Errata
The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".
The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.
Color key: Serious technical mistake Minor technical mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update
Version | Location | Description | Submitted By | Date submitted | Date corrected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Printed | Page 7 The fourth line of the first paragraph did read |
". . .created a commission in 1970. . ." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 7 The fourth line of the first paragraph did read |
". . .created a commission in 1973. . ." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 26 3rd paragraph |
Holtsville now says [New York]after it, not [New Jersey]. |
Anonymous | Apr 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 32 The second paragraph, line 6 did read |
". . .want to have records that could be |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 71 The sixth line of the first paragraph did read |
"All that's is needed. . ." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 190 In the third line of the last paragraph on page 190, did read |
"The researchers scanned 858 anonymous blood samples from |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 194 In the third paragraph from the bottom, starting with the third line |
did read: |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 211 The fifth line of the first paragraph on page 211, did read |
"...they are more properly though of as military actions." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 295 |
John Gilmore's group is listed as the "Electronic Freedom Foundation". |
Anonymous | Apr 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 300 |
The following entry was added to the index |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 312 |
The following entry was added to the index |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 |