CISSP Rapid Review

Errata for CISSP Rapid Review




The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".

The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.

Color Key: Serious Technical Mistake Minor Technical Mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update



Version Location Description Submitted By Date Submitted Date Corrected
PDF, ePub, Safari Books Online
Page 2.2
Objective 2.2

Answer to Objective 2.2: Securing network components Distance-vector routing protocols (such as OSPF) provide a more accurate view of a network than a link-state (such as RIPv2) routing protocol does. Link-state protocols only look at the number of hops. Distance-vector protocols evaluate many more variables. OSPF is a link-state routing protocol and RIPv2 is a Distance-vector. Should read: Link-State routing protocols (such as OSPF) provide a more accurate view of a network than a Distance-vector (such as RIPv2) routing protocol does. Distance-vector protocols only look at the number of hops. Link-State protocols evaluate many more variables.

Note from the Author or Editor:
On pg 44, please change. Distance-vector routing protocols (such as OSPF) provide a more accurate view of a network than a link-state (such as RIPv2) routing protocol does. Link-state protocols only look at the number of hops. Distance-vector protocols evaluate many more variables. to Link-State routing protocols (such as OSPF) provide a more accurate view of a network than a Distance-vector (such as RIPv2) routing protocol does. Distance-vector protocols only look at the number of hops. Link-State protocols evaluate many more variables.

David Maynard  May 08, 2013