O'Reilly and Associates

An Open Letter to Jeff Bezos

Your responses...

Tim's Open Letter appeared on February 28, 2000
The following 10,000 responses were recorded over a period of five days, from 17:00 PST 28.Feb.00 thru 16:24 PST 03.Mar.00

February 28, 2000

Sigh. Here we go again. Good thing the Web gives consumers the upper hand, hmm?

Lane Becker


February 28, 2000

Patents like this beget patents much worse. Stunt the free nature of the net, and all net-based businesses will fail. Please, stop this.

Ethan Deneault


February 28, 2000

Henri Asseily


February 28, 2000

<p>As a published author and subsequently having an indirect business relationship with Amazon, I'm not happy with this situation. There's a pattern being established which places the future in jeopardy. My book is doing well on Amazon but, instead of being pleased, I feel like I'm sleeping with the devil.

Alex Charalabidis


February 28, 2000

Matt Hallmark


February 28, 2000

Tom Cook


February 28, 2000

I have ordered books from Amazon when they were a young company, I was wholly satisfied with the service. Finding and ordering is easy, and the shipping is prompt. However, I find Amazon's actions with this patent wholly disgusting. I can order O'Reilly books (and other reading material) from a local book store within walking distance from my house. Bezos, I hope you are happy about alienating the entire of the technologically inclined. We don't just read O'Reilly books (sorry Tim, but you don't seem to carry much Science Fiction).

Jeff Frasca


February 28, 2000

Alex Whitney


February 28, 2000

Kit Lo


February 28, 2000

Dennis Pipper


February 28, 2000

I double dare you to sue whoever actually uses your technology. Second I ask some of you protesters to continue developing in your technologies as iof none of this bull had ever happened. You can't stop a moving train Mr. Bezos especially when you're riding on it in the caboose. The Internet is the epitome of "I'm going to build XYZ regardless of what fool thinks they run it." Ayn Rand had a passage about some 20 illustrious engineers who invented the candle in her book Anthem. Are you inventing the candle Mr. Bezos? I do think you are. Please cease and desist. (Yes, I am a fan of Rand not so of her followers, but anyway yes, she did in fact warn us about this fscking shit earlier.)

Rares Marian


February 28, 2000

Until recently, nearly all of my DVD collection (mostly Anime) as well as the vast majority of computer related books I have purchased online were purchased from Amazon.com. >From this point on I will be purchasing computer books from Fatbrain and videos from Reel and Buy.com. Unfortunately, I have not found many of your competitors to offer the features I particularly enjoyed about Amazon.com (like the commentary sections and the consistently excellent handling of orders) I have missed the excellent service I have consistently received from your company. However, though your competitors do not have better service than you, they ARE sufficient. This combined with the fact that they are not abusing the broken patent system to destroy the culture of openness that made their (and your) very success possible, tips the balance in their favor for at least as long as Amazon persists in defending this patent. In the past I have even given business to your company even when competitors had beaten your price slightly, because I knew that I would receive excellent service and it was not worth the trouble to try them out. You have an excellent customer focused company, perhaps the best. Your abuse of the patent system is the ONLY reason I am not doing business with you. I know that we (the principled computer-enthusiast demographic) will not be able to harm you significantly by our boycott. Since the ranks of Amazon's customers are being constantly swollen by apathetic newcomers, our exodus will not be too sharply felt. We can at least see to it that they stay in business, so that you will not attain in market share the hegemonic monopoly you are presently trying to attain by hijacking obvious ideas and by chilling the culture of innovation that has made the Web and E-commerce viable. Sincerely, Jeff Keays (Santa Clara, CA)

Jeffrey Keays


February 28, 2000

I've been a regular Amazon customer for quite a while now. Until Amazon makes a few changes and gives up the patent to 1-click and their new patent on associate programs I will shop with bn.com instead. Amazon really isn't any better than Barnes and Noble, but I shopped with you guys for so long it became a habit. Time for a new habit.

Geoff Taylor


February 28, 2000

Having been using 'the web' since its infancy I find what Amazon has done a personal afront to the community, and yet another reason why there should be serious patent reform.

Menachem Pastreich


February 28, 2000

Tim is quite right. Bogus patents like these hurt everyone in the long run.

Matt Jensen


February 28, 2000

These are trivial patents and not novel

Jim Tivy


February 28, 2000

While I think the bulk of the blame of these ridiculous patents belongs with the US Patent office, Amazon should be using their rights to the patents to prevent someone else from using them, rather than using them themselves. They should follow the model that Linus Torvalds has with handling the Linux trademark. I personally haven't bought anything from Amazon since their attempt to enforce the 1-Click patent. I plan to avoid them best I can, purchasing items elsewhere whenever possible, until they change their methods.

Douglas L Stewart


February 28, 2000

Nile Geisinger


February 28, 2000

If Amazon believes it can pull off stunts like this, then I believe they no longer deserve our business.

Chris Grantham


February 28, 2000

I have to agree - Amazon has, through this action, taken the first steps towards being a less customer friendly company. I will certainly take my business elsewhere until this is resolved. I cannot imagine that this patent is worth the damage this controversy is causing to the Amazon brand.

Sam Schillace


February 28, 2000

I am an Amazon.com customer and I agree with Tim O'Reilly and Richard Stallman about the 1-click patent. No need to repeat or add to their arguments so that's all I will say here.

Dan Tenenbaum


February 28, 2000

Joe Tan


February 28, 2000

Very well said!

David G. Green


February 28, 2000

Matthew Gioia


February 28, 2000

Shame on you.

Ed Sherry


February 28, 2000

Ken Cotton, Tokyo Japan


February 28, 2000

Robert Karabelnikoff


February 28, 2000

The voices of my peers have spoken well for me. Thank you Tim!

Benjamin Connelly


February 28, 2000

Philip Levis


February 28, 2000

Garrett Rooney


February 28, 2000

I have long been a buyer from Amazon but now I feel they have gone too far. To me this is an obvious abuse of power that is a consequence of being successful, I would even go so far as to compare Amazon to Microsoft! I will not be buying any more merchandise from Amazon, alternatives exist for everything they do (especially here in Europe where the choice of services is less than in America). /Trevor

Trevor Lyall


February 28, 2000

Jay St. Pierre, Boulder, Colorado


February 28, 2000

Every signature on this page is a customer lost, Mr. Bezos.

Matthew Lefkowitz


February 28, 2000

Alan Schussman


February 28, 2000

the big K gonna gecha!

Michael Collins


February 28, 2000

Tomasz Kaczynski


February 28, 2000

Stephan I. B÷ttcher


February 28, 2000

Stop Amazon.com before they patent online ordering!!! :-)

Azher Ahmed


February 28, 2000

If Amazon.com wants to continue trying to patent such broad and stupid things as 1-click shopping and the Affiliate Program, then they can kiss any future business from me or my family goodbye. This patent was never fully reviewed as a number of other sites have used things like this (such as LinuxMall.com to which I am an affiliate). Write your Senators and Representatives and let them know how you feel about the ease with which these patents have been getting through the patent office and demand that changes be made to the system.

Kevin Brown


February 28, 2000

Enough already! And I thought patents were supposed to be for "non-obvious" things...

Margaret Balfour


February 28, 2000

This really sucks. I'm disappointed in Amazon for taking advantage of an obviously busted patent system to the detriment of themselves and everyone else. :(

Frank Font


February 28, 2000

I've been a big customer of Amazon in the past. No more. I'm stopping any sort of purchase from Amazon until you stop enforcing the patent you stole from the original web innovators.

Subrata Das


February 28, 2000

Don't become just another company sadly scrambling to exploit the digital age. You have prospered on the innovation of others. Don't be so selfish, we all lose.

Chris Elder


February 28, 2000

I've started buying all my books from Barnes & Noble since this started and will continue to do so. I've likely spent 躔-񘈨 on books with you in the past.

Matthew Steven


February 28, 2000

Aside from these patents being absurd (patently absurd?), they are harmful to the internet. I agree with everything Tim O'Reilly has said on the subject. Drop the patents, Amazon!

Thomas Winzig


February 28, 2000

it's a shame that a patent like this can be granted and it's even greater shame when somebody enforces it.

Erik Steffl


February 28, 2000

Best of luck to O'Reilly & Associates. I am very pleased that you have taken the time to bring this to the attention of so many. I will no longer being using Amazon to purchase my regular book orders.

Michael Weber


February 28, 2000

David Cheal


February 28, 2000

Scott Kazimour


February 28, 2000

what amazon is doing is rediculous. they may be as bad as microsoft in terms of what they are doing to the software industry. between patent abuses like this and legislation like the uctia anyone who values thier personal freedom and right to know whats on thier computer has some work to do. http://www.gnu.org

pixel fairy


February 28, 2000

After careful review, I have advised the company I work for to avoid proposed dealings with Amazon.com. I also advise a smallish school system, and have pointed out to them the fact that your patenting of obvious and pre-existing ideas goes against both the original idea of patents and against common sense. Amazon.com is no longer linked on any of their sites. I will not reconsider my reccomendations in the future. With your patenting of the "associates" program (incredibly similiar to Multi-Level-Marketing), you have shown utter disregard for both patent protection and the wishes of a large portion of your customers. Thank you for your time.

Paul Tice


February 28, 2000

When amazon grows beyond the emotional age of a petulant three year old unwilling to share, I will once again give them my business. Until then, I will denigrate them to all my family and friends.

Mike Sali


February 28, 2000

no one has said it better :) right on, Tim.

brent verner


February 28, 2000

Mitch Moritz


February 28, 2000

The 1-click patent is a sham, an embarrassment to our (software) Patent system.

Donn Baumgartner


February 28, 2000

Stop the madness. Why do this to your very successful business, Amazon? Why anger the very people that brought you this success? We can't stand still as this happens.

Sergio Villarreal


February 28, 2000

I have done a considerable amount of shopping at Amazon.com. This patent causes me to reconsider where I take my future business.

Matt Tornowske


February 28, 2000

Christopher Campbell


February 28, 2000

Arun Katkere


February 28, 2000

While I appreciate your position in wanting to retain rights to your intellectual property, I do not believe that "One Click" qualifies as either "intellectual" or "property." I have spent many hundreds of dollars at amazon.com in the past, but I will find it difficult in the future to reconcile to my conscience the act of subsidizing an organization that pursues such dubious claims. Other vendors offer, in my mind, equivalent services without the moral baggage, and they shall be rewarded with my patronage in the future. Please reconsider your decision in this matter.

Dr. Brian J. Albright


February 28, 2000

I was, at one point, a strong proponent of your site, primarily in its infancy, when I thought that it was a good thing, both for book lovers and for the 'Net at large. Unfortunately, I'm no longer of that opinion. Your virtual store has adopted business practices that I could never condone, primarily through your patent applications, which make a mockery of the process as well as stifling competators who are obviously not deriving their innovations from your work. I can assure you that my purchases from now on will be from corner booksellers and from fatbrain.com. You have certainly lost my business.

Kyle Niedzwiecki


February 28, 2000

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. I shouldn't have to say this, but clearly Amazon cares a lot more about inappropriate and indefensible patents than they do about customer respect.

Cari D. Burstein


February 28, 2000

We agree here, too. No more purchases from Amazon. Go to <http://noamazon.com>.

dk smith


February 28, 2000

Daniel Knighten


February 28, 2000

James V Nutley


February 28, 2000

Mike Farahbakhshian


February 28, 2000

Ray Beausoleil


February 28, 2000

Omari Carter-Thorpe


February 28, 2000

In the past, I bought a lot of books at Amazon. Maybe I will do it again.

Christian Ullrich


February 28, 2000

For years Amazon was known as "Spamazon" in the net.abuse newsgroups. When they realised that spamming didn't pay, they turned to aggressively "defending" ludicrous and ill-conceived patents. They have shown that they care about _nothing_ but their bottom line (which in these strange days, means market share and stock price rather than net profit), and will screw every customer they've ever had to achieve it. Nothing less than an abrupt, total, complete about-face in their entire corporate philosophy will get me to even consider doing business with them. I hope others--MANY others--will take the same course of action.

Colin Bigam


February 28, 2000

Jeff (Mr. Bezos), I stopped shopping at Amazon some time ago. Computer Literacy (now FatBrain) gets my and my co-workers book orders at work. I went so far as to get a corporate account at FatBrain, just so that everyone else in the office wouldn't use Amazon for purchasing (reimbursed) books. Counting up texts, I bought 12 O'Reilly texts in 1999, 4 Oracle books and 3 more security texts. Ok, so I still haven't cracked that Camel book. The 10 other programmers in the office buy alot of books every year. We *get* it - you don't. In a market where there is little differentiation between sites, all that it takes is one (seemingly) little thing to cause me to set my bookmark at a different site. Did I mention that I also buy CD's online too? Coders tend to listen to CD's a good bit of the day ... but that's another protest email. Paul Drake

Paul Drake


February 28, 2000

Emre Kiciman


February 28, 2000

These patents wouldn't help you make any money or even any significant advantage over your competitors. You guys're getting a bad rep around my peers... BTW Thanks Tim, Oreilly continues to be my favourite publisher.

Pedro Sam


February 28, 2000

Though I generally despise the idea of open letters in general (due to the lack of individuality of the response mostly), this is quite simply one injustice that can not stand. It is clear that this is not only a frivilous patent, but an immoral one as well. I cannot possibly believe that Amazon was the first to generate the "invention" of utilizing cookies for credit card storage purposes, and it suprises me that no one has publically announced prior art on this issue. Regarding the pattenting of "affiliate" programs, that is simply bogus. That is patenting a business practice, a money-making strategy. That is no invention, no new technique of innovation. And of course there have been affiliate programs before Amazon's (I actually think theirs is quite new). Amazon's inability to realize this fact (or at least in the case of their CEO) has led me to join the Amazon boycott and sign this letter. For now on, the only purchases made by myself at Amazon.com will be made using 100% gift certificate purchases (thus actually causing amazon to lose money). I'm sure borders.com or bigwords.com or barnesandnoble.com will be happy to receive my paying business, and I won't notice the difference anyway seeing how they brutally copied Amazon's patented internet techniques.

Zach Hensel


February 28, 2000

While I appreciate your position in wanting to retain rights to your intellectual property, I do not believe that "One Click" qualifies as either "intellectual" or "property." I have spent many hundreds of dollars at amazon.com in the past, but I will find it difficult in the future to reconcile to my conscience the act of subsidizing an organization that pursues such dubious claims. Other vendors offer, in my mind, equivalent services without the moral baggage, and they shall be rewarded with my patronage in the future. Please reconsider your decision in this matter.

Dr. Brian J. Albright


February 28, 2000

I used to think Amazon.com was cool. I used to be proud of them for being a successful Internet-based business. Now I do not. I will not buy books from Amazon.com again. I get all I need from Fatbrain. Incidentally, that's close to 20 books in the past two months, with many more to come...

Tim Howe


February 28, 2000

I have been a customer of Amazon in the past. No more. Unless Amazon drops their 1-Click lawsuit, I will not purchase from them. Note: dropping does not include simply losing the court fight (which is pretty much inevitable). A few weeks ago, I was in the market for almost 躔 (plus shipping) of textbooks (and I will be again next semester, and the semester after that . . .). I purchased none of them from Amazon. In addition to the 1-Click issue, I find Amazon's whole additude of "patent whatever we think we can get away with" very distasteful. That distaste is will certainly to influence my buying patterns, even if the 1-Click lawsuit is dropped.

Noah Romer


February 28, 2000

This kind of abuse of the patent system is what will make it crumble. I will boycott Amazon.com and all of its partners as long as you keep it.

Olivier Crete


February 28, 2000

Amazon.com just lost a customer. Sigh.

Brent Metz


February 28, 2000

Nicholas Bayle


February 28, 2000

I agree whole heartedly with Tim - these absurd patents constitute a theft from the global community. Is Amazon prepared to pay damages to those who have been hurt by this abuse of the courts?

Adam West


February 28, 2000

This action cannot be seen by anyone who is reasonably well educated about the issue as anything other than an ill-advised attempt to use the legal system of the United States of America to stifle electronic commerce of all types by attempting to impose an industry-wide tax on all electronic commerce, the collected funds from which are directed to the coffers of Amazon.com. Being profitable should be based on a business' ability to compete in its market, and the validity of its business plan, not on its ability to essentially unethically stifle competition.

Patrick Anderson


February 28, 2000

Stefanos Kiakas


February 28, 2000

You have lost my business. I tell everyone I know about you. So you have lost a lot more than just my business. You have lost business from my friends, my mother, my father, etc. And you will continue to lose more everyday. I now buy my books from FatBrain and B&N.

Adam Yellen


February 28, 2000

I used to be an Amazon customer. But I feel that as a consumer and a member of the IT community the only way I can vote is with my pocket book. So I hereby pledge, and intive other signatories to do the same: I hereby pledge that not one cent of my money or money that I have control over via my professional budgets and spending allowences will go to Amazon until such time as they publicly retract their holds on both the 1-click and the affiliate patents.

Dale Babiy


February 28, 2000

I am an Amazon associate. Or at least, I was until I read about this instance of what I feel strongly is patent abuse and "evil overlord" style tactics with your competitors. As an information technology professional who has been using the internet since 1993, I find the business practices Amazon is attempting to be unfair and petty, to say the least. I'll be switching my associate status to Barnes & Noble.

B. Hall


February 28, 2000

Jeff - >From what I have read about this issue, I get a bad taste in my mouth when I think of Amazon, especially after this second patent. I used to base my shopping decisions entirely on price. Now I make a point of avoiding Amazon to go to Fatbrain, Ecampus, or Barnes and Noble. If you stop with the patent bullying, you have a return customer right here.

Charlie O'Keefe


February 28, 2000

One would really have to have a big financial incentive to believe that 1-click is a patentable idea.

Eric Lehman


February 28, 2000

Xarath


February 28, 2000

A patent on customer service would be no more absurd.

Nancy Collins


February 28, 2000

Steve Burnett


February 28, 2000

Derek J. Balling


February 28, 2000

Greg Jewell


February 28, 2000

David Harkness


February 28, 2000

As someone who makes his living writing computer books, I have a vested interest in Amazon's success. That's why I'm asking you to reconsider your approach of using patent law, instead of competitive energy, to boost your market trajectory. Apart from the fact that 1-Click(sm) is an obvious descendent of cookies, and that there is prior art that should have kept the PTO from issuing the patent in the first place, the larger issue is that you are fouling your own nest. By taking the stance that *you* invented this technology and that it's *yours*, you are running the same risk that my 5-year-old occasionally encounters while playing with friends: others, including the huge cadre of associates and customers that have made you successful, may decide not to play with you any more. Compete, don't litigate.

Paul Robichaux


February 28, 2000

Tim says it best when he says "trivial application of cookies." There's so much that Amazon does very very well, I can't understand what benefit Amazon thinks will be gained by attempting to artificially limit competition. In the meantime, Fatbrain.com is a fine source for my numerous O'Reilly purchases.

Andy Lester


February 28, 2000

I will no longer be buying from amazon.com

Patricia J. Hawkins


February 28, 2000

This is like the Y2K windowing patent: silly. >From now on it's www.noamazon.com.

Josh Knight


February 28, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos: I think that your efforts to maintain and enforce the One-Click patent are a mistake which make me question whether I want to continue working with Amazon.com. I agree with Tim O'Reilly's views on this subject and I believe Amazon has not articulated any sensible position in response. I hope you will reconsider. Sincerely, Michael Karlin Beverly Hills, CA

Michael Karlin


February 28, 2000

The two Amazon patents are about as close as you can come to patenting the air. Until Amazon drops the patents and apologizes for abusing the patent system, I will make sure that our company no longer makes purchases from Amazon. How can the Patent office be so incompetent in the software area, makes you wonder what is going on over there. I wonder if you can get a patent for hyperlinks since no one has patented it already.

Marshall Carroll (President Iocomp Software)


February 28, 2000

I sent you, Amazon, a message earlier this week. You responded back with a form letter not even addressing my concerns -- you addressed the one-click issue, which alone was not enough to convince me to join the boycott. With the inclusion of the affiliates patent, it's clear that this was not a one-shot deal. I can no longer support your company. And I was a pretty damn big customer. Too bad.

Kenneth G. Cavness


February 28, 2000

Eric Schoenfeld

ericms{at}NOSPAMpanix[dot]com


February 28, 2000

Both of Amazon's patents are *trivial* applications of cookies and URLs. Unbelievable!

Si Ly


February 28, 2000

I have always admired O'Reilly and Associates for their role in the Open Source community. After reading Tim's letter I am more convinced than ever that the people at O'Reilly deserve the respect I have for them- as a business well aware of the needs and issues in its community.

Matthew Helsley


February 28, 2000

I completely agree with Tim. Here's another angle, consider using Amazon for ONLY research. Use their database for finding what you want. Then go buy it elsewhere. Me personally, I've been doing this for over a year. I find it online and then go out and buy it from a local merchant. I'd much rather have a vibrant local economny than save Ū for a book. Call me a sentimentalist but I like seeing my neighbors having JOBS.

Bill Kearney


February 28, 2000

Please declare the 1-click patent not to be enforced. This is a technique which is obvious to anyone skilled in the art and should never have been awarded a patent.

Carl Ellison


February 28, 2000

Tim Lundeen


February 28, 2000

Tim, I agree. I felt this was so important that I forwarded Dave's comments this morning to all the members of the Common Licensing Work Group (CLWG). Thank you for taking a stand. Michelle

Dr. Michelle Kraus


February 28, 2000

Kudos to Mr. O'Reilly for taking a public stand on this issue. Has the U.S. Patent Office truly gone off its rockers?

Christopher Gill


February 28, 2000

Aaron Montes


February 28, 2000

Add my vote for short sighted and antiInventional. Competition will evolve a way around and over any barrier this weak patent presents. What was the motivation fot the patent application? Surely not to teach! I use Bookpool.com as well as Amazon. Perhaps other purchasers will too?

Jim Christophersen


February 28, 2000

Brent Simmons


February 28, 2000

I am all for Amazon and others refraining from doing the "wrong thing." However, even if Jeff Bezos decides _today_ not to be agressive, whoever follows him will de duty-bound to grab these trivial patents. It is important to realize that the fault largely lies with the patent office in this case. WRITE TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE, alongside the letters to patent holders.

Bulent Murtezaoglu


February 28, 2000

Amazons application and enforcing of these silly patents is rediculous. I can't belive someone who bases their whole business on open standards and free software, of which they wouldn't even EXIST without, is now seeing fit to go proprietary. This about face lends me to take my business elseware, its such an insult to me, and everyone else who uses the internet.

Warren Chartier


February 28, 2000

The "1-Click" and affiliate patents are examples of taking advantage of a patent office that can't seem to keep up with the times. I happily take my business to FatBrain, and will continue to stay away from Amazon until this stupid patent nonsense is finished.

Drew Taylor


February 28, 2000

Owen Leonard


February 28, 2000

Joel Hnatow


February 28, 2000

At this point, my only worry is that I still have a credit card number somewhere in the Amazon database waiting to be hacked. Because I see Amazon's attitude as a threat to the future of the web, I now fufill all of my shopping needs elsewhere.

Ken Boucher


February 28, 2000

Price Ramirez


February 28, 2000

Scott M Parrish


February 28, 2000

I care about integrity.

Jeff Breidenbach


February 28, 2000

I have been a happy and satisfied customer of Amazon for a long while. I think it provides good service -- and I use it frequently. I know several others who feel the same way. I am then surprised that Amazon feels the need to use frivolous patents like one-click ordering and the affiliates program to be able to compete. I strongly urge Amazon to not take this path. It is important not to choke off the flexibility of the web in this short-sighted manner.

Anurag Acharya


February 28, 2000

If only I were as eloquent as Tim. Amazon, I simply must stop doing business with you - both for personal as well as business related books - until this is over. I'll take my money to your competition.

Tackett Austin


February 28, 2000

Software patents are a bad idea. Independent reinvention is so much more likely than for other things that get copyright and patent protection that patents wind up depriving a lot more people of their true rights than they protect. In addition, the other existing forms of software protection -- copyright, trade secret, and license agreements -- also go too far today, because: 1) Nearly all software is obsolete in 10 years or less. Having copyrights expire that quickly (or at least creating an automatic licensing mechanism like the one that now exists for music) would enable software professionals to improve and debug each other's work, raising the average quality of software in the marketplace and increasing the rate of innovation. 2) Trade-secret law and licensing have been abused to let software makers install code on your computer without your knowledge that reports to them about what other software you have, what web sites you visit, and the like. In my view, you as a sysadmin have the need and the right to know everything that any program on your system may do, no matter where that program came from. 3) Licensing agreements have further been abused to prohibit you from running benchmark comparisons of the licensed code, publishing their results, or telling anyone about bugs in the code. Such restrictions destroy the functioning of the market and give you no recourse if the program does not even come close to doing what it promises to do. I strongly favor abolishing software patents, limiting other IP protections to 10 years or less, limiting the restrictions a license can impose, and not enacting UCITA.

John David Galt


February 28, 2000

Yet Another Formal Loyal Amazon Customer. Tim O for prez! :)

Blue Lang


February 28, 2000

I am sorry to see that Amazon.com has shown that they are committed to continuing to abuse the US Patent system with trivial patents. I no longer purchase any books from Amazon. Furthermore, I have influenced my current and former companies to also cease purchasing from Amazon. This includes approximately 1,000 technical employees in the high tech field of software programming and operating system design. Consider retracting the use of these patents in an offensive manner. Your current policies are damaging to your reputation.

Joshua Rodman


February 28, 2000

Troy Engel


February 28, 2000

Amazing, the things a company will resort to in fear of the competition. I always thought you were a fearless innovator. You could win without these tactics. Bye Amazon, Hello Powells.

Steve Flippin


February 28, 2000

Tom Negrino


February 28, 2000

Fredrik Vraalsen


February 28, 2000

I have been a strong proponent of Amazon, both in my online book shopping and as an Amazon.com Associate. I have spoken in public and on several mailing lists about how much better your affiliate program is than any other I've worked with. According to your associates site, I have brought you over 񘘐 in business since you started keeping track. This does not include the books I've bought from Amazon.com over the years. I have a support Web site for my book on which I used Amazon.com as the default bookstore for all clickthroughs. Let me explain. I use a redirector service that allows people to choose a bookseller, from the several affiliates programs to which I belong. When they have chosen a bookseller, they can click on any link related to my book or on any of the lengthy list of books in my bibliography, and they will be redirected to the page on their favorite bookseller's site where they can purchase the book. Thus, my redirector gives the customer the ultimate choice, as well as saving them time. In essence, it's the same sort of trivial application of cookie technology and backend logic that characterizes your "1-Click" ordering, only by holding the backend logic, I can make a small change to my script and cut off all or most of the traffic that would have come to you. I believe that your practices of late are destructive and short-sighted, and I have accordingly redirected all of the default traffic from my site to fatbrain.com, whose prices tend to be slightly cheaper, whose Web site provides a better and more detailed rundown of my book, and who have the second best affiliates program I've worked with. I hope you will realize that by refusing to enforce the patents you have been granted, you will restore the faith that I and millions of other customers have had in your service over the years, and, conversely, that continuing to use the patents as a weapon, you will not only be shooting yourself in the foot, but alienating your core customer base.

Steven Champeon


February 28, 2000

David William Hess


February 28, 2000

Tim, Thanks for taking a public stand--and a strong one at that. This is starting to feel like the makings of a business school case study classic in how to throw away a leadership position: "Blinded by good fortune, e-commerce pioneer loses moral compass and incurs the wrath of his earliest supporters." Brian

Brian Mulvaney


February 28, 2000

Get a grip Jeff. I love Amazon, but this has made my view of you and your company go right down the tubes. To be straightforward..."Get a Life!"

Joshua Link


February 28, 2000

I am voting in the way that Amazon will feel the most: my wallet. I used to buy from Amazon all the time. But now I don't. I hope that we can make a difference. </A></I></I>

Andy Berkvam


February 28, 2000

Stefan Langerman


February 28, 2000

Andy Helfrich


February 28, 2000

One of the driving forces of the "web community" has been that of self-sustainability. We have not had to wait for the market grow to meet our needs; we created the market. Try to take that away and we will rebel.

Kenneth J. Strait


February 28, 2000

I don't know what's worse, the fact that Amazon filed patents on the blatantly obvious, or that they were actually awarded the patents. Words cannot adequately describe the depth of stupidity that this fiasco plumbs.

Matt Kennedy


February 28, 2000

brian singer


February 28, 2000

I just felt that I had to send in this protest. Amazon is apperantly trying to kill the web and everything it stands for and it seems so absurd me. Why bite the hands that feeds you??

Magnus Larsson


February 28, 2000

I can't say anything that hasn't been said before. Keep the ideas free.

Josh Logan


February 28, 2000

Amazon's competitors are all just Two-Clicks(tm) away from exclusively getting my money.

Chad Netzer


February 28, 2000

Software patenting embarrasses humanity and showcases American capitalism for all its evils.

Kirk Woll


February 28, 2000

I try my very best to avoid rewarding companies that are greedy, and you have now become one of them.

Dean Klear


February 28, 2000

Dear Jeff, I look forward to remaining an *EX* loyal customer of amazon.com until this issue is resolved to my satisfaction.

Peter Brenton


February 28, 2000

I have bought several books from Amazon in the past, but I will not buy anything else from you until you publicly disavow this atrocious patent.

Mike Coleman


February 28, 2000

Jeff R. Allen


February 28, 2000

Dear Amazon, I know your brokers will have been on your back about the importance to your stock price of creating a monopoly - but those guys know nothing about keeping customers. You have lost this one. john weiley

jweiley


February 28, 2000

As a regular customer of Amazon I strongly disagree about Amazon's tactics and recent patent filings.

Mark Janssen


February 28, 2000

You gain patents at the expense of the good will of your customers! Is your business producing and selling propritary software, or selling of books and other goods? Would you rather have a patent which may prove to be worthless or purchases and recomendations of regular customers? The choice is yours!

Mark J Roley


February 28, 2000

I certainly will not shop at Amazon.com until they drop the patent-related lawsuit AND issue a public apology to the community. Furthermore, the whole frivolous software patent issue is so frustrating to me personally that I make it a point to inform people of the issue, and my stance, whenever they mention Amazon.com. I would estimate that my urging has cost Amazon at least 15 customers at this point.

George McBay


February 28, 2000

I am the president of a small company. We're building a website with big plans. Those plans were thought up totally independantly of ever using your site (I never have and now never plan to), however those plans will incorporate things that fall under your "patent". When it's up, I'll tell you, then you can sue me. It would be worth it just to turn it into a PR nightmare. Nate Bender President, Curiosity Trading

Nate Bender


February 28, 2000

I used to be an Amazon customer. But I feel that as a consumer and a member of the IT community the only way I can vote is with my pocket book. So I hereby pledge, and intive other signatories to do the same: I hereby pledge that not one cent of my money or money that I have control over via my professional budgets and spending allowences will go to Amazon until such time as they publicly retract their holds on both the 1-click and the affiliate patents.

Dale Babiy


February 28, 2000

Interesting thought: To those of you who control your sites' firewall: block amazon.com at the firewall. Yes, its completely over the top, and infringes upon others abilities to use their computer as they see fit. But it would make a much larger impression (or lack of one) in a bigger hurry. user: "Hey, how come I can't hit Amazon?" sysadmin: "It must be those German hackers again. See if they're shutting down FatBrain." Paul

Paul Drake


February 28, 2000

I object to these patents being used to stifle competition, and in the long run hurt the customer. I don't understand this since Amazon is such a service centered business. This is even more unbelievable considering visiting a competitor's place of business is trivial on-line. Why potentially hurt your business by harming the customers that you are fighting so hard to keep? In the mean time, I have ceased using Amazon and am using more customer friendly alternatives.

Ian Cahoon


February 28, 2000

Because I love the Internet more than any single entity on it, I am boycotting y'all. I took down all links to you from my web site, (actually, I did this yesterday; before I heard of this boycott; wasn't that prescient of me? :-) and won't purchase from you again until you put all this stuff in the trash where it belongs. Remember, the Internet community made you who you are today. Haven't you aquired enough without legal recourse? Be grateful, Amazon, not greedy. Sincerely, Michael Goglia PS: My records show that I purchased 跕.52 worth of stuff from you between 5/98 and 2/00.

Michael Goglia


February 28, 2000

Abigail Rolling


February 28, 2000

Geoff Romer


February 28, 2000

Amazon.com was the only online site that I bought my college books from. Now I may have to go to a different site. I can nothow these patents passed. That's like Ford trying to patent the wheel, even though it's been used for centuries, and it was a collective idea. They didn't create it, they just gave it a fancy name and called it their own. This is just wrong. Products like these should not be patened, they are just cookies..and that is a collective product also.

Travis Folck


February 28, 2000

I believe this is a very blatant abuse of the patent system, both the one-click ordering and the affiliates program. Especially the affiliates program. Jeff, I have a very difficult time believing that 1-click and affiliates are somehow innovative and deserving of a patent.

Ben Kosse


February 28, 2000

David Meeker


February 28, 2000

The system is in a sad state of affairs. It has become so out of touch with the reality of technology that our elected officials enact laws that strip us of our freedoms everyday, without realizing it. I believe the "Big Brother" that Orwell predicted should have been the "Big Stupid Bumbling Brother." I need not look far to prove my point. Any of the following will suffice: the DMCA, Amazon's patents, Sony Bono Boneheads extension to copyright law, crypto as munitions. The laws have been passed, the freedoms have been stripped, but luckily we haven't had an elected official that's seemed to realize their power yet......

Richard Long


February 28, 2000

Amazon has provided a great survice to many customers throughout the world. This software patent is totally outrageous. It attempts to make a common-sense practice that I for one know has a been a general practice for a while on many sites. It's a basic practice, not some super-special idea of yours. Cookies were intended to store data about a user. Website operators can choose to use data from a cookie in any way that suits the needs of their site. Therefore, I ask you to do the smart and just thing and remove the patent.

Christian T. Hilchey


February 28, 2000

Josh Joyce


February 28, 2000

I agree with all of the points in Tim O'Reilly's letter, save one. He has not endorsed the boycott against you (Amazon) because he believes you provide a valuable service to the community. I believe that while you provide a good service, you are not the only fish in the sea. Because of your enforcement of the 1-Click patent, I have spent 趚 in business on your competitors which I would have otherwise assuredly spent at Amazon. I had been a loyal customer before this, buying a significant supply of books from you over the web. But no more. I will spend no more of my money on you, and recommend to friends and family (and strangers) that they do the same. I find it ironic that this was triggered by 1-Click, as I find it to be a dangerous service---I disabled it on my Amazon account when it first became available. Yet your attempt to monopolize the idea has driven me away from you because I find the attempts to enforce such obvious patents unconscionable (and it is obvious---any competent web engineer asked to implement 1-Click would come up with a system identical to yours). I hope that you will reconsider using 1-Click and other such patents in any other than a defensive manner. I cannot say when I might return to Amazon, but I can guarantee that it won't be before you change your behavior.

Mark Jefferys


February 28, 2000

Nick Kolowski


February 28, 2000

You did a great job with Amazon. I often browse your german site (www.amazon.de) but I will not order any book until you drop this patent. Your competitors are just one mouse click away...

Thomas Geil


February 28, 2000

I was very impressed with Amazon at first and used it to find and buy hard to find books. Since the 1-click patent I have stopped using Amazon and switched to Barnes and Nobles. If the patents are given up freely by Amazon then I will consider returning as a customer but as it looks I will soon prefer another company anyway and you will forever loose a customer.

Chris Aurand


February 28, 2000

I've used and admired Amazon. Your patent policies are forcing me to go to other sites. Innovate -- don't litigate.

Grant Skousen


February 28, 2000

If Amazon believes it can pull off stunts like this, then I believe they no longer deserve our business.

Chris Grantham


February 28, 2000

Dear Jeff Bezos As the microsoft trial proofs unethical manuverings and hard tactic does not win friends and can and will be found legally culpable. So if you don't want to wind up indicted and tried like MS. You'll drop your patent. Patenting 1-click and Affliate programs will only have the affect of ultimately killing innovation and vast increasing expenditure on proprietary research. So listen to common sense and drop the patent

Jianying Ji


February 28, 2000

Timothy McClanahan


February 28, 2000

Keep your lawyers away from my software, Bezos!

Doug Salot


February 28, 2000

I urge Amazon.Com to drop these patent issues and get back to selling books. I have bought many books from Amazon.Com in the past, but until the patent stance changes with Amazon, I will be buying my books elsewhere.

Mike Hill


February 28, 2000

Ethan Bakshy


February 28, 2000

Mathias Wegner


February 28, 2000

Claire Lundberg


February 28, 2000

Yorick Dix


February 28, 2000

You're all alone, Jeff.

Peter Folk


February 28, 2000

Eric Skaug


February 28, 2000

<xmp>Minneapolis MN, USA</xmp>

Steve Paltzer


February 28, 2000

Gregg Belli


February 28, 2000

Andrew van Biljon


February 28, 2000

Jan Karjalainen


February 28, 2000

Henrik Mattsson


February 28, 2000

I have been a customer of Amazon.com since almost the very beginning, and have spent hundreds of dollars on purchases at the Amazon.com website. I feel that Amazon.com offers an amazing variety of services, at reasonable prices. That said, I am also gravely unhappy with Amazon.com because of the way that Amazon.com has chosen to patent ideas that were obvious to me (as a software professional) years before Amazon.com was glimmer in Jeff Bezos' eye. Neither "1-click" shopping or "Affiliates" programs are new ideas; mail order houses have been using these techniques for decades. Amazon.com may have the monetary high ground, but they do not have the technological high ground, or the moral high ground in this war. I'd hate to pour money into the coffers of Barnes and Noble (www.bn.com) but I'd rather do that than support Amazon.com's bid to monopolize Internet commerce.

W. Craig Trader


February 28, 2000

There are enough online bookstores -- I can live without amazon.com and their 1-click "technology"

Latchesar Ionkov


February 28, 2000

The net's open kind and patents' proprietary character just don't fit together.

Stephan Tolksdorf


February 28, 2000

just one more unhappy customer... btw, jeff, why don't you tell us all why you don't see this as an abuse of the patent system???

amy alexander


February 28, 2000

I've bought O'Reilley books from Amazon, but rest assured, I will buy them elsewhere from now on. Thanks for standing up for us, Tim.

Joe Rumsey


February 28, 2000

I'd rather click several times in the process of purchasing goods online than make one click to purchase anything from Amazon in light of this comical patent.

John Sommerville


February 28, 2000

Thank you for speaking out Tim. This sort of behavior by a company that, in-part, defines the internet today, is a step backward. As such, I choose to direct my business elsewhere.

Jeff Johnson


February 28, 2000

Hi, Over the last twelve months, I have purchased at least 25 CDs from Amazon. As of immediately, I will not buy another product from your company again, until you withdraw your greedy and short-sited patent claim. Ken Ambrose

Ken Ambrose


February 28, 2000

What does it say about Amazon's intelligence if they really expect these patents to be upheld? What a PR disaster this is. Nobody likes a bully, especially a contemptuous or foolish one. Maybe it's a streak of self-destruction. This is really a very sad development.

Jozsef Izsak


February 28, 2000

I am very sad that Amazon has chosen their current course of action. Amazon HAD! a loyal following among the web/computer techie crowd. We are a group that likes purchasing items on the web. But I'm now urging all my associates and clients to boycott Amazon. First the 1-click stuff, now the simple concept of an associate program. Amazon can not be permitted to continue this very damaging "land grab".

Chuck Gadd


February 28, 2000

As many others have already stated, I too am participating in a total boycott of Amazon.com. I have done so since the first day the story broke... Since that time, I have purchased books at BN.COM exclusively... Even when it meant paying a couple of dollars more than had I bought from Amazon. I'm not so kind as others (like Tim) have been... I hope this patent nonsense utterly destroys your company, and your person fortune. A statement needs to be made. I vote with my dollars. Thousands of others will too.

Bruce Arnold


February 28, 2000

Frank McNamara


February 28, 2000

Yorick Dix


February 28, 2000

I fail to understand how Jeff Bezos can label this a "successful" patent when all it patents is something completely obvious as an implementation of cookies. He is abusing the patent system in order to leverage his competitors. In these days of "internet time", the time and money it takes to fight an erronerous patent (as is in this case) could easily overwhelm the company trying to fight and and result in their inability to sucessfully compete. Everyone knows that this patent is garbage and has obvious previous-use behind it. Come on, Jeff. Using this patent it just playing dirty pool and you've already proven you don't need to do that.

Dave "Zoid" Kirsch


February 28, 2000

Shimpei Yamashita


February 28, 2000

I have been boycotting your site for some time. My trust in the fundamental value of your company has been badly shaken. I spend *a LOT* of money on books. And I miss your site; you simply do things better than your competition. But not because of stupid, obvious things like One-Click; rather, it is the clever use of data mining and targeted advertisements. I do not like B&N's site as well -- but they and their online competitors get my book money until you back off from this foolishness. You don't need these bullshit patents to survive and prosper. You are making life difficult ON ME and I resent it very much. Sites that I like may not be able to use a trivial technology like 1-click ordering until your spurious patent is overturned, and this infuriates me. I plan to continue boycotting for sixty days to see if you change your mind. If you continue pressing patents for such ridiculously obvious 'inventions' as 1-click and affiliates, I will never patronize your online store again. They boycott will be permanent, regardless of your later actions, and I will strongly recommend the same to others. Your attitude is becoming obvious -- win by any dirty trick available. Do you really want to be remembered that way? Ron Watkins

Ron Watkins


February 28, 2000

Wing Lee


February 28, 2000

Justin Mohr


February 28, 2000

I am a long time Amazon customer, and have been well pleased with their service and products. But frivolous software patents and strongarm lawsuits to protect software are two of my biggest pet peeves. Amazon, if you are serious about having an edge in web commerce, lead the way with inovation and service, not lawyers. Outperform the competition, don't strangle it with a checkbook. Oh, I'm a professional software engineer, so I understand the importance of intellectual property in software.

John Enright


February 28, 2000

J. L. Woudt


February 28, 2000

Bernd Dulfer


February 28, 2000

Geoff Janjua


February 28, 2000

I have to say that I am disgusted by Amazon's insistence on resorting to collecting frivolous patents in a misguided effort to be more competitive. Such vague and far-reaching patents on concepts such as '1 click shopping' and 'associate programs' undermine the basic advantage of the Internet, openness. So I've decided to put my money where my mouth is and no longer purchase from Amazon.com. Jeff, you have plenty of competitors that I'm sure are dancing in circles these days because of all the negative publicity Amazon.com has made for itself (Chapters springs readily to mind, for example) and who would be more than happy to take my business from you. Be a man (and a mench) and swallow your pride on this one. It's not going to gain you anything in the long run except for the same sort of reputation that Microsoft has built around itself.

Avram Cherry


February 28, 2000

Steve Pordon


February 28, 2000

Filip Zawadiak


February 28, 2000

Ed Farnbauch


February 28, 2000

Sean Channel


February 28, 2000

Nathan Walther


February 28, 2000

Get real amazon.

Brandon Camp


February 28, 2000

John Krahn


February 28, 2000

To Jeff Bezos: To protect its competitive position, all Amazon had to do was to publish the specs for 1-Click and the Associates processes used by Amazon. This would preclude anyone else filing for a patent. Then competitive forces, rather than the US Patent Office, would be responsible for the outcome. Filing for a patent, on the other hand, suggests your intention to monopolize certain ecommerce techniques. As the inventor of the term "ecommerce" for the California Legislature in 1984, I could have trademarked the term, I suppose. It would have been equally foolish. Bob Jacobson Redwood City, CA

Bob Jacobson


February 28, 2000

Timothy Danford


February 28, 2000

david newman


February 28, 2000

Frank Fletcher


February 28, 2000

Nick Barnes, Z’rich, Switzerland.


February 28, 2000

Obvious things are not ment to be patented.

Janne Liimatainen


February 28, 2000

Mikko Saari


February 28, 2000

Small business owner and *former* Amazon customer.

Eric Johnson


February 28, 2000

When will they stop taking and start giving!

Karl Kopp


February 28, 2000

There are only two things I have to say. First, even to file for these patents is obscene, full of greed and arrogance, and represents a slap in the face of lots of people who made possible the internet. Who do you think you are? Second, you lost a customer. Kay Schneitz

Kay Schneitz


February 28, 2000

</i> Amazon has too many competitors to adopt the Microsoft style of business. It won't work for them.

Michael Harder


February 28, 2000

Thank you Mr. O'Reilly for your support and efforts towards this cause on behalf of technology users and innovators everywhere.

Iain Cox


February 28, 2000

I've had little reason not to buy from Amazon before, now I do and I won't. I can recommend OneBookStreet to any looking for a book source.

George Van Arsdale


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos: In the last twelve months, I spent 跄.45 at Amazon.com. Until you drop your offensive use of software patents, I will spend my money elsewhere.

Robert T. Huffman


February 28, 2000

People who want to consider alternatives to Amazon might peek at my list of online bookshops http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~telford/reference/bookshop.html

Telford Tendys


February 28, 2000

I think we should be asking too who are these guys at the Patent Office who are allowing these obvious "innovations" to go through. Both Amazon and the Patent Office are wrong.

Naju Ventura


February 28, 2000

As the author or editor for a decade, including for many books sold on Amazon.com, I believe that enforcement of the 1-Click patent is short-sighted and ultimately harmful to all of us in the publishing business--including Amazon.com itself.

J.W. Olsen


February 28, 2000

Jeff, I've been an admirer of your efforts with Amazon as one of the major players in a successfull deployment of e-Commerce. Your attempt at patenting cookies, a "technology" the Web community have known and used for a long time, is not admirable at all. Please just drop it. It's not worth the bad publicity you'll be receiving.

Per Weisteen


February 28, 2000

This and other patents, including the ones given to eCash and Stefan Brands (now licensed to Zero Knowledge Systems, exclusivly), are putting an enourmus burden on the on going epansion to the new markets and taking us to a more opne market all over the globe. Hopefully, but not likely, this kinds of patents will be rejected and sent away to the trashcan were they belong.

Per Kangru


February 28, 2000

It is with a grave heart that I've started to boycott the online bookstore with the best user interface, most comprehensive features and widest selection. Stop the madness! I am a professional software developer and have consistently refused to take part in immoral patent scheming, though my employer offers large financial incentives (granted, to protect ourselves and not for frivolous lawsuits such as yours).

Wouter Cloetens


February 28, 2000

Tim Conrad


February 28, 2000

Mark Durham


February 28, 2000

Kai Puolam„ki


February 28, 2000

Te-Cheng Shen


February 28, 2000

I personally have never bought a product as Amazon; however, I am now quite certain that I never will. This abuse of the patent system to destroy competitors is inexcusable. I will continue to by to majority of my books from a physical book store(I like the smell of all the new books, and the enviroment of being able to flip through any book that interests me).

Andrew Parker


February 28, 2000

Toivo Voll


February 28, 2000

Toivo Voll


February 28, 2000

Tim stated the concerns shared by so many of us much more eloquently than I ever could. Rest assured my boycott of Amazon will stay in effect until Amazon realizes the error of their ways. I am still taking every opportunity that presents itself to inform others as to Amazon's practices regarding enforcement of their ill-gained patents. Last years Amazon spending: 񘒘.45 Total spending since the B&N injunction: Ũ.00

Bill Giese


February 28, 2000

David Karowsky


February 28, 2000

Rob Sweet


February 28, 2000

I am very disappointed in Amazon.com. What if one supermarket chain had patented the concept of "put items in a shopping cart and bring it to cashier"? Would all the others have to make their customers hand-carry everything? Amazon's 1-click patent is just petty and mean-spirited, and I will now take my business elsewhere. </I>

Jim Gottlieb


February 28, 2000

We need more openness in this industry, not aggressive tactics to gain market share and limit innovation. This is the same sort of underhanded game that Microsoft plays so deftly to the detriment of all users of computer software and the internet. This patent should not have been granted. A trademark for "One Click" is even streaching things a bit.

Brennan Hildebrand


February 28, 2000

This is truly outrageous. I'm sorry, Mr. Bezos, but I cannot lend any form of support to a company willing to sink so low to make a quick buck at the expense of the general public. I sent a couple of books to friends a while back and thought Amazon was pretty cool for a little while, but I won't be doing it again. Not now. Not soon. Not ever. The world doesn't need companies with the ethics that Amazon exhibits.

Jonathan Locke


February 29, 2000

I first shopped at Amazon.com over 2 years ago. In the past year I have spent ũ,117.40 at your site. I've had to make a conscious effort since last month in boycotting your site because I'm so used to going there... but I can't anymore in good conscience. Hopefully, you'll come to realize soon how foolish this all is. If not, then it saddens me to say that I'm sorry that your software patent is more important than my patronage.

Leonard Lin


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos, I strongly disapprove of your company's ludicrous actions, and the sooner this insane patent is thrown out, the better. For your employees sake, I hope that the firms you have bullied away by brandishing this patent never file suit against you for lost revenues, for I feel they would have a strong case. If it were only you, and any other member of the management who supports this inanity, who would be punished, I would be the first in line to assist in said lawsuit.

Jason Baker


February 28, 2000

Making use of the community development and ideals is a fine thing to do,it encourages development for the betterment of the web community. However, abusing this, and claim the work of others is wrong, in the strongest sense of the word.

Peter Crystal


February 28, 2000

I have placed hundreds of dollars worth of orders through Amazon.com over the past few years and have always enjoyed your company's service. The way in which you have used the patent system is inappropriate, however, and I will join the boycott.

Garin Hiebert


February 28, 2000

I've spent close to ๛ a month at amazon in the past two years. Its too bad that because of thier greed, i'll be forced into going elsewhere.

Jeff Eineke


February 28, 2000

Look at the size of this page. Get with the PR agency quick, you've got some damage control to perform, Amazon.

Scott W. Hill


February 28, 2000

Yet another lost customer... pity.

Clay Scott


February 28, 2000

Amazon is a wonderful place, but I cannot approve of such a ludicrous patent.

J. Robinson


February 28, 2000

Markus Pihlaja, Finland


February 28, 2000

Yet another lost potential customer... pity.

Clay Scott


February 28, 2000

Leo Breebaart


February 28, 2000

Koen Van den Heuvel


February 28, 2000

Ronald Parazoo


February 29, 2000

Bill Bercik


February 29, 2000

Mark C. Chu-Carroll


February 29, 2000

Since Amazon has started enforcing patent 5,960,411 I have boycotted their business and will continue as well as encourage others to do the same.

Trevor Bakker


February 29, 2000

David Himelright


February 29, 2000

1-click signed ...

Frank Roscher


February 29, 2000

Hey Mr. Bezos, Fatbrain's going to get all my business till you stop this shit.

Kevin Broch


February 29, 2000

How dare you use *my* disk space to store your cookies and then have the gall to say that others can't. I would say that should be up to me, wouldn't you? Keep your damn cookies off of my machine!

Scotty Orr


February 29, 2000

I have been a long time Amazon customer and until this patent issue came up, Amazon was the only online book seller I ordered from. Now it is the only one I won't order from. I hope that they can wake up and see their mis-use of software patents.

Kevin Lilly


February 29, 2000

I have bought from both Amazon and B&N.com. By experiences with Amazon were very positive. My experiences with B&N.com were not. This had nothing to do with how tough the ordering was, it came to down to customer service. Stop the stupid patents. Open Source is revolutionizing software development.

Paul Rentschler


February 29, 2000

All I can say is that this is very sad. I had previously thought of Amazon as a great pioneer in web commerce; and I imagined Mr. Bezos to have understanding of the community. Clearly, the 1-Click patent falls under prior art. I sincerely hope Amazon can assume a more friendly position on this issue; I would be more than willing to make my purchases on Amazon rather than Barnes and Noble if I felt that Amazon was more in tune with the technical community.

Jason Clouse


February 29, 2000

That the patent office granted such a patent shows ignorance which can (hopefully) be overcome with proper education about software. That Amazon submitted such a patent in the first place shows complete disregard for the internet community and adherence to underhanded business practices. I'm certainly going to boycott anything from Amazon and will encourage all friends and co-workers to do the same until the patent is withdrawn and a formal apology is given.

Marty Combs


February 29, 2000

I vehemently oppose the increasing abuse of the patent system in the technology area. The entire point of patents is to protect your ideas. When patents are used as weapons the whole market suffers, including consumers and, indirectly, the patent holder. Even frivolous patents that won't hold up in court are a weapon because a company has to spend large sums to prove it's frivolity in court. Thus any small competitor is effectivly eliminated from using the patented techniques, regardless of whether they are obvious or previously used.

Seren Thompson


February 29, 2000

Lisa Mann


February 29, 2000

Michael Rozynski


February 29, 2000

Bad, Bad Amazon!

Herb Mathews


February 29, 2000

Eileen Tso


February 29, 2000

Jason Pollock


February 29, 2000

Joe Thomas


February 29, 2000

Rick Bartels


February 29, 2000

Michael S. Edwards


February 29, 2000

Joseph Laudadio


February 29, 2000

http://www.fatbrain.com

John Bridleman


February 29, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon because of this patent.

Rachel Sundquist


February 29, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon because of this patent.

Rachel Sundquist


February 29, 2000

I couldn't have said it better, Tim!

nan zhang


February 29, 2000

I am a former Amazon.com faithful. Note the word former.

Thomas Briggs


February 29, 2000

Come on Jeff, don't be a bozo. You're just losing the respect of your customers.

Ken Spreitzer


February 29, 2000

Even though I prefer Amazon, I will be ordering my books from Borders and B&N until this patent issue is resolved.

Phillip Toland


February 29, 2000

Well, I believe Amazon just lost a customer! You're not the only one selling books on the web. bye!

Fredrik Bonde


February 29, 2000

I am appaled by Amazon's actions. I am the "go to" guy for most of my friends when it come to computer related topics. I now reccomend against using or supporting Amazon due to their stupid attempt(s) to enforce the patents that should not have been granted. A nice quote from the US supreme court: It was never the object of patent laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures. Such an indiscriminate creation of exclusive privileges tends rather to obstruct than to stimulate invention. It creates a class of speculative schemers who make it their business to watch the advancing wave of improvement, and gather its foam in the form of patented monopolies, which enable them to lay a heavy tax on the industry of the country, without contributing anything to the real advancement of the arts. It embarrasses the honest pursuit of business with fears and apprehensions of unknown liability lawsuits and vexatious accounting for profits made in good faith. ùU.S. Supreme Court, Atlantic Works vs. Brady, 1882 Hopefully Amazon will learn the wrongs of their ways, and will be forced to pay damages and legal fees for the defendants in any cases they bring forth. --Mahlon Hollway

Mahlon Hollway


February 29, 2000

I, too, have and will continue to consciously avoid purchasing anything from Amazon.com and actively suggest to others to do the same.

Craig Michael Nathan


February 29, 2000

Amazon has unfortunately been learning too many lessons from Microsoft. I will no longer buy from Amazon, and urge everyone else I know to do likewise.

Andrea J. Cameron


February 29, 2000

It is my stated intent not to purchase anything through Amazon.com and to convince people around me until Amazon publicly denounces these abusive practices.

Tom Heynemann


February 29, 2000

Perhaps next you're going to try and patent "priority shipping" ? Come ON, Amazon, this is an embarrassment to you and a detriment to the web.

C. Alvarez


February 29, 2000

Due to your abuse of the patent system, I will now choose Fatbrain over Amazon for technical book purchases, and encourage my co-workers to do the same.

Craig McDaniel


February 29, 2000

I wish Priceline would get a grip, too. What's next - patenting the integration of OE/AR/AP systems with the web? Patenting English auctions? Dutch auctions?

Keith Gibbons


February 29, 2000

Rick Saenz (Austin, Texas)


February 29, 2000

Excellent letter Tim! Lets make sure that the web remains an open standard as it is! I stopped ordering from Amazon because of this patent some month ago.

Peter Thoeny


February 29, 2000

Over the past four years, I have probably spent close to 񘘐 at Amazon.com. Until they reverse their position on this topic, I will not spend another cent with them.

Curt Hagenlocher


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim O'Reilly that the patents are ridiculus, and I agree with Richard Stallman that a boycott of Amazon is a good idea. My next order will go to Barnes & Noble.

Anders S. Buch


February 29, 2000

I have been an Amazon.com customer in the past, but I will no longer be a customer as long as you attempt to enforce your frivolous patents and/or continue to file such patent claims.

J. Allen Crider


February 29, 2000

I find the attempt to enforce this patent to be an anti-competitive and ungracious business method. Amazon should show some respect and gratitude for the thousands of developers on who's innovation they built their business.

Lawrence Dol


February 29, 2000

Scott Gasch


February 29, 2000

I have been a regular and happy Amazon customer, sending large chunks of my disposable income to you for several years, but intend to shop exclusively at your competitors until you drop this conscienceless patent pursuit.

Jay B. Parker


February 29, 2000

I will no longer purchase (I haven't for some time now) from Amazon. I have always been a loyal O'Reilly customer, and my future O'Reilly purchases will either come from a local shop or directly from the publisher. Thanks for your support here, Tim.

Brian St. Pierre


February 29, 2000

Amazon had their oposition beaten up down and sideways until they started down this road. Now they are just a site I use to look up ISBNs before I buy elsewhere. That's 1000 quid a year out of their income, and I can't be the only one they have driven away who spends that amount.

Richard Caley


February 29, 2000

I have been a regular Amazon customer for quite some time. No more. For as long as Amazon continues to abuse the patent system and otherwise acts in a manner I consider irresponsible, I will take my business elsewhere. Guess Amazon better run out and grab that 0-Click shopping patent, because that is what they will be getting from me for the time being ;)

Jim Cole


February 29, 2000

Amazon used to be well respected for their innovative mix of technology and business. Now they are becoming the laughing stock of the Internet. Come on guys. Tim is speaking more than his mind; it's the truth of how open-source helps everyone out, including you. Why not let the marketplace determine the winner, without having to "stack the deck" in your favor?

Jimmy Sieben


February 29, 2000

As a software engineer, I find taking someone else's innovation, made freely available by them, and trying to turn it into a proprietary technology, appalling. This is exactly what this "1 click" patent nonsense does with browser cookies. I have purchased dozens of books from amazon in the past. I will not be doing so in the future, unless amazon cleans up its act.

Josh Shepard


February 29, 2000

I believe you are taking advantage of our patent office with your patents. They are not adequatly equiped to handle the current rush of new technology patents and by slipping one like your "1-Click Shopping" under their eyes, you have taken advantage of something that was originaly created to inspire inovation, not stigmatize it. I am glad to say I have never bought anything from Amazon.com, nor will I.

Logan Hall


February 29, 2000

I have only been an online shopper for about 6 months now, but Amazon is the one that got me excited about it, and was my favorite. This is NOT because of the 1-click ordering!!! Now that I spend much of my monthly entertainment budget on the web, I am saddened to feel compelled to boycott Amazon,but I never like to reward needless greed and bullying of competitors. Shame! You guys should realize you don't need this stupid patent!

Kelly Hardwicke


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos: Shrewd business move, Mr. Bezos. Look at what you've done now. You upset all these people with your company's selfish decision. Once you have a mad enough audience in the computing world and you have the greater public's eye, you will retract the patent so that you can be the hero and everyone will buy from you again plus some new customers that were lured in. A well thought out way to get free publicity if you ask me...

Kevin Schoenrock


February 29, 2000

I used to use Amazon often, and I am a co-author of a soon-to-be-published O'Reilly book about web programming that will undoubtedly be sold on Amazon (and guess what, like the previous edition published years ago... it discusses cookies). However, I no longer shop on Amazon and I will encourage anyone who asks about my book to avoid you as well. It will take much more than simply dropping the lawsuit at this point to repair the damage you have done.

Scott Guelich


February 29, 2000

While I tend not to be activist over issues, I agree that this patent is frivolous and should be overturned. I don't know how much Amazon's business will be affected by customers and potential customers boycotting your service, but can you really afford to take that chance? Besides, I find price and customer service to be far more important than simply reducing two or three mouse clicks to one. As long as you are a leader in those two categories, you won't have anything to fear.

Nevada Hamaker


February 29, 2000

I strongly agree with this letter. The Internet was built through the good-faith efforts of government, engineers, and hobbyists. The shameless "corporatism" being revealed by companies like Amazon is more than just an insult to those who have built the Internet; it impedes future net development. I hope that Amazon either recognizes the ill-will that their FUD tactics promote, or pays the consequences. On principle, I will not buy Amazon products until they start acting like responsible netizens...

Alan Stein


February 29, 2000

A warning to Bezos: Revolution When people have nothing more to lose, Then revolution will result. Do not take away their lands, And do not destroy their livelihoods; If your burden is not heavy then they will not shirk it. The sage maintains himself but exacts no tribute, Values himself but requires no honours; He ignores abstraction and accepts substance. -Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching In other words, focus on being of substance, and do not try to exact tribute (do not enforce these patents), for then we will have nothing to lose and it will lead to a revolution against you.

Moxie


February 29, 2000

I would like to register my strong opposition to your company's patenting trivial and obvoius applications of web technology, as exemplified by the one-click and partners program patents. The fact that the patent office is willing to grant these patents does not mean that they are are beneficial, ethical or that they will stand up in court. Amazon in its attempts to monopolize e-commerce by patenting the obvoius stands to ruin its good name and become the new nemesis of many not because of market share, but because of its odoius business practices.

Jonathan Caplan


February 29, 2000

I agree with the content of the open letter crafted by O'Reily. Your patent-wielding of such obvious prior art is akin to the monopolistic and abusive practices of Microsoft. Why do corporations think that they have to be immoral to compete and to think that they can act immorally until they get caught? Perhaps if enough people cared to make you feel it in the wallet, you'd think twice. I am but one man, but I can assure you that, as a previous customer of Amazon.com's I am not presently. You have destroyed an good-will that you may have had with this previous customer!

Don Bivens


February 29, 2000

I had actually ordered a book from Amazon and have cancelled the order because of your patent practices. I reorded this book through Barnes and Noble (bn.com) immediately after cancelling my order with Amazon. I order books on-line at least a couple of times a month, and until your position on patents is reversed, these orders will be exclusively through bn.com and half.com. Greetings from Amazon.com! You have successfully cancelled your order #103-2750320-9959806 For your reference, here is a summary of your order: Order #103-2750320-9959806 - placed February 20, 2000 at 11:57 AM PST Status: CANCELLED - on February 28, 2000 at 06:33 AM PST

Brian Keen


February 29, 2000

This situation illustrates two important points. 1. The patent authorities have only a fraction of the knowledge required to handle modern information technology and software patents. It should be easier to stop the patenting of ideas that are already in common use. 2. I recently attended a symposium where Jeff Bezos was one of the keynote speakers. Jeff was enthusiastically talking about being customer centric and ôfocusing on the customer, not the competitorsö. This statement becomes relatively funny when Amazon.com resorts to attacking their competitors through dubious patents rather than focusing on increasing service to the customers. Apparently Amazon needs to become much more afraid of their customers!

Mathias Dybvik


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I'm dissapointed...I was one of Amazon.com's earlier customers (I wish I still had the sticker from the banana that your booth babe handed out at one of your first trade show appearances). Over the years, I have spent not hundereds but THOUSANDS of dollars at your site. Many of these purchases have been technical manuals, and music to listen to whilst employing them. I'm sure the same can be said for a sizeable chunk of your customer base. Having said that...it's on to Fatbrain.com for me. And CDNow or any other online retailers. I've also noticed a very recent and marked deterioration of your fulfillment operations and customer service. Jeff, the way to keep market share is NOT to cut these while making yourself "the only game in town" in an industry, ala' Microsoft. As already stated, none of the recent patent motions by your company are likely to hold up in court in the long run. The only thing that you'll get out of this is lost sales and a bad reputation.

Jen Runne


February 29, 2000

Sandy Blyth


February 29, 2000

Michael McDuffie


February 29, 2000

Kenneth Wong


February 29, 2000

Kevin Ring


February 29, 2000

Paul Davis


February 29, 2000

Kenneth Topp


February 29, 2000

Glenn Barnett


February 29, 2000

Jeff Uphoff


February 29, 2000

Matthew Theobald


February 29, 2000

Ludicrous patents have been part of the software industry for too long. A patent on 1-click, if not the winner for chutzpah, is surely a leading contender. David Wilczynski President, Pacific Software Solutions

David Wilczynski


February 29, 2000

Magni Ons°ien


February 29, 2000

Hey, this is EVIL amazon.

Brian Wolfe


February 29, 2000

Thomas Scoville


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim. This patent is ridiculas !!!!

Arturo Bialas


February 29, 2000

Amazon. I think you have just sealed your own coffin

Mark Shelly


February 29, 2000

I will not buy anything in Amazon, and I will tell my friends not to do it.

Mauricio Rivera


February 29, 2000

Pick your battles carefully, Amazon. Surely this one is not worth the cost.

Joseph L. Jones


February 29, 2000

Amazon, drop the patent strategy. I will boycott you until you do.

Michael Please


February 29, 2000

I just spent โ at CDNow and Barnes & Noble. I put my money where my mouth is. :)

Paul Schreiber


February 29, 2000

These patents are ridiculous and will stifle the web. Please consider storing them in the wastebasket.

Damon Clinkscales


February 29, 2000

echo Bezos | tr "es" "o " This patenting of ideas that are trivial is a pox on humanity.

Kerry Liles


February 29, 2000

I do not shop at Amazon anymore. Your patent on One-Click Shopping is as fraudulent as patenting tying one's shoes.

June Kontvis-Bell


February 29, 2000

In truth, the actions of Amazon.com violate the spirit and the rules of the WWW - rules that were once known by all who frequented this space.

Michael Lautman


February 29, 2000

As a multi-year Amazon.com customer, I really regret your destructive software patent strategy. I will take my business elsewhere until it changes.

Rob Campbell


February 29, 2000

I stopped shopping at Amazon when they started selling toys and home improvement articles. Now I will ask my friends and associates to shop only at Barnes and Noble.

Gary J. Antonetti


February 29, 2000

used to by all my programming books and others at amazon. Have taken business elsewhere - will not be back until patents are dropped

alan macdonald


February 29, 2000

This is crap. I've used Amazon almost exclusively for online purchases, but I won't put up with this blatant patent misuse. I'll take my e-business elsewhere.

David Bender


February 29, 2000

While I have ordered items from Amazon in the past, I will no longer do so and I will encourage my colleagues to also discontinue business with Amazon due to the ridiculous nature of this patent.

Duane Healing


February 29, 2000

(My first submission disappeared, and with it my comments. This site has obviously had some traffic today ;-) I heartily agree with Tim O'Reilly's letter.

Henning Strandin


February 29, 2000

Laurie Trindle Gennari


February 29, 2000

Software patents are bad, mmkay? Especially when there is quite a bit of prior art. At this rate, Amazon, you will lose all of your customers, and *NEVER* turn a profit! :)

Adam Muntner


February 29, 2000

It's hard to imagine Jeff B. keeping a straight face explaining that while "he believes the patent process can sometimes be abused, he believes that this is not the case with Amazon's 1-Click patent."

Noah Booth


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com Dear Jeff, with this patent application you have become: First in e-commerce innovation First in taking over a common resource First in the hearts of what NetCitizens don't want. Phillip Knowlton

phillip knowlton


February 29, 2000

I have been boycotting Amazon since October and I hope that this petition will finally bring Amazon to its senses. Amazon's myopia will only bring them down in the long run and ruin what is a truly great ecommerce site. Matt

Matt Midboe


February 29, 2000

Thank you, Tim. I totally agree with everthing that you wrote in your column. This patent that Amazon is trying to get is frivolous at best and offensive at worst. Hopefully, they will soon understand the magnitude of their folly. Thanks.

Colin DeLong


February 29, 2000

"pissing in the well". I agree. I was disapointed by Amazon's response to my e-mail saying I was going to shop somewhere else while they pursued this patent; they believed the error was in my confusion, not in their behavior.

mike hemming


February 29, 2000

This is a patent that should be swiftly overturned as blatantly obvious. In the meantime, I will be spending my online dollars anywhere but Amazon. Once Amazon has ceased trying to patent the obvious, then they'll go back on my vendor list.

Michael Llaneza


February 29, 2000

Amazon, you underestimate the consumer and are not in a position to act as a monopoly. You are risking consumer hatred without any exclusivity on the book market. Very silly. I am also participating in the boycott, and am recommending my friends and family do the same.

Marco Bianco


February 29, 2000

While I have and will continue to applaud Amazon's creativity and innovation, this idea of patenting ideas that aren't really theirs to begin with is ludicrous at best and downright dangerous to the continued "open" structure of the Internet at worst. Please stop the madness before it's too late.

Frederic Woodbridge


February 29, 2000

It's pretty obvious that most people boycotting do, in fact, like the Amazon web site. Unfortunately, our hand has been forced by ridiculous business practices. If Lotus and Apple can't protect large, complicated applications and operating systems via the patent system, what gives you any hope this ridiculous One-click patent will hold up?

Sam Yates


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, I don't have anything to add to Tim O'Reilley's argument, but I can tell you that I completely support the Amazon boycott. I won't be shopping at Amazon until the patent is dropped, and I will be asking my friends to order from your competitors as well. Please re-think your position. You're biting the hand that feeds you.

Kirk Rafferty


February 29, 2000

As a teacher I used to recommend Amazon to my students as a place to buy books. I can no longer do this. I am telling them to support this boycott. Placing patents on ideas drawn from Open Source software is dubious and morally wrong. You are taking advantage of bad laws to patent trivial uses of other people's ideas. You can't own the web and you can't own e-commerce. Bill Beaver

Bill Beaver


February 29, 2000

I've been an Amazon supporter since the beginning. When B&N opened their web site by filing a frivolous lawsuit against them I vowed never to use or recommend B&N and never have. What Amazon is doing now with this joke "patent" is just as bad. Unless Amazon reverses this - I'll buy elsewhere whenever possible and incourage everyone I know to do the same. Do the right thing and change this now.

Dusty Nidey


February 29, 2000

I used to be an amazon customer, a very happy one in fact. After hearing this rather devious and inherently evil action, I've chosen to personally boycott your site, even before RMS's call to action. Your a book and media seller, what are you doing patenting web technology? Your very own patent works against the very business model that you started under, the small business! Please, don't become yet another member of the pack of Evil Empires residing here in Seattle.

Ryan Whitney


February 29, 2000

I've been using Amazon's services for quite some time now, and though my contributions to your bottom-line would be considered miniscule relative to the number of people who purchase at Amazon, I still feel like I have spent a considerable amount with Amazon over the years. I've done this because of the convenience, the broad selection, and to be honest the great customer service. However, as of now, because of your enforcement of your 1-Click patent my purchases with you will stop. Please reconsider your stand on this issue.

Bren Smith


February 29, 2000

There is no doubt that Amazon.Com has spent a lot of effort in building its highly sophisticated web site. But your success and failure in the long run will have nothing to do with your sole possession of a technology as trivial as "1-Click Ordering". It is a great convenience for your customers, but hardly a make-or-break proposition. Amazon's customers most appreciate its selection and service and are not going to switch to Barnes & Noble because they suddenly have 1-click ordering as well. You will gain more goodwill by backing off the patent than you will by being the "Only Site With 1-Click Ordering"

Michael Ross


February 29, 2000

I still recall the rainy night when driving home from work I listed to an interview with Jeff Bezos on Fresh Air. Ditched the plans to grab a beer and went home to check out this online bookstore. Loved what I saw. Since then I've purchased hundreds of dollars of books each year through Amazon.com for my technical library, for gifts, for whatever. None of this would have been possible without the technical contributions and collaborations of the web community. With these software patents Amazon.com is attempting to stifle the flow of technological lifeblood that nurished their online womb. Hopefully either the patent office or Amazon.com will not allow this to continue. Until then the business nurishment of my spending will flow elsewhere.

Michael Rasmussen


February 29, 2000

I find it disheartening that a company would try to lay claim to practices and knowledge that was born out of their own labors. I sincerely hope such blatant acts of thievery and Bill Gates style land grabbing will not be tolerated by the public or upheld in a court of law. Until Amazon.com ceases in this endeavor I will not patron them my business.

Brian Kohl


February 29, 2000

I myself have participated in patents filed for defensive reasons, but in using patents merely to squash the competition, Amazon is pissing in the well once they have had their fill. What particularly offends me is the notion that Amazon is protecting *their* innovations. I myself worked on one-click shopping (not implemented due to customers' unfamiliarity with online shopping in 1997) and affiliate program tracking via unique identifiers in URLs (implemented and still in use). And in the case of affiliate programs, I was learning techniques from looking at parameter passing via URLs as implemented by others. This kind of cross-fertilization is the only reason that the web exists. I cannot believe, Mr. Bezos, that you are so blinded arrogance that you cannot see the work that others have done before you. Patents and the legal system exist to further competion, not prevent it, Mr. Bezos, and your obligation to your shareholders neither entitles you nor requires you to knowingly abuse the patent system and legal system in the name of gutting the competition. The end result might be that you gut the web itself, cut off the true sources of innovation, and kill the boom in prosperity you so richly enjoy. As a member of the internet development community, I urge Amazon to cease their destructive policies now.

Jason Thaxter


February 29, 2000

To: Amazon.com c/o Jeff Bezos Dear Amazon, You're Fired. As several previous communications from your employers (aka customers) have pointed out, Blatant abuse of the technologies that put Amazon.com where it is today is not acceptable behavior. Despite several clear communications regarding this matter, Amazon.com has continued to flagrantly engage in these practices. We therefore, regretfully, find it necessary to terminate your employment. You may now take your place in the unemployment line behind etoys.com. Thank you.

Sean Clark


February 29, 2000

Ben De Rydt


February 29, 2000

Cheryl Short


February 29, 2000

Jacqueline Clark


February 29, 2000

Kim Scott


February 29, 2000

I agree...

Schoenmaekers Raf


February 29, 2000

Gary Nutbeam


February 29, 2000

Roberto Trevino


February 29, 2000

Chris Mangum


February 29, 2000

Greg Glover


February 29, 2000

Andrew Deckowitz


February 29, 2000

Keep open standards open Jeff - you will have only yourself to blame when innovation is stifled and your business takes a nosedive as a result.

Maru Newby


February 29, 2000

Jes”s Reynaga


February 29, 2000

Patently mad. Goodbye amazon.

JohnK


February 29, 2000

Barnes and Noble just got a new customer.

David Wolfe


February 29, 2000

I will join the boycott.

Ben Abraham


February 29, 2000

Ever heard of One-Click Bankruptcy (~TM)? ;-)

Paul Miniato


February 29, 2000

Time to re-read Aesop's Fable about the dog with the bone...

Monique Reed


February 29, 2000

I refuse to buy books through Amazon due solely to the patent issues.

James Farley


February 29, 2000

I wholeheartedly agree. Amazon has great service but they have lost my business.

kent davis


February 29, 2000

I haven't purchased anything from amazon.com since mid December of '99.

Jeremy Hankins


February 29, 2000

I no longer buy at Amazon, I informed them of my decision, and I urge anyone I know to do the same.

Ori Pessach


February 29, 2000

The patent is absurd, enforcing it is even worse. I will not be supporting Amazon in any way until it reverses its decisions.

Bruce Beyeler


February 29, 2000

I've been directing people to Barnes and Noble or Fatbrain for some time...down with proprietary primadonnas!

Peter Burris


February 29, 2000

I too will not be buying any more books from Amazon solely because of Amazon's abuse of the patent system. BarnsandNoble.com, here I come.

Robert Spotswood


February 29, 2000

I've used the Amazon.co.uk site a few times when I've needed books, but I won't be going back while Amozon is behaving like this.

Alexa M. Robinson


February 29, 2000

As a previous user of amazon.com, I hope that you will stop your abuse of the Patent system, so I can once again use your site.

Warren E. Downs


February 29, 2000

Amazon is a bad citizen of the net. I have joined the boycott, and have successfully urged technical people not to join Amazon's staff.

Elizabeth Parish


February 29, 2000

Totally ridiculous to allow an open Web technology to be owned and controlled by one entity. The Patent people need to open their eyes.

Peter Andersen


February 29, 2000

Give me a break, Jeff! To file the patent is one thing, but to actually claim that it is valid is embarrassing to you and the entire Internet community!!!

Michael T. Williams


February 29, 2000

This is absolutely ridiculous and I will be adding my name to the already length list of those who will be boycotting Amazon until they give up on this patent.

Douglas Simon


February 29, 2000

A blantant attempt to squash fair competetion, shame on you Amazon! I WILL NOT use your site or any of your affiliates as long as you pursue such actions. SFT

Stuart Trimbath


February 29, 2000

A blantant attempt to squash fair competetion, shame on you Amazon! I WILL NOT use your site or any of your affiliates as long as you pursue such actions. SFT

Stuart Trimbath


February 29, 2000

What an absolutely stupid and arrogant attitude. I will refuse to purchase anything from Amazon until this changes.

Desh Sharma


February 29, 2000

A blantant attempt to squash fair competetion, shame on you Amazon! I WILL NOT use your site or any of your affiliates as long as you pursue such actions. SFT

Stuart Trimbath


February 29, 2000

I used to patronize the Amazon.com web site, and recommend it to friends and family. I can no longer in good conscience shop on your site, and I will encourage my friends and family to use other resources.

John Straw


February 29, 2000

I am now a very satisfied customer of borders.com and barnesandnoble.com. Too bad for you. I also have many friends, colleagues and family that have stopped or will not start buying from Amazon. Those who live by the sword...

Peter Hull


February 29, 2000

What a nasty bout of hubris. Amazon has changed the face of commerce forever -- I wish you took your responsibilities as trendsetter more seriously. It's not just about your company -- the world watches you.

Amy O'Hair


February 29, 2000

I will not be buying anything at Amazon until they stop this abuse of the patent law. I also will make sure that the managers of the mutual funds I own (and which contain Amazon stock) are made aware of the backlash building up against Amazon.

Eric Simms


February 29, 2000

This patent is sad, and has only been granted through the inadequacy of the US patent system when it comes to technology patents. I would urge you to please relinquish your patents, on the basis of prior art. Amazon is a really great site. Don't do damage to yourself like this.

T. Thatcher


February 29, 2000

I have purchased a large number of books through Amazon.com in the past, and in general your service has always been excellet. However, I find it hard to take seriously the claim that "1-click Shopping" represents an innovation worthy of patent protection.

Kevin J. Brennan


February 29, 2000

FWIW: Barnes And Noble is probably a /worse/ choice as an alternative. Their business practices involve driving out competition in local markets. Support your local retailer - or someone else's local retailer, like Powells, Wordsworth or others. They can all order anything.

JB Segal


February 29, 2000

May a thousand fleas infect your armpits and may your pile of monopoly money be reduced to nothing more than the elaborate hoax you are trying to perpetrate on the Internet community at large. I am supporting a boycott of amazon.com and any affiliate thereof.

Matthew Snyder


February 29, 2000

An IT friend of mine told me that O'Reilly books are the best source for learning or referencing computer technology and that Amazon was a good place to order from. Now I will have to check back with him to see where the IT field will be purchasing from... and me.

Carl Kristoffersen


February 29, 2000

www.spree.com, www.fatbrain.com, www.borders.com, www.barnesandnoble.com and others will be getting my business in the future. Jeff, with all respect to your innovative marketing, alienating many of your best customers and partners is demolishing any chance you might have had at profitibility.

William Harris


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon relents and cancels their attempt to patent "1-click ordering" and smilar patents of existing technology, I will boycott their service. I will instead patronize their competition and other companies that demonstrate through their actions and good-spirited participation in the Internet community. Adam Klein

Adam Klein


February 29, 2000

The amazon patent is just purely abuse. It's very easy to spread the bad-word at Universities, so I urge everyone in school to tell a friend about amazon's rediculous stance; maybe even take out a small ad or write a quick letter to the editor in the school newspaper. After all, we are their current and future consumers.

Scott Fritzinger


February 29, 2000

As long as you stick with this ridiculous patent policy, I will choose your competitors over you for all my online purchases. I hope you will rapidly realize that the long-term losses resulting from a bad public image largely outweigh the short-term advantage this kind of patent might give you over your competitors, temporarily.

Pascal Vincent


February 29, 2000

I have been using Amazon since early 1997. Since Amazon started keeping track of my orders in late 1997, I have spent 񘋌 in books and music from that service alone, much of it while i was a student. However, brand loyalty only goes so far. thanks for the coffee mug last Christmas. I have a ฟ gift certificate on my desk I would like to return. Good bye.

Rachel Walls


February 29, 2000

I will be buying specifically from those companies that are being attacked under this patent (e.g. Barnes & Noble) until this stupidity ends.

Henk Hesselink


February 29, 2000

I've been an Amazon customer in the past, but I won't be so again until you stop bludgeoning competition and innovation by trying to monopolize a simple idea. What you're doing flies in the face of the open internet spirit that gave birth to your business, and I think it's a slap in the face to all of your customers. You don't need this to compete--stop using software patents!

Steven G. Johnson


February 29, 2000

These patents are an insult to the technology industry and, more specifically, the nature of the Internet. The advancement of the industry in general will be _severely_ hampered if Amazon continues on its current course. As such, until these practices are stopped, I will no longer conduct any business with amazon.com, and I will urge all of my family, friends, and colleagues to do the same.

Andrew Zajkowski


February 29, 2000

I am a regular buyer at Amazon.com and a receiver of many of your emails. I *do* agree with RMS and will promptly remove myself from all mailings, remove my wish list, and refrain from buying at Amazon.com until they come to their senses. The patent office is rife with abuse over software technology and 1000 lb gorillas like Amazon.com just make it worse. Jonathan Arnold

Jonathan Arnold


February 29, 2000

I used to be a regular Amazon customer. Because of this patent nonsense I have taken thousands of dollars of my business to Fatbrain (http://www.fatbrain.com/) and DVD Express (http://www.dvdexpress.com)! I am in no way affiliated with either business. I will continue to boycott any organization that exploits the ignorance of the US patent office in such a flagrant manner!

Dr. Johannes Ruscheinski


February 29, 2000

This has got to stop. I'm sure that lawyer and business types consider patents like this as just "part of the game", but this particular game is wrong. I've bought a few things from Amazon before, but I'm going to look harder at alternatives now. If I ever hear of you trying to enforce this patent against a competitor, then that competitor will almost certainly be getting my business, as a show of support.

Barry Pederson


February 29, 2000

These patents do little more than make Amazon look ridiculous as it bites the very hand that has made it a success. If other money-hungry companies follow and begin patenting other basic methods of doing business online, it will not be long before we see the day that the independent retailer can no longer compete online. And we will have Amazon to thank for it. Honestly, Mr. Bezos. What were you thinking?

Kevin Murphy


February 29, 2000

There are plenty of high quality web sites who sell everything you do, for comparable prices and customer service. And they don't resort to insane patent disputes to keep their business. Maybe you've heard of them; the competition, they're who will be getting my business from now on.

Jeramia Ory


February 29, 2000

Why aren't we sending an even more strongly-worded message to the morons at the Patent Office? I don't think it's right to protest against amazon.com : it's not gonna stop the rest of the dot-coms from abusing the system. Protesting to the law-makers and the Patent office as voters is a better long-term solution. Why isn't anybody getting the Patent Office to comment on their incompetence in reviewing prior art?

Mittal Monani


February 29, 2000

I wholeheartedly agree with R. Stallman³s feelings, and Tim O³Reilly³s considerations. Amazon³s patent goes against the spirit of the internet. Such bully tactic³s may appeal to a stock-oriented management but are inherently a treason to the medium that in first place gave them the opportunity to make a nice business. For the time being I will buy all my O Reilly books from www.ora.com and shift to Barnes&Noble for the rest.

Enrique Lemus Rodriguez


February 29, 2000

Mr Bezos, It would appear that your accolades as Time Magazine's "Man of the Year" were misplaced. Either that, or they have gone to your head. Be aware that you have begun to tread upon dangerous ground. While customers have placed their loyalty in your business, it may just as easily be placed in the hands of your less greedy competitors. After all, another website is just "1-Click" away from yours. I will not be shopping with you until you eliminate this incredibly short-sighted and greed-infested patent.

John Gleisner III


February 29, 2000

The ability to abuse the system does not make it moraly right. Amazon should carfully consider the impact, not just now, but for the future, of absorbing other people's work as their own. In education, such practice is called plagerism. Enforcing, nay, even having these patents will have long term effects upon the internet, and technological innovation. In short, the customer will speak with his dollar, and my money will no longer support Amazon.com.

Cary Mathews


February 29, 2000

You are obviously offensively using the patent system to gain market share. I will no longer buy books from Amazon because of this. You advisors are surely telling you, as I have heard before that patents are one of the things people look for when investing in a company, but you need to invent something first. These patents you are describing are just uses of things that have already been used and created. It's nonsense and I won't stand for it as a consumer. I'm going to buy from your competitors. Sincerly, Eric M Gibson

Eric Gibson


February 29, 2000

I recently purchased ~ 贄 more in books from Amazon. Just after that, I started reading about these absurd patents. I personally used (coded) cookie-based one-click systems 5+ years ago. The bottom line: I nearly cancelled my order, and will neither browse, nor purchase anything from the amazon.com website until they cease their destructive behavior. Sincerely, Noah Fiedel

Noah Fiedel


February 29, 2000

I have been a regular customer of Amazon since its inception, and a strong supporter of its business approach. However, Amazon appears to have given in to the terrible and soul-eroding temptation of greed, and lost any sense of proportion or, apparently, decency. The 1-Click and "Associates" patents are both absurd on their face. While it is true that they both suggest the patent law is in dire need of being drastically revised, the fact that Amazon chose to abuse a system ripe for abuse does not reflect well on Amazon either.

David Link


February 29, 2000

Open standards and processes are the foundation of the environment in which your business operates: The Internet. By refusing to honor the spirit of cooperation and mutual benefit that created your market you sadden, dissappoint, and anger your (in my case former) customers. I submit that it is more advantageous in the long run to maintain the widespread grassroots energy of the internet and the goodwill of its users than it is to shut bn.com out of the christmas shopping season with an offensive (in both senses of the word) patent suit.

Michael Jurney


February 29, 2000

The Patent system was designed to support patents of the design of physical products that must then be produced. The idea of a patent separates the "designer" from the "producer", and protects the former's monetary investment in a new design from someone else who can copy the product. In the software field, all programming is "design;" only the binary copying equates to "producing." We already have an adequate if overzealous copyright law relating to software copying; if the patent system is applied to software, then every program in the world should have its own patent.

Ted Spence


February 29, 2000

Doing business in such a way as to harm others in the same market is no better than stealing. Good business is done by offering something that no one else currently has, or by offering better quality or service. These are the kind of things I look for in a business. I feel that you are abusing the use of a patents by patenting something that would hinder further development of the Internet, and that being 1-Click Ordering. This should be open for developers and other businesses to use freely. I might not boycot Amazon because of this, but Amazon has lost my loyalty, and in the future I will shop elsewhere unless Amazon is my only or last resort.

Matt Johnson


February 29, 2000

Totally disturbing that Amazon, up until now such a clean organization, would violate both the intent of the patent process (by depending on the ignorance of the examiners) and the ethics of the Internet community. My reason for buying from Amazon rather than B&N up until now stems from B&N's own history of questionable business practices (intentionally destroying independent booksellers and the like). However, there's always Borders.... I wonder if the open computing community could set up an arrangement where the community as a whole could become affiliated with Amazon's competitors, and funding generated in this way for free software development. Further, could the GPL be amended to give rights to everyone _except_ those on a patent abuse blackhole list?

Whit Blauvelt


February 29, 2000

I am an Amazon Associate, which means that I direct people to the Amazon site on books that I've read and recommend. I can not continue this practice any longer in good conscience. Instead I will start pointing my readers at other online sites. Since I probably make less than โ/year in "referral fees" I don't this going to hurt Amazon nor me very much (except for the inconvenience of reworking the web site). If M. Bezos and his bevy of lawyers want to make a positive contribution to the Internet that made his business so successful, he should keep this patent and others, but give away licenses to use them for free. That way noone else can try to control the technology. Acquiring patents is an expensive and time consuming task that no volunteers has the resources nor the will to pursue. On the other hand, if the open source community is to survive, it must protect its "intellectual capital" from hoarding by others.

Ken Mayer


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos: I am the webmaster and primary content author of a small website for fans of literature, photography, and music. While my site could potentially bring a number of dedicated readers to Amazon.com (I link to many booksellers and music stores online each week), I have chosen instead to prominently display my official position on Amazon.com (which coincides with Mr. O'Reilly's), linked to Richard M. Stallman's call for a boycott of Amazon.com, and taken much effort to find alternative sources of books and music online to encourage people not to patronize your business. I will continue to vocalize my position against Amazon.com and encourage my readership to seek alternative sources of books and music until Amazon.com officially states that it has reversed its policy on WorldWide Web patents, at which time I will encourage my readers to show support for your decision by purchasing books and music from you. I look forward to seeing such an announcement from you soon.

L. D. Steiner


February 29, 2000

I doubt that I can express my disgust with Amazon's business practices more eloquently than Tim O'Reilly, other than to say that I am yet another heavy purchaser of books in general and technical books in particular who boycots Amazon.com and encourages others to do so as well. As to the rediculousness of the patent, the simple fact that I can explain it to non-technical web users in under a minute is clear evidence that "trivial" is about the kindest thing that can be said about it. To take the fruits of the Gift Economy and pervert them as Amazon has done is the height of disrespect for all those who contribute real innovation and intellectual capital to the world. To Amazon, I tell you that I have cost you marketshare and will continue to do so for as long as you persist. When people consider purchasing on-line, they ask the opinion of people like myself, and when I tell them to use bn.com or fatbrain.com, they do. By offending the technical opinion leaders of the world, Amazon has most definitely created a severe long-term problem in the pursuit of short-term gains. -Chandler Howell

Chandler Howell


February 29, 2000

As a professional in the computer field(s), I feel compelled to comment on Amazon's actions. My position may, in-fact, be unique, because I work for a subsection of a company that does prepress book publishing. I am a software developer, have been a web developer, and a system administrator. I believe that most people don't understand the significance of the software patent problem until they've worked in/been exposed to the field for some time. (Please see the league for programming freedom -- http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/ -- for more information on how damaging these patents can be. It's too much to cover here.) What we're dealing with at Amazon may be just that -- someone who doesn't understand. That said, I can not condone, or permit Amazon to continue along this course of action with any real or imagined support from myself. It really does not matter whether the people at amazon lack understanding, or simply lack morality. Any online book purchases I may have made from Amazon will go to Barnes & Noble until this is resolved favourably. If this is resolved, and Amazon's patent is upheld, I'll not be shopping with Amazon again. I want to make that clear. This protest will last as long as Amazon enforces the patent, and not just until the legal trouble is over. I will do my best not only to refrain from buying things from Amazon, but to refrain from using any Amazon services during this time. I know somebody who sells things on zshop, and I'll be purchasing them directly from him rather than through zshop, for instance. I'll also display a bias against any institution which chooses to associate itself with Amazon. The only way for Amazon to redeem themselves at this point is to release all claims on this patent. Anything else is most likely unacceptable.

Christopher Smith


February 29, 2000

Ed French


February 29, 2000

M. Buendia


February 29, 2000

Brad Parker


February 29, 2000

Roger Eberhart


February 29, 2000

Derek Richardson


February 29, 2000

David Jao


February 29, 2000

Bill Redmond


February 29, 2000

Matthew Zeier


February 29, 2000

David Reiss


February 29, 2000

Justin Lessler


February 29, 2000

Bill McKinnon


February 29, 2000

I fully support the message behind this letter, and, as a loyal customer, truly believe it is in Amazon's best interest to comply.

Nick Burling


February 29, 2000

Jeffrey Hulten


February 29, 2000

Just too greedy. You'll fail.

Weigen


February 29, 2000

Just too greedy. You'll fail.

Weigen


February 29, 2000

Just too greedy. You'll fail.

Weigen


February 29, 2000

Einar Fl°ystad D°rum


February 29, 2000

Stella Fabiane


February 29, 2000

I'm disgusted.

Benjamin Turner


February 29, 2000

You can't be serious. The joke is over. Give it up, Jeff.

Matt Long


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com is a great convenience, but I'm done doing business with them... this patent is ludicrous.

Mike Lewis


February 29, 2000

I have to agree with the sentiment. I've quit buying from Amazon because of this.

Richard Vasquez


February 29, 2000

I'm going to be even happier about the O'Reilly books that I'll be buying - somewhere other than Amazon.

Tracy Atteberry


February 29, 2000

I've never purchased from Amazon. I plan to make that a policy in my home, and to encourage others to do the same.

Eli Vaughan


February 29, 2000

Tim pretty much said it all -- you are hurting the entire industry with this sort of behaviour.

Jonathan Kift


February 29, 2000

Please don't exploit the poorly-run patent infrastructure that made the mistake of granting these patents.

Todd Hutchinson


February 29, 2000

A former Amazon employee: given my opposition to ludicrous software patents, it would have been hypocritical to stay.

Dave Carrigan


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, do you really want history to remember Amazon, and you personally, as a bully, rather than an innovator?

Benjamin Leidner


February 29, 2000

I agree with the letter and ask that you stop this use of patents. Until you do so, I will not shop or recommend that others shop at your store. VO

Vince Outlaw


February 29, 2000

Amazon is a bad citizen of the net. I have joined the boycott, and have successfully urged technical people not to join Amazon's staff.

Elizabeth Parish


February 29, 2000

I love Amazon and have ordered many products from you- last winter I had an Amazon Xmas. Don't blow it by becoming hated. Continue the good work.

Robin Hankin


February 29, 2000

I have ceased buying from Amazon.com and am encouraging my friends and family to do likewise. Your exploitation of the USPO's ignorance is breathtakingly unconscionable.

Nicole Carlson


February 29, 2000

I will also take my business elsewhere until Amazon gives up trying to enforce these ridiculous patents. We thought you were the good guys. Were we wrong?

Glen Henshaw


February 29, 2000

I found this letter just after purchasing a CD from an Amazon competitor. I would have preferred to buy from Amazon, but I won't while this ridiculous patent in force.

Jim Hague


February 29, 2000

I don't like anyone messing with the integrity of computers and the internet. Nobody is more powerful than an irate mass of consumers, so take heed, Amazon. Play by the rules of the internet.

Patrick Draper


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, because of Amazon's frivolous patent filings, Borders.com earned my business. You have contributed to my research on both more friendly policies and on lower prices. Thank you.

Michael S. Keller


February 29, 2000

I bought one O'Reilly book on Linux from Amazon. Hope I can find another vendor to buy the second edition. I don't want to buy anything about GNU from vendor that Richard Stallman boycotts.

Rafal Michalski


February 29, 2000

I have been an Amazon customer for more than 4 years. Even though I like to support local companies, and several friends work or have worked for Amazon, I will not support Amazon until they drop their 1-click patent.

Aki Namioka


February 29, 2000

I've bought from Amazon in the past, but will not do so again until this patent abuse issue has been resolved. If Amazon will play dirty with its competition, I hope customers will realize that they are the ones to get hurt in the end.

Tom Lofgren


February 29, 2000

There was once a fellow named Bezos Who promised to sue the bejeezus Out of anyone who With means that WEREN'T NEW Tried with one-click orders to please us! I resent that, and will boycott you until you cease to hold this aggressive position.

Sean Callanan


February 29, 2000

It seems like Amazon has forgotten one of the rules to keep a good business going: Don't get [too] greedy! ... While my โ or ์ worth of book may not make a big difference, let's see what happens if everyone who's signed here buys their books somewhere else...

Luis Orozco


February 29, 2000

I was a loyal customer of Amazon in the past. Due to their absurd patent applications, I can no longer deal with Amazon in good faith. Until Amazon backs away from their attempts to make the Internet their own private marketplace, I will take my business elsewhere.

Stan Melton


February 29, 2000

I've enjoyed doing business with Amazon over the past three years believing them to be an asset to the net and considered them a merchant I could trust. However, after reading Tim O'ReillyÆs "one click" article, I've decided my loyalty was misplaced. I will be more careful in the future.

Frank Lea


February 29, 2000

Competition, not protectionism, is what has made our economy strong. While true innovations should be encouraged and rewarded, patenting trivial reuses of technology should result in penalties commensurate to the time and energy wasted in establishing and subsequently challenging them.

Paul Mineiro


February 29, 2000

Since Amazon has attempted to enforce this patent I have stopped purchasing from Amazon. I have also urged others not to shop from Amazon with success. I will not purchase from Amazon and will discourage others from doing so until Amazon relents from attempting to enforce the "1-Click" and the "Associates" patent.

Mark Menard


February 29, 2000

The intent of the internet is not to stifle your compitition by abuse of the patent office with trivial and obvious extensions of existing technologies, or to bog down rivals with lawsuits. I can not support your business until you support and respect the community that gave you the opportunity to have such a venture.

Dusty Jones


February 29, 2000

I am lending my voice to this cause as well. I will be taking my dollars elsewhere until the patent issues are resolved. I will also be encouraging family, friends, and colleagues to do the same. Additionally, I encourage O'Reilly to stop shipping books to Amazon until a satisfactory outcome has been reached.

Michael S. Lewis


February 29, 2000

I've already written back to Amazon in response to a marketing e-mail they sent me informing them that I would no longer shop there while they pursued this ridiculous patent on a toy technology. I was given a patronizing response indicating that Amazon was aware of a significant amount of confusion regarding their patent litigation. The confusion is inside the gates, not outside. Stop this ludicrous litigious onanism. Innovate, don't litigate.

Brian Sletten


February 29, 2000

As a computer professional and a believer in freedom, Amazon's attempts to stifle innovation and restrict the Web disgust me. A patent on the associates program? Business associates and alliances are older than the US PTO! I will not be buying anything from Amazon until they become a merchant worthy of my money. And I will make sure everyone I know understands just how slimy they're being.

Kai MacTane


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim. Amazon provides a very good service. I had no problems and I gave Amazon.com a lot of my business up until Christmas, the whole patent issue came up and I decided to join RMS's ban on Amazon. Barnes & Noble's online store got my business that season and most of my purchases were books of one order or another. There are other book, music, electronics, movie sites on the web. See <http://www.noamazon.com> for some.

Steve Lamb


February 29, 2000

In addition to relying on the good will of consumers, Amazon should also take note of the fact that it is still losing money and is relying on investors to keep itself solvent. As public opinion grows against Amazon's unethical patenting processes a public boycott serves to further endanger the interest of their investors. In short, they should stop spending their time and effort on frivolous lawsuits over their patents and instead go back to what they're good at - selling books.

Jeanette Johnston


February 29, 2000

This is truly unfortunate. The Patent Office has become nothing less than a rubber stamp generator for incredibly greedy people. Between patenting of gene sequences (Jeez!!!!) and obviously frivilous patents such as this, the whole Patent issuing process has to be over-hauled or scrapped. I can only hope that some one at the Patent Office will have their light bulb turned on eventually. (P.S. We were doing browser state-management for Web-based applications developed around '94 and '95. We have source-code archives kicking around somewhere.)

Gerard Hynes


February 29, 2000

I have purchased thousands of dollars worth of merchandise from Amazon, but I am so outraged by their clueless, anti-Internet, parasitic behavior that I stopped buying from Amazon several months ago. Adding up my purchases from Buy.com and Borders -- purchases I researched first at the Amazon site, before switching over to their competitors to place my actual orders -- I see that I have spent 躲 in the past 3 months that would ordinarily have gone to Amazon. I would prefer to buy from Amazon, but cannot in good conscience support them until they begin to act responsibly.

Walter Purvis


February 29, 2000

While i always enjoyed shopping at amazon i dont anymore

Arne Hueggenberg


February 29, 2000

I was an Amazon.com customer long before they became the giant that they are now. I'm saddened and ashamed that they have chosen this path, and I sincerely regret that I can no longer support them or recommend them to others, at least until they back away from this ridiculous and fraudulent claim. Mr. Bezos, peel the dollar-signs from your eyeballs and take a good look around. These are the people that made you and your company what they are today. Don't continue to alienate them by persisting in this foolish and self-destructive act of greed. In the end it will be you, not your competitors, who will be the biggest loser.

Keith Wasserman


February 29, 2000

This really rubs me the wrong way. Amazon has obviously benefitted from the work of others, but seems uninterested in giving anything back. That's bad enough, but not reason to stop using their service. However, the fact that they see fit to stop others from freely using that medium disgusts me. I, and the rest of my family, have been regular customers of Amazon in the past. Not anymore. It's a shame, I really liked Amazon. They seemed like a class-act. This seems far beneth them. But we have been using other web-based booksellers, and will continue to do so, until Amazon stops its abusive practices.

Bryan Scaringe


February 29, 2000

At present, the granting of software patents in the US appears to be a frighteningly arbitrary process. Each unfairly granted patent allows one party to enjoy priveleges that are wholly out of keeping with the spirit of exchange and innovation that IP law seeks to promote. One party wins a pyrrhic victory, every other party loses the freedom to undertake simple everyday tasks, innovative or otherwise. When this happens sufficiently often there will be no winners at all - nobody will be able to do anything without infringing patents. Amazon did not invent clicking on a hyperlink. They did not invent sending a cookie. By patenting trivial ideas, Amazon is endorsing and supporting a system from which they stand to lose at least as much as anyone else.

Duncan Pierce


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, I have no problem with your registrations of these aforementioned patents, but I do feel that by using these patents to inhibit the competitive nature of your market you are wrong. The techniques you use for your "one-click" shopping have been around in use at hundreds of web sites before you used these techniques. Admit this, keep your patent and use it only to keep others from trying the same exploits as you now do. While my past purchases from Amazon.com may not add up to much, I am fortunate enough to be in a position where those who are unfamiliar with e-commerce ask my opinion for the best sites on the web to purchase certain items. Amazon.com has been one of my recommendations in the past, but if you continue with your absurd stance with this "one-click" patent and possibly your "associates" patent, then I must express my influence and tell people to buy their books and other merchandise at places such as fatbrain, Barnes & Noble and cdnow. Please reverse your decisi! ons to use your patents to be anti-competitive. Thank you for your time.

Joel Hart


February 29, 2000

As a professional in the computer field(s), I feel compelled to comment on Amazon's actions. My position may, in-fact, be unique, because I work for a subsection of a company that does prepress book publishing. I am a software developer, have been a web developer, and a system administrator. I believe that most people don't understand the significance of the software patent problem until they've worked in/been exposed to the field for some time. (Please see the league for programming freedom -- http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/ -- for more information on how damaging these patents can be. It's too much to cover here.) What we're dealing with at Amazon may be just that -- someone who doesn't understand. That said, I can not condone, or permit Amazon to continue along this course of action with any real or imagined support from myself. It really does not matter whether the people at amazon lack understanding, or simply lack morality. Any online book purchases I may have made from Amazon will go to Barnes & Noble until this is resolved favourably. If this is resolved, and Amazon's patent is upheld, I'll not be shopping with Amazon again. I want to make that clear. This protest will last as long as Amazon enforces the patent, and not just until the legal trouble is over. I will do my best not only to refrain from buying things from Amazon, but to refrain from using any Amazon services during this time. I know somebody who sells things on zshop, and I'll be purchasing them directly from him rather than through zshop, for instance. I'll also display a bias against any institution which chooses to associate itself with Amazon. The only way for Amazon to redeem themselves at this point is to release all claims on this patent. Anything else is most likely unacceptable.

Christopher Smith


February 29, 2000

Jason Reid


February 29, 2000

Evan Robinson


February 29, 2000

Michael Bealer


February 29, 2000

Gabriel Bereny


February 29, 2000

Jesse Grosjean


February 29, 2000

Subhajit Bhattacherjee


February 29, 2000

Do the right thing.

Joey Tsai


February 29, 2000

Rodger Crawford


February 29, 2000

David Krinsky


February 29, 2000

Robert Del Huerto


February 29, 2000

Roger Franz


February 29, 2000

Dave Erickson


February 29, 2000

Julian LaPlace


February 29, 2000

James I. Slaydon, III


February 29, 2000

Your patent is ludicrous and I no longer buy any books from Amazon.

Brent Halsey


February 29, 2000

Former customer & maybe never again -- Amazon's choice.

Bill Kohn


February 29, 2000

I'm a big fan of Amazon. Please do the right thing.

Patrick Colgan


February 29, 2000

Amazon is damaging the internet and its time to route around it.

Maurice Davis


February 29, 2000

To say I am most disappointed with Amazon would be a severe understatement.

Alan Krause


February 29, 2000

It should be bloody obvious that the patent is bollocks. Just drop it.

Alex Pasternak


February 29, 2000

I support the ban on Amazon use until the patent issues are resolved.

Sean O'Grady


February 29, 2000

I will not purchase from Amazon for so long as Amazon feels that it must use exploitative business practices.

Garrick James


February 29, 2000

I've never been to Amazon, I've never even seen one. But this I'll tell you anyhow, I'll never see or be one.

Jeffrey Chimene


February 29, 2000

As a software developer, I purchase quite a few books every year. Fatbrain gets all of my business until Amazon wises up.

Dave Neuer


February 29, 2000

this patent makes a mockery of the patent system and should never have gone this far. Shame on you Jeff Bezos.

Ed Meyer


February 29, 2000

I say we patent delivering content via HTTP for the intent of selling merchandise. Then we sure Amazon and put them out of business =)

David Vedder


February 29, 2000

My loyalty to Amazon.com has ended. While I'm at it, I plan on submitting a patent for the process of putting a pen cap back on the pen.

Darrell Brogdon


February 29, 2000

I believe that this is an abuse of the patent office ignorance of Internet technologies.. It should be revoked. I urge Amazon.com to relinquish its patent and the patent office to review it own Internet patent pollicies. -Richard Monson-Haefel

Richard Monson-Haefel


February 29, 2000

I agree with your denouncement of Amazon's patenting policies. On a wider scale, I dislike software patents in general. Add my name to the list.

Robert Smith


February 29, 2000

I have been a big Amazon customer for both books and music in the past year. This will stop and I will go to alternate sites. I love the convenience, but not at this cost.

Claus Laundrup


February 29, 2000

I have no intention of doing further business with Amazon.com as long as they continue to enforce this or any other ridiculously broad and socially harmful software patent.

Brian McGuinness


February 29, 2000

I support software patents, but only when they are for legitimate processes. These patents violate the spirit of the patent system and cast a shadow over all software patents.

Runako Godfrey


February 29, 2000

No longer is the internet a place of intellectual freedom and sharing of ideas for the common good. It is now a place of pure greed, it's corruption is complete, Thank you Jeff

Jay Hellmann


February 29, 2000

No longer is the internet a place of intellectual freedom and sharing of ideas for the common good. It is now a place of pure greed, it's corruption is complete, Thank you Jeff

Jay Hellmann


February 29, 2000

I've been a satisified Amazom customer for years, but my business will be going elsewhere until this situation has been resolved. I'm also actively encouraging co-workers to do the same.

Don Krause


February 29, 2000

I am a formerly very satified Amazon customer, but I will no longer do any business with them until they stop misusing the patent system.

Kelly Price


February 29, 2000

Patenting simple technology such as use of a cookie is petty and simple-minded. I will likely purchase my books elsewhere until you see the light and stop trying to stifle technological development. Thank you.

Mike Dodd


February 29, 2000

Agree with Tim's letter wholeheartedly. Amazon is a wonderful business, but their patents are beyond outrageous. Until they drop their efforts to constrict the Web, I will not shop with them.

Gordon Strause


February 29, 2000

David M. Hungerford III


February 29, 2000

I hope that by attaching my name to this letter, it will help convince you that attempting to enforce the patent (not just getting it) will prove to harm more than help your company's bottom line.

Scott Wolford


February 29, 2000

Amazon seems lost in their own jungle, missing the forest for the trees and I think they just ran head first into a big one. Listen to Tim, guys, he's trying to play native guide, and you could do worse.

Zachary DeAquila


February 29, 2000

I was formerly a very happy customer of Amazon.ca, unfortunately due to this blatant abuse of power on Amazon's part, I will no longer deal with them until they realize the err. in there ways and correct it. Keep the Internet open.

Robin Bolton


February 29, 2000

I'm actually more upset with the USPTO than with Amazon, but I absolutely agree that agressively persuing a bad patent is just as bad as granting it in the 1st place. Jeff: Please stop. Tim: Thanks for the call to action. JB, not shopping at Amazon.

JB Segal


February 29, 2000

I have bought several books through Amazon, but can no longer continue to do so, given Amazon's patent issues. Please reconsider your position with these patents. I have also advised my many local and 'net friends to consider boycotting Amazon for these patent practices.

Jim O'Brien


February 29, 2000

Just today I bought seventy dollars worth of books that I would have much rather bought at Amazon. Instead, because you continue to abuse patents, I was forced to purchase from another vendor. I hope that you are pleased with what your entirely foolish behavior has caused.

John Mascher


February 29, 2000

Thanks Tim for picking up this battle. We need somebody with enough leadership and visibility to speak up. Those few hundred bucks each of us is spending individually on Amazon.com isn't much of a leverage to give the giant a nudge. But I sure hope that combined they make a difference.

Joel R.


February 29, 2000

first i called amazon and told them to delete my name from their database. then i went to http://nowebpatents.org/ and registered with their boycott. my next steps are to urge my friends to to do the same, and to choose a different bookstore to spend several hundred dollars each year.

Adam Chandler


February 29, 2000

Thanks to Tim for saying it so well for all of us. If Amazon does not follow his advice, I will join the boycott of Amazon. I have already stopped using Amazon and checking out the competition. Amazon's superior lists of books and prices are the reason I use it; the one-click is irrelevent.

John G. Stewart


February 29, 2000

This position is disturbing, and I applaud Tim and company for their approach to the protest. As of this date I will not buy anything on Amazon, and will persuade my friends and family to do likewise. I hope Jeff decides to change his position, as I would really like to continue to do business with this company.

Matt Bacchi


February 29, 2000

I was previously a devoted Amazon customer. Their recent assults on the free and open nature of the web have insulted consumers like myself as well as every retail site online. I have since canceled my pending orders and will give my patronage to other sites until Amazon gives up their policy of aggressive comonplace-technology squatting.

Jamie Zucek


February 29, 2000

I've spent a total of ๠ at online bookstores. That's not much, but there are _many_ more people who may have spent equals amounts. I spent them at "www.bn.com" because of the Amazon patent issue. I will continue the boycott of Amazon until the patent issues go away, and I hope many thousands of others do likewise.

Thomas Palmer


February 29, 2000

It is sad how little knowledge the patent office seems to have about technical issues. It is even more sad how eager companies like Amazon.com are to exploit this flaw in the patent office. What is not sad, however, is the level of knowledge of the general public. They will not allow this; if Amazon's sales are not hurting now, they soon will be. And I will be doing eveything in my power to guarantee it.

Sonja Tideman


February 29, 2000

I have been surprised and disappointed at Amazon's patenting trivial technology. It only says bad things about Amazon, and the US Patent Office. My company has been buying a lot of technical books through Amazon the last few years, but this patent has caused the software company I work for to start using other sources. Please reconsider this awful direction you have chosen. There is still time to make the right decision.

Robert Leider


February 29, 2000

Your decision to actively support the patenting of 1-click ordering is wholly foolhardy, especially considering that you chose to emphasize the user-experience part of the process (the single click) over any particularly clever application of code that would allow for 1-click shopping. Patenting an idea is presumptuous in the extreme, and I urge you to take this letter and what it represents _very_ seriously.

Ben Cochran


February 29, 2000

I find it hypocritical that a company who's success is derived from the open systems of the internet, would try to patent such a trivial application. Where would we be if someone patented the hyperlink? I am writing a letter to Amazon requesting that all my credit card data and personal information be removed from their system. I am also selling all my Amazon stock and promoting http://www.noamazon.com any chance I get.

Joe Pearson


February 29, 2000

I had heard of cookies before I heard of amazon.com. As a professional developer the most "obvious" use I saw for cookies was to store customer information. I remember being slightly paranoid about the security of cookies and my credit card information. An obvious use of technology is about as far from an invention as possible. Amazon, please drop this suit and make the "one-click" patent freely available in the public domain before you lose more customers like me. Thank you. Craig Maslowski

Craig Maslowski


February 29, 2000

Amazon, you are seriously jeopardizing a significant segment of a loyal customer base. As a member of an internet startup, I and my colleagues not only make a high volume of purchases through Amazon, but are often engaged in getting our less tech-savvy friends and relatives comfortable with on-line purchases. Your egregious abuse of muddy intellectual property law has ensured that you will not be receiving further business or references from us. I hope you will reconsider the patent.

Paul Agostinelli


February 29, 2000

When Amazon filed their 1-click shopping patent, I decided not to purchase anything else from them. Still, I kept relatively quiet about it, and didn't really try to convince others to do the same. Guess what? Twice is too much. My decision to not purchase from Amazon until they revise their patent policy has been extended, to convincing others not to purchase from the company as well. It's not as if there aren't other sources for books on the web; often cheaper, as well. I look forward to exploring them.

A. Freed


February 29, 2000

The filing and legal enforcement of this patent is against the principles that the 'net was built on in the first place. After learning more about this issue, I will reserve my book money for organizations that are more in-tune with the culture of the Internet. Do not turn your back on the Internet culture, it is what has nurished your business from the start. I would like for you to change your position and come out in support of the openness that the Internet was built on. When you do this, you will earn my appreciation and even more of my business.

Michael Learn


February 29, 2000

I find it hard to believe that all the ill will you are generating can be balanced by your pursuit of this and other patents. If your motives were defensive I could understand, your actions indidcate otherwise. I can live without one-click shopping and I can't help wondering how valuable your Associates program can be as fewer people use your site. Prior to this patent absurdity, my first inclination when looking for a book was Amazon. Sadly for Amazon, that is no longer the case, now I look for alternatives. I urge Amazon to re-examine their position. To paraphrase an old ad campaign, "A lost customer is a terrible thing to waste."

Jake Spiller


February 29, 2000

I am (or should I say "I was"?), a good customer of Amazon's. I purchased plenty of books from them, as they gave me the possibility to get some otherwise unavailable technical books. I am truly disappointed by their current behaviour and I am therefore refraining from buying anything from them as log as this issue is not satisfactorily solved. I hope that they do check my previous record of book orders and do notice that they ceased. I hope that they can estimate how much money they will be losing on this issue and step back. As a matter of fact, during the last 6 months I ordered some 躔 worth of books, from other people. Too bad for them.

Giacomo Mulas


February 29, 2000

I wrote a similar letter to Amazon when I first heard of this and received a response much like the response Tim got. I have since made all of my book purchases through Amazon's competitors. I will continue to abstain from using Amazon so as long as Amazon continues its abuse of the patent system by patenting commonly used e-commerce techniques. I strongly believe, however, that Amazon will continue to try to fence in technology as long as they believe that the masses will remain ignorant of what they are really doing. My fear is that this will encourage other companies to do the same. Then we will start to lose not only common e-commerce processing techniques, but perhaps more general computing techniques as well.

William Green


February 29, 2000

It is this sort of patently stupid (and if your foolish enough to patent "1-Click" then you might as well formalize the colloquialism and patent "stupid" as well)corporate strategy that ultimately kills the very corporation it was designed to protect. Turning a blind eye to your consumers in an effort to fend off competition and establish, essentially, a monopoly in a given market is a good way to ensure that your customers will desert you and your business will fail. In the end it's not the consumer that's hurt, it's you. If you value your current position in the market, I suggest you listen to your customers and cease such monopolistic and predatory actions as the "1-Click" patent and the lawsuit against Barnes & Noble.

Alaric G. Weigle


February 29, 2000

I have ordered countless items from Amazon since my first order in February 1997. They were an excellent service with excellent prices. I am apalled they have succumbed to shortsighted corporate greed--especially considering their success without resorting to such tactics in the past. I have cancelled my 6 unshipped orders and will make no further purchases from them unless they redeem themselves by renouncing their exploitation of an outdated patent system to the detriment of the Web and the philosophy of open-source. I don't make this decision lightly. It will mean I must now make many purchases I was used to making online at other websites, or even at brick-and-mortar locations, spending higher prices and wasting more time. I will do it anyway because the openness of the Net is far more important to me that the convenience of Amazon.

Adams Douglas


February 29, 2000

This truly sickens me to see Amazon.com patent and enforce the patent on such a blatantly obvious technique. There are some people in this world who will knowingly do things just because they feel that they can get away with it. It is my impression that Amazon.com falls into this category. It's clear to everyone that Amazon is willfully abusing the patent system. As such, they are showing their true colours and demonstrating their lack of business ethics and common sense. In light of this, I can honestly say that I will not purchase anything else from Amazon now or in the future, no matter what the outcome of the patent situation. Even if they were to give up their patents, the damage has been done and Amazon has been exposed for what it truly is. I will always remain a <B>former</B> Amazon customer. Amazon.com, I wish you everything you deserve.

Matt Perry


February 29, 2000

Very well said, Mr O'Reilly. Amazon should ponder very carefully the implications of the reaction their moves have provoked amongst the technically aware community. It's not just direct loss of sales which is involved: despite all the current hype e-commerce is still in its infancy, and many people still find the prospect of making their first online purchase a daunting and uncomfortable one, for which they seek reassurance and advice from someone who has already done it - and the technically aware are still a large part of this pool. In such an environment, bad repute can spread rapidly and result in permanent loss of business as potential customers become familiar and comfortable with competitor's offerings. Perhaps even more significantly, the reaction gives a strong indication of what will be the consensus of undeniably expert testimony should a challenge to this mischievous patent come to court.

Pete Lee


February 29, 2000

I regret that Amazon insists on this ludicrous patent. When we reflect on other foolish software patents, like the Compton patent on all multimedia or the Microsoft patent on web discussion forums, we can see how uninformed the USPTO is about software issues. Can Amazon be confident that no competitor will dredge up some inane patent to use against them? And if not for a service they currently provide, for an area in which they seek to expand? I think not. It is in Amazon's interest to make software patents a non-issue. Their brand equity and customer loyalty are very good, and their willingness to rethink their mission constantly as the e-commerce world grows will serve them well. Building walls of this kind wil not, and the side effect of alienating a vocal segment of technophiles and early-adopters will not. I have bought over 񘈨 of books from Barnes and Noble since this began, using Amazon only for hard to find titles. I am also considering boycotting them altogether until this is resolved. Since I have been shopping with Amazon since 1996, and since I have spent in excess of 񙇈 with them, I believe I am one of their core customers. That is the future they are building as far as I am concerned. Sincerely, Steve Salkin

Steven Salkin


February 29, 2000

I have purchased from Amazon in the past, but not since I heard about the absurdity of their "business decision" to patent non-original ideas and processes. I believe that brick-and-mortar is the way to go; at least there, I can read the book (or at least get a good idea of the contents) before I purchase it, and don't have to worry about violating someone's patent (no matter how trivial it really is) just to make a purchase! Barnes and Noble, here I come....or Hastings, or Borders, or.... Mr. O'Reilly, thank you for your eloquent and unbiased letter to Mr. Bezos, and I can only hope that the number of signers to this letter and the number of sales they lose as a result might become an eye-opener for Amazon.com. One thought: perhaps we could inform Amazon directly as to what their potential customers think! this page has a list of their customer support email addresses: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/help/mail-menu.html/103-8692251-0663030 Robert A. Cooper Bryan, Texas, USA

Robert A. Cooper


February 29, 2000

E J Steil


February 29, 2000

David Besch


February 29, 2000

Mel Norbeck


February 29, 2000

Dave Parker


February 29, 2000

The history of this industry is full of stories of people and companies appropriating obvious work. Does Amazon realize they are now in idealogical alignment with the guy who patented the pivot point Y2K fix? I've been a strong supporter of Amazon and have liked the way they have done business to now, but until they relinquish their stand I will remove all affiliate links and shift my business to powells.com .

Dave Slusher


February 29, 2000

Joshua Baer


February 29, 2000

James S. Neff


February 29, 2000

Bruce J. Lindsay


February 29, 2000

Brian Bush


February 29, 2000

Patrick Green


February 29, 2000

I've been buying books from Amazon for several years now but this patents issue fills me with revulsion for their methods. Its sad to see a once truly innovative company go the way of the Gates of this world. No more Amazon for me (of course, if they publicly retract their claims, I might rethink).

Papi Menon


February 29, 2000

Jeff MacDonald


February 29, 2000

Arno Hollosi


February 29, 2000

Sean Cummins


February 29, 2000

Ben Esacove


February 29, 2000

Allan Morstein


February 29, 2000

Daniel Mercer


February 29, 2000

Judy Anderson


February 29, 2000

Ken Hagler


February 29, 2000

Christopher Schweda


February 29, 2000

Bem Jones-Bey


February 29, 2000

Guillermo Aranda


February 29, 2000

Raymond M. Reskusich


February 29, 2000

Andrew Bakun


February 29, 2000

Greg Robbins


February 29, 2000

Mattias Wadenstein


February 29, 2000

Simply ridiculous!

William A. Aquila


February 29, 2000

Former customer

Joachim B. Haga


February 29, 2000

I'm boycotting, and I'll advise others to do so too.

Nigel Purdy


February 29, 2000

Another unsatisfied, former customer.

George Kyle


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim. Don't buy from Amazon!

Michael Grinder


February 29, 2000

Amazon, you should be embarassed by your behavior.

Dave Newton


February 29, 2000

I agree with the letter on all points.

J. Stephen Warren


February 29, 2000

Amazon has gone too far with this. Despite finding their service excellent, I will no longer buy from them.

Alex Burr


February 29, 2000

Trivial patents hurt everyone, especially Amazon's customers. I guess I have to find books elsewhere now. This is a shame since I appreciated Amazon's good customer service.

Nathan Lawson


February 29, 2000

Amazon is off my list of vendors to consider for any purchase. I am advising others to not deal with Amazon. Amazon is not a "good neighbor".

Peter Hoffman


February 29, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos I am taking my business elsewhere. I am not impressed by Amazon's behaviour with regard to prosecuting spurious software patents. Kindly reconsider, Saras Udanpur

Saras Udanpur


February 29, 2000

Ease up, or I buy elsewhere. Customer loyalty is an easy loss, especially on the net. I like Amazon the site and service. I dislike Amazon the bully. Desist!

Richard Taylor


February 29, 2000

Please reconsider your stance on your two software patents. Actions such as these can only be detrimental to the future development of the World Wide Web. Thank you.

Amy Csizmar Dalal


February 29, 2000

As a result of Amazon's ridiculousness, Amazon has no chance at any of my business until they cease and desist trying to patent a vital and common element of e-business.

Colin Spitler


February 29, 2000

I am an O'Reilly customer and purchase books (both technical & non-technical) online. I am supporting the boycott of Amazon until this issue is resolved to my satisfaction. Ian Paul Foot

ian.foot(a)dial.pipex.com


February 29, 2000

The 1-click patent does not protect a unique or novel technology. It's just a legal artifice, borne of a corrupt patent system, that Amazon is using as a bludgeon to attempt to smash its competition. How crass.

Andrew Tannenbaum


February 29, 2000

It's quite simple Jeff, if you continue with this, you will have a huge boycott on your hands... There are many alternatives to your site now, I'll have no problem with going elsewhere. It's your call.

John Gardner


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim. This is the end of my business with Amazon, my family's business with Amazon, and many of my friends' business with Amazon.

Ed Kern


February 29, 2000

As an employee of one of the largest brokerage institutions in the US, I am urging my fellow coworkers to go elsewhere to purchase books online until the management at Amazon.com comes to their senses.

Phil Johnson


February 29, 2000

I've also spent hundreds of dollars in the past at Amazon, but as a developer myself, am disturbed by what I consider to be Amazon's unethical and irresponsible actions in this matter. I would urge Amazon to reconsider.

Phil McJunkins


February 29, 2000

I find Amazon's patent on 1-click ordering, and almost all software patents in general, to be disgusting. They're already stifling innovation in the software industry, and they are rapidly on their way to destroying the Internet.

Pete Flugstad


February 29, 2000

Being an e-commerce innovator, I'm saddened by how Amazon has stifled continued growth and innovation in this field. I will not support a company that doesn't support the industry/medium that it was founded upon.

Jeff Carnahan


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon stops trying to enforce this ridiculous patent, I'll be boycotting and encouraging all my friends to do likewise. Please do yourselves *and* the net a favor and stand down from this absurd position.

Claudia Mastroianni


February 29, 2000

Intellectual Property is a public trust, intended to reward innovation and spur invention, for the public good. This patent serves only private profit, and without meeting any measure of innovation. As such, it deserves no public largesse.

Jeff McCoskey


February 29, 2000

You may add me to the list of *former* amazon.com customers. Mr. O'Reilly did not state the case too strongly when he accused Amazon of "pissing in the well," and I for one will not buy from a vendor who does that kind of thing.

WAde L. Scholine


February 29, 2000

I have brought tonnes of books from anazon.com and amazon.co.uk (lots of them ORA books :-) and if you don't desist from this daft behaviour over patents I'll be forced to follow RMS's boycott suggestion -- please have a re-think.

Chris Croome


February 29, 2000

Guys, if you back off from this you will not loose your face, quite opposite. If you show that you can learn from your mistakes it will be the best marketing you can get. And I do hope that it's just a mistake on your side!!!!

Artem G. Abanov


February 29, 2000

Ya know, I was really irate when Barnes and Noble went after Ingram, so I took my consumer voting dollars to Amazon. Now Amazon has decided they can play the bully and profit off the efforts of others. So much for them taking the high road.

Larry Loesch


February 29, 2000

I cannot say anything better that what have previously been said. I guess will just say "Barnes and Noble" here I come. I have money burning a hole in my pocket and books to buy. If you come around, send me an e-mail, and I would be happy to come back. Well ... until then ....

Jeff Barrett


February 29, 2000

Indeed, the World Wide Web was given to us all as a gift, and now some are trying to claim parts of it as their own. I guess that's business as usual, but it doesn't make it ethical and I will not be buying from Amazon until they wake up and see the light.

Michael Schwager


February 29, 2000

I do most of my book purchasing from Amazon. Not any more. I also purchase CDs, videos and toys/electronics. Until Amazon wakes up I will shop elsewhere. BTW Amazon I also purchase MANY technical books for a large department. You are losing more than a typical single customer.

Michael Kriss


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim's letter and feel that Amazon should drop the patent. Most of the techno-weenies I know (including myself) all think that Amazon looks really stupid for having the patent. After all, the technology was around before they were and was given freely to the world...

Christopher Lamey


February 29, 2000

Like many others, I am not a large source of income for Amazon. However, I agree that what you are doing is wrong. I think that the patents should never have been issued. I will not be buying anything from you until you quit your abuse. Plenty of other sources for O'Reilly books out there!

David Kubalak


February 29, 2000

I can appreciate Amazon filing patents to prevent someone else filing the patent and then trying to collect royalties. But I do not agree with your policy of using the patents to restrict others.

John McQuilling


February 29, 2000

Tim said it best, you're "pissing in the well." You don't have to "give back" to the community, but you certainly have no right to strangle it. If I can boycott the entire movie industry due to the DVD fiasco, then I'll have no trouble boycotting one online book store (that's you). Thanks.

John L. Varga, III


February 29, 2000

It is indeed not logical in any definition of the term to go against those who created the technology you (Amazon) wish to hide. In fact, as has been stated by so many others, it will prove to be counterprofitable. The Betamax is a prome example of short term greed. Learn from it!

Neil J. McLeish


February 29, 2000

As a previous Amazon.com customer (books & cd's), I'm disappointed in Amazon. I will not buy anything from Amazon.com until they change their stance on this issue.

Joe Phillips


February 29, 2000

I have supported Amazon.com for quite some time, even defending their position in the book industry as my friends bemoaned the "demise" of the small bookstore. Given Amazon's unreasonable pursuit of this patent issue, I will be shopping elsewhere, and encouraging others to do the same.

David Hoskin


February 29, 2000

You would think that, in this time of general public recoil from companies like Microsoft, Amazon would be smart enough to not go against the principles that so many of the people on the net hold dear. I, for one, will be trying to purchase books elsewhere from now on, with Amazon as my last resort.

Kristin Anne Igaki


February 29, 2000

I find Amazon's behavior and intent fascinating. Mr. Bezos et al have amassed immense fortunes which, at least in part, are results of other people's time, effort, and sense of community. To ignore this fact is shameful. Perhaps there is something in the Seattle water supply that causes this amazing selective memory.

Calum Lawler


February 29, 2000

I have spent more than 躔 to date at amazon.com, and have never purchased books or CDs from any other online merchant. However, in light of the abusive patents on One-Click ordering and the Affiliates program, I can no longer countenance purchasing anything from Amazon. I hope you see fit to change your policies soon.

Seth L. Blumberg


February 29, 2000

Over the past several years my colleagues and I have built a very large library of technical books here for us to reference. In the past we looked to Amazon as a major supplier of those books. In the future we will not buy anything from Amazon until they admit that the 1-Click and Associates patents are absurd and cease to enforce them.

Jeffrey A. Everett


February 29, 2000

The Amazon case is just the tip of the iceberg. The current patenting practices have to be subjected to a review by the courts (inevitable) as well as in the public policy arena (desirable and more important). It is high time to question the normative and practical preconceptions that underpin our attitude towards intellectual "property".

Dieter Zinnbauer


February 29, 2000

I am a small business owner and Web developer. This type of patent will hinder the advancement of the internet and ideas. I hope that after the obvious disagreement from the technical community Amazon will reconsider their position on this issue. The internet is a success because of it's open ideas and mass inovation. Not by the power of one.

Scott Burton


February 29, 2000

Tim has elucidated the situation clearly. As both an amazon.com and O'Reilly customer, let me say that as of today I'm a former amazon.com customer who will be purchasing O'Reilly books elsewhere from now on. I'm also an amazon associate, but I'll be removing all those links from my website shortly, and directing folks to more responsible vendors.

Pann McCuaig


February 29, 2000

I was an Amazon associate/affiliat, but have converted my online bookstore to use FatBrain. Amazon had captured nearly 100% of my book purchases, but now I go elsewhere, and will continue to do so until/unless these patents are dropped or assigned to some neutral entity (see http://www.p3c.org, or http://www.openpatents.org) with a free license.

Gregor N. Purdy


February 29, 2000

Like many others, I am not a large source of income for Amazon. However, I agree that what you are doing is wrong. I think that the patents should never have been issued. I will not be buying anything from you until you quit your abuse. Plenty of other sources for O'Reilly books out there!

David Kubalak


February 29, 2000

I am a Software Engineer and have seen and heard stories about software patents. How a simple idea could not be used simply because some lawer took it away. The patent system is being used outside of the spirit of its purpose and is bringing great harm to the whole industry. No software should be patentable, just copyrighted. I will never buy from your company again.

Jon Allen


February 29, 2000

I concur with the above letter. I furthermore wish to add that I have been an Amazon customer in the past -- but will not be in the future, if this ill-considered patent move is not reversed. There are still plenty of "bricks-and-mortar" stores where I can get my books, and even other online book sellers. I will make no further purchases until this ignorant stance is reversed.

Brandon Havey


February 29, 2000

A trademark on "1-Click Ordering" is one thing, but a patent on such an obvious process? This whole rush on patents on obvious e-commerce processes is remarkably like the rush on domain names a few years ago. Hopefully the courts will get some technical advisors who realize that granting patents for most of these things is like letting me grab www.coca-cola.com just because I was faster than Coca-Cola.

C. Robert Stevens


February 29, 2000

I have been aware of this for a while, and it's clearly ridiculous. I believe Amazon is also suing over coffee cups (another one of their great, and proprietary ideas) and of course, the entire process of selling books through the mail: "We WRAP them, and put POSTAGE on them, - get it? - OUR idea!" - Bezos was quoted as saying Tuesday by a source who refused to be identified, stating "they might claim they thought me up, too."

James Woodson


February 29, 2000

As a former independent bookseller, I have a long history of loathing Barnes and Noble. Even though Amazon contributes to the death of these small businesses, Amazon was my preferred on-line dealer because there was none of the paternalistic censorship that we can expect from B&N. Patenting and enforcing patents on obvious technology that you have borrowed is flat out wrong. Until such time as Amazon's patent policy is changed, I will buy books from B&N or Fatbrain.

Louis Moore


February 29, 2000

I can't belive the audacity of Amazon to believe that these ideas are worthy of patenting. The innovation and creativity these ideas embody is exactly what these patents will destroy. The internet is a medium that fosters innovation and technological advances and these patents, if enforced, will stifle exactly the innovation that made Amazon what it is. I will never, ever, ever buy anything else from Amazon and hope that everyone else follows suit.

Mark Davis


February 29, 2000

Amazon has always been one of my favorite stops on the web. I've always considered it a model for excellent customer services. I am very distressed to learn of Amazon's tactics of patenting what is an obvious technology, and clearly in an attempt to extort money out of other websites. I will no longer shop at Amazon. I will withdraw my memberhip in their affiliate program, and I'll be sure to tell all my friends to shop elsewhere. Goodbye Amazon!

Steve Faiwiszewski


February 29, 2000

Thank you Mr. O'Reilly for taking the time and energy to publically address this critical issue. I am impressed by the professionalism with which you've handled yourself and the creativity you have shown by providing this mechanism for the rest of us to make our voices heard. I sincerely hope that these efforts are not made in vain and that Amazon sees the error of their ways in regards to both the 1-click *and* the affiliate-program patent issues. Sincerely, JSF

Joshua S. Freeman


February 29, 2000

The 1-Click and Associates program patents that Amazon has acquired and apparently intends to enforce are outrageous. A few weeks ago, I bought what I think was my 10th Amazon book; now I regret it. I won't be shopping with Amazon until Amazon gives up these trivial, overly broad patents. I can't believe you ever sought to obtain them in the first place. If that's not hubris, I don't know what is. O'Reilly's 'pissing in the well' comment is right on the mark.

Charles Hornberger


February 29, 2000

I have been a customer of amazon.com for a long time, and have been very satisfied with the level of service. In short, amazon.com has always made me a happy customer. Sadly, I have realized that amazon.com now subscribes to business-practices that is totally unacceptable, even to the best of my wishes. The patent on one-click-ordering and the associates-program is forcing me to get my books elsewhere, even if that means lower service and higher prices. Too bad, but here goes another customer...

Jo Totland


February 29, 2000

Amazon is simply taking advantage of a woefully inefficient and ineffective patent process that is unable to distinguish legitimate inventions deserving protection from those that are not. This scenario is repeated over and over again in many different industries. It is invariably left to a judge/jury (non-technical) to make a decision. I have always believed that the way to win in the marketplace is to run faster than the competition and suggest that Amazon do the same instead of erecting barriers which impede progress for everyone, including their own.

Jerry E. Hurst, Jr.


February 29, 2000

I spent some money over the holidays at Amazon and recently ordered two books. I won't order anymore from amazon.com. There's not an informed person on the web who thinks this patent (or the patent application on affiliate programs) has any merit. Don't prey upon the ignorance of the patent office by asking for a patent on the marketing spin of an already established technology. And don't kill the goose that laid the golden egg...the free invention and exchange of technology "tricks" ultimately benefits you more than trying to create and enforce these kinds of restrictions.

Kim Flint


February 29, 2000

I work as a computer tech and sys admin and I'm pretty apalled by Amazon's attitude. I bought from Amazon before because I thougth their prices were great and because of the service. But I have to agree with Tim and Amazon is in fact trying to limit the potential of the net. As a technical user, I (and the company I work for) require to buy plenty of books (several by O'Reilly in fact). In fact yesterday I decided to got to Fatbrain.com to buy 2 books. I hope Amazon sees "the light", but until then I will shop elsewhere. I thought something like Amazon should be successfull because its service, not its bullying tactics.

Manuel Alducin


February 29, 2000

Dear Amazon, I was once a frequent and loyal customer. I eagerly recommended your web site and service to my friends. As a programmer and computer scientist, I have also been an opponent to obvious software patents. In the past, this industry has seen many foolish and clearly obvious patents. Unfortunately, your one-click patent is one of the most obvious. I will not support you in your effort to impinge upon the future innovation of the web. I will continue to boycott your business, and I will continue to dissuade my friends from using your service until these patents are released into the public domain.

David Johnson


February 29, 2000

I, also, have been a good customer of Amazon.com. But, this patent should never have been granted, submitted, or enforced. Prior art alone should have rendered this a non-issue. Patenting a cookie process would be as insane as patenting gene sequences (I forgot, Patent Office is issuing patents on those also). The only good that could come from this is if Amazon comes to the public and says that it was doing this as an experiment to show the folly of the Patent Office and they were using this as a test case to show Congress they need to overhaul the process. But, alas, they probably are not creating a test case and merely creating ill-will.

Jason McClellan


February 29, 2000

I am the CTO of a small internet startup as well as being a full time application developer. My startup does not make any purchases from Amazon, and I've stopped buying there myself. All of my co-workers have joined the boycott of Amazon as well. I'm not happy about this situation, as I think that Amazon is a great company with great service. However, if Amazon maintains their current position much longer, it's very likely that many of us will become so comfortable with and used to using Barnes and Noble, fatbrain, Tower Records, and many other sites that there will be no reason to ever go back to Amazon even if they do finally come to see reason.

Matthew Yarbrough


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com used to be my "default" online book retailer. I really liked thier search tools and one-click ordering. Fact is, though, I have not even accessed Amazon.com since the 1-click patent and absolutely will not order anything from Amazon.com now that they have taken this to the next level. Amazon.com, Please stop closing and locking doors on the Web. The Web is driven by open technology. The spirit of the Web involves giving and preserving the environment for the advancement of technology. 1-click and affiliate programs are a "step ONE" in the life of e-commerce sites. Unblock the next step. Matt Warden http://mattwarden.com/

Matt Warden


February 29, 2000

As I read about the conflict in process, my only thought is, 'What a shame.' It's obvious the Amazon attorneys have too much time (and money) on their hands. Imagine what kind of new features and enhancements could have been made to your site if you would spend the resources on improving the technology. Your site is not as great as you think it is. It takes up to four cookies just to load the first page. I don't know where your hiring your programmers, but where I come from that's not good programming. I wouldn't be surprised if your attorneys soon filed another patent on selling the information your gathering from people just visiting your site. What a shame.

Jorge A. Garcia


February 29, 2000

A company that has benefitted so much from open standards as Amazon has should never have filed such stifling patents as these. Amazon: you have no right to continue doing business using the innovations provided to you by the likes of Tim Berners-Lee, the Netscape group that formed the cookie specification, and many others. I personally feel cheated, having recommended to others and contributed my own money to a business that would rob the Internet community in this way. Thus I will discontinue my business with Amazon, and take every opportunity to urge my friends and those who trust me to do the same, until Amazon completely reverses its position on software patents, contributing those that it already holds to the public domain.

Oliver Stewart


February 29, 2000

A company that has benefitted so much from open standards as Amazon has should never have filed such stifling patents as these. Amazon: you have no right to continue doing business using the innovations provided to you by the likes of Tim Berners-Lee, the Netscape group that formed the cookie specification, and many others. I personally feel cheated, having recommended to others and contributed my own money to a business that would rob the Internet community in this way. Thus I will discontinue my business with Amazon, and take every opportunity to urge my friends and those who trust me to do the same, until Amazon completely reverses its position on software patents, contributing those that it already holds to the public domain.

Oliver Stewart


February 29, 2000

Daniel P. McCarty


February 29, 2000

Dear Jeff Bezos, As both a Web developer and an employee of an organization who's heart and soul is in the education of students, I believe what Amazon has done is appalling and will seriously hurt both the Internet business and the education of people around. Amazon is in the business of books from the start, and it should not stand in the way of those others who would like to get books into the hands of those to learn. I also hope that this stands as a message to the patent offices of the world that they must be more careful and educated in their granting of patents. Their job should be the promoting of innovation, not the stifling of it! Sincerely, Andrew Jung Analyst, Web Services Centre for Education Information Standards and Services. http://www.ceiss.org/

Andrew Jung


February 29, 2000

I am personally boycotting Amazon and will use other services, i.e. fatbrain.com, until such time as Amazon drops this childish behaivor. If they want to "take thier ball and go home" they will be alone in an ever evolvoing web environment.

Rod Richeson


February 29, 2000

Why the hell where you (Amazon.com) ever allowed to obtain a patent on a simple thing like "cookies", that you didn't even invent! Ridiculous! It is sad that the American public is not informed enough YET to understand the gravity of your greedy actions. As technology evolves and time goes on, people will understand more and more about these kind of technical issues and will lump you into an unpopular and distasteful catagory like Microsoft. Unfortunately it will proabally have little if any negative effect on your profit margins, and that is most likely the only thing that would grab your attention enough for you to consider releasing rights to this patent. All I can do is use my power as a consumer to not shop at your site and convince everyone I know to do the same. Amazon.com : Think about it.

Austin Vaughan


February 29, 2000

I am one of Amazon.com's early adopters and a techie, buying many books, toys, music, and video, including many of O'Reilly's. I am also distraught about this malicious abuse of patent law, and a clueless patent office. Until Amazon ceases this land-grab on the 'net, I will no longer purchase any product or service from Amazon, or an Amazon affiliate like drugstore.com. This is not a slanderous affair, I'm just not putting my money into a business which violates the "New Ethics" of the internet. If I'm buying books on Open Source Software, I'm going to buy them from a company that believes the Internet and simple applications like Cookies are also open. Call it a Service Mark, make it better, do whatever, but it's easy to prove prior art. Until then, this is a more malicious instance of etoy v etoys. Until Amazon learns to play nice with the other kids in the sandbox, I'm leaving this playground.

William Foy


February 29, 2000

Tim, First, thank you! Not only for the excellent quality of the books that you publish, but the manner in which you voiced so eloquently your concerns over the recent Amazon.com (tm) patents. Second, like many of the others who have signed this open letter, I am telling as many of my on-line companions about my views of the things that Amazon is pulling, and I am providing them with lists of other places to look and shop for their books and such. TOI date, there has only been one person whom I have not been able to convince to shop other places than Amazon. The reason for that is that her interests are rather obscure in medieval manuscript arts. But, as soon as I can find a reliable source for those types of books, I can bet that she'll start buying elsewhere, too. To Amazon, I can only say "Shame on you!" The idea in marketing is not to piss off your customers... It should be to please them so well that they continue to buy from you. Only then can you get out of the "red" and actually start making a profit, which is really the idea behind business: to MAKE money, rather than loose it. Sincerely, Geordon VanTassle Former Amazon shopper

Geordon VanTassle


February 29, 2000

Like so many others who have signed this open letter, I am a formerly happy and satisfied customer of Amazon.com. Moreover, I have friends and family who have worked for Amazon, and whose opinions of your company were extremely high. In addition to my own purchases, I have certainly referred many others to purchase books, music and other things from you. I hope that you understand that Amazon.com cannot afford to lose the goodwill of the community which supports them. For awhile, you can continue to profit from those who are unaware of your patent claims, but eventually the vast bulk of your market will migrate to your competitors. Even if your patent were to be upheld as valid, this would be a very ill-considered strategy. You know very well that Internet changes the rules of business in extremely significant ways. One of these changes is that intellectual property claims (even valid ones) will often create a backlash more costly than the value of the protection. When it is one so precarious as the 1-Click or Affiliate claims, I think you should save the money you've been spending on lawyers, drop these at once, and invest in reacquiring the goodwill you've lost.

Mike Goldman


February 29, 2000

Derek Harrell


February 29, 2000

Rob Bryan


February 29, 2000

Sandor Fuss


February 29, 2000

James Eagan


February 29, 2000

Sean Cavanagh


February 29, 2000

Chris Peikert


February 29, 2000

Neil Hoggarth


February 29, 2000

Wade Badenhorst


February 29, 2000

David Menestrina


February 29, 2000

Guenter Schneider


February 29, 2000

Javier Arturo Rodriguez


February 29, 2000

David M. Zendzian


February 29, 2000

I heartily support Tim O'Reilly's letter.

Jeff Shepherd


February 29, 2000

David M. Zendzian


February 29, 2000

I have been an Amazon.com customer for quite awhile but I refuse to purchase another product from the site until the patent application is withdrawn. I used to have a great opinion of Amazon.com but now I see them as just as bad as Microsoft. Not a good business strategy.

Tyler J. Alumbaugh


February 29, 2000

Theodore Hong


February 29, 2000

Andrew Sherman


February 29, 2000

Gregory McLean


February 29, 2000

Reuben Sumner


February 29, 2000

William J. Murphy


February 29, 2000

William Hester


February 29, 2000

Peter Palfrader


February 29, 2000

Robert G. Schmertz


February 29, 2000

Scott Elliott


February 29, 2000

Cloyce D. Spradling


February 29, 2000

Triantafillos Karayiannis


February 29, 2000

I'm shopping at Fat Brain and Powell's, until amazon lets up.

Floyd Mann


February 29, 2000

I used to really like Amazon. Now I stay away.

Bradley R. Smith


February 29, 2000

This patent has convinced me to take my business to other online bookstores.

James W Walden


February 29, 2000

Please take account of your customers wishes. They made you company.

Hugh Potts


February 29, 2000

Your abuse of the patent system has already cost you this (formerly satisfied) customer.

Shane Pielli


February 29, 2000

This is almost as ridiculous as the Onion joke about Microsoft patenting the numbers 0 and 1.

Ron Laufer


February 29, 2000

That technique existed well before Amazon. Bezos, your altruism is displaying grred here !

David Hilton


February 29, 2000

Luckily, most the books I want I can get at FatBrain. The rest I'll go to a meat bookstore for.

Adam Heinz


February 29, 2000

Is Amazon going to patent bookmarks next? Or cover jackets? Repent. You have invented NOTHING.

Paul F. Dubois


February 29, 2000

Can I patent that revolutionary blue-green color on my Windows desktop and then make Microsoft stop using it?

Tim Gales


February 29, 2000

Well, it's off to Barnes & Noble. And to think, I had been so pleased with your site that I have never even tried anyone else.

H. B. Harris


February 29, 2000

Being a developer of e-commerce sites I can safely say that I am in violation of this Patent and proud of it.

Robert Nylander


February 29, 2000

Add one more person (me, duh!) to the list of people disgusted with Amazon's actions in the area of software patents.

scott jacobs


February 29, 2000

I will not order anymore merchandise from Amazon from this day forward until they abandon their one-click shopping patent.

Patrik Dousa


February 29, 2000

Although I have been a loyal Amazon customer since the beginning, I am now joining the boycott until Amazon releases these frivilous and selfish patents.

John Boardman


February 29, 2000

My animal rights group currently has an association with Amazon for our recommended reading list. We're switching to Wordsworth because of Amazon's lameness.

Dave Rolsky


February 29, 2000

I very much like Amazon.com, and have bought many books and CD's from amazon. But I really think that these patents are a bit off of the deep end. Please Mr Bezos, drop these patents.

Zachary Kessin


February 29, 2000

My best internet shopping experiences have been with Amazon, but until you stop pursuing such baseless patents, my business will now go to fatbrain.com, bn.com, and a host of other web retailers.

Steve Lewis


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com *used* to be my favorite place to shop online and I recommeneded it to everyone who'd ask me. As a consultant, I am asked alot. Amazon is no longer on my list - and will not be - until this silly patent is dissolved.

Lisa Kramer


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com *used* to be my favorite place to shop online and I recommeneded it to everyone who'd ask me. As a consultant, I am asked alot. Amazon is no longer on my list - and will not be - until this silly patent is dissolved.

Lisa Kramer


February 29, 2000

I won't be using Amazon while they enforce the 1-click patent. Barnes and Noble offers a similar service at a similar price at bn.com, so why support Amazon's attempt to use the patent system to stifle competition?

Andy Latto


February 29, 2000

I agree fully with Tim. I think this whole business will hurt Amazon far more than it will help. Remember, unhappy clients share their experiences with others FAR more frequently than happy clients do.

Kimberley Harding


February 29, 2000

As a former loyal Amazon shareholder and customer, I am very disappointed by Amazon's ill-advised use of software patents. I can no longer support the company until they publically state they will change their practices in this area.

Jason Bandlow


February 29, 2000

I stopped shopping at Amazon the day the decided to enforce their pathetic 1-click patent against Barnes and Nobel (www.bn.com). I buy everything I need at Fatbrain (www.fatbrain.com) now and I urge others to do the same. I don't miss Amazon one bit.

Tim Drury


February 29, 2000

I was an enthusiastic Amazon customer and never hesitated to recommend them to my friends. However, given your recent efforts with regards to patenting, I am now doing the opposite whenever possible. Beware the power of memes: "No Pesos for Sr. Bezos."

Tom Maszerowski


February 29, 2000

I share the belief that Amazon has reaped huge benefits from public domain technologies, and is now repaying the favour by engaging in intellectual theft via absurdly obvious patents. I am informing all of my non-technical friends and family members of Amazon's behaviour, and they can make up their own minds whether to continue giving their business to such a destructive and selfish corporation.

Robert Martin


February 29, 2000

Amazon used to be a great company that built its success on providing superior service and selection to customers. I am very disappointed that it has abandoned this strategy in favor of using thuggish tactics to squelch competition. I won't be buying from Amazon any more.

Kevin S. Van Horn


February 29, 2000

I used to be a regular customer to amazon.com. However, I am now participating in the boycott and will continue to encourage others to do so until this issue is reversed. I will not spend my money in a corporation that pursues such anti-competitive policies.

Brandon Schmidt


February 29, 2000

Since I first heard about this patent and suit, I have turned to other book outlets on the web. I believe that this patent is ludicrous, yet dangerous. I won't be buying from Amazon until the patent is dropped. I will have my information purged from their database.

Charles H. Baker


February 29, 2000

Both of these patents are a slap in the face of the real Web inventors. Trying to enforce these patents is hypocritical and ultimately self-destructive. I will not buy anything from Amazon while they are trying to use these patants as a cheap trick to stifle competition.

Scott Johnson


February 29, 2000

I will not be purchasing books from Amazon.com until this gets resolved. While I am not a major source of income to Amazon.com, I am public in my opinions and am speaking out to my friends and family that do make purchases from Amazon.com. I will continue to do so until the patents are dropped.

Chris Riddoch


February 29, 2000

Stephen


February 29, 2000

Amazon, I like your service and website in general, but I cannot condone your stifling of innovation with ludicrous patents. I order a considerable number of books each year, from various booksellers, and will be taking my future business elsewhere. I hope your stupid patent is worth all the ill-will and lost business.

Alex Stangl


February 29, 2000

Since January 29, 1998 I have placed 39 orders worth Ū,215.57 with Amazon and have until this point been a satisfied customer. The above amount does not count my wifes purchases or my company - we have 12 employees. Please rectify the patent issue so we may continue doing business with Amazon, until that time, my business goes elsewhere.

John Wise


February 29, 2000

I have stopped buying books from Amazon, the place I used to buy all my books for school, in support of RMS' call for a boycott. This patent is pantently absurd. I have also begun actively telling the other students at my school to hold back from buying at Amazon until they sign the rights for these patents over to the Free Software Foundation.

Joseph Lesh


February 29, 2000

Amazon, the world wide web thanks you for your contribution to the sea of trivial patents and innovation. Certainly a powerful company such as yourself couldn't possibly have needed the freely given hardwork of countless others to get to where you are to day. Congrats on how well you stand on the backs of others and rakin in your dough. Davon Shire.

Davon Shire


February 29, 2000

The other day I actually went to the bother of driving to Borders and physically walking in and buying some books in person, rather than go online and buy from Amazon.com -- this patent this is just crazy! I will also more regularly visit my local independent hole-in-the-wall bookstore rather than go to Amazon.com, until they come to their senses.

Carole E. Mah


February 29, 2000

I think that Amazon is engaging in non-productive and non-profitable activities with this pursuit. I hope that they can be dissuaded from endeavoring to coral the WWW for themselves. Further, as Tim stated, Amazon has an obligation to contribute to the Internet. For with out the Internet, where would Amazon be? Sincerely A saddened Amazon customer

Christian Ullman


February 29, 2000

I have bought quite a few books from Amazon.com, but I will not buy another until both the "Associates Program" patent and the "1 Click" patent have been released. I had thought Amazon.com was above this, and am sorry to discover that I was wrong. I am also encouraging everyone I know to buy from either bn.com (Barnes and Noble online) or a local bookstore rather than amazon.com.

Joey Smith


February 29, 2000

I've always considered Amazon a excellent company that is responsive to customers' interests, but this patent nonsense would simply give your company a monopoly on certain aspects of the web. This is something I don't want anyone to have, and it's enough to make me avoid buying from you until your policies are changed.

Dru Oja Jay


February 29, 2000

I'm now convinced that the world has gone mad. Patents on something as widespread as an affiliate program or the use of cookies for shopping are ludicrous. What will come next? Patents on the way Amazon.com is designed, with the tab look.. one that is successful and that many ecommerce sites have mimicked because of the familiarity? I'm hoping that these patents fall over. As a web developer this really concerns me.

Amy Pronovost


February 29, 2000

I used to buy books at Amazon.com and stopped when I learned about this silly patent. Tim's open letter has prompted me to further action. I will email all my friends about this and ask them to pass the message on. Further, I'll to tell them to take their business elsewhere, such as competitors fatbrain.com and barnesandnoble.com. Personally I have beneifited greatly from Open Source software and the web. Amazon's appropriation of public property for private use I find infuriating.

Clifford V. Moravetz


February 29, 2000

Most people don't pay much attention to patents and why the patent system was created in the first place. Patents were originally designed so that "inventors" could profit from an invention in which the inventor has invested a lot (time, money, etc) in. 1-Click is not an invention. It is an amalgamation of prior works. Furthermore, it is one which is already in common use. Patents are not for one entity to first claim as prize. Ironically, this is the most common use of (software) patents.

Albert Hopkins


February 29, 2000

I used to be a faithful and loyal customer of Amazon's. In my experience they have phenomenal service, and reasonable prices. My evangelism has brought Amazon dozens of customers. But being deeply offended by Amazon's patents I felt forced to search out an able competitor. It took over a month trying out several different companies but I have finally found an online bookseller I am satisfied with, and who is now the subject of my evangelism (fatbrain.com). Goodbye Amazon, I will never buy anything from you again.

Jason Grimes


February 29, 2000

It is because of this issue and other similar ones that I now shop at Fat Brain. It is revolting to me to see that a company that has so much obvious talent and ability would turn its focus to underhanded legal tactics in order to get ahead. Sadly, this is a common tale. In the process of going public and having tremendous success, someone always gets greedy, surrounds the company with a moat of lawyers, and begins to be unscrupulous. You become part of the system, and unless you are very careful and stand by some guiding moral principles, it becomes part of you.

Chris Monson


February 29, 2000

Amazon should be ashamed of itself. This is a patent that should not have been granted in the first place. The very fact that Amazon feels the need to enforce something of this nature speaks volumes to the fact that Jeff Bezos is just another money-hungry, greedy, capitalist. I strongly doubt that Amazon would be significantly hurt by other web sites using the term "one-click ordering". I mena, come on! Amazon has already reached "critical mass" in terms of brand recognition as an "E-Tailer". Amazon, take this opportunity to take the high road and show a little class. Enough already.

Alberto S. Lopez


February 29, 2000

I buy lots of books from Amazon, even though you are not always the lowest price, and I have for several years now. I am also a stockholder. I also admire your website from a technology standpoint. I consider a lot of what goes on in the "intellectual property" arena to be classic examples of corporate predatory behavior, and unfortunately it looks like you may be included in this category. I'm not sure if I'm going to totally boycott you yet, but I am shifting some of my purchases elsewhere. I am also circulating material about this to my acquaintances. I hope you change your mind on this issue.

Rick Saling


February 29, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, I enjoy(ed) using Amazon for many years and believe that it does have the best website for buying books and cds. However, I cannot condone the use of the patent offensively. So, I regret to say I've switched to a competitor, Borders.com. I would consider switching back if I observed that stop using this patent in this form of terrorism. It is anti-competitive and immoral. The Internet has been good to you and your stockholders. Thankfully, the inventors of the cookie didn't terrorize you. Every eBusiness person is terrified by your stance on this issue. Please do the right thing. -Ron Perrella

Ron Perrella


February 29, 2000

Sarah Gandt


February 29, 2000

I have purchased from Amazon in the past. I find your site extremely convenient and you always have what I want at reasonable prices. However, I will not be shopping at Amazon until you cease your abuse of the US patent system. You are shooting yourself in the foot by angering the customer base that spends hundreds if not thousands of dollars per year on heavyweight computer books such as those from O'Reilly. You are also doing yourself out of valuable word-of-mouth advertising from the "techie" population who until now have been your biggest advocates.<br><br>I urge you to reconsider your position on software patents.<br><br>Respectfully,<br>Bill Duetschler

Bill Duetschler


February 29, 2000

The continued growth of the internet will largly depend on the success of the ethical struggle to nurture and maintain open standards and systems. Amazon has benefitted greatly from the open ethic of the internet and would not exist in its present form without it. Amazon, as a pioneer of e-commerce, should gratefully and enthusiastically contribute its knowledge to open systems. It is almost incomprehensible that an internet pioneer would create a corporate policy and culture to keep its knowledge proprietary, thereby contributing to degradation of the internet. Success on the internet will be achieved by organizations that base their policy and actions on the development and sharing of management and technological excellence. Internet Organizations that develop a proprietary culture expose the 18th. century thinking of management.

Gordon McAllister


February 29, 2000

Tim O'Reilly mentions that "that while (you) believe the patent process can sometimes be abused, (you) believe that this is not the case with Amazon's 1-Click patent." While this may be true in a strictly legal sense, it is certainly not the case where the perception of your customers is concerned. Like many of the people signing this open letter, I was once a frequent Amazon customer. And like many of the signatories, I no longer patronize Amazon because of my perception that your 1-Click "technology" (sic) is a gross abuse of the intent of the patent system and the lack of technical savvy on the part of the USPTO. I have ensured that neither my friends or family will do business with Amazon as well. The nugget here is that regardless of how valid your actions appear in the wrapping of legal technicalities, if your customers perceive that you are acting in a manner which is either unfair or counter to their best interests (or both!), you and your company will end up the worse off for it.

Erik Jakowatz


February 29, 2000

Mark C Smith


February 29, 2000

Michel Dalal


February 29, 2000

Wesley Tanaka


February 29, 2000

Wesley Tanaka


February 29, 2000

Brett Rosen


February 29, 2000

Aaron Fuegi


February 29, 2000

Stan Purington


February 29, 2000

dave green


February 29, 2000

Arnaud RÐVEILLON


February 29, 2000

Rick Dieringer


February 29, 2000

Ralph Jocham


February 29, 2000

Ronald Yorgason


February 29, 2000

Steven O'Toole


February 29, 2000

Tim's letter speaks for itself.

Steve LePera


February 29, 2000

Kathleen E. Forden


February 29, 2000

The associates patent is the last straw; I will boycott Amazon.

Neil Weber


February 29, 2000

I agree entirely with RMS and Tim. I have closed my account with Amazon.

Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS


February 29, 2000

I purchase close to a thousand dollars worth of computers and business books per year. I had been dealing with a local bookseller up until recently and was interested in trying out your web service. In light of the current patent issue, I do not believe I can support a company that would take what was given freely, then close the door on others. This behavior is akin to being first in line at a buffet dinner and taking every single item. At a restaurant, you would be considered a pig. As a business, you should be ashamed of yourselves.

Travis Schneider


February 29, 2000

By these tactics, Amazon.com is on its way to become the other bully in Seattle.

Sriram Venkataraman


February 29, 2000

I'm boycotting Amazon and urging everyone I know to do the same.

Arthur Parker


February 29, 2000

I fully support this letter to Amazon. I will shop elsewhere until this matter is resolved.

Holland Guldberg


February 29, 2000

Amazon has lost a lot of business from me since they started this silly patent crusade.

Troy Klyber


February 29, 2000

I am a current amazon customer and decry their blatant attempt to stifle competition.

Bill Pfeifer


February 29, 2000

wake up! You lost another company's business. No clickee, no money.

Bryan Hunt


February 29, 2000

There is no way this abuse of the patent system will stand up in court. Until then, boycott Amazon.

Neal Groothuis


February 29, 2000

All my on-line book purchases have been with Amazon. I will use other vendors until the patent is dropped.

Gary Dean


February 29, 2000

I think Tim has spoken for the community quite eloquently in this case, and deserves our support and our thanks.

Keith Russell


February 29, 2000

This is a general problem that requires a general solution. However, in the meantime, it is incumbent on the techo-savvy to police themselves.

david Butcher


February 29, 2000

I used spend about โ a month at Amazon. I will now be taking my busness elsewhere unless they decide to drop their patent.

Brian Richards


February 29, 2000

It's time to stop these innovation-unfriendly bogus intellectual property patents that make things worse for consumers and developers.

Andrew Huff


February 29, 2000

The web succeded there others tried, mainly because it was open and non-proprietary. Was the web patented, you would not be here.

Daniel M. German


February 29, 2000

Not only will I not use Amazon until this patent is dropped. I have requested Amazon to purge all information about me from their database.

Ed Bruce


February 29, 2000

I agree fully with Tim's Letter and hope that this will make Amazon realize the amount sales lost mainly by people in the technical field.

David Pieniaszek


February 29, 2000

I routinely spend large amounts of money on books for school. Until Amazon stops their abuse of the patent system, none of this money will be going to them.

Nathan Ingersoll


February 29, 2000

Jason Mellein


February 29, 2000

Amazon has shown that it's not out for anyone but itself, and will subvert the legal system to its own gains. I refuse to support such a company.

Wade Minter


February 29, 2000

I'm still buying stuff from Amazon, but unless they rethink their patent strategy quickly, I'm not sure for how long I'll keep doing it...

Nuno Nunes


February 29, 2000

It is my hope that amazon (and any other company or indvidual) who trys to own public domain property or ideas "one clicks" them selves into oblivion.

Spike Wetmore


February 29, 2000

I have been a member of the affiliates program at my personal HTTP://atkeison.org site, but I will switch to another program if Amazon does not change within the week!

John Atkeison


February 29, 2000

I'm a long-time customer and frequent user of Amazon. I heartily agree that you are stupidly angering people like me when you could be sharing your ideas and winning us over.

Art Mellor


February 29, 2000

I believe it is time for an about face. There is nothing ignoble about reversing ones views in response to discusion, rather it is quite the opposite. It takes a brave person to do the right thing.

Ian Hodur


February 29, 2000

I believe that Amazon's attempts to patent such trivial applications of web development technology represent a current and real threat. I won't shop at Amazon until they drop this application.

Tom Janofsky


February 29, 2000

It is about time that companies begin to act responsibly rather than what is in their short sighted best interests. Amazon, you may think this is an advantage but you are gaining quite a negative image.

Ben Edwards


February 29, 2000

I am a software designer/programming engineer and I find this kind of patent abuse appalling. I for one am not going to buy anything from Amazon until this behavior is halted. I will also make it a point to spread the word along.

Paul Moreau


February 29, 2000

I love the convenience and price at Amazon, but I have stopped all purchasing there. I've been going to brick-and-mortar stores again. I'm willing to suffer with higher prices and fewer choices if it can help put an end to this absurdity.

Tofer Chagnon


February 29, 2000

I recently recieved a letter from Amazon asking why I had not ordered anything from them in so long. I stated then that I was refusing them my business in disgust over their current business practice. Until they reform, they will not get my money.

Scott Boland


February 29, 2000

I would rather pay twice as much on my technical books than support a company that feels it needs a patent on a trivial process to remain competitive. I will no longer even use Amazon to find books because of your abuses of the patent system. Goodbye internet.

Walter Wicklund


February 29, 2000

I had contemplated becoming an Amazon customer for some time until I heard about your abusal of the above named patents. I will gladly keep my business and money with bn.com and buy.com and will encourage my family and friends to do the same. You're only hurting yourselves by pushing the patent issues.

Andrew J. Heroff


February 29, 2000

Tim stated it well - the development of the web depends on the open use of shared technologies. Imagine if someone had patented the link! Where would we be? Amazon needs to get with the program, or they will find themselves left in the dust, either financially or eventually somewhere karmically!

Justin Hall


February 29, 2000

I never did shop with amazon.com, but I probably never will now, in light of these absurd and greedy patents..it's a shame the so-called "Man of the Year" has to resort to dirty pool to try to get a leg up on the competition..are you going to sue CDnow.com because they have an `Affliates'-like program as well?

Timothy R. Geier


February 29, 2000

This abuse of the patent system, and the lawsuits that have come from this abuse, have caused me to boycott Amazon.com. In short, last night, when I purchased my mother's birthday present books, I bought them from Barnes and Noble (bn.com), rather than Amazon. I will not do business with Amazon until they release these patents.

Brent E. Edwards


February 29, 2000

Patenting the trivial hurts the small guy more than the big guy, folks. I'm a small guy. I feel myself restricted by this frivolous patenting - what's next? A patent on using color to highlight something on a web site? Will I get sued? - that I feel entities that abuse IP law deserve boycotting and any other retaliation that is allowed by law.

Thomas Tonino


February 29, 2000

If this patent is allowed to stand then I will immediately patent the process for relieving the mucus pressure upon one's sinuses as follows: 1) Placing an receptacle object against ones nostrils and: 2) Blowing until all pressure is relieved and the sinuses are clear. Seriously though, I will no longer be spending money with Amazon.

Alex Olshove


February 29, 2000

I find the actions of Amazon absurd and ruthless. They're trying to destroy what so many have spent so long creating. I used to buy books at Amazon all the time. I thought Barnes and Noble was a joke. Now, I buy all my technical books at bookpool.com or fatbrain.com, and all of my other books at barnesandnoble.com. No more Amazon for me.

Peter Thatcher


February 29, 2000

I've purchased a little over 񘈨 at Amazon in the past year -- up until RMS called for the boycott, that is. Since then, I've been purchasing through a local "brick and mortar" retailer that matches prices with Amazon. So, Amazon is welcome to keep their patents (until they are voided), and I'll just keep purchasing everything through other vendors.

Robert Butler


February 29, 2000

I have bought several hundred dollars worth of merchandise from the Amazon web site. since then I have learned about their patent practices. I am glad to say that I have not bought one thing from them since then. It isn't too hard to find other vendors that sell the same stuff, and I think it's worth my time to do so. Go Two Click Shopping! - Marc

Marc Hughes


February 29, 2000

Ask any IP attorney he/she will tell you this is the easiest it has ever been to get a patent, particularly in the so-called business processes area. I understand the PTO is swamped and very little/thorough prior art investigation is done. I have bought at least 100 books in the past year alone, if Amazon follows this route I will never buy another book from them.

Ayokunle Giwa


February 29, 2000

Besides short-term gain, I'm unsure as to what Amazon has to gain here. Thus far it's seemed to breed only ill-will and contempt. Fortunately, this feeling is spreading beyond just the technical community and into the mainstream mindset. Hopefully the number and importance of people who are pissed at Amazon will be significant enough to deter them from pursuing this any further.

Benjamin White


February 29, 2000

I believe software patents, especially frivolous ones like the Amazon ones, are a tragedy to the internet. I will purchase no more products from Amazon as long as they are enforcing their patents. If I hear a public statement from Amazon that they are backing down from their stance on these patents, I will begin purchasing from them again. Until then, I consider it a sin to buy from them.

Brian Hayward


February 29, 2000

Granted, I'm not up on intellectual property law, I dont see how this patent could possibly be upheld. Lastly, I would think that trying to own a technology that has been freely available in the public domain is a terribly tacky thing to do. Perhaps someone should try to pass off a document delivery mechanism by the patent office, and then license only amazon for implementing the technology as a web server... Maybe they'd then get the picture. Probably not, since money is quite an intoxicating substance.

Adam Prato


February 29, 2000

I would like to see the magical code you have written for your one click shopping. It seems to me that all you really have to do is store an encrypted credit card number associated with a cookie. (Something I would never do on my sites anyway). I would guess it would take about 10 lines of simple ColdFusion code. I guess maybe I should patent my search bar code that allows visitors to search from a pulldown menu of websites. I have never purchased anything from Amazon ever since you turned into the Wal-Mart of the web. If I need a good book I'll just go to BN.

Kyle Singer


February 29, 2000

I think the real problem is the patent office not being technologicaly informed enough to be issuing patents like this. I think it is up to the patent office to stay informed on new technology and do the research required before giving patents away to such important things as these. Amazon has further irritated the situation by taking advantage of this major fault in the patent office. If we do not take a stand on this issue not only with Amazon but the patent office we will soon be over-run with unimaginable patents that will kill the growth of the Internet.

Candie Yoder


February 29, 2000

I used to recommend Amazon as the best place to buy books online. Your customer service and your selection were excellent. My referrals encouraged dozens of your customers. But since you have chosen to abuse the US patent system with patents as obvious as one-click ordering and your associates' program, I can no longer do business with you. Until you pledge to use your patents only for defensive purposes, you can rest assured that I will cost you lots of customers. People in the Internet business understand exactly what you're doing, and many of them are profoundly unhappy.

Eric Kidd


February 29, 2000

To Jeff Bezos - I used to shop quite a bit at Amazon. I used to think that you guys were at the start of the whole e-commerce revolution, etc. I also encouraged friends and family to use Amazon to buy books, CDs, etc. The day I heard about your patent, I informed all of those friends and family (who look to me as the 'computer expert') that I was boycotting Amazon and immediately switching my business to Barnes and Noble. You are taking advantage of a Patent Office that is not yet up to speed with this new technological world. You have lost mine and my friends business for now, possibly forever. When your patent gets overturned, I may be back or not... Sincerely, William J. Edney

William Edney


February 29, 2000

With each passing day, my disappointment with the U.S. patent system grows - but not nearly as much as my disappointment in those people who, whenever the opportunity presents itself, will abuse it. I have participated in Richard Stallman's boycott ever since it was called for. Nothing personal, really - I simply hope that each and every company that pulls an "intellectual property" stunt like this (triply so when they didn't invent it in the first place) goes violently and permanently bankrupt. I believe that Mr. Bezos earned his fortune. I believe that Mr. Bezos has also - through this action - declared his company unfit and undeserving of all the support it has received from the online community. But above all else, I believe that Mr. Bezos doesn't care in the slightest what I - or any of us - think any more.

Damien Spracklin


February 29, 2000

I have been a loyal Amazon customer for years. I have yet to find anyone who can consistently compete with your prices. I have purchased hundreds of dollars worth of books and videos from the Amazon website and I had suggested your site to all of my friends and colleagues. However, I am loyal no more. I have been participating in the boycott since it started. The patent on 1-Click ordering is the one of the most ludicrous abuses of patent law I have ever seen, and Amazon should be ashamed by its conduct. I don't care if I have to pay more money when I buy from other outlets. I will not support any internet business which so selfishly abuses current regulatory systems at the expense of the people who helped carry Amazon through its early years. Your ingratitude toward the people who helped make you a sucess will only hurt you and your company in the long run.

Matt Popke


February 29, 2000

Kraig A. Olmstead


February 29, 2000

Looks like I'll be shopping bn.com.

Joe Brandt


February 29, 2000

A well reasoned letter I am proud to add my name to.

Andre I. Mel'cuk


February 29, 2000

I've always enjoyed shopping at Amazon but I will find other venues.

Fred Dirkse


February 29, 2000

Note to Amazon: Technical people are laughing at this patent. What if Apple had patented the phrase "One-Click" when their one-button mouse was introduced? Get with the program.

James Quinby


February 29, 2000

I certainly hope that trivial software patents get reevaluated in the near future. The supression of ideas and applications by corporations is a scary reality.

Greg Bodnar


February 29, 2000

While I admire Amazon's tenacious competition, trying to base a patent on cookies is a complete shame and a hoax pulled on the non-technical public. It is tantamount to patenting variables for the temporary storage of information in a computer language - all hogwash. And, to take liberty with a well known phrase, to live by the patent is to die by the patent. Shame on you amazon.com!

Greg Ouzounian


February 29, 2000

A clear example of "I'm on board with my millions, now pull up the ladder". PS, it's not the patent office's fault. They can be sued if they refuse to grant a patent, but they have nothing to lose if they do grant one, even if it's overturned later. In other words, the system is deliberately designed to work this way. You can thank your corrupt system of special interests and lobbyists for that.

Robert O'Callahan


February 29, 2000

I am new to purchasing books and music on-line and have only made a few purchase from amazon. No longer. Barnes & Noble gets my business now.

Phil Jones


February 29, 2000

Frivolous technology patents need to be stopped. Exploiting a patent office that doesn't know any better is not fair or good buisness. When I read that Amazon was trying to patent '1-click' I was furious. Bezos should do the right thing and encourage innovation by dropping the patent persuit, not to mention the fact that he OWES his fortune to the people who invented he technology he is trying to claim credit for, in no small part.

Steve Steele


February 29, 2000

It is unfortunate that Amazon and Jeff Bezos are choosing the low road. Amazon's sole remedy to me in this case is to place in the public domain (or better yet, under GPL) any of their so-called proprietary "innovations." At that point I might consider buying from Amazon again. Meantime, I can still pick up ORA books in other places, like http://www.fatbrain.com/ and http://www.bn.com/ . Good luck, Jeff. Is the made for TV movie going to be called Dances with Lawyers?

Brian Bilbrey


February 29, 2000

rediculous patent

Clint Whaley


February 29, 2000

How Absurd.

Leigh Shoemaker


February 29, 2000

Amazon are not what they used to be - now too rich and too stupid to see the consequences of this.

Michael Strang


February 29, 2000

I have moved all my business (hundreds of dollars in the past few months) Barnes & Noble and Borders since I heard of the 1 click patent.

Mark Marsalese


February 29, 2000

How long will it take for companies to realise that this kind of patent isn't effective, even if ruled valid? All it does is antagonise people. Amazon has totally lost my respect solely because of their patent policy.

Andrew Main


February 29, 2000

That's what I really like about Tim O'reilly. Complete, clear and to the point! I agree 100% with what Tim has said. But I'm also "voting with my dollars" and taking my business elsewhere. (have been for a while now) I'm also going to encourage my associates, friends and family not to buy from Amazon.

Duane G. Meyer


February 29, 2000

The fact that patenting a technology of this sort is *possible* says the worst possible things about the intelligence of patent lawyers. But Amazon should have enough of a sense of fairness and good business to realize that this isn't the way to get or keep a competitive edge. I won't buy from Amazon and I'll make sure other people know why.

Julia Flanders


February 29, 2000

Amazon was my favorite online store. The service was excellent with every purchase I made. I even have a directory in my bookmarks called "Amazon books," for all the books I intended to purchase from them. I will now be buying all those books from their competitors. I continue to search the Amazon website for the excellent commentary, but I've not made a single purchase from them since the first patent action.

Dennis Peterson


February 29, 2000

Can't wait to see amazon patent the entire e-commerce side of the internet. The real issue is not just the patent but your Amazon's use of the patent. If they try to enfore it they will get a massive amount of bad publicity. Amazon's entire play online has always been there Web focused, friendly neighbor based reputation. Enforcing patents to eliminate potential competitors is just doing to opposite of what your PR agencies tell us. If Amazon enforces it will lose in court and it will lose in the PR game. Either way the will feel it on the bottom line.

Sam Sorenson


February 29, 2000

In 1999, there was a brief boycott of Amazon when Amazon's legal counsel asked inappropriate questions about the sexual orientation of the owners of Amazon Bookstore, a feminist bookstore which has been around since the 1970's. Since the case was settled out of court, I reluctantly gave Amazon another chance. Now there's the much larger issue of patenting completely obvious uses of technologies which others made available for free. If Amazon admits that it has made a bad mistake and relinquishes the patents willingly, even now I will give them another chance. However, if Amazon persists, and when the courts hold the patent to be invalid (which seems very likely), it will be clear that Amazon really thought it has a right to these patents. If this happens, it will be my decision to refuse to do business with Amazon for the rest of my life. There comes a point where you don't get any more chances.

Sean Crist


February 29, 2000

Unless and until you stop enforcement your 1-Click and Associates Program patents I will make every effort to avoid shopping at Amazon.com. I will also encourage others to do the same.

Brooks Davis


February 29, 2000

Anthony Meyer


February 29, 2000

I'm joining the boycott as well.

Steve Pierce


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with this letter, and I will also support the RMS boycott.

Michael T. Gallagher


February 29, 2000

Your patent is nothing more than plagiarism; as a result, I will do no business with Amazon.

Josh Neal


February 29, 2000

May this, my support and dislike of "capitolizers" do some good in the world of FREE and OPEN tought and invention.

Patrick Moore


February 29, 2000

One less customer.

Mike Smoot


February 29, 2000

񘈨/yr+ in book sales will start migrating towards a company that is more innovation friendly. -Mark

Mark Interrante


February 29, 2000

We have all had these naive hopes that maybe, just maybe this once business wouldn't come in and trash a beautiful environment.

Peter M. Kane


February 29, 2000

I find your web site useful for seeing opinions on books. It's a shame that now I feel obligated to go someplace else to make the purchase.

Fred Krogh


February 29, 2000

We do need a lot of technical literature, being a company whose success is based on continuing innovation. It looks as if we would better turn elsewhere for 'innovation friendly' suppliers now that this 'patent' exists.

AGS Applied Geo-Systems Technology


February 29, 2000

You took our money, we didn't mind - we thought you were a cool company. Now you're betraying us. I actually bought a book on cookies and saving user prefs before you filed this wierd patent. Perhaps you should patent underlined links?

Rob Buijs


February 29, 2000

I am about to set up a web site which will include literature, philosophy, history, geography and art sections, as well as being connected to a major teaching institution. I had planned to add an Amazon link to the home page, but now it will be BOL.

Madelaine Davidson


February 29, 2000

I can't believe that a company I've enjoyed doing business with would sink to this level. Amazon provides a great service, but this isn't the right way to grow your business; there are easy ways to do almost the same thing which would not technically violate your patent.

Roger Walkup


February 29, 2000

A character in "Wall Street" said, "Create something! Don't live off buying and selling alone." Enough has been said on the subject of patents. The question is, what has Amazon given back to the web that it has gained so much from? Maybe that's an old fashioned idea. Giving. Or is it?

Pandurang Rao


February 29, 2000

The worst thing is that whoever at Amazon suggested applying for this pattern must have known it's wrong, morally and technically to apply for something so obvious and previously used. In any case, I stopped buing books from Amazon as of December, 1999. Amazon, please delete my records from your database, my name and e-mail is above.

Milan Zimmermann


February 29, 2000

It is unfortunate to see an industry leader such as Amazon embarking on the distasteful path of trivial software patents. As such, I and many others will take our business elsewhere. In addition, I recommend the decision makers of Amazon read the Cluetrain Manifesto and heed its warning, for it applies directly to the consequences of these wrongs being committed.

Alexander Kent


February 29, 2000

So, a company who patents software which was not originally created by them, on ideas thought up by other people, who is using the patent to bully their way to the top of its industry. Hrm, that sounds a lot like another large company who we all know and hate for their stranglehold on the personal computer OS market. And we all know how much we do anything to not have to use that other company's products.

Gary Margiotta


February 29, 2000

OOPS! Looks like you have 'accidentaly' made some people mad at you by doing something of questionable ethics...and it seems likely that some of those people are net savy programmers... now lets see, where did I put that list of web sites that were under attack a few weeks ago... I guess that you can be glad that most people have a sense of ethics and try to be good net citizens. It works out best if everyone cooperates...tit-for-tat...Golden rule... Good & Bad Karma, whatever. You could blame it on the 'lawyers'...people would understand...

Bill Mothershead


February 29, 2000

I give Amazon kudos for acquiring such a wonderful defensive patent. Unfortunately, defensive patents are basically a requirement currently, just to block other companies from manipulating the patent process to stifle creativity on the Internet (and your companies trivial practices). The proper course of action now requires Amazon to give the right to use this Patent away to the Internet at-large, or dissolve the Patent all together. This would leave us with the net effect of what should have been a clear case of Prior Art and trivial "innovation". Do this, and I believe the technical community will appreciate your move.

Mike Dawson


February 29, 2000

That you would patent this as an original "invention" make it appear that your organization is too clueless to understand original thinking when you see it. The initial success of your organization occurred because of some great original thinking. That you can no longer recognize original thinking suggests that Amazon is in trouble as a customer service expert -- and more distinctly -- as a long term business investment. The value of Amazon stock is based largely on its promise for the future, not on current earnings, but on its "intellectual" capital. The capital is apparently running out.

Mike Meyer


February 29, 2000

I remember using Amazon.com for the first time several years ago. Since then, I have purchased most of my books and CDs from them. Until the 1-Click patent. Now, I buy from bn.com and fatbrain.com, and educate my friends and family against using Amazon.com for any purchases. The Affiliates patent is the nail in the coffin, and is quickly inspiring me to become much more vocal in my opposition to Amazon.com and software patents, in general. I hope the stock market crashes hard with Amazon.com leading the way. I hope one day I'll read in a magazine (purchased from B&N) about how Jeff Bezos is now working at the local car wash to make ends meet since Amazon.com went belly-up and his new software company was sued for patent infringement.

John Zachary


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, If anything, you might be entitled to a trademark or copyright for 'one-click shopping' but nothing more. Is this part of your grand scheme to get Amazon.com profitable by litigation against anyone who offers the ability to purchase over the web? Amazon certainly did not create the idea and to have the arrogance to believe that you are entitled to an enforceable patent, in anyone's eyes is plain wrong. But the real injustice was done the pinheads in the courts that granted it, as they have clearly not done their homework. Those same courts will, I believe, prove that the patent you have been granted will be unenforceable and ultimately repealed. What's next, a patent on the term 'shopping cart'? I fully agree with Mr. O'Reilly's comments and will fully support my colleagues in our collective boycott of Amazon.com. Mr. Bezo's, as the CEO of an company, one of your key duties is to ensure a return on the investment for the shareholders, so keep this in mind as you make further decisions that will drive business away from your company. Respectfully, Glenn K. Schulke

Glenn K. Schulke


February 29, 2000

I just saw the 'Silicon Summit' show on MSNBC where John Markoff (from Kevin Mitnick fame, or should I say, Kevin Mitnick exploitation) asked Jeff Bezos about the 1-Click patent issue. Jeff replied that they don't have a patent on 1-Click and that he would not discuss it. My mouth dropped. I used to spend quite a bit of money at Amazon, but with their Affiliate patent as well as Jeff's comments on tv... I just can't endore or buy from them and feel good about myself. It's really pissed me off! I, single-handedly, developed the most advanced e-commerce system for the life sciences industry. And to have Amazon getting patents on processes that are not only obvious, but essential for the growth of commerce on the web, is just ridiculous. So, to take things a step further, I've also boycotted companies Amazon has invested in. This includes drugstore.com and kozmo.com, two very cool sites. I've let all my relatives and friends know of the situation and urged them to do the same. Even if Amazon withdraws the patents, I don't know if I'll go back... Jason Lee, Lead Developer, Biospace.com

Jason Lee


February 29, 2000

Chip Olson


February 29, 2000

Matthew Barry


February 29, 2000

Daniel Gredler


February 29, 2000

Claus Ekstroem


February 29, 2000

Tucker Goodrich


February 29, 2000

Joe Friend


February 29, 2000

Stephen Jolly


February 29, 2000

Dave Barron


February 29, 2000

bradbury taylor


February 29, 2000

Guntis Glinavs


February 29, 2000

Chason Chaffin


February 29, 2000

Benjamin Gittins


February 29, 2000

Liam S Coughlin


February 29, 2000

As I turn to look at my bookshelf, I see hundreds, if not a thousand plus, of dollars worth of books purchased from you. On my desk sits the Amazon.com insulated coffee cup which I received from Amazon for Christmas, 1996. My last order exceeded US趆. As I write this, I am listening to Hendrix' "blues" which I recently purchased from you. By trade, I am an Information Architect; the free use of cookies is an easy way to establish persistent state and has been so for many years. Your patent threatens to close avenues of resources which I depend upon to generate the income which allows me to spend so much money with you. I won't need to boycott you; if you persist, I won't be able to afford you. Does it have something to do with all of that rain in Washington that makes companies act like 800 pound gorillas?

Joe Stein


February 29, 2000

Vijay Karunamurthy


February 29, 2000

Shawn A. Roske


February 29, 2000

Brian Greenberg


February 29, 2000

Mitch Armistead


February 29, 2000

Indirajith Meganathan


February 29, 2000

Jonathan Westmuckett


February 29, 2000

I agree.

Kathryn Schultz Miller


February 29, 2000

i support the RMS boycott.

Edward Wetherell


February 29, 2000

The patent(s) are rediculous, and have reaffirmed my commitment not to by from Amazon.

Phillip Fox


February 29, 2000

Well stated Tim. I have never joined any sort of boycott before, but this will be my first.

Rich Peiffer


February 29, 2000

I used to buy my books from Amazon. I switched a while ago to buying from Fatbrain due to this patent.

Greg White


February 29, 2000

I regret to say that I can no longer in good conscience buy from amazon.com, your abuse of patent law disgusts me in inumerable ways.

Kevan Shea


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com's efforts to acquire and enforce unjustified and unearned patents completely destroys their reputation.

Scott Horn


February 29, 2000

You can be sure that I will ask AMAZON.com to remove my account...I WILL never purchase anymore books, videos, OR DVD from AMAZON.

David Choi


February 29, 2000

The one-click patentis absurd. I have removed all links, including my Associates links, regarding Amazon from my web site.

Alex Russell


February 29, 2000

Amazon's patent is ridiculous, and I'm in full agreement with this protest. Amazone has gone from a cool startup, to a corporate entity, and only seems to rudimentarily understand what made their success possible - the very freedom of innovation they are now trying to crush. Time to hit this newly turned corporate entity where it hurts -- it's wallet. There's plenty of other places to buy books and other items online. Maybe I'll come back to Amazon when they give up this silly idea.

Matt Hall


February 29, 2000

One would think a company wholly dependent on the internet would care more for the health of the internet than this.

Michael Stover


February 29, 2000

I've used BN.com for most of my book purchases since I'm an investor of theirs. This move by Amazon just gives me more reason to stay with BN.com.

Marc Gallagher


February 29, 2000

I have spent nearly 񘈨 at Amazon over the last few years, but I will not be doing that anymore. I will be switching to one of their competitors.

Jake Edge


February 29, 2000

Two words "Prior art". Not only that, but it's a patent of an obvious idea. Not only that but it's a cheesy way to try to get a leg up on your competition. Andrew Smith

votex


February 29, 2000

I've already contacted Amazon and asked them to remove my Wish List and close my account. Let's all hope they respond to the will of the people and do the right thing!

Rod Myers


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com is a wonderful site, but I will not be shopping there as long as they continue their practice of frivolous patents. Ideas are meant to be shared, not hidden.

Billy Mabray


February 29, 2000

You guys are a leader in the online-retail industry. With that comes the responibility. Do the right thing and use your patents to keep the web free. Happy web users actually buy things.

Chad Brewbaker


February 29, 2000

I have been an Amazon customer in the past, but will hold off on any further purchaces until it is clear that Amazon will not be using my money to enforce such unfortunate patents.

Aaron Sherman


February 29, 2000

I have bought my last book from Amazon.com There are too many other on-line book companies that aren't trying to pull the garbage Amazon.com is trying to get away with.

Joshua Skillings


February 29, 2000

Joseph Benavidez


February 29, 2000

I am sadden to see that a company I considered one of the forefathers in ecommerce is so short sighted, the money was comming but you got greedy! Now you will no longer get my money!

Laurel Campbell


February 29, 2000

I have returned my most recent order to Amazon and am now shopping exclusively at competitors' sites. I sometimes use Amazon's site for product information, and then click over to another store to buy. Gotta love the web.

Adam Stein


February 29, 2000

I pledge not to buy any more products from Amazon until they withdraw their patents. Last year I spent several hundred dollars there. Luckily there is still plenty of competition in this market, so I have plenty of other options.

Brian Buck


February 29, 2000

Surely you cannot ignore the amount of people that are displeased with your "patent(s)". This letter alone is evidence that both your customers and potential customers will think more than twice before shopping with you.

Kevin N Shallow


February 29, 2000

I wish companies would compete based on the quality of their service and products, not by how many lawyers they employ. Trying to acquire patents on simple and obvious concepts is not a good way to improve your service or products!

Michael Hentges


February 29, 2000

I have to agree with Tim's comments and with Dave Winer that if the response is for everyone to get their own patents, we will all be using more lawyers than developers. The fun of developing for the Internet will be gone. <http://davenet.userland.com/2000/02/28/noMorePesosForSenorBezos>

Ian Roberts


February 29, 2000

I have to agree with Tim's comments and with Dave Winer that if this the response is for everyone to get their own patents, we will all be using more lawyers than developers. The fun of developing for the Internet will be gone. <http://davenet.userland.com/2000/02/28/noMorePesosForSenorBezos>

Ian Roberts


February 29, 2000

As a software developer, you have insulted me and all of the real web pioneers that GAVE you the tools of your success. Yes, _GAVE_. As a customer, I don't buy from Amazon anymore. Period. Oh, and I'm very chatty to all my friends about WHY. Oh, and I have a lot of friends.

Earl Higgins


February 29, 2000

Software patents are bad enough; patents on obvious Web technologies are absolutely ridiculous. I have bought books worth several hundred dollars since Amazon received the patent. None of those books came from Amazon, and this will continue to be the case until I see some clear change in policy.

Reuven M. Lerner


February 29, 2000

I'd agree with Amazon if they'd come up with a new technology, but all they've come up with is a marketing slogan for a trivial use of existing technology. By all means Trademark "1-Click", by all means copyright the code, but a patent? You've got to be kidding. In the meantime, I'll buy my books elsewhere.

Tony Smith


February 29, 2000

I support Tim O'Reilly wholeheartedly on this issue. I think that while a boycott is morally the right thing to do it will have little effect. Most customers of Amazon would not understand the issue and not follow the boycott. Amazon is hurting its long term profitability and Tim O'Reilly's article and letter sum it up nicely.

Elmar S. Heeb


February 29, 2000

I understand that you had to apply for the patents to prevent your competition from doing the same thing. The initial blame lies with the patent office for issuing a patent. Now that that is over and done with, the best way to win customers from your competition is not by enforcing the patent, but by giving free use to anyone who wants it.

Eric Wagoner


February 29, 2000

Check my account. I'm a regular customer but won't be one again until you change your direction on this patent noise. The basic rule for patents should be: "If you can step on it and break it, you can patent it". I have a patent. I'm amazed that your patent passed muster. Perhaps we need technical reviews by advisory boards because, clearly, the patent office is lost.

Tim Daly


February 29, 2000

To Mr. Bezos: I firmly agree with all that Mr. O'Reilly has stated. You are "pissing in the well," as he puts it. I am not necessarily a frequent customer of yours, although I have bought some books from you in the past, and have even done so after Mr. Stallman first began urging his boycott. But if you and your company continue in this vein with regard to patents, I shall be forced to move my business to one of your competitors.

Carson Chittom


February 29, 2000

Both one click ordering/shopping and affiliate programs have been used by a number of commercial web sites for a couple of years now, even before Amazon.com was widely known. Software patents of these kinds can only harm the online community in the long run by stiffling innovation. It would be an excellent sign of faith if Amazon.com would release these patents, and I'm certain that by doing so, the Free Software community would stop our current boycot.

Roger Messier


February 29, 2000

I have been a regular customer of Amazon for several years. But because of their patent nonsense, my business will be going to fatbrain.com and my local bookstores and CD stores until they back down. It costs me nothing to change vendors; I had stayed with Amazon because I liked them, and wanted to encourage this pioneering business. But the good will has dried up, at least on my end. There are other competitors in every Amazon marketplace of which I know. Those competitors will get my business.

Patrick Lamb


February 29, 2000

1-Click ordering is scary at best, offering way too easy of a conduit for purchasing books or merchandise online. I have never used the 1-click feature, or any other on the amazon.com web site, besides checking out with a shopping cart. You should patent this. At least you can then bully 95% of the online retailers. Holding and enforcing patents on IP that you didn't even create is ludicrious at best. But the denial of your conscience for your wallet makes amazon.com's actions unacceptable.

Eric Hoffman


February 29, 2000

Like most of the rest of those who have signed this petition, I will henceforth not conduct business with your company. Furthermore, I've been successful over the past few months in convincing several other people to do likewise. Ill will is something that is extremely hard to overcome. Word of mouth advertizing (especially negative kinds) can grow exponentially. There are plenty of places that sell books on the internet. Only an idiot would have granted your patent in the first place as it is obvious in the extreme. You can patent a mouse trap. You should not be able to patent trapping mice.

Alan Pugh


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim about Amazon's flagrant abuse of the patent system. While the patent office should certainly know better, it is apparently beyond our collective abilities to appeal to their common sense, since the awarding of far-reaching and obvious software patents goes on. I will therefore boycott Amazon and any other company that knowingly abuses this unfortunate hole in our nation's commercial oversight. I urge Amazon to give up on the issue of the 1-Click patent. It is true that Amazon has already unavoidably affected any good will that the technological community had for them; however, I believe that acting in good faith from this point on will eventually turn that negative opinion.

David Fay


February 29, 2000

Jeff Grollo


February 29, 2000

Chris Shabsin


February 29, 2000

Robert Lucier


February 29, 2000

Cameron Purvis


February 29, 2000

Brian Campbell


February 29, 2000

david m. reville


February 29, 2000

Jason Werpy


February 29, 2000

Mark Geary


February 29, 2000

Einar Rune Haugnes


February 29, 2000

Andrew Waltman


February 29, 2000

Wade Leftwich


February 29, 2000

Christopher Farnham


February 29, 2000

Karl Braun


February 29, 2000

Dan Wilson


February 29, 2000

Catherine Hartley


February 29, 2000

Allen Hutchison


February 29, 2000

Florian Neuburger


February 29, 2000

Michael E. Meyers


February 29, 2000

Amazon has lost my business.

Grant Warkentin


February 29, 2000

My wife and I have been, and will continue, boycotting.

Eric Fitton


February 29, 2000

Amazon, you've lost me as a customer - stop the madness!

Tom Novak


February 29, 2000

Amazon is not the first to think of this idea and not the first to use it, only the first to use their lawyers to steal it. It's no fun in the Marketing Sandbox when someone steals all the shovels.

Marion Flanagan


February 29, 2000

I agree fully with the Letter by Tim and hope that this will make Amazon realize the error of their ways.

David Cornely


February 29, 2000

I too, support the RMS boycott. I have not purchased anything from amazon.com since 12/20/99.

Jim Campbell


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I'm disappointed that you took this tactic. Try doing something original and I'll back you 100%.

Doug Schwartz


February 29, 2000

One of the most arrogant attempts to use the law to stifle the spirit of the internet to have ever come along.

Paul Wear, Jr.


February 29, 2000

Amazon has lost my business until they learn to play well with others.

Lloyd Sommerer


February 29, 2000

I am no longer buying any products from Amazon. I am no longer visiting Amazon's web site. I am advising everyone I know to do the same.

Terence Mark


February 29, 2000

I am no longer buying any products from Amazon. I am no longer visiting Amazon's web site. I am advising everyone I know to do the same.

Terence Mark


February 29, 2000

I'll keep it short. I spent almost 񘘐 with Amazon.com last year. No more, bn.com will get my business. Absolutely reprehensible.

L Hill


February 29, 2000

I have not bought from Amazon since they did this patent. I would be happy to buy from them again if they drop it. Paul Vincent Craven

Paul Vincent Craven


February 29, 2000

I've ordered 46 books, CDs, toys, etc. from Amazon over the last 3 years, but I won't be buying anything else until they drop this stupid patent.

Michael P. Persons


February 29, 2000

Amazon has lost my business, and my referrals. This loss shall occur for as long after the 1-click patent is gone as the 1-click patent existed.

Russell Billings


February 29, 2000

The two patents recently given to Amazon are a travesty, and can only harm the field/industry in the long run. Please, let common sense prevail here!

Mike Miller


February 29, 2000

I wholeheartedly agree with Tim O'Reiley's argument against Amazon.com's two recent patent filings. They are a travesty in the face of the open world of the Internet.

Aaron Dershem


February 29, 2000

Hey Jeff--what about buttons and listboxes, too?

Dale Goetsch


February 29, 2000

Simone Paddock


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim O'Reilly on this. Please return your focus to meeting the needs of your customers, supporting open standards, and creating the best implementation of them.

Kathleen Sinnott


February 29, 2000

It is unclear to me how anything in the Amazon business model requires such intellectual thievery. I am a new Amazon customer but will not be for long if this practice of patenting stolen ideas persists.

Stuart Popejoy


February 29, 2000

I've purchased books from Amazon for home and my place of employment. I'm so fed up with this "patent fever" of theirs, I don't think I'll buy from them EVER again. Screw you Jeff! BTW, excellent prose Tim!

Doug Smoak


February 29, 2000

Tim, thanks for saying something. I've been disturbed by Amazon's patent abuses for some time, and I can thankfully say that I've stopped buying from them as a result. I encourage others to do the same.

Jon Shiring


February 29, 2000

I don't have anything to say that hasn't already been said by others, but I wanted to add my voice to the protest. Ultimately, I hope that the patent office wises up and realizes how much prior art there is in the computer field.

John Welch


February 29, 2000

David Horsey


February 29, 2000

How does that go again? If I tell Ten people and each of them tells Ten people, etc...etc... Amazon, don't worry, once everyone has stopped buying books from you, maybe you'll be able to make money from collecting on your patents.

Aaron Shackelford


February 29, 2000

Amazon has always provided great service and value to its customers, including myself. It's unfortunate that you would pursue such an obviously misguided course even when confronted with a sound argument such as Tim O'Reilly and others have made. I will be clicking at least twice to make purchases as long as Amazon continues on this ill-advised course.

Kris Lilley


February 29, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon while this patent nonsense is still active. I further have convinced the rest of my family (a great deal of whom are online, and find ordering online convenient) not to shop at Amazon anymore. I've pointed them to places like Barnes & Noble instead.

Galadriel Billington


February 29, 2000

I strongly agree that Amazon has patented something that was created and in use by other people and companies. I think that this patent should never have been granted.

Jeff Plummer


February 29, 2000

You will note that I AM an Amazon customer, and though I have directed many of my companions to your services (which you have benefitted GREATLY!), I find your stance repugnant, and, as the letter states, forwarding a process that will unravel the foundation upon which you sit.

Tom Payne


February 29, 2000

</i><!-- attempt to fix the formatting of an earlier response --> I love Amazon.com and use it often. Now, because of Amazon's aggressive aggrandizement of public domain intellectual property, I feel that I must stop using Amazon.com, despite all the convenience it offers.

Jeffrey Henning


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com was my favorite online book provider. Not just books, but music, videos, and everything else. I really enjoyed a one stop solution. Now, thanks to the "1-Click" patent I will look elsewhere for my needs. If Amazon ceases their current actions I may begin shopping there again. Maybe not. As my mother tells me - once trust is lost it is very hard to regain.

Joseph Martin


February 29, 2000

As an Internet Strategist, I buy a large number of books to keep up the flow of new information and keep myself current. As a web developer since 1995, I know that the web was built on people improving each others "neat web hacks". Given Amazon's recent behavior, I can't possibly consider buying anything else from a company that so recklessly disregards that ethic.

Cushing Whitney


February 29, 2000

Abuses, like this, of the U.S. patent system should be considered criminal. Your actions are speaking louder than any words. With the attempted enforcement of this patent, you are effectively saying: "We will use whatever means necessary to keep our lead in the eCommerce world, even if it means squashing the open community that created 99% of the technology we base our business on."

Steve Weinrich


February 29, 2000

Amazon used to be the first place I went to order books (including before physical stores). I've spent over a ũ,000 in the last year on computer books alone, and consider Amazon to be the easiest way to get book reviews and books. I will never by another book from Amazon and will encourage every one I know not to as long as patent abuses continue. This disgraceful abuse of patents is absolutely unacceptable.

David Richardson


February 29, 2000

Tim O'Reilly put it quite well. Amazon has not developed anything new, and their patent is the equivelant of patenting crushed ice. Cookies, like ice crushers, might be patentable, but not the product, or ice, that is the inevitable result. I hope Amazon backs off from this strategy and owes up to it's mistake. Give Amazon back to the technical people who built it, not the Marketing people who are driving it into the ground.

A Hoffman


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon began pursuing this ridiculous patent, I was a loyal customer who didn't bother to look any further for what I needed. Pursuing this one-click patent has made me look around a bit - as it turns out, the competition (FatBrain.com in this case) has quite a good selection of technical books (Including the O'Reilly line). So, until Amazon gives up wasting everyone's time and money on these foolish court cases, I'll be buying elsewhere.

Michael Kohne


February 29, 2000

I am a big fan of amazon.com, and I often have made use of their wonderful sight to browse for books and make online purchases. However, I believe that amazon.com is not acting in the best interests of the Internet community as a whole when is attempts to patent trivial web technology. In addition, this irresponsible use of the patent system further deteriorates its usefullness as a way to register true inovations. For these reasons I do not intend to purchase anything from amazon.com until they change their strategy on this issue.

Nick Bartoli


February 29, 2000

I have not purchased anything from Amazon since RMS asked the community to boycott Amazon and you can be sure the way things are going you won't be getting my money anytime soon. It has ben tough I have spent a good deal of money at Amazon but there are other places to shop: http://www.bn.com/ http://www.fatbrain.com/ http://www.booksamillion.com/ http://www.chapters.ca/ http://www.uk.bol.com/ http://www.borders.com/ and there are more I just don't know them.

Shafik Yaghmour


February 29, 2000

I'm a graduate student in computer graphics; I buy most of my technical books online. Patents like this are a slap in the face to two groups which matter very much to me -- the open source movement and the academic research community (without which the Web wouldn't exist in the first place). 1-Click is a trivial application of an idea (namely cookies) placed into the public domain. Unless and until the patent is overturned (or is no longer enforced), I feel obliged to take my business elsewhere.

Andy Wilson


February 29, 2000

As someone who buys a LOT of books both personally and for the IT department I work in, I have to say that Amazon has, until now, always been my choice of vendors. The customer service is easier, the website is more detailed, and the shipping practices are better than any other online booksellers that I've encountered. Until this patent nonsense is dropped, however, I'm willing to go through the extra hassle of ordering from other vendors. Meanwhile, I'll still be using Amazon's website to look up details & reviews on books I'm considering purchasing. Amazon, this is NOT a good business move on your part!

Raaven O'Quinn


February 29, 2000

Sir: I recently helped design a web site for a contest promoting a game. The contest won second place. During the design process, we decided to set up a link to an online retailer for the ordering of books related to the game (which is based on a reasonably famous role-playing game). When the question of who to go with came up, we spoke a few times. Amazon was rejected as the result of the 1-click patent. Our logs indicated at least 10 orders from our actual affilate - and we do not know how much was sold per order. Perhaps if more sites with your affiliations turned it to someone else, you would begin to notice the situation changing.

Geoffrey M. Depew


February 29, 2000

I must say I was very dissappointed when this whole mess started out. I decided to send Amazon.com an email explaining my dissappointment, and my reason for ceasing to purchase from them. I've since found out, though, that there are better prices elsewhere anyway. Between bn.com and buy.com I get everything I used to from amazon and almost always for cheaper than amazon can offer. I'm still dissappointed in their chosen business tactics, but it's not hurting me at all to simply stop buying from them. So I urge anybody else reading this to do the same. (And I commend anybody who read *this* far down the page of comments ... wow, you've got more patience than I, that's all I can say.)

Thomas Trelvik


February 29, 2000

Initially I was a large Amazon.com booster. I purchased books from Amazon even though the shipping made your prices more expensive than I could get at the bookstore because I believed that Amazon was the way of the future. I am most disappointed in the effort to enforce a patent of an obvious use of cookies. Any person with coding experience will find the "1-click" technology to be self-evident. I have now ceased purchasing anything from Amazon.com and have moved my spending to sites such as fatbrain.com and Barnes & Noble simply because they are not Amazon. This is a pity since I found the Amazon site superior in nearly all ways, except the moral one of course. Andrew Benson Network Admin

Andrew Benson


February 29, 2000

This whole issue is such an insult to the technical community. I still can't believe that you're actually pursuing this course of action. The fact that somebody has royally screwed up at the patent office is dis-heartening. But to see a corporation that I thought was above this blatently excercise a right that it never posessed is plain sickening. I didn't always feel this way - oh no... I've got several books bought from amazon sitting right next to me as I type, but will I ever shop there again? NOT IF MY LIFE DEPENDED ON IT. I guess amazon is more effected by competition than I though and quite frankly, I'd love to see them bankrupt. If you want to support a truly viable technical book alternative, try out bookpool.com - they sell technical books and that's all. No, you can't get your favorite Pokeman cards there, but who uses amazon for that anyway? I still can't believe it.....

Joel Brubaker


February 29, 2000

The US patent system now *encourages* the filing of such frivolous patents: - A frivolous patent such as the Amazon patent is a powerful weapon against existing or potential competitors. It reduces their chances to get capital (who wants to invest in a lawsuit?). The weapon relies on the possibility that a trial would go badly wrong and award damages for willful infringement. Even if the probability of such an event is low, it is high enough to create a lot of pressure. - Filing more frivolous patents is the best defense against other patents (frivolous or not). It gives you chips to trade in the event of a patent attack... - There is no downside on filing frivolous patents. It is very unlikely that you will get fined for filing a frivolous patent. Proving that you did so knowingly is close to impossible. Therefore something must be done. - Leon Bottou (speaking in my name)

Leon Bottou


February 29, 2000

It is sad to see such a great company using such low tactics to succeed in their marketplace. Over the last few months, I cannot recall the number of times (well over 20) that I've been wanting to buy books or even other articles (Amazon doesn't just sell books anymore) from Amazon. Unfortunately, because of their practices, I've had to restrain myself and use competitors (I had never been to Barnes & Nobles' site www.bn.com until I had to find an alternative to Amazon) to do order my books. I've shared my views with my wife and friends and although they may not go as far as signing this petition, they have also decided to boycott Amazon after hearing my arguments (which are certainly nothing new to you if you are reading this). I hope that Amazon realises their error. I would so easilly and willingly switch to a real marketing machine for them if they were simply willing to pull away from these silly patents. Wake up Amazon! You have so many things that makes me want to be you customer. Christian Saucier Atlanta, GA.

Christian Saucier


February 29, 2000

Geoff Catlin


February 29, 2000

Howard Cheng


February 29, 2000

Mitchell Hall


February 29, 2000

Johan Eriksson


February 29, 2000

Frank Bodmann


February 29, 2000

Neal Mooers


February 29, 2000

Sandi Steding


February 29, 2000

Bruce C. Denman


February 29, 2000

Alex Pukinskis


February 29, 2000

David Medinets


February 29, 2000

David Hunt


February 29, 2000

Guy Albertelli II


February 29, 2000

Andrew Brown


February 29, 2000

Levi Purvis


February 29, 2000

Alex Lindgren


February 29, 2000

Andrew Brown


February 29, 2000

Larry D. Burton


February 29, 2000

Scott E. Johnson


February 29, 2000

29-Feb-2000

William B. Sharrock


February 29, 2000

I fully intend to boycott Amazon until this is resolved.

Richard Smith


February 29, 2000

While Amazon is patenting software, whether it is enforcing those patents or not, I will not buy anything from them.

Alison Hawke


February 29, 2000

Jeff, This claim will weaken the very medium that helped you and your business become succesful. Why don't you try showing some gratitude instead?

Victor J. Zuylen


February 29, 2000

I agree with Mr. O'Reilly and ask Amazon to abandon these patents. I am a long time customer of Amazon, but will boycott them until they cease chasing these patents.

Paul Firgens


February 29, 2000

If Amazon makes a mockery of intellectual property rights, then so shall the individuals. Why buy from Amazon when you can copy a book from your neighbor? A former Amazon customer,

Peter Constantine


February 29, 2000

I strongly protest the idea of patenting such trivial things which are far from innovations. This is just an attempt to kill the competition. Something Microsoft has taught us all.

Nadeem Hasan


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim O'Reilly's assessment that the 1-click patent is a trivial and obvious application of something that was known within the WWW. I shall boycott Amazon until there is a change in policy.

Kumar Balachandran


February 29, 2000

I have been boycotting Amazon.com since October, and I will continue to do so until amazon withdraws its patent suit against B&N. I was a good customer Mr. Bezos, and I would like to return.

Chris Rohlfs


February 29, 2000

Your "one-click" patent is absurd and a slap in the face to those who have created the internet on which you have made your fortune. Your competitors will continue to enjoy my patronage until you remedy this madness.

Andrew Parker


February 29, 2000

I hope the folks at Amazon come to their senses - We have enjoyed spending our money there in the past, and want to return as customers in future, but enforcing these ridiculous patents is a waste of resources.

Faith Loewen


February 29, 2000

A patent on the concept of your affiliates program? A patent on a trivial usage of Netscape's cookie protocol? Shame on all of you. I'm with Richard Stallman on this one: Amazon, you don't deserve my patronage.

Matthew Benjamin


February 29, 2000

In the so-called "Internet age," service is more important than monopolizing the software industry. Acts like these will only contribute to Amazon's fall from power. Please don't make all your decisions in the name of the holy dollar.

Andy Cox


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Your frivolous patents constitute a slap in the face of all the generous contributors to the software/networking/internet/www world that made your business possible. I do not intend to give you any more of my business.

Scott D. Webster


February 29, 2000

It's amazing that these patents were granted. Reflects poorly on the PTO and also reflects poorly on Amazon. I will be looking elsewhere to purchase books, though I am somewhat disappointed since I've always received prompt and reliable service from Amazon in the past.

Jesse Hong


February 29, 2000

I think Amazon is the best. They have been my prefered vendor for everything they carry. I am so disappointed about these ridiculous patents they are obtaining. I feel I have no choice but to look to other vendors for my needs unless (or until)Amazon drops this effort.

Dennis Kelley


February 29, 2000

I always compare prices on many sites when I order a book, and almost always order from Amazon because of their great service and quick response. After this, I will be using other sites to get my books/CDs/movies/etc online. There's still a chance for Amazon to fix things if they will just think about their customer base.

Jake Williams


February 29, 2000

I have not done any web programming at all except for a few cgi scripts. That being said however, I think that after about a week I could produce a "one-click" feature on a website just based on the description. I don't see how this got patented in the first place, and I don't know how Amazon can honestly stand up and defend what clearly is not innovation.

Floyd Walker


February 29, 2000

Let's see - Short-term benefit: Restrict competitors from using one-click purchasing and referrals Short-term detriment: Piss off customers and competitors Long-term benefit: None (patents will be revoked) Long-term detriment: Piss off customers and competitors What are you thinking? You have the opportunity to make it right, and perhaps generate goodwill. Swallow your (false) pride and do the right thing.

Pete Shay


February 29, 2000

As the owner of Studio B Literary Agency www.studiob.com that represents over 150 technical authors, I agree completely with Tim's sentiments. Amazon is a great company, and will remain a great company if it continues to compete openly without setting up unnecessary and harmful barriers. Amazon - You ARE the 500 pound guerilla. You don't need to put a padlock on the bananas in order to horde them.

David Rogelberg


February 29, 2000

Thank you Mr O'Reilly for writing this letter. I wish to give Amazon the benefit of the doubt on this matter, hoever their actions toward B&N indicate that their intentions are not honorable with regards to these patents. I will not be purchasing from Amazon at all, unless they resolve this in a timely and acceptable manner. Even if the patents are found to be invalid, should Amazon continue to pursue this, I will continue to discourage others from purchasing using Amazon.

Christopher McKinley


February 29, 2000

The real injustice is that patent offices exist that grant such patents. As long as such terrible mistakes can happen without being overruled, we will have to fight similar cases again and again. Of course, I'm boycotting Amazon now, but I think of the thousands of other patents that have been granted in a similar way that do not find a lobby fighting against them. What's up, Mr. Bezos, would you raise a fund to fight patents granted by clueless patent offices worldwide? You have made your proof that such a fund is urgently needed. Get your head out of this silly case with a clever initiative.

Andreas Koenig


February 29, 2000

I have in the past bought books from Amazon. I even bought books for a college course I was taking through Amazon, rather than the school bookstore. My wife is an avid reader who has is the past bought loads of books (via the above email address) from you. But if you check your records you may notice that no books have been bought via that email address over the last few months, including the Christmas season. That is no accident. During that time we bought no less than 12 books through your competitors. I view software patents as inherently evil. You are of course withing your rights to take them out and use them a vigourously as you can. But my family will buy *no* books through Amazon while you persist in this behavior. Neither will anyone else that it is within my power to convince.

Ted Dennison


February 29, 2000

The only reason I've never tried other book sales sites is because Amazon's setup seemed quite elegant. I liked your eyes program, particularly since it was a validation of something I'd proposed to a former employer for relationship marketing several months before you adopted it, and I enjoyed having all my past mailing addresses ready for my next delivery. I will now take the time to use other online sellers. How can you claim that simply because you're using a cookie rather than a user name/password to access database information that 1-click is non-obvious? I hope you succeed in taking this to court. When you loose, I hope congress will take a look at the patent system and see there is a need for change. I also hope private companies will create searchable library services with prior art to fight these patent lawsuits so that resources can once again be applied toward companies competing based upon who has the best service and support, not who holds the most patents.

John David Thomas


February 29, 2000

To Mr. Bezos et al at Amazon, I concur with Tim O'Reilly's statements as expressed in his letter to Jeff (reprinted in the Ask Tim feature of the O'Reilly Web site) and would like to add a short comment of my own regarding the self-nurturing nature of the Web. Transparency is the sine qua non of the World Wide Web. A generation (and soon many more) of programmers and other enthusiasts have built their skills upon this transparency, using the basic tools of the Web to expand and enhance their knowledge of the Web and how it works. I count myself among that group, having "popped the hood" of many a site using my browser's "View Source" capability to gain a better understanding of how a site operates and flows. Skills built using this and other techniques which depend upon the openness of the Web and the Internet as a whole have contributed tremendously to my own productivity as a programmer and Web designer, as well as to the success of my clients' sites. Doubtless your own success is due is some measure to the similar experiences and knowledge bases of your own programmers and technicians, who have leveraged knoweldge gained from utilizing the Web's transparency to make Amazon the commercial epiphany I truly believe it to be. Yet your actions in regards to filing for and enforcing your 1-Click patent threaten to suffocate the very environment which has benefitted yourself and your company so much. Future generations of Web services and technologies will suffer for such efforts, because the expertise necessary to understand, deploy and extend them will be limited to those "within your own fences", as Tim put it. The effects of sustained climate of secrecy and proprietary technologies will leave us all -- businesses and consumers, programmers and end users -- appreciably worse off, and will stymie the growth and richness of the Internet in all its facets. Please do not discount your role in the evolution of the Web. As a leader in so many areas, Amazon sets the standard by which others abide. The notoriety, credibility and concrete practical benefits to be gained from doing the right thing in this case far outweigh the short-term gains you could possibly realize from your current course of action. This is an opportunity waiting to be seized. Sincerely, Jonathan P. McCarter

Jonathan McCarter


February 29, 2000

Laura Schmier


February 29, 2000

Mike McGee


February 29, 2000

Mike Janger


February 29, 2000

Dear Jeff Bezos I have read about your moves to enforce your trivial 1-click patent and am deeply disappointed by the action Amazon has taken. It is contrary to the spirit of the internet and is a betrayal of the many people who have helped to shape this exciting medium. I plan not to buy any further from Amazon until you change your policy. I will also advise friends and colleagues in the UK to stop buying from Amazon until you indicate that you will give up the patent. Details that I have received from Tim O'Reilly have disappointed me and will go to my large mailing list of IT and education contacts in the nwest. I think that you should reconsider your position fast. Ian Harford

Ian Harford


February 29, 2000

Grant Zurko


February 29, 2000

Gale Langseth


February 29, 2000

I have been a web developer and I have operated a web site hosting company since 1995. This predatory action by Amazon directly affects my ability to continue to make a living. I agree with those who will discontinue shopping at your site, as I have been an Amazon customer for over a year - I will now look elsewhere. I will not support someone who is trying to hurt me in this way. Think about what you are doing to people - if you damage us it will come back around to you. Rick Bastedo President GygaBite, Inc.

Rick Bastedo


February 29, 2000

I not only govern my own purchases, but I also have the ear of people who influence purchasing at a local college and several businesses (not to mention family and friends). My recommendations for purchases will be for Fatbrain.com until you refrain from your absurd and anti-competitive abuse of current software patent law. Your recent behavior is a disgrace to the industry, and your callous disregard for those who's work you have reaped the benefits of disgusts me.

Nickolas Atkinson


February 29, 2000

I buy many things online, but I have bought nothing from Amazon since this patent issue came to light. I also encourage my less technically savy friends to use outlets other than Amazon, and they have mostly done so.

Thomas S. Urban


February 29, 2000

Jeremy Sheeley


February 29, 2000

Carly Huitema


February 29, 2000

Chris Micacchi


February 29, 2000

Andreas Rasmusson


February 29, 2000

Jonnathan Briggs-Lee


February 29, 2000

Shame on you.

Laura Wilber


February 29, 2000

David Guthrie


February 29, 2000

Jason Deck


February 29, 2000

Leo Dejan


February 29, 2000

Mike Krasnay


February 29, 2000

Rex Mc Dowell


February 29, 2000

Michael Agard


February 29, 2000

Allen Wyatt


February 29, 2000

P…l Ove Pedersen


February 29, 2000

John Kohler


February 29, 2000

Robert Jones


February 29, 2000

Braden Gibson


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Openness built you. Your business is built from the ground up on standards, protocols, and technologies that were freely given. Every time you make a sale, you benefit from the efforts of thousands of academics, programmers, and entrepreneurs who gave, expecting to gain nothing but the benefits from others who did the same. Now you've turned around and spat in their faces. Your "one-click" patent is a ridiculous land-grab, a slap in the face to the community of openness that created the Internet and, by extension, you. You aren't required to play nice. You aren't required to call off your attack dogs pursuing lawsuits against competitors who implemented the same obvious feature as you did. But I'm not required to buy from you, and neither is anyone else. Please keep that in mind.

David Price


February 29, 2000

Avner Kenner


February 29, 2000

Software patents are the beginning of the end of future independent innovation. I agree that Amazon should recognize this and change their policies, despite their market size.

Joe Ripley


February 29, 2000

Aaron Strich


February 29, 2000

Greg Landrum


February 29, 2000

Fatbrain.com, here I come!

Mark Kennedy


February 29, 2000

I used to think Amazon was pretty cool and ordered from your site several times. However, once this (and some other, similar things) came out I stopped even looking at your pages when shopping. It's not like there aren't lots of other companies I can turn to...

Trevor Hayes


February 29, 2000

Ronald L. Sheridan, Jr.


February 29, 2000

Tim, I agree 100%

Ray Mears


February 29, 2000

I spend at least 躔.00 a year on computer books, CD's, DVD's, and leisure books. 95% of my purchases had been at amazon.com due to the spectacular service and ease of order. I have been unable to continue to use amazon.com as of December 15th, 1999. Being a computer programmer myself, I agree 100% with Tim O'Reilly, Richard Stallman, et al. You wont get another dime of my money. _Andrew

Andrew Embury


February 29, 2000

I will take my business elsewhere as well.

Jim Crumley


February 29, 2000

Pathetic, simply pathetic.

Aaron Morris


February 29, 2000

Janne Kulmala


February 29, 2000

I will not buy any more from Amazon.com

Jagadeesh Venugopal


February 29, 2000

Stop typing amazon.com. Start typing noamazon.com.

Alex Blume


February 29, 2000

BEWARE!!!!! The Internet gaveth to Amazon, the Internet can taketh away!

popman


February 29, 2000

BEWARE!!!!! The Internet gaveth to Amazon, the Internet can taketh away!

popman


February 29, 2000

You go Jeff. A dollar in your pocket is a dollar in mine.

A. Meade


February 29, 2000

I think the patent office should be apportioned some responsibility in this letter.

Charlie Goodier


February 29, 2000

William Crosby-Lundin


February 29, 2000

This issue is of enormous importance, and not just within the United States.

Paul Martin


February 29, 2000

You do not own this technology. So stop trying to steal it. Thank you.

Manny Manuel


February 29, 2000

I am in full agreement with Tim -- and RMS.

Steve Lamont


February 29, 2000

The 1-click patent has got to be the dumbest patent ever awarded and Amazon should be ashamed of it.

Kristoffer Henriksson


February 29, 2000

I am boycotting until this situation is resolved...

Adrian Rollett


February 29, 2000

I will be shopping elsewhere until Amazon assures me that they will not attempt use their patents to keep other sites from using obvious ideas like cookies (one-click ordering) and multi-tier marketing (afiiliate programs).

Eric Costello


February 29, 2000

Dear Sirs, You're a big enormous company, I'm just a customer. I can't stop you, but I won't buy books from you.

Jos'h Fuller


February 29, 2000

If you purue this patent, I hope you fail! pk

Pete Kingswell


February 29, 2000

I have ordered things from Amazon since the patent was granted, but I'm beginning to think that that may have been a mistake.

Kevin McKenzie


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon changes their ways, I'm using Barnes & Noble, or ordering direct from publishers like O'Reilly

Richard Rognlie


February 29, 2000

Once the best bookstore on line, now interested in selling everything (including the kitchen sink) and obsessed with growing at any cost.

Bill Symmes


February 29, 2000

Rethink it!

C.W.P. Schoenmakers


February 29, 2000

My last amazon.com purchase was made last week, and that only because I had gift certificates to spend. Mr. Bezeos & co. will not see any more of my money.

Steven V.


February 29, 2000

I will boycott amazon until they resolve this matter. If the courts resolve it for them, patent or no, I will never do business with you again.

Sam Stintson


February 29, 2000

I prefer amazon over other services. Unfortunately, I view their actions as abusing the very system that helps them exist. I will boycott until amazon corrects this.

Brandon Hill


February 29, 2000

I'm in agreement with most of these opinions and will certainly buy elsewhere until I hear this issue has been resolved. (not that I could actually read them all given the large number who have already responded)

Paul Mueller


February 29, 2000

Jeff, You must be following bad advice with these misguided patents that bites the hand that feeds you. I am disappointed with your actions. Align Co. Publishing, Media, and Technology Consulting

P. G. Secondino


February 29, 2000

I can contribute nothing substantive to what Tim O'Reilly and Richard Stallman have already written. However, I feel compelled to add that you should be ashamed of yourself.

Joe Formoso


February 29, 2000

Stop Software Patents Period. Make money with supporting open standards and creating the best implementation of them.

Jochen Bedersdorfer


February 29, 2000

Let Amazon compete on _service_ not patents. I used to shop at Amazon because they understood customer service better than any other book seller. Now Amazon has lost its way and my money will go elsewhere.

Edward Franks


February 29, 2000

I've stooped using your service, Amazon and intend to continue the boycott until this situation is resolved

Dmitriy Meleshko


February 29, 2000

because of this issue our family has decided to cease doing business with amazon.com. we need to send a clear message to these big sharks that such purely greedy attempts are simply unacceptable. they will ultimately hurt us all. this is simply outrageous!

bettina gentry


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com is using a petty tactic to beat back its competition, and I think it stinks. I'm not patronizing Amazon.com anymore. (I might use their terriffic web content to make purchasing decisions, but they won't see anymore of my money.)

Drone Head


February 29, 2000

Im you persist on this patent's things, I will stop buying books from you and urge all the persons I know to stop doing it.

Alejandro Forero Cuervo


February 29, 2000

I have nothing to add to what many others have said about this issue.

Ian Jackson


February 29, 2000

Please differentiate on services and material offerings. Differentiating on the cookie level is simply ridiculous. Look at what the patent has gotten you, and then compare that to the ill will it has bred. Was it worth it? It's not too late to turn this puppy around, you know.

Erik Ratcliffe


February 29, 2000

These patents are wrong, and until cease this activity I will and have been participating in RMS' boycott of Amazon. I have also convinced some non-tech friends/relatives to participate in the boycott as well. Its your choice, and it seems clear what you should do.

Ethan Benson


February 29, 2000

I'm happy to buy my books elsewhere. I'm a student in Digital Design and spend at least 贄 a quarter on computer and design books. I'm also happy to inform my classmates, teachers, and the underclassmen whom I work with, about Amazon.com's brazen actions towards monopolizing a common vehicle.

Elisa Del Vecchio


February 29, 2000

Even though I am satisfied as a customer by Amazon, I am absolutely horrified that somebody could be STUPID enough to grant a patent on cookies. And that Amazon would exploit holes in the US patent system is in my opinion almost a criminal act. So I think they should back down.

Michael Wulff Nielsen


February 29, 2000

Amazon is one of the easiest and most effective ecommerce sites around. While I may not buy huge numbers of books, 95% of the books I have bought in the last 12 months, and 100% of the books bought online were ordered through amazon.co.uk. As of yesterday (28/2/2000) I've started using bol.com.

Gary Hill


February 29, 2000

Amazon used to be the first place on the web where I looked for books. Now it is the last thanks to their insistence on enforcing their trivial patent. If Amazon insists on protecting their territory instead of innovating, it won't be long before someone else comes along and comes up with something that will put them out of business.

Tanner Lovelace


February 29, 2000

To Jeff Bezos, Simply Chinese proverb analogy, Amazon - Boat Us the book buyers - Water We can keep you afloat, we can also sink you just as easy. I would like to start shopping at Amazon again, but in the meantime, I will take my business elsewhere. Sincerely Xu He

Xu He


February 29, 2000

I don't know who told you getting a patent on cookies was a good idea, but I don't think they should get a raise this year (or next year.) I was a fan of Amazon.com. It was bright and shinny and could do no wrong. Now your image is tarnish and I don't know if myself or my family will ever be customers of yours again. I'm sorry for you.

Sterling Keener


February 29, 2000

I have been an Amazon customer and have purchased books on varied subjects from them. However, since this whole fiasco started I have taken my business elsewhere. I absolutely refuse to deal with any company which behaves in such a greedy and predatory manner.

Brian Showalter


February 29, 2000

While Amazon.com chooses to enforce its "1-click" patent (or any of the other ridiculous patents they have been granted) I will no longer purchase from Amazon.com, either personally or on behalf of my company. Further, I will take every opportunity to encourage my friends, family, and colleagues to do the same. I look forward to the day when such patents are declared invalid in a court of law. Jason Ruiter

Jason Ruiter


February 29, 2000

One would think that Amazon, supposedly knowing the Internet so well, would never pull something like this. I can understand assembling a portfolio of defensive patents to protect your interests, but using obvious ideas like this offensively is unconscionable. Now Amazon will learn how well the Internet routes around obstacles (of any kind). IÆll be shopping elsewhere until further notice. -Darin Buck

Darin Buck


February 29, 2000

I was neutral on this case until I read Mr. O'Reilly's comments. After reading the summary of Mr. Bezos' comments, I am 100% behind the boycott. I think Mr O'Reilly is in a tough position that precludes him from boycotting Amazon, but it IS the reponsibility of the reader's of O'Reilly books to join the boycott. I spent over ū,000 at Amazon in 1999, just in books and CD's. Now I will point my browser and my dollars elswhere.

Bruce Bilbrey


February 29, 2000

Mark Bridgers


February 29, 2000

Amazon does not need a patent on 1-Click to still be successful. There are many other ways that Amazon can ensure their success without unfairly bullying their neighbors out of using such a basic function as saved preferences and express checkout. Can you imagine if one supermarket chain owned the right to offer an "Express checkout line"?! Customers will ultimatelyh base their shopping choices on the their end experience, and not on marketing names.

John Genuard


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon stops with these silly patent claims, they should not be expecting to see any of my money. There are plenty of other vendors who provide a similar service for a similar price. They need to be aware that once we get used to purchasing from a different vendor, Amazon will no longer be the first place we look for books.

Steven Evatt


February 29, 2000

If they were not to be so utterly and blatantly ridiculous patents, perhaps there would be some merit in Amazons patenting scheme. Perhaps. I used to buy about 赨 in books from amazon.com a month (being a developer) and now i buy 0. I currently buy all my books at it's competitors (including the one amazon has filed a lawsuit against) and will continue to boycott amazon.com until releases the patents. Maybe forever. Amazon.com people: your customers are not happy. DO SOMETHING.

Paul Nguyen


February 29, 2000

Patents are supposed to be to encourage people to make public things they do in secret so that knowledge might be advanced. Even if the dubious merit of business process patents were to be accepted, one-click shopping is not something that needed patent protection to encourage its being published or developed. In my opinion, the granting of your patent was unconstitutional. Your insistence on using this patent offensively has lowered my opinion of your company from audacious innovator to the level of a slimy cybersquatter.

Eric Hopper


February 29, 2000

Amazon...Take down your patents! Seriously-- your move to patent the 1-click process is (as I'm sure you have been made aware by now) both illegitimate (in that it is not the creation of a novel 'art' or process... simply an application (and not a particularly inventive one) of the cookie) and (in the long run) ill advised. Chalk up one more book buyer who will not grace your 'virtual' storefront with their presence. (estimated weekly expenditures on books(as averaged over the last few years)-- between 贄 and 赨 dollars.) (Not to mention CD's) :P

Kerry Lazarus


February 29, 2000

I have enjoyed shopping at Amazon.com for quite a while. However, after hearing about the patent nonsense and RMS's call for a boycott I checked out the competition. So far I haven't been as happy with the competition, but in an attempt to make a statement, I am avoiding Amazon.com. The world wide web is already suffering greatly from the realization of corporations that it can be commercially viable. I thought Amazon.com was a good example of how an e-company should work. Please return to sensible business practices and back off of your frivolous patent claims. Those actions do not set a good example.

Jeffrey W. Jones


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim O'Reilly and RMS that this trivial software patent is an abuse of privilege on the part of Amazon. The open standards Internet technology and open source software make it possible for Amazon to exist. This attempt to illegitimately lay claim to public technology must not be allowed to continue unchallenged.

Charles Spurgeon


February 29, 2000

<P>I agree with Tim O'Reilly's well-written thoughts on the Amazon.com 1-Click patent. Amazon.com should spend more time and money working on improving customer service, maintaining a great site and continuing with innovative technology, and spend less time trying to enforce a patent that should have never been granted in the first place. There is nothing innovative or unique in the Amazon.com 1-Click system.</P> <P> Until such time as Amazon.com retracts the patent application and lawsuits, I will cease purchasing from Amazon, and will advise all of my friends and family to do the same. After all, I can always order my books directly from O'Reilly or BN.com...</P>

Mark Boltz


February 29, 2000

I, like the hundreds who have signed their names above and below me, am appalled by your misguided and shortsighted attempts to stifle creativity by turning trivialities into minefields of potential litigation. I have not purchased anything from Amazon.com since your ridiculous patent action, and do not intend to do so until you come to your senses. Pissing in the well, indeed.

Chris Crick


February 29, 2000

I work for Thomson Consumer Electronics, the manufacturers of RCA, GE, and ProScan consumer electronics equipment and one of the leading holders of patents in the consumer electronics industry. Although I personally have mixed feelings about software patents, I have much fewer problems with software patents that are non-trivial and non-obvious. (You might want to look into the history of the Bell Labs' setuid patent at this point.) Trying to use obvious and trivial patents to protect your business position is a pure short-term strategy. Short-term because competitors will use their obvious and trivial patents against you to begin with, short-term because it makes you look very bad in the eyes of the technically astute customers who were your early adopters and are still probably among the best at spreading the word of Amazon.com to others, and short-term because eventually the Patent Office will start revoking these patents, thereby removing your business advantage from these obvious and trivial patents. When the Amazon.com technicall staff comes up with non-obvious, non-trivial software techniques that will get patents that will stand up in court, it would be very understandable for Amazon.com to patent these techniques. Unfortunately, the 1-click ordering and affiliates program are not those patents. I will still continue to tell people about Amazon.com -- it is by far the handiest way to order books and music at home.

Mark Leighton Fisher


February 29, 2000

I would like to speak as a technical professional whose book spending is literally in the multiple thousands of dollars per year. I was increasingly using Amazon for my book purchases. After trying several on line book vendors over the last year I was pleased with Amazon's customer service and in light of this the slight increment of price over other vendors was no object. I also enthusiastically encouraged my non-technical friends and family (generally voracious readers) to use Amazon. I frequently linked to Amazon URLs in on line discussions and e-mails. Then the 1-click patent came along (not to mention the even more unspeakable associates program patent) and everything changed. Tim has made both the technical and moral case against these better and more authoritatively than I could. And let me add that I respect the hard work that has gone into the creation of your excellent site, and fully support your right to appropriate trademark and copyright protection. However, it is with deep regret that I am unable to buy from you, recommend you or link to you any longer. I have found the service from your competitors acceptable if somewhat less polished than the service I enjoyed from Amazon (this has absolutely nothing to do with the patents at issue, I may add, but just old fashioned hard work). I cannot speak for the thousands of other avid book buying technical professionals like me, but if Amazon would step back from this ill conceived business strategy, I for one would give you a second look.

Matthew F. Leo


February 29, 2000

I too am appalled at the misbehavior of Amazon. Like so many others, I have switched my online book purchases to Barnes and Nobel and others. I urge Amazon to do the right thing, to be competitive on thier own merits and to save themselves the trouble of fighting these ridiculous patent fights.

Howard Ship


February 29, 2000

Rob Klink


February 29, 2000

Tom Jones


February 29, 2000

Eric Grove


February 29, 2000

Chris Abiad


February 29, 2000

What Amazon is doing is retarded. Time magazine should revoke Jeff Bezo's "Man of the Year" title. He's the schmuck of the year (so far). He's become an enemy of the Internet. This will not be easily forgotten.

Mark Cidade


February 29, 2000

David Shantz


February 29, 2000

David Heffner


February 29, 2000

Tyranny does not drive innovation. Amazon would be nothing without the generosity of previous works which were made freely available to Amazon. To claim a patent on well known technology is preposterous. Amazon will not be getting my business.

Brandon Poyner


February 29, 2000

Paul Penedo


February 29, 2000

Mando Escamilla


February 29, 2000

Michael Pirnat


February 29, 2000

Simon Hill


February 29, 2000

Kay Nettle


February 29, 2000

Richard Weeks


February 29, 2000

I purchased books from Amazon over xmas and was impressed with the service and selection. However I will no longer use amazon.com due to what I see as a predatory practice of pantenting technologies that were developed from prior technologies developed in a more open environment. If it were not for this open environment, the web, as well as Mr Bezos and his company would be a lost advance in communication and information science. One Gates is enough.

Wesley Harrell


February 29, 2000

Danna Cornick


February 29, 2000

Stefan Buchholtz


February 29, 2000

Chris Hubble


February 29, 2000

Michael Wiltsie


February 29, 2000

where do I apply for a pattent to cut and paste between frames?

Andrew Snyder


February 29, 2000

Products want to be sold, but the Internet needs to be free!

Erik Peterson


February 29, 2000

I'm a social worker and don't know a lot about technology, but I know oppression when I see it.

Julie Johnson


February 29, 2000

Patent something I can write in an hour? Gimme a break. I'll buy at barnes and noble and reel.com from now on, thank you.

Jason Wambach


February 29, 2000

I have been boycotting Amazon since they announced the patent and have been urging all my friends and relatives to boycott it too. Frivilous patents like this stifle innovation.

Charles Leeds


February 29, 2000

Many with more skill in putting words together have stated above exactly what I feel. The only thing I want to add is that I, too, have exclusively shopped at B&N since this ludicrous patent was awarded.

Glen Frank


February 29, 2000

For the good of the Amazon's customers, employees, and shareholders (and, oh yeah, the rest of the world) ... it's time to lay these patents down. In cases such as these, where there *is* prior art, there should be no patent. Daniel Gray geekbooks.com

Daniel Gray


February 29, 2000

alison headley


February 29, 2000

As long as Amazon.com continues such greedy, foolish behavior, I will not spend a dime at their website. Furthermore, I will urge my friends, family, and clients to purchase products at alternative websites until Amazon backs away from its current stance.

Ryan Hennig


February 29, 2000

Pavel Shevchenko


February 29, 2000

I think Amazon has done a number of positive things for the industry, but I cannot support the issuance or aggressive defense of this and other such trivial patents. I believe Amazon should drop defense of this patent, and will boycott their site(s) until they do so.

Poney Carpenter


February 29, 2000

The granting of the 1-Click patent application is another indictment of the incompetence of the US patent office. I hope Amazon try to enforce it and a reasonably savvy judge laughs you out of court. Heres hoping such patents never get granted in the free world.

Gareth Owen


February 29, 2000

In the past I have bought thousands of dollars worth of mechandise from Amazon, as well as recommended your company to many others. I will no longer purchase from or recommend Amazon as long as you insist on causing long term damage to the community for your own short term gains.

Dan Green


February 29, 2000

Even as a die-hard-laissez-faire-economics-libertarian, these patents offend me to my very core. I am uncertain who to direct my anger against, the evil of Amazon.com for filing the patents, or the nonchalant ignorance of the U.S. Patent Office for allowing them to succeed.

Michael F. Maddox


February 29, 2000

I have stopped purchasing from Amazon for both my personal items as well as my corporate purchases. I will continue to boycott you and direct my business transactions to your competitors until you reverse your stand on both of your patents, 1 Click and the Associates patent. Respectfully, Jeff Hinrichs Omaha, NE

Jeff Hinrichs


February 29, 2000

I am a registered affiliate of amazon.com, but with such predatory tactics being used by Amazon, I have no choice but to drop my affiliation from a company that no longer stands for innovation. A company that can't compete on it's merits, and must resolve to using cheap and dirty tactics.

Vidyut Luther


February 29, 2000

I agree whole-heartedly with the sentiments of Tim O'Reilly's letter.

Alastair Burt


February 29, 2000

I have been a good (maybe even excellent) customer of Amazon.com since it started several years ago. I have never used the One-Click process and never will. I don't expect to stop buying books from Amazon, but I certainly do object to their efforts to keep for themselves something they "stole" from the public.

H. Milton Peek


February 29, 2000

I'm just one but I will not buy from Amazon, and have written some people and will try to convince others to stop using them. It's too bad because they're so convenient but, I'll use them for user-comments, but actually buy stuff elsewhere. We have to discourage trivial ankle-biting patents.

Jeff Donner


February 29, 2000

I used to by books from Amazon, no longer. Their competators have the same prices, so that's where my dollars now go. Maybe I should patent the idea of providing a button to click on in a website and enforce it against Amazon, or better yet, the idea of cookies. Patenting the obvious is in my opinion a form of corporate criminal behavior. Enjoy your loss of market share.....

Owen C. Creger


February 29, 2000

I applaud Mr. O'Reilly for a rational and even-handed dissection of this issue. Mr. Bezos should not attempt to learn his business ethics from Mr. Gates and the competition-squashing mafia in Redmond. Like many others have already stated, there's nothing Amazon sells that I can't click-and-buy at any number of other sites - ones that are far less predatory and abusive.

Scott Harvey


February 29, 2000

Although not many, I have purchased books from you in the past, and do not intend to buy from you in the future if you continue such behaviour. If my name is not in your records, it is from the necessity of having to borrow another's credit card.

Jeff Read


February 29, 2000

As someone who are been on the net for several years now, there have been incredible advances in technology that have come about simply by people sharing their ideas. What Amazon is trying to do, in essence, *stealing* these ideas, sickens me to the core. As long as Amazon continues this blatant misuse of the patent system and utter disregard for pre-existing technologies, I'll continue to not do business with them, and to tell my friends the same.

Doug Muth


February 29, 2000

I will no longer purchase books through Amazon.com. I am a college student and an avid reader--and will purchase my significant volume of books elsewhere until such time that these ridiculous business practices are discontinued. Please also keep in mind that for each of us who speak in this forum, there are untold others who feel as we do-- please, please, reconsider! It will be better for business.

Jennifer Jensen


February 29, 2000

I am a devoted Amazon customer. However, as an Internet Technologist I cannot condone the patenting of any system that is merely a superficial application of a technology that has been open source from day one. That way lies Microsoft, err, I mean, Madness.

Robert G. Ferrell


February 29, 2000

I have nothing to add but to note that I will never again use the services of Amazon, if they should even continue to be construed as services. Pharmaceutical companies patenting nature, business executives patenting well known technologies; what next? Engineers who do not share their knoweledge and insist on patenting every line of code. Sigh. Mark Washeim Technical Director, Large Medium AB Proud to support OPEN SOURCE! (NetBSD, Apache)

Mark Washeim


February 29, 2000

Your software patents are an obvious attempt to gain a monopoly in an open environment. Had patents such as '1-click shopping' been approved in the web's infancy, you would be selling books out of your parent's garage. I personally plan to boycott amazon.com until this matter is resolved. Please take this not as a threat to you, but as a necessary means to an end...The patent will be overturned eventually, Jeff, but will the community's doubt in amazon.com?

Jim Sproull


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I have been shopping at Amazon.com for years now. I think it is a great store with incredible potential. As a software developer and one who believes in open standards, I believe what you are doing is simply wrong. Because of this, I and any others can I get to join my cause, will be boycotting your store effective immediately. Please overturn your 1-Click and Affiliate patents and I will be happy to return to your store... Scott Meeuwsen High Level Software, Ltd.

Scott Meeuwsen


February 29, 2000

Since hearing about this One-Click patent nonsense, I've ceased even visiting the amazon site. The Amazon link on my netscape toolbar has now become a Barnes and Noble link. Amazon will never again see a dime of mine until they begin acting like rational and decent citizens of the online community (and having the patent revoked by the Patent Office or overturned by a court doesn't count as acting rationally). I may not be wealthy, but I spent a fair amount at Amazon, and if enough of us stop shopping it will add up.

Michael McLaughlin


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos- Since learning of Amazon.com's intent to pursue patent litigation, I have ceased to be a patron of your company, and have urged those around me to do likewise. It's one thing to succeed by being an innovator, it's something wholly different to be selfish and arrogant with other people's technology. I doubt my 跌 annually (and whatever my circle of friends might spend) means much in terms of your company's bottom line. I may even end up paying slightly more out of my own pocket by using other vendors, but feel that compromising not only my own principles, but those of the people who make the internet work, live, and grow.

Rafe Brox


February 29, 2000

I love Amazon's book site. It makes books easy to find and easy to order. The author and reader commentaries are useful. I used to buy most of my books from Amazon. No more. The 1-click ordering and associate program are nice, but they were NOT my reason for visiting Amazon, and the fact that some other on-line store copies those features will NOT make me go there. Price and information, price and information, that's what attracts me. I will happilly resume buying from Amazon as soon as they publically declare that they will no longer use patents as weapons.

Bill St. Clair


February 29, 2000

Whatever "rights" Amazon or any other corporation or individual feels they have to patent software and business processes, the fact is, such patents are already having a chilling effect on Internet development and innovation, which will in the end limit everyone's (including Amazon's) ability to make money off the Internet. I hope that anyone considering registering a slew of patents will instead spend their money more wisely: lobby the U.S. government to reexamine the work of the Patent and Trademark Office, and the concept of patents themselves. Just in the past quarter, my site ahref.com has brought over 迀 of business directly to Amazon. Within 24 hours, ahref.com will stop referring purchasers to Amazon.

Edward Piou


February 29, 2000

I'm disappointed by Amazon's ludicrous claim to have invented anything (in regards to 1-Click). This is a misnomer. To keep my statement in context though, I want to be clear that I have books on my desk purchased from Amazon. And though I'm not enforcing or advocating any boycott, I have chosen other book vendors ever since I first read that Amazon applied for this patent. I've also told others in my IT organization where they may find computer related books from a less nefarious organization. I see your move as pathetic and unrealistic. In my eyes it's about as relevant as copyrighting letters of the alphabet. My personal opinion is that you can go f**k youself until you decide to drop your claims of having invented anything. (these are all personal opinions really, none of which reflect the views of my employer.. )

Dagen Brock


February 29, 2000

I've been upset about this patent since the beginning of the year, and as a software developer who usually spends between around 躔/year on books, my protest alone has moved 贄 in book sales to other web sites. I've also taken the time to forward this information to my less technical friends who've invested in Amazon, and used their services to tell them likewise to boycott amazon. So Mr. Bezos, you've screwed up. Cover your behind and hold your patent but leave it in the public domain so others are free to use it. Have you noticed your sales starting to decline? Computer books seem to be the most expensive books and all programmers I've known have decided to shop elsewhere. I'm looking forward to your next quarterly statement to see how your losses are increasing. But I don't believe you've got a clue since you are now patenting the "associates program" or whatever it's called. I don't care if I don't get paid(not that I ever participated in linking to amazon for cash), I'll link to any web site but yours.

Dan Pieczynski


February 29, 2000

I am saddened and disappointed by Amazon's ill-advised use of software patents and I can no longer support Amazon in good faith until they rectify this issue.

Lawrence Leung


February 29, 2000

Jon Snader


February 29, 2000

I thought the 1-click patent was an absurd childish ploy that I could ignore. Now I'm frought. I have long supported and promoted Amazon, have been very loyal as a customer, and am (for the moment) an affiliate myself. But now I have some serious pondering to do. The reason for my support was because Amazon was innovative and provided good service. I didn't care for BN because I wanted to shop from a company with a new model, in short, because Amazon didn't have brick and mortar stores. I liked their innovation as much as if not more than anything else. But now they appear to be slipping. They're not innovating. I haven't been particularly happy about their expansion away from their core business into tools, toys and auctions, where they're less than original. But it's becoming obvious that they're moving away from innovation and into anti-innovation, into an attempt to have an anti-trust lawsuit filed against them, perhaps? The fact is, we all know that 1-click ordering was just a typical use of existing cookies technology, and that affiliates programs are nothing but an old marketing method from long before the internet existed. What really matters is where Amazon goes from here. Perhaps the 1-click suit was just an ill-advised childish phase, and this newest absurd patent will be allowed to just collect dust. I certainally hope so, and will be watching closely.

Chad Gard


February 29, 2000

Dennis Scott


February 29, 2000

Iain Holmes


February 29, 2000

Tim Riehle


February 29, 2000

Scott Houle


February 29, 2000

Justin Stringer


February 29, 2000

Agreed

Bob Bunge


February 29, 2000

John Anderson


February 29, 2000

John Hicks


February 29, 2000

kevin mayhew


February 29, 2000

Greg Johll


February 29, 2000

Michael Thicke


February 29, 2000

David Miller


February 29, 2000

John Camille


February 29, 2000

Patrick Misterovich


February 29, 2000

Never was a customer, and now I never will be.

Matthew Bielanski


February 29, 2000

Joshua Duke Sharp


February 29, 2000

This is to register my support.

Richard A. Phillips


February 29, 2000

I used to be a customer of Amazon and value their service but unfortunately I have to go somewhere else for my books now.

Albert Dorofeev


February 29, 2000

Amazon was good,but there are oter online sites ,which respect The Internet more than amazon.com.

Guntis Liepins


February 29, 2000

The key thing is that Amazon publish their intentions with their patents and are held publically accountable to them.

Martin Burns


February 29, 2000

This patent issue is an outrage. Why doesn't Amazon get a patent on the alphabet or the decimal system - these are also available to take.

Szymon Sokol


February 29, 2000

The one-click and affiliates patents make me wear my fatbrain.com hat and t-shirt with extra pride. It helps me remember who to buy from...

Brett g Porter


February 29, 2000

Excellent letter Tim. I can't believe that amazon is going ahead with not only applaying for, but also enforcing, these patents. Keep the net free of "cash and grab".

Noah Genner


February 29, 2000

I refuse to give my business to a company that insists on stifling technological innovation.

Noal McDonald


February 29, 2000

I am an <i>Amazon customer</i> but will not be purchasing any more books (or any other merchandise their <em>empire</em> wants to sell) from them until they get over this childish patent.

Alex C Tan


February 29, 2000

The patent is bogus to anyone who has the slightest idea of how the web is designed. They just had enough money to get it and slipped it past inept PTO officials. I only shop BN now.

ernie mcginty


February 29, 2000

What happens to patents if the company dies .... for example the highly profitable AMAZON.COM ??? I would like them to go out of business ... highly unlikely but such a nice thought!

Frans de Wet


February 29, 2000

I've been using Amazon for a couple of years but now I'll be going elsewhere. I spend about ú250 per year on books, mostly from Amazon, but they won't see another penny.

David Allewell


February 29, 2000

Watch out Amazon. I am going to patent the click itself and counter sue. Then I will sue for licensing anytime someone pushes the mouse button for using my patent. Oh boy! This will be great!

Chad Z. Hower


February 29, 2000

I have joined the Boycott. Another example of a private corporation gorging on government open source fueled innovations and then turning around claiming that they invented it, they own it.

Mark Saltzman


February 29, 2000

All I can say is that since these issues have arisen I've bought many hundreds of dollars worth of books that I might have purchased from Amazon from other sources instead.

Howard Ding


February 29, 2000

All I can say is that since these issues have arisen I've bought many hundreds of dollars worth of books that I might have purchased from Amazon from other sources instead.

Howard Ding


February 29, 2000

Amazon has potentially a long way to fall. I am astounded that a company I previously thought to be forward-thinking can be so short-sighted. Step back from the abyss before it is too late.

Robert Galbraith


February 29, 2000

I haven't bought a single thing from Amazon since this whole fiasco started. That's more than 跌 they won't be seeing from me in the near future. Maybe a small amount, but with enough people, it adds up.

Shaun Thomas


February 29, 2000

Software patents of this kind are evil, and I will not do business with any company that uses a tactic like this to gain market share. Until Amazon sees the light, I'm doing my book shopping at bn.com or fatbrain.

Monty Manley


February 29, 2000

Althought I have been an Amazon customer in the past, I have been part of the boycott. And, unfortunately for Amazon, I have been so pleased with Barnes and Noble, I doubt that I will return to Amazon now, regardless of what they do.

Sara Mabon


February 29, 2000

Onde again, it was a plaisure reading Tim's opinion. I believe Amazon will see the light and stop trying to corner the market with their patents. Until they do, I will be having a great time reading books from O'Reilly and others wich wont be purchased at Amazon.

Jose Venceslau


February 29, 2000

It saddens me to say that I won't be spending any more time or money on the Amazon website. Your service and selection over the years has been excellent, but I simply can't abide your patent policies. When and if you revisit your decisions, I'll revisit mine.

David Love


February 29, 2000

I fully agree with Tim's position and I support the boycott of Amazon. I have bought several O'Reily books from them in the past. Now, their competitors will benefit from my future purchases.

Michael Lippo


February 29, 2000

Even thought I have purchased from Amazon in the past, and been happy with the experience, I will not spend another cent at Amazon until they drop these ridiculous patent issues. There are many other places online to get books. www.fatbrain.com , www.alibris.com, www.bn.com, www.borders.com, etc.

Matthew Van Horn


February 29, 2000

As an online customer and a web developer, I am continually frustrated by the attempts of large corporate interests such as Microsoft or Amazaon to take technologies which were formerly free and open and make them proprietary. These practices, which exist only in the interests of the employees of the companies that pursue them, are antithetical and poisonous to the open, unbounded nature of the web. I will boycott companies such as yours, who attempt to grab resources that should be available to everyone (and if you check your database, you'll see that I have been a customer in the past). Furthermore, I will encourage friends and family to do the same. Best regards, Heather M. Buch

Heather Buch


February 29, 2000

I had nothing but respect for Amazon.com, and have made purchases through them. As a member of the IT community and an advocate of the open standards that have made Amazon's success possible, I am disgusted by their current behavior. Therefore, until Amazon.com changes its tune, I will be participating in the boycott against them called for by RMS, and I will be urging others to do the same.

Frank Wierzbicki


February 29, 2000

Amazon like many other corporations in recent history has forgotten its roots and what helped it to get to where it is today. If it hadn't been because of the web and its free and innovative offerings Amazon and many other e-commerce would not be in existance. Amazon should do the right thing and release these patents into public domain ASAP.

Fred Rahmanian


February 29, 2000

Like at least one other signer, I too have avoided "spamazon" as a result of the extremely negative light they cast themselves in on the news.admin.net-abuse newsgroups in the past. I was beginning to reconsider, but this absurdity has only widened the gulf I'd have to cross. Sorry, Jeff. I will continue to recommend your non-spamming, rational competitors as long as you direct the company in this manner. It's sad in a way; I hope this self-immolation of Amazon's stops soon.

Patrick P. Murphy


February 29, 2000

I have been a big Amazon fan, I've ordered a lot of books and participated in auctions. Until now I've never hesitated to recommend the site to my family and friends. However, these two patents have utterly dismayed me, and I feel betrayed by a company that I thought had actually grasped the idea of web-based commerce. Until Amazon backs off from these patents I will never use the site and will advise everyone I know to boycott it as well.

Paul Caton


February 29, 2000

Your abuse of swamped patent clerks to pass such a ridiculous patent is really low, and to acutally use the patent to sue your competitors is really the lowest! It's equal to domain name pirating (i.e. being first at registering whatever). I thought you competed with high availability, efficiency and a wide sortiment, but apparently you do not. If you only had registered the patent to stop someone else from doing what you do I'd still respected your business, but not anymore.

Lars Rasmusson


February 29, 2000

Before they lost their customer focus, I used to spend hundreds of dollars per month at Amazon.com, mostly on books. Then came the 1-click patent, the published lists of books purchased in particular locales and from particular domains, and the associates patent. This tells me that Amazon.com has moved its focus inward; it no longer cares about its customers. I cannot in good conscience encourage that sort of business practice, so I will be spending my money at Fatbrain, Borders, and Barnes and Noble until they regain their customer focus.

Joseph Walsh


February 29, 2000

Mr. O'Reilly put a great deal of thought into what he's done. From his summary of the response he got from Amazon.com, I have to agree that he was brushed off. The one-click patent <b>not</b> a frivilous patent? The associates patent <b>not</b> a frivilous patent? Come on. Both have tons of prior art. Why is there so much prior art? The people who used the ideas before weren't bone-headed enough to think that they may be doing themselves a favour by patenting it! Save yourself a lot of time and aggravation: drop the patents and instead patent the method that you used to get the US Patent Office to give you a patent on such an already-used technology.

Andrew Kohlsmith


February 29, 2000

I don't believe anything has gone unsaid in the preceding signatures. Amazon - see the light. You may think only techs care about this ... but believe me (and others) - it isn't difficult to convince the public. Do you want to be compared to corporations such as Microsoft? Microsoft might have a 95% market share for desktop PCs ... it might not hurt their bottom line to have people decrying their practices. However - you don't enjoy the same position, think about this. Barnes & Noble, Borders, DVDexpress, reel.com, etc. - you're replaceable, you really are. All you are to people is this: http://www.amazon.com a URL .. nothing more, nothing less. Easy to replace, easier to forget. Think carefully if this is worth pursuing this silly patent.

Brice Ruth


February 29, 2000

It's a chilling sign of the times when service business's feel they are above the ones they service. As with Microsoft, the argument is not so much with the actual product (although it may also well be drawn into question), but with the assumption of absolute right to ignore basic moral codes in order to gain market share. While there have always been differing views on what is the best way to go forward with new technologies, the end results tend to prove that innovation, solidity, & growth flourish where ideas are free and even nurtured, whereas overly stringent and/or overly petty attitudes based on immediate financial power tend to produce inferior and non permanent results. I'll spare the History 101 course, as the above has been proven again and again over the centuries. Amazon had moved to my list of companies to Not give my hard-earned money when the initial patent announcement was made. Too bad that such a wonderfully convenient service has decided to play such a shortsighted game.

Theresa Heath


February 29, 2000

I thought the 1-click patent was an absurd childish ploy that I could ignore. Now I'm frought. I have long supported and promoted Amazon, have been very loyal as a customer, and am (for the moment) an affiliate myself. But now I have some serious pondering to do. The reason for my support was because Amazon was innovative and provided good service. I didn't care for BN because I wanted to shop from a company with a new model, in short, because Amazon didn't have brick and mortar stores. I liked their innovation as much as if not more than anything else. But now they appear to be slipping. They're not innovating. I haven't been particularly happy about their expansion away from their core business into tools, toys and auctions, where they're less than original. But it's becoming obvious that they're moving away from innovation and into anti-innovation, into an attempt to have an anti-trust lawsuit filed against them, perhaps? The fact is, we all know that 1-click ordering was just a typical use of existing cookies technology, and that affiliates programs are nothing but an old marketing method from long before the internet existed. What really matters is where Amazon goes from here. Perhaps the 1-click suit was just an ill-advised childish phase, and this newest absurd patent will be allowed to just collect dust. I certainally hope so, and will be watching closely.

Chad Gard


February 29, 2000

I greatly admire Amazon for capitalizing so brilliantly on a new market opportunity. The marketing, user experience, speed and simplicity they have demonstrated are remarkable. I must say, though, that they have lost my business due to these patent decisions. Amazon, as a big business that must maintain a competitive edge, is now making greater use of "big business" tactics, one of which is patenting. However, it doesn't look like this kind of a patent will be a licensing revenue source; it looks more like a competitive advantage issue. Ironically, as Tim states so well, the platform that made Amazon such a success case was an open, non-proprietary environment, a level playing field where someone with a better product can win; thus the success of Amazon. What they are doing now is trying to lock their current market position in. But they are starting to fragment the platform without which they would have not succeeded. I might say they are starting to rely less on their value added (customer service, ease of use, wide selection) to keep their advantage, though I have seen no evidence of this. They are in a tough position, no doubt: competitors could crop up as strongly and quickly as they did. The patent office has been recklessly giving patents out for business models on the net. I would imagine Amazon though if they didn't pursue these patents, someone else would (given the patent office's propensity to grant these types of patents). Think of a smaller firm looking to get a foot in the door/market? This is no justification, however, for what has happened. If they won't relent on the patents, I would ask Amazon to be creative with them. Let them keep ownership of the patents, but grant the world non-exclusive rights to reuse without need to credit the patent owner. When that, or something much more intelligent, happens, my wife and I will gladly come back as a customer. Cheers, Miguel Marcos

Miguel Marcos


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim, in all his arguments. The practice of patenting already widely-used software and commerce techniques is not just selfish, but an obvious "bully tactic" against competitors. This is evident in the Amazon v. Barnes&Noble, which was executed suspiciously soon after Amazon's awarding of their [1-click] patent. Considering that B&N is one of Amazon's biggest competitor, it's hardly coincidence that this would happen. In addition, no suits have been filed against e-commerce companies who use similar (or identical) techniques for business unrelated to selling books or music/movie media. I'm sure many people are grateful that Amazon's lawyers have NOT pursued suing "everyone and their mother" for patent violation - which would be the "all" in "all or nothing" - but even more people are concerned about this practice in general, regardless of who you choose to target in your patent-based lawsuits. Therefore, the best thing Amazon should do, is not to b! ully people who've used the same technology that was literally handed to [Amazon]. To Amazon: Your people seem to think that retracting your patents might make your company look "weak" or "unsure of yourselves". I completely disagree. By taking advantage of the patent system and the technologies given to you by established Internet innovators, you have already been labeled by thousands of other netizens and patent lawyers as bullies. Your public image is already tainted, and an apology to the community you serve will certainly let you regain your image as a responsible e-commerce company. Please don't interpret this the wrong way, because I don't mean ill-will towards you as a company. I would like to see this issue adversely affect your sales, if even the smallest amount. Money talks, and while your public and peers (our fellow netizens) are voicing their opinions and boycotting your service, you should consider the reason. You work for your customers, not yourselves. Where would you be without us?

Erik Allan Schorr


February 29, 2000

Jon Booth


February 29, 2000

Iain Allan


February 29, 2000

Amazon has lost all credibility as a company ready for the paradigm of online business. As an aside, from one developer (me) to the developers that work for Amazon: Aren't you ashamed of yourselves?

Tommy Hayes


February 29, 2000

Mark Vernon


February 29, 2000

I have written many systems to register and keep track of users and user information over the web. Including using cookies, or pathinfo, or hidden form fields to keep a single identifier for the user. Several of these systems were dynamic, and so the list of fields could easily have included "credit card #" and "shipping address". And a form button to send the identifier to a single routine which pulls that info and sends it to the order processor was so trivial as to be not even considered... Oh, sure, I didn't actually connect the one block I had to the other, but it would've taken me five minutes, not thousands of hours, to do so. There is no innovation in One-Click(tm) ordering - it's a connection of blocks that people have been using before Amazon existed. And a trivial connection. Had you merely patented it to keep other people from doing what you're doing now, that would be one thing. What you are doing instead is actually morally and truly wrong.

silver Harloe


February 29, 2000

Jeff Harris


February 29, 2000

Cherry Marks


February 29, 2000

Diego Zamboni


February 29, 2000

Spencer Booth


February 29, 2000

Victoria Clarke


February 29, 2000

I just made my last Amazon.com purchase, and wish I had read this letter first. I will urge my friends to not buy anything from Amazon, as long as it maintains its offensive protection of ludicrous patents.

John Locke


February 29, 2000

Hear, hear!

Druce Vertes


February 29, 2000

Rob Campbell


February 29, 2000

Dan Haley


February 29, 2000

Rumy Driver


February 29, 2000

Emmanuel Pirsch


February 29, 2000

Allan Neal


February 29, 2000

Amazon' use of trivial patents in an offensive manner is cutting off its nose despite its face. I have no doubt that this tactic will, in the end, cost Amazon far more than they are able to gain. The only question is, how much collateral damage will this sort of behavior cause in the meantime. In order to hasten the day when Amazon will see the error of their ways, I will be taking my business elsewhere, and encouraging others to do the same. Brent

Brent Eubanks


February 29, 2000

Fabio Rojas


February 29, 2000

Jared Warren


February 29, 2000

John Krueger


February 29, 2000

Keith Ballard


February 29, 2000

John Krasnay


February 29, 2000

Jim Knight


February 29, 2000

Julien GILLE


February 29, 2000

Robert M. Wagner


February 29, 2000

Alan Oursland


February 29, 2000

Peter Vachuska


February 29, 2000

Akilesh Rajan


February 29, 2000

Michael Westmuckett


February 29, 2000

Ron Manley


February 29, 2000

Mike MacLeod


February 29, 2000

Robert "Christopher" Hunt


February 29, 2000

I consider myself a loyal customer of Amazon's and I would like to express my disillusion with the enforcement of the 1-Click patent and the possible enforcement of the Associates patent.

Gregory Yepes


February 29, 2000

I'll shop elsewhere until the patents are released to the public domain.

Neil Booth


February 29, 2000

Now we know why they picked the name Amazon. Their lawyers are the crocodiles! Someone call The Crocodile Hunter!

Fred Porlock


February 29, 2000

I would hate to lose amazon.com (and amazon.de and .co.uk for that matter) as suppliers of fine books. Please reconsider!

Adrian A. Baumann


February 29, 2000

Amazon are good, but there's nothing I can't get elsewhere. They've lost another customer - at least until they see sense.

Simon Green


February 29, 2000

This has all gone too far. I've urged my fellow employees to also boycott Amazon. There are lots of competitors anyway (see www.noamazon.com).

Steve Willer


February 29, 2000

I was an early and enthusiastic customer of Amazon.com. I will not do any more business with them until they return their focus to customer service rather than this patent folly.

Daniel Nachbar


February 29, 2000

Joputas!!!

Julio Gonzßlez


February 29, 2000

Excellent letter, Tim. A note to Amazon - in biology organisms (amazon) feeding on their hosts (the internet) with (almost) no restraint are called "parasites". You can do better than that.

Christian Reiniger


February 29, 2000

Unlike, Tim, I have no qualms about RMS' method of protest. So, no more books/music from Amazon until they rethink their ill-advised attempts to hold the web to ransom.

steven filling


February 29, 2000

Mark Russinovich


February 29, 2000

I am complete agreement with Tim O. It is now 'borders.com' for me now.

bill slaybaugh


February 29, 2000

since i've been coding, my goal has ALWAYS been to perform a specific function with as few instructions as possible. Do you really think you're the first site that that's looking at efficiency? Duh!

Allen K. Cacko0wski


February 29, 2000

Bruce Fletcher


February 29, 2000

I have spent a great deal of my money as well my employer's money on books from your site. Because of your company's actions regarding this patent, I have decided to begin typing bn.com in the address field when I need a book.

David Mabe


February 29, 2000

I used to purchase some textbooks from Amazon. Until Amazon kills this patent, I will no longer purchase from Amazon.

Adam Hollidge


February 29, 2000

William Grosso


February 29, 2000

Excellent letter Tim! It's a good thing Mr. Bezos has already recieved most of the "bigtime" accolades. With his current crop of corporate stunts, I rather doubt more will be forthcoming. Personally, I will find it very easy to 1-Click on over to Bookpool or FatBrain for my future purchases (heck, they're usually cheaper anyway).

Eric Lorenz


February 29, 2000

I work for a software company that is heavily involved in e-commerce, so I'm fully aware of the importance of intellectual property. However, I fail to understand how either of the technologies in question could be novel or non-obvious to experts in the field. It is a sad indication of the failure of US patent law to keep pace with the Internet revolution that either of these patents was awarded. You should be embarrassed, as an e-commerce leader, to be trying to enforce what is so clearly a simple attempt to damage competition that is fairly beating you.

Michael K. Werle


February 29, 2000

I support the ideas in this letter 100%. I used to spend well over 񘈨 per year at Amazon, but I stopped when RMS called for the boycott, and have taken my business elsewhere. I do like Amazon's interface better, and would most likely return to them if they drop the existing action and make a strong statement that they won't do it again.

Pace Willisson


February 29, 2000

I agree completely with the comments made by tim O'Reilly in his letter to Amazon. Having used Amazon extensively for a number of years and found the servcies they offer, I can only hope that they realize that there real service to their customers is the sales services they offer, and not tricks like "one-click". Will somebody now try to patent 1.5 click next? Karl

Karl Schopmeyer


February 29, 2000

Your irresponsible use of patents has caused me to become a former customer of yours. While you provide a valuable service I cannot abide a corporation who cuts off innovation on the web by patenting ideas which Amazon clearly did not invent and are commonly used. Your actions stifle the web's growth and I will no longer purchase from your site as long as you insist on these ridiculous patent suits.

Jason Oppel


February 29, 2000

Why on earth did Amazon ever think that they had to become a software bully to keep my business? Before this I used to use them all the time and spread the word to people who I know who were just getting onto the net (friends, family). Now I make a point of sending them to other book sites and I tell them exactly why they should ignore Amazon. Without exception my advice has been accepted. Nobody likes a bully.

Dave Pearson


February 29, 2000

First of all, Jeff Bezos said Sunday night on MSNBC's "Summit in Silicon Valley" that Amazon.com did NOT have a patent for the one-click ordering system. Either he is lying or you all have raised a big stink about some serious misinformation. Second of all, the program that Amazon.com has recently applied for a patent is called the Associates program, not the Affiliates program, which is the similar program used by barnesandnoble.com.

Amanda Dombek


February 29, 2000

I strongly urge amazon.com to reconsider your current patent litigation, and to make clear your intentions with regard to the remainder of your patent portfolio. As a long time amazon.com customer and as a web application developer, I can say that your actions are threatening to my livelihood. Until this matter is settled in a way that benefits both the web community and amazon.com, I cannot justify conducting further business with you.

John Burkhard


February 29, 2000

It took a while for me to explain this to my wife, who was a loyal Amazon shopper (3-4 books or cd's weekly). We have since switched to other online bookstores, and she is very happy with the service she is receiving.

Christopher T. Smith


February 29, 2000

Thank you Tim for a most eloquent letter. Amazon/Jeff, My recommendation for you is to back off enforcement of your patent. This will save the company face, and with a little quiet PR (if there is such a thing), all can be made well with the technical community. As for my book purchases, which totaled about 踰 last year, and will total more than that this year (I am an MBA candidate), I will likely be shopping at fatbrain.com or varsitybooks.com.

Stuart Hall


February 29, 2000

I let my wife know that 'we' do not shop via Amazon anymore. We homeschool, and typically we spend 轜 to 񘈨 dollars on books for our childrens education. That money is going to other resources now. I've been in the computer industry for close to 20 years, and the idea of 'saving state' has been around since working on my first IBM 4600 mainframe.. Amazon is acting in bad faith, and at this point, I feel strongly that I may never shop there again, even if they drop their patents...

Stuart Hunt


February 29, 2000

As a software developer and long time Amazon customer I protest this abuse of US patent law and declare that I will no longer be spending any of my hard earned dollars (earned BTW using many open source tools and technologies) at Amazon.com.

Philip Corp


February 29, 2000

I don't believe that amazon is doing this. It is what we as the online/internet community has feared would happen. We as the community are trying to fight this kind of thing. We need to consider that we have groups like UCITA who are trying to control the IT field and we recieve news that one of our own Amazon is doing such a thing like this unbelievable. I am very disappointed at this action and well no longer buy books from Amazon until they come to they're senses. One Love, One Peace, One Free Online/Internet Community. I believe that we can all profit if some stop being so greed.

Sedarin Perry


February 29, 2000

I've seen Jeff Bezos being interviewed on UK TV a number of times, and I always liked his attitude. He believed in giving good service, and looking after the customers. He realised how easy it is for someone to take their business elsewhere on the internet. Someone can just as easily go to fatbrain, waterstones, whsmith, barnes&noble. And that's just what I intend to do. I find it hard to believe that the person I saw interviewed is the same person responsible for these patents. I now feel like I have been watching a politician. A nice media friendly image, but not so nice in reality. It's very sad.

Mark Brinton


February 29, 2000

It's a chilling sign of the times when service business's feel they are above the ones they service. As with Microsoft, the argument is not so much with the actual product (although it may also well be drawn into question), but with the assumption of absolute right to ignore basic moral codes in order to gain market share. While there have always been differing views on what is the best way to go forward with new technologies, the end results tend to prove that innovation, solidity, & growth flourish where ideas are free and even nurtured, whereas overly stringent and/or overly petty attitudes based on immediate financial power tend to produce inferior and non permanent results. I'll spare the History 101 course, as the above has been proven again and again over the centuries. Amazon had moved to my list of companies to Not give my hard-earned money when the initial patent announcement was made. Too bad that such a wonderfully convenient service has decided to play such a shortsighted game.

Theresa Heath


February 29, 2000

I believe the proper channel for protecting your "One Click Shopping" should be trademark law, not patent law. You are simply using cookies the way cookies were designed to be used, and it is a travesty that this patent was granted. However, if you wish to create a trademarked service name, such as One Click Shopping, to protect an investment in a branded targeted service, then you have every right to defend your brand name (but not the underlying technology, which you had nothing to do with developing or innovating). If any other non-affiliated vendors start calling their service "One Click Shopping", let them have it. If they use cookies to save state information, then they are simply using prior art and public tools in the way they were designed and envisioned to be used. Leave them alone. I believe Amazon offers a superior service to most other online vendors, and my wife and I spent several hundred dollars at Christmas alone last year with your store, most of which was gift certificates that likely drove even more additional business to your site. Until you abandon and further renounce this abuse of the patent system, I will be forced to take my families business to Barnes and Noble simply to protect my future as a web user and software professional. You think the abuse you are getting now is bad? Just wait until the literary community can be made to understand that what you have done is roughly analagous to patenting the application of ink on a printed page to convey information. It will take a while for them to "get it", but they will, and when they do, then there will REALLY be hell to pay. I further commit that this week, I will make at least one public statement (hmmm... maybe talk radio) and to make at least one non-technical person understand the danger (not to mention the sillyness) of what you are trying to do.

Bill Kilgallon


February 29, 2000

Gary Thornock


February 29, 2000

Harry Hochheiser


February 29, 2000

Ian Wienand


February 29, 2000

I am a customer of Amazon who has thoroughly enjoyed shopping at Amazon because of their excellent selection, nice web design, and decent pricing. However, after collecting all the facts about these frivolous and unfair patents that Amazon, I have decided to consider other options before purchasing anything from Amazon. Amazon provides an excellent service to the technical world, but if they are going to take advantage of the technical world, the net gain from Amazon is 0.

Robert Johnson


February 29, 2000

Julie Weaver


February 29, 2000

I was floored when I heard about this patent. While patents are legitimate in instances of true innovation, this hardly qualifies, and I hope the patent office has the good sense to eventually overturn this patent. Meanwhile, fatbrain, b&n, or provantage are more likely to get my online purchases than amazon.

Basil L. Copeland Jr.


February 29, 2000

Bryan Borsa


February 29, 2000

Rod Knowlton


February 29, 2000

Brian Agnew


February 29, 2000

Brinton Sherwood


February 29, 2000

Amazon who?

Dale Hull


February 29, 2000

win with service not lawyers

Michael Lowe


February 29, 2000

I bought one book from Amazon and was planning to buy more when I heard about this patent and the lawsuit. I won't be buying any more books from Amazon, not until they change their tune on patents. I urge everyone to not only sign this letter, but to join RMS's boycott of Amazon. I'd also like to ask Tim O'Reilly to stop supplying books to Amazon for sale. If he really cares about this issue, he will. You must vote every day, not with your ballot, but with dollars.

Jason Stephenson


February 29, 2000

Patents are for fools !!! Free the cookies !!!

Marco Muskus


February 29, 2000

Tim is right. I'm on the virtual picket line now....

Rob Thornton


February 29, 2000

Former frequent customer (to verify check my info you captured with 1click)

Ray S. Duvall


February 29, 2000

Anyone with the slightest claim to "expert" status can see that the "One-click" method is both trivial and obvious, and not deserving of a patent.

Dan Ritter


February 29, 2000

Rowell Sotto


February 29, 2000

As Tim has thoughfully pointed out, this can facilitate a hostile atmosphere of proprietary standards. Something that I am not waiting to see reoccur.

Brian Gupta


February 29, 2000

Having read the patent in question, it is clear to me that it is (as Tim says) a trivial application of cookies, and unworthy of a patent.

John Hartnup


February 29, 2000

Software patents are disgusting, especially obvious ones such as "1-click shopping". I have already stopped making purchases from Amazon.

Jaakko Lipasti


February 29, 2000

my wife and I are former Amazon customers. We will not purchase at Amazon as long as these patents (and others like them) are in force.

Eric S. Johansson


February 29, 2000

As a (former) Amazon-customer I am very sad to witness what is going on. Please reconsider your decision regarding the patent. It isn't doing anybody any good....

Peter Andreasen


February 29, 2000

As a librarian and fairly knowledgable computer user, I find such behavior frightening. I have never been an Amazon customer and, given Amazon's continued stance in this matter, will likely never be.

Peter Tagtmeyer


February 29, 2000

I'm saddened by Amazon's disregard for the free spirit of the web that helped launch their success. Neither I nor any of my friends will return to spend more at amazon until this bizzare patent is abandoned.

Matthew Neumann


February 29, 2000

I'm a long time customer of Amazon.com, and have always thought they were a great place to shop... But, as long as they continue filing for and enforcing such trivial and lame patents on completely obvious ideas, I can just no longer buy from them in good conscience...

Robert Seace


February 29, 2000

Until you decide to stop enforcing this ridiculous patent I shall not be purchasing any further items from Amazon.

Orion Hodson


February 29, 2000

Jeff Bezos - I find your use of patents to be offensive. My orders will now go to Barnes and Noble, and I will advise my 3000+ clients nationwide to do the same. I have used Amazon extensively in the past, but cannot support a company that steals from the community that built it.

Con Dowler


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, et al., the aquiring by Amazon.com of the so-called "1-click" patent does nothing more than stifle innovation and lay claim to something that pre-dates your company. It is this innovation you seek to supress that allowed the prosperity you currently enjoy. But now you show your appreciation by biting the hand that fed you.

Dave Coyle


February 29, 2000

I agree whole heartedly with Tim. Amazon's actions only serve to encourage other companies to exploit the patent system before they are fenced out of the game. I used to use Amazon exclusively for my personal and educational requirements, but their attitude in this leaves a sour taste in my mouth and have therefore lost my business.

Christopher Dahn


February 29, 2000

Mr. O'Reilly is 100% correct. I am a IT professional and was surprised when Amazon was able to hoodwink the patent system. The prospect of a patent being filed on every application of cookies is frightening. I can't even imagine the stifling effect that patents would have had if VisiCalc had filed them on its digitalization of spreadsheet paradigms.

Jim Bernstein


February 29, 2000

As a member of a software consulting company that buys books online almost exclusively from Amazon, it greatly concerns me that you have chosen a course of action that closes opportunities for growth and innovation on the internet. It is my sincere hope that you will cease and desist immediately, so that I do not have to encourage my organization to find another book seller.

Nathaniel Talbott


February 29, 2000

Patents are for fools !!! Free the cookies !!!

Marco Muskus


February 29, 2000

Jeff, The first time I ordered from Amazon, I was immediately impressed with your customer service. Amazon.com is a model for what e-commerce should be. With that said, I agree completely with Tim's letter. You have benefited enormously from the generosity of Tim Berners-Lee and others. Until you decide to give up on the patent issue, I will boycott Amazon. There are many other choices out there (FatBrain, BN, Borders, local bookstores).

Matthew Ikle


February 29, 2000

I have used amazon.com in the past for ordering many computer books. At 30 to 60 bucks a pop, you'd think they'd want to do more to keep me. Well, not anymore, I think it's time to hit barnesandnoble.com some more. I mean, what is keeping us here, prices certainly aren't much better than anywhere else either is the service and silly patents like this may affect the way I do my job in the future and I don't like the thought of that. Off to barnesandnoble.com I go.

Dan R. Smorey Jr.


February 29, 2000

Amazon owes it's success to the technical community and the pioneers of the web. To stab those groups in the back with these jokes of patents is as low as it gets. I won't be making further purchases from Amazon, unless the company starts showing some ethics.

David Muench


February 29, 2000

While, in general, I tend to strongly disagree with Richard Stallman, I am forced to agree with him and Tim O'Reilly on Amazon's patenting of basic and trivial applications. Being somewhat familiar with the patent system, and being intimately familiar with software and computer architectures, it is obvious to me that there is nothing novel about "1-click ordering", nor with reseller agreements like your affiliates program. Until your policies change, I will be disinclined to continue purchasing from Amazon. I will probably be advising my clients in a likewise manner. I am also associated with an ACM Chapter that took advantage of the Amazon Affiliates program. I will be advocating our chapter's immediate withdrawal of Amazon Affiliate links from our web site.

Russell Schnapp


February 29, 2000

Your company is named after The Amazon, a might river. I hope you can see that the channel of even the mighty Amazon may be diverted if it becomes clogged with debris. Your recent patents have been dropped into the flow of Amazon's revenue stream and while most of the flow simply moves around them for the time being, they will become the base that snags more debris until the flow is sufficiently choked and you'll have to watch as your revenue stream leaves your banks and cuts a new channel elsewhere. When a farmer sees debris clogging a stream running through his property he removes it. I would hope you can make the right choice between saving face and saving market share. I have already diverted my own book purchases to http://www.barnesandnoble.com/ and have purchased both books and CD's in the past few weeks that would have gone to Amazon and I am adding the above URL to my sig along with links to the boycott information. carlos

Carlos Benjamin


February 29, 2000

The patent system has always supposed to protect true innovation in the market place. But alas, many of the patents you have filed, including the 1-click patent and the associate program, are 'obvious' uses of the technology made available by others. In enforcing these patents, you are abusing the patent system and taking advantage of a Patent Office which is clearly struggling to educate itself about the rapidly-changing technological landscape. If such patents as yours stand, I see only short term monetary gain and an Internet experience where developers are increasingly ham-strung by litigation and patent-minefields full of trivial ideas. In the long term, the withdrawal of support from purchasers like myself who would normally obtain 軸+ worth of books every year will be a far greater problem for Amazon - there are an increasing selection of other online booksellers who provide a similar service, and I shall be uses their resources until Amazon revokes these trivial pate! nts.

Dr Toby J.W. Haynes


February 29, 2000

Just what is Amazon.com trying to prove here, anyway? That Amazon.com can't compete in the marketplace and has to try to put down its competitors through other means? That Amazon.com wants everyone else to have better online shopping...only through Amazon.com? That the people who created the internet were "stupid" for letting people get on it and communicated for free? That the only people who can transact business over the internet are those that can afford a team of patent lawyers? I guess the "man of the year" can do no wrong. Don't get full of yourself, Bezos, the store around the corner may be able to have an attitude because it is close to my house, but EVERY store on the internet is right around the corner. I ordered stuff from you before, a shipment is coming now, but there will be no more orders from you while you are acting in this manner. The internet is a competitive place, and they compete on more than just price and interface. They compete on viewpoint a! s well. When all internet stores are one step away, why would I go to yours? It's obvious you don't respect the internet's foundation of openness, so my money is not going in your pocket.

Kipp Leland


February 29, 2000

I shall boycott, and urge others to do the same, until Amazon repents of this open display of greed and foolishness.

Dave Sherman


February 29, 2000

Thomas Glad


February 29, 2000

Jamie Stillman


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon relents, both on the patent and the privacy front, I won't shop, or even VISIT the site again. Over the past two years, I've bought several thousand dollars in books via Amazon, but no more. In the meantime, Bookpool gets my technical orders, and BN.com gets my general orders. It's the only way to force change: vote with my hard-earned dollars. . .

Keith A. Glass


February 29, 2000

To quote the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Atlantic Works vs. Brady, 1882: "It was never the object of patent laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures. Such an indiscriminate creation of exclusive privileges tends rather to obstruct than to stimulate invention."

Aaron W. Thorne


February 29, 2000

I have been a customer of Amazon in the past, however I won't be buying anything else until this embarrassing patent debacle is cleared up. You stand on the shoulders of giants, either respect and acknowledge that or get off.

Ken Dow


February 29, 2000

Amazon's patent practice is sick - why don't you try to patent e-Commerce as well??? I'm impressed how Amazon sees something as trivial as 1-Click shopping an important invention of its own. I mean, c'mon, hire some better programmers. Even monkeys can do that. Thinking it as something worth patenting makes me laugh - it looks like a monkey is trying to tell the world how great it is because it can stand up and walk... I'll tell everyone on my icq list to stop doing any business with Amazon and tell them to do the same. I'll see how long you can survive.

Michael


February 29, 2000

What Amazon has done is a slap in the face to anyone who has done web development. Their patents are for obvious methods. I am wholeheartedly for initiatives to make them realize that their customers are not going to stay with them if this continues. If Barnes & Nobles were charging double for the books, I will buy from them on prinicple. Look me up Jeff, I'm a long time customer. Not anymore.

Benjamin Walling


February 29, 2000

Manfred Jeusfeld


February 29, 2000

Brent Chatham


February 29, 2000

PS Neville


February 29, 2000

Cathy Aki


February 29, 2000

James Buening


February 29, 2000

Mark Bridgers


February 29, 2000

Richard Campbell


February 29, 2000

Mark Cottrell


February 29, 2000

I feel strongly that your attempts to make proprietary that which should be open are both sad and regrettable. I've purchased from Amazon before the whole incident, and I shall not purchase from them again, especially with companies around who support my philosophy of moral behavior on the web, such as barnesandnoble.com and buy.com, which both offer much the same products without appearing in the news for bullying other companies.

Adam Watson


February 29, 2000

Gunnar Kreitz


February 29, 2000

I agree completely with Tim. Amazon, you are screwing up!

Bruce L. Bryant


February 29, 2000

The whole idea of software patenting is ludicrous.

Klas Laitinen


February 29, 2000

Mike Minton


February 29, 2000

Amazon won't get "1 Click" from me...

Chris Mance


February 29, 2000

John Lewis


February 29, 2000

There's plenty of other sites to buy books and all that other stuff from now...

KrisJon Hanson


February 29, 2000

Amazon will get no further "clicks" from me. I can find the books I need on elsewhere!

Jonathan Stitt


February 29, 2000

Brond Larson


February 29, 2000

If Amazon goes through with this patent Barns & Noble will gain me back as a customer.

debbie hull


February 29, 2000

give us a break! We haven't gotten the sour taste of Microsoft out of our mouths yet.

steve farris


February 29, 2000

give us a break! We haven't gotten the sour taste of Microsoft out of our mouths yet.

steve farris


February 29, 2000

So far, neither my wife nor I have wanted a title that we could not find at Barnes & Noble.

James Schultz


February 29, 2000

I don't express myself as well as Mr. O'Reilly does. So, I'll let him speak for me. We agree on the points mentioned in his letter.

Jim Putnam


February 29, 2000

amazon.com looked like an interesting place to order interesting things. I'm going elsewhere, 1-click or no 1-click. It's not that important.

Geoff Wozniak


February 29, 2000

I don't shop from work, and my home computer is a shared resource, so one-click shopping isn't for me anyway. Bye, Amazon. I won't even miss you.

Fritz Knack


February 29, 2000

Although I do still use Amazon's service, I feel that the 1-Click patent is unenforceable, because of it's use of existing and previously documented technologies.

Peter T Mount


February 29, 2000

There are few things to be said about this patent that haven't already been said. To patent such an obvious use of existing technology (cookies) is insulting to the web community, and has no place in today's market.

Philip Heede


February 29, 2000

The 1-Click patent is actually nothing more than an application of existing technology. Thanks, Tim for the clear and consise letter. I hope that Amazon and others will take it into consideration.

Chris Egolf


February 29, 2000

Daniel Stutzbach


February 29, 2000

Jef, Why do think cookies were invented? How much will it take you to realize that you have blundered? You have built and now killed Amazon. As far as I am concerned, I will never buy a book through your company.

Ceki Gulcu


February 29, 2000

A ludicrious patent, a great letter. Thanks, Tim, for expressing my feelings so exactly. Unlike you, however, I have no problem in avoiding using Amazon's services when I shop online. Chapters/bn.com/whoever here I come.

Chris Rovers


February 29, 2000

1 Click was silly. Affiliates is ridiculous. What's next are you gonna try to patent BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" or perhaps the FONT FACE tag. Perhaps DoubleClick should patent ad banners and sue everyone else.

Jon Chang


February 29, 2000

I, along with family members and friends, have stopped buying books from Amazon. These patents of theirs seems to be an insult to the intelligence of their customers. I sincerely hope they right their wrongs very soon.

John F. Brainard Jr.


February 29, 2000

What more is there really to say? I used to be a faithful Amazon customer, and I must've bought at least a few hundred bucks worth of books a year there. But I don't think I'll ever buy anything from them again, even if they stop prosecuting their patents.

David Bonner


February 29, 2000

Well I've used Amazon, and I like it, now as an Internet Developer, there is just no way I can continue to use the services of a company that is trying to say "hey look we invented a way to use a cookie to remember who you are and make shopping faster !" so for books there is always www.bol.com

David Smith


February 29, 2000

Thanks, Tim. You've taken the first step to organize the technical community against obvious abuse of the patent system.

Tim Goldenburg


February 29, 2000

Barnes & Noble has enjoyed my business since Amazon.com was granted the "1 Click" patent. They will continue to have my business until Mr. Bezos and Co. realize that perverting the patent process in their favor will do more harm than good to their future incomes and share prices. Caveat Empetor!

Mark Herring


February 29, 2000

Amazon provides a great service and I've been a loyal customer for a couple of years. However, I agree with Tim O'Reilly, RMS, and others that patenting 1-click shopping and associate programs is ridiculous and damaging to the Internet. I will no longer patronize your organization until you resolve these issues.

Emin Martinian


February 29, 2000

I've ordered several books from Amazon, and have been quite happy with their service up till now, but I feel that software patents of this nature are not productive, or worth pursuing. I have colleagues at Sun who feel the same way (and who also order many books online) - you're damaging your reputation Amazon !!

Tim Foster


February 29, 2000

Agree with Mr O'Reilly, these patents (1-click and associates) contain no novelty or original process and should not have been considered. I am British and they could even provide a reason for trade warfare, why should we respect these patents, which are unlikely to be granted in (at least) the UK patent office? I am boycotting Amazon where I used to use as sole on-line supplier. Long live bol and fatbrain until this is undone! Hugh Barnard

Hugh Barnard


February 29, 2000

I will not buy anything from Amazon, and I urge anyone to do the same. Amazon should fight software patents as could harm them in the future.

Christian Vilhelm


February 29, 2000

I am continually amazed by Tim O'Reilly's ability to cut to the heart of the matter and eloquently put to words the things I only feel. ([Amazon is] pissing in the well. Ha!) Patents are not universally evil but technology is changing the balance between the good of the Artist/Author/Inventor and the good of society. Until we figure out how to fix this balance we are going to have more growing pains like this. Until Law gets fixed we have Public Opinion and the Market as forces to regulate Amazon and other offenders' behavior. Let's use them.

David A. Marquam


February 29, 2000

Eric Chien


February 29, 2000

Ian Koetter


February 29, 2000

Jules Miller


February 29, 2000

I used to be Amazon's customer since it's day one and I am disgusted by the wave of ridiculous patents filed for by amazon. I am joining RMS's call for boycott and I am going to recommend doing the same to all my clients and friends.

Alex Luchkovsky


February 29, 2000

Dan Linderman


February 29, 2000

Fredrik Kronlid


February 29, 2000

James A. Tzitzouris, Jr.


February 29, 2000

Steve Hodge


February 29, 2000

Robert Shull


February 29, 2000

Creation of value for stockholders is not creation of value for society. A stockholder mentality built around quick return, rapidly upward mobile stock value, and pressure to find more ways to keep returns and rises happening is antithetical to the common wealth. None of us would be on the world wide web now if all the core technologies involved had not been freely available to everyone, creating value for society and benefiting our common wealth. Frivolous software patents do nothing in the long term for anyone except create ill will before they are struck down. I hope that Jeff Bezos has the courage to see the difference between benefit to stockholders and benefit to the common wealth.

James F Keenan


February 29, 2000

Bert Vermeulen


February 29, 2000

I Have ordered from Amazon in the past. No more.

Tom Grydeland


February 29, 2000

Hope Wyss


February 29, 2000

alex vorobiev


February 29, 2000

Matthew Barger


February 29, 2000

Lance J. Hoffman


February 29, 2000

Anthony Clark


February 29, 2000

patents are crap

Christopher Dickman


February 29, 2000

Steven A. Erickson


February 29, 2000

I agree with O'Reilly's letter completely.

Mike Waddell


February 29, 2000

Thanks for writing a great letter, I agree with your comments completely. The "1-click" and "associates" patent are ridiculous.

Richie Bielak


February 29, 2000

Amazon's patenting of "a trivial application of cookies" is tantamount to theft. I suppose I'll have to shop for books IRL now.

Eric Richmond


February 29, 2000

Having spend a lot of money with Amazon over the years I'm refusing to buy from them while they hold such patents - instead I'll buy books from their competitors.

Mike Bennett


February 29, 2000

Tor Magnus Castberg


February 29, 2000

until amazon ceases their present business practices, i will shop elsewhere - and, of course, ask ALL my friends, family, and co-workers to do the same.

matthew collins


February 29, 2000

Denis M. Bayada


February 29, 2000

Former Amazon customer. When all big names buy all patents there is virtually no room left for small developers. Anyone wanting to patent the if statement?

Michael Rathmann


February 29, 2000

I think Tim's said everything that needs to be said about this most eloquently. It won't be easy to function without Amazon, but it will be worth it if it helps them to see reason.

Andy Armstrong


February 29, 2000

I personally buy all my O'Reilly books directly from www.ora.com, not amazon.com. Until Amazon respects the proper use of the patent office and the framers of the Internet, I won't shop with them.

Duane Gran


February 29, 2000

Amazon, are you really so scared of your competitors that you need to resort to such desperate tactics to protect your business ? If you are that scared then maybe your competitors are winning.

David J. Williams


February 29, 2000

What more is there to say! Patenting something as technically basic as "one click ordering" is clearly set to inhibit the growth of the internet which is our primary economic indicator for the immediate future.

Peter Chapman


February 29, 2000

Untill now, I have purchased most of my technical books from Amazon. From now on, and untill this issue is resolved, i will always go to an alternative site first. (www.noamazon.com), I will also recommend to all my collegues to do likewise.

Moshe Vainer


February 29, 2000

Well said, Tim. It's a shame I have to do this, since Amazon offers so much great stuff. However, I'm no longer using the site and I'm reccomending the same to all my friends. It's disappointing to see such a promising company go so low as to put limits on the very medium which made the company possible.

Ric Rivera


February 29, 2000

I don't know what's worse, a completely lame US Patent Office, or a company like Amazon who insults our intelligence by claiming for it's own the good work of thousands who came before it. A company who stands on the shoulders of all those who gave freely, and presumes to take creative credit for the obvious!!! Outrageous!!! Boycott Amazon!!!

Robert Geiger


February 29, 2000

Based on the older news of your pending 1-Click patent and the recent news of your Associates patent, I have decided to STOP shopping at Amazon for both my personal and professional needs. As one who has contributed to the growth and benefitted from the growth of the Internet, I find it reprehensible that you are attempting to change the Internet into a closed, propietary system. You have benefitted from the open standards that helped make you what you are, and I see these patents as a reversal of all that. I may only spend a few hundred dollars with your company, but I have decision making authority for our consulting firm, which orders books quite a bit from your company. I shall be sure to use non-propietary competitors from now on. I urge Amazon to abandon it's attempt to enforce these two frivolous patents and to rejoin the community that it has benefitted from. Please see the following text from the O'Reilly Open Letter To Amazon for a very well written piece on this issue. Regards, -- Michael Shorten

Michael Shorten


February 29, 2000

The 1-click patent and the Associates Program patent are clear abuses of the patent system. Personally, I think, it would be immoral to support a company that is exploiting the current weakness of the US patent system and harms innovation - thus, I will not puchase anything from amazon.com anymore until they drop these and similar patents.

Manuel M. T. Chakravarty


February 29, 2000

Arjan Huijzer


February 29, 2000

Amazon greatest success, the one that earned it it's multi-billion market-cap, is the creation of the Amazon brand. Patenting, and enforcing the patent on, 1-click, is a step in destroying that brand, especially in Amazon's core market. While you reconsider your position on the subject I will of course boycott you, there are other on-line stores you know.

Michel Rodriguez


February 29, 2000

Amazon, if you have any idea about marketing - and it certainly seems that your success belies a little knowledge in it - It should seem obvious to you that for each signature on this petition probably represents at least another hundred disgusted customers who are just leaving you without bothering to say why. We're doing you a favour here, perhaps you should listen (and not just have your lawyers do your listening for you!)

Rod MacBain


February 29, 2000

Since Amazon.com started using tactics that I find repulsive (1 Click patent related lawsuit against Barnes and Noble, and the sharing of purchasing information without the consent of your customers), I have stopped giving my business to Amazon.com. There are other more reputable businesses that can provide the services and products I want. If Amazon.com stops the frivolous and harmful patent-related actions that they are taking, then I will re-consider giving Amazon.com my business again.

Greg Foster


February 29, 2000

Your patents are insulting to the very nature of the web, and the most anti-competitive move by an e-commerce company to date. You have let down your customers, and you have let down the Internet community in general. You will be forever scarred.

Corey Menscher


February 29, 2000

You've done a great job building a company that gets it right -- a real model of the way to kick ass as an online store. Don't blow it with this. You made a web site so easy and fun to use, it's been painful for me to avoid using it, but I'm not buying another book from Amazon until you've tossed those patents. You can make more serving your customers than you can abusing your competitors. After all, your competitors aren't the one with disposable income looking to buy books from Amazon. So focus on your real business and drop this anticompetitive patent-and-sue nonsense! Lawsuits aren't core business for anyone but lawyers.

Grant Gould


February 29, 2000

I run a popular Sci-Fi website. I was considering becoming an amazon affiliate, as a lot of our members regularly buy books, some of them online. When amazon started enforcing it's ludicrous 1-click patent, I immediately decided I'll not become an affiliate, let alone now they've patented the affiliate program self! C'mon, cookies and web-rings were around long before amazon was. I will definitely NOT be becoming an affiliate, I will definitely NOT be shopping at amazon ever again, and I definitely WILL be advising my friends to boycott them too... until such time as they make a public apology and statement that they do not intend to enforce these ridiculously obvious patents.

Nick Waterman


February 29, 2000

Since Amazon.com surfaced on the web I did nothing but rave about their service and excellence. A number of my co-workers and friends were recommended to use your service by me in the attempt to assure your survival because of the wonderful service you provide. To this the dismay that has befallen me due to your recent patent is just as great. After reading the patent, I find it extremely unfair and counter productive for the WWW as a whole. After seeing O'Reily's stance on the subject as well, my stance has grown even more firm. I do intended on making certain all of my referrals to your service find out about this misjustice. Alongside this I have no longer ordered any product from your company. Please change your view on this silly idea.

Michele Gosdin


February 29, 2000

Tim Becker


February 29, 2000

Until I heard about the 1-click patent issues, I frequented Amazon.com when I had my (monthly) urges to infuse new knowledge into my brain, usually on the order of 赨 a trip. However, since Amazon has enforced their 1-click ordering patent, I have been exploring other options for my hunger for technical knowledge, including Barnesandnoble.com and others. While Amazon.com has excellent prices and fabulous customer service, I cannot support a company that takes advantage of the open nature of the Internet, yet offers nothing back in return.

Kenneth Platz


February 29, 2000

Malcolm Silberman


February 29, 2000

Peter van der Spoel


February 29, 2000

Stephen Gusz


February 29, 2000

Eric Sandvik


February 29, 2000

Christopher Burgess


February 29, 2000

Protect using your innovation, not your lawyers.

Dave Marples


February 29, 2000

You've lost one more customer. This is ridiculous.

Steve Houghton


February 29, 2000

I won't buy from Amazon until they resolve this nonsense.

Martijn Faassen


February 29, 2000

I am returning to Barnes and Nobles. I have had it with your stupidities.

Erik Kj†r Pedersen


February 29, 2000

Paul Imboden


February 29, 2000

I am not buying from Amazon.com until the frivilous patents are dropped. I am encouraging all my friends to do the same.

Jason Bruce


February 29, 2000

With some sadness I will not be using your fine service until you come to your senses.

Tony Green


February 29, 2000

Charles LeDuc


February 29, 2000

I'm on my third e-commerce up-start, and I have admired Amazon for their innovation and quality of service for several years, and have frequently used them as an example of what e-commerce solutions can look like, if you're good. It therefore saddens me immensly to have to stop using their services (and stop giving them free publicity) for such an obviously stupid reason. I am active in Sweden, and here such a patent would of course never have been admitted. Nevertheless, I will stop using them, and stop recomending them, until I'm certain that they're not abusing the open economy of technology on the web.

Henning Strandin


February 29, 2000

Suffice it to say that I will take my business elsewhere until this is resolved to my satisfaction.

Gunnar Ljungstrand


February 29, 2000

Joseph Panico


February 29, 2000

As an internet applications developer, I cannot do business with a company whose practices are clearly harmful to the development of the web.

Tom Clark


February 29, 2000

I really think Amazon does not need such protectionism. I'm currently a regular customer at Amazon but might re-think this if they continue their current course.

Markus Peter


February 29, 2000

There's not much to say about. I'm a amazon customer, and also the company where i work. These kind of 'tactics' dissapointed me, i tought Jeff wasnt that kind of guy.

Maximiliano Kolus


February 29, 2000

I've purchased a number of items, primarily technical books, from Amazon in the past. Future purchases will be supporting their competitors, until they drop their absurd patent tactics at least.

Greg Norris


February 29, 2000

I have purchased nearly 500 dollars worth of merchandise from amazon.com. That was before the 1-click patent. Since then I've spent nothing, but barnes and nobel has had plenty of my business.

Eric Sandvik


February 29, 2000

Man, I should have patented the internal combustion engine when I had the chance.

Kyle


February 29, 2000

Amazon is not the only offender but it is the most visible one. We have to stop this trivial software patent madness now before it is to late and you cant write a single line of code without consulting a patent lawyer!

Steffen Vulpius


February 29, 2000

Kim Skinner


February 29, 2000

Neither I nor any members of my family will be buying anything from Amazon.com until these patent issues are dropped.

Keith McGuigan


February 29, 2000

I've spent hundreds of dollars on books from Amazon, both out of my own pocket and for my company. Guess it's time to move on to other sites. Thanks Tim, for speaking out about this and providing a public forum.

Scott Carpenter


February 29, 2000

I am outraged by Amazon's actions regarding patents. I have enlightened everyone I know about this behavior. I encourage them to boycott Amazon and help spread the word.

Eric Johnson


February 29, 2000

As someone involved in web development and e-commerce, I'm apalled that Amazon applied for and was granted a patent for something so obvious. Cookies were designed to save information about the client between sessions, which is all that 1-click shopping does.

Les Jones


February 29, 2000

I hope for your sake, and the sake of everyone else who's business revolves around the open standards that the net provides, that you drop this and other frivolous patent. You need to do what's best for your company without stepping all over the people and ideas that have helped propell your company into this new era of e-commerce.

Jackson Bloomston


February 29, 2000

There's nothing I can say that hasn't been said before. By trying to fence open technology, you're shooting the whole Web community in the foot, as well as yourselves. Is obtaining money from competitors really that important to you? Are you providing a service to the global public, or your few thousand shareholders?

Joseph Hoy


February 29, 2000

Although Amazon's actions are distasteful and they are loosing me and many others as customers, perhaps this protest movement needs to be directed at the patent regulations. If regulations make it legal to halt the evolution of electronic commerce, why direct our efforts at those who are following the letter of the law. Boycott Amazon, but write your congressman.

Joel Bowers


February 29, 2000

I've been on the web longer than Amazon, and I've been buying from them since their first months. Until now. The health of the web is more important than my old habits. No more Amazon for me.

Timothy Randolph


February 29, 2000

As a long-time customer and associate of Amazon, I'm appalled by Amazon's recent attempts to poison the well for their competitors while reaping the rewards of the generosity of technical innovators far more brilliant than the "inventors" of One-Click ordering and the Associates program. Amazon is one of the few companies that I love doing business with, but unless they reverse course on this, I cannot in good conscience do so.

Joshua Macy


February 29, 2000

As someone who works in this industry (and for O'Reilly - I wrote the NNTP server component of WebBoard) I'm appalled at the US patent office for this and many other stupid patents on software processes. Will it come to the point where I have to scan my code for all patent violations before submitting it to my managers? And what if I violate a patent that simply can't be coded around? Do we not publish the software - or try and seek a licence? Stupid stupid stupid. Am I the only one banging my head against the wall!

Matt Sergeant


February 29, 2000

As we move more and more fully into an e-commerce economy, it is in the best interests of the e-vendors to welcome as many customers as possible over the psychological hump of sending their credit cards off in a flurry of bits over the internet. Exclusionary tactics designed to gain short-term market share, such as Amazon's aggressive pursuit of questionable patents, will hurt the entire e-commerce industry, and therefore Amazon, in the long run. Please be respectful of your own future, and the open technology that got you where you are today. --James W. Lindenschmidt

James W. Lindenschmidt


February 29, 2000

I regard this sort of blatant profiteering as contrary to the whole concept of the internet. It is akin to, and as ridiculous as attempting to patent the idea of a total at the bottom of a regular bill. Scratch one more customer.

James Dening


February 29, 2000

I love using Amazon, and believe the company to be an example of how to do customer service on the web "the right way." Unfortunately, as a customer service company, you've chosen to do technology the wrong way, and my only response can be to look for another place to shop.

Michael S Czeiszperger


February 29, 2000

Lee Wilmot


February 29, 2000

Rod Brandt


February 29, 2000

Adam Stephen


February 29, 2000

I intentionally went to borders.com for my Christmas shopping because of Amazon's pursuit of the patent and will continue to do so for future purchases. In addition, I urge my family, friends, and colleagues to do likewise whenever possible. It is a sad thing to see a great and revolutionary company doing something so destructive and (in the long run) foolish.

Kenneth Haase


February 29, 2000

Petty fence building patents will halt the expansion of the internet, and that will harm us all. If you remember the parable of the scorpion and the frog, just because greed is the nature of a corporation, it doesn't make it beneficial to any of those involved. The paradigm has changed, and the good will of the internet users is the lifeline that enables all of us to succeed.

James Terwilliger


February 29, 2000

Patrick O'Callaghan


February 29, 2000

Jonathan Meltzer


February 29, 2000

I have already mailed separately to let Amazon know that I'm joining the FSF's boycott. I remain unpersuaded by the reply from Amazon's staff, and by reading the text of the 1-click patent and the testimony of the various people who participated in the litigation over it. I continue to urge Amazon as a company not to go down the path of proprietary implementations and software patents used as weapons against competitors, but that seems to be exactly what they intend to do. In good conscience I cannot make my on-line purchases from Amazon while they persist in this course of action.

James Wetterau, Jr.


February 29, 2000

herbert furtenbach


February 29, 2000

Will Mc Donald


February 29, 2000

Mike Bowler


February 29, 2000

Well said, Tim

Chris Rimmer


February 29, 2000

Jason Wojciechowski


February 29, 2000

The lawyers are taking control of this world also it seems.

Erik G„vert


February 29, 2000

Jason Arnold


February 29, 2000

Patenting like this is like stealing from the internet-community. The community that gave you everything you have now. If you want a patent, at least make an invention.

Peter Vos


February 29, 2000

Peter Grabowsky


February 29, 2000

As a frequent buyer of books, I have taken Amazon off my list as my #1 source. Until they lighten up and stop inhibiting innovation, I will no longer shop there. They have lost over 踰 of my money since they started this farce...

Brent Michalski


February 29, 2000

What more can I say that others haven't already said??

Jonathan W. Rose


February 29, 2000

Software patents such as these are killing the internet. The internet was built using open standard protocols and software innovations, filing patents on things you build using OPEN STANDARDS software is just evil, and I hope amazon.com gets blown away by the competition.

Paul Schultz


February 29, 2000

I want to register my support for this letter of protest - trivial patents like this are ultimately self-defeating efforts to privatise intellectual efforts that should be considered common property to us all.

Henry Farrell, MAx-Planck Projecktgruppe on the Law of Common Goods


February 29, 2000

Emilio Cesar C. Melo


February 29, 2000

I am in complete agreement with Mr. O'Reilly's remarks concerning Amazon's patents on One-Click Ordering and Affiliates Programs. Unless and until Amazon abandons these ridiculous patents, I will take my business elsewhere, and will encourage the readers of my web site to do the same.

Robert Bruce Thompson


February 29, 2000

I have used Amazon, and praised the efficiency with which I was serviced. They have built a good machine. Nonetheless, I support Open Source and an open web, and I can't tolerate any attempt to control it. There must be no monopolies, no dictators, no bullies. Please reconsider, Amazon.

Darrell King


February 29, 2000

I agree wholeheartedly with Tim on this issue. And so, affiliate this, Amazon, my 񘈨/yr will now be going "1-click-away" (no TM) to a competitor, like FatBrain and Powell's. _dave_(no longer an Amazon supporter)

Dave Paulsen


February 29, 2000

I have purchased quite a few books from Amazon - for myself & as gifts. I am also a software developer, and find their patent for 1-click and now this associates patent disgusting. This cheap "microsoft-like" behavior is beneath them. I seriously hope the re-consider. If the do not, I will not buy anything from them again.

Arron S. King


February 29, 2000

I'm horrified at what Amazon are doing today, and delighted to see such a respected publisher as O'Reilly speaking out against these patents. Over the last few years I have spent several hundred dollars ordering books from Amazon, but certainly will not be doing so again unless they back down on these ridiculous claims.

Shawn Hargreaves


February 29, 2000

i have already cancelled my amazon-account a few weeks ago because of this patent system abuse. i was a regular client of amazon (books, cd, dvd) and am now a regular one of dvdexpress, cduniverse and b&n. my webpage carries the noamazon.com link for weeks now and i will continue to support the boycott amazon movement. Sascha, Berne/Switzerland

Sascha Mettler


February 29, 2000

I have bought many book from Amazon in the past, however I can tell you with clear assuradness that I will NOT be purchasing any more products from Amazon atleast until this patent issue is resolved.

James Tyson


February 29, 2000

As a consultant, I purchase several books a month on new or new-to-me technologies. As an avid reader, I purchase several more a month from many genres. Once I heard of the enforcement of the 1-click issue against B&N.com, I took my customer support dollars away from Amazon.com, and will continue to do so until they reverse course. I cannot frame my disgust for Amazon's Patent Abuse any better than has already been done, and won't waste anyone's time trying.

Bill Romano


February 29, 2000

I used to buy about a dozen books a year from Amazon. Since this patent came out I have stoped buying from them as well as well as removed all my associate links to them.

Jose M. Vidal


February 29, 2000

I hope that you will see very clearly that your customers don't accept your cheap tricks. We internet people are a bright community, and we don't accept brute force. There has been word that it took a while until Amazon's programmers understood that "1-click" means really only 1 click, not one click and one additional confirmation click. Bezos had a hard time to get the message across. But the fact that these programmers are typical programmers doesn't make "1-click" an idea worth patenting!

Christoph Pingel


February 29, 2000

The web was built on a foundation of trust and with a culture of sharing and "giving back". Amazon's ridiculous software patents are a complete affront to the core values of the Internet. Unlike Mr. O'Reilly, I am not constrained in my actions towards Amazon. As a professional programmer, I buy upwards of 񘘐 - 񘧸 worth of books per year. In light of Amazon's patent tactics, I have shifted my purchases to fatbrain.com and encourage my colleagues to do the same.

Kevin Smith


February 29, 2000

I would just like to remind everyone that even using amazon.com as a reference site earns them money for every banner ad they serve. Please, refrain from hitting amazon.com for ANY reason! There are other options such as Barnes & Noble: bn.com; Borders: www.borders.com; fatbrain: www.fatbrain.com to name a few.

Eric Wright


February 29, 2000

I have bought many book from Amazon in the past, however I can tell you with clear assuradness that I will NOT be purchasing any more products from Amazon atleast until this patent issue is resolved.

James Tyson


February 29, 2000

I'm horrified at what Amazon are doing today, and delighted to see such a respected publisher as O'Reilly speaking out against these patents. Over the last few years I have spent several hundred dollars ordering books from Amazon, but certainly will not be doing so again unless they back down on these ridiculous claims.

Shawn Hargreaves


February 29, 2000

Henry van Dyk


February 29, 2000

Tony Finch


February 29, 2000

Matthew Bloch


February 29, 2000

Justin Martin


February 29, 2000

I've been, in the past, an Amazon customer, ordering a variety of books and CDs from their UK "branch". But now, while I don't consider a boycott an effective course of action, I still can't, with a clear conscience, order anything from Amazon's web site. For now, I am just holding off on purchases, but, if the Amazon situation doesn't improve (and, with the new "Affilliate Program" patent, it seems to be worsening), I will, reluctantly, have to start looking around for alternatives. I can't support the abuse of IP any further.

Canis Lupus


February 29, 2000

Geir Harris Hedemark


February 29, 2000

Timo Laine


February 29, 2000

Kay Blaurock


February 29, 2000

B&N thanks you for my business.

Will Sexton


February 29, 2000

Chris Shull


February 29, 2000

Amazon, NO MORE!! Sigh, it is indeed a sad day.

Nish Kohli


February 29, 2000

Sebastian Djupsj÷backa


February 29, 2000

It's really a sad day when companies feel they need to use the government, specifically the patent law, as a tool to hurt others. I won't do business with Amazon until they admit that their patents are nothing more than a thinly disguised scheme to prevent competition and discountinue the practice.

Mike Catchpole


February 29, 2000

Well spoken Tim! I'll still buy O'Reilly books, but not through Amazon...

Michael Lindgren


February 29, 2000

Matt Gilbert


February 29, 2000

Tim said it fair better than I could've done -- I'm a developer, not an author. I now consider buying from you equal to undermining the open flow of ideas and innovations which I depend on to do my work. Therefore, it's now a policy in the company I work for not to buy anything from companies like yours that seek to destroy the biggest advantage of our Internet, as opposed to the more proprietary networks, namely that standards and tools and protocols are open and available to all, giving low entry-barriers.

Eivind Kj°rstad


February 29, 2000

I do not believe in patenting business practices or marketing systems. They arn't inventions. Patenting "1-Click Shopping" is like patenting retailing itself.

Oliver Jones


February 29, 2000

I cannot stand this kind of extortion. I love Amazon, but I can't in good conscience shop there any longer with this kind of legal shenanigans.

Dan Gentry


February 29, 2000

Amazon should rely on quality of service rather than patents.

Timothy Sheerman-Chase


February 29, 2000

Herouth Maoz


February 29, 2000

I agree, absolutely. Thank you, Tim. I've done the little I can, too: asking amazon.com to cancel my membership in the Associates. (In case people think I'm making a big sacrifice, it hasn't earned me more than a few cents...)

Jerry Peek


February 29, 2000

I cannot in good faith continue to shop at a company which has a policy of what is essentially stealing. Until Amazon does an about-turn on these patent matters, and preferably apologizes for their actions, I will take my business elsewhere.

Jan Wiberg


February 29, 2000

I stopped using and recommending Amazon the day I heard about them enforcing the patent on their 1-Click system, which is very nice, but should not be patentable. When they stop this thieving behaviour I will consider using Amazon again; until then I'll just spread bad words about Amazon.

John Hopf


February 29, 2000

The original 1-click patent gave me serious reservations about dealing with a company like Amazon.com when I could spend my dollars on companies that haven't made a business policy of taking whats offered to them and not offering anything in return. The associates program patent has cinched it. Neither my money, or the money of any company I have purchase authority over will ever be spent at Amazon.com. Sure its only a few thousand dollars, but it adds up. I hope others do the same.

George Hartz


February 29, 2000

Amazon has converted me to a customer of Barnes and Noble by their outrageous actions regarding patents and the internet. I will never again buy anything from Amazon until they renounce their actions and guarantee that they will not enforce the patents they have been granted

Mark Stracke


February 29, 2000

It's really a shame it's come to this. Before 1-Click, I always went to amazon, I didn't even consider other vendors. Borders and Barnes & Noble have gotten so much of my money since then. It's been the same with most everyone I know. You tried to corner the market with this patent, and instead squeezed us out of your market.

Tony Lastowka


February 29, 2000

Sad, very sad.

John McQuillen


February 29, 2000

It pains me immensely to see companies who had some hope of being ethical and providing a great service to the customer (you don't _sell_ to customers, you don't advertise to them, you help them) reverts to such disgusting tactics to acomplish what? To get more of the market? to become a monopoly? To eventually get sued by everyone and get everyone to hate them? I just don't understand.

Max Pakhutkin


February 29, 2000

When I first heard about this patent, I also sent an email to Amazon.com and got the same kind of response as Tim mentioned in his article. And, I still disagree with the patent. It is a simple, obvious thing that should have never made it past any kind of initial scrutiny from a halfway educated patent board (which we obviously do not have.) My business has been going to Barnes & Noble ever since.

Susan Aker


February 29, 2000

I will never purchase anything from Amazon due to their exceedingly obscene business practices. What's next? Patenting credit card payments on-line?

Dave Coker


February 29, 2000

No comment needed, really. I have been a happy amazone'r, but not any more. There are other sources online.

Stein Skogseth


February 29, 2000

While I have used Amazon for quite some time now, and am an associate, I believe that what Amazon is doing with the 1-click patent is wrong and shortsighted....

Robert McCown


February 29, 2000

Richard Karsch


February 29, 2000

Michael Grant


February 29, 2000

Olivier Carlier


February 29, 2000

Joshua Rubin


February 29, 2000

Wayne Pierce


February 29, 2000

After carefully reading both the text of the "one-click" patent and the opinions of those who consider the PTO's granting of that patent to be thoroughly misguided, I am clearly in agreement with the latter. Your patent is totally frivolous and its claims are completely covered by a substantial amount of prior art, dating back several years and spanning thousands of contributions to WWW development by many people worldwide. I have no idea why the PTO granted this patent. Perhaps their examiners either lacked the resources or the technical literacy to fully understand the claims you made. As Tim notes in his letter, seeking a patent for defensive purposes is one thing, misguided though it may be in the case of something as obvious and non-novel as this. But your recent actions in this case and the "affiliates" program indicate that you intend to use these patents as a legal bludgeon. Until you come to your senses and realize that such unmitigated greed won't get you very far with your consumers (especially those who have at least a modicum of technical understanding), you won't be getting any business from me.

Alexander Mitelman


February 29, 2000

Illtud Daniel


February 29, 2000

This patent is absurd. Amazon, please drop your claim.

Dave Peticolas


February 29, 2000

I hope you are not naive enough to think you can just weather this one out amazon.

Ger Gorman


February 29, 2000

the affiliates deal was the last straw for me. i've been promoting amazon since '95, now they're on hold. z.

ziv navoth


February 29, 2000

I was looking into purchasing a stack of books on Java. With Amazon's constant ridicule of the open atmosphere which originally gave rise to their business model, I will take my business to B&N instead.

Sami Lempinen


February 29, 2000

In simple words: no Amazon orders from me or my workplace until you change your policy.

Gilad Ben-Yossef


February 29, 2000

Ron Newman


February 29, 2000

I would like Amazon to know that I no longer buy from them or refer people to their site. Their site to me is now just a catalog and I order through a book shop even if it sometimes costs more.

Mel Gorman


February 29, 2000

The game must not (can not) be won at the expense of the consumer. I was an Amazon consumer by night, a web developer by day, but now me thinks I'm gettin' screwed. If Amazon wins this war, then all that's left for me to do is to piss on their spoils.

Bart Wolther


February 29, 2000

My company GlobeCom AB (http://www.globecom.se/) has until now made most computerbook purchases from Amazon.com but will now be forced to take our business elsewhere at least until you reverse your policy on this issue. Henrik Johnson Technical Prime GlobeCom AB

Henrik Johnson


February 29, 2000

I feel as Tim does that this kind of trivial patent is a horrible abuse of our patent laws, and already has had a chilling and damaging effect on the fantastically productive and innovative web technology landscape. I intend to boycott Amazon, which is something that goes beyond Tim's objective, but something which I feel I must do in order to preserve the freedom to develop new technologies without walking through a landmine of greedy, unjustified, and short-sighted patents and lawyers.

Henry Minsky


February 29, 2000

As a regular Amazon customer, I am sickened by the recent bout of software patents (1-Click and Affiliates) registered by the company. The Cookies specification was devised for 1-Click ordering techniques, but was not patented because it is a trivial task and forming proprietary systems on an open-source system such as the Web is hypocritical. I urge Amazon to drop their proceedings against BOL and CDNow and embrace the web, before their customers turn away from yet another 'AOL' or 'Microsoft' of the 21st century.

Ian Abbott


February 29, 2000

Although Amazon is not the only company to abuse US software-patents, we need to make an example of them by speaking our mind all at once. Only that way can we hope to catch the attention of the other companies that are abusing the software patent law. Amazon make an excellent example because they are a very high-profile company, in a highly competitive market. -- Also, remember http://www.noamazon.com

Mar Orlygson


February 29, 2000

As a long-time customer and an affiliate both personally and professionally, it pains me to see Amazon abusing the patent system in this manner. I, like many others, will be taking my small chunk of business (several hundred dollars per month) elsewhere until this matter is resolved.

Ron Craswell


February 29, 2000

The Web started out as free. Let's keep it that way.

John Alex Hebert


February 29, 2000

This action is totally contrary to the spirit of the Web.

David Bell


February 29, 2000

Future book orders will only be placed with B&N.

L. A. Weber


February 29, 2000

This sort of behavior on the part of any commercial entity is inexscusable. One might have hoped that Amazon would know better. At any rate, they've lost my business, and that of friends, family, and random web page visitors I might otherwise have sent their way. It might not amount to much, but I've noticed these things tend to snowball...

Brennen Bearnes


February 29, 2000

Your patent = crap.

Matt Dieter


February 29, 2000

Scott Favelle


February 29, 2000

Rex Rhoades


February 29, 2000

I used to buy books from Amazon but I will no longer do so because of the patent issues.

Lee Leighton


February 29, 2000

Still boycotting Amazon...and will continue to do so until they Do The Right Thing.

Kate L Pugh


February 29, 2000

I used to buy books at amazon, and i wont buy anything from amazon, until the 1-click patent will not longer be in use.

Juergen G. Schimmer


February 29, 2000

Neil Salyapongse


February 29, 2000

Henning Holtschneider


February 29, 2000

Tom White


February 29, 2000

Your company arguably invented the business model of how what's now called "e-commerce" works. I have always found the Amazon site a pleasure to use, and have always bought books there -- at both the .com and the .co.uk sites. However, my conscience dictates that I cannot support the use of software patents as a predatory practice, so until this matter is resolved, I'm taking my business elsewhere. I hope you sort this out. It's a shame that such a good setup has been ruined by this kind of greedy behaviour.

Justin Mason


February 29, 2000

Aaron O'Brien


February 29, 2000

You will reap what you sow...

Robert J. Berger


February 29, 2000

patenting accepted standards can not and will not be tolerated, revoke your patent

Brandon Alanis


February 29, 2000

Your service was good, your prices reasonable, and delivery was fast... but your business practices are unacceptable. As one who has been a 'Netizen' since Gopher was state of the art in hypermedia, I consider myself an early adapter. This early adapter is pointing people to www.noamazon.com.

Dave Walker


February 29, 2000

I've bought from Amazon before but now I'm going back to buying from my local book stores. They don't have frivolous patents. I'll reconsider buying from Amazon when they drop the law suit and when they renounce their patent.

David Talmage


February 29, 2000

Jeez. If I was Tim Bezos, I'd be wondering: "Hmm. Just how much money do I NEED?" Aren't you already like a triple-gazillionaire? Sell the damn stock, move to the country, raise up some damn kids, and quit taking out insane patents that any rational human would laugh at. Oh yeah: SAN DIMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL RULES!

Josh Walker


February 29, 2000

I long refused to shop with Amazon, preferring Stacey's for technical books (huge O'Reilly selection!), and used-book stores for classic fiction and soc sci. Now, I refuse to even visit their site; do ye likewise (fewer site hits => fewer "eyballs" => less advertising revenue => lower market cap => coredump)!

K Vainstein


February 29, 2000

Amazon's behavior is counter to everything that has made the Internet the phenomenon that it is. I boycotted B&N after their predatory attacks on Amazon during their early days. And I'm now abandoning my 1-Click account and removing Amazon affiliate links from my Web site for the same reasons. Until Amazon rejoins the ranks of those who are *building* the Internet and abandons those who are pillaging it for their own gain, don't expect any commerce from me, my family, or my company.

Chuck Shotton


February 29, 2000

I can only hope that the patent office starts hiring enough scientists to keep up with the flood of software (and genome) patents. However, the blame does not lie in the fact the patent was awarded, but in the strong arm tactics that Amazon is using to enforce a patent, when it should be a trade (or service) mark. Amazon, explain you didn't know the difference between trademarks and patents, and face far less embarassment and ill will than you are generating for yourself with your current position.

Judith Elaine Bush


February 29, 2000

Rex


February 29, 2000

Anything I could say here would simply be a repeat of what Tim has already put so eloquently, so I'll just say this: Starting this year, I've been making use of Amazon.com as a reference tool and doing my buying elsewhere. In some cases it costs me a few more dollars, but I'd much rather spend the extra money knowing it won't be used by a company that's biting the hands that feed it. I'd like to propose that if publishers really care about this problem, they enclose a leaflet explaining the problem in everything they distribute through electronic resellers. (I was initially going to suggest that the publishers stop selling through companies with practices like Amazon's. But why should they be forced to suffer because the executives at one of their distributors are acting like buttheads?)

Mark Feit


February 29, 2000

Tim Howell


February 29, 2000

Jon Saville


February 29, 2000

Avdi Grimm


February 29, 2000

Carlos Gamboa Dos Santos


February 29, 2000

Heath Tanner


February 29, 2000

As Tim put it, "you're pissing in the well". As someone who makes a living providing open Internet technology, I drink from this well every day. In my own self-interest, I'm not buying from Amazon until you stop being a threat to the Web.

Mark Koek


February 29, 2000

Mathieu Guillaume


February 29, 2000

Wayne Pascoe


February 29, 2000

David Kennedy


February 29, 2000

Sam Tobin-Hochstadt


February 29, 2000

I was a loyal Amazon buyer. Not anymore.

Tim Funk


February 29, 2000

I buy no more from Amazon till this patent is released to the public domain

Bob Ogden


February 29, 2000

With regret, I've ceased doing business with Amazon until they return to being a cooperative member of the Web community.

Jon Bloom


February 29, 2000

Amazon is trading long-term customer relations for short-term shareholder value. How much stock does the management still own and when does it plan to sell it, I wonder.

Stefan Eissing


February 29, 2000

There's still a way to make the best of this - look what Linus has done with his trademark - but right now it just looks like the same old same old, from people who really should know better.

Christian Hellon


February 29, 2000

hey amazon,...you just lost a *large* order

Paul Haley


February 29, 2000

I spent over 񘈨 dollars last year at Amazon, but I will no longer purchase from them until this patent problem is resolved.

Sean Leach


February 29, 2000

Thanks to Tim O'Reilly for speaking out on this issue. I had enjoyed using the services offered by Amazon.com I will now be giving my ๖+/month to fatbrain.com and bookpool.com instead of amazon.com. I thought you were smarter than to bite the hand that feeds you Mr.Bezos....What a sham(e). :(

Nino Benvenuti


February 29, 2000

I was shaken by the fact that this was allowed to happend. I certainly will not shop at Amazon.com after reading about this 1-click patent. Further I will make sure that none of my friends do either. I think it is very good that someone is taking action and hopefully this will be reconsidered before it does more harm to the internet community.

Ingemar Henriksson


February 29, 2000

Though I believe in intelectual property and it's protection, I also believe that it should only apply whenever it comes about after much effort and investment of time and money. A bright, ideia doesn't count, specially if it's an obvious feature. This doesn't even count as a bright ideia. 'nuf said.

Gustavo Carvalho


February 29, 2000

I first wrote to a letter to Amazon around christmas to let them know I would be taking my business to Bn.com for my holiday book purchases. In return, I got a ฮ gift certificate. Amazon, in my opinion, you were a great company once, but this patent business is inexcusable. You're going to lose quite a bit of business from myself and like-minded folks until you adopt a less antagonistic patent strategy, and focus on your service instead.

David Thiel


February 29, 2000

Do you really believe that you have a right to patent this technology? This technique was never yours, it was developed long before you were able to pull one over on the patent office. If you continue with this, I assure you that you and your company will live to regret it. The community that you used to build your empire will toss you aside. Hope you enjoy your "man of the year" award while you can. Save some money, it is a short trip. Sincerely, Jeff Coburn

Jeff Coburn


February 29, 2000

Do you really want to make yourselves the most hated internet retailer? Stop pursuing this trivial and fundamentally indefensible patent. I have ordered from Amazon.co.uk in the past. I will not place any more orders until you see sense. A policy that has seen Barnes and Noble gain orders from me for around 踰 U.S. That could, maybe in your opinion should, have been your money. I'm not alone. How much can you gain from this compared to how much you have already lost and stand to lose in the future?

Michael Cottle


February 29, 2000

This patent ordeal has reached a very high point in how the system can be abused. Asking or pleading to a company or an individual to abandon a patent that was made out of self egocentrism is a good start. But appealing to every such individual is next to impossible and striking at a big company like Amazon is a logical course. But I think a better approach would be sending the same pleas to the system that is responsible for such misshaps would have greater results. So I urge a person with high publicity value to start such a campaign.

Dmitry Schwartsman


February 29, 2000

I strongly object Amazon's policy on software patents. Futhermore, I will not purchase anything from Amazon until they change their stance on these two specific (1-Click and Affiliate) issues.

Jussi Hannunen


February 29, 2000

Oliver O'Hehir


February 29, 2000

Others have suggested it, and I will too. Assign the patents to the FSF. Let them (and companies who sign over their patents) use these patents as "defensive bargaining chips" against companies who use patents to attack Free Software or the companies who support them.

Brad Garcia


February 29, 2000

Terence Mac Goff


February 29, 2000

Peter Hofmann


February 29, 2000

Mike Muise


February 29, 2000

Rikard Anglerud


February 29, 2000

Creating shareholder value is pretty important, but by abusing wrongly granted you'll eventually loose your first and most important resource: your consumerbase. I suggest you read 'net gain' from Hagel & Armstrong (I guess you should know where to find that book), so that you can realize that the competitive advantage in business-to-consumer sites will heavily depend on the creation of active communities around your site.

Bram Kerkhof


February 29, 2000

Mark Roberts


February 29, 2000

Jon Wilson


February 29, 2000

David Hallowell


February 29, 2000

William Montgomery


February 29, 2000

Gill Martin


February 29, 2000

Reagan Blundell (UK)


February 29, 2000

I strongly object to Amazon's patenting practices that are extremely harmful to the development of the Internet and e-commerce at large.

Tatu Ylonen


February 29, 2000

Agreed totally. These broad ideas do not fit the requirements of patents. Can we also address the matter to the responsible elected officials for the Patent Office?

Don Armstrong


February 29, 2000

The whole 1-click-patent is kinda silly - i bet there was someone who developed this waaay before Amazon put a name on it. Amazon's use of patents to stop other from using this kind of techniques is like saying that noone else should be able to write gui's, except for Microsoft. (or someone else for that matter)

Mats Lindh (NO)


February 29, 2000

I agree. I've been thinking about patenting a "No-Click" process where the web browser remembers something about me so that the next time I visit, I don't have to identify myself. Of course, my new technology will leverage the power of cookies, a little-known browser feature that is just waiting to be exploi...err...I mean leveraged. As a matter of fact, amazon.com would be in direct violation of this patent. Hmmmm...off to the Patent Office...

Michael Swanson


February 29, 2000

Although I understand that a company must protect their ideas. The idea of one click buying is not such an idea. Pantents on software causes wheels to be reinvented instead of using solid foundations. Amazon need not feel that they are being singled out. It is just as easy to raise protest against a company that takes unfair measures against Amazon. However since Amazon is the one that is taking an unfair measeure, I am participating the this boycott until such time as this policy is reversed. Please keep in mind that mistakes are to be reversed, and fixed mistakes result in a new relationship between company and customer. I strongly encourage Amazon to release their patent as they were a wonderful resource for me to buy informative books.

Jeffrey Eugene Crawford


February 29, 2000

Brian Kelly


February 29, 2000

Although I would much rather purchase my books at Amazon, the current situation has forced me to shop somewhere else (B&N for instance), until Amazon gives up on enforcing this ridiculous patent. I encourage others to do so as well.

Remmelt de Haan


February 29, 2000

George Grewgious


February 29, 2000

Jon Edwards (UK)


February 29, 2000

Emmet Hikory


February 29, 2000

I never thought of the Amazon Patent as theft, or at least not giving back to the community that gave them the platform to make money. I now don't feel so bad about not buying books/CDs from them. Count me in on the boycott, chaps! Thanks Tim.

David Jolley


February 29, 2000

Thomas Eibner


February 29, 2000

Amazon has embraced many innovative features of the web that other companies have shunned - such as deep linking and using their customers to help sell their products. I fail to see how regressing to a big monolithic company intent on stamping out all competition is going to appeal to their user base.

Richey Smith


February 29, 2000

Cheryl Maynard


February 29, 2000

For a company which is devoted to spreading knowledge through books, this patent goes against the free flow and use of information around the world. I don't understand why people keep patenting stupid things like ideas in software, they will just make writing programs for rest of us much,much harder. I can see a day when software development is going to be like traversing a room filled with barbed wire. No-one gets across without being torn to pieces, and then people just do not bother. And then the proprietary companies will then have won.. I will not be using Amazon until they see sense. Sorry, but there are other places to buy books from, and perhaps customer pressure might do something.

Arron Shutt


February 29, 2000

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Marcos Paulo Hauer


February 29, 2000

Ingo Kegel


February 29, 2000

Amazon is throwing away the very substance of what it has developed during the past few years. It's reputation as the world's most famous Internet success story threatens to be tarnished, possibly permanently scared. Rather than going down in history as the company who pioneered e-retailing on a large scale, it will be remembered as the company who pioneered stupendously stupid 'software' (can we even call it software?) patents. This will not help Amazon in the long run, and will force many of their loyal customers to competitors. I for one now shop at Fatbrain.com for all my technical books. I cannot say it any louder. Listen up Amazon, refine your ways, do an about-turn in PR and set a good example to your competitors by abandoning your patents and pledging to cease the entire patent crusade.

Ben Myles


February 29, 2000

Anthony H. O'Bryan


February 29, 2000

Did you ever see that shampoo commercial, where the people just multiplied over and over again, sort of looking like the beginning of the Brady Bunch show? Amazon will reap its destined reward with the number of anti-referrals which will spawn from me and other intelligent people who know when to draw the line. Word-of-mouth can make or break a business, so just give it a little bit more time. The "Microsoft of the internet" shall suffer given its current mode of thinking. Repent, spin, dry, but do not agitate. Do the right thing and let patents be for the real genuine thing. Get real about what you are trying to patent here.

Ethan Weeks


February 29, 2000

I'll be doing business with Amazon's competitors from now on.

Joseph Ringh


February 29, 2000

Speaking as a customer and occasional shareholder, I'd like to state my displeasure in Amazon.com's patent-protection legal practices, and would highly encourage them to stop those practices, lest I take my money elsewhere.

Jim Whitfield


February 29, 2000

Alexander Larsson


February 29, 2000

Jani Ekqvist


February 29, 2000

I applaud Tim's opinion and agree wholeheartedly, particularly with respect to the open gift of opportunity that the Web presented to Mr. Bezos. I hope he will consider this gift and remember the implications of Amazon's "patent".

Eric


February 29, 2000

Although I spent a fair amount of money at Amazon last year, and value their services greatly, I joined the boycott as soon as I became aware of it, and will continue to avoid using Amazon for online book (and CD) purchases for as long as they keep persuing this patent.

Adam Spragg


February 29, 2000

Like many other longtime repeat Amazon customers, I will be going elsewhere for book, music, and video purchases until such time as they stop using invalid patents offensively. In addition to being contrary to everything that put Amazon where it is, Amazon does its stockholders a disservice. First, as you see here, you have created a great deal of ill-will among your core customer base. Second, you waste a significant amount of money pursuing a case that you most likely will ultimately lose.

Dave Fuhs


February 29, 2000

I've been programming for Web sites since the bad old days of the mid-90's, and I've been using cookies and other technologies to track sessions and access user information since the beginning. And I'd gladly testify to that in court, if necessary. Amazon's "patent" is a shocking, bald-faced lie. I can hardly praise Tim O'Reilly enough for his continuing demonstration that you can honor a commitment to Doing the Right Thing in the software business and still be very successul. Why don't companies like Amazon understand this? I am enthusiastic about buying from O'Reilly, not just because the books are excellent, but also because Tim and his company inspire me to give them my money.

Geoff Simmons


February 29, 2000

Brian Clark


February 29, 2000

Anders Munck


February 29, 2000

Andrew Whitwham


February 29, 2000

Maurice Buxton


February 29, 2000

Ronald J. Clark


February 29, 2000

Ola Torstensson


February 29, 2000

This is exactly the kind of land-grabbing you'd expect from today's corporations destroying the fabric of what really made the internet what it is today. I will not shop again with Amazon until this is dropped.

James Wilkins


February 29, 2000

Pierre Neihouser


February 29, 2000

Michael Costall


February 29, 2000

Êsmund Tjora


February 29, 2000

Tim says it all.

Dave Sheridan


February 29, 2000

Christian Tanzer


February 29, 2000

Kevin Johnson


February 29, 2000

Karl Knutsson


February 29, 2000

Leon Widdershoven


February 29, 2000

Eric Warmenhoven


February 29, 2000

Bernhard Rosenkraenzer


February 29, 2000

This is good, people taking a stand for what they believe in - damn i like it. Amazon - you're going down !!

Paw R. Olesen


February 29, 2000

Johannes Beigel


February 29, 2000

Holger Hoffstaette


February 29, 2000

What's next? Patenting wallets?

tor fosheim


February 29, 2000

I have been reading most of the comments that are submitted here and one thing that struck me was how polite and insightfull the comments are. The people commenting here are *not* mindless goons shouting for another boycott because everyone else is doing so. These people are really offended by what's happening and are taking the time, like I am, to say something about it. I hope someone at amazon.com will get to read all these coments and get the message. I also hope other companies considering similar tactics will see why these tactics are unethical and indeed may form a danger to the Web.

Reinout Hoornweg


February 29, 2000

Bad form Amazon - how greedy can one company get?

Michael Merlin


February 29, 2000

Aaron Denney


February 29, 2000

Tord Jansson


February 29, 2000

Software patents are anathema. Arrogance and greed have consequences. Bad company, no donut. No more money for you from me...

Tamara Munzner


February 29, 2000

Lee Genz


February 29, 2000

This is a serious issue and we will certainly be taking our own steps to help education consumers and developers to these practices. The Ring Group, Istanbul, Turkey

Jeff Merriam


February 29, 2000

Until recently, I was very satisfied with the service provided by Amazon. However, until they have realised the error of their ways, my business will be going elsewhere and I will be advising my colleagues to do likewise.

Andrew Eacott


February 29, 2000

In this process I have become increasingly supportive of Oreilly and decreasingly impressed with Amazon. I think the whole thing is a tragedy, because Amazon does offer a great service. The freedom of information IS the root of a new intellectual movement, and it will not be stopped by selfish interests.

Kyle Cranmer


February 29, 2000

I support Tim O'Reilly and his calls for this patent to be surrendered. It can be shown that the concept of cookies to save personalisation settings existed for at least 12 months before amazon's presence on the web (or indeed anywhere). Since their "1-Click" is to all intents and purposes a clever branding of this process, I do not feel that a patent is appropriate - they may like to consider a trademark application for the name?

Jonathan Care


February 29, 2000

Alik Widge


February 29, 2000

I would love to be a financial genius and point out all the ways that Amazon is hurting themselves. I would love to be able to understand exactly what they patented and how that puts them in a position to sue Barns & Noble. I would like to have enough technical knowledge to be able to prove what Amazon is doing is wrong. But I am just an average consumer. I used to have a funny feeling Apple had single click patented because you had to double click everything in Windows. But, as I said, I am just a consumer. I only know that legal fees make products cost more. I know that my taxes increase to pay the judges salaries. I know that competition is good for me as a consumer. I know that it is the consumer that ultimately keeps you in business. I know that a business can be run without profit for only so long before the investors in that business decide the CEO was a con artist and his business plan was a scam. I know that I have referred at least 25 people to Amazon because you seemed to have so much on the ball compared to anyone else. I know that anyone loosing a game starts cheating. You are Cheating. INVESTORS DON'T BACK LOOSERS. So, stop cheating and looking like a looser. In the mean time, while you get your ducks in a row, I'll be buying my books at an old fashion walk in book store. I've told all the people I referred to you to stop using Amazon. That list includes: my mom, dad, 3 sisters, 3 brothers, a dozen co-workers, and a few of my friends. I'm sure they will pass the word along. You may find that the hype your business is based on works double when used against you. A lifetime of achievement is ruined by a single dishonorable act. It only takes one time. This is that one time. Fix It.

Jason Pippin


February 29, 2000

<sarchasm> Why doesn't Amazon try to get a patent on having a website or maybe breathing. I'm sure that there are no cases of prior art. </sarchasm>

Carsten Svaneborg


February 29, 2000

Jos‰ Igor Tßmara Pati±o


February 29, 2000

Emily Winch


February 29, 2000

David Riddoch


February 29, 2000

Jonathan Montgomery


February 29, 2000

Martijn de Vries


February 29, 2000

Douglas Krick


February 29, 2000

David DeGeorge


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com has lost my business.

Ryan Earl


February 29, 2000

James Lanfear


February 29, 2000

Antonio Lagana


February 29, 2000

You have one less customer, Amazon.

Matt Ebb


February 29, 2000

No Amazon books for me while this lasts...

Arjen Roos


February 29, 2000

RMS never speaks with a forked kernel.

Matt Christoff


February 29, 2000

freedom. freedom of information... freedom of ideas... freedom... and all will benefit.

Ricardo Contreras


February 29, 2000

Build it and they will come, Fence it and they will stay away in their millions.

Mark Chettle


February 29, 2000

A very wierd patent. How can someone patent a "Cookie" based system?? I shan't be using 1-Click anymore. Andy

Andy Williams


February 29, 2000

No business of mine or my company will be given directly or indirectly to Amazon until a written undertaking has been made by them to cease these absurdities. The initial request for the patent is offensive in the extreme.

Martyn J. Pearce


February 29, 2000

I hope Amazon have enough of a sense of justice so that they do not continue with stealing others ideas and patenting them as their own.

Andrew Wilson


February 29, 2000

As a naval officer stationed overseas I was one of the first Amazon customers, since Amazon made it easy for me to purchase books not available overseas otherwise. Now, however, as a law student specializing in intellectual property issues I must reconsider my previous appreciation and admiration for Amazon. I strongly urge Amazon to do the right thing and cease attempts to enforce its trivial ecommerce patents.

Ernest Miller


February 29, 2000

Any proficient software engineer would be ashamed to have his/her name on the patent application. If this is the heigth of genius Amazon has to offer...

Emile Heyns


February 29, 2000

Such software patents are for me a sad example of a larger problem: business competing not anymore with the quality of products but with the abuse of laws, regulations and institutions.

Dr. Christoph Tietz


February 29, 2000

Kent Neier


February 29, 2000

Trivial and malicious software patents are poison to the very software industry that gave you your current position. I will boycott your (otherwise excellent) service until these claims are dropped.

Alex Brown


February 29, 2000

I've used Amazon for a couple of years now and was always extremely pleased with their service. Unfortunately I can no longer purchase from them, and I encourage them to change this ridiculous policy as soon as possible.

Alisdair McDiarmid


February 29, 2000

I have always felt that Amazon provides one of the best interfaces for ordering books. However, I cannot support the use of such a trivial patent to beat down your competition. I will (regrettably) be taking my business elsewhere unless your patent policy changes.

Paul Pelzl


February 29, 2000

Its a disgrace whats happening, I only hope that someone quickly overturns this patent. It shows no respect or responsibility towards the medium and technology that allowed Ama-stole.com to reach the size it has. Needless to say I will not purchase books from them at all. Michael

Michael Stromberg


February 29, 2000

Please back off from this silly patent. I used to like your company, but your abuse of the patent system has changed my mind.

Keith Hankin


February 29, 2000

This is a stupid patent that anyone with a little knowledge of the web could 'invent'. I disagree with it wholeheartedly, and have therefore boycotted buying from Amazon. I instead go to my high street store, or order from a competitor of yours. Maybe if you loose enough customers who normally buy expensive manuals will you see that people do feel strongly on this, and that it makes sense for it to be dropped - it will increase your profits.

Mark Godfrey


February 29, 2000

I used to be a huge Amazon customer. Living in South Africa, I found that they stocked books that I just couldn't get anywhere else, and Amazon's customer service was always excellent. However, since this patent frenzy of theirs, I have started using alternatives like Barnes & Noble, and I have found them to be a more than acceptable alternative. I have placed over 35 orders with Amazon in the last 3 years and spent an obscene amount of money there. Oh well, Amazon's loss... their competitor's gain. I just can't spend my money at such an unethical bussiness.

Peter Knowles


February 29, 2000

Trivial and malicious software patents are poison to the very software industry that gave you your current position. I will boycott your (otherwise excellent) service until these claims are dropped.

Alex Brown


February 29, 2000

As a software developer for an internet company, I was an early customer of Amazon, and as a collector of first-edition hardback books, for a while I also made extensive use of your auction area. I have not visited amazon.com or amazon.co.uk since the day Richard Stallman called for the Amazon boycott in protest of Amazon's decision to enforce it's One-click patent with an injunction against Barns & Noble. As an avid reader I spend a considerable sum on books - I will be taking my business to your competitors (Barnes & Noble in particular) until Amazon changes it's stance on silly internet functionality patents.

Janice Wright


February 29, 2000

I didn't realize the potential ramifications of Amazon's patent claim on the future of the Internet until I read Tim O'Reilly open letter. My first impression was that it seemed like a good way to keep new ideas from being imitated and that Amazon was simply trying to protect's it branding of "One click". I realize now that this approach would seriously have stifled the growth of the Internet had it been enforced early on. Can someone like Yahoo come along and say they have a patent on web site directories or it's widely used categorization system? What about portals? Although, I won't go all out to boycott Amazon, I will certainly think twice about shopping at Amazon.

Juan Camacho


February 29, 2000

I own an ISP and am widely respected in my community regarding technology issues being also a member of our regional technology council. As a person, I have ceased to do business with Amazon, there are too many alternatives and I find their action, which is akin to seeing some one urinate and then patenting "urinating in a closed room", quite horrifying in terms of what it reveals about their corporate attitude. If that's how they're doing business now, what happens when they achieve the real power that comes when they finally become insanely profitable? I doubt they'll suddenly come down with a case of morals. At my company, we are ceasing to do business with Amazon until their attitude improves. All of our employees have been briefed on this issue and all of our customers have been notified of Amazon's actions; we advise them to stay away from Amazon and help them find alternatives. Likewise in my position on the Regional Tech. Council, I also am ensuring that everyone knows about this issue as well as understanding just how basic cookies and the idea of giving someone a percentage for a sales referral (affiliates program) really are...and how Amazon's actions are threatening economic development in our region and in our state (although not limited to us).

Lon R. Stockton, Jr.


February 29, 2000

Tim Ostler


February 29, 2000

Adam Thomason


February 29, 2000

Marrije Schaake


February 29, 2000

Ulf K„ck, Sweden


February 29, 2000

Luc Van Hoeylandt


February 29, 2000

Kevin Kent


February 29, 2000

Emil KIRSCHNER


February 29, 2000

David Porter


February 29, 2000

Chris Winkler


February 29, 2000

David Oggs


February 29, 2000

Steve Calder


February 29, 2000

Rudi Sluijtman


February 29, 2000

Paul Hernaus


February 29, 2000

I had respect for Amazon until this 1-click patent nonsense. This is no longer the case, at least until they smarten up and drop this frivilous patent. I thought of this application for cookies years ago. I, much like others, also considered this a trivial use of cookies and not worth a patent. <p> I think that taking the work of others, who give it away freely for the betterment of all people, and patenting something that will hinder the growth of more innovation is despicable. Amazon, you should be ashamed of yourself! This action brands you not as a member of the community, but as a bandit who preys upon the community, having dollar signs as their only motivation. <p> Until this patent is overturned, i openly suggest people use www.noamazon.com instead of the other one.

Cam Mayor


February 29, 2000

Didier Leimbach


February 29, 2000

Graham Green


February 29, 2000

Patrick Keller


February 29, 2000

Ville Salmensuu


February 29, 2000

Greed gone mad!

David Hass


February 29, 2000

Marcin Gorycki


February 29, 2000

Down with this sort of thing!

Leo Talbot


February 29, 2000

customerlost++

Gulam Faruque


February 29, 2000

Now, I use www.fatbrain.com.

Alexandre Dulaunoy


February 29, 2000

You've lost my business. 'Nuff said.

St Aardvark the Carpeted


February 29, 2000

Play fair! Give up your patents, please. Or don't expect anyone I know to shop at Amazon's.

Roland Mas


February 29, 2000

Nis Donatzsky Hansen


February 29, 2000

No more Amazon purchases from me while they keep this nonsense up. Off to bol.com ...

Leon Verrall


February 29, 2000

Hm. Amazon: a user of Apache (v 1.3.6), and reputedly, of FreeBSD. Obviously Mr Becos just doesn't "get it."

Ewing Caldwell


February 29, 2000

Even though amazon.de offers great service, I haven't ordered a book with them since RMS asked for the boykott - down with silly patents!

Britta Koch


February 29, 2000

I am disappointed even to imagine someone can make a patent on someonelse's idea

Emilio Anzon


February 29, 2000

Hopefully ordinary people and politicians soon will realize that the benefits (?) of the patent system is by by far outweighted by the disadvantages.

H…kon L°vdal


February 29, 2000

Martin Fluch


February 29, 2000

Hi Tim, I'm behind you and RMS on this whole issue. I will no longer support Amazon.com until these petty patents issues are dropped! "pissing in the well... " hehehe how true!

Chris Steinke


February 29, 2000

In 1999 I spent 軕.12 at Amazon.com. In 2000 I have spent Ũ.00. As long as Amazon.com continues this shameful patent suit I will use Amazon to find books and buy them elsewhere.

Brett Peters


February 29, 2000

Well, as a lot of ppl already said, until amazon drops their ridicilous patent, I wont buy another book from them. Search their site for books, yes, but buying them elsewhere.

Stefan Lindstrom


February 29, 2000

Amazon's service isn't worth their bad vibe. I'm shopping elsewhere now. Tim, why is the patent office is allowed to operate like this? They're destroying our collective prosperity! Jeff, go outside and look up at the stars.

Jon Cox


February 29, 2000

I have always used Amazon before as I felt they offered a great service, and have encouraged my friends and family to do so. Now with this greedy abuse of the patent system I shall take my business elsewhere, and shall encourage them to do so as well. Cian

Cian O'Connor


February 29, 2000

I can't remember not buying my books from Amazon: reasonable prices, swift shipping, all in all good service. But I will not buy another book from them until they stop this nonsense patent business which is, as Tim points out, a slap in the face of all the Web pioneers. Dag Hovden, The Netherlands

Dag Hovden


February 29, 2000

Trying to patent something that is a fundamental part of the HTTP protocol (ie, the cookie) is a *Bad* move. IMNSHO it constitutes unfair business practice; it gains you nothing, it steals others' work for your commercial misuse and it stops other people using what is an open protocol. Until you desist I shall persist in boycotting Amazon and continue to inform folks as appropriate. ~Tim

Tim Haynes


February 29, 2000

Entrepreneurship is necessary for the advancement of economy and society. This kind of corporate behaviour makes it despicable, and that in itself is to be deplored. The real guilt lies with the US PTO, judges and politician who will ruin the system by allowing its abuse. But having the right to do something is no excuse for doing it.

Bernard Lang


February 29, 2000

Amazing this was ever allowed. It makes a mockery of an already outdated patent system. This would be funny if it did not directly and adversly affect the freedom of the internet. This patent is stealing from those who were involved in the creation of the net and all those who use it in there everyday lives. The internet is about open standards - these standards are not then to be hijacked by companies such as amazon in a futile attempt to become an on-line monopoly.

Mark Williams


February 29, 2000

This 1-click patent is ridiculous. I feel it is an obvious application of the purpose of cookies as stated in the Netscape document which created cookies. The example in the document makes it very ovious that 1-click is exactly what the creators of the cookies had in mind. </i> I am in complete agreement with Tim on all he said and I wish to thank him for stating it so clearly. I just can't see how software patents are ever going to be more beneficial to the computing trade than their former absence used to be. Copyright law is more than enough protection for anyone's work.

Jean-Marc Libs


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com and it's associated sites have always had my respect for being a leading example of how to do business on the Internet - providing a user-friendly and forward-thinking browsing and purchasing environment. They have consistently innovated, and have lead the field. I have been proud to cite Amazon as an example to my customers. Amazon's successes have finally spawned credible competition. Amazon as a company has to respond to the change in environment to maintain their position. However, it is my belief that their current actions, viz. restricting the technology available to others through legal means, is absolutely the wrong way to go. There is plenty of energy within Amazon to meet the challenge of the expanding marketplace, without having to resort to attempting to cripple the opposition. Run an honest race, Amazon. It got you where you are today, don't turn your back on your own history.

Jim Cheetham


February 29, 2000

I will also no longer support Amazon.com until these petty patents issues are dropped!

Hidetaka YOSUMI


February 29, 2000

Ryan Richter


February 29, 2000

Alan Braggins


February 29, 2000

Glenn Handeland


February 29, 2000

I sympathise with Amazon: it's very easy to overestimate the originality of one's own ideas. Sadly, not only does the patent have zero technical merit, but it fuels distrust for & contempt of Amazon. I've stopped shopping there.

Andrew Forrest


February 29, 2000

Jos Backus


February 29, 2000

Iqbal Shamsul


February 29, 2000

Kari Asikainen


February 29, 2000

Steve Johnston


February 29, 2000

Brent McLeod


February 29, 2000

I was always taught that a patent could only ever be granted for non trivial innovations that contribute to the state of the art. Patents were originally created for a person to protect years of work and investement from being stolen by unscupulous people, not for someone with a bright spark to hold the world ransom. In this light I can only see your patents as a perversion to the whole spirit or the system, a perversion that will slowly rot the fruit from the inside. When patents are used like this, they demean the whole idea of patents, and that is a tragedy.

Marc Gimpel


February 29, 2000

Joshua Yambert


February 29, 2000

Nicola Turner


February 29, 2000

Amazon got the patents, their competitiors got my business...

Louis REINARD


February 29, 2000

I don't think I need add anything to the letter -- says it all, really. Cheers.

Stuart Lamble


February 29, 2000

I despise the 1-click patent and won't deal with a company that does such unethical things.

Peter Mutsaers


February 29, 2000

Its a shame that Amazon can gain so much from free technology and then slap the free technology in the face. What horrible greed.

Kevin Stelzer


February 29, 2000

Count me in, Mr. O'Reilly. I love your books, and I totally agree with your letter. I'll go to fatbrain.com to buy your books. ;-)

Glenn Arndt


February 29, 2000

Stopped using Amazon (UK) as soon as I heard about this. The great thing about the internet: an alternative is always close by.

Stephen Watkins


February 29, 2000

So I gave y'all the same email address that I use at your site, so that you can map the customer to the opinion. I completely understand patenting/attempting to patent petty/obvious technologies; if you don't do it, someone else will. But going after people for doing something that is obvious is not something I will ever support. It's bricks 'n' motar B&N for me until you wisen up, and behave fairly.

Dilum Ranatunga


February 29, 2000

Brendan Kehoe


February 29, 2000

It's a real kick in the teeth to see the poster-child of forward-looking, innovative Internet businesses behaving in such a short-sighted, backward-looking way.

David Salgado


February 29, 2000

While I have always considered Amazon a great company, this is too serious. As long as Amazon's position remains the same, I will support the NoAmazon initiative (www.noamazon.com).

Jonas Beckman


February 29, 2000

You have certainly lost my business until you end this foolish patent enforcement.

Craig T. Snydal


February 29, 2000

I am disappointed by the use of patents from Amazon who built the business upon the generosity of the people who made the web. i stopped buying anything at their place until they change their mind.

Guillaume PROUX


February 29, 2000

I want to like amazon.com because I feel like it's a hometown success story...after hearing about your "1 click ordering" patent, it seems that Amazon is too big and too powerful. I have shopped amazon.com in the past but not until I hear that this issue is resolved.

JB McDaniel


February 29, 2000

We no longer buy our books from Amazon as a result of their patent, and this is actually company policy (we use the Amazon site to look up books and info, but wil not buy anything from them until they drop the patent application). I am personally encouraging our associate companies to adopt the same policy.

Neil Newell


February 29, 2000

I've been a happy amazon customer since Jan '97 and have spent a lot of money with them. Right now I don't have an alternative to get US books at an acceptable price point in Germany, but that will change when other book sellers catch on. And then there's going to be one amazon customer less.

Dirk Reiners


February 29, 2000

Daniel Barrero


February 29, 2000

As a web developer I am all too familiar with what happens when proprietary interests get in the way of innovation. As a web developer I have purchased a lot of books, almost all from Amazon. I will no longer purchase _anything_ from Amazon, neither will my friends or family until they can pull their heads out of their asses. -Jonathan Younger

Jonathan Younger


February 29, 2000

The patents claimed by Amazon are clearly technically vacuous and trivial. I use Amazon regularly, but if its policy is to compete via pointless and clearly plagiaristic patents, which are clearly deposited in the most general terms possible, rather than on quality-of-service, I won't be doing so in future.

George Buchanan


February 29, 2000

Maybe a trademark would be appropriate for the term "One-click ordering", but there is no way this patent should have been granted or enforced.

Nigel Metheringham


February 29, 2000

As somebody who has made great use of Amazon either purchasing directly, or indirectly (as other friends have ordered), I shall not be involving Amazon in any future purchasing decisions. I shall also encourage all my friends and family to do the same. As somebody who has contributed (in a small way) to the Open Source community, I find it insulting to all those who have freely contributed their efforts, just so you can attempt to acquire these transparently trivial algorithms. To claim these as inventions is fraudulent, and I hope that you reverse your direction on this matter.

Jon Eaves


February 29, 2000

Dalton Serey


February 29, 2000

I just read the patent application - my first thought was 'yes, and?...' Maybe I should go and patent my idea of having pictures on a web site to make them more interesting :-)

Ian Buxton


February 29, 2000

Lennart Rasmusson


February 29, 2000

no comment

Marco Mariani


February 29, 2000

I don't believe in software patents, as the danger of abuse far outweigts the gains from use. Amazon enforcing the 1-click-parody, will surely jepordize whatever good use SW patents have in the first place.

Frank Stevenson


February 29, 2000

Andy Gimblett


February 29, 2000

Mickey Everts


February 29, 2000

Joop Boonen


February 29, 2000

Daniel Martinus Moelbaek


February 29, 2000

Have a care Amazon ...

Nick G


February 29, 2000

I have defended Amazon.com in public in the past when I felt that complaints against it were unwarranted. I was definitely a loyal Amazon.com customer. Now I am seeing my loyalty defiled in the shape of these patents. It is clearly time for me to stop supporting Amazon.com with my purchases, and to also cancel (and encourage others to cancel) Amazon.com affiliate relationships.

Stuart Whitmore


February 29, 2000

Like many other people signing this letter, I will not purchase from Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk until this patent is placed in the public domain.

Phil Harrison


February 29, 2000

Another former amazon customer

Struan Donald


February 29, 2000

100% in agreement. 1-click purchasing is hardly an innovation. Period.

Andy Key


February 29, 2000

Stefan Berglund


February 29, 2000

I stopped buying books from Amazon when RMS put the call out about the patent. Fatbrain, B&N, and the local Borders brick-and-mortar have received the โ-贶 I spend each month. I don't need Amazon.com to get my books, obviously, and I successfully encourage others to purchase books from other sources because of Amazon's patent stance.

Chris Jones


February 29, 2000

Count me in - I believe this patent thing is complete nonsense. --alex

Alexandre Takacs


February 29, 2000

Andy Gimblett


February 29, 2000

Even though you havn't called for a boycott I will no longer be buying from Amazon (or Amazon UK) until this matter is resolved.

Andy Guy


February 29, 2000

This case is an excellent argument for the European Community not to approve patents on software. This is maybe the only positive thing about it ;-)

Bernard Pinon (Paris, EU)


February 29, 2000

Until this patent is dropped I won't be ordering anything from you, which is a pity because I liked the service. Until then though I'll go to your competitors or a bookshop.

James Skinner


February 29, 2000

I was an enthusastic supporter of Amazon, but I condemn their approach to the community that has put them where they now are. The beauty of the internet is that as a community we have a combined voice that should be large enough to make a difference.

Lindsay Davies


February 29, 2000

I used to present Amazon as the example of how to create a successful business on your own merit, rather than by harming (potential) competitors. Now I can't even use Amazon myself in good conscience.

Per Abrahamsen


February 29, 2000

Crystal Trexel


February 29, 2000

Please give up your right to your business process patents -- they do nothing to serve your interests. Please compete on your own merits.

Thomas Lakofski


February 29, 2000

I used to love shopping at Amazon purchasing both books, cd's as well as other items. While I understand the need to protect your intellectual property, this patent does not cover IP owned by amazon. As such I will not be purcashing any products from Amazon until this patent has been dropped.

Antony Wuth


February 29, 2000

I'm not normally one to take this kind of stance. But it's time to change. I've watched too many of these things go by thinking that it would be a good idea to do something and finally I've come to getting off my ass and doing something about it. Bye bye Amazon. From now on my business is going elsewhere.

Kurt Olsen


February 29, 2000

Lets nip this nonsense in the bud now. Well said Tim.

Leigh Dodds


February 29, 2000

It's a shame. I really didn't want to stop shopping at Amazon, because the service has always been impeccable. You got your first-to-market advantage already, Amazon - I would never have considered going to any of the copycat johnny-come-latelies like B&N before. But by pursuing these (frankly untenable) patents you are not acting like the worst kind of corporate bully we've seen outside of the web, but also retarding the growth of the countless other web sites who are not even your competitors.

Andrew Clover


February 29, 2000

While this silly patent dispute gose on I will not buy anything from amazon.

David Fromosa


February 29, 2000

I have spent over 辎 at Amazon over the last year, and I love their site and service, but I will be buying elsewhere until they relent on this rediculous position that they "invented" the idea of attatching information to a cookie "key"--That's what cookies were designed for! As a web application developer, I truly feel that attempts like this one to appropriate (read steal) open technologies like the use of cookies is a direct threat to my livelyhood. Comon Jeff! Do you really think the "one-click" gimimck is all that stands between you and corporate death?! You got to where you are because of excellent customer service, vision, and excecution-- not a kindegarten level toy-grab.

Joel Boehland


February 29, 2000

I urge Amazon, a company which I have to date regarded highly, and whose services I have often used, to reconsider this short-sighted act, which I am sure will be counter-productive from their point of view, as well as generally harmful.

Brian Randell


February 29, 2000

PJ Hellyer


February 29, 2000

Jonas Olsson


February 29, 2000

Stephan Ichiriu


February 29, 2000

Samuel Marshall


February 29, 2000

Christine M. Lingenfelter


February 29, 2000

Nicholas Murphy


February 29, 2000

yet another former amazon customer...

Greg Brown


February 29, 2000

In solidarity with Richard Stallman, Tim Oreilly, and all others resisting Amazon.com's (Jeff Bezos) attempted abuse of what has become of an archiac perspective in regards to Intellectual Property. Amazon.com and Mr. Bezos, you and your co-conspiritors have produced, in your response to "the letter", a clearly shortsighted and arrogant approach that has resulted in a collective signiture on the death certificate of the model in question... RIP

radicalis - the roots of change


February 29, 2000

Michael Rozhavsky


February 29, 2000

The one-click patent is an abuse of the patent law and an insult to serious technology innovation. It is also a threat to all new entrants in the technology marketplace who do not have the legal resources to combat your racket. This move reveals that Amazon.com intends to employ the same quasi-legal mafia-style marketing techniques used by Microsoft to crush competitors. Consequently I will continue to use Amazon for identifying books but I'll take pleasure in purchasing them elsewhere. May all your stock be shorted...

Alec Permison


February 29, 2000

Ulrik Haugen


February 29, 2000

Hey Jeff: do you really like the idea that your cool new-economy powerhouse is acting like... Unisys? Your 1-Click patent isn't just questionable, it's absurd and will undoubtedly fail the first time it is challenged. It's a waste of everyone's time and effort, including your own. Until Amazon ceases to pursue frivolous patents I will shop elsewhere.

Neil Kandalgaonkar


February 29, 2000

Dick Middleton


February 29, 2000

Raymond Smith


February 29, 2000

Bye bye Amazon

Jack Huang


February 29, 2000

I fully agree to this letter!

Jan Rune Hogstad


February 29, 2000

I'd laugh at the whole thing if it wasn't so sad.

Garrett Coakley


February 29, 2000

Patenting old news and trivialities must stop.

Jan Roger Wilkens


February 29, 2000

Incredible how someone can be allowed to patent something so apperent /Tobias

Tobias Adamson


February 29, 2000

Jason Casey


February 29, 2000

Kim Mason


February 29, 2000

Keep the web open! Big thanks to im O'Reilly for expressing an opinion shared by many in such thoughtful words.

Tomas Perez


February 29, 2000

Thanks for hosting an area where we can be heard. Hopefully It will make a difference. Jeff: Stop This nonsense!!!

John Michael Keller


February 29, 2000

I urge amazon.com to reconsider the patenting of technologies that they by no means invented, that will only hurt small web based companies.

William Bunyan


February 29, 2000

Quit acting like a POS. Until you amend your ways I will personally ensure all my friends and family as well as anyone who will listen will not shop at your site.

Martin Jackson


February 29, 2000

Upon learning of Amazon's software patent activity, I ceased buying from them. Moreover, I am actively urging to not shop at Amazon, but to instead patronize one of Amazon's competitors.

Kevin Buettner


February 29, 2000

Colman Reilly, ex-Amazon Customer


February 29, 2000

I was a regular customer at amazon.com until these recent patent foul ups. Now I refuse to purchase there anymore. There are other online resellers and you are NOT as indespensable as you think.

Samuel Hazel


February 29, 2000

I heartily support Tim's views as expressed above. My on-line book orders are now going through BOL and Waterstones, and will remain that way until Amazon clean up their act with regard to software patents.

Tim Franklin


February 29, 2000

One more attempt at patent abuse = one fewer customer. I have today cancelled my currently outstanding order with amazon.co.uk, and will now buy exclusively from your competitors. Please reconsider.

Sean McGeever


February 29, 2000

Very much agreed.

Michael Goren


February 29, 2000

It seems sad that the company which created the concept of e-commerce as the vast bulk of the population know it, may also be the company to ultimately bring about the end of the same. You can't steal a basic technology and not expect to be noticed.

Fintan Ryan


February 29, 2000

Despite having made numerous purchases from Amazon and recommended it to both friends and family, I feel that I can no longer support such a company so long as they continue to use software patents in such a stifling and counter-productive manner.

Paul Holden


February 29, 2000

Today amazon lost another customer to BOL. Where does this patent thing end? Will yahoo patent the idea of a search spider? Why don't Amazon go all the way and patent the idea of a book E-Commerce store. That way they can kill ALL the competion in one go!

David Maddison


February 29, 2000

Tim brought up every point that could be made about your attempts exploit the ignorance of the US Patent Office, so I won't add to it. I'd just like to reiterate that the potential gains from these trivial patents are far outweighed by all the potential problems.

Rene Fromhold-Treu


February 29, 2000

Amazon - It's not too late to do the Right Thing and back off from these destructive patents.

Tony Mountifield


February 29, 2000

I felt that the original patent on 1-click shopping was a poor idea but this new patent on the affiliate program is adding insult to unjury. I have already stopped using Amazon for purchases and will now cancel my outstanding orders with them. I will also try persuading several of friends who run affiliate links on their websites to stop doing so. I would point out to Mr Bezos that he may "patent" himself out of business, just as fast as he innovated himself into it.

Alan Ward


February 29, 2000

first the 1-click, now the affiliates. result: I'm removing my wish list, and will be shopping somewhere else.

Morten Wang


February 29, 2000

Everyone that attached their names to this letter are doing so because they have a problem with your theft from the public domain. Do you need a slide rule to piece his together? AT THIS POINT YOU'RE YOUR OWN WORST ENEMY!!

Jann Rinken


February 29, 2000

amen, tim! i have switched ALL of my business to fatbrain, barnes, etc. i am not opposed to legitimate software patents however affiliate programs, reverse auctions, etc. are ridiculous and could really threaten the future of ecommerce.

mike wheeler


February 29, 2000

Amazon was the site which first truly showed how the web could make commerce easier and better - a simple, brilliant service. It makes me particularly sad that they are also one of the first to show how commerce may soon make the web another corporate "wasteground", where little guys are kept out of the market with "lawyer power", and anyone who disseminates information freely is stamped on. It's a short step from your patent lawsuit against a competitor to suing the W3C for publishing the cookie specs that 1-Click(TM :-) is based on. The intelligent people who are building the rest of the web around you - and who built many of the platforms on which your company depends - read a lot of books. Whilst you may have your sights set on selling trashy romances to every housewife in middle America, I believe that you can't afford to lose our support and our custom. I used to love Amazon - its a great, quick way to pick up the books I need, and I'm currently getting through 1 or 2 large, expensive technical tomes a week. I won't be spending any of that money with Amazon until they start playing fair, however. How many other customers are you losing?

Simon Batistoni


February 29, 2000

Amazon was the site which first truly showed how the web could make commerce easier and better - a simple, brilliant service. It makes me particularly sad that they are also one of the first to show how commerce may soon make the web another corporate "wasteground", where little guys are kept out of the market with "lawyer power", and anyone who disseminates information freely is stamped on. It's a short step from your patent lawsuit against a competitor to suing the W3C for publishing the cookie specs that 1-Click(TM :-) is based on. The intelligent people who are building the rest of the web around you - and who built many of the platforms on which your company depends - read a lot of books. Whilst you may have your sights set on selling trashy romances to every housewife in middle America, I believe that you can't afford to lose our support and our custom. I used to love Amazon - its a great, quick way to pick up the books I need, and I'm currently getting through 1 or 2 large, expensive technical tomes a week. I won't be spending any of that money with Amazon until they start playing fair, however. How many other customers are you losing?

Simon Batistoni


February 29, 2000

Boniface Young


February 29, 2000

Boudewijn Jong


February 29, 2000

Exactly !

Neil Marshall


February 29, 2000

Michael Sullivan


February 29, 2000

Bj÷rn Stenberg


February 29, 2000

joshua corning


February 29, 2000

Amazon has lost my business for as long as they continue with this futile, obstructionist ploy. That's quite a shame, as they do offer a convenient, useful service - but I for one am quite willing to go out of my way to give my business to a more responsible corporate Internet citizen.

Zac Stevens


February 29, 2000

Runo F°rrisdahl


February 29, 2000

I have already stopped buying from Amazon and exchanged e-mail with your company explaining why I have stopped ordering from you. From the time I stopped (in December) I have redirected more than 񘋰 of purchases that would have been made through you to other suppliers. I also convinced two friends holding your stock to sell it, not because of any potential profit or loss but because your actions were not ethical. If your company does not relent in its support of needless and wasteful patent-and-litigate tactics, your stock will have about as much appeal as that of a tobacco company -- perhaps profitable for a while but risky when a lawsuit finally goes against you. Now I shall start making sure my other investments do not hold your stock and start letting your associates know that if they carry product besides a link to you that I will be dropping them from any purchase considerations (after giving them a month to drop you.)

R. A. Burt


February 29, 2000

Neal Sidhwaney


February 29, 2000

Michael Bruun Petersen


February 29, 2000

Henrik Larsson


February 29, 2000

bookpool.com & fatbrain.com z.

Tinusz Nijmeijers


February 29, 2000

Good to see such involvment from O'Reilly.

Sven-Arne Reinemo


February 29, 2000

Boudewijn Jong


February 29, 2000

The only company that I had ever used to order books from was Amazon, until today.

Andy Tomlinson


February 29, 2000

Until this is resolved, I'll be buying my O'Reilly books from somewhere else. Neil Ford.

Neil Ford


February 29, 2000

Shame upon Amazon.com. I'll be going to FatBrain in future or, better still, my local bookstore.

Pete Cassidy


February 29, 2000

Greed will finally kill everything in sight. Let's hope we can kill greed before that happens.

Mathias Creutz


February 29, 2000

I am not going to order one more item from Amazon until they withdraw this ill-considered patent application. Simple as that.

Toby Poynder


February 29, 2000

I'm going to buy my books from Blackwell's or BOL in future; in the last year I must have spent over ú100 at Amazon. Count yourselves one customer down....

Robin Stephenson


February 29, 2000

I'll not buy from Amazon until they will change their attitude on the "one click" patent and I'll diffuse these information to all my friend

michele michelotto


February 29, 2000

I have been a loyal Amazon customer for as long as the company has existed... However, patenting something that isn't patentable is somewhat ridiculous... Time to shop elsewhere...

david r. perry


February 29, 2000

I used to do all my onlne book shopping with amazon.com and amazon.de - and lots of it. But this patent thing is just ridiculous and has just cost amazon another customer - there ARE other places to buy books online.

Joerg Michael


February 29, 2000

Jeff, This is my real email address, unSPAMprotected, to show you how serious I (and we) are about you rescinding your 2 most recent patent claims. I will spend no more money with your company until you do. Yours, MCT

Matthew C. Thompson


February 29, 2000

A clear abuse of the Patent process, and a mockery of our freedoms as Americans. As I did with Circuit City and Divx, Amazon no longer has my business (or all those I influence) until this abuse stops. End of story.

Jason Hurdlow


February 29, 2000

Since 1997, I have had the following statement on my personal homepage "Web Technology has a great future. A lot of what will be considered normal in the following five to ten years is already possible in experimental form. For these experimental systems to reach their full potential, a number of important choices have to be made. I like to make those choices." With patents like this to be granted, I am starting to fear the future...

Kees Leune


February 29, 2000

I agree entirely with this open letter, and Tim's earlier letter of January 5th. This strategy of patenting obvious inventions and aggressively pursuing them against competitors is offensive and counter productive. I too have ceased my custom with Amazon from the day that the news of their 1st-Click patent broke. Having always appreciated Amazon's service, I hope that pressure of public opinion will convince them to abandon these patents, so that I can consider returning as a customer.

Martijn Koster


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, although you seem to believe that your patent application for One-Click ordering is a valid one, I think that the examples Mr. O'Reilly quoted are themselves enough evidence to prove prior art. I know I have build a system similar to yours in 1996. I am also sure the affiliate program has enough prior examples (not necessarily in the internet sector). Enforcing these to patents is a blow in the face of people who have always been willing to share their developments with others out of good will.

Maarten Boekhold


February 29, 2000

Thank goodness you didn't figure this whole internet thing out in 1994, if you had you would killed the web before it had a chance. I would much rather buy my books from a brick and mortar store, or barnesandnoble.com than to purchase anything from you. Doug

Doug Mandell


February 29, 2000

Amazon offer great service. I've used you to locate two out of print books that I could never have found any other way. Pity I can't do that again until you drop this dumb patent.

Paul Johnson


February 29, 2000

The behaviour of Amazon may appear to be smart in the short term, however like much of their behaviour it is so very short sighted. The book trade is changing, but not so fast that it will accept such antagonistic behaviour by one of its own. Beth Jenkins Blackwell Retail Ltd

Beth Jenkins


February 29, 2000

In my eyes, Tim's letter was very polite. I think that Amazon has received and will receive statements which are much less nice in the wording than this -- and justifiably so. Amazon prospered and still prospers from freely available technology and now tries to keep others from using techniques or methods which are trivial at best. To blame only the U.S. patent office for this is too easy -- not doing all I may do legally is what distinguished me from an asshole. That's called ethics.

Nils Philippsen


February 29, 2000

Gregory Rae


February 29, 2000

Joshua Bluestein


February 29, 2000

Diederik Willem van Liere


February 29, 2000

Yes, I protest.

Ivan Szanto


February 29, 2000

Mike Hale


February 29, 2000

Cees de Groot


February 29, 2000

I wholeheartedly agree with this letter. My firm, Ewing Data Incorporated, no longer uses Amazon for any book purchases due to their behavior in this matter. We are encouraging our colleagues and customers to do likewise.

James Ewing


February 29, 2000

Ditto, ditto. Boycott baby.

Kevin Johnson


February 29, 2000

Thomas Mailund


February 29, 2000

I think it is a shame if companies, instead of competing on equal grounds, start to abuse the patent system in order to prohibit their competition to do business. These Amazon patents are not about complicated innovations that needed years of research, they are about business ideas. Why should a company have the right to be the only one being allowed to do a particular business? This is in direct contradiction to the idea of a free market, where at any time a competitor may appear that can do the same thing better.

Claus O. Wilke


February 29, 2000

Now looking for somewhere else to do my shopping....

Lars Fastrup


February 29, 2000

I use to love Amazon, but now - no more shopping there!

Mikkel Rasmussen


February 29, 2000

This letter is right on target, and I completely agree.

Ùrjan Reinholdsen


February 29, 2000

I use to love Amazon, but now - no more shopping there!

Mikkel Rasmussen


February 29, 2000

Raj Dutt


February 29, 2000

Amazon is a good company...these tactics are not necessary.

Doug Lane


February 29, 2000

In the past I have purchased books from and recommended others to use Amazon.com. Not any more.

Barry Wilkes


February 29, 2000

I've been boycotting Amazon and shopping at Barnes and Noble instead. Cease and desist, Amazon, or you'll never get my business again.

Wilson Yeung


February 29, 2000

Amazon's patent is ludicrous, indefensible, and should frighten shareholders: if they're depending on this weak ploy to help business, they're in a sorry state, indeed.

Ben Trafford


February 29, 2000

I used to order about 贄 worth of CDs per month from amazon. Until this absurd practice is stopped, cdnow.com will be getting this money. I prefer amazon as the prices and selection are better, but...

David Slorah


February 29, 2000

Amazon's prices are not all that interesting when you have the books shipped to France (even from the UK or Germany). I did however buy a book (about LaTeX) from Amazon. I try to support Internet-based shopping, voting, etc. whenever I can. I'll continue to do so, but not with Amazon.

Eric W Broneer


February 29, 2000

On behalf of my company, I've made purchases of more than USD 񘯬 from amazon.com last year. I will *not* spend a penny on amazon.com until they once again become the great internet company delivering the best customer service that they once were. Instead I'll spend my company money at an amazon.com competitor site. = tmk =

Tattoo Mabonzo K.


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, As a long time Amazon.com customer and supporter, I was highly dismayed to witness your recent patent actions. Your "one click" patent demonstrates a trivial application of HTTP cookies. To use this patent offensively is nothing less than an attack on the Internet infrastructure itself. Since December '99 I have been buying all my books from Fatbrain and I plan to continue the boycott until you apologise to the Internet community for this mistake.

Gordon Lyon


February 29, 2000

While I seldom perchase any books from Amazon on a personal basis, over the past couple years I've built up quite a library that I've made work order for me. Lots of O'Reilly books, lots of other stuff. Either way, that won't be happening anymore until such time as you give up wasting effort on the stupid legal games, Mr. Bezos, and get back to spending your time and money on improving service for us, your former customers. While I realize the loss of me personally won't affect you much, be advised that I am a very noisy and influential person. As such, I've convinced the president of the firm I work for to issue a memo to all 400+ employees stating that we will no longer be doing business with Amazon for any work related perpose, and encouraging them not to do business with you on a personal level outside work. To this end, I've reconfigured the corporate web proxy to transfer any web requests from any employees who may have "forgotten" about our new policy on Amazon ove! r to Barnes & Noble. Figure B&N could use the profits to help pay the unnecessary legal charges you're inducing!

Nathan D. Holmes


February 29, 2000

I was a loyal customer and have always highly recommended Amazon.com to my family and friends who have in turn done the same with others. The grassroots word of mouth buzzs is what helped propel Amazon to the top of the class. Why sabotage the good will with fear tactics and ill will. You have lost a good customer and the same word of mouth (and mass emailing) that I once did to support Amazon, I now turn towards encouraging family and friends etc to not buy from Amazon as long as the threat of patent action against others is retracted. You had a life, get it back!

Michael Graves


February 29, 2000

+


February 29, 2000

It's very sad when companies that are regarded as prime examples of the new Internet culture turn bad. Amazon, it's not too late! Your success is not relying on stupid patents, it's based on customer admiration, so please turn around quickly! Allow your customers to be proud of the place they shop!

Thomas Widmann


February 29, 2000

Amazon used to have my respect and my business. It now has neither. The web is the architypal success story of the open source community. To take that freely given corpus of code and knowledge and attempt to make it proprietory via some pathetic variation on an obvious theme is revolting and disrespectful to the many people who made the net a reality. These patents are wrong, insulting and bordering on theft.

Peter Ashford


February 29, 2000

Barbara Novak


February 29, 2000

I bought books for 663,38 DM (ca. 跩) during the last year at amazon.de. I appreciate the excellent usability of your website, it's far better than that of the other shops. I'm the coauthor of the book "Linux Kernel Internals" which has the sales rank 33.120 on www.amazon.com. I agree with Tim O'Reilly. Amazon-like patents will destroy the value of the Internet and create some kind of a Mononet, ruled by evil empires, that divide the world in the big and the poor.

Ulrich Kunitz


February 29, 2000

Augusto Roman


February 29, 2000

Dave Sieber


February 29, 2000

Forrest L Andrews


February 29, 2000

David McLean


February 29, 2000

Jon Harford


February 29, 2000

Marcus Adair


February 29, 2000

Eric Sharkey


February 29, 2000

Adam A. Smith


February 29, 2000

Alistair J Gunn


February 29, 2000

o'reilly -> fair move. amazon -> bad move.

benjamin deboute


February 29, 2000

Yet another ex-customer. Congratulations, Amazon.

Alan M. Evans


February 29, 2000

Please show your customers respect!

Hrafnkell Eiriksson


February 29, 2000

I'll gladly click more than once to order if it means not funding your patent lawyers.

Andrew M. Harms


February 29, 2000

The ill will that Amazon will instantly generate by this patent will far outway whatever monetary gain they gain. Shame on Amazaon.

Douglass Turner


February 29, 2000

Amazon has become greedy with it's "success". I hope they will join the community and be a partner and give back and not just take, take, take.

Clayton Hicks


February 29, 2000

CMW


February 29, 2000

I strongly oppose what Amazon is doing with their 1-click and associates patents. I will be taking my business elsewhere until they change their policies.

Robert Tsuk


February 29, 2000

Amazon's abuse of the patent system and the goodwill of the internet community repulses me. I have ordered goods from Amazon in the past, but I now use competitors and urge anyone I can influence to do likewise.

Paul Ashton


February 29, 2000

I have also mailed the Amazon helpdesk, informing them that I just canceled all in-progress orders, and that I would not be ordering from them again until they straightened this nasty business out.

Shaun Flisakowski


February 29, 2000

Tim is completely correct here. This is a ludicrous patent. Absolutely unbelieveable, this sort of nonsense will do great harm. And it is a particular bitter pill that amazon which became the model to which you could point to to show the success of online selling has become the model to point to as to how unscrupulous business destroys itself in an ill advised attempt to protect itself from fair competition.

Caolan McNamara


February 29, 2000

Even though I am (still) a big customer of Amazon (books/dvds, and toys for my nephews!) I resent this hijacking of a software technology. I do, however, believe that the main thrust of the campaign should be aimed at the US Patent office for allowing such a ridiculous patent to be filed in the first place, and secondly, for continuing to allow new stupid patents and thirdly for continuing to support existing stupid patents.

Yousef Syed


February 29, 2000

Arno Peters


February 29, 2000

hi

Fred Cheng


February 29, 2000

I think that without sharing, the Web would not be what we know it to be today. Enbracing a strategy such as patenting technology so trivial, and obvious is a move that has forced me to take my buisness elsewhere until Amazon.com decides to stop this silly pursuit. I urge other people to do the same.

David Britton


February 29, 2000

I'm both a very satisfied Amazon.com and Amazon.de customer, and a professional developer of software systems. Through the actions of Amazon.com on patent issues, I feel obliged to refrain from doing business with Amazon.com in the future, and from recommending Amazon.com to clients and friends, until Amazon.com changes it's stance towards patents issues.

Pierre Mai


February 29, 2000

Jussi Sarkkinen


February 29, 2000

Tom Baehr-Jones


February 29, 2000

Ben Byer


February 29, 2000

Martin Larsson


February 29, 2000

Dines Justesen


February 29, 2000

Shai Spharim


February 29, 2000

Dagfinn Stenberg


February 29, 2000

Andy Ball


February 29, 2000

Tim Massingham


February 29, 2000

No Web Patents!

Peter Wilhelmsen


February 29, 2000

What Vince Stratful said ;)

James Morgan


February 29, 2000

Wouter Hermans


February 29, 2000

"Pissing in the well" - what a wonderful summary of the situation, Tim :-)

Gervase Markham


February 29, 2000

The patent office needs more scrutiny of software patents!

Gareth McAleese


February 29, 2000

Bradley S. Ridnour


February 29, 2000

Sheesh, if I can code it, how can it possibly be patentable?! This is absurd. Amazon, shame on you.

Tim Murphy


February 29, 2000

The very idea of patenting this kind of system is blatantly monopolistic.

Justin Wilkins


February 29, 2000

What a picture: "In short, I think you're pissing in the well." That says it all... thanks, tim

Joe Rady


February 29, 2000

My opinion is that you should apologize to the community at large and admit that there is nothing new or non-obvious in this concept. Short of that, I see little reason to do business with you.

Gerard Pierce


February 29, 2000

For a company that makes such thorough use of the internet, you display so little understanding of it. Your patent is ridiculous! Do yourselves a favor and retract.

carlos cogen


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim O'Reilly on this one. If everyone was to patent all new ideas and technologies even though it is considered common-knowledge we wouldn't have gotten as far as we are today. /David

David Hjorts°


February 29, 2000

New technologies and algorithms that took years of development: fine. Simple five-lines-of-code ideas already implemented thousands of times: not acceptable. Clean up your act, Amazon.

Roger Nesbitt


February 29, 2000

I can't believe that someone would try do something this stupid! Why? What does Amazon hope to gain? All that I can see this producing is a large profit for the lawyers involved. It makes me wonder what moron came up with this stupid idea.

Chris Babcock


February 29, 2000

Yes, all these patents be damned. Wether it's Unisys with their patent on a data compression _algorithm_ or Amazon.com with their patents on 1_click and such (if you look for 'amazon.com' on IBM's patent site, you get about 10 answers), they're all doomed. Sincerely Amaury

Amaury JACQUOT


February 29, 2000

I have spent next to nothing buying books from Amazon, thanks to fatbrain. My employer however, has spent thousands of dollars buying books from the company that seems intent on abusing the patent system for all it's worth. I will now ensure these dollars move elsewhere.

varun sharma


February 29, 2000

Great service. Great prices. Completely FUBAR attitude to the rest of the netizens. Until this ridiculous patent enforcing stops and is assured not to be repeated again, I will take my shopping elsewhere. I'd much rather pay a little bit extra and support a "fair player", than support Amazon when doing things like this.

Johan Mattsson


February 29, 2000

Jeff, try and remember the one big tenet of retail, THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT. It's quite clear that the majority of your customers that have any idea what this is all about are totally against this patent. We're not in the playground anymore, no-one will laugh at you for backing down on this. Just put your hand up, say "I was wrong" and we'll all forget this happened.

Scott Keegan


February 29, 2000

I've recieved a few books through your service in the past, and was not disapointed with the speed and ease of your service. But you aren't the only bookstore in town and I (and many of my friends) believe in voting with our money, if you continue applying for and enforcing these absurd patents I will continue buying books at barns & noble and my neighborhood bookstores.

woodruff burley


February 29, 2000

A waste of time and money on a patent that will be rejected. r.b.

Richard Bottoms


February 29, 2000

I suggest in your letters to Amazon.com that you make explicit that if it takes a court ruling to overturn the patents, you will never be able to purchase from Amazon in good conscience again. The ONLY out for them should be to drop the issue of their own free will. Right now I bet they think that, whether the patents are upheld or not, any loss is short-term--maybe a year. Make them realize it's an extremely long-term issue.

michael jones


February 29, 2000

And I have recommended Amazon.com to others! You are a bunch of leeches getting fat on the labour of others. I am done spending my money at your site and I will encourage all I know to do the same.

Karsten Poulsen


February 29, 2000

While much blame for the batch of ludicrous patents we have been seeing can be placed on the shoulders of the USPTO, the old saying 'two wrongs don't make a right' holds true. While I understand that, had Amazon not patented the things they have, other competitors could have gone out and done so, the fact remains that Amazon has PURSUED other's uses of their patents in court. Were this not the case, I could easily blame the USPTO entirely. But this not being so, Amazon must hold a large amount of responsibility.

James L. Morton


February 29, 2000

If somebody from Amazon is reading/checking this, they can find I have bought a good number of books from them before... till now. I dont pretend to EVER buy from Amazon again until they stop playing this kind of stupid, greedy moves on us. I have to agree with Stallman, the only way to hit Amazon as hard as they are hitting us is to boycott them. So they will get no more money for me until they backoff and clearly say they will never do this kind of thing again (fat chance, now, with the associates program fiasco) and I urge all of you to do the same

Jesus Couto F.


February 29, 2000

I do not believe in software patents and agree that, in any case, there is copious prior art on this issue. I have, in the past, been a customer of Amazon and would buy additional items through your site except for this issue. I have spoken to many friends and co-workers, explained this issue to them clearly and encouraged them not to patronize your site. I pointed them in the direction of some alternatives. As you know, word-of-mouth is the most effective advertising. Should you void these patents and once again become a member in good standing of the Internet community, I would consider purchasing from you in the future and let my friends and co-workers know that you did The Right Thing (tm).

Russell Rowen


February 29, 2000

For me this is the straw that broke the camel's back - if we don't draw a line in the sand soon these ridiculous patents of intellectual concepts and prior art will do more to stifle innovation than Microsoft ever dreamed of. Until Amazon ceases this sort of behavior I too will take my network shopping bag somewhere else, and will advise my friends to do likewise. Amazon.com's stock value (and Jeff Bezo's selection as man of the year) is based solely on the hope of the current stockholders that someone else will pay more for their stock than they did. How else could a company that's bleeding money at the rate of 跌M a year be judged a success? The only thing that will change the minds of the people at Amazon who are trying to offensively enforce these patents is the perception that it will adversely affect their stock price. And the best way to do that is to let them know that it will lead to a decrease in revenue in the next quarter. Arguing that it's "the right thing to do" will have no affect. If that meant any thing to them they never would have started along this course in the first place.

Ken Jancaitis


February 29, 2000

Harvey Bowen


February 29, 2000

Dan Ports


February 29, 2000

Daniel Heinonen


February 29, 2000

David Nusinow


February 29, 2000

Austin Godber


February 29, 2000

I have also joined the boycott of amazon.com, and have encouraged friends and co-workers to do the same. The patents on one-click shopping and affiliate programs are just another example of a deceptive player in the Internet industry exploiting the technical ignorance of the Patent Office for short-term gain. In the meantime, it is the industry itself that suffers. I choose not to do business with a deceptive, exploitative company.

Charles Miller


February 29, 2000

Eric Heien


February 29, 2000

Jing Su


February 29, 2000

I think I'll have the time to click more than once at www.bol.de :)

Tobias Willhauck


February 29, 2000

I've bought from Amazon multiple times before (just do a search for Vidar Hokstad in your customer database - I'm the only person named Vidar Hokstad in the world), but I won't do so again if you don't give up your ridiculous patents. I'll be a Barnes and Noble customer from now on. I'm simply disgusted by your abuse of the patent system, and will make sure that my friends get to hear about it, and I will also suggest to the marketing people of the company I work for to stop using your associate program. Vidar Hokstad (a customer you just lost)

Vidar Hokstad


February 29, 2000

Seattle, Washington

Robert S. Mitchell


February 29, 2000

count one more vote against the 1-Click patent

Greg Matthews


February 29, 2000

I don't agree with patents

Vladimir Tßmara


February 29, 2000

Sorry Amazon, my company often purchased technical books from you, but now we will be using your competitors only. Give up these silly and unenforceable patent applications. You're losing goodwill at the fastest rate I've ever seen.

Jason Rhino


February 29, 2000

One more against Amazon's 1-Click patent...

Ryan Marsh


February 29, 2000

Lars Olof Norell


February 29, 2000

I've purchased material from Amazon in the past...needless to say I've since gone elsewhere.

Chris Friesen


February 29, 2000

Amazon's behaviour with regards to this issue has been nothing short of eye-opening. I won't be buying from them again.

Simon Cross


February 29, 2000

I am a big fan of the many features of the Amazon site. I will continue to use it to help me best decide which goods I should buy elsewhere.

Rob Hodges


February 29, 2000

As web-site creators we should have been customers of Amazon's technical books. Now, however, Amazon is positioning itself as an agressive competitor.

Pieter Nagel


February 29, 2000

Stuart Scott


February 29, 2000

I used to think Jeff understood. Apparently the money has helped to rot his brain. Sad. Looks like FatBrain (and others) will get my business.

Jeremy D. Zawodny


February 29, 2000

I agree entirely with Tim's letter and would like amazon to know that since I've started boycotting them I've baught for 400$ of books at fatbrain.com

David Bourget


February 29, 2000

I too, will not buy from Amazon anymore as 1-click ordering doesn't deserve a patent and Amazon are, as Tim O'Reilly put it, simple thiefs just glossing up a true invention.

Pawel Wiechowski


February 29, 2000

Software Patents are a bad thing.

Heath Albritton


February 29, 2000

I have recommended purchases by my firm of many hundreds of dollars at Amazon, both in the US and in Europe. Henceforth, when possible, I will direct my purchases elsewhere.

Luca Lizzeri


February 29, 2000

I am a big supporter of Amazon but a bigger supporter of a free and open internet environment. If there is no let up in the patent business strategy then I will take my purchassing power elsewhere.

Murray Littlejohn


February 29, 2000

It's amazing that such a great service should be acting like such total jerk-offs.

Jacek Surazski


February 29, 2000

As a customer of Amazon.com, a shareholder, and a 10 year veteran (is 10 years long enough) of the software industry (4 with Microsoft) I completely agree with the protest against Amazon's patent of a 'patently' obvious and existing technology.

Brian O'Grady


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com needs to learn to compete based on its merits, not with its lawyers. It's greedy abuse of the patent system is a threat to all e-commerce sites, and the Internet as a whole. I just withdrew my Home-Automation.org website from their affiliates program.

David Orr


February 29, 2000

I too have spent a tidy sum at Amazon.com over the past few years, and have had, until now, only good things to say about the company, but no longer. I believe there is a danger Amazon will eventually, with the US patent office's approbation, render "cookies" of little use to anyone but themselves, by continuing to patent trivial applications of their use.

James Bailie


February 29, 2000

I'm an Amazon.com customer, as are my wife and brother; we're all buying from your competition instead until you change your position. What's more, I'm an Amazon.com associate, and I'm withdrawing from the program until you reconsider. They say it takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. Will you be that man?

Scott Maxwell


February 29, 2000

As a firm believer in the opportunities afforded to entrepreneurs in the USA, it grieves me to see the patent system abused. Moreover, it is disappointing to see the ones who have benefited the most trying to shut the door behind themselves so that others may not enter. I too will take my business elsewhere.

Christian Price


February 29, 2000

I've recieved a few books through your service in the past, and was not disapointed with the speed and ease of your service. But you aren't the only bookstore in town and I (and many of my friends) believe in voting with our money, if you continue applying for and enforcing these absurd patents I will continue buying books at barns & noble and my neighborhood bookstores.

woodruff burley


February 29, 2000

O'Reilly have made more money from the Open Sores bigots and rabid morons on /. than anyone else. So its no big surprise to see the arch hypocrit Tim O-high-and-mighty-Reilly attack Amazon. When was the last time O'Reilly did something original. Tim's attack on Amazon is as typically hypicritical as the rest of the fucking morons chanting the Open Sores mantra

Anonymous


February 29, 2000

I've purchased a lot of books and CDs from Amazon.com since it was launched. I actually felt some loyalty to them because I'd always thought of them as pioneers of a new type of business. This loyalty factor was strong enough to keep me going back even though I knew of other online booksellers that had better prices for the same merchandise. But no more - this patent business disgusts me. I'm probably not going back no matter what happens from here on.

Chetan Rai


February 29, 2000

</i>I have spent and directed thousands of dollars towards Amazon.com since 1997. I am very disappointed in Amazon's behavior and abuse of what's left of the patent system. I encourage you to release the patents for trivialities to the public domain. I will be taking my business to <a href="http://www.fatbrain.com">FatBrain</a> and other competitors of yours in the future. Thanks, Tim, for providing such an eloquent voice to the issue.

Steve Watt


February 29, 2000

Since I've become aware of this issue, I have placed all of book orders with a competitor.

Thor Sigvaldason


February 29, 2000

Integrity is an important matter and something that shows through in a million forms, especially if you don't have it. You can bet Amazon would be howling like a banshee if Barnes & Noble managed to snooker the PTO with a similar unconscionable patent claim. If they'll act this way on patents why should we expect better of them in the book selling, credit card handling, or employee handling arenas where we are asked to trust in their good sense and consideration for what's good, right, and true?

Brian K. Yoder


February 29, 2000

I've spent far more than I can afford over the last two years at amazon.com and amazon.co.uk, but I will not be spending any more until this silly patent idea is dropped. Amazon: You're brilliant, and I'm going to miss you. PLEASE drop this action, and go back to beating the competition on your own merits. You can do it, easily. Your prices, service and attitude have been outstanding even to countries as far away as New Zealand, and we're really going to miss the convenience and cusstomer service that you have offered in the past.

Bernadette Mooney


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim (O'Reilly)that upholding the 1-click patent will be causing a wind of very ill will towards Amazon. Amazon is one of my examples which i used to point out that the web is a viable commerce platform. All the commotion around Amazon patent filing is getting in the way of this. People i speak to are only seeing the troubles around Amazon and not the company behind it. So now i use Amazon as an example how NOT to do bussines on the web. I'm not happy with that because i'd rather speak good about others. I hope you will turn back on your track and find the right road again. Make me speak good things about Amazon again...

Walther Ligtvoet


February 29, 2000

I am an internet "old timer." I have been using the internet at school and in my personal life for what is now half my life; and I have just recently gotten over my reservations about online commerce. Needless to say, I was disgusted by your company's attempt to patent such a simple, non-proprietary concept. Before I had heard of your patent, I had only purchased one item from your bookstore (An O'Reilly book, by coincidence.) Now, needless to say, I will refrain from purchasing anything from your company at least until you drop your attempt to appropriate this idea. I am a forgiving person by nature, so when you finally come to your senses and drop this pointless venture, I will likely have business with your company again. Until then, I implore you to look at what you are doing, and how it is affecting your customer base. While even bad press is some press; I have noticed in my time that politically-minded geeks are among the most strong willed individuals out there.

Ed Hurtley


February 29, 2000

Stephen Judd


February 29, 2000

R. Joe Cooper


February 29, 2000


February 29, 2000

Gert Steenssens


February 29, 2000

Steven L Fines


February 29, 2000

I endorse the open letter.

Tom Backer Johnsen


February 29, 2000

It is unfortunate that an innovative company such as Amazon.com has to resort to such obvious and distasteful business practices. I stopped giving you my business when you patented the 1-click purchase idea. I encourage others who have not already done so, to do the same.

Craig Kohtz


February 29, 2000

George Baptista


February 29, 2000

I was trying to think of something funny and witty to say. Then I realised, I don't need to. I'm a valid and funny person anyway. Witty comment or no witty comment. I think I reached a higher plane of existance tonight, thank you, Amazon.com, for driving me to this higher level of existance. Now, could you too, rise yourself above what the PHB's (Pointy Haired Bosses) and marketing-type-people tell you and reach my level of existance? Rise above the moronic and highly stupid patents on implementations of cookies! Become enlightened! Oh ... And ... Pull the stick out of your butts and look at the big picture, the picture you're attempting to strangle ...

Vince Stratful


February 29, 2000

NC, USA

B. Kelly


February 29, 2000

Amazon's attempt to create artificial barriers to e-commerce is detestable. I had a book order in transit when I first read about it -- when the books arrived, I promptly sent them back. Mr. O'Reilly's position on this issue is a perfect summation of the facts. While I admire Amazon's *true* innovations (one-click is not one of them), I cannot and will not buy from a company that abuses the patent system and stifles innovation.

Art Cancro


February 29, 2000

After the RMS announcement I've stopped buying from amazon. This equates out to ~250/mo in books/cds.

Mike Skoog


February 29, 2000

Darlene Wallach


February 29, 2000

Joona Koponen


February 29, 2000

Magne Alvheim


February 29, 2000

It is disturbing to see that the "Man of the Year", and his company, are doing their best to stifle innovation and creativity. If this patent nonsense continues as Amazon would have it, internet development will slow to a crawl. Mr. Bezos, please walk down the hall, talk to your developers, and listen to what they have to say. As members of the IT community, I'm sure they would agree that agressively "defending" this patent is not in Amazon's (or the world's) long-term interest.

Kevin Miller


February 29, 2000

IP protection is an inherent part of a healthy free economy, but spuriously patenting mere implementations of currently existing technology is harmful to that goal in that it dilutes the value of the system. Such patents are a short term goal with an eventual destructive end.

Christopher Hallaxs


February 29, 2000

Jess Have


February 29, 2000

I was thinking of getting a cd from Amazon.com. That is untill Hank the Angry Drunken Dwarf told me that they went and patented 1-Click buying. "How LameÖ", I thought

DLS


February 29, 2000

Tov Are Jacobsen


February 29, 2000

Anthony Botrel


February 29, 2000

Jon Gilkison


February 29, 2000

Martin Hepworth


February 29, 2000

It is unfortunate that an innovative company such as Amazon.com has to resort to such obvious and distasteful business practices. I stopped giving you my business when you patented the 1-click purchase idea. I encourage others who have not already done so, to do the same.

Craig Kohtz


February 29, 2000

The use of these patents will create acid rain in the Amazon basin...

Richard Mazzaferri


February 29, 2000

It's rather disappointing that Amazon chose to resort to these methods.

Lyle Tagawa


February 29, 2000

agreed

ryan schmidt


February 29, 2000

There are better ways of making money than patenting and inforcing blatantly simple processes.

Matt Greenfield


February 29, 2000

This is a great opportunity you are providing to voice our protest over ridiculous patents.

Roberto Pavan


February 29, 2000

This petty attempt at a not so petty theft cannot succeed and can only serve to damage Amazon.coms relations with its customers.

Mike Rose


February 29, 2000

Lawrence Green


February 29, 2000

As a programmer and former Amazon client I feel that their 'patent strategy' is unethical and damaging to me. As a result I won't buy any more goods from Amazon until they abandon this line of conduct.

Ottone Maurizio Grasso


February 29, 2000

I've been boycotting Amazon.com since I heard about this. I have ordered, on three seperate occassions, from an online competitor and will continue to do so; even if I do have to type in my billing and address information each time.

John Ford


February 29, 2000

I have purchased hundreds of dollars worth of books and CDs from Amazon. Even though I value the service provided by Amazon, I will instead opt to purchase from its competitors if 1-click and affiliates patents are not licensed in the public domain

Jonathan Graehl


February 29, 2000

Andreas Mattern, Karlsruhe, Germany


February 29, 2000

I have bought alot of stuff from Amazon but I will reconsider any burchase from now on.. You are loosing a customer here Jeff. Peter J÷nsson

M


February 29, 2000

A good reason to look for alternatives

Peter Hopfgartner


February 29, 2000

Jonathan Moore


February 29, 2000

Until the recent issues with your patent claims came up, I didn't even consider going to your competition - frankly, it wasn't worth the time and energy, not to mention the risk of doing business with an unknown, just to save a few dollars. Congratulations, you've found the only way I can think of to drive me away as a customer without resorting to gross incompetence. In the last 8 months, I've spend over 躀 at amazon.com (I checked). I hope you will reconsider your stance on this issue before my next major book purchase. Once I've taken the time to research and go with another vendor, I'm unlikely to go back. You may not miss my money, but when you multiply it by all of the other business you stand to lose, I suspect it adds up...

Tom Bortels


February 29, 2000

Makes me very discouraged from doing anything for free for the Web, when billionaires feel *they* aren't rich enough to be ethical. Boycott doesn't make people ethical. It makes greedy people behave better for practical reasons. But that's still something.

Alexander Chilsenko


February 29, 2000

I was dismayed to learn from http://cnnfn.com/1999/10/22/bizbuzz/amazon/ and http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/10/22/0959240 that you are suing barnsandnoble.com for the violation of your frivolous 1-click patent. I have used your service on several occasions in the past and found it relatively convenient, but not particularily cost effective. Now you are attacking a competitor which does a better job, in my experience, of sourcing hard to find books. On what charge? A violation of a patent which takes the idea of calling up a store where I am known, asking them to send me an order and bill my account, and translates that idea into an internet context. The engineering side of the picture is no doubt of high quality, but was never worthy of a patent. Granted it was the USPTO which granted this valueless patent, and I understand it's value for defensive purposes, but to take this patent and use it for attack purposes subverts the intention of patents in a system of free enterprise, particularly with respect to the open architecture of the Internet. I find myself with no choice than to stop using your service unless and until you withdraw this lawsuit. I may not come back even if you do stop the lawsuit. As you may have noticed, your competitors are actually _competing_ instead of trying to bully themselves into a dominant position with underhanded tactics.

Michael Cope


February 29, 2000

I have purchased numerous books and other items from amazon.com in the last year or so. I was a loyal customer to amazon because they provided a convienient way of shopping and a reliable service at very competitive prices. In the last month alone I have purchased several hundred dollars worth of books from amazon's competitors due to my disgust with this patent on 1-click "technology." Amazon, I request that you stop abusing a faulty patent system and embrace the community that made you what you are today. If you do that, you will regain my loyalty as a customer. -Matt Elder

Matthew M Elder


February 29, 2000

I have been a strong supporter of Amazon (through lots of purchases), but believe very strongly that their 1-click patent was wrongly granted. By enforcing it they are just compounding their error. The only way I can show my displeasure that will actually affect Amazon is to stop buying from them. So, I have done this. I am finding many other excelletn providers of the services that Amazon offers. They may not bundle it all up in one nice site, but they are out there. I hope, for Amazon's sake, that they give this patent to the public before they lose too many customers to competition.

Scott Hinckley


February 29, 2000

Just wanted to let you know that I will cease my habit of buying 贄+/month from Amazon, and will attempt to dissuade my friends from doing so as well until you demonstrate an interest in the furtherance of the community which has made your entire business model possible. Where would you be without Apache, Perl, Bind, HTTP, and HTML?

Michael Granger


February 29, 2000

I also in the past have spent quite a bit of money at Amazon, but not a dime since I heard of their patent policy. I have instead spent several hundreds of dollars at other stores, and will continue to do so as long as Amazon continues these policies. Pity that when I expressed my concerns to Amazon all I got back was an auto-reply.

Jeremy Blosser


February 29, 2000

I used to support Amazon because they were the underdogs, and were doing something completely revolutionary, and upending the monopoly of horrific bookstores like B&N etc. Now they're just another corporate bully, they have become what they conquered. I think it's really sad, and I'm personally going to be doing all my book buying from www.powells.com instead..

Bryan Burns


February 29, 2000

I feel sorry for Amazon, I'm sure that there are lawyers right now sharpening their class action knifes.

Bill Pickett


February 29, 2000

You've lost another customer......

Benjamin MacIntyre


February 29, 2000

I spent well over 񘈨 at amazon.com last year but I refuse to spend another dime until they rethink their patent strategy.

John F. Dumas


February 29, 2000

Damn near every CD and book I've bought in the past couple of years has been ordered from Amazon.com. Not after today. I just opened accounts with fatbrain.com and Barnes and Noble. Amazon has lost my business.

Bill Beal


February 29, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos: A great man once said that if he saw further than other men, it was because he stood on the shoulders of giants. Sounds to me like you just want to stand there to block the view of the folks behind you. I sincerely hope you see that you are doing the wrong thing. If you don't know why it's wrong, please reread RMS's and Tim O'Rielly's letters on the subject. BTW, you wouldn't happen to have the URL of a mirror for the DeCSS, would you? Thanks for your attention in this matter, and I look forward to the news that you've come to your senses. Too bad I won't read about it, or anything else, on amazon.com.

Jim Sullivan


February 29, 2000

Being a web developer myself, I find your "One Click" patent to be one of the sillier things I've seen in quite some time. Patenting the blatantly obvious serves no purpose except to erode the openness and free exchange of ideas that are so central to the success of the Web. If this sort of thing continues, it will only come back to haunt you, as your competitors will file their own "defensive" patents for equally un-original ideas and continue the vicious cycle. The only sensible thing to do is to stop the potential madness before it begins by dropping this and other e-commerce patent applications and let the Web remain the open environment it has always been. You have also lost yet another customer, Mr. Bezos - thanks, but no thanks.

Bryan Dyck


February 29, 2000

Dear Jeff, I use Amazon a lot, especially amazon.co.uk for UK books not published over here yet. I wholeheartedly agree with all of Tim's points. How about just keeping it as a defensive patent (cf IBM) if you aren't willing to drop your patent claim ? Although I must admit the comments about prior Art and trivial would seem to be true. I would hate to have to withdraw my custom, so please do the right thing. Winton

Winton Davies


February 29, 2000

Jeff - As one of the two programmers you hired to create Amazon.com, I am dismayed that my fears about the use of software patents by the company are coming true. Patents on trivial technology only force other people to waste time working around them, and 1-Click is nothing if not trivial. Please stop using software and process patents to stifle competition. See http://www.op.net/~pbd/amazon-1click.html for a longer statement. Paul Barton-Davis

Paul Barton-Davis


February 29, 2000

If Windows hadn't been so crash prone and so obtuse and obscure when it came to fixing problems, I probably wouldn't have bothered to start over and learn another OS from the ground up. I'd still rent from Hastings if my drivers license hadn't been rejected and the clerk had at least been able to explain why Hastings would no longer accept 'my' cash. Likewise, I'd still buy books from amazon, if I hadn't been annoyed there as well. I have always done this with businesses and will continue to voice my vote with my purchases. And it does work. Out of business in my town after I started boycotting them: Smiths Home Furnishings, Futureshop, Egghead, Divx, etc. I was just one of many who took our purchases elsewhere, and it is obvious to me that we make a difference.

Kel Hausken


February 29, 2000

David Sirrine


February 28, 2000

Emmanuel M. D‰carie


February 28, 2000

I am sure amazon.com, like the rest of us, has benefitted from the freedom and the expanse of the opensource universe. Most likely they used some of those building blocks to develope one-click. Why wouldn't they release this little idea to be freely implemented by others? Their attitude indeed will inhibit my shopping preferences now. A shame because I really enjoyed to shop at amazon.

Claudio Peredo


February 28, 2000

My personal website will be using fatbrain.com links for all resource links and I'll be encouraging my employer to make the same bold choice. If they don't I'll edit the web pages for them.. but anywho we will be actively directing traffic away from Amazon.com.

Chris Scharff


February 28, 2000

As a frequent customer of Amazon.com, I strongly encourage you to rethink your 1-Click patent.

Michael Jennings


February 29, 2000

Chris Tilden


February 29, 2000

While I believe the real tragedy is with the misinformed patent office, I support this letter in full.

Frank Schmittroth


February 29, 2000

Frederick Feiger


February 29, 2000

John Hurst


February 29, 2000

How m$ of you, as there is Linux, there is www.noamazon.com

D. Nehring


February 29, 2000

It's unfortunate that Amazon feels it must stoop to such low levels in order to compete. You have lost another customer.

Jeff Larsen


February 29, 2000

Great letter Tim. O'Reilly makes some great books, I own several :) Anyway, I just handed in a paper for my entreprenurism class regarding Amazon's ludicrous patents. It's a shame to see things like this happen on the internet.. I hope that they realize their ignorance and desist from enforcing these patents (though unlikely).

Greg Fodor


February 29, 2000

Hey kids, it's Haiku time: Hey mister Bezos My cash is going elsewhere Your attitude sucks

J. Brian Shumate


February 29, 2000

hey fatbrain.com, here comes another new customer!

Beth Usouski


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com has always acted predatory toward "the little guy" but this really shows their true colors. Patenting the 1-Click system is absurd. Patenting the Associates program is even more so. I was planning to sign up as an Amazon.com associate when I re-designed my web site, but not any more!

Sheila Addison


February 29, 2000

Sean Crowe


February 29, 2000

You need a monopoly if you want to act like Microsoft. I have been a very satisfied Amazon.com customer, and hope to be again, but will not buy from you again until you give up this farce. I have a friend who owns a bookstore. I am advising him to sue you for stealing his idea of selling books.

Mike Paparella


February 29, 2000

Ron Allen Hornbaker


February 29, 2000

I have informed Amazon by email, and will state again publicly here, that I will not do any further business with Amazon until they renounce enforcement of their patent on one-click ordering.

Alexander McKinnon


February 29, 2000

It's absurd to think this even could be patented.

David Breakey


February 29, 2000

The rules of Law and the Courtroom should not be a REPLACEMENT for COMMON SENSE, but rather an extension. Common sense tells us that certain things are the property of Man as an intelligent species. Imagine if Trek patented the process of pedalling a bike or if IBM patented the layout of a keyboard. This is dangerous ground.

Joseph Paulchell


February 28, 2000

Carl Chu


February 28, 2000

Mary Chu


February 28, 2000

Tim Sloan


February 28, 2000

K Friesen


February 28, 2000

Mike Soto


February 28, 2000

Don Walker


February 28, 2000

Robert Roy


February 28, 2000

Ben Parees


February 28, 2000

Mike Hardy


February 28, 2000

Philip Suh


February 28, 2000

Don Kukral


February 28, 2000

Avi Bryant


February 28, 2000

Abraham Ro


February 28, 2000

Kevin Wong


February 28, 2000

Billy Teng


February 28, 2000

Lev Bishop


February 28, 2000

Sam Tregar


February 28, 2000

Matt Dalby


February 28, 2000

Seth Yalcin


February 28, 2000

Matz Kolsch


February 28, 2000

Aldo Cimino


February 28, 2000

Mark DuPrey


February 28, 2000

Josh Eckels


February 28, 2000

John Donoso


February 28, 2000

Alex Shiels


February 29, 2000

Looks like I'm shopping bn.com from now on.

Arthur Hart


February 28, 2000

Dan Yagudin


February 28, 2000

Tom Lokovic


February 28, 2000

G A Michael


February 28, 2000

Jeff Bailey


February 28, 2000

Justin Palk


February 28, 2000

Chris Turner


February 28, 2000

Steve Garber


February 28, 2000

Jeff Mayrand


February 28, 2000

Dragan Tubic


February 28, 2000

Paul Telford


February 28, 2000

Jimmy Rimmer


February 28, 2000

Adam Clefton


February 28, 2000

David Whedon


February 28, 2000

Michael Tsai


February 28, 2000

Peter Wiggin


February 28, 2000

Robert Spier


February 28, 2000

Dylan Hasman


February 28, 2000

ronan cremin


February 28, 2000

Richard Croy


February 28, 2000

Craig Watson


February 28, 2000

Brian Albert


February 29, 2000

I fully support Tim O'Reilly's position on your very ill-advised use of patents. By curtailing freedom on the Internet you directly affect your customers, which by definition are internet users. Pissing on your customers has never proven to be a wise marketing policy, not has a chance to become so in the future.

Stefano Lassini


February 28, 2000

Harold Crayon


February 28, 2000

Matt Morrison


February 28, 2000

Daniel Abrams


February 28, 2000

Jeff Klingner


February 28, 2000

Preston Smith


February 28, 2000

Zoltan Sandor


February 28, 2000

John Barnette


February 28, 2000

Stephen Evans


February 28, 2000

Josh Crockett


February 28, 2000

James Bielman


February 28, 2000

Jake Peterson


February 28, 2000

Jody McIntyre


February 28, 2000

Steve Shucker


February 28, 2000

Sten Drescher


February 28, 2000

Steve Lussier


February 28, 2000

Geoff Crompton


February 28, 2000

Gregg Thomason


February 28, 2000

Kevin McCarthy


February 28, 2000

Eric Schneider


February 28, 2000

Ianiv Schweber


February 28, 2000

Jeremy Hedley


February 28, 2000

alex verhoeven


February 28, 2000

Patrick Hunter


February 28, 2000

Stephen Taylor


February 28, 2000

Timothy McKane


February 28, 2000

Stephen Bowman


February 28, 2000

Dominic Carney


February 28, 2000

Mark McWhorter


February 28, 2000

Dave Liebreich


February 28, 2000

Reuben Partida


February 28, 2000

Mark Chaikelson


February 28, 2000

Dan Orzechowski


February 28, 2000

Brian Naberhuis


February 28, 2000

Nicholas Lawler


February 28, 2000

David J. Wilson


February 28, 2000

Jennifer Gurbin


February 28, 2000

Peter Lundqvist


February 28, 2000

Michael Dowling


February 28, 2000

Nathaniel Price


February 28, 2000

Mark Drzycimski


February 28, 2000

Steven Versteeg


February 29, 2000

I also will boycott Amazon until the give up their patent.

zachary sung


February 29, 2000

I've bought a lot of stuff from them in the past, but I support RMS's boycott of Amazon and won't buy anything from them until this problem is resolved.

Daniel M. Carolin


February 28, 2000

Jonathan Paulett


February 28, 2000

Nicklas Karlsson


February 28, 2000

Roberto Castillo


February 28, 2000

David G. Churchill


February 28, 2000

Enough.

Mark Silvia


February 28, 2000

Kevin Micheal Smith


February 28, 2000

Daniel Craig Giffen


February 28, 2000

Simon Anderson

pranshu


February 28, 2000

Well said.

Scott Sotka


February 28, 2000

Todd Yocum


February 28, 2000

Dr. George U. Zimmerman


February 28, 2000

Till Otto


February 28, 2000

Amy Link


February 28, 2000

Mark Atwood


February 28, 2000

Paul Nakata


February 29, 2000

I made my last Amazon purchase---until this patent insanity is curtailed. Thank goodness it's easy to take my business to Barnes & Noble. What's more, I'm going to do my best to convince my family and friends to do likewise. With customer goodwill the only real proprietary commodity on the web, is Amazon's strategy a good one? I doubt it.

Steve Strickland


February 28, 2000

Jay Schomer


February 28, 2000

August Mueller


February 28, 2000

Vlad Podgurschi


February 28, 2000

Daniel Leinker


February 28, 2000

Bob Harman


February 28, 2000

Rob Walker


February 28, 2000

Daniel Leinker


February 28, 2000

Gene Novark


February 28, 2000

Richard Li


February 28, 2000

Chris Lynch


February 28, 2000

Carter Page


February 28, 2000

Brian Cocks


February 28, 2000

Sandy Lopez


February 28, 2000

Greg Brown


February 28, 2000

down with Amazon!

Nick Roth


February 28, 2000

Steve Ivy


February 28, 2000

Jim Evins


February 28, 2000

Eric Norige


February 28, 2000

Andrew Eiler


February 28, 2000

Matt Grommes


February 28, 2000

Tommy Williams


February 28, 2000

Sam Black


February 28, 2000

Rima S. Regas


February 28, 2000

Ben Prater


February 28, 2000

Chris Wright


February 28, 2000

Sam Black


February 28, 2000

Sam Black


February 28, 2000

Sam Black


February 28, 2000

Brett Roper


February 28, 2000

Thomas Joynt


February 28, 2000

Craig Gulow


February 28, 2000

P. Rogers


February 28, 2000

Matt Dew


February 28, 2000

Jason O'Brien


February 28, 2000

Ben Johnson


February 28, 2000

Morgan Jones


February 28, 2000

Greg Titus


February 28, 2000

Michael Birk


February 28, 2000

Perry Lorier


February 28, 2000

John Dunn


February 28, 2000

Daniel Brooks


February 28, 2000

Fight the Power!

John Kasinger


February 28, 2000

Alan Jaffray


February 28, 2000

Jim Matthews


February 28, 2000

Samuel Gibbs


February 28, 2000

Derek Warren


February 28, 2000

Fidelis Orozco


February 28, 2000

Geoff Janjua


February 28, 2000

Gerry Chu


February 28, 2000

Jeff Noxon


February 28, 2000

Mariano Belinky


February 28, 2000

Luke Stroven


February 28, 2000

Tero Turtiainen


February 28, 2000

Kenneth Baker


February 28, 2000

Luke Shulenburger


February 28, 2000

Martijn Pieters


February 28, 2000

PJ Fancher


February 28, 2000

Barry F Margolius


February 28, 2000

Piotr Kaminski


February 28, 2000

Dr. Edmund Weitz


February 28, 2000

peter dapkus


February 28, 2000

Tod McQuillin


February 28, 2000

Chris Recoskie


February 29, 2000

Jeff, Since you've already made a bundle and a half for yourself, maybe you should start thinking about the legacy thing.

Ken Losey


February 29, 2000

Turnabout or no, I will never become an Amazon customer now.

Stephen Krauth


February 28, 2000

Michael Spriggs


February 28, 2000

Greg Dunlap


February 28, 2000

Ben Buchwald


February 28, 2000

Brett Poulin


February 28, 2000

Mike Champion


February 28, 2000

Ryan Goldberg


February 28, 2000

Shaji Sebastian


February 28, 2000

RJones


February 28, 2000

Mars Saxman


February 28, 2000

Joe Hootman


February 28, 2000

Mike Hansen


February 28, 2000

David Radcliffe


February 28, 2000

Jonathan Blow


February 28, 2000

Justin P. Miller


February 28, 2000

Paul Lavelle


February 28, 2000

Kenton Varda


February 28, 2000

Anthony Ramos


February 28, 2000

Robert Walsh


February 28, 2000

Mark Frazer


February 28, 2000

Stephen A. Smith


February 28, 2000

Brian Deitte


February 28, 2000

Evan Jeffrey


February 28, 2000

Conley Roberts


February 28, 2000

Geoffry Dison


February 28, 2000

james lorenzo


February 28, 2000

Matthew Finnigan


February 28, 2000

Ross A Knepper


February 28, 2000

Peter Merholz


February 28, 2000

Dane Jackson


February 28, 2000

James Rickard


February 28, 2000

Dan Horwitz


February 28, 2000

Kenneth L. Hamer


February 28, 2000

Michael Hall


February 28, 2000

Michael Hall


February 29, 2000

Jeff, Your firm is a great firm, first in the market, and in my opinion one of the best. I love your small touches, such as the notepads and bookmarks. As you already have heard, a lot of people are not happy with Amazon.com. A lot of loud, talkative people, as evidenced above. I'm one of them. Please stop this if you expect me not to tell everyone I know not to ever buy from you again. Sincerely, Jamie Becker

Jamie Becker


February 29, 2000

Steve Rice


February 28, 2000

Gary Bland


February 28, 2000

Nick Popoff


February 28, 2000

Colin Rowsell


February 28, 2000

Keith Burdis


February 28, 2000

Eddy Talvala


February 28, 2000

Stephen Hamel


February 28, 2000

C. W. Fields


February 28, 2000

Justin B. Smith


February 28, 2000

Andrey Mirtchovski


February 28, 2000

Albert Geyser


February 28, 2000

James Street


February 28, 2000

Keith Calvert Ivey


February 28, 2000

Jonathan R. Schwanbeck


February 28, 2000

rob casson


February 28, 2000

Ben Slusky


February 28, 2000

Kris J. Zaragoza


February 28, 2000

Angus Davis


February 28, 2000

R. Long


February 28, 2000

Aaron Kimball


February 28, 2000

Dan Bowman


February 28, 2000

Chuck Boyce


February 28, 2000

Lukasz Salwinski, PhD


February 28, 2000

Sumit Daftuar


February 28, 2000

Brendan Humphreys


February 28, 2000

Antony Courtney


February 28, 2000

Abraham Thomas


February 28, 2000

Jeff Wiegand


February 28, 2000

Luke Tymowski


February 28, 2000

Christopher Volz


February 28, 2000

Jon Schweitzer


February 28, 2000

Theodore C. Csernica


February 28, 2000

Jon Hamkins


February 28, 2000

Brad Cavanagh


February 28, 2000

Olivier Pelletier


February 28, 2000

Bill Barth


February 28, 2000

Keith Howanitz


February 29, 2000

Ryan Robbins


February 29, 2000

What can be said that hasn't been said, and even shouted, by many other people? I believe in patents; I think they're a good thing. However, trying, successfully at that, to patent well-known prior art is ridiculous. In fact, it's theft and should be illegal.

Matthew Julius


February 28, 2000

Galen Silversmith


February 28, 2000

John Van Voorhies


February 28, 2000

Scott Benish


February 28, 2000

Daniel Arbuckle


February 28, 2000

Aaron Moshiashwili


February 28, 2000

Charles Ballowe


February 28, 2000

Daniel Morrison


February 28, 2000

Joseph Reves


February 28, 2000

Robert Impollonia


February 28, 2000

Michael Nunamaker


February 28, 2000

Michael Sheldon


February 28, 2000

Jacob Childress


February 28, 2000

Glenda R. Snodgrass


February 28, 2000

Chuck Lundgren


February 28, 2000

Andrew McCormick


February 28, 2000

Michael Strasser


February 28, 2000

Alan Grossfield


February 28, 2000

Paul A. Armstorng


February 28, 2000

David C. Mills, Esq.


February 28, 2000

Dave Wilkinson


February 28, 2000

Eric Beaurivage


February 28, 2000

Good letter tim!

Rick Segal


February 28, 2000

Matthew Franklin


February 28, 2000

Well said, Tim.

Chris Maroney


February 28, 2000

David Aspinall


February 28, 2000

Maurice C. Parker


February 28, 2000

it has got to stop!

Robert DeFusco


February 28, 2000

Very nice letter. Right to the point.

John SMith


February 28, 2000

see also http://www.nowebpatents.com

Micah Alpern


February 28, 2000

Down with stupid patents!

emad


February 28, 2000

What Tim said.

David Boroditsky


February 28, 2000

David B. Harris


February 28, 2000

Relent. It's making you lose customers.

Matt Willis


February 28, 2000

<AOL>me too</AOL>

Randall Hansen


February 28, 2000

Might as well patent the question mark.

Andrew Burton


February 28, 2000

End the patent bogosity!

Shaun Lawson


February 28, 2000

Absurd!

patrick breitenbach


February 28, 2000

Others have said it all ...

Don Wright


February 28, 2000

I agree with all of Tim O'Reily's points.

marc mandel


February 28, 2000

remember, you sell because of sympathie!

Stefan Berndt


February 28, 2000

Paul Turpie, Brian Dunn Ford


February 28, 2000

information should be free

Neil Harrington


February 28, 2000

Amazon... come on... get a clue!

Mark Wagner


February 28, 2000

Web patents are evil and shouldnt be awarded.

Brandon Johnson


February 28, 2000

This is ridiculous! I think I'll patent rendering HTML!

Eric Pree


February 28, 2000

I have bought my last book from Amazon.

Tim Josling


February 28, 2000

I do not believe in software patents.

Mike Tocci


February 29, 2000

Sean Hannan


February 28, 2000

www.fatbrain.com www.bn.com

Chris Kuklewicz


February 29, 2000

Looks like I'll be shopping and barnesandnoble.com for the forseeable future! Too bad ... your site used to be one of my favorites.

M. McLoughlin


February 29, 2000

The internet has always been so enticing because of its lack of set boundaries and limits. This patent could go a long way to changing that for the worse.

Evan Eckersley


February 29, 2000

What Amazon is doing is retarded. How many enemies are they waiting to have before they realize this isn't a good idea? We're not likely to easily forget this.

Mark Cidade


February 29, 2000

The Amazon patents will not stand up under a review of prior art. I encourage a moratorium on software patents until new guidelines for the review process have been put into place.

Kent Dorsey


February 29, 2000

I count myself among those who have chosen to boycott your company and I continuously urge others to join this boycott. Please reverse your stand on the patent issue so that I can once again feel good about the service you offer customers like myself...

Jack William Bell


February 29, 2000

I, like most of the people on this list, am a technology buff. I read books and I work with computers, specifically web application developement. However, I won't be buying my computers books from Amazon any longer, and if I can help it, neither will any of my friends, associates, or family. Amazon, come on now, are you guys serious? 1 Click Order?

Aaron Johnson


February 29, 2000

It's discouraging that a www pioneer like Amazon would behave in such a petty, greedy way. I remember when buying a book about Linux or Perl from amazon.com felt like a revolution, an amazing experience of access to technology, information, merchandise via the web and all the technologies that built it. Now buying the same book from amazon.com would feel like a betrayal.

Brenda Haugaard


February 29, 2000

The 1-click patent evokes a "this can't be" sentiment that is the flip side of the notion of a "miracle" attached to a truly landmark new invention. Trivial - as in basic, fundamental - things indeed can be patented IF they are new and if they involve an inventive step. The more fundamental the claimed invention seems to be, the more everyone needs to ask the question: was this unknown to mankind, is there genius at work here ? The sooner someone forces a court to respond to that question regarding the 1-click patent (and many other overarching "software" or "business method" patents), the better. Intellectual property is an exception from the regular rule of free-for-all competition. Its scope must be kept in check.

Timo Ruikka


February 29, 2000

Christopher Smith


February 29, 2000

Igor Shpak


February 29, 2000

Adam Glass


February 29, 2000

Igor Shpak


February 29, 2000

Tracy Boland


February 29, 2000

Sven Riedel


February 29, 2000

Dan Newman


February 29, 2000

Joe Robins


February 28, 2000

I think this is a horrible misuse of USPTO.

Al Brown


February 29, 2000

Michelle Brose


February 28, 2000

So sorry to see the well being poisoned!

William T. Hole


February 29, 2000

Brandon Harris


February 28, 2000

</i></b>Such a great example of Hypocrasy.

Brett Nash


February 29, 2000

Dmitri Poujlivyi


February 29, 2000

Michael Pullen


February 29, 2000

Andrew Lenharth


February 29, 2000

I have changed my name in amazon.com's database to "No One-Click Patent". If others do the same, their database admins can easily see how many of their former (and present) customers oppose this action.

Jonathan Sari


February 29, 2000

Boycotting Amazon.com AND Jim Bezos indefinitely.

Johan Bager


February 29, 2000

Brad Wallace


February 28, 2000

As Tim O'Reilly says, stop pissing in the well.

Rafe Colburn


February 28, 2000

Well said, Tim, keep up the good work!

Bruce Linton


February 29, 2000

Giles Lean


February 28, 2000

Absurd! Patrick Breitenbach

patrick breitenbach


February 29, 2000

I've been boycotting Amazon for over a month because of this issue. Sigh.

Jessica Perry Hekman


February 28, 2000

Software patents? Maybe... but not for something obvious.

Stefan Burkhardt


February 29, 2000

Remember that your 'early adopters' CAN make or break a new paradigm. Remember DIVX?

Douglas R. Oosting


February 29, 2000

Christopher Jordan


February 29, 2000

Patrick Wolf


February 29, 2000

Pride and greed come before the downfall. I hope to never be forced to purchase from a company working hard snuff out competition.

Triston Whetten


February 29, 2000

Amazon, remove my cookie from your oven! Amazon should not indulge in jungle warfare by trying to kill the entrepreneurial development of e-commerce by using the US Patent Office and miring the industry in the typical US over-dependence of lawyers and their kin. I started e-shopping with you at Christmas and will now divert to Barnes and Noble who do not employ such draconiam measures to stultify trade and pad the pockets of attorneys even further.

Barbara Watson


February 29, 2000

The Amazon patent is a sad abuse of an old system which cannot move fast enough to keep up with the current advances in technology.

Jason Alexander


February 29, 2000

You've lost my business to B&N

Irfan Mohammed


February 29, 2000

Your company has benifited immensely from the open architecture of the WWW. Why are you now trying to destroy this openness?

Martin O'Connor


February 29, 2000

Your company has benefited immensely from the open architecture of the WWW. Why are you now trying to destroy this openness?

Martin O'Connor


February 29, 2000

Fred Boak


February 29, 2000

Taylor Cavnar


February 29, 2000

Amazon = "Microsoft Jr". Come on guys, are these patents really necessary? I've been an Amazon fan from day one, but this has radically changed my opinion.

Mike Stamp


February 28, 2000

Free code and free information == free market and free America

Bart Cilfone


February 29, 2000

I refuse to be held up by exploitatitive practices. Because the administration of the law is an ass, does not give you the right to destroy this medium.

Michael Merwitz


February 29, 2000

Like so many others, I find Amazon's recent mis-use of the patent system to be offensive and short-sighted. I have not ordered anything from Amazon since I heard about the 1-click patent.

William Dyson


February 28, 2000

A noble effort, Mr. O'Reilly. Best of luck.

Carlos Salgado


February 29, 2000

Another formerly satisfied Amazon customer who'll be driving down to Barnes and Noble, or clicking to fatbrain.com for my book fix. Hope you guys don't mind losing the extra 񘈨 a year. Drop it. Drop it now.

Kris Newman


February 29, 2000

I've been a huge supporter of Amazon.com and I prefer them over B&N, etc. Not any more. This patent is ridiculous and is obviously just a money-making scheme. Amazon.com will no longer get my business.

Carl Johnson


February 28, 2000

Please act like adults - you should be ashamed of yourself.

Norman Richards


February 29, 2000

Since this patent issue was raised, I have stopped buying at Amazon.com. I have now spent close to 赨 at alternative book sites, and will continue to "vote with my pocketbook" until Amazon.com stops this foolishness.

Brent Fulgham


February 29, 2000

Well...I can tell you I won't be buying anything from Amazon.com anymore. It is sad that things have come to this point in the internet community, which used to be so open. I'm making sure everyone I know doesn't use amazon.com again.

Andrew Lewis


February 29, 2000

Until amazon.com changes its patent policies, it is no longer an asset to the net...

J. Bradford DeLong


February 28, 2000

I agree. I am no longer an amazon.com customer.

George Hart


February 29, 2000

I now use other vendors to purchase products that I might have purchased from Amazon. This will continue until they stop, period! I urge others to boycott the Amazon Web Site and any affiliated Web Sites. I hope that Amazon "feels" this where it hurts. On their bottom line.

Sean Rolinson


February 29, 2000

I had recently considered joining the affiliate program. I will not be joining that program, and I will avoid shopping at the amazon.com site because of the improper patent requests and approvals.

Matthew D. Rider


February 28, 2000

Jeff, count me off your customer base until you come to your senses.

Alan Morris


February 29, 2000

As Tim stated, the most shocking aspect of this is how insulting these patents are to the thousands of people who built the web and the Internet. Amazon must realize that if any one of those people had not believed in an open system of free exchange, Amazon would simply not exist.

Dan McCormick


February 28, 2000

I agree with Scott McCoy; put the patent in the public domain.

Yoritaka Sakakura


February 29, 2000

Why should I bother with this crap when Fatbrain is around and is just as good, if not better? I have purchased from Amazon before, but will not do so again. You still have a chance to redeem yourself before the world; take it before you lose any more business.

Mark Stanford


February 29, 2000

I've spent well over ũ,000 on Amazon in the past year. Not any more. Sorry, Jeff, but that inane laugh just can't cover up you limp business model and the rapacious greed the rush to patent everything from electricity to magnetism. You have been de-boomarked and un-favoritized. Change your ways and we can talk.

Gerard Van der Leun


February 28, 2000

Yet another successful company conveniently forgetting its roots...

Dave McLaughlin


February 29, 2000

I won't be giving my credit card to Amazon until they drop this insanity. Patents on cookie applications and affiliate programs are like copyrights on words in common usage. The patent office and Mr. Bezos need to pull their heads out and recognize what is common, obvious and simple application of existing, public domain technology.

Linda J. Laubenheimer


February 29, 2000

As an Amazon customer I am appalled at your total disregard for your customers. Since you insist on pissing in our well (the internet), I will do everything in my power to piss in yours. I will dissuade everyone I know from buying from your company. There are plenty of other reputable companies to do business with and they are only "1-click" away on the net.

Robert Lee Gage


February 29, 2000

I, like many IT professionals, buy a lot of books. In the past, I have been pleased to visit Amazon.com for most of my purchases. Since this patent issue has come up, however, I have ceased buying from your site(as have my friends and associates), and will continue to do so until this issue is resolved in a rational manner(ie. You reliquish this silly patent and cease your injunction against B&N.)

Forest Zachman


February 29, 2000

Wholesale patent-grabbing of web marketing methods that are obvious and non-innovative is not only greedy, but short-sighted as well. Amazon is already a strong competitor and a leader in its field; why resort to underhanded techniques that will only garner a mountain of bad publicity and ill will? Drop the patents and help foster the openness of the net that has been its hallmark since its inception.

Claude Martins


February 29, 2000

Mr Bezos: The US Patent office has shown itself time again to be unable to understand the complexities of computer science and development. Given that situation it is perfectly understandable that a company would patent any idea or technology coming out of its own development shop to avoid patent infringement suits from less scrupulous competitors. When a company such as yours uses one of these obviously bogus patents as a weapon against another market player then it ceases to be a competitor and becomes a predator on the entire market place

Chuck Ford


February 29, 2000

I am disappointed in Amazon.com's lack of concern for the effects of their actions. The action of even filing for such a patent, and patents like is, is sheer pettiness. Amazon.com is exploiting a weakness in US Patent Law. The laws were not intended to be used in this manner. Until this patent is overturned, Amazon.com has lost my business as well.

Amy Schechter


February 29, 2000

I agree that the patents that Amazon.com has received are anti-competitive and violate the principles upon which the internet is founded *if* they are enforced. I can understand filing the patents to prevent the techniques from being locked down, but to use these patents to stifle competition is unethical. I have purchased from Amazon.com in the past, but all of my online book purchases will go to their competitors until they reverse their policy of intimidation and anti-competitive behavior. I will also do my best to influence those around me to do the same.

Greg Shoults


February 29, 2000

I have shopped exclusively for books at Amazon since I made my first web purchase years ago. Over the years I've spent quite a bit of money, and have referred countless people to your service. Now it seems that you've gone the way of the soulless book chains (Barnes and Nobles, Borders, etc.). It was bad enough that you let your publishers write the "staff reviews" of books, but this patent nonsense takes the cake (both the 1-Click and Affiliates programs). Until you rescind these lawsuits and give up your spurious patents, I'll be shopping at FatBrain and Powells. - Jesse

Jesse Ephraim


February 29, 2000

As a developer working within the Open Source Movement, I am discusted with Amazon's heavy-handed abuse of the trust relationship we all try to build and benefit from. It shows just what truly motivates Bezos & crew. I'm disappointed and will am showing my support through the purchase of books, music, etc. via resellers.

Brant Fagan


February 29, 2000

I have been a fan and regular customer of Amazon.com in the past. I love your customer service, your site is extremely well laid out and easy to use. A shining example of e-commerce. But I cannot accept your recent actions with regard to these frivolous patents. I cannot imagine what you hope to accomplish by this. You know very well that these patents should never have been granted in the first place, and will not be upheld in the long run. Your actions remind me of a particular dove in a nearby park where I go to feed the birds sometimes. This one dove is so intent on having it all for himself, he spends all his time running around chasing off the other birds, and thus never gets anything to eat! Knock off this inane pettiness and concentrate on what you do best.

Alan Little


February 29, 2000

I have bought books worth about Ū,700 from amazon in the last 3 yrs. Amazon has provided an amazingly convenient service at an affordable price (I value the service more even if some of the books might be over-priced compared to other sites). I agree with Tim that for this reason, Amazon should be able to stand on its own feet without resorting to enforcing trivial patents. It goes without saying that I will no longer buy from Amazon. Ironically enough, the last book I bought from Amazon just before knowing about the patent issue was the O'Reilly published "Open Sources". To all the people who think we should fix the patent system in this country first, I agree with you. However, I guess the rest of us expects Amazon to show some leadership until the time the system does get fixed. So much for a net pioneer! The laws in this country may be so screwed up that you may be able to get away with murder, but the question is would you do so ? Only when you are desperate and have no concern for what your former admirers think of you anymore. Shyjan Mahamud Carnegie Mellon University

Shyjan Mahamud


February 29, 2000

I was (note "was") an early Amazon customer and an early adopter of 1-click. I admit, it's convenient. However, I see *nothing* in this technology that could not have been produced (I certainly will not write "invented") by me or many other software engineers. To consider your appropriation of the cookie mechanism as patentable is patently ludicrous. That the Patent Office actually issued your company a patent for this is a canonical example of governmental cluelessness. If you really want to make lots of money, I suggest you start selling lotion and chapstick to lawyers -- they will need vats of the stuff to heal their chafed skin from rubbing their hands and lips so greedily over this. In the end, you will win little but ill will over this issue. Personally, I urge you to stop. We stand on the shoulders of giants. You could not do what you do had it not been for the free contributions of many, many people. Please respect and support the tradition of free sharing of ideas that has made your success possible. Please do not squander your most precious inheritance. John Tobler

John Tobler


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezoz, what were you thinking??? This cheap attempt to grab the gold given to us all by the pioneers of the internet. Shame on you!! I am including a quote submitted by Mahlon Hollway because it bears repeating, and will surely be quoted and referred to when you are taken to court, as you surely will be. The loss of your business will be your reward. A nice quote from the US supreme court: It was never the object of patent laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures. Such an indiscriminate creation of exclusive privileges tends rather to obstruct than to stimulate invention. It creates a class of speculative schemers who make it their business to watch the advancing wave of improvement, and gather its foam in the form of patented monopolies, which enable them to lay a heavy tax on the industry of the country, without contributing anything to the real advancement of the arts. It embarrasses the honest pursuit of business with fears and apprehensions of unknown liability lawsuits and vexatious accounting for profits made in good faith. ùU.S. Supreme Court, Atlantic Works vs. Brady, 1882

Paul Phillips


February 28, 2000

Wonderful letter, Mr. O'Reilly. Thank you for speaking out.

Robert Neely


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I appreciate the service that Amazon provides to book-readers. However, as an IT professional, I must take issue with your patent on "1-click shopping." It seems such a trivial technology, and I am willing to bet that your site was not even the first to develop it. While I can not completely boycot Amazon due to the wide variety of books that I read, when possible I will be diverty my business to www.bookpool.com and www.fatbrain.com as much as possible. Please reconsider your stance on this issue. You stand to lose a lot of money and gain infamy(not a Good Thing). Jacob Woldstad

Jacob Woldstad


February 28, 2000

Just wanted to add my support against this stupid patent. Fernando

Fernando J. Zapata


February 28, 2000

Amazon is trying to hack off the tree they climbed on.

Ori Pomerantz


February 28, 2000

I am Boycotting Amazon.com until you drop your frivilous patents.

Chris Nelson


February 28, 2000

I value Amazon's services, but I will not buy from a company who acts like this.

Adam Hull


February 28, 2000

Until Amazon stops this nonsense, I'll buy elsewhere. Two words....Prior Art!

Rob Robinson


February 28, 2000

Embarrassingly ridiculous patents being issued to embarrasingly greedy people.

Len MacDonell


February 28, 2000

I'm seriously thinking not buying any book from Amazon.com from now on.

Tao Lu


February 28, 2000

Fatbrain, Barnes and Noble, Borders..they are all looking pretty good right now.

Frank McPherson


February 28, 2000

Biting the hand that feeds you. Even my dog knows better than that.

Tom Jenike


February 28, 2000

I will never purchase items from Amazon. I believe that what you are doing is wrong.

Normand Robert


February 28, 2000

while ($OneClickPatent = $enforced) { $IBuyBooksElsewhere = 1; }

Brian E. Fisher


February 28, 2000

Tim O'Reilly pretty much communicated my thoughts exactly on the issue.

Scott Gray


February 28, 2000

I find myself browsing the brick-and-mortar stores more and more...

Jamie Manley


February 28, 2000

No business from me until enforcement of patents like this one are dropped.

Deke Clinger


February 28, 2000

I believe "one click" ordering is so trivially obvious as to be unpatentable.

Scott Schram


February 28, 2000

Just about a perfect letter. I can't add anything except: "hear, hear"!

Steve Newman


February 28, 2000

Not obvious.. what is amazon thinking? proud user of http://www.noamazon.com

Ken Hahn


February 28, 2000

I have spent well over a thousand dollars at amazon.com; but not any more.

Craig Kelley


February 28, 2000

I hope you realized that you really don't need to play this silly game.

Nicolßs Lichtmaier


February 28, 2000

Amazon did not develop this technology; Amazon does not own this technology.

Tim Hurley


February 28, 2000

sigh. I ordered quite a bit from amazon - but I guess I'm on to other retailers.

Lawrence Wright


February 28, 2000

i have nothing much to say...it's already been said, and better than i could put it.

Jared Nied


February 28, 2000

I just looked at the patent. Are you kidding? Please do the right thing.

Patrick J. Melody


February 28, 2000

I still can't believe a second lame patent (on the associates program idea) was filed, even after this..

Stuart Lowes


February 28, 2000

This whole pattent deal has made me stop buying from Amazon, and I can only hope that more will do the same.

Cyrus Hall


February 28, 2000

The patent is ludicrous. It shouldn't stand, but if it does, then Amazon should put it in the public domain

Scott McCoy


February 28, 2000

It was a real mistake making Jeff Bezos man of the year. The world needs a different kind of rolemodel.

Marcus Ahlfors


February 28, 2000

What an outrageous abuse of the patent system! I will never EVER buy from amazon.com again.

Chris Baer


February 28, 2000

This is yet another reason to spend your money with local booksellers whenever possible.

Galen Seitz


February 28, 2000

Mr Bezos, I hope your firm's truculence helps consumers reacquaint themselves with their local bookstores.

David Emile Lamy


February 28, 2000

A sad abuse of a simple and obvious idea. I personally wont be shopping at amazon in the future.

Perry Vais


February 28, 2000

Too bad I can't patent the number 1. Then I could slap a hold on Amazon's 1-click bull.

Brian Mihulka


February 28, 2000

One Word: BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT!

Jim Bruer


February 28, 2000

Tim, I concur wholeheartedly. http://davenet.userland.com/2000/02/28/noMorePesosForSenorBezos Dave

Dave Winer


February 28, 2000

Jeff, Sorry to see your lawyers have overtaken your good sense about how to take good care of customers.

Dan Lynch


February 28, 2000

Why be a bully? You don't need this patent to win. Take the high road and give back to the community that bred you.

Jerry Asher


February 28, 2000

Amazon has lost several hundred dollars in sales from me, due to their short sighted piggish behavior.

Matt Michie


February 28, 2000

Nothing more can be said, except "Thanks" to O'Reilly for giving our voices a forum in which to be heard.

C. Colin Guest


February 28, 2000

I am an instructor at NYU. I will be explaining this situation to the students in my class. They care!

Evan Korth


February 28, 2000

I am in complete support of Tim O'Reilly. The patent is rediculous, and has no right to be enforced.

Jefferson Knox


February 28, 2000

You've captured exactly what I would want to say to Amazon; you have my full support, and my signature.

Brent J. Nordquist


February 28, 2000

I *really* like Amazon and the services it offers, and it's a shame that I can no longer shop there due to things like this.

John Cramp


February 28, 2000

I am honoring the boycott, and will not do business with Amazon.com until they stop this patent madness.

Mike Shimanski


February 28, 2000

My business is going to fatbrain and local specialty stores until this silliness ceases.

Thomas B Harris


February 28, 2000

Amazon.com must get with the programme, or we will be them irrelevant, well for technical books anyway...

Evan Summers


February 29, 2000

Rune Nielsen


February 28, 2000

The amazing things that people will do. This sounds like Divx. I have just one thing to say: "WTF, man?" Alan

Alan Fraze


February 28, 2000

Patenting things this trivial will lead to the downfall of the World Wide Web and e-commerce!

Blair Stilwell


February 28, 2000

I am appalled by the attitude that Amazon has taken, and wish them more losses until they repeal this patent.

Brenden van Stolk


February 28, 2000

Congratulations Tim for your courage. Shame on Amazon for even attempting to defend this silly patent.

John A. Simkiss, III


February 28, 2000

I've stopped buying from Amazon since I've heard of this patent, and will not buy from them as long as they try to enforce it.

Philippe Troin


February 28, 2000

I do hope Amazon will act to redeem its reputation. I admired them greatly at one time, and hope to do so again.

Rick Moen


February 28, 2000

This is deplorable and will, if anything, drive anyone with any knowledge of the issue away from your company.

Marc Raaphorst


February 28, 2000

I have erased your cookie and deleted your bookmark and will not allow them on my computers again until you drop that silly patent.

Bill Barry


February 28, 2000

Though I like the service very much (actually I'm a customer in Germany - amazon.de) I will switch to a competitor, namely bol.de.

Lothar Hegebart


February 28, 2000

Amazon doesn't deserve my effort in crafting an eloquent comment on their pathetic behaviour. Down With Amazon!

Nathan M. Morse


February 28, 2000

Amazon's actions represent a clear abuse of the patent system. Fortunately, they are not the only bookseller on the web...

Tim Voght


February 28, 2000

Great letter, I have used Amazon in the past but again will not do so until they drop the issue of patenting

Rich Spadaccini


February 28, 2000

This assertion augments my current boycott of all Amazon.com related services. Do the right thing for the web!

Bryan Klingner


February 28, 2000

Until this 1-Click fiasco has come to an acceptable end, I will be taking my business elswehere, and I will encourage others to do the same.

John Watson


February 28, 2000

I had never really considered looking elsewhere for books online, until now. Now I will do my best to find an alternative.

Jonah Peskin


February 28, 2000

I've bought books from amazon in the past, I was going to again. Continue this idiocy and I'll go somewhere else.

Christopher Werner


February 28, 2000

Jeff Bezos, I stopped purchasing books at Amazon since your injunction against Barnes & Noble. Barnes & Noble gets my business from now on.

Ronny Brekke


February 28, 2000

The Amazon.com patents are ridiculous and threaten to destroy the Internet as we know it. They should be immediately withdrawn.

Rob Keniger


February 28, 2000

Until Amazon.com backs away from these ridiculous software patents, I will not be a customer, and I will urge others to act in the same manner.

Patrick Dubroy


February 28, 2000

Please copyright your name, which is indeed an interesting concept. But, to patent a few lines of easy CGI code is criminal.

Rick Cogley


February 28, 2000

In my IS department I tell them where to order computer books from when I order a group of them. The patent is unethical and I will boycott Amazon.

Marcus Brody


February 28, 2000

The geek girl population is rapidly rising. This would be a terrible time to alienate us! Drop your obscene patents, and we'll stop boycotting.

Julie Montgomery


February 28, 2000

I purchased 16 O'reilly books from Amazon last year, which amounted to 蹢. This year I plan to buy none from them. Good luck Tim.

Cory Wright


February 29, 2000

One who denies oxygen, which doesn't belong to it, cannot ask for it. But, trying to suffocate amounts to *Internet Crime*.

abass alamnehe


February 28, 2000

Jeff Bezos. You are attempting to strangle the Internet goose that laid your golden egg. This is not merely wrong, it is stupid.

Eric S. Raymond


February 28, 2000

I'd love to purchase from Amazon, and I did before, but after the patent I stopped and I've urged several people to stop also.

Joseph Guhlin


February 28, 2000

Hey Jeff, you piss off the whole e-commerce community. Job well done!!! By the way, check out NOAMAZON.COM, they got better prices and more slections.

Eddie P


February 28, 2000

As a professional internet systems integrator, I have read the patent and recognize it as a technical statement of the obvious.

Eric Rachner


February 28, 2000

We don't need no stinking bloodsuckers. I'm buying my next books for more at the local Borders, rather than support your crooked schemes.

Bart Aronoff


February 28, 2000

OpenMarket lost in any attempt to enforce their shopping cart patent. Assuming the US judicial system has half a brain, Amazon will lose this one as well.

Tom Gross


February 28, 2000

Tim's eloquence and stature in both the internet and literary communities is a great asset to those who are opposing software patents.

Adam Lynch


February 28, 2000

Time to do something about this! I have advised all my friends who are buying books from the web to boycott Amazon! They were very supportive of this gesture.

Soo Guan


February 28, 2000

I am personally avoiding the use of Amazon's services until this entire morass is settled. The patent issue is an offensive joke.

Howard Melnick


February 28, 2000

I find it disgusting that such a patent was ever passed, even more disgusted that someone would attempt to file for it. This is a cheap cheap move by amazon.

Greg Nelson


February 28, 2000

Over the years I've bought many books, cds, and audio books from amazon, but no more. I doubt I'll ever buy anything from amazon.com again... :(

Jim Woodgate


February 28, 2000

I bought a few books from Amazon this summer. In the last few months I've bought quite a few more books online- from Barnes and Noble.

Tagore Smith


February 28, 2000

I am disheartening to learn not only one patent but two that abuse the patent office. I feel amazon is stealing from everyone on this planet.

Kent Nguyen


February 28, 2000

Amazon's recent patenting actions, if continued, may turn the internet into an ugly, vicious, commercial place. Please rethink your strategies.

Drew Bell


February 28, 2000

Amazon purchases: ũ,180 in 1998 Ū,660 in 1999 趶 in 2000 so far. Nothing more. John Pettitt Co-Founder Beyond.com, software.net & CyberSource

John Pettitt


February 28, 2000

It has been said that a patent is really just a license to litigate. Commit your company to the creation of value, not unnecessary litigation.

David R. Johnson


February 28, 2000

Don't believe for a minute that we don't take RMS's call for a boycott seriously. There are many other sellers of books out there.

Kris Warkentin


February 28, 2000

I will hereforth use the Amazon.com website only as a research tool (which it definitely is), but will take my book buying business elsewhere.

Raja R Harinath


February 28, 2000

1-Click buying and associates programs aren't just examples of reinventing the wheel. Amazon is reinventing it, and then slashing everyone else's tires.

Tom Cunningham


February 28, 2000

I buy several books a month online. And due to Amazons business practices, I will not be purchasing books from them any longer. Hello Barnes and Noble!

Jason Nichols


February 28, 2000

I will not use Amazon.com again until this is resolved in a reasonable manner. This is as silly as the patent for the 'cat toy' laser light pen.

Kathy Christian


February 28, 2000

Please reconsider your 1-click patent application. By pursuing this patent, you are hurting the very openness that made the web such an explosive force.

Alexander Chiang


February 28, 2000

Yet another (former) Amazon customer... drop the patents and I'll come back. BTW, I'm applying for the Click-and-buy-from-anyone-but-Amazon patent...

Paul Lee


February 28, 2000

Hoping you'll reconsider your pursuit of these damaging patents. I will not be purchasing any items via the Amazon.com web site until you address this issue.

John Walker


February 28, 2000

I just bought my first book from Fatbrain. A sale that would of gone to Amazon.com even just a few weeks ago. No more. From now on I go to www.noamazon.com Mark

Mark Staben


February 28, 2000

Thanks for the opportunity. And thanks for a great letter, Tim. And for what it's worth, all my online book purchases have been going to Powell's and Fatbrain.

Tim Trendall


February 28, 2000

Go Tim ! This is the right message, one that those who think they can win by bully-pulpit tactics need to hear, and implement. 100% behind this message.

Ken Knull


February 28, 2000

For anybody with even a fraction of a clue, the Amazon patent is a blatantly obvious land-grab by a company thatÆs already the 800-pound gorilla on the block.

Bob Dively


February 28, 2000

I'm tired of software and "process" patents. Instead of sitting back and simply signing petitions and whining about the state of affairs, it's time to act.

Jonathan Koren


February 28, 2000

I think that Amazon's 1-click patent is absolute rubbish. As a consquence, I too am boycotting Amazon, as well as getting my friends, colleagues, and associates to do the same.

Michael Lee


February 28, 2000

More than prior art, this is about precedents. What Amazon is trying to do will not lead to the kind of net community or practice of openness that I want.

Josh Rosenberg


February 28, 2000

Amazon has no right to patent the basic tools of ecommerce. If Amazon continues to press for patents on commonplace technology I will be forced to boycott.

Jef spaleta


February 28, 2000

I do not plan on patronizing amazon.com again until they change their approach to patents for trivial applications. My local bookstore will see a lot more business.

John Canning


February 28, 2000

Tim, Thank you for the stand against this trivial patent. I hope that Amazon sees the light, either now or eventually when the Patent Office gets a clue.

Deana M. Holmes


February 28, 2000

Jeff, I can't believe that you honestly feel One-Click is a valid technology worthy of a patent. Thank God Tim Berners-Lee and others weren't as short-sighted as yourself.

Terrence Coccoli


February 28, 2000

I regret that I will not be purchasing anything from Amazon until the CEO removes his head from 6 inches underground and realizes how stupid his patent is.

Aviv Keshet


February 28, 2000

I think both the 1-Click patent and the Associates patent were not very well researched since they made it through. That's like me trying to patent putting pants on before shoes.

Adam DuVander


February 28, 2000

The web is a technological gift to humankind. It would be very short of the spirit of this gift to try to 'own' it. Please do not try to crush this wonderful gift through greed.

William J. Burgos


February 28, 2000

Jeff, I personally have spent hundreds of dollars at amazon.com, my company has spent thousands. These tactics may well lose you this revenue. Wake up. Sy.

Simon Anderson


February 28, 2000

Since I can squash behaviour like this by clicking twice at some other retail site, I will. Conduct like yours would have strangled the Web at birth. Ingrate.

Nick Brooke


February 28, 2000

Jeff, Ever since amazon has started this 1-click nonsense, I have vowed never again to use your service, and am encouraging everyone I know to do the same. - Eric

Eric Raible


February 28, 2000

I have nothing to add to Tim's letter. I've just sent the URL of the letter to several of my friends as well as the entire staff of the successful small software company I founded.

L. Peter Deutsch


February 28, 2000

Anyone who's ever worked with JavaScript knows how laughable this "patent" is. Technology of this basic level cannot, and should not, be proprietary. I will join the boycott of Amazon.

Greg Campbell


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Consider me an ex-Amazon.com customer. I've discovered the joy of www.fatbrain.com. Wishing your company all the worst. Mathew Thomas Software Engineer

Mathew Thomas


February 28, 2000

I buy scores of books every year and online purchasing is much more convenient than local book stores... but I won't buy any more from Amazon until they demonstrate a little common sense.

Michael Sims


February 28, 2000

establish market leadership by providing unequalled quality, not by trying to pull off bullshit patents like this. actually innovate, don't isolate and alienate.

matt harrison


February 28, 2000

I've purchased books from amazon.com, and I think that it's a great realization of a great idea - but I won't be buying from them any more until they apologize for patenting 1-click.

Ross Morgan-Linial


February 28, 2000

I was a frequent amazon.com customer, but have not bought anything from them since I heard about their One-Click patent. This kind of parasitical behavior must not be tolerated.

Jamie Zawinski


February 28, 2000

This patent must not be upheld and should be invalidated. Software patents are doing the software industry a disservice and should be thrown out of the patent system. Regards, Tom

Tom Gall


February 28, 2000

no tiene rason tal treta por parte de su compa±ia para acaparar el mercado, ya han crecido de una forma somprendente y hasta el momento lo han hecho eticamente.

santiago valverde


February 28, 2000

I expect the next big 'innovation' from Amazon to be allowing users to read their site from left to right! Best stop now while you still have a scrap of dignity. Jeff Gatlin

Jeff Gatlin


February 28, 2000

I fully support any effort to show Amazon that what they are doing is wrong. I have not and will not purchase any products from Amazon until they cease enforcement of this patent.

Erick Woods


February 29, 2000

James K. Huggins


February 28, 2000

I hope amazon will come to their senses regarding both the propriety of their recent patents and their needlessly agressive stance regarding what is, at root, a trivial and obvious technology.

steven smolinski


February 28, 2000

Frankly, I'm disappointed in Amazon descent into abuses of the patent system, and there isn't more I can say without repeating what everyone else crying at the top of their voices.

Daniel Root


February 28, 2000

The beauty of the web, there are always choices....I have chosen booksellers other than Amazon for some time, I encourage others to do the same until they drop the absurd patents.

Patrick Ludwig


February 28, 2000

Amazon's claim is "patently ridiculous" and offensive to every principle of the open, global Internet. The Patent Office is obviously lacking in adult supervision.

Jim Warren, columnist & advocate


February 28, 2000

Amazon is using a governmental artifice in an effort to stifle competition and intimidate the marketplace. I will not purchase any more products from Amazon until this problem is fixed.

Will Cate


February 28, 2000

Please come to your senses, Mr. Bezos. Let the ideas develop independant of your company... and they may grow into something far more powerful and useful to you and your customers.

Ross Karchner


February 28, 2000

Please reconsider this short sighted action. I also have admired your company and business dealings for a long time but trying to build fences around the Web is something that I doubt anyone would admire.

Leigh Scott


February 28, 2000

Come on Jeff, loosen your grip on this patent. Let it go before your brand erodes due to negative publicity. This thing will get bigger faster than you think. Look at what happened to etoys.

Eddie Codel


February 28, 2000

As a long-time Amazon customer, I am very concerned. I spend 񘈨+ every year on your site. That stops today! When you cease your one-click jihad, I will come back Jeff. Yours, B Griggs

Bobby Griggs


February 28, 2000

Tim O'Reilly has summed the issue admirably. Until Amazon releases these senseless patents, I will conduct my business elsewhere, and encourage anybody else I know to do the same.

Russell Gordon


February 28, 2000

I am dismayed by Amazon's application for and defense of such an obviously trivial application of existing technology. Shame on you Amazon. My book buying dollars will be spent elsewhere

R A Lichtensteiger


February 28, 2000

I think the 1-Click patent is a fraud. Amazon is a terrific company, but your use and modification of a technology that was Open Source, then patented by Amazon is W-R-O-N-G! -dave

Dave Jackson


February 28, 2000

Any company that has to resort to trivial software claims is clearly a company that is an investment that is headed to the dustbin. Someday Bezos will be the same as Ponzi. Alan Meckler

alan meckler


February 28, 2000

Any company that has to resort to trivial software claims is clearly a company that is an investment that is headed to the dustbin. Someday Bezos will be the same as Ponzi. Alan Meckler

alan meckler


February 28, 2000

Ths is the height of frivolous web patents. You might as well have patented selling books over the web. Hopefully, you will change your position. I will not be purchasing any books from Amazon.

Ravi Ramkissoon


February 28, 2000

yes, the patent office made mistakes and granted patents that came nowhere near meeting the standards for novelty and nonobviousness. and no, you don't have to enforce them. i'm happy to buy elsewhere for now.

colleen reilly


February 28, 2000

Due to Amazon's stifling & restrictive practices they have lost me as a customer. I used to purchase close to 贄/month from them before this patent fiasco occured. B&N and Borders now get my business.

Net Llama


February 28, 2000

I, too, have spent a lot of my money at Amazon in the past. But also like many others, I feel I can no longer support a company that is blatantly abusing a warped patent system that is still stuck in the early 1900s.

Bill Moore


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos et al.: Just remember that "Those who can, Innovate. Those who can't, litigate". Too bad you've fallen into the latter clause. The more you litigate, the more I'll diversify my purchases. Your move...

Ted Bardusch


February 28, 2000

Nothing much to add. There are other online book stores, and I'm happy to spend my money elsewhere while Amazon continue with this behaviour. Amazon are far from alone in trying such tactics, but that's no excuse.

Philip Sainty


February 28, 2000

As uncounted others have stated before me, these patents are insults to intellectual freedom, perpetrated in the name of illogical greed. That does not, of course, reduce the importance of saying it once more...

Robert Himberger


February 28, 2000

Until Amazon.com stops this "land grab" of trivial software patents, I wil stop using there service. Further, I will recommend to all of my clients that do stop supporting Amazon.com as well.

John Worthington


February 28, 2000

I'm not against software patents per se, but one-click ordering is completely obvious. Amazon.com built a great reputation based on customer service; attempting to enforce silly patents is a step backwards not forwards.

Scott Lawton


February 28, 2000

Well, nothing much can be said that hasn't already been. . .But it's disappointing to see a pioneer in our industry bite the hand that has fed it so well. Amazon. . .Goodbye, Gerald Former good customer

Gerald Anderson


February 28, 2000

Silly or obvious patents should not be granted in the first place, but the USPTO doesn't seem to be doing the job. Therefore I sign the open letter. Let the community fix the patent system!

Mike Guidero


February 28, 2000

I have probably spent 񙇈 on books from Amazon over the past couple years. Pursuing ridiculous software patents, aparently with your full understanding and consent, is pushing me to other companies.

John Carmack


February 28, 2000

Thank you for making this effort, Tim. Amazon's attempt to exploit the patent office's technological deficiencies with moves that can so badly hurt customers and the innovative landscape of the web is disgusting.

Evan Williams


February 28, 2000

This so-called patent is really nothing but the theft of others work... Seems like that's all the computer revelution has done; from xerox park to amazon, one does the work, someone else takes the credit.

Sam A. Kersh


February 28, 2000

While I like Amazon's layout and system, I cannot abide such anticompetitive acts as these software patents. I will be sorry to move my business elsewhere, but it's the least I can do until this nonsense stops.

Chris Gomez


February 28, 2000

To Amazon: Please listen to your customers. We value your great service and excellent use of the Internet, however your actions in software patents on obvious ideas is silly. Please come back to Earth.

Scott M. Dier


February 28, 2000

I wholeheartedly agree with tim. My grandfather built his business on LEGITIMATE patents for LEGITIMATE innovations in packaging machinery, but Amazon's blatantly bogus patents should not have been granted in the first place.

Richard Kurtzer


February 28, 2000

The patent office needs the help of technologically adept individuals to help fight this sort of thing. Support your local neighborhood Open Source developers. They are your base of support and innovation.

Aaron van Meerten


February 28, 2000

The patent office needs the help of technologically adept individuals to help fight this sort of thing. Support your local neighborhood Open Source developers. They are your base of support and innovation.

Aaron van Meerten


February 28, 2000

Dear Amazon, i appreciate your service and I praise you guys for your innovation. However, I believe that this patent is "pissing in the well." I as a customer of amazon am asking you to retract your patent.

John Hwang


February 28, 2000

I have been following RMS' guideline in boycotting Amazon, which I used to used frequent for books and CDs. I will resume buying from their site only when they choose to not pursue software patents in court.

Greg Chappell


February 28, 2000

Patents are for new and non-obvious ideas. 1-click and affiliate programs are not new or non-obvious. The U.S. Patent Office is obviously incapable of determining what are really novel ideas. Amazon, please don't abuse the situation.

Mike Rain


February 28, 2000

Well said Mr. O'Reilly. I also pledge my support to help send the message that we as consumers must not allow the patent process to be abused. I will challenge everyone I know to do the same, and boycott amazon. -Eric

Eric Gonzalez


February 28, 2000

I spent over โ per month at amazon last year. I haven't been there (except just now to check my order totals) since November 27th because of the ridiculous patent claims. I won't go back until the claim is dropped.

Jason Majors


February 28, 2000

As long as amazon.com is going to persue such grossly general patents I will both refuse using amazon.com AND i will go out of my way to convince friends and faimly to use alternative sites for their online book purchases.

Matt Knopp


February 28, 2000

I was an early customer of Amazon's and have purchased several hundred dollars worth of books from them over the years. I'm sorry to have to terminate my relation with Amazon, but I'm afraid it's the only ethical thing to do at this point.

Jonathan Badger


February 28, 2000

I find http://www.bookpool.com perfectly good for purchasing technical books, and of course I've been giving Barnes and Noble my business lately as well. I wish there were legal consequences for frivolous patents like this.

Mark Allen


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos One-Click is great. A patent fight is the wrong way to demonstrate Amazon's customer benefits. This is the wrong way to get market attention. Please demonstrate to your customers that you are interested in making their lives better.

Jeff Litherland


February 28, 2000

Jeff: I like your store. Don't screw it up by being a schmuck. These patents and attempted enforcement of them is just negative marketing. Your customers, even many of the non-techies, are now looking at your competitors.

David Merrill


February 28, 2000

I do participate in the Amazon.com boycott called by Stallman and constantly urge people to buy from Barnes and Noble to help fund their legal defence of this farce. I don't think I'll ever buy from Amazon.com again, in fact.

Javier Heredia


February 28, 2000

Amazon.com has established its success by looking always one step further. Patents like these are just relying on what already exists, i.e. looking back to old successes. It's gonna be a definitive mistake for an innovator.

Alessio F. Bragadini


February 29, 2000

I have bought several thousand dollars worth of goods from Amazon.com in the past. I have also been an Amazon.com affiliate, and thus made many more thousands of dollars for Amazon. No more. I have removed all my links to Amazon.com books and Associates, and will no longer shop there. I hope that Amazon.com will reconsider their position on these patents.

Kristina Pfaff-Harris


February 28, 2000

When the government comes to help you, hold your wallet. The PTO is in over their heads in the area of intellectual property and the patents in question should never have been granted. I support an open and competitive environment.

Betsy Garfield


February 28, 2000

I'll no longer be suggesting Amazon as an easy place to get books on every subject. There are other places to go, and my friends and collagues seem to feel the same way. So much for our plans to participate in those affiliate programs!

Iain O'Cain


February 28, 2000

This 1-click patent is the silliest thing I've ever heard of. This is obviously either the product of an corporate idiot, or a corporate tyrant. Which one do you want to be perceived as, Amazon? Show some forward thinking.

Brandon Bickford


February 28, 2000

The patents are bogus. If tried in court it could easily be shown that there was prior art. Plus even if there were no art, this is a bad patent and Amazon's use of it is evil. I will not buy from them until they give a public apology.

Edwin Purvee


February 28, 2000

One small step would make you a hero. Reveal that you got the patent so that nobody else ever could then publicly swear that it will NEVER be enforced. That way you would be praised as the protector instead of reviled as the destroyer.

Eileen Wharmby


February 28, 2000

I agree with Tim. Software patents can have value, but only when they are for truly novel inventions. Amazon's patents are among many that the PTO should never have been approved. (I am one of the inventors of software patent 5,055,998.)

Ray Lischner


February 28, 2000

I was on the verge of entering into the online purchasing world with Amazon as my portal; but upon careful review, I've decided against it because of their reckless use of patents. Other vendors will reap the benefits, until Amazon sees things differently.

Marc Directo


February 28, 2000

Amazon's patent tactics have prompted me to boycott the company, turn down a job offer from Amazon.com, stop wearing my Amazon.com t-shirt, and remind my friends and co-workers that Amazon is evil. I now buy all my books from Barnes & Noble.com.

Liam Quinn


February 28, 2000

I think that this case is a good focus for reviewing the entire software patent process. This was much needed in the light of the completely ridiculaous patents that have been granted of late. I will also cease buying from Amazon until they recant on this.

Udhay Shankar N


February 28, 2000

Don't try to be oversmart and steal others work. You'll go down the drain by doing this..cause you can't live without the support of millions of people who helped build the internet... Don't be a fool....wake up!!!! -Wilson

Dionysius Wilson Almeida


February 28, 2000

I miss being able to shop at Amazon (which my conscience no longer permits), but I miss the days when I could use technologies for the purposes for which they were designed without fear of teams of rabid lawyers snapping at my heels even more.

Brent Spillner


February 28, 2000

Amazon seems to be run by a bunch of greedy suits. I'm not going to do any business with Amazon until they withdraw their patent. I like Tim O'Reilly's phrase "they're pissing in the well". Soon there will be more that will piss in their well too.

Andrej Gabara


February 28, 2000

Amazon seems to be run by a bunch of greedy suits. I'm not going to do any business with Amazon until they withdraw their patent. I like Tim O'Reilly's phrase "they're pissing in the well". Soon there will be more that will piss in their well too.

Andrej Gabara


February 28, 2000

I just bought two books from B&N. I compared B&N's prices and availability to FatBrain. I did not include Amazon in the purchase process at all. When Amazon states that they will not enforce their patents, I will again consider them when I make purchases.

Andrew C. Bertola


February 28, 2000

Jeff, it's just a cookie! You have so many other battles to fight and so many other features to create that I really hope you let this one go and get on to more important matters. If you pursue this you're making Billy G look like an easy-going guy!

Adam Pratt


February 28, 2000

I have bought many books from Amazon in the past and was quite impressed with their level of service. However, I am now boycotting them. I advise others to try the following excellent sites: barnesandnoble.com fatbrain.com bookpool.com textbooks.com

Sean C. Rhea


February 28, 2000

Boycott or not, Amazon has insulted my intelligence with this patent. I will no longer shop or support their site until such time as they publicly state they will cease these activities and a full apology to the web development community has been made.

Joseph E. Trent


February 28, 2000

You realize, I hope, that we aren't suprised that that such a trivial patent is being enforced. We are suprised that it is being enforced by YOU. Most of us respect Amazon for being a pioneer. That kind of respect is hard earned, but easily lost.

Chris Siegler


February 28, 2000

You wonder how the patent office approved of these but then you find that they patented a laser pointer for the use of a cat toy... http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?&pn=US05443036__ Makes the same sense. Not enforceable and should have never been granted.

Tim Pozar


February 28, 2000

I agree with Tim that there is no need to cheat at a race you are winning. Just before you finish the race in first place, you turn around and attempt to trip over the other players. In regards to the free software thing. Amazon itself is using Apache.

Brock Henry


February 28, 2000

I agree on the stupidity of these software patents for trivial items. In addition, I found the 'purchasing circles' program to be an incredible violation of privacy, to the point that I am no longer a customer of Amazon. Mr. Bezos, this is your loss.

Peter Brooks


February 28, 2000

I believe that Amazon has a substantial lead in both name recognition and customer base over competitors on the web, and that this is a ridiculous ploy. I will happily shift my business to borders.com or booksamillion.com if this sort of nonsense continues.

Raymond Forte


February 28, 2000

What can I do but add my voice to the chorus? I have been a happy Amazon customer in the past, but until the company stops trying to use the USPTO as anticompetetive muscle, I will take my business elsewhere, and encourage my friends and associates to do the same.

Dan Martinez


February 28, 2000

Amazon is a great service which I have used many times in the past, mostly because of the convenience, but also because the prices for good computer manuals tends to be cheaper than in my local bookstores. However, I will not be using Amazon again unless this issue is resolved.

Robert Norris


February 28, 2000

Patents were meant to protect something that took much time and effort to invent and create, not a simple system such as 1-click shopping. It seems that the patent offices also need some education in this matter as well. They seem to be handing out software patents much too freely.

Mr. J. Moody


February 28, 2000

I support the Amazon boycott, and will continue to do so until they drop their patent suit against Barnes and Noble (note: drop, not have it thrown out by a court). Ironically, we may be doing them more harm than good, since they loose money on every transaction...

Luke Francl


February 28, 2000

On an MSNBC program on the evening (EST) of 2/28 ("Silicon Valley Summit"?), Mr. Bezos seemed to be saying that there is no 1-Click patent. Very disingenuous in light of other evidence. I certainly agree with the sentiments expressed in Mr. O'Reilly's very thoughtfully crafted letter.

Jay Gerard


February 28, 2000

Thanks Tim. I've been told that my home looks like an O'Reilly warehouse. <g> I spend a significant portion of my discretionary income on books and recommend many of them to clients. Amazon won't be seeing any of that anytime soon unless they change their ways.

Bill Duncan


February 28, 2000

I would like to be able to recommend the IMDB web site to people, but I don't since I don't want to support amazon.com until they change their attitute about overly broad and nasty software patents. Amazon, please clear your name and stop making an ass of yourself.

Peter Cordes


February 28, 2000

I had other reasons for never ordering from Amazon in the past, primarily that I prefer to support my local book store, Powells. When news of this patent came to my attention, it only solidified my feelings about Amazon. As long as they hold this posture, I will continue to avoid them.

Hagen Amen


February 28, 2000

Jeff, I know you want to do what is right. You are a technical person at heart. Please do what you can and stop enforcing these patents. I really want to buy books and software from you again, yet I cannot as long as you enforce these unfair patents. Jonathan Geach

Jonathan Geach


February 28, 2000

I'm so annoyed, I don't know what to say. I *used to* to be an Amazon customer. My friend *used to* send Amazon certificates for my birthday. I *used to* tell people to try Amazon. No more. This is madness. What next, Amazon? Patents on double clicking?

Maggie Brazeau


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos, You are presented with a wonderful opportunity here to apologize and gain respect for doing so. We all know in our hearts, you included, this patent is wrong. Do the right thing(tm) before you suffer more embarassment at having the patent thrown out.

William R. Swaney


February 28, 2000

Dear Jeff, As a tech professional and avid book buyer/reader I am reluctant to stop frequenting your service, but your open flaunting of the very environment that allowed you to thrive pains me so that I can no longer in good concience buy from you. Sincerest regrets

Alex Russell


February 28, 2000

Selden's attempted patent of the automobile, Compton's attempted patent of the multimedia CD, and now Bezos' attempted patent of Web basics. Who says the Web has been commercialized? It's been humorized. Come on Jeff, give up the comedy and get back to selling my books.

Joseph T. Sinclair


February 28, 2000

Jeff, a patent was granted to your company for a technology that is both trivial and not of your own invention. Holding this patent is fraudulent, and until you deregister it, myself and everyone I know will be buoycotting Amazon.com. I think you will find a lot of people hold this same view.

Geoff Smith


February 28, 2000

I have purchased many hundreds of dollars worth of technical books from Amazon. Now I regret every penny spent. I am sad that I can no longer support Amazon while they pursue these patents. If they ever pull their heads out of their posteriors I will consider supporting Amazon's services again...

Jeff Soule


February 28, 2000

Amazon.com is a good company, on the verge of being great. I don't know what their problem is these days, but this patent ridiculousness has got to stop. I really liked my coffee mug I got from them as a Christmas present, but not enough to continue to buy books from them.

Chris Lindsay


February 28, 2000

I would be redundant to say that "patents" like this undermine every effort of the development for the better of internet and the world together. I can just hope that Amazon will stumble upon their own game once they try to implement something trivial that someone else patented.

Ugen Antsilevitch


February 28, 2000

I've used Amazon since they started, and I love what they provide. I own their stock, and use their service, but no more. This is truly insane and out of hand. There are plenty of competitors now, so why perpetuate this madness by supporting a company that is so clearly insane.

Shawn Gordon


February 28, 2000

come on this is retarded. One-click ordering as a _patent_?!?! Please regain some of your sanity, I really value the service that amazon.com provides and have ordered off the site several times because I would rather patronize a web retailer than someone else, but this is going way too far.

Karl Shea


February 28, 2000

Go Tim! Keep up the good work publishing the best computer technical books in the business. Bad Jeff! Where would you be if standards such as HTTP, SMTP, and DNS upon which your business is based had been patented and kept proprietary? Yeah that's what I thought. No biscuit! Jason H. Reeves

jhr_at_net-noise.com


February 28, 2000

Thank you Tim for taking a stand! I means a lot because it is obvious that you benefit from Amazons presence, yet you have decided to speak up! I have long since decided to no longer use Amazon.com for my online book purchases. Now only if O'Reilly would sell direct...

Frank Xavier Ledo


February 28, 2000

It takes a big man to admit making a mistake. Be a big man. You won't look bad if you back off this; it's easy to be seduced by lawyers. If you push it, you'll not only lose the patent and lots of money but you'll lose the hard won respect of the technical community. It just ain't worth it.

Dana Trantham


February 28, 2000

Jeff, by all appearances Amazon's patents are a frivolous abuse of a perhaps overly trusting patent system. Amazon's interests are not served by enforcing these patents, and your reputation can only suffer. These questionable practices have certainly altered my online buying habits.

Craig S. Kaplan


February 28, 2000

I thought a boycott over the 1-click issue was maybe a bit extreme. But now I think the Associates Program patent should be a big wake-up call for everyone. It obvious that Amazon 'just doesn't get it' and I, for one, will have to think about it a bit before I order from them again.

Michael Caplinger


February 29, 2000

Mr Bezos, For however long you hold and attempt to enforce patents on obvious or trivial techniques, I shall boycott Amazon.com and all subsidiary sites. Further, I will always lobby my family, friends and co-workers also to use alternative services. David Weil

David Weil


February 28, 2000

I am in the market for 3 new books this week and was planning on going to Amazon to make the purchases. This issue has changed my mind. I am voting with my wallet. Bezos, show some common sense about the direction your company is going in. Now before it's too late. Del Gillogly

Del Gillogly


February 28, 2000

A satisfied customer of Amazon, I do feel that the two most recent patents should not have been pursued or granted. The letter written by Mr. O'Reilly adequately sums up my sentiments. I will be forced to purchase from Amazon's competition until this situation is remedied. Christopher Horn.

Christopher Horn


February 28, 2000

I was buying several products/month from Amazon before they attempted to enforce this frivolous patent. Since then, I have bought nothing (not even at Christmas) and will continue to buy nothing so long as they pursue this strategy. Thanks, Tim, for providing a nice focus for this protest.

George Reese


February 28, 2000

I am an author of a book which is sold on Amazon. I would rather lose income than be associated in any way with a company such as Amazon which cannot make a profit through hard work, but must instead exploit the sorry state of the U.S. patent system. I am utterly disgusted with Amazon.

David F. Skoll


February 28, 2000

I would like to officially patent my "2-clicks and a jump" purchasing where two clicks followed by a page redirect to a secondary will complete a purchase. Hopefully, I can patent a whole gamut of these obvious methodologies and make a mint off of lawsuit settlements. Thanks Jeff Bezos!

Jonathan Jason Sy


February 28, 2000

I agree with Tim. Amazon is acting foolishly, and (much as it pains me) I will shift my business to fatbrain.com and barnesandnoble.com until Jeff & co. understand just how wrong they are. I sincerely hope that either they will change their minds or find their business sincerely damaged.

Carl C. Farmer, Jr.


February 28, 2000

I will not be buying anything more from Amazon. There are many alternative online resources that are not trying to fence in their own little corner of the internet. If more people join us, hopefully Amazon will be come just that - an insignificant little corner of the 'net. http://www.noamazon.com

Eric Sandeen


February 28, 2000

You sent me email asking why I haven't purchased anything recently---this is why. Since I became aware of your acts of bad faith I've bought all my books at fatbrain.com, and will continue to do so. I don't know whether you need me, but I sure don't need you. "No more pesos for Senor Bezos."

Benjamin Ogdon


February 28, 2000

I've decided not to support Amazon.com in their efforts to dictate not content, but methodologies used on other's web sites. Amazon.com has lost about 跌 worth of my business to BookPool in the last 2 months. I wish the general public had a better understanding of Amazon's tactics.

Brian McLaughlin


February 28, 2000

I also agree that software patents are making a mockery of the U.S. Patent Office, and would like to see this practice ended before it does any greater damage. You are exercising very poor business ethics, and I also have refused to purchase any product from amazon.com until this comes to an end.

Ryan Sackenheim


February 28, 2000

Amazon, please open your eyes and see that a patent like this is a hindrance to everything that made you what you are-- a thriving e-commerce company using the open standards of the Internet. I urge you to destroy this patent, and gain back many of your technically-adept and freedom-friendly customers!

Michael Proto


February 28, 2000

I find the idea that you have patented such self-evident concepts as one-click ordering and affilate marketing both absurd (within the context of the objectives of patent law) and injurious to the internet. It is impossible in these circumstances for me to continue to do business with your company. Fred

Fred Hapgood


February 28, 2000

It is clear to me that Amazon will not have my business until these patents are officially overturned. I have also strongly encouraged associates, colleagues, friends and family to avoid purchasing goods from Amazon, and to seek other channels to acquire books, gifts, electronics and audio/video media.

Paul C. Bryan


February 28, 2000

I've spent several thousand dollars at Amazon. I've encouraged several thousand more as an Amazon Associate. As an author, I've sold quite a few books via Amazon as well. Until this stupidity stops, I'm done. No more purchasing, no more Associate, and I'm going to urge my readers to purchase elsewhere.

Mike Gunderloy


February 28, 2000

The 1-Click feature would not make or break my decision to shop on Amazon, but your use of a failure of the patent system to bludgeon competitors, among other monopolistic practices, does compel me to stop doing business with you. Until the bullying stops, I will stick to brick-and-mortar bookstores, thank you.

Elson Liu


February 28, 2000

I wholeheartedly disagree with your tactics. Your patents are obvious, and an obvious abuse of the patent system, and can only act to stifle the development of the web as an open palce for commerce. I urge you to rethink your strategy. I can and will go elsewhere. And I never use the one-click anyway.

Russell Miller


February 29, 2000

I'll vote with my pocketbook. I spent several hundred dollars this past Christmas at amazon -- and it's not something I'll do again. Others will be getting my business this year -- all throughout. kbs

Kyle Sparger


February 28, 2000

Mr Bezos, I've been a frequent Amazon patron and greatly enjoyed the convenience of your Web site. However, your patent policy has greatly disturbs me and it has cost you a repeat customer. I've elected to make my last four purchases at a local bookseller and will continue until this matter is resolved.

Brian Sauls


February 28, 2000

I firmly believe that it is in the best interest not only of the Internet user community at large, but of Amazon.com's shareholders, that Amazon.com give up their claim to this frivolous and ill-conceived patent rather than waste a great of everyone's time and money fighting it in court, whether they win or lose.

Graham West


February 28, 2000

I needed a book today. I was in front of my computer when I realised this fact. Instead of ordering via Amazon (which I would normally do), I got in my car and drove to Borders. Will you now be patenting the process of getting in a car and driving to a bookstore in a vain attempt to discourage this behavior?

James Ludlow


February 28, 2000

Amazon: Welcome to the world of grassroots activism. I hope you enjoy your short stay on the Internet. You couldn't figure out how to use cookies to maintain session state until 1997, then you have the gall to try to patent the idea? May all your future innovations be pre-emptively patented by Barnes & Noble. Snakes.

Cameron Huang


February 28, 2000

Amazon - Stuff like this makes you hard to love. Stop pissing off the community that supports you. What if the brick and mortar Barnes and Noble tried to patent the plastic bags customers use to carry out their purchases? What you're doing is just as ridiculous, and it's only patent-department ineptitude that allows it.

Jason Hickner


February 28, 2000

I was shocked when I first learned about Amazon's patent land grab. It seemed so out of character--something I would have expected to come from Barnes & Noble after their "world's biggest bookstore" protest. I want to thank Tim O'Reilly for providing this opportunity to do more than just quietly redirect my money.

Doug Schafer


February 28, 2000

Granted, I only spend 躔-񘈨/year on your web site, but as Mr O'Reilly said, doing nothing lets you win. I will make no more purchases from your site until you stop this nonsense, and grow up. The World Wide Web is NOT your playground to dominate. Stop trying to be another Microsoft, it is very unbecomming.

Nathan Tallack


February 28, 2000

Tim's letter summarise wonderfully our concerns about Amazon's patent. Thse patents are not doing justice to the people who build the Internet and Web as a free Open Medium for everybody. What they have build is order of magnitude more complexe and a trivial use of cookies, and still they have offred it to the world.

Khalid HASSANI


February 28, 2000

I'll never again buy anything from Amazon unless this patent enforcement action is halted very soon. It's not only a very bad thing to do, but it's an indication of what kind of people there are at Amazon. This is a thing that only very bad people would do, and I won't buy from very bad <insert strong language> people.

Michael Ward


February 28, 2000

I would like to add my voice to the list of those urging Amazon to decline to enforce their patent on "one click ordering". I agree with Tim O'Reilly's points about the triviality of the application, the potential effect on the Internet, and the likelihood the patent will not be upheld. Curtis Frye Professional Writer

Curtis D. Frye


February 28, 2000

I stopped shopping at Amazon the moment the news of your abuse of the patent system made it on to Slashdot. I now routinely tell people to avoid purchasing products from you. For your demographics, I'm a 25 year old computer professional. I really don't think that I'm in the demographic group that you want to alienate.

Eric Esposito


February 28, 2000

I have already stopped making purchases from Amazon.com in protest of the enforcement of this obnoxious software patent. I have also encouraged others to make their purchases through other sources and will continue to do so while this nonsense goes on. Patents should protect implementation and not the outward effect.

Jason V. Morgan


February 28, 2000

It amazes me that Jeff Bezos would do such a thing. It's not that I object to his profit motive. I'm just amazed that someone who has been running in front of the pack so hard for so long would bother with something so obviously beneath him and so obviously doomed to failure. How small. How very small.

Mark Draughn, Chicago, Illinois


February 28, 2000

Amazingly dense behavior for someone trying to cultivate a popular image of being a technically savvy company. Anti-marketing attitude that betrays disdain for the efforts of others who provided the tools that made your original strategy possible and who provided much of your original -- and perhaps definitive -- clientele.

David Howson


February 28, 2000

I have ordered from Amazon in the past, and I had a good experience. However, because of the recent patents on obvious applications of web technology, I have stopped ordering from your company. Barnes and Noble has already received a 趚 order that could have been yours. Please cease this foolishness so that you can reclaim my business.

Benjamin Thomas


February 28, 2000

Those boycotting Amazon should consider doing as I've done: Buy your books from Barnes & Noble, and tell Amazon why you are doing so. Since B&N is the most direct target of their bogus 1-Click legal action, taking your business away from Amazon while giving it to B&N adds a touch more leverage to your act of protest.

John Callender


February 28, 2000

I believe I had the essence of this 1-click patent going long before Amazon did, with MiniVend. I find this patent nonsense to be a bar not to the truly innovative, but I hereby proclaim that I have given my new 0-click purchasing mechanism to the world. <META HTTP-EQUIV=refresh CONTENT="60; url=/cgi-bin/place_order">

Mike Heins


February 28, 2000

I've admired Amazon's foresight and intelligent business practices in the past, but I cannot accept the enforcement of such a meritless patent. Even though Amazon provides a convenient one-stop (and one-click) shop on the web, I will take my business elsewhere (www.bn.com, www.x-radio.com) until this issue is resolved.

John Reeves Hall


February 28, 2000

I think that patenting something obvious should not only be disallowed, but considered as a crime, just like stealing is. Unfortunately, boycotting isn't the solution. We need to convince Amazon (and other companies with similar tactics) that what they're doing is wrong, not convince them that it is just bad economically.

Michal Karczmarek


February 28, 2000

I find it unfortunate that Amazon, a company I have done business with in the past and might have in the future, has opted for this kind of corporate direction. I not only agree with the statements in the letter to which I am signing, but I strongly believe in the original 'Ask Tim' open letter. Please turn around before your clientele turn away.

Lynn Pye Jr.


February 28, 2000

I've never bought a thing from Amazon, and I never will, until they stop using patents as weapons against their competitors and all who dare to challenge them in the future. My favourite local bookstore can have alllll my book business. They've earned it. http://www.bolen.bc.ca/ (PS to Tim: I have 17 ORA.books! You're the best!)

Jim Roepcke


February 28, 2000

Amazon is sowing the seeds of their own demise. If only they were wise enough to see the long term effects of this whole fiasco, they might change their strategy. Laying claim to something that you do not own, especially in this case, is no different than stealing. This is much worse, though. It is stealing from a common trust.

Jonathan Shook


February 28, 2000

Tim said it far more eloquently than I could ... taking what doesnt belong to you has always been called stealing. Taking advantage of the US Patent Office for a service that is global in scope is not only inappropriate it should (and eventually will) be illegal. Personally I now shop at Barnes and Noble for my books.

James C. Diggans


February 28, 2000

These really are bad patents. 1 click and associates programs are *so* blatently obvious. I really hate to boycott Amazon, because my wife and I really love the site. But I don't feel like I have any other choice. Barnes and Noble and FatBrain will be getting my business from until Amazon publicly drops these rediculous patents.

Bob McCormick


February 28, 2000

As a published author who helped Amazon by recommending that my book be bought through them, and by filling out an interview (presumably thus enhancing their content), I'm dissappointed. As a softwar engineer, I'm annoyed that a trivial idea was patented. As a taxpayer, I'm upset that the Patent Office is so apparently inept.

David Ascher


February 28, 2000

Patently arrogant behaviour on Jeff's part - he is named in the affiliates patent. It is a true insult to those that are creating bonafide innovations. Furthermore, it is hypocritical for him to encourage a legal bureacracy that he surely despises (every reasonable entrepreneur does) - a very poor role model for entrepreneurs indeed!

Steve Pappa


February 28, 2000

While i believe that true innovations are reasonable candidates for patents, i see nothing innovative or new about the 1-Click technology that would justify its earning a patent. By setting a precedent for aggressive patenting, you are laying yourselves open to be victimized by the exact same tactics with the next round of incremental development.

Daniel Steinberg


February 28, 2000

I believe that Amazon's actions are a slap in the face of the pioneers that created and sustained the World Wide Web. As these patents are likely to be overturned anyway, I urge Amazon to discontinue pursuit of these patents. Until such time as they do, my business and my recommendations to collegues will go to their competitors.

Rich Shappard


February 28, 2000

It's a shame that it has come to this... Yes, Microsoft is one of the richest companies in the world, but it is disgusting to sink to their level just because of greed and desire... Amazon is already the greatest. Why can't they be satisfied with a competitive market in which they are the leaders... Why do they have to be the bully?

J Derek Wilson


February 28, 2000

As a Senior Software Engineer and Architect for a business to business e-commerce firm that provides an automated web partnering service, this particular patent claim strikes close to home. I have been a loyal customer of Amazon's ever since they started their business, but their predatory approach to the e-commerce market has left me with a very bitter taste.

George Feil


February 28, 2000

I have been in support of the boycott since it first came to be, and will refuse to have any dealings with Amazon until their stance on the above mentioned patents is reversed. This playing field is no longer Amazon only -- there are many alternatives available now for consumers to get the products they need over the web. I vote with my feet.

Brian Loudon


February 28, 2000

Although not quite on the level of RMS, i do believe that these kind of software patents are wrong in the moral sense, and will lead to a loss of revenue in the long term. If you come up with something new; fine, great, be the first one to capitalize on it, but if you just use a cookie to store user information, keep your laywers to yourself!

Ben Cummings


February 28, 2000

There is nothing new to add except for the fact, that not only is 1 click shopping a trivial patent, its also very dangerious. Your opening the doors wide open on this one. So I sit down on my neighbors computers and buy a few things, and what do I know, I didn't have to pay for it. Smart guys, really smart. Derek Young President GS Data Design Inc

Derek Young


February 28, 2000

It is absurd to me that someone can patent such a thing as this. This which has been around since the beginning of business on the web. This would be like me patenting Links between webpages. Nope sorry you have links on your page pay me! It's absolutely insane to think that the patent offices are so oblivious as to grant this patent. Well thats my .02

Jared


February 28, 2000

It is rather offensive that such a trivial patent has been granted and that Amazon is attempting to enforce it. Amazon *was* my favorite place to get books before the lawsuit against B&N. In the future I hope I can purchase from Amazon again, however, as long as this patent (and the affiliates patent) stands I shall be forced to shop elsewhere.

Andrew Sharp


February 28, 2000

I have bought one book from Amazon -- until you publically announce that you will not pursue infringement claims on any of your patents, I will be shopping elsewhere. I would also strongly urge you to announce a royalty-free license to anyone who wants to use your patents. In this way, you can begin to regain the good will that has been lost here.

David Carter


February 28, 2000

As other's have stated, Tim has drafted an excellent letter summing up my feelings. I have purchased hundred's of dollars from Amazon.com, I have since purchased hundreds of dollars elsewhere. Any more I just use your site to get a rough idea on price and doing product searches. I no longer make purchases. I didn't even use you 1-click system. Joe kline

Joe Kline


February 28, 2000

The 1-Click patent is a mockery of the patent system. This lawsuit has ensured that dvdexpress.com, fatbrain.com and buy.com now receive the considerable portion of my income which had previously been spent at amazon.com. My only hope is that your abuse of the patent system will bring it's credibility in the software field into review. Kevin D Way

Kevin Way


February 28, 2000

Gee, Jeff didn't answer my letter--I just got a robot... Tim's wimping out by not advocating a boycott. Many of us are not going to be so charitable. What we really need is a free book ranking list. Once it got up and running (and was free of Amazon or any other company), I wouldn't miss your company at all. For now, I browse, then buy (and post comments) elsewhere...

Jason Duell


February 28, 2000

I gave Amazon all my book business because I thought they "got" the Internet. It appears I was wrong. I now use B&N for all my mass market book buying and resent Amazon that little bit more for every needless extra click I have to use. I will own no Amazon stock and recommend against to all my friends. After 200+ orders in 18 months, goodbye Amazon!

Christopher Schanck


February 28, 2000

Tim O'Reilly has said it well. I want to add my protest to the use of trivial patents to stifle competition and innovation. If the purpose of patents are to encourage innovation, your patents make a mockery of the system. The only benefit that I can see from your actions, Amazon.com, is that you may hasten a much needed overhaul of the patent system.

Chris O'Hare


February 28, 2000

I invested in and used Amazon.com because I thought it was a novel idea and philosophy. Until Amazon resolves this issue, I will continue to explore other means of purchasing internet goods. C'mon, Jeff, give it up. At least Al Gore later admitted he didn't invent the Internet! You're not fooling anyone aside from some myopic patent office clerks.

Gregory Harrison


February 28, 2000

I really liked the tremenous services that Amazon.com provided and have bought many books over the years. Because of this clear beginning of corporate greed harming the public and innovation, I am following Richard Stallman's call for boycott and am telling others about it. Until I see some signs that you are going to be a responsible corporate citizen, I will continue to do so.

Jason Yoon


February 28, 2000

I used to shop at Amazon.com. I no longer do so because of the patents that they have filed. The patents abuse the patent system and allow Amazon to use anti-competitive practices against other e-commerce companies. I find that unacceptable. I no longer shop at Amazon.com and I am urging everyone I know to shop at the other book vendors on the web.

Mark E. Boudreau


February 28, 2000

Amazon, As a consumer of your services I implore you to reconcider your position on the 1-click patent. I dont want the web to become a place where I have to look behind me everytime I use a technique on a web site that should be free to be used by everyone. I value the free spirt of the Internet and your actions are killing the way to our Information Society.

Scott Larson


February 28, 2000

i have exclusively used Amazon so far but now because of this silly patent stuff i have moved my purchases (+encouraging/educating others)somewhere else. i find Amazon to be better than my new vendor but i am willing to go thru the inconvenience because i feel very strongly about the issue. Hope you see (business) sense + moral obligation ...reverse your stand and be 'Open'.

Nikhil Jhingan


February 28, 2000

I will never buy another book from you. This is because you show the capacity to spend the profits of my patronage trying to destroy something that I use every day: the web. If you wish to provide a service, you may start by not being a barrier to your customers. The only investment of yours that this patent protects is the time you have spent filling for it.

Adrian Johnston


February 28, 2000

Amazon, this is a rather foolish thing you have done. Don't you realise that this is just inviting MickeySoft to invent and patent no-click technology, where all of your financial details are transmitted immediately to Redmond, Washington. Where Micro$oft immediately charges you for all software you may or may not have purchased, and all future upgrades/versions of said software.

Matthew Wallis


February 28, 2000

I've dropped out of the Amazon Associates program, removed all links to Amazon from my site, and signed up with Powell's Books. I will do no more business with Amazon -- though they are far and away the best in their field -- until the company moderates its aggressive deployment of bogus software patents. My public stand is at http://tbtf.com/blog/2000-02-27.html#1 .

Keith Dawson


February 28, 2000

I have long been a customer of Amazon and in your associates program. The 񘐜 or so per quater in orders that you receive from our web sites participation in the associates program will cease at the end of this quater. I will be terminating our membership in the associates program and joining in the boycott of Amazon unless you change your policy on this issue.

R. Steven Rainwater


February 28, 2000

I've spent quite a few bucks buying books from your company over the past 2 years, because it was convenient and because I liked the way you did business over the Internet. These feelings have changed with your ridiculous move toward these rather trivial patents. Until you change your stance on these patents, all of my business will be redirected to your competitors.

Mike Richardson


February 28, 2000

I have been boycotting Amazon since I heard of this ludicrous patent claim in early January, and will continue to do so. There has been no public statement from Amazon that remotely justifies their actions, and with the passage of time, it has become even more clear that even Amazon cannot justify the patent. Perhaps it is time that Amazon looked at how amoral their actions are.

C. Bryant


February 28, 2000

Leave it to humans, supposedly the most species on the planet Earth, to once again deficate where they eat. Jeff, cease listening to the power hungry, greed obsesed, lawyers of the Dark side and come back to us. We are the one's that made you. The AOL horde is too sheepish to support you for long. In the words of Kiki, "Stay good, Jeff! Stay good!!" (Thanks Pete)

Todd Metcalf


February 28, 2000

You and your company disgusts me, I will not buy from you again, and I will persuade my friends to choose another vendor to purchase from, until you give up this childish crap. Dont forget your roots! http://www.noamazon.com is a good site to start with, it lists all the alternatives to amazon. I strongly encourage all to go there right now and bookmark it for later use.

robert soros


February 28, 2000

Gee, Amazon... this letter is getting a tad large, don't you think? On a less flaimbaitish note, i do support the boycott of Amazon while they engage in practices which engender such badwill on the part of it's customers. I've done my part to discourage my friends and family from using Amazon in their online purchasing and i encourage everyone to spread the word. Paul Young

ephemeral at operamail dot com


February 28, 2000

I've shopped quite often at your website. I even bought christmass presents there this year for my neices and nephews. I will no longer shop at your establishment. When you come to your senses it will probably be to late. Look at the etoy etoys fight. Next time I want a book I'll get it from Barnes and Noble. Think about what you're losing compared to what you are gaining.

Steve Baugus


February 28, 2000

Even if these patents were not enforced by Amazon, I think this form of thinking when it comes to technology can lead way to stifling progress. The example that Amazon sets is going to be carried on by others, and if enough people do that, or enough people do it strongly enough, then we may be in for trouble. We've come so far, and it's sad that marketing and gimmics are threatening that.

Adekunle Olonoh


February 28, 2000

What is being done to patent law is distasteful and offensive. Its truely pathetic that company as large and ubiquitous as Amazon would need to resort to this kind of lowbrow tactic in an attempt to fend off their rivals. In the past I used amazon frequently. Since this case was opened I would rather spent longer and pay more to get the books I want than to use Amazon.

Aaron Tavistock


February 28, 2000

Today I reject Amazon.com, IMDB and any other sites which exist as part of, or to support Amazon. Until the patents on One-Click Shopping and the Amazon Associates program are repudiated by Amazon, I will no longer shop at Amazon. Whatever value that Amazon offers the Internet and the world at large pales in comparison to the potential havoc caused by absurd patents.

James Mitchell


February 28, 2000

I couldn't agree more Mr. O'Reilly. If and when I see an associate or friend on Amazon's site, I always take a moment and explain to him/her the one-click patent and how it suppresses creativity on the 'net. Then I usually point their browser to bn.com or thinkgeek.com. <br><br>Not b/c bn.com is necessarily better, rather because of principle. I just hope Jeff realizes this in time.

Joshua Staples


February 28, 2000

I understand business motives behind filing for a patent. However I urge Amazon.com to give up it's software patents as they represent something truly trivial. In my opinion it is only a matter of time before these patents are overturned. All the ill will that these patents are generating is surely not worth whatever benefit there is to holding on to them until they are overturned.

Steven Pulito


February 28, 2000

Trivial and obvious patents are an unethical means by which large companies stake out portions of the market place, obstruct the activities of competitors, and deny individuals the benefits of our rapidly expanding publicly developed technology. We, your customers, are not blind to the advantage you take of us. Your trademark's "good name" is its most important asset. Don't waste it.

Daniel R. Strick


February 28, 2000

And by the way, why is the patent office so overwhelmed by current software technology? Who is running that office?? Your average tech-spec person should be able to understand the universality of cookies. Its the patent office that needs a real overhaul, and we should press that point to the elected officials who can do something about it. Let's send them and the office an open letter, pronto.

Colin Rudd


February 28, 2000

I am furious about the 1-click patent and Amazon's attitude about it. I have been an Amazon customer since the early days, and until now I have bought a couple of thousand dollars worth of books and CDs from Amazon. No more. Since RMS's call for boycott I have stopped buying from Amazon, and unless Amazon voluntarily gives up the blatant abuse of the patent system I will not buy from them again.

J’rgen Botz


February 28, 2000

When the patent office finally gets up to speed -- perhaps even catches up to the 1990s, muchless the next decade -- it will laugh all Amazon patents into legal oblivion. It's too bad. I liked Amazon. But I will never, ever use it again. And I know a lot of people, folks who I will urge to do the same. B&N and Borders run pretty good sites. So does Walmart. With my help, they'll get even better.

Steve Abatangle


February 28, 2000

Amazon: You are behaving poorly. Your judgements are unsound, and your ethics in this issue are questionable. To patent the '1Click' ordering process is ridiculous. If you can offer any reason why it isn't, I will immediately stop complaining. In the world of e-commerce, public perception is everything. And despite what you may think, your public perception is not invulnurable. Dont risk it.

Ryan Abrams


February 28, 2000

I could not agree with you more, Tim. Amazon is pissing in the well, and they will receive no more of my business unless they do an "about-face" on this issue. I am a book addict, and I buy a book every other week, but I'll buy them from a company that has my (and the whole Internet's, really) best interest at heart. I don't think I can afford not see things this way. Sorry Jeff, Troy Johnson

Troy Johnson


February 28, 2000

Amazon's patenting of the one-click ordering system is a blatant abuse of their power as a major internet company. They are purposely using it to impede the progress of all web commerce that neither merges with them nor pays royalties to them. Because of the ineffectiveness of the current US patent system, I believe that the only way to correct this abuse is a total boycott of amazon.com

Marissa Hoftiezer


February 28, 2000

It's hard for me to simply stop using the valuable service that Amazon provides. I've bought numerace dvd's and countless books from them since their inception. However, the anti-competitve nonsense that this patent signifies has got to end. Now, it is my turn to look elsewhere as I purchase technical books and films. Other options are available, even if I do have to "click twice" to order from them. ;)

James Scott Olsson


February 28, 2000

To attempt to own and exclude all competitors from using the bloody obvious "1-click" ordering process has shown the world your true colours. Not only have you alienated your technical customer base, you have sent out a clear message that amazon will resort to any dirty trick to keep its monopoly... you may win a few battles this way, but you will certainly lose this war yet another x-amazon customer.

Jim Clark


February 28, 2000

It is disgraceful that Amazon has chosen to try to take open standards that made the WWW grow so fast and try to subvert them to their own purposes. Thanks to their predatory and ill conceived patent filings, they have lost my business. Apparently, they are too close to Redmond, and have taken lessons from their neighbor about "Big Brother" ambitions. I'm very appalled and disappointed at their behavior.

Peter Schilling


February 28, 2000

I used to look to amazon first for any product that they offered. I was there in the begining buying hundreds of dollars worth of books for a business when amazon was just developing. I beleived that amazon was different, a beleiver in the new way of doing things. I now see that as soon as amazon had the chance, they joined the establishment. They joined not as a reforming party, but as a supporter of the party line.

Piotr Misztal


February 28, 2000

To Mr. Bezos and the shareholders of amazon.com: As a web developer I find your tactics ghastly. Therefore, my wife, myself and members of my family will no longer make purchases from your company. I will also educate everyone I know of what amazon is doing and urge them to look elsewhere for on-line shopping. I hope this boycott will be a lesson to all corporations everywhere that attempt to abuse 'the system' in a 'free-market' society.

Dean Williams


February 28, 2000

On top of the absurdity of digitizing a widely popular and age old business model (the running account), a trivial application of a widely used feature is responsiible for this alleged "invention". The whole reason behind the "cookie" is that you need not identify yourself on a regular basis to the web sites you frequent. I no longer frequent Amazon, and I actively encourage my friends to abstain from using your services.

Eric B. Mitchell


February 28, 2000

It is not only discourteous and bad business practice to take a free technology and make its use proprietry, but plain thievery. It is disgusting that people would even have the gall to consider such a thing, let alone go ahead with it. Please do not set a precedent for the rest of the Internet community, which has thrived because it is an open community where technology enriches the lives of all, not just one selfish player.

Andr‰ Pang


February 28, 2000

I have purchased several books (all technically related) and have been very happy with the service. I have enjoyed the ability to be assured that the book that I purchased would be worth the money, and how I could find exactly what I wanted. However, since hearing of Amazons' patent filings I have not visited their website, nor will, until the matter is resolved to my satisfaction. That is, they drop their efforts to patent.

John Hayes


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos: Since I chose to quit purchasing from Amazon.com after the Spamazon debacle, your most recent episode of dishonorable behavior has not lost me as a customer. Rather, it has gained me as an enemy. I, too, shall be recommending to my friends, family, and associates that they cease doing business with you. I sincerely hope that your stockholders spend a good deal of time thinking over whether dishonesty constitutes due diligence.

Karl A. Krueger


February 28, 2000

I cannot say enough about how apalled I was by not only the *grant* of this baseless patent, but the fact that it was *Amazon* who filed it! So Jeff using his old office door as a desk was just a ploy to ingratiate himself to the public! I'm a techie: the kinda guy parasites like you *need* in order to flourish. Don't piss us off. Your org WILL die, without cheerfully willing brains to propell it. Get on the clue train, Jeff!

Peter r Schmitt


February 28, 2000

I read and learn much from looking, examining and trying people's code: Code that has been freely shared with others for that purpose. We better ourselves through sharing what each other has learned including the mistakes and successes. If we are not able to learn from each other; if our thoughts and ideas are fenced behind legal barriers surrounded by paranoia and fear of not getting credit then we might as well remain in the stone age.

Dan T.


February 28, 2000

To Amazon.com, You have already lost business from myself and other associates of mine over the ridiculous issue of patenting 1-Click ordering. Why do you continue to foster such ill will? Our business isn't lost forever, however. I enjoy using Amazon.com, and I will place an order the day you announce that you are abandoning this absurd abuse of the patent system. I imagine you will get a lot of free publicity by "doing the right thing"(TM).

Eric Jones


February 28, 2000

It's questionable logic to conclude that, through a collection of technologies otherwise not belonging to Amazon and some of their own development, one could patent any apparatus that would lead to an individual clicking on something. The click is a fundamental aspect of computing via GUI. I wonder if Amazon would be willing to accept all customer support issues relating to problems that sourced from or involved a click at some point.

Tyler Regas


February 28, 2000

Take any old normal sales medthod and add the words "with a computer" or "over a network" and suddenly that's original? Not likely. We are moving more and more non-computer business practises to computers. It's called automation. What Amazon is doing is abusing the legal system to take money for our pockets. I have stopped using them and now go to the conner store. Thanks for the nice little kick in the teeth. -- James Dornan

James Harry Dornan


February 28, 2000

Mr Bezos, I admire what you have done with amazon.com, and I was a frequent shopper there. However, since hearing of the 1-click patent, I haven't oredered a single item from your web site, and I don't plan too again until this abuse of the patent system is ceased. Thanks for all you've done for the web so far, I just hope that you see the light soon, and continue to make the medium a better place. Thanks for your time, Ben Stanfield

Ben Stanfield


February 28, 2000

The Amazon executives should read and heed www.cluetrain.com if they ever hope to survive. The Internet has given us customers new power to communicate instantly and effectively with each other in our own community. We can easily and instantly select ANY available vendor based entirely upon our own whims simply by typing in a different URL. Either play the game the way we want it to be played or you simply won't be invited to the next round.

Jim Gunkel


February 28, 2000

Amazon used to be an innovative company; now these ridiculous patents show that it has become a typical mindless corporation. The time for such dinosaurs is over. Customers don't have to take this kind of thing any more - Bezos of all people should know this. Whoever advocated this move at Amazon should be fired immediately, because they've killed the company. Amazon shares now represent a piece of the past. Goodbye, Amazon, it was fun while it lasted. V.

Viveka Weiley


February 28, 2000

Amazon used to be the perfect example of the new era: a small internet company challenging the established world of bookselling dominated by Borders and Barnes and Noble. Sadly, as so often happens, once the oppressed gains power, it turns around and does the same thing that was done to it. Amazon is becoming a perfect example of the old era: a stodgy company able to compete only by manipulating the government and stifling competition. You've lost my business.

Henry Towsner


February 28, 2000

I was one of the first members of the associates program, and i've been shuttling book reviews to your sites for years now. I used to be a regular customer myself, too: one or two orders each month. But when the One-Click patent was announced, I slapped a big "stay-away" warning on my recommendations pages, and now that "Associates" are patented, too, I am redirecting visitors to other sites. You've lost my business and my trust.

C. Scott Ananian


February 28, 2000

I think its about time that the entire community spoke out with regards to patents like this. We also need to encourage the patent office to wake up, and prevent these types of patents. If I remember correctly, Yahoo pulled a few of these some time ago (although, I don't recall the end result). The Amazon patents are just a symptom of a larger, much more dangerous problem, the patent system. Perhaps an open letter to the patent office is also in order.

Troy Poppe


February 28, 2000

It's very disappointing to see a company that was once an innovator of the web become an abuser of the US Patent system. I've shopped at Amazon for a couple of years now, but I no longer do any business whatsoever with Amazon, and I encourage others both in person and through my website to likewise avoid Amazon. Until Amazon stops using legal harassment and lies, claiming they invented obvious uses of software that they didn't, I will go elsewhere.

Michael Gusovsky


February 28, 2000

Before your software patent, I considered B&S and old world company that was just out of touch with the new technology of the web. Now I am once again their customer, totally disheartened by Amazon's enforecment of software patents and by their email reply that basically snubbed me when I protested to them about it. Now instead of comming off like a pioneer on the web, you are comming off as a one time deal that just lucked out, but really doesn't get it.

David Christy


February 28, 2000

The Amazing Amazon is worthy of several accords and praise. But, their stance on patents should be loathed and driven six feet under. I would seriously like to challenge both their patents, for I too (along with several other internet developers) have invented 1-click-click ordering, and affiliate programs (in the form of banners) long before Amazon was registed as a domain. Right now, Amazon might be not even be worthy of a nicely chewed tobacco spit.

Mohamed Ishan


February 28, 2000

To whom it may concern: I am president of Dataway Inc, a security consulting firm based in San Francisco. I have used Amazon several times personally and for business. I strongly urge Amazon to give up on this reckless 1-Click patent strategy as it is patently (excuse the pun) ridiculous and will hurt Amazon and the Internet community in the long run. Dataway shall not be purchasing any items from Amazon until this silly game is stopped. Sincerely, Simon Lewis

Simon Lewis


February 28, 2000

Not only will I no longer buy books from Amazon.com, I have put an end to all use of your site on our corporate intranet. I also take it upon myself to educate my peers and friends to not use your site and recommend other sites at which to buy books. As programmer of web technologies, I am very concerned about your short sighted and selfish behavior regarding this issue. My boycott and related activities will continue until you change your policy.

john napiorkowski


February 28, 2000

Just yesterday, I was defending amazon.com to a friend of mine as "the only company I've run into on the Net that doesn't piss off its customers - the only one that consistently 'gets it.'" Which, so far, has been the case - at least once the problem has been brought to amazon.com's attention. Software patents (patents in general, in my opinion) are bad things. Worse than spam, I'd say. I would hate to have to join the boycott. I really *do* enjoy buying from amazon.com.

Jack Rigley


February 28, 2000

Mr Bezos, what are you thinking? If ARPANet had not been opened to .com access for the price of registration and a POP connection, Amazon.com would not be. If Tim Berners-Lee, Larry Wall, and Linus Torvalds had acted (with much more justification) as Amazon...there would be no Amazon.com. So now you shun the very ideals that produced the World Wide Web on the Internet and alienate the very architects upon which your empire is founded. Have you no shame?

Robert Taylor


February 28, 2000

To amazon: This patent is both an abuse of a system designed to protect genuine innovation instead of obvious applications of exisiting technologies as well as an insult to the Internet community at large; it is a remarkable about-face of a company many believed to be genuinely interested in fostering growth and innovation on the Internet instead of stifling it. Regardless of what happens in this patents case on a legal level, this disrespect of the roots of your success will come back to haunt you.

A. W.


February 28, 2000

I had already written to Amazon, as a very early customer, stating that I am boycotting them because of this patent action (even quite a bit before RMS made his public statement). Of course, I am just some guy who bought a couple dozen books, not an influential publisher like Tim O'Reilly. But it's good to do what you can. I would encourage all other Amazon customers to both sign this public letter, and write individual comments to Amazon stating the same general sentiment.

David Mertz, Ph.D.


February 28, 2000

Patents should be reserved for truely innovative ideas that need protection. Such trivially obvious refinements as 1-click ordering fall far short of the bar. As a 17 year software developer with experience at IBM, Apple, and 10 years at Microsoft (most recently as an Architect), the "innvention" of 1-click ordering is so obvious it's banal. It is certainly not the kind of innovation I would suspect from the company that made Web-based retail a reality. Sincerely, Brendan Dixon

Brendan Dixon


February 28, 2000

This is my second letter to Amazon.com in 12 hours, but there are certain acts of stupidity that can't go unnoticed. The US Patent Office, Amazon.com, RIAA, DVDCCA, Unisys, and the MPAA come to mind. As I stated in my earlier email, Amazon's competitors have received all my business since this patent nonsense started. My 趚 my not account for much, but when we start multiplying it by the thousands the numbers will get noticed. Stock holders tend to notice these things.:)

Gregory Stooksberry


February 28, 2000

Amazon is great for me - I've always used it as a perfect example of e-commerce, back when that phrase wasn't mainstream like it is today. Right now I use it as an example of how stupid a company can be, losing money from customers because of a trivial patant. This issue will slowly grow and grow, and at some point it will get Jeff Bezos on the front of Time again. But this time, he won't like it. Such a pity, Amazon is a great concept. The good thing is, it gives competition a chance..

John Sinteur


February 28, 2000

Take from the poor, give to the rich. It seems that the poor do get poorer and the rich do get richer. I can not believe that there is NOT a system in place to allow for review of patents that are under consideration. While I know the patent office must be busy as a bird in spring with the on slaught of new software patents, this stinks of needing a website devoted to just that. I'm glad Tim O'Reilly has decided to do something about it and not just talk about it. Down with Amazon, long live O'Reilly.

Troy Muller


February 28, 2000

This 1-click patent business is simply crazy...Give it up Amazon. I have purchased from Amazon in the past, and I would have purchased other items in the future since their service, speed, and prices were all superb. But I will be certain to purchase from your competitors until the time comes that you have agreed to give up this silly patent. Also, I will be certain that my family and our business are aware of your shenanigans and their purchases will be made elsewhere as well. Give it up.

Mark Tomich


February 28, 2000

I have emailed them asking them to remove all trace of my "customer identity," etc from their databases. I have not heard back. I *WANT* to know that they will remove all trace of my credit cards, shipping info, and email addresses from their databases. What a regret. I quite enjoyed shopping with them and making use of their consumer feedback. I even used to cite them as a shining example of good site design. Tsk tsk that it comes to this b.s. example of greed and legal shenanigans.

Jason P. Stanford


February 28, 2000

I hope that Amazon.com's new patent-centric business model helps them in their quest for that ever-elusive profit. It's a shame, because the original plan (you know, the one that just involved pleasing customers) seemed like such a good bet. The great thing about the Internet, besides the fact that that the technology isn't patented, is that it costs me nothing to shop at a different online retailer. Which is exactly what I have been doing ever since learning about the 1-Click patent.

Alexander Kourakos


February 28, 2000

It isn't like Amazon has some unique product or service we all HAVE to have. Jeff Bezos isn't Bill Gates and he needs to wake up, smell the coffee and realize that we ain't about to allow him to BECOME another Gates. It's easy, and often less expensive, to purchase from other online booksellers so that's what is happening with anyone with a clue about things 'Net related. This boycott isn't even a minor hardship for those of us joining it so it can and probably will continue as long as needed.

John Morris


February 28, 2000

The Amazon patent, like many other recent United States software patents granted for 'inventions' that do not meet the criterion of being 'non-obvious', is an alarming and potentially crippling travesty. Amazon - as one of the largest beneficiaries of a network born out of open and competitive intellectual endeavour - should be ashamed to be associated with the crappy tactics of patent bargaining and harrassment. Up till now I had no particular reason to feel positive about Barnes & Noble.... Peter

Peter Gallagher


February 28, 2000

While I haven't been a large customer of yours, I have purchased over 贄 at your store between O'Reily books for the ISP I work at, and books for myself at home. If I thought it was remotely possible I would ask to return these items so I could purchase from one of your compeditors. Since the emergence of your patent I've purchased ์ from your compeditor, Barnes & Nobel. I will continue to boycott your website until you reverse your decision, even if it meant loosing the ability to buy online.

Tom Forsythe


February 28, 2000

I agree with virtually everything Tim O'Reilly has said. Perhaps the most galling and outrageous aspect of all this (and surely the most ironic) is that Amazon depends upon *unpatented* open source software for their very existence -- and they repay this debt with preposterous patents on algorithms they did not invent. I will not spend a dime at Amazon (and I will discourage my friends from doing so) until/unless Amazon changes its course. Free your patents, Mr. Bezos. Stop listening to your lawyers.

Fred W. Noltie Jr.


February 28, 2000

I am a former Amazon customer and have purchased more than 񘈨 worth of books from the site. I have also recommended the site to others and linked to it. Not any more. Not only am I boycotting Amazon, I will patronize and actively recommend any company you sue. "One-click ordering" was one of the suggested SAMPLE APPLICATIONS in the original Netscape page on web cookies. Art can't get much more prior than that. Your patent is utterly bogus -- did you hire your lawyer from an email spam or a bus bench ad?

Don Marti


February 28, 2000

Ariving somewhat late onto the online-book scene, I have purchased all of my books (in the multiple hundreds of dollars) from Barnes and Noble online, specifically because of this Amazon.com nonsense. It will be interesting to see if Amazon wishes to lose more and more business to try to enforce a patent that is essentially ridiculous. So I have to use Barnes & Noble's 2-click purchase method. Big deal. I haven't not purchased a book because of the inconvenience of that extra click yet.

Christopher T. Lansdown


February 28, 2000

At one point in time (internet decades ago) I was pulling for Amazon because I thought they had a better idea. In the far distant past I was pulling for Microsoft because I thought they had a better idea. Dumb, Dumb, Dumb . . . The pattern should be clear: innovate -> thrive -> dominate -> bully And if there weren't people such as Mr. O'Reilly, and many other fine individuals, to call the bluff; what would happen? The images I can conjure up are dire. Not buying my books at Amazon, Jonathan Moran

Jonathan Moran


February 28, 2000

I had never even thought about buying a book anywhere besides Amazon before this. I didn't even know Barnes and Noble had a site, and even though I go to their retail stores religiously, Amazon.com was my first choice for online books, the service is THAT good. Tim makes many excellent and eloquent points, all I can say is DROP IT. I admin 20 web-servers and work with this stuff daily, we wouldn't even THINK of patenting this kind of thing. Concentrate on service, and maybe, someday, you'll make a PROFIT.

Chris Curtiss


February 28, 2000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Software patents are, in general, a necessary evil; and once their evil outweighs their necessity, they must be done away with. There is no necessity which the "1-Click" patent serves, and a lot of unnecessary evil which comes along with it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOLtTS5gOGKeCwjkrEQJoiwCeIJtwu02uzNgqSbOdnHiOsfxk7DgAn1JB J6EasDYya/fkriWk/0ohdohc =vOsn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Robert J. Hansen


February 28, 2000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've officially been boycotting amazon for almost 2 months now. And have bought several books from competitors in the meantime. Hey Tim! could you add comment numbering to this page, so we can easily count how many signatures. Anyways to make this official! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOLtOFmVupIrBSmvQEQL7NACbBKo2AK03mvQcTnGujS2jrEKHSkQAoMqf AsiVPTeRynSAcUyt3vkMzYgU =qJ+L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

John Larsen


February 28, 2000

The mere thought of this patent makes me sick. The only word that I can think of for it is obsurd. What's next? Is somebody going to patent the English language and then expect royalties from every person that uses it to communicate? Amazon.com has just lost all respect that I ever had for them. Their only hope for regaining that respect is to publicly appologize for this slap in the face to the software development community. The management of Amazon must have attended the Microsoft University of self-interest and greed.

Len Huppe


February 28, 2000

I am boycotting Amazon <em>forever</em>. There is no redemption for their actions. Even if they stop enforcing this patent, and/or if it is overturned, I will never again purchase anything from Amazon. <p>Likewise, I am boycotting all products from Xircom, Diamond (and S3 who bought them), American Power Conversion, Iomega, etc. Even if these companies have finally been hit by a clue by four, their previous hostile actions to Linux and Open Source, before Linux and Open Source was cool, have earned them a place on my blacklist.

Kenneth J. Hendrickson


February 28, 2000

Come on Jeff! You did it all man, you started the company that became the poster child of internet business. I cannot imagine how it must feel to look at the world each day, and the huge number of people trying to build on the frontier *you* helped discover. But you're not using that mind to innovate any more. Or perhaps you are, but by subscribing to this farce, no one will ever know it. You are now helping to destroy that which made you succeed. Can a man of such potential have become that short sighted?

Johnathan Nightingale


February 28, 2000

Amazon's patent should never have been allowed due to prior art. The management should take heed of the well-reasoned arguments presented above and abandon this method. Who cares if it takes one click, two clicks or many clicks? It makes no difference to a customer. What the customer wants is good prices, reliable service, and fast delivery. The patent has nothing to offer to satisfy these needs. Many people will not purchase from Amazon due to these tactics. Please add my name to the group. Regards, Michael R. Monett

Michael R. Monett


February 28, 2000

I glanced over my orders, about 赨 for me. I glanced at orders from my deptartment at work(8 people) and they ammount to well over 񘈨. I will not, and I will recommend my employer no longer support amazon by purchasing books there. I now go to the BN store about 20 minutes away and get them that way. It costs a bit more, but I feel that saving money (change) worth less then princepal. I will not return to amazon until they show that they will no longer use their patents as a tool to retard web and internet advances. Scott

Scott Alexander


February 28, 2000

I am a programmer and online consumer of many books including technical manuals and recreational readings. I think that Amazon has monopoly power in the area of internet distribution and is sadly mistaken if it thinks its current actions are morally right or good for the increasing growth of the Internet as a medium. Because Amazon wishes to bully with their monopoly powers and not allow competing companies to stay in business on genuine merits, I will be temporarily ordering my future purchases from barnesandnoble.com.

Jeffrey Pierce Henderson


February 28, 2000

Jeff, I'm saddened to see you resort to such tactics to stifle the competition. I _was_ a fairly regular customer of Amazon until the "1-click patent" issue came up - but you changed that. Now I frequent Fatbrain and the local Softpro store instead, and that will continue as long as your company persists in this ridiculous and harmful behavior. Until then I'll visit your site ONLY when I need to help the lunchtime crossword puzzle crowd with hints about authors and books - and you won't get any revenue from _that_ sort of visit. Sigh ...

Calvin Dodge


February 28, 2000

I have been a long-time Amazon customer, but I have recently taken my business elsewhere, as well as urging friends and family to do the same, because of Amazon's unethical and nearly-fraudulent tactics in this matter. To take the freely-given work of others and to leverage it into your own crass commercial advantage is nothing better than thievery. You are sowing many seeds of ill will for very dubious gain. I urge you to reconsider, for your own good and the good of the community, before permanent damage to electronic commerce and your own good name is done.

Philip Kim


February 28, 2000

Jeff, You are a good guy who has done a great job. Don't make a huge misstep with this silly patent thing. If you are a technical guy-- as you yourself have claimed you are-- then the good engineer force will triumph within you and you will not let this stand as it is. At the very least we know you realize how trivial the "technology" behind your patents are. The ideas themselves have been around a lot longer than amazon. Compete, don't foreclose,. Two brothers who have easily bought two VW bugs from your site, Antonio & Andres Rodriguez

Antonio & Andres Rodriguez


February 28, 2000

Having been involved with the web since it's infancy, I worked closely with one of the first, if not the first web site to allow readers to publish comments and reviews about software games. Perhaps we should persue a patent for online reader reviews using our earliest published date and point several attorneys Amazon's way. It's a real shame that so much work by so many people has gone the way of the IPO and money grubbing late commers. Amazon has seen the last 'unique impression' from our company network. Steve Gerencser - CIO - NeoTek Computer Systems

Steve Gerencser


February 28, 2000

I rebustly applaud the efforts of Mr. O'reilly and Mr. Stallman, in addition to numerous others. Sadly, I feel Mr. Bezos will be unswayed by our objections. It appears from the 'gist' of his response to Mr. O'reilly, as well as public statements/conduct, that he has no intention of altering course. I have never bought, nor shall I ever, any merchandise from Amazon. I do, however utilize their website and reader reviews/comments to base my purchasing decisions at competing retailers. This is, in my opinion, a rather ironic use of their services. Michael S. Oski

Michael S. Oski


February 28, 2000

The way companies compete in a free market is by originality and price. Amazon has not shown me either lately, and instead will capitalize on an already widely used technology by cheating. Cheating in the sense that lawyers with their crypticly worded patents can manage to fool over a patent board to own something that is not owned by anyone. Amazon.com will no longer get my business, which was pretty steady until the patent lawsuit Richard Stallman called for a protest on, which I also strongly agree with. Wise up Jeff, Adam Alexander Network Engineer Nexus Networks

Adam Alexander


February 28, 2000

I use Open and Free software because of the control and power it gives me over my machines. Much of this software was written by volunteers who can't afford high powered attorneys. The offensive and defensive uses of patents are formidible reasons for a talented volunteer coder not to release software. Neither defense or offense were among the original intents of the patent system which is now being sorely abused by proprietary software developers and e-businesses. I will not do business with Amazon as long as they hold and enforce these patents. I will urge others to do the same.

David Maxwell


February 28, 2000

i was a satisfied customer of amazon.com, but have been actively boycotting amazon for the past three months. that is i am using all of amazon's search facilities to find books and then ordering them at a competitor. i am doing all of this because i am appalled at patenting trivial technology as '1-click shopping' for online shopping. had similar trivial ideas been patented before, i don't think that the web would have become (and amazon.com with it!) what it is now. this has to stop and i will refuse to buy anything from amazon.com until amazon gives up on patenting trivial technology.

Patrick Decowski


February 28, 2000

I've ordered dozens of books from Amazon over the years, not because of one-click shopping (never used it), not because of the affiliate program (never used that either), but because Amazon had a robust web site, great selection, terrific customer service and prompt delivery. And you would have had me as a customer for life were it not for this ill-advised grab at other people's innovations. Mr. Bezos, please do the right thing and release these patents into the public domain. Please don't make the courts decide this issue, at which point you'll have lost my business for good.

Ken Wood


February 28, 2000

i officially quit shopping at amazon.com when the 1-click patent was revealed, and the associate program patent has only served to drive home the fact that i made the right decision. i will not begin to consider revoking my decision until both patents are released and a public statement/apology is made by bezos himself - in short, i'm never going to shop at amazon again. barnes & noble, dvd express, and ebworld will be happy to take the 1k+ per year i spend on movies, books, cds, and software. sincerely, another unsurprised ex-customer p.s. i use ebay for auctions, too ;]

Justin Honold


February 28, 2000

While I understand why Tim O'Reilly cannot support a boycott of Amazon, I feel that a boycott is appropriate. For those of us who agree, may I suggest trying the following online booksellers? I have been pleased with them and I think you will probably find better prices than at Amazon: www.bookpool.com www.1bookstreet.com I seem to recall that Amazon gained a reputation as a spammer in its early days. It seems to me that the company continues to have little or no respect for the internet or the people that use it. Amazon is an opportunistic plunderer. Please don't support them.

Kevin Cheek


February 28, 2000

Two months ago I had a fairly substantial book purchase to make. I researched all the books on Amazon, and then purchased them through Indigo.ca. I emailed Amazon to let them know that they lost the sale because of their ridiculous patents, and would continue to lose my business until they smartened up. In two months I've spent nearly 躔 on books, in each case using Amazon as a research resource, but purchasing through Indigo. I'm sure I'm not the only one doing this sort of thing, and I will continue to let Amazon know how much money they're not making off me and why.

Richard Lee-Morlang


February 28, 2000

As someone who has seen the evolution of computers since before Apple made a debut, I've seen my fair share of abuse against innovation and progress. For the last 5 years I have been deeply involved with a number of Internet activities, and so far have been using, recommending and supporting Amazon myself. Today I have to take side with Tim against these patents. It's my professional view that this is a grave mistake with long term effects that neither one of us desires. Please reverse your stance and stand up for innovation and progress. We need you! Steve Szmidt

Steve Szmidt


February 28, 2000

These kind of patents only hurt the industry (and your own company) in the long run. It has been said that in America, the rich get richer but the poor come with that rising tide as well. If the tide can rise even faster (by, for example, not patenting extremely obvious ideas) the industry can grow even faster and all can benefit. I acknowledge that you may have acquired the patents to protect yourself from other companies. If this is indeed the reason then state so and do not sue those who are indirectly helping you. Any other reason only serves to harm Amazon as well as the industry in general.

Kevin Hoffman


February 28, 2000

I think what Amazon is trying to do with not letting any one appart them to use the "one click shopping" technologie it's a stroke to the whole Internet community, it affect all of us, as developers or as simple persons that are looking for a good service not only in Amazon. You don't are where you are for free, it is because the people, the Internet community that have trusted and purchased in your oonline store, without them you would be no one, so why don't give something in return to them? FREE THE PATENT!!!!! COOKIES FOR ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Juan Luis Baptiste


February 28, 2000

In a world with a US Patent Office that didn't give out patents like jellybeans you would have never obtained a patent on the non-novel and obvious "1-click" idea. After benefiting to the tune of billions of dollars in Market cap from the Internet, you now have the hypocritical gall to obtain and use this patent to legally intimidate and bludgen other potential competitors. You do a disservice to the image and brand that you've attempted to create over the past few years. I've signed my name to the BOYCOTT AMAZON site at http://nowebpatents.org/, and will no longer do business with you.

Neal Nuckolls


February 28, 2000

Over the last year or so, the sight of a UPS package from Amazon.com has been a common and welcome sight at my house. I have no desire, based on the service and convenience I have received from Amazon.com, to quit buying from you, but I cannot abide the stifling and anticompetitive use of trivial software patents. I write open source software for a living, and if everyone took your attitude to patent acquisition and enforcement, I would be unable to continue without a team of lawyers. Thus, my next few book and dvd purchases online will have to come from someone other than Amazon.com.

Jonathan Abbey


February 28, 2000

I previously mailed Amazon with my complaints/boycott letter, and while I was pleased by the (if possibly mechanized) response's promptness, I was appalled by its patronizing tone. What could make Mr. Bezos think so many of his customers are so unsavvy? And unprincipled? I am more than happy to tell (twice) a once bold and inventive company that they have slid off the deep end and shall have no more of mine (or my family's, or anyone else I may persuade) business until the patent is disolved. I am also pleased to second every one of the points Mr. O'Reilly made in his letter. There it is.

Michael Fischer


February 28, 2000

I previously mailed Amazon with my complaints/boycott letter, and while I was pleased by the (if possibly mechanized) response's promptness, I was appalled by its patronizing tone. What could make Mr. Bezos think so many of his customers are so unsavvy? And unprincipled? I am more than happy to tell (twice) a once bold and inventive company that they have slid off the deep end and shall have no more of mine (or my family's, or anyone else I may persuade) business until the patent is disolved. I am also pleased to second every one of the points Mr. O'Reilly made in his letter. There it is.

Michael Fischer


February 29, 2000

How can you patent an associate program when others have been doing this for some time? It's time for you to become a good citizen of the community that has been so good to you and not steal from those that have made you a millionaire.

Grant Johnson


February 28, 2000

I have ordered several hundred dollars worth of books, etc. from Amazon, but I have not ordered _anything_ from your site/company since you started to enforce your "One-click" patent. Nor will I order from you ever again, until you admit that your patent is nothing more than a trivial implementation of cookies, which where in widespread use long before you filed your patent application. Amazon will continue to lose customers, especially web savy, customers, until you admit that this patent was wrongly granted, since it is just a catchy marketing phrase tacked on to prior art. Raffael Cavallaro

Raffael Cavallaro


February 28, 2000

I have long been a customer of Amazon, since almost day one. I have supported them both by purchase and promotion. I'm sorry that this should have to end, but proprietary, whether by closed systems or patents (which is the ludicrous concept of a state mandated secret) is antethical to the Net, and it's current success which Amazon is now seeking to exploit. Shame on you Bezos, you begin more and more to resemble not an Internet pioneer, but a Barnes and Noble like bricks and mortar monopolist wannabe. You wouldn't be Time's Person Of The Year had you pulled this stroke a little earlier.

Hamish MacEwan


February 28, 2000

We have supported Amazon.com for over a year now, and we will continue to do so. I still feel comfortable buying from Amazon, but now I shop around because I feel betrayed by its recent actions. This has cost Amazon.com sales of ฽ to CDNow.com, ์ to Electronic's Boutique's online store, and ๖ more to a technically oriented shop with discounts on O'Reilly books. That's 赏. Perhaps such a small amount of revenue or the cost of losing an enthusiastic supporter isn't important to Amazon, but if they wish for me to purchase books and music as often as before then they must change their priorities.

Sean Crago and family


February 28, 2000

I have been a very loyal customer of yours. Since I learned of your web site in the Fall of 1997, I have purchased books from your site almost exclusively. Shopping at your site was much more convenient the hour I would have to spend in the car to shop with your competitors. I also strongly believe in supporting e-commerce whenever I can. However, your actions regarding the patenting of cookies is outragious. Unless you reverse your position on this matter and apologize to the online community (as well as to the true inventors of cookies whose ideas you have stolen), I will continue to take my business elsewhere.

Chuck Reese


February 28, 2000

I have spent untold dollars at amazon.com - but no more. Not even the cute Christmas commercials could hange my mind now. Mr. Bezos, until you voluntarily withdraw your patent, I will voluntarily withdraw from purchasing anything from your site. I will recommend to all my friends and associates that they not purchase anything from amazon.com until this patently absurd (pun intended) patent is withdrawn. I would also advise any and all investors in amazon.com stock to sell the shares and donate the profits to the Free Software Foundation as they lead the call for the amanzon.com boycott. Fatbrain here we come!

Eric Wayte


February 28, 2000

As a college student, I don't have the most money in the world to spend, but I used to spend a lot of my expendable income at amazon.com. Well, I haven't for months now and I will continue to NOT buy anything from amazon until you cease such frivolous behaviour AND take steps to make amends for your transgressions (I would suggest 贄,000 each to the FSF and EFF). Anyway, I now buy books locally and get all my DVDs from DVDExpress, and have told all my friends and family about what you're doing. Not all of them see my point, but 2 or 3 have and now they are no longer your customers either. Do the right thing, please.

Shawn Boyette


February 28, 2000

You may not care what a bunch of geeks think - I wouldn't be all that surprised if the whole boycott is so far absolutely undetectable in your sales numbers - but you're swimming with the big sharks, these days. Imagine some state's Attorney General deciding your head would look very nice on your wall, and launching a suit against you and your ridiculous patent on 'behalf' of all the startups that won't generate wealth for her state because of your patent. More scarily, perhaps, imagine some other bubble-riding ecommerce company deciding to throw a few million into fighting your patents instead of into Super Bowl ads.

Jon Shemitz


February 28, 2000

As a college student, I am always short on miney and strive to look for the best deals. More than once my sights have set on Amazon.com. I appreciate what you have done for the e-commerce industry, and what you have done for your customers. But when you start to throw your weight around and patent things that are not unique to you and not new or very inovative, then you start to hurt yourself in the minds of the people who love you most. We are showing you a message of tough love here. I personaly will not shop at Amazom.com until it drops the one-click patent and the affiliates program patent. Amazon.com can be successful without these patents.

Martin Burgess


February 28, 2000

What a wonderful concept: Take a prior art, make an insignificant change, and call it a patent. Using that same line of thought, this could make car theft legal. Think about it - steal a car, change the tire's , now you own your own car. You took the original idea, make a small change, and called it your own. No different than my (perhaps weak) analogy but the idea remains, theft of public property (or idea) is still theft - period. Add my name, my son's name, my wife's name, my brother, his wife, son and daughter, my sister and her 2 kids, and my Mother and Father's name to the list of people who will no longer be purchasing from Amazon.

Ron Gage


February 28, 2000

Are you guys really that cheesy to patent something as silly as this? How many non-trivial technologies did you have to build upon to make Amazon? How many of these were patented? What if you had to wrangle with thousands of different companies, one of which patented the concept of transferring data, one of which patented the concept of the hyperlink, one of which patented the concept of exchanging money for goods and services? When you try to enforce patents such as these, it appears to many to be an act of desparation from a highly overvalued company that is expanding too fast, becoming breadth-first shallow rather than depth-first rich.

Martin Hock


February 28, 2000

Isn't strange...our parent's hard-earned income is taxed by Uncle Sam who invests that money into the Defense Department; who strategically creates an international network; who entrusts it to the universities of the world; who equip our youth with the tools needed to tap this valuable resource; who develop the tools and shares these tools with everyone; only to have a guy name Bezos say it belongs to him. Maybe this patent should have been given to the folks that made it all possible, not to some guy name Bezos. Buy your books from fatbrain.com. They are a great group of folks to work with because they put the customer first!

Robert Barksdale


February 28, 2000

E-commerce sites, Amazon customers, and Amazon affiliates should take a stand in support of the continued expansion of the internet, which Amazon is obviously seeking to ruin for everyone. Mass boycotting of Amazon's website and the products sold there, Amazon's affiliates websites, and any of the websites that link to or are associated with Amazon is in order until such time as the lawsuit against bn.com is dropped and the patents are abandoned by Amazon and placed safely back into the public domain. It's high time that Amazon learn to profit by implementing good and sound business practices, not just from, or at, the expense of others.

Deborah Ann Logiacco


February 28, 2000

This approach by amazon.com is (a) short-sighted; (b) ill-founded; and (c) a slap in the face to all who have embraced the company -- and its origingally superior philosophy -- since its earliest days. I have long held amazon.com as one of the best and most shining of e-commerce sites, one which could rise above the pettiness and cut-throat habits of established brick-and-mortar shops. The current attitude of the company is simply repugnant. Although it will be less convenient to seek out new sources for the various content I choose to purchase, it is a sure thing that I will no longer use amazon.com for my information purchase needs.

Bernard HP Gilroy


February 28, 2000

The growth of e-commerce allows us to focus more on the company than on the product. As is the case with most items, one can purchase a book from any number of websites. A company stands out based on its ease-of-use or customer service or good-faith-measures. Amazon chooses to stand out by attempting to squelch the foundations of the Internet. An overall poor marketing choice AND an abuse of the laws governing our country AND preying on the ignorance of the patent office. Shame on you. I am joining the ever-growing boycott of Amazon. And I will not return as a customer unless the mistake is admitted and amends are made--publicly and immediately.

Susan Petracco


February 28, 2000

I once extolled the great thigns that Amazon.com did. Buying books online, a geek's dream! It was a service to the community, and the world at large, truly a breakthrough idea. But now, after the crud Amazon is pulling, I've decided that any company that pulls a stunt like this may well pull a similar stunt again. As such, I am never shopping at Amazon again. Chapters.ca for my books, cdnow.com for my CDs, and if I need anything else Amazon offers, I'll take a walk to the mall. Amazon has, in the minds of many people, permanantly sullied their reputation with many people, and anyone with a memory won't easily forget these incidents. I know I won't.

Daniel Udey


February 28, 2000

I've purchased a large number of items from Amazon, including a number of gift certificates to friends as a way to introduce them to online shopping. With this type of obscene abuse of the patent system, I can't bring myself to shop at Amazon any longer. I'm also a stockholder of AMZN and I'm leaning towards selling my holding because of Amazon's less then admirable business practices. Also, I really don't like 'one click shopping' and would much rather opt out of such a feature. I've already had my credit card number stolen thanks to the cduniverse mess. I'd much rather type my credit card # in every time then risk having it stolen due to inadequate security.

Clem Taylor


February 28, 2000

I am a software developer by profession, and have bought thousands of dollars worth of books from Amazon. If you check my customer profile, you will see that I speak the truth; I enjoyed Amazon, in the early days. However, I sign my name to Tim's letter, in sadness, to signal my distaste of the way you are choosing to handle your patents. Did you have a conscience, you would be ashamed. FatBrain has received thousands of dollars from me in new book orders since I made the decision, months ago when you went after Barnes & Nobles. If you could check my profile there, you'd see that, again, I speak the truth. This _is_ affecting your bottom line. I promise.

Jeff K. Hoffman


February 28, 2000

To the people who know, Amazon's actions are clearly nothing more than a cynical attempt to bash competitors. What you, Mr. Bezos, should remember is that such technical people make up a large portion of your market. You can still redeem your company and regain our business if you admit your mistake and promise not to engage in this kind of monopolistic, anti-free-market maneuvering in the future. Please do so, and set an example in the moral sphere of e-commerce, as you have so spectacularly done in the sphere of content. PS: I have been boycotting Amazon in all my purchasing decisions, including the many I make at work, since this patent was filed. I won't stop until you do.

Quinn Weaver


February 28, 2000

While I believe that Mr. O'Reilly should have gone the whole hog and agreed to participate in RMS's boycott of Amazon, I can see how that would affect his business (and possibly open him up to shareholder lawsuits, if O'Reilly Books is a publically-traded company). I, personally, have made purchases at Amazon in excess of $US550, and currently have over $US250 worth of purchases that I would like to make there. Because of their actions, I have decided not to go ahead with these orders at Amazon, and I will instead take my business to other Web-based vendors. I will continue doing so until Amazon backs off and makes a public apology for its misuse of the patent system.

Bruce Harada


February 28, 2000

I am disappointed to find that one of the pioneer's of Internet commerce feels it necessary to resort to dubious patent claims to maintain their business and stifle the competition. Cookie technology, as used in 1-Click technology, is nothing new or terribly innovative. It's particularly disappointing when considering the points made in Tim O'Reilly's open letter: that the majority of the technology that even allows Amazon to exist is from people who had the foresight not to restrict the technology they had created. Technically, I can't boycott Amazon, since I've never purchased from you. But I will not purchase from you or your affiliates until this issue is resolved.

Craig Bull


February 29, 2000

Pity. I will now be forced to take all my business elsewhere.

Kent Crispin


February 28, 2000

As a customer of amazon.com and an internet developer from pre-web days. I find your patenting of the "1-Click Order Process" First of all greedy to the point of sillyness I dont believe you originated an idea so obvious and to be damaging to the internet community at large not only because it it stops others from using a simple order interface but bnecause itencouages similar patenting of obvious Ideas denying people the right to innovate. I hope that if you dont give up your patent that it is struck down in court. Untill one of these things happens you have definately lost a customer. O'reilly however will still get my patronage through a different vendor. Jason Conway

Jason Conway


February 28, 2000

Jeff, It's tough admit you're wrong. IÆm sure it seems less humiliating to have a patent claim rejected that to turn around and withdraw it after all this fuss. The patents youÆve obtained on ôone-click technologyö and the ôassociatesÆ programö are frivolous and the attempt to enforce the ôone-clickö patent is a shameless grope for a competitive advantage you have no right to. To admit this and to withdraw these patents and lawsuits would be a favor to yourself and the internet community that your success is built on. I firmly hope that youÆll do the right thing. For what itÆs worth, my last on-line book purchase didnÆt come from Amazon; I just couldnÆt bring my self to do it.

Michael Askew


February 28, 2000

As a regular book buyer, and a regular web shopper, I find this patent offensive. It is equivalent to patenting spreading your peanut butter in a swirl. It may be innovative to you, but many many folks have been doing it for years. Net cookies are simply configuration and documentation files. Having your particular set of info in there is just another obvious use of the storage. Oh, and the Associates program is also pretty cheesy. That's just like the companies that gave you a coupon if you got a friend to join up. Old Hat. In the long run, these patents will change your bottom line not at all, especially in comparison to the revenues brought on by the Amazon brand name, a name you are now sullying.

David C. Todd


February 28, 2000

Unbelievable. The idea that patents such as the "1-click" and "affiliates" were ever granted was hard enough to believe. The fact that Amazon is actually tried to enforce them is amazing to me. I had been a faithful Amazon customer. Quicken tells me that prior to my joining the boycott, I spent over 񘧸 at Amazon. I recently went looking for almost 10 O'Reilly books. My search never went near Amazon. At one shot almost 跌 was lost. Unless Amazon stops all litigation involving their ludicrous patents I will not only send all of my business elsewhere, but I have and will continue to explain to everyone I know why they should purchase from just about any company other than Amazon.

Rick Friedman


February 28, 2000

I tried for a few minutes to come up with analogies for this patent, but they all seemed ridiculous (Our innovation uses the number 'two' to allow our customers to order more than one but less than three or more units...). Then I realized that was not inappropriate. I guess being a laughingstock is easy with a full swag bag o' loot slung over your shoulder, eh Mr. Bozos? Well, word gets around and all the 'savvy media consultants' money can buy will be left trying to help you figure out how it becomes cool to hate some megacorp and how it happened to you. Brad "Don't wanna 'just do it'" Gregory (patron of local independent AND Barnes and Noble bookstores, and spreadin' the word...)

Brad Gregory


February 29, 2000

If the only way Amazon can figure out how to become profitable is making some silly patent and suing the pants off everyone else, why bother investing in the company?

Jon O


February 28, 2000

As this "One-Click" system is so easy to be made by any web developer and as I am able to reproduce its effect in 4 differents language (ASP, Perl, PHP, C/C++) in less than 5 minutes, I request you to hold any action against anyone creating it. This system use a wide-open way to store an ID number inside a client computer and match this number when needed against a database stored inside the server. Millions of E-Commerce site use this system to store the client progress during the shopping cart checkout/credit card authentification process. Amazon and only Amazon would hold the right to be able to retrieve those informations AGAIN, when the client come back ??? This is just nonsense.

Simon Huet


February 28, 2000

<b>I urge everyone who considers themselves open-minded to familiarize themselves with the possible dangers of frivolous software patenting. The internet, in this world has a chance like no other medium to be truly democratic and natural. Its as close as we can now get to connecting millions of brains together for common benefit. Amazon, do you really want to go into the book of history as one of the pioneers of free expression, or as as another Corp.com that can shove dollars into people's faces as proof of your achievement? The age of the internet/Open Source Software/Linux etc. is perhaps the only time in our collective existence when we begin to realize that MONEY isn't everything!</b>

Tom Bradford


February 28, 2000

I'd like to add my voice to Tim's in opposition to Amazon's recent business practices involving software / business-model patents. None of the benefits the Internet brings to society would ever have been available to anyone -- including Amazon.com -- if the 'Net's original developers had shared Amazon's rapacious, anticompetitive corporate attitude towards intellectual property. Amazon's strategy appears to be insidiously simple: reap the advantages of an historically-open development process, then slam the door shut on everyone else's access to the same benefits. Here's hoping that at some point, it will occur to Mr. Bezos that <i>he's</i> the one who Just Doesn't Get It.

John Miles @ RAD Game Tools


February 28, 2000

I am a longtime customer at Amazon, and have a lot of loyalty to them for their minimal, clear, dependable interface. But I am also a web developer, and absurb patents on obvious techniques threaten my livelihood. There are many developers like myself who implemented cookied logins long before Amazon, and any of us would have considered it idiotic to attempt to lock down that vital resource. Maybe we're like the indians who sold Manhattan - unable to believe that anyone could be foolish enough to think they can own such a thing. Or maybe Amazon is smart enough to know you really can buy the Brooklyn Bridge. Either way, if they make themselves my opponent, there are other stores just a click away.

Lucas Gonze


February 28, 2000

I found out about Amazon's actions concerning patents shortly after my first purchase from them. If the book I bought wasn't sitting at work with my name written in it, I was going to return it and demand my money back (and a restocking fee would have been a small price to pay for my conscience to be eased). Hopefully, some government agency with some leverage will do something about the USPTO's incompetence (as an organization, I'm sure the individuals are doing the best they can with what they've got). Just as Congress came down on the IRS, perhaps the Executive branch will come down on the USPTO, Clinton loves extolling the virtues of e-commerce. But will he back it up and let it grow at it's true capacity?

Ryan Grange


February 28, 2000

I, like many others it seems, once thought amazon.com was a wonderful example of a company that had struck the balance between convienence and service. I found and bought quite a few unusual books, too; however, you made my black-list the first time I saw one-click ordering (do NOT remember my credit-card number!) and doubly so when I saw that you had patented it and were trying to sue others over it's use. It's such an obvious application of cookies, I'm not sure even what to think of a patent office that granted such a patent. Actually, I take that back - thanks for patenting it, you've made an example of yourselves and made sure that no-one else tries anything as obnoxious. But I'm never buying a book at Amazon again.

Kevin Puetz


February 28, 2000

Amazon.com is an example of business people being business people. There goal is to make money. Simple as that, and they feel the best way to do that is to shutout everyone else from something they feel will give them a market advantage. The patent office needs to realize that they have little idea of how the Internet works. And they don't have qualified people looking at these patents. Why would a qualified person work at the patent office with their pay when they can get a job in industry. It's a shame of how Amazon.com has turned it's back on the Internet community which helped to make it a success. The Internet is not about making a profit, and destroying your competitors. It's about inovation which Amazon.com has helped eliminate.

Dan Nguyen


February 28, 2000

Mr. Bezos: Openness built you. Every time you make a sale, you're relying on countless open technologies: from the bare-metal wire protocols you ultimately use to talk to your cutsomers to the intricacies of HTML markup, your revenues are dependent on technology that's free for the use of all. Your company has rejected that openness. Your "one-click" patent lawsuit is a farce, and a slap in the face to the community whose efforts allowed your business to grow to its current stature. You aren't required to be considerate; you aren't required to show any form of respect or gratitude for those whose efforts made the technical basis of your enterprise possible. But I'm not required to buy anything from you. Neither is anyone else. Keep that in mind.

David Price


February 28, 2000

A few days ago I bought my first book online, usually just get them at the bookstore, but sometimes you cant find the right ones local.. anyway, due to the recent fact that amazon.com thinks they can patent html code and the use of cookies, I bought my first book from a different online store: We're pleased to let you know that the following has been shipped and is on its way. In the meantime, you can check the status of your order online; just go to your account and look under order status. Should you --barnesandnoble.com Customer Service This will be the only place I buy books from now on, until amazon figures out what they are doing and puts a stop to it.. Josh Bright

Josh Bright


February 28, 2000

I have to agree with many others who have signed this open letter that the folks at Amazon.com have provided an invaluable service to its customers worldwide. I am a poor college student who has considered purchasing books from Amazon.com because the prices are better than the on-campus bookstore. However, due primarily to the foolishness of the actions taken by Amazon.com against anyone using something even remotely similar to the "one-click shopping" mechanism, I cannot justify choosing Amazon as a vendor of choice for my textbooks. My ethical standards would not allow me to do so. This case is very similar to the MPAA case against the young Norwegian boy over the reverse-engineering of CSS. I sincerely hope you reconsider your actions.

Charles Scheidecker


February 28, 2000

It is unfortunate that a company whose enormous market capitalization is based on taking advantage of the work of others should decide to use the government's patent system to try and prohibit others from using what are to most anyone in the business community an 'obvious' idea. Unfortunately, due to this abuse of the patent system to try and corner the intellectual market on obvious ideas, I will be forced to make all future purchases through the chief competitor, Barnes & Nobles, and will encourage all of my customers and company to move all their purchases. These "land grabs" are offensive to the creativity of the community and will, in the end, set a bad precident which at some point Amazon will be on the wrong end of, with no supporters.

Christopher Petrilli


February 28, 2000

I think these patents are totally absurd. Amazon is misusing an incompetent patent system in order to steal the works of others, given out in good faith as an open standard, for their own gain. With greedy corporations such as the RIAA and MPAA attempting to steal our freedom for their own profit lately, I and many like me have been very sensitive about companies trying to do something similar. I simply cannot stand for such an obvious misuse of the system, broken or not, and I will deffinately be boycotting Amazon as long as these rediculous patents are still held. I will also continue to derecommend them to everyone I know, as there are quite a few people who often ask my opinion of technical things like this. Check out www.noamazon.com for a list of alternatives.

Adam Lassek


February 28, 2000

I first started using Amazon.com for virtually all my book shopping way back when it first surfaced on the net. I thought it was the best thing ever. Other booksellers' sites have appeared on the net since then, but I never wanted to use them. Until now. Mr. Bezos, I find your pursuit of these absurd patents to be absolutely disgusting. Perhaps it was naive of me, but I had hoped that the Web's early innovators would be people of more character than you have demonstrated in this blatant and arrogant abuse of the trust and loyalty of your core customers - the tech crowd that drove the Web in the first place. Until you give up trying to patent obvious applications of basic Web technology (that you didn't even invent!) I will not spend another penny on your site.

Christian Allred


February 28, 2000

Dear Jeff, I have three shelves full of technical books (over a dozen of them O'Reilly) and hundreds of CDs in my personal library. I add books and CDs regularly, spending easily โ - 贄 per month. I am quite comfortable with purchasing these items over the Internet, and have done so on many occasions. But I will not purchase them from Amazon. Not until you listen to what Tim and the entire technical community is telling you and drastically change your patent strategy. There are many vendors out there, and though your service may be excellent, I will accept some inconvenience in order to uphold a principle I believe in. The 1-click and associates program patents are just plain wrong, and your continued aggressive enforcement of them will ensure that I continue to shop elsewhere.

Carl N. Miller


February 28, 2000

I regret to inform you that I will refrain from ordering any books or software via Amazon until you "cease and desist" from your patent pursuit. I will watch for a public announcement that your company has granted a free public license to the existing patents, and at that time will inform the e-mail list I am building that you have corrected your error. I have been a customer, albeit not a large one, of Amazon in the past, but will find other sources for my books, software, and online auctions until you have reversed this unfortunate trend. Regarding enforcement of your patent, I intend to advance the idea of a class action lawsuit that has as plaintiff class the group of consumers that are financially penalized by the enforcement of patents that are non-substantive.

Raymond J. Johnston


February 28, 2000

I used to be a steady customer of Amazon.com, buying most of my books online due to both the convenience and pricing. When Borders.com and BarnesandNoble.com started challenging their dominance in the online book ordering business, I stuck with them, as I value competition. I even purchased books from Amazon that I could have gotten cheaper elsewhere, in order to prevent the large bookstores from using unfair business practices to eliminate competition. After the one-click fiasco, however, I realize that Amazon is no better, and I have decided to speak out with my purchasing power. I have not purchased from Amazon since, and I doubt I will ever buy from them again. The ironic part about all of this is I now save quite a lot of money on a regular basis by boycotting Amazon!

Douglas Rudd


February 28, 2000

In my many quests for technical materials on the internet, I have arrived many times on Amazon's page. But I have decided never again to shop at the site; they have taken all that has been given to them; TCP/IP, cookies, GIF, JPEG, and - now this is the motherload - from netcraft's page: "amazon.com is running Stronghold/2.4.2 Apache/1.3.6 C2NetEU/2412 (Unix) on DIGITAL UNIX". Even their web server, probably one of the most important parts of their success, has been a gift from the internet technical community. And now they attempt to copyright and steal all that was given to them, for purposes that are - I couldn't say any less - stupid. I hope that this is the end for Amazon, and that it presents a message to all of today's "wired" corporation: do not bite the hand that feeds you.

Colin Stanners


February 28, 2000

Last year, I spent a large chunk of my disposable income on (O'Reilly) books, CDs, and DVDs from Amazon. Then they started collecting (and publishing) statistics. If they want to use the information to present a new item I might be interested in (based on prior buying decisions), that is fine with me because *I* am the only one who sees it. If they are going to publish my buying decisions without my consent, that's a strong reason for me to go elsewhere. And now Amazon is trying to enforce a patent that is similar to me patenting style sheets! (Oh wait, that was already done... http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US05860073__ ) I'll be taking my business to http://borders.com/, http://reel.com/, and especially http://www.barnesandnoble.com/ until Amazon ceases and desists. PKG

Pete Gale


February 28, 2000

I will join the legions of IT professionals that are disgruntled and dismayed with both Amazon and the Patent office, which ought to be shut down until they can figure out how to step into this century. I am a Chapter Leader of the Houston Webgrrls, and this has been a hot topic on our mailing list as it should be. I also own a web design company, and have a vegetarian cooking site which is an Amazon affiliate. I will no longer make my purchases from Amazon, and will stop promoting them on my site as an affiliate. I will also inform all visitors to all my sites about this issue and my clients, some of which are Amazon affiliates, and most are Amazon customers. This is a big, big, costly mistake Amazon. You think you're in the red now? Just wait. Kristi Sadler Fresh Pages Web Design Co. www.freshpages.com

Kristi Sadler


February 28, 2000

Amazon: I am a student, an exceptionally poor one. As such I haven't bought much of anything, either off the net or in regular markets, as of late. I did, however, purchase three Neil Stephenson books from Amazon last summer(June or so). I don't like these patents that you are applying for, for so many reasons that have already been listed by many others here. THUS, the next time I purchase a book, or anything else online, that you may have provided for me, you can bet your bottom dollar it won't be from you. I've heard it said that this corporation has yet to turn a profit. You are in the red, so to speak. Whether or not you ever do manage to turn a profit, you are slitting your own wrists before the technical community with this move. That's one shade of red that's not easily washed off.

Josh Duncan


February 28, 2000

As have many others, I have spent numerous personal and business dollars at your web site. I was prepared to do considerable christmas shopping at your site as well, and then this sad excuse for "good business" came to light. I understand you have shareholders to answer to, and that they expect you to maximize profits. But understand that there are a core group of people that make recomendations with regard to technical issues (and in this respect shopping on the internet is still considered a technical exercise by many), previously I had mentioned your sight. Due to its easy navigation and use, but I now instruct friends and family to shop any number of your competitors, because a company that does not act responisbly, cannot be trusted. And your abuse of the patent system is irresponisble.

Patrick Hurley


February 28, 2000

I support this letter both in its request and its intent. Further I would like to suggest several reasons that this patent is harmful to the nation as a whole. The international nature of the Internet in comparison to the limited nature of patents, will simply make it possible for corporations external to the United States to use this simple technology, while creating an unfair burden on American companies. While this nationalistic viewpoint may seem beside the point it is one more example of how unduly unfair the application of such a patent, and the legal costs involved with it will be. The end result is that we shall become the laughingstock of the world, spending billions of dollars protecting ideas that are apparent to the world, while they reap our innovation. Thanks Tim for being a leader.

David Lorin Goldstein


February 28, 2000

Dear Amazon, As a past customer i can tell you without a doubt that I will NEVER order from you again. I can't really add anything more than Tim O'Reilly hasn't already said in his open letter to you but, i can assure you.. as a fellow engineer I am deeply offended at your blatent disregard and disrespect for what has essentially been given to you in many respects. How arrogant do you have to be to think you can patent something as trivial and widespread as cookie utilization? I hope for the sake of your company's reputation with the technical community that you revisit your decision regarding these patents. Lastly, I've passed along this information to every colleague of mine in the hopes that they will see the same reckless behavior in Amazon and discontinue using your company's services.

Brandon Shoemaker


February 28, 2000

As a supporter of the Open Source Movement, and a Cisco Certified and Redback Networks Senior Instructor of some note, I wish to register my dismay with the choice that Amazon.com has made in attempting to enforce the aforementioned patent. You know all of the arguments for and against, and I won't bore you with repitition of facts of which you are already aware. I will simply cut to the chase: The actions of Amazon in this matter will eventually harm themselves and the Internet and software development community at large. Please take the feedback of myself and thousands of others to heart and stop the defense of this process before it has a chilling effect on the entire software development community. Sincerely, Michael J. Golub Senior Instructor / Instructor Developement Redback Networks, Inc.

Michael J. Golub


February 28, 2000

I can't understand why we even have to bother with shit like this. There are real problems out there in the world and someone like Amazon should have enough sense to not make us all waste our time fighting over idiocy like this. This is a no contest joke. Amazon, pull your head in and enter the real world. No one will support the kind of actions you are taking here. If you think you are in the right, conduct an anonymous survey of your own staff and see what they think. I imagine that you will be surprised by the results. And when you've recovered from the shock, a reasonable penance for your malicious intentions would possibly involve the donation of schoolbooks to somewhere like, say, East Timor. I think the kiddies down there are more in need of the books than Amazon is in need of the money that these patents might have bought in.

Michael Abramovich


February 28, 2000

Amazon has been a great resource for me as a CS student in researching and purchasing numerous technical books on a variety of subjects. However, this patent nonsense has put an end to my use of Amazon for now. There are many other outlets available to purchase the same books at equivalent prices. I previously chose Amazon because of the good experiences I had with their service, and also because of their apparent commitment to the technology and culture that helped bring them their success. This patent nonsense is, as has been stated, an insult to those who created and distributed the technology to the community in the beginning. I will no longer be ordering from Amazon and I can assure you many of my peers share the exact same sentiments. Amazon, it is time to swallow your pride and do an about-face on the patent issue. Eric A. Whitfield

Eric A. Whitfield


February 28, 2000

Jeff (Mr. Bezos), I stopped shopping at Amazon some time ago. Computer Literacy (now FatBrain) gets my and my co-workers book orders at work. I went so far as to get a corporate account at FatBrain, just so that everyone else in the office wouldn't use Amazon for purchasing (reimbursed) books. Counting up texts, I bought 12 O'Reilly texts in 1999, 4 Oracle books and 3 more security texts. Ok, so I still haven't cracked that Camel book. The 10 other programmers in the office buy alot of books every year. We *get* it - you don't. In a market where there is little differentiation between sites, all that it takes is one (seemingly) little thing to cause me to set my bookmark at a different site. Did I mention that I also buy CD's online too? Coders tend to listen to CD's a good bit of the day ... but that's another protest email. Paul Drake

Paul Drake


February 28, 2000

To all the folks at Amazon, I was one of your first customers. I was happy to shop at Amazon and directed lots of people to your site. When you took out the 1-click patent, I thought that you were merely trying to build up an inventory of patents to avoid being bullied by others: a sort of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) doctrine applied to software. It was shocking to find Amazon actually start acting like a bully. It is easy to try to shift the blame to the US Patent Office, but that is no excuse for your shameful conduct. By analogy, the failure of a teacher to keep her students well behaved does not excuse the actions of the class bully. There is a difference between what you should do and what you can get away with. You can rest assured that until you publicly reverse course, I will never purchase anything from amazon.com. I have already removed all the links I had pointing to your site.

Anant Sahai


February 28, 2000

I bought a couple of books from Amazon (O'Reilly books, actually) before this whole mess started. Now I don't even consider buying from you. What's more, I urge my friends and relatives - my coworkers and associates not to buy from you and I tell them why. That "why" is because you are not playing fairly. You are not heeding the common law of the land. Anytime I hear the words "amazon.com" spoken by anyone, I immediately tell them not to buy from you, under any circumstances whatsoever. But it's more than that - I'm a network administrator and, having that position, I'm able to use a little part of the Linux kernel called "ipchains"... Maybe you've heard of it. It's not a large network - only about 100 people, but none of them can get to your site - to them it appears dead. At least from work. Yes, I'm willing to risk reprimand for this because what you're doing is WRONG! Stop it! ps - I urge other admins out there to do the same.

Michael Kroh


February 28, 2000

You may look at this patent as a situation where you were freely given the ingredients and then built your own solution with them, but Tim is right. The technology is trivial and basic and very likely was done before you did it, so the patent will probably be thrown out. It's more like you tried to patent the flour so no one else could make a cake. I would argue that the flour was not yours to patent. As Tim said, many people helped to plant the wheat and grind it. You may say they were the fools for not patenting their own work, but if they had you and many others would not likely be in business. If you had stuck with just the one patent you might have been ignored. But, now you have established a pattern by patenting Associates programs. The technological community may have sloughed off initial outrage at your single patent, but I think if you continue this trend you endanger your profit margin far more than you protect or enhance it. Dee-Ann LeBlanc

Dee-AnnLeBlanc


February 28, 2000

I doubt anybody will be reading an entry on the bottom of the list, but nonetheless, I'll take the opportunity to go on the record. I buy a few hundred dollars of books and music online a year, and since Amazon filed suit against Barnes&Noble none of it has been from Amazon. I've just recently found out about the noamazon.com site, which has lists of Amazon's competitors in all markets. The advantage to noamazon.com is that all click-throughs to Amazon's competitors are recorded, so that Amazon can be provided accurate figures as to how many customers they are using through this boycott (by the way, noamazon.com does not receive any money from amazon's competitors for the click-throughs). So if you are boycotting amazon like I am, please use noamazon.com where your effort will be recorded. (btw, I'm in no way affiliated with noamazon.com, which is totally non-profit anyway) -- I am not Montel Williams.

Andrew Cady


February 28, 2000

Before this whole 1-Click mess, I had ordered from Amazon several times, most recently purchasing some Christmas gifts for friends and family. I was, on the whole, more than satisfied with my purchases, with the ease of ordering, the price, and selection...Amazon was all that I could have asked for. I've probably spent between 贄 and 贶 there. I would have spent more, recently, but this nasty patent business has definitely put a damper on my ardor for Amazon. While I don't actually see myself as being an active part of a "boycott," the idea of patenting something so trivial has had a distinct chilling effect on my desire to do further business with Amazon. I have found myself looking in other places and making purchases elsewhere that might otherwise have been from them. I strongly urge Amazon to reconsider their use of patents in light of the larger community of which they are a part. At such a time, I will be glad to order more books from them.

Christopher E. Meadows


February 28, 2000

My my! I don't know what all the hub bub is over. I belive that this is wonderful news! I belive that the precedent is being set, and it could benefit all of us greatly. I will set to work immediatly tomorrow at first light to go about contacting the patent office for a number of things that I should hold the patent on: Air, sunlight, noise, the letter "e," (oh wait, that one is taken by another monopoly wannabe..) why, the mind simply reels at the potential that all these things we take for granted can be owned, and used exclusively by us! Neato! Dirt! How about dirt? Yes, and a patent on water too... Thankyou Tim, and also all of you who have railed against this utter folly. As Tim stated, you are pissing into the well, but it sounds like in the long run, reasoning like this will cause you to fall into it as well. I honestly regret that I will curtail my Amazon habits as well until you come to your senses, finding other suitable vendors for the book needs of myself and the enterprise for whom I purchase technical publications. Please reconsider!

Christopher Fee


February 28, 2000

As a developer of what I hope are innovative applications for the web, I get a knot in the pit of my stomach whenever I think about software patents, especially the dumb, obvious ones like Amazon's. Am I infringing on some idiotic "sooner" patent when I write this line of code? How about this one? We're a very small company, and can't afford to defend against even inane patents. Should I file for my own portfolio of dumb patents? This concept here looks patentable, maybe that one, that one there for sure. But why should I? Sure, I've worked hard to make things work the way they should, maybe I should be protected. But come on, this isn't rocket science, it's not like I'm the only one that would ever think of it... so I let it alone. Actions like Amazon's make me re-think this position. Yes, maybe I should give 跌,000 a year to lawyers so I can have something to trade when the big boys come knocking. Bah. I may as well be paying the mob not to break my windows. Can't we just compete based on the quality of our service, our ease-of-use, our innovative features, rather than the size of our legal budget?

Gary Teter


February 28, 2000

I had bought probably thousands of dollars of books from Amazon, but that stopped with the "fun" publicizing of companies' purchases, and the ludicrous response I received when I complained about this disrespectful violation of privacy. And then came these idiotic selfish patents, spoiling the commons for every other web citizen. The sheer arrogance and gall necessary to see these as proper is beyond belief. I had thought Amazon was a very clever innovative company. Nice web site, good review structure, good links to related purchaes, gift wrapping, many nice things. And 1-click was certainly a reason for buying more books than I care to admit :-) But since boycotting Amazon, I have found several price comparison web sites, and don't regret the extra clicks at all. I save much too much money to go back. Amazon, Senor Bezos (or is that Bozos?) -- you may think you can protect your turf by lawyers, but the reality is the opposite. You have lost a good customer for good, and no doubt many more. I haven't been to your site in ages of Internet time, and I don't even know what markets you have expanded into. I don't care. I simply will not support the greed you show.

Felix Finch


February 28, 2000

As a graduating Computer Science student at the University of Waterloo, I was recently contacted to set up an interview for a position with Amazon.com. However, due to the defence of the 1-Click patent, I feel that I had to decline, and I urge other students in my position to do the same. It's a sellers market right now for top students. We all have options. Amazon needs to realize that they cannot afford to offend the community on which they depend. Below is a copy of the email sent in reply to Amazon. ====== Dear Jenn, I was interested in possibly pursuing a career with Amazon.com, unfortunately I'm in agreement with the rest of the internet community regarding Amazon's defence of the 1-Click patent. Thus I'm going to have to decline the interview. I would urge you to inform 'those in charge' that they have offended the talent pool that Amazon depends upon. I don't mean to offend you personally. And I'm sure you'll be tempted to delete this email and move on to the next candidate :) But _please_ understand that this patent fiasco could genuinely affect Amazon's ability to draw top talent. If you could pass this on it would be appreciated. Sincerely, -Brendan Sterne

Brendan Sterne


February 28, 2000

I am historically a frequent customer of Amazon, but I am appalled by the "one-click" patent and I think that Amazon has lost its way. In the search for immediate competitive advantage, Amazon will kill the goose that laid Amazon's own golden egg. You must rethink this strategy, which will ultimately spell your own end as well as that of your competitors. If one company can close off internet commerce to others by throwing some scrim on top of universally utilized protocols, consumers will never adopt internet as the equivalent to the telephone or the car. You have made a short-sighted and poor business decision, and those of us that are against you have your own future as well as other dot.coms at heart. If you were to prevail and establish a legal precedent, some other company could throw some scrim on top of your supposedly unique system and preclude YOU AMAZON from using it. Or could throw some scrim on top of TCP/IP and become an internet monopoly. We do not want t! o see you and other companies that have brought so much value and convenience wiped out by a monopoly, yours or anyone else's. Please stop your efforts to establish a legal precedent which will ultimately strangle internet commerce and your future profits.

Lisa Kerr


February 28, 2000

I am in total agreement with you on this Tim, and thought I would quote the email I just fired off to Amazon: Dear Sir or Ma'am, I am writing to request that you cancel my account immediately. I have been a customer of Amazon since July of 1997 and have always been admired your wide selection, prompt shipping and excellent customer service, however I can no longer support you in any way due to your 'one-click' and 'associates program' patents. I am currently a web programmer (due in no small part to the books I have purchased from you) and the audacity that you have shown in attempting to patent ideas that are immediately obvious to anyone who has knowledge of how http works is quite ridiculous. When I first heard that you had applied for and were granted a patent on these ideas, I had grave misgivings, but now that you are attempting to enforce them I feel it is time for us to part ways, before you do me and the internet as a whole a grave injustice. As I have said I am a web programmer and am aware that you have various information about me in your databases. This information belongs to me, and I am hereby rescinding your rights to it. Please delete all references to me immediately. Thank you, Nathan Stitt Webmaster

Nathan Stitt


February 28, 2000

I use Amazon from time to time to order books and also use other methods. Amazon provides a useful service however Mr Bezos does need to reconsider his patenting of something patently unpatentable as the one-click carrying of information. Business depends on goodwill most of all and Mr Bezos is sailing very close to an ill wind in this his company's patent action. It irritates me...there is no need for such an attitude...Amazon will need goodwill when it tries to convert its expansion into steady profit. Would it not be a pity if it were boycotted at that point? There are other ways of buying your books...don't forget the *apparently* cheaper prices are offset by additional postage costs...you have less opportunity of handling the merchandise...the reviews are suspect... Now we have this greed extended...a little like the Gates/Case arguments over instant messaging protocols...only more insidious. Mr Bezos...please release this patent...it is valid...but only because of a technicality...it is no intellectual property, but a method of cornering the market. To insist on your rights would not be the action of a gentleman. Please - play hard, but play fair. Not to do so would seriously irritate not only myself but many other potential customers.

Ian Clark


February 28, 2000

Mr. O'Reilly and Mr. Stallman, thank you for speaking out against Amazon's patenting of 1-click and Associates. Mr. Bezos, I'm very unimpressed by the fact that the company lawyers have overtaken your true grasp of financials and the web. It would be much better if Amazon were to grant these patents to the community as a defense against the "patenting" companies that are scouring around the corner. Furthermore, you must have better things to think about (esp. in the way of site design, additional stores, financials, W*Mart, etc.) than this proprietary side-show. Your site is one of the great compendeums that has naturally cropped up; please do not spoil what the community has entrusted to you. The Associates patent is a case in point. Imagine the number of people who are removing links and who will think twice before pointing to Amazon---for some and I would agree, it is a break with an unwritten rule: you do not own the process or control such a critical portion of "linking". BTW, I believe this will also happen with your Z-Bubbles program...nobody will entrust you with their opinion (or at least any opinion worth reading) unless you serve the community rather than exploit it by patents, privacy invasion, and proprietary database building. Sincerely, A concerned developer and Amazon shareholder.

K Trivedi


February 28, 2000

To the folks at Amazon: As a bestselling author, book enthusiast and strong supporter of online commerce, I am ashamed and outraged by the actions of your company. I have repeatedly cited Amazon as a model of great customer service in many industry seminars and classes which I have taught over the years, and have been a loyal customer since your earliest days. Your current actions are calling my own integrity into question, and I feel morally violated. Your attempts at using the patent office as an offensive legal weapon are simply heinous, and will NOT be tolerated by the technical community which helped build your business. The vast wealth generated by your early lead in this climate of loss-driven IPO madness has clearly gone to your heads, and given you the impression that you can simply get away with murder. This must end NOW. I gladly join the chorus of voices demanding that you stop trying to strongarm OUR continued efforts to expand and improve this great invention, the Internet, which you DO NOT OWN and without which your people would not have jobs. Until you retract this ridiculous patent claim, I will personally cease giving any further media-buying business to your firm, and will recommend that all of my clients and students do the same. Shame on you! David Biedny IDIG, Inc.

David Biedny


February 28, 2000

NOTE: My views, not my employer's NOTE: Amazon.com is not the only offender. My views on Patents, Copyrights, and Licensing I have very strong feelings regarding software patents, copyrights, and licensing. Software should NOT be patentable. As software developers we constantly solve new problems and previously unsolvable problems as well as develop new processes on a DAILY BASIS. We are engineers. It's what we do. A patent is intended to protect a company's work not to provide revenue as so many companies use patents for (due to the inherent lack of value in their patented products, extortion under the guise of patent law is their only source of income). Companies that abuse patent law only serve to retard technological development which I believe is a Bad Thing(TM) for society and generally pretty damn anti-social. Copyrights are intended to protect the intellectual property of teh author. Since software and algorithms are written software should be copyrighted NOT patented. Licensing is a right that any product developer may use and enforce. Many companies abuse this right by licensing products that possess no intrinsic value. This shifts revenue from the product to the license which will ultilmately harm the abusing organization by causing consumers to seek out alternative products with less restrictive licensing and better value.

Jonathan Chaillet


February 28, 2000

I've discussed this with my father before and he actually told me his perspective which I find interesting. When starting off people had small local mom and pop shops that sold goods or delivered goods. Then franchises took over and where beating the competition by out numbering them and where able to buy products at lower prices because they could buy in high quantities so they could lower prices enough to kill competition (the local mom and pop shops), and I've heard of the Walmart studies where they have shown that the Walmarts where strip mining local economies of money instead of helping them, so it makes sense. Now the internet companies are going against local franchises by aiming for a larger audience, and they too are lowering their prices to drown competition, Amazon is a perfect example, but my fathers perspective on this was that eventually companies like Amazon would die at the hands of publishers and publishers would shrink to simply provide services to authors a! nd everything old would be new again. This happening because once publishers realize they do not need the middle man any more (Amazon) would start marketing on their own and with the internet its much easier to do this and have customer bases of people whom like their books. I believe this is what Amazon is afraid of, and why they are not listening to publishers, I can see this happening and seeing O'Riellys position on this I can see its starting to happen already...

Leyland Needham


February 28, 2000

I think Tim's "Ask Tim" column hit the nail right on the head. Anything I say will just be anticlimactic -- though that's never stopped me before. Amazon/Bezos is raping the good will of those who came before him. What I don't understand is how they can weather this bad PR. I suppose the majority of web surfers don't really consider this an issue, but I (a former Amazon customer) definitely do. As was stated in Ask Tim, "One-Click" is such an obvious thing to patent. Bearing in mind the flood of negative criticism Amazon must have received after the "One Click" patent, I just plain don't understand why they went ahead with yet-another-obvious-patent, namely the Affiliates program (By the way, I have been a member of CDNOW's Cosmic Credit Affiliate program since Feb. 1997. I would guess that qualifies as prior art). What does amazon hope to gain from these patents? They surely will not hold up in court, so what is gained by them? Why, why, why do you insist on doing ! this, Mr. Bezos? WHY would you want to anger and/or alienate the people at the core of the medium on which your business, the Internet/IT professionals? The people with all the money now? Why would you do this? How can you simply not care? We all care, you do not. I mean, because of you (and choice others) there is a "Patent Pending" section of Slashdot, devoted to stupid patents. You are really the star of that section. Come on, you should know better!!!

Evan Hoffman


February 28, 2000

Despite my youth, I am someone who could easily be considered an early adopter of the web, if not an old-timer. Many millenia ago (by web standards) I can recall grabbing the first public release of Jim Clark's Mosaic browser. I was so fascinated and amazed by the implications of a network such as the web that I immediately began to learn all I could, from frontend HTML to backend serving, so that I could participate in this great medium. Since that time, I have watched the web bloom, then skyrocket. I watched the browser wars with amusement and fear. I remember one of the first web-protests, wherein all webmasters were encouraged to change their background colors to black. I honestly don't recall what the protest was for, but I remember the sites of large corporations going black for a day, to join in. It is that spirit which draws me to the web, of freedom and individual empowerment. Amazon.com gave consumers a new, easier way to shop. Although it was only a matter of time before an amazon.com came to light, I still appreciate its presence. It is in that spirit that I ask that you release your 1-click patent into the public domain, as its use is vital for the growth of the web. Only with such basic technologies can e-commerce thrive. This was not your invention, nor is it your right to own such a basic component of e-commerce. Again, I urge you to release your 1-click and Affiliate Program patents into the public domain. Doing so would be to the world's mutual advantage.

Ian James Wessman


February 28, 2000

The roads of history are littered with the dessicated corpses of exploitative nations and corporations that pursued short-term gain with nary a thougt of long-term implications or the shoulders of giants on which we all stand. As has been said before, how many billions of dollars have been made by Amazon.com and other Internet-based ventures ... every cent of which was only possible due to the "gift economy" from which we have all benefitted? As a (former) customer, I am annoyed -- you are actively stifling innovation that may benefit me. As a professional Web developer, I am enraged -- how *dare* you encourage the patent avalanche that will prevent me from contributing back to the community! 1-Click-like technology is trivial to conceive and implement, as are affiliate programs. I have implemented both in the past, and I lay no claim to membership in an elite corps of developers. I doubt that the loss of my thousands of dollars per year in online shopping will keep you up lat!

Bill Kunz Jr.


February 28, 2000

Jeff, I have always admired your vision of what the web could be. Years ago, when everyone was proud of their brochure site, you decided to try commerce over the web. That was your innovation. Being first, you reaped the rewards, as I believe you should have. However, your success could not have happened if not for the selfless work of others who came before you. You didn't invent the Internet. You didn't invent the HTTP protocol. You didn't even invent cookies. Yet you use all of these things in your day to day business. What would the web be if someone had patented the idea of HTTP and cookies before you got started? Could you have made it? Would you have tried? Now that you are successful (Man of the Year as well as financially) do what the other giants in the field have done before you. Stand up for what's right. Be the person who builds the base for the next great man or woman who comes along with a brilliant idea. I understand that sometimes patents are used a defensive measures. I understand that, albeit sadly. If you must patent these technologies to protect yourself, please publicly announce that you will never enforce them. Please show the world how things *should* be. If you are patenting for other reasons, then shame on you. I was hesitant to support the Amazon boycott in the past. I really like purchasing from your company. The affiliates program is the last straw. I will no longer purchase from your company until these issues are resolved. Best regards, David Joham

David Joham


February 28, 2000

It is well understood in the dog eat dog world of corporate America that you'd better get it or someone else will. It is also understood that you have to defend what you have lest someone else can legally claim it. The problem lies not with getting patents, but with the patent system as a whole. Where at one time it was intended to protect inventors from people stealing their inventions and claiming them as their own, nowadays patents ONLY serve to stiffle innovation and benefit ONLY the business and NOT the customer. In Russia you only had one source of toilet paper - it's much like sandpaper. Why improve or innovate? It's one thing to protect against exploitation through theft of ideas, but totally another to exploit the system to fight off competitors. This is bad for the people, and because this is bad for the people it will eventually be bad for the corporation. Copyright your code, but don't prevent others to develop similar or even better technology. In the spirit of co! mpetition - if theirs is better, make yours better. Then you'll have a better product and we'll all benefit. Otherwise your product will stagnate while you're busy sueing potential competitors and we'll all suffer - us, you and you're competitors. The patent system is in a sad state and in need of a complete overhaul if not totally scrapped for a better method to protect against theft of ideas while still promoting innovation... If you really care about your customers, then lead the fight for patent reform rather than participate in it's exploits...

Michael V


February 28, 2000

To whom it may concern at Amazon (*if* you're concerned at all), why do you insist on doing this? You are alienating some of your best customers. Joe Sixpack might not care about such issues, but it should be ovbious that people like us, people who are comfortable with shopping online, your technically-minded clientele, *do* care *deeply* about these issues. You're making a mockery of the Internet by persisting with this. I'll grant you that the Patent Office is partly to blame for issuing the patent in the first place, but don't try to hide behind that. *You* are ultimately responsible for your business decisions, and we don't appreciate greedy squatters trying to grub all they can from this wonderful thing that some of us built. If you're interested, I've put the following in my .signature file: "Stop abusive software patents! Start typing http://www.noamazon.com" This is attached to every email I send, and I subscribe to some mailing lists with high membership. I've not bought anything from you yet, and if you keep this up, I never will. Others have said that they'll boycott you for the duration of your assertion of this patent; you may have made a lasting mistake with others, though, as I'm not sure if I'll *ever* purchase anything from you at all. To my fellow comrades-in-arms, http://www.noamazon.com/ is a good reference point to find alternatives to this madness. If it's technical books you're after, I've heard http://www.fatbrain.com/ spoken very highly of. There's always bn.com, of course, to send a louder message to the powers-that-be at Amazon. Someone else had mentioned that they use Amazon only for their reviews on the books, now. I encourage you not to do that, however, because even though, yes, you're using some of their bandwidth, you're still generating page views for them which ups their profit through the sale of banner ads. Add me to the list of people publically calling for a cease and desist of this odious business practice. Have a nice day.

Bill Jonas


February 28, 2000

A patent used to stand for some noteworthy, worthwhile innovation. The outcome of some serious investment of time & effort, if only to thoroughly understand a field in enough depth to be able to create something that extended that field. This patent clearly shouldn't have been granted - it doesn't pass any of the tests described to me by the patent lawyers I've worked with. It is clearly 'obvious to one skilled in the art', the most basic yardstick. Frankly, I wish there were some grave consequence in granting such frivolous patents for the Patent Office - the potential for damage and the legal costs of overturning even an obviously bogus patent like this one are huge. I'm amazed that Starsight (now Gemstar) still holds, and even worse, has successfully defended, some similarly frivolous patents related to on-screen program guides. This just reeks of opportunism. Who benefits from this kind of behavior? These kinds of anti-competitive practices are in no-one's interests, not even Amazons in the long run. In a sense, Amazon is indirectly showing contempt towards their customers. I'm glad to give a company my business when it is won fairly. But gaining my business by eliminating my choice of who to do business with? I won't stand for that, and that's how I interpret Amazon's attitude. As for now, you've lost my business and my advocacy. Perhaps one customer doesn't mean much to you. But it should - great reputations are built by taking care of each individual with the same high level of respect and service. Each happy customer becomes your advocate. Your current actions are rapidly tearing down a reputation that was once the envy of many. Sure, you still have great brand recognition, but what it represents is starting to change... I urge Amazon to sprint ahead, maintain their edge by innovating and leading the industry, as they began. If you stop & try to defend your position - particularly with the poor weapons you've chosen - people will just innovate around the roadblock you create, and you'll become irrelevent.

Paul Chambers


February 28, 2000

An Open Letter to Jeff Bezos We are writing to request that Amazon stop all attempts to enforce the patent that it has been granted on "one click ordering" (Patent number 5,960,411). It is our belief that this patent was granted without adequate review of prior art, and further, that even were it ultimately found valid, such broad patents serve only to hold back further innovation. One-Click ordering is a clever marketing slogan. However, your patent fails to meet even the most rudimentary tests for novelty and non-obviousness to an expert in the field. The fundamental technology on which Amazon's one-click implementation is based is the use of "cookies", a small amount of data placed on client computers to add state and session management capabilities to the World Wide Web, which was introduced in 1994 into Netscape Navigator 2.0 by Lou Montulli, Marc Andreesen, and others, at the urging of none other than Vint Cerf. The technique had been deployed on thousands of sites well in advance of your 1997 patent application. We believe that the rapid innovation on the World Wide Web and Internet platform that has created so much new value for the public (as well as for Amazon and its shareholders) will be choked off if companies take the short-sighted route of filing patents on commonly accepted and obvious techniques in an attempt to keep competitors from using them. Ill-advised patents and other attempts to limit the use of web technology for private advantage have put the whole software development and standards process into a precarious state. We understand that you may feel a need to file such patents for defensive purposes, to keep unscrupulous squatters from keeping you from doing business on the web, but if you use these patents offensively, as you have done in obtaining an injunction against Barnes & Noble's use of one-click ordering, you are striking a blow against continued innovation in the medium that has proven so successful for you. Given that you've now also received a patent on your Affiliates program (patent number 6,029,141), as well as several other critical patents relating to e-commerce, we urgently request that you clarify your intentions with regard to software patents, and avoid any attempts to limit the further development of internet commerce on the basis of the patents you have already been awarded. I'm hoping you'll give me quick permission to attach your names to this letter. However, it will be up on our site as an open letter to which our customers can subscribe, starting this evening.

laura


February 28, 2000

Here is the copy of an email I sent directly to Amazon.com, which had a very apathetic reply from a Titus G.: Subject: Your monopolistic attributes Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 01:32:40 -0500 I used to support Amazon.com. I have even shopped at the place. Now I am even offended to type those words. You represent everything that is commercial and wrong online. What you believe is right and protective, is nothing more than posturing for domination of the market through monopolistic means. You're no better than Microsoft pushing its products through its grip of its operating system. Your patents on technology that has been around long before you were even a concept is not only wrong, but outright insulting to all who use the internet. You propose to patent everything and anything, not because it protects you from others doing the same, but to shut down your competition and try to earn money where your business obviously cannot. One-Click Shopping was broad enough that anyone who tried to implement any easier shopping methods to their website for their customers would either have to pay you a fee for something you did not create or have a hand in developing, or they would have to chance a lawsuit based on this terrible abuse of the patent system. Now you propose to include affiliate programs as a patent. Again, this was a concept long before you were even in business. Affiliates existed back with mail order companies when the telephone became a more important sales tool than door-to-door sales. Thousands of sites have used similar methods of attracting new business and paying those who help them out, far before you filed for the patent. How dare you consider yourself the creator of this patent. It is insulting to think that I once bought from you. I only support those businesses who have an ideal I share. I now only shop online for North American books through Barnes & Noble, the very company with whom you decided to throw your legal weight around. The more you try to pull stupidity like this patenting of ideas that have long existed before you existed, especially on the internet, the more business you will lose. You should check out www.noamazon.com. It has a lot more support than you think. And if you ever want to consider having a quarter where you make a profit, this is NOT the way to go. I suspect you will be bankrupt in a few years, if the stockholders don't sell out to someone else who knows how to run a proper business online. Someday you may learn. Right now, it's evident you don't. A customer you have lost forever, Christopher Bair

Christopher Bair


February 28, 2000

I have already written to Amazon.com customer support and received a number of emails from them. Here is the last email I sent them, which they never replied to. (Excuse any formatting errors, please). ----- Original Message ----- > The copyright we obtained for 1-Click ordering was for a specific > implementation of the technology. We do not seek to prevent others > from offering such a feature, but simply want to prevent the pirating > of specific code. The concept of clicking once cannot be copyrighted, > only the code behind it. Many stores has implemented their own > version of this idea, without mirroring ours. This is not what is implied by the patent that has been awarded to Amazon.com, nor does it explain why Amazon.com is suing Barnes & Noble for patent infringement (as is my understanding). I was not under the impression that B & N stole any code or implementation from Amazon, just that (like all electronic commerce sites) they implement a similar 1-Click ordering concept. As you said, the concept cannot be copyrighted, so why then the lawsuit? By your own admission there are a number of other sites with the same concept as B&N but no lawsuits have been brought against them. To many, including myself, this is a rather detestable way to compete in the marketplace. After reviewing the patent and information cCutchen's site its seems to me to be a question of semantics. What you are describing as an implementation (assuming your lawsuit against B&N is just) I would generally describe as the concept of 1-Click ordering. The general idea (as outlined in the patent) is the concept, the implementation is the actual code and hardware involved, is it not? The patent should be more specific to your implementation, not just general overview of the standard practice of using cookies to keep track of customer information and matching it with your product database (the patent is even more vague and conceptual than this!). If B&N stole your implementation, then by all means, let them meet their fate in court. However, if Amazon.com thinks that it can leverage a better market position through abusing the antiquated legal system, you (Amazon.com) must think very little of your customers. These practices are no longer acceptable, and your customer's are not ignorant of your business practices. In any case, I expected much better from Amazon.com, as one of the foremost new Internet companies they should be setting an example and leading the market into a new era of corporate responsibility and accountability. Your thoughtful replies to these emails reaffirms my suspicions that Amazon could be something special. However, concern for us, the consumer, must be taken at all levels of business, not just customer support.

Ryan Kelln


February 29, 2000

Kevin Ma


February 29, 2000

I have been a customer of Amazon.com from very early on and they have been my preferred source for books, videos, and CDs. While I disagreed with the 1-click patent, I continued to buy from Amazon. However, the new affiliate patent broke the camels back. It is clear that Amazon is aligned against the public good and seeks to make as much of the eCommerce revolution Amazon proprietary as possible. I can now no longer, in good faith, patronize a company that is actively engaged in undermining the benefits bestowed to all via a free, open market for electronic commerce.

Christopher Everett


February 29, 2000

I am certainly not against Amazon turning a profit. However, ridiculous software patents are not the way to do this. I am the primary source of my companies book purchase. With a book budget of several hundred a month. You have lost my business and I now use FatBrain as my bookstore of choice. Not because they are not out to make money, but because they are not out to monopolize the market through bully techniques. I am ashamed of you and your company.

Derek Neighbors


February 29, 2000

I too buy a lot of books, and mainly from the Amazon web site. But I will boycott the website until this patent is dropped or redefined. The use of cookies to preserve client information (of any kind) is so elementary, that it seems impossible to me that the patent office actually granted a patent. It is clear that this patent was not well researched and will not stand up in court. This patent sounds to general. I currently have client web pages on which I use cookies to preserve client information. I wrote these pages _before_ Amazon existed. Those of us who have already written these pages should file a class action lawsuit against Amazon....if this idea is truly patentable, then any web page developer who saved purchasing information on a client via cookies is owed money to them by Amazon.

Mary Thomas


February 29, 2000

I've just convinced my web-designer friend to join the boycott, and he's clued his design-major brother in on it. You see how the information spreads? I'm taking my business to www.powells.com. //Miles witness the comic: http://isometric.spaceninja.com

Miles Johnson


February 29, 2000

Please stop this nonsense now !

Paula Batey


February 29, 2000

Bruce Labbate


February 29, 2000

I ordered from something from Amazon once. Rest assured that until you cease your egregious abuse of the patent system, I will not even consider a second purchase from your company.

Ian Rowan


February 29, 2000

It is time for you to give up this silly attempt to stifle the web economy. I will still use your site to find the books on your site (you offer a great service), but in the future I plan on multi-click ordering them from your competitors. Joel Baumert

Joel Baumert


February 29, 2000

There is no way patents like this should exist. Open standards are the most crucial element in computing.

Nathan Howell


February 29, 2000

Patenting trivial and well-established Internet 'technologies' will stop innovation dead in its tracks. Amazon should know better.

James Byers


February 29, 2000

John Buie


February 29, 2000

I've been a loyal Amazon.com customer for the past year or so, but I think that I too will join the boycott. Although I value the service that Amazon provides, I can not condone this ridiculous patent. Like someone else has said, the term "1-click shopping" could be trademarked, but I fail to see any redeeming value or legitimacy in this patent. If Amazon decides to change their tactics and honor the open source movement that they have built their empire on I will gladly renew my business with them.

Seth Petry-Johnson


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com is losing my potential business, and O'Reilly is gaining an even stronger foothold as my publisher of choice.

Josh Klun


February 29, 2000

What's wrong with the patents office? The unscrupulous actors in this business always attempt to monoplolize the gifts that have been freely given by the open community - we shouldn't be too surprised by Amazon.com's attempts, perhaps Jeff Bezos' fortunate and unprecedented success has made him feel that he can operate under a more fortunate and unprecedented set of rules than more ethical actors would. Personally I think he's just 'trying it on' because he has the time and resources. I don't believe the patent will stand once scrutinized. I do believe the US patent's office deserves critical scrutiny as well as Amazon.com and others who try to patent 'breathing' when they act complicitly, whether out of ignorance or for any other reasons.

Nick Murray


February 29, 2000

I did not order anything from Amazon yet, because they wanted too much personal information about you. Then, some time later when I hadn't much time to get them, I wanted to buy books worth some hundred dollar there. That evening, I read about their one-click-whatever patent and that they _really_ want to enforce it. Guess what. I bought the books somewhere else and will continueing to do so. In my opinion, Amazon is getting less and less trustworthy.

Johannes Tevežen


February 29, 2000

What's the deal with this patent thing? All I can say is: "No soup for you!" {Soup being business and you being Amazon, of course}

Sarah Lamont


February 29, 2000

Noel Franus


February 29, 2000

Noel Franus


February 29, 2000

I find it incredulous that a company can be awarded a patent on technology that was in existence before the company was registered. The US patent office did not adequately research or understand the patent they issued to Amazon.com (if this is the case, who knows what else will be patented - anyone up for XML?) If this is the direction in which these companies choose to protect their interests which, in reality, comprises research and work done by people other than themselves, then I'm forced to mass with the side against them and support open innovation. Nicholas Oddson

Nicholas Oddson


February 29, 2000

You know, attempting to patent an idea that's not yours in the first place is wrong. And trying to patent something that is an intrinsic part of Net Commerce is just plain stupid. Amazon.com, you're more intelligent than this. or, at least, you should be. I will boycott the use of Amazon.com until you return to your senses.

Seth A. Sher


February 29, 2000

I bought a video from Amazon this year. It was my first order and I was delighted with the service. I probably would have ordered a lot more, if it wasn't for this patent issue. I am strongly against software patents, and until you stop using them against your competitors I'll be taking my business to them.

James Simmons


February 29, 2000

I used to buy books from Amazon, because I found their web site entertaining, engaging, and a real help to buy better books. However, when I found out about their abusive use of the patent system, I decided to boycott. I now use www.chapters.ca for most of my book purchases. Shame on Amazon.

Ben Damm


February 29, 2000

Bah. It is hard for people to admit when they've done something wrong. If Amazon admits they were wrong, doesnt that open them up for counter-suits?

Nicklous Roberts


February 29, 2000

Andrew J. Lillie


February 29, 2000

Sorry Jeff, Amazon used to be a nice place to browse but, my money is gong to Fatbrain and Powells from now on.

Michael M. Craig


February 29, 2000

Similarly to Tim, I am immensely impressed by Amazon, both as a consumer and as a (past) shareholder. And, I too am disappointed to see Amazon using the (clearly outdated by events) patent system to their (short term?) advantage. I think, or want to believe that, Amazon is a better comapny than that. Perhaps Amazon feels it is compelled to apply for this 'protection' given the actions of others in the e-commerce world. I would disagree - be better than them.

michael bushman


February 29, 2000

I concur whole heartedly with the sentiments expressed in this letter.

Herb Gentry


February 29, 2000

I agree with all the points in you letter.

Edward Murphy


February 29, 2000

A fool and his business are soon parted. I see a fool and have no wish to do business with him. Guess we now know the plan on how to make Amazon finally turn a profit, eh!

Jamie LeBreton


February 29, 2000

Derek Vadala


February 29, 2000

barnes and noble is starting to look better and better.

christopher chan


February 29, 2000

Benjamin Gordon


February 29, 2000

I've been an active Amazon customer for a long time, promoted the site like crazy, and this is one of the silliest uses of the patent office I've ever seen. Maybe a group of "us developers" could get together and patent the words "Button" or "Click" or "Book"... This is an embarrasment to the industry, and most inane. Please, Amazon, stop this.

Larry D. Wilson


February 29, 2000

Please give up on this terrible patent. Because the patent system CAN be abused, doesn't mean it should be. Please show your ethical side, as well as your respect for those who have made your entire web presence possible in the first place.

Robert Hendelman Jr.


February 29, 2000

Wake up, Amazon!

Drew Parsons


February 29, 2000

I am really disappointed that Amazon.com feels it needs such restrictive trade practices to compete. You have been every thing that is great about the net and now you are debasing yourselves. Please reconsider and return the Net to us all. Iain Wyder, Delta, British Columbia.

Iain Wyder


February 29, 2000

Since Amazon's anticompetitive and abusive software patents have come to my attention, I have turned my business elsewhere. In the past 3 months alone, I have purchased over 踰 of textbooks and other reading material from fatbrain.com and sundry brick-and-mortar stores -- instead of online at amazon.com, where I used to do all my shopping exclusively. A disappointed former customer, John

John Fisher


February 29, 2000

Since Amazon's anticompetitive and abusive software patents have come to my attention, I have turned my business elsewhere. In the past 3 months alone, I have purchased over 踰 of textbooks and other reading material from fatbrain.com and sundry brick-and-mortar stores -- instead of online at amazon.com, where I used to do all my shopping exclusively. A disappointed former customer, John

John Fisher


February 29, 2000

Chris Klimas


February 29, 2000

C'mon, this is like patenting idea of storing information in computer memory. What next, patenting the for loop?

Anthony Castelletto


February 29, 2000

Amazon seems to be suffering from lawyeritis..too bad. If they insist on this and other similar patent applications. I for sure will not buy from them anymore, and will actively discourage others from doing so.

Michael Comerford


February 29, 2000

Denis Zorin


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim here. For the record, until this issue is resolved, I will take my purchases to FatBrain. When it's over and Amazon decides to play fair, I'll probably be back. Too bad too. I do a lot of business with Amazon. This stance by Amazon is ridiculous.

Billy Dunn


February 29, 2000

John V. Martinez


February 29, 2000

Say bye to another customer

Jim Fredrickson


February 29, 2000

I think I'll file for a patent on the English spellings of names of major rivers around the world. I figure I've got about as much prior art as Amazon.com does for their patents. Maybe I could even sue Amazon.com and Tigris Corp (Tigris.com) for patent infringement! In any case, I won't buy from Amazon.com until they mend their ways.

Daniel L'Hommedieu


February 29, 2000

And you thought greed died in the eighties? Sadly, I've ordered several times from amazon.greed in the last few months. While I'm happy with the service, including the ordering technology, I won't be ordering from amazon.greed again until they put their customers first. A boycott worked for Yahoo when they tried to steal the rights to their users content, and I hope it makes Mr. 'I'm man on the year' Bezos wake up as well.

Dave Matthews


February 29, 2000

It pains me to avoid giving business to Amazon, a company that I in general have quite liked and whose technical achievements (mostly pertaining to the level of interoperability between amazon and other systems) I respect. Seeing Amazon abuse the US patent system for a non-novel application of this sort saddens me.

Devin Carraway


February 29, 2000

Timothy W Thiele


February 29, 2000

J. Bruce Fields


February 29, 2000

I just saw the patent on the IBM patent server. Besides agreeing with Tim O'Reilly, I was stupefied by seeing that such an obvious thing could be granted a patent.

Dirk De Bruyker


February 29, 2000

Yongsheng Zhu


February 29, 2000

Eric Olander


February 29, 2000

Personally...I've been pissed about the commercialization of the WWW for a long time.... CLICKING ON ANYTHING + GETTING A RESULT = THE FOUNDATION OF THE WWW (as developed by Berners-Lee) Dave Kaplan

David Kaplan


February 29, 2000

What a shame, another customer down the drain. :~(

Kenneth W. Hall, AIA


February 29, 2000

Eduardo Morales


February 29, 2000

I was a happy customer of amazon and hope that you make it possible for me to do business with you again. Until then I will go elsewhere and will encourage everone I come into contact with to join the boycott.

Frank Pittel


February 29, 2000

Rachel Dixon


February 29, 2000

Graeme Hewson


February 29, 2000

Richard Ashby


February 29, 2000

Gregory Pindris


February 29, 2000

Tristan Lawrence


February 29, 2000

Bradley J. Sandidge


February 29, 2000

Brock Adamchak


February 29, 2000

I cannot support a vendor whose business model is based on theft and monopolization of others' works.

Jim Hood


February 29, 2000

As of today, I am a former affiliate of Amazon.com. I have removed the links, and I will buy and sell elsewhere until Amazon.com comes to ots senses. Share the web.

Chris Carr


February 29, 2000

Amazon greed is a threat to global freedom and innovation...they must be banned until they vhange their ways

Mikkel Bruun


February 29, 2000

It is shameful that Amazon would have the audacity to seek enforcement of a patent so obviously lacking in technical merit, and I find it equally insulting that they would so incomprehensibly underestimate the intelligence of their customer base. I can buy my books elsewhere.

Graham Blake


February 29, 2000

bookpool.com

Ed Daniels


February 29, 2000

You can still come out of this as the good guy if you publicly and sincerely admit that you have come to the understanding, if indeed you do, that your pursuit of this lawsuit is a losing situation for everyone, including yourself.

Ken Engel


February 29, 2000

It's all too easy to stand on the shoulders of giants. However, from up there, everyone can see you making an ass of yourself.

Jonathan Cole


February 29, 2000

I have purchased from your site in the past but will not support these types of business practices. My work is centered on bringing new people to technology and not only will I not use your site as a model of innovative Net technology but I will use it as an example of how companies can go wrong and then teach how we as a community can take corrective measures. I make it my mission to work toward, and lead toward, open standards and innovation. I will, as long as you pursue these philosophy's, lead people away from your site. Regretfully, Clifton W. Hyatt ComputerWorks

Clifton W Hyatt


February 29, 2000

just goes to show that even "cool" places will get greedy once given the chance. Very sad.

phil baird


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I have been an Amazon customer and shareholder since day one. No longer. Your use of patents on core, simple technologies that make the web cool offends me. I have never even looked at BarnesandNoble.com, but I'm heading there next for another 贄 order... Surrender the patents, compete in an open field, and run like mad. That's what the rest of us do.

J. Clark Venable


February 29, 2000

John Thompson


February 29, 2000

As a college student and frequent online shopper, I have bought about 踰 worth of merchandise from amazon.com. Service was great; nice looking website; I enjoyed it a lot. Unfortunately, their recent patent nonsense shows a clear lack of concern for the consumer, obviously favoring Big Business greed over the sense of community that the internet was built on. Fortunately, as an internet user I don't have to be forced into the arms of Big Business. I have lots of other options: Fatbrain.com has a great selection of technical books. Barnes & Noble has about everything. Ebay has much better auctions. And buy.com has better prices and shipping specials. 1-click purchasing is obvious. As a web developer, as soon as I saw the name "1-click purchasing" I knew exactly how it worked and how I could implement the same thing. Affiliate programs are nothing new, either. I remember reading Boy's Life (boy scout magazine) as a child -- the back cover always had this program where you could sell products for commission. Applying this idea to the internet is no big conceptual leap -- and I know for a fact it takes absolutely no new technology to implement these affiliate programs, either. I don't agree with software patents in general, but this sort of trivial "innovation" is beyond even the most desperate interpretations of patent law. I liked Amazon.com, but if they continue to act this way, there's no need for me to return. Sincerely, Tom 7 Carnegie Mellon University

Tom 7


February 29, 2000

I had become so used to browsing and buying at amazon that I recently forgot that I was boycotting them and made a purchase. I look forward to the day when they drop this and the associates patent and I can again be a regular customer (I've even lowered myself to shopping in meatspace as an alternative, shudder). bob

Robert Bushman


February 29, 2000

Only time will tell, but I predict you will lose this battle and will regret having fought it. rr

Ron Rice


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, this is a terrible mistake you are doing. I hope you realize this sooner than later ... Or is this deliberate ignorance on your part?

MadKAT


February 29, 2000

I will no longer purchase anything from Amazon.com Typically, it has been once a week for me but no more. There are more than enough competitors. What's next? A patent on ctrl + alt + del?

Shane Miles


February 29, 2000

I am saddened and dismayed at Amazon.com's actions. I fully agree with this open letter and hope Amazon.com changes its tactics soon.

Linda Howard


February 29, 2000

Amazon, if you have to resort to such anti-competitive measures to protect your business then you are not the the sort of company that I wish to deal with.

David J. Williams


February 29, 2000

I used to be a customer of Amazon.com until I knew about the utterly rididulous patent you are trying to enforce. I now find it morally unacceptable to do buisiness with you. Please reconsider your position.

Arturo Galvan


February 29, 2000

Prior to learning of Amazon.com's behavior in this 1-Click patent affair, when I was considering buying a new book, your website was the first place I would check. Since then, I have begun shopping at barnesandnoble.com, ThinkGeek, and other companies whose patent policies are not offensive. I believe that your actions in this matter are harmful to the continued technological development of the web as a platform for commerce. Please consider reversing your stance on this patent. You have already lost me and countless other customers over this issue. Don't risk losing more.

Nathan Sandver


February 29, 2000

Tim said it all: if there is one person who deserves to be a gazillionairre, it is Tim Berners-Lee, rather than some dime a dozen book merchant like Bezos. You build off of a platform provided to you free and open source and then decide to sh** on it like Microsoft. Complete shame on you.

Henry Bradford


February 29, 2000

I found this trend disturbing. Next someone will patent the process of squeezing a lemon by hand. No longer will I support Amazon.com or others who have taken similar actions.

Sean Farren


February 29, 2000

Though I have bought several books through Amazon in the past, your aggressive pursuit of frivolous web patents is unacceptable for a good corporate netizen. Therefore, I will buy no more of your products nor link any of your books to my website until you abandon these patents. Someday we're going to have to figure out a way to make corporations aware of more than their own bottom line.

Wayne C. Westerman


February 29, 2000

Your greed is not going to get you where you think it will. Chances are, you think that even if you loose a number of customers, there are millions of other unknowing people out there who would never know better. This is unacceptable, and represents how bad we need another company who can do what you do, that concentrates on customer satisfaction and corporate fairness (whatever that is these days, due to companies like yours.) rather pure personal wealth and growth. I hope you enjoy your quickly-becoming-hated empire of poor business decisions, I know I will not as long as you maintain your ways.

Raymond W. Lucke IV


February 29, 2000

kevin montuori


February 29, 2000

Stuart Cheshire expressed this very well 6 years ago: http://ResComp.Stanford.EDU/~cheshire/rants/Patent.html

Kevin Marks


February 29, 2000

I've been an Amazon customer since its early days, but am resorting to www.noamazon.com these days to find alternative vendors. As a longtime member of the Internet community, I resent Amazon's tactics with regard to both the 1-click and Affiliates patents. They have lost me as a customer, and the only way they'll get me back is if they stop this foolishness. If they continue to pursue it in court, they'll have lost me permanently. There will always be alternatives.

Matthew E. Newton


February 29, 2000

This is severely disappointing. My company purchases a few thousand dollars in books from Amazon each year; the (significant) portion of this that I'm responsible for will be going elsewhere. We've been universally happy with Amazon's service in the past, but this is just silly.

Adam Michaud


February 29, 2000

Seth Vanderdrift


February 29, 2000

Josh Adams


February 29, 2000

I have boycotted Amazon.com for several weeks and will continue to do so until it stops its blatant abuse of the patent system.

Dan Copeland


February 29, 2000

It certainly makes the blood boil.

Suresh TV


February 29, 2000

I have chosen to boycott Amazon due to this bogus patent, and I have been urging everyone I know to do likewise. Please come to your senses.

Ian Lance Taylor


February 29, 2000

You know, Amazon has been doing some really hideous things, but this tops them all! I hope this boycott really takes a bite out of them. It will be bad for the Affiliate business, and for E-business in general. Think about it. IF their patent works and they keep beating up on other businesses with it, it won't be long before "EVERYTHING" is patented and/or copyrighted, and then what? We have to pay fees just to write an HTML page? I think not! Hopefully this boycott will hurt enough that they will take a step down!

Cynthia Kimball


February 29, 2000

I've been a loyal customer of Amazon.com for four years, and I've been happy with their service. In spite of that, I will no longer do business with them until they give up their strategy of patenting everything they can think of. They have no right to claim exclusive ownership of technology that was *given* to *everyone*.

Mike Cummings


February 29, 2000

I have spent considerable money at your website over the last few years, and have introduced others to your business. Now I find myself in the regretful position of reversing both my habits and my recommendation. Your attempt to monopolize the World Wide Web, or at least part of it, by patenting such an obviously public domain idea is counter to the philosophy associated with the medium from which your business sprang. Dogs are taught to "not bite the hand that feeds," and so shall you be taught. Yes, many of the "newly connected" mainstream do not understand or appreciate the potential negative impact your patent will have. They are happy to just "1-click" their way to new books. The people whom you are alienating are some of your most valuable customers, as well as some of your best marketing instruments. These are the people who are comfortable with the net, who develop software and websites, and are the people others come to for advice on where to buy online. Your patent has the most impact on them, and they will be the ones who will spread the word far and wide on the net that buying from Amazon poisons the web. Jeff, do the Right Thing, and earn the "Man of the Year" moniker.

John Meyer


February 29, 2000

I am glad to see that there is a forum where Amazon will be able see the overall stupidity of what they have done and the community's reaction to that. I can only hope that they (Amazon.com and the patent attorneys retained by them) will put aside their egos and look at the actual problems with what they have done and not let a lawyer saying "but we got the patent, so we obviously deserve it" be the guiding voice in what is already an obviously misguided and short-sighted approach to e-commerce. It would appear that Amazon.com is afraid to face its competitors based on selection/quality/price and will only face them on service at the checkout counter and only then by taking control of common e-commerce practices so that their competitors won't be able to compete on equal footing. Interesting way to do business, but it reeks of fear and tells me that they don't think they can compete in any other way. Needless to say, I too have boycotted Amazon and have had the pleasure of steering five other people away from Amazon in the past two weeks. I hope someday to be able to purchase books and other items from Amazon again. But as long as I can't shop at their site with a clear conscience, I wonÆt shop there at all.

Chris Riley


February 29, 2000

I have to add my 2 cents...Does Amazon.com have to resort to this kind of greed because they haven't made a profit selling their products? You are embarrassing yourselves before what you obviously think is a gullible lot. Please change your mind about this patent nonsense!

Scott Tate


February 29, 2000

As an early fan of yours, I will not order from you again until you change your ways of trying to cash in on other's original ideas. What are you trying to gain. Just let people order stuff and you ship it and let the development of software fall where it may.

Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr.


February 29, 2000

I purchased at least 躔 in books off of Amazon last year, fatbrain.com here I com.

Ethan Post


February 29, 2000

Molly Des Jardin


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com, Do The Right Thing (tm), please...

Jason G. Aults


February 29, 2000

I am forced to agree with the technical community on this issue. I cannot believe that the patent was even granted, much less that Amazon is attempting to enforce it. There have been many events in recent years that have caused me to realize that the patent office has seriously gotten out of control, and this is further proof. Their inability to understand the issues at hand is simply providing fodder for lawyers and inhibiting the growth of the Internet. As a technical professional myself, I encourage Amazon to abandon this effort. I believe that it is doomed to failure in any case, and they could avoid the enmity of people that have supported them in the past and are deeply interested in their overall success.

Tony Lindquist


February 29, 2000

I feel that software patents in general and the 1-Click patent in particular are a threat to the continued growth of the internet. Software patents are a mounting threat to Free (as in speech) Software, whose spirit has brought the world such benefits as the Internet, commodity PC hardware, and Unix (to say nothing of Linux, FreeBSD, Apache, and the like). I further assert that "aggressive" patents are an abuse of the patent system, a system that has repeatedly demonstrated its inability to cope with the ever accelerating speed of technological growth.

Mark Storer


February 29, 2000

DON'T FORGET TO VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET!!

DOUGLAS SAUBY


February 29, 2000

Wow, these folks are really something. I hope they try to enforce this on someone and that someone contests their patent and the whole thing blows up in their face. That would be a fine mess.

Alexey Zinger


February 29, 2000

Rev. Eric Maultsby


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim's position on this issue. Just because the patent office is slow enough to (for the time being) allow such patents doesn't mean any respectable company should try to take advantage of it. I will not be purchasing from Amazon until it learns to respect the industry and people that made its existence posssible.

Jeff Oplinger


February 29, 2000

Most amazon customers do not care about software patents. Think, however, how much influence an open software advocating Database Administrator can have among his/her co-workers.

Dr. Boris Fain


February 29, 2000

Peter House


February 29, 2000

After learning of the odious "one click" patent a couple of months ago, I told Amazon I would do no more business with them until they stopped their patent madness. Not patronizing Amazon has been no great loss because there are plenty of other internet merchants out there. In a business that so depends on brand name, Amazon has distinguished itself, negatively.

Timothy P. Egbert, J.D., Ph.D.


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I admire much of what you have done. I can only assume that you hold the patents just to keep others from trying to work it against you. I will offer that I refuse to purchase from Amazon until you make a public statement about the ridiculousness of your patents, and your true motivation of getting them. I'm not much for threats, though I am one for history. I beleive your options are to make your statement of patent enforcement inactivity clear, or prepare to be the sacraficial lamb that you will become. The throngs of people wanting you down for your antics are growing to hundreds of thousands. I myself will continue to spread the information until you smarten up. Thanks for being there. Goood luck. Jen

Jen Ronner


February 29, 2000

Rob Wiseman


February 29, 2000

please come to your senses.

Robert Thorsby


February 29, 2000

There are lots of other booksellers on the web, and I will frequent them instead of Amazon. <a href="http://www.fatbrain.com">FatBrain for nerd books!</a> <a href="http://www.bn.com">Go shop at Barnes & Noble (Amazon will love that!)</a> <a href="http://www.fatbrain.com">FatBrain for nerd books!</a> <a href="http://dir.yahoo.com/Business_and_Economy/Companies/Books/Shopping_and_Services/Booksellers/">Go to Yahoo! and pick your own BookSeller</a>

Alan Field


February 29, 2000

As someone who has spent thousands of GBP at amazon.com and then amazon.co.uk I'm extremely saddened at Amazon's short-sighted attitude but am happy to take my business elsewhere.

Ralph Corderoy


February 29, 2000

David Robb


February 29, 2000

This is a very disappointing turn that Amazon has taken. I strongly hope that they reconsider this course of action.

Todd Knealing


February 29, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon.com until these ridiculus patents are stopped.

Eric J. Knapp


February 29, 2000

Just say no!

Robert Van Horn


February 29, 2000

Kirk Patton


February 29, 2000

I am an avid reader. I ordered several books from Amazon in the past and was happy with their prices and service. I will not order from them again until they change their tune.

Doug McNaught


February 29, 2000

I'd say go and read up on Anarachism Triumphant. These are, or should be, the ways of the past Amazon. http://old.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/anarchism.html

Michiel Ettema


February 29, 2000

This is ridiculously trivial. You can't seriously expect this patent to amount to anything when opposing lawyers are comparing stacks in the negotiation rooms-- this has "prior art" written all over it.

Robert Eckstein, Author


February 29, 2000

I will buy my technical books (and I buy many) solely from Amazon's competition until Amazon renounces this patent. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team.

Jeremy Allison


February 29, 2000

The patenting of this idea is akin to patenting the idea that you can use a glass to put water in to drink, instead of lowering your face to the faucet. It is something that everyone does already because it is a simple use of existing tools which someone else created. Until and unless Amazon drops the enforcement of this ridiculous patent, I will cease to use Amazon.com for any purchases, both personal and work related.

Paul D Fottler


February 29, 2000

I have yet to purchase anything from Amazon, and it looks like it's going to stay that way.

Andrew Hamilton


February 29, 2000

Imagine, if a Chemical Company President was polluting the Great Lakes with material that he/she knew was carcinogenic even though the law said it was "legal". Once we found out we would be outraged. We would petition the Chemical Company into bankruptcy and sue the President and Board of Directors. There is no difference between what Amazon and Jeff Bezos are doing with these patents. They are polluting the Internet with carcinogenic patents. We are outraged. Lindsay Moir

RightsMarket


February 29, 2000

I used to admire and enjoy Amazon. I have taken my business to B&N since you targeted them. I have also spread the news about the apparent brain hemorrhage suffered by Amazon. Remember Amazon - for each signature listed here there are likely several more that are also no longer buying from you. Please stop this injustice and let's get things back to normal.

Wayne Speir


February 29, 2000

It's becoming distasteful to order from Amazon. If all these patents are upheld, there won't be any new Amazons on the scene.

Paul Lane


February 29, 2000

Silly amazon..

Ian Main


February 29, 2000


February 29, 2000

I agree fully and completely with the content of the open letter to Jeff Bezos =eas=

Earl A. Stutesq


February 29, 2000

Stacey Edwards


February 29, 2000

I would prefer to work with Amazon. However, now the value they provide is not enough to cover for the damage that they are doing. I will take my business and my recommendations elsewhere.

Miles Johnson


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Consider the benefits you have received through the use of open source tools. And please reconsider these foolish attempts at market domination. I have spent thousands of dollars on Amazon. No more, however.

Dave Warner


February 29, 2000

I'll be buying my tech books from fatbrain.com or bookpool.com until they too do something stupid. Hopefully that won't be for a while.

Jude Nagurney


February 29, 2000

I'm a long time Amazon associate. Over the years I've invested a lot of time in making my site attractive and useful based on the legacy of sharing ideas, resources, source code, etc. that made the Internet what it is. I've started my site long before Amazon announced its associate program. I feel increasingly uneasy with Amazon's grabby and selfish attitude vs. this open and friendly Internet spirit. The money I make out of commissions is definitely not worth all the work I invested in my site I refer people to amazon, not for the commission, but to provide broader relevant experience in the form of related books. Both the "one click" and the "associates" ideas are way too broad and obvious to patent. They are definitely not Amazon's original ideas. I call upon Amazon to stop this ludicrous patents campaign. Amazon's tactics are alienating its best partners. We've chosen to be Amazon associates when Amazon attitude was different. We're giving much more than we're taking. I suggest to every Amazon Associate to try the following: Divide the commission money by the number of hours invested in building your web site. How does this compare with the minimum wage? Any one of Amazon's associates can switch to be B&N (or any other company) associate. It is a choice anyone can make. Amazon's attitude is making this choice increasingly easier with every patent they file. We are not ``eyeballs'' or ``clicks'' or ``patent items'', we are human beings who care much about freedom, fairness and sharing. I would like to commend Tim O'Reily once again for his leadership and stand on this issue.

Ariel Faigon


February 29, 2000

Greed is not an attractive trait Mr Bezos. I bought three books from Amazon this week, but they will be the last I buy if you continue in this ridiculous endeavour.

Mary Comber


February 29, 2000

Craig Kattner


February 29, 2000

Yes, another boycotter. Not only do I no longer purchase from Amazon, I also drop the boycott into any reasonable conversation on related topics. I know I've convinced a few others not to buy from them, and not just tech people. Hopefully, others are working similarly. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazon.html

Jason Riedy


February 29, 2000

I will join in the boycott until Amazon learns to appreciate and show more respect for its open source heritage.

Scott Annett


February 29, 2000

Jon Lapham


February 29, 2000

amazon customer from 1997 to today, until 1-click patent is abolished.

Teresa Hsu


February 29, 2000

Since the dark day you enforced your 1-click patent against B&N, I haven't bought anything from you. It won't change until you finally open your eyes. You can fool lawyers and judges pretending you invented how to use cookies... not your customers.

Antoine Duch‚teau


February 29, 2000

I am a former Amazon customer -- however, I refuse to support a company that would abuse the crippled patent system to unethically damage the market.

Aaron Malone


February 29, 2000

I agree that Amazon is in the wrong here. Our company has bought plenty of books from Amazon but we will be buying from a competitor until Amazon publicly drops all claim to this technique.

Avi Flax


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com *used* to be where I went first to purchase books online...

Matt J Cwanek


February 29, 2000

The one-click and affiliate program patents are egregious and flagrant abuses of the patent office's ineptness. Their enforcement is an insult to anyone who uses the web. But the (in my opinion completely disingenuous) claim that these patents cover non-obvious innovations is empirically testable. If the innovations are non-obvious, then a naive programmer designing a new e-commerce system without any exposure to amazon's web site, should be extremely unlikely to come up with either idea. To be conservative, let's say that even if as many as half the subjects in this experiment were to come up with the idea (given minimal cueing as to what they were designing), we would still consider it non-obvious. We all know how this thought experiment comes out. Over half the people reading this message probably did think of one-click ordering before Amazon had it. Certainly I would certainly be willing to bet my entire net worth against a thousandth of that of Jeff Bezos that, if we could find a thousand appropriate subjects, perhaps ten might never come up with the idea of one-click ordering, and fifteen might never think of affiliate programs. I think Jeff will get a lot of takers for this bet, though.

Daniel Y. Kimberg


February 29, 2000

Uhmm I purchased around 蹢.00 worth of books, CDs, and videos from Amazon.com I also was one of of the first few that believed in Amazon.com's e-comerce model. I must say that buy.com, fatbrain.com, bn.com, and bookpool.com are going to get all my business. Being a developer I am disapointed that you are defending a patent based on an open standard such as web cookies.

Stefano Santoro


February 29, 2000

I agree and stand firmly behind all the points you have made in your letter, Tim.

Matt Quail


February 29, 2000

Finished with Amazon until this silly patent is dropped.

Chris Winkler


February 29, 2000

I regret that I will be unable to shop at or even visit amazon.com or any of its subsidiary sites until this policy is reversed. I'll also make an effort to inform friends and acquaintances of the strong necessity of protesting software patents in a similar fashion. These companies are providers of service whose business owes completely to the free exchange of ideas, and this sort of theft from the common good cannot be ignored.

Marc Sira


February 29, 2000

I think everyone has said everything there is to say. The biggest travesty is that the rest of us programmers are deprived of what is rightfully ours. I mean really! Patenting cookies! How outrageous is that!!! You should be ashamed of yourself, Amazon. I have bought hundreds (maybe even thousands) of dollars worth of books for me and my company and I have always spoken so highly of you. This is the last time I buy your products or even think about whispering your name to another person until you stop this ludicrous abuse of power.

Adria


February 29, 2000

Come on Mr. Bezos, you know better than this. And so do we. Success is a great thing, and you have achieved a very large measure of that, but this 1-Click thing is not yours and you know it. It's a cute little name for technology being used the world over. I'm also afraid I'll have to close my associates pages if your company persists in this ridiculous notion. Be careful, the ice gets very thin where you're walking...

Ken Barrett


February 29, 2000

I agree, these patents are bad for all. Amazon is a PERL shop and if Mr Wall decided to revoke your licence, you would have no service for weeks and perhaps months as you would be forced to re-design (how would investors like that?). How about those gif images? They belong to Unisys but I am sure if they told you to replace them with a less efficient file format, you would be pictureless for days and perhaps weeks. Hope there are no Apache services on your network also. And wouldn't it be nice to offer your customers the option of naming their own price on excess inventiory? Can't because of another dumb patent. Maybe you could be forced to remove shopping carts because another dumb patent covers maintaing state. So as you can see, if all people enforced these bad patents, Amazon.com would not have fast downloading pictures, no shopping cart, more complex code, higher labor costs to maintain it, higher legal costs to maintain complience and no company spirit because the right to innovate is being smothered by corporate giants like yourself. I respect your company but not the robbing of ideas of the people that made your existance possible. Join us in making the web better and more open. If you don't, you may be shooting yourself in the foot like another Washington company.

Michael DeVivio


February 29, 2000

I'm another book collector that will be avoiding amazon.com. I buy a lot of books, but patents like that suck and I can't support a company that uses them. I will also spread the boycott, and recommend amazon's competitors to all my friends, who recognize me as "the computer and internet expert". Think again Mr. Bezos!

Torrey Hoffman


February 29, 2000

Let's see Amazon come up with some original ideas first, then try and use them for a competitive advantage. These trivial patents are an admission that Amazon's technical staff is being mismanaged.

Richard Anderson


February 29, 2000

Wrong move. Tell your lawyers you have no fiduciary obligation to enforce a patent that ought not have been issued and in any event ought not be enforced. Jerry Pournelle Chaos Manor

Jerry Pournelle


February 29, 2000

steven morgan friedman


February 29, 2000

All Amazon has (or any e-tail entity) is their reputation. You're blowing it.

Mason McDaniel


February 29, 2000

Please wake up, Amazon. Stupid stunts like this just make your customers go elsewhere. I won't be shopping at Amazon again.

Curtis Porter


February 29, 2000

It's a sad day when something that has always been free, such as the internet, becomes cluttered by irresponsable coorporations such as Amazon. I believe in the freedom of the `net, and the technology that it was built on, and I cannot support any company that attempts to limit that freedom.

Kenneth E. Lussier


February 29, 2000

happy to say that i just turned into a proud owner of 赨 worth of books from fatbrain.com oh and clicking more than once was SUCH a chore! *chuckle*

tomasz konefal


February 29, 2000

I buy a *lot* of books in a year. (My technical books alone, stacked on end, are already taller than my 5'9", and I've only been in the habit of buying tech. books for 3 years now.) Of late, I've begun to buy more frequently from Amazon. Your website is a technical marvel. I am astounded at the breadth and the relevance of your website's features. You have truly created a business of which to be proud. Why do you have to debase your technological achievements by pretending that certain of them are more important than they are? Rather than concentrating on expanding your offering, or incerasing the convenience of making a purchase, you expect to stay ahead by patenting the obvious? Come on. On the Web, there is more than one way to do it, and you can be quite sure that the other ways will be found. I can't conscience supporting a business that persists in stalling the progress of the Web. I will make future book purchases from Barnes & Noble (online and offline) Fatbrain, and O'Reilly direct. When Amazon backs off from its preposterous defense of a worthless patent, I will revisit my decision.

David Hand


February 29, 2000

David G. Doster


February 29, 2000

Jan Rune Holmevik


February 29, 2000

I am bothered by your use of what I view as an illegitimate, so much so that since reading of it, I have exclusively used bn.com. I would prefer to use Amazon, but cannot in good conscience unless and until you stop this egregious behavior.

Keith Piepho


February 29, 2000

D.C. Lawrence


February 29, 2000

I know you are falling victim to your lawyers but wake up and smell the tech. Do you really think anything as basic as 1-click is your invention? Really? Come on. The same paradigms , except for crypto, have been reused since we had sparse array binary trees for use as databases in MUMPS in 1965. Grow up and compete. Sincerely Robert D. Silvetz, M.D.

Robert D. Silvetz


February 29, 2000

Curtis Layton


February 29, 2000

While I have purchased a few books from Amazon, I stopped when I heard about this bogus patent. I won't buy anything at all from Amazon any more until you retract all software patents. Meanwhile, I strongly urge all my friends to do the same.

Stephan Niemz


February 29, 2000

Kevin T. O'Brien


February 29, 2000

Shame on you, Amazon!

Jenny Fain


February 29, 2000

Corey Benninger


February 29, 2000

Chris Lusena


February 29, 2000

I entirely agree with this letter.

Greg Galcik


February 29, 2000

As I recall, greed was not one of the cardinal virtues...

John Deighan


February 29, 2000

Applying patents for a way of using cookies is not protection of innovation. It is sheer stupidity. Shame on you Amazon.

Dury Arnaud


February 29, 2000

I have cancelled all my outstanding Amazon orders, and will not buy from Amazon again until the patent litigation is completely abandoned.

Ron F.


February 29, 2000

I have a very large technical library---over a thousand titles---many of which have been purchased at Amazon.com. As long as Amazon.com attempts to enforce marginal patents, I will not patronize their establishment.

Jeffrey Aguilera


February 29, 2000

As of now consider me an ex-customer. You should be ashamed of exploiting the work of so many (mostly unpaid) others who have developped the technology that enables your existance. In the long run this will do you much more harm than good.

Martin Fuzzey


February 29, 2000

I have purchaced several books from you & fatbrain.com, I think I'll be continuing my business with fatbrain unless you wise up, you are just too greedy ( tell us again how much you are worth in stock ?????? ). Sincerely D.J. Barrow. Member of Linux for 390 developer development team.

DJ Barrow


February 29, 2000

Bobby Woods-Corwin


February 29, 2000

I purchase several books a month (about 贄 worth). Sometimes with you. If you continue to exploit an idea you claim as your own, I will terminate my business with Amazon. And I will encourage everyone I work with and know to do the same. Maybe when your shareholders start feeling the effects, you will realize the mistake you have made.

Ken Koors


February 29, 2000

I used to buy books approximately weekly from Amazon.com. I haven't bought a single book since the beginning of December, because of this patent silliness. In addition, I always recommend that people wishing to buy my recently published book avoid Amazon. Jeff Bezos, stop the nonsense! I really do like your site best, but I'm not going to frequent it if you insist on strangling the industry with legal harassment. -- Larry Gritz

Larry Gritz


February 29, 2000

I will never purchase any products from Amazon while they continue to hold the one-click and associates patents, or any other similar patents that use bully tactics in restraint of trade to make obvious and prior technology unavailable to the software community. These patents should be overturned, and the Justice department should investigate Amazon for its abuse of the free market. I'd love to know if anyone in the patent office got a nice Christmas present from Amazon for their careful perusal of these patent applications.

Dan Childers


February 29, 2000

Vote on this issue with your dollars. There are plenty of other merchants out there that would gladly step into the space the Amazon.com may currently hold for you. A few of them include, but are not limited to: http://www.bn.com barnes and noble http://www.fatbrain.com fatbrain books http://www.powells.com Powell's Books in Portalnd, Oregon (the "true" Largest Bookstore in the World). It sells new and used texts together and many of the "hard to find" books on Amazon are actually bought from Powell's and resold to you (at a good sized markup). Skip the middle man, buy from Powell's Books!

Jim Jones


February 29, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos: A great man once said that if he saw further than other men, it was because he stood on the shoulders of giants. Sounds to me like you just want to stand there to block the view of the folks behind you. I sincerely hope you see that you are doing the wrong thing. If you don't know why it's wrong, please reread RMS's and Tim O'Rielly's letters on the subject. BTW, you wouldn't happen to have the URL of a mirror for the DeCSS, would you? Thanks for your attention in this matter, and I look forward to the news that you've come to your senses. Too bad I won't read about it, or anything else, on amazon.com.

Jim Sullivan


February 29, 2000

I started boycotting Amazon when they patented 1-Click(tm). BOOKPOOL.com has amazing prices on technical books and for anything else I go to one of the sites listed on NOAMAZON.com. Shame on you Jeff Bezos.

Brien Voorhees


February 29, 2000

As a developer, I have made my living off of open source software, and technology and techniques which had no or open patents. I previously bought the majority of my reading material from amazon.com in the efforts to support the internet economy - an economy I hoped would be based on openness, respect, and freedom. Instead, the leader in e-business has proven that they are just interested in business as usual. As a result, I am no longer purchasing from amazon.com I applaud Tim O'reilly for his courage to speak out with the ideals that he believes in!

Praveen Sinha


February 29, 2000

Michael Sander


February 29, 2000

Justin Lawler


February 29, 2000

Worried (past?) swedish customer...

Anders Hedborg


February 29, 2000

Come on guys, why do you want to pollute the patent system with such dreck as the On Click patent? It is not that I am opposed to patents; in fact I have several in submission at the moment, but you need something stronger then the use of a cookie to make a case for one! Your approach is really a slap in the face to those people who have worked to bring you, without patents, the technology that you use everyday. I used to be a heavy (and happy) user of your company, but I have shifted over to fatbrain and, ugh, bn.com. I will not support your position on these patents.

Murray Smigel


February 29, 2000

Many racers fall to the paranoia of watching, and sabatoging those who follow, instead of clearing the next hurdle. Did you start, and grow amazon by *focusing* on what the competition might do ? I doubt it, you *were* much too clever during your startup. Why stop showing the competition how to create the best shopping experience on the net ?

Marty Davis


February 29, 2000

Bad Amazon! No biscuit!

Kai-yuh Hsiao


February 29, 2000

Amazon has lost another customer.

Matthew Templeton


February 29, 2000

I agree with Tim wholeheartedly. Amazon will not see any more business from me until they drop the patent nonsense.

Chad Marshall


February 29, 2000

Maybe you (Mr. Bezos) will get the idea that those of us who have built this medium which you are exploiting don't appreciate it when you take our ball, write your name on it and then decide to not let us play with it anymore! I am joining the boycott and recommending to everyone I know to do the same!

Richard Bastedo, President GygaBite.com


February 29, 2000

I really like Amazon service but this patent business forces me to choose some other book seller.

Alex Kravchenko


February 29, 2000

Michael Calabrese


February 29, 2000

Douglas Lewis


February 29, 2000

It is well known that software patents have become more of a vicious land grab than a protection for the rights of innovators. In the absense of a patent-providing body that can tell the difference between these two scenarios, it is up to the patent submittor to only pursue original and innovative ideas/algorithms for patent, even if the submittor is a corporate body. Otherwise, the land grab will continue until true software innovation is throttled to death. By applying for and utilizing the "1-click shopping" patent, Amazon.com has violated this rule, and is thereby hastening the demise of innovation for short-term corporate gain. This stinks.

Matthew Ford


February 29, 2000

I've allready bought books at Amazon UK, and I won't again until Amazon decides to stop pattenting computer usages in its businness process.

Olivier Berger


February 29, 2000

Marko Aalto


February 29, 2000

Arwen O'Reilly


February 29, 2000

Unlike Tim, my feelings on this are so strong that I will participate in the boycott. To write an open letter decrying this practice and refuse to boycott when there are apparently equivalent providers is too mamby-pamby for my taste. I intend to urge friends, family and co-workers to participate in the boycott. I intend to add an informative sig to all personal and corporate communications about this insidious practice. If our eyeballs are worth even a small fraction of the value the market accords them, the names on this list and those they communciate with will be significant.

Wayne Durden


February 29, 2000

Tom Kyle


February 29, 2000

I have set up Amazon affiliations for several of my web design clients and was impressed by the assistance I received on a programming question by email within a day. BUT as a result of these two patents I will not be reccomending Amazon to clients or using Amazon personally because I feel what you are trying to do is harmful to the future of the Internet. Take a look at your nearby neighbor Microsoft and the ill will they have created by their negative and abusive actions. What goes around comes around, and if you operate your company from a defensive and negative postion you will eventually reap the results of that.

Rich Ward


February 29, 2000

Dan Debertin


February 29, 2000

As an internet old-timer (I have been there since 1984), I have been purchasing books at Amazon.com for quite some time. These times are over. I will not buy another book from Amazon until they clearly signal that they will stop taking undue advantage out of a failing patent system. Jean-Denis

Jean-Denis Muys-Vasovic


February 29, 2000

I oppose your patents for "1-Click Shopping" and "Affiliates" technologies and I will no longer shop at Amazon.com as long as you lay claim to them. I am confident that, if necessary, the courts will eventually revoke these patents. By that time, you will have created such ill-will among the web community that your business will surely suffer. Or you could admit your mistake now and save yourself a lot of grief.

Sam Choukri


February 29, 2000

You are killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. As with the fairy tale, you will end up with a bloody mess.

Chris Rasley


February 29, 2000

As an internet old-timer (I have been there since 1984), I have been purchasing books at Amazon.com for quite some time. These times are over. I will not buy another book from Amazon until they clearly signal that they will stop taking undue advantage out of a failing patent system. Jean-Denis

Jean-Denis Muys-Vasovic


February 29, 2000

The Amazon patent is as absurd as someone patenting a coupon. 1-click ordering was a clever marketing innovation, but nothing more. We must tell Amazon in no uncertain terms that they're wrong. Vote with your dollars, folks. It's the only communication Jeff Bezos seems to understand.

John Kaufeld


February 29, 2000

Neil Robertson


February 29, 2000

Michael Osterlie


February 29, 2000

Like hundreds of others who have already signed this letter in the past day and a half, I'm a techie who has spent a good thousand or two on Amazon stuff. Amazon used to be one of my favorite companies. I sorrowfully join the boycott. When you mend your ways, I'll be back...

Michael Peterson


February 29, 2000

David Solum


February 29, 2000

one less amazon customer here...

K. Brant Niggemyer


February 29, 2000

Peter Lieverdink


February 29, 2000

Daniel Howard


February 29, 2000

I have bought from Amazon.com before, but wont buy anymore till they relent on such bogus patents. fatbrain or maybe even bn..

Saikat Dey


February 29, 2000

Benjamin Gilbert


February 29, 2000

I buy around 3-4 books a year from Amazon.com. I have an extreme dislike of software patents - I believe they stifle this industry more than they help it. The Amazon 1-click patent is more obnoxious than usual. I may have to take my business elsewhere if Amazon insists on following this ridiculous patent policy.

Steve Anichini


February 29, 2000

Jeremy Epstein


February 29, 2000

I'll not buy a thing from amazon until this is cleared up. It's too bad too, I'd prefer to shop amazon, but i'm stuck visiting bn.com or my local bookstore.

Aaron Hope


February 29, 2000

D. L. M.


February 29, 2000

Darryl A. Peterson


February 29, 2000

I recently purchased a couple of hundred (Canadian) dollars worth of books from a competitor to Amazon, a sale that, until recently, would have gone to amazon.com. I'm saddened that amazon.com would take such a trivial bag on the side of existing net tech and make it into a patented 'invention', effectively stealing what is in the public domain. However, I just have to hope, I guess, that amazon's engines are written in Perl, so that they would :. fall under the GPL. Grin. Dave

Dave Bradshaw


February 29, 2000

Laura Chiles


February 29, 2000

I have purchased quite a few books from Amazon, and had planned to purchase quite a few more in this year alone. But until Amazon stops this insane patent on One-Click and promises not to try to enforce the Associates program patent, I will spend my book money at other online businesses.

Denise Loving


February 29, 2000

Jon Ault


February 29, 2000

James P. Steiner


February 29, 2000

Stephen Mendrzychowski


February 29, 2000

San Dinh


February 29, 2000

I agree with most everything stated, your current business practices have me sickened and I will no longer shop at amazon.com I think I will get all my books from Barnseandnoble now.

Ryan Fuerst


February 29, 2000

Hey, Bezos! Have you ever thought of teaming up with Macroshaft, AOHelL, and Time-Whore and seeing if you guys could patent stupidity? Oh yeah, I just thought I'd mention this-I'm an avid gamer (who $pends on such books), a true-crime novel afficionado, and aspiring detective with a reputation for accumulating LOTS of books..I was going to place a 贄+ order with you, Amazon, but the chance of that happening now with that bogus patent shit is less than the 0% chance of me switching to AOHelL. <click> -Nitro

Denise "Nitro" Lee


February 29, 2000

I will not utilize Amazon.com and I will infor others as to the reasons why until Amazon self-revokes the patent on the 1-Click purchase.

Greg Corwin


February 29, 2000

Until such time as Amazon ceases to use their silly patents as a bully stick, their competitor have my business. 'nuff said.

Matt Bandy


February 29, 2000


February 29, 2000

I suppose we and, especially, you, Mr Bezos, are thankful that the descendants of Guttenberg aren't pursuing cases of patent infringement on the printing press! I wonder, were I to hurry, if I could still be granted a patent on the fonts typically used in the printing industry? *chuckle* Well, my friends, I've not yet purchased from Amazon, although I've considered it. Certainly, though, I have no intention whatsoever of purchasing from Amazon now. Thanks, Tim, for your forthrightness in this matter.

Dave Fluri


February 29, 2000

Paul Reynolds


February 29, 2000

As a customer at Amazon.com I have to rethink my way of dealing with you as a company. Even that you provide a very fine service, I have to turn you down if you do not stop this no sense patent war. It damage the Internet on the long run. Sorry I have to do so. Steen Talmark

Steen Talmark


February 29, 2000

Dear Sir, I will not buy another book from your company. I will not recommend anyone else do either. I have bought many books from your company in the past, as have my relatives. I have been treated fairly, and found that the people who work under you to be excellent, prompt, and dilligent in finding hard to locate, or out of print books. Please do not insist that you invented something that has been available for long before your claim. (I hope to be able to shop with you again in the future (if the pattent application is dropped)) Sincerely, Kelly R. Black (Ex. Amazon.com shopper)

Kelly Black


February 29, 2000

Get real.

Muni Schweig


February 29, 2000

Tadas Osmolskis


February 29, 2000

Until this issue is resolved I refuse to buy from your site. I have several associates that regularly purchase from Amazon, I will inform them as well. I run the IT department here and may implement blocking of amazon.com on our corporate network. Rick Parker

Rick Parker


February 29, 2000

I was a happy Amazon customer, buying several books anually, until I read about their patents. I have gone as far as boycotting. I urge everyone to do the same. Not only have they lost my business for the past few months, but I've found other book resources such as bookfinder.com . check it out.

Michael Adler


February 29, 2000

I used to be an Amazon customer. I no longer buy at Amazon for two reasons: One is their patent policy, the other is their policy to send email advertisements even if you asked them no to do.

Walter Hofmann


February 29, 2000

I too have purchased numerous books at amazon, but if this issue is not resolved quickly, amazon will never see my business again.

Dan Greer


February 29, 2000

Ian Goodrich


February 29, 2000

Josh Eno


February 29, 2000

Given the fact that Bezos refuses to acknowledge his mistake, I guess I'm going to have to start going to his competitors.

Lamont Granquist


February 29, 2000

Excuse me, But what's next as far as ignoring prior art??? You thinking of patenting the button next?

Steve Sherwick


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon.com reverses itself on their attempts to enforce an un-enforcable patent, I will be going to the local bookstore, or Barnes&Noble.

Todd Ojala


February 29, 2000

Sadly, I will have to find another source for books. I hope you come to your senses soon. I am making sure everyone I know joins this boycott.

Jeff Sewell


February 29, 2000

I have been your customer in the past. I'm sorry that I cannot support anymore a company that doesn't have any respect for the common good of the society.

Timo Pakkala


February 29, 2000

Amazon, you will not receive any more of my business until you relinquish this feeble and unjustified patent on common technology. You are now considered a technology squatter. Sincerely, Bob Roberts.

Bob Roberts


February 29, 2000

Eagerly grasping for proprietary rights to commonplace technology is something I've come to expect from Microsoft. Good to know that if MS is cut down to size, there'll be no shortage of techno-corporate audacity.

Casey Boettcher


February 29, 2000

You have a patent of something that anyone and has created. A bunch of cookies and a button that tracks you. Ridiculous.

Michael Goodman


February 29, 2000

I've been a faithful Amazon customer for years; half of my technical library and a large portion of my other books have come from Amazon. I also work in the industry, building websites, and feel that both the 1-Click and the associate patents are abusive. Amazon needs to abandon those patents in order to regain the confidence of their technical customers.

Robert Crawford


February 29, 2000

Until this is resolved - I will not even visit the Amazon site. I will purchase all future books from FatBrain or another competitor. John D.

private


February 29, 2000

I pledge to avoid in every way doing business with Amazon.com so long as they continue trying to enforce ridiculous patents. And I will work to inform my friends and coworkers concerning this issue, so they can respond as they see fit.

Robert C. Woodbury


February 29, 2000

As a college student I spend hundreds of dollars a year on books, but there's no way I will consider purchasing from you until you stop abusing your patent and the community that allowed you to exist in the first place.

Chris Vazquez


February 29, 2000

Until this is resolved - I will not even visit the Amazon site. I will purchase all future books from FatBrain or another competitor. John D.

private


February 29, 2000

Carl W. Powers


February 29, 2000

douglas de Marco


February 29, 2000

I will be urging my friends and acquaintances to avoid Amazon until Amazon sees the light on this important issue.

Frank Woodward


February 29, 2000

Since this first became an issue I have purchased all online books from www.bookpool.com.

Ben Beuchler


February 29, 2000

Tim Pierce


February 29, 2000

I applaud Tim for his attempt to shed light on this issue, and I hope that whether or not Mr. Bezos possesses the intelligence to realize the possible adverse effects of Amazon's actions, that it will be realized that there is nothing original deserving to be patented in the first place.

Chris Shiflett


February 29, 2000

I've been on the net since '89, and worked as a professional web developer since early '94. Ever since these early days, a big part of my job was to educate customers about the culture they were about to get involved with - the Internet. Needless to say, most had a hard time getting it. What does that have to do with the topic at hand? Well, over the last year, I bought about 軸 worth of books at amazon.de for my private use, and authorized company purchases for more than five times that amount. Why? Because I thought that you HAD understood how the net works, and how to do business not just on the net, but with the net. Boy, was I wrong. Here's hoping that fatbrain.com doesn't catch corporatism any time soon. Otherwise, where would I shop for books?

Daniel Schmitt


February 29, 2000

I'm against the abuse of patents, which deserves freedom and innovation.

Laurent Kestemont


February 29, 2000

I've been on the net since '89, and worked as a professional web developer since early '94. Ever since these early days, a big part of my job was to educate customers about the culture they were about to get involved with - the Internet. Needless to say, most had a hard time getting it. What does that have to do with the topic at hand? Well, over the last year, I bought about 軸 worth of books at amazon.de for my private use, and authorized company purchases for more than five times that amount. Why? Because I thought that you HAD understood how the net works, and how to do business not just on the net, but with the net. Boy, was I wrong. Here's hoping that fatbrain.com doesn't catch corporatism any time soon. Otherwise, where would I shop for books?

Daniel Schmitt


February 29, 2000

John Griffiths


February 29, 2000

I will not buy a single book on Amazon because of this patent, and I encourage the boycott in every other similar case.

Herv‰ Eychenne


February 29, 2000

What is it that you are so afraid of? Stop looking for clever ways to take advantage of an antiquated patent system and go make some money.

William Wechtenhiser


February 29, 2000

I no longer buy books from Amazon. Nothing more to say expect to clean up your act.

Bryan Whitehead


February 29, 2000

why affiliates program, such a widely used process, can be patented? i think i should patent my keyboard typing style (use right index finger to type "i") Anti-Amazon!

Harry


February 29, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon again until these patents are released.

Tim Thompson


February 29, 2000

I have bought several books from Amazon in the past but will not do so again unless they stop trying to patent everything that moves. I am saddened that the whole US & worldwide patent system has shifted from protecting real inventions to monopolising all trade in the hands of a few rich and unscrupulous corporations.

Matthew Moncaster


February 29, 2000

I have spent thousands of dollars on books at amazon - but will not do so any more until Amazon declares it will not enforce these ridiculous patents.

Robert Whitehurst


February 29, 2000

I still remember how exciting it was when Amazon first came to the Internet, and how much I enjoyed your selection and service. I also was impressed at the way you built the business from one room to a major corporation with a great idea, and lots of grit and determination. It saddens me to see that you feel you need to comandeer existing technology in lieu of innovation and legitimate competion. I no longer have the heart to buy from you, and have taken my business elsewhere.

Scott Davis


February 29, 2000

I believe that if the one click patent is successfull the competition of Amazon will have no alternative to act in a similar fashion, and soon there will be an avalanche of software patents. I don't really want to be a programmer if every line of code I write must be checked by a legal department to ensure it doesn't infringe a patent or two. Is this really the future Amazon wants?

Peter Harrison


February 29, 2000

I've long since recommended Amazon to friends and collegues. No more, as long as they continue this abuse behavior.

Joshua Kronengold


February 29, 2000

I have bought several hundred dollars worth of Items from amazon.com so I think i have mroe then enough right to dictate their actions (as an active customer) I think it's immature and stupid for someone to patent the associates and 1-click /no brainer/ ideas. It does make sound business sense however, and I respect this. Perhaps what amazon.com needs to do is release the patents under an agreement that they(or similar patents) cannot be re-registerd. My 2 cents, I think I've paid enough for them to listen to me.

Keith McCartney


February 29, 2000

Tim, I'm all for boycotting Amazon if they exercise their rights to this patent, but are you going to pull your books from their virtual bookshelves?

Ron L.


February 29, 2000

I've bought books, cds, and DVDs from Amazon.com. I won't buy any more until they drop the patent assaults.

Patrick Tullmann


February 29, 2000

Francisco Neira


February 29, 2000

I have been a customer of Amazon.com but will decline to continue as one unless it joins the internet community as opposed to the e-commerce community. It is one thing to offer a service that people find useful enough to pay for, it is quite another to try to finagle an advantage and avoid straight ahead competition.

Thomas J. Keller, Ph.D.


February 29, 2000

As a consumer and tech, I am very disappointed in Amazon. I have purchased books and other merchandise from their site as well as recommend them to my friends and family. I feel that I can no longer do either. Amazon was a shining example of the promise of the internet and e-business. Now, I fear that it will be an example of a turning point in internet history. A point where the internet's promise was put to rest.

Chad Holbrook


February 29, 2000

As a consumer and tech, I am very disappointed in Amazon. I have purchased books and other merchandise from their site as well as recommend them to my friends and family. I feel that I can no longer do either. Amazon was a shining example of the promise of the internet and e-business. Now, I fear that it will be an example of a turning point in internet history. A point where the internet's promise was put to rest.

Chad Holbrook


February 29, 2000

As someone who manages a web development team which maintains an ecommerce application as well as an affiliate program, I am saddened to see Amazon make their patent claims. How is one click shopping any different from storing credit card informaiton? Where is the invention? How does an affiliate program differ from a bounty for referals? These were not new ideas. Amazon pushed the envelope for e-commerce applications, but when I look at their site I see a checkout process stolen directly from eToys, and an interface that becomes more Yahoo-like everyday. I plan on taking my business elsewhere until the patent issues are addressed.

Ian Siegel


February 29, 2000

Eric Weese


February 29, 2000

Robin Bandy


February 29, 2000

As someone who manages a web development team which maintains an ecommerce application as well as an affiliate program, I am saddened to see Amazon make their patent claims. How is one click shopping any different from storing credit card informaiton? Where is the invention? How does an affiliate program differ from a bounty for referals? These were not new ideas. Amazon pushed the envelope for e-commerce applications, but when I look at their site and see a checkout process stolen directly from eToys, and an interface that becomes more Yahoo-like everyday.

Ian Siegel


February 29, 2000

While I am not completely taking part in the boycott, Amazon.com is no longer my first stop when shopping online. Much of my business that you would normally have received has gone to competitors such as Fatbrain, BN, 800.com, toysrus.com, etc... I do think you provide a great service. I especially like the user comments on products, and I have had pretty good luck with your recommendations, at least on fiction books. I normally like to reward such companies with my purchasing dollars. However, your patent on 1-Click ordering seems so ridiculous that I cannot support such a company. If you can provide a reasonable public response as to why your patent should be valid, or drop the patent altogether, then I may change my position. Until then, however, Amazon.com will never be at the top of my online purchasing list.

Rob Anderson


February 29, 2000

Tim Neu


February 29, 2000

Amazon, you had all of my business before your silly power-grab. Now you have none. I also influence my employer's purchases, who I know spends many thousands of dollars on books anually.

Jim Saxman


February 29, 2000

Kevin Landers


February 29, 2000

I find it offensive that a company which has benefited so much from the 'open' nature of innovation on the internet would misuse patent law in such a shameless fashion. I will quite happily find another outlet for my book purchases. I've been quite satisfied with Amazon service and have used it for probably 50% of my book purchases for the last 4 years, but this is too much of an insult to overlook. I hope that Jeff Bezos will show that he is worth the accolades he has been receiving as an internet visionary and not simply another one of the same old crowd. Issuing an apology and retracting the patent would go a long way towards restoring my confidence and will spare you the embarassment of having the judge throw you out on your ear when he realizes that you are effectively claiming to have invented cookies.

Chris Gottbrath


February 29, 2000

Software patents are often abused since the patent office is not able to keep up with current technological progress. Patenting such an obvious idea is ridiculous and reflects badly upon the company.

John Kugelman


February 29, 2000

It's all been done a million times before -- how is Amazon's use of the tech any different and deserving of a patent? All this can do is scare other people out of entering the market or trying to develop the tech. Bad!

Chuk Goodin


February 29, 2000

I feel a company should keep it's competitive edge trough innovating instead of trying to claim a very simple principle, that's explained in almost any CGI site, as their own. This seriously screws the development of the WWW as a whole and I sincerely hope Amazon will give it up for the greater good of the internet community, and in the end, for themselves. -- Eric

Eric Loos


February 29, 2000

I fully agree with Tim O'Reilly on this issue. It's exactly this kind of behavior that annoys Amazon customers like me. Make that former Amazon customer. There are other places I can shop, and they're only a few clicks away.

James Graves


February 29, 2000

Ben Tindale


February 29, 2000

Amazon should do what it does best. Do business, not patents/lawsuits.

Chris Hanson


February 29, 2000

I would at least like to know _why_ Amazon considers this to be a worthwhile patent, when it seems pointless and malicious to such a large number of people.

Brian Wisti


February 29, 2000

I strongly urge Amazon.com to behave like the market leader that they are and to drop enforcement of this ridiculous patent. In no way did Amazon.com create the technology employed in 1-Click. By enforcing a sham patent they are setting a fallacious example for emerging companies in their industry. I have been a loyal and frequent customer of Amazon.com and I am surprised by Mr Bezos's apparent inability to remember that just a few years ago his company was merely one server located in his garage. According to netcraft.com, Amazon.com runs on Apache 1.3.6. Amazon.com is a lousy and irresponsible participant in the open source movement.

George Runnells


February 29, 2000

Ronald Pottol


February 29, 2000

As a fairly early user of the web, and a professional who works in Internet based technologies, I find it deplorable that companies, like Amazon may try to appropriate parts of the Internet and its technologies. This is truly theft of the many, many intellectual ideas and ideals that created the Internet. I am frequently consulted by friends and co-workers about Internet purchasing issues. While Amazon maintains its current thinking about the so-called "1-touch" patent and the new 'associates' patent, I will not recommend Amazon as a reputable vendor of any sort, and will recommend competitors for purchasers. If Amazon rethinks its position, I may rethink mine.

John Fulmer


February 29, 2000

I think Amazon would reap enormous financial benefits from the public goodwill that would be generated if it dropped this patent voluntarily.

Andrew Robertson


February 29, 2000

As a long-time and loyal customer of Amazon, I am sorry to see this patent issue come up. I support the statements that Tim O'Reilly has so eloquently made against your abuse of the patent system.

David E. Wheeler


February 29, 2000

The biggest issue regarding these patents (One-click and Affiliates) is not that Amazon should NOT have tried to file them (although they shouldn't have), but rather that the Patent Office in its own stupidity actually thinks they deserved them. This is fairly reminscent of Gates, Barksdale and Nealy trying to discuss browser monopolies with the Senate Congressional committee; they try to understand but they have simply been overtaken by events and are unwilling to admit that they aren't as smart or wise as they should be to handle today's market issue. Long story short, Amazon doesn't realize that they really don't provide any great value, they are a product aggregator and little else. Given the choice between continuing to shop at their site or click (even if its a just one-click) away to a competitor ... I think I'll choose the latter (and recommend the same to as many people as I know).

Peter Petracco


February 29, 2000

I used to be a loyal Amazon customer. However, until these patents are dropped, I'm making it my mission to see to it that everyone on the Internet - even newbies - knows about this and how it is severely limiting our freedoms and innovation. There are plenty of great places to buy stuff on the Internet. Believe me, it's no problem at all to use your competitors. But if you drop these ridiculous patents quick, I may come back.

Micah K Yoder


February 29, 2000

I'll be using my local influence to encourage people to avoid Amazon.com >From my perspective, your trivial patents are poison to the well of internet innovation.

Frank Hage


February 29, 2000

When recommending books, as a Java instructor I do that, I used to link to amazon. Now I send Java newbies to Fat Brain because of the 1 click patent suit. If you felt you needed the patent for defense that's one thing but going on the offence was too much. -Peace Dave

Dave King


February 29, 2000

Legal gangsterism should not be part of Amazon.com's business plan.

Alan Watson


February 29, 2000

It is moves like this that companies make that will one day destroy the entire spirit of the internet. The internet's foundations are in openness and freedom, and huge companies (even ones started on the internet) see this as a threat to their own survival. I beg of the companies to see the foolishness of this.

Geoffrey Cohen


February 29, 2000

Jeff Myers


February 29, 2000

I for one would like to thank Mr. Bezos. His patenting of something as rudimentary as cookies has inspired me to get off my ass and finally send in my patent for the Earth's atmosphere. You scum having been breathing my air long enough. Sarcastically,

N. LaThotep


February 29, 2000

I couldn't have said it better and will not attempt to. I agree in full.

Jeremy Miller


February 29, 2000

This power play by Amazon is ridiculous. I have completely stopped buying from them, I steer all my friends and family away from them, and I will continue to steer my (and everyone I come in contact with) purchases towards Barnes and Nobles and Fatbrain until Amazon rethinks this egregious act. I used to hold Amazon up as an icon of the power of web-based marketing. Now I can only point to it as a perfect example of hubris. Get real, Amazon. Your programmers were neither exceptionally clever nor inventive when they set your 1-click ordering up... and if they convinced you that it was hard or innovative or even particularly clever they hoodwinked you.

Gary D. Foster


February 29, 2000

Applying patents to software is a misinterpretation of the waning utility of patents in general. The intent of government-backed patents is public good not personal profit. We all benefit from others ideas. To say that you are the sole originator of an idea and prevent others from having and using that idea is socially offensive and only allowable if there are clear benefits to society. The Amazon "patents" do not benefit society, they and others like them, severely hamper it.

Travis Oliphant


February 29, 2000

Peter Sinnott


February 29, 2000

If a piece of new software technology is truly a new invention, I have no problems with granting it a patent. However, 1-Click ordering and associates programs are gross caractures of inventions. They may be new from a marketing standpoint, but from an engineering perspective, they are neither novel, innovative or new. As a longtime customer, I urge Amazon to relinquish all rights to these patents. The proliferation of meaningless software patents has reached epidemic proportions, and Amazon is leading the way. Taking a falsely courageous stand on trivial and obvious patents only weakens those patents that are truly deserved.

David Johnson


February 29, 2000

There's an old saying, politely translated as "don't poop where you eat." Amazon's efforts to pursue these misguided patents will ultimately stifle the innovation that they themselves rely on to grow and thrive. What is worse, we will all suffer the consequences of their short-sighted patent strategy.

Marc S. Merlin


February 29, 2000

James McCusker


February 29, 2000

R‰gis Rampnoux


February 29, 2000

Please cease and desist from trying to patent obvious web technologies which are/have been already in common use.

Kevin Little


February 29, 2000

Renaud Deraison


February 29, 2000

I can't believe that a company that thrives on user feedback and reviews could choose to pursue a path that will adversely effect those some customers. I have refused to buy anything from Amazon until they drop this patent.

Daniel Weber


February 29, 2000

You just lost a long-time customer for any future orders...

Patrick Lawrence


February 29, 2000

Until such time that the patent request for one-click ordering is reviewed then I will no longer use the Amazon site for purchase of any materials.

Matt Moots


February 29, 2000

The ability to get patents on such feeble innovations does not make it ethical to do so. I'm informing my friends and family of your patent activities whenever the subject of computers comes up.

Eric Buddington


February 29, 2000

Sam Buchanan


February 29, 2000

Daniel Barragan


February 29, 2000

Mike Gollub


February 29, 2000

This patent is lame, and I don't intend to spend any more money at Amazon.Com until they change their evil ways.

Peter Blum


February 29, 2000

One more satisfied Amazon customer... now shopping at BN.com.

Eric Ding


February 29, 2000

Keep true innovation alive on the web by not patenting common applications of widely used technologies.

Tim Jones


February 29, 2000

I have stopped using Amazon for my book purchaces. This patent does not belong to them. I agree with Tim O'Reilly that this patent belongs to the internet entire community.

Gary Virene


February 29, 2000

Amazon *and* the especially the PTO should be ashamed of themselves.

Joseph Kiniry


February 29, 2000

For as long as Amazon.com continues on this path, I will take my business elsewhere, namely to bn.com and to my local Barnes & Noble bookseller.

Pedro J. Cabrera - former Amazon.com customer


February 29, 2000

Good site design, good prices, good selection, but I won't shop there because of this. Sad, really.

Christopher Yates


February 29, 2000

I have purchased many many books from Amazon.com. However, I feel that since there is competition and the competition does not employ these patent tactics that I must take my business elsewhere. Amazon does not offer me anything their competitors do not, so its a simple switch and one which I am sure is being made by people every day. Amazon, you are eroding your customers faith in your company, and therefor, will erode investors faith in this company by wasting resources on protecting this rediculous patent.

Micah Nerren


February 29, 2000

As a freqent purchaser of books on Amazon and a referer of many friends and family I will have to add my protest to this list and state that I will be advising all the folks that I can to use a competitor until Amazon ceases this sensless pursuit.

Rick Drake


February 29, 2000

Shame on Amazon to pull such a 'land-grab' on an obvious patent. If someone should own any of it it's Berners-Lee or the other pioneers who built the web. Hijacking the web for profit may keep the shareholders from noticing you haven't turned a profit, but it is a slap in the face to everyone else on the web.

Boon Sheridan


February 29, 2000

As a co-author of a book which has sold many copies on Amazon, I am reluctant to bite the hand that feeds me, but as a citizen, I feel I must speak out. Amazon should never have abused the USPTO by applying for a patent on something as trivial as 1-Click. This action has debased the Amazon name and brought it into disrepute.

Tom Snee


February 29, 2000

Chris Waters


February 29, 2000

Steph Tomlinson


February 29, 2000

I beleve that this ludicris patent of Amazon's is a manuver that is to Microsoft like for my tastes

Adam Jenkins


February 29, 2000

Merci pour une aussi belle invention ! Non mais vous n'avez pas honte de faire des brevets la dessus ? (je vais brevetter le concept comme quoi les voitures roules !!!!)

Eric Seigne


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com provide an extremely convenient and competitive service, so it is some regret that I have stopped utilising their services. This will benefit quantumbooks.com by about 񘈨 in technical book purchases in the next 12 months, so perhaps Amazon.com will also regret it.

Gregory Ball


February 29, 2000

Merci pour une aussi belle invention ! Non mais vous n'avez pas honte de faire des brevets la dessus ? (je vais brevetter le concept comme quoi les voitures roulent !!!!)

Eric Seigne


February 29, 2000

I refuse to purchase anything through Amazon.com until this matter is settled fairly.

Craig Agamemnon Magaret


February 29, 2000

I suggested that my students might use Barnes&Noble (www.barnesandnoble.com) for general items until these claims are overturned.

James P Bennett


February 29, 2000

Harry Moritz


February 29, 2000

I agree that the patent was not given the necessary consideration by the patent office. It is basicly a technique commonly used on a great number of E-commerce sites...

Damon Childs


February 29, 2000

I'm an author, an Amazon Associate, and a heavy-hitting Amazon customer. I'm moving my 赨/month book purchases to other vendors and dumping my Amazon stock until Amazon abandons its litigious ways and rejoins the internet community in spirit and good netizenship.

Jerry Muelver


February 29, 2000

Gary Almes


February 29, 2000

Lynda Jones


February 29, 2000

I've purchased from Amazon in the past, but will not in the future, as their patent has already made my life more difficult in ordering from other web vendors.

Howard J. Poe


February 29, 2000

Just so you know, I have been boycotting Amazon ever since the "one click" patent was announced. This means that so far nearly 赨 which could have been part of your bottom line has gone to competitors such as Fatbrain.Com, and Barnes and Noble. Regarding the "associates" patent: At one point I was thinking of signing up one or more of my websites as part of your Associates program. I am dumping that as well, which may cost your company a lot more money if and when my site become popular. Perhaps you should rethink your position on these and any other patents you might be considering.

Paul Ellsworth


February 29, 2000

It is too bad that I can no longer benefit from Amazon's solid customer service, and incredible selection now that I am boycotting them because they are patent mongers.

Sam Borgeson


February 29, 2000

a couple of Words can't be bought by a company it spoils people of their most important common point that is language

alexandre bon


February 29, 2000

I have been a frequent buyer of technology books over the web. Though I haven't patronized Amazon in the past, I certainly will not do so in the future unless Amazon reverses course on this silly and blantantly greed-inspired patent.

Jon Keene


February 29, 2000

I completely agree with Tim about this issue. The patent is based on a trivial development and may even violate one of the first principles of patent application - that the development must not be obvious or already in the public domain.

Meyrick Chapman


February 29, 2000

I am sure many of the letters above have already stated that they will not shop at Amazon or recommend that others do either, and the philosophical and legal reasons behind their actions. Ditto. This has already cost your company several hundred dollars from me and my family. It will continue. I am angry at the US Patent Office, but ashamed of you.

John Gwinnell


February 29, 2000

Jeff Bezos has long been the idol of the Internet masses, a popularity perhaps abetted by his not being Leo Riggio [CEO of Barnes & Noble]. However, it looks as if he is not so dissimilar as we might like to believe, doing his best to dominate and monopolize an open market.

Derrick Schneider


February 29, 2000

No es lcito apropiarse del trabajo de otros. No compremos de Amazon hasta que retiren la patente.

Francisco Montero


February 29, 2000

bert van capelle


February 29, 2000

I agree with the letter wholeheartedly. This is analgous to a grocery store trying to patent check out lines, and is a ludicrous idea only made valid by the idiocy of our Government. Amazon invites government intrusion into the internet through actions like this, which I strongly disagree with.

Arin Sime


February 29, 2000

Cortney R. Michael


February 29, 2000

I will be shopping through Amazon's competitors until Amazon abandons this patent.

Paul Holt


February 29, 2000

Chad Englin


February 29, 2000

Sign me up as another ex-Amazon customer. I have shopped at Amazon since their inception. When Barnesandnoble.com arrived on the scene, I continued to make my purchases through Amazon. Not any longer. BN will get *all* of my business, and if I can help it, all of my company's business, until such time as Amazon drops this patent nonsense. Mr. Bezos, you have done a great disservice to the Internet community.

Steve Lammert


February 29, 2000

James Simmons


February 29, 2000

I'm an engineer and developer who buys plenty of books and would buy at least 2 today from Amazon if not for this petty 1-click baloney. Instead I'm gonna go elsewhere for my "Pragmatic Programming" book and that new Kernihan book.

Gerald Svenddal, Minneapolis MN


February 29, 2000

I won't be buying from Amazon. But more than Amazon, I blame a patent system that invites abuse.

Ken Ross


February 29, 2000

No comment ...

J‰rŸme Benoit


February 29, 2000

As a system administrator and programmer, I find the 1-click ordering concept trivially obvious. Only a pathetically oput-of-date Patent Office would have granted it. I have spent quite a bit of money at Amazon over the last few years - the latest being British editions of Harry Potter for my Anglophile sister (not cheap in the States). I will continue to use Amazon's web site to look up information about books - it is very helpful and well organized. However, when it comes time to buy I will take my business elsewhere.

Dave Lorand


February 29, 2000

You can't say it any better than Tim O'Reilly already did. I'll just say that Amazon will not be getting any of my business until it reverses its position on these patents.

Eric M. Winslow


February 29, 2000

I believe that the patent chase started by Amazon for the 1-Click and Associate programs is indeed wrong and flies in the face of the Internet and that which actually made Amazon popular. An open, functional, cost-effective experience. To patent some so simple as cookie-use on a site is to say that the many other aspects of customizing and experience - from SSL to cookies to browser detection should also be targets. I urge Amazon to put down this effort and get back to the task at hand; building a successful and profitable company.

Stephen Wynkoop


February 29, 2000

Jesse Boyes


February 29, 2000

Vladimir Khait


February 29, 2000

David Fuller


February 29, 2000

I hope Amazon will go back with this...

Jean Gillaux


February 29, 2000

David Reiss


February 29, 2000

Laurent Rathle


February 29, 2000

Dommage!

Daniel Malgorn


February 29, 2000

B L Franco


February 29, 2000

This is very troubling behavior from Amazon.com, poisoning the very well that made them viable. Thanks for speaking out about it, Tim.

Dave Polaschek


February 29, 2000

Ruiming Zhang


February 29, 2000

Jim Gumm


February 29, 2000

Lynn Manhart


February 29, 2000

I think that this is a perfect chance to test the power of the voice of the internet community. I'm only hoping that it is a succesful one...

Adam Ribaudo


February 29, 2000

As a representative, among my peers, of the "technological community", and in defense of said community, I now intend not only to avoid Amazon.com in lieu of its competitors, but to recommend such a course of action to all of said colleagues and peers.

Richard Hestilow


February 29, 2000

I have always liked Amazon, and have been pleased with the innovations that you have introduced to your site over the years. My approval does NOT extend to the patenting of 1-click ordering. Let us know when you stop enforcing the patent, and I will resume my ordering from you. Thanks.

Joe Wagner


February 29, 2000

Phillip W. Hutto


February 29, 2000

Tuomas Luttinen


February 29, 2000

I'm an early adopter who buys for about 5,000$ books a year... allthough i haven't boycotted amazon.com - their actions has severely damaged my perception of the company and if it continues i'll stop using them.

Thomas Madsen Mygdal


February 29, 2000

As a professional software engineer, I would welcome the opportunity to testify against Amazon regarding the blatant lack of novelty in their patent and the overwhelming quantity of prior-art.

Timothy M. Shead


February 29, 2000

RENARD Jean-Marie


February 29, 2000

I am another satisfied but former customer of Amazon. I have already convinced serveral friends and clients not to do any business with Amazon until you mend your ways.

Steven Farnham


February 29, 2000

Steven Jones


February 29, 2000

First one-click, then affiliate sales. On the one hand Amazon is to be congratulated for trying to think "outside the box". However this is too far outside. Will we see a patent on electronic commerce that utilizes an IP address? Unfortunately this is likely to be tied up in court for quite some time, all the while casting a shaddow over the industry.

David H. Janson


February 29, 2000

I won't buy anything from Amazon until the patent is given to public domain.

Rodrigo Feher


February 29, 2000

Jason Haas


February 29, 2000

I have been buying books worth several 100s of dollars each year from your store. I have always been very happy with the speed and quality of your service. Unfortunately, because of this ridiculous patent application, I will not be using your store; in fact, just this past week I ordered books worth ๛.80 from Fatbrain.com.

Zerksis D. Umrigar


February 29, 2000

Weston Cann


February 29, 2000

This whole affair is something that never should have had to come about. I had just started to use Amazon, but unless they change their ways in regards to this then I will not buy from them again.

Simon Michelmore


February 29, 2000

Joseph Makuch


February 29, 2000

Amazingly short sighted effort on both your part and the patent office. I have been online since 1985, started the first commerical ISP in Canada and develop software for a living. Your one click patent is not an inovation. I have ceased to buy online from Amazon and will not buy from Amazon again until and unless this patent is found to be invalid or dropped. I will instead my business to another online service such as chapters.ca or bn.com which may appreciate my annual book buying budget.

Stuart Lynne


February 29, 2000

hy !!! just for freedom

berkane


February 29, 2000

Kurt Mosiejczuk


February 29, 2000

First Amazon patents "open" or what should be open source. Now it is has patented multi-level marketing (a.k.a. Associates Program)??? When Amway finds out they are going to be pissed. I hope that this is a chess-like move on Amazon's part to keep other e-commerce sites from claiming these patents and using them for harm. More than likely, when the patent office and courts get a technological clue, they will be overturned anyway. Amazon has resorted to dirty tricks way too early in the game. The barriers to entry are few and word spreads quickly. One last thought. It's only going to take "1-click" to submit this message and never buy from Amazon again.

Steve Cummings


February 29, 2000

Ari Olson


February 29, 2000

While I have indeed informed friends and family of the facts surrounding this debacle, I should note, Mr. Bezos, that Amazon's patent notoriety (and I do beg that you forgive the pun) has spread to many laymen in my community with little assistance. Your company's transgression is so readily apparent and understood that this could easily billow into a vastly more public issue. Like all these others, I urge you to repeal this ludicrous patent and clarify the company's intentions. Such action lies within your best interests and the best interests of the technical community as a whole.

Adam Augusta


February 29, 2000

As a senior-level internet developer and consultant at a successful consulting company, I would simply like to add my voice to the aleady deafening symphony of people whom you have foolishly alienated. On behalf of numerous other professionals I have spoken with personally, and countless others whom I see represened in these comments, I humbly remind you that our thoughts and reccomendations are respected by hundreds of thousands of clients, business associates, friends, and casual acquaintances. Other than perhaps the media, we are the front line of information on abuses such as this. So please continue on with this blatant attack on the very principles which drive the internet, and let us demonstate the breadth of our influence on your customer base. Tim may have issues on supporting a wide-scale boycott (due, I would imagine, to his unique situation in the matter), but I assure you that the vast majority of webmasters, developers, consultants, et al. have no such reservatio! ns. Interestingly enough, I am also the co-founder of an online Writers' Guild, speaking on behalf of numerous writers as well; and we writers do tend to be ferocious readers as well. Just a thought.

Christopher Cain


February 29, 2000

Aaron D. Haney


February 29, 2000

I strongly agree with O'Reilly's position.

Sean Gugler


February 29, 2000

Evelyn G. Eldridge


February 29, 2000

Andrew Johnson


February 29, 2000

Looks like Amazon has bitten off the hand that feeds it...

Tom P


February 29, 2000

O, reform it altogether. -W. Shakespeare, Hamlet

Tara McGoldrick


February 29, 2000

Jeff, You seemed like a really nice guy on TV - was it some evil lawyers that made you do it?

Oz Kologlu`


February 29, 2000

Fulko Hew


February 29, 2000

Shani Ferguson


February 29, 2000

Keith Bigelow


February 29, 2000

I've used Amazon in the past, but will avoid them until they see the error in their ways.

Brian Nicolucci


February 29, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, I'm now a happy customer of Barnes & Noble. You won't see another penny of my money unless this patent crap stops. Sincerely, J. Scott Farrow

J. Scott Farrow


February 29, 2000

Getting a patent on one-click ordering and affiliate programs is ridiculous. Bye, bye amazon. Besides, BooksAMillion has MUCH better prices.

Corbin


February 29, 2000

You are creating a lot of ill will by trying to enforce a patent for a feature (one click shopping) that I am ambivalent about. The most important element of a customer relationship is trust. If you feel free to do something ethically questionable to your competitors and compatriots I would expect the same treatment of customers.

Michael Gauley


February 29, 2000

I will be forced to conduct my online purchases with anyone but Amazon until this foolish endevor is discarded. I will have to request the same from all of my friends, clients and any others that will consider my words. For your own peace of mind Mr. Bezos, get back to the business of being a great online retailer!

Stan Smith


February 29, 2000

Feel free to review my account. You'll see I've spent several hundreds of dollars at Amazon. Until you repeal the patent, all my business will go to Bookpool and Fatbrain. Stephen Webster

Stephen Webster


February 29, 2000

This is not the behavior one expects from a world class organization. Please show us that you want our business by admitting this mistake, and getting on with the business of superior customer service and convenience.

James Post


February 29, 2000

Neil Fitzgerald


February 29, 2000

David Butts


February 29, 2000

How very unfortunate that someone who has had such good fortune... has pulled such a boner.

B. Mudd


February 29, 2000

Robert W. Kelley


February 29, 2000

I trust the 'system' will overturn this ridiculous claim. I also feel Amazon should publicly apologize for even starting this fiasco - otherwise we ought simply boycott them to their competitors advantage.

Geoff Tolputt


February 29, 2000

I have canceled my three outstanding Amazon orders, and will not place another one until Amazon ceases attempts to enforce the patents in question.

Marek Behr


February 29, 2000

Stanley HM Lam


February 29, 2000

I bought lots of books and DVD from amazon (I received three books yesterday again). But what they are doing with these patents makes me feel sick. I am a Linux geek for 7 years now and I am advocating OpenSource every day. May be the RMS boycott proposal is the way to handle this. But first let's see the results of this open Letter, just to give Amazon a chance!

Christophe Prud'homme


February 29, 2000

Michael Vieths


February 29, 2000

I have stopped using Amazon. It's that simple. I now use Borders and Barnes & Noble because I believe that the web should remain free and that stupidity in business should be rewarded with a loss of business. I have advised my family and friends to also stop ordering from Amazon and will continue to encourage everyone I know to stop ordering from Amazon. What Amazon is doing with their patents is wrong and must be opposed.

Brian G. Fay


February 29, 2000

As customers our most powerful mean of action is to stop using Amazon and spread the word around us ... I saw somebody proposing to dump the stock: that's an excellent idea too ;-) If each of us refer half a dozen friends to this site, we will make Amazon feel sorry for this. The sad thing is that this is just another example of a corporation putting ethics at the bottom of the priority list.

Daniel FAUXPOINT


February 29, 2000

Hello Amazon and Jeff, I am an avid computer scientist, who reads VERY VERY many technical books. Many, which I have bought from your site. I believe in certain software patents, however, your 1-click patent just doesn't make the case if you ask me. A patent is a novel idea that is unobvious. 1-click has been around for years and is pretty darn obvious considering the technologies in place for it. Amazon did not invent this, so it shouldn't pretend that it should to try and make more money. Its just flat out ridiculous.

Lonne Osborn


February 29, 2000

The longer you wait to abandon the ridiculous patents, Amazon.com, the less chance you have of ever doing business with me again. Rest assured that not only does my business go away but also that of the all the people who look to me for technical guidance.

Jon M. Gohr


February 29, 2000

A buzzword does not an innovation make. I am considering boycotting your associates as well.

Mark Balitsky


February 29, 2000

Goodbye Amazon... hello Fatbrain.

Hans Frederickson


February 29, 2000

caleb clausen


February 29, 2000

I used to use Amazon all the time, but your legal action over this 1-click "patent" made me furious. I've pointed out the issue to all of my friends and asked them to shop elsewhere until you agree to stop this nonsense. D. McBride, Silicon Valley programmer and reader

Doug McBride


February 29, 2000

Warren Young


February 29, 2000

I can't believe that you think this will help you competively. It will only drive your customers away.

Tim Gruen


February 29, 2000

Why patent the obvious? Didn't you realize that your customers, disgusted by your behavior, would turn to one of your many competitors?

Fran‡ois Gouget


February 29, 2000

I will not buy anything from Amazon until the one-click patent is abandoned. I have been using Amazon's competitors (Barnes and Nobles,...) quite happily since this issue came to light.

Dan Sandberg


February 29, 2000

Nope. Not gonna go there.

Julian Doherty


February 29, 2000

Justin Freitag


February 29, 2000

Hasn't Microsoft done enough of this stuff already? The sheer idiocy of some of the patents granted them boggles the intellect. Amazon need not follow in these misguided footsteps. Patents like this do nothing but exacerbate the problem of a already hideously litigant society. Repent.

Greg Baumgartel


February 29, 2000

Gerald Jensen


February 29, 2000

Chris Sutton


February 29, 2000

Amazon is taking a coward behaviour. Amazon likes the One-Click patent concept. I prefer the One-Click boycott concept.

Jean-Luc Leclercq


February 29, 2000

Amazon, I already told you not to do this. You should have listened.

Larry Mulcahy


February 29, 2000

Troy Wollenslegel


February 29, 2000

Rupert Weber-Henschel


February 29, 2000

I have been a satisfied customer of amazon.com and in the process of becoming a "loyal" long-term customer. I am willing to pay the "price" for loyalty, but my loyalty also needs to be earned by value-centric.

Chung-Mei Corey


February 29, 2000

I fully agree with Tim's letter. Amazon's e-commerce patents do not fulfill the definition of patents laid down by the Constitution and the Supreme Court. They are neither non-obvious nor a leap forward for the field. Thanks, Brad Neuberg

Bradley Keith Neuberg


February 29, 2000

As I understand, patents are useful to young startup as a means to prove that they have some intellectual property on which to build business. By doing this they might succeed at attracting venture capital. I see this use of patents as legitimate. Amazon doesn't seem to be in need of VC at this stage. Rather they use their patents as a defensive weapon against their competitors. Unfortunately the 1-click patent doesn't seem to cover a lot of innovation. People say it will be eventually overturned. Meanwhile Amazon is hurting its PR with technically minded people. In the short term the patent enforcement is probably good. In the long them it will not be so.

Hugues Talbot


February 29, 2000

Jarle Stabell


February 29, 2000

Karl Smith


February 29, 2000

How rude! I am taking my online shopping elsewhere, even if I have to click twice.

Jeremy Shaw


February 29, 2000

Not only will I not shop there anymore, but more importantly, I will be asking everyone I know not to either.

Jim Smith


February 29, 2000

Michael Jarvie


February 29, 2000

Matthew Enger


February 29, 2000

Sanjay Patel


February 29, 2000

I am a former Amazon.com customer. Because of the use of the suit filed against Barnes and Noble, I now shop at other sites for my books, music, and movies. I tell my acquaintances about this patent abuse whenever I get the opportunity. This is a trivial application of cookies and will eventually be overturned anyway. Cut your losses and drop the suit.

Anthony E. Greene


February 29, 2000

Matt Wilson


February 29, 2000

With all these patents flying around, how am I ever going to make <i>my</i> ".com" millions?

Dan Folkerts


February 29, 2000

Very Sad.

Eric McGlohon


February 29, 2000

Wow. I guess I'll go apply for a patent on the use of the fork in a process called "eating."

Riad Wahby


February 29, 2000

Ronald Cogswell


February 29, 2000

Marcus Rugger


February 29, 2000

I will not support any company trying to appropriate what is basically a trivial technique. The whole internet protocols and space has been designed as an open, collaborative effort and should be kept that way. I will boycott amazon.com, not do any business of any kind with amazon.com, and urge all my friends, relatives, and anyone I may be in contact with to boycott amazon.com, and to further disseminate the same ideas and opinions to all their friends and relatives.

bruno schwander


February 29, 2000

Sigh... Amazon should be better than this. They don't need the edge this patent gives them, and it only makes them look petty.

Chris Dunphy


February 29, 2000

When I first started using amazon.com, I thought they were innovators; not for imaginary technical "accomplishments" like one-click shopping, but for having put together an online company that provided excellent customer service. Hint: it's about the customers! Thankfully the open market hasn't been despoiled yet, so I can shop at fatbrain instead of supporting this anti-competitive insanity...

Chris Castiglione


February 29, 2000

Roland Trique


February 29, 2000

Joe McCann


February 29, 2000

Leonard Bartkus


February 29, 2000

The Internet belongs in the public domain as most of its contributions come from it. To patent certain technlogies that are develeoped from it -more specifically - thinks derived from cookie technology infringes on the foundations of the internet.

Jason Petrie


February 29, 2000

for shame!!!!

Jamie Stellini


February 29, 2000

Petros Raptis


February 29, 2000

Alan Sparks


February 29, 2000

Dont'confuse trade and racket !!!

Jarillon


February 29, 2000

William J Maggos

wjmaggos


February 29, 2000

William J Maggos


February 29, 2000

I have purchased several technical books from Amazon, but no more! This patent is ludicrous!

Ed Dunkle


February 29, 2000

I wish Amazon will listen and learn to behave!

Michael Andersen


February 29, 2000

What comes around goes around Mr. BOZOS....particularly to companies that thrive on greed. I'll take my book buying elsewhere. Eric Weiss

Eric Weiss


February 29, 2000

Jason Lines


February 29, 2000

I, my parents, and several of my aquaintences no longer do buisness with Amazon.com as a direct result of this. You are too easily replaced to regard the good will of your customers so lightly.

Chris Raser


February 29, 2000

Dear Amazon Employees- Raise this issue internally, discuss it widely, and pursue a consensus on how pursuing a "cookie patents" expresses the purpose of your organization. We eagerly await the results.

Tom Danaher


February 29, 2000

I was an Amazon.com customer from nearly the beginning. It is only with this recent bout of pattent nonsense that I have stopped using them. If the maddness does not stop soon, they will never be able to regain me as a customer. I am fully against software pattents, as I believe that they are abused more often than not, and Amazon.com simply reinforces this belief.

Will Fife


February 29, 2000

David Blum


February 29, 2000

Peter Thompson


February 29, 2000

Jeff Mickle


February 29, 2000

Great letter Tim. Thanks for speaking up, going out on a limb, and saying something about this. I'm an Amazon shareholder, so hopefully they realize that there are some of us in this bunch. Shareholders that stand against this kind of thing (particularly developers involved in, interested in, and using the open source community) may be few, but I'd bet that we are some of Amazon's best customers (turn a profit...turn a profit). I buy scores of books a year from them (many O'Reilly...any spots left for reviewers, Tim?). However, I could just as easily make the same purchases (and sell the stock -- not that they would care) from other sites that are more responsible in managing the intellectual capital that has been the foundation of places like Amazon. Because of obvious prior art, the case would never stand up in court, but actually taking it there would set a precedent that your average open source developer could never compete against because of lawyers and money. Tim said it, fencing in the internet with patents would make it extremely difficult to realize the level of innovation occurring currently. Granted, threat of litigation won't stop many of us, but who would be willing to develop new technology and stand up to suit by the Amazons of the world if an invention could even appear to infringe on a bogus software patent. Even if one of us was right, we could never afford to defend ourselves against a corporate litigation machine. Great new technologies would never see the light of ! day because of the threat (DeCSS comes to mind). Not that this is likely to happen, but it would be great to see Amazon turn this into an argument for reforming the patent system. But, that's pie in the sky. And they probably ought not spend any money on that kind of activity until they have posted one quarter of profit. :) More reasonably, turn the patent over to GNU (or a similar organization) and put it in the public domain. They would certainly retain my business, support, good word, and interest as both a shareholder and customer.

Edward O'Neil


February 29, 2000

Good thing there are competitor's to Amazon. Guess they'll be needing my customership. Erik Bunn

-


February 29, 2000

People from Missouri have saying...Show Me that you desire my business by discontinuing the both frivilous patents.

Clifford Achord


February 29, 2000

Yet another example of an attempt to use America's useful and (mostly) well-intended copyright laws for the specific purpose of making large companies better profit margins and hurting consumers and technical innovations in the process. Let this case prove to be a precedent of reform of the usage of copyright law.

Kevin R. Bullock


February 29, 2000

Paul Prescod


February 29, 2000

I'm sick of everyone trying to monopolize a good thing. Play nice Amazon, one Microsoft is ENOUGH!

Scott Neilson


February 29, 2000

I really think the patent office should have sat down and thought a REALLY LONG TIME on what software was, and whether it should be patentable. You may wonder why I say that - the simple fact is that software is, at its heart, a collection of mathematical algorithms, something which isn't patentable. A computer is a device which is capable of executing those algorithms - but this isn't quite true, either - because a computer can be replicated in software (ie, an emulator) - which points to the idea that a computer is a hardware embodiment of software. Software is that ephemerable. It is like saying that you are your body - eyes, ears, nose, mouth, hair, blood, etc - when in reality, "you" are just some kind of collection of neurons firing. "You" aren't even your brain - that is just something "executing" what you call "you". In broad theory, it should be possible to build a computer entirely out of software - no hardware (not in the sense that we know it) needed. It is like software is something akin to a natural law - not a device which can be patented, but rather a collection of algorithms to be discovered and shared by all. Unfortunately, the patent office has decided that software is ONLY a machine, and is nothing like an algorithm...

Andrew L. Ayers


February 29, 2000

"Ease of use" is not substantiated by the one-click method. If it were, power switches would be infringing upon this. I find the notion laughable. ~Mike

Mike Andaluz


February 29, 2000

Steve Chadsey


February 29, 2000

Raphael Hernandez


February 29, 2000

I have purchased both books and music from amazon but will no longer do so. There are plenty of other online book and music resources available that do not have such close minded policies.

Lee Benson


February 29, 2000

Lauritz Jensen


February 29, 2000

Sir, I am opposed to software patents because at its core, software is really just mathematics. Logically, how could anyone patent numbers. I not opposed to copywrites on the name, but the idea of one-click is as a patentable process is ludicrous. To make this process into a patent would be similar to patenting the hypertextversion currently in use on the WWW.

Steven Kelly


February 29, 2000

First it was the spam issue - but both Amazon and Barnes and Noble eventually saw the light on that. Now it's patents - and I hope you see the light on that, too. I'm not buying any books from Amazon until you do, and I'm discouraging others from doing so too. Danny Yee book reviewer and maintainer of the Australian Bookshop Directory

Danny Yee


February 29, 2000

I've stopped buying from Amazon because of their patent policy. It's unethical for them to waste everybody else's time by acquiring and attempting to enforce a bogus patent like that.

Paul Eggert


February 29, 2000

Please do not abuse the patent system. Your simple use of cookies is clearly not an invention and should not be patentable. Seeking a patent on the 1-click system flies in the face of what the Internet stands for, and it is not good business.

Samuel Padgett


February 29, 2000

I am quite upset with these issues. As a stockholder I will be making my voice heard the best I can. if nothing is done, your stock will be dropped on my side. www.fatbrain.com is much more deserving of my money right now.

Seth Goldberg


February 29, 2000

I love the amazon service, but refuse to use it now. Its that simple.

Joshua Reich


February 29, 2000

Nicholas A Macey


February 29, 2000

Endorsed. Too bad, since Amazon provides a great service. Sam Hunting

Sam Hunting


February 29, 2000

Ken Gosier


February 29, 2000

Justin Felker


February 29, 2000

Although I am a firm believer in giving credit where credit is due, Amazon's recent patents border on the ludicrous. To patent such widely used and obviously unoriginal "inovations" is an exercise in futility. Your patents will obviously not stand up to any seriously legal challenge, and you have lost many otherwise faithful customers (including myself) because of them.

Rob Alwood


February 29, 2000

I will not be buying anything from Amazon until this ridiculous patent is dropped, and will be urging all my friends to boycott Amazon as well. (a dot com worker)

Annette Koh


February 29, 2000

Dear Jeff, What next? Are you going to patent e-commerce... Patenting 1-click purchases and and affiliate programs is so anti progress and anti business that I wonder what your overal objectives are. That's it Amazon is on our black list... Looser! AR

Ariel Roberge


February 29, 2000

I am very disappointed that a company like Amazon has to resort to such tactics. This is truly a sad time for anyone involved with software or the Internet

Morgan Terry


February 29, 2000

It's sad that a company with such a large and loyal customer base feels the need to use patents to protect their income. That aside, I think it's downright wrong to patent something built on open ideas. They are betraying the very idea that allowed them such success.

Tim Olson


February 29, 2000

Quite simply, everything that can be said regarding this issue has been. Amazon.com's 1-click patent challenge is flatly ridiculous - its only a browser cookie, for pete's sake. I am participating in the Amazon boycott (and have been for some time now), and will continue to do so. A company that tries to exploit a befuddled patent office for their own sole gain is a company that will NOT be receiving my business. This is especially galling, as the only reason Amazon.com exists is due to the creation and generosity of the founders of the world wide web. In short, to you, Mr. Bezos, get a clue. Apologize for your company's actions, and I MIGHT shop there again. Otherwise, there are plenty of e-commerce sites that don't try to screw the consumer I will visit instead.

Joel Goodall


February 29, 2000

Matthew Manuel


February 29, 2000

I always had 1-click feature turned off and it's not the 1-click feature why I preferred Amazon in the past. And while I knew that there were many competitors, I still used amazon because of their dedication to quality customer service. After spending a LOT of money on Amazon (toys, music, video, books), I will not order anything from them from now on until they stop using the ridiculous 1-click patent to choke competition.

George Datuashvili


February 29, 2000

Prior to your patent foolishness, I did not hestitate to recommend amazon. Now that recommendation is no longer given. The longer you tarnish your reputation by your unwise actions, the more difficult it will be to restore.

Bruce McInnis


February 29, 2000

Kriang Lerdsuwanakij


February 29, 2000

Judy Taylor


February 29, 2000

I am an Amazon customer. I placed an order before the weekend (2/25/2000) and before I saw any of this news. Rest assured, I'd have post-poned my purchase or taken my business elsewhere (in protest) had this news come to my attention prior to my order. I totally agree with this open letter, and will share my opinion openly with my friends and coworkers that are also Amazon patrons. (I would really like to see a public statement from Amazon with regard to their position on open and community software.)

Shon Frazier


February 29, 2000

David Fagerland


February 29, 2000

Just how much greed is in your soul? Yes, you shall receive NO more orders from me.

Dick Engel


February 29, 2000

I have been advocating that my friends and family find other places to make purchases online since the original announcement of the 1-click patent. I will continue to do so until Amazon makes a change in corporate policy to open their "patents" and advocate for the overhaul of the U.S. patent system. Regards,

Ross Bagley


February 29, 2000

If the intent of this patent was to drive Barnes and Noble from the Web, the strategy has boomeranged. I and others are now using them to protest you, leading to a net surge in B&N sales. Nice thinking guys.

L. C. Rees


February 29, 2000

The extremely public exploitation of an intellectual property system that has been completely perverted from its original goals seems like extraordinary folly for a company attempting to build a consumer brand aimed at well-educated, technically savvy users. The only logical explanation for this I can see is that Amazon has reached the point where they need to begin exploiting their customers by raising prices to create profits. Of course, doing this on the Internet requires special effort to avoid customer flight. Seducing users with convenience is a laudable approach, but you are attempting to avoid having to compete with anyone on convenience by using patents to guarantee a market failure. It is this I find unacceptable. I will never use One-Click. A web commerce site that originated public standards system for the handling of purchasing information would have my unreasonable loyalty for a substantial period, on the other hand.

Mark Carmichael


February 29, 2000

Bad move...

Jonathan Spence


February 29, 2000

Anjan Bacchu


February 29, 2000

I regard your actions regarding this patent (and others) with alarm. Such actions can only do harm to the Internet at this critical stage. I am, therefore, a former-customer.

Dave Taylor


February 29, 2000

Jeff, Cross me off your customer list. I am not ever buying anything from your site until you come to your senses. And you can be sure I will be encouraging my friends and associates to do the same. This insane greed has to be stopped.

Cigy Cyriac


February 29, 2000

another former amazon customer...

Andre Weinand


February 29, 2000

Amazon's abuse of both the patenting system (which nearly all informed people agree is severely broken, or at least mismanaged, at present) and the openness of the internet, which is its bread and butter no less, is enough to raise disgust in my less well-informed friends when the subject is broached. If acquantances of mine are sufficiently turned off by this behavior to stop using Amazon (and several, none of whom are computer enthusiasts, are), one can only imagine the tangible business amazon.com is and will continue to lose by persuing such a destructive policy. As one who spends a great deal of money on-line (and a great deal of that on books) I can assure the reader that amazon has lost hundreds of dollars since the lawsuit first became public knowledge from me alone. Factor in the ripple effect for my circle of friends and acquaintances alone, and the loss is significant. I will be most amused and gratified when the stock price begins to reflect this growing fact.

Jean-Michel Smith


February 29, 2000

Hi, I purchased CORE JAVA, vol 1 and 2 just 3 days back. I knew about the patent case but didn't know how important it was till I read Tim' letter. I agree with him completely. What you're engaging in is ANTI-COMPETETIVENESS and I disagree with it. The difference between your price for the above books and FatBrain.com was a few dollars and had I known about the patent case, I'd have decided to buy from fatbrain.com. I strongly protest against this and would like to tell you that I will not buy any more books from you till you backout. Pls. think it over again. Kind Regards, ANJAN. B

Anjan Bacchu


February 29, 2000

I used to buy from Amazon. Now I discourage friends from doing so. I have diverted over 跌 of my own business and hundreds more of business from friends since the one click patent was granted. I will continue to do so until Amazon makes an about face on its use of patents.

Nathan Tuck


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I've ordered quite a few books from Amazon in the past. The service was always great, and the prices competitive. Basically, you had me as a customer. Until now. Your patent land-grab has lost me as a customer. -Don Busch

Don Busch


February 29, 2000

Michael Beddow


February 29, 2000

Since I first heard about the Amazon 1-Click patent, I've shopped exclusively at Barnes & Noble for books... even as a broke college student, I don't feel I can afford to support a company that supports itself thru legal-system fascism.

Colin McMillen


February 29, 2000

First Amazon decided it was a good idea to publishing reading circles to show everyone what you were reading. Now they think it's a good idea to patent ideas that have already been in use. They have shown poor judgement on a number of occasions. That means I don't know when they're next going to show poor judgement and use information that I have given them in a way that I won't approve of. They've lost my biz.

Michele Carpender


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, I personally have been a steady custom of yours for many years, ordering hundreds of dollars of books and CDs from you on an annual basis. I have purchased gift certificates because of the ease with which my family could select and order their gifts. I have also ordered hundreds of dollars per year of books for our company through your site. However, all that stopped at the beginning of this year. I can not, in good conscience, support a company that practices such blatant abuses of Intellectual Property Rights and our legal system. The approach of "if you can't innovate, litigate" seems better suited to failing industrial giants of the rust belt then it does for a leading edge electronic commerce company. When Amazon.com decides that serving their customers is more important than pursuing frivolous patents and legal action I may return to do business with you. Notice I said "may". I'm finding that FatBrain.com is doing an excellent job of meeting my book needs, and frequently at a lower price. Best Regards,

Jim McCorison


February 29, 2000

I have bought from Amazon before. I will not again, until you let this patent go.

Eric Jacks


February 29, 2000

I have bought books on Amazon.Com since its inception, seeing as I am isolated from any 'real' bookstores. I have also sold a ton of items through their auctions and zshops, and have sold many books for them as a website affiliate. I always backed them when people cried foul, but this time I will have no part of it. I have purchased my last book from Amazon until they drop this patent, and I have not relisted any of the 2000 items I had for sale on their zshops. I am no longer an associate, either. This ridiculous idea is a direct insult to internet users, and will only serve to help destroy the industry that Mr. Bezos & Co. are hoping to retire on - E-commerce. Competition is business, Jeff. Leave the crybaby whining and mobster scare tactics to Microsoft.

Ken


February 29, 2000

Having read what Tim O'Reilly and Richard Stallman, among others, have written, I don't think it's worth my effort to add anything philosophical here. I'll just say that I wholeheartedly agree with their concerns, and that I think Amazon's patents are flagrant abuses of the system. I hope Amazon will give up its attempts to raise the barrier of entry to competitors. This kind of behavior is against the principles of our economic model, our Internet community, and hopefully, our morals.

Dana Dahlstrom


February 29, 2000

Trique


February 29, 2000

In my letter to Amazon dated 12/13/1999 I stated: "If you do not drop your suit concerning the so-called 'one-click' software patent, I shall be forced to discontinue using your service, and shall instead take my business to your competitors." As a early adopter of Amazon, and a frequent book buyer I am very disapointed in Amazon. Moreover, while I have been participating in the boycott, I have found good service, prices and availability from Amazon's competitors. In fact, I may not use Amazon even if they drop the suit. At this point THEY have to win ME back. Still "patiently waiting for reason to overcome greed,"

John Cairns


February 29, 2000

right on Tim!! i bought more books from amazon last year than the rest of my life put together from all other souces, bol.de is begining to not look so bad afterall.

christoph devenoges


February 29, 2000

How could a company like Amazon that was birthed by the open-ness of the Internet violate it so ruthlessly? This is like RAPEING YOUR OWN MOTHER! You must STOP or you will set a precedent that will destroy everything that is good about the net. Until you stop this madness, everyone that I advise (myself included) will not use AMAZON.COM. I urge everyone to take a stand on this.

John Morgan


February 29, 2000

Darren Rogers


February 29, 2000

Although Amazon provides a very practical and worthwhile service to its customers I feel that endorsing their outrageous patent claims, by purchasing books from them, would be morally wrong. Hence I have for quite some time now been taking my business elsewhere.

Bj°rn Borud


February 29, 2000

P'tit Lu


February 29, 2000

Attempting to patent such a findamental web operation will do Amazon no good in the long-run, both financially and in their PR. Not to mention the stifling effect it will have on the web...

Graham Grindlay


February 29, 2000

On behalf of Ecotope, Inc., I oppose Amazon.com's patent practices and hereby boycott the company. Sincerely, Kenneth Ligda

Kenneth Ligda


February 29, 2000

I recently received an email from Amazon.Com that said, "You haven't ordered from us in a while. We thought you needed some incentive to visit, so here we go." and I was deluged by an e-mail advertisement spouting the beauty of your site. I agree. I truly enjoy Amazon.Com, but unfortunately, I cannot shop at a store which feels the need to enforce software patents. This patent being protested (1-Click Ordering) and the new patent (Affiliation Programs) are both complete crap. I won't rehash what's above, instead I will give you figures. Personally, my wife and I spent over 迀.00 on your site last year. That's a good chunk of change from two people on books over a 6 month period of time. (We discovered and began using Amazon in late August.) I personally have a budget of 赨 a month on technology books, as Tim points out I am of your "core target customers." >From a corporate standpoint, I am the IS Manager of a medium sized company. Until January, we ordered our books through your site. It took some talking to our CEO (as he owns Amazon stock; did I mention he recently sold?) but I now have authorization to take our business elsewhere, and Fatbrain looks mighty nice right now. The cost to you? We purchased approximately 񘒀.00 in training materials in the last three months. We have plans to purchase many more. In short Amazon, drop the patents into the public domain, or suffer a loss of business that is completely unnecessary. Your summary explanations of "people don't understand the patent" is way out in left field - the Open Source Community wouldn't be this upset if we didn't understand the TRUE meaning of those patents. Thank you, and I hope you sincerely listen to these messages.

Brian and Jennifer Schkerke


February 29, 2000

Jay MacDonald


February 29, 2000

Well, Amazon looks friendly and gentle judging by the look of its web site, but deep down, it's just another brutal business.

Jim Tran


February 29, 2000

I concur wholely with the disagreement of your patents.

David Seruyange


February 29, 2000

No response from the stock investors? Hmmm.... Perhaps that community will take notice of depressed financials. So perhaps it is time to also 1) sell off our own stock and 2) stop patronizing and alert any web site owner who maintains an Amazon.com affiliation on their web site. We stand to lose in the long run; history says so. Freddie

Freddie B. Jones


February 29, 2000

Dion Terry


February 29, 2000

David Spellman


February 29, 2000

As an author with a book for sale on your site, I'm not ready to give in to Richard M. Stallman's suggestions that authors use the comment space on Amazon to tell readers to buy the books elsewhere, and I haven't dropped my Amazon affiliation yet, but these are very questionable patents. Beat your competition in the marketplace, not in the courtroom. Part of the problem is the patent office being willing to grant these ridiculous patents, and I can see grabbing them if you can, just to protect yourself from someone else grabbing them and using them on you. But if you turn around and try to use these newfound weapons to close out competition, then all you do is prove RMS was right after all and it'll be time for authors and book publishers to take a stand against you.

Dave Farquhar


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, When I sent you a letter telling you I was joining the boycott, I got your company's form letter in response. I was so angry at the condescension and the assumption that I did not understand the patent that I could not write back, for you would take me to be an ignorant flamer. I can only tell you that you have stirred up a hornet's nest. Rarely do people die from one hornet - but you have angered so many, I hope the toxic shock connects with your synapses. Please re-read Mr. O'Reilly's letter, and stop all enforcement of your ridiculous patents. Until then, I, my family, my company, and my clients will be continuing to frequent your competitors. you have lost hundreds of dollars from my actions alone, and there are many others listed here. Reconsider your stance. -Matthew P. Smyth

Matthew P. Smyth


February 29, 2000

I buy a lot of stuff on the Web: movies, books, CDs, clothes, camping equipment -- you name it. I have used your service in the past because it is fast, reliable and secure, and because I can usually find whatever I'm looking for. However, I cannot justify supporting your company if you persist in holding and enforcing the 1-Click and Affiliates Patents. I ask you to please remember why you started this company in the first place -- equal access for all -- and be true to that spirit. Until then, I am boycotting your site.

Deb Asch


February 29, 2000

Once a frequent Amazon customer, I refuse to do business with a company so willing to turn its back on the culture that made it possible.

Matthew Moore


February 29, 2000

The patent system needs to be thrown out. Amazon gives a perfect example of why.

Mo DeJong


February 29, 2000

Eamon F. Walsh


February 29, 2000

I think Amazon and its patents are just plain bad for the net. If amazon is allowed to patent such general things where will it stop? Will the patent office grant me a patent on a system of using various graphics and glyphs for conveying ideas? I wrote to Amazon when the patent first came out and I am glad to see that they actually read their feedback because I was fed a canned response saying how proud they are of the patent, etc. C'est la vie

Jeff Trout


February 29, 2000

Mark Whelan


February 29, 2000

Craig Scrivner


February 29, 2000

Sam Phillips


February 29, 2000

Daniel Kim


February 29, 2000

I am participating in the Amazon boycott and I am encouraging others to do so. Until Amazon shapes up, I am finding books through http://www.bestbookbuys.com which proves that not only does Amazon not play fair, their prices suck.

Gisli Ottarsson


February 29, 2000

The fact that you were granted a patent on '1-click ordering' shows how clueless the PTO is about technology. I well be shopping for my books elsewhere as long as you continue to enforce patents on what should be un-patentable ideas. Andrew

Andrew Colasanti


February 29, 2000

Mike Edwards


February 29, 2000

R. Jay Campbell


February 29, 2000

Why doesn't Amazon concentrate on trying to make a profit (which they haven't done yet) rather than pursuing such stupid courses of action?

Dev Brown


February 29, 2000

Samuli K„rkk„inen


February 29, 2000

Kevin Finn


February 29, 2000

I have been impressed by Amazon as a customer and and associate. However this patent is unacceptable and I will not be using Amazon in future and will remove links from my site.

David Clark


February 29, 2000

Some while back I already wrote to you at Amazon to explain that I support Richard Stallman's boycott over your "1-click" patent, which appears to me to have no merit. I said at that time that I would no longer purchase books at Amazon until you either backed off from the patent or that it is overturned in court. I purchase a *lot* of books online and I certainly purchased many from Amazon, previously. I have not purchased from you since my last email and you, unfortunately, have lost a good customer in me. Your loss, my loss. I don't see why you want to alienate a large and vocal percentage of your customer base. Gene

Gene Wilburn


February 29, 2000

How rich do you have to get to lose all your sense?

Austin Luminais


February 29, 2000

Jeff Derenne


February 29, 2000

It is indeed sad when a business feels they must resort to patenting air and then sues anyone else who dares try to breath. The fact that the patent was granted in the first place is an obvious mistake. The fact that Amazon has seen fit to pursue harassing lawsuits against their competitors based on this mistake is beyond the comprehension of ethical people everywhere. Amazon. I'm really disappointed. I puchased some books from you and was looking forward to ordering many more. This will not happen now.

Charles Morrison


February 29, 2000

What a ridiculous concept. Do they not understand the entire concept of the internet today is the SHARING of information and ideas?

Jason Malone


February 29, 2000

Keith W. Lawless


February 29, 2000

I've bought books from Amazon before because it is difficult to get some books in Australia. Ever since they've started this sillyness I've gotten them from Barnes and Noble instead.

Craig Small


February 29, 2000

Like many others who have signed this open letter, I too have bought many books (as well as other merchandise) online - many of them from Amazon.com. Like my colleagues and friends who have signed, I am no longer purchasing from Amazon.com. I disagree wholeheartedly with Amazon's use of the US Patent system to protect its own interests - and hurt its customers. Thus, I am no longer one.

David Ahern


February 29, 2000

Jeffy! How many times do I have to tell you! Go to your room till you learn to play fairly!

Porter Hammer


February 29, 2000

Greg Lincoln


February 29, 2000

Scott Turton


February 29, 2000

Kevin Iverson


February 29, 2000

Shame on you Amazon, and Kudo's to you, Tim, on taking this stand.

David L. Weiner, CTO, WebMasters, Inc.


February 29, 2000

David C Walls


February 29, 2000

I can write a one-click system in about an hour using Cold Fusion. Sue me.

Lee Surma


February 29, 2000

Dear Mr.Bezos, Your patent is "over the top." We will no longer be purchasing from your company nor referring business to your service(s).

Ben Montanelli


February 29, 2000

Beth R. Martin


February 29, 2000

I have been an Amazon Associate for close to 18 months or so. From January the 1st to now I have sold 񘐜 worth of merchandise off my site for Amazon, with an unknown number of orders having been placed by people introduced to Amazon through my site. This isn't much, I know, but Barnes and Noble will now have the pleasure of my visitor's purchasing power... unless they stop the patent abuse of patents. Great service, poor vision :(

Zak McGregor


February 29, 2000

Tom Buck


February 29, 2000

Chris Carpenter


February 29, 2000

Chris Carpenter


February 29, 2000

I don't really care about 1 Click shopping much, but I think enforcing a patent on an obvious idea is a serious attack on freedom.

Michael Keller


February 29, 2000

Michael Danicich


February 29, 2000

Bill Nesting


February 29, 2000

As I told your customer service people weeks ago, I will no longer be buying any products from Amazon. And that's too bad, because it used to be my favorite place to buy books. Since Amazon started to carry other products, I would likely be buying other products as well. I spend many hundreds of dollars a year on books alone, and buy many products on-line. Once you've lost my business, you'll have a hard time getting it back. You might want to read "The ClueTrain Manifesto" and realize that "markets are conversations." And the conversation in the market right now is how Amazon has lost its roots and is turning into just another bully of a company driven my lawyers and accountants. It was your customer service and the sense of _community_ among your customers that made you. As Tim says, you're pissing in the community well, and the rest of the community doesn't appreciate it. It will not take long for word to spread and more and more people are encouraged to shop elsewhere. You have plenty of competition, and unfortunately you are driving away what made you special: loyal customers.

Guy Townsend


February 29, 2000

My first purchase on the Internet was through Amazon.com. But I buy my books from Barnes & Noble now. I won't be coming back to Amazon until you drop this patent nonsense, and show greater respect for customer privacy. (The purchasing circles bit also really ticked me off.) Why can't you just treat people with respect instead of trying to exploit your customers and screw your competitors? If Amazon wants to live like Microsoft, then I will live without Amazon.

David S. Touretzky


February 29, 2000

Until amazon changes their mind about the patent, I for one will not use their services.

Kaj Berglund


February 29, 2000

I have a one click on amazon, it won't get used again if this continues. There are other bookstores on the web

Kenneth Tyler


February 29, 2000

Once again, some 'big business' succumbs to its corporate lawyers and tries to control its world. You'll never make money if you lose all your customers, and bad word of mouth outweighs good publicity ten to one. Lose, Amazon, lose.

Paul Wayper


February 29, 2000

Amazon gained First Mover Advantage by realizing the opportunity of Internet Based e-commerce and spawned a million look alikes. However, even today, it is only the Amazon name that is cited as the epitome of web based commerce. Trying to convert that initial leverage into a sustainable advantage through constant product/service innovation, excellent customer responsiveness, prediction of new trends, core product mix expansion, strategic alliances and other value additions is justifiable, even encouraged. However, seeking dubious legal protection on trivial "innovations" gains them nothing but animosity. It is not only "Techies" who are disgusted with this underhandedness. So are managers types, lawyers, intellectual property experts and honest hard working Americans. Amazon may expect to gain short term profits, but they will also gain long term antagonism. And patenting the very concept of strategic alliances - a paradigm as old as the history of commerce - borders on the ridiculous. One wonders at the naivete of a patent office that grants such frivolous patents.

Suvir Bhatia


February 29, 2000

Bill Ray


February 29, 2000

We just can't allow people to profit from ignorance. Antics such as Bezos' are only possible beacuse the people who make the decisions in these matters, as well as the general public, don't understand the technology. Tim O'Reilley explained this quite eloquently, so I won't belabor the point except to say that we must support initiatives such as Tim's vigorously, as it is truly the only defense we have against this sort of behavior...public pressure. I don't think guys like Bezos are evil, but that they have put so much of their life and resources into building their dreams, they lose sight of the big picture. Perhaps more importantly, they lose their connectedness to the community. We need guys like Bezos because we need drive, innovation, and creativity. What we don't need is castles, moats, and stagnation...

Stuart Slaugh


February 29, 2000

What's next - are you going to patent the use of forms in e-commerce?

Ryan Douthit


February 29, 2000

Not only am I not buying books from you personally, I am no longer approving any books bought from Amazon as well. I am also submitting a sugestion that this be made a company wide policy. I want us to be around in 10 years. With these bogus patents, I'm not sure sure it will happen.

Kai Cherry


February 29, 2000

I am a lover of books, technology, and freedom. I have enjoyed purchasing products from Amazon in the past. I will not purchase any further materials from Amazon.com until this nonsense stops. If it does not cease soon, Amazon.com may never be able to recover me as a customer.

Michael T. Garrison Stuber


February 29, 2000

I am protesting Amazon's actions by the best way in a market economy: I am taking my money and will spend it at Barnes and Noble and Border's.

Todd Kuper


February 29, 2000

I reguarly (did) buy books from Amazon, but I guess fatbrain.com will have to get my business from now on.

Ray Gerhard


February 29, 2000

Amazon was my favourite online store. In the past year I've ordered hundreds of dollars worth of books and CDs. But now I will take my business elsewhere. As a professional web developer, this directly affects my line of work, not to mention having a very damaging effect on the whole Internet community.

George Ma


February 29, 2000

Nathan Machula


February 29, 2000

i am a unix administrator and have a huge library of technical books. i used to buy them all from amazon. since their patent, i have ceased buying from them. my 񘈨 dollar yearly book allowance now goes elsewhere. not only have i not bought from them, but i no longer recommend them to friends, family, or technical peers. each opportunity i get i ask those who i work with to learn more about the controvery with Amazon's 1-click patent. thank you oreilly for providing this petition. -edward

Edward Sexton


February 29, 2000

Andy Deitsch


February 29, 2000

Good letter, Tim. I'm just starting to buy on-line but won't be shopping at Amazon.

Graham Todd


February 29, 2000

Adam J. Foxson


February 29, 2000

Tracey Anne Hytry


February 29, 2000

I have been following this issue for some time, even emailed Amazon about my concerns over their patent grab. Although I am not a huge book buyer, my purchases will be made elsewhere. Poetic justice would be for the inventor of the cookie to patent his idea (which is a far more patentable idea than 1-click or Affiliates) and make it public domain for everyone EXCEPT Amazon. Then perhaps you would realize how perverse it was to pursue these patents. Every company that participates in E-business must realize that a move like this is a threat to every business that operates on the web. If you are truly commited to your customers, Amazon, think of those who are businesses. Realize that they will take this as a threat, and that they will then look elsewhere for their needs. Think on how much revenue you will lose because you chose to chose to pursue these patents so aggresively. And then realize that it is not worth what this will cost you, your good name.

Nathan Tenney


February 29, 2000

Please abandon your pursuit of these software patents. When you do, I will start shopping with you again. Stand Fast, tjg.

Timothy Grant


February 29, 2000

Gregory Sutter


February 29, 2000

I bought a lot of books from Amazon and I like the 1-click feature. However, from the very beginning, it was absolutely clear that this is based on the cookie technology created by Netscape. There is nothing novel about it, except for the marketing hype. The fact that Amazon applied for the patent shows the complete disregard for the Internet community. The fact that the Patent office approved the patent application shows that they have to learn a lot as well. Since there was prior art, the patent will not hold up in court, so the best way to handle this issue without a lengthy legal battle would be for Amazon to drop the patent.

Joachim Feise


February 29, 2000

Connie Malinowski


February 29, 2000

Even from this distance, in Australia, Amazon has been a significant service for me in the past. It's a pity that's not likely to be the case in future. This patent claim is not quite as ridiculous as those for human genome details (suitably ridiculed by the woman in Europe who is now registering herself as a patent), but it borders on it. And is made worse by the fact that it is built on work by people who made their intellectual property available freely to all. Sneaky and unworthy.

Peter G. Martin


February 29, 2000

It was a trivial matter to change the Amazon link on my Web site to Barnes & Noble. Now all the members of my book review club are just one click away from your competitor.

Peter Lacey


February 29, 2000

I heartily agree with Mr. O'Reilly's letter. It looks like you are biting the hands that fed you - both, those technically aware that bought your goods, as well as those who have developed the technology that you are now seeking to restrict. Please reconsider your stand.

Scott Williams


February 29, 2000

Tobias Hagge


February 29, 2000

I'm very disapointed. I will be canceling my Amazon account as well as two open orders totaling over 贬. I've always trusted Amazon ordered not a few books from them in the past. Now I find that they are not good netizens so I will reluctantly stop doing business with them. Thank you Tim. I wasn't aware of this issue until I logged in to your site. I'll pass on the link to my friends and a few on line societies I belong to. John Purser

John M. Purser


February 29, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, I was an early and active Amazon.com customer. After you've got this ridiculous idea of enforcing "1-Click patent" I would NOT BUY A SINGLE ITEM from your site until you come to your senses - however long it'll take. Most of my friends also stopped buying from Amazon.com (at least, until you change for the better). You have plenty of good competitors and rather high prices (if in doubt, look at www.mysimon.com and www.bestbookbuys.com). Spend your time and energy on building real competetive business, not on PR spin and abuse of patent system.

Igor Mendelev


February 29, 2000

- Definition of a Patent is based upon the creation of an invention. - Definition of invention is the act or process of developing a new device, method, or process. Amazon is clearly in abuse of known Internet technologies that has allowed the Internet to rapidly evolve over the last decade. Amazon, as a long time consumer of your services, I ask that your organization do the right thing and not lead the way of a patent crazy economy looking to sue and block economic growth to maintain psuedo leadershhip. Your initial leadership as a forerunner within this new economy gained Amazon much success and opportunity ... your efforts can (and should) be focused on setting a positive precedence for business on how to succeed within the Net Economy via creative vision and rapid execution! Regain your creating innovation and don't rely on blocking competitors via patent's as a means of success!

Jeff Hooker


February 29, 2000

I would like to add further that I can not in good conciousness buy goods from Amazon.com until the "One-click" patent is dropped, despite that I think Amazon.com is otherwise the best on-line shopping system and store around. I support Richard Stallman's call for a boycott. I believe that Amazon.com is acting as a pirate against humanity. I applaud Tim O'Reilly's actions thus far. I'd like to see O'Reilly & Associates pull their books off Amazon's shelves.

Mason Lee


February 29, 2000

It's a long way from the kind of extremist views espoused by Richard Stallman to the much more measured views of Tim O'Reilly. Richard has nothing to lose by supporting this effort, but Tim does. I agree with Tim - Amazon is a customer service company. Stick to that and don't get enmeshed in this kind of subversion of the art and craft of computer science.

J. Paul Holbrook


February 29, 2000

The 1-click shopping patent violates the spirit of scientific development that created the internet and all the technological marvels that allow amazon to be where it is today. Patenting such an obvious process is not only obscene but also a move that brings us closer to the end of open computing architecture and development that the internet was built on.

Dare Obasanjo


February 29, 2000

Thank you Amazon. Your stupidity caused me to try FatBrain ... and I like it.

Mike Bird


February 29, 2000

Jon King


February 29, 2000

Add my name to the list.

David Youd


February 29, 2000

I have been a customer of Amazon.com, but from this point on I will not be shopping at Amazon. I will be shopping at one of Amazons competitors until it gives up its one click ordering patent.

Mike Drashil


February 29, 2000

I truly value the service that Amazon has provided in the past and have always enjoyed shopping there. However, until Amazon stops using improperly issued patents as a weapon against the Web and it's users, all of my book purchases will be from Amazon competitors such as www.bookpool.com Ken Wilson

Ken Wilson


February 29, 2000

Dimitris Stassinopoulos


February 29, 2000

Your actions are ridiculous. Anyone who works in the Industry was well aware of the techniques which you are using. Patenting this would be like patenting the method of wiring a plug - obvious and silly. Please rethink.

Jonathan Lawrence


February 29, 2000

One click patents are wrong. They clog up the system, and they prevent fair use. I will not shop at amazon until they stop patenting arbitrary ideas.

Erica Rettig


February 29, 2000

Your patent is absurd. As one of the many internet companies that I have seen grow into monoliths overnight, simply by virtue of their early positioning and funding. Your attempt to stake out this territory is a symptom of your corporation's intoxication on its own power and quick success. Shame on you. As an early Amazon customer I regret ever having given you my business and it will be a while after you stop this nonsense that I will ever give you my business. That period of time will be a geometric function of how long you persist with this. Now grow up.

Sonia


February 29, 2000

Patrick Dalton


February 29, 2000

I have shopped with Amazon in the past. I will no longer shop at Amazon. I will encourage my co-workers in the book business as well as my friends and associates to do e-commerce with Amazon's competitors, including and especially bn.com.

Erin Chervenock


February 29, 2000

I will no longer support a company that takes software gifts that are freely offered, and then turns around using it as a stick to beat their competitors. Maybe a portion of my purchases to those same competitors will fund the fight to strike down these ridiculous patents?

Daniel Armstrong


February 29, 2000

Further I would ask anyone with ties to "traditional" media to notify them of this effort. Wall Street needs to know about this. It would be awesome for "hair force-one" on CNBC to make mention of this effort. Sincerely, Chris Kelley CTO Dynamic Digital Media

Chris Kelley


February 29, 2000

I've been a Amazon customer, but will refrain from using their service until they give up this ridiculous claim.

Christian Stork


February 29, 2000

Sorry Amazon. I'm off to Borders to (once again) buy more books.

Scott Hunter


February 29, 2000

This is digusting.... Amazon! It is plain and simple. Companies were using One-Click style shopping before you were around. Therefor you don't have the right to even think about patenting it. Just because you have them money and the attorneys to pull it off, doesn't give you the right to apply. You were at a fork in the road, and you took the path under the low road. What you did was just sickening, and it will not help you. Patents are meant to protect ingenuity, not the person who could file the quickest. You didn't invent one unique thing on your site, you have NO RIGHTS to patent anything. What is next, you will patent html and forms used in a manner to place orders online? Why don't you just patent apache... Or how about DNA? Why don't you patent the Amazon Rainforest, after all, they have your name, and you probably have more money than the countries that own the forrest. Or why don't you sue those countries to change the name of the forrest to protect your interests. You are a bunch of gre! edy hypocritical bastards, and I hope you all rot in hell....

Mike W.


February 29, 2000

Sebastian Kun


February 29, 2000

Andrew Green


February 29, 2000

I will refrain from buying books from amazon until they take back their claim on the patent. They are violating the very basic law of internet - freedom.

Jeff Davis


February 29, 2000

I've already switched to Barnes and Noble and FatBrain. I've also convinced my company to switch, my friends to switch, and basically anyone I've talked to. Convinced?

Matthew Hornyak


February 29, 2000

I won't be buying further books from Amazon while these patents remain in effect.

Rodney Brown


February 29, 2000

It will be my pleasure to shop elsewhere from now on. It is the "open" nature of the web which put you people in business. And now you want to help make it more difficult for e-business to grow and mature. With that sort of attitude, I will do my part to help keep amazon.com from ever operating "in the black".

Jeff Spence


February 29, 2000

I've bought from amazon.com before, but no more, until you give up this patent nonsense.

Jack Smith


February 29, 2000

Well, here we are. Amazon: where Microsoft is now, if where you could one day be. In court. We made you, we can break you just as easily. We are the customers. Ultimately, we decide who stays, and who goes. Remember that.

Christopher M. McCraken


February 29, 2000

Amazon was the first web co. I did business with, so I guess that they earned a special preference whenever I wanted a new book... But now there's many more choices, and bn.com ain't all bad - they had a hardcover edition for xmas that would've taken Amazon weeks to deliver. c'est la vie

sean flaherty


February 29, 2000

I will not be ordering any books from Amazon until this patent is reversed.

Martin Ortmayr


February 29, 2000

It just feels like a slap in the face from a company we all helped put at the top.

Blake Seely


February 29, 2000

Jess Garms


February 29, 2000

I'm sure it seemed like a good idea at first. Oh well...I suppose Amazon has swung its weight too far in that direction. I would wager that a nervous VP is about to cover his ass by proclaiming to Mr. Bezos that our outrage is a sign that patent abuse is a strong step forward for Amazon.com.

Dimitry Dukhovny


February 29, 2000

Joshua Yockey


February 29, 2000

I find this issue ridiculous. I, too, love amazon.com and feel you offer a phenomenal service. In fact, I'm quite guilty of using amazon.com far too much. However, if this patent isn't dropped, I'm afraid I'll have to rethink the new way in which I buy books. I can't support you guys with a good conscience if something doesn't change. In the words of Kathie Lee Gifford: "How dare you". ;)

Mark E Reynolds


February 29, 2000

I'm most happy to add my signature to this letter. I would like to voice my dissagreement to issuing a patent for Amazon.com's 1-click purchacing system. Amazon's 1-click, while a clever marketing device, is not clever software. It's based on key internet components including browser cookies, back-end databases and common software. These key components are necessary for the existance and operation of many web sites. Patents of this nature adversly impact development of the web because royalities paid to patent holders would limit competition.

Tim Sawyer


February 29, 2000

My, my... I normally assume that I need to add creative and pithy comments to this sort of protest. But after reviewing the comments that have already been posted here, I can only say that I second most of the opinions contained herein. Amazon is a well executed example of what the Net can be. Amazon will note that, since 1997, our family account has shown purchases totalling somewhere in the middle four figures. If the patent nonsense is withdrawn, that stream will probably restart. If it does not I, like the Net itself, will route around the trouble spot as best I can... --rdr

R. Dean Riddlebarger


February 29, 2000

I'm sorry to see a company with such a great service do something so thoughtless. With luck I'll be able to use amazon.com again before the end of the year...

aram price


February 29, 2000

I agree, I have never bought anything from Amazon yet. Furthermore, I won't. Greg

Greg Zegan


February 29, 2000

Time to vote with our $$'s. Use Barnes and Noble, Fat Brain or your local independent bookstore (I think there's still a few around).

David Spurrier


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com is a victim of its own hubris. They had a good thing going for them, but attempting to become the "Wal-Mart of the Web" takes the e-tailing concept too far. And now that they're doing it anyway, the rights of both consumers and it's competitors are in jeopordy. Thanks, Jeff; if Congress doesn't kill electronic commerce with taxes, your company's lunacy surely will.

Ed Lee


February 29, 2000

P. David Schaub


February 29, 2000

The group i work with (8 technoids, all avid readers) will no longer be spending its book (or CD) $ at amazon.com, unless yous guys learn how to play fair, and soon. Greedy bastages, grow up!

Pedro Ruiz


February 29, 2000

I spend about 贄/month on books and CDs, previously exclusively at Amazon. I will be now be taking my business elsewhere.

Sarah Wustner


February 29, 2000

Well, Amazon, I agree with Tim above. You have made a mistake. I think a fundamental rule in business is not to consider your SUNK costs when contemplating a business decision, but instead consider your future costs. In specific words... Regardless of how much it has cost you so far to proceed with this patent suit; you should consider the cost of future lost business, and a public relations disaster. I ALSO will be spending my money elsewhere, until this desicision is reversed. I ALSO have many friends and family, and then will be notified of this situation. I urge you to reconsider! P.S. Don't forget the story... the bigger you are..... The harder you may fall.

Jason Hoffman


February 29, 2000

When I first heard about the boycott, I said I didn't want to give up such a great service. But I realized that continuing my shopping habits with Amazon only reinforces their belief that they will not be hurt by such moronic decisions. So on to Barnes & Nobles I go... Our 40,000+ employee corporation also goes through B&N for their book needs.

Ginger Freiling


February 29, 2000

As a computing professional I purchase an average of 贶 worth of books / month. In addition my advice is regularly sought when collegues are considering their own purchases. Since RMS issued the call to boycott none of my purchases have gone through Amazon, and all my advice is accompanied with a warning not to shop with Amazon. Until Amazon renounces *all* it's patents I will never buy, and will actively discourage custom with them. Tim I am disappointed that you have failed to boycott amazon, you have no fear of lost sales, if I cannot find an ORA book in a book store there are no substitutes, your demand is inelastic.

Andrae Muys


February 29, 2000

I have been an Amazon customer in the past. I will take my business to Barnes and Nobel until Amazon drops this ridiculous lawsuit. I will urge everyone I know who orders merchandise online to do the same.

Clayton Tucker


February 29, 2000

I applaud Mr. O'Reilly for coming out so strongly and yet sensibly on this issue. I can feel good about buying fro O'Reilly, a company with a functioning sense of ethics. Guess who will not be receiving any orders from me in the near future.

David Byrnes


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com should quit patenting obvious patents. The one-click ordering is similiar to someone patenting "one flip" light switches. It does nothing but leave everyone in the dark, hindering innovation. I am a Amazon.com customer and I will refrain from using any of their dubious "patented features." If Amazon.com went as far as forcing competitors to remove "one-click" and similiar features, I will boycott and tell others to boycott Amazon.com as well.

Gordon Li


February 29, 2000

As a customer who's used web services for a while and a newcomer to the computer servicing community, I have to say that I agree that this one click patent is quite silly and am becoming more and more convinced of that fact the more I become immersed in the computer servicing industry.

Rogelio Juarez


February 29, 2000

Jason Doh


February 29, 2000

Jeff Doering


February 29, 2000

Acquire the patents, but only to keep these ideas free. Allow free use and never enforce them. Please Amazon.

Simon Fragmire


February 29, 2000

Much to my regret I have joined the boycott. Amazon offers an excellent service but I now seek other avenues for book buying.

Peter Grant


February 29, 2000

Dangit, Jeff, I've sent you over ũ,000 in order to acquire books to help me help others establish e-commerce on the net. And now your company has literally STABBED ME IN THE BACK AND TAKEN MONEY OUT OF MY POCKET with your ridiculous patent. What a way to reward customer loyalty. I think I'll just have to buy from Barnes & Noble from now on: to reward them for standing up to you, and to punish you for attempting to control a concept you didn't really create. Shame on you, Jeff, because I've heard you're a really nice guy and you really think you're trying to make the world a better place. Stop this madness now, or you will fail at your dreams. Or has the money finally gotten to you? Is it "I got mine, so screw the rest of you," Jeff? Or are you going to do the right thing?

Chuck Kincy


February 29, 2000

Joel Richards


February 29, 2000

How can one even think about patenting a cookie? I mean really...it's just sick.

Justin Monical


February 29, 2000

I will no longer purchase products from you until you stop abusing patents which were issued on questionable grounds at best. Also, perhaps you are not aware of (or refuse to acknowledge) the fact that it is no inconvience for me to shop at other e-commerce sites that provide an equally good product/service.

Chris Johnson


February 29, 2000

Mr Bezos, I aggree with Tim's comments re your patent of 1 click buying. I have been a loyal and frequent customer of Amazon for quite some time. Please re-consider your actions. I would hate to have to take my business else where. -jss

John S Sobieski


February 29, 2000

As a developer I understand the need for certain copyrights of intellectual material. But I also know that If I do create a totally new methodology of doing something I can copyright the code I used to make it work, not the method. That would kill competition.

James Herring


February 29, 2000

WAIT! Think about this for a minute. If you were granted a patent, and a competitor infringed on it would you sit idly by. I agree the patent was granted without proper consideration, but the industry is new and the PTO made a mistake. Direct your complaints to the PTO and write your congressman.

Bruce Kowkabany


February 29, 2000

I sincerely hope this isn't the start of a new breed of studpidity on the net, but it appears to have started. Amazon.com will not receive any of my business, and I will make sure that all my friends are made aware of this situation. Until then - the $$bucks$$ stops here, just remember that Amazon.com

Charles Olson


February 29, 2000

Regrettably, the course taken by Amazon.com can only lead in one direction---that of higher book and media prices due to litigation expenses, decreased productivity, and decreased competition. The recognition of this outcome can only increase. Therefore, arising from perfectly pragmatic concerns, and speaking as a past customer, and regardless of the ultimate resolution of the patent issues, I suggest to you that your current strategy in this area cannot lead to a sustainable customer base.

dr. george lloyd


February 29, 2000

I will buy from Barnes & Noble from now on.

Sia Gek Ming


February 29, 2000

I don't know alot about patents, but I do know that Amazon just lost a customer.

Simon Willgoss


February 29, 2000

I am in europe and I believe that the Amazon patents are not valid here but I am boycoting them anyway. I have purchased several books from Amazon.com and Amazon.de but until they change their position I will not buy again from them. Ruben

Ruben Leote Mendes


February 29, 2000

Jim Bauer


February 29, 2000

Until you withdraw your 1-click patent application, I will place no more orders with Amazon.

Gerald Brown


February 29, 2000

The use of trivial patents as an anti-competition device ranks right up there with how Microsoft uses lawyers as a competitive weapon. My e-purchases won't be going to Amazon.

Bob Maynard


February 29, 2000

If such kind of generic and broad patents continue to be granted, one day we will need authorization even to breath, because some smart one will manage to patent the process of breathing. It's really worrying, I've already suffered personally with such absurds, and people have to be mobilized against that.

Andr‰ Quites


February 29, 2000

Ye Gods, I'm sick of this endless onslaught of bogus patents.

Jason Ozolins


February 29, 2000

I too have bought extensively from Amazon in the past, but will not do so in the future unless this nonsense is publicly stopped. Even if they were the first website to use this technique (and they werent), it goes against everything that we have fought for to achieve a level playing field, not one where you play by the rules of MonopolySoft. What next, a patent on having a "Back" button on your website???

Dale Wright


February 29, 2000

Jeff Michou


February 29, 2000

I am a University lecturer. For some time I have have used my class websites to recommend books to students along with links to various online booksellers. I featured Amazon most prominantly by linking to their book description for each recommended book. Following Amazon's recent patent actions, I have replaced Amazon's descriptions with those of barnesandnoble.com and have replaced my link to Amazon with links to fatbrain.com and barnesandnoble.com. I have also included a link to O'Reilly's letter page along with the following statement on my websites: "Until recently, I had linked to Amazon.com, but in light of their recent actions, which may threaten internet and ecommerce innovation, I have decided against doing anything that might promote Amazon." I usually teach 200-300 undergraduate and postgraduate students per semester. If other University teachers take similar actions, Amazon might start to see some impact.

Thomas Crook


February 29, 2000

For shame, Jeff. I own your stock, I really like Amazon, my nonprofit uses your affiliate program - but *think* about what you're doing. You may have lots of nontechnical mindshare now, but don't think for a second that the geeks aren't driving the web anymore - with XML, WAP, scripting, etc. we're building today the platform that will define everything about your business in the future. Software patents kill the goose that laid the golden egg, and if you make them prevalent enough, we'll have to start engineering an unpatentable platform to fix companies like you. Maybe you should think about where that's going to put you? Seriously.

David Rostcheck


February 29, 2000

I concur with the fact that this patent and many others are not only silly but detrimental to the evolution of the Internet and technology itself. There is nothing new or revolutionary about the 1-click patent and many of the so-called new processes that have/are being patented are often reruns of other ideas used in a different context. The US Patent Office should not dictate free market nor the growth of the Internet.

Mark Scherling


February 29, 2000

Hello Jeff, I've been a very loyal Amazon customer for over 3 years, spending 0000's per year. Since the patten, I have stopped purchasing at your site and have found nice alternatives. I also advise my friends and associates of the my decision when I hear or see them purchase from Amazon. Please stop this insane patent paranoia, stop listening to the lawyers and business control gurus & return listening to what got you started on the amazing success you have had...scott

Scott Schmidt


February 29, 2000

Amazon should be ashamed. I am reminded of a stanza from Kipling's 'IF': "If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools," The truth is the fact that Amazon did not invent the use of cookies for online purchases; this technology was given freely for all of us to share. But Amazon are acting like knaves who have little enough moral fiber to trap the patent office into granting them a patent for something they did not invent. If you enforce this patent we all will suffer.

Doug Hurley


February 29, 2000

Please do not stifle the very environment that is responsible for your unusually high market capitalization.

Robert S. Heckel Jr.


February 29, 2000

I've bought things from Amazon before and I never use the one-click thingy. Amazon, you only have to look at the size of this list to realise that majority of the net population consists of intelligent business people (usually developers) who are concerned about their rights to utilise things that, rightly, should be free. Your patent on one-click goes against the spirit of the internet. People have poured hours, days, months, years of their lives (without pay!) into producing the tools that you use to run your site and you have no right to claim ownership or exclusivity.

Nicholas Boyle


February 29, 2000

I do not regret never having done business with your firm in the past and with your current stance toward an open and free Internet, I will not regret never patronizing your firm in the future. Sincerely, Nate Bargmann

Nate Bargmann


February 29, 2000

I am deeply disturbed by this self-involved willingness to help turn the internet into a legal mine field. The 1-click patent claim is simply dishonest, and I am appalled that Amazon seems reluctant to admit their dishonesty to their customers, even in the face of the substantial criticism that they have received. I have been an occasional customer of Amazon in the past, but I cannot, in good conscience, support a company while it continues to assert these frivolous and dishonest patent claims.

L. Adrian Griffis


February 29, 2000

I and my family have purchased at least ũ,000 worth of merchandise from Amazon.com. My only regret is that I did not find this letter sooner. We have not made a single purchase from Amazon since the obsurd move that amazon has taken. We now and will continue to take our business to Barns and Nobel. I'm sure the couple of hundred per month we spend at Barns and Nobel will not be missed by Amazon. I have been internet active since 1988 and have watched it grow. This attempt to take advantage of a processes someone else has developed is totally out of line with the intent of the internet. In my view the people at Amazon.com are nothing more than thiefs. I for one will continue to boycot them even if this just all goes away. I do NOT do business with thiefs!

Clint Johnson


February 29, 2000

As an owner of a web business myself it saddens me to see someone with as much influence in the world of the internet and e-commerce as Amazon.com feel that they have to patent such simple web technologies. These technologies are the back bone to e-commerce and no one should have direct control over them. These patents will cause every company on the web to examine the technology they are using and apply for patents on any thing they feel someone else might get to first creating a basic civil war on the internet. I ask you to sit down and closely examine what you are doing and the ramifications it may have on Amazon.com and other companies existing on the internet. It could come back to bight you in the ass.

Andrew Blaisdell


February 29, 2000

I also choose not to do business with amazon.com, for the same reasons expressed by Tim and Richard.

Carl Gibbons


February 29, 2000

This is *the* reason that I avoid buying books from Amazon.

Kirk Johnson


February 29, 2000

As a web developer and an amazon.com customer (check my account, I buy a lot of books from you guys), I have a real problem with your stand on the "1 Click" issue. Since I understand and use cookies in my own development work, I know first hand how powerful, yet how simple they are. I can understand that you want to protect the name "1 click" but claiming patent on this would be the equivalent of Microsoft saying that no other software company could develop an operating system, because they developed an OS. Nothing against MS, and they were not the first OS, but amazon was also not the first to use cookies to identify customers and use the info to pre-fill a form or gathre info. If this lawsuit continues, I will seriously have consider whether I will continue as a customer. Sincerely, Greg McNary amazon.com customer since 1996

Greg McNary


February 29, 2000

What's next, an Al Gore internet patent.

Ben Ancock


February 29, 2000

Absolutely absurd. For some reckless reason I overlooked this insanity when it was just the 1-click patent, but this is adding insult to injury. My business is going elsewhere.

Thom Goodsell


February 29, 2000

I will not be purchasing from Amazon.com until this issue is resolved.

Brian Youmans


February 29, 2000

Back in the early days I started using Amazon in protest to the way B&N was handling its buisness where I live. Basicly B&N came to town built their big new store and promptly started to close all the BookStops in town ( by far my favorite book store and B&N ownes them ). Now I refuse to purchase books from B&N. Now after being a customer of Amazon for a while you go off and do this stupid thing. I guess it is time for me to find another book seller. It won't be B&N and it will not be Amazon. True I only spend about a 1k a year but that is 1k you will no longer have.

Richard D. Jackson


February 29, 2000

"Pissing in the well." Can't say it any better than that.

Andrew Olsen


February 29, 2000

Two points: patents are for those, who invented something new, not for those who decided to grab something already existing first. This concerns not only infamous 1-click thing, but many of other so-called "Amazon" patents. Second point: I moved to FatBrain and find it cheaper and suggesting somewhat better service than Amazon. I also tell my friends about this case and have some of them moved too -- Amazon should be prosecuted, let's work it out!

Alex


February 29, 2000

Here's well over ũK a year going to Powell's, Fatbrain, and anywhere except Amazon.com until the patents on 1-click ordering and affiliate programs are abandoned. Licensing isn't good enough. Drop them. And yes, I'm telling two friends (well, lots more than two), and they'll tell two friends, and so on, and so on...

sarah gregory


February 29, 2000

I will cease doing any business with Amazon until they abandon their brain-dead patent strategy. I think Amazon should get a clue and realize that attempting to patent obvious programming design methods will ultimately result in expensive lawsuits and a growing base of pissed off non-customers.

Thomas Fowler


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos: You must be aware that in this emerging online sales industry, competition is fierce. Chances are, someone else offers a lower price than you, and visiting a different web site is rarely less convenient for the consumer (as compared to visiting a different store). One tool that can assist your potential customers can be found at http://www.snmputils.com/booksearch/. It looks up the prices that various prominent online retailers offer on any given book. I highly recommend you try it. You will discover that Amazon.com usually does not offer the best price. Really, all you have going for you is your reputation. And you are very quickly spoiling that reputation. Thousands of angry netizens are spreading the word that amazon.com is a company committed to destroying the open environment from which their community was born. I strongly encourage you to reverse your stance on this shameful patent. In the mean time, I will abstain from making any purchases from amazon.com, and each e-mail that I send will contain a signature that encourages others to do the same.

David Steinberg


February 29, 2000

G. Richard Raab


February 29, 2000

I am adding my name in support of this initiative. As a Web developer and previous amazon.com customer this patent sickens me.

Charlie Llewellin


February 29, 2000

Click. . .click. . .click. . . I just bought a book from Barnes & Noble!

Alan Little


February 29, 2000

Bye Amazon. I will dedicate my best efforts to explain to those I know why they should not do business with Amazon. The longer you persist on your stealing of public goodwilli and freedom, the harder it will be for the results of such efforts to be reversed. We made you... we'll break you.

Alfredo Alvarenga


February 29, 2000

It is utter nonsense that these patents have been approved. Amazon.com needs to back off before they end up "up the Amazon without a customer". BookaMillion is usually cheaper than Amazon and service 9delivery) can't get better. Tim, you are the man and yes Jeff has his weenie in the well...

Ron Pierce


February 29, 2000

Amazon, you are trying to patent santa claus's reindeer. Relax and rule the world the newfashioed way, by inovation.

Tod Goree


February 29, 2000

Amazon will not get another dollar from me unless this silliness is rethought.

Daryl Spencer


February 29, 2000

I am Fatbrain.com, regardless of how many clicks.

Bosco Tjan


February 29, 2000

Open source and the free sharing of ideas and technologies made the Internet and web what they are today. Your business relies 100% on the basic framework that was given to the world by countless individuals who contributed without compensation.

Kevin Wyman


February 29, 2000

I am a streaming media Web developer and business owner. I help our clients implement streaming, e-commerce and business strategy. I will be an evangelist against Amazon.com in every way until Amazon.com drops pursuit of the 1-click patent. You can expect no partnerships from <b>ANY</b> of the Internet startups we work with. We only work with Internet startups. As a developer Amazon.com's business practices infuriate me and if this goes on long enough I will be so far alienated that I may never do business with Amazon.com.

Torgeir Rokke


February 29, 2000

As a software developer, I am afraid of what software patents might mean to my ability to support myself in the future. Many companies these days file for patents on the most trivial and obvious of techniques. Unfortunately, the U.S. Patent Office does not appear to have the technical ability to weed out the frivolous software patent applications. Unfortunately, as a result, many of these patents are actually awarded. Many other developers may implement the same or similar ideas between the time the original application is filed and the time it is awarded. This is an indication of how obvious the idea was but it does nothing to protect those secondary developers from the costs of defending themselves in a patent infringement suit or the cost of throwing away months or years of development and working on a non-infringing solution. Who knows what code I write today may end up being the subject of a patent infringment suit tomorrow? What will it cost me if I am named in a patent infringement suit? In the past, amazon.com has always been my first and usually only stop when I needed to look for a book. Due to the fact that you are not only in support of activities detrimental to my future ability to support myself but are also actively using the legal system to extract financial rewards from these ill-gotten gains, I can no longer use your service or recommend it to my friends. I have removed pointers to your web site from my web pages and have replaced them with pointers to alternative suppliers of things that you sell. In the future, it is these alternatives that I will use and promote to my friends and colleagues. If you don't understand why I believe your actions are dangerous to my future, please see http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/ and http://linuxtoday.com/stories/13652_flat.html.

Thomas Pfau


February 29, 2000

"Fear or stupidity has always been the basis of most human actions." - Albert Einstein For their sake I hope amazon.com is acting out of fear...

Anthony Anderberg


February 29, 2000

I believe this sort of thing is the root of evil. Putting a restriction of this sort on something so obvious is like trying to patent the use of the wheel on a motor vehicle. This application of a cookie is so widely-used and obvious that no one would ever think of trying to patent it for their own uses. When you take the innovations of a great mind and attempt to license them for your private use, that, in my mind, is theft. If the patent office had any clue about software this would have never happened. This was an innovation that was offered to the world; only the boldest and the greediest would ever think of trying to take it and run to the patent office. Barnes & Noble, here I come.

Jared Forshey


February 29, 2000

Travesty.

Paul C. Leddy


February 29, 2000

As a System Administrator/Tech Support person and more recently as a Web Developer/Tech Support person I have for the last few years recommended Amazon.com to many of my newest and most inexperienced customers as a good site for them to cut their teeth on. I meant it too. I have introduced hundreds of people to your site. Amazon.com was most of those peoples first experience purchasing items online. Many of those customers still purchase books from you. It is most unfortunate that I feel I can no longer recommend you any longer. It is even more unfortunate that how I originally found about this issue was when a former customer (a retired gentleman spends perhaps to much time on the web) e-mailed me, very upset. He was one of the customers who I introduced to the web using Amazon. Based largely on the excitement of that first afternoon I spent showing him the web, Del now is one of the more advanced web users I know and has just recently started writing web pages. Which brings me back to how I found out about this issue. Del is very new to web development, but even he was able to give me an example in the e-mail of how easily he could implement a "1-click" ordering system. It was, frankly, a little disallusioning for Del. I understand, because I feel the same way. I don't have the time, nor the stomach, to go back and ask all the customers to stop purchasing from Amazon. However, even if they didn't understand how simple and unoriginal either of the patents you have received so are, I'm sure that they would readily agree that your abuse in "enforcing" your patent rights justifies a boycott of your business site. I don't have the time, but I'm sure that without to much effort I could find many sites on the net using similar techniques. However, by sueing Barnes and Noble you showed that you primarily want to use these patents to beat back competion. I wish I didn't have to, but I will no longer be sending any portion of my roughly 蹢/yr of personal book purchases to Amazon.com. Perhaps even worse, I feel I can no longer use Amazon as an example of one of the Internet's "shining jewels".

Ben Maas


February 29, 2000

Get a grip Amazon

Ian


February 29, 2000

I couldn't have said it better Tim. Amazon will not get another dollar from me unless they stop enforcing this patent before a court tells them that they can't enforce it.

Keith Caceres


February 29, 2000

Amazon -- I was an avid customer. Last year, I purchased over two hundred dollars worth of merchandise from Amazon, both books and CDs. This year, I have purchased nothing, nor do I have any plans to purchse anything, because of Amazon's willingness to abuse the patent system. Both the '1-click' and the 'associates' patents are trivial applications of cookie technology, and -- furthermore -- there is significant prior art. Until such a time as Amazon decides that these patents are, in fact, trivial, I'm boycotting amazon.com. I can only hope that Amazon has the foresight to clear this up before Christmas.

Andreas Schou


February 29, 2000

Amazon -- I was an avid customer. Last year, I purchased over two hundred dollars worth of merchandise from Amazon, both books and CDs. This year, I have purchased nothing, nor do I have any plans to purchse anything, because of Amazon's willingness to abuse the patent system. Both the '1-click' and the 'associates' patents are trivial applications of cookie technology, and -- furthermore -- there is significant prior art. Until such a time as Amazon decides that these patents are, in fact, trivial, I'm boycotting amazon.com. I can only hope that Amazon has the foresight to clear this up before Christmas.

Andreas Schou


February 29, 2000

The sad thing is, the one time I tried using 1-click, it broke my order. The one service I don't like or use is the same thing Amazon feel is their competetive advantage...

julian boot


February 29, 2000

Dear Jeff: I love to use Amazon.com as a wondrous source of information on books but your latest moves keep me from buying books from you. Is your business model in such serious trouble that you must seek to prevent others from applying what you perhaps refined but surely did not invent so as to hurt their businesses and do a disservice to the millions of web shoppers who will be hampered by your moves? Perhaps it is. Well it wouldn't be helped by your demanding patent protection. The hole you are digging wouldn't be filled with customers, only their shadows. You are smarter than this. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Diforio

Robert G. Diforio


February 29, 2000

I find your behavior regarding patents totally disgusting and completely unethical. Amazon.com will never see another dime of my money and be assured that I will strongly urge *everyone* I know to take their business elsewhere.

Debra Davis


February 29, 2000

bruce hafford


February 29, 2000

I can't help but think that everyone with any technical insight at Amazon knows just how ridiculous this patent is, and it's just a matter of hoping to slip one by the famously incompetent patent office Please reconsider - the world would be a lot better place with a little less litigation

Michael Hodson


February 29, 2000

Once hailed as visionary, now detested as a bully. Great job, Amazon!

Sean Underwood


February 29, 2000

As a computer professional who spends hundreds of dollars annually on books (primarily purchased on the web), I find your patents of 1-click shopping and Associate/Affiliate programs insulting. As long as you hold these patents, I will not purchase any materials from you, and I will advise others not to as well.

Brian Woodring


February 29, 2000

SLIME!!!

Gary Lee, a former Amazon customer


February 29, 2000

Jeff, I've been an Amazon customer from just about day one. Checking my records, I've spent over ũ,300 on books at Amazon in just the last 2 years. I like one-click technology, but as a software developer for 30 years, it just doesn't seem novel enough to warrant obtaining a patent. Being in the software industry and watching such patents be granted really ticks me off. If you don't nullify your one-click patent, I'll take my business to the two-, three-, four-, or whatever- clickers. Preventing others from using obvious processes must be stopped. Ron Britvich Chairman qKnow.com, Inc.

Ron Britvich


February 29, 2000

Not one penny more! Man of the year indeed.

Walt Savage


February 29, 2000

These patents smack more of greed than innovation. I'm very disappointed, because until now I was quite fond of amazon.com.

Chuck Miller


February 29, 2000

Stephen Elliott


February 29, 2000

fatbrain or borders for me.

Fred Burnette


February 29, 2000

I must admit that I find the patents offensive. There are better ways to compete than trying to force your competitors out of business. I think that Microsoft are learning that one.

George Smiley


February 29, 2000

Chrysta R. Collins


February 29, 2000

Some organizations obviously don't play well with others.

Joe Price


February 29, 2000

I hope Amazon wakes up soon.

Michael Connolly


February 29, 2000

This breaks my heart. I was an early Amazon fan. Mr. Bezos clearly has a duty to his shareholders but at the level of wealth Amazon represents, it is a duty secondary to that of helping keep the world sane. This patent is idiotic, and with his refusal to admit this Mr. Bezos is tossing his own honour out the window. I don't understand. Why be a billionare if it enslaves you to foolishness?

Par Winzell


February 29, 2000

Companies that abuse the patent system don't get my business.

Michael Schmitt


February 29, 2000

I am saddened to see Amazon stoop to the level of perfidious opportunism. This is a slap in the face of the hard-working men and women that have contributed to open standards and the Internet. Amazon used to be the "little guy," so give the little guy a break and withdraw this absurd patent claim! A quick check of my Amazon purchases shows that I have purchased close to 񘈨.00 worth of books over the past year. Many of these are O'Reilly books, which I am sure O'Reilly would be happy to sell to me directly. I can also get off my can and go to the nearest book store to purchase my books, or seek a Web retailer that is not so quick to litigate instead of compete. Consider this and please withdraw the patent claim. -Garve

Garve Hays


February 29, 2000

Trademark, maybe. Patent, never.

Jim Armstrong


February 29, 2000

Petri Maaninen


February 29, 2000

It is quite ridiculous to think that a basic and useful concept such as "one-click-shopping" cannot be used by other legitimate business entities. Its not a matter of 'inovation', but rather an effort used to capitalize on the growing market share. Jeff- I'm very dissappointed in this decision. Make the GPL community proud and Give It Up!

James W. Landon


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com's patent seems like something straight out of a Dilbert cartoon.

Alan Hecht


February 29, 2000

I find one-click technology something a chimp could have developed, find it repulsive that it is necessary for you (amazon.com) to patent it, and hope that you will realize this as such, give this patent a safe voyage to the trash, and begin finding internal methods that are better material for patents than this mediocre attempt at stifling competition.

Steve Spigarelli


February 29, 2000

This patent and your enforcement of it are ridiculous. There is significant prior art on this matter. To me, this seems just as silly as trying to patent air.

Alton Pouncey


February 29, 2000

As a long time customer and associate I am most pleased with your service but must protest your obvious abuse of the patent system. I hope you will reconsider the 1-click patent application.

Jeffrey Davis


February 29, 2000

Chris Shramko


February 29, 2000

Debra Luneau


February 29, 2000

Bobby Ray


February 29, 2000

Another route is to make this position known to sites that maintain their affiliate relationship with Amazon. It may not be enough to simply not buy through the affiliation. It will have a much greater impact if Amazon's own affiliates express that the patent has become a disqualifier for the very relationships that Amazon is trying to exploit.

Fred Fluke


February 29, 2000

I will no longer be an Amazon customer until this is resolved.

David Hastings


February 29, 2000

Aaron Ross


February 29, 2000

This patent and your enforcement of it are ridiculous. There is significant prior art on this matter. To me, this seems just as silly as trying to patent air.

Alton Pouncey


February 29, 2000

Regretably I must agree with the boycott of your site. Although your site provides a great service, your recent trival patents make supporting you very questionable.

James Carpenter


February 29, 2000

It is one thing to realise that the US Patents Office is willing to grant invalid patents and quite another to then hold everyone else over the barrel because of it. As an Australian I find this behavior of Amazon both offensive and disturbing. Wishing you much regulation and government involvement Jeff...

Angus McDonald


February 29, 2000

Any Internet technology which is selfishly hoarded will retard the growth of Web technology for everyone. Amazon has permanently lost another customer.

David Chu


February 29, 2000

Bernhard Damberger


February 29, 2000

Vincent M. Lee


February 29, 2000

I cannot believe how ridiculous these patents (and accompanying business practices) are. I am boycotting Amazon.com until these issues are satisfactorily resolved.

David Sharp


February 29, 2000

As a programmer for a struggling e-commerce company I have to say that it scares the crap out of me when I think that we could be buried by a lawsuit over code I wrote. And it pisses me off that the lawsuit could come from a site I used to patron. You can get brand awareness just from a trademark on "1 Click Checkout" (or whatever you want to call it), but a patent on trivial code that any newbie web programmer can reproduce is just plain mean spirited. I'll never work for you or any other company that handcuffs my collegues.

Scott Stults


February 29, 2000

I have nothing to add. Please do the right thing, Amazon. David Krieger

http://www.fqa.com/


February 29, 2000

What were you thinking Jeff?!?!

James Holobetz


February 29, 2000

Chris Ehly


February 29, 2000

Thank you Tim! I will stay more aware of new frivilous patents in the future!

Stephen Warloe


February 29, 2000

Armand MacMurray


February 29, 2000

Alexander Morgan


February 29, 2000

I think the 1-Click Shopping patent and the affiliates patent are ridiculous.

Andrew Sharp


February 29, 2000

This type of IP homesteading by taking advantage of the inadequacies of the US patent system is reprehensible by my lights. I strongly urge Amazon to rethink it's position.

Jareth Hein


February 29, 2000

I guess I'll be buying my books from sources other than Amazon.com from now on.

Gary J. Brooks


February 29, 2000

Such patents actually are non sense. They turn usefull protection of research into a tool of company to protect their positions at any price.

Thomas Morin


February 29, 2000

I have no trouble agreeing with the sentiment of this letter wholeheartedly.

Saul Goodman


February 29, 2000

I am a shareholder of Amazon.com. I understand that not enforcing these patents may decrease the stock price growth and my profits. I strongly believe that the way these patents are being used is an abuse of the patent system. Please use these patents differently (e.g., for swap agreements with other companies' absurdly granted patents), not for preventing other companies from incorporating obvious ideas. In the long term, doing something that is disliked by the public is more damaging to stock prices than the missed profits (just look at Philip Morris). As a CEO you have always been committed to the creation of shareholder value and you have done it masterfully. I hope that you won't miss this opportunity to prevent its destruction. Sincerely

Eusebio C Rufian-Zilbermann


February 29, 2000

As one of the thousands of "affiliates" who never seemed to bring in enough in the way of "commissions" to count, and as a programmer/analyst since 1962, I concur with the sentiments that you need to give back to those who built what you used. Trademark, possibly even copyright on the particular code, yes. Patent, hardly. Litigation, clueless, unworthy, stupid. Should you pursue litigation much further, may you meet the fate of others, consigned to the dung-heap of digital history.

Mary Rickman-Taylor


February 29, 2000

Tim O'Reilly's statement of the problem says it all.

Simon Cox


February 29, 2000

Nate Perkins


February 29, 2000

Barbara Irwin


February 29, 2000

Your patents reek of bad faith to the internet community that collectively allowed you to create the business you now enjoy. Worse yet, your patents will squash competition and stifle innovation. Please transfer your patents to the W3 organization and stop your downward spiral into a Microsoft-like way of doing business.

lou


February 29, 2000

Too bad Amazon.com thinks it can't make enough money serving customers, and have to turn to pattern litigations. I will boycott Amazon.com until their patent request is thrown out.

Erika Toth


February 29, 2000

I will buy nothing from Amazon, until Amazon drops this patent.

Duane Powell


February 29, 2000

Please do the right thing and withdraw this patent.

Barbara Irwin


February 29, 2000

It is time to boycott this outfit until they come out clean.

Mike S


February 29, 2000

There should be a similar petition to the US Patents office to avoid similar ridiculous patents being given.

Kim Covil


February 29, 2000

I think comments about the founders of the web really hit it right on the head, what if Tim B-L had decided to patent the web? We really would all be using AOL at this point ;-)

Rick Winfield


February 29, 2000

That you would even consider patenting such a trivial piece of functionality makes me sick. I'm a 20-year old college student, and I've written plenty of code which is much more marketable than the '1-click' joke that is so controversial. Let's get some morals, and let's get a clue.

Phil Schroeder


February 29, 2000

Obtaining a patent for "defensive purposes" is one thing, but to use such an obvious idea with many, many examples of prior art is taking advantage of the US's already flawed patent system and just downright low. Microsoft holds a patent on scrollbars, but you don't see _them_ suing anyone. Cut the crap and put these patents in the public domain.

Scott Noveck


February 29, 2000

Emma Story


February 29, 2000

I can only agree with this letter. Software patents are bad. Open standards is the way forward.

Jens Kolberg


February 29, 2000

Come on, give us a break. It's not the patent office's fault they don't understand software, but is it grown up to take advantage of them? The only point to these idiot patents is to make it an expensive court battle to get them thrown out. The only people that benefit from this are the lawyers. Let the lawyers "invent" things like air and water and sue each other; let the rest of us just get back to business.

Eric Hartwell


February 29, 2000

I work as a web manager and have ordered from Amazon 5 times in the past year. I appreciate the work they put into their site and system, but will not shop from them anymore if they insist on trying to patent obvious ideas.

Wayne Brill


February 29, 2000

I used to shop at Amazon for few years, and bought a lot, but disgusted with 1-Click patent I look to other places now. Go sell idiot-romances, I don't buy your stuff!

Piotr Muszynski


February 29, 2000

Amazon will never turn this around except by doing the right thing.

Lydia LaFleur


February 29, 2000

Amazon has already used the 1-click patent in an offensive manner to thwart competition on the web. An offensive move on Amazons part regarding associate/affiliate programs will deny millions of site owners with some much needed revenue. Until Amazon publicly announces what their intentions are with these silly patents I will take my business elsewhere and insure everyone I know gets that same recommendation. - NR P.S. I started tonight by buying some books from bn.com

Norman Ring


February 29, 2000

Sure smells like M$ !

Grant Lovaasen


February 29, 2000

Justin Sonnekalb


February 29, 2000

Ernie Miller


February 29, 2000

Previous customer, will remain so until you stop this silly patent action.

Tom Garland


February 29, 2000

FORMER customer!

Roger D. Shorney


February 29, 2000

Julia Riddlebarger


February 29, 2000

I've always used amazon.com out of convenience. I realize there's better, cheaper on-line book sellers out there, but amazon.com is good enough and cheap enough. Most importantly though, it's convenient because I've already established an account there. I dislike retyping my credit card info over and over, so I was willing to stick with amazon.com and pay the slightly higher prices. But this patent nonsense has finally driven me to the competitors. You may eventually give up the stupid patent fight, but the lower prices will keep me shopping elsewhere. I can safely guarantee I'll never be back to amazon.com.

Matt Arnold


February 29, 2000

I have spent Ŭ,000 on books this year and none of it went to amazon due to their behaviour. Fortunatly, there are other good book companies such as fatbrain.com. I have also noticed my friends doing the same thing, and some of them purchase more than me, especially if you consider DVD purchases! -keith humphreys

Keith Humphreys


February 29, 2000

Pierre Sarrazin


February 29, 2000

Kinda makes you want to get a patent for "Method and system for processing food and oxygen including reproduction and conscienceness". I wonder if the patent office would catch that one...

Rolf Campbell


February 29, 2000

Until amazon.com gives up these ridiculous patents and even more ridiculous lawsuits, I won't be buying from them.

Karen Birkner


February 29, 2000

I am offended by your actions - your patents, both on "one-click" and on the "affiliates" program are not likely to survive court challenge, but you have adopted the old IBM game of moving the conflict into the arena of litigation, where the deep pockets almost always win. It is a sad (and almost impossibly rapid) parallel to our society's decay from an entrepreneurial, risk-taking, reward-driven culture into a gaggle of litigators, ambulance-chasers, and bureaucrats. In your response to Tim O'Reilly you apparently agreed that software patents were invidious, but that 'this one is different' - I disagree: the only differnce is that you own this one. I hope Bill Gates (God help me - better yet, Xerox) can force you to pay a royalty on the term "click."

Dean Cardno


February 29, 2000

I am appalled by Amazon's patent strong-arming and believe it goes against everything that the internet has been and should be based on. Until Amazon stops being a technology bully, I will continue to shop at Borders and Barnes & Noble.

Victor Andersen


February 29, 2000

Paul Guertin


February 29, 2000

Tom Dolbilin


February 29, 2000

Come on fellas! Enough with patent wars. --An Amazon customer who will now move to fatbrain and OpAmp.

Noel H. Taylor


February 29, 2000

I don't believe it is a good idea to seek a patent for this.

Bryan Burke


February 29, 2000

Intentional impediment of technological progress. Absolutely disgusting.

Joshua Cohen


February 29, 2000

Nil Pointier


February 29, 2000

To whom it may concern: I have never nor will I ever shop from your web site as long as you hold and keep the patent on "associates programs" or "one click shopping". You have no right to patent an idea that was thought up before you ever entered the online market. This is greedy and will push more people away then it will promote. Why don't you come up with a brilliant and creative way to do business on a service that was provided well before you decided to place your piece of world on the information super highway, or better yet open up a few retail outlets and try getting a patent on cash registers, coffee bars, bathrooms, and shopping malls. Give it a rest

D Crawford


February 29, 2000

Who at Amazon is patent crazy? Open competition is what the free market system is all about and brings a healthy dose of reality to business. Someone at Amazon is definitely out of touch with reality and I hope it isn't Jeff Bezos. Of course, my business is (temporarily?) going to www.bookpool.com.

Christopher Cobb


February 29, 2000

I respected Amazon.com enough that I considered working there, and until today I was an extremely satisified customer. However, until Amazon ceases to act as a "net-parasite" I will take my business and my respect somewhere else. Don't be a net-parasite. par¸a¸site n. 1.Biology. An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host. 2. One who habitually takes advantage of the generosity of others without making any useful return. Tim Richey

Tim Richey


February 29, 2000

Michael Sayres


February 29, 2000

James Patten


February 29, 2000

I'd like to see Amazon go one step further: Not only repudiate their patent, but gather the evidence of previous art and hold a big PR conference _showing_ how the Patent Office has erred. Let Amazon use their influence with Washington state's legislators to have them sponsor a bill censoring the P-O and putting a hiatus on all software patents until they have demonstrated that their patent claim process has been corrected. Then, let the Patent Office review all SW patents granted in the last 5 years and revoke those that do not meet the new (i.e. correct) criteria. That is how Amazon can redeem itself in my eyes. I'm not holding my breath.

J. Cleverdon


February 29, 2000

I will be taking my business elsewhere in the future.

Robert George


February 29, 2000

Steven Jeffrey


February 29, 2000

Jackson Lancaster


February 29, 2000

Rather than RMS's boycott of Amazon, I'd like to see the publishers start holding their products back from Amazon. After all, it's their "intellectual property", isn't it?

Patrick Cotrona


February 29, 2000

It shouldn't have to be this way, but it seems like Amazon is banking on us choosing convenience over integrity - a poor bet, I believe.

Suzanne Palmer


February 29, 2000

This is like McDonald's getting a patent on pickles.

Fred Brunet


February 29, 2000

While I have been a very satisfied customer of Amazon.com, their behaviors concerning these patents have so offended me that I will be using competitors exclusively until these practices end. Donald

Donald Brown


February 29, 2000

Nick Jenkins


February 29, 2000

I would like to patent the letter M, as all three of my names start with it, and thus I have a right to it...exclusively. Geez. Honestly.

Marcin Mateusz Manek


February 29, 2000

Yet another former customer who will now be going to your competitors. I will specifically be giving all my business to those you litigate against, and strongly recommending the same tactic to my friends, employees and associates.

Richard Lane


February 29, 2000

Amazon.Com has built its business on technology that was intented to be open and non-proprietary. It is unfortunate that now that they have tasted success, they feel that it is their duty to raise the barriers to innovation and competition by enforcing patents such as this one. This action is wholly against the spirit and nature of the Internet economy, and if the only way to make Amazon realize this error is through a boycott, then I support that. Matt Welsh, UC Berkeley Computer Science Division

Matt Welsh


February 29, 2000

I have spent several thousand dollars at your website, but that has to cease as long as you persist in trying to take profit from other peoples' work and try to stifle competition. If you do not want Amazon to become the next Microsoft; maligned, hated, and ultimately brought down by arrogance, then you will stop trying to control web software. Sincerely, James Domenico

James P Domenico


February 29, 2000

I believe software patents in general are against the public good, and trivial abuses such as this are despicable. I will never trust Amazon with my business, since they have shown themselves to be entirely without ethics.

Dave McCracken


February 29, 2000

LAVAZAIS


February 29, 2000

Geoffrey Espin


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com is a company that will have no earnings in the foreseeable future. They understand that at some point the Internet Bubble will burst and they are looking to these silly patents to keep them afloat when the market looses its fascination with profitless companies.

Earl C.


February 29, 2000

David Dribin


February 29, 2000

I have spent thousands of dollars at amazon over the years and have since stopped entirely due their patenting philosophy. Could it be they are simply sore that their prices are some of the most expensive among online book stores? I agree categorically with Tim O'Reilly's letter as posted at: http://www.oreilly.com/ask_tim/amazon_patent.html

Carlos Smith


February 29, 2000

I placed an order at the Barnes & Noble website today and it was a great pleasure to buy from someone OTHER than Amazon. I have and will continue to urge friends and webmasters at sites with links to Amazon to join the boycot. Rich Brown

freemars.org


February 29, 2000

Huzzah and kudos to O'Reilly & Associates! I too eagerly await Amazon.com's reconsideration so that I may resume patronage of their services.

Reid Hekman


February 29, 2000

Without a doubt, the two "patents" in question are ludicrous and Bezos is acting in a destructive, arrogant, selfish manner. As head of Amazon.com he is responsible for whatever actions that company pursues. Using lawyereze in order to obtain a patent for something which, quite frankly, IS obvious and NOT novel is heinous. "Pissing in the well" is not accurate enough. "Pissing in your pants to keep your butt warm" is a better description. This is ripping the goose open to pull out the golden egg inside her and destroying the future of the entire medium. What's next? Will the Bezos mafia somehow use tricky words to get a "patent" on individual sequential numbers applied to pages so as to indicate accessing the information encoded within using a linear, programmed fashion? Will they somehow secure exclusive ownership of the word "a"? These "patents" are as stupid and assinine as the ones that cover transparent blinking cursurs and "windowing" of numbering systems. The patent system is designed to reward creativity and innovation, but NOT creativity and innovation in the wording of the applications to obtain the patents themselves. Is the Patent Office to blame for this? Partially. There's no question about that. That is no excuse for Amazon's behavior. This is as heinous as a bottled water distributor charging 贄 per gallon after an earthquake. There are other online media merchants who are honorable and responsible business owners. Jeff, I'll use your search engine to find what I want. I'll gladly use your resources to do my research. But you won't get one more penny from me.

Fred Thompson


February 29, 2000

another lost customer...

Gerard Jakits


February 29, 2000

Property is theft. I'd be surprised if Amazon doesn't patent the World Wide Web next!

Sergey Goldgaber


February 29, 2000

I will no longer buy anything from Amazon, and will instead seek their direct competitors, until Amazon publicly backs off their ludicrous patent claims. I'm sure they have other "brilliant" patents that will have been foolishly granted them in the future.

V Jaswal


February 29, 2000

Scott A. Colcord


February 29, 2000

๯,000 -- that's approximately how much money the 210 engineers in my business unit spent on books last year, and almost of all of that was spent with Amazon. We have always had a corporate policy that allows engineers to buy any book they think is useful and be reimbursed, no questions asked. However, I 've instituted a new policy which states that nobody in my unit will be reimbursed for a purchase from Amazon. They are of course free to buy books from Amazon, but if they want to be reimbursed, they must buy from another vendor. Amazon's offensive use of trivial patents is simply unconscionable. I have come to regard Amazon as the worst kind of parasite, and a danger to the Internet. I would be happy to have Amazon change my mind by taking the obvious, moral steps of acknowledging their mistakes and making a commitment to be a better citizen, so that I and my colleagues can return to shopping at Amazon.

Paul Striver


February 29, 2000

I do not plan on doing business with Amazon until they drop this frivolous action with the 1-click patent.

Daniel Simon


February 29, 2000

Not only will I not purchase anything from Amazon, but I will no longer refer 'net newbies to the site. I will in fact be sending people to this page to read the letter and add their names, and suggesting other companies they can take their business to instead. How long will it take for Amazon to see the light?

Ian Hobday


February 29, 2000

Yet another reason to be glad there's a Richard Stallman! Color me one more boycotter. Actually, I'm getting to prefer the competition more and more. I find I'm not having to consciously boycott--I just go elsewhere. And like it. In a business where perception is almost everything, it doesn't make sense to make yourself look nasty.

Stan Johnson


February 29, 2000

Yet another reason to be glad there's a Richard Stallman! Color me one more boycotter. Actually, I'm getting to prefer the competition more and more. I find I'm not having to consciously boycott--I just go elsewhere. And like it. In a business where perception is almost everything, it doesn't make sense to make yourself look nasty.

Stan Johnson


February 29, 2000

Corporations need to compete by competing, not using their army of lawyers.

Steve Payne


February 29, 2000

Back in June 1997, I placed my first order with Amazon.com. Since that time I have placed (somewhat to my surprise upon review) 38 additional orders. I visit the site at least once a week just to see what's new. I am deeply disappointed that a company as innovative as Amazon.com has recently patented two very useful but hardly unique techniques that facilitate e-commerce. The decision to patent the One-Click Ordering and Associates program rejects the pioneering spirit of the Internet that has made it possible for Amazon.com to become the large company it is today. Amazon.com has been the beneficiary for years due to the open nature of the Internet, freely shared ideas that have not reduced their value to a specific individual or company. Even as I browse your site today, I can see many elements that evolved over time, and in many cases, are direct implementations of ideas one finds on other web sites. Had the U.S. Patent Office been more aware of what existed before Amazon.com, plenty of "prior art" could have certainly been found. I can only imagine your drive across the U.S., as the oft-told story relates, when the you made the decision to start Amazon.com. I cannot believe that at that time the idea of using litigation to force out other players in the market was a part of your business plan. Customers return for the continued quality of service from a company that for many people was their first online purchasing experience. Your actions make Amazon.com look like a bully and it sends a negative message to your customers. Certainly, a business has a right to own certain types of intellectual property, but as you well know our existing patent laws don't easily translate into the new economy. Abusing patents in this way only manages to make megacompanies like Barnes and Noble look like a poor, trod-upon Mom & Pop bookseller. Amazon.com hasn't been a competitor on price for a long time and the approach of patenting the very ideas at the core of many internet businesses will do nothing but cause many of your regular customers to look for more "respectable" e-tailers. I strongly urge you to reconsider your position on these two patents and to quickly issue a statement to the world saying, "this was a dumb idea and we apologize" before you lose thousands of your regular customers, including myself. Sincerely, William N. Overall P.S. Thanks for the yearly coffee mugs.

William Overall


February 29, 2000

The #1 reason I went to Amazon is that local independent bookstores did not have many ORA books. It seems that trying to enforce this patent will hurt Amazon more than Barnes and Noble or anyone else. Especially since discussions of this issue always include recommendations of other online booksellers. I had already decided that alibris.com was better for out-of-print books, but I would have automatically kept going to amazon for new books. It's a nicely put together site. Mr. Bezos--So many stupid `jokes' "I'm going to patent ____" are your fault. (Unfortunately not all of them.) Stop the madness. Take O'Reilly's offer of advice on how to recover some good will.

Steven Schmidt


February 29, 2000

The spirit that created and developed the Internet is attacked head-on by this venal action of Amazon's. "Of those to whom much is given, much is expected." Amazon should serve as a constructive and positive example to others in e-business. If they chose to, they could show us (as have a number of other large companies) that it is indeed possible to be both ethical and profitable. Until then I won't buy any more from them.

Murray Loew


February 29, 2000

I can't sum it up better than Tim did. Suffice it to say that I have not, and will not order anything from Amazon.com until you see the error of your ways. I buy quite a few books, and have recently placed orders with Barnes & Nobel and Bookpool. I have also been telling anyone that I know that uses the Web to place orders not to order from Amazon. I also used to be an Amazon associate, but I have since removed my website.

Douglas E. Miles


February 29, 2000

Kevin A Rahilly


February 29, 2000

Khalyl Khan


February 29, 2000

One characteristic of the human mind that is key to the success of our specie is the ability to rationalize anything at all when doing so suits us. The success of individual amongst us, though, lies in knowing when not to. Jeff, it's time to withdraw the patents not only on 1-Click and affiliate programs, but database queries and partial data exposure, too. That, or prove my first two sentences right by doing things the hard way.

Art Sackett


February 29, 2000

I am disgusted with Amazon's abuse of the dim-witted patent system. It is outrageous that the Patent Office allowed this trivial "invention".

William B. Brogden


February 29, 2000

Wen-Chun Ni


February 29, 2000

I am appalled at amazon.com's blatant disregard for what is right and good for the internet as a whole.

Neil Halelamien


February 29, 2000

Jeff Bezos and company at Amazon are showing a remarkable amount of short-sightedness and arrogance. I am proud to be counted among the many who won't be patronizing amazon.com any time in the foreseeable future.

O'Shaughnessy Evans


February 29, 2000

Amazon's action is primitively human selfishness and greed - causing conflicts to the world. Who wants to pay to see people playing dirty tricks to rival in a competition supposed to be fair. - Sydney, Australia

Paul Chau


February 29, 2000

Amazon's attempts to patent a simple idea as intellectual property is ironic given that its market position comes from user's willingness to share their own intellectual property as 'reader reviews'.

Mia Ridge


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com's selfish actions are exactly what is needed to kill the world wide web.

David Raeman


February 29, 2000

How arrogant. Former customer until Bezos comes to his senses on these patents.

Jim Swegle


February 29, 2000

I've stopped ordering from Amazon.com and hope everyone else will do the same. Screw them.

Gregg Cercy


February 29, 2000

Amazon's attempts to patent a simple idea as intellectual property is ironic given that its market position comes from user's willingness to share their own intellectual property as 'reader reviews'.

Mia Ridge


February 29, 2000

I have spent hundreds of dollars at Amazon over the past few years. Overall, I have to say I was pretty happy with my shopping experiance. Decent prices and good service. I have to say I was greatly disappointed in Amazon with not only their patenting of the use of 1-click purchasing, but their attack against B&N. I personally never used 1-click and apparently I will now never again have the opportunity as I will be taking my business elsewhere. I have also started telling all my friends and co-workers to avoid Amazon specifically because of this. From their feedback, it appears that I am not the only one who feels this way. It would appear that B&N is going to start getting a lot more of my business.

Aaron Turner


February 29, 2000

Damn shame - I've got all these books in my wish list on Amazon that I'll now have to chase up elsewhere.

Chris Betts


February 29, 2000

Amazon offers good products for good prices, but I cannot knowingly support a company with such poor business practices. They're taking someone else's contributions and declaring them their own, with no regard to the creators of the technology, or the effects of their actions on the web as a whole.

Curt Merrill


February 29, 2000

John Kodumal


February 29, 2000

I do not agree with Amazon, they should relent in there pursuit of domination. Where will it end?Are they going to say soon they *invented* selling books on the web and request another *patent*?! Damn! I just bought a couple of books there(including 3 O'Reilly books). The sad part is I really like Amazon, a great company, Why can't they see the writing on the WALL????

Christopher J Connell


February 29, 2000

Angry and disappointed, but not surprised.

Geoffrey King


February 29, 2000

This is a vital issue that must be addressed at once. Thank you, Tim, for bringing this issue to a broader audience.

Nicholas Noe


February 29, 2000

Might I suggest class action, voluntarily funded, against Amazon, or more correctly, the patent office, for damages arising from the grating of patents on such trivial processes. Perhaps if the "public" won one against the patent office itself, it might be more reticent in granting unsupportable patents in the future. Fight fire with fire. There are more of us than them.

P. Hornby


February 29, 2000

Dear Amazon, It's a COOKIE. Did you invent the cookie? No. Have many others been using cookies just like this for years? Yes. And you have the right to patent this because ________________. That's what I thought. Please give this up.

Matt Dukes


February 29, 2000

This patent, along with many others should never have been granted. It just goes to show that the patent office has no clue when it comes to software.

Michael Hermann


February 29, 2000

Okay, Jeff, you've got the patent, now use your position as a patent holder to argue AGAINST the right to hold this kind of patent. It's time to stop "shrinking the government" and INVEST the kind of money we need to into the Patent Office's research arm so that they won't be out of their depth in cases like these. The people at the Patent Office are only human and there are only so many hours in the day. They need more hands on deck and more specialists. Mr. Bezos, you have the visibility to make your voice heard on this issue. I don't. Protect the brand.

Cassady


February 29, 2000

I hold out hope, as an Amazon.com shareholder, that Amazon will follow eToys.com's example and drop this suit before any more harm is done either to the openness of web technology or to the reputation of Amazon.com.

Michael Pohl


February 29, 2000

I thought Al Gore already patented the entire internet! Come on Amazon, don't try to enforce ridiculous patents. I am certainly boycotting Amazon and am encouraging everone I come in contact with to do the same, until such time as Amazon clarifies its intent. Amazon, are you attempting to own technologies that were not even your innovations? Are you attempting to hinder the growth of the internet? Since Amazon is an internet company, it amazes me that it would act in a way which is so damaging to the internet and what it stands for. Luckily Amazon hasn't patented the whole concept of e-commerce, so I'm more than happy to use Amazon's competition.

Wes Bateman


February 29, 2000

Bravo Tim. About time somebody stood up to the software patent thugs. To Amazon. Big mistake. You look like cheats and standover men.

Luke Webber


February 29, 2000

Eric Tapley


February 29, 2000

Open access and the free flow of information and ideas is the bellweather of the internet. People like you are the ones that will try and choke the life out of it for your own personal gain. I won't buy from Amazon again even if you do give up on your ludicrous plan to patent everything you can think of. And I'm telling everyone I know! IMO you are trying to be an internet dictator, and the only way to stop control freaks like you is to boycott your site.

John Peters


February 29, 2000

I have been a customer of Amazon for a few years, but I refuse to support their patent enforcement, and thus, I add my voice to those who are outraged at Amazon's business practices.

Christopher Kira


February 29, 2000

CAN YOU SPELL DDOS, KNOCK IT OFF, WHY ARE YOU TURNING INTO MICROSOFT. GET SMART, STOP THIS DUMB ASS PATENT STUFF NOW..!!!

DANIEL J. COHEN, PH.D.


February 29, 2000

Matthew Ryan


February 29, 2000

J. Gareth Williams


February 29, 2000

Israel Andrews


February 29, 2000

The one-click technology I'll be availing myself of on future Amazon.com visits is the Back button, 'cause I'll most certainly wish to back out of whatever blind alley led me thither. As long as Amazon insists on dragging the coercive power of the government into its stable of core business technologies, its customers should start paying excise taxes and start warming to the cozy relationship Amazon is striking up with the

government in the e-commerce sphere


February 29, 2000

It is with great disappointment that I sign this open letter. I have been an Amazon.com customer and cheerleader for many years now. I have bought thousands of dollars of books for my business and for my pleasure reading. I have referred to Amazon.com's customer service excellence and business model as examples of what my clients should be striving for on their own sites. I have closed my account on Amazon.com today. I will no longer purchase from them or use their success as an example of Web marketing excellence. I will now unhappily order from their competitors. Here's hoping they come to their sense and put an end to the frivolous use of patent law inadequacies so I can return to being an Amazon.com customer.

Vikki A. Donnelly


February 29, 2000

This is just another example of how technology and lawyers don't mix.

Charles R Hamilton Jr


February 29, 2000

I have ordered from Amazon in the past, but I do not intend to order from Amazon again until it stops filing for and attempting to enforce these absurd "patents".

Allen Bell


February 29, 2000

These patents simply don't make sense! As a fellow publisher (Top Floor Publishing --> topfloor.com), I'm happy to add my name to Tim's open letter.

Peter Kent


February 29, 2000

*sigh* More legal retardation on the internet...

Eric Skramstad


February 29, 2000

Matthew Crawford


February 29, 2000

Very well put Tim. I wil be quite happy to take my business elsewhere. It tureuly sadens me to see so much effort wasted trying to steal a few more dollars profit from honest work done by others.

Alfred Rizzi


February 29, 2000

Mikko Parviainen


February 29, 2000

Recently, I received a certificate for บ, asking why I haven't ordered anything new from Amazon lately. This is the reason why. You have nothing to lose, and everything to gain. Be the better man- do the right thing for everybody- now, and in the future.

Nicolas "Doc" Lindgren


February 29, 2000

I can't believe that a company would try and do such a thing.

Justin "Jaygray" Grant


February 29, 2000

I can by my books elsewhere.

Maarten Almquist


February 29, 2000

I've never bought from Amazon ... now I'm sure I never will. Some people, however, may be placated if you rescind this ill advised policy.

Steve Donachie


February 29, 2000

Tim, Thanks for the word on the Amazon patent and a site to post on. I, and I am sure others, appreciate it! There are too many places to buy books from, so Amazon is off my list. Two clicks is not too much. John Nicholas

John Nicholas


February 29, 2000

It is truly amazing to imagine that a company which has invested so much in public relations by wrapping it up in a big goofy pokemon doll, naming it jeffbezos, rolling it out in front of any camera that will point at it and hoping for the best, has made such a onerous misstep as trying to robber-baron e-commerce with offensive patents. Recant!

Todd Lyons


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Consider strongly where Amazon would be today had other companies chosen to use the patent system as you have. If the first company to use the Internet to collect order information had patented the concept, which they could have given the fact that it was a new idea, Amazon would not be able to use the Internet for selling anything. If the first company to use the Internet for person to person auctions had patented the concept Amazon Auctions would not exist. Think real hard about what the past could have held and what the future may hold. Until you do, you will not receive any more orders from my family or business. Rip Linton

Rip Linton


February 29, 2000

Seems to me Amazon.com stands to lose more than just the good will of those opposed to Amazon's one-click patent. Amazon.com stands to lose hard cash dollars on book and merchantdise sales. I wonder how comfortable investors will feel about losing so many customes? I wonder how many other customers Amazon.com will lose due to a lack of recomendation from those that signed this petition?Customer loyalty is difficult to come by why would Amazon do something that would alienate so many customers? Does Amazon want to post their biggest loss for a quarter yet? Just a few things to think about! Mark J Roley

Mark Roley


February 29, 2000

When I heard about the original patent I was very surprised. I ceased shopping at Amazon. Now I am very concerned, and will increase my efforts to persuade others to shop elsewhere. I have spent close to 񘈨 online for books since I heard about the patent, none of it at Amazon.

Steven T Forster


February 29, 2000

I have to ad my voice to those other voices of protest. This patent is patently rediculous, and I strong urge Amazon to patent it's rediculousness, as THAT would truly be unique. I've already sent Amazon notice of my concerns, so this can't be news to you. I can't believe Amazon would undermine the very foundations upon which it's built. I truly hope they will see the error in their ways. I haven't shopped at Amazon since Christmas, and I can tell you I've been impressed with my alternatives. I urge others to look elsewhere for online purchasing, as their are some excellent alternatives.

Christopher Smith


February 29, 2000

I have shopped Amazon in the past because of the services offered. However, I find offensive use of trivial patents repugnant. I would much rather click multiple times at competitive sites. There are simply too many alternatives to find goods and services to bother supporting a business that seeks to control technology. Your strength is in service delivery, not in control of proprietary interfaces.

Hugh Daschbach


February 29, 2000

I find your applying for and enforcing the one-click patent to be reprehensible. You are profiting freely off the innovations of others (the Internet, the web, etc) yet are preventing others from using "your" technology in turn. You are trying to have your cake and eat it too. In addition, there appears to be plenty of prior art, so it isn't even rightfully yours, even though the patent office was apparently mislead into granting this patent. This seems an awful lot like stealing people's rights to use technologies they developed or others developed for their free use. I will not purchase anything at amazon.com in the future.

Frank T. Lofaro Jr.


February 29, 2000

It's so interesting, and disappointing, to see Amazon pull this kind of stuff. You've managed to morph yourselves from a company that had a exhibited a certain degree of innovation, forward thinking, and good taste into the exact opposite. You're still traveling at light-speed but you're just as apparently headed in the wrong direction. I think of the many well expressed points in Tim's letter, the one that strikes home hardest is the fact that the technologies that Amazon was founded on were created by true innovators and were offered to us all as a gift. These attempts to enforce wrong-headed patents make it clear that Amazon's nature is fundamentally different; that is, self-serving to the point of blindness. Hopefully the boycott's effects will be measurable.

Michael Simcich


February 29, 2000

Yet another lost customer. Too bad since I bought many books from them and also software and games. Perhaps someone could alert Amazon's institutional stockholders about the ill-will senior management's decision on patents is creating with customers. Wall Street has not been happy with Amazon's continuing money drain. I can't imagine they'd be cheered to see customers spreading the word to avoid a company they're invested in.

Dana Fletcher


February 29, 2000

The granting of patents on processes of these types will stifle this industry.

Clarence Jeandrevin


February 29, 2000

Jacob Rome


February 29, 2000

Another former Amazon customer ... waiting until Amazon comes to its senses so I can shop there again. In the meantime I am enjoying exploring the many other fine retailers.

Jonathan Mark


February 29, 2000

Tim's letter is the most eloquent exposition on the matter that I've read to date. He covers all the bases. We are living in a truly precarious time in the history of software. These decisions will affect us all for decades--for better or worse. I think the inventors of cookies at Netscape actually hold substantial prior art, as the so-called 1-Click feature is exactly the type of implementation they had in mind. They should have acquired a patent just to fend off this sort of nonsense. If you want to get right down to it, Tim Berners-Lee is the inventor of the original 1-click feature--they're called anchors. Prior art abounds.

Todd Lucas


February 29, 2000

Amazon was the first Web vendor from whom I made a purchase, and I have always been pleased with the quality of that service. Nonetheless, I have not placed an order with Amazon since learning of the decision to patent the "1-Click" Technology, and I will not purchase from Amazon again unless it changes its policy. I agree with Tim O'Reilly's comments about 1-Click being based on prior art. I am even more outraged with Amazon's patent of the "Affiliates" feature, for the same reason. If Amazon needs a monopoly upon the uses of Web technology and design that has made it the premier bookseller on the Internet, it has already failed. I hope Amazon will rethink its strategy.

Catherine Olanich Raymond


February 29, 2000

Dear Jeff, Maintain the Customer Service ethos which the current ordering system is about (plain and simple) without the Marketing Hype/Anti Competitive undertones of this patent. This technology is just an old dog your trying to reposition for commercial advantage as a new trick.

Leonard Hannaby


February 29, 2000

It seems that "big business" will never learn. The Web is soooo large, and yet one company thinks they can dominate. Listen to the people and rescind this stupid patent nonsense. A trademark is sufficient, there is no need to be arrogant and file legal motions. Sounds to me like JB is cutting off his nose to spite his face. Grow up and realize that attempts to stifle the Web are lidicrous. And I hate to mention this, but pulling stunts like this makes Amazon a huge target for all of the script-kiddies and haxors. Dont give them any more reason to behave like juveniles. BTW, B&N just gained another customer (and they even make a profit once in awhile...)

Craig Rockwell


February 29, 2000

Amazon.com's aggressive nature in pursuing these frivolous patents is truly saddening. I too am yet another lost customer. Will I come back if they change this erroneous course? Probably not.

Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.


February 29, 2000

As a young child I was taught the difference between right and wrong. It just never ceases to amaze me that a little money will throw everyone's values right out the window.

Jay Packer


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Your actions are a perfect example of greed in operation. Please stop being adolescent; keep the playing field level and compete on merit. Scared someone else will do it better? Your current attitude makes you your own worst enemy. Unload your gun and I will shop your site again. Until then, you've lost a customer and a lot of good will.

Bryan Stalcup


February 29, 2000

As a once loyal customer of Amazon.com, the patenting of 1-Click has forced me to reassess my loyalties and turn to other sites to purchase goods that I would have otherwise bought at Amazon.

Dion Detterer


February 29, 2000

I firmly believe in keeping the internet as wide open as possible because it gives the world a chance to operate and explore a new paradigm which is badly needed. Closing it down in any way at this stage would be a great loss.

Christina O'Reilly


February 29, 2000

Tim Hutchings


February 29, 2000

Dear Amazonians, Given the information in a clear and concise manner, it is now your job to do the right thing. -Andrew

Andrew Scott


February 29, 2000

Wow.....Amazon, you were once the business on the web to look up to, and now in many people's eyes you have fallen to even greater depths of hubris and insanity than even the great devil of software, quite obviously Microsoft. To patent something that has been in use so widely by so many, and to claim that you invented such a trivial thing is just greedy and arrogant. Time to head over to Barnes & Nobles....

Kerry Kopp


February 29, 2000

comment peut-on lier une id‰e, une pens‰e, un concepte???

franck dassonville


February 29, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Apparently your attorneys and legal advisors want to set up a company where they file frivolous patents unrelated to the business their employer is involved in. You are a bookseller. You sell books. You do not obtain patents, it is not related to your primary order of business. On this basis alone the U. S. Patent Office should revoke these questionable patents in perpetuity and declare them free and in the public domain. Your stockholders who have previously stated their intent in this letter would be wise to file a request of "Notice to Stockholders" with your firm's Office of Stockholder affairs to have an emergency meeting of stockholders, as it would be in the stockholders' best interests to have you removed from your position. As you direct your firm with a somewhat questionable ethos, I have intructed our web designer to remove all affiliate links to your site effective immediately.

Rob Schlesinger


February 29, 2000

You're standing on the shoulders of giants and taking all the credit for your height--I can buy all the books I need online from FatBrain.com and others (and probably will...)

Daniel Dooher


February 29, 2000

I have been able to count on O'Reilly books for education now it seems I can count on Tim O'Reilly to stand up for what is right. Thank you and keep the great books coming!

Robert Barrios


February 29, 2000

Chris Carson


February 29, 2000

Eric Combes


February 29, 2000

One word to amazon.de: I will buy "TCP-IP Network Administration" at buecher.de, give your parent a wake-up call!

Kurt Bremser


February 29, 2000

thomas crispin


February 29, 2000

In the past I have purchased several books from Amazon.com and maybe it's time to buy from someone that doesn't use unscrupulous business tatics.


February 29, 2000

Christopher Wee, PhD


February 29, 2000

Kendra Crispin


February 29, 2000

Jo Evelyn Egger


February 29, 2000

Amazon executives shamelessly collude to misappropriate a basic component of the Web, their patent attorneys shamelessly aid and abet the process and our so-called servants at the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office shamelessly neglect to perform the job for which we pay them. This is ethical terpitude that deals a severe blow to the open-mindedness that forms the core of the Internet. Please publicly desist from this folly. Doing so will provide an example that should give pause to others of similar mind.

Dick Gingras


February 29, 2000

Nathan Yowell


February 29, 2000

Michael Imhoff


February 29, 2000

Stop fooling yourself, it's for your own good.

Laurent Martelli


February 29, 2000

The one-click patent enforcement by Amazon the single best thing that ever happened to barnesandnoble.com

Rebecca Rachmany


February 29, 2000

Please think about what amazon.com is doing. The internet is not made to be patented neither are ways of e-commerce or web pages. Has anyone patented hyperlinks? Think what the internet had brought u and what u want to take from it. The right for people to improve

Harry Pahayan


February 29, 2000

Charles Martin


February 29, 2000

Until Amazon.com relinquishes it's spurious patents on '1-click' and 'affiliate' programs, I will not shop there. I will also inform others of the nature of Amazon's actions and persuade them to purchase elsewhere whenever possible.

David Snow


February 29, 2000

Yves BAILLY


February 29, 2000

Amazon: Not a good thing, change the course and the infinity of what the web is will maintain. Forbid that the web should EVER be finite as this action would cause.

DD Rivera


February 29, 2000

I too am no longer going to be buying books from Amazon - as a Software Engineer I have an on-going need for technical books, however from this point on I will be obtaining them from suppliers other than Amazon.

David Buddrige


February 29, 2000

Hank Bromley


February 29, 2000

Brett Payne-Rhodes


February 29, 2000

Jason Preszler


February 29, 2000

Say hello to a new Fatbrain and Barnes & Noble customer. I was a loyal Amazon customer (񘕈 over 3 years) but no longer. -earl-

earl Hathaway


February 29, 2000

Amazon, be ashamed.

Mike Yriart


February 29, 2000

Hamish Pearcy


February 29, 2000

James McCullough


February 29, 2000

Please reconsider your stance; do not enforce the patent.

j lenskes


February 29, 2000

Patenting concepts and symbolic languages are dangerous precedents in a society who's health is dependent upon the free exchange of ideas.

thaddaeus brophy


February 29, 2000

Bezos' company has not made a cent yet, and probably never will judging by his egregious behaviour.

Reinis Kanders


February 29, 2000

Calls for a boycott are so prevalent on the Internet today that I haven't really looked into the issues around Amazon. I probably should have. When a respected publisher like Tim makes a stand such as this, people listen. I suspect that some of the earliest and staunchest customers of Amazon are technologists, many of whom buy Tim's books and respect his opinions. Let me add my support to Tim-- I want to see Amazon returning to its days of pioneering on the Internet, not holding it back. It's not too late to do what is right.

Steve Bonds


February 29, 2000

Tom Buckles


February 29, 2000

Don't just voice your opinion. If you want Amazon to take notice, withhold your dollars from them.

Edward Elliott


February 29, 2000

Aaron Goldstein


February 29, 2000

Such opportunistic use of patent laws is a disappointing action on Amazon.comÆs behalf.

Alberto Garcia


February 29, 2000

This patent seems destined to garner little more than bad press and ill will. Such an ill-advised strategy makes one wonder if Amazon has lost touch with the market that made them successful... a development that should worry any investor.

Barry Baker


February 29, 2000

M.-A. DARCHE


February 29, 2000

Daniel E. Williams


February 29, 2000

Laurent Mathieu


February 29, 2000

Come on Amazon! You know this "patent" is only going to hurt you. Bite the bullet and admit it was a mistake.

Travis Bell


February 29, 2000

Emmanuel Gilmont


February 29, 2000

Bryan Dumm


February 29, 2000

What comes to mind when I think of Amazon.com? Misleading customers by secretly accepting money from publishers in exchange for high profile book placements; questioning opponents' sexual orientation while they are on the witness stand in a desperate attempt to win a recent lawsuit; and repeatedly abusing the United States Patent Office by wielding it as a billy club against your competition. Gosh, way to go, Jeffey! No reason to let a little thing like integrity stand between you and Time's Man of the Year award. Needless to say, I have stopped shopping with Amazon.com. I urge everyone on the planet to join the boycott.

Robert Marsh


February 29, 2000

Mike Snoderly


February 29, 2000

How sad and petty of Amazon. I will be spending the week scrubbing my machines of Amazon cookies and getting rid of affiliates links of theirs on my sites.

Karen Ellington


March 1, 2000

I have unsed the internet for quite a while, but never shopped at Amazon.com, and now I was thinking about trying, but then I hear about you getting the patents for those obvious techniques, so now I³ll stick to my old book seller www.bokus.com ! Sincerly, M…rten Seiplax, Finland

M…rten Seiplax


March 1, 2000

I'll think twice before I place my next order to Amazon and maybe I'll click once somewhere else !!!

Paul Tait


March 1, 2000

I will not be shopping there until these patents are taken off! All affiliate links will be taken down today too...

Ryan DeLuca


March 1, 2000

No comment

Fabien Gaujour


March 1, 2000

Guess I'll have to try Barnes & Noble on the web now.

Richard McLane


March 1, 2000

Andreas Sikkema


March 1, 2000

Time to use services from another company! What a shame!

Vivien Malerba


March 1, 2000

Maarten 't Hooft


March 1, 2000

Amazon appear to be trying to build their own evil empire on the net. I have joined the boycott and bookmarked www.noamazon.com for my e-shopping. Already I've made purchases from DVDExpress and BooksAMillion rather than Amazon even when Amazon had the best price.

Kevin Colville


March 1, 2000

My wife and I in the past have purchased frequently from Amazon. We like your prices, and your act is generally together. Your customer service, on the rare occasion where there was any problem, was superb. However, we may have to re-evaluate are loyalty to your company in light of the attempt to patent one-click, and the affiliate program. Both were, in our view, obvious to anyone with knowlege of state of the art. Your company can compete successfully on quality and service. You don't need to attempt to stifle competition with inappropriate patents. Actions such as these are the trademarks of losers, not winners. "If you can't compete, litigate" they say. Sorry to see you apparently in that camp. Sincerely,

John Andrews


March 1, 2000

I used to buy all my books in Amazon but since the 1-click patent was enforced I stop buying products. I know go to fatbrain for all my book needs. Please I would like to be a customer again... don't enforce those stupid patents. I'm a programmer in case you wonder.

Jose Pena


March 1, 2000

Honte € Amazon

Stephane Coste


March 1, 2000

Amazon is the bis echelon and the bis M$ Fuck this Knacker

knacker


March 1, 2000

A relative asked me what I wanted for my birthday. I told her an Amazon.com gift certificate. The next day, I heard about your ridiculous patent on 1-click, and I called her up. Thankfully, she hadn't purchased that gift certificate yet. I asked her to get me a gift certificate to Barnesandnoble.com. She did.

David Blood


March 1, 2000

I have worked on projects with the Internet since before it became commercialized. Amazon.com was one of the first signs of a bright future for the Internet. However, with the realization that the sharing of ideas (as well as source code) as one of the reasons the Internet took off in the first place, I feel that patents on obvious inventions will be detremental to future development of the Internet. O'Reilly echos my concerns and I hope that Amazon agrees not to enforce their obvious patents.

Terence Haddock


March 1, 2000

This is why I have a ongoing boycot of Amazon.com. Just last week I bought from Barnes and noble instead of Amazon even though their prices were the same.

Steven Martin


March 1, 2000

Mark Jones


March 1, 2000

Get real Amazon, whats next patenting the GUI?

Morten Andreasen


March 1, 2000

Amazon just lost another customer. Even if they have given great service and prices in the past one must take a stand against stupidity.

Anders Carlsson, Sweden


March 1, 2000

I've bought many books from Amazon. This one click patent is silly. Please don't make matters worse by trying to enforce it. Better yet, publically announce that you aren't going to enforce it, and we can all go on with our lives.

David Rolston


March 1, 2000

Robert Shiels


March 1, 2000

Although a fan and a regular customer of Amazon I share O'Reilly misgivings about the patents awarded to Amazon. Especially the 1-click ordering patent is, apart from its obviousness, potentially damaging to anyone writing session based or repeat-vistor recognizing applications for the web.

Bela Mulder


March 1, 2000

Andrew Watts


March 1, 2000

Juha Meriluoto


March 1, 2000

Shooting their own foot. I will happily click twice to buy a book. Somewhere else. Is someone counting the lost customers?

Sjon Svenson


March 1, 2000

I admire your desire to create shareholder value but in the end you actually harm the company because you look bad in the eyes of the public and essentially make a fool of yourself and make a mockery of the spirit of the Internet. In other words... you're a freaking idiot, man!

Dan Sherman


March 1, 2000

Hi I share the views on the Amazon patents, that Tim has pointed out. I have bought a great deal of books from Amazon (before the stupid patents), but I have sworn to myself, that as long as you uphold the patents, you'll never get a single dime from me!!! Niels J. Hansen (Denmark)

Niels Hansen


March 1, 2000

Simon Fowler


March 1, 2000

Benjamin Menjivar


March 1, 2000

Anything that propagates money over thought is inherently bad for society.

Jason Soares


March 1, 2000

Tim West


March 1, 2000

Vincent Propice


March 1, 2000

Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. sheesh. A gander at netcraft (http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.amazon.com) reveals that amazon runs apache. Apache, almost the epitome of free-software. created by 8 guys w/ nothing better to do than make a kick-ass web server and give it to the world. Now Bezos, still punch drunk off his man of the year (dear lord how did that happen?) not only bites the hand, but tries to take off everything up to and including somewhere near the shoulder blade (on both arms!). what are we ("we" in a general sense) coming to here?? Absolute power corrupts absolutely -(i think my dad claimed this one...) -Peter

Peter Moody


March 1, 2000

This is a very shocking situation. However Amazon are now so desperate to make a profit that they will stop at nothing to ensure that finally their share holders were not wrong. This patent isn't designed to show how clever they are but simply a marketing ploy designed to drive their competitors off the internet. It is a restrictive practice!

Rik Kershaw-Moore


March 1, 2000

What goes around, comes around.. Beware Amazon or some one might give you a taste of your own medicine.

Henrik Nielsen (Denmark)


March 1, 2000

Gwenael Piaser


March 1, 2000

Wake up Amazone! As a web programmer, I just can't believe what you are doing!

RICHARD JOO


March 1, 2000

Can you take out a patent on a mathematical proof on paper - an algorithm ? how about a piece of source code ?

Niels Thomsen


March 1, 2000

Nothing to add.

Olivier Rossel


March 1, 2000

Kah-Ching goes Kah-Chump. Cant we all just get along

Tony Whyte


March 1, 2000

Tim O'Reilly has made an entirely reasonable and modest request. Simply stop using offensively any patents you may be granted on what many consider obvious software technologies and obvious business processes. Defending yourself against attacks is one thing--attempting to do in your competitors, rather than merely out-competing them--is quite another, and a scurilous other thing at that. Please use your prominence and power both wisely and modestly, not arrogantly. Thank you.

Dr. John M. Goodman


March 1, 2000

This is a very bad commercial move. I suggest Amazon's CEO to read again the books he sold regarding "what's the phylosophy behind the WWW" Anyway, i'm not going to buy anything from them unless they try to be a little bit clever and honest regarding who hown the technology.

Eric Fleury


March 1, 2000

In real-world, companies need to be environmentally responsible. Online, companies need to be intellectually responsible. By enforcing patents that deprive the web of innovation, Amazon is not intellectually responsible. It is a shame because, otherwise, Amazon service is real good.

Benoit Marchal


March 1, 2000

andreas schmidt


March 1, 2000

Kelly Haskins


March 1, 2000

Amazon was always my first port of call when looking for or buying books, mainly because of brand name, but also because of their good service and prices. However this patent is ridiculaous and there are plenty of other online bookstores to buy from (at the same price).

Paul Cooper


March 1, 2000

Philip Bowman


March 1, 2000

Andrew Moran


March 1, 2000

Marco Cesati


March 1, 2000

You act, you have to live with the outcome. So I look for another book shop.

H.-J. Heitlaender


March 1, 2000

Sophie Wilson


March 1, 2000

Richard Voss


March 1, 2000

I cannot believe that anyone who knows anything about software can think of 1-click shopping being a major technical innovation. OK it is an innovation as far as the end-user is concerned, but you wouldn't need too many brain cells to think it up. I am currently boycotting Amazon and persuading as many people in my company to do the same.

Peter Fox


March 1, 2000

I used to use Amazon for all my book purchases, but basically they can go screw themselves now. As an Internet consultant I buy A LOT of books, looks like bol.co.uk will get my custom from now on. Perhaps Amazon should patent the microchip, I mean they DID invent that right ?

Dominic Hyland


March 1, 2000

Marcus Hulse


March 1, 2000

erwn Baeyens


March 1, 2000

deroubaix patrick


March 1, 2000

I am glad I live in Canada, where such preposterous patents piggybacking on the good ideas of others cannot be enforced. The idea that the moderately creative use of cookies should be the basis of a patented technology is, if you'll pardon the pun, patently ridiculous. It is unfortunate that cookie technology wasn't developed with a restrictive public license, prohibiting their use in patent applications. If Amazon doesn't want to give back to the Net that made it freely, perhaps it is time it be forced to.

Richard Bethell


March 1, 2000

absurd. makes Amazon look foolish and low-class. perhaps the little guys without one-button ordering are worth a look afterall... at least they keep their tongue in their mouth.

Charles G Nanninga


March 1, 2000

Maybe it's time I tried Barnes and Noble.

Martin De Saulles


March 1, 2000

Steven Jackson


March 1, 2000

I'm really pleased to see Tim take the stand that he has on this issue. I'm following suit as one of O'Reilly's authors, even though it'll mean a potential loss of revenue to me since many copies of my first book was sold through Amazon. I've eradicated every Associate link to Amazon on the userfriendly.org site and am urging all of my readers to make their purchases at Amazon's competitors.

J.D. "Illiad" Frazer


March 1, 2000

Eddie Nicholson


March 1, 2000

I liked shopping at Amazon, I spent over 軸 at your site last year. I never used 1-click, it wasn't necessary. You folks at Amazon were able to track down an out-of-print book I wanted. It took 10 months, and to be honest I had forgotten about it. I realize that this sort of thing happens everyday in your business but at that particular moment you had a one very loyal customer. I'll miss your site. Change your patent strategy and I'd be glad to shop there again. P.S. Thanks for the coffee mugs.

Mike Biddlecombe


March 1, 2000

Glenn Abrams


March 1, 2000

Chisel Wright


March 1, 2000

After only two days, this open letter reveals a clear-cut reaction against Amazon by technology-savvy ex-customers. This must have been about what Amazon expected. But Amazon is also in the midst of a gamble. Amazon believes that their brand name and advertising have taken them beyond reliance on the influence of an offended technical group. Amazon is betting that it can ignore this group, even though its members were the early adopters who guided less technical people toward online purchases, reassuring them that Amazon could be trusted. It was remarkable to see how rapidly trust and good will were estalished. Amazon may find that both can be lost even faster.

John Hiles


March 1, 2000

Erwin Moedersheim


March 1, 2000

This is just silly

Rick Walker


March 1, 2000

I suppose the fact that they've never made a profit is worrying them & they are looking for ways to get an unfair advantage over their competition. As far as I'm concerned this pack of sleazy jerks can close my account. My Web Ferret will find another online bookstore for me I'm sure

Bob Cooper Bateman West Australia


March 1, 2000

Unless Amazon changes their strategy, I will be forced to resort to customer pressure. As many others has noted, there are a lot of online bookstores to choose from (in Europe as well as in the US).

Anders Olsson


March 1, 2000

It's a shame that this action is even necessary.

Jeremy Scrivener


March 1, 2000

Let's keep this technology open.

Nicholas Steven


March 1, 2000

Geez. One, why the heck PTO grants such stupid patents? Two, why the heck Amazon is so stupid to patent the obvious/prior art? Three, why the heck Amazon is so stupid to try to lie to customers? I wrote two emails to them and both times they tried to convince me that I know nothing and that the patents are "technically difficult" and they spent "thousands of hours and dollars" on them. Hah. Calling your customer "stupid"? Hmm? Four, what the heck is wrong with the courts and judges? Are they chosing IT-illiterates in cases like Amazon vs Barnes & Nobles? Amazon, stop it! You've lost one customer for good, but some others might return if you stop it now.

Tien Lee


March 1, 2000

I have bought numerous books (text books and fiction) from amazon.com and amazon.de. I stopped doing this because I really think these patent issues are silly, and harm the development of the Web and the Internet in general (also, software patents in general are kind of silly). I will return to shop at Amazon when they change their policy regarding these patents. Until then, well, there are traditional book stores as well... and they quite happily take my money.

Gert Doering


March 1, 2000

agree 100%

dog


March 1, 2000

John Savage


March 1, 2000

Alice Brooks


March 1, 2000

Christopher Gomis


March 1, 2000

Anu Garg


March 1, 2000

I'm cancelling my Amazon affiliate accounts immediately, and will switch to other online vendors.

Bill Bradford


March 1, 2000

I would suggest Amazons competitors relocate their companies to Europe - here foolish patents like those granted to Amazon are not enforceable. It should not be too difficult in a virtual world. By the way, Most Amazon customers are dedicated web-users (who else) - they surely wont like this attemt to chain the web. I dont - and will shift my focus for books to other companies.

Werner Lischka


March 1, 2000

I am an Amazon Affiliate, and if these two patents are not rescinded I will no longer be an affiliate or customer of Amazon. I will also publicize this matter on my Cable TV program.

Roger Wasson


March 1, 2000

I've used Amazon for over a year, have never used 1-click as far as I can remember, and I'm an affiliate. As of today I'm cancelling my two outstanding orders (which have taken over a month to still not arrive) and as of this evening I'm removing the affiliate link from my website links page. I'll be ordering the books from Books Online (Bol.com) instead, until Amazon rescind their patent claim.

Matt Moran


March 1, 2000

Santosh


March 1, 2000

Keith Latheron


March 1, 2000

Having scanned the comments, all I can say is: Ditto! Kudos for a great initiative, Tim.

Robin Peters


March 1, 2000

What if someone had patented the process for processing and smelting iron ore? Whoops, there goes the Iron Age. I feel overly broad and inappropriate patents on Internet and Web technologies can have a similar impact. Of course, the root of the problem is the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO): It is underfunded, understaffed, and quite unable to keep up with the rapid evolution of Internet and related technologies. It is therefore up to "us", the providers and consumers of Internet technologies, to apply a "common sense" standard to when, how and if patents should be used. It is my opinion that Amazon's actions do not rise to the level of "common sense", and this reflects poorly upon their decision process and business ethics. Until Amazon improves this situation, they will recieve no further business from me. Though this decision may cause a few extra pennies to flow from my pocket, I consider any such cost to be a down payment on the kind of Internet I desire and wish to support.

Robert W. Cunningham


March 1, 2000

I've switched to other sites, and found out that it's a lot cheaper too most of the time...

Fvw


March 1, 2000

Serge CLAUS


March 1, 2000

I am signing not just for Amazon to stop exploiting the broken "intellectual property" system we have, but for those in power to fix that broken system.

Greg Mildenhall


March 1, 2000

Gerard Richardson


March 1, 2000

I'm disappointed. You have been pioneers, you have benefited from the open philosophy of the www, it certainly helped you become what you are. And now this. I'm quite a good customer of yours, too bad...

Joelle Nebbe


March 1, 2000

I can't wait to watch your house of cards fall in on itself

John Bankert


March 1, 2000

Amazon are surely shooting themselves in the foot by trying to stop other web sites using on-click ordering. In e-commerce, the customers will only start to trust a service once they have seen it used over and over again. Something only existing on a single web site is unlikely to be used in preference of a more familiar method. These corporations don't realise that the web is a completely different medium to conventional business, and if they don't co-operate and let it develop together, they will become as obsolete as the Sinclair ZX that I used to prop my door open with.

Adam Christie


March 1, 2000

Arne Kleppestrand


March 1, 2000

I agree. Amazon has gone one step too far.

Nils Juergens


March 1, 2000

My Browser has the "ONE CLICK switch to competitors" feature. I will use it!

martin Posch


March 1, 2000

Although it has been even better, Amazon still has one of the best websites around. It actually helps customers to find their way around and to make an informed purchase decision. This has always been an important reason for me to refer friends and others to Amazon: after all, I want my friends to have a good time on the web, rather than let them muddle through ill-designed sites. However, I no longer recommend that people visit (and possibly buy from) Amazon, rather I discourage them to go there, since Amazon steals from the web (maybe not in a legal sense, but most certainly in a moral sense). Pitty, that.

Branko Collin


March 1, 2000

These patents are wrong, both technically and morally. I work as a system support and so get lots of questions about using the Net. Rest assured, Jeff, that since you started this patent business I have been advising everyone to use your rivals' sites.

Tiina Muukkonen


March 1, 2000

I have in the last couple of years spent over a thousand dollars at Amazon - but that will be it until Amazon stop this idiocy. The web was built on a philosophy of innovation and sharing of ideas. Amazon are exploiting the fruits of thousands of people who GAVE there ideas to the world, making money from those people, but denying others the right and opportunity to do the same.

Ian K Rolfe


March 1, 2000

The US patent system must be the most bizarre thing of its kind in the world, with the possible exception of the Italian one. How on earth can you legitimately patent an idea that thousands of people have been using for years before your application? Particularly when it wasn't even your idea in the first place! Amazon, you are losing customers for this stupidity. You just lost another one in me. Are you really going to earn enough from this scam (yes, scam) for it to balance out the loss of a major part of your customer base? You may be thinking that not that many people will be that bothered, but remember that all your affiliates run websites themselves, and will not want to see their field polluted with this kind of behaviour - how many sales are you going to lose as all your affiliates move away from you? Drop the patent, return the ownership of the ideas to the collective mind from which they came. Denny De La Haye

Denny De La Haye


March 1, 2000

Haukur Hreinsson


March 1, 2000


March 1, 2000

Alexander Shvedoff


March 1, 2000

To whom it may concern, With great concern have I taken notice of the fact that Amazon has obtained a US patent on E-commerce (5,960,411). Of even greater concern is the fact that Amazon is sueing other companies who are also giving consumers the opportunity to buy through the Internet. Though I have been a satisfied customer of Amazon until now, I feel that Amazon's use of patents is restricting me (and consumers in general) in my choices. Therefore I will refrain from placing orders at your website until Amazon will change their patent policy. Furthermore will I urge all my friends to also refrain from buying at Amazon. It is my opinion that Amazon's patent policy is alienating consumers from them, and justly so. Yours, Rein Halbersma

Rein Halbersma


March 1, 2000

They try to sell in europe, but now i'm off to some very good belgian ones: www.proxis.com and www.amazur.com.

Bernhard Dobbels


March 1, 2000

Next thing you know, US Patent Office will award AOL for the Internet... I have nothing eloquent to say, except what Amazon.com is doing is harmful to everyone. I would urge everyone to boycott Amazon for the rest of its lifetime (A jihad...).

Y. Choe


March 1, 2000

Looking arond my office, I see several hundred pounds worth of books from amazon.co.uk bought this year alone. I'll be taking that business elsewhere until such time as these patents are revoked or I see a public statement that they will not be enforced. Come on Amazon -- we thought you were above this kind of cheap shot.

Scott Mitchell


March 1, 2000

John FitzGerald


March 1, 2000

Irvin Probst


March 1, 2000

Pieter van der Eems


March 1, 2000

Mark Tyndall


March 1, 2000

As a computer consultant in the web field I find it absolut rediculous that such an obvious use of saving state in a cookie is patentable. Fortunately in Germany it isn³t. During last year I purchased books worth between one and two thousand dollar at amazon.de. Now I³m going to take by money to some other bookshop until you give up on that patent. Sad, I really liked your service. Klaus

Klaus Rothert


March 1, 2000

A while ago, when amazon was just starting out, I bought a book from them. The service was good, and it seemed to be the beginning of a new innovative wave of electronic marketing. Now amazon are doing the very thing that other early adopters have tried in the past - keep the innovation to themselves. It didn't work for these greedy folk, the market just flowed past them with new ways of doing things. Lawyers (and patents) just slow change down; they can never stifle it.

David Thomas


March 1, 2000

I've been a very happy Amazon customer for more than three years now. They had won my respect by their high-quality service and helpfulness. But this silly "patenting frenzy" is really silly. It feels like an insult to their staff, like saying to them "you guys are helping customers daily but we still prefer to use ugly legal techniques to ensure our position".

Guillaume Laurent


March 1, 2000

The question is who is in charge of the patent office? Who allows such poor decisions to be made? Let's find out who is in charge there or go up the government chain. Or is the problem the Clinton administration itself? Maybe the next administration will do a better of directing this office? Sheese.... JW

JW


March 1, 2000

Nina Kucklaender


March 1, 2000

I used to be a strong supporter of Amazon. As a Seattle resident in the tech community, I have a close relationship with several stock-option millionaires, and was a very loyal customer. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to support my friends as much as I used to. I began boycotting Amazon.com a few days after they patented the "one-click" methodology. My main beef about the current state of business patents is that the US PTO doesn't seem to read these things closely. Patenting "one-click" technology is the same as going to a bar often enough that the barkeep recognizes you, and allows you to run a tab. And this recent one, patenting "affiliations," is just the same as all the old discount or gift certificate programs if you refer someone to a store. There's nothing special about these patents---in fact, the prior art on both extends back at least 200 years---but phrased a certain way by a clever lawyer, and knowing the PTO won't read the applications closely, these patents are granted, and then used to senselessly beat money out of other companies using methodologies they developed independently derived from the obvious art. I didn't so much mind the patent itself, frankly, but when I complained to Amazon.com about the "one-click" patent and what I felt was a potential abuse of the US patent system, they responded (in an obvious form letter) that they believed that it would help "promote competition." The audaciousness of this obvious falsehood---for I cannot believe for a moment that they think that they intended this to *promote* competition---and the astonishment that they would actually "tell that to my face," as it were, prompted an immediate cessation of business. I've probably spent over 񘈨 on Amazon books in the last few years. No more. I'm doing *my* part now to promote competition by supporting Amazon's competitors, and have been urging anyone within earshot to do the same thing. I still have some sympathy for my friends who own Amazon stock, but owning a piece of a company which is undoubtedly snickering at their abuse of the patent system seems unwise to me, and . . . well, caveat emptor. I'm actually sorry about this. Amazon gives great customer service, and I never ever had a problem with orders or shipping. But I simply cannot support their current stance, and feel strongly enough about it that I'm willing to go out of my way to avoid business with them until they change their stances on the patents they're pursuing. Not that they care. Maybe after losing a significant percentage of their customers, they'll start caring.

Ken McGlothlen


March 1, 2000

You know, I actually used to use Amazon for most of my shopping. Not if this is where it's led them.

Samuel N Jones


March 1, 2000

Keep innovation free.

Richard M. Conroy


March 1, 2000

Ridiculous. Greed, stupidity or what?

Tony Lawrence


March 1, 2000

This is everyone's Net, not just Amazon's.

Simon Chapman


March 1, 2000

There is nothing wrong with obtaining patents for use as a defense against hostile companies that use patents to extort others. There's plenty wrong with becoming an extortionist. What amazon.com is doing is morally and ethically wrong, no matter how legal it is. I will now sing the praises of their competitors. I just have one question: why? Why would amazon.com do this? Don't tell me for money, because they had money. Don't tell me for a competitive advantage, because they had that. Don't tell me for respect of the community, because they used to have that.

Keith Smeltz


March 1, 2000

Jesus M. Castagnetto


March 1, 2000

Paul Radford


March 1, 2000

Karl Tomas Andersson


March 1, 2000

What can I say? How sad.

Marten Payne


March 1, 2000

I've been a periodic customer of Amazon.co.uk since their startup. I won't be using them again until they abandon this ludicrous patent action, and get it into their heads that not even Americans can copyright the future.

John Luby


March 1, 2000

Taking innovation sthat other have developed and provided to the internet community for free and calling them your own amounts to stealing. I fyou have any respect for those who have helped the internet flourish so that companies like Amazon.com can prosper then you will give up this ridiculous patent. This definately makes me think twice before buying any books from Amazon in the future.

Daniel Poage


March 1, 2000

How sad that someone may think to be able to patent something as obvious as this

David York


March 1, 2000

Amazon is a cool service, but intellectual property was not meant for this.

bert hubert


March 1, 2000

I buy THOUSANDS of dollars worth of books, Gifts, reference, sci fi, fantasy... weird books I find on AFFILIATES sites! I buy them all from Amazon. Or more correctly I did. I work as a consult and support specialist. I get asked about the web, and ecommerce almost weekly. I used to say, Try amazon... its great. These days I don't... I recommend against the new media company's... better to go with an established company. One which knows how to think LONG TERM. Perhaps it makes more sense to go with the underdog. They have to work harder for your business. It turns out the prices are right. Ya know, I bet amazon are going to patent shipping cartons with URLs on them next, or even a system to accept an order and automatically dispatch by an international courier firm from a central warehouse, at the same time as processing a monetary transaction with a bank. Wow... why didn't I think of that ;)

Stuart Espey


March 1, 2000

IJdo Dijkstra


March 1, 2000

Hey! What's Barnes & Nobles web address!

Robert Campbell


March 1, 2000

This is a bad sign of what commercial companies can make out of the internet if we let them. I just went to CEBIT 2000 and EVERYCOMPANY is talking about E-Commerce as if they inventented it. Its hardly bearable.

Holger Krekel


March 1, 2000

Angel Hernandez


March 1, 2000

Why don't you patent WHEEL and sue all car manufacturers?

Jukka Lahtinen


March 1, 2000

I, as were many others on this list, was until recently a loyal amazon customer. Amazon provided the best service, prompt delivery and an excellent selection of english language titles over their affilliate amazon.de. Unfortunately, all these plusses cannot outweigh the negative effect of your attempt to hijack the future of electronic commerce on the internet, and I feel I must reconsider my decision to do business with your company. Please reconsider your decision to enforce these patents.

Steven Davis


March 1, 2000

software patents are already stupid. but patents on web-features? this is not silly any more, it's insane.

Tom Vogt


March 1, 2000

Aleks A.-Lessmann


March 1, 2000

I agree, let Amazon know what we think of them. Let them burn in hell.

Steffen Sandgren


March 1, 2000

Laurent Dudouet


March 1, 2000

Bye-Bye Amazon. I will no longer purchase product from or visit your web site until this patent nonsense stops. Furthermore, I will vigorously discourage my clients and staff against doing business with your company as well.

Gary Praegitzer


March 1, 2000

Mike Hazas


March 1, 2000

Joost Baaij


March 1, 2000

Amazon ! Shoot of my bookmark. Amazon ! Shoot of my futur purchases.. Amazon ! Shoot of my mind...

Nicolas Lorrain


March 1, 2000

Joshua T. Rowe


March 1, 2000

Amazon was one of the few sites I would buy from. I will no longer use there service, and will advise others to avoid Amazon also

Dennis Lee


March 1, 2000

Ulrich Porsch


March 1, 2000

The patent office is woefully antiquated and taking advantage of that fact is an example of killing the goose that laid the golden egg.

Robert E. Clements


March 1, 2000

Mathias M°lster Lidal


March 1, 2000

Well, at least Europe rejected the patent on the grounds that it was a business process. Perhaps this will lead the US patent office to see sense. I will not buy from any Amazon site until this blatant monopoly building is stopped. In fact, I will be giving Amazon as an example of how not to do business to my clients.

Jason Irwin


March 1, 2000

Mike Nieforth


March 1, 2000

Amazon's patent is simply ridiculous.

Cesar Augusto Carvalho


March 1, 2000

After hearing about the One-Click shopping patent, I quickly began to shop at bn. Amazon, and others, stop trying to patent the obvious.

Robert Hadaway


March 1, 2000

This is greed, pure and simple. The laws are there to protect inventors/designers, not to help line the pockets of commercial organisations. Amazon did not invent anything, they're just stealing rights to a particular implementation of someone elses invention (TimBLee). It's difficult to believe that a body such as the patents office could make such a huge blunder in giving away such sales power to a single internet company (could this be a monopoly situation?)

David Court


March 1, 2000

I have read the patent. It's appalling. I will now place my orders (and the ones of all the companies, colleagues, friends, and family I know) with competitors of Amazon -- until Amazon adopts a more civilized, freedom-loving, and entrepreneurial behaviour.

Magnus Kempe


March 1, 2000

Andreas Braukmann


March 1, 2000

I'm not shopping at amazon any more. For UK customers I recommend www.bookshop.co.uk

Neil Youngman


March 1, 2000

I placed my first Amazon order in October 1995. I have always considered Amazon one of the e-commerce companies, if not THE company, with the best understanding of the Internet and the Web. I have been praising Amazon's impeccable service to lots of people, many of which are now also your faithful customers. I have always praised your interface design as a model for others to follow (in spite of some recent degradation in favour of useless graphic elements). I have used you as a standard against which to compare almost any e-commerce iniative. Until now. Only a few days away from applying for an affiliation, in spite of the 1-click patent (which I was hoping Amazon would be too smart to continue defending in spite of Internet protests) I see that even such a trivial concept as affiliation has also been raised to patentable status. By you. I have no greater simpathy for some of the competitors (such as the Bertelsmann Group) you may be trying to defend from. But precisely because of my years-long simpathy for (and satisfying customer relationship with) Amazon, I believe it is time for us, the large Internet community of customers who helped Amazon grow, to send you a clear message about something we see as a turning point in your relation with the Internet. Please listen to this collective message. If some of the old Amazon soul is still alive inside the now huge corporation, I know you will. Until then, I will buy from your competitors and urge others to do the same. After all, competitors are just a few clicks away.

J M Cerqueira Esteves


March 1, 2000

I'm a frequent Amazon customer, and prefer to think of the company as leading others to the net, not obstructing wider use of this resource.

Gary Greenberg


March 1, 2000

It's a disgrace that Amazon should be allowed patents for such basic technologies. The US Patent Office should realise the kind of effect which this decision has on web development, and employ some people with more than a vague knowledge of their home PC to deal with requests in this area. As for Amazon, it's a shame that what was once a fresh innovative company clearly has nothing more to offer on the side of development, and must resort to overly capitalist tactics like this.

Stefan Tryggvason


March 1, 2000

The idea of trying to patent ANYTHING that has to do with the 'Net is simply imbicillic. Hopefully this will open a few eyes and ears to how dumb the US goverment can be.

Joe Burris


March 1, 2000

This is totally ridiculous!

Jim Curtis


March 1, 2000

I agree wholeheartedly with the message of protest against Amazon. For this reason, I will move my online business that otherwise may have gone to Amazon to its competitors, Barnes and Noble, CDNow, etc. Very, very shortsighted attitude. And very disappointing... Greg

Greg Gorman


March 1, 2000

>From here on I will stick to other bookstores, and make my collegues, friends and family aware of this ridiculous exploitation of old technology.

Dominique L. Bouix


March 1, 2000

I have spent many hundreds of dollars at Amazon.Com and have recommended it to many others. Patenting obvious internet techniques is outrageous. I will no longer purchase from Amazon.Com and I intend to spread the word about Amazon's behavior.

Steven M. Lundahl


March 1, 2000

I have spent many hundreds of dollars at Amazon.Com and have recommended it to many others. Patenting obvious internet techniques is outrageous. I will no longer purchase from Amazon.Com and I intend to spread the word about Amazon's behavior.

Steven M. Lundahl


March 1, 2000

Patents slow progress significantly. It's time that we humans learn to share things. Didn't your mom teach you that? Jens Elsner

Jens Elsner


March 1, 2000

I am boycotting amazon.com until this nonsense stops.

Jack Bonn


March 1, 2000

I trust that by supporting your letter using one click I haven't abused anyone's patent.

Tim Meyer


March 1, 2000

As a regular Amazon(de) customer I absolutely agree with Tims opinion. Please reconsider your stance

Bernd Knoebel


March 1, 2000

I have something on the order of a couple thousand books here in my 800-square-foot apartment. Every week sees me buying more. I am, in short, addicted to books, and Amazon.com has been a large part of this. No more. Until this carpetbagging land-grab patent claim is dropped, I shall no longer be giving Amazon.com my business. There are many other web-based bookstores that I will now turn to: Barnes & Noble, Half.com, Powells, Abebooks, Bibliofind, MXBookfinder, Fatbrain, 1Bookstreet, Book Buyers Outlet, Edward K. Hamilton, eFollett, A1Books, and quite a few others. You have sown the electronic wind, Mister Bezos, and it may soon reap you an Internet whirlwind.

Alex Jay Berman


March 1, 2000

No more Amazon for me

Jon Brzostowski


March 1, 2000

My wife and I will purchase nothing further from Amazon until this nonsense ends.

Charles & Teresa Jade


March 1, 2000

Jose CHARTERS


March 1, 2000

I have spent more dollars, pounds and deutschmarks at amazon.com, .de, and co.uk than I care to recall, and this patent farce is enough to make me think seriously about taking my custom elsewhere. Amazon is showing bad faith and bad business sense, don't do it.

Dr Jonathan Rodgers


March 1, 2000

Mauro Isaja


March 1, 2000

I have spent more dollars, pounds and deutschmarks at amazon.com, .de, and co.uk than I care to recall, and this patent farce is enough to make me think seriously about taking my custom elsewhere. Amazon is showing bad faith and bad business snese, don't do it.

Dr Jonathan Rodgers


March 1, 2000

HJ Wolthuis


March 1, 2000

Amazon should stop the appropriation of others' work for it's own self aggrandizement. Perhaps we should begin thinking boycott.

Ronald Wellman


March 1, 2000

Josh Glover


March 1, 2000

I've made it my personal preference to buy books from Amazon (.co.uk, and .com) to other services, because I've been a great believer in what you're doing. In particular, technical books are often hideously overpriced in the UK, and Amazon usually sells these at equivalent to US prices.. I also am responsible for signing purchase orders for my employer for technical book purchases at this office.. But I will be neither buying any personal, or work-related, books from Amazon while Amazon continues to patent, and exploit, patents on software.

Malcolm Campbell


March 1, 2000

Do the right thing.

Rich Rosa


March 1, 2000

Good Bye Amazon.com!! I've made my last purchase from you -- Hello Barnes & Noble and many other bookstores on the Net. BIG MISTAKE!! You live in a house of glass, pure communications, that can just as easily work against you as with you. The public is watching! It's our Web - you can't own it!! Or we collectively can make you NO MORE!!

James D. Alvord


March 1, 2000

I like the boycott (of Amazon) idea. Hopefully the authorities will repeal the patent.

Phil Craig


March 1, 2000

I endorse the comments made in the letter above.

Doug Bell


March 1, 2000

Hey, I send this with one mouse click...wanna sue me?

Michael Schmitt


March 1, 2000

I was just about to order some books from Amazon but that's not gonna happen now. Why in the world does a pioneering Internet business use such backward, defensive and alltogether Spirit-of-the-Net-hostile methods. Stop this nonsense now.

Jens Henningsen


March 1, 2000

It's really a shame that such common sense ideas can be patented !

Fran‡ois D‰sarm‰nien


March 1, 2000

I fully agree with the sentiments expressed by Tim O'Reilly, and I will be recommending to all my acquaintances and friends not to buy from Amazon until after they have given a promise not to use any patents offensively to hold back innovation on the Net.

Gary Coady


March 1, 2000

Tim says it all. I think the judgement was in error and should be reviewed.

Greg Hanna


March 1, 2000

Jeff Payne


March 1, 2000

I've had less-than-flattering opinions of Amazon ever since my last (and final) order took three months to get here - more than two longer than it should have, and one month _after_ the item arrived in the shops local to me. For _less_ than what I paid Amazon for. But this patent issue really ticks me off!

Adrian Waters


March 1, 2000

I suppose the next will be Amazon claiming a patent on the Amazon River. Thumbs down to Amazon and the US Patent Office.

Jeff Kerr


March 1, 2000

Soren bjorn-andersen


March 1, 2000

C'mon guys, get a clue. You didn't do anything new - Maybe you did it better - Maybe you did it sooner - But without the open spirit of the Internet And of those who came before you You wouldn't be here at all. Amazon is the shining example of how business can work on the Internet. If you, and those who follow you, choose the path of destruction, the Internet will die.

keshet


March 1, 2000

It is my opinion that the actions taken by Amazon.com are harmful to everything that makes the Internet a great place. The patents you are getting are for such trivial things, things which I have seen applied for so many years, and yet you want to call these your own? Over 4 years ago I had an associates program on my website, it linked to some computer hardware, and I would get a portion of the profit, and yet you want to say that you invented this technology? This is the same old story of a company in seek of the almighty dollar, and they will go to great lengths to achieve this goal, even if it means going against everything they stand for. The open technology of the Internet is what got Amazon.com to the top. Please Amazon, rethink your position, you can maintain yourself a leader in this market by fair means. Until then, you won't be recieving my business.

Matt Dunn


March 1, 2000

Well, we oughta do something about this patent thing before it goes even further down the hole

Jaime Herazo B.


March 1, 2000

Peter Jahn


March 1, 2000

Amazon is not only standing on the shoulders of giants, they are attempting to put reigns on that giant and call it their own.

Paul Bovenzi


March 1, 2000

As a Software Engineer, the idea of patenting "ideas" instead of implementations of ideas is ridiculous - as is the patenting of implementations which are already out of the bag. No more Amazon for me for a period of 6 months after they stop this bad behavior - wonder if I can return last week's order?

Brian Allison


March 1, 2000

Dave Kearney


March 1, 2000

Per Jessen Schmidt


March 1, 2000

Erik Sentell


March 1, 2000

Peter Jakobi


March 1, 2000

I've been a very good customer of Amazon in US, UK and DE (look up my account Jeff) but unless this continuous patenting of the obvious doesn't stop then I'm not buying a thing more. Enough already. Amazon's whole business is founded on the freely exchanged work of others (i.e. the Internet) ... you shouldn't be trying to land grab now. At the very least, put the patents in the public domain if you're afraid of someone trying to out-Amazon Amazon patent-wise.

Ralph Bearpark


March 1, 2000

No more Amazon for me for even if they they stop this unaccepted (thivery) behavior

Boubaker Adjali


March 1, 2000

Don't let Patents win !

Manuel Meanl


March 1, 2000

I've been a loyal Amazon customer for several years. I love the service they provide, and the site allows for easy searching, etc. Customer service has been great. It's hard for me to do this, but - unless Amazon reverses it's position on the 1-Click patent, I will no longer purchase product from them. How anyone could possibly patent the use of a record and a cookie is beyond me. It's a shameful abduction of open technology, and I feel it will go the way of patenting the .gif format - valid patent, impossible to enforce.

Jeffrey A. Beer


March 1, 2000

I will be spreading the word to others so that none of us purchase from Amazon until this nonsense is stopped.

Kathy Cole


March 1, 2000

Richard Schulte


March 1, 2000

I have found Amazon.com to be a good source of books and CD's that are hard to find locally. It would be a shame if I were to give up such a good resource. I will, however, take such an action if my resource seems bent on stifling creativity and commerce on the 'Net. Amazon seems to also be guilty of letting success go to their heads. Quality of the website has gone down in past months. An item that I currently have on order (which I will most likely cancel) that I placed using One-Click Ordering (TM). The descrption of the item said 'Usually ships in one to two day' A week after I placed the order, I wondered where my CD was. I looked in my status area, and the item now said 'Usually ships in one to two WEEKS', but oddly, when I followed the link back to the item's main description page, it still said 'Usualy ships in one to two days'. Once I can secure a new source for this hard to find CD, I will cancel my order...

Christopher Congdon


March 1, 2000

I have ordered books from Amazon.com in the past, and it will remain in the past. I'll be using Barnes and Noble, and other online stores, from now on. Even if Amazon.com remedies this outrageous infraction of the people's trust and goodwill, I will not be a returning customer, unless Amazon.com also makes some serious effort to restore good faith. - Chris Jacobson Sr. Programmer, Jacobson Code Consulting

Chris Jacobson


March 1, 2000

I have ordered from Amazon in the past. I will not order again until this situation is resolved. One of the hardest things for an e-commerce site to maintain is 'stickiness'. The ability to retain customers time after time. To have them come back to your site instead of a competitors. Amazon has been successful in building this 'stickiness'. Their actions have destroyed that 'stickiness' with an important part of the Internet Community. P.S. My firewall is now set to filter out all links and advertisments from Amazon. Amazon no longer exists on my local network.

Jim Du Vall


March 1, 2000

Knock off the nonsense and concentrate on selling not grabbing.

Tom Park


March 1, 2000

Nicholas John Murison


March 1, 2000

Chris McGrath


March 1, 2000

Kinda monopoly upon internet development??? Yeah, for sure...

Andres Buendia


March 1, 2000

Richard Iserman


March 1, 2000

Dear Amazon, I always thought that you were a great service company. Really! I now question my use of that adjective. Service is a state of mind. You have apparently seceded from that sacred union. Pity. Hello, bn.com and fatbrain!

Peter Birtolo


March 1, 2000

Chris Saia


March 1, 2000

hello many of us are just waiting for the day when wall street gets tired of seeing smoke in mirrors from the big A. Of course by then Bezos and his boys will have siphoned off all the real cash. Unfortunately, it will be the unsuspecting - investing public who will eat the loss. Read the history books Jeff - every greedy, power hungry dictator before you has lost and so will you - thankfully! Lets hope that after this last arrogant patent pooper it will be sooner rather than later.

michael five


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, It is very apparent that the longer this stupidity ensues the more money you stand to lose. Either by spending your money enforcing a patent that you should never have received and/or driving your loyal customers to your competitors. This is almost as ridiculous as suing a small town bookstore that most of the world never knew about just because they had the same name as your website.

William S. Walker II


March 1, 2000

With a six BILLION world population, something has got to give in the 'intellectual property' arena. Patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets (and all the cold war 'spy' stuff) end up in the arena of TRUST. Once SELFISHNESS enters the equation -- as initially interpreted in Tim's letter, based on the OFFENSIVE nature of Amazon's use of its 'patent' rights -- we ALL suffer. What did the old farmer say to his neighbor? "I trust no one 'cept thee and me; and sometimes I wonder about thee." The entire WEB idea depends on imperfect software that 'gets the job done' for imperfect people and their communities. (Just look at the TCP/IP -- it reroutes and retransmits packets until they are received and ACKNOWLEDGED.) Come on, Jeff. Come back to the real world! I am sure five billion people don't care about or even comprehend this 'internet' thing, but they do understand 'turf wars.' The medieval Japanese (see Clavell's Shogun) were amazed that 'some woman, halfway around the world, had given Japan to some rag-tag group of adventurers. Thanks, Tim! Let common sense RULE ! ! !

Aubrey Kelley


March 1, 2000

I have never buy anything from Amazon. Now I have a reason for continuing to do so.

Luis Correia


March 1, 2000

I have been a regular customer of Amazon for some time now. However, I have now cancelled all outstanding orders and will not order another item from you until you stop these absurd and indefensible 'patent' actions. Furthermore I shall do my utmost to influence friends and family not to use you until you mend your ways.

Robin Parkinson


March 1, 2000

Somebody, get that Patent Office to do something *useful* with its time and its budget.

Klaus Petersen


March 1, 2000

You just plain suck - big time.

Fat Elvis


March 1, 2000

This is the best way to start a global boycot on your services. I Hope the internet community will not accept this behaivior. Keep the net free and open!

Erwin Verhulst


March 1, 2000

I will NEVER ever purchase from Amazon.com again. Such immature behavior does not belong in the business world. I have already cancelled all my orders (i had 3 pending) and will heavily recommend others not to use Amazon.com again. Thanks tim for a letter well written.

James Yoon


March 1, 2000

I once believed there was little difference between Amazon and Barnes & Noble. That has changed since the patent issue. Now all my business will go to other companies until you see the error of your ways and change your behavior.

Dennis Heltzel


March 1, 2000

Kent Garner


March 1, 2000

The sad state of the US patent office is that of a candy store, for the small child of a growing internet company. Amazon is one of the companies that exploits this weakness to their advantage in an attempt to use the flawed legal system to push down competitors instead of simply trying to be better. The root of this problem lies in the US patent office, but if somebody commits a murder with a stolen gun, do we place all the blame on the person the gun was stolen from?

Micah Dowty


March 1, 2000

The sad state of the US patent office is that of a candy store, for the small child of a growing internet company. Amazon is one of the companies that exploits this weakness to their advantage in an attempt to use the flawed legal system to push down competitors instead of simply trying to be better. The root of this problem lies in the US patent office, but if somebody commits a murder with a stolen gun, do we place all the blame on the person the gun was stolen from?

Micah Dowty


March 1, 2000

This is entirely ridiculous and immoral, nothing else.

Rainer Weikusat


March 1, 2000

Whenever i've bought a book or CD online it's always been from amazon.com. First order was in 1997 and i've made at least one order each year since then. However with this continued abuse of the patent system that will soon end.

Hubert Chao


March 1, 2000

Yeah! What Tim said!

David A. Mooney


March 1, 2000

No more purchases from Amazon. I guess I'll start using Borders.com

Mike Hales


March 1, 2000

Well done Tim. Spot on!

Steve Bradshaw


March 1, 2000

Andr‰ Poisson


March 1, 2000

I am terribly disappointed on the actions you have taken regarding your patent. Rest assured that you have lost my corporate as well as my personal business. Also rest assured you will hear this issue come up at the shareholders' meetings until this anti-ecommerce attitude is stopped.

Thomas Casola


March 1, 2000

Steve Benson


March 1, 2000

To date, I only ordered three books from Amazon. If they continue this nonsense, however, I have no reason to buy another book from them. I'm sad that companies like Unisys (LZW patent) and Amazon have to put such a bad taste into my mouth. They just don't get it. Amazon may count the comments on this open letter and say: Hey, we don't need these few customers any more. They should think again. Those few will spread the word ...

Dr. Bernhard Scheffold


March 1, 2000

shawn musseau


March 1, 2000

Joseph Simmer


March 1, 2000

Poor judgment Amazon...you'll be sorry. I won't buy from you any more and neither will my friends.

Mike Smith


March 1, 2000

I agree with the sentiments expressed in the open letter. I will no longer buy from Amazon.com until they stop the offensive use of software patents.

Tom Kelly


March 1, 2000

I've spent hundreds of $$$ on purchasing from Amazon, BUT NO LONGER. I'm taking my money elsewhere. What's next Amazon, will you patent the process of breathing air?

Eyal Zvi


March 1, 2000

I agree with you Tim, and I also agree with Richard Stalmann: I will not buy anything at amazon, unless they stop abusing patents.

Marijn Neevens van Baal


March 1, 2000

Simply ridiculous. Likens to Microsoft's stupidity.

David H. Jones


March 1, 2000

I'm tired of reading about such loosely defined patents being granted. This is as bad as an earlier (pre-Web) case concerning "mixing text, sounds, and graphics", aka multimedia. Maybe if the patent office would actually get a clue about technology these things would not happen.

Howard Hill


March 1, 2000

Tom Clark


March 1, 2000

Sorry Amazon, you won't see any of my money until these ridiculous patents cease.

Damian Van Dooren


March 1, 2000

Such frivilous patents on something with plenty of precedence should be punished. So let the free market do it. Kiss my money goodbye Amazon.com!

John Wilson


March 1, 2000

Non aux brevets en Europe !!!

Fran‡ois Garnier


March 1, 2000

Patents have been turned from methods to protect hard work from being unrewarded into methods to make money from other people's work by companies like you, Amazon. In that sense, you are criminals.

Guus Sliepen


March 1, 2000

I used to buy from Amazon. A few hundred bucks worth in 1999 but I had to quit a few months ago because it seems that Amazon and Jeff Bezos just don't get it. So they aren't going to get my business anymore either. They even sent me an email with a ŭ coupon saying they noticed I hadn't bought from them lately and maybe that would help. No, it doesn't. Good-bye Amazon, good-bye Jeff Bezos.

Irene Park


March 1, 2000

remember Jeff; there's always Barnes & Noble ( and others ). need i say what you can do with your patent ?? ( although you DO seem to have some idea about trying to run everyone else out of business with it .... )

v. berg


March 1, 2000

I sent a similar complaint to Amazon several months ago and have since stopped ordering from them. If Amazon can not see the detrimental effect of this ridiculous patent, then it is up to the consumers to make their positions known. Until Amazon clarifies its intent and relinquishes its "rights" to this patent, I will refuse to purchase from them. Thanks Tim, for your efforts to correct Amazon.

Keith Kiser


March 1, 2000

I have been a consistent Amazon.com buyer for over a year. Until Amazon.com demonstrates a sense of responsibility to the medium it is a small part of, I shall boycott their site and do my on-line media purchasing from other sources.

John C Buck


March 1, 2000

I can not beleive that these patents were issued.

Brian T. Kent


March 1, 2000

Previously, I've purchased several books from Amazon. I will no more, given the oppurtunistic nature exihibited by the enforcing of this obvious technology.

Daniel Cox


March 1, 2000

Keith Brandt


March 1, 2000

Michael Klug


March 1, 2000

Thank you Amazon for inspiring to never buy from you again and for giving me a reason to travel to a B&N store to rediscover what book shopping is all about.

Sean Galbraith


March 1, 2000

No way - you've lost, Amazon!!!

Kathrin


March 1, 2000

Only one comment needed - ridiculous!

Mac Proffitt


March 1, 2000

Moronic move, Steve and Co. If this was an attempt to bring that floundering little dream of yours into the black, I sincerely hope it results in the exact opposite. I've never bought any merchandice from you and at this point, I shall make a concerted effort to deter any of my friends, co-workers and other colleuges from ever purchasing anything from such a Microsoft-ian, full-of-itself "eMistake." The web, as I see it, isn't a tool for you, and all the other "e-" jackoffs to make more money, it's a melting pot of technology and innovation. The current trend of "e-" this and "dot com" that, which was largely fostered by your imputance and spin sickens me. I will personally revel in the day amazon.com and companies like it go belly up. I hope this mistake proves to the public that you deserve the kind of cultish hatred that until now was reserved for only that little trollup and his hulking beast Microsoft.

Matthew Ernisse


March 1, 2000

John Q


March 1, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, I suggest you concentrate on profits not patents. If you do not, Amazon will not be around long enough to enforce any patents.

Jim Jennings


March 1, 2000

I'll be doing my book buying at fatbrain or bookpool from now on. I think Jeff's a smart guy. Soon he'll realize that it's not good business to alienate tech folks. These are, after all, the people who tell lots of other people where they should shop online...

Eric White


March 1, 2000

Marc CHANTREUX


March 1, 2000

Well, I have purchased books from Amazon in the past and I certainly will not be purchasing books from them in the future. Let's see about B&N now, shall we? Lea

Shawna Lea Adams


March 1, 2000

Chris Parry


March 1, 2000

Just because it involves the internet does not mean it should be a patentable idea. The patent office is behind the times and is issuing too many "bad" Internet patents now. Amazon should compete on it's own merits NOT try to "cheat" by playing by different rules with government protection.

Tony Casanova


March 1, 2000

I agree with Tim, excellent, soon they will want a patent on a mouseover or click.

Larry Nies


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com should be excommunicated from the Internet. Their actions have excluded them from the spirit of the internet. Their behavior is just one more step toward big brother governing the internet. They prove the internet society needs an enforcer.

Phillip R. Wood


March 1, 2000

Amazon is crazy for doing this stuff, the Net was built for communcation and sharing ideas. Now the business has put money into the mix and now the one thing that can kill the Net is loose. Greed. Amazon is greedy. The Gif people are greedy. The MPAA is greedy. If we do not stop this greediness, then the Net will be just like the real world. You can't do anything without money, and money lets you do anything.

Benjamin K Williams


March 1, 2000

No more amazon purchases & a recommendation that all my friends to do likewise. Until ...

Tony Haggerty


March 1, 2000

I find myself amazed at the temerity of such an organization and will endeavor to place my business elsewhere until such time it is publically announced that either Amazon will not enforce the patent rights or donates them to the public domain where they rightfully belong.

John Quist


March 1, 2000

I've bought a couple of books from Amazon in the past. It's always worked well with quick deliveries and low prices, but that's not all that matters. I will never buy anything from Amazon again, and I am currently spreading the word to all my friends and colleagues.

Johan Eriksson


March 1, 2000

Otto Hyv„rinen


March 1, 2000

Patent Officers! This is really a mess. I'm going to tell all my friends about Amazon and convince them to order books from their competitors.

Robert Schoeller


March 1, 2000

Sir. I understand and realize that your company is running at a huge loss, and that you have to try and make some money so that the share prices for your "not as hip as it should be" service can gain even more points on the "shmuck market", but you should understand that your heinious attempt to patent a behaviour that has existed before your air castle existed is lower than even you should reach...

Reality bites....


March 1, 2000

I'm a former Amazon customer.

Ron Stykel


March 1, 2000

Nicolas J Doye


March 1, 2000

For a company that has yet to turn a profit, Amazon is doing an amazing job in turning off its potential market, thus ensuring future losses. Patents such as those at issue have the potential to choke off e-commerce before it gets off of the ground. It smells like "Freedom to Innovate", which is anything but. Don't kill an infant industry because of greed.

Sean Smith


March 1, 2000

I have ben a past customer of yours for quite awhile. You have always been one of my favorite shopping sites. No more. I am in total disagreement with what you are doing and will have no part in helping support you to accomplish this. Remove me from your customer list.

Elwin Myers


March 1, 2000

Marty Christopherson

m


March 1, 2000

Unfortunately, I'm out of touch and hadn't heard of this before today. I placed an order with Amazon the other day, and if it hadn't already shipped, and I didn't need the books so desperately for my job, I would immediately cancel the order and take my business elsewhere. Here begins my boycott

Mel Grubb II


March 1, 2000

Thanks to Tim O'Reilly for bringing up this issue. I have been a satisfied amazon.de customer for quite some time now, and I like the "one click" ordering facility a lot, but I will certainly cease to buy from Amazon if they continue to act against the Internet Community in such an unfair way. The idea of "one click" ordering is an obvious consequence of how the Web works, and it is an extremely little addition to an enourmous work done by a collective of others, therefore the patent should never have been granted in the first place. I don't think an Internet company can be successful if it does not show respect for the Internet, so this is not a plea to Amazon, but a warning.

Arndt Schoenewald, Dortmund, Germany


March 1, 2000

Philipp Lange


March 1, 2000

You're making the lawyers rich at your own expense, Amazon.

May Wasserman


March 1, 2000

Do what Amazon has always done: lead the way, but don't fence it off behind you.

Gordon Michael


March 1, 2000

Amazon lost my business after the first patent issue, and I have been campaigning for people to use other companies ever since. This new patent just reaffirms my decision. At this rate you'll be lucky if I ever visit your site, none-the-less actually buy anything from it.

Adam Debus


March 1, 2000

patents is only a way to make people pay and reduce innovation. ideas are shared, not retained by law ! sharing idea mean evolution, innovation. retaining ideas mean regression.

Emmanuel PIERRE


March 1, 2000

Eric Poulin


March 1, 2000

Emmanuel PIERRE


March 1, 2000

Hey Jeff, are you related to Bill Gates? Lets play fair! Renee

Newby


March 1, 2000

Chris Elder


March 1, 2000

Kim Goldenberg


March 1, 2000

Brad A. Wanner


March 1, 2000

I'll never buy from you guys again...

Michael Krupnick


March 1, 2000

Martin Svalin


March 1, 2000

Julian v. Bock


March 1, 2000

I'm a former Amazon Customer. I'm not much of a programmer, but I've used cookies in the same way as this absurd patent. New Idea, no way!

Michael K. Steeves P. Eng


March 1, 2000

Dear Amazon, I have been your customer since your company started, buying at least one book every 3 to 4 weeks on the average. While I understand that you might have valid business reasons to protect your propietary processes, patenting widely used web methods as the cookies for transactions is not a wise one. The net made you rich. Mess with the net and it will make you poor. Circuit City thought they were pretty smart with their DIVX, but it took less than a year for a small grassroots online movement to crucify it. Now DIVX is nothing more than a glorified drink coaster, even more useless than AOL's trial CDs. Please release your patents to the public domain and refrain from doing this kind of thing in the future without proper research. I will not hesitate for a second before taking my business (and all my friends, co-workers and clients) elsewhere.

Pedro A. Vera-Perez


March 1, 2000

Xavier Poinsard


March 1, 2000

I am a long time user of the Amazon service but give clear notice that I will move my purchasing to other companies if Amazon persists in prosecuting other organisations which use 'one-click' interfaces.

Iain Rangeley


March 1, 2000

I will no longer make any purchases through Amazon.com. (and I was a very frequent buyer)

Edward M. Smith


March 1, 2000

Very well put Tim. As a developer I buy a large number of books. A lot were from amazon. Not any more.

Dwight Mayo


March 1, 2000

I am no longer a customer.

Kelly Hatcher


March 1, 2000

>From South Africa. Jeff -- I'm impressed with your site. But patenting 'One Click' really doesn't seem like cricket to me. Arthur G Clarke

Arthur G Clarke


March 1, 2000

Signed, a former Amazon customer.

Matt Drew


March 1, 2000

Sorry, you lost my business.

Elana Kehoe


March 1, 2000

There are currently many places on-line for one to purchase the same materials that Amazon deals in. Companies must be aware that with e-commerce the consumer can easily utilize many sources when making purchases. I cannot support, or recommend, a company that hampers future internet innovation and growth with such short-sighted, self-serving actions.

Kevin Craft


March 1, 2000

Frederic KIEFFER


March 1, 2000

I think its called biting the hand that feeds you. The internet really isn't business as usual, its too open to the customer to play these kind of corporate games. We can, and do, vote with our money. Course - its not like Amazon is actually making any.

Marty Christopherson


March 1, 2000

I agree with the above Open Letter.

Mario A. Mariani


March 1, 2000

There are currently many places on-line for one to purchase the same materials that Amazon deals in. Companies must be aware that with e-commerce the consumer can easily utilize many sources when making purchases. I cannot support, or recommend, a company that hampers future internet innovation and growth with such short-sighted, self-serving actions.

Kevin Craft


March 1, 2000

Joe LaPenna

saint


March 1, 2000

Joe LaPenna

saint


March 1, 2000

Barnes & Noble is just as good and has good prices. Adios Amazon.

Matt Hughes


March 1, 2000

aaron d meyers


March 1, 2000

For anyone that couldn't previously see the difference between Barnes & Noble's anti-competitive behavior and Amazon's destructive nature, perhaps now the curtain has been pulled back.

Adam Militello


March 1, 2000

There's many other places that sell books - Amazon can't take them all down.

Jeff Ungurean


March 1, 2000

This is stupid. If it doesn't stop I'll have too start shopping elsewhere!

Kenneth G. Baker


March 1, 2000

I have removed my Amazon affiliate links from all three of my web sites, and have replaced them with affiliate programs from other booksellers. I have also just cancled an order for ๧ worth of books, and will not order any more until Amazon.com changes the way it handles these matters. (Perhaps I can get a patent on the decimal point. It would be only slightly more silly than Amazon's patent on the use of cookies in this manner.)

Wayne Q.


March 1, 2000

David Keathly


March 1, 2000

The use of coockies can't be patented.Any fool that patents such a right is an idiot, for it is a technology that is invented to serve such appliences.

Srgjan Schrepfler


March 1, 2000

I have been a loyal customer for the past few years buying my books and cd's exclusively from Amazon. I will now do so elsewhere...

Chalmer Lou-Hing


March 1, 2000

I quit buying from amazon a few months ago because of their prices. Now I will never enter their site again. You might want to think about hiring more creative talent and fewer lawyers amazon.

Rick Rodgers


March 1, 2000

There are other bookstores on the web. Use fatbrain.com or barnesandnoble.com. Stop shopping at the Amazon.com flea market.

Douglas Hensel


March 1, 2000

Mike Lieman


March 1, 2000

If worse comes to worse, I'll just go to a real life bookstore and get what I need. Oh, wait, do you have a patent against using a door too?

Chris Flohr


March 1, 2000

I have stopped using amazon.com until this issue is resolved.

Meghan Retzlaff


March 1, 2000

Boyd McGill


March 1, 2000

Tim Barnes


March 1, 2000

Keith Mantell


March 1, 2000

I've ordered several hundred dollars worth of merchandise from Amazon in the past. That's all stopped for now. Maybe it's just "a drop in the ocean", but when millions of people do the same thing, that "drop" becomes very large.

N. Clements


March 1, 2000

I use Fatbrain.com normally will now use them exclusively.

Steve Burton


March 1, 2000

You may want to set "1-Click Order"(or whatever) as a trademark which is, for me, just okay, but holding a patent is ridiculous. There are hundreds of techniques that you are using and somebody could get a patent for it. Back out before some fanatics start to raze your service. I think it would not be so much work to start a massive hostile movement against you. And if there are tens of thousands of "guilties" from dozens of countries, you can not protect yourself with legal methods.

J.H


March 1, 2000

Building a whole business with Open Source software and then filing truly ridiculous patents (any patents at all) should be a no-no.

Malte Cornils


March 1, 2000

I want to add that I am joining the Amazon boycott. I have been a fairly regular Amazon customer, and not just for tech related material. Until Amazon stops applying for, and enforcing, patents based on trivial extensions to existing technology I will not buy another book from Amazon.

Phil McMillan


March 1, 2000

In the past, I ordered almost everything I bought from amazon.com - but once I heard about the one-click patent, that stopped. I think it would be great if amazon.com would set an example and drop this - just because they'll grant silly patents doesn't mean you have to take them.

Jennifer Lyons


March 1, 2000

Simon Miner


March 1, 2000

WR Smith


March 1, 2000

I was about to offer พ.8 billion to buy Amazon.com, but I think I'll buy a small country instead.

Bill Gates


March 1, 2000

The key thing that Amazon needs to remember is that in the fast moving world of e-commerce, there is always someone else who can supply consumers with whatever they're looking for. No matter how big Amazon gets, how much name recognition they have, if they piss off the techies, the ones who were buying things online before it was a fad, the balance of power will shift somewhere else. Beware the techies scorned.

Matthew Cox


March 1, 2000

This is absurd! No company should be allowed to patent any technology that it did not spend time and money developing. How can be possible to patent a 'technology' that is in widespread usage retrospectively? Why not simply apply for a patent on the practise of handing over coloured pieces of paper in exchange for goods?

Neil Davis


March 1, 2000

Sorry, you also lost my business.

Carlos Baquero


March 1, 2000

Amazon is a great service, but I regret I will not use it anymore for my book purchasing. In the long run, innovation must prevail over profit. (Regardless of what shareholders demand.)

Tronster (Todd Hartley)


March 1, 2000

Frank H. McPherson IV


March 1, 2000

Greedy minds at work, again!

JD Saller


March 1, 2000

As some of the other readers have stated, Amazon is now only an information resource for me, ISBN's and reviews.

Brydon Gilliss


March 1, 2000

Beatriz Ibanez


March 1, 2000

Amazon, Don't kill the internet.

Glen Schneider


March 1, 2000

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits..."

Max Wainer


March 1, 2000


March 1, 2000

*I* will be buying from anyone *other* than Amazon until this is resolved.

Grier Ellis


March 1, 2000

As one of your first and most loyal customers I must confess that this action of yours shows you are more interested in consolidating your market share at any cost rather than attempting to remain the best of the best in an open and competitive market. All of my future perchases will hinge to a large extent on your actions. Choose wisely. . .

Peter Renaud


March 1, 2000

Cynical and selfish abuse of the system.

Craig M. Schoelles


March 1, 2000

In "World Wide Web", there is a little word: "World". I believe there is a little difference between how to write "World" and how to write "Amazon". I want that this difference exists for ever.

Di‰go D'OLIVEIRA GRANJA


March 1, 2000

Eh?

Trevor Milbourn


March 1, 2000

I will never shop or browse Amazon again! I will also encourage as many people as I can to avoid the site! To hell with Amazon!

Doug Weems


March 1, 2000

I am really disappointed that a firm that is concerned with the distribution of high-level knowledge could be so low-leved. As a physicist I intended to buy several books to them. I will go some place else, and make sure that as much of my colleagues do so too.

Thibaut Cousin


March 1, 2000

David Pease


March 1, 2000

John Schweiger


March 1, 2000

I used to order from Amazon.com, but I haven't in several months due to the patent issues. I'm happily going to other on-line retailers as well as my local store for my books and records.

Beirne Konarski


March 1, 2000

Je signe des deux mains

R‰mi Renaudin


March 1, 2000

I have bought several books from Amazon, but since the patent on One-click shopping cleared I have not bought a single book from you. I also encourage others to not purchase books or other items from you. Many normal, not-tech literate folks find these patents rather outrageous as well and cannot believe that such patents are filed, let alone passed. I will continue to tell everyone I know about this until your foolishness stops.

Chris Edwards


March 1, 2000

Isn't Information Technologie (at the heart of it) about sharing information and making it freely easily available? Looks like MS and now Amazon haven't grasped that concept yet. Oh never mind... If I can stop using MS softwares and use Linux instead, I don't see any problem stopping using Amazon to source my O'Reilly's books. BOL seems to cool in the UK, am sure they'd do O'Reilly books. And if Amazon goes down because loads of people buy somewhere else their stuff, like me... too bad, I don't care!

Dominique Cressatti


March 1, 2000

If Amazon keeps this up then they will really heat things up for competition, as we won't be shopping there anymore. Alternatives: Reel.com, Fatbrain.com, and of course bn.com.

Steven Pavloski


March 1, 2000

In addition to our outrage towards Amazon for attempting to patent something that is not only inherent to ecommerce, but that existed before Amazon came along, we should all be incensed by the U.S. Patent Office issuing the patents in the first place. I heard an excellent analogy on television. The host of a talk show stated that it is equivalent to McDonald's attempting to patent the drive-through window. This is yet another example of a regulatory body not understanding technology and a "dot-com" company taking advantage of such ignorance.

Ken Scott


March 1, 2000

Amazon just lost another 2 customers. When will they learn that they can't patent common sense?

Dustin Fay


March 1, 2000

At such game, maybe one day someone will send you lawyers because you use illegally a patented thing. What if Tim Berners-Lee patented the www and asked you 񘍊 per sell? Free For All!

Lol Zimmerli


March 1, 2000

I personally will *never* buy from Amazon again. Goto noamazon.com for alternative sites for everything that amazon sells. cya

David Thibodeau


March 1, 2000

Franck Babin


March 1, 2000

Bill Napier


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com has gone completely mad with their patents of the obvious. Since they started with the 1-click shopping patent and their lawsuit against BN.com, I haven't been back to their site. I have begun purchasing my stuff locally or through the links found on www.noamazon.com.

Aaron Shapiro


March 1, 2000

Geert-Jan Van den Bogaerde


March 1, 2000

It is sad when a company that has started to dominate its field by legimate business practices, by simply offering a better service, becomes so paranoid in defense of its marketshare that it starts to stoop to some rather questionable tactics. I had always respected and admired Amazon, but now I don't know if I will ever shop there again. Give up your patent suit, and I will consider it.

Chris Durbin


March 1, 2000

Lisa Chiarella


March 1, 2000

Please be advised that I will no longer be ordering from Amazon. In addition, I am liquidating all Amazon stock from my portfolio. A company that makes such poor business decisions, is one that I do not consider a good investment.

Andrew Marciniak


March 1, 2000

Goodbye Amazon, Hello Borders.

Kyle Pellar-Kosbar


March 1, 2000

Amazon's 'patent' is just one more example of how business tries to misuse what was once an open forum, by trying to monopolize it. ETOYS.COM was taught a similar lesson, not too long ago, and suffered as a result. (see http://www.etoy.com)

Jack Furlong


March 1, 2000

Alexis Dubourg


March 1, 2000

</I>Although I have yet to use Amazon, I definately won't now...

scott schmit


March 1, 2000

Andrew Grimm


March 1, 2000

Stifling the innovation that put you where you are today is hardly "Man-of-the-Year" caliber behavior.

Jack Johnson


March 1, 2000

This patent is absurd. This type of programming idea is not an invention. It's just an application of a programming construct.

Gregg Bendtsen


March 1, 2000

Dmitri A. Gusev


March 1, 2000

If barriers to entry are so low that you need to lean on questionable patents to stay on top, perhaps your business model isn't all it's cracked up to be.

Adam Farkas


March 1, 2000

Why ?. The power of the dollar change ones good intentions into bad ones.

Neil Jonkers


March 1, 2000

I have used amazon.com but will cease to do so if they persist in this rediculous patent issue.

Michael G. Malone


March 1, 2000

I have bought several books from Amazon, but since the patent on One-click shopping cleared I have not bought a single book from you. I also encourage others to not purchase books or other items from you. Many normal, not-tech literate folks find these patents rather outrageous as well and cannot believe that such patents are filed, let alone passed. I will continue to tell everyone I know about this until your foolishness stops.

Chris Edwards


March 1, 2000

Hmm, I thought Microsoft was the jerk of e-commerce, I guess not? Please don't do this!

Nick Whalen


March 1, 2000

It's hard to imagine that something as obvious as "One-click" or an "Affiliates" program could be patented. Why would anyone would want to spend time with the patent process rather than continuing to innovate and adding further value to their business? Neither "One-click" nor "Affiliates" take me to Amazon, good service and good prices have. It's interesting to note that if you do a search on evenbetter.com Amazon rarely comes-up as the #1 value. Is price competition taking Amazon to the point where they feel the need to litigate their competition rather than compete? It looks like when the going gets tough, the tough litigate... how sad.

Mike Summers


March 1, 2000

Casey King


March 1, 2000

Mike Ford


March 1, 2000

I have been a loyal and consistent Amazon customer from its earliest incarnation. Never again!!!

Kevin Bradford


March 1, 2000

Michael J. Park


March 1, 2000

Most disappointing. Amazon, you've lost yet another customer.

Doug Hall


March 1, 2000

I don't know if I will shop Amazon anymore.

George Bonito


March 1, 2000

Douglas A. Salathe


March 1, 2000

We are writing to request that Amazon stop all attempts to enforce the patent that it has been granted on "one click ordering" (Patent number 5,960,411). It is our belief that this patent was granted without adequate review of prior art, and further, that even were it ultimately found valid, such broad patents serve only to hold back further innovation. One-Click ordering is a clever marketing slogan. However, your patent fails to meet even the most rudimentary tests for novelty and non-obviousness to an expert in the field. The fundamental technology on which Amazon's one-click implementation is based is the use of "cookies", a small amount of data placed on client computers to add state and session management capabilities to the World Wide Web, which was introduced in 1994 into Netscape Navigator by Lou Montulli, Marc Andreesen, and others, at the urging of none other than Vint Cerf. The technique had been deployed on thousands of sites well in advance of your 1997 patent application. We believe that the rapid innovation on the World Wide Web and Internet platform that has created so much new value for the public (as well as for Amazon and its shareholders) will be choked off if companies take the short-sighted route of filing patents on commonly accepted and obvious techniques in an attempt to keep competitors from using them. Ill-advised patents and other attempts to limit the use of web technology for private advantage have put the whole software development and standards process into a precarious state. We understand that you may feel a need to file such patents for defensive purposes, to keep unscrupulous squatters from keeping you from doing business on the web, but if you use these patents offensively, as you have done in obtaining an injunction against Barnes & Noble's use of one-click ordering, you are striking a blow against continued innovation in the medium that has proven so successful for you. Given that you've now also received a patent on your Affiliates program (patent number 6,029,141), as well as several other critical patents relating to e-commerce, we urgently request that you clarify your intentions with regard to software patents, and avoid any attempts to limit the further development of internet commerce on the basis of the patents you have already been awarded.

Sherrie Abruscato


March 1, 2000

I, like many others, have been a consistent customer Amazon.com. Until this patent issue is resolved, however, I feel it will be neccessary to take my business elsewhere.

Blake Sorensen


March 1, 2000

Diane M. Napolitano


March 1, 2000

I have recently bought a book at Amazon before becoming fully knowledgable on the issues surrounding your patent application concerning one click functionality. This sort of attempt to stifle competition and to harm the growth of both other commerce sites and also non-commercial ventures is disturbing to say the least. I am not the typical student on a cause coder for world freedom type. I am an Account Manager of Data Operations for a large corporation. In this role, I end up purchasing a large number of computer books because I have to familiar with Unix, and NT Operating System functionality as well as Oracle Database Administration. In other words I buy a lot of books and I made my first purchase of books online from Amazon. It was my first foray away from the brick and mortar bookstores. The sad part is that your closed minded corporate attitude has made it absolutely clear that it will be last time I make an online purchase from your company.

Johnathan Bailes


March 1, 2000

The U.S Patent Office needs a top down review as this latest "patent" by Amazon is plain silly. If Amazon.com is the inventor of one-click shopping than Al Gore really did invent the Internet.

Khan Usman Iqbal


March 1, 2000

S. Peters


March 1, 2000

I find the whole idea of patenting software ludicrous. I have yet to see a single patent filed for a software "idea" or "concept" that was worth it's salt. Until we actually have qualified people in the patent office to deal with deciding whether or not these claims are legitimate, they should all be disgarded. I am truly disappointed in Amazon. I have been a long time customer and feel that they have truly made a mark on the net by being unique and distinct. The answer isn't to patent your ideas and then charge admission. The idea is simple. Innovate or stagnate. I hope that these missives help convice Mr. Bezos that he has taken a wrong turn and that it's not too late to turn back.

Bill Wehnert


March 1, 2000

I haven't bought a thing from Amazon since hearing about the "patent".

Zach Williams


March 1, 2000

I agree with much of what has been said here. I have never bought anything from Amazon and I never will until they can curb their overt capitalistic tendenacies.

Lee McKee


March 1, 2000

As a book author, and as a customer, I'm appalled at Amazon's behavior. This is surely killing the goose that laid the golden egg.

Clinton Pierce


March 1, 2000

Zack Tennant


March 1, 2000

Kevin Poorman


March 1, 2000

My comment is my sign.

Igor Piontkovskiy


March 1, 2000

patrick a. kloeckner


March 1, 2000

Jack Webb


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos: This is not a smart move. Think about it. Byron Law

Byron Law


March 1, 2000

This represents the ultimate in electronic arrogance. To think that this type of business relationship is exclusive to the internet, and then to declare that you are the "owner" of said intellectual capital completely rejects the principles on which the web was developed.

Ben Ellington


March 1, 2000

Hope you make a lot of money off of those patents...because it doesn't look like you'll be making too much more off of books if you continue this idiocy. I know with me you had cultivated that all-important product of retail commerce, customer loyalty. I used to buy from you almost exclusively, but that is all over now unless you rethink your stance on exclusivity and intellectual property.

Steve Barbe


March 1, 2000

Stephane Arguin


March 1, 2000

Jason Hartman


March 1, 2000

Eric Ouzts


March 1, 2000

We can only hope their next filing is for Chapter 11.

Ken Koeberle


March 1, 2000

This is incredibly ridiculous. I am a long-time customer, but will be taking my business elsewhere, from this point on.

Paul Shealy


March 1, 2000

Cyrus Bhedwar


March 1, 2000

Here, here!

Peter Davison


March 1, 2000

Maxim Zakharov


March 1, 2000

Jeni Kolsrud


March 1, 2000

The net is inventing new ways to do business. Amazon's ridiculous patents are an attempt to revert the the neanderthal business practices of yesteryear. Keep it up, and amazon.com will just become another extinct dinosaur.

Jason Bailey


March 1, 2000

1 word... ridiculous.

Ty Scicluna


March 1, 2000

This behavior by Amazon is unacceptable to me, and I will not be making any purchases from your company until it ceases.

Dean Zorn


March 1, 2000

Garett R. Laberge


March 1, 2000

I used to buy regularly from Amazon, and recommend it to my friends over Barnes and Noble. But I am disgusted by this patent. Having written and deployed more than one large-scale web application which now appears to retroactively violate this ridiculous patent, I am in a position to know how silly it is. You have driven me into the arms of the hated Barnes and Noble, and I will tell others to do the same. Sincerely,

Brendan Cully


March 1, 2000

I really don't see how going out and getting patents like this are going to help the computer industry out at all. It will only limit what can be done with commerce online. I am certain we could get Steve Wozniak (sp) to be a big supporter of this letter, as he wanted to release the schematics of the first apple computer to everyone. I always believed that the point of technology was to make life better and easier, not to line one's own pockets with as much money as possible. Perhaps I am being proven wrong.

Andrew Randall Picek


March 1, 2000

Hmmmmm..... Training materials budget for one of the top 5 logistics providers in the country.... Gone to the border(s). Wake up Amazon, it is truly sad to see what I once considered to be an e-commerce pioneer becoming a carpetbagger. Listen to your customers, or at least pay attention to the breeze caused by everyone leaving at once...

David Macauley


March 1, 2000

I personally will not purchase anything from amazon.com until this issue is satisfactorily resolved. Furthermore, I will encourage all my friends and relatives to do the same.

Thomas J. Boberek


March 1, 2000

"One-click ordering"!?..."affiliate programs"!?...give me a break Amazon.com... But hey, wait a minute!....That's it!...The "right mouse click"...I could patent that!...I'll make a fortune!...Where does it end? With stunts like yours, the web is doomed. Disingenuous, irresponsible, and self-serving behavior...Shame on you!

MLGrant/Seattle


March 1, 2000

Well, how very Microsoft of them.

Bryan Decker


March 1, 2000

Becky Silva


March 1, 2000

I have ordered from Amazon.com in the past, and have had absolutely no problems with my orders. However after reading about what you have done, and are still doinging I am forced to abandon your service for the many other options out here on the Ineternet. While my personal boycott may not harm you, and while you may not care. I have also done my part in alerting those I talk with, and they too are taking their business elsewhere. After all, we helped create the internet, and we are not about to be bullied by big business. It's worth two clicks at bn.com to stop the attempts at owning what we created. This is just the start of what is going to happen to your client base. I hope you have vision enough to at least see that.

Nathaniel Beall


March 1, 2000

I usually spend about 񘧸 a year on books. I haven't bought a book at amazon since I heard about the boycott. I'm sure Fatbrain.com loves your patent since it caused them to receive my business.

Mike Mangino


March 1, 2000

I have used Amazon.com in the past to purchase books. Until the company drops this absurd "patent" of prior art, I will not shop there again. Mr. Bezos, the Web was, and is, being built through personal innovation, not corporate stagnation.

Timothy Bowser


March 1, 2000

I just deleted all cookies from Amazon on my PC and I do not plan on returning to Amazon until this is properly handled. You know...for a company that is loosing money hand over fist, I wouldn't push this one too too far.

Stephen Szyszkiewicz


March 1, 2000

Paul DeLuca


March 1, 2000

William D. Moore


March 1, 2000

I now have ONE LESS SITE to visit!

D. Caviness


March 1, 2000

As long as Amazon insists on protecting their rights to to questionable technology based on something that was given to me and the world as whole ie: Public Domain, I will avail myself of the self same technology ie: ONE CLICK ON THE BACK BUTTON

George G. Smith Sr.


March 1, 2000

Chris Updike


March 1, 2000

Free trade is essential. This patent restricts e-commerce and I strongly oppose it.

Jan Krupnick


March 1, 2000

Ridiculous. I can (and will) easily go to bn.com, or just stop at the Barnes & Noble over on Rte 9.

James M. Hartley Jr.


March 1, 2000

An ex-customer of Amazon

Geert Jan van Oldenborgh


March 1, 2000

Although the true fault lies with the incredibly inept United States Patent Office for granting such an broad patent, the fact that you are taking advantage of their ineptitude has inclined me to bookmark barnsandnoble.com and oreilly.com as alternatives. Instead of competing on merit, you've obviously decided to use the Bill Gates 'if we can't beat them, kill them' model of competition. I guess that's what can happen when you're on the cover of every national news magazine, your company is hailed as a model of the new economy, yet you're still in the red.

Matthew Persico


March 1, 2000

Tim: thank you. Jeff: we are tired of your companys behavior.

Ian Geoghegan


March 1, 2000

The patent is astounding. The fact of filing this patent is enough to disqualify the company ...

Roland Lichti


March 1, 2000

I am shocked that someone would try to patent a simple thing such as a Cookie or a link. and to enforce the patent is absurd!! Ill be going to some other online bookseller for my purchases from now on.

Carl Lafferty


March 1, 2000

What Amazon has done with it's software patents is to me equivalent to raping the internet. I will have no part of Amazon any longer.

Jeff Kennedy


March 1, 2000

While I do like using Amazon for buying books, etc, I will be quite happily using other online retailers while this sort of policy continues.

Simon Dick


March 1, 2000

Jussi Kangasharju


March 1, 2000

It's hard to believe that a large business can have such childish priorities. We can't support that kind of business.

Rod Kee


March 1, 2000

Victor Rehorst


March 1, 2000

Why would anybody want to buy from Amazon.com anyway? they never have the best price, use www.bestbookbuys.com to find many cheaper places to get the same book. The last book I bought I got for half of Amazon's price, and with free shipping.

Michael Masterson


March 1, 2000

Prashanth Ram


March 1, 2000

Justin Cave


March 1, 2000

I am so annoyed about the Amazon One-Click Patent and the Affiliate Program patent. I have enjoyed Amazon.com so much that I hope they will drop the law suits and re-think this acquiring of patents.

Rebecca Hippert


March 1, 2000

I guess I'll just take my business elsewhere.

Mark Richards


March 1, 2000

I guess I'll just take my business elsewhere.

Mark Richards


March 1, 2000

Never again.

Scott Carpenter


March 1, 2000

As an IT admin, I would take great pleasure in adding Amazon to the list of blocked sites in my organization! Oh well, at least there is bn.com

J Dyer


March 1, 2000

As a college student, the convenience of "one click ordering" is not nearly as important to any of us as the open nature of the internet. I for one will forgo that convenience in boycott. Until your position is rethought, your competitors will be getting my textbook money this semester. (and boy, are there a lot of books i need)

Dan Chin


March 1, 2000

Bob Bell


March 1, 2000

As a long-time customer of amazon.com I'm disgusted by their patent policy. They have to change it or we, the customers, will vote with our feet and buy our books elsewhere.

Thomas Oesterlie


March 1, 2000

I find it bizarre that Amazon should even apply for a patent on such a simple use of cookies, let alone be granted one. To then enforce this is against all the principles of the web and can only serve to hurt all businesses. Do they really want to end up in a similar situation to Microsoft? As a long-standing (and so far very satisfied) Amazon customer I wait to see the outcome, book selling competitors are only one-click away.

Julian Browne


March 1, 2000

Businesses have a motivation to improve the bottom line and to ensure stock holder value. However, this patent goes beyond a purely defensive stance against market erosion and takes an offensive posture reminiscent of Microsoft. Microsoft was judged to have monopoly power by virtue (or lack thereof) of their operating system. Amazon.com now seeks the same level of non-competition that Microsoft seems to enjoy. By "patenting" a technology that even novice computer science students are taught as a means to maintain state in a stateless system, amazon.com has thrown out the gauntlet and said "If you want to do business on the web, you have to do it our way, with our technology, and pay us the royalties." Gee, "Where do you want to go today?" There is such a thing as "the greater good". In this day and age of technological miracles and rapid advancements, Jeff Bezos and company have shown an incredible short-sightedness with this marketing tactic. And truly, that's all this is. They gain no real competitive advantage, but by using this patent to spread FUD across the e-commerce terrain, they have definitely muddied the waters. I am truly disappointed.

Matt Sorrell


March 1, 2000

Justin Lynch


March 1, 2000

FOOLS!

Brian Pettit


March 1, 2000

Jeff: Please stop this silliness.

Richard Hamilton


March 1, 2000

Vladimir Savastiouk


March 1, 2000

Kenneth Maniscalco Sr.


March 1, 2000

I love Amazon.com. Customer reviews are great, and the prices are nice too. But until this issue is resolved in a satisfactory manner, my business is at fatbrain.com.

Tom Panning


March 1, 2000

Trying to demolish E-Commerce as we know it? No thanks.

Holly Culpepper


March 1, 2000

Mark Szidik


March 1, 2000

Benjamin Wutt


March 1, 2000

While I am an Amazon customer and have been fairly pleased with them, I find the software patent issue ojectionable for the same reasons already stated by Tim. If Amazon persists in being heavy-handed with their patents, I'll simply take my business elsewhere.

David Huff


March 1, 2000

Tim O'Reilly: Interesting guy, smart businessman. Jeff Bezos: Bill Gates wannabe. 'Nuff said.

Keith Phillips


March 1, 2000

I use Amazon.com every year for Christmas shopping and periodically in between. It's unfortunate to hear that they are being so greedy. It's one thing if the patent office has made a mistake and entirely another to capitalize on that mistake. I have no problem standing up for what is right and boycotting them too.

Betheny Hawkins


March 1, 2000

Christoph Eyrich


March 1, 2000

The idea that Bezos can get away with these silly patents is chilling. What great entrepreneurial idea will be lost because some small underfunded company is not allowed to use obvious technology nor has the funds to wage a legal battle with Amazon? After 18 months of ordering from Amazon, I'll now switch to Barnes & Noble or Borders. Thanks, Tim, for this forum. And the letters should also go to the clueless at the U.S. Patent Office. Tina

Tina Louise


March 1, 2000

Carl Harris


March 1, 2000

Besides that software patents are in general not a good idea, this kind of abuse serves no purpose other than putting a bad name on a company (read: Amazon.com).

Stefan Egilsson


March 1, 2000

I do this not out of any dislike for Amazon.com. I'm signing because it appears to me that what Amazon.com is doing is the 'net-equivalent of patenting "Amazing Grace."

Peter A. Masalsky


March 1, 2000

Well, it looks like Amazon has annoyed a whole lot of people with this practice, and a bunch of them seem to be voting with their feet (me too, at least for now). Personally, I think that even one Microsoft is too much for the world, so I defintely won't be supporting this.

Sean Reilly


March 1, 2000

Michael Klem


March 1, 2000

You are hurting businesses your not even competing with - it's infuriating - unless you are trying to compete with everyone. Oh, I see, this is what monopolies do.

Pamela Neville


March 1, 2000

I have been thinking about buying from Amazon.com for a while, but have been uncertain as to Amazon's ethics. Now after the recent controversy, I am without a doubt going to continue shopping at Chapters in Canada. How can one company seriously think they can patent anything to do with the 'Net??? This is ridiculous. Paul Smith

Paul Smith


March 1, 2000

Jeffrey Williams


March 1, 2000

Amazon has lost another customer to this absurb patent.

Chris Coleman


March 1, 2000

Amazon's policy is at best shortsighted and at worst monopolizing. No good comes of this practice for anyone involved, least of all consumers.

Ben Speakmon


March 1, 2000

That's it - Barnes and Noble may not exactly be everyone's romantic notion of the new company which battles successfully with old money in a new frontier (like Amazon is), but I don't really care: They'll get my business now, and will continue to get it until Amazon declares their intention to drop their software patents.

Mark Newton


March 1, 2000

Compare thee to microsoft - take someone else's innovation and act as if it is your own....

Matt Critcher


March 1, 2000

I have been a steady customer of Amazon.com for some time and I remember when Barnes and Noble had bought out your main distributor in the hopes of forcing Amazon to jack their prices up. I remember how Amazon.com screamed about how unfair this was to them and I also remember B&N was prevented from using their leverage by the Government. By filing and holding a patent on any function that should be native to e-commerce is attempting to create a stranglehold on any business out there that you might not like. This feels as if Amazon is trying to outdo B&N in the sleazy business arena. It also feels that Amazon is setting a dark precedent concerning any and all future e-commerce. The freedom that allowed Amazon to grow is now being threatened by Amazon itself. I can't help but to think of Amazon as a tree that has grown so big that it's roots push out smaller plants and its branches and leaves block out the smaller trees from sharing the sunlight.

TS Killeen


March 1, 2000

Please remove me from your affiliates program.

Russel Madere


March 1, 2000

This patent hearkens back to the Microsoft - Apple appropriation of Xerox Parc GUI technology.

David Trimmer


March 1, 2000

Truely Unbelievable. You came across as an honest, goodwilled company and now you prove it was all a farce to make a buck.

Karen Donoughe


March 1, 2000

I've been using Amazon since 1997 and have had _no_ problems with them in the past, but this is just lunacy for trying to keep a good idea to themselves.

Samuel Smith


March 1, 2000

I wil be terminating all my dealings with Amazon while they continue to follow these practices.

Kris Boyle


March 1, 2000

I wouldn't be a software developer without the free (as in freedom) tools provided by the GNU project and related projects of the software community. I don't agree at all with your langrabing patents, so you've lost another custumer. Fortunatly competition is providing a good level of service and the Internet community doesn't need Amazon.

Miguel Duarte


March 1, 2000

Tsk, tsk. It's a shame that big companies seem to be having trouble understanding the fundamentals of the web. It's even worse when said company owes everything to the technology that it's trying to stifle. Biting the hand that feeds has never been a good idea...

Ted Coldwell


March 1, 2000

You can be sure that I will not be buying from or recommending Amazon for as long as they continue to patent obvious concepts and processes. There are plenty of other sources for books on the web.

Michael Haertjens


March 1, 2000

Up until now, I've done most of my online purchasing through Amazon. They just lost a customer until they do an about-face with these unfair and completely rediculous practices.

David King


March 1, 2000

Trademarking the term 'One-click ordering' would be understandable. Trying to patent the concept is patently (pardon the pun) ridiculous.

Scott Maley


March 1, 2000

I once thought highly of Amazon, and the convenience it offered me for purchasing technical manuals. Your current tactics remind me of the Forces of Evil currently residing in Redmond, WA. Bill would be proud. However, you will not get any more of my money.

Bob Carter


March 1, 2000

Thomas Jones-Low


March 1, 2000

Folks - You've done a wonderful job of making the Internet a great place for the consumer to do business, but now you threaten to kill that same wonderful venue by balkanizing it with (ridiculous!) software patents. PLEASE reconsider your position and drop your ultimately self-defeating attempts to enforce ownership of that which was never yours to begin with.

Bennett C. Baker


March 1, 2000

Patenting real inventions is one thing, patents of internet standard practices and basic business models is another. If you stole it for your site doesn't mean you can patent it just because you have a large amount of sales and a large legal department. The net was built by individuals Amazon is just capitalizing and the net will not stand for it. Amazon, if we can't beat you legally we'll watch your market share drop to the floor and just laugh at you.

Robert Grimm


March 1, 2000

After reading this letter I looked at my purchasing history from Amazon. I made a rough calculation of 轜 for what I spent there in æ99; they even sent me a cool travel mug. I imagine that I would have spent even more this year, however that will not be the case until Jeff and his friends end their little hike up Mount Stupid Ass. Watch it boys, I hear itÆs real cold and lonely at the top.

Dan Viescas


March 1, 2000

The patents on one click ordering and the affiliates program are, of course, laughable. I am confident that they will eventually be overturned based on prior art. Nonetheless, Amazon's attempt to bully its competitors with these patents has a high potential to slow down the rate of innovation on the Internet and to scare companies out of the business. This is the type of ruthless and unfair business tactic I would have expected from another Washington state high tech firm. Your high-handedness smacks of an attitude which could eventually give you a DOJ investigation of your own. Until you withdraw your attempts to enforce your patents, I will buy nothing further from Amazon. Sincerely, Vin Shelton

Vin Shelton


March 1, 2000

What a slap in the face.

paul targosz


March 1, 2000

Diane Robinson


March 1, 2000

This is very disappointing. It had been my belief (and perhaps I was naively led by the press) that Amazon had gotten where it is by vision, determination and innovation ... but NOT necessarily by out-and-out greed (especially intellectual greed) or by taking the hardass crush-our-enemies approach.

Tony Nowikowski


March 1, 2000

Wendy OBrien


March 1, 2000

Patenting obvious applications is an abuse of an already overtaxed patent system. You should be ashamed of yourselves. I will not be making further purchases from your company.

Gordon Haverland


March 1, 2000

I have been a loyal Amazon customer since they started. They deliver a tremendous service at a fair price. But this is a matter of principle, and their abhorent behavior requires me to take my business elsewhere. I will buy no more from them until they reform.

John Quentin Heywood


March 1, 2000

I spent over 躔 last year at Amazon, on books and videos for my family and my business. I wish now that they had come out with this stupid idea in early January so I could send it all back for a refund. I will not be going to Amazon.com again, and will encourage my customers and my co-workers to do the same.

Ralph Nelson


March 1, 2000

I spent over 躔 last year at Amazon, on books and videos for my family and my business. I wish now that they had come out with this stupid idea in early January so I could send it all back for a refund. I will not be going to Amazon.com again, and will encourage my customers and my co-workers to do the same.

Ralph Nelson


March 1, 2000

Laurel Palmer


March 1, 2000

This make the sort of thing that Kafka and George Orwell wrote about sound sensible.

Robert Ramsdale


March 1, 2000

"God gives hazel-nuts to he who has no teeth"

Nitsan Wakart


March 1, 2000

I was a regular customer, and used your service not only for my own book needs, but I would regularly give out gift certificates for holidays and birthdays. However, in light of this new situation, I will join the boycott until you either (a) recant and operate under less cutthroat methods, or (b) you lose business, go bankrupt, and serve as an example to others. Plus, I will be negating all backorders and returning all gift certificates given to me. I can easily deal with other methods of ordering, and the inconvenience of having to click more than once is minor compared to the inconvenience of having yet another monopoly-dominated chunk of e-commerce on our hands.

Bryan L. Cox


March 1, 2000

Amazon, I... have no words to read from you, right now.

Rui M. Silva


March 1, 2000

Peter Caporilli


March 1, 2000

Aaron Ferrell


March 1, 2000

Its a shame that a company so in tune with the new world that the web has brought about is so out of tune on this issue. Amazon is killing the goose that lays golden eggs.

Howard Fear


March 1, 2000

Amazon may be the biggest legal thief in history!

Jerome Gillis, M.S., CRC


March 1, 2000

Who the Hell Amazon.com think they are...

Fr‰d‰ric Gu‰nette


March 1, 2000

I will no longer support a company that engages itself in such unethical business practices.

Thomas McGrath


March 1, 2000

Guillaume AUDOIN


March 1, 2000

Bard Hustveit


March 1, 2000

I have been a loyal Amazon purchaser for several years but I can not condone bullying tactics. None of the patents that have been awarded to Amazon are innovations in any way. One-Click ordering wasn't even their innovation; people have been using cookies to simplify web navigation since there creation. Also affiliate programs have been around in the 'real' world for ages; do they honestly believe that just because they emulated it on the web that it qualifies as innovative. I think not, and so I will not spend any more money at Amazon until they get a clue.

Christopher Rockett


March 1, 2000

no patent on already existent technologie!

Louis Plouffe


March 1, 2000

Michael R. Rudel


March 1, 2000

Christopher W. Ethridge


March 1, 2000

Terry Lavely


March 1, 2000

Dustin D. Marks


March 1, 2000

Myself being a veteran of the Patent process find the one-click patent totally frivolous. Amazon need not worry about what it has created in the past. Amazon should direct all attention on creating future value for the consumer. Here is a tip: INNOVATE, RECREATE and EVOLVE!!!! Former 軸 dollar a yr Consumer @ Amazon Michael Fleener

Michael Fleener


March 1, 2000

Carol Belair


March 1, 2000

Scott Farber


March 1, 2000

If your patent application is upheld I will transfer all my electronic book orders to a competitor and cease all business with Amazon forthwith.

Helgi Briem


March 1, 2000

I have already emailed Amazon and told them that I was boycotting them for this. They wrote back with their standard excuse. When I heard of that they had obtained a patent on "afiliates", then I was even more disgusted with them.

Michael Demoulin


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com is predatory. They might very well patent the search function next. Have you noticed how their version craftily adds authors?

Paul Dickins


March 1, 2000

<sigh> Makes me glad that I always found other sources for my book purchases and never got around to ordering them from Amazon. I'll be passing your idiocy on to others.

Angela White


March 1, 2000

Amazon has lost me as a customer!

Dennis T. Morsani Jr.


March 1, 2000

So much for the home theater equipment I was looking to purchase from Amazon.com, and the 15-20 book purchased last year. But that's okay, there are pleanty of businesses online that aren't trying to rape compeition and have better prices.

Brett Spangler


March 1, 2000

Douglas R. Carson


March 1, 2000

Claus Borchardt


March 1, 2000

These are invalid patents of obvious solutions to common problems. Amazon has used the nievity of the US Patent System in respect to the internet to prevent ligitimate e-commerce. This cannot be allowed.

Joshua Warchol


March 1, 2000

Tim Jansen


March 1, 2000

Until Amazon drops this case, I will not be purchasing anything from them. I believe that this court case is very detrimental to the development of commerce on the web, and in the long run will only succeed in harming Amazon and the net.

Larry C. Lyons


March 1, 2000

I have stopped purchasing from Amazon.com a while ago when they started their first round of "sneaky tricks" Amazon.com is going to give all the .com's a bad name in the business world with the underhanded patent tactics they are trying now.

Tim Gray


March 1, 2000

Jeff, The whole purpose of the Internet is to be open. Your patent claims are silly and will only hurt the consumer. I would be very careful about pursuing this lawsuit. There are many places to buy books online...

David Gostanian


March 1, 2000

David Chan


March 1, 2000

Bryan Paul Inderhees


March 1, 2000

I can only hope that some good in the form of software patent reform will come of all of this. In the meantime I'm taking my book and cd buying business elsewhere.

Tim Pickering


March 1, 2000

Michael James O'Connor


March 1, 2000

Jeff Bezos, I'll be watching for Amazon's anti-trust trial which should be starting soon if you keep up with these steps to eliminate your competition.

Richard Childs


March 1, 2000

I've purchased about 躔 worth of books from Amazon.com in the past 6 months, and was planning to purchase even more in the near future. My business will now be going to B&N, either online or their store down the street. All of the people I recommended to Amazon.com will also be receiving an email redirecting their business. Until this rediculousness has ceased, I will avoid Amazon.com at all costs, and suggest others do likewise.

Eric Harris


March 1, 2000

I'm going to patent shoes! I wear them every day so it's obvious that I invented them. Then I can sue every other person who makes shoes, or uses them. Won't that be a swell idea!

Neil Yriart


March 1, 2000

Our company will no longer be purchasing any books or material from Amazon.com (as we have done in the past) if this silliness continues.

Dave Lehman


March 1, 2000

As an Amazon customer and long-time Internet user I am horrified that such a patent can be issued. In Europe, where I live, it is not possible to patent software, the copyright mechanism serves in its place. It is time for the USPTO to educate themselves on the current state-of-the-art in I.T terms and clamp down on the many abuses that the commercial sector is trying to inflict. I will no longer buy through Amazon.

Robert S. Newson


March 1, 2000

one click ordering is an idea. Since when have we been able to patent ideas?

Michael Kline


March 1, 2000

Not only does it seem absurd to patent the use of cookies based on a clever marketing phrase, but to pursue a legal suit seems to be very short sighted. Given the current buzz concerning the DoubleClick use of cookies, I expect more people will use extreme discretion in allowing cookies to be used thereby limiting the usefulness to a web site. I, for one, disable all cookie use by default. There are enough other online book stores that serve the technical community that I can take my business elsewhere.

Sam Lemons


March 1, 2000

Jean-Baptiste Marchand


March 1, 2000

You started on the web like the rest, so stop being a corp and drop the silly patent fighting.

Ted Lehrman


March 1, 2000

Pathetic.

Torak


March 1, 2000

Brian Yeilding


March 1, 2000

I've spent well over 񘈨 at amazon.com just last year. I won't be spending anymore though. Not after seeing the depths that they will sink to in order to make a profit. I assure you my company won't be spending money there either.

jason shultz


March 1, 2000

Tony Powell


March 1, 2000

When I heard about the patent, I'd just bought a software CD from Amazon; I promptly returned it, with an explanation. All I got was a canned answer in which the assured me they were justified by the money they'd sunk into development. I'll not patronize them until they come to their senses, and I'm spreading the word among my friends, acquaintances, and colleagues.

Max Hyre


March 1, 2000

I was an Amazon affiliate, but after reading about the one-click patent and now the affiliate patent I will be cancelling my affiliation with Amazon and informing my Website users why I did this. Amazon should be ashamed of itself for applying for a patent on work started by others, and used prolifically about the Web. The Patent Office should be ashamed of itself for granting the patents, especially since their own rules state that these "ideas" can not be patented.

Dion Vansevenant


March 1, 2000

One step down the low road...leads to another! Here's an idea, Why not patent left to right reading?

Bradley Boutwell


March 1, 2000

Paul Hinecker


March 1, 2000

Ryan Junk


March 1, 2000

I'm a Senior IT Engineer for a Fortune 500 company and I've been an Amazon customer for years. I have been delighted with Amazon in all of my experiences with them, and have praised their service to all who would listen. It saddens me that I will now have to speak out against Amazon (as I have done with Microsoft) due to the questionable business practices that are starting to emerge. No business or businessman is left unaffected when their integrity is called into question.

Bryan Davis


March 1, 2000

As a CGI programmer I find the attempt by Amazon to try to patent both the One-Click and Affiliate Program "technology" completely absurd. The fact that they were actually issued the patent is even more absurd. Amazon will single-handedly destroy e-commerce for all of us with this patent. I used to enjoy purchasing all of my technical and personal books from Amazon, but will not do so in the future if they decide to try to enforce either patent.

Judith F. Cannon


March 1, 2000

Shame on you Amazon.com! Billions isn't enough? You guys working on trillions, huh?

Emanuel Smith


March 1, 2000

Bouverot


March 1, 2000

I cannot in good conscious remain a customer of Amazon. This however is not enough. These moves by Amazon pose a clear and present danger to the furture of the Internet. I would urge everyone to send Amazon a message and do whatever is legally and ethically prudent to put pressure on Amazon to cease and desist form such practices. Further I urge everyone: To refuse to patronize Amazon and to inform Amazon of their reasons for doing so To write their elected officials in order to pass legislation barring such practices and to investigate the U.S. Patent Office and direct them to better scrutinize any and all Internet patent applications. To register complaint with any and all sites that promote, link to, or are affiliated with Amazon. To inform as many others as possible, using ethical means, of the nature of this issue, the ramifications, and how they can help to end this threat. These efforts should continue until Amazon: Ceases any and all attempts to enforce such patents Pay the legal costs of any person or entity that has been a target of a lawsuit by Amazon in relation to these patents. Place these patents permanently and irrevocably in the public domain without reservations or limitations of any kind. Prominently and publicly apologize to the Internet community and acknowledge their error in judgement.

Michael D. Eurbin


March 1, 2000

As a software developer and web developer, I understand the technical aspects of these patents, and I can say that these patents are ludicrous. I have developed similar things in the past using the same technology, and I can say that these technical solutions are obvious, easy, and widely used. As a customer of Amazon, I urge Amazon to stop this practice and keep the web an open place to innovate.

Andy DePue


March 1, 2000

Phillip A. Lindman


March 1, 2000

I've purchased several hundred dollars' worth of books and cds from Amazon.com in the past, but I will not buy anything more until the patents (or at least their enforcement) are abandoned.

Matthew R Burack


March 1, 2000

Jerry Guizar


March 1, 2000

Your patents are holding back the Internet community. Please stop these attempts.

Brian Gannon


March 1, 2000

'Tis a disgrace that a company such as Amazon.com would resort to suing over a patent they should have never filed in the first place. I have looked around on Amazon's website for various computer related books, but have always found the same books in local bookstores for lower prices and no wait for shipping. I can seriously say that until Amazon ceases with this ridiculous action, I will not even load up their website, and will advise everyone I know to do the same. By enforcing a patent they really had no right in securing, they are endangering the innovation that has caused the internet to grow by leaps and bounds. I agree that the US patent office holds equal responsibility in this, because they allowed a patent on a technology that was already in use elsewhere, just because Amazon was the first to file for it. However, Amazon has shown me that they are willing to abuse the system in order to make a buck, and that puts them too close to Microsoft, in my opinion.

Chris Stevenson


March 1, 2000

I'm amazed. I'm completely shocked that someone would try to claim ownership of the physical depression of one, two, or three buttons on a mouse. This is embarassing and appalling. Amazon can rest assured that its quarterly losses, for so long overlooked by markets totally enfatuated with gross sales, will continue and multiply. The length of this list speaks volumes, and I hope someone up there reads it.

John Beamon


March 1, 2000

These patents make ultimately no sense at all. I am no lawyer, I am only partially a programmer, and I am certainly not a full-blown CGI/Perl designer, but there's something about patenting an integral part of the internet that simply MUST be illegal in some sense.

Nicholas Killewald


March 1, 2000

Daisy Arroyo


March 1, 2000

I am outraged that a company that has gained so much from the Web would now wound that Golden Goose. This shortsighted moneygrubbing says a lot about the people in charge at Amazon. I will never do business there again. (I just dumped their stock too).

Larry Whittington


March 1, 2000

Tariq Amin


March 1, 2000

Brian Lalor


March 1, 2000

I have not placed an order with Amazon since this whole debacle start. Goto fatbrain.com instead! Lower prices, and they aren't trying to control the entire web!

Bryan Murphy


March 1, 2000

Robert Lingle

rlingle(splat)hotmail.com


March 1, 2000

Chris Maniar


March 1, 2000

Both the 1-Click and Affiliates patents encroach upon common sense practices. Pursuing and enforcing such patents can do nothing more than stifle the growth of commerce.

Bill Good


March 1, 2000

Heather Chappelle


March 1, 2000

I have never been a huge supporter of Amazon.com, but hearing this makes me quite sure that the few dollars I spent with them in the past year will be far more than I will spend with them again. I was already disgusted with them for some of the stupid things I had been hearing before, but this patenting of something that is so basic to almost all net based stores (more every day) seems absolutely ridiculous. I guess it's time for Amazon to flush itself down the toilet. I really thought this was a Microsoft (after all, MS claims they were the ones that made the Internet popular) like move, but someone beat them to the punch. Down with Amazon.

Nathaniel Jay Lee


March 1, 2000

Live by the sword, die by the sword. I think you get the idea...

Shannon Aldinger


March 1, 2000

There is nothing that I can add that wasn't already stated in the letter. Check yourself back into reality, Bezos, or your company will continue to post losses for every quarter.

Wayne Clement


March 1, 2000

What is Amazon.com?

Daniel Conallen


March 1, 2000

If this is what Amazon the .com has become, (a patent-hunter and bully,) then I want no part of it. It goes against everything the 'Net oringally stood for, which is really about cooperation and community. Now Amazon is leading the charge to make the 'Net about contentiousness and capitalist greed. Bully! to O'Reilly.

Cappy Conn


March 1, 2000

Aaron DeWolf


March 1, 2000

This kind of patent is outright ridicolous to anyone that has knowledge about the internet in general. I am in full agreement with o³reilly.

Tomas Westin


March 1, 2000

When are we going to get Congress involved in this? Wouldn't the original cookie concept used by Netscape fall under some licensing of their product at that time. If so, wouldn't a copyright pre-empt this patent. When does a concept, writing, idea, or programming code become public domain?

Dave Barnes


March 1, 2000

My hope is that Amazon.com's tactic of stifling on-line competition will drive many to shop Amazon's competitors, therefore creating the problem from their patent "solution".

Paul Leon


March 1, 2000

No need to buy from amazon anymore. Your attempt to steal from the community is laughable. Shame on the marketing guy who had the idea. I bet it was not the idea of a programmer.

Detlef Steuer


March 1, 2000

Joe Navratil


March 1, 2000

Joakim Cederberg


March 1, 2000

This is an amazing insult to intelligence Amazon should not be able to get away with. It's prime time for the bubble to burst!

Joe Dobrovolny


March 1, 2000

Amazon's patents are another example of the problems with software patents and patent granting procedures.

Guy Helmer


March 1, 2000

I live in Belgium, Europe and have never bought something on Amazon before - in Belgium alone there are three other online bookstores to choose from - but given this recent attack of idiocracy I will never ever buy from Amazon. Besides ... come on ... who really needs that one-click stuff ? Are we that lazy ? I don't mind filling out the delivery-from every time I buy something. And who cares that some pages are two or three clicks away ? Speed up the connections, servers and database-engines and no one will mind pressing that mousebutton once more if the pages enter the screen in no time. Don't try to re-invent old technology, try to improve it.

Steven Duerinckx


March 1, 2000

As an engineer, I can certainly understand the purpose and necessity for protecting one's research and development efforts. However, these are general concepts, used to make the internet medium the useful tool it has, and will continue to become. This is of course, if organizations such as yourselves refrain from the business practices we have come to see of late. I have had several very good experiences ordering from you, but I can not tolerate this exploitation of the U.S. Patent Office's ignorance in the finer points of internet technology by remaining an Amazon customer. A sad day for e-commerce.

Scott Stanley


March 1, 2000

It is obvious from these patents that Amazon think they are not only the inventors of these commerce technologies, but of e-commerce itself. Amazon also need to admit to themselves that the only reason that they are suing Barnes & Noble is look and feel, and not the 1-Click, however 1-Click gives them the grounds they need to win the case. Amazon are *not* the only players in the field of e-commerce, and should not be restricting other people's competitiveness of "technologies" that they could have dreamt up themselves. Affiliate programs too have been around long before Amazon. Have a look at LinkExchange for example. Amazon as a company really needs to look at their strategy and decide whether they want to upset a core of their customers in this way.

Matthew Byng-Maddick


March 1, 2000

I have spent several hundred on books and am currently an affiliate. I will be taking both my business and my affilate elsewhere.

Ian Rutherford


March 1, 2000

I join those who will boycott Amazon.com until the patents are dropped.

Dick Zantow


March 1, 2000

This patent should have never been awarded! People have been using cookies for such processes since they were invented. It is sad to see such an "innovative" company using such tactics to bully the market that created the ideas and use them against them.

Chad Boyda


March 1, 2000

Once again, the US Patent office is being used as a tool to promote business and destroy innovation. Luckily, Barnes & Nobel and Borders both have an inventory that should be able to support my book habit now that I'm unwilling to buy from Amazon.

Jennifer Hill


March 1, 2000

The One-Click patent is absurd. This makes as much sense as the first email program ever made to charge people money in order to click on Send to send email!

Joseph Litherland


March 1, 2000

What a disappointment. I used to like Amazon, but this patent represents the worst kind of opportunism.

Doug Lay


March 1, 2000

I had not yet become an Amazon customer, but am now certain that I will not be one.

Shannon Lucas


March 1, 2000

Brendan Alderslade


March 1, 2000

Stephen Erikson


March 1, 2000

My feelings have been stated more eloquently by others on this petition than I am capable of stating, so there is nothing left for me to do than sign my name...

Jeremy D. Impson


March 1, 2000

>From a business perspective, you certainly do NOT have the best interests of your shareholders value in view. Short term thinking like this will lead to long term pain (decreases shareholder value).

Mark Gyurcsik


March 1, 2000

Is Amazon slowly moving to become the "Microsoft" of e-commerce? Ruling by pressure and wealth, they won't have me and my friends as customers anymore. Shame, shame on Amazon.com«¨Ö

Nick Csakany


March 1, 2000

Steve Vigneau


March 1, 2000

This is .. beyond words. If Amazon.com does not reverse the actions taken with these patents I will never shop at their site again and will discontue the use of their affiliate program on all my web sites.

Rob Portinga


March 1, 2000

This is .. beyond words. If Amazon.com does not reverse the actions taken with these patents I will never shop at their site again and will discontinue the use of their affiliate program on all my web sites.

Rob Portinga


March 1, 2000

I will no longer shop at Amazon, but instead do business with one of your many competitors - conveniently listed at www.noamazon.com

Robert W. Wilde


March 1, 2000

Kevin Hickey


March 1, 2000

I had always supported Amazon before this idiocy. But realistically, the prices are rarely better then Barnes and Noble, and B&N aren't nearly as preditory. They have my business now.

Rebecca E. Tants


March 1, 2000

Amazon isn't alone by any means in the patent rush. They didn't start it, and it won't end here. All of the times I've just shaken my head in disgust or felt some shame at being a part of a community where things like this can happen, I can tell you the last company I expected to sink to this level would have been Amazon. So much for integrity and pride. The patents office is clueless and Amazon has taken advantage of this. Would someone else have done it if Amazon hadn't? Probably. Amazon should set an example at this point - and do the right thing.

Jason Hartman


March 1, 2000

I hereby sign my name for both myself and all those that I have any influence with. I help people understand and use the Internet for a living, therefore, my explanations have a greater impact on your business than the big money paid for advertising. I still have faith that the great minds at amazon.com will come back to the friendly terms that allowed it to become the ecommerce pioneer that it is.

D. Murray Inman, II


March 1, 2000

How many customers and potential customers can you afford to alienate.

Mike Farrell


March 1, 2000

How many customers and potential customers can you afford to alienate.

Mike Farrell


March 1, 2000

How many customers and potential customers can you afford to alienate.

Mike Farrell


March 1, 2000

I agree this kind of broad patent is absurd.

Chris Orem


March 1, 2000

The fact that Amazon is able to so easily manipulate the system indicates that not only is Amazon unscrupulous but also that the patent system needs to be fixed. I hope that this mess draws the attention necessary for congress to fix the system and that Amazon feels the consequences of their offensive use of frivolous patents. Amazon will not feel the loss of my business as I have never given them any, but I will be informing my friends who do use Amazon of the situation. Jack Littrell

littrellATpostmarkDOTnet


March 1, 2000

I think this is as rediculous as the patent a guy obtained for the Y2K algorithm that was 5 lines of code. It's obvious the patent office is way behind the times, this should never be allowed. But even more troubling is that a company like Amazon.com is taking advantage of it. I will not give my business to any company who purposely commits actions that jeopardize business and growth on the Internet. From now on bn.com will get all of my business.

Michael Mattox


March 1, 2000

Shame on you for your greediness. It is people like you that gives the internet a bad name.

Gary Pinson


March 1, 2000

Jennifer Baughman


March 1, 2000

Stephane Laurin


March 1, 2000

I'm not bitter. I just don't believe in supporting an organization that cuts off the hand that feeds it. And while I won't advocate a boycott of Amazon, I will advise my students -- who buy ũ,000's of computer books each year -- of the constraint this patent puts on their use of a powerful feature of the internet.

Tom Hill


March 1, 2000

I hope it helps.But I think it won't. :-(

Dmitry Erkin


March 1, 2000

Corporate greed will be another of our society's downfalls if we don't stand up for basic freedoms and rights!

Frank Christensen


March 1, 2000

Michael Veksler


March 1, 2000

Daniel R. Oelke


March 1, 2000

I am with holding further orders until this is settled on the side of reason.

John Tong


March 1, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon again.

Jeff Greulich


March 1, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon again.

Jeff Greulich


March 1, 2000

I have purchased many items from Amazon. However, until this absurd attempt at control is removed, I will no longer buy anything, be it books, music, software, or the kitchen sink from Amazon. Tom Gwilt

Tom Gwilt


March 1, 2000

I have purchased many items from Amazon. However, until this absurd attempt at control is removed, I will no longer buy anything, be it books, music, software, or the kitchen sink from Amazon. Tom Gwilt

Tom Gwilt


March 1, 2000

There was one click before Amazon.com was even a blurry hangover dream...trying to patent such a mundane and completely unoriginal thing is just absurd

Bran Ruffin


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com is biting off the hand (mouse?) that feeds it. Even worse, their patent application did not properly credit Al Gore for inventing the Internet.

Andrew Wagliardo


March 1, 2000

In the past experiences with Amazon, I have enjoyed their level of customer service and timely delivery of orders. However, I can not support a practice that relies on the gullability of the patent office and the courts in terms of computer technology. It's time to find another online bookstore.

Jasn Verschage


March 1, 2000

This is about as intelligent as burning ones house because it's cold outside.

Matthew Anderson


March 1, 2000

I, for one will NEVER spend a cent at Amazon because of this. FYI: I spent an easy 񘈨 on books and music last year at bn.com and similar sites, but none at Amazon. Either earn your money the fair way, or go the way of the dinosaur.

Scott


March 1, 2000

The enforcing of this patent is a giant step backward in the field of e-commerce.

Bryan Mayland


March 1, 2000

Seth Crothers


March 1, 2000

Jason Scharlach


March 1, 2000

Jeremy Rickard


March 1, 2000

Dear Jeff Bezos, I love Amazon.com! Please consider the arguments being presented by Tim O'Reilly and Richard Stallman. Please stop attempting to enforce this absurd patent. Amazon.com is a great company. Now let's see you show that you have strong character and good ethics by stopping this crazy litigation.

RAW


March 1, 2000

I am signing under that open letter.

Alexey Kopylov


March 1, 2000

Matthew Laube


March 1, 2000

It's sad to see that you dare appropriate technology that is genuinely free

Vandoorselaere Yoann


March 1, 2000

Tom Swanton


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos can kiss my @$$!

Steve O'Dwyer


March 1, 2000

Werner Wild, Zurich, Switzerland


March 1, 2000

I urge Amazon and all other companies to reconsider the use of software patents. I urge the U.S. Patent office to hire some persons who truly understand the issues involved with such patents.

Seth Lachner


March 1, 2000

Robb Rosell


March 1, 2000

I have ceased to purchase anything from Amazon.com and I openly discourage others from doing so. I will continue this behavior until this patent nonsense is discontinued.

Hugh Brown


March 1, 2000

Why not patent H2O ?

Heb Dirarni


March 1, 2000

It is sad to see the quality of service decline as Amazon begins to rely on legal means to try and maintain its market share. Such methods of doing business rarely last for long.

Eric Christian Berg


March 1, 2000

Richard Sevenich


March 1, 2000

I've been a repeat customer of amazon. No more. I will support the boycott for as long as amazon insists on violating 'net ethics.

Sergey Bratus


March 1, 2000

mark hawkins


March 1, 2000

I happily join the boycot of Amazon and will be encouraging all 5,100+ of my newsletter subscribers to pull all Amazon Affiliate links off their webpages and halt all personal sales with Amazon. You're single handedly trying to throw of monkey wrench into the growth of the internet. Do you think you are the only ones doing business online? Your efforts will harm many business owners and everyday people who are using the Internet to shop. I see no other reasons for this patent effort then selfishness. Shame on you!

Lisa Schmeckpeper


March 1, 2000

I shop at amazon.com because of their outstanding content, selection, and customer service. If, instead of competing on quality and service, they choose to compete on lawsuits and controversy, the values I support will be gone. At that point, instead of going straight to amazon.com, I'll go straight to the price comparison service, and buy from the cheapest.

David Nickason


March 1, 2000

What makes Amazon so "special" that they have to prevent others from using obvious techniques for e-commerce, just because the US Patent Office was dumb enough to grant the patent? Show some sense, have some dignity and respect for others. If Amazon is so damn good, you will do fine whether or not anyone else has one-click ordering. Particularly if they aren't even selling the same products as you. What a bunch of muppets.

Mike Wyer


March 1, 2000

I'm a little late in signing, but I've already warned my mom about this absurdity. Amazon is committing political suicide here. The Web has made it even more of a buyers' market, and folks have way too many other options to remain loyal to any Web merchant that makes them unhappy.

Katie Simpson


March 1, 2000

Amazon is amazing... what are they going to try to patient next, the wheel?

Matt McMahon


March 1, 2000

I guess Bill Gates resigned from Microsoft to head up the Amazon Legal Department... same attitude, same lack of real innovation, same hostil practices. I like Amazon's site and think they really did pioneer the e-commerce mega-site, but there is no real technology innovation here. I could understand if they want to copyright "1-Click" as a slogan, but with the patent they are just trying to keep other people's technology all to themselves. Like a child in a sandbox, they want the toy to themselves (even though it's not theirs to begin with!)

Rich Tefft


March 1, 2000

Too late now, you've lost my business and all my company's business. Several thousand pounds last year. For goodness sake stop trying to destroy your company. It used to benefit from so much goodwill, now you are in danger of losing everything you developed through nonsense legal games.

Chris Lamb


March 1, 2000

Why not focus this mis-guided resources and energy back into company for future growth. Let's not hinder the growth of a internet ,yet. I will go elsewhere to make my purchases...

michael lynch


March 1, 2000

As a programmer, I understand the need to protect your work. I am a big believer in the Open Source movement; however, if code is not deemed "open source" by its creator, then it should be protected. That said, the notion that Amazon's "Once-Click Ordering" is a unique and patentable creation is absurd. Thousands of people, myself included, have been using cookies for state and session management for years. The concept of storing information to be used later in a one-step transaction creation process is not a new one, and Amazon is very wrong to think that they have developed a unique technology that can be patented. While Amazon may have a valid case for registering "One-Click Ordering" as a trademark phrase, obtaining and defending a patent of such broad scope is extremely negligent. I have previously purchased products from Amazon, as well as their "sister" company, Drugstore.com. I will no longer purchase anything from these companies until a fair and amicable solution for all parties involved has been reached.

Steve Buchanan


March 1, 2000

Stuart Schwalb


March 1, 2000

I've already stopped using Amazon and now buy from Bookpool or Fatbrain.

Robbie Honerkamp


March 1, 2000

I have probably spent at least 񘘐 with Amazon since their inception. I was also starting to consider spending more with their new vertical areas for Home Improvement and such. With this kind of bullying, I must decide to spend it elsewhere. You were a shining example of how to do e-commerce, but you have just tarnished that.

Troy Wehrle


March 1, 2000

Well this is one way to get free publicity Amazon. Not what you really wanted thought, is it?

Kelcey Brackett


March 1, 2000

I Support

Umesh Dhekane


March 1, 2000

Shawn Goodman


March 1, 2000

Michael Stecher


March 1, 2000

Clint Greenwood


March 1, 2000

As both an amazon customer and an Amazon affiliate I support their efforts to build a business based on available web technology and pre-existing web software. But I strongly object to their claim that they can claim ownership to either.

Richard Todd


March 1, 2000

This single, poor, selfish move by Amazon has the potential to seriously injure the future development of ecommerce and Amazon should be ashamed of themselves. I have no intent to purchase anything from Amazon in the future. I'm going to Barnes and Noble.

Ian Austin


March 1, 2000

Jason Williams


March 1, 2000

No comments here, no clicks at Amazon.

Schaft


March 1, 2000

Maarten Bukkems


March 1, 2000

Chance Stephens


March 1, 2000

I don't really shop on Amazon, but I'm allways down for a fight. Stop the opression and stop the childish acts. As adults always tell kids "Grow UP!"

Brian Hellman


March 1, 2000

I'm a long-time customer who loves Amazon. (I'm drinking coffee from one of my Amazon mugs as I type.) I'm very disturbed by their abuse of the patent system and the bullying attitude that it implies. I now check BookPool and B-N before I consider Amazon. What a shame.

Keith Meade


March 1, 2000

It seems having a multi-billion dollar company is not enough to satisfy the greed, justified by investors rights, of this new blessed golden boys. More personal-power, less people-power. More arrogance, less gratitude. Jeff Your Digital Karma is getting heavier. Soon come, jamaicans say. As success came rapidly just as rapidly can leave. Mr. Bezos: Watch your steps. That's not chocolate. one-click on this ....

SkagneTTY


March 1, 2000

I will boycott Amazon until they contritely apologize and no longer lay claim to these ridiculous patents.

Christopher Bryan Calloway


March 1, 2000

My family has been boycotting Amazon since December, 1999, and will continue to do so until the selective enforcement of their patents stops. What's next - a patent on HTML?

Brad Hildebrand


March 1, 2000

Is tacky and childish really the image that Amazon wants to project?

Wolf Lahti Duby


March 1, 2000

I've been reluctant for other reasons to buy from Amazon, although I have in the past. I certainly will NOT be buying from Amazon in the future.

Randi Himelgrin


March 1, 2000

---------------- BEZOS is a BOZO! ---------------- I want his "man of the year" status recinded! Hey Jeff! You can't FORCE the internet to get your company out of the red by using millions of OUR dollars to FORCE it. You JUST sealed the fate of Amazon. You will NEVER get out of the red now. Wall Street take notice. Sell your stock, everyone, the bottom is going to fall out on this one. B&N will reap the reward of your stupidity. It's almost as stupid as Gore'd claiming he invented the internet. The USPTO is stooping to this level to find some work? Bad move too. Thanks for the forum, Tim. John Beaman - Affiliate Program programmer - - "EX" Amazon.com book buyer, and affiliate. The WWWeb Factory - Builds Affiliate Programs.

We have been doing this since 1995. SUE ME!


March 1, 2000

I will support the boycott and I believe Amazon must be crazy to have this movement and get away with it!

Richard Tirtadji


March 1, 2000

I consider the use of patents to stifle competition to be highly unethical, when the patents are for obvious, non-innovative, natural developments. I am a published author, and a member of your affiliate program. If you harass competitors any further I will remove all links to Amazon, and also discontinue my personal book-buying at your store.

Matt Hucke


March 1, 2000

For the last two years I have made large purchases from Amazon for my Organization's musical seminar program. At least ฤ,000 worth of product a year. While I have always considered Amazon a good service, I will not purchase materials from Amazon again until Amazon stops using their patents offensively.

Christopher Warden


March 1, 2000

Tim, I am amazed on what stupidity companies would do to try to obtain a patent on a virtual programming. I applaud at your open letter to the community to try to stop Amazon. I've just purchased my last book from there -- no more use of Amazon, let them rot. They don't deserve to have anyone as a customer if they do not share anything. It's just simply amazing at what one simple company would to to try to monopoloize the WWW. I've been using the WWW for over 6 years, and I view the web as what exactly Richard Stallman had intended all along -- the use of free programming to apply. If Amazon has any guts, they will simply drop their patent, and publically apologize to the Web community, and distribute their 'patent' (I laugh at that word) to whoever wants to use it. My suggestion is that you write to your congressmen/senators and urge them to introduce a bill to revamp the US Patent Office and their laws to meet today's standards, especially with World Wide Web, the Internet, E-commerce and the like. I work for a company that is primarily a defense supplier. I don't agree with their principles, but they are setting up an E-commerce business very shortly, so it's a very exciting opportunity, and I want to be absolutely sure that Amazon's idiocy will not affect the E-commerce business. Once again, Tim, I applaud to you and your guts for writing this open, boldfaced letter to Jeff Bezos, and tell him what we all feel. J.D. Frazer (Illiad) had done the right thing and put on a link to his website to show that what Amazon has wronged us, and we want them to right a wrong. Thank you for your wonderful letter, and your open forum. David Tesler

David Tesler


March 1, 2000

Yakov Peretz


March 1, 2000

I have been using cookies to maintain session and other information for years. This is not a new idea. I guess I won't be using Amazon's services anymore.

Kevin Hendrickson


March 1, 2000

This is one more reason why we should support independent booksellers.

Megan Hall


March 1, 2000

Leon Geesey


March 1, 2000

Biting the hand that feeds you, never a good idea.

Dr Simon Willcox


March 1, 2000

I've never bought anything from Amazon. And now I never will.

David Thomas


March 1, 2000

Mark Fetterolf


March 1, 2000

Andrew Gormanly


March 1, 2000

It's got to stop. The internet will eventually be the prime conduit of commerce in the world (if it's not already, counting business-to-business), and if it's ever going to reach that point there must be more thought invested in what rights and responsibilities the companies that use it have.

Daniel Walker


March 1, 2000

Syl Primeau

sp


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com has lost yet another source of future revenue in me and anyone else that will accept my recommendations.

Bruce Davis


March 1, 2000

When you are at the top of your industry, its always tempting to change the rules and "close the door" behind you. But while this tactic works for a while, people will ultimately find a way around you - leaving you in a worse position than you would have been in if you just played hard and fair. Intellectual property is too slippery a commodity to ever gain a "corner on the market". Let it go - compete on quality, or you risk losing the early lead you worked so hard to build. Brendan Gaul

Brendan_Gaul


March 1, 2000

I have bought books from Amazon before but will not do so whatever Amazon's price until this kind of anti-competitive and bullying behaviour comes to an end. What price my freedom as a programmer to innovate ?

Richard Kay


March 1, 2000

The Government has worked hard to 'give' the Internet to the public and keep it 'fee' free in order to increase its adoption and innovation. Patents awarded for 'mere' copies of real world practices with the intent to control aspects of it are first, ridiculous (catching an off guard patent office) and second, unethical for individuals and corporations which have profited from this great gift.

James Crouthamel


March 1, 2000

The Internet grew because of Open Standards not Closed Patents. Amazon is cutting off its nose to spite its face.

Steve Song


March 1, 2000

Stuart Stanley


March 1, 2000

Patents are for unique and original ideas. One-Click ordering is not unique, nor is it original.

Alex


March 1, 2000

Clearly you are becoming one of the "Robber Barons" of the Internet when you take such legal yet unscrupulous action. I have been reluctant to purchase from you because I believe in the brick and mortar booksellers. I would gladly pay full price at the local store that treats people in a fair and ethical manner than to get a "great deal" from someone as unethical as you. I will never buy from your company. I will communicate to all my friends, family and co-workers encouraging them not to purchase from you.

Craig Bowie


March 1, 2000

3/1..Mr. Bezos. Due to this ridiculous patent I have ceased *ALL* purchases from your company and no longer recomend it to anyone I come in contact with. I will return when you withdraw the application

Anthony Placilla


March 1, 2000

Can rationallity prevail?

steve kain


March 1, 2000

Last year me and my family have ordered books from amazon(.de) for a substantial amount. We will no longer order from amazon until the 1-click patent is removed. Walter Kriha System Architect

Walter Kriha


March 1, 2000

There is nothing original in the patent you granted. It was so obvious an idea that I suspect others already were using something like it.

Guy Chocensky


March 1, 2000

Michael B. Klein


March 1, 2000

Forrest Houston


March 1, 2000

I don't know who is more to blame, Amazon or the Patent Office. Although I use Amazon regularly, and think it was one of the best out there, I am going to use other services(FatBrain, B&N) unless they change their tune.....

Robert J. Soltys


March 1, 2000

I havn't bought from amazon and in view of this ludicrous attempt to profit from the web, I will never consider buying anything from amazon.

Dinh-Tuan Pham


March 1, 2000

In the future I'll spend the time at Barnes and Noble, and not my money at Amazon.

Curtis Ditz


March 1, 2000

For each customer amazon gains by having this 'proprietary' ordering method, you'll lose more who won't do business with you because of your enforcement of this rediculous patent.

Dave Clendenan


March 1, 2000

Amazing how quickly Amazon turned evil.

Tim Baldwin


March 1, 2000

Patent practices have gotten out of control and this is just the most heinous result of it. Patenting something that a novice can do in the most basic of "Teach me" books is absurd.

Jon Doud


March 1, 2000

I am a regular Amazon.com customer, a member of your affiliates program, and have been a huge advocate of your site among my friends, students, and co-workers. I am very dissapointed that your company has chosen to take the low-road by using a foolish and extremely questionable patent to stifle competition. Amazon.com does enough things right that they should not have to stoop to this level. All you will accomplish is the accumulation of bad press, a reputation as a bully, and the contempt of some of your best customers. I don't think that this is a desirable goal. Please call off your ill-concieved and ultimately futile legal gymnastics. Abandon this stupid patent and back out with some grace and dignity remaining. Please. -Bryan

Bryan Costin


March 1, 2000

Ron Teeple


March 1, 2000

Way to go Amazon. You have single handedly alienated millions of people in one fell swoop. That's got to be a record. I won't be buying anything from you until you stop this senseless bullying.

William M. Perdue


March 1, 2000

The idea of 1-click is neither original nor unique, and is an abuse of our patent system.

Richard Kaszeta


March 1, 2000

Over the last year, I have spent hundreds of dollars on books and movies from amazon.com. In addition to all money that the friends, family, students, and coworkers that I have referred to amazon.com have spent. I feel that patenting this simple process which many people have used before is ludicrous. I have personally have developed web sites which use this same technology on several occasions, and this was before amazon.com was even a twinkle in your eyes. You should stop abusing the ignorance of the US patent office, until you do you will not see any more of my money, and I'll be sending my friends to bn.com.

Orien Vandenbergh


March 1, 2000

Pachot


March 1, 2000

To patent the use of cookies to save user/customer information is simply pointless. Beyond that, Amazon did not invent any of the technology involved. Amazon is the premiere online book/music/movie store, I have never been anything but ecstatic with their service and their product, however they seem to be overstepping their bounds by going after companies that are using similar technology for e-commerce. It would be like Gateway 2000 going after Dell for makeing made-to-order computers that use similar components. Amazon is still, and will always be the best at what it does, but patenting universal and public technologies is going a bit overboard. -- Michael "FoolsRun" Delaney

Michael Delaney


March 1, 2000

Given that word of mouth is the best advertising tool known to man, it seems Amazon has a lot of negative advertising in the works. Too bad.

Andrew Ellis


March 1, 2000

Chat Clussman


March 1, 2000

Patrick Wong


March 1, 2000

These patents can only be seen as a way of making money for little investment. Amazon have every right to protect their own implementation through copyright laws on the code, but to patent the basic idea and stop anyone else implementing the system is ludicrous! What would have happened if the inventors of the Store Card or the Mail Order Account had patented their ideas? Amazon's invention seems little more than an application of these ideas on the web. I'm going to buy the new Perl DBI book. Despite previous good service from Amazon I'm seriously considering shopping elsewhere.

Richard Corfield


March 1, 2000

Thomas Vincent


March 1, 2000

please abandon this patent.

Boris Hajduk


March 1, 2000

Alasdair Gillespie


March 1, 2000

Colin

Devine


March 1, 2000

I just can't understand how the US Patent Office can be *so* stupid. Will they allow Amazon or any other big compagny claim a patent on the Web ?? As Richard Stallman said, the problem is also up to American people to force the government to change the laws, or to change the US Patent Office, or something like that..

Sebastien Aperghis


March 1, 2000

I've spent about Ū,000 at Amazon over the past year or so, and have been buying from them for longer than that. Amazon does a lot of things right, but this is clearly wrong. I will avoid Amazon completely in the future until they change their egregious behavior. And BTW, what morons at the patent office GRANTED these piece-of-crap patents? Anyone with half a brain who's been on the Internet could easily see that these are laughable. How anyone can patent one thing after another that they DIDN'T EVEN INVENT escapes me. <P>My future purchases will be done at www.fatbrain.com and www.bn.com.

Michael Lorenz


March 1, 2000

Jamie Wood


March 1, 2000

I used to shop at Amazon from time to time. They've lost my business, until they wise up and apologize.

Greg Underwood


March 1, 2000

So how about it, Amazon. Are you going to regard the voice of your customers?

Jason T Rosa


March 1, 2000

Matthew Stepheson


March 1, 2000

I buy hundreds of dollars worth of books per year, and directly influence the purchase of several thousand more dollars worth of books. As long as Amazon is enforcing patents that I consider abusive (regadless of their official status), none of those books will be purchased through Amazon.

Tom Morrisette


March 1, 2000

Todd Bailey


March 1, 2000

Michael Schultheiss


March 1, 2000

Norman Fair


March 1, 2000

Jason Martin


March 1, 2000

Rom Lucek


March 1, 2000

Rom Lucek


March 1, 2000

To whom it may concern.... Stating the obvious is starting to be pass‰à.yet it does not seem that anyone is affected with the obvious anymore! No one patented the Click technology or whatever Amazon calls it might be because no IT professional would take more than two seconds to laugh at whoever does that. Alas sad to say, this is not the case with the US patent department, for it does not seem to be up-to-date and fully qualified and informed in this department, then again it does not seem to stop them! The US budget is spent on so many unnecessary things, yet you will be at the same time amazed on the number of law budget different government departments! or is it just lack of interest! It is sad to see were all this is going! I do hope that this will be rectified as soon as possible and at the same time measures are taken for this to be prevented in the future.

Gaith Bader


March 1, 2000

To whom it may concern.... Stating the obvious is starting to be pass‰à.yet it does not seem that anyone is affected with the obvious anymore! No one patented the Click technology or whatever Amazon calls it might be because no IT professional would take more than two seconds to laugh at whoever does that. Alas sad to say, this is not the case with the US patent department, for it does not seem to be up-to-date and fully qualified and informed in this department, then again it does not seem to stop them! The US budget is spent on so many unnecessary things, yet you will be at the same time amazed on the number of law budget different government departments! or is it just lack of interest! It is sad to see were all this is going! I do hope that this will be rectified as soon as possible and at the same time measures are taken for this to be prevented in the future.

Gaith Bader


March 1, 2000

One-click shopping is just using cookies the way they were designed to be used. It is not worthy of a patent.

John Macdonald


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com, do you know how O'Reilly is uniquely identifying me as I order a book from its site? A cookie. Perhaps you should have tried patenting the use of cookies to uniquely identify users or the use of cookies in conjunction with "Shopping Cart" technologies. It's not like anyone ever thought of that before! I love Amazon.com as a consumer. They've treated me well as a customer. But these patents are garbage.

Greg Cymbala


March 1, 2000

Ok Jeff, err Mr. Bezos, You can't patent something you didn't create. That's bunk. Remember what happened to Yahoo/Geocities? When they tried to claim co-copyright on any material posted on there site? They got boycotted, harshly. Even now that they have revised their stance on the co-copyright, many still will not use their service. Are you asking all of us to boycott you as well? Well, your request for boycott has been filled. My company used to buy all of it's book from Amazon, but we no longer will. If you remove your patents, we would consider returning as regular customers, but in the mean time, you have lost us. Sincerely, Seßn Prunka WebMaster Fairfield Language Technologies

Seßn Prunka


March 1, 2000

There is no excuse for such a business practice. "Amazon.com" was once a model to admire. A business that started from a solid idea, and smart business sense. Somewhere along the way, that business sense was lost. I had been planning to purchase several items from Amazon in the near future. I am now in the process of ordering these items from Chapters. This Canadian competitor may not be perfect, or have access to as much material as "AmaZOT," however, it does its business in a more honest manner.

Michael Alers


March 1, 2000

I have been an Amazon.com customer in the past but am no longer. I have several reasons for this but Amazon's actions in patenting common-sense ideas and attempting to muzzle the competition by enforcing these erroneous patent grants is the last straw. In addition, I will ask Amazon's affiliate program be dropped from any organization I belong to and any e-tailer I frequent.

Derek Ho


March 1, 2000

It is such a shame that an admired company as Amazon is would do this. The negative publicity will in the long run, ofset any gains you may achieve with this action. Too bad.

Jack Sager


March 1, 2000

Sean Payne


March 1, 2000

Here's hoping that the negative publicity this moronic legal stunt generates will completely obliterate whatever financial compensation Amazon.com anticipates. I'm disgusted, but not surprised. Flush one potential Amazon.com customer.

Scott Lynch


March 1, 2000

Rhett Nieto


March 1, 2000

S Bari


March 1, 2000

If you didn't invent it, you shouldn't try to patent it. Amazon should try to keep the goodwill of the nerds across the world who made their business possible.

Peter Mancoll


March 1, 2000

I don't blame Amazon for grabbing the patent if the patent office would let them, but it's not a patent that should be enforced. Better if Amazon looks at the holding of the patent as a means of ensuring no one else can claim such an obvious patent themselves.

Jered Heeschen


March 1, 2000

Matthew A. Petty


March 1, 2000

Kathryn L. Penn


March 1, 2000

Illiad, the creator of the comic strip UserFriendly, summed up my comments on this matter best in this cartoon: http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/99oct/19991024.html Please read, understand, and learn. Patenting cookies is ridiculous. Now really, it's not even in your own best interest. When people/companies try to be the only one using some technical thing [read 'proprietary'], the rest of the world just passes them by.

Mark O'Connell


March 1, 2000

I have always enjoyed the services provided by Amazon.com and veiw them as a tremendous resource for technical publications. What really concerns me is that a company that has profitted so much from free technology is now depriving others from using it in a simple attempt to "corner the market". Amazon has done very well in the free technology arena and did so with innovation, timing and top flight customer service; not technological breakthroughs. I see this action as stifling to the free market and a classic example of a short-sighted, bottom-line-driven company. This is NOT the kind of company I like to deal with and will from now on deal with other less monopolistic-minded companies for my purchases. In the event I find a publication that may be exclusive to Amazon.com, I will contact the publisher to urge them to reconsider this arrangement and/or not make that purchase. There are too many options now available in the world of e-commerce and I for one am not going to deal! with a "bully" simply to save a few percent on price. My values don't have a price tag. I sincerely hope that Amazon quickly realizes that it doesn't need this kind of protection to be successful and cease it's pursuit of obvious patents. They grew well without them and continuing like this can only sour public opinion and consumer decision. Lightin' up, do what you've done SO well to this point and enjoy being a success story for e-commerce. Jeff Boyer

Jeff Boyer


March 1, 2000

Living in Sweden I am now a close witness to the breathtaking development taking place in the field of information technology. Therefore it strikes me as very odd when a company like Amazon, in the "home of the brave and the free", tries to obstruct this development by acquiring patents for trivial means of doing business on the Internet. I don't know who is most at fault here, Amazon or the US Patent and Trademark Office. Nevertheless, somehow this microsoftian obstruction of progress and semilegal business tactics must come to an end! Until then, let's do business elsewhere!

Niklas L÷nnbro


March 1, 2000

I've been a customer for several years, and spent many a hundred dollars on Amazon. I do think that their service is terrific, but I'm definitely taking my money elsewhere until the dirty game they are playing of patenting obvious stuff is going on.

Sergey Asvadurov


March 1, 2000

I think it's an immense injustice that Amazon has the clout to pull such a stunt. Asking for a patent that rightfully isn't theirs to have is sone of the most low-down acts of subtrefuge I've seen. YOU HAD BETTER NOT KEEP OR ENFORCE THAT PATENT, AMAZON, OR YOU WILL HAVE THE EVERY SINGLE COMPUTER-LITERATE PERSON ON THE INTERNET ON YOUR BACK!!!!!!!!! And we WILL prevail!

Cristina Zamora


March 1, 2000

The internet is built on free technologies. I do not support patents on any internet technology. Amazon should realize that their competitors are just 1-click away. Oops, did I infringe on a patent? ;o)

Nilesh Pereira


March 1, 2000

Florian Wallner


March 1, 2000

Jeff, This is wrong and I will see you at the stock holders meeting to open a disscusstion in front of the stock holders and then you can explain your actions to them. Then explain how your foolishness started a boycott. I am sure the stock holders will look froward to your statements. I would suggest the continued boycott of Amazon, but also purchase one share of stock and show up at the stock holders meet and put him on the hot seat there.

Joseph Basanta


March 1, 2000

The patent office has clearly become a "rubber stamp" for anything that a technology company cares to patent, regardless of how old the idea is or whether it is even really a patentable idea. Beyond that, there seems to be a complete lack of research for pre-existing ideas on behalf of the patent office. They are content leave their job for the already overburded courts to do. It is unfortunate that corporations are taking advantage of this situation in an effort to monopolize various forms of commerce. It is clear the patent office is not fulfilling it's duty, so we must use social and economic leverage to prevent such rampant and irresponsible abuse of the patent system.

Christopher Haisty


March 1, 2000

As a previous customer of Amazon.com, I can honestly say that I enjoyed and utilized the 1-Click feature. I was (naively it seems) looking forward to seeing versions of it pop up at all of my favorite eshopping sites. I am appalled by the ruling that allowed you to obtain a patent on so obvious a technology! I will gladly join the chorus of voices against you and the piracy that you are commiting.

Liz Streissguth


March 1, 2000

It seems that, one by one, players get bigger and feel a need to do stupid things in the name of getting even bigger still. Amazon has now joined the ranks of those who have lost my business in their drive to greater and greater profits. I believe they'll have much to talk about with other members of the 'don't associate with' list. Say hello to E-Toys for me boys!!

Michael P. Millow


March 1, 2000

Dan Sundell


March 1, 2000

Seth Marshall Eisenberg


March 1, 2000

Seth Gordon


March 1, 2000

I find it disgusting and beyond any reasonable sense that a single company, such as yours, can claim a patent to a technology that you have benefited from freely. It takes small but crucial obstacles to put a damper on the growth of e-commerce and open source ideology. See you in a few years, if you change your ways! This valuable customer is now shopping elsewhere! Your loss! And I can bet you I will not be the only one! Austin

Austin H. Kapfumvuti


March 1, 2000

The feelings of the internet community at large cannot be ignored. You lose Amazon.

Kevin Plankey


March 1, 2000

I think these patents are just ridiculous. For example, take affiliate programs.. I know of many non-profit sites that use affiliate programs to increase their hit rates. Is Amazon.com even considering how their patent will affect these groups?

John Caswell


March 1, 2000

By filing for this patent, Amazon is demonstrating its greedy capitalist ideology, and will also be making it difficult for us programmers to employ certain modules in our applications. Even if this patent goes through, there is no way it will stand up. Sure, patent your specific code, but don't try to patent an idea that thousands of developers come up with every day. Doing that infringes on our creative rights.

Heather


March 1, 2000

Dear Amazon, I will never shop at Drugstore.com or Amazon.com ever again. There are plenty of other .com's who could use my money. I think it is outrageous that you are patenting such obvious ideas as "1-click shopping" and "affiliate programs". You will inevitably stifle ecommerce innovation. Your company as of today has yet to be profitable. If you can afford to lose savvy ecommerce customers such as myself, my family and my friends then by all means continue on the same path. Sincerely, David Metzel

David Metzel


March 1, 2000

I am the head of the IT department of a NYC law firm and I am also the purchasing decision maker. I and my attorneys will NOT be buying from amazon.com until it can think like an Internet Generation company and not fight to take credit for an idea that is hardly new and exciting and contributes nothing of value to the 'Net.

Angelique Conde


March 1, 2000

Amazon has just lost another customer.

Scott Skeate


March 1, 2000

If it was something truly new, unique and significant, I'd say: "All health to you." But this would be ridiculous, only if it were funny. For shame!

Seth Marshall Eisenberg


March 1, 2000

When I first heard about this, I honestly thought it was a joke. To have a patent granted for this idea is insane! Wait! I just thought of a shortcut to work in the morning. I'd like to have a patent please. When doing the dishes, I scrub my plates counter-clockwise. Patent please. I won't be holding my breath waiting for these to be granted. Seriously, if this idea can be patented, what is NOT eligible? What strikes me as the most obvious is that Amazon did not invent a technology. They used technology, designed to be manipulated in such fashion, to acheive their goals. At most, as I understand it, the scripts could maybe be copyrightable, but certainly not patentable! Go ahead and tradmark the One-Click slogan, copyright the scripts, and leave the patents alone. Perhaps the process of claiming rights to your creations are incredibly more complex than this, but it would take an awful lot of convincing to get me to accept this one. Of course, condemning Amazon and boycotting is sure to produce the desired result of making this patent uninforceable, at the very least, but the real perpetrators are the people at the Patent Office. If Amazon hadn't applied for it, and someone else had, say a very small company with which a boycott would have been largely ineffective, then Amazon and the rest of the world would have seen themselves be denied the right to use this. The patent would probably still exist. Luckily, in this case, a boycott can change things, but for the future of the internet and invention in general, I suggest that everyone direct their attention to the Patent Office and appeal for a revocation of these absurdities. It still shocks my brain to see that this is truly happening. Stop it now before it gets out of control.

Syl Primeau


March 1, 2000

Ditto!

Harlan Wilkerson


March 1, 2000

Patents on software do not help anyone. As so many have stated they only slow down the inevitable pace of technology and the owner of the patent get lets behind.

Bob Sanders


March 1, 2000

The Web it not "yours" to own -- the entire reason Amazon exists today is because of the openess of the Web and the rate of expansion for users and retailers. You seem to snub your nose at the fact that the Internet as a whole has been under development since you were in grade school -- to then turn around and claim to be the "inventor" of key Web technology (particularly the patents you have wrongfully been issued) is ludicrous. I have spent hundreds of dollars with Amazon in the past, but future purchases are on hold and will be done through your competitors until Amazon issues a clear statement on this issue. The same patents you are using to try to "protect" you from your competitors will be the reason you begin losing your loyal customers.

Richard Harvey


March 1, 2000

The "One-Click" "technology" of Amazon amounts to nothing more than the use of browser cookies with a great marketing term slapped on it. The term is great, but the technology has been in use longer than Amazon's own existance. Your attempts at stifling your competition are valid, but the enforcement of cookie-content will only stifle progress and innovation on the world wide web.

Jon D. Godfrey


March 1, 2000

Greed is obviously a strong motivating factor. Software patents on truly original software concepts _*might*_ be defensible, but a patent on a totally obvious concept like this - Amazon should be ashamed of itself.

Warren Baird


March 1, 2000

I'm not too sure about a full boycott, but I'll sure look at other sources until this stops. David Krecklow

David Krecklow


March 1, 2000

I am amazed. Stunned. I don't understand how a company built on the Internet can abuse the very thing that makes the company's existance possible. I don't understand how a company built on the freely distibuted efforts of others can so callously turn its back on the people that made the company's existance possible. It would seem that the child believes it now better than its parents and therefore owes no loyalty to them. I wonder if anyone at Amazon will read this. I wonder if anyone at the major investment firms will read this. I wonder...

Eric L. Helvey


March 1, 2000

Jon Patrick Wheaton


March 1, 2000

Jeff, I am deeply disturbed to hear that your company is actively enforcing your nuisance patents. I am a software developer who routinely purchases expensive computer books. You are alienating one of the most lucrative marketplaces for your company. Please leave the intellectual property arena to those who have *real* inventions and require protection to recoup research and development costs. Dave McKay

Dave McKay


March 1, 2000

Amazon has just done one of the stupidest things imaginable for its business. Not only will people boycott Amazon over this stupid stunt, but it will also hinder development of other web-based, open-source (and open-protocol) innovations, that are useful to all.

Dave Mescher


March 1, 2000

You shouldn't be able to patent the obvious.

Steve Fox


March 1, 2000

Hamish Macdonald


March 1, 2000

Upsetting to say the least.

Justin R. Miller


March 1, 2000

Get real!

Kevin Darbro


March 1, 2000

Give up the patent, Amazon. It's just not right.

Bruce Heerssen


March 1, 2000

I also am a past Amazon customer, "past" being the key word here. What's next a patent on the use of a rectangular button? How about the use of a little common sense both at Amazon and in the courts?

Ron Blessing


March 1, 2000

I guess I'm not one of Amazons's biggest customers, but I bought all my online books, videos, and DVD's there. I personally don't like "One Click". If Amazon continues it patent law suit, I'll try some other online booksellers. I hear that you can get a better price anyway.

Michael Boyle


March 1, 2000

I guess I'm not one of Amazons's biggest customers, but I bought all my online books, videos, and DVD's there. I personally don't like "One Click". If Amazon continues it patent law suit, I'll try some other online booksellers. I hear that you can get a better price anyway.

Michael Boyle


March 1, 2000

Matthew Eagar


March 1, 2000

Matthew Eagar


March 1, 2000

There is no real need to repeat what has been already stated here. The offensive patent approach is not acceptable in this market, and until it is discontinued I will no longer spend my money at Amazon.

Corey Morgan Turner


March 1, 2000

Patents of this calibre are probably the most ridiculous things I have ever heard of. I'll take my money elsewhere...

E. A. Graham, Jr.


March 1, 2000

I can't begin to compete with the other comments on this page. All my ideas have been stated. Don't do this, Amazon. It's a mistake.

Richard Onanian


March 1, 2000

You've lost another customer for life.

Ronald Christopher


March 1, 2000

Ian Wallace


March 1, 2000

this is obviously malicious and stupid. that technique is no invention, period.

fr‰d‰ric d‰nomm‰


March 1, 2000

A Patent on that kind of technology is just plain silly. As stated by others, the patent should not be enforced, only used to keep other idiots from trying the same stunt. It's sort of like someone trying to patent the old classic "hello World" program that every first time programmer learns to write. The larger issue at stake is that based on a silly lawsuit, some other new companies will be afraid of putting thier stuff for sale on the net, effectively gutting further progress in e-commerce. This hurts everybody. why look online for a product when the company you like to do business with gets flushed because of a frivolous lawsuit? Scratch yet another potential Amazon customer. Also scratch the respect that I used to have for Mr. Bezos. We thought you really wanted E-commerce to fly.

Paul D. Black


March 1, 2000

I've purchased several books from Amazon - now, other e-commerce sites will get my business.

Jen Cowan


March 1, 2000

Lost another customer for Life.

Ron Christopher


March 1, 2000

I was shocked to learn of this patent. It's the equivalent of Dominoes Pizza patenting deliveries.

Bernie Margolis


March 1, 2000

I believe that the power of the Web is the freedom to innovate. Anything that takes this freedom off needs to be stopped.

Carlos Ribeiro


March 1, 2000

The recent patent of so-called "Affiliate Program" technology sets a dangerous precedent that if not stopped could hinder further innovation in e-commerce technology. The patent does not represent a unique idea or invention. "Affiliate Program" technology is in use by thousands of Internet businesses. The idea of the "Affiliate Program" existed long before the advent of the Web. If Amazon enforces this patent, it could affect the additional revenue streams of both competing and non-competing companies, as well as the professional services of web developers everywhere. The patent of "One-Click" and "Affiliate Program" technology is analogous to patenting the process of making paper airplanes. Will Amazon go after shopping carts, credit card processing, order fulfillment, eating, breathing, etc. next? As a professional web developer and software engineer, I urge you to re-consider your patent of this fundamental business concept.

George Crawford III


March 1, 2000

While I recognize that an organization needs to be able to protect it's brand differentiation, the actions that you are taking at Amazon on these patents is ultimately destructive to the Internet and to your business. In enforcing these patents, you are attempting to implement a monopoly over simple "good customer service" ideas. It would be as if Sears had placed a patent on 1-800 customer service lines - or by IBM on placing a manual with their computers. Please respond publically to the extensive concern that is being voiced throughout the Internet about this issue, so that we may all judge whether it is prudent to continue to do business with you. David Meredith

David Meredith


March 1, 2000

I guess in the new economy (great stock value, AND great losses in the real world) there is also a need for real money. It's sad Amazon needs to earn money this way instead of focussing on their core business(although their core business seems to have changed in patenting)

kees spoelstra


March 1, 2000

Losing me as a customer probably isnt a big deal since I've only bought one thing (the matrix) from amazon. Considering Amazon's patent actions recently, I wish I could go back and change that. I would rather live without something I want than support such blatant greed and stupidity. Fortunately, I dont have to. There are many places, online and offline, that can provide me with the same products at the same or better prices. Amazon isnt special, doesnt instill customer loyalty, and doesnt have a product of it's own. All it has is it's reputation...and right now, that isnt a good thing to have.

Michael Vogel


March 1, 2000

I can't stand it when the Patent Office give a patent for inventing nothing, but doing idea that anybody could or would do to impliment 'one-click'. I can't stand it when the patent holder then tries to stop other from using any idea that sounds like a 'click' idea even if the coding is different. I will not order anything from Amazon anymore until they stop with this patent lawsults.

Thomas Gentiluomo


March 1, 2000

Nicholas Dibble


March 1, 2000

Idiots.

Kerry Fitzgerald


March 1, 2000

How would Thomas Edison(?) have been able to 'see' so far if the giants he 'stood' on had charged him 5$ a ride :)

Eric Stratte


March 1, 2000

Robert Zich


March 1, 2000

Here we have a company (Amazon) who try to be (and to a large extend is) associated with the Internet origin and soul. And now it goes directly against the Internets original and basic ethics, and the future development of the Net. How can you make yourself do that? Or is it an ill-advised lawyer who did this without asking for Amazon politics. Find some excuse and do it quickly. The reputation of Amazon.com is at stage so don't hesitate.

S°ren Hornstrup


March 1, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, As you can see, your short-sighted policy is alienating thousands. And these are just the people who are vocal in their protests. Reconsider. And better yet, say that it wasn't YOUR idea, and blame it on the lawyers.

Jerry Wright


March 1, 2000

When large companies are allowed to stifle competition by denying others the right to use obvious discoveries, not only do the consumers suffer, but the economy as well. End this lunacy. You are only alienating your potential customers.

Coltrey Mather


March 1, 2000

I work at a small company that's been hit hard by a silly technology lawsuit. Frivolous lawsuits based on the patent office's ignorance of technology seem to be a trend these days. Unfortunately, the most innovative technology firms are usually small startup companies who can't afford to fight these silly legal battles. I've admired Amazon's accomplishments and growth to date, mostly because Amazon is a small start-up techology success story. Please, Amazon, remember your roots. Encourage the growth of the internet and new technologies, don't try to squash it.

Karen Harding-Alonzi


March 1, 2000

Here's the e-mail that I sent to Amazon this morning: Hi Amazon.com: As someone who has ordered a huge amount from Amazon.com in the past several years, including a 36ö inch screen television, I am very disappointed in AmazonÆs patenting of the affiliate program that numerous e-commerce companies are using. As a result of your decision, you have lost me as a customer. If youÆd like to see how much IÆve spent at Amazon just check my account details. Until I hear from you that you have decided to suspend the pursuit of a patent for your affiliate program û thereby stifling the e-commerce industry which you tout so much û I will not order from Amazon. In fact, I had planned on ordering a birthday gift for someone this morning from Amazon. However, as soon as I hit send on this e-mail, I plan to go to B&N.com to order the gift.

Jeff R


March 1, 2000

Joseph Vasquez


March 1, 2000

Sounds like Amazon is trying to become the next Micro$oft.

Jason Lamey


March 1, 2000

If you look in your customer database, you will notice that I have been a repeat customer of amazon.com. That will stop immediately and will not start again until this patent is dropped. As Tim Oreilly said, you patented a trivial application of cookies. While you may have fooled the patent office into believing this is an innovation/invention of yours - you're not fooling the technical crowd (which includes me). Do everyone a favor and drop the patent. It is ridiculous.

Alex Van de Putte


March 1, 2000

I will no longer use amazon.com. Put me in the fomer amazon.com consumer category.

R. Bardwell


March 1, 2000

One less Amazon.com customer...

Michael Lundy


March 1, 2000

I will no longer use amazon.com. Put me in the former amazon.com consumer category.

R. Bardwell


March 1, 2000

Honestly, I think Amazon needs to examine what they've patented. A patent is a claim of ownership over a given technology (ie: an invention), not just a 'we got here first' claim of ownership over an idea that's years old, and wasn't theirs in the first place. I'm more familiar with copyright law than patent law, but were this a copyright issue Amazon would likely be looking at trouble for violation of the public domain. As it stands, I strongly urge Amazon to take up its banner and venture forth into the courts. Several lawsuits need to be filed. They should file not only against Barnes & Nobles, but any other site making use of cookies and against any book publisher who explains how cookies are used. Why... they're spreading trade secrets. Of course, this promises to be amusing. Were my last paragraph taken seriously (please?) I'd be entertained for hours on end reading the legel reports from said lawsuits, and by watching Amazon's position plummet as they bite the hands that feed them. Go on, Amazon. Amuse me. It's not like I ever shop at your website, anyway. I actually prefer driving down to the local (uh oh) Barnes & Nobles to shop in person. It's right down the road from an excellent restaurant, after all.

Jeff Hulsey


March 1, 2000

Yup.Pretty ugly.

Irene Duma


March 1, 2000

morgan evans


March 1, 2000

morgan evans


March 1, 2000

Nicklas af Ekenstam


March 1, 2000

Jeff Bezos; You're an idiot! You've forgotten what being a start-up is like and have gotten greedy. To hell with you and Amazon. I'm taking my links to Amazon off and putting up Borders or Barnes and Noble. Your patents are about as stupid as the guy that patented the windowing technique for Y2K. Maybe the government will finally wake up and stop issuing patents for the obvious but until then I will express my free speech by taking business away from companies as obnoxious and degrading as yours and giving it to normal companies that don't try to undermine the freedom of business.

Brian Gowing


March 1, 2000

Up until now, I was a member of the Amazon.Com affiliates program. Under the circumstances, I cannot in good conscience do that anymore. I refuse to contribute to what I view as a patently unhealthy way of doing business.

Eric Wilson


March 1, 2000

Mike Pettypiece


March 1, 2000

Jeff, Ask to see your original birth certificate and make sure of the spelling of your last name. IMHO it's probably bOzo. You are acting totally out of line and if you could hear the comments being made about what dumb s*** you are, perhaps you'd rethink your position. About the only thing you will hope to gain out of this is a tarnished reputation, at best. Congratulations, you've just been nominated to the "how I screwed up my company" club! It'll make great reading in the How Not to do it history books.

Paul Dare


March 1, 2000

Svante Pettersson


March 1, 2000

The best means of advertisement is by word of mouth. Good news travels fast, but bad news travels faster. By this afternoon, think of the hundreds of thousands of customers that will be going to your competitors. Think of how your loyal customers, such as our company, have shunned your website forever. If you think of nothing else, think of the money. We have spent thousands of dollars on merchandise from your store, and we are just a very small part of your business. But it is us: the small business, the individual, the school, the home-town library, the teacher, who will be the ones who determine just how far you can go with this. We do listen, we do care, and when you piss us off, you'll surely know about it. Hear us by our absence. As Mr. Prunka indiated, our company will suspend buying books from Amazon.com until further notice. | David M. Dumler | Director of Technical Services & | Software Engineering Coordinator | Fairfield Language Technologies

David M. Dumler


March 1, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, One of the hallmarks of the Internet is the community that has been created. Your actions, while understandable in the physical world, have serious implications in the world of the Internet. You have developed many concepts on your site which benefit consumers. It would be a shame if you tried to prevent others from working to benefit consumers as well by using similar concepts. For a real world parallel, most fast food resturants have drive-up windows. Consumers would not have benefited if McDonalds (or whoever began the first widespread use of them) had tried to prevent their competitors from giving the customers the same convenience. I am currently an Amazon associate, but I will be reconsidering this (along with future purchases) based on the actions your company takes in the future. Thank you for your time.

Nick Hlavacek


March 1, 2000

one URL www.bn.com. You are not he only store online.

John Lang


March 1, 2000

If I understand the financial reports, Amazon has yet to turn a single penny of profit. Amazon's house of cards can fall in an instant by alienating consumers who understand the origins of the internet. You should find other ways to protect your business like sharing new technology and cementing the loyalty of your customers with service. I'll find another company to enrich.

Barry Bonnell


March 1, 2000

This is a truly disappointing example of over-reaching corporate greed on the part of Amazon. They're taking unethical advantage of a flawed system to patent a concept that should not be patentable, and was in common use before Amazon took this action. I'm joining the ranks of those boycotting Amazon, where I was a frequent buyer, and will be urging others to speak out as well.

Andrew Maddox


March 1, 2000

Patenting a web based technology is not only ludicrist it is also greedy! If you had produced something extraordinary YES! but this is definately no revelation!

Matthew Stiger


March 1, 2000

I have been a loyal Amazon customer for years, but now I have to rethink that position. Fair competition is a mainstay of all American commerce, and to think that Amazon wants to stifle that with enforcement of patents that do nothing to add to the value recieved by it's customers is ridiculous. If you are afraid of losing customers to Barnes & Noble or anyone else, you should offer your products at the best prices and deliver the best service after the sale. That is what will keep your customers loyal. I for one do not mind having to fill out a form if it means a substantial saving on my purchase. I will not be doing any business with Amazon till this is resolved. In fact I will visit a site today I have not been to before-Barnes & Noble.

Tom Froehlich


March 1, 2000

Close off competition and you will be closing the doors on your business soon.

Robin Smith


March 1, 2000

Laurent DESNOYERS


March 1, 2000

Patrick Lougheed


March 1, 2000

Lost another customer for Life.

Matthew L


March 1, 2000

Amazon's greed is only eclipsed by its audacity.

Raymond M. Rura


March 1, 2000

John Papalia


March 1, 2000

Murali Sreenivasan


March 1, 2000

John Anderson


March 1, 2000

Aaron Steele


March 1, 2000

Robert B. Scott


March 1, 2000

Nice going. You've got the "first mover" advantage in ecommerce, and you blow it by annoying your customers with this ridiculous patent. A patent, I might add, that would never have been granted if the Patent Office had anyone on staff with even a faint clue about prior art in the field. It's too bad. I liked the Amazon web site, and have ordered several things in the past, but unless you cease and desist this odious practice, you've seen the last of my money.

Tom Wanek


March 1, 2000

J°rgen Kj†rsgaard


March 1, 2000

Adam Ruth


March 1, 2000

The qwhole arena of software patents has long been absurd. What is a shame is that Amazon seemed like such a nice consumer oriented business. When they started patenting right and left, it was a bit surprising. When they started sueing, it was a shame.

August Zajonc


March 1, 2000

amazon sucks

shane carter


March 1, 2000

Josh Lannin


March 1, 2000

Nicholas Hansen


March 1, 2000

Thomas J. Irizarry


March 1, 2000

As a regular Amazon user I applaud all your efforts to make purchasing easier, but I deplore your attempt to use questionable patents to hinder the ease-of-use offerings of other vendors. Such efforts will stunt the growth of the web. Please continue to win by helping your customers, not by suing your competitors.

Lance S. Benson


March 1, 2000

I am an Amazon.com "affiliate" and "advantage" participant who will seriously reconsider using both of these services in light of Amazon's latest actions.

Matt Plichta


March 1, 2000

What's next? Will the Patent office recognize that Al Gore invented the internet and should get a share of all sales? Sheesh! Amazon is probably trying to force B&N and Borders away by claiming these things so that B&N and Borders cannot use them. Well my orders will now go to somewhere else. I don't like bully tactics.

Thomas Perry


March 1, 2000

Shame on you Mr Bezos. You should know better.

Mike Fisher


March 1, 2000

Anton F. van der Kraaij


March 1, 2000

I buy about 10 programming books a year. I will not be buying books from amazon for the forseeable future.

Bob Lazarski


March 1, 2000

Dimitry Korsunsky


March 1, 2000

Amazon, Apple, ATT? I see a pattern emerging. I've been programming for 25 years and if I'd only known how stupid they were at the patent office I'd be rich! I guess I was to busy converting the obvious into code?

Richard Blessing


March 1, 2000

I will find other sources for my books and CDs. I don't need to use one-click to make my purchases.

Robert Bonnell


March 1, 2000

I have been a loyal Amazon customer, but after reading this I am pretty disappointed with the company - I will henceforth be taking my business elsewhere, and will notify them of this and the reason.

Mark Spiller


March 1, 2000

1. The US patent office seems to be beyond uniformed to the point of negligence. 2. This does not excuse Amazon's behavior in attempting 'patent extortion'. 3. I will not be making any further purchases from amazon.com while they continue to enforce this patent.

Brian Daniels


March 1, 2000

tsk tsk

James Weisbin


March 1, 2000

This is nothing more than a blatant act of corporate bullying. You cannot own that which is now public domain - that which you did not even create! You are no better than common thieves now. May your greed lead to your downfall. ~JPS

Jhared P. Smith


March 1, 2000

Grady Peterson


March 1, 2000

David Beneteau


March 1, 2000

Unlike Microsoft, Amazon truly DID develop a superior product. It is sad that you are now resorting to bully tactics to solidify your already dominant market position. Your site is and will remain successful because of service, selection, and price, NOT because you save customers one mouse click. I have lost a great deal of respect for you, and you have lost my business until this patent issue is dropped.

Jonathon McKitrick


March 1, 2000

Not much to say that hasn't been said. The whole thing saddens though, and shows that even those we hold in high reguard aren't impervious to the forces of curruption. Power currupts, ultimate power...

Tom Kaufman


March 1, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, Your patents on 1-Click Ordering and Affiliate Programs are so obvious and general that they are ridiculous. What's next -- are you going to patent the idea of e-commerce and then sue everyone who tries to sell stuff on the web? My wife and I order a lot of books from you, but thanks to the Internet, we can easily take our business elsewhere if you continue your predatory behavior. Enforcing these patents is going to do nothing more than cast you and your company in a very negative light. Do the right thing, Amazon.

Ken Watson


March 1, 2000

Amazon lost another customer....

Mike


March 1, 2000

Nicholas Tufar


March 1, 2000

I'd hate to have to stop buying from Amazon forever, so I urge the company to reconsider its legal strategies. They are unconscionable.

Joseph Sartelle


March 1, 2000

Not much to say that hasn't been said. The whole thing saddens though, and shows that even those we hold in high reguard aren't impervious to the forces of curruption. Power currupts, ultimate power...

Tom Kaufman


March 1, 2000

As a loyal customer to Amazon, I am appalled at this ridiculous action. Amazon should remember where it started and what FREE technology they used to get where they are. Barnes and Noble looks better and better everyday.

Michael Terry


March 1, 2000

I also have ceased purchasing from Amazon.com, and am recommending that my friends and coworkers cease purchasing as well. Please Amazon, reconsider your efforts to offensivly enforce these patents. I'd like to purchase from you again ! -- Pat

Patrick Spinler


March 1, 2000

I think I will shop for books elsewhere from now on

Nate S


March 1, 2000

All thats been said appears valid. I always liked Borders more anyway.

Mike Costello


March 1, 2000

Tetsuo Torigai


March 1, 2000

The only way I can protest this infringement upon the freedom and innovation that exists on the internet is to add my voice to the outcry, and to withhold my spending dollars from those who seek to limit and control the internet. Amazon, you messed up here and you won't be getting anymore of my money if you continue to offensively enforce this patent.

John Brady


March 1, 2000

I spend several thousand dollars a year on books and music. I used to spend it Amazon. It looks like other retailers will get my business now.

Blake Sobiloff


March 1, 2000

One would think that Amazon's strategy of "leverage millions of dollars is losses now, to gain millions of loyal customers later" would necessarily preclude pissing those customers off. As a professional Web Developer and ActiveX programmer, I devour ๋.95 manuals like steak on a regular basis...but of late have been going to Barnes & Nobles for them. I would hope for the integrity of the field that this was a Marketing decision, and Amazon's own Developers are cringing at the thought of how their hard work is being used. You should know better, Amazon.

Franc Moses


March 1, 2000

Your patent application is incomplete. You should also be filing a patent on the mouse button and the mouse ball that are used to accomplish that single click. Why not be totally outrageous?

Richard Harold Bartels


March 1, 2000

one URL www.fatbrain.com. You are not the only store online.

Andrew Lieu


March 1, 2000

I am a long-time Amazon customer and affiliate. I have supported the company and its outstanding services for several years. But this attempt to partition the web into proprietary fiefdoms is misguided. Unfortunately, I don't think it will necessarily be futile. Your example will be followed by others. Please reconsider your decision to pursue these patents. You are doing yourself and all of us a disservice with your poor behavior.

Robert Cheetham


March 1, 2000

Jason Denton


March 1, 2000

Amazon got big by offering a service to the interent community. They will get small by angering the internet community. Think long and hard about how many affiliates you will lose if the early adopters get serious about this boycott.

Thomas McVeigh


March 1, 2000

Mark Mackevelli


March 1, 2000

First Amazon has not made a profit. Now they do this. I see them losing more money, then making it, especially if they are paying lawyers to enforce their patent. Stupid.

Scott A. Smith


March 1, 2000

Jon Johnstone


March 1, 2000

Dana Pellerin


March 1, 2000

Anders Hasselqvist


March 1, 2000

I am in the process of cancelling my affiliation with Amazon.com because of these issues.

Matt Kaatman


March 1, 2000

I've looked at my account on Amazon.com's site and seen that I've ordered 赻.58 worth of items in the last two years. It's actually more than that, as I've been an Amazon customer since 1997, and they seem to have missed some stuff that I ordered for X-mas this past year. My guess is that my running total with Amazon is somewhere closer to 躔 since the spring of 1997. I'd like to let Jeff Bezos know that I will not be purchasing anything from Amazon.com until their frivolous patents are dropped or rescinded. Joshua Gramlich

Joshua Gramlich


March 1, 2000

The only way I can protest this infringement upon the freedom and innovation that exists on the internet is to add my voice to the outcry, and to withhold my spending dollars from those who seek to limit and control the internet. Amazon, you messed up here and you won't be getting anymore of my money if you continue to offensively enforce this patent.

John Brady


March 1, 2000

Thank GOD that I have never bought anything from Amazon and I am glad. Their competitors will continue to recieve my business.

Dugles Cherry


March 1, 2000

Christopher D. Peters


March 1, 2000

I will stop using Amizon until it stops the policy described in this letter.

David Smith


March 1, 2000

I, too, will be taking my e-business elsewhere in protest of Amazon's actions.

Orv Beach


March 1, 2000

Robert Beckman


March 1, 2000

Tony Hammitt


March 1, 2000

Frank Ambrosia


March 1, 2000

I will not purchase anything from Amazon until it stops enforcing this stupid one-click patent... Hey, maybe I should copy write the word "JavaScript" or maybe the use of the ".c" and ".c++" extension... http://members.theglobe.com/rerdey/

Raymond M. A. Erdey


March 1, 2000

hold the patent ...mmmquestionable. sue others with it ... well that just hurts us all. bad form, Captain Hook.

mike hemming


March 1, 2000

I just wanted to add my name to the already lengthy list of protesters here. I think it's already been sufficiently stated how generally foolish and counterproductive these patents are. I will certainly not be doing any business with Amazon until they end these ridiculous legal actions, and will be encouraging others to do likewise. I'm curious whether O'Reilly has the option of refusing to sell their books through Amazon. I have no idea how distribution & sales works here, but I think such an action could be potentialy far more effective than a boycott.

Eric Hillman


March 1, 2000

Joel Goodling


March 1, 2000

I was thrilled with Amazon as a source of books. Given how many books I buy, I probably qualify as a collector, rather than just a reader, and I bought many books from Amazon. I won't buy from Amazon again, as long as I believe they are misusing the patent system.

David R. Dick


March 1, 2000

Patents should be used as a means of protecting National Security only! No one person, whether they invent the productor application should have the right to keep its secrets and free use from the rest of society.

Lee Smith


March 1, 2000

Megan O'Neil


March 1, 2000

Until Amazon's current patent practice is changed I will no longer be purchasing anything form your company.

Dave Teske


March 1, 2000

Scratch yet another good customer, Jeff. I've been telling my friends to order elsewhere for months now, and I'll continue the campaign until you call off the dogs.

Andrew Holleman


March 1, 2000

The incompetence of the Patent Office in granting this sort of ridiculous software patent does not excuse Amazon's behavior. I have been an Amazon customer since its beginning -- but I will not be making any additional purchases at Amazon until they cease and desist both the lawsuits and the patent claims. Jeff, don't let greed ands shortsightednes kill the goose that laid the golden egg for all of us! TNT

Tom Tipsword


March 1, 2000

Thanks for speaking out publicly against Amazon's abuse of patents, Tim. It's obvious on moral grounds that what Amazon has done is wrong, but it takes guts to say it, and clear vision to see that it's bad for book publishers and everyone else in the long run. The ultimate solution, of course, is to stop issuing patents on business models and software entirely. Neither of these needs patent protection-- business models _should_ be imitated when they work (that's a chief source of economic growth and productivity increases), and software is best protected by copyrights, not patents. --Robert Ellison, President Syntrillium Software

Robert Ellison


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, I have to agree with everything Mr. O'Reilly has said in his open letter. I'm appalled and outraged that a company I have done business with a number of times and have admired is not behaving in a manner befitting it's stature in the internet community. As such, I have discontinued my families use of Amazon, as well as encouraging my friends and colleagues to do the same, until such time that Amazon sees fit to once again be a good citizen on the public internet. Sincerely, Robert Chastain

Robert Chastain


March 1, 2000

Terrisa Gaul


March 1, 2000

I have ordered from Amazon numerous times (being a college student and an avid reader I go through lots of books!) and I was pleased with the service I received each time. However, I will not be ordering from Amazon again until this patent issue is resolved. (i.e. dropped by Amazon)

Ethan Blanton


March 1, 2000

James Hepler


March 1, 2000

What really scares me is that an agency like the US Patent Office is so incredibly out of touch with today's generally accepted business practices. Since Al Gore invented the Internet, maybe he should step in a give the Patent Office a lesson in E-business 1.0. - now that's a scary thought.

Mark Landry


March 1, 2000

Amazon, This is ridiculous. Get off your high horse and stop trying to suppress the open nature of the net. Next thing you know, you'll be attempting to patent electricity... - Bob

Bob Smith


March 1, 2000

Not one cent more.

Eric Guy


March 1, 2000

I am an avid book reader. I have purchased many books through Amazon. I, in fact am also an Amazon affiliate. NO MORE! This type of activity on the part of Amazon is what can destroy the innovativeness of the internet not to mention the great entrepreneurial aspects that Bezos himself has been successful with. Barnes & Noble may not be a "little fish" in a big pond, but the vast majority of the innovations and "e-businesses" that exist are "little fish". Now that Amazon is fattened itself into a "big fish"...or HOG...it wants to crowd out any potential competition. I think Bezoz and Amazon need to step back a little and rethink their strategy. I like what a previous poster said...if you want to grow and hold on to your customers, you need to offer competitive prices and quality service...THAT IS WHAT WILL HOLD YOU IN GOOD STEAD, not trying to keep me from checking out your competition!

Don Watson


March 1, 2000

I've spent thousands of dollars on the net, and I've been shopping at Amazon.com for years now. I've always preferred it to B&N, whose corporate practices I considered predatory. I had no idea. I wonder why you're not defending yourselves against court actions by E-Bay for stealing their ideas for online auctions? I'd like to see you try to patent that technology. Get ready to spend a LOT more money on marketing to bring in new customers to replace those like me who are getting a clue. Bye bye Amazon. You're going the way of the dodo.

Michael Saulters


March 1, 2000

As long as this patent exists, I will not do business with amazon.com.

M. Chen


March 1, 2000

This is a feature article in MIT's technology review right now. Check it out. Amazon is not the only company doing this sort of thing. There are companies out there patenting obvious technology (and worse, vague business models) that they never intend to produce. There must be a line to separate the true innovators, researchers, and pioneers from the profiteers.

Dan Brousseau


March 1, 2000

Time to do my shopping at other sites...

Robert Myers


March 1, 2000

Amazon, a river? One who flows unimpeded To sea should fear dams.

Jon Green


March 1, 2000

It truly saddens that the only way for Amazon to show a profit is by legal wrangling. Bye, Bye, Amazon - but I won't miss you that much - Barnes & Noble is just a Web site away (and two blocks down the street).

John Burski


March 1, 2000

It is true that patents are beneficial. Patents were intended to give the initial creator a period of time to reap the rewards of their hard work, effort, and creativity. Unfortunately, the patent system was not designed with the rapid pace of the internet and computers in mind. The patent system was designed at a time where advances in technology, and the proliferation of that technology's usage took many years. Additionally, patents were for items that were truly new, unique, and original. They were not intended for simply a different way or style of doing something anyone else could (or is) doing, unless that method or style resulted in a truly unique or fundamental difference of distinctly measurable proportion. The application and enforcement of patents, as they are currently instituted, will severely hinder the advancement of the internet. This is a problem that those who define patent laws must deal with soon. It is my understanding that, in effect, Amazon has received a patent on something that anyone else could (or is) doing, and that that method is not truly unique. It also does not result in a truly unique or fundamental difference of distinctly measurable proportion. In short, it is something that many other people could be doing, and maybe even are doing. Receiving a patent on this is simply taking advantage of the patent office's lack of understanding of the technology and methods behind the internet, as well as their lack of understanding of the rapidity with which the internet is advancing. If Amazon has come up with something truly unique and significant, then by all means go for it. But if Amazon is simply trying to make things harder for others to compete by complicating the development process and limiting common options for implementation, then that is simply harassment. This situation sounds akin to one company patenting putting the price tag in the top right corner of its products packaging, then suing another company for placing price tags in the same location. Perhaps this is a very simplified example, but I have the impression that it fits this situation.

T.Mike Curry


March 1, 2000

Kudos to O'Reilly for helping to bring to the forefront this deficiency in U.S. Patent law. The U.S. Patent Office needs to be educated about the internet and what constitutes an original and unique idea. It's akin to Goodyear trying to get a patent on the _shape_ of their tires. I'll add my name to the list of Amazon customer's that will not purchase until this silliness is stopped.

Gary Singleton


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com, ask yourselves, was this move really necessary? You *do* have competitors. In my eyes, you have given more reason to shop elsewhere.

Brian J. Sayatovic


March 1, 2000

I will discontinue shopping on Amazon until this practice stops and will urge everyone else I know to do the same. Shame on Amazon for trying to choke the very medium which facilitated its success. ;-(

JP Toto


March 1, 2000

Dennis Hostetler


March 1, 2000

Wake up Amazon! The world is changing and the rank and file are getting really sick of big business abusing laws that were intended to protect small inventors and producers from people like you. Shame on you. I will not purchase from Amazon and will actively work to undermine the company.

Matthew Yeo


March 1, 2000

This one-click patent is just stupid.

Tim Troxel


March 1, 2000

I've never used Amazon, nor do I plan to. The 1-Click patent just sounds like a stupid marketing tool to me, and I don't do business with companies that do stupid things with marketing (a certain sofware company in Redmond, for example). Give a consumer credibility first, and their orders in a timely fashion a close second; no one needs any more lame 'Net .company marketing.

Bryan J. Green


March 1, 2000

I had to slap myself on the forhead -- I just ordered a book from Amazon. I had two more books I was going to buy later this week. I will not purchase them or any others from Amazon until this nonsense stops.

Steve Armstrong


March 1, 2000

Neither one-click ordering nor the idea of an affiliate program should be patentable ideas given the state of Internet technology and marketing concepts at the time when they were patented. I'll be buying from other online and offline booksellers and cancelling my Amazon affiliate membership in protest of these patents and the use to which Amazon is putting them.

John Mozena


March 1, 2000

I will not be ordering anything further from Amazon, and I will urge everyone that I know not to order anything as well. I have been connected to the internet since 1990 when it wasn't pretty and when people looked at me funny when I said the word Internet. I am sick of corperate America exploiting one of the most valuable resources ever conceived. There are timess when I would like the end of "Escape from LA" to come true and someone would unleash a big enough EM pulse to send us back 100 years..so we can start over again. Companies such as Amazon are just too big for own good.

Ben Rosenberg


March 1, 2000

It's wrong! Simply Wrong!

Courtenay Probert


March 1, 2000

I'm surprised that it took THIS for Spamazon to suffer public backlash--for years Spamazon has been anti-privacy, most notably with their policy of sending unsolicited advertising to people who order from them or even sign up for contests (and then refusing to honor any and all remove requests). Amazon has ALWAYS sucked, and always WILL suck.

Camille Klein


March 1, 2000

As a past customer [who has now switched to BN, Borders, and CDNow], I find myself extremely disgusted with these patents. If Amazon doesn't back off, it will find out just how mobile the web is and how fast you can lose customers.

Joe Lin


March 1, 2000

It's wrong! Simply Wrong!

Courtenay Probert


March 1, 2000

Courtenay Probert


March 1, 2000

Courtenay Probert


March 1, 2000

harvey blessing


March 1, 2000

'Tis a disgrace that a company such as Amazon.com would resort to suing over a patent they should have never filed in the first place. I have looked around on Amazon's website for various computer related books, but have always found the same books in local bookstores for lower prices and no wait for shipping. I can seriously say that until Amazon ceases with this ridiculous action, I will not even load up their website, and will advise everyone I know to do the same. By enforcing a patent they really had no right in securing, they are endangering the innovation that has caused the internet to grow by leaps and bounds. I agree that the US patent office holds equal responsibility in this, because they allowed a patent on a technology that was already in use elsewhere, just because Amazon was the first to file for it. However, Amazon has shown me that they are willing to abuse the system in order to make a buck, and that puts them too close to Microsoft, in my opinion.

Chris Stevenson


March 1, 2000

This is very unfortunate news to me, and until I hear that stupid patent was dropped, I will never do any business with amazon.com, ever. Fortunately, I live in a country where that patent will not be enforced. You have to realize that it would be easy for any competitor to move his website to such a country, and yet, through the Internet, have the order processed in the US. You are not going to stop the competition that way, and worse, you are going to loose customers. You may survive the crisis, but your image will be tainted for a long time, and the momentum that pushed you forward may very well put you behind the scene faster that you can imagine.

Raphael Manfredi


March 1, 2000

Neither affilate programs or one-click shopping are technological advances worthy of patenting. They're marketing advances, plain and simple. Any company that lets their marketing department get hold of the patenting and technology has serious problems.

Brian Mastenbrook


March 1, 2000

I have made purchases from Amazon in the past. But I will not do so again, unless Amazon give up these questionable patents.

Ken Firestone


March 1, 2000

Olle Viksten


March 1, 2000

johnson sikes


March 1, 2000

I purchase an average of 2-3 books per month from Amazon, and have for the past 6-7 months. However, I am furthermore ceasing any and all business with Amazon.com, as well as proposing that many other Amazon customers do the same, considering the ridiculous patent that your company has on "1-click shopping". Your pompous attempt to patent another's ideas has infuriated me to no ends. You are not an innovator, Amazon. You're an imitator. An imitator with some marketing skill. Pete Thompson

Peter Thompson


March 1, 2000

As a long-time Amazon customer, I am appalled by your audacity in patenting an application which was in use well before you "invented" it, and dismayed that you obviously intend to use this patent to bludgeon your competitors. Worst of all, you don't even need "1-Click" to achieve your currently dominant sales position. I've NEVER used "1-Click", since I prefer to review the information as I step through the sales process. Although I've previously used Amazon exclusively, due to the high level of customer service received, I will NOT be purchasing anything more from you unless and until you rescind this ridiculous power grab. Here's hoping that you'll wake up soon, and issue an apology.

Marcus P. Hagen


March 1, 2000

Jeff Kilpatrick


March 1, 2000

Marcel Brown


March 1, 2000

F*** you Amazon!

Joe


March 1, 2000

I'm taking my business elsewhere and advising my friends and family to do the same.

Ryan Sweeney


March 1, 2000

Bad Amazon! Bad! No more cookies for you!

Steve Emerson


March 1, 2000

Corporations depend upon you and me for their survival. That's why Amazon is blindly fixated on our wallets. Let's exploit this Achilles heel and send them a message to stop trying to own what isn't theirs. Please join me in boycotting Amazon.

Chas. Porter


March 1, 2000

Wayne Allen


March 1, 2000

Under no circumstances will I purchase anything from Amazon.com. Additionally, I will *make* opportunities to tell people why they should not choose to conduct business with Amazon. Between this and your spam-house activities, your firm is just a blight on the web and the Internet.

Joe Altman


March 1, 2000

I am proud to use these sites: www.fatbrain.com www.bn.com www.cdnow.com I urge others to do the same.

carolyn rhea drapes


March 1, 2000

Amazon, you've lost me as a customer for the foreseeable future by your position on this matter.

Bob Leigh


March 1, 2000

Dear Sir, I find the use of patent, your latest patent especially, greatly troubling. I don't believe for a minute it is required for your company to be sucessful. Instead of focusing on your competition and outdoing them with better service, prices, etc. you have begun behaving like other corporate behemoths whose would rather manipulate the market and legal system to squelch competition than compete openly. I realize the internet is a fiercly competitive market, tough cookies. Whoa to amazon.com should this become your strategy for "competing". Just watch your back because you will become less competitive and someone will eat your lunch while you rest on your laurels(read patents). Sean P. Doyle

Sean P. Doyle


March 1, 2000

Tim Sharpe


March 1, 2000

I buy LOTS of books. I won't be buying any from Amazon.

Ed Stauff


March 1, 2000

Not a penny more for stupidity - not to mention greedy stupidity. As an employee of a moderately sized player in the e-commerce field, I see your "land-grab" techniques as a kiss of death to anyone who tries to develop new technologies - and certainly threatening to folks using the tried and true (you never know, Amazon may have patented it...) Get real, Mr. B - if you keep trying to defend your patent of the wheel, you're eventually going to find a judge who knows a cookie from a crook when he sees one. And then you're going to loose your shirt. Though judging by your earnings profile, you may not have any of those left anyway. Ooops, sorry - someone patented shirt technology while no one was looking. Sorry, Jeff - you're gonna have to wear pants instead.

Kate Evans


March 1, 2000

Let's patent a wheel! Why not?

Michael Krivoruchko


March 1, 2000

Wayne Langford


March 1, 2000

What more needs to be said? Amazon is turning into the typical company run by lawyers looking for some unethical way to turn a quick buck. Between this and the "Mein Kampf to Germany" issue, I'll never shop amazon again.

tim dunn


March 1, 2000

Tim Gray


March 1, 2000

Karin Groening


March 1, 2000

I am in complete agreement with the O'Reilly letter. I am and have long been a loyal Amazon customer, and have always been VERY happy with their services. However, this campaign of pursuing "infrigements" on patents that should never have been applied for, let alone issued, will only spoil everything for everyone. I remember using Amazon's feedback to discuss the idea of them adding a "wish list" area to store things you find while browsing (saying that CDNOW had a similar feature). Gosh -- Amazon now has a "wish list" -- maybe CDNOW should sue them! Amazon -- stop wasting everyone's time and money, and just get back to business.

David Rhoten


March 1, 2000

Eduardo A. Suarez


March 1, 2000

Although I admire Amazon.com greatly, their patent claims are silly. Beyond not inventing the ability to prcess orders with one-click, there are other reasonable arguments why the patent is ridiculous. What would have happened if someone had patented the check-out lane at the grocery store - and claimed that no one else could use a checkout lane? Silly. Silly Silly. Too many lawyers!!!

Norman Fletcher


March 1, 2000

troy hakala


March 1, 2000

Elric James Zufan


March 1, 2000

I have purchased a number of books from Amazon, but I am unlikely to buy any more. The 1-Click Patent is nonsense. Shame. Don Anderson Harpswell, ME

Donald L. Anderson


March 1, 2000

While I am all for people developping and patenting original ideas and concepts I find it peculiar that one can take a prevalent idea and patent it. While I certainly assign a high degree of blame to Amazon for attempting to patent this concept, it is important to remember that this was also a mistake by the patent office which granted it in the first place. If you want to patent a concept, please develop it first at that time you will have my support. What comes next can I get a patent on selling cars through dealerships.

Brice David


March 1, 2000

Looks like I won't be one click ordering in the foreseeable future. Just in case that's not clear - I will no longer order my books from Amazon.com. I will go out of my way to order books from other vendors, even if it means paying more.

David Archer


March 1, 2000

Shane Eller


March 1, 2000

Michael C. McGlynn


March 1, 2000

Rene Baumann


March 1, 2000

I have stopped ordering from amazon due to these ridiculous patents.

Lewis Stead


March 1, 2000

Amazon has now joined the ranks of etoys.com ... another corporate bully abusing the open system upon which their business is based. May you have to pay Microsoft for all your software needs (a more fitting curse I cannot imagine). My family spent several hundred on books and media at Amazon last year ... from this day forward, we shop elsewhere.

Steven R. Staton


March 1, 2000

I certainly will not shop at amazon.com anymore. What a shame. It smells like a bad lawyer is behind this whole ordeal.

Bryan Harper


March 1, 2000

Dan Fellows


March 1, 2000

I've ordered from Amazon in the past, and that's the operative word here, past. Until Jeff Bezos gives up this insane idea that he can patent something that should benefit all, he will not be receiving any more of my dollars. Look what he (and all of us for that matter) have been given freely, and how he has abused the gift. Is there no shame needed when you wealthy?

Sandra K. Crizer


March 1, 2000

Jerry Winkler


March 1, 2000

Todd Sjolander


March 1, 2000

I've ordered from Amazon in the past, and that's the operative word here, past. Until Jeff Bezos gives up this insane idea that he can patent something that should benefit all, he will not be receiving any more of my dollars. Look what he (and all of us for that matter) have been given freely, and how he has abused the gift. Is there no shame needed once you're wealthy?

Sandra K. Crizer


March 1, 2000

I find it laughable that Amazon seems to think it has invented two of the most used and simplest ideas on the net... one-click and an affiliates program. Many years ago I used to be a CDNow affiliate site. Since they only offered me music in return, I kept my eyes open for other ventures. Then there was VideoServe. I was an affiliate with them for a good long while. Why was I an affiliate with these two organizations and not Amazon? Because Amazon had no such affiliate program! I switched to Amazon when they finally started offer their affiliate program, but dropped it like the dickens when all the "circle" stuff started, and was very glad I had when the idiot patent stuff came out. I have been with Fatbrain since then and am glad I am.

Randy Rathbun


March 1, 2000

As I've said many times before. The only way idiots like Amazon get the message is to hurt them where it hurts most, in the wallet. Stop buying from them!!!

Boris Kogan


March 1, 2000

I have been a regular customer at Amazon. I intend to shop elsewhere until this patent is dropped. The internet is based on sharing of ideas and technology. Amazon benefits from those who pioneered, and now wants to call those gifts proprietary. That's ungracious and greedy.

Rachel McCracken


March 1, 2000

Kevin Vig


March 1, 2000

While I can understand (barely) your thinking that you need to patent the 1-click and associates ideas to protect yourself, I cannot understand your denying it to others. Your business was built on the backs of those who came before you. Those who gave freely to enhance the web. We need to continue that spirit. What do you have to lose? Customer Support!! I will NOT buy anything from Amazon.com until you release those patents freely to others.

Kenneth Ash


March 1, 2000

Zac Baron


March 1, 2000

The Web is about innovation, it's about the freedom to communicate whatever you want to a global audiance no matter how little your voice may be... that little voice becomes noticed. Amazon is attempting to chain up innovation on the web for anyone who wishes to delve into the world of e-commerce. Imagine, Amazon, that one day you woke up to find out that you can't open your bedroom door because it is locked. It's locked because some company decided to patent the idea of the door and the locking doorknob. You can't infringe on their patent rights and they don't want you using their doors. Your trapped. No where to go. The world on the other side of the door might as well not exist. Amazon, I am personally asking you to not box the Web in. Let innovation breath.<BR><BR> Nick Finck<BR> Editor in Chief<BR> <A HREF="http://www.digital-web.com">Digital Web Magazine</A><BR>

Nick Finck


March 1, 2000

I avoid Amazon, even though from what I know of Mr. Bezos he's a cool guy, because of the patent mistakes. I say "mistakes" because I don't believe Amazon has any malice -- this is something you can fix to get back status in the Netizens community. Please amend this and help us make the Net a better place.

Sumana Harihareswara


March 1, 2000

Dan Whitaker


March 1, 2000

I will have to say that I do not approve of this patent. I will have to show Amazon the only way I can. Since money is like voting, I will take my votes elsewhere.

Scot Halvorsen


March 1, 2000

I'm not certain whether Amazon has acted out of ignorance or immorality. If the latter, nothing we can say here will change the viewpoint of the decision makers at Amazon - if the former, perhaps they are better informed now. Either way, I hope that a boycott will make them reconsider their actions, if not their motives.

Rick Chadderdon


March 1, 2000

I went to delete your bookmark from my 'Favourites', and what do you know, it had never been entered. I then went to the Barnes and Noble site, to which I had never been before, and proceeded to bookmark theirs. I'll hear about your decision to drop the lawsuit before I visit your site again.

Steve Bartlett


March 1, 2000

I feel truly saddened to hear of this blantant abuse of a system still trying to catch up to the modern age (ie: the antiquated patent system). To basically patent the concept of sending and receiving 'cookies' is outrageous and I'm happy to say I've never done business with your company..and now I'm justified in that practice. I perhaps feel more saddened by the fact that there are more people duped into using your service than we could probably ever hope to reach. Thus they will blindly go along with your malicious schemes to undermine beneficial technology without a second thought. I feel a bit frightened that soon someone will 'patent' the concept of sharing information (such as in this manner) and bring about the great net censorship. Granted, there will probably always be small pockets of free information, but they will be resigned to appearing much like the paper tabloids in the supermarket do to the general populace: an outlet of freakish information that isn't true and only good for a small laugh. Use your size and considerable monetary power to benefit the information exchange across the Internet, instead of trying to stifle it for your own conceited ego. Drop the patent now.

Brian K.


March 1, 2000

HEY AMAZON PATENT THIS!! (reaching below the waist)

Jim Harmon


March 1, 2000

Just noting that I'm another satisfied Amazon customer that won't be going back to Amazon unless this idiocy is resolved.

JS Pereira


March 1, 2000

Sara Davidson


March 1, 2000

I think I'm going to file a Patent request for 'multi-click shopping'... That's how absurd this whole issue is. Amazon.com should be chastised for submitting the patent request. The Patent office should be held acountable for granting the request. INSANE! The patent should be overturned and any royalties (plus say, 10% penalty) Amazon.com earned should be donated to charity and/or Internet access for educational purposes.

Brian Coyle


March 1, 2000

I will advise all my friends that Amazon's patent claims all endanger the freedom on the Internet and that they shouldn't buy at Amazon anymore.

Andreas Spengler


March 1, 2000

This is what comes from listening to lawyers. Mr. Bezos, you're well on your way to winning Time's "Corporate Sleaze-bag of the Year award for 2000".

Richard Cunningham


March 1, 2000

Won't be buying anything from amazon until something is done about silly patenting.

Chris Strutt


March 1, 2000

As I sit here typing, at least 20 more comments will probably be posted. Isn't this amazing Amazon; That for every minute that passes at least 10 more people have actively spoken against you, and joined a boycott of your site? >From now on, I too will be doing my shopping at Barnes and Noble.

Daniel Sanchez


March 1, 2000

As I sit here typing, at least 20 more comments will probably be posted. Isn't this amazing Amazon; That for every minute that passes at least 10 more people have actively spoken against you, and joined a boycott of your site? >From now on, I too will be doing my shopping at Barnes and Noble.

Daniel Sanchez


March 1, 2000

If you check your records, you'll find that I'm a regular customer. Well, I was a regular customer. No longer, unless this sort of nonsense stops.

Mike Couvillion


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos: I purchase approximately 񘈨-1500 per year of technical books and reference material. I have traditionally gone to a local "brick and mortar" establishment to do so. After lamenting about the selection available locally, a friend asked me to look at your site. I was sufficently impressed to consider my next purchases (W2K CBTs and Reference Manuals). "Was" being the operative word. After learning of your company's gross abuse of intellectual property law as a substitue for earning profits the old fashioned way - via sales - I will not purchase anything from amazon.com. Not now, and not until you cease and desist this action and filing. It's too bad that companies like yours and others fail to understand that, like government, the web is to be "... of the people, by the people, and for the people." Enjoy your fifteen minutes -- 14:30 are already up.

Josh Friedman


March 1, 2000

Yet another satisfied Amazon customer who won't be purchasing from them until this patent ruling is sorted out. Vote with your Credit Cards!

Jason Wickham


March 1, 2000

This is the kind of mentality that clutters up our justice system. If this patent goes through, Amazon will start a legal battle that will ultimately be a waste of America's resources. Our courts will be cluttered with cases where "XYZ" company infringed on Amazon's patent. People should be in court for more important issues.

Kyle Mankes


March 1, 2000

Blatent abuse of patents and an all around destructive act by Amazon, I will take my business elsewhere. Thanks to Mr. O'Reilly for supporting this effort to publicize Amazon's unethical business practices.

Robert Cornall


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com recently aquired 20+% of Living.com, the company I work for. At first this was exciting, now after learning of Amazon.com's patent abuse I'm concerned about the level of honesty displayed by our new business partners. How can a company claim innovation that is not rightfully theirs, built on technology that existed several years prior to their patent application? Let alone, take others to court because of it... sickening.

Daniel Jackson


March 1, 2000

As they say in football, "Amazon has taken a cheap shot" at the Internet community. If they can not practice good citizenship then I will switch to a kinder source of books.

Leo Abbott


March 1, 2000

It is outrageous! Maybe we should modify the gnu public license so that every free software is free for every one except Amazon. Frankly, this kind of behavior makes Bill Gates look like a saint. C'mon, Amazon, do what is right!

D Xie


March 1, 2000

Pete Brayman


March 1, 2000

shame, shame, shame on Amazon! You've lost my business until you change your microsoftian tactics.

Christine Childs


March 1, 2000

shame, shame, shame on Amazon! You've lost my business until you change your microsoftian tactics.

Christine Childs


March 1, 2000

The arrogance of amazon.com is only surpassed by its greed. I support my local indie booksellers, the only true professionals left in the business.

Lynn Dixon


March 1, 2000

I was an Amazon.co.uk customer. Now I have to search another on-line bookstore that operates in Europe. Jeff Bezos must be very "smart" businessman: before he lost millions of dollars each year and was considered the man of the year! But that was not enough for him, so he decided he should lose customers too and run for man of the centuryà Don't byte the hand that feeds you.

Joƒo Orvalho


March 1, 2000

Patents for inovation are good. Patents for theft of public knowledge are bad.

Mark Fowle


March 1, 2000

I have spent hundereds if not thousands of pounds with Amazon.co.uk over the past year - Mostly on books explaining type technologies Amazon are now attempting to patent! I'm switch to bol.com

Richard Walkington


March 1, 2000

Alex Williamson


March 1, 2000

As a free-market consumer, I still have the ability to choose whom I would like to do business with, even to the point of spending more money to get better service. For the past couple years, I have placed quite a few orders with Amazon.com, yet have chosen sometimes to go through BN.com, and some others if I needed a product you did not have, could not ship quickly, etc. I always came back to Amazon, though, because for the most part, you were a "best of breed", as far as online booksellers go. I am not able to understand why a merchant with your market share has chosen to alienate their customers in this way. Remember, selling drugs can make you a lot of money, but is it something you can proudly tell your mother you do for a living...? Same principle - don't cut off your nose to spite your face. Good day, and good bye, Amazon.com. A little exercise walking down to the local Barnes and Noble will do me good, and I won't have to pay shipping either.

Taggert Siegel


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com I need some advise. I'm a college musician, and I've been learning these things called scales. Now then, could I patent something so creative as a musical scale? Thanks for your time. Utter and complete sarcasm.

Terry Carr


March 1, 2000

As a software engineer, I find this sort of abuse intolerable. I will not purchase anything else from Amazon until this issue is resolved.

Matt Stucky


March 1, 2000

Amazon has lost another customer. Too bad you had to be so selfish.

Andrew Campbell


March 1, 2000

Peter Walters


March 1, 2000

The patent certainly seems to fail both the test that the patented technology be non-obvious and that there be no prior art.

Atlant G. Schmidt


March 1, 2000

One-Click ordering was a convenient way of purchasing over the Internet, and was one of the reasons I used Amazon. Now that you are using questionable legal tactics to eliminate this convenience from other Web Sites I might choose to visit, One-Click ordering will be the reason I stop using Amazon.

Stephen Olson


March 1, 2000

Johna Cravens


March 1, 2000

Yves Bastide


March 1, 2000

I hope this serves notice to online business that consumers won't tolerate the same practices that worked in the "bricks and mortar" business model. Times have changed, and so must fraudulent misuse of the law for capitalist gains.

Andrew Scott


March 1, 2000

Visiting the local Borders bookstore until this is resolved...

Jarrod Igou


March 1, 2000

Clayton A. Whitehurst


March 1, 2000

Brice Busselman


March 1, 2000

So.... you now have a patent. You are .. a company that yet has made a profit, yet you stock price makes a lot of people paper rich. But that is all it is - paper. Methinks that this would be a great time to bring a company like yours down. How -- Having to spend big bucks on Attorney's fees defending your patent. More than one company has gone under even when successful in a legal action. And methinks that your patent is not winnable. Result - more losses and a huge drop in your bloated stock prices. Someday everyone is going to finally be able to see that the king is wearing no clothes.

Ed Edwards


March 1, 2000

Such malicious stifling of innovation must be stopped. This is an obvious idea to which Amazon.com should be allowed to claim no propriety stake whatsoever.

Gregory J. Dunham


March 1, 2000

James Ho


March 1, 2000

Brett Oster


March 1, 2000

This is a truly despicable act. As the son of a patent attorney, I am familiar with the rudiments of patent law. Being first doesn't always make it right. The only reason to do this is to shore up an extremly poor profit/loss statement. You should be ashamed. Barnes and Noble has my business until word comes of your dropping this ridiculous patent.

Brett A. Noe


March 1, 2000

Amazon, You have not only lost me as a customer, but all my students as well. I had been telling them to buy their books at Amazon. No longer. Larry

Larry Henthorn


March 1, 2000

It is absurd that they are even trying this. I will be shopping other places form now on... Robert Rust

Robert Rust


March 1, 2000

As a programmer I have lost all respect for Amazon.com and even if they don't enforce this I still will never shop Amazon.com again....

Daniel Simser


March 1, 2000

Keith Allington


March 1, 2000

I have enjoyed shopping with Amazon in the past, but I will not be doing so in future as a result of these cynical and ridiculous patents on very, very obvious things.

Roberto Abraham


March 1, 2000

I will no longer be doing business with Amazon until they cease these unconscionable practices.

Thomas E. Ballenger


March 1, 2000

Please drop this lawsuit. The patent you were granted for one-click purchasing was an obvious and common use of widely available technology. This litigious behavior acts against all of the efforts that brought us to this point in internet history. I have the same reservations about the affiliate program patent. Affiliate programs have been a part of many industries for a long time, before internet commerce was a conceivable possiblity. This is simply another case of a patent being granted for an obvious and common use of available technology. Some companies receive similarly questionable patents and then formally turn the idea over to the public so that nobody else can patent it and hobble the progress the benefits all of society. You could make a good name for yourself if you did the same. Otherwise, it will be your fate to have the first several hundred people who implemented one-click purchasing and affiliate programs rush to the defensive. This can only harm your good name. Sincerely, A frequent customer of Amazon.com (Look up history on Jeania Messer and Greg Messer) Greg Messer

Greg Messer


March 1, 2000

It just boggles the mind that you had the nerve to even apply for a patent for something so obvious. Do not pat yourself on the back for doing it first. It is just digusting. I am an IT Professional and we use and reuse the ideas of other professionals in our every day work. Why do you think this country has taken such a lead in Software innovation? I find it revolting that you are trying to start a pattern of stealing obvious ideas and stifling innovation and growth in this industry. You have lost an Amazon customeer. I will make it my personal mission to try and steer customers away from you until you stop this predatory behavior. Shame on you Mr. Bezos.

Shrinivas Modayur


March 1, 2000

Amazon has been the first in it's field. They were among the first to build credibility and a loyal customer base. This is obviously not enough of a challenge, so they have decided to publicly dismantle their semi-decent name with a 40-pound sledgehammer. Nice going - you should be ashamed of yourselves. I will not buy from Amazon until this matter is resolved (and I would like Jeff Bezos to write 'I've been a very naughty boy' 100 times on a blackboard, please).

Snorri Hergill Kristjßnsson


March 1, 2000

Just because the US Patent Office has given up on validating software patents, you shouldn't take advantage of a broken system. Your abuse of the legal system can only breed ill will. Renounce the patent, chastize your lawyers.

Edmund Hack


March 1, 2000

It is obvious that one-click prior art exists and that this patent should not have been issued. Further, it is extremely likely that protecting this patent will make you an extremely unpopular Internet neighbor, which added to the expense of patent protection will reduce your ability to remain an Internet neighbor. I have been one of your customers (though low volume) for a couple years. I am also an Internet neighbor. This kind of patent protection will cause me to take my business to vendors other than Amazon.com in the future because supporting you as a vendor neighbor is counterproductive to my own neighbor status.

Byron T. Watts


March 1, 2000

I will not be making any purchases from Amazon.com. I will be doing all of my online book shopping at bn.com

Gregory T Hopper


March 1, 2000

100% of nothing......get the picture? Of course U.S. Patent laws probably aren't valid anywhere outside the U.S.A. Perhaps all online businesses should move where Amazon isn't. Don't we have enough random stupidity without adding greed to the mix?

Cory Hameluck


March 1, 2000

This patent filing is ludicrous, my business will be taking its moeny elsewhere.

Jeremy Winn


March 1, 2000

Here is someone else that has not used Amazon.com since they started to attack other companies with this patent.

Kevin Rank


March 1, 2000

As an E-Commerce developer by trade, I find this patent sickening. It stomps on one of the fundamental concepts that I have been applying to E-Commerce sites for the past year +, and makes doing my job very difficult because of it. Furthermore, as a consumer, I am even more outraged. I have been shopping with Amazon since their launch several years ago, and 95% of the books I've bought since Amazon launched have come through them. The simple fact of the matter is that I've all but forgone physical bookstores because Amazon makes life so much easier. I own approx. 25-30 O'Reilly books; every one of which was purchased through Amazon. Thats over A THOUSAND DOLLARS worth of book, not to mention the other books I've bought from Amazon. This patent is so blatantly ridiculous that I just don't know what to say.

Brendan W. McAdams


March 1, 2000

As an Amazon customer and an Amazon affiliate, I am deeply troubled by this. Jeff Bezos and his brood of lawyers are attempting a move that would make even Microsoft embarrassed. Like most, I can understand protecting the phrase 'one-click ordering' but I cannot understand patenting and taking legal action to protect a technology you did not invent. Cookies and session management have been used for many years. In fact, I use cookies and session management on my website. Am I the next target? Will I be dragged in to court for using a one-click ordering system? how about signing up for other affiliate programs? Will I now have to pay royalties to Amazon to be an affiliate? I will just have to find out, since I am now proud to be the newest Barnes and Noble affiliate....

Mark DeHaven


March 1, 2000

Having been an amazon customer for some time, I've wondered why I should bother checking out the other online bookstores. Now I know.

Kevin Roper


March 1, 2000

Amazon, put down the skunky patent, and slowly back away... Seems our U.S. patent office needs to hire a technology staff to keep this craziness from continuing. Until that happens, Amazon, and anyone else submitting bogus technology patents gets no business from me.

Greg Kludt


March 1, 2000

Jeff, last year (FY99) my extended family and I accounted for about US񙦘 worth of your sales. Once you started your patent pushing tricks you immediately were added to our boycott list. You won't be seeing a penny from me or my family until this ridiculous abuse of the internet ends. I also have made it a top priority to seek out your competitors and actively recommend those that are best in class to anyone and every one who asks me for recommendations. I may be small change compared to your total cash flow, but I?m not alone - there are hundreds of people who feel just like I do. Together we may have enough voice to make 10 August 99 look like a good day; then what will the per share valuations look like?

Chris Abbey


March 1, 2000

Borders.com and BarnesAndNoble.com replaced Amazon for me long ago. : ) steve

Steve Wolfe


March 1, 2000

I heard that 1's & 0's were still up for grabs. Chapters here I come!

Michael Parker


March 1, 2000

your patents are ridiculous, the US Patent office is full of morons

David Graves


March 1, 2000

Shame on you. What you are doing is irresponsible. Without the innovation and healthy exchange of ideas that created the web, where would you be now? Please stop trying to enforce your misguided patents.

Dave Baerg


March 1, 2000

Amazon, you've lost a customer that presently spent literally hundreds of dollars with you every single month. All of this due to a stupid policy of thwarting competition in the courtroom rather than by giving us, the customers, their best choice. You ARE the best online bookstore, so it's a true shame that I now do my online bookshopping at Barnes and Noble. Kind regards, Henning K Pedersen

Henning Kilset Pedersen


March 1, 2000

After I read article about Amazon patenting simple ideas and using free software I WILL NOT SUPPORT THEM EVER AGAIN !!! They should be put down !!!!

Radoslaw Wierzbicki


March 1, 2000

Karen Johnson


March 1, 2000

I feel strongly about this issue, Amazon is wrong! An affiliate program is nothing more than a Internet MLM, maybe Amazon should have patent MLM Networking!

Bob Busanovitch


March 1, 2000

Write to you Congressperson about revamping the USPTO.

Jill Druschke


March 1, 2000

The Amazon 1-Click patent is really about business practices, not about software, innovation, or inventions. Amazon is using (abusing) software patents to restrict other competitors from using a like business practice (expressed through software) in servicing their own customers. This is unethical, but also it highlights how the broken patent system can be abused for anti-competitive purposes. Kevin Prichard

kevin prichard


March 1, 2000

.............................. shit !

Christian Sager


March 1, 2000

Please be more careful in the future while trying to profit from technical novelties. A name and a use do not a novelty make; the technique you "patented" is -- should be -- out for common usage.

Zeynep Dilli


March 1, 2000

Dear AmazonS .com AMAZON:noun A fierce warlike tribe of women who tried to scare the hell out of anyone nearing their territory. They and their legend are mostly a myth. AFFILIATE:noun Like-minded people with the concept of achieving a common goal in association with one another. The concept has existed far into our collective histories. INTERNET: noun An affiliation of computers for the purpose of dissemination of information for the common good. (Myth has it that one Al Gore was its inventor.) Today, this affiliation of computers has created an astounding number of sub-affiliations, of all manners and means. Any attempt to isolate and patent one version of these sub-affiliations would be absolutely absurd ... possibly only attempted by a fierce, warlike tribe of women. Come on ... Amazon! Stick to what you know best. Jim Conrad

Jim Conrad ... pREACHERPRODUCTIONs.com


March 1, 2000

Until Bezos & Co. choose to quit attempting to enforce a patent on a technology that was in place BEFORE the company existed, I choose not to do business with Amazon.com. In addition to an open letter, why not ask people to CANCEL their accounts and ask that their name be removed from promotional advertising (I know I received one yesterday.) Maybe if enough people cancel their account AND state why, we might be able to sway some opinions.

Gary Noles


March 1, 2000

I have an account on Amazon and have purchased from them several times. I was very upset to discover what they were doing and will not do business with them again.

Mark Kinsey


March 1, 2000

I am doing my best to let everyone I know who does not follow the tech trades that Amazon is not a company worthy of thier business, to find another reseller instead. I have not convinced many people yet, but the few that I have have already bypassed Amazon for thier 񘐜 in purchases. Every penny helps.

Nathan S Randall


March 1, 2000

Amazon's behavior with regard to their "1-Click Ordering" patent has been so utterly deplorable that I now consider them one of the three greatest threats to the future of the Internet as we know it. Needless to say, I will not be buying any more books from them (geez, they still sell books?), especially as there is a wonderful independent bookstore here in Denver (The Tattered Cover, in Cherry Creek and LoDo) that deserves my business far, far more than these high-tech carpetbaggers. Mr. Bezos, you may not know this, but I actually had a phone interview with your company some time ago. Had I known then how your company was planning to rape and pillage the Internet to justify your inflated stock price, I would never have bothered. As it is, I am glad I'm not working for you after all.

Eric J. Bowersox


March 1, 2000

Stance Nixon


March 1, 2000

Dennis Geier


March 1, 2000

This lawsuit is just plain wrong. Not to mention there is prior art out there for this same exact thing. You might want to take a look at mitpress.com, it was first built by Philip Greenspun (photo.net) back several years ago and had a simular one click mechanism, via I think cookies. Philip has mentioned this thing several times, so maybe someone could use this info for some good. Then again who knows I may be wrong.

Jeff Barrett


March 1, 2000

I recently only used Amazon.com for all of my book shopping needs. However in light of their recent "patents" I feel I can longer support their business. I now use their site to read book reviews but purchase the books with either Barnes and Noble or Fatbrain.com. I've also actively started recommending to my circle of friends that they do that as well. This is ridiculus and it makes me completely insane trying to fathom how someone could get a patent on "1 click buying" and "affiliate programs". So I guess when we're all using our thumb print to purchase goods and services, Amazon will likely try to patent that! The worst part is, they didn't invent this stuff, they just patented it. Unreal. I'll never recommend Amazon.com to anyone ever again, in fact I will actively disuade anyone from using Amazon.com.

David W. Stevens


March 1, 2000

There were "1-click" systems hanging off the internet long before 97. Perhaps my book spending should be best spent helping Barnes & Noble fight this mockery of our government.

Chris Gamble


March 1, 2000

I'll be supporting boycott of Amazon.com until this is solved to my liking. (In fact, I'll make Barnes & Noble my first stop for any such shopping.) Thanks for an informative web page (I appreciate having been able to read it in a text-only browser, too). But the big question is, how do we get the US Patent office to a) revoke this horific patent, and b) stop giving out such patents?

Syd Bauman


March 1, 2000

Michael Messawer


March 1, 2000

Drew Duncan


March 1, 2000

Marty Kraimer


March 1, 2000

Yet another attempt from a big company to control (i.e. monopolize) the Internet.

Bob Nash


March 1, 2000

I am a shareholder in Amazon, I am going to sell all of my shares today due to this.

Jonathan Nouri


March 1, 2000

Justin Penney


March 1, 2000

While I've never been a big fan of the "Open Source" movement, I do find this action by Amazon to be most disturbing. You might as well copyright "printf", or "while" loops, or other such "novel concepts". Then you can sue anyone who writes a program in C. Let's have a sanity check. I'll start by buying my reference material from Barnes & Noble from now on. Amazon can take the next step by ending this ridiculous lawsuit and try to win our business back.

Frank Di Vincenzo


March 1, 2000

Amazon, you had all my business until now. I'm so disappointed that I'll have to use Barnes and Noble. Hurry up and figure out that you're being utterly detrimental to yourself.

Pamela Kelsay


March 1, 2000

I guess I won't use amazon.de anymore.

Bart Hartgers


March 1, 2000

I no longer shop at Amazon.com because of the issues outlined above.

Adam Rice


March 1, 2000

Kenn Persinger


March 1, 2000

I am disappointed in this action by Amazon.com, although this is not the first time I have been disturbed by the actions of your company. (Particularly in the realm of human resources) I will not be shopping at Amazon.com again. I will use other vendors for my shopping needs, esp. Powell's for books.

Elaine Nelson


March 1, 2000

Well, you've got a wonderful search engine. Of course, I'll be damned if you're going to get any money from me for another item. The behavior of Amazon.com in the matter of "1-click" and "associates" patents is unspeakably low. I look forward to selling your stock short when the investing public realizes you're still not making money... and alienating your customer base. That's bright. Of course, you may be headed that way already... With a market cap of 23 billion, you have debt/equity ratio of over 3.5... Over 40% loss in profit margin over last 12 months... Cashflow, earnings... return on investment... sheesh. and this is the company that made you Man of The Year? Amazon is still bleeding. They have to grow or die. Too bad they're not getting any growth from here. I guess I'll just have to find somewhere else now, won't I?

Marc Phoenix Gibbs


March 1, 2000

Scott Mohnkern


March 1, 2000

The attempt to patent such nuances of the internet is equivilant to patenting the pumping of gas or the breathing of air. The one click function is a natural extension of the use of a mouse - perhaps next you'll apply for a patent for typing on a keyboard. Or perhaps Starbucks will now attempt to patent the pouring of coffee? Corporate giants who consistently crush and drive out smaller businesses, both in day to day commerce and on the web have gone too far with these notions. I think the consumer backlash will prove my point.

David R. Slayton


March 1, 2000

Like any other consumer, I vote with my wallet, and I'm voting against this represensible and stupid patent. I've been happily doing business with fatbrain.com and Powell's books since greed got the better of you, Amazon.

Mark Coletti


March 1, 2000

Along with so many others, I feel that these patents are making a mockery of U.S. Patent Office. To anyone that knows anything about the field this is like patenting the concept of pouring water into a cup, it was so obvious of thought that no one had dreamed of patenting it. Which leaves the real question, imagine what life would be like for the average person if someone did patent pouring water, now you know what these patents are doing for programers world wide. Ike Stewart

Ike Stewart


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com got over 90% of my Christmas business a few months ago. I have always been pleased with the service Amazon.com has been able to offer. However, in this environment of competition, I find that we must vote with the largest weapon we have left, our dollars (credits, pounds, etc). While I understand the need to protect your business. Filing patents that patent obvious processes and being given them by virtue of the fact that the Patent office is not as technically savvy as it needs to be is badly taking advantage of the system. While you CAN do that, your customers can also fight back as we are now. The decision must be made by you as to if the potential for increased profits by the patent offsets the potential for decreased profits via the negative publicity. Jeff, please do the RIGHT THING and disregard enforcement of this bad patent decision!

Richard C.S. Kinne


March 1, 2000

I feel this is an attempt by Amazonto monopolize this form of e-commerce. I feel it is total BS and shouldn't even be the chance to waste the time of a Federal Court. I have yet to order from them, and now will be sure to keep it this way.

Sean Rutledge


March 1, 2000

Daniel Sullivan


March 1, 2000

Bill Forgette


March 1, 2000

I have always heard good things about amazon, until now. Why you feel you have to patent something so mundane as this boggles the mind. you will never get any business from me or anyone in my family....

Corey Kovacs


March 1, 2000

As an Amazon UK customer I am disappointed in with Amazon's patent nonsense. I may be taking my business elsewhere if sense does not prevail.

James Jarvis


March 1, 2000


March 1, 2000

Nice work. It is good to know that there is someone out there trying to make it harder for everyone else. Let us keep the internet family in as much bondage and chaos as possible.

John Parker


March 1, 2000

Jeff Bone


March 1, 2000

Hey, why did not Amazon patent the idea of selling books(or anything) on the web!

Anuvinder Singh


March 1, 2000

Whoever counseled you to register the One-Click patent and counsels you to enforce it does not have your or your company's best interests at heart. The patent will be invalidated; prior art. This will hurt you at least two ways: 1) You will waste money on lawyer fees trying to enforce the patent. 2) You will waste accumulated good will with a large group of your customers and with all your competitors.

Bob Wakefield


March 1, 2000

I would like to add my voice to the growing outcry against Amazon.comÆs predatory and unjust business practices. Their trivial use of patents as a weapon against their competitors is highly objectionable and a danger to the future innovation of the Internet. I will be taking my business to one of its competitors and encouraging my family and friends to do the same.

Jerry Gamble


March 1, 2000

Amazon was an innovative idea and one of the first to recognize the immense power of the web both to simplify our lives and as a vehicle for commerce. I was a happy user and gladly recommended your service to my friends. The "1-click" idea is an obvious use of an existing technology, a technology created to enable just such an application. Amazon's attempt to patent this idea and prevent it's use by others is a great step backward for the user's of the web and a hindrance to it's use as a vehicle for commerce. I have removed the Amazon cookie from my machine and urged my friends to do likewise. I will continue to boycott amazon.com until you cease in your attempts to hold the web hostage. to'c

Timothy F. O'Connor


March 1, 2000

I've loved Amazon and spent a great deal of money there, as evidenced by the plethora of Amazon post it notes in my office. B&N will get those dollars now. Get with the program and leave your unfair business practices behind. They don't become an otherwise terrific firm.

Michele Morgan


March 1, 2000

Eric C. Allman


March 1, 2000

I totally agree with Tim O'Reilly's position that broad patents on internet technology will only serve to choke off continuing innovation for the benefit of all.

Tsenying Hong


March 1, 2000

Michael Atwood


March 1, 2000

I am completely opposed to the two recent Amazon patents. They are trivial and will only interfere with progress on the Internet. I am familiar with other software patents that are also trivial or have "prior art". Amazon made a poor choice to apply for these patents. The patent office made bad decisions to approve them. Now it would be best if Amazon released them to the public domain in order to allow small business to use similar technology without fear.

Patrick D. Logan


March 1, 2000

David Warmington


March 1, 2000

Brandon Johnson


March 1, 2000

Jeff Bozos uh Bezo's is a Bill Gates wanna be. How about trying to make a profit before you patent common business ideas. So when will they patent the idea that selling a product on via the Internet is unique. Jeff pull your head out of your behind and realize you can help e-commerce instead of hurting it. Looks like BN.Com might get my business. I hope your customers switch, your revenues go down and then your stock gets hammered.

Christopher Kracht


March 1, 2000

This patent demonstrates that the people who are trusted to grant them lack the necessary expertise to do. This patent amounts to legalized thief of intelectual public-domain property.

X. Chris Lor


March 1, 2000

Makes me glad I have only ever bought one Ů.95 CD from the muddy river. I guess that means that the loss of my business is just a grain of sand, but that is not the point. Having been in the retail world, I know that bad word of mouth can kill your traffic pretty quickly... spread this word, "Dam the River"! Glad to add my voice to the din!

Scott A. Smith


March 1, 2000

Nicely done Amazon.com. You have entered the realm that used to be reserved for such companies as AOL (trying to patent the phrase "You've got mail.") Ok. so you have patented this 1-click ordering scheme to prevent competition. What next? Patenting the act of moving a mouse? Clicking on a web page? THINK for God's sake people. We are trying to enter a world where there is international E-Commerce (quick someone patent that!) and people like you are trying to KILL it with stupid, asanine tricks like this. I am no longer going to order anything from you until you resolve this issue, and I am going to inform my friends and family to do likewise.

P. Alex Kenlon


March 1, 2000

The Internet was built on the open sharing of ideas, a process that made their implementations stronger, & made both everyone involved, as well as the Internet, richer. The current fad of grabbing ideas found or developed there & attempting to claim ownership -- all under the misnomer of ``Intellectual Property" -- is destroying this richness. Amazon's latest patent is but one more of these rapacious acts. And must needs be the last one.

Geoffrey Burling


March 1, 2000

I believe Amazon has confused 'invention' with 'implementation'. -This patent reads like a chapter on use of cookies from any one of the internet textbooks that can now be purchased at borders.com!

Matt Christensen


March 1, 2000

John Koszarek


March 1, 2000

This is a disgusting! Amazon.com patenting the right to one-click shopping would be like Apple (or some other company) patenting the double-click.

Steve Mader


March 1, 2000

Debbie Elam


March 1, 2000

>From a paying customer.

Tim Turner


March 1, 2000

Paul Damer


March 1, 2000

Jennifer DePung


March 1, 2000

Due to the practices of Amazon.com, I will no longer be using the site. Pity, a good site that violates the precepts of the community that built it.

Ted Johnston


March 1, 2000

Amazon executives: I am disgusted at your actions and misuse of a out-dated Patent system!! Your morals and character are now in question with the public. Put plain and simply, I will *not* now, nor ever in the future contribute to your revenue. You have proved yourselves unworthy of my, and my family and friends', business. You blew it!! I wish you all the worst of luck, Doug

Douglas Ford


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, It is entirely one thing to patent your company's 'implementation' of 'one-click ordering' and 'affliate programs'. This I can see. But, to patent the concept of these two mechanisms, in light of their being implemented before and independent of your company, is a gross misapplication of 'the patent.' It is reasonble for you to want to protect your company's investment in this technology, but to say you own this technology is ridiculous. Does Ford own the the concept of the automobile, should Chevrolet, et al, pay royalties or cease production of their products. No, Ford should be allowed to protect their inhouse technology and craft without worries of infringement from other sources. If you are going to patent these two technologies, that were clearly implemented before your company, then you might as well team up with Mr. Gore and patent the internet.

Arden Robinson


March 1, 2000

James Babcock


March 1, 2000

I'm sorry to say that I feel an obligation to boycott amazon.com from now on, and urge my friends and family to do likewise. If I can't find it at the local Borders, I'll visit bn.com-- maybe I won't be able to buy with One Click, but I will have the satisfaction of not giving my money to a company that doesn't deserve it.

Jeff Biddick


March 1, 2000

I must say that I'm disheartened to see yet one more promising business begin using the kind of tactics that threaten to close off the openness that makes the Internet great. No big deal, I guess. The nice thing about the Internet is that it's just as easy to type "fatbrain.com" instead of "amazon.com"

John Murphy


March 1, 2000

Up until today, I was an Amazon.com Affliate, but I have removed all links to them. I now support powells.com - one of the best alternatives out there.

Tim Elkins


March 1, 2000

Rafael C. Nunez


March 1, 2000

This is another attempt by a company to claim ownership for an intellectual concept that has been around for a long time. I do not support companies who stifle innovation, claim ownership of common property or seek to inflate their already enormous bottom line by unfair business practices...hmm...sound familiar? Compete fairly! I will not use amazon until this patent suit is dropped by them. In fact I will go out of my way to patronize B&N.

Paul Lambert


March 1, 2000

Robert Bigelow


March 1, 2000

Why bother having patents issued when "prior art" will just have them recended in the end. You get bad press, hurt feelings, and lawyer costs. Now you'll also have to deal without my busines, and our departments, until you rethink your practices.

Jeffrey Hundstad


March 1, 2000

I and my family stopped shopping at amazon.com the moment I learned that amazon.com had sued bn.com over this ridiculous patent.

Robert Fisher


March 1, 2000

What Amazon did is rather ridiculous. How can they patent something that already existed? Even though I have friends working for Amazon, well too bad boycotting them would be a great idea. BtW: Is there an banner made for boycotting Amazon??? I would gladly put it up on my website.

Edward Holmes


March 1, 2000

I have in the past used amazon, and recommended amazon to friends, colleagues, and family. I have retracted that recommendation, and have been more than verbal in recent weeks about not using Amazon. I have in fact pointed the same large group of friends, colleagues, and family to alternative purveyors of similar products, especially the barnesandnoble.com website, which is the subject of your impending litigation. Several business associates were contemplating opening Zstores with your company. This too has been halted. One angry voice, many lost customers, much lost revenue. Discontinue the obvious, ridiculous ploy, and play on the level field that those around you have created, and will continue upon long after your intelligent shareholders have profit taken and moved on to business more concerned with the future, and everything that it holds. You will be left standing amongst a scorched field, with no resource with which to recover. This should not be the future for a company which has often been termed "visionary". The Internet considers software patents damage, and routes around it accordingly. Do the wise thing, and drop these patents, all of them, and allow our competitive landscape to continue unobstructed. This will prove that Amazon.com is in fact the visionary that it was so often thought to be in the early days of the Internet.

Lloyd Duhon


March 1, 2000

Daniel Chang


March 1, 2000

Amazon is quickly turning into another corporate giant much like Microsoft and AOL. The problem with these dominating corporations is that they begin to honestly feel above and beyond the laws, rules, and regulations that apply to everyone else.

Christopher Delhom


March 1, 2000

When will businesses learn? They can't make the internet theirs. They can't use it to their advantage. As far as business goes, the internet empowers the consumer, and big business just won't accept that, so they keep trying stuff like this.

Adam Huette


March 1, 2000

Laurent DAVERIO


March 1, 2000

Why can't the DC boys get their act together and see at least 5 minutes into the future? Too many dumb laws, too many dum patents. Too many lawyers. Too much money being thrown into Amazon. Long live shopping.yahoo.com/books!

Noemi Burford


March 1, 2000

BarnesandNoble.com (BN.com) and Borders.com are one click away from your site. I appreciate your site and what you have done for the internet, but I now have doubts about your business practice. As a huge company you have the power to influence and change the world. Why not put it to good use! Stealing others ideas in a commodity market isn't a very good idea. How could you have let this happen?

Scott Henderson


March 1, 2000

Not only is this a weird and unconstructive thing of Amazon to do, it's also sad to see such things pass the patent reviewing. Both 1-Click and the Associates program are well working concepts, but not in any way deserving a patent status.

Gunnar Liljas


March 1, 2000

Zubairy Ismaail


March 1, 2000

I buy approximately 50 books a month. Thank you, Amazon.com, for losing all of my future business until you clear this silliness up.

Joan Baldridge


March 1, 2000

You have lost a future customer.

Chris Hennessy


March 1, 2000

I have been an Amazon.com customer for close to three years now. However, I'm disgusted with these tactics. Amazon.com is abusing the spirit of the patent. Patents are there to protect invention not to create monopolies by preventing other companies from using common sense business practices. You've just lost my business.

Rob Strebler


March 1, 2000

The patent system was envisioned to protect innovation. Please do not subvert it to prevent innovation.

Ted Roberts


March 1, 2000

I am in support of the recent Amazon patents. I have recently filed for patents on the wheel, the fork, and written language. I plan to sue everyone on this planet by next fall. Sincerely, Rick Battagline

Rick Battagline


March 1, 2000

It's people like Tim using tactics like these that could unltimatley spell doom for the open nature of the internet. Trying to patent a technology that he didn't invent, and has been in use on the web for years, is a great way to stifle innovation.

Steve Fishburn


March 1, 2000

Yekmani Grenkov


March 1, 2000

I order books from Amazon.com for my home, my family/friends, my business and for the architectural firm I work for. I like the way your site operates; but your policies on patent grabbing must stop. FYI - it's been quite the buzz in the technological community in Seattle and you WILL be losing many customers if you don't do something about it. Frankly, I like your site the best for book buying but I don't mind at all paying a few more dollars to get them from one of your competitors if you don't drop that 1 click patent and if you continue to snag silly patents on basic tecnnologies like charms on a bracelete.

Mahalie Pech


March 1, 2000

Jim Seach


March 1, 2000

I second Tim O'Reilly's position.

Ed Robinson


March 1, 2000

I doubt I can add anything that hasn't been added already, but we really need to make a stand against ridiculous patents, such as Amazon's.

Nicholas Paufler


March 1, 2000

This is unexcusable. I'll give my business to Barnes & Noble.

M.E. McKinley


March 1, 2000

Once upon a time the term "Patently Obvious" meant something. Although it's not Amazon's fault that the patent office has decided to grant a patent for just about anything, abdicating their responsibility and letting the issue be decided in the courts. However, going after such a patent and then trying to defend it is an indication of either immoral business practices or just plain stupidity. Neither of which leads me to belive that they are a competent and reputable company. I doubt that I will be buying from them until they regain my trust.

Darlene Stevens


March 1, 2000

The way your company is bleeding money I don't think these cheap band-aids will help much. All you have succeeded in doing is opening another wound on your corporate skin. Now instead of bleeding money, your bleeding trust and loyalty. I refuse to visit/use amazon.com anymore, and I will demand the same from my friends, family, and co-workers.

Michael P. Morris


March 1, 2000

John Brugeman


March 1, 2000

I have previously been delighted with the service provided at Amazon.com. I purchased almost all of my Christmas gifts last year through Amazon. I have recommended that friends shop at Amazon when looking for not just books, but several other items. Unofrtunately, I cannot support a company that abuses such loopholes in the patent system in an attempt to stifle competition. Until I hear that Amazon has abandoned such practices, I am closing my account and advocating this boycott to anyone I know who shops online.

Daniel Baye


March 1, 2000

Tim Hughes


March 1, 2000

Gil Milbauer


March 1, 2000

This reflects the patent office's fundamental inability to grasp new technology at even a conceptual level. They should have their driver's license revoked.

John Biederstedt


March 1, 2000

Your company has as much right to the one click innovation as Apple had to menus. Once it is "invented" it is obvious, but limiting the rights of others to use your innovation is unduly restrictive. Think of what would have happened if someone got a patent stopping others from using wheels. It will get you little goodwill + business advantage, assuming your patent stands. I will avoid shopping on your site till you clean up your act.

jean-luc peyret


March 1, 2000

I couldnt begin to say anything that hasnt already been said. I just want to voice my disappointment in the way corporate america is all about greed. Business hasnt been about the customer for a long time, but it should be.

Erik D. Lyons


March 1, 2000

Daniel J. Isaacs


March 1, 2000

David Schwartz


March 1, 2000

I have used amazon many, many times. I have posted reviews in the 'spirit of internet'. I will now no longer use amazon for going against that 'spirit of the internet' that so many companies are losing touch with. I find it disgusting that you can take such an idea as 1-Click and patent it. That is the fault of the patent office but as the letter above mentioned, you are at fault for attempting to use it to force out competition. Even more saddening is the patent of the "Affiliates" program. A program in which you are not the front runner. This same idea has been used for years, if not hundreds of years. I will post a call for boycott on my web site and tell everybody I come in contact w/ to avoid your site. There are plenty of other options. A former customer. Erin Jones

erin jones


March 1, 2000

Amy Hunter


March 1, 2000

Innovate, don't litigate. Henceforth, I'll be purchasing my books from barnes-n-noble.

Mark Shepard


March 1, 2000

Sued a brick & mortar bookstore with a similar name. Strike one. Patented 1-click and sued bn.com. Strike two. Patented the affiliates concept. Strike three. You're out. (So where can I sign up to boycott the US Patent office? ;)

Edward A. Hennis


March 1, 2000

Amazon is in a no-win situation. If they win the patent battle, they'll reap a harvest of ill will for a long time. If they lose that battle, then they will be perceived of attempting a truly arrogant move. Better to admit error and quit before this escalates further.

Craig Healy


March 1, 2000

Nick Roberts


March 1, 2000

As a long time customer, I am deeply disappointed in your practices, Amazon. I am an avid book reader and my business will go to others until you have made some changes.

Jerry Latimer


March 1, 2000

Another attempt to compete in the courtroom instead of the marketplace.

Thomas K. Almroth III


March 1, 2000

I cant see why Amazon would want to do this - it will only end with this stuff.

Magne Haagen Flatval


March 1, 2000

Jessie Ferguson


March 1, 2000

I've only purchased four books online, but all have been from http://www.bn.com, and I will continue to spread the word against using Amazon until the rediculous patent issues stop.

Christopher J Coakley


March 1, 2000

Sharyn Lee


March 1, 2000

The 1-click patent.. Hey, let's try to patent breathing. Then we can charge a fee every time someone takes a breath of our precious proprietary air. Should've known you were a tool by watching that (was it Dateline) interview. Maybe if you actually spent some of that money.. you might even be able to get rid of that foreign object protruding from your ass. You've lost my business.

Tom Finegan


March 1, 2000

I've spread the word to my friends and family: don't buy from Amazon. Buy from some other online bookseller, or better yet, stop supporting these giant book store chains, online and off, and start supporting your local, *independent* book store.

Daniel Wislocki


March 1, 2000

Jon Ingersoll


March 1, 2000

Dave Hancock


March 1, 2000

K.Wasserman


March 1, 2000

Since Amazon is starting to act like AOL or Microsoft and using tactics of intimidation based upon high priced lawyers; wouldn't it be ironic if Netscape/AOL tried to patent the cookie? Hey Jeff, guess your technology is not so unique after all.

Chris Haggerty


March 1, 2000

You should be ashamed of yourself Amazon. Your shareholders may punish your Directors yet.

Ken W Sinclair


March 1, 2000

It's pathetic. Forget making the world a better place, bringing countries together, let's just turn the entire internet into a massive marketing machine and make lots of money on it. Hey, I said 'internet'. Is Amazon going to sue me now? Haven't they bought it?

Paul Ross


March 1, 2000

You can buy all the air We'll still breathe free You can own all the water We'll still drink it fresh You can copyright emotions We'll still love those sharers You can patent presents given you We're still grateful to the givers You can try to hoard what's public We'll know you to be selfish You can practice anti-ethics You'll lose -- the patents and our good will.

B. Allan Ross


March 1, 2000

Chris MacLeod


March 1, 2000

I've bought from Amazon.com in the past. Now? Forget it. I hope you keep losing money like you always have, you twits.

Samuel Wood


March 1, 2000

Patents for obvious stuff should not be allowed and given the rate of innovation that exists patents should last just 17 months rather than 17 years. The original intent of the patent was to provide the originator with enough time to research and produce the patented item and provide them with an opportunity to reap benefits of the patent. Typically it would take a very long time to bring a patented idea to market. The time it takes to bring items to market now is at least an order of magnitude less in this day and age. Why hasn't anyone bothered to update the patent law appropriately?

richard burk


March 1, 2000

You might as well patent the cookie while your at it. I'm sure your devlopers spent thousands of hours trying to write the one that creates your "One click Shopping" effect.

Garett Spencley


March 1, 2000

Clint Holeman


March 1, 2000

aaron lawn


March 1, 2000

Well written and to the point. Where would the net be today if html and http had been patented and the patent enforced the way Amazon is doing?

Ronald Tschal„r


March 1, 2000

Even from Canada I used Amazon to find the books I needed - depsite having Indigo.ca and Chapters available in my own country. You no longer have my business and I will make sure no one else I know uses Amazon either. My first Amazon delivery box served as my toolbox. It's been replaced.

Erin McGann


March 1, 2000

As a web developer, I find your patent, as filed, absurd. To abuse a dead equine, examples of prior art on this are quite abundant, and I am certain that this patent was filed expressly counting on the Patent Office's ignorance. This kind of opportunism benefits no one, not even Amazon. You have lost my custom as of now.

Carlos Rodriguez


March 1, 2000

Too bad...I used to like Amazon.

Matthew Moelter


March 1, 2000

Amazon your actions are like McDonalds patening the drive thru. I'm glad O'Reilly has taken a stance against you. I think McGraw Hill should be next.

Bart McPherson


March 1, 2000

Pehaps Amazon could shock the world and actually withdraw the filing and post an apology to the offended masses. (But then pigs could fly also.) Still it might represent good form. It is clear that any profits that a-com is hoping to actualize will be greatly out weighed by the raw flamage their actions have engendered.

G Engel


March 1, 2000

Evelin


March 1, 2000

SHAME SHAME SHAME.

Anthony Ferguson


March 1, 2000

Mr Bezos should be sure to consult with the invetor of the internet, Mr. Al Gore, before considering any further patents. After all he is using Al Gore's invention to make money.

Edward Whitfill


March 1, 2000

I just found out about what was happening from the article on zdnet news. Amazon is no longer getting my business - even if their prices are better on some things. Additionally, I will send them an email letting them know this. Thanks to Richard and Tim for not letting this pass by quietly.

Allison Speers


March 1, 2000

David Hill


March 1, 2000

This patent action is just one more example of big companies with high-payed lawyers trying to claim open ideas as their own inventions. I will not buy another book from Amazon and will spread the word to everyone I know.

Larry Ott


March 1, 2000

While others are working to keep the Internet tax-free, Amazon is working to tax the Internet in it's own way. Are they getting a little worried by the competition? Stop all the "Mine, Mine, Mine" already.

Kent Krueger


March 1, 2000

I just found out about what was happening from the article on zdnet news. Amazon is no longer getting my business - even if their prices are better on some things. Additionally, I will send them an email letting them know this. Thanks to Richard and Tim for not letting this pass by quietly.

Allison Speers


March 1, 2000

bn.com, here I come...

David Winters


March 1, 2000

Kevin Harter


March 1, 2000

As I've reported to Amazon, directly, I was surely in their top 20 percentile as far as dollar spending goes, but have decided to remove my support for their business until they change their stance on patents.

Brett A. Thomas


March 1, 2000

Patents are for forward thinking ideas. Not for the road already traveled. Go away Amazon!

Eric Thorstenson


March 1, 2000

My family and I will no longer purchase anything from Amazon. There are other sites that have not tried to infringe on what someone else created for the benefit of all and I intend to use them from now on. My husband and I are software engineers and and patenting "1-click" is like patenting how someone dials their phone or flushes their toilet. I am disgusted.

Jeanie M. Schwenk


March 1, 2000

Well if they can do this I am going to patent the For loop. This is really unfortunate. We should probably get some technical people in the Patent office.

Mitch Maio


March 1, 2000

Short sightedness for financial gain on the part of a internet company will only engender ill will towards it's own customer base and to the larger internet community. The drive by companies to patent everything will ultimately kill the golden goose. There should be a revamping of the U.S.patent office to bring in a broader and more knowledgeable people to review high tech patent claims. Both Amazon.com and Genetech represent what is worst about high tech companies in patenting ideas which will ultimately silence innovation and growth within their respective fields.

Kristen Claussen


March 1, 2000

I do not approve of greed by latching on to simple ideas and saying they are new ideas. I'm also not fond of the death-like grip some companies hold on to their patents.

Dylan R. Evans


March 1, 2000

Mr. O'Reilly already stated the case perfectly, so I cannot add anything. But I will voice my full support on this issue. Until Amazon changes their policy regarding this patent, I will be purchasing my books from Barnes and Noble.

Michael Urban


March 1, 2000

As an Amazon shopper since its inception with my annual average personal purchases exceeding USũK, I'm terribly dissapointed in the Amazon company and particularly it's executive staff. Instead of attempting to compete in the marketplace, executive management is attempting to intimidate and stifle competition through the ignorance of the US patent office. These tactics are not only unworthy of a competent and successful management staff, but harken back to the ridiculously wasteful "look-and-feel" lawsuits of the 80's. Is Mr. Bezos attempting to emulate the unconstitutional (not to say unscruplous and immoral) methods of Microsoft or is there something in the water in the Seattle area? I will not support or shop at Amazon.com as long as these childish and noncompetitive practices continue and will actively discourage others of my acquaintance from doing so as well.

Carolyn Cooper


March 1, 2000

Lisa Dunn


March 1, 2000

This is ridiculous. My family and I have not and will not purchase another product from Amazon for as long as your company continues these "patently" absurd maneuvers. You're losing customers left and right, and considering your P&L reports, that's something you can't afford.

Kim Flournoy


March 1, 2000

I disagree with your restrictive software patent policy and am therefore finding another place to shop for my books.

Stephen Arehart


March 1, 2000

William Young


March 1, 2000

Marc Audy


March 1, 2000

Be careful now. Overpriced stock, profits still WAY in the red. Let's not go turning your loyal customers against you and insuring that you'll never see a profit. Who knows, keep these tatics up and maybe Barnes and Noble will 'aquire' you. Drop the cheap moves, get back into the spirit of innovation not litigation that started the technological progress we've already made. Admit the mistake, make a change and we'll be back. For now I'll be using http://www.barnesandnoble.com

William Bendrot


March 1, 2000

I'm am personally uphauled at this patent. like someone said earlier, this is like mcdonalds patenting the drive thru, or even stupider, people trying to patent genes, someone trying to patent breathing... all they do is use cookies, a process that was used before there was even an amazon. how lame.. -ds

Dan Stagner


March 1, 2000

As a developer, I would like to be known for innovation, not intimidation. It just sounds better. I will assume the fact that many developers order their materials from amazon.com. was not taken into consideration by the marketing department. Don't expect too much support from the "open source" community on patenting web technologies. -Eric Wallace

Eric Wallace


March 1, 2000

Derek Anderson


March 1, 2000

Fatbrain {*} from now on!

Scott Davis


March 1, 2000

When I first started playing around with the web in 1993/94, I created a web-based application that effected a "1 click" method on my website. Thousands of others have done the same. Amazon *must* recognize this and other "prior-art", and give up their patent on "1 click" technology... they didn't invent it, and they're wrong to try and enforce their patent on others.

Micheal Kelly


March 1, 2000

Michelle Pollick


March 1, 2000

you see, this is all about wall street and uneducated tech investors.....we know, senor bezos, that you dont get paid very much outside of the 36% of the public company you own.....and that is all on paper.....so senor bezos, you are actually a slave to shareholders and the market.....from an e-commerce pioneer to a greedy capitalist pig.....my how we have fallen as our wealth has risen..... thank god you can buy the o'reilly books straight from the source.....senor bezos, you and your whopping -轰MM losing company have gone simply too far.....don't forget where you came from because it certainly will come back to remind you.....THE INTERNET MADE YOU AND IT WILL SURELY BREAK YOU.....

john r. davidson


March 1, 2000

I am -like many- disturbed by latest actions of Amazon. It will be a shame if one of my favorite sites turns against the very principles that created it. I hope that you will realize that it is not anyone's best interest -including yours- to sabotage the web like this. regards, Berkay

Berkay Mollamustafaoglu


March 1, 2000

I've stopped buying from Amazon as soon as I heard they got this patent. The best way to voice your opinion in the captialist system is to vote with your waller and take you bussiness elsewhere.

Jeff Waltzer


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com rules the on-line book market for now... Can you say IBM, Digital, and maybe soon, Microsoft? Monopolies don't last forever. It is always best to engender a loyal, faithful customer base through ethical means.

Tom Dawson


March 1, 2000

This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach.

William Brinkman


March 1, 2000

Not only will I never buy from you again, I'm going to educate each of your affiliates I come across.

Charley Conrad


March 1, 2000

Get over it Amazon, lay-off some of your lawyers and start hiring creatives to make your website even better. The problem with corporate giants is, you stop innovating. You take existing technology and tie it together and call that innovation, when it's really just re-packaging existing materials. And shame on you for trying to call it innovation, your as bad as Microsoft. Innovation is something NEW, something that didn't exist before... why don't you spend some of your time and money innovating rather than fighting off duplicators... cause that's what you did to get where you are! -- Gordon Nall

Gordon Nall


March 1, 2000

Jason Wodicka


March 1, 2000

I will no longer be ordering anything from your site until this issue is resolved in a way that would benefit consumers, unlike your current path now.

joe guiditta


March 1, 2000

Taj Johnson


March 1, 2000

The "idea" behind rewarding people for referrals has been around since Moses.

Hakim Chishti


March 1, 2000

Thanks alot Bezos. Is the alphabet the next thing on your list to patent? I'm going to barnesandnoble.com from now on.

Jarret Franklin


March 1, 2000

Niki Thornock


March 1, 2000

Jeff, I am very disappointed in this most recent affront to all on-line businesses. In the Internet world of e-commerce we all benefit from each other and the innovations of a few. Should e-commerce now be stopped or slowed so you can be the sole beneficiary of the work and efforts of others (where would you be without the 'cookie'?) and an antiquated patenting process? Instead of being known as a Pioneer and e-commerce innovator you will now become known as a Pirate and a 'Styminator'.

Martha Woodbury


March 1, 2000

'nuff said

Veer Hossain


March 1, 2000

'nuff said

Veer Hossain


March 1, 2000

How about spending your time and money on ensuring that hackers can't break in and steal customer information instead of worrying about another company using a tool that could increase your sales. Honestly, if a site has easy ordering or not won't determine if I shop there, but if a company's computers are broken into, I will think twice about shopping with them for my own safety.

Heather Malson


March 1, 2000

John Waggenspack


March 1, 2000

Shaun Crumb


March 1, 2000

How about spending your time and money on ensuring that hackers can't break in and steal customer information instead of worrying about another company using a tool that could increase sales. Honestly, if a site has easy ordering or not won't determine if I shop there, but if a company's computers are broken into, I will think twice about shopping with them for my own safety.

Heather Malson


March 1, 2000

I've been keeping up with the recent Amazon situation, and am quite upset about things like this that keep slipping through the patent office. After reading the Tim O'Reilly letter, and looking at the actual patent for this amazing '1-click' technology I have a question I would like to post to the entire Open Source community. If the patent system's ignorance continues to harm us, and what we all stand for then what is stopping us from manipulating it the same way Amazon and countless others are? What is stopping us from founding an organization that does nothing but submit patents on the most trivial of technologies, in an attempt to keep them free and out of the hands of companies like Amazon who exploit them. If the system is broken and no one is willing to take a stance to fix it, then the system will never change. I fully support the boycotts imposed on Amazon, but they are only part of the problem. The patent office that allows these kinds of patents to slip through need! s to be sent a message that we are not going to accept big companies that take out patents that are equivalent to tying your shoes in the business world. Just because this is new technology, doesn't mean it's a valid excuse for these kinds of acts. I mean seriously, can I take a patent out on writing a check to pay for a transaction, if I word it right I probably could with the way things are working today. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm sure some of you out there are. What kinds of steps would we as a community need to take to keep these technologies that we use every day safe and free where they belong? I know this is not the only solution to the problem, but I believe it is one that has merit and could be accomplished if we banded together to stop others from abusing our work.

Tim Crider


March 1, 2000

I sincerely hope this letter will be copied to the US Patent Office as well. The requirements for granting patents are obviously not being closely scrutinized, as this is very similar to when Compton's Multimedia tried to enforce a similarly unfounded patent on database searching methods related to their encyclopedia, which were in common use before they applied for the patent. I am heading for Barnes & Noble for my books.

Wayne Blackburn


March 1, 2000

Dave Jarzembski


March 1, 2000

Donald Chamberlain


March 1, 2000

I agree with Mr O'reilly. These patents are having a chilling effect on busnesses and new technology development. Amazon runs the risk of being deemed a monopolistic corporation if they continue trying to force other people off the web, and I simply won't do business with Amazon, or any of it's Affiliates (go ahead, sue me) until you stop this foolishness. If you continue, I hope that the Feds shut you down completely, and send your Board of Directors to prison for life.

Eric Robison


March 1, 2000

Dave Camp


March 1, 2000

Amazon has always been more reliable and convenient than the local college bookstore, but at least all they do is over-charge us. This is inexcusable.

Meghan McMullin


March 1, 2000

I'll be back on board in an Internet second as soon as you agree to stop trying to enforce these ludicrous patents. Until then, I'll be shopping elsewhere and encouraging others to do the same. As someone else said, thank god I can order directly from O'Reilly. (Is that why the site is experiencing heavier loads than usual?)

Tim Peierls


March 1, 2000

Amazon ought to be ashamed.

Mike Earl


March 1, 2000

Come on now, these are very straight forward applications of previuosly developed technology.

Carl Backstrom


March 1, 2000

I'm gonna patent pushing a button to turn a computer on.

Mike Keeler


March 1, 2000

Justin Cook


March 1, 2000

By this act of intellectual theft and piracy, Amazon.com has joined the select list of companies I will avoid doing business with. Willem de Lind

wdlvwATmagma.ca


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Before I learned about your company's predatory legal practices, your web site was the first I visited when it came to purchasing books. I now shop Barnes & Noble. Ryan Huff

Ryan Huff


March 1, 2000

I would like you to know that ever since you took out the patent on the "One-Click" technology, I have not ordered a book online from you. Barnes & Noble and Borders both offer decent online bookstores and Reel.com is a good place for movies. Therefore, I boycott Amazon, and will continue to do so, and encourage others to do so, until you stop this frivolity.

Robert Desmond


March 1, 2000

BOYCOTT AMAZON. Hit this coporate greed machine in the only place that matter to it - its WALLET. Whenever you find a website who is an Amazon affiliate, e-mail them asking them to drop Amazon and go with an alternative. Many web sites have mulitple affiliates in an attempt to make money, I'm sure they'd be well pleased if Amazon one day demanded a royalty for every other affiliate program running. AFFILIATE BOYCOTT!!!! AFFILIATE BOYCOTT!!!! AFFILIATE BOYCOTT!!!! AFFILIATE BOYCOTT!!!!

Drew Gardner


March 1, 2000

Everythings that needs to be said, has been.

Amrik Thethi


March 1, 2000

Amazon, ehh I don't know anybody with that name. And I plan to keep it that way. Barnes and Noble sounds good to me. Open Source traitors!

Smileyq


March 1, 2000

Any attempts to enforce this frivolous patent will only lead to similar patents and will choke the innovation of the WWW in general. I urge you to give up this patent.

Paul Gilles


March 1, 2000

I used to like Amazon. They were neat. They provided easy access to things I normally wouldn't have been able to find. But then they went and did something like this. Power to their competition.

Brandon Matthews


March 1, 2000

I was a regular customer of Amazon and enjoyed its ease of use. Since the one-click patent was filed I have ceased doing business with amazon.com and will make future purchases from electronic retailers that choose to compete based on the merits of their system.

Jay L Norton


March 1, 2000

The patent will not make money for you, but put yourself out of business. You are going to the wrong direction. Bye bye Amazon.com.

Terence Chang


March 1, 2000

First the homophobic nonsense with Amazon Bookstore in Minnesota, and now this... I've never purchased from amazon.com before and now I'm certain I never will.

Barb Strom


March 1, 2000

Shame on you. I think we (internet users) would be happy if you changed your name to amazon.CON!

Dan Seiders


March 1, 2000

Chad Harris


March 1, 2000

Eric Willeke


March 1, 2000

Dear Jeff, I am a systems administrator who spends a fortune on computer literature each month. I will no longer be spending this at Amazon as I have no interest in contributing to the finanical well-being of a company that treats it's own community in such a contemptuous fashion. Barnes and Noble, here I come...

Sean McCormick


March 1, 2000

This is silly. Amazon, I have been a good customer over the last couple years, purchasing over a thousand dollars in books, music and DVDs. Heck, your subsidiary DrugStore.com even offered me a programming job. Believe me when I say this patent is groundless and obvious. Listen to your customers, listen to us highly wired folk. Do not do this. Persist in this activity and you will be boycotted by your largest segment. Your only advantage over Barnes and Noble, Bookpool, MovieStore and other online retailers is your good name. Persist, and that will be gone forever.

Eric Huber


March 1, 2000

I will no longer buy anything from Amazon or affiliate with Amazon until they stop trying to force other to pay them for using a common web programming method.

Dan Hersam


March 1, 2000

Rofl... absurdity can be the best humor

Justin Kudo


March 1, 2000

Greg Baker


March 1, 2000

I sent the following letter to my friends, so don't think that the signers of this page are the *only* ones who won't stand by your malicious business practices. I hope that all companies with your selfish and manipulative sense of morals are driven out of business. Attachment: "This is an open letter to Jeff Bezos at Amazon.com concerning their suit against Barnes & Noble over Amazon.com's "patent". Give it a read. I wouldn't buy anything from Amazon until they stop this crap..." PS: If I recall, you haven't patented the use of attachments in this manner. God willing, the US Patent Office would at least throw *that* application out. Have a crappy day.

Dane Madsen


March 1, 2000

While we are at it lets patent breathing...

Ross Cormier


March 1, 2000

Brian Wang


March 1, 2000

This award of a patent for affiliates is no doubt a follow up to getting awarded the patent for "One Click", and both are absurd. I had just started purchasing books through Amazon, at least I'm not yet set in my ways - I will be shopping elsewhere.

Aileen Carlstrom


March 1, 2000

I've read and agree with most of the comments. As a computer professional and business man I understand the desire to protect intellectual property and innovative concepts. However, as this discussion shows the concepts and ideas covered by the patents are clearly not innovations of Amazon. They are merely marketing buzz-words coined to refer to otherwise mundane (and in this case somewhat controversial technologies-at least as far as cookies are concerned) that by using traditional terms would keep some users from utilizing the technology. So, go ahead and trademark the term 1-click-ordering or whatever --- don't try to make marketing word games a technology statement.

Arthur Foret


March 1, 2000

Jamie Flournoy


March 1, 2000

Jason Steenblik


March 1, 2000

I guess there just wasn't enough money to go around, huh? When does Amazom become another subsidiary of Microsoft? They are certainly learning from the same source!

Larry Stein


March 1, 2000

It took 7 years of hard work for Kodak's engineers to clone Polaroid's instant camera. I can implement 1-click shopping in 20 minutes, test it in an hour, have it locked down in a day. THIS IS A RIDICULOUS PATENT! It makes all patents look bad! Like the UCITA makes all commercial software publishers look bad. You're only adding feul to the fire!

Bryan W. Seigneur


March 1, 2000

You guys screwed up. Just admit it, and drop the suit.

Shane Allen


March 1, 2000

The 1-click patent is ridiculous, and one absurdity leads to more. Is this where Amazon wants to assert their leadership?

Karen Hensley


March 1, 2000

1-Click Shopping as an idea is very good. It was done before Amazon, it will be done after Amazon. I used to use them because they were #1 in the field -- I will never use them again because of this patently flawed patent.

Anthony Shubert


March 1, 2000

I have been a long time buyer of books from Amazon.com. However, due to their unreasonable request for the 1-click and associate program patents, I will take my business elsewhere. These patents should have never been granted or requested.

David Falksen


March 1, 2000

Dear Jeff, I've spent thousands of dollars buying books from Amazon in the last 4 years, including textbooks used by students in my classes. I've recommended your company for its great customer service and the context services. Now I'll have to recommend fatbrain.com, and point out they aren't trying to become the next Microsoft (who at least has legitimate patents). Very disappointing.

Brian Fulmer


March 1, 2000

Boycott Amazon!

Roman Katsyv


March 1, 2000

If I were Amazon I'd fire the lawyers that came up with these absurd notions, place the patents into the public domain, hire a few marketing flacks to trumpet Amazons interest in protecting and investing in the internet (which they could afford by firing the lawyers) and hope that it manages to convice those who've left and gone elsewhere that they've seen the light. I've already sent them a letter saying that I'm taking my business to another company that doesn't seem to be focused on destroying the field in which I work...

Michael Long


March 1, 2000

Ben Ceschi


March 1, 2000

I don't think that there is much to add by way of comment to this. Until I hear otherwise I won't be purchasing from Amazon and I shall be making sure everyone I know does the same.

Uel


March 1, 2000

Nathan Thompson-Amato


March 1, 2000

I have been a costumer of Amazon for some time, but that is about to change. This company is trying to patent things that have no right being patented. What is next, patenting the use of a mouse on a website.

Alex


March 1, 2000

I've read and agree with most of the comments. As a computer professional and business man I understand the desire to protect intellectual property and innovative concepts. However, as this discussion shows the concepts and ideas covered by the patents are clearly not innovations of Amazon. They are merely marketing buzz-words coined to refer to otherwise mundane (and in this case somewhat controversial technologies-at least as far as cookies are concerned) that by using traditional terms would keep some users from utilizing the technology. So, go ahead and trademark the term 1-click-ordering or whatever --- don't try to make marketing word games a technology statement. Also for you technical people out there -- try www.bookpool.com --- good selection --- better prices --- excellent customer service.

Arthur Foret


March 1, 2000

Kristen M. Jagodynski


March 1, 2000

Dear Jeff, You're stupid. You've a patent in software. You disfavor the american companies. Because software patents are prohibited in Europa companies will go to the Europa for his takes. It is stupid to think you have a good vision of public. You think about client is the first preoccupation but you hate it ! Stupids !

1155


March 1, 2000

Peter Steiner


March 1, 2000

Annette Kracht


March 1, 2000

Jeff, I have enjoyed "browsing" and purchasing from Amazon.com. Please do NOT pursue this patent issue. I think it is against the spirit of what your company originally stood for.

Jeff Miller


March 1, 2000

I agree completely. Not only is this patent ridiculous technically, but offensive application of the patent is almost certain to damage ecommerce as a developing industry.

Darin Douma


March 1, 2000

Washington Irving


March 1, 2000

My money goes where my heart goes. I had previously avoided ordering from Barnes and Noble because of their corporate policies even in cases where their prices were the best. Because of your pursuit of this ridiculous patent, you've joined them on my list of common corporate scum. Steve Collins

Steve Collins


March 1, 2000

Douglas Rehg


March 1, 2000

Next thing you know we'll be hearing Bezos whining about Amazon's "right to innovate", just like Gates. Which is a code-phrase for "right to play as dirty as possible, and keep everything proprietary and own the whole industry just like Ma Bell in the 70's".

Steve Conover


March 1, 2000

The letter pretty much says it all, we're all playing in this new playground, lets play nice.

Bethany Wolfson


March 1, 2000

While the use of patents is a valid idea, patenting something which has been available public domain for years to use as an offensive tool to damage competitors is shameful, at best. This is no better than if I were to attempt to patent the letter "e" and use that patent to attack all competitors. I have been satisfied in the past with Amazon, however I'm afraid that I cannot condone the use of ridiculous patents as a business tool. By all means, trademark "One-Click" if you must, but to patent it??? I think I will be shopping elsewhere in the future, most likely at Barnes & Noble. -Christopher Corayer.

Christopher Corayer


March 1, 2000

1-Click as a marketing strategy and a technical method: good move. As a patent: bad move. You will lose this battle, legally or technically and commercially. If the patent stands, then someone else will only need to make another insignificant change and make their own patent. Integrity is more than cash register honesty. Perhaps the old saying, "Never overestimate the intelligence of the consumer.", is not nearly as reliable as it used to be.

Kevin O'Brien


March 1, 2000

Another frequent user goes by the wayside. I would love to continue using their site, as their feature set and convenience is excellent. Until this patent nonsense goes away, I will not. - jef

Jef Dinkler


March 1, 2000

Nimret Sandhu


March 1, 2000

Become a hero--surrender the patent, fire your lawyers and let them take the blame.

Mike Bonk


March 1, 2000

This is a perfect example of a company that has lost sight of the fundamentals that have made it a major player in the market. Hopefully other companies will not feel forced to follow in the footsteps of Amazon's madness.

Eric Van Dewoestine


March 1, 2000

I have been a long time customer of Amazon. I am deeply offended by the use of these unjustified patents. Ever since I have become aware of the Richard Stallman compaign I have halted my purchases from Amazon. I have moved all such purchases to other competing sites both for personal and professional purchases. I was a big fan of Amazon's service and thought they were doing a good job. But patents like the 1-click and the Associates patent are blatent abuses of the patent system and cost us all money in the courts. They also damage an already ailing patent system. I hope that Amazon will publically open these patents to prevent further abuse. -Duncan

Duncan Watson


March 1, 2000

Caitlin Vilcsak


March 1, 2000

Bogus patents like this from Amazon mocks all the truely great people who has been awarded real, important patents for the great inventions they have shared with the world. Those Amazon people are little, petty, greedy people.

Dag Ûien


March 1, 2000

Jeff, Think about this again. I believe you have been watching too many "greed" gameshows. You are cutting off your nose to spite your face, so the saying goes. I will buy elsewhere. Goobye to Amazon.

Harry Tompson


March 1, 2000

I am frequently asked to give advice about good (usually technical) books - both in person, and in online forums. I have begun to qualify every reccomendation I make with short rant about your ridiculous practices, and provide links to your competitors. If you wish to maintain/regain your credibility and the respect of the community, you'd better make a very public commitment to stop using the patents you have aggresively, and to refrain from abusing the cluelessness of the USPTO. Pissing off the intelligent minority can and will have major effects in the overall population. Simply put, patenting these trivial techniques is not in the interests of your core business, and further distances you from profitable operations.

Tim Lieberman


March 1, 2000

Craig Powers


March 1, 2000

Ryan Koga


March 1, 2000

Next it'll be patenting the shape of the buttons on mice, or even on the web pages... As a consumer I can only vote one way - with my money. Jeff, you won't like my vote. There are other sites out there, just a click away. See me there...

Ray Hricik


March 1, 2000

Karen


March 1, 2000

I am very disappointed that a web pioneer like yourself would do this. Shame.

Bryan Broyles


March 1, 2000

Jenny Levine


March 1, 2000

I am glad that Amazon.com is successful, and despite the stupid, anti-internet technique that the 1-click patent is, I will probably continue to patronize them, mostly because of price. However, if some other bookstore shows promise, this 1-click fiasco - if Amazon.com tries to enforce it - will be a major part of my decision to go elsewhere.

Roy Staples


March 1, 2000

Predatory behavior will lead to a backlash amongst consumers. I have 踰 I will be spending on books in the next week, and it will be going to an amazon.com competitor, unless Amazon retracts the lawsuit against Barnes and Noble.

Alan Peery


March 1, 2000

ROFLMAO. What's the matter, Jeff, you couldn't think of a more intelligent way to compete once you have to raise your prices because your stock Ponzi scheme is finally collapsing?

Kristen Dunn


March 1, 2000

One-Click? You can get a patent for that? What idiot granted that patent?

Mark Brown


March 1, 2000

Trademark the marketing slogans, don't patent them!

Brock Wager


March 1, 2000

Another loyal customer driven away by this ludicrous patent.

Wayne T. Rambo


March 1, 2000

Kirill


March 1, 2000

James Voorhees


March 1, 2000

Amazon DEFINES customer service on the web. It has always been a pleasure to deal with them. But customer service isn't everything, and I'm more than happy to take my business elsewhere if they're going to resort to the offensive use of ridiculous patents. Until this ends, I refuse to do business with them (or with any others who have the same methods).

Tim Gentry


March 1, 2000

Stifling innovation on the web is selfish and irresponsible behaviour from a company that should be a beacon of hope for new entrepreneurs.

nyall engfield


March 1, 2000

It seems to me a lame attempt by a profit-less company to generate income elsewhere. Better off fixing your business than wasting company assets on lawyers. Fire the programmers too; if it really cost 1M to create one-click it's no wonder the company can't turn a profit. It's a shame to see such a good business idea ruined by inefficient management.

David Price


March 1, 2000

As of now a former Amazon customer

Larry Fox


March 1, 2000

It's sad that a small business success story like Amazon.com has turned into an ugly corporate monstrosity.

Don Christianson


March 1, 2000

To reap the benefits of competition we must be able to buy from the smaller players, and do so.

Steve Mitchell


March 1, 2000

Two words: Grow up

Mike Catalano


March 1, 2000

I have found Amazon.com to be consistently at the head of the pack in online bookstores. Your prices are not always the best, but the added value of many aspects of your site has always placed you at the top. But I have never used the 1-Click method, feel no need to do so, and do not regard it a stunning addition to your site. Far more than that, however, I am outraged that you would seek to patent such an obvious technique and attempt to lock competitors out not by innovation and customer service but by the heavy hand of the Federal government. Shame on you for making every effort to destroy the environment which has allowed you to flourish!

Dwight Divine IV


March 1, 2000

As an Amazon customer in the past and hopefully in the future I would ask that Amazon stop trying to privatize commonly used net technology.

Dexter Steinke


March 1, 2000

amen. i'll vote with my money as well. use amazon for all the great recommendations and buy at bn.com until bezos becomes a member of the internet community again.

Gay Gilmore


March 1, 2000

Jeff, What's the matter? Are you just trying to make sure that since YOU can't manage to turn a profit in this business that the well-run businesses shouldn't be able to either (with ordering methods most of them beat you to anyway)? If Peter Drucker hasn't already noted that "It's a bad idea to become the laughing-stock of your clientel" he's almost sure to with this one.

Michael K. Gaffney


March 1, 2000

Why not grant a patent on the process of urination.

Eric Winter


March 1, 2000

Ronnie Miller


March 1, 2000

Please stop this gesture of BAD will. I'll be forced to use a competitor until I see that you have stopped this attemp to hijak the freedom that the web was built upon.

Stuart Mintz


March 1, 2000

Gabe Shepard


March 1, 2000

The next step is patenting earth itself! This patenting madness must stop. Clarification of what an invention is, and clearer guidelines for fair business practices in the internet must be established before companies start (as some may already have) patenting colors! Ultimately, such restrictions and patents Amazon have filed for will come back to haunt the genius of the internet--which is free trade and unlimited creative freedom within existing, established and fair industry regulations.

Kirk Kvistad


March 1, 2000

William Sears


March 1, 2000

I am vastly dissapointed, but not very surprised. Amazon.com has just joined the ever increasing ranks of people patenting the blatantly obvious. Your apparent greed is creating what is becoming a large backlash against you and is costing you customers, myself included. I implore you to recant this absurd notion and open your "pantents" before this incident goes from "blowing up in your face" to "dynamiting your company." Once again, let me be clear, this is costing you trust and money. Greed, while a good modivator when in check becomes a strong enemy when out of control. Welcome to the Seven Deadly Sins. Kirk Lawson

Kirk Lawson


March 1, 2000

Not the way to keep and grow customers!! You have way too much going for you to carry this patent thing to it's conclusion. Get smart Amazon!! from a shareholder and customer (?)

Dianne Thompson


March 1, 2000

Alan Batie


March 1, 2000

With the patent issue and their older, but ongoing, spam problem Amazon will not be seeing any of my money for the forseeable future.

Lloyd Eldred


March 1, 2000

It seems to me that Amazon is attempting to establish a monopoly, something which free enterprise is avidly against. Even Microsoft is learning that. I urge Amazon to cease these frivolous patents and ensure fair business practices for all.

Kristie Garber - Tech Support/Customer Service


March 1, 2000

Geoff Haisty


March 1, 2000

You know, I used to be proud to be an Amazon.com affiliate, and I was planning on joining again, and expanding my participation. Forget it.

Garrett Fitzgerald


March 1, 2000

Kreg A. Kimmons


March 1, 2000

How in the world can you say you "invented" these things. Amazon wasn't the first to use cookies. How repulsively ignorant. Patents are too vague for these things.

Jason Gulledge


March 1, 2000

You should invent a "NO-Click" Patent, so Nobody will click on Amazon.com.

John Cheng


March 1, 2000

Steve B.


March 1, 2000

Both the legal harrassment (with its taint of anti-homosexual bigotry) of the "other" Amazon Bookstore and this groundless patent have stuck in my craw. Now I'm supporting my rather expensive book habit through other vendors. The 1-Click patent itself is bad for two reasons. First, it was not a patentable invention at the time Amazon filed. People who understand computing better than the US Patent Office ought to be able to find tons of prior art. Second, even if this *were* an invention, the Internet and its users are better served by freely available inventions. Had CERN or NCSA or CNRI or Guido van Rossum or Larry Wall taken such narrow-minded mercantile stands, the net wouldn't be what it is now. The web just wouldn't be. And Amazon.com wouldn't be in business.

Dave Demko


March 1, 2000

Teri Niadna


March 1, 2000

Word can get around pretty fast in this age! When someone tries to impose proprietary exclusive tactics, they tempt the wrath of many. Like AOL's treatment of ICQ, now we have Amazon and this. But there are other places to buy online, right?

Rob Howse


March 1, 2000

As a Web/E-Commerce developer, I see cookie shop carts no more patentable than database integration. It concerns me that my future project development might have to be scrutinized by a company attorney in order to avoid paying some sort of "greed tax". If this is enforced, it could be profitable for attorneys, Amazon competitors, developers hired to rework sites but at the cost of restricting future innovation in what may be the last great frontier in my lifetime. A former Amazon customer...

Pete Spoto


March 1, 2000

Amazon righly trumpets the importance of listening to to its customers. It is equally important to hear the voices of the people who made it possible for this company to flourish.

Felix Kramer


March 1, 2000

When I first heard about the injunction against bn.com (in the dispute over 1-click shopping), I stopped shopping at Amazon and immediately started spending my money at bn.com. I may have to click twice to order now, but I refuse to support predatory practices and making a mockery of the patent and intellectual property rights systems.

Michael Novi


March 1, 2000

Dear Mr. Bezos, I am a long-time customer of Amazon's, and have purchased quite a few books from Amazon. I have enjoyed the fine customer service, and the convenience of shopping with at Amazon. However, I must agree with Mr. O'Reilly's analysis that Amazon's offensive use of obvious patents is tantmount to pissing in the well. I make my own living in electronic commerce, and must consider my own long term interests. Your abuse of patent law must ultimately hurt electronic commerce on the web, and thus hurt my family's income. Until such time as Amazon chooses to cease its predatory practices, I will make my online purchases somewhere else. Barnes and Nobles is the obvious first choice. Sincerely David Cabana

David Cabana


March 1, 2000

I have been a longtime customer of Amazon. Your short-sighted, greedy policies have now driven me to your competition. It is my sincere hope that, like someone in a Neilson panel, I represent at least 10,000 others in this sentiment, and that they will go to Borders, B&N, CD-NOW, and anywhere else but Amazon until you rein in your lawyers become good netizens again.

Craig Menefee


March 1, 2000

I agree with the letter and what most people are saying. By requesting this patent, Amazon is clearly undermining the creativity and innovation that is spawned by the internet. This is the same internet that made Amazon what they are today. It is shameful, and extremely lame for them to attempt this patent. I have purchased many things from Amazon in the past (alot of O'Reilly books), but I will no longer use the site, and I will persuade my friends to do the same. In fact, I'm deleting all bookmarks to the site right now!

Matt Ruhn


March 1, 2000

Ronald Dean Stoddard


March 1, 2000

I've been buying books on the net for 5 years now, but only last year made my first Amazon purchase. The next one proved to be my last, as soon after I learned about the patent. With all the discount net retailers out there, Amazon can't afford to alienate people.

Michael Estrin


March 1, 2000

Now that Amazon has gotten a patent for the business strategy of paying people for referrals on the web, maybe it can get a patent for the business strategy of sending coffee cups to customers on the web. Perhaps this maximizes the value of Amazon's stock but then it certainly makes it obvious that the patent laws have become ludicrous.

Gerald Dwyer


March 1, 2000

Alan Zabaro


March 1, 2000

Jeff As part of the larger Internet community who have never purchased from Amazon.com, I believe Amazon.com is making a large error with it's continuation of this patent. The tarnished name will simply drive new users to your competitors - give it up now!

ritchie turner


March 1, 2000

don't think i can say anything that hasn't already been said. let it be known that i'll stick with Fatbrain and Barnes & Noble from now on, though...

james nigh


March 1, 2000

This is absolutely ridiculous. Dammit Amazon wtf. Get some manners. Just because your online shopping sucks doesn't mean you can tear down your competitors by enforcing stupid 5yearold rules. I used to shop at Amazon.com regularly getting computer-type books(which cost a pretty penny), but now I will look elsewhere. Bite me you bigot corporate scum..

Robert Linnemann


March 1, 2000

This is tantamount to obtaining a patent on breathing-- without one click, we all will be stifled, forever. This move is utterly shameless, and if it passes, i assure you, that this is at least one customer you will have lost.

Terry Callendrillo


March 1, 2000

Jeff, Please stop your abuse. In light of this abuse I have no choice but to fight it by telling every family member and friend I have to boycott Amazon.com. Thank You

Roy Taylor


March 1, 2000

Find another way to make money dream boy. Try an honest approach. Until this fiasco of yours stops, my family, friends, cousins, uncles.....you get the idea? won't be using your site for purchases. I am a college student as is my wife, and your silly ideas has already cost you several hundred dollars. Now I know that is chicken feed to you big time spenders, but judging from your companies past financial reports every little bit helps. There is more than one site on the Internet to do my purchasing. Places I have been buying from, places which have yet to perform such ludicrious acts as you have done. So, get with the program and try making your business work honestly.

john rhodes


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, This letter has been in circulation for less than three days and already it contains hundreds of signatures. There is a reason for this. Anyone with the least bit of intelligence (i.e. people who read books) and technical savvy (i.e. people who use computers) can see that the chilling effect of your legal manuevering is contrary to the tenets of an open internet, monopolistic in style and boorish in scope. If you're going to patent something, at least let it be your own idea. I submit to you, Mr. Bezos, that it is not in your interest to upset book reading computer users. And I do hereby swear that I will buy not one more book from Amazon until such time as your patent is repealed, or is otherwise not en force.

Jim Woodward


March 1, 2000

I am a frequent customer but will not buy from Amazon again until this nonsense is cleared up.

Jock Cooper


March 1, 2000

I seriously doubt that Mr. Bezos will personally read this but I do hope that the sheer number of people signing this petition and others (http://nowebpatents.org/ for one), as well as the rising number of protest sites on the Internet will be an indication to Amazon that their attempts to pad their corporate earnings through predatory lawsuits or crush competition through threats and intimidation have not gone unnoticed by the public. Though I haven't purchased anything from Amazon with any frequency, I will now completely refrain from visiting their site. To hell with Amazon.

Michael J. Barillier


March 1, 2000

I was not a regular customer of Amazon but from now I WILL NOT BUY anything from Amazon or/and their partners. In addition: I have my own web project at the internet with about 150 visits a day. I will recommend my visitors NOT TO SHOP at Amazon.com

Serge Tkeo


March 1, 2000

Jeff, What you are doing is WRONG. You're actions are hurting people. Ethics are important, review yours.

Nathan Wallwork


March 1, 2000

Brian K. Bragg


March 1, 2000

Until such time as Amazon stops filling in those ridiculous patent applications and use them aggressively, I won't be doing any business there and will make sure that the people I know are informed about your practices. In fact, you even made me discover Indigo.ca -- Good choice, better prices (even if you live in the US), great service.

Stephane Rolland


March 1, 2000

Carl Anderson


March 1, 2000

I am disgusted by Amazon's actions. I hope that others who feel the same way will do as I am; immdiately discontinue doing business with Amazon. BN,here I come.

Mark Rubin


March 1, 2000

I am disgusted by Amazon's actions. I hope that others who feel the same way will do as I am; immediately discontinue doing business with Amazon. BN,here I come.

Mark Rubin


March 1, 2000

the one click shopping patent is riculous. i wont be shopping at amazon any more

scott turner


March 1, 2000

No more Amazon ordering in my house. Barnes and Noble here I come.

JG Motolanez


March 1, 2000

Josh Cogliati


March 1, 2000

My view on 1-click shopping on Amazon's is one of greed. Can you patent a function! Do they eventually want to sell the licencing to one-click. It all just hoopty and I feel goes agaist the ethics of the web. phil

Philip Wexler


March 1, 2000

Since you have a computer science degree, I'm surprised that you can honestly say that using cookies to store customer state is non-obvious. Ater all, the cookie mechanism was created for keeping end-user state. Using software patents defensively by freely licensing them is a good way to neutralize the non-productive, meritless, lawyer-feeding software patent mess the PTO has created. Using software patents offensively is sleazy.

Paul E. Baclace


March 1, 2000

What's next, are we gonna hear Jeff Bezos whining (like Gates about M$) about Amazon's "right to innovate" - a code-phrase for "leave us alone and let us play dirty and crush everyone with proprietary code and silly lawsuits, it's just natural market competition". I don't think so. I'm not buying anything from Amazon until they stop this nonsense and APOLOGIZE to Tim. O'Reilly rules, I'm just buying off this site from now on.

Steve Conover


March 1, 2000

Due to this ludicrous misappropriation of Internet ideas and technology which is a) trivial and b) extant for a long time, Amazon will be getting no business from me or the people I advise on technology issues.

Mark G. Adams


March 1, 2000

I had already heard of Amazon's practices from some of my friends who persuaded me (without any difficulty I might add) to cease all business with Amazon. In addition, I am now telling everyone I know to please refrain from doing business with Amazon until this matter is corrected.

Paul Lewis


March 1, 2000

Jason Abbott


March 1, 2000

I think that the OSF community needs to rework their license to prevent companies of the likes of Amazon from using their code.

Gautham Krishnamurti


March 1, 2000

As one of the web people in our company and a consultant with several others charged with e-commerce development I am amazed and angered by these current patents Amazon received on such obvious, common, basic, and ubiquitous web technology. At least Unisys actually originated the technology they patented in the gif controversy. Amazon is a freeloader savaging the culture and environment that gave them birth. I may not be a big customer of Amazon.com, but I have preferred them over Barnes and Noble till now. No more. Amazon risks making Congressional regulation and oversight of the Internet Marketplace necessary and that would be a tragedy.

Gary Greene


March 1, 2000

In March, as the author of an unpublished ActivePerl book, within twenty-four hours, I watched it drop over half a million notches on amazon's sales rank; coincidentally, this occured right after the announcement of this ludicrous One-click patent. I wish that we could make the same impact in the world of politics whenever a ludicrous announcement surfaces or a mad decision is agreed upon. Sincerely.

Tobias Martinsson


March 1, 2000

Jon Shavor


March 1, 2000

We have used Amazon for virtually all of our book and CD purchases over the last year. I cannot believe that: 1) you would attempt to patent something which is clearly not patenable as it has been used many times before. Other than your cute marketing name there is no new technology. 2) that you would take advantage of the fact that the US Patent Office is behind the technology curve to snow them with a bogus applications These are both serious ethical and legal issues in my opinion. As a consumer the only thing I can do is vote with my dollars which I am doing starting today (I was planning on placing an order for a friend's birthday). Dave Watts

david watts


March 1, 2000

Aiden Massey


March 1, 2000

This is insane. I am all for business on the web, but everyone should be granted equal opportunities on a level playing field. We already have one microsoft, we really don't need another.

Seth Gibson


March 1, 2000

What more can be said? I'll purchase elsewhere.

Daryl Lozupone


March 1, 2000

Rick Sanderson


March 1, 2000

Although I buy most of my books at Ruminator books in St. Paul, MN, I have often used Amazon.com in order to obtain hard to find books and CDs not available in the US in the past. However, after following the legal battle between Amazon.com and the Amazon Coop in Minneapolis, in which your entire case seemed to be based around the fact that since you were neither gay nor a lesbian, you have more rights than they do, despite their 30 year precedence on the name, I started growing wary. The knowledge that you are trying to prevent anyone else from using something so basic to making the Internet work well doesn't surprise me, but it does sadden me. Of course you were Time magazine's Man of the Year. Like so many other important men who have worked in the Time-Warner monolith, you have a professed hatred of minority groups (gays & lesbians) and have no interest in free trade or what is best for the people who should be most important to you: your customers. My apologies, but until I see a turnaround in your corporate polices, it looks like I'll just have to get the rest of my books from Ruminator, even if it means I have to wait a little longer. As for CDs? Well, since you haven't tried to put CDNow out of business yet, they'll be a viable option until you do.

Jonathan Michael Ehrich


March 1, 2000

You are only puttin e-comerce a step back by patenting a technology which everyone uses.

Greg


March 1, 2000

I have a "wish list" on Amazon totalling 跟.38 and have spent a similar amount on others. I made that list because I had found Amazon to be one of the best web shops I've used and I reward good service with my business and my recommendation. While your destructive abuse of the (admitedly absurd) patent system continues, you will not gett any business from me and will recommend to others that they do the same. Be the best by leading innovation, not restraining it, and the business will arrive, including mine.

Andrew J. Caines


March 1, 2000

Eric J. Potter


March 1, 2000

Jeff, what a disappointment. In all those major-media interviews you come across as a genuinely nice, regular guy with the Internet's and the future's best interests at heart, while behind the scenes you're directing your company to play games like this. "Freedom to innovate" does NOT mean "protection from anyone else who might innovate better, or cheaper". You and Bill Gates are trying to pervert the very notions of competition, innovation and progress. He hasn't fared well in the courts, and I believe you'll do no better. You're working at a breakneck pace to capture new retail markets, but your anti-competitive business practices will cost you those very things. One-ClickÖ isn't worth this, Jeff. Your "patent" is not defensible, and the harder you try, the more you'll damage you'll do to Amazon. And the future of e-commerce. And Seattle's economy. Those losses will leave you longing for the days when your only worry was a little honest competition. Which will it be, Jeff: real, lasting e-progress with the support of the online community and the justice system, or a Quixotic battle against us? It's still your choice. Call off the lawyers and get back to the books.

Cheryl M. Hammond


March 1, 2000

I will be ordering from bn.com until you realize the error of your policy, and demonstrate that you remain as customer-oriented as you have been during your brief history. It will be interesting to shop online from those who sell me the rest of my books. After all, most Amazon customers are already Barnes & Noble customers.

Britt Blaser


March 1, 2000

Actually, I hope Amazon in all their greed DO in effect try to run us small internet business people out of business. They (Amazon) will experience a boycot of their products and services that will make their narrow-minded little heads spin.

Bill Joseph


March 1, 2000

I don't think I can add anything beneficial to what Tim has said so elequently. A former Amazon customer.

Ray Cadmus


March 1, 2000

Dear Jeff, Gave your site quite a bit of money in the past year. Won't be doing it again this year.

Randy Greber


March 1, 2000

I too will no longer purchase anything from Amazon or any affiliate until this nonsense has come to an end.

Mary E. Sayre


March 1, 2000

I echo all of Tim's concerns about the actions that Amazon.com has been taking of late. I have gotten to the point where I buy all of my reading online, normally 2-3 texts a month at least, and I had been buying them at Amazon.com. Since this incident started I have moved all my business elsewhere, even if it costs me a few extra dollars. I refuse to do business with a company that is so ignorant of the medium on which it feeds.

Matthew Douglass


March 1, 2000

I won't be buying anything from Amazon at all unless they withdraw their patent or donate it freely to the internet community

Bruce Millar


March 1, 2000

Bob Gregorish


March 1, 2000

I won't be buying anything from Amazon at all unless they withdraw their patent or donate it freely to the internet community

Bruce Millar


March 1, 2000

I will stop to purchase book from Amazon !

Frederic SAVOIR


March 1, 2000

Amazon should be ashamed of this abuse of the system. They should look to true pioneers like Tim Berners-Lee, Richard Stallman, and Linus Torvalds, who know that giving away innovations is the only decent thing to do.

Esme Cowles


March 1, 2000

Scott Stevens


March 1, 2000

Patrick Peralta


March 1, 2000

As an Amazon customer (by now over ũ,000 spent), I am extremely disappointed in your actions. If Amazon does not decide to relinquish its absurd patent claims soon, I will be obliged to take my business elsehwhere and urge all my friends to do like wise.

Bruce W. Edwards


March 1, 2000

Mark Lemley


March 1, 2000

I am also no longer going to do business with Amazon.com based on the patents they have obtained. I will give my business to Barnes and Noble.

Rick Smith


March 1, 2000

I stopped using Amazon when they embraced unsolicited bulk email (spam) as a marketting tactic. Before that, I frequently bought from them. This patent just provides yet another reason not to buy from them.

Paul Tomblin


March 1, 2000

For an invention to be patentable, it must not be obvious to someone of average skill in the craft. It's a shame that there are very few people in the patent office with at least average skill in the software craft, for patents like these clearly don't stand up to that test.

Steven P. King


March 1, 2000

An occasional amazon customer who will be finding alternative sources until you realise that You Are Wrong!

John C. Finch


March 1, 2000

I concur, aggressive enforcement of the common practices you have legalisticly been the first to claim is like being the first to register rocks as a patent. For anyone to claim that no one else could use granite in their construction due to the registration of a patent of "rocks" would be silly. Depending on your intentions, this too could be silly. Amazon is too good a product to embarass itself in this way... I hope!

Roger Barnette


March 1, 2000

I will study and research this. It is apparent, now, that I will refrain from any contact, referral, and purchase from Amazon until the matter is resolved. Selfish greed is the only definition. We have always known that there are people that would patent and control air, if they could. Amazon affiliation will be removed immediately from my sites and all my hosted sites.

Robert Baker


March 1, 2000

They suck.

Alexei Borodin


March 1, 2000

It is disappointing to see an innovative company resorting to anti-market tactics. If amazon truly wishes to be the most customer centric company in the world and a "built-to-last" business, its management should: - recognize the difference between short term and long term benefits - recognize the difference between right and wrong (the patent system was not designed to provide these types of defensive rights) - recognize that your customers are not stupid

Scott Lenet


March 1, 2000

This is ridiculous.... Priceline.com is attempting similar damage with their reverse auction patent. I have participated in one-click shopping for years now- Amazon was never the first company to come up with it.

Sam Sperling


March 1, 2000

I will no longer purchase from Amazon as long as they maintain their current patent policy as evidenced by their suit against B&N.

Joseph J. Yuska


March 1, 2000

Perhaps Amazon can next patent the actual action of using a finger to click the button on the mouse. Granted, the button has been around for a long time, and people have in fact been clicking it with their fingers (one might argue this was the whole idea) BUT as far as I know, nobody holds the patent yet.

K. Frost


March 1, 2000

I think it is unfortunate that Amazon would patent those things. It hinders the growth and openness of the web.

Michael Ang


March 1, 2000

Andrew Towle


March 1, 2000

I find Amazon.Com's actions in this matter to be offensive and inflamatory. I refuse to support this kind of behavior and will begin immediately to request that my friends and family stop using Amazon.Com immediately in protest. This kind of greedy misguided behavior will surely kill the golden goose ... look down the beanstalk ... I think I see Jack busy with the axe ...oh ... that's your own lawyers ... I hope you enjoy the fall from the sky. When I hear that you've stopped hacking at the roots of the very e-business that got you off the ground, I will consider spending my money with your business again. I suggest you get back to the business of selling ...and get out of the business of using the federal government to enforce such ridiculous patents as you have somehow managed to obtain for techniques you surely didn't invent.

Robert Boyd


March 1, 2000

Cory Oliver


March 1, 2000

Patents like this will only stand in the way of innovation, so I will add my signature and not purchase anything from Amazon.

Michael Bowen


March 1, 2000

1. I agreed with both Richard and Tim 2. I will recommend to everybody to stop using Amazon for buying of anything. 3. Software patents must be invalidated as soon as possible and placed under GNU Public License. 4. Jeff now is just another sample of the stupidity of capitalism. Internet-based Civilization will go elsewhere. Sorry, Amazon and bye.

Andrew Pandre


March 1, 2000

Just another American company trying to make a few extra dollars...

Alex Cutshall


March 1, 2000

Plain and simple. If these types of patents are enforced the open landscape of the internet and e-commerce are in danger.

David McCarthy


March 1, 2000

I won't bother discussing the issues with the patent here, as it is obvious to me that you are just "trying it on" in the worst way possible. It is also obvious to me that you are fully aware of this, but are choosing to do so, nevertheless. What I will say is that I personally own over ú500 of computer books, but will not do any trade with Amazon as long as this issue continues. I am also in a position to recommend technical book purchases at my place of work (which employs several hundred people), and will not recommend anything be bought through Amazon (and explain why). This will also be my response to friends and family. As an internet company, all you have to trade on is your reputation. Please consider this.

Mike Ward


March 1, 2000

Garson Xie


March 1, 2000

Jason Chow


March 1, 2000

The patent is specious, the agressive enforcement offensive. Tim O'Reilly is correct, Jeff Bezios is pissing in the well, and the taste is foul. I will no longer shop at amazon.

Michael Welles


March 1, 2000

George Cripps


March 1, 2000

I believe it impossible that these patents were not only granted but actually applied for in the first place. The one-click shopping is just a basic cookie, anyone could have done this way before Amazon even considered it. If you spent "A million dollars" inventing this then you wasted precious money and man hours. As for the affiliate program, these have been around way before Amazon ever was. How can you get an actual patent for something that has been around longer than you?

Andy Eidson


March 1, 2000

This patent is a joke and should never have been issued.

Saurabh Jang


March 1, 2000

I am saddened to hear that a company such as Amazon.com that I have happily supported over local bookstores in the past to encourage net-business would lower itself to use such ridiculous tactics such as this patent attempt. Still, this is reflective more of the industry on the whole then this one individual company. So much for Amazon setting a good example, they seem to be doing the reverse.

Jerry Foglesong


March 1, 2000

Disappointing.

Jamie Fifield


March 1, 2000

One click, away from Amazon.

Jonas Flygare


March 1, 2000

I will no longer purchase from amazon. Too bad you say, but I represent a fairly large company who spends 200-300 a month in technical books. Long Live the freedom to innovate.

Mark St.John


March 1, 2000

Thanks to Tim O'Reilly for his courage in speaking out in protest of one of his largest vendors' intolerable behavior. I will not purchase from Amazon, or any of its "affiliates".

Bill Morgan


March 1, 2000

Myself and Mrs. Kroeger also known to your credit card server as Barbara WootenHirsch, will now find our book and music purchases at the smaller less convienent sellers who won't be using "one click shopping" Remember what Lillian Hellman said: Callous greed grows pious very fast. Abandon your "patent" and keep the internet free, you've made enough money already. C.Kroeger and B.A.Wootenhirsch

Charlie Kroeger


March 1, 2000

I have helped develop and employ cookie-based "one click" shopping systems back in 96 - more than a year before your patent was filed. In addition, you'll find documentation on Netscape's development site as well as bundled with their old Commerce servers on how to do just this. This patent is obviously granted in error.

Arthur Hagen


March 1, 2000

I find this attempt at locking down growth and innovation on the 'net and in the area of software developement to be shortsighted and completely self serving, with no regard for the community that made your "success" possible. I will from now on recommend to everyone that I know that they stop making purchases at Amazon.com until such time as you realize that your consumers are not morons, and are perfectly capable of seeing through this simplistic attempt to cut them off from useful services on the web.

Genera Q. Goldsborough


March 1, 2000

Nicholas Piper


March 1, 2000

Joe Bardgett


March 1, 2000

The use of patents on unpatentable material only serves to enrage the people who made you popular in the first place, the computer savvy, those not afraid to use credit cards, those not wanting to take the time to go to a local store. Have the sense to not alienate those who make you possible.

Jeffrey McBeth


March 1, 2000

I always use FatBrain.com as a link whenever I mention books I like. I've seen that others do the same or refer to book sites other than Amazon. I never considered FatBrain.com before the patent. Amazon gives such good service that I never considered anyone else. However, I cannot buy from or recommend a site that wants to patent widely used, simplistic, trival web design techiques.

Jacqueline Judge


March 1, 2000

Intellectual property is dead. Admit it.

Woody Funderburk


March 1, 2000

Juliana Thompson


March 1, 2000

I will not buy anything from Amazon.com until Mr. Bezos stops enforcing these bogus "1-click" and "affiliate" patents!

Bruce H. Van Aartsen


March 1, 2000

I don't know which is more galling, the Patent Office's stupidity, or Amazon's arrogance. I am boycotting Amazon.com, and urging everyone I know to do the same.

Greg White


March 1, 2000

Have some common sense. If you continue to patent common sense, it will hurt you in the long run, while it hurts everyone else in the short run (and the long run). Your practices are totally opposed to the kind of spirit and openness that has allowed the internet, and your business, to exist. Don't bite the hand that feed you.

N. Smith


March 1, 2000

Mingyan Bao


March 1, 2000

Jennifer Freeman


March 1, 2000

Lee Rudolph


March 1, 2000

The net was and is a very healthy comunity ......... lets leave it like that... if people start claiming patents for every small thing... well then it beats the whole point of using the world wide web

Dinesh Peter


March 1, 2000

I'm a somewhat frequent customer of both Amazon and bn.com, and feel disgusted by the way Amazon is trying to patent Web site functionality. I work for a small Web development startup and have taken a few programming classes here and there. I don't understand how Amazon can claim rights to a function on their site - developers create programs that emulate functionality that already exists on another site 95% of the time. Does that mean that, for example, Mapquest can claim the ability to product a map based on an address and monopolize that technology or code? I think not! Just my $.02.

Rebecca Brewer


March 1, 2000

C'mon amazon, you guys should know better.

Alex Rosteck


March 1, 2000

Will these overreaching patent applications trigger an overreaction from Congress or the Patent Office, taking us back to the time when software wasn't patentable at all? Nice to see Amazon's competitors named in these readers' comments. My favorite -- Abebooks.

John Matthews


March 1, 2000

Laurentiu Marin


March 1, 2000

Fedor G. Pikus


March 1, 2000

Well, Jeff (and the Amazon board), I don't really expect you to be swayed by the appeals to reason and ethics that have been written here---you're corporate directors, after all. So I am going to appeal to your bottom line. How much will you gain, after how much time, IF you win your suit? And how much have you already lost, and are losing every day, in sales, market share, goodwill and legal fees? And can you really afford all this with your current financial picture? Cut your losses while you can. It won't be much more embarrassing than it is already.

Tom Zych


March 1, 2000

I'm sadly disappointed, but not at all surprised, that the patent office doesn't have enough technical expertise to realize this patent shouldn't have been issued. Accepting the fact that it would be, and was, issued, registering the patent to prevent mangering would be an honorable move, preventing much wasted money, effort, and legal posturing. Instead, actually assuming the role of the dog is reprehensible. There are too many competitors--until Amazon shows some sensible responsibility, I see no reason to give them my trade.

David M. Ihnat


March 1, 2000

Graham Phillips


March 1, 2000

Maybe you can apply for a patent on aerobic oxidization, also known as breathing.

M. Pare


March 1, 2000

Calvin Kwok


March 1, 2000

I truely can't believe the judge in Seattle gave an injunction to Amazon for something that is clearly prior work!?

Kevin Ford


March 1, 2000

The fact that the judge's decision in the restraining order compelled barnes and noble to use "two clicks" shows how stupid this is. Should I rush right out and patent "3-click" shopping? STOP IT AMAZON. STOP IT NOW. Bill Underwood

underdog


March 1, 2000

Too bad. I like(d) Amazon, and have long admired them for their innovation and leadership in the world of e-commerce. As an IT professional, however, I find the patenting of 1-click "technology" revolting.

Lowell Larson


March 1, 2000

Bill Willis


March 1, 2000

This is yet another example of why the Patent Office and the Patent Process needs to undergo revision - with the number of Intellectual Property Patent requests being submitted for review by non-experts in the technology, it's no wonder how such Patents slip through and get approved. My confidence in any corporation volunteering to withhold enforcement of an aquire patent because it's "the right thing to do" is simply not there. Fortunately, the law does provide a remedy: Challenge the Patent. I'm no lawyer, but I do believe this can be done at anytime by anyone. I think this approach would be much more effective than any petition to the Patent holder. Should Amazon choose to enforce the Patent in court, I'm sure the defendant would try to have the court invalidate the Patent. Judging from the minimal research I've seen, there is little doubt in my mind as to the existance of prior art, so on that basis alone the Patent should be judged invalid. Prior art not withstanding, the mere fact that the Patent covers such a broad and general Process devoid of novelty, it would be difficult to argue that is is unique enough to justify a Patent. Finally,our final petition could be made to the government. Although not likely, I do believe that the Federal Goverment could step in and take ownership of the Patent claiming it for itself.

Michael Abel


March 1, 2000

Boooooo!

Luke Orsborne


March 1, 2000

Kal Kolberg


March 1, 2000

It's about time that the publisher's stand up against this ridiculous patent... what happenend, that patent claims can be made to "nonobvious" innovations?

Philipp Tomsich


March 1, 2000

Jeff, while it may be good business, your decision to protect your sham of a patent is nothing short of cowardly. The computer patent system badly needs reform, and nothing will be done until the powerful take a stand against it. May all your vested programmers leave you for a less spineless company.

Dean Yasuda


March 1, 2000

These patents are sheer abuse of the system, and you should be ashamed of yourselves for attempting to limit the rest of the world in such a manner.

Tabitha Wharton


March 1, 2000

Russ Hubbard


March 1, 2000

It is hard to believe a company that has gained greatly from the openness of the Internet is willing to stoop to the level of your typical "show me the money" business. Employing such questionable tactics can only hurt online commerce as a whole. It will be a boon to the Internet when the Patent office can get it's act together and provide patents that are unique and legitimate within the computing industry. I see no part of the Amazon.com patent that represents a truly original idea (admittedly, I only skimmed the patent contents). Of course, some of the cited claims might have been unique in 1997 when the patent was first issued. Unfortunately, the Patent office is woefully incapable of keeping up with the pace of innovation in today's society. I believe more attention needs to be made at reworking the Patent process to prevent such frivolous claims on uniqueness.

Brian Sweeney


March 1, 2000

Dr. Kurt Andersen


March 1, 2000

I have bought many items from Amazon.com in the past, but I can no longer do so with a clear conscience... These patents are ludicrous; give them up...

Robert Seace


March 1, 2000

Todd Tolhurst


March 1, 2000

Amazon's patenting "one-click ordering" is about as silly as having a chain of grocery stores patent the "8 items or less" line. It's merely a tool to create a nuisance lawsuit to line their coffers. By suing competitors who are using the same obvious idea, they're tuning out to be no better than scam artists making false accident claims. I'm voting with my dollar by not shopping at Amazon.com.

Joey deVilla


March 1, 2000

Kathleen A. Bieltz


March 1, 2000

Look at the number of people on this letter.... Realise that the web is not something you own, but something you participate in, something you contribute to. Not siffle or cajole or bully. No more buying from Amazon from me, at least until this and other issues are finished with. Well done Mr. O'Reilly Spead the word.... Kind regards Yann (U.K.)

Yann Lawrence


March 1, 2000

Dear Sir's If your company has stooped to this childish level, simply to aquire money or attempt to defer that which has in essence created your company then I think it is time that the same ones that brought you to life on the net, take it away. Show at least some form of self respect and respect for the common good, and revoke it. Jim

Jim Bonds


March 1, 2000

H. Browne


March 1, 2000

Ben Lowery


March 1, 2000

Mark E. Anderson


March 1, 2000

Jennifer Bevan


March 1, 2000

Jon Tyler


March 1, 2000

Chris Brewer


March 1, 2000

Bertil Lindgren


March 1, 2000

Does the word "monopoly" apply here perhaps??

Tricia


March 1, 2000

Noran Marie Gillian


March 1, 2000

I believe that Mr. Bezos recently became a father. As a father myself, I would suggest that how we conduct ourselves as parents, the moral tone we set and the kind of world we try to make for our children, should be the highest priority in our lives. It would be *much* better for Amazon and Mr. Bezos to risk a minor business disadvantage by abandoning this patent, than to risk sending the message to everyone watching that money is God. How many school shootings could have been prevented if a few more parents had set the example that doing right is more important than winning? This may seem like a small thing, Jeff, but on such choices is our children's future built.

Matt Harding


March 1, 2000

A patent should not be such an obvious idea. No jury of techs would uphold this one.

Hank Arakelian


March 1, 2000

joe grace


March 1, 2000

Jayne De Young


March 1, 2000

George Bremer


March 1, 2000

Haakon Lorentzen


March 1, 2000

Haakon Lorentzen


March 1, 2000

Although not yet patented, I am offering for the use of all who read this my unique "no-click" shopping. It is now the way I shop at Amazon. Hmmm... Perhaps I should patent it.

Michael Ballenger


March 1, 2000

Give it up Amazon.

Erik Swanson


March 1, 2000

I have been a regular shopper at Amazon since the site first opened, and have referred people there a number of times. I've spent thousands there. However, this kind of nonsense is unconscionable. To obtain a patent like this for defensive purposes, like the letter says, makes sense; but to attack Barnes & Noble for using an idea that anyone who's written two lines of CGI knows to do... I was doing "one click" type stuff years ago. It used to be that I would go to Amazon.com first and only shop BarnesAndNoble.com if I could find what I'm looking for at Amazon. That has now been reversed because I don't like supporting amoral actions. Farewell, Amazon.com.

Jim Moore


March 1, 2000

Bret Robideaux


March 1, 2000

I think this is as ridiculous as patents of use of cashiers and calculators in real world.

Elden


March 1, 2000

The PTO is subverting the whole internet based economy. Clinton and Gore should be careful that their legacy isn't a totally bankrupt America.

Thomas R. Corbin


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, You can remove your "one-click" cookie from my machine. It will no longer be necessary.

John R. Byron


March 1, 2000

Why not patent reviews as well? And patent the radical concept of charging customers "money" in exchange for "merchandise". I'm sure that's never been thought of before...

Craig Dial


March 1, 2000

Jennifer Lynn


March 1, 2000

I have purchased at least one book from Amazon in the past. After having reviewed the contents of the patent claims, I cannot see how any informed individual could have come to the conclusion that it is in some sense unique or innovative. Relying on litigation as a protection of an minimally original business model is patently offensive to me. I'm surprised Amazon didn't have the nerve to try patenting the sale of books off the web and be done with it. Given that I have a choice in where I can purchase books, I will take my business elsewhere.

P.J. Hinton


March 1, 2000

In the late 1800's or early 1900's a director of the Patent Office wanted to shut the office down since everything that could be invented had already been invented. Now we have a Patent Office that cannot recognize what an invention in this new technology world. Therefore, it concludes anything submitted to it must be an invention. Quick, Rube Goldberg, start filing. Personally, I'm working on my wheel blueprints so I can file next week.

Glen Caldwell


March 1, 2000

W. Scott Gagon


March 1, 2000

It has no doubt been said before, but deserves repeating. What is being done with the "One-Click" patent is malicious, and goes completely contrary to the principles of the development community. The technique patented is so basic to the e-Business industry, it would be akin to either Apple or Microsoft putting up a patent on the standard open file dialogue box.

Nathan Derksen


March 1, 2000

Open Source is the only way!

Steve Brennan


March 1, 2000

It's silly to try to patent any obvious idea and then use legal muscle to prevent people from using it. Give it up, Amazon.

Omar Siddique


March 1, 2000

Fatbrain and Barnes and Nobles have a new custommer, Amazon lost one.

Julien Ellie


March 1, 2000

Dawn Livingston


March 1, 2000

BOOOOO!!!!! I knew I didn't like Amazon for some reason, now I know why.

Steve Ragan


March 1, 2000

Shane Doucette


March 1, 2000

Robert Diamond


March 1, 2000

The rapid growth of the internet into its present utter usefulness and practicality has always been due to the freedom to move, experiment and express about it. We simply will not take any more borders... I actively boycott Amazon.com until the whole issue is settled.

Symeon Charalabides


March 1, 2000

I've had to deal with the patent office granting a patent on public domain technology (that I helped develop) to someone previously. We REALLY need to reform the patent system in this country that makes it easier to gain a patent on a technology that's already widely used in the public domain than it is to patent a legitimately new and innovative idea! Having been a long time supporter of amazon, I'm ashamed at how they've taken advantage of this, and the open-source nature of the web at large. And I'm outright enraged at their refusal to admit what they are doing is wrong, and cancel the patent of their own free will.

Les Rosenberg


March 1, 2000

those patents are ridiculous.

joe martin


March 1, 2000

The rapid growth of the internet into its present utter usefulness and practicality has always been due to the freedom to move, experiment and express about it. We simply will not take any more borders... I actively boycott Amazon.com until the whole issue is settled.

Symeon Charalabides


March 1, 2000

The rapid growth of the internet into its present utter usefulness and practicality has always been due to the freedom to move, experiment and express about it. We simply will not take any more borders... I actively boycott Amazon.com until the whole issue is settled.

Symeon Charalabides


March 1, 2000

I truely can't believe that Amazon really thinks that they can get away with this. If they want to patent the Slogan, well that's fine, but not the technology. Boo hoo to Amazon, I will not support them with my purchases until this silly lawsuit is dropped, and they forfeit or revise this patent.

Gregory Wood


March 1, 2000

I am against Amazon's 1-click patent attempts. In the past I have been an Amazon customer. I will boycott Amazon until they drop this issue.

Andy Miller


March 1, 2000

There is only one real way that a consumer can voice their displeasure with a company, and that is to take their business elsewhere. This is exactly what I am doing, personally and professionally. I do not approve of your business practices and will not contribute to them.

Craig Phillips


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, et.al.: You have been issued a patent on something you obviously copied from Microsoft (wallet), CyberCash or used non-propietary code that is available to the public. I will no longer frequent your stores, nor serve, or click on, your banners. Bruce Clark

Bruce Clark


March 1, 2000

Anthony RENOUX


March 1, 2000

Mark Lenz


March 1, 2000

Not only will I not use Amazon, neither will my friends, family, relatives, or anyone that will listen to me for 10 seconds. I will make it my personal responsibility to keep as many people from using Amazon as possible. I suggest everyone do the same.

Nathan Benson


March 1, 2000

Pretty bad !

chris gardner


March 1, 2000

Patrick McNamee


March 1, 2000

I will not use Amazon until this patent is revoked. Patenting cookies and links? Shame on Amazon!

Clay Tsuhako


March 1, 2000

I'm curious, if it wasn't for Barnes and Nobles, would this have been patented?

Aaron Johnson


March 1, 2000

Trey Mathis


March 1, 2000

For a company that has gone sooo far in the red to get big, is a lawsuit like this reaaaly going to make a difference? sure, you can use the phrase as a catch word, but in truth there have been others to use the technology before you. Amazon.com is not the only fish in the sea, and even a big fish can get gobbled up by a united bunch of little fish. I also need lots of technical information publications, and know far too many places to get them tather than waste my time on a place like Amazon. Make the choice to be the more benevolent one of this issue, and drop the lawsuit. It will only give the company a bad reputation, and the main thing an internet company has is reputation, then service. a lawsuit does noone a service.

Mel Kilna, MCSE


March 1, 2000

Yan Portnoy


March 1, 2000

In these modern times, when the artifacts of an outdated government and economic model trouble even the least of our citizens, individuals have begun to band together. First dozens, then hundreds, now thousands and millions of people are trying to help; trying to correct these problems, and repair the land in which we live. But now, when so much progress has been made, the true demons of our time are emerging. These demons prey on the weakness they find in the system, and try to destroy the progress we have made. Amazon, by its recent practices, has named itself one of these demons, and will be treated as such by the progress-seeking individuals of the world.

Benjamin R Blank


March 1, 2000

I will not patronize amazon.com for my (substantial) yearly tech book spending, nor will I let anyone I know do so without informing them of their ludicrous policies.

Donald Wheeler


March 1, 2000

Josh Wood


March 1, 2000

Well, Amazon *had* my business... once. Richard Stallman was right, as he so often is. You guys *deserve* to be boycotted, until you learn the difference between what should and should not be patented... until you acquire some morals. Free clue: What you can get away with, what is legal, and what is right are not always identical. You should pick the *latter* two, preferably the lattermost, not the former.

Nick Alcock


March 1, 2000

Thought everyone might be interested to see Amazon's response to an earlier e-mail that I sent them. For a supposedly "customer-centric" company that prides itself on focusting on the customer, their response is completely "canned." I explained to Amazon that after spending literarlly thousands of dollars with them, that I'd be shopping elsewhere until they ended this silly notion of patenting affiliate programs. Response from Amazon.com: Dear Jeff, Thank you for writing in with your comments. On February 22, 2000, Amazon.com was awarded patent #6,029,141. The patent application was filed on June 27, 1997, and generally relates to an Internet-based referral system such as Amazon.comÆs industry-leading Associates Program. The Patent Office reviewed our submission in view of information existing prior to our application and determined that our invention was patentable. Patents are designed to encourage innovation. They are an important part of our intellectual property portfolio, as they are for any company in the high-tech field. It is Amazon.comÆs policy to refrain from speculating about or commenting on potential future business strategies. Full information on the Amazon.com Associates program is available at http://www.amazon.com/associates. The patent is accessible through http://www.uspto.gov. We appreciate feedback from customers about all important issues concerning Amazon.com, and we carefully consider all viewpoints expressed. We hope you will continue to let us know how we can improve our service to customers. Best regards, Patrick T. Amazon.com EarthÆs Biggest Selection http://www.amazon.com

Jeff R


March 1, 2000

The Amazon.com One-Click-Ordering and Associates Program patents are ridiculous. The U.S. Patent Office is apparently so out of touch with technology that significant reform of their process must be undertaken. Amazon.com is being very shortsighted about this. C'mon Bezos, don't make us call you a Jeff Bozo.

David Anderson


March 1, 2000

I am a huge fan of Amazon.com, and have made many purchases over the last few years, both for myself, and for gifts (I referred to this year as an all-Amazon Christmast because a majority of the gifts I gave were actually bought on your site). I am also opposed to your patent policies, and am in agreement with Mr. O'Reilly. I am not boycotting your company at this time, however, but I am feeling pressure from peers in the technical community (such as on Slashdot and in-person peers) to do so. You guys really can succeed without fencing in the web, why not win as good guys instead of making yourself the bad guys? Sincerely, Chris Garrison

Chris Garrison


March 1, 2000

Thomas Wilsher


March 1, 2000

Like it's namesake(s), Amazon appears to be lopping off a breast in order to pull a bow. Customers with a sense of fairplay will fall away, while Amazon "corners" it's perceived technological innovation--which is not original at all. Shoot Straight, Amazon. Excessive greed and monopolism are not becoming, and anti-trust lawsuits will surely be not far behind. I've come to find that prices are cheaper and selection wider (particularly for out-of-print items) at bn.com, anyway. --Finster

Finster Smedley Ledbetter, Dr. of Theosophy


March 1, 2000

What!??! Did Bill leave Microsoft to work at Amazon.com? All this patent is going to accomplish is higher prices for the consumer, since the smaller companies cannot absorb the high cost of advertising that is going to become a reality if they cannot use the Affiliate Programs for fast, cheap, and reliable advertising online. This now officially ends any future shopping at amazon.com. Greed is an ugly thing that can blow up in your face. BOOM!!!

Lisa


March 1, 2000

Jeff, Is your business model failing so badly (quarter over quarter losses per share escalating at an unheard of rate) that you must grasp as such poorly conceived ideas as this to keep the dream alive? I am glad I have never bought in to the Amazon.com myth and that your stock is not represented in my portfolio.

Scott Hollomon


March 1, 2000

sarah Nuernberger


March 1, 2000

You will get no business from me until you can prove you are a good net-citizen and either drop this patent or stop all efforts to enforce this invalidly issued patent. I buy between 2/5 books a week. So long to any profits from me and any others I can convince. Believe me, I will be able to convince others.

Don Richards


March 1, 2000

To Amazon, You just lost my business. In this case, whether you enforce your patent or not, I won't buy from you in the future. You have shown your character clearly, and it is not in anyone's best interest to keep you in business.

Jan Crowell


March 1, 2000

Using the legal system in an attempt to stifle competition has been proven to result in PR disasters; witness both Lotus vs. Borland, and the earlier debacle of Apple vs. Microsoft and HP. Amazon is taking swipes at the very people who have supported its growth; this is not a good idea. Amazon.com has lost countless purchases already as the result of its attitude. We urge you to reconsider your position, and to do the "right thing" so that we may once again purchase from Amazon in good conscience.

Glenn Cole


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com? Didn't they used to be a valid company? Isn't stealing from others (one-click is certainly not amazon.com's personal technology) and profiting from it wrong?

Everett Warren


March 1, 2000

Stip away the code lines and you have a marketing referral method that has been in use long before Amazon.com saw the light of day. That one can patent what, from my perspective, is a marketing method is indeed frightening. As a PR professional for some 28 years, I wonder if the first user of direct mail will step forward to patent his/her creation. And if not allowed, then why? This ruling makes no sense. But what is indeed frightening is the impact this could have on thousands of small biz owners. The PR damage to Amazon should prove to be notable, also. Perhaps, though, Amazon needs a change in PR counsel. It's odd that a reputable agency didn't stand up and note the results that would occur from the patent being effected.

Cynthia Freyer, President, CFNA Inc. PR/Marcom


March 1, 2000

Utterly ridiculous.

Ryan Dewell


March 1, 2000

To Whom It May Concern (maybe you, Mr. Bozos?): I was an Amazon.com customer. Past tense. I _may_ consider buying from Amazon.com again once the company makes its patents freely available, and tries to get its profits (hah!) from selling its products instead.

Tilmann Steinberg


March 1, 2000

I have used Amazon's 1-click feature, and I simply find it a convenience when purchasing online. It is certainly not something that I would consider a feature that is very important to me, and certainly not something that would stop me from shopping elsewhere. If I can get a book at a better price at another online store that does not have 1-click, I will spend the extra 3 minutes and save myself a few bucks. Amazon should be competing on the merits of their customer service, great selection of products and competitive prices instead of predatory practices.

Kendall Bennett


March 1, 2000

We should put an end to this broad and generic patents that are clearly intended to attack competitors

Ramiro Lpez Sales


March 1, 2000

Until Amazon stops this ridiculous policy, I will not buy anything from them and will urge all my friends to do the same.

Rohan Oberoi


March 1, 2000

The great American business ethic: if you can't beat them, SUE! If all the inventions down the years had been patented like this, science would get nowhere. It's about time these moneygrabbing companies woke up and realised this. The patent authorities should certainly take a better look at their rules as to what can and can't be patented.

Matt Rix


March 1, 2000

The penulum on software patents has swung from non-existant to too liberal in the last 30 years. The original rational from a patent was give business protection for revealing inovation. This patent reveals nothing not obvious to those skiled in the art.

RBStanfield


March 1, 2000

Jeanne Diaz


March 1, 2000

Get real amazon.com. You didn't "invent" the technique, so why should you get the only use of it.

Cliff Brown


March 1, 2000

Nick Morizio


March 1, 2000

Boycott. Boycott. Boycott. Boycott. Boycott. Boycott. Boycott. Boycott. Boycott. Boycott.

Guillaume Mauger


March 1, 2000

Andrew Pitonyak


March 1, 2000

Amazon, enough already. Drop the greed and embrace the net for what it truly is.

Michael J. McConaghy


March 1, 2000

Given the actions of your organization, I will never buy anything from Amazon again. Its funny how so many businessmen screw up a good thing by getting too greedy.

Travis Hubbard


March 1, 2000

I wrote to Amazon.com to express my displeasure and inform them that I will no longer buy from their site and will actively support the boycott against them. I have discussed the issue with people I know to educate them and encourage them to participate in the boycott. I provide assistance to people who need an alternative to Amazon.com and indeed most of the time I am able to help them fnd their books, etc. for less than Amazon.com is charging. I have augmented my website to include a message about the boycott and a link to further information. I explained all of this to Amazon.com in my email and I will continue to support the boycott until they change their position. I encourage others who support the boycott to help people understand why it is necessary and to show them alternatives to purchasing from Amazon.com

Harris L. Gilliam


March 1, 2000

You cannot patent Ideas, only Implementations.

Jeremy Shaffner


March 1, 2000

Robert G Rea


March 1, 2000

I have read the patent, and it contains nothing that would seem novel or inventive to any moderately experienced web programmer. I have checked my mutual funds (Pax and Calvert) to make sure they do not invest in Amazon.com. Needless to say, I have switched to other online book distributors and urge my friends to join in the boycott. Thanks, Tim, for providing this public forum. We'd all be really impressed if you saw to it that no O'Reilly book could be found at amazon.com.

John Tobey


March 1, 2000

Adrian Dorsman


March 1, 2000

Utter nonsense from Amazon.com. Goodbye Amazon, hello http://www.bookpool.com.

Adrian Wright


March 1, 2000

Cut the patent-greed. You are holding us all back.

Michiel van Mil


March 1, 2000

I am deeply disappointed that Amazon is taking this stance. Until this is resolved, all on-line orders for myself, and my company will be placed elsewhere. Ken Beach SysAdmin

Ken Beach


March 1, 2000

The one-click and affiliates program patents are so obvioius that it is hard to understand how these patents could have been prosecuted in good faith. The sanctions for bad-faith prosecution of patents should apply.

Steven Olson


March 1, 2000

Shame on you Amazon.Com !!!!!

Denise Lochen


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com You deserve a Brick Today !

Lou Kolinek


March 1, 2000

I can think of nothing which both conveys my revulsion of the current situation and also falls within my personal standards of decency; therefore, this comment intentionally left blank.

Nathaniel Klumb


March 1, 2000

Amazon is a dead duck anyway. Why? Because it is a middleman, and while the Internet has created fantastic opportunities for middlemen (i.e. Amazon), it will ultimately kill them all. A brief look back at history reveals that the merchant class evolved to facilitate trade between parties that were too distant to engage in a direct economic relationship. Merchants have always been nothing more than a transport mechanism for trade, whose personal "profits" should really be regarded as inefficiencies in the producer/consumer relationship. Over the course of the industrial revolution, the merchant class has benefitted from advances in transportation technology, improving efficiencies to such levels that it is no longer (economically) relevant what part of the planet your food comes from. What this means is that the methods for distributing material wealth are no longer relevant to the success of the producer, the consumer, or the merchant. All that is left is the mercant's role as facilitator of the relationships between producer and consumer. As any marriage counselor will tell you, relationships are all about communication. And thanks to a ubiquitous, global network infrastructure, communication can now be direct and instantaneous. So given this, why do we need merchants? Guess what. We don't. Certainly, merchants will try and demonstrate their necessity in other ways. Mainly, they will argue "expertise" in their given niche and "quality of service." But the best service will come from producers who care enough about the consumers of their products to get personally involved. And even today's primitive search engines give me far, far more experise identifying quality products and competitive proces than the average store, telephone, or e-mail representative. This inevitable evolution strikes at the very heart of the Amazon business model. It's days are numbered just as surely as the local video rental store. It's just a matter of time. Given how fast things are going, Amazon may be remembered as the most successful company that never had a profitable quarter.

Michael L K Eaton


March 1, 2000

I have ordered books from Amazon ever since there WAS an Amazon. These patents place in danger, the signifigant respect your fine company has amomgst developers and the on line community as a whole. Sure, you might have some little nugget of fresh art somewhere within your use of cookies -- but let it go! Your responsibility to your customers and your shareholders is being ill served. This is simple. Get on the phone right now and call it off. All will be forgiven, I'm certain of that.

Jeff Morris


March 1, 2000

Adam Bregenzer


March 1, 2000

Amazon, I was a customer of yours until now. I don't think I can say much more than has already been said, sorry. -New B&N Customer

Nick Foster


March 1, 2000

Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him. Prov. 26:27

Nick Strathy


March 1, 2000

Having spent a great deal of time reading through the comments of others I am amazed at Amazon's blatant disregard for the power of the consumer and their total lack of human decency. It seems that what Amazon has done amounts to commom robbery and "they" don't seem to care about the image this portrays. The loss will be theirs. This behavior will reduce their profits. Ironic, since profits are what "they" sought to gain....Had I done something like this my mother would have taken a strap to me...and then given me a lecture. Perhaps this letter campaign will serve as the lecture; the loss of profits will be the strap.

Steve Johnson


March 1, 2000

Joshua Rachlin


March 1, 2000

This is a joke. Trying to patent "One click ordrering" is like patenting sliced bread. I don't use Amazon.com anyways, but now will encourage others not to use the site.

Chad Quigley


March 1, 2000

How did amazon ever get a patent on one-click ordering? Every web programmer knows how to do it, and how trivial an operation it is. I have ordered lots of books through Amazon, but no more till this silly enforcement of an absurd patent is dropped.

Jeffrey Lyon, Ph.D.


March 1, 2000

A great way to stifle inovation and another good reason for me to shop at Chapters or Indigo.

Tom Gowler


March 1, 2000

A great way to stifle innovation and another good reason for me to shop at Chapters or Indigo.

Tom Gowler


March 1, 2000

Not that you care, but you just lost one more customer.

J X


March 1, 2000

Just another reason for me to take my business elsewhere.

rick crawford


March 1, 2000

Jamie Boyd


March 1, 2000

Did Amazon patented the breathing process?. Dear Amazon, I expect many of your customers to turn away from you as a result of your "breathing" patent.

Alex Freeman


March 1, 2000

I was just about buy a book from Amazon.com! I guess I'll have go somewhere else.

Leon Brandy


March 1, 2000

I don't think there's a patent on air yet... I won't do business with Amazon because of their attempts to claim ownership of obvious ideas, and because of their lack of respect for user privacy. And I tell everyone about using www.clickherenow.com and about book sellers that consistently outperform Amazon. And outside of books, there are lots of competitors who provide much better value to customers.

Conor Sanders


March 1, 2000

Michael Newlyn Blake


March 1, 2000

I could not agree more that Amazon is 'pissing in the well' with this heavy-handed behavior. Curious behavior from someone who made their fortune thanks to the openness of the WWW. As a computer professional I am appalled at the callousness of this by Amazon. Jeff obviously knows that they have nothing worth patenting, and is simply trying to 'Pull a Microsoft' on the e-commerce market. My family, for one, doe not buy books from Amazon anymore. We've spent over 񘈨 on books over the last 12 months, quite a bit of which went through Amazon. No longer.

Tom Ellis


March 1, 2000

Dear Amazon, You have lost nearly 躔.00 in book sales over the past half year, because of your poor habits with regards to patents, and technology. Keep it up ... and you'll keep on losing my business.

Phil Chandler


March 1, 2000

Amazon: Reverse your course now, for down this road lies madness. Tim: Thanks for putting forth your comments, and for once again demonstrating your understanding and support of the open source community.

Dave Barnett


March 1, 2000

Can't believe this patent was issued in the first place. The patent office SHOULD know better but Amazon certainly DOES KNOW BETTER!! This is ridiculous and IS costing Amazon business.

Doug Wolfe


March 1, 2000

Pursuing patents for what are obviously methods of business is ridiculous- trying to enforce them is even worse.

Donald Carr


March 1, 2000

This insanity needs to stop. Amazon needs to get a clue.

Randy Carpenter


March 1, 2000

I've decided to take a patent on the process of defecation. That way, anytime Jeff Bozo sits on the crapper I can demand payment. Given the proliferation of absurd patents by the U.S. Patent Office, this patent is sure to get unfettered approval. Of course, as constipated as Bozo appears to be, I probably won't make a mint. On the other hand, he's so full of crap anyway, I might just end up buying Amazon (I'm sure they can use the money).

Jim Slim


March 1, 2000

Addison Laurent


March 1, 2000

I don't understand how patents like this ever get granted ?? There are hundreds examples of previous usage that I have seen in my 30 years as a systems developer. And if it makes any difference, this kind of ordering method was used even before Internet.

Tuomo K Stauffer


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, Please don't be absurd! Eventually this patent will be overturned. In the meantime, you are only losing customers and lining the pockets of the law establishment.

Ed Chaltry


March 1, 2000

Your local bookshop needs your money more than Amazon, anyway. Long live face-to-face commerce!

Brian Trudell


March 1, 2000

I sincerely hope that Amazon will do the right thing. As so many have already stated, there is a Right way of doing business on the web and a Wrong way. This is *clearly* the Wrong way. I hope that Amazon will see the shortsightedness of their decision and get back on track, quickly.

Scott Davis


March 1, 2000

Until Amazon gives up these ridiculous patents I will not puchase anything on your site.

Ariff Alidina


March 1, 2000

Wow. As an programmer with experience in web development, I would like to point out that Amazon.com did not 'invent' the technology. It is common knowledge. Hey ! Maybe I can get a patent on 'touch typing' ? Anyone out there have one yet ?

Matthew Allen


March 1, 2000

I'm a regular online bookstore consumer, but I haven't purchased a single item from Amazon since the bn.com injunction was announced. I have purchased over 跾 of books in the last 3 months from bn.com beginning from last holiday season. As a result of this most recent patent filing, Amazon has lost my business forever.

Nate Bowler


March 1, 2000

Business model patents are only valid in the US. The US patents office has made a mistake - that the US government currently supports hoping to gain a trade advantage. I doubt that such patents will stand up in other nations when finally challenged. I hope your company goes through a financial ringer defending your ludicrous patents in the EU.

mike deniverville


March 1, 2000

John Hales


March 1, 2000

I think that these patents by Amazon are ridiculous. Remember, this is the internet, founded upon open source and free trade. We've got a great thing going. Why screw it up now?

Gene


March 1, 2000

GREED can make a person rich, GREED will make a person poor and I'm not referring to money. Remember Jeff, what goes around comes around. You obviously like publicity, no sane person likes the kind of publicity you are getting now. The biggest accomplishment you have made is getting people's respect. Now you will never get it back. I've just removed my Amazon.com bookmark. You loser.

Gerry Vrbensky


March 1, 2000

Pissing in the well, indeed.

Mike Murphy


March 1, 2000

Tom Stidham


March 1, 2000

Amazon used to rule. Now they suck. The dent in their bottom line that will be created by the lack of my business probably won't persuade them from changing from their Microsoftesque ways, but I have several friends who regularly order large amounts of product, and they have friends, and so on. Suddenly the dent becomes a crater that we can only hope they won't be able to ignore. Kudos to Tim O'Reilly for providing a forum for this outcry. Amazon, I emplore you to return the WWW you've stolen. All sins would be forgiven, and you could rule once again.

Cheyenne Greatorex


March 1, 2000

As has been pointed out, these patents and the actions Amazon has intiated to defend them are so entirely out of keeping with the spirit upon which the Internet was built...and as much of an innovator as Amazon may have been in the past, one would hope they would be a little more far-sighted than recent actions have shown them to be. Pursuit of litigation relating to these patents is certain to stifle significant future growth of the Internet and the "wired economy" - and may well have a significant negative imapct on e-commerce in general (and Amazon's bottom line in particular).

Dave Knapp


March 1, 2000

Your response to Tim was very disappointing, Jeff. It's one thing is to be ignorant and easily convinced by your lawyers, it's another to refuse to listen to those "skilled in the art".

Sengan Baring-Gould


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com? Didn't they used to be a valid company? Isn't taking what's not yours (such as a technology they didn't invent) considered wrong? Pirates, thieves, vandals!

Everett Warren


March 1, 2000

The fact that the PTO is utterly clueless is no excuse for abusing them. If Amazon wishes to protect its rights by filing patents, it should grant open, no-fee licenses to any and all comers.

Keith Law


March 1, 2000

Let us just patent the concept of 'sale through Internet' - it will be funny...

Leonid Beliak


March 1, 2000

Besides the fact that you are abusing an absurd patent and over-worked patent office, you are also back-stabbing the people who made you what you are today. I remember amazon's opening day, and I think I'll probably be around for it's closing day too if this keeps up. MBG

Matthew Guenther


March 1, 2000

Back to Wild Wild West?

Alex Zhigimont


March 1, 2000

These patents may be legal but by any decent standard of morality this is theft pure and simple. I am offended by such restraint of trade. I support a boycott of Amazon and will not purchase any books through Amazon nor will I support any "partner programs on be half Webination or my clients.

Mark Garron CEO Webination


March 1, 2000

It looks like Amazon.com is trying to find a way to make it out of the red. Hmm, maybe they can patent reading left-to-right.

Alan Starr


March 1, 2000

Aparna Bamzai


March 1, 2000

Jon Vincent


March 1, 2000

This is an example of how money and lawyers can achieve anything. Please don't bite the hand that feeds you. Amazon owes it's existence to the ease of use that the internet provides and now you turn around and patent the very ideas that inherently give the internet this quality.

gabriel higham


March 1, 2000

Paul L. Schumacher


March 1, 2000

Hi Jeff! Thanks for the free bookmark! Really, I mean, you can't blame a guy for trying. There are a thousand reasons why the internet should garner innovation, and this is no exception. And the blame does not lie with Amazon - it lies in the archaic structure of the U.S. patent system. It's a lost cause from any angle. Deeper research into the subject will show that Amazon.Com was FAR from the first to use this technique of user registration; and that accemptance of a system retaining your credit card information has only, until recently, been accepted as common practice. In the brick and morter days; NO ONE could get away with that. And we, as a public, have accepted the practice. And just a couple months back; some 500,000 individuals suffered the consequences of this action.

Matt Smith


March 1, 2000

This is just stupid. It goes to show that money and lawyers can achieve anything in America.

Aaron Brown


March 1, 2000

Why and how can Amazon be granted a patent for something so obvious? This is ridiculous and I don't think it will hold up very much longer

Mark Cenicola


March 1, 2000

Amazon should stop trying to patent something when it's patently obvious it should remain in the public domain -- the practice of affiliation is also called networking, and it's done across industries. It is not a product or practice of a corporation, but of society in the generic. The idea that Amazon wants to patent it is not only foolish but dangerous -- to the economy and the social forming of social bonds, something entirely outside the scope of business, Amazon's industry, and beyond Amazon in particular. Amazon, stop this nonsense at once.

Nathan Avilla


March 1, 2000

alyce cresap


March 1, 2000

Greg Ritter


March 1, 2000

Tim Smith


March 1, 2000

Better be carefull, amazon may patent the open letter process soon. Bastards

Greg Pointing


March 1, 2000

I am against the issuance and enforcement of software *only* patents. I do not agree with Amazon's intention to 'impact' their competition by using a government enforced monopoly technique, patent protection. I am a very unhappy *current* Amazon customer. With your 'attack' on Barnes and Noble during the Christmas buying season, you attempted to reduce *MY* 'options'. Of whom were you thinking? It certainly does not appear to be me, your customer. Perhaps, in a very short term way, it might have helped your stockholders. It has to be win-win-win: Stockholder-employee-customer. Anything else is just a shortsighted gain. Why? Eventually the 'lose'-r will take his toys and find a 'win' place to play! The consequences to you, Amazon? 1. The *only* time I purchase a book from you is when I cannot get it anywhere else. I *first* try Barnes and Noble. To date, that accounts for about 赨 in sales. 2. Everyone I know and come into contact with (and that is 100s of people, BTW), I make clear my displeasure with you and recommend they go to Barnes and Noble. I do not know the total $'s, but I know there is now bad will connected to the Amazon name. 3. A reduction in my support of the patent system and my person focus on assisting those supporting some form of regulation limiting patents so they do *not* include software only patents. So, all in all, thank you for generating the awareness around this issue. Perhaps it will galvanize even more action to get rid of software patents. Good luck running your business *long term* while ignoring the better interests of both yourself and your customers. Sincerely, Jim O'Flaherty, Jr. Richardson, Tx. Sidenote: I believe the only *bad* monopoly is the government protected/enforced monopoly! All the others are assimilated by the market...eventually. Need an example, Intel is losing ground rapidly to AMD, M$ is losing ground to Linux/FreeBSD. Patents = Government protected/enforced monopoly!

Jim O'Flaherty, Jr.


March 1, 2000

This is outragous. I mean, isn't it enough with you beeing one of the biggest actors on the InterNET ? You are getting more and more powerhungry everyday. Shape Up!

Per Eriksson


March 1, 2000

Christopher Dick


March 1, 2000

Furthermore, there is zero probability that I will order anything from Amazon unless they stop trying to enforce these questionable patents. I've been enjoying their competitors' websites in the mean time.

John W. Lockhart


March 1, 2000

Rich Henderson


March 1, 2000

I had been a loyal customer and investor in Amazon until the "1-Click" lawsuit. When I first read about it I was incredulous. The idea is so obvious -- and already pervasive on the internet--I thought it a joke. When I learned it was not, I then realized that Amazon had lost its way and had stopped focusing on its customers and innovation, and had resorted to bully tactics. I sent an email to Amazon expressing my displeasure, but only recieved an automated "thanks for your input.." message. I have not bought anything from Amazon since, and will not until they drop their lawsuit. In addition, I am no longer a share holder.

Peter Liske


March 1, 2000

Rick Davis


March 1, 2000

Hey Mr. Bezos (Mr.Bozo) You can not rename old technology and take the credit for it. Don't belive that we,in this online world will stand for it.

Wes Noel


March 1, 2000

As a software engineer working for an e-commerce company, I greatly admire Amazon's accomplishments in the field of e-business. I do not, however, appreciate your repeated attempts to stifle competition through ridiculous patents and lawsuits. Until the two patents in question are repealed and a public statement of apology is made, I will not buy goods from your site, and I will recommend to friends and family to do the same.

Nathan Sandland


March 1, 2000

Amazon has done a lot to increase the ease of use on the Net and raise awareness of the possibilities. In one stroke they have laid the foundation to strangle it. I have used Amazon for most of my book buying for the last three years. That will cease if they continue on this course.

Mike Salinas


March 1, 2000

I don't think I will have any trouble finding what I need at bn.com, borders.com, or fatbrain.com. And I need about 񘈨 in books/year.

Chad Warning


March 1, 2000

Another example of corporate greed.

Miguel Justiniano


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, You are now on my weasel list.

Mark Cole


March 1, 2000

Hey Mr. Bezos (Mr.Bozo) You can not rename old technology and take the credit for it. Don't belive that we,in this online world will stand for it.

Wes Noel


March 1, 2000

If this type of thing is allowed to keep happening, pretty soon Amazon will just patent on-line selling of merchandise, and the entire on-line commerce community will just collapse. Way to go Amazon and patent offices!

Travis Hudson


March 1, 2000

I prefer to do my shopping on line and visit a number of sites weekly and purchase products. I will not visit or purchase anything from Amazon untilt his patent is lifted.

Alice Sher Riccabona


March 1, 2000

I'll never visit Amazon again. You're just getting bigger, slower and greedier. Please change your ways. Remember the web and it's technology has got you to where you are today, not the other way around.

Tim Harman


March 1, 2000

This patent, like so many other software patents, makes a mockery of the patent system.

Craig Harding


March 1, 2000

Dmitriy Genzel


March 1, 2000

David Grogan


March 1, 2000

I am a devout Amazon customer, but am reconsidering that standpoint. If Amazon were truly interested in the best user experience for its customers, it would promote instead of stifle innovation. If Amazon is as good as they think they are, they will stay ahead of their competitors by developing better ideas than their competitors, and be better at implementing/countering the ideas of their competitors, thereby actively retaining the crown as king of business-to-consumer commerce instead of passively retaining it (resting on their laurels) by trying to make their innovations exlusive and proprietary. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Brett Lider


March 1, 2000

It just sickens me that the patent office even let Amazon pattent this.....

Jim Kneuper


March 1, 2000

The atempt to place a starngle hold on that which you did not create, but exploited so well, is proof that even in a new world of intelect and freedom, there will always be greed and selfishness to match any love and hope we can feel.

Thomas Earthman


March 1, 2000

In January I purchased Oracle Essentials and Oracle8i Internal Services from Amazon. Its my last Amazon purchase until they stop abusing the patent system. I'm forwarding the ask tim URL to all my friends and clients. Linux Rules!!!

Dan Benson


March 1, 2000

Tim, I cannot believe that someone can patent something they did not create, design or in no way assisted in that process. They took another person's idea and implementation, added a NAME to it and said it's theirs. I won't get into lack of morality in this idea. I am glad I never bought a book online. I will be sure to send this link to everyone I know. Thanks again Tim.

Benjamin Williams


March 1, 2000

Jason Bailey


March 1, 2000

Not only does Amazon.com go too far on this issue, but the whole idea of of a free internet is at stake. Amazon.com disgusts me and if they win, I sincerely hope the internet population puts them out of business!

Jack Wilson


March 1, 2000

Mel Hooper

hooperm


March 1, 2000

Mel Hooper


March 1, 2000

Scott Raulinaitis


March 1, 2000

Mats Stahlkrantz


March 1, 2000

Look out amazon -- I intend to patent 2-click through n-click ordering, thus limiting you to PRECISELY one and only one-click ordering... stupid, no? Nuff said!

Mike Stafford


March 1, 2000

Will be buying my books elsewhere!

Matthew Tamm


March 1, 2000

You have lost my custom, anyway.

Victoria Catterson


March 1, 2000

Oscar Wilsson


March 1, 2000

Yes, I agree with the hundreds of comments made above that i have read as well as (i am sure) many other comments i have not. I am a cgi/perl programmer as well as a past amazon.com customer and must say that amazon.com and whoever approved this absurd patent made a big mistake.

Adrian Porter


March 1, 2000

Karel Baloun


March 1, 2000

I will not buy anything more from Amazon.com until this stops.

Ben Matasar


March 1, 2000

Shame on you Amazon.com.

Robert Hove


March 1, 2000

Mike Sawyer


March 1, 2000

Kevin Kleppinger


March 1, 2000

Josh Michaels


March 1, 2000

Atlee Gordy


March 1, 2000

This use of patent law is totally unacceptable.

Bill Rolland


March 1, 2000

I fully agree with the contents of the letter of protest. The underlying technology, the use of cookies, predates anything that Amazon has ever done. I think that unless they actually wrote the code to do any of this in assembler, they are barking up the wrong tree. What's next? Are they going to patent the Submit button? In the last couple of years. I have purchased several hundreds of dollars of books from Amazon. I am a computer professional so everything I purchase is a high ticket item. If they choose to abuse my profession and consequently my livelihood I will limit theirs by removing my custom.

Stephen Hudson


March 1, 2000

Jeff,

Mark Gibson


March 1, 2000

As a regular web-consumer, I have no problem going to other sites besides Amazon to make my purchases. I do NOT agree with this patent and find it ludicrous.

Jodi Ivy


March 1, 2000

Dan Kressin


March 1, 2000

I have regularily ordered from Amazon.com in the past. After learning of their dishonest tactic, I will take my business to someone else.

David E. Penley


March 1, 2000

In the past, I have purchased many books from Amazon.com, encouraged friends, co-workers, and businesses to do so, also. At one point of time, even I worked with a nonprofit organization at Miami University that operated through Amazon's affliate program to raise substantial revenues for the organization. The amount of money I have spent on books (often as an affiliate) is simply embarrassing, so I won't share that detail here, but I've plunked down a substantial chunk of change with this company and after reading in great detail about these two patent issues, I have no intention of doing business with Amazon when it is doing things like this. Patenting something this simple and widespread is not defendable in any way. This is legal bullying and extortion and I want to part of it. And as a consumer, that is a very easy decision for me to make.

John C. Rowland


March 1, 2000

Brian Smedley


March 1, 2000

Jeff, I've spent several hundred dollars on books at Amazon.com over the past couple of years. I'll be buying books from your competitors in the future. Regards, Mark

Mark Gibson


March 1, 2000

I've been loyal to Amazon for their amazing levels of customer service. This stupid and shortsighted patent policy has made me change my mind -- I'm looking for another online bookstore, and Amazon has lost my business.

John Schofield


March 1, 2000

I will not purchase from Amazon.com until they change their position on this.

Andrew Perry


March 1, 2000

Patenting the obvious is patently rediculous. Do not bite the hand that feeds you. The more web sites that implement ease of use features such as one-click ordering, the more people will be inclined to shop on the web. The more people that are comfortable shopping on the web the more people who will have exposure to Amazon.com advertising. I have always been a happy customer of Amazon.com and will continue to shop there, for now. However if they persist in their attempts to stifle E-Commerce I will be forced to take my business to a more ethical company. Prove to your customers that their entire net experience is important to Amazon.com, not just the time they spend on your site buying things. Thank you for your time and consideration. -David Fleetwood

David Fleetwood


March 1, 2000

Patenting the obvious is patently rediculous. Do not bite the hand that feeds you. The more web sites that implement ease of use features such as one-click ordering, the more people will be inclined to shop on the web. The more people that are comfortable shopping on the web the more people who will have exposure to Amazon.com advertising. I have always been a happy customer of Amazon.com and will continue to shop there, for now. However if they persist in their attempts to stifle E-Commerce I will be forced to take my business to a more ethical company. Prove to your customers that their entire net experience is important to Amazon.com, not just the time they spend on your site buying things. Thank you for your time and consideration. -David Fleetwood

David Fleetwood


March 1, 2000

Dr. Fredrick Rea O'Keefe


March 1, 2000

Theo v. Werkhoven


March 1, 2000

Amazon has just lost another customer.

Peter King


March 1, 2000

I'm actually rather appalled that these patents were awarded in the first place. Be that as it may, they _WERE_ awarded. The unfortunate part of this entire issue is that a company like Amazon actually thinks they can swindle people into believing they invented such simple concepts. Perhaps I should apply for a patent on some of the ultra-basic activities I regularly partake in online. I might make a name for myself. wait! what am I thinking, that's just ludicrous, not to mention a great way to make myself a couple million long-term enemies.

Christopher D. Snow


March 1, 2000

This is a bloody stupid idea. The technique existed long before Amazon came up with it; the patent probably shouldn't have been granted, or at least not to Amazon, since their work seems to have been more in the way of making it suit their needs than *making* it, period. Aren't patents supposed to be for *original* ideas? Original this was not. This is acting like a whiny spoiled child out to take all the pie, and I get enough of that in my daily life. Is this how they plan to finally start turning a profit? Forget it. From now on I use Amazon.com as a way to search out the books I'm interested in, and then I take my printout to the local bookstore, which specializes in special orders. They behave better *and* they're good capitalists.

J. McGeary


March 1, 2000

Stop this insanity! While I will not be involved in an official boycott of Amazon, I will personally take my business eslewhere and gladly explain to anyone who asks why.

Sibyl Perkins


March 1, 2000

Theo v. Werkhoven


March 1, 2000

I agree with Tim! boycott Amazon.com!!

Brent Anderson


March 1, 2000

Disgusting.

Christopher Kirk


March 1, 2000

Dan Moschuk


March 1, 2000

Nat Papovich


March 1, 2000

In the old days you'd just hire goons to break your competitor's store windows in the middle of the night. Today's hired goons are lawyers. Their tactics are legal, but that doesn't automatically make them morally defensible. We need to all stand up and point out how glaringly wrong Amazon's behavior is in this case -- and if they don't straighten out and play fair, we can easily buy our books from someone who will.

Paul Nordquist


March 1, 2000

I agree with many of the statements made against the patents that Amazon has filed for. It would be a great disaster to the internet is this sort of thing became a regular practice. The progress of the internet would come to a screeching crawl. Besides, this sort of action of patenting established ideas ranks under "unethical". -JB

John Borge


March 1, 2000

You have now lost another Amazon customer.

Mike Rivington


March 1, 2000

Amazon, please be civilized! I like Amazon, and things like this just make me sick. From now on, I will be checking www.bn.com and www.cdnow.com prior to Amazon - just to support them.

Valera Fooksman


March 1, 2000

I wouldn't be surprised if they try to patent the intake of "Oxygen Through Nostrils" next.

Kirk Lashbrook


March 1, 2000

I have not purchased anything at Amazon since I heard about the cookie monster patent. I asked my Employer to purchase new books at Barnes and Noble (which they did). I also tell all of my friends not to use Amazon.

Judd Montgomery


March 1, 2000

http://www.patents.ibm.com/gallery

Boris Gheihman


March 1, 2000

I will not use Amazon again!

Chuck Worboys


March 1, 2000

Nick Finco


March 1, 2000

I have bought books from Amazon.com in the past, but will no longer buy books from you until you change your ridiculous policy of patenting the obvious and the sending your lawyers after people who use the idea. Shame on you! You want to get rich? Offending your customers is no way to do it. I am no longer you customer, and I urge everyone to boycott you into changing your policy. Let's see you get rich now.

John Brockmeyer


March 1, 2000

Robin L. Brandt


March 1, 2000

Tanya Den


March 1, 2000

I believe this effort represents both a fundamental flaw in the U.S. Patent Office and a fundamental lack of ethics on that part of the executive management of Amazon.com in abusing that system. Where such broad patents to become ultimately enforcable, every business professional on the planet would be required to license the rights necessary to do thier job. It is flawed, unethical, and economically unsupportable. I will not only no longer purchase from Amazon.com, I will do my best to encourage everyone I know to do the same.

Andrew J. Lewis


March 1, 2000

I am personally against patenting something so obvious.

Ben Layer


March 1, 2000

I sign this petition to show agreement with it. However, my protest with Amazon started months ago when I stopped buying books from them. Patents have a place in society... this isn't it.

Jason Anthony


March 1, 2000

It is unfortunate that Amazon has taken this action. We have enough problems with software patents in general. A high profile company like Amazon taking this kind of action only makes things worse.

Andy Andrews


March 1, 2000

Ciaran Lynch


March 1, 2000

Another boycott, more bad word-of-mouth, more non-customers, more dollars going elsewhere. I would think the Amazon stockholders should be very unhappy about now. If they're not now, they will be.

Brett Parker


March 1, 2000

Having read about the patents granted, I've suddenly been overwhelmed with the urge to no longer shop at AMAZON. I think I'll use buy.com from now on and I think my friends should too. cheers, -Jimmy

Jimmy Lang


March 1, 2000

Scott Van Den Elzen


March 1, 2000

We spend hundreds of thousands of dollars each year on our research portfolio--patenting non-trivial discoveries and research advances. With patents on things like "one click" it is clear that predatory behaviour is going to become the norm. Shame on you and the patent office. Back to the Dilbert cubicle with you.

m. brady


March 1, 2000

Bad move Amazon! Take your move back and try something positive...

Chris Els


March 1, 2000

You've lost another customer, Amazon.

Mox-Dragon


March 1, 2000

Benno T Brummel


March 1, 2000

Bill Boggins


March 1, 2000

I have bought many books from Amazon.com. I can't believe they would pull such a stunt. Trademark the name, yes, patent the action of a mouse click? NO WAY. I won't buy any more books from them until this nonsense stops.

Scott Lanham


March 1, 2000

It is truly unfortunate that the people in charge of issuing patents cannot be more informed about the topics they issue patents for. Amazon's "One Click Ordering" system is obvious to anyone with a tiny amount of web-related programming experience, and is in use in a number of other websites developed before Amazon.com Basically, the patent is for saving someone's information in a cookie and retrieving it, a commonly used technique for a wide variety of information, from credit card numbers and addresses to shopping cart contents and user preferences. This technology is used on thousands of sites. Will they be suing everyone with a cookie-based information retrieval system? I'm sure that with some of the judges out there who are less than technically proficient may see it that way. I won't ever be buying anything from Amazon, that's for sure. Mr. Bezos: Please get a grip on reality - you may have a patent, but it is morally meaningless. Whether you win or lose in court, you will never get my business and lose that of others (as you can see from this letter). I hope this action gives you pause to think about what your doing, what types of precedents you might be setting and finally makes you change your course of action.

Steven Lapointe


March 1, 2000

Donna Maser


March 1, 2000

Mike Renne


March 1, 2000

Cameron Bales


March 1, 2000

This patent, along with the recent patent for the "windowing" solution to Y2K problems, is yet another example of a Patent Office that simply does not understand the terrain they are navigating in, and a company that seizes every opportunity to use "legal" means to harass a competitor. The stupid thing about this is that Amazon was beating B&N's brains out, not with 1-Click ordering, but with great customer service. This just tells me that the inmates are now running the asylum at Amazon. C'mon guys! Wake up & smell the coffee!

Gerald Cosby


March 1, 2000

No way -- this is not the way to compete in the new economy. I will not support a company that imposes these sorts of tactics.

Bryan Smith


March 1, 2000

Come off it Amazon, cop on! Maitiu MacCabe

Maitiu MacCabe


March 1, 2000

Camille Fournier


March 1, 2000

See above.

Phil Feldman


March 1, 2000

I and my family are long time customers of Amazon.com and we purchase many things from your company for personal and use in our business in the entertainment industry, i am shocked to find out that Amazon is leading the battle to disrupt the developement of open source code and the use of many long established conventions for comunicating information on the internet, we all stand to benefit from a FULLY open environment on the internet and without the contributions of those people who volunteered their time and talents to making the internet what it is today your company would have no ability to operate at all online(there would be NO online period.)i am a user of LINUX and as i hear it so are you, i would urge you to re-examine your efforts to hinder internet developement.until that time i will refuse to purchase any products from your company and will advise my clients to find alternate sources for their purchasing needs in the future.

Michael Goldstein


March 1, 2000

David Newcum


March 1, 2000

OK. and Al Gore/d invented the Internet. You can't get your over inflated-stock company out of the red by resorting to Billy Gates tactics Sorry Mr. Bozo, er, Mr. Bezos. Amazon.com, Inc. Has spent millions amazing the press and the stock market. Since they have never made a profit, I wonder what their stock is really worth. I work with companies every day that make an HONEST doller, millions of them. Get real Mr. Bezos. Get a life, and quit using suckers money to hype your big bag of hot air. A Million Dollars for that routine? HAH! I'll sell you a few MUCH MORE sophisticated ones for HALF that amount. Try another URL to buy your books, How about AMAZON-BOOKS.ORG for a listing of 257 booksellers that make a profit honestly, and give credit where credit is due, to those that give back to the Internet that helped make them profitable. You BLEW IT! -John

John Beaman - WebMaster


March 1, 2000

The internet is looked on as the last source of real freedom, but actions like your selfish patents is quickly turning it into a jumble of restrictions and frivolous waste.

Dillon Bussert


March 1, 2000

Michael Khalandovsky


March 1, 2000

Obvious ideas shouldn't get approved by the patent office -- this is the primary problem. But a secondary problem is company lawyers submitting them. They do know better. They do not understand that a company's reputation is more important than short-term financial gain. Microsoft is successful. They would be twice as successful if they had guarded their reputation.

John Kalstrom


March 1, 2000

Leonora Heinrich


March 1, 2000

Jennifer Kemp


March 1, 2000

I, for one, intend to honor the boycott.

Ted Strall


March 1, 2000

Garth Grimm


March 1, 2000

Someone ought to set a date, perhaps March 31, by which time Amazon.com should renounce its patent on one-click ordering and renounce all intentions of seeking or enforcing any similar patents. If Amazon.com does not meet that deadline, we should organize a worldwide Internet boycott of Amazon.com. Such a boycott would be quite simple to organize and would show real results in less than a month. Although I am a regular Amazon.com customer, and I admire their business, I can find many other places to buy books and CDs, if necessary. Amazon.com, however, cannot afford to lose hundreds of thousands of sales.

Walter Crockett


March 1, 2000

I've bought a lot of books from Amazon -- they have a well-run online store. But I will not buy any more products from them until they stop attempting to exploit patents issued by a clueless PTO. Innovate, don't litigate. Amazon's benefitted from the open source community which has made the Internet the wonderful vehicle that it is. Without it, there would be no Amazon. I will be happy to continue purchasing books, CDs, videos, and such from you when you declare that you will not seek to use these patents to intimidate others, that they will be used purely to prevent others from hindering innovation. Until then, I will take my business elsewhere.

Chris Shenton


March 1, 2000

Todd Adamson


March 1, 2000

Amazon's behavior is an insult to the open standards that make the internet possible. When the courts overrule this travesty, Amazon will be left out in the cold, exposed as the ruthless thieves they have lowered themselves to be in a failed effort to actually turn a profit. There are PLENTY of web sites to buy Books, Music, and EVERYTHING else Amazon peddles. It will be enjoyable doing business with THEM.

Ward Kaatz


March 1, 2000

Jason Vasquez


March 1, 2000

I have made dozens of orders with Amazon, and thought the 1-click was a great feature - but patenting it is a foolish and offensive move, it will destroy the promise of commerce on the web. I guess I'll go back to supporting my local bookstore instead.

Jonathan McDowell


March 1, 2000

you are a peive of shit!

ez


March 1, 2000

This plainly doesn't fit with the original intent of patent law. It was set up so that the little guy didn't get stomped on by the big corporates. It isn't right now for a mega-corporation to break the spirit of that law by using it to stomp. What right does a mega-corporate have to tell us as individuals what we can and cannot do? None. What right does a mega-corporate to dictate to other companies what they can and cannot do?

Jeremy Taylor


March 1, 2000

It looks like I've just discovered another example of excessive corporate greed to use in my business classes. You've just lost another customer.

Dennis Emmerich


March 1, 2000

What's next? A patent on Two-Click ordering? How many clicks must one use in order to feel relative sure that their own ecommerce initiatives will not be slammed by someone with enough money to do so through our legal system?

Cindy Furry


March 1, 2000

Stop already!

Tom Walsh


March 1, 2000

I no longer recommend that my friends use Amazon.com as their bookstore. While you still have my business, you won't for much longer if you continue with this inane abuse of common sense. Wake up, look at how many people have signed this letter in just two days. You will ultimately lose more business on this than you could ever gain back in a lawsuit. End this foolishness now, and I'm sure the vast majority of your former customers will return to you.

Geoff Adams


March 1, 2000

I will not shop at or link to Amazon.com as long as they pursue their absurd software patents.

Kevin Teague


March 1, 2000

Benjamin Exley


March 1, 2000

Benjamin Exley


March 1, 2000

Goodbye Amazon.

Joe Klovance


March 1, 2000

Jonathan Corbin


March 1, 2000

Jonathan Corbin


March 1, 2000

Absurd patent.

Gary Ingram


March 1, 2000

Amazon - Please desist your rediculous behavior. I have boycotted Amazon, as I'm sure many others have also. Your behavior not only makes you look bad, it sets a bad precedent for Internet commerce, and technology patents in general.

Neil Conway


March 1, 2000

Philip Morrison


March 1, 2000

Sad, Amazon.

Matthew Murray


March 1, 2000

I have been boycotting Amazon for over 12 months. The recent patent issues simply confirm my outrage with the practicies of this company.

Wayne Wooten


March 1, 2000

Luckily I've never bought a book from Amazon...and now I have good reason to never do so in the future. Thanks Amazon for making my shopping decision easier! You should patent that as "One Patent Customer Alienation"...that's the ONE original thing you've done so far.

Gary Cox


March 1, 2000

I used to use Amazon, but since this patenting nonsense appeared, I have felt obliged to avoid their site, as well as telling everyone I know about my feelings. I can just as easily use Fatbrain.com, which appears not to have abused the patent system for competitive advantage.

Kurt Yoder


March 1, 2000

I used to be a loyal customer and may once again be one if you (Amazon) would drop this ridiculous patent. Acknowledge prior art (cookies and it's implementations) and give back to the Internet. The Internet has treated you very well with the millions you have made while never turning a profit. Do NOT try to make your money with patents and enforcements.

Randy Wilcox


March 1, 2000

Mathew Patterson


March 1, 2000

Enough other people have made eloquent comments about this, so I won't get lengthy. I heard about a guy who tried to patent ".com"... this is about as stupid, only amazon suceeded. Shame, that.

Gunilla "Godmoma" Williams


March 1, 2000

As an attorney and a software developer, I could not more outraged at your rediculous attempt to strangle the web with a patent on such a blantantly obvious, pre-existing technology. Kiss this customer good-bye and I'm sure many of my colleagues will feel the same when they learn the facts.

James Conger


March 1, 2000

James A. Welsh


March 1, 2000

The steps Amazon have taken to protect their business indicate that they have lost sight of their customers.

Shane Lazarus


March 1, 2000

Isn't it amazing how innovators and entrepreneurs quickly get strangled by their lawyers and business "experts" who believe in "win/lose" and not "win/win". C'mon Jeff, get the balls to do what you know is right, not what your jaded "experts" are telling you. I admire your innovation and success, but this is a real step backward. There's a lot of disillusioned people out there thinking "well, there goes another one to the mega-corporation dark side". I think, however, you still have a chance if you can renounce this a recover with a bit of grace. So, for now, my credit card number is going to other online retailers, even if I have to click more than once! Trent.

Trent Schumann


March 1, 2000

Tina Blackshear


March 1, 2000

Robert Ferney


March 1, 2000

You can't get your over inflated-stock company out of the red by resorting to Billy Gates tactics Mr. Bozo, er, Mr. Bezos. Try AMAZON-BOOKS.ORG for 257 OTHER booksellers! You can't make your hyper inflated stock hid your VERY RED balance sheet by bullying the Internet. You Blew It!

John Beaman


March 1, 2000

Misguided, Poor, and Prohibitive to business.

Annie Gentry


March 1, 2000

What's next...a patent on reading left to right?

Kent Giard


March 1, 2000

Nicholas S. Olah


March 1, 2000

Greg Johnson


March 1, 2000

Lauri Pitk„nen


March 1, 2000

One-click innovation prevention!

Russell J. LeBar


March 1, 2000

It's a pity the US government allows people to patent a process that's really nothing more than common sense, even worse is somebody trying to capitalize on it.

Justin Buist


March 1, 2000

Gabriel Dubois


March 1, 2000

Dominika Spetsmann


March 1, 2000

As a systems administrator and 'net user since '91, I can't believe that any company would try to patent this technology, let alone enforce it. I am currently boycotting amazon.com, and urging everyone that I know to do the same.

Jeff DuVall


March 1, 2000

George Nies


March 1, 2000

Wellington Lim


March 1, 2000

Bill Millinor


March 1, 2000

Keith Moltzan


March 1, 2000

Guess where I won't be buying my books.

Gavin McCord


March 1, 2000

I won't order from Amazon until this nonsensical lawsuit is dropped! Greg Smela

gsmelamsn.com


March 1, 2000

Geoffrey Callaghan


March 1, 2000

As an avid reader, I am always looking for good prices locally, and online. Amazon, if you continue this attempt, I will have one less place to shop around online. As well, everyone I know, I will recommend them to do the same, they may not have time to sign this, but you can technically include another 20 or so lost customers. College students and IT professionals tend to buy alot of books. Jayson Strudwick

Jayson Strudwick


March 1, 2000

You guys arent the first to use these technologies, nor did you play any role in developing them. Give credit to those who deserve it, dont try to screw competetors, and promote open source technologies. Ditch the patent Amazon. BTW, WTF with the US Patent office actually allowing this crap in the first place?

Andy Estes


March 1, 2000

Patently ridiculous. AMZN will no longer be getting the thousands of dollars per year we spend on O'Reilly books alone. Thank you Mr. Bezo's for showing your true colors. Sincerely, David V Duccini CEO BackPack Software, Inc.

David V. Duccini


March 1, 2000

Patenting cookies is like patenting bookmarks in a novel. They both are used to remember what you did last time.

Simon Coggins


March 1, 2000

Bad "MOVE" Amazon. YouÆre history as far as IÆm concerned. Mike Morris

Michael R. Morris


March 1, 2000

Olivia Given


March 1, 2000

Any benefits that shopping at Amazon provides me amount to squat when compared with what may happen to the internet marketplace if this patent is upheld. Until this lawsuit is dropped I will take my business elsewhere.

Ken Blake


March 1, 2000

Lost My Business

Ezekiel Hernandez


March 1, 2000


March 1, 2000

Karl Stevenson


March 1, 2000

Amazon's patents are ridiculous. This goes right up there with the patent somebody has on the XOR operation to place/remove graphics from a screen and RSA's patent on multiplication and division.

Lance E Sloan


March 1, 2000

As a frequent Amazon.com customer, I find this action on their part extremely offensive. I guess I'll be ordering from bn.com until Amazon changes its ways. Note to Bezos: fix this NOW!

David Hernandez


March 1, 2000

Irene Petrova


March 1, 2000


March 1, 2000

I have shopped at amazon.com previously, but will not visit the site again. I now explain to my colleagues that it is in their best interest not to use Amazon either, and most of them have joined in removing Amazon banners, and avoiding the site. This sort of abuse of intellectual property law cannot be tolerated.

Steve Bach


March 1, 2000

Sue Fomby


March 1, 2000

I'm happily taking my business to Fatbrain.com, and will not even consider dealing with Amazon anymore.

Gabe Newcomb


March 1, 2000

Dr. David C. Bossard


March 1, 2000

Barnes & Nobles, FatBrain, Readme.Doc, ... Here I come!

Guy Gervais


March 1, 2000

I will never buy anything from you again, Amazon.

Frank Green


March 1, 2000

William Cumming


March 1, 2000

William Cumming


March 1, 2000

Brian Cousins


March 1, 2000

Buh-bye

Padraic Renaghan


March 1, 2000

Vincient Valentine


March 1, 2000

It was a surprise to me that these patents were not only granted, but enforceable. I don't see any business advantage to you in giving the patents over to a public trust, but I'd ask you to do it. Good luck with your website.

Ion C. Freeman


March 1, 2000

Angela Urman


March 1, 2000

There are a lot of other bookstores on the net... I guess you don't need my business anymore.

Michael Wiegand


March 1, 2000

Neeta Bhakt


March 1, 2000

I have been pleased with the service and availability of products at Amazon.com in the past. However, your course of action in this matter will determine whether I continue to patronize your site.

Rick Smart


March 1, 2000

Jeff Bezos is an innovator and a visionary, and should be ashamed of prostituting himself to simple greed. We in the technical community know the facts behind this "invention", even if the Patent Office doesn't. Bezos knows it too. I exhort him to make his money the old way, by earning it.

Michael Grybush


March 1, 2000

I have been a frequent customer of Amazon in the past, and would like to continue being one. The one-click patent, and now the Affiliates patent, have forced me to reconsider my buying habits. I urge Amazon to mend their ways before others do the same.

Andrew Shebanow


March 1, 2000

I am ashamed and disgusted once again at the US Patent Office in issuing such a ridiculous patent, and at Amazon's executives and lawyers for taking advantage of what can only be called government ignorance (or stupidity?). I have never, and will certainly never now, shop Amazon.com or any subsidiary or affiliate of it. Amazon, do the right thing: drop your lawsuit of B&N and assign your patents to the Free Software Foundation. Give something back to the community that has treated you so well.

Mark Knox


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos is this the only way you can get your company out of the red (by stealing the ideas of others)? Thanks for all the taxpayers money you are going to waste with what will be another long Supreme Court Trial.


March 1, 2000

A bad idea...

John Guthrie


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos is this the only way you can get your company out of the red (by stealing the ideas of others)? Thanks for all the taxpayers money you are going to waste with what will be another long Supreme court trial.


March 1, 2000

I've been a customer, as you can see. And I've been known to "brag up" Amazon.com to friends and family. Barnes and Noble just got a new customer. I'll be back when you back off the patent things. eToys made a similar back off and I admire them for their integrity and continue to buy toys for my grandchildren from them. Be reasonable. Don't be greedy. Get some different advise.

Martin Power


March 1, 2000

Amanda Hugg


March 1, 2000

Turn from the Dark Side, young Jedi!

David Allen


March 1, 2000

Daniel S. Keen


March 1, 2000

You just lost another customer. Your disreguard for the free exchange of information is a blantant example of GREED! Without the freedom that is available on the internet your business would not exist.

Nestor Beach


March 1, 2000

I can not support this blatant abuse of the internet community that has provided you with your source of income! Shame on you!

Fred Govedich


March 1, 2000

Kenton R. Riley


March 1, 2000

The one-click patent is absurd and does nothing favorable for e-commerce. There are plenty of alternatives without these silly patents that we can turn to.

Henry W. Pinney


March 1, 2000

Such heavy-handed tactics as those employed by Amazon can only alienenate customers. May I suggest Powells.com an independent book seller based in Portland OR.

cOLLIN fLEMING


March 1, 2000

Amazon is a great company with a great future as long as it's management remembers that the web is about openness. It exists in it's present form simply because it is the quintessential free medium. Protectionists will kill their golden gooses in the same way that Apple lost the PC war by refusing to license Mac clones, and Unisys is about to lose the image war by forcing every user of GIFs to pay a royalty. Trying to nail-down innovation on something as big as the web is both futile and dangerous. When someone gets a good idea for the web everyone benefits. Where would Amazon be today if they hadn't used hundred of free and unpatented ideas to build their business ?

Simon Mahony


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos is this the only way you can get your company out of the red (by stealing the ideas of others)? Thanks for all the taxpayers money you are going to waste with what will be another long Supreme Court Trial. Well I guess Amazon.com can expect quite a few more quarters with record losses since no one will shop there anymore.

GWW


March 1, 2000

I use to recommend Amazon to friends and family but no more. I will stop using Amazon and ask my associates to do so as well.

Vichu Tanta-Nanta


March 1, 2000

Arun Mehra


March 1, 2000

I have been a software professional for many years, and have actively supported Amazon in recognition for their pushing the boundaries of E-commerce. I will now be supporting others, and not Amazon, since they are pushing the boundaries of the Web back into the stone age. Wise up! You're biting the hands that feed you!

Kevin Farlee


March 1, 2000

It is my understanding that a patent issued for a device that already has been in general use cannot be successfully defended. I remember reading a case about a patent that was issued for a new type of wheelbarrow handle - the patent statement was for "handle and also wheelbarrow". When the company receiving the patent attempted to enforce it against other wheelbarrow manufacturers on the grounds that they had a patent on the wheelbarrow itself, they lost, and the patent was ammended to specifically exclude the wheelbarrow. They may have the patent, but they will loose when they try to enforce it.

Ted Hajduk


March 1, 2000

Eric MONJOIN


March 1, 2000

After having heard about your (disgraceful) patent applications, I now take my custom elsewhere. My original choosing of Amazon as my preferred place to purchase books was based on your excellent reputation. However, your recent actions have greatly tarnished that reputation and I no longer recommend you to friends and collegues.

Lee Webb


March 1, 2000

Remember etoys.com. My money is going else where. It still surprises me that a company that is based on the web is stilling willing to try this shit. History is another html ready to be accessed by billions.

Leon Mills


March 1, 2000

Joshua Gatts


March 1, 2000

Chris Pugrud


March 1, 2000

Amozon really needs to quit that Nazi crap.

David Mann


March 1, 2000

To take advantage of openly used techonology by preventing others to use is beyond standard business practice. I object and will no longer purchase from Amazon.com

Paul Strange


March 1, 2000

I've bought a lot of books from your company but from now on I'll be clicking twice and getting them from someone else.

Jerry Russell


March 1, 2000

I will let everyone I know about this and will recommend them NOT to support amazon.com. goodbye amazon

Cody Hall


March 1, 2000

I have in the past been a very active user of Amazon (enough so that you, Amazon, sent me a Christmas present.) I have referred student sot Amazon in my capacity as an English teacher, and have placed mass orders for books for my school through Amazon. That will now all cease, and I for one will boycott Amazon, and encourage others to do so, until this absurd patenting is dropped.

Brian McCallister


March 1, 2000

Bert Hayes


March 1, 2000

Richard Platel


March 1, 2000

Do the right thing!

Kevin J. Sweeney


March 1, 2000

As a web administrator and programmer, I am ashamed of the actions of Amazon. Taking simple ideas and staking legal claim to them is about as sleezy an action that is possible in this industry outside of outright spamming. (Oh, I forgot, you have done that too.) It is even more shameful that you use open source software to maintain your business. Hypocracy at its finest! I have ordered a couple hundred dollars worth of books from Amazon. I spend a couple thousand a year on books alone. (My money. I order MUCH more for the company.) NONE of my money will be spent with Amazon. Furthermore, I will encourage my friends and business associates to not spend money with you. Those people I know who have associate programs with you, I will encourage to drop those programs. You need to change your behaviour before I will do any more business with you.

Alan Olsen


March 1, 2000

People like you and companies like your's SUCK the life out of everything good. Be careful the next time you go to court it may be to file bankruptcy. We can only hope.

Gerald Kline


March 1, 2000

Didier Claverie


March 1, 2000

I am equally appalled that Amazon (Jeff Bezos) should need to stoop to this level of business practice. We are owners of a small internet start-up and we spend our time convincing the general public that the Internet and E-commerce is the way to conduct business in the 21st century. If you continue on this path, you give us all a bad name and squash the possibility of further e-commerce developement. We need to share out technology for us as a whole to succeed in this new medium. Shame on you Jeff. I am a regular purchaser from Amazon. untill you recind your tactics,I will USE your site for information only and i will purchase elsewhere, even if it takes me five clicks!

Meg Ballinger


March 1, 2000

I do not belive that patenting web technologies is good for the marketplace or for the continuing development of new technologies. I purchase in excess of 񘘐 of books every year. Until Amazon releases the patents that have been filed including the one-click and affiliate patents, I will not purchase products via amazon inc. Respectfully, Aaron Bosley

Aaron Bosley


March 1, 2000

Non-obvious. Cookies were designed for exactly what said patent seeksld to control. Perhaps Netscape should really own the patent.

Jim Reovich


March 1, 2000

No one I talk to about web subjects will walk away without being suitably warned AWAY from Amazon.com and all it's affiliates. You have done a very greedy and stupid thing.

Justin Smith


March 1, 2000

How sad. Until now I was an avid supporter of Amazon.

Howard Cheng


March 1, 2000

Amazon - what goes around comes around. In the end your greed will backfire on you. I'm going to enjoy reading about your collapse when it does.

Anthony Griffiths


March 1, 2000

Aaron T Porter


March 1, 2000

Well done Amazon. I see that your long term business plan is working well. Not only are you famous for the lack of profit that you make, but now you are persuing a strategy of turning away more customers.

Aaron Smith


March 1, 2000

Your absurd "business process" patents are bitterly offensive to the free software community, and I, for one, will not do business with you until stop trying to enforce them.

Tim Fairbank


March 1, 2000

Andrew Lohmann


March 1, 2000

I can't believe how rediculous this "state saving" patent is. That kind of thing has been around since the version 3 web browsers. I have a strong feeling that if the USPO knew more about internet technology, you wouldn't be pulling the wool over their eyes. For SHAME!

Jonn Berg


March 1, 2000

eric augustyn


March 1, 2000

I can't believe how rediculous this "state saving" patent is. That kind of thing has been around since the version 3 web browsers. I have a strong feeling that if the USPO knew more about internet technology, you wouldn't be pulling the wool over their eyes. For SHAME!

Jonn Berg


March 1, 2000

Gary Mandau

majic93981


March 1, 2000

This is nuts! And I thought that Barnes & Noble were the corporate bad-guys...

Dave Graber


March 1, 2000

With one-click I will now register my intention to stop shopping at Amazon until they agree to only use patents as a defensive protection against other patent holders. Patents were originally intended to encourage innovation and are designed for a slower economy than we now have. Software patents create a mine-field for software developers than can only be effectively navigated by large corporations.

Nathan Wilson


March 1, 2000

Daniel Eron Schoenblum


March 1, 2000

The web is a big place, don't be greedy. We dont want another microsoft here.

Ross Mitchell


March 1, 2000

Chris Key


March 1, 2000

Every programmer hates (and fears) software patents, and so obvious ones are just a scandal.

Michele Beltrame


March 1, 2000

Doug Pierce


March 1, 2000

Silliness. I know where I'm NOT shopping anymore.

adam b


March 1, 2000

This kinda stuff is sickening. Stop using apache if openness is too much too ask.

Christian Lavoie


March 1, 2000

I love Amazon.com, but in light of recent patent events, I was considering taking my business elsewhere. This petition was the motivation I needed to solidify my decision. Until Amazon gives up on the 1-click patent (having it overturned in court does not count!), I will take my business elsewhere. Please reconsider soon!

Brian Moyle


March 1, 2000

David Ayres


March 1, 2000

Nicholas A Trandem


March 1, 2000

It should be obvious to anyone that this patent isn't going to stand. Give it up now and gain public approval. There are other places to purchase goods online, you know.

David Darnall


March 1, 2000

Andrew Guyton


March 1, 2000

Isn't it illegal to patent a phrase that does not include a distinctive name? Maybe if your patent was on Amazon (C) One-Click-Supereasy-Ordering you mignt have some validity. Otherwise, intellectual property so undistinctive as what you are attempting to patent should be regarded as illegal.

Daniel M. Nugent


March 1, 2000

James Underwood


March 1, 2000

You may have pulled the wool over the eyes of the judicial system, and, perhaps even the general public, but this gross exploitation of known and common technology, will never be forgotten among those who know better, and care about fostering a better internet, and a better world.

Katharine Osborne


March 1, 2000

I concur with Mr. O'Reilly on the Amazon.com patent issue. I will not be purchasing books from Mr. Bezos' company until this patent issue is addressed, and Amazon.com's directors at minimum agree not to use this "patented" technology in offensive court cases against competitors.

Scott Nemmers


March 1, 2000

Nice thing about the web: other retailers are only one click away. Amazon has lost my business. On the off chance that they manage to enforce this across the web, I'll gladly take the extra step to order elsewhere.

Scott Lores


March 1, 2000

Kyle Rode


March 1, 2000

Hallvor Engen


March 1, 2000

allen green


March 1, 2000

Chung-i Yeh


March 1, 2000

Amazon, get a Clue! Did you think no one would notice?

Karen Jones


March 1, 2000

I cancelled all of my outstanding orders at Amazon after finding out about the 1-click patent. The only thing worse than Amazon's pathetic patents is that the US Patent Office actually granted the patents.

Pete Popov


March 1, 2000

I will not buy from Amazon.com, possibly forever, as there are many other companies out there selling books at good prices (barnesandnoble, elgrande...). Good luck on your attempt to grab as much power as you can. BTW: Good luck when the market wises up and realizes your business model will never justify the current stock price. Adios!

Eric Andreasen


March 1, 2000

I think if I got a suggestion from Tim, arguably one of the most influential men in Information Systems and Technology, I would listen. Listen to the developers. You are hurting the environment and turning your back on the image of a pioneer. You're the 500 lb. gorilla already....why resort to these tactics. Stay fair or get off the field. Get commerce is done in the business realm, not the courts.

Joseph Fecarotta


March 1, 2000

I think if I got a suggestion from Tim, arguably one of the most influential men in Information Systems and Technology, I would listen. Listen to the developers. You are hurting the environment and turning your back on the image of a pioneer. You're the 500 lb. gorilla already....why resort to these tactics. Stay fair or get off the field. Great commerce is done in the business realm, not the courts. Do the Right Thing !

Joseph Fecarotta


March 1, 2000

Iain Proctor


March 1, 2000

I've used amazon.com many times before now. However, if they insist on stifling the use of the technological solutions that were well known before their creation of "One click shopping", I will have to find a different online store to frequent.

Rebecca Gray


March 1, 2000

Scott Castner


March 1, 2000

When these patents without substance are overturned, and I emphasis when - not if, you will have alienated an important group of people on the web and given your competitors a substantial boost of goodwill. Not very clever business logic is it.

Peter Enzerink


March 1, 2000

By choosing idiotic legal manueverings over customer service, you choose to not have me as a customer.

Steve Burnap


March 1, 2000

Mike Rolig


March 1, 2000

as if Amazon.com has not already imposed enough?!?!!??!??

Kimberly Westphall


March 1, 2000

Holly Wilper


March 1, 2000

Dennis Sosnoski


March 1, 2000

I urge you to reconsider the patent and strongly support all inclusions in O'Reilly's open letter to Bezos.

L eanne T


March 1, 2000

Cashan Stine


March 1, 2000

Shu Chow


March 1, 2000

All patents like these do is diminish the value of the internet as a viable platform for business, and prove that the US Patent Office is lax in its duty to verify that filed patents are truly original and non-trivial. Shame on you and all others who use flagrant patent abuses to gain an unfair advantage over legitimate competition. Colin Walsh Celsius Software

Colin Walsh


March 1, 2000

I took the opportunity to read some of the comments posted by those signing this letter - and I came away with the understanding that this problem will not go away quietly – nor will it be allowed to continue for long.. The people signing this letter frequent the O'Reilly web site - they are the ones openly embracing new technologies, the ones that their friends look to for advice on computers and the Internet. To Mr. Bezos I say, "You have joined yourself to the Internet, you have benefited greatly from the freedom and the openness. You cannot now force it to become something that it is not - you cannot bend it to serve your will alone." "If you are acting on the advice of attorneys then I caution you with the words of Shelley (Ozymandius) relating the remains of a statue of a tyrant of ancient times - "And on the pedestal these words appear: 'My name is Ozymandius, King of Kings: Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!' Nothing beside remains. Round the decay Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare The lone and level sands stretch far away."" It is time to mobilize the power of the Internet and the court of public opinion to demonstrate to Mr. Bezos what course he should take. I would propose that the word be spread - far and wide - that NO ORDERS be placed on amazon.com for 24 hours (midnight to midnight EST) on Wednesday, March 8th. The movement could be called "Dry up the Amazon". We could then await Mr Bezos's response. Regards

I am sparticus


March 1, 2000

Patents of this nature only hinder the advancement of technologies.

Mike Pennell


March 1, 2000

Sense make what it companies have does what patent companies when other done already?

Patrick Hargis


March 1, 2000

Dave Urbanski


March 1, 2000

This patent attempt is ridiculous on its face, but I must confess to some divided feelings about it. The argument that if Amazon somehow patents cookis, then I won't have to put up worth nearly so many cookies on my browser is rather tempting. more likely though, they'd just happily license the use to DoubleClick et al. and finally become profitable. But my own feelings aren't enough to justify letting this pass. Software patents are terrible to begin with. Non-inventors patenting technologies that are already in common use is unconscionable.

Rachel McGregor Rawlings


March 1, 2000

Reid Miller


March 1, 2000

I have been greatly impressed by Amazon's success in the field, and have been equally appalled by their sudden desire to patent the simplest of ideas. Shame on you, Amazon!

Michael E. Cohen


March 1, 2000

Philip M. Causey, CPA


March 1, 2000

Kevin Buhrer


March 1, 2000

My wife and I have already sent our letter of protest to Amazon.com explaining our objections to their frivolous patents, and also informing them that we WILL NOT SHOP AT AMAZON.COM until they drop these and other patents.

Howard W. Pepper, Jr.


March 1, 2000

Jordan Piel


March 1, 2000

Ray Arsenault


March 1, 2000

You need to immediately fire whoever suggested that you should file these ridiculous patents. You're only hurting yourself.

Jim Van Vorst


March 1, 2000

I certainly agree - I am amazed the patent office cannot see the obviousness of this invention. Sometimes the courts aren't the best place to deter this type of behavior. So I'll just start buying from bn.com - two clicks aren't that big of sacrifice to deter this type of behavior

Scott Muir


March 1, 2000

I agree with what the other guy said.

Gabe Heafitz


March 1, 2000

Randall Donald


March 1, 2000

Phillip E. Trewhella


March 1, 2000

To Mr. Bezos: Until your intentions with these patents become clear, I refuse to make any purchases from your company, and will be reccomending that friends and family do the same. If you begin charging royalties to other companies for using the technologies you have patented, by boycott will continue. Patenting commonplace technologies is not a good way to make friends, especially for a company (such as yours) that is already on unstable financial ground.

Neal Coffey


March 1, 2000

If amazon.com insists on their current course of action, I resolve to no longer purchase their goods, nor shall I invest in their company. I shall also desist in recommending amazon.com to friends and colleagues.

Stan Charbonneau


March 1, 2000

Charles Li


March 1, 2000

Jeff, If the Internet is truly to grow and continue to be this nation's innovative driving force, then we must stop frivolous lawsuits for unpatentable technology. Sincerely, Daniel Fernandez

Dan Fernandez


March 1, 2000

I thought that they had given up this silly quest, but apparently not. Let's try and have people behaving with at least some slight modicum of common sense! -//

Peter Norby


March 1, 2000

These amazon patents are plainly ridiculous. I'm not sure what to think of the government patent office in this case; granting a patent for something already used widely just seems stupid. I recently attended a presentation on legal issues of e-commerce and the attorney who presented thinks the whole idea that you can patent a process like this is a load of you know what. But the fact that the government is stupid doesn't free amazon from blame. The business model that they are following is outdated and uncalled for, and will only face increasing resistance as time goes on.

Adam Howard


March 1, 2000

The patent is just plain stupid. Everyone knows that! Why make a bad name for Amazon.

Jeremy


March 1, 2000

Greg Lehey


March 1, 2000

THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE AGAINST AMAZON.COM Amazon.com did the right thing. They let the world know that something original was designed and developed that makes them unique. O'Reilly and Associates is way off course here. In fact, I'd go as far as saying that this "protest" smells more of sour grapes than anything else. Grow up, this is business!

Robert G Spector


March 1, 2000

One more customer lost, I'm sorry to say.

Jerod Husvar


March 1, 2000

Why do some companies that become successful try to turn around and kick their most valuable clients in the nuts?? Amazon, I believe it is now time to wake up to yourself or risk losing the IT community clients.

Stuart Lindenmayer


March 1, 2000

Shame

Chris Liljenstolpe


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com is already one of the most well-known web sites on the Internet, along with Yahoo! and eBay. Why must Amazon make more profit by doing this incredulous action?

James Wang


March 1, 2000

Amazon won't get any more of my money until they begin to set a good example of e-commerce, not the horrid one they are now.

Seth Cohn


March 1, 2000

Hendrik Van Belleghem


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com offers a valuable and incredibly well done shopping experience on the web. However, this whole patent issue is nothing but bad news: bad PR, low likelihood of success, and, most importantly, alienating customers like myself. I have not used Amazon.com since the 1-Click ordering patent issue began and have since taken my business to other vendors such as Fatbrain.

Andrew Ho


March 1, 2000

David Härdeman


March 1, 2000

Edward Dooling


March 1, 2000

Jeff: Here's an idea. Think about something that you love and thought was wonderful that you now look at and say "those idiots really ruined this." Now go look in the mirror.

Van


March 1, 2000

I Just bought Bjarne Stroustrup's latest "The C++ programming language" on Amazon.com last week. That's it. off to BN.com untill this is resolved. Sory Jeff.

Andre Oughton


March 1, 2000

Here Here!!

B Shell


March 1, 2000

Amazon claiming credit for 1-click-ordering and an associates program makes me think that Al Gore works for the company. Their claims have the same ring as Al's that he invented the internet.

Darren Ellis


March 1, 2000

Patrik Metzmacher


March 1, 2000

Please reconsider, Amazon -- we all have looked up to you and admired your accomplishments -- but you should not limit the success of others, as you can only create a major backlash!

DeVaux McLeanq


March 1, 2000

Meredith Tupper


March 1, 2000

Steve Hodge


March 1, 2000

Mr. Bezos, I would like you to be aware of the fact that since your company has commenced its lawsuit against Barnes & Nobles, I have purchased well over Ū,000 in books. All of which has been spent at your competitors, like borders.com and bn.com. I have discouraged all of my family and friends from buying from Amazon as well. I will continue to exclusively support your competitors for as long as you keep this lawsuit going about this so-called invention (one might even say, obvious.) Thank you for your time, Eli Boaz

E. Boaz


March 1, 2000

MIchael Duffy


March 1, 2000

I think US patent law is probably to blame for the whole Amazon 1-click situation -- patents should be only on novel and unique things. Presumably if you can patent 1-click and affiliates programs, it would have been possible at some stage to patent being an OnLine bookstore -- I don't know why Amazon didn't think of that.

Douglas Roth


March 1, 2000

I have not bought a book from Amazon since the 'one-click' suite began. I will not buy another untill you stop enforcing this silly patent, even though Amazon was my first e-commerce experience.

G. Foyle


March 1, 2000

Luke Garner


March 1, 2000

I purchased 1300.00 worth of books last month alone from Amazon for our employees, we have bought on average 300-400.00 per month worth of textbooks from them over the past year. Good bye Amazon, hello BN! You have lost my business. Your BS has cost you about 5,000.00 per year. Now multiply that by the 20-30 people who I tell who are in the same business as me who buy the same abount from you. :-) Have a nice life.

Chris Jester


March 1, 2000

Ari Fogel


March 1, 2000

Ari Fogel


March 1, 2000

Ed Hatfield


March 1, 2000

Sheila Moyer


March 1, 2000

I have been a frequent Amazon.com customer, but I am in complete agreement with Tim O'Reilly on this issue. I strongly urge Amazon.com to stop penalizing competitors with Amazon's patents.

Don Jackson


March 1, 2000

David Fugate


March 1, 2000

I used to buy hundreds of dollars of books every year (I even received a mousepad and a cup from Amazon a while back). I will not be shopping at Amazon any longer, and I will recommend to friends and family that they avoid you too. Hello FatBrain/BookPool/Borders.com...

Brian Strand


March 1, 2000

I spend almost 񘘐 on buying books through Amazon. On principle, I feel compelled to not use the 1-click system till this matter is resolved. Its worth the extra click. Hello Barnes and Noble.

mustafa vahanvaty


March 1, 2000

Please withdraw the patent.

John-Gardner Pewthers


March 1, 2000

Corporate rule (AKA ravenous greed) is gutting democracy and now it's even attempting to suffocate innovation and strangle its own cherished sacred commerce cow. The only consolation here is that these venomous predators will, after they've killed all they can, eventually author their own destruction. If practices like these are allowed to go on the blame will lie wholly with the apathetic consumer. No-Click-Ordering will be my policy at Amazon.com.

Darren W. Clarke


March 1, 2000

Greed and power-grabbing looks just as unbecoming on amazon.com as it does on microsoft.

David E. jones


March 1, 2000

Scott Patterson


March 1, 2000

The best way to fight it is to boycott their site completely. It's utterly ridiculous to think such a thing could be patented.

Roger Swanson


March 1, 2000

I understand the need to use advantages to help your business. However, I consider it a sign of weakness and cowardliness that you feel the need to exploit the failures of our current patent system.

Don Garrett


March 1, 2000

Theft of “Intellectual Property” has been around for a long time, even longer than you have. Given your recent tactics, however, it doesn’t come as much of a surprise. No more merchandise from Amazon.com for me. Welcome to the dark side

Lane Perry


March 1, 2000

Why not make an open source alternative....

A. Torrey


March 1, 2000

I buy a goodly amount of books on Amazon every month, but this patent idea is one of the most inane cases I've ever heard. When I first read about it, I thought it was a joke. I guess according to this ideal, the first web server to use SSI could patent its use and sue others for implementing it. It's not just a bad idea, it's a dangerous one to the industry at large.

David Blake


March 1, 2000

Like many others, Amazon was my first online shopping experience, and I have bought there many times since. Until this matter is resolved and Amazon ceases trying to enforce the '1-click' patent, I will not shop there again. Amazon - do you wonder why your stock price has been in a steady decline since Christmas?

Ross Parker


March 1, 2000

Eric D Howard


March 1, 2000

...looks like the cluetrain just stopped in Seattle. I could be mistaken, but it seems to be filled with angry refugees. Hey folks. I had this silly notion that you wanted to form a relationship of community with me. Well, your pursuit of this patent is not consistent with the community to which I belong. Look out the window. Figure out what the crowd is angry about. Then fix it! You're welcome to rejoin us. We'd really like to have you back. ---v

Vincent Lowe


March 1, 2000

I enjoy ordering from Amazon and the service has been excellent. However, to patent a piece of code is like patenting 1+1=2. Drop this silliness and do not hamper the technical innovation that has led to your own success.

Paul Russell


March 1, 2000

Eh. The entire patent system is stupid. If it truely is an original idea, keep it to yourself and trusted others.

Callum Lerwick


March 1, 2000

olivier faurax


March 1, 2000

What Amazon has submitted for patent protection should not be deemed intellectual property. Give it up.

Jennifer Lee


March 1, 2000

Douglas Rushkoff has remarked that the lack of regulation has resulted in the internet turning into an electronic strip mall. I'm already not an amazon patron and as long as this patent is around I won't consider changing that status.

Patrick Niemeyer


March 1, 2000

Brandt Everett


March 1, 2000

Kevin Patton


March 1, 2000

Billy Constantine


March 1, 2000

This type of patens and the way US Patent Office is handling them is outrageous! Isn't there any way to legally challenge that?

Catalin Caranfil


March 1, 2000

gault


March 1, 2000

Devon Henderson


March 1, 2000

The Patent / Trademark office should not be assigning patents to such broad inventions especially with the amount of prior art. Amazon is essentially inviting litigation on the matter so that these patents are declared invalid. Hopefully once this occurs, the precedent will allow more software patents to be invalidated.

Barnaby James


March 1, 2000

Tiernan McGuigan


March 1, 2000

First off, how a company that has never made a profit can be such a highly valued stock; I'll never understand. Amazon.com will never have my business, as it has proven that lawyers are in charge and that it cares not for the medium that created it. My support for this boycott is 100% and I have been spreading the word from the day Amazon filed the patent!

D Mihm


March 1, 2000

Jeff Dykstra


March 1, 2000

TWinder


March 1, 2000

I am an Amazon.com customer who has not decided to join the boycott in the hope that Amazon management will give up on trying to patent prior art. If you persist, expect the end of my patronage. The prior art is there, and you will lose this case. Why persist?

Mel Nicholson


March 1, 2000

James Remsik Jr


March 1, 2000

Matthieu Avrillon


March 1, 2000

Bad move Amazon...stinks!

Vincent Lim


March 1, 2000

I always enjoyed ordering from Amazon due to their vast selection, however, if they are going to behave in such childish manner (hoarding all the toys in the sandbox) then I'm going to take all my business to Barnes & Noble.

James L. Haynes


March 1, 2000

I agree with the sentiments of the many others on this site- Amazon.com, stop this patent nonsense. The Internet giveth and it taketh away. I for one will not buy anything else from you while this nonsense continues. I have been waiting for the axe to fall in the proprietary data wars. I enjoyed the Internet while it was still a open place. This is the first shot across the bow of unarmed party boat that holds the folks who would get to your port. Everyone knows that this move is akin to biting the hand that feeds you. We cheered for you when you made history with your IPO and business. We all wish it was us. Time for some humility, however. I don't think to copyright the way I have said the previous statements, could I do this simply because the sentiment I write of here is echoed by nearly everyone who has written in this letter? Previously Expressed Sentiment- Copyright, Regis Chapman, 2000. Unauthorized use is prosecutable under U.S. Patent Law- U.S. Patent 90909090909090909090909090909 Doesn't that sound silly? Should I say Patently Silly (TM)?

Regis Chapman


March 1, 2000

i was one of the first users of amazon. i loved it, and i still love it. but i'm deeply disturbed by the patent on "one click." this is like a patent on a pencil, or a piece of paper. it's that obvious, and that outrageous, and it runs counter to what the Web democracy stands for. it had better stop, or i'll consider future buying from the very competitor (barnes and noble) that bezos just won the patent suit against.

d. purnell delly


March 1, 2000

Please withdraw the patent.

Pete Tremblay


March 1, 2000

Thomas Jones


March 1, 2000

I think it's pretty bad form when a company as large as this tries to grab hold of a universally used technique as it's own in order to make money. Give it up Amazon - you're going to lose in the end anyway, and all you'll do in the meantime is give yourselves a bad name.

Robet Hudson


March 1, 2000

Such mean mindedness from a source of information or have you forgotten we made you big because you are a bookshop. Drop it now or I'll never be back and I shall add you to my list of case studies of companies that miss the point for my students to ponder.

Mike Leah


March 1, 2000

I think it's pretty bad form when a company as large as this tries to grab hold of a universally used technique as it's own in order to make money. Give it up Amazon - you're going to lose in the end anyway, and all you'll do in the meantime is give yourselves a bad name.

Robet Hudson


March 1, 2000

Lars Albertsen


March 1, 2000

Todd Ellner


March 1, 2000

I'm from Iceland, and am an fan of Open Source, free speech, and the Internet -- All of which you have made a mockery of.

Henrý Þór Baldursson


March 1, 2000

I'm an Amazon customer, a web industry colleague and now, a patent abuse protester.

Chris Mitchell


March 1, 2000

I was just about to buy a stack of books from Amazon, but after this Microsoft-like cheap trick, I will patronize your competitors instead!

Jennifer A. Barry


March 1, 2000

Katie Gardner


March 1, 2000

Feel free to copyright breathing and eating! Clearly Amazon doesn't get the whole Internet thing. Sadly, I will no longer have Amazon as an alternative for on-line shopping.

Kent Strachan


March 1, 2000

Linda McMullin


March 1, 2000

troy whittington


March 1, 2000

Keith Steiger


March 1, 2000

Dave Walton


March 1, 2000

Michel Goudeseune


March 1, 2000

Michael Thacker


March 1, 2000

Looks like I'm an exclusive Bookpool.com customer now... clean it up Amazon, you have a good thing going... don't blow it on something this lame.

Daniel de Young


March 1, 2000

I did write programs which used cookies as database keys before 1997. People at patent office that reviewed and approved this patent are really dumb.

Ricardo Galli


March 1, 2000

I will never purchase anything from Amazon.com again if they don't back down on both of these absurd patents.

Jim Gurd


March 1, 2000

Gordon Christensen


March 1, 2000

Amazon.com has shown themselves to be spammers, and now traffickers in specious patents. I'll never buy a book from them again. Next stop, Amazon, to delete my account with them.

Randy Kaelber


March 1, 2000

They will lose my buisness untill this notion is dropped!!

Dwight Mitchell


March 1, 2000

How greedy, short-sighted and stupid!

Joel Schuman


March 1, 2000

I find it laughable that Amazon seems to think it has invented two of the most used and simplest ideas on the net... one-click and an affiliates program.

Many years ago I used to be a CDNow affiliate site. Since they only offered me music in return, I kept my eyes open for other ventures. Then there was VideoServe. I was an affiliate with them for a good long while. Why was I an affiliate with these two organizations and not Amazon? Because Amazon had no such affiliate program! I switched to Amazon when they finally started offer their affiliate program, but dropped it like the dickens when all the "circle" stuff started, and was very glad I had when the idiot patent stuff came out. I have been with Fatbrain since then and am glad I am. Randy Rathbun


March 1, 2000

As I've said many times before. The only way idiots like Amazon get the message is to hurt them where it hurts most, in the wallet. Stop buying from them!!!

Boris Kogan


March 1, 2000

I have been a regular customer at Amazon.

I intend to shop elsewhere until this patent is dropped. The internet is based on sharing of ideas and technology. Amazon benefits from those who pioneered, and now wants to call those gifts proprietary. That's ungracious and greedy.

Rachel McCracken


March 1, 2000

Kevin Vig


March 1st, 2000 4:59 PM
 
Steven Baker

March 1st, 2000 5:00 PM
 
L. Christopher Paul

March 1st, 2000 5:01 PM
 
Don't even try it...
 
winston haynes

March 1st, 2000 5:04 PM
 
Edwin Horneij

March 1st, 2000 5:05 PM
 
This would be funny if it wern't so incredibly stupid! What are they smoking over at the patent office?
 
peter thompson

March 1st, 2000 5:06 PM
 
It leads one to question your abilities when instead of competing with other businesses you spend your time trying to criple them with lawsuits.

What that says to me is that you are unable to do things BETTER than your competitors and now must resort to attacking them.

I've had nothing but good dealings with Amazon as a customer, I would like that relationship to continue, but not until this patent farce is concluded.
 
Mike Robinson

March 1st, 2000 5:07 PM
 
I'm sick of this shit.
 
Daniel Schuler

March 1st, 2000 5:07 PM
 
I wholeheartedly agree with this petition, and I have personally been boycotting Amazon since I noticed them SPAMMING for advertizement purposes, then there was the story about Amazon releasing private customer information to other companies, and now the misguided patent awards and lawsuits. I sure hope nobody is fooled by Amazon, and I'd like people to know that the only way to vote here is to vote with your wallet. Send your business and money elsewhere! www.bn.com is a great site, and is certainly getting my business, as well as any other e-commerce player that isn't out to hurt the technologies that we work so hard to create.
Eventually, Amazon, you will lose!
 
Jason Brittain

March 1st, 2000 5:08 PM
 
This patent is a good reason to follow RMS's advice and boycot Amazon.
 
Larry Colen

March 1st, 2000 5:08 PM
 
All this does is display Amazon.com's insecurity... not unlike Web sites that don't link to other Web sites lest people find others' Web site more useful and interesting.

If the patents for Amazon.com holds, I'll never buy anything from Amazon.com.
 
Pawan Vora

March 1st, 2000 5:08 PM
 
If you patent one click, what's next? Two clicks? Three clicks? Four clicks? Where does it end?

This is absurd. Amazon, in a world where you depend on people who live and work in the high tech industry, this is a stupid move.
 
Clifford Clinton

March 1st, 2000 5:08 PM
 
Keith Broere

March 1st, 2000 5:09 PM
 
As a high school graduate with Jeff Bezos and a LONG time Amazon customer, I'm disappointed that he continues to hold his ground on such a bad position.
 
Jay Jason Bartlett

March 1st, 2000 5:09 PM
 
Margaret L Ruwoldt

March 1st, 2000 5:09 PM
 
Stefan Hartsuiker

March 1st, 2000 5:10 PM
 
Trent Bartlem

March 1st, 2000 5:11 PM
 
Matthew Picioccio

March 1st, 2000 5:11 PM
 
Buck Naked

March 1st, 2000 5:11 PM
 
Jeff, I'm gonna whip your ass next time you come home.
 
Mrs. Bezos

March 1st, 2000 5:13 PM
 
Dustin Boyle

March 1st, 2000 5:13 PM
 
David Purdue

March 1st, 2000 5:14 PM
 
I'm glad I shop at chapters.ca...
 
Kyle Vanditmars

March 1st, 2000 5:15 PM
 
George Renner

March 1st, 2000 5:16 PM
 
Brian Teague

March 1st, 2000 5:16 PM
 
As a Canadian, this is the final straw that convinced me to shop exclusively at Chapters.ca for all my books from now on.
 
Stephen Clarke

March 1st, 2000 5:16 PM
 
Dave Roberts

March 1st, 2000 5:17 PM
 
Dear Amazon,

Keep up the good work! You have a right to protect the inventions that you pioneered. This country was based on the American Dream, where inventiveness should be rewarded, not punished.

Most left-wing thinking people want those who do the work to just give everything to those who don't.

I support your patent efforts and will increase my purchases from your site. Right on!!
 
Dan

March 1st, 2000 5:19 PM
 
This is the greatest idea since the beginning of the "Information Super-highway"
I'm going to make millions out of this.
All of you people replying are dope-heads.
Oopss... look at that, I just made more money right now.
 
Jeff Bezos

March 1st, 2000 5:19 PM
 
Why the Patent Office doesn't have an oversight committee for something as important as a patent, I'll never know. Amazon joins a long list of undistinguished opportunists who take advantage of the lack of expertise and organization at the TPO, and then clog the courts with frivolous lawsuits.
 
Mary Stewart

March 1st, 2000 5:20 PM
 
Harley Pierce

March 1st, 2000 5:20 PM
 
amazon.com are disgraceful.
 
Nick Rawlings

March 1st, 2000 5:21 PM
 
David Wixom

March 1st, 2000 5:21 PM
 
Ken Bradshaw

March 1st, 2000 5:22 PM
 
It's a pretty stupid thing to say you "invented."

Monopolistic practices, and those business practices that are dependent on the ignorance of the customer base, a' la Microsoft and now this, are infuriating and heinous.

Go forth and innovate, but don't claim that you invented the internet. We all know Al Gore did that before you. ;-D

 
Michael Rousseau

March 1st, 2000 5:22 PM
 
Lawrence Chen

March 1st, 2000 5:23 PM
 
I agree that patents should be taken on original techniques or service and not for existing ones
 
marc hervais

March 1st, 2000 5:23 PM
 
This is not innovation.
 
Adam Rybicki

March 1st, 2000 5:23 PM
 
I have been a loyal customer to amazon. I even purchased my recent Tablesaw ($750) from Amazon.

As a direct result of Amazon.com's business decisions, I am truly looking elsewhere on the Internet for my books, woodworking, and music purchses.

I am sorry to see a business, expecisally Amazon make a crazy "patent" move on an item.

Sorry,
Ron Zanardo
 
Ron V. Zanardo

March 1st, 2000 5:24 PM
 
The patent office obviously dosen't know what it is doeing in regards to software patents. I my opinion, software patents should never have been issued for anyone from the beginning.
 
Kevin Kaas

March 1st, 2000 5:27 PM
 
Vasilis Vassalos

March 1st, 2000 5:28 PM
 
I sent a letter directly to Amazon on this subject before and got a form letter in response. Hopefully together in this we our voices will be heard.
 
William Baxter III

March 1st, 2000 5:28 PM
 
What an absurd patent. What's next -- a patent on the "shopping cart"?
 
Howard Fernald

March 1st, 2000 5:29 PM
 
I love their 1-Click technology and I am even an affiliate of theirs for my Web site (http://www.macchat.com) but these seem like obvious ideas that not one company should hold a patent on it.
 
Victor Rhee

March 1st, 2000 5:30 PM
 
James Mulford

March 1st, 2000 5:30 PM
 
this is going to be remembered as the first of such nonsense patent issues unless *we*, as the internet community, stand up and fight. i have no issues with legitimate patents, but to patent a concept so basic is, well, patently absurd. if you want to patent the implementation, fine, but not a concept as broad as keeping the credit and shipping info in a database and using it the next time someone wants to check out. that's just a tad generic.

it's really an insult to the intelligence of the entire community.
 
tom moore

March 1st, 2000 5:31 PM
 
Mr Bezos,
If you survey your database, you'll find that I have ordered many books from your site. Not anymore. Blocking innovation on the Internet with aggressive tactics like this will only put you in the camp of doomed players like Mickeysoft who just don't get it.
 
Greg Rundlett

March 1st, 2000 5:31 PM
 
This patent is a disgrace to the Patent Office, and to Amazon.com, who is spitting in the face of all the open-systems developers that have made their success possible. What a foolish move!
 
Dave Trowbridge

March 1st, 2000 5:34 PM
 
Your tactics suck.
 
Joe Brandt

March 1st, 2000 5:34 PM
 
Dear amazon
I have been buying a number of books from you and found it very useful and worthwhile until even a few days ago.
Yet I certainly have to stop buying from you unless you ensure the freedom of the internet, and stop this very american narrowmindedness.
Even thought your government can seduce ours, I will not stand by while you misuse some stupid rules trying to quake our human rights of freedom of speech and communication.
Christian
Denmark
 
Christian Ræder Clausen

March 1st, 2000 5:35 PM
 
Amazon has joined my boycott list as well.

 
Merell L. Matlock, Jr.

March 1st, 2000 5:36 PM
 
Consider alternatives.
 
jeff jack

March 1st, 2000 5:37 PM
 
And now with this single click I inform you that you won't see any of my money.
 
Fran Sabolich

March 1st, 2000 5:37 PM
 
How much more pathetic and old-school can one company get? My company is not nearly as big as Amazon and we would NEVER stoop to this level. What kind of two-bit operation is this? I can't believe I actually trusted to buy good books from a company that would do something so incredibly stupid.
 
Simba Canuso

March 1st, 2000 5:37 PM
 
Just goes to show business corrupts that which is free and good.
 
Chris Foster

March 1st, 2000 5:37 PM
 
patents such as this are most likened to killing the golden goose. Surely you have a book about that somewhere.
 
Mark Wollschlager

March 1st, 2000 5:37 PM
 
This is even more asinine than Al Gore inventing the internet and discovering Love Canal. I wonder if the wheel has been patented yet?...
 
William Arnold

March 1st, 2000 5:38 PM
 
C'mon Jeff. Or should I call you Bill.
 
Joel Coppin

March 1st, 2000 5:39 PM
 
Steve Freitas

March 1st, 2000 5:40 PM
 
---I can't believe you would even consider one-click purchases unique enough to patent....
 
David Starr

March 1st, 2000 5:41 PM
 
Paul Payne

March 1st, 2000 5:41 PM
 
I agree with this petition wholeheartedly. Furthermore, I'm sending the email below to my friends:

==============================================
Hi Friends,

As you may or may not be aware, Amazon.com has patented a "technology invention" called 1-Click purchasing. Essentially this encapsulates the current state of e-commerce, technically based on cookies and nothing new. As you may have figured out by now, this really does not warrant a patent to be issued. I invite you to read some of the facts and opinions on this matter:

Patent detail on IBM patent server: http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US05960411__
Tim O'Reilly's column on this matter: http://www.oreilly.com/ask_tim/
Richard M. Stallman's view: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazon.html

For those of you are not from a computing background, Tim O'Reilly publishes some of the most popular and useful computing references. Richard M. Stallman (RMS) has been the prime driver behind the GNU project which has been producing essential, "free software" (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html). Just ask any of your "technical, computing" friends.

There's no doubt that I hold high regards to both Tim and RMS's opinions and I agree with both that this is a BAD IDEA(tm) (as oppose to my CUNNING PLAN(tm)). I hope you, after reading the above links and sublinks, would agree too.

I have never wrote a "chain-mail" like this - but I feel this has gone too far and it's time I do something that will, hopefully, make a difference. And I believe you can too. It's not hard - you can do any or all of the following:

* Sign up the petition on the O'Reilly site at: http://perl.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/asktim_comments.form?articleid=amazon_patent

* boycott Amazon.com as RMS suggested

Furthermore, if you feel this is a worthwhile cause, you can raise the public's awareness on this subject by letting your friends know. Not necessary forwarding this email to everyone on your address book, but by mentioning it to you colleagues, mum & dad, neighbours. Again, it's not hard.

Thank you for reading this.


David Hsu
 
David Hsu

March 1st, 2000 5:41 PM
 
I can't believe my friend works for you guys.. in the words of Samir Naeynanaja "This is horrible"
 
Paul Sliwowicz

March 1st, 2000 5:43 PM
 
i was never a big amazon.com fan, never utilized it personally. however i have given it as an option to many people who were looking for books. that will no longer be the case. their ego has gotten the better of them. from now on whomever i give a list of e-commerce sites to seek out something, amazon will be absent from the list. it is reprehensible for them to try to reap the rewards for something that is so widely used, and the basis for so many peoples livelyhoods. 2 thumbs down to amazon.com.
 
ali davis

March 1st, 2000 5:43 PM
 
The fulfillment of the promise of the Internet as a social phenomenon is the democratization of opportunity. And all over the world people of good will -- Albert Einstein's 'great spirits' -- are working HARD to hasten this fulfillment.

Amazon, unfortunately, is presently contributing less than its best.

Hopefully this petition will help all parties concerned.

Thanks O'Reilly :^)
 
Frank Ruscica

March 1st, 2000 5:43 PM
 
Let's get rid of these ridiculous, "patently" obvious patents. Where is the technical adjudication at the patent office?

 
Steve Bishop

March 1st, 2000 5:45 PM
 
Ramki Balasubramanian

March 1st, 2000 5:46 PM
 
Patents are for protecting some new R&D IP, not for driving competitors out of business. It's a real shame Amazon choose to abuse the current poor state of the US patent office because they really did champion e-commerce. Now they'll be out out business themselves as everyone buys from Barnes & Noble or Fatbrain or another store instead.
 
Matthew Hawkins

March 1st, 2000 5:46 PM
 
***NEWS-FLASH***
You cannot patent obvious things.
Perhaps you can get around the legal definition and get this 'one-click-shopping' crap past the patent office, but within the big picture, it (along with most of your other patents) is still a move intended to hurt your competitors and make you lots and lots of money.
Unfortunetly for you, money cannot buy you happiness, and hopefuly, what you have sowed will be what you reap. Save me a spot by the lake of fire.
 
Michael R. Johnson

March 1st, 2000 5:47 PM
 
From Time Magazine's Man of the Year to the Internet's Bozo of the Millenium.
 
M D McCallum

March 1st, 2000 5:47 PM
 
Mr. Bezos,
You appear to be getting some bad
advice from your lawyers on this issue. I
submit that your technical staff may be a
better source of information on this particular
patent. Until Amazon chooses to abandon
such frivolous pursuits, I will not engage
in any business practices with your company.

Sincerely,
Chris Neustrup
 
Chris Neustrup

March 1st, 2000 5:48 PM
 
Ridiculous!
 
Willie Wheeler

March 1st, 2000 5:48 PM
 
Thank you Tim for a great and "to-the-point" letter. I wholeheartedly agree!!
 
Aasim Syed

March 1st, 2000 5:48 PM
 
Matthew Behunin

March 1st, 2000 5:49 PM
 
Roland Garner

March 1st, 2000 5:49 PM
 
This is a clear abuse of the patent system.

Today, for the first time, I went to bn.com to buy a couple of books.
 
Michael Gordon

March 1st, 2000 5:49 PM
 
William G. Castagne

March 1st, 2000 5:50 PM
 
Rick Floyd

March 1st, 2000 5:51 PM
 
This is the most ludicrous thing I have ever heard. How can anyone possibly patent the use of cookies or even an implementation that makes use of them. Amazon.com has simply pulled one over on the U.S. Patents office. It has certainly changed my opinion of them and as a consumer who does an increasing amount of shopping on line I can assure them that I will not be that they will not be seing any of my business. Please stop these tactics it will hurt all of us in the long run.
 
Alan Alfonso

March 1st, 2000 5:51 PM
 
Nils Paulsson

March 1st, 2000 5:51 PM
 
Jeremy Kelley

March 1st, 2000 5:56 PM
 
I am a profesional photographer and a teacher in the local community college. I consider Amazon.com's abuse of the patent system to be unprofessional and detrimental to future technical and commercial development of the Web. I will not purchase from Amazon.com and I will urge my professional and educational collegues to direct their book purchases to another source. Further, I will recommend to my students, and urge my educational collegues to recommend to their students, alternative book sources other than Amazon.com.
 
Ken Marine

March 1st, 2000 5:56 PM
 
Your patent attempt is contemptable!

For the price of filling out an industry survey, I was offered a $50 gift certificate to Amazon which I refused. A friend sent me an Amazon gift book and I've asked they not use you again.

Finally, your attempt to squash Amazon Online (a lesbian media outlet) because they have Amazon in their name, even though they were well established online BEFORE you, shows you are an enemy to technology and people. Good thing offices such as mine have stores like O'Reilly to buy all their books from.

Maybe Amazon's goal is to burn financially to the ground and rise again as a mini-mart.
 
Andy Dalrymple

March 1st, 2000 5:57 PM
 
I have ordered from amazon.com for awhile now. However after reading about this rediculous patent issue, I have decided that I will not purchase from amazon.com in the future.

 
David Birney

March 1st, 2000 5:57 PM
 
Tim's comment, "pissing the well," leaves nothing more to be said.
 
Chris Ferebee

March 1st, 2000 5:57 PM
 
Jeremy Ehmke

March 1st, 2000 5:58 PM
 
I know of no other way to put it: I am appalled! I recently started
using amazon.com, notably in obtaining two books I probably
could not have secured locally, and was looking forward to
utilizing their services to a much greater extent in the future.
Fortunately I found out in time just what a bunch of (insert
approriate description here) were running the business. I'm
afraid I must say that, regardless of the outcome of this issue
I will never again use their site. This was a permanent alienation.
 
Walter Brameld

March 1st, 2000 5:59 PM
 
Valerie Cox

March 1st, 2000 5:59 PM
 
Martin Mendelson, MD, PhD

March 1st, 2000 6:00 PM
 
George Lewis

March 1st, 2000 6:01 PM
 
My only question is why?? Why would one of (if not THE) top booksellers on the web think they have to pull a stunt like this in order to 'protect their business.' It's quite logical that large chain bookstores around the US and around the world would start similar operations online, but Amazon.com was the first, and the only one I've ever used, and I know many other poeple whose online book/music buying is done -only- from Amazon.com. Why, with such a large and loyal customer base, must they scramble to find such petty things to blast their competitors with? As stated in one of the signatures, it's a weapon, and that's not the way the patent system was meant to be used. Protect, not inflict. And that's not even counting the fact that the technology was around before Amazon.com was.
 
Steve Pittman

March 1st, 2000 6:03 PM
 
You will win more customers by allowing people to be impressed by what you do than you will be trying to keep all others out of the market.
 
Jared Carr

March 1st, 2000 6:04 PM
 
Ali Lemer

March 1st, 2000 6:05 PM
 
Skip Newell

March 1st, 2000 6:05 PM
 
Eric Borduas

March 1st, 2000 6:05 PM
 
Dear Mr. Bezos, I am sorry that the individuals listed above have not read, or simply do not understand the patents. I am sorry that the above do not understand the difference between a cookie that identifies the user and the point-of-purchase method actually described in the patent. I am sorry that the above do not understand the difference between a referral program and the Amazon.com Affiliates program. In other words, on behalf of the entire internet community, please don't allow these misguided, misinformed few to dissuade you from your work. The majority of us are pleased with Amazon.com, and will continue to support your efforts with our wallets.

Thank you,
Joshua Steinberg
 
Joshua Steinberg

March 1st, 2000 6:06 PM
 
Until you reverse your Microsoft-like tendencies, I will do everything in my power to avoid doing business with you and will encourage others to do the same.
 
Bill Mayo

March 1st, 2000 6:06 PM
 
I don't know which is worse -- the fact that Amazon applied for patents for common technology in the first place, the fact that they were granted, or the fact that Amazon now uses them to bludgeon other businesses. One thing I do know -- neither I nor any of my associates or employees will buy from or recommend Amazon until their policies are reversed.
 
Robert Kesterson

March 1st, 2000 6:07 PM
 
I have stopped ordering anything from Amazon
for my company, and will not use them again
should they persist in following this 'dark'
path they have chosen.

They are currently second in line to the MPAA
on my personal negative hit list...

8^(
 
Larry Marsden

March 1st, 2000 6:07 PM
 
Amazon have helped me (living in Japan) so much to get the books and other fascinating materials, but I will continue to boycot until Amazon change the way of thinking and acting.
 
Yasuhito Mitsuma

March 1st, 2000 6:07 PM
 
Stan Swaren

March 1st, 2000 6:07 PM
 
In my book you just went from Bezos to Bozos.
"Time" should have named you "MANure OF THE YEAR" cause this is really s****y.
 
John Cantu

March 1st, 2000 6:08 PM
 
I will refuse to purchase from Amazon until they review their business and legal practices, but not before I make a point to alert all of my friends and co-workers.
 
Andrew Maguhn

March 1st, 2000 6:09 PM
 
Benji Congdon

March 1st, 2000 6:09 PM
 
A patent on the use of cookies... incredi-bull!
 
Roydon Hughes

March 1st, 2000 6:10 PM
 
Mr. Bezos, can you type "bn.com" or "fatbrain.com"? I can. And do.
 
Ron Wilhoite

March 1st, 2000 6:10 PM
 
Come on Amazon, I expected better out of you!!!!! From now on, my music will come from Tower, CDNow, and half.com. Books will be from Tower also. No more money for you until you get this patent revoked!
 
Andrew Stern

March 1st, 2000 6:10 PM
 
Duncan Bayne

March 1st, 2000 6:10 PM
 
This signing in protest of Amazon's actions is only one of my protests attempts. 1. I've cancelled my "affiliates" program with Amazon. I don't need that kind of money. 2. I've cancelled my customer account, for the same reason. 3. I've written Amazon informing them exactly why I've taken this route.
 
Ralph Harwig

March 1st, 2000 6:12 PM
 
Rich Levine

March 1st, 2000 6:13 PM
 
This is truly chilling in effect. What if the people at Disney decided to start patenting multiplane (layer) animation. Then virtually all digital art would be locked by one company. This type of approach to business is detrimental to all. and, if left unchecked, will result in the type of fragmentation on the web that WILL kill it as it exists today. Please, release these patent claims immediately. Before they encourage others to follow a similar detrimental course.
 
Pat Fallis

March 1st, 2000 6:14 PM
 
Mark Ovens

March 1st, 2000 6:14 PM
 
Andrew Frederiksen

March 1st, 2000 6:15 PM
 
You have lost my business for a long time.
 
Erik Severinghaus

March 1st, 2000 6:15 PM
 
Adrian Wong

March 1st, 2000 6:16 PM
 
Many of the patents in question should never have been granted, and goes on to show glaring loopholes in the patent granting process. Trying to enforce them will be counter-productive to Amazon in the long run. Certainly they have lost one customer.
 
S. Ghosal

March 1st, 2000 6:17 PM
 
Amazon.com should consider turning a profit before making such a ridiculous move. Nice business you lost, Bezos.
 
Jake Morley

March 1st, 2000 6:18 PM
 
Jim Hill

March 1st, 2000 6:18 PM
 
Mr Bezos, the community has spoken. Will you listen, or is the Man of the Year too proud to hear the voices of those who would be his customers?
 
Jessica Sheffield

March 1st, 2000 6:19 PM
 
I've never bought from Amazon.com, and now I guess I won't.
 
Glen Canaday

March 1st, 2000 6:20 PM
 
You've lost several hundred dollars of my business
so far, and the meter's still ticking. I also go
out of my way to discourage everybody I can from
buying from Amazon.com.

I wonder how big the crater will be that is left
behind by Amazon.com's implosion???
 
Benjamin Ellsworth

March 1st, 2000 6:21 PM
 
Var

March 1st, 2000 6:22 PM
 
karl sung

March 1st, 2000 6:23 PM
 
Amazon.com should patent their whole site and then keep it a BIG secret. Wouldn't that? Well, till the time Amazon stops abusing the patents, I am not going to buy *anything* from them.
 
Varun Suri

March 1st, 2000 6:28 PM
 
Brian Bankler

March 1st, 2000 6:29 PM
 
Agreeing with Tim's letter, and looking at alternate vendors. I've been a fairly big customer of yours and this patent nonsense, as well as other developments, have left me feeling such tactics are blatantly anti-competitive and leave me vulnerable if I knowingly continue purchasing from a vendor who appears to be erecting artificially high entry barriers to future small-scale net merchants. While I understand that Amazon may be in desperate need to show a profit soon, enforcing a patent for something akin to "inventing" coupons strikes me as a desperate move.
 
Brett Underberg-Davis

March 1st, 2000 6:31 PM
 
Scott Parish

March 1st, 2000 6:31 PM
 
This patent office is a real loser. You just can't teach them commen sense...
 
Bob Sidla

March 1st, 2000 6:31 PM
 
Amazon's patents are not only unfair, but also prohibit fair competition on the Internet and create severe obstacles for entry to the marketplace. The web was designed as a medium for large-scale innovation and needs to be unrestricted. Your existing and pending patents not only violate the concept on the Internet but are simply absurd and need to be eliminated.
 
Charles Michael

March 1st, 2000 6:32 PM
 
Amazon's tactics are both needless and insulting to their customer and the Internet community, and until they stop these practices they have lost my business.
 
Ryan Roos

March 1st, 2000 6:33 PM
 
Amazon! Shame on you. Have you never heard of fair business practises? There are a lot of us internet Jaguars in your Amazon Jungle getting ready to eat you for lunch.
 
Marge Edinger

March 1st, 2000 6:33 PM
 
Bye Amazon! Not buy! Not good bye! Just So long!
 
Scott Haller

March 1st, 2000 6:35 PM
 
Jerry Albro

March 1st, 2000 6:36 PM
 
Soren Harward

March 1st, 2000 6:36 PM
 
I prefer B&N, Tower and Fatbrain anyway...
 
Bill Burton

March 1st, 2000 6:36 PM
 
May the silicon god format your hard drive
 
Brad Clarke

March 1st, 2000 6:36 PM
 

 
Sridhar Venkatesh

March 1st, 2000 6:37 PM
 
At this point I am ashamed of the support and patronage I have given and recommended to Amazon.com.
The funny thing is that the service provided makes you want to keep doing your shopping with Amazon.com. It's a shame that in such a short time you have thrown away so many of the customers that you worked so hard to service.
Amazon.com was one of the great points of pride for the entire Internet community. I believe that you should open your eyes and see that the accomplishments that you have made are not yours alone but the shared accomplishments and ideas of developers the world over.
However you are one of the only ones trying to take all the credit and push everyone else out...
If you do decide to maintain these patents, I hope that you are ready to face the world alone with a much reduced customer base... I'm sure that your competitors appreciate all the business you've given them with this oh so brilliant move.
 
Shawn

March 1st, 2000 6:38 PM
 
Unbelievable. I am boycotting now.
 
Nicholas Morris

March 1st, 2000 6:40 PM
 
I wholeheartedly agree and encourage others to also boycott amazon.com until they decide to lighten up.
What will they try to patent next? The browser-based book buying idea?
 
Michael Brook

March 1st, 2000 6:41 PM
 
Daniel Stephens

March 1st, 2000 6:42 PM
 
Victor Grey

March 1st, 2000 6:42 PM
 
The Patent office seems to have gone nuts. This kind of patent granting may suggest some backroom dealings re. the award. The internet is severely constrained and damaged by such patent awards.
 
N Paterson

March 1st, 2000 6:42 PM
 
I concur with Tim in the points made in his "Ask Tim" article. Particularly in that a lot of your customers are hard-core computer geeks. Everyone in the office who views amazon.com, does so to buy computer-oriented books. Not all, but a majority, are aware of yuor transgressions, and will be signing this petition soon. I look forward to your public response.

Signed,

Rob Nelson
ronelson@vt.edu
 
Rob Nelson

March 1st, 2000 6:43 PM
 
Alexandre Rochette
 
Alexandre Rochette

March 1st, 2000 6:44 PM
 
I really think this is kind of low. I mean honestly, copyright your particular method and make money that way, sure, but it's not even like Amazon did this first, plenty of other smaller internet businesses had it well before Amazon spents 1000's of hours developing this. Their words not mine. this is sick, and should stop.
 
Damian Monogue

March 1st, 2000 6:45 PM
 
Why not patent double clicking while they are at
it. I will have second thoughts before release of
anything usefull on the net.

Sincerely
Joseph Turner
 
Joseph Turner

March 1st, 2000 6:45 PM
 
Barry M Strain

March 1st, 2000 6:46 PM
 
What is Jeff going to patent next? Hyperlinks? Give it a rest Bezos and dont kill the goose with the golden egg.
 
sam shank

March 1st, 2000 6:47 PM
 
Is Amazon so far in the red to have to re-coup losses by suing for patent infringement?
C'mon Amazon, embrace the Source.
Use the Source, Jeff, use the source...

Alpha
 
Alpha Lau

March 1st, 2000 6:48 PM
 
Michael Bruckheimer

March 1st, 2000 6:48 PM
 
And I thought that patenting small stretches of DNA sequence was ridiculous. Maybe you wanted to give your lawyers something to do, but you aren't actually going to enforce this patent? I mean, come on, what a waste of time. Was this your decision Mr. Bezos, man o' the year?
 
Phil Olsen

March 1st, 2000 6:49 PM
 
Aw. Gee whiz, fellas. Why don't you just run home and tell Mommie you can't take the competition. Better yet, go tell Barnes and Noble's Mommie that they don't play fair.

Bottom line. Everyone in business goofs at one time or another. But when you destroy your own integrity you've dug your own grave. I hate cheating and those who profit by it.
 
Craig Edinger

March 1st, 2000 6:50 PM
 
Chris W. Johnson

March 1st, 2000 6:50 PM
 
Amazon's actions are an abuse of the U.S. intellectual property legal system, stifling innovation and competition.
 
David A. Smith

March 1st, 2000 6:53 PM
 
Andrew Watson

March 1st, 2000 6:53 PM
 
I have been a buyer of books from Amazon almost from the start. I typically make at least two purchases a month from Amazon and I really like the one-click feature. But I will start shopping at the other book stores if Amazone tries to enforce either the one-clock or the assiciate patent.
 
Gary L Scott

March 1st, 2000 6:54 PM
 
What can I say that has not already been said? Your tactics are pathetic and the U.S. Patent office is clearly not capable of handling their task.

Not I, nor my family, nor my company will purchase from you until you and your business tactics have climbed out of the sewer.

 
Ian Watson

March 1st, 2000 6:54 PM
 
I will boycott a business which would try to patent such obvious and necessary technology. Good Grief!
 
Shirley Childers

March 1st, 2000 6:54 PM
 
Amazon's patents on e-commerce technology are the equivalent of someone in the auto industry receiving a patent on the wheel.
 
Matt Collins

March 1st, 2000 6:55 PM
 
Arthur L. Ray

March 1st, 2000 6:56 PM
 
Greg Husarik

March 1st, 2000 6:56 PM
 
I would be interested to hear Daimler-Chrysler's take on the one-button novelty, since they introduced the "one-button-click" shift concept in 1955 Chrysler products, a few years after several companies pioneered the "one-button-click" radio tuner.

(You can tell me confidentially: One-button-click urinals have been around for years - isn't that where you got the idea?)

And have I violated your patent by using One CLick to delete your bookmark?

BTW, has Brazil ceded rights to the "Amazon" name yet?

The world wants to know...
 
Rusty Keeney

March 1st, 2000 6:59 PM
 
Jim Puls

March 1st, 2000 7:00 PM
 
An abuse of the term "Intellectual Property".
 
George D. Barnes

March 1st, 2000 7:01 PM
 
This whole patent thing makes me sick. ll stick to chapters / BN.
 
Jason Keirstead

March 1st, 2000 7:01 PM
 
jonathan mcclain

March 1st, 2000 7:01 PM
 
Douglas Rohrer

March 1st, 2000 7:02 PM
 
Jason Moore

March 1st, 2000 7:03 PM
 
Well Amazon, hope you enjoy your patent, cause I'm finding other places to shop now.
 
William A. Barnhill

March 1st, 2000 7:04 PM
 
Michael Booth

March 1st, 2000 7:06 PM
 
Dan Haygood

March 1st, 2000 7:07 PM
 
I agree with the sentiments expressed by Mr. O'Reilly wholeheartedly. When I was in college, I supported Amazon with the few books I purchased, because I wanted to further the cause of an excellent bookstore available to everyone on the internet. Today, when I buy many more books than I did then, I feel differently, because of these heavy-handed tactics to enforce a patent that should
never have been allowed to be pushed through, and as
such have not spent any of my book money at Amazon
for the past 6 months, and do not intend to in the
future, nor will I purchase anything else from
Amazon.
 
Justin C. Ferguson

March 1st, 2000 7:07 PM
 
Quit the Shenanigans, Jeff, or you can kiss my $250 a year in sales good bye.
 
Todd Tracey

March 1st, 2000 7:10 PM
 
Really Jeff, abusing antiquated intellectual property laws as a means of protecting extra-normal profits... Totally unacceptable.
 
Eric Lerner

March 1st, 2000 7:10 PM
 
Absolutely ridiculous!
 
Dirk Dawson

March 1st, 2000 7:11 PM
 
Nancy Ivy

March 1st, 2000 7:11 PM
 
I am a faithful customer who finds your intentions on this patent ridiculous, and it appears the rest of the Internet -community- agrees.
 
Stacey Tollackson

March 1st, 2000 7:12 PM
 
I have emailed Jeff Bezos personally. I have told him very respectfully that I will no longer purchase products and/or services from Amazon until such time as they publish a statement revoking this patent and any other patents that are not in the interest of the public.

Boycott Amazon! (at least until they come to their senses)
 
Steve Nelson

March 1st, 2000 7:12 PM
 
Jonathan Kozolchyk

March 1st, 2000 7:13 PM
 
Paula Jakobs

March 1st, 2000 7:13 PM
 
My family has made many purchases from Amazon.com in the recent months.
Our business will likely go elsewhere unless your attempted enforcement of the "one-click purchase" is discontinued.
 
Leo Roberts

March 1st, 2000 7:14 PM
 
I'll be getting my treeware from the shop down the street until Amazon drops this claim.
 
Eric Sutherland

March 1st, 2000 7:15 PM
 
Amazon has some nerve!
 
Trudy Boisvert

March 1st, 2000 7:15 PM
 
Donald Boisvert

March 1st, 2000 7:15 PM
 
Troy Rollo

March 1st, 2000 7:15 PM
 
Jeffrey Boisvert

March 1st, 2000 7:15 PM
 
Goodbye Amazon, hello Barnes & Noble. BTW, Jeff Bezos, did you see that your stock was down 4.4% today, while the Nasdaq was up 1.9%. And Patent Office, get a clue. Patent law needs at least a major overhaul, maybe even an abolishment.
 
Darren Grayson

March 1st, 2000 7:16 PM
 
Wow, that was kind of dumb.
I sure _used_ to like Amazon.
 
Nat Williams

March 1st, 2000 7:16 PM
 
jackson

March 1st, 2000 7:17 PM
 
Like you I am in a field that relies heavily on customer service and satisfaction. The perception of greed brought forth by your actions will be the downfall of all the hardwork that has gone into building Amazon.com into the company it has become. I have ordered from you many, many times and have been pleased with its customer friendly focus. However, as with so many others, I have to say I will no longer use this site and will let others know of your intention to enforce these patents.

I am sure you did not expect such an outpouring of protest against your actions. You need to rethink what you hope to gain and weigh that against what you are losing.........customers.

 
Noreen Brideson

March 1st, 2000 7:17 PM
 
Robert B. Collie

March 1st, 2000 7:18 PM
 
I'll be forwarding the address of this website to every member of my family who is online - and hoping they'll be adding their names to the protest.
 
Mary Farris

March 1st, 2000 7:18 PM
 
Alfred Price

March 1st, 2000 7:19 PM
 
Jerry L. O'Neill

March 1st, 2000 7:20 PM
 
reffered by interstone@cyberzone.net
 
Gerry Caron

March 1st, 2000 7:21 PM
 
Rod Sherwin

March 1st, 2000 7:21 PM
 
tom pacheco

March 1st, 2000 7:21 PM
 
David Pieczkiewicz

March 1st, 2000 7:21 PM
 
As an Amazon stockholder, I think that this is a sleazy and short-sighted way to try to increase the value of a company. Jeff, you have a lot of people behind you who have bought your stock (both types.) I urge you to think very carefully before you begin throwing your weight around in an anti-internet, ethically questionable fashion. It's the 2000's and we all know how to vote using information and our wallets!
 
Catherine Mikkelsen

March 1st, 2000 7:22 PM
 
Mike Howard

March 1st, 2000 7:24 PM
 
Tony Truong

March 1st, 2000 7:25 PM
 
The 1-click feature is great. I just used it the other day, actually. On the other hand, patenting 1-click to get an edge over competitors is misuse of the patenting system. Why ruin Amazon.com's great reputation for something like this?
 
Chuck Emmel

March 1st, 2000 7:28 PM
 
Wow! 6280 in the last three days, and 10 in the past five minutes. I think that says it all.
 
Robert C. Mosher

March 1st, 2000 7:28 PM
 
I cancelled my Star Wars video order!!
 
Barney Evans

March 1st, 2000 7:28 PM
 
Maybe you don't want cultivate a negative feeling in the technical community! It may cost you someday.
 
Timothy J. O'Neil

March 1st, 2000 7:29 PM
 
Shame on you, Amazon.
 
Lisa Greenberg

March 1st, 2000 7:30 PM
 
Shame on you, Amazon.
 
Lisa Greenberg

March 1st, 2000 7:31 PM
 
I love the services that Amazon.com provides, but unfortunately until they make a decision to not enforce their patent no one in my family will be using their site. Another unfortunate matter is that a few of my colleagues and I have been tracking their stock thinking of buying into them, but that is out of the question now. Please stop this monopolization now!
 
Seth B. Gang

March 1st, 2000 7:31 PM
 
I don't believe a patent could be issued to corner the internet business such as this.
 
George Rye

March 1st, 2000 7:31 PM
 
Amazon you should be shaking in your boots. Consumers have more power than you give us credit for. We join the boycott.
 
David & Shirley

March 1st, 2000 7:31 PM
 
Fabian Dal Santo

March 1st, 2000 7:32 PM
 
I'll be shopping elsewhere until Amazon changes its ways.
 
Christopher Mendelson

March 1st, 2000 7:32 PM
 
Allow me to re-post a comment from the ZD-Net site:

"I personally plan to patent water flowing downhill. Think of the team of lawyers enforcing on all you infringers..." -William C Pate

This about sums up the arrogance of Amazon and the STUPIDITY of the U.S. patent office.
 
Tyler Francis

March 1st, 2000 7:32 PM
 
I was a customer of yours until you pressed the case aginst barnes and nobel, but i will not support those whom pursue a stratigy of denial for obvious technologies.
 
Daniel Phillips

March 1st, 2000 7:35 PM
 
I have not been a customer of amazon and now I never will be.
 
Michael Frazer

March 1st, 2000 7:35 PM
 
MARK GRAHAM

March 1st, 2000 7:36 PM
 
I will not buy from a company which abuses the patent system the way Amazon.com does.
 
Mike Montour

March 1st, 2000 7:36 PM
 
Mike Pacific

March 1st, 2000 7:38 PM
 
Eric Webster

March 1st, 2000 7:38 PM
 
Chris Halaska

March 1st, 2000 7:39 PM
 
T. Alex Beamish

March 1st, 2000 7:41 PM
 
"One-Click Technology in general is in no way an "original idea". Please clarify or discontinue your practice of maintaining exclusive rights to the patent. Thank you.
 
Joel D. Parker

March 1st, 2000 7:42 PM
 
I agree with the 6000 and counting. I bought from amazon once. The experience was wonderful. There are other places to buy, though, and I think I'll be looking into those until Amazon repeals its enforcement of such a silly, inappropriate patent.
 
Edward Miller

March 1st, 2000 7:42 PM
 
*shakes head*
 
Chris Gann

March 1st, 2000 7:44 PM
 
Each business exists and thrives on the Internet at the mercy of those who connect to it and use it. Actions to close the Internet will result either in a fight to rid us of the menace or drive away the very people companies like Amazon need. I for one believe the power of the Internet to organize a boycott has only partially been demonstrated.Given the proper motivation companies which are Internet only based can quickly brought to their needs. All we have to do is stay away.
 
Berry Densman

March 1st, 2000 7:45 PM
 
I was one of Amazon's first 100,000 customers. If I had known what a bucket of feces Amazon is, I wouldn't have bought from them and thus put them on the roadmap. Since you will not ever make a profit by competing fairly, you now have to cry for help from the patent committee. Go to hell Jeff Bozos!!!
 
Brian F.

March 1st, 2000 7:47 PM
 
What next ... a patent for breathing?

This is absurd? Spend your money on your business processes instead of on lawyers.
 
Joseph Walling

March 1st, 2000 7:47 PM
 
I was a frequent Amazon buyer prior to this issue being made public. I will no longer purchase my books from Amazon until the patent is discarded.
 
Robert Brown

March 1st, 2000 7:48 PM
 
You've already beaten the competition, and you can do it without resorting to patenting such simple things as one click buying. Please tell the world you did this just so someone else can't stop you. And please, let the GPL and Linux users know you will never inhibit the open source development model.

Maurice L. Entwistle
3918 Harrison St.
Kansas City, MO 64110

I've seen you on TV, Jeff, and you seem like a pretty nice guy. Please let the open source community know that you will support them. Let's one piece of the pie, free and open. OK?
 
Maurice L. Entwistle

March 1st, 2000 7:48 PM
 
For a pioneer in the etrade business to come to such a low point is truly saddening; a public apology and confession of the stupidity behind the Amazing short-sightedness of this sickening blunder in free enterprise will get Amazon back in my good graces - nothing short.
 
ed poston

March 1st, 2000 7:49 PM
 
Looks like Amazon wants to be another Microsoft
(but they haven't turned a profit yet). Guess I'll
do my on-line book buying at Fatbrain.
 
Ken Deboy

March 1st, 2000 7:50 PM
 
I am a recent Amazon.Com customer, receiving good service for Xmas, '99. For Amazon.Com to enforce these patents would be in poor tastes, in my opinion. This process of restricting progress on the Net may snowball. Instead, please continue to compete on good service and pricing.
 
Randall L. Nickell

March 1st, 2000 7:50 PM
 
The patent system is broken and is being used in gross perversion of the purposes envisioned by the framers of the Constitution.
 
Thomas Beckett

March 1st, 2000 7:50 PM
 
The Internet was founded and continues running by the principals of open and free information. By patenting things that make the net userfriendly and more comfortable for its average user, Amazon is destroying part of what give the Internet it's wonderful charm.

Welcome to the world of the 'Net Amazon. When the community here let's its digital voice be heard, we choose to let it be a roar!
 
Dylan Vanderhoof

March 1st, 2000 7:50 PM
 
Neal Hardesty

March 1st, 2000 7:51 PM
 
I had previously been a customer of Amazon.com and had enjoyed their fine selection. But now, they have done a great diservice to all of their customers, many of which will now be Ex-customers. Amazon.com's attempt to patent the work of OTHERS, and claim it as their own, and attempting to patent common practices on the internet, has caused me to NO longer be a customer of Amazon.com. Instead, I will shop from companies that support honest work, rather then theivery, and support their internet customers, rather then attempting to sabotage them.
 
Jean Ann Donnel

March 1st, 2000 7:53 PM
 
Robert Shelton

March 1st, 2000 7:53 PM
 
Jeremy Whistance

March 1st, 2000 7:56 PM
 
In the last century, a company named Daimler-Benz invented something of a novelty in the automotive industry. Several things actually. And as a matter of course, they patented them. I am certainly glad that the people that now run Amazon.com were not in charge of Daimler-Benz at the time.
This is not an advertisement for overpriced German luxury cars--which I would never own. It is a plea to the administration of Amazon.com to consider their actions. If Daimler-Benz were to have acted as Amazon has, we wouldn't be driving automobiles with airbags and anti-lock brakes.
One could argue that withholding these technologies would have forced other automakers to innovate on their own, but the cost of that time is measured not in money, like here, but in lives.
True avarice, however, is unmoved by humanity.
 
Chris Seiger

March 1st, 2000 7:56 PM
 
I will no longer purchase from Amazon.com. Goodbye.
 
Robert J. Johnston

March 1st, 2000 7:56 PM
 

 
Tom ONeil

March 1st, 2000 7:58 PM
 
Björn Pernemark

March 1st, 2000 7:58 PM
 
Jim Beck

March 1st, 2000 7:59 PM
 
Give me a break... 1-Clock-Shooting might be worth more than that...
 
Peter H. Froehlich

March 1st, 2000 7:59 PM
 
As a result of your anticompetitive actions and betrayal of the spirit of openness which is the sole reason your business is even in existance, I will never again purchase products from your business, and will be urging all of my friends to do the same.

 
Kris Kennaway

March 1st, 2000 8:00 PM
 
This is one Internet Shopping 24/7 Researcher who is disappointed in your less than top-drawer patent claim. I can't imagine that Amazon will be showing up any time soon on http://people.bu.edu/celtics or
on http://www.EcommerceAndMarketing.com


I would love to hear the other side of the story.




















Happy e-shopping












Bruce D. Weinberg
Ecommerce Shepherd and Founder
EcommerceAndMarketing.com

Asst. Professor Marketing and Ecommerce
Boston University
 
Bruce Weinberg

March 1st, 2000 8:02 PM
 
I don't know which is worse, the government trying to censor and/or tax us on the internet, or big business trying to stifle progress by 'patenting' procedures and methods that were in place before they became part of the 'net.
 
Wayne E. Pfeffer

March 1st, 2000 8:03 PM
 
Amazon.com, pleasse be decent!!
 
Jose Nieto

March 1st, 2000 8:03 PM
 
David Kuruvilla

March 1st, 2000 8:04 PM
 
Joseph A. Rayawk

March 1st, 2000 8:04 PM
 
Here goes some more.
 
Tamara Dent

March 1st, 2000 8:04 PM
 
Most uncharitable Jeff. Patents are for the protection of totally unique products, processes and procedures, yours is not.
 
Brian Jones

March 1st, 2000 8:07 PM
 
Frank Atencio

March 1st, 2000 8:10 PM
 
Patrick E. Moseley

March 1st, 2000 8:11 PM
 
Of course the ramifications of this on the software industry as a whole are staggering. Where do we draw the line here ?? Did Amazon suddenly gain the right to shut down any web presence that uses cookies in a web ordering process ?? If companies are allowed this kind of power, the power to patent technology that previously existed that is, the software industry as a whole is doomed. The Open Source Community has shown us that it is **NOT** necessary to hoard your source code, and more importantly, your method of implementing said source code, to make money.

Bezos -- this is a mistake for Amazon to make. The damage that this will do to Amazon will far outweigh anything B&N.com could have ever imposed on the company.

I nor any of my associates, employees, friends or family will buy anything from Amazon until this issue has been decidedly reversed for good, and I should hope that our courts don't keep making mistakes like this. This kind of behavior isn't good for anyone.
 
Samuel Kesterson

March 1st, 2000 8:11 PM
 
Amazon, by your reckless exploitation of the hard work of others, you have just lost my business, and that of my company.
 
Bob Martin

March 1st, 2000 8:11 PM
 
I will not be buying from or so much as looking at amazon.com until this is resolved favorably.
 
Thomas Chadwell

March 1st, 2000 8:12 PM
 
Matthew Hicks

March 1st, 2000 8:16 PM
 
I am a frequent customer of amazon.com, and if this practice continues I will remove the amazon.com bookmark from my browser and never go there again.
 
Michael F. Martin

March 1st, 2000 8:17 PM
 
Duane Smith

March 1st, 2000 8:17 PM
 
Please stop!
 
Carsten Strotmann

March 1st, 2000 8:18 PM
 
This is indeed a very low thing for Amazon to do. I for one will voice my concern to them the only way they will listen, and will not do any buisiness with them.
 
Athar Kamal Malik

March 1st, 2000 8:18 PM
 
A few members of my immediate family used to spend a great deal on movies and books at Amazon. I will not allow this anymore until the site is patent-free.

This sort of patent should not be allowed.
 
Anonymous

March 1st, 2000 8:18 PM
 
Reminds me of that company who tried to obtain royalties from mp3.com on downloading music over the internet...whatever happened with that??
 
Angus Lovitt

March 1st, 2000 8:20 PM
 
Jonathan Hepburn

March 1st, 2000 8:23 PM
 
Amazon just lost another customer - ME. Keep it up Jeff and pretty soon you won't have any...........Do you think your petty antics are not seen as an attempt to be *big brother* - ? oh brother............
 
Marilyn Marion

March 1st, 2000 8:23 PM
 
Ben Coakley

March 1st, 2000 8:25 PM
 
Jacob Morrison

March 1st, 2000 8:26 PM
 
Dennis Clark

March 1st, 2000 8:26 PM
 
I often shop on the Web for books and will now stop using Amazon.
 
Jonathan Cage

March 1st, 2000 8:28 PM
 
I've ordered from Amazon since before it sold anything other than books. I've spend $thousands with them. I've never been more uncomfortable with doing so, and it's not because I'm morally outraged, it's because they're acting like idiots. I don't trust idiots very much, especially when they want my credit card number.
 
Dick Taylor

March 1st, 2000 8:29 PM
 
What ever happened to "prior art"? I signed up for affiliated programs over a year ago!! Who's kidding who??
 
Larry Burke

March 1st, 2000 8:29 PM
 
I'm a big fan of amazon.com; I spend a lot
of money there. But com'on guys, this is
Seattle -- wake up and smell the coffee.

 
Steve Isaacson

March 1st, 2000 8:29 PM
 
I personally will order nothing more from Amazon.com till the issue is resolved. I find nothing honorable in patenting something that doesn't belong to you. You didn't invent the technology. You weren't even in business when the technology evolved.
 
John W. Colby

March 1st, 2000 8:30 PM
 
Halden Johnson

March 1st, 2000 8:31 PM
 
Good call Tim!
 
Jason DeCamp

March 1st, 2000 8:32 PM
 
Ian

March 1st, 2000 8:32 PM
 
I resent Amazone attempting to take advantage of the Patent system for such a trivial application of cookies.
 
Steven Green

March 1st, 2000 8:36 PM
 
Brian Clark

March 1st, 2000 8:37 PM
 
Any business that you earn will be due to your excellent service and prices. Software patents will not help your business and will only drive away customers like me.
 
Christy McCarthy

March 1st, 2000 8:39 PM
 
Cory Noteboom

March 1st, 2000 8:40 PM
 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.

March 1st, 2000 8:43 PM
 
Looks like Fatbrain's going to be getting my money.
 
John Groseclose

March 1st, 2000 8:44 PM
 
Amazon, get real! This procedure has been available for anyone to use for a long time before your company ever thought of including it.
 
James Joens

March 1st, 2000 8:45 PM
 
Eric Rollins

March 1st, 2000 8:46 PM
 
I was a fan. Now I have decided to stop using Amazon.com and to sell the stock I owned in the company.

The reason I decided to stop using Amazon.com? Because I cannot support such a blatant attempt to capture technological "common sense" into a patent.

The reason I decided to sell the stock? Because I think the company is going to suffer from a huge downfall as soon as Wall Street realizes that the whole industry is rallying against Amazon.com and the analysts start changing their positions...

Amazon was a pioneer, but like with most pioneers, it will be quickly forgotten.
 
Francois Bergeon

March 1st, 2000 8:46 PM
 
Klaus Bernpaintner

March 1st, 2000 8:48 PM
 
Nadeem Bitar

March 1st, 2000 8:48 PM
 
Colleen Garton

March 1st, 2000 8:49 PM
 
Aaron J. Greenwood

March 1st, 2000 8:56 PM
 
John Sands

March 1st, 2000 9:01 PM
 
Mr. Bezos,

I believe your patent for "One-Clik" will be found to infringe on my patent for "Clik" which clearly encompasses any number of cliks.

Expect to hear from my lawyers!
 
Mark Thorpe

March 1st, 2000 9:02 PM
 
I appreciate Amazon's marvelous service, but they should not continue this short-sighted foolishness.
 
Mark Trevor Smith

March 1st, 2000 9:02 PM
 
Melissa Reid

March 1st, 2000 9:03 PM
 
Earle Shugerman MD

March 1st, 2000 9:11 PM
 
Johan Thorngren

March 1st, 2000 9:11 PM
 
This patent hurts business, the emerging internet economy, and proves that the patent office is full of individuals who do not know what they are doing.

I personally use Amazon.com for book reviews and now take the information and order books from a good website such as eastwest.com or fatbrain.com using iqorder.com's search engine.

If Amazon were an AD&D character, it's alignment would be lawful evil.
 
Charles Burns

March 1st, 2000 9:12 PM
 
Nowadays its anything to make a buck.
 
Chris Zygar

March 1st, 2000 9:13 PM
 
I have created two websites that include links to Amazon.com, and am currently developing two others that were going to. I may continue to learn about titles thanks to the myriad thoughtful users of Amazon.com who have made the site what it is, but I will no longer be affiliated with it if its thoughtless owner continues his attempts to destroy it and the Web.
 
Shebar Windstone

March 1st, 2000 9:14 PM
 
Rob Carraretto

March 1st, 2000 9:16 PM
 
I like Amazon.com but will refrain from patronizing the company until it comes to its senses regarding patents.
 
Jon Jensen

March 1st, 2000 9:16 PM
 
Jonathan Cobb

March 1st, 2000 9:16 PM
 
Jesse T. Voorheis

March 1st, 2000 9:17 PM
 
This is insane. You guys have a great selection and good prices. Why not compete on those merits rather than try to use legal molasses to hold back the competition? It hurts me to have to boycott your site, but I have no choice. So I ask you, whom does this benefit? Not me, not you, maybe bn.com...
 
Mike Scott

March 1st, 2000 9:17 PM
 
Until this issue is resolved I will not be using or recommending Amazon again. I have informed my staff (we work at a small IT consultancy which is heavily into OSS and the Web) about this issue. I'm sure they will feel the same way.
 
Adam Clarke

March 1st, 2000 9:17 PM
 
This patent is ridiculous! It is based on obvious concepts implemented prior to the patent application.
As of today I refuse to use or promote Amazon.
 
Eric Peterson

March 1st, 2000 9:19 PM
 
Mike Gallan

March 1st, 2000 9:20 PM
 
The Internet is one of the most amazing events to have happened in the earth's history. Never before have people been able to communicate with other people around the world with such ease. The economy of the United States and eventually other countries will be highly impacted by Internet commerece and events. The only reason the Internet has matured so much in the past 7 years is because of the time, dedication, and insight that many talented programmers have given to the world and all just to share what they envisioned the Internet to be.
 
Scott Averbach

March 1st, 2000 9:21 PM
 
Former Amazon affiliate. Vote with your $$$ and your marketing expertise folks.
 
Rick Bier

March 1st, 2000 9:21 PM
 
Stephen Cox

March 1st, 2000 9:27 PM
 
Come on, Amazon. You know better than this. I've never bought anything from you, but I have thought about it. Now, I don't think a company with its head that far up its ass deserves my money.
 
Jesse T. Voorheis

March 1st, 2000 9:28 PM
 
All I can say is what Amazon is doing is complete bullsh!t!!!!
 
Ben M. Ward

March 1st, 2000 9:30 PM
 
Toby Bartels

March 1st, 2000 9:31 PM
 
Man, I am disappointed with this very Microsoft-ish attempt at bullying other
bookstores off the web. I bought books
from Amazon, but will look elsewhere now.
 
Lawrence Brown

March 1st, 2000 9:31 PM
 
I pesonally spend $1000's of dollars a year at Amazon, with most of the books being O'Reilly titles. I am boycotting Amazon now because of these patents.

-Scott
 
Scott Fraser

March 1st, 2000 9:32 PM
 
{*} fatbrain.com from now on baby
 
Richard Yamin

March 1st, 2000 9:33 PM
 
respect your roots -- if the web had been a closed, owned system you would be nowhere right now!
 
robert and jennifer monn

March 1st, 2000 9:37 PM
 
I've had an account on one Internet connected machine or another since 1984. When I started there was a spirit of knowledge, investigation, and wonder. Now it's just money grubbing.

Since Amazon can't turn a profit selling books, they now obviously mean to make money through litigeous means by suing every website that uses cookies.

For shame.

Scott
 
Scott Balneaves

March 1st, 2000 9:38 PM
 
I have been one of the earliest purchasers of books from Amazon here in Australia and was impressed by their service. But this patent stupidity has so annoyed me that Amazon will be the last place I will look for when I need books
 
Ajit Damle

March 1st, 2000 9:40 PM
 
Glen Shelly

March 1st, 2000 9:40 PM
 
Tim M. Azerkan

March 1st, 2000 9:41 PM
 
The bigger they get, the less they remember where they came from and how they got there!

It is always interesting to see them wonder "what happened to the business?" Pay attention Jeff. Your customers are speaking and they aren't saying good things.
 
Paul Tietz

March 1st, 2000 9:41 PM
 
Shawn Petriw

March 1st, 2000 9:42 PM
 
Dean Corn

March 1st, 2000 9:43 PM
 
I also am boycotting amazon.com and encouraging others to do the same. Mr. O'Reilly has made many observations on the patent that I strongly agree with.
I believe in the long run you will find that you're cutting your nose to spite your face.
I would encourage you to reconsider your position before the patent on the very run of the mill technology behind the on-click-ordering is overturned and you do yourself some serious pr damage.
 
Glenn Green

March 1st, 2000 9:43 PM
 
It is very distressing that Amazon, which it seemed to me held so much promise, should act in this way, relying on the stupidity or ignorance of the Patent Office ruling to gain an inappropriate advantage and do something so hostile to the prospects of future development in what seemed a really important and exciting direction.
I think it cannot but hurt Amazon. It certainly makes all of my family feel hesitant about doing business with Amazon in the future. A loss I will regret.
 
Tom Lisi

March 1st, 2000 9:44 PM
 
I refuse to, and will continue to refuse to buy anything from Amazon.com, or even browse the site until they put a stop to this lunacy.
 
Chris Bracken

March 1st, 2000 9:46 PM
 
Ever since I can remember there being a WWW commercialized for the masses, there has been talk about this wonderful site amazon.com. I dare say that your site has gotten more ink than any other in the past four years. So many good things have been written about you and your company, and most if not all of it has been warrented. There can be no question that your defining feature is your customer service. However, you do not have the right to exclude others from offering efficient customer service through the patenting of common database/web routines. Doing so has shaken my faith in your company to the core. No longer are you the good guy entrepreneur with the better (and friendler) mouse trap. Now you are a Bill Gates-like sneering wares peddler. Shame on you for destroying your name, and shame on you for hindering the development of e-commerce. Well, if it's true that you wake up every morning scared as hell at what your customers are going to do, then my advice to you is to sleep for a long, long time. We're going to be your worst nightmare.
 
Ben Snyder

March 1st, 2000 9:46 PM
 
Paul Schultz

March 1st, 2000 9:47 PM
 
Amazon.com is not the only retail outfit.
 
Allen Marshall

March 1st, 2000 9:47 PM
 
Ivan Vecerina

March 1st, 2000 9:48 PM
 
Ken Smith

March 1st, 2000 9:49 PM
 
From now on I'll give my online book business to
Barnes & Noble, Borders, et al. until Amazon takes
its head out of its ass.
 
Terry Turner

March 1st, 2000 9:49 PM
 
Time should ask for their "Man of the Year" award and magazine cover back.

Failing this please re-read all of the comments from other signers.
 
Paul A. Thompson

March 1st, 2000 9:52 PM
 
Terry Brugger

March 1st, 2000 9:52 PM
 
Robert Cook

March 1st, 2000 9:53 PM
 
John Reche

March 1st, 2000 9:53 PM
 
Doug Ford

March 1st, 2000 9:54 PM
 
I was a satisfied customer of Amazon.
However, due to this patent affair I will
refrain from buying their books and invite
other to do the same. It is a pity that
so often multi-billion businesses cannot
resist the temptation of trying to crush
others in unfair ways. Not the kind of
behavior that deserves my simpathy.
 
Roberto Bagnara

March 1st, 2000 9:54 PM
 
The open source movement and standards organizations (esp. for network protocols, etc.) have already proved that "inventing" a technology, retaining a patent, but giving the product away can be hugely profitable. What does Amazon gain by sitting on this One-Click Shopping besides the ire of the public?
 
Eric Van Cleve

March 1st, 2000 9:55 PM
 
Such "patent nonsense" serves no good end. The whole area of business process patents, under which this was granted, needs to be reviewed.
 
Sam Lanfranco

March 1st, 2000 9:55 PM
 
I wanted to recall the case of the blind men and the elephant, with the US Patent and Trademark Office being the blind men. I dont know...

I am an internet application developer and i have developed a lot of applications on the internet with the One-Click features. DAMN IT! Looks like i'm out of job huh?
 
halmi 'affroman' yasin

March 1st, 2000 9:57 PM
 
The best patent is a good marketing organization. Stick to what you do best, Mr. Bezos: spending money to drum up business. Leave the technical innovation to those who really innovate. Your corporate behavior shows a complete misunderstanding of public opinion. Wise up!
 
Steve Cotler

March 1st, 2000 9:58 PM
 
Raul Rascon

March 1st, 2000 9:58 PM
 
To use the patent system in such a poorly masked attempt to stifle competitiveness and innovation makes a mockery of the ideal of protecting the rights of the INVENTOR to earn income/control the deployment of NEW ideas/concepts/techniques...
One might as well patent and charge for the speaking of their favorite personal phrase, ignoring the fact that a simple assembly of a words in a language is already covered by the prior art of communication!!!

Too many industries are already stifled by poorly structured, sweeping but valid-seeming (to third party observers) patants which stifle growth and competition and tie up funds in pointless litigation... Let not the software industry suffer a similar fate (MPAA, Im talking to you to)
 
David Henderson

March 1st, 2000 9:58 PM
 
I am a long-time Amazon customer -- a customer who has been extremely happy with the service and selection that Amazon offers. I am, however, most unhappy with the fact that Amazon has gone after patents for which prior art is well established and obvious. Moreover, Amazon has used the ill-gotten patents to avoid rightful competition in the marketplace.

Amazon should compete on the basis of superior selection, service and prices. Failure to operate the company in a stand-up fashion will ensure that I take my future business elsewhere. I do not consider enforcing bogus patents to put competing companies at a defensive disadvantage "stand-up."

The web's been good to you, Amazon. Be good to the web. Play fair and don't kick sand in your competitors' faces. Such behaviour is unbecoming in a company that is positioned to be a role model in e-commerce strategy.
 
Trane Francks

March 1st, 2000 9:59 PM
 
It is indeed a sad day for the Internet development community when big business once again, in an effort to procure "the almighty dollar" places itself above the medium which it used to gain its popularity. It appears Amazon.com has gone the way of other egotistical, arrogant corporations. What once began as an "Internet darling" has turned into "a spoiled little ***ch." Amazon.com has lost my business (and business was good) and will lose anybody else's business whom I speak with. I predict a fall in Amazon.com stock very soon.
 
Jack Ramsdell

March 1st, 2000 10:00 PM
 
Tim Scott

March 1st, 2000 10:01 PM
 
I have purchased items from Amazon in the past, but will not do so again until they back off on this patent nonsense.
 
William Oechsle

March 1st, 2000 10:01 PM
 
As a practicing software engineer of 20 years, it has become very clear to me that the patent office, in its grants of software patents, has become little more than a clearing house for the unscrupulous attempting to secure monopoly rights over obvious ideas or the work of others. Mr. O'Reilly is far too generous in not supporting the boycott of Amazon. I am not so generous. Not one penny to Amazon.com! Next quarter when they report their financial losses (and there will most certainly be a lot of red ink), Amazon.com can also try to explain to their shareholders why they have even less revenue after having alienated the technical software community.
 
Andrew Mangogna

March 1st, 2000 10:01 PM
 
I recall a rebuttal by a Spaniard to RMS's
original call for boycott. In that rebuttal,
our friend from Spain, with a voice of
detatchment, stated that Amazon was holding a
harmful and inappropriate patent simply because
the US patent office allowed it to. (Something
like if theft were legal, there would be more
thieves around, despite the fact that it's
still a harmful and immoral act.) Therefore,
I urge everyone to write their Representative/
Congressperson/ politician-type person and
voice your concerns with them as well.
 
Michael Wong

March 1st, 2000 10:01 PM
 
I urge everyone who has shopped at
Amazon.com and has decided not to shop
there again to send an e-mail to
feedback@amazon.com and request the
closing of their account(s). From now on,
BarnesAndNoble.com, reel.com, and cdnow.com
have my business (visit www.noamazon.com
for more alternatives).

 
John Hanks

March 1st, 2000 10:02 PM
 
Mr. Bezos,

I find your actions, and those of your company, to be delporable. Affiliate type programs have been used for years by numerous different companies, both online, and offline. As a slightly different example, Amway has been basing their entire business off of this for many years now. I find the fact that your company was awarded a patent for it to be nothing more than proof that the US Patent Office needs a complete overhaul. As if that wasn't bad enough, your attempts to enforce your 1-click ordering process is absurd, almost as absurd as the patent itself. My brother works at Godfather's Pizza, a mostly national pizza chain. About 5 years ago, they went to a computer based system, and they now keep customer information in a databse. When someone calls in, they need give just their name or phone number, and the Godfather's employee can retrieve their name, phone number, address, their past 10 orders, any notes made in regard to them, along with a wealth of additional information about them and their purchasing history. As such, I could call up, give my name, and order my 'usual'. Interestingly enough, it sounds almost exactly like your 1-click ordering, except without the actual click. I hope one day you will realize that your actions are stifling competition on the Internet, our most amazing resource with more potential than almost anything created in the past century.
 
Christopher Cashell

March 1st, 2000 10:04 PM
 
Let us think before we allow the litigious element to gain de-facto control of the net... Amazon must drop these ill-conceived patents and win on quality.
 
Michael Murray

March 1st, 2000 10:04 PM
 
Niels Jakob Darger

March 1st, 2000 10:07 PM
 
I have often used Amazon in the past, but I will no more. No more, that is, until this patent fever passes.

I'll be visiting my local book and record store a LOT more in the future.
 
Kevin Layer

March 1st, 2000 10:08 PM
 
Richard Elsbernd

March 1st, 2000 10:09 PM
 
Stuart Sanders

March 1st, 2000 10:13 PM
 
I have been a regular customer of Amazon and a longtime fan of its web design. However, this patent is completely unjustified and should never have been granted. Since Amazon prefers lawsuits to the open market, I encourage everyone to boycott their website and products to send a clear message.
 
Donald Dotson

March 1st, 2000 10:14 PM
 
Anna Shubina

March 1st, 2000 10:14 PM
 
While I have continued to patronize Amazon, I will take my business to a competitor if these frivolous patents and lawsuits persist. A patent is meant to protect a genuine invention, not a marketing gimmick. You will do more to protect your business by maintaining the excellent customer service Amazon is known for. Read the surveys - this is what matters to customers.
 
Scott McGrath

March 1st, 2000 10:16 PM
 
I will buy no book from Amazon.com and will put URLs related to this case in my e-mail signature.
 
Erik

March 1st, 2000 10:18 PM
 
Your patented "one click" won't work on my machine. I have cookies disabled.
 
Ken David

March 1st, 2000 10:19 PM
 
I was going to order a number of books today from Amazon.com when I decided to check on the status of their patent craze; to find it is still in effect has me rushing to the bookstore tomorrow where my $$$ won't go to a business nincompoopery as Amazon.com. I hope this hurts even more when it's time for me to make a decision who supplies technical reference books for the telecommunications giant I'm employed by. I'm quite certain that as this open letter spreads and more sensible business decision makers sign this petition taking their $$$s elsewhere, Amazon.com will comprehend just how appaling and unnecessary their patent (and its enforcement) is.

I wonder who the morons are running the patent office anyway ...
 
R5

March 1st, 2000 10:20 PM
 
David Watt

March 1st, 2000 10:24 PM
 
If Amazon are going to take this approach then I'll take my business elsewhere.
 
Steve Kerr

March 1st, 2000 10:25 PM
 
Peter Stevenson

March 1st, 2000 10:26 PM
 
I may be missing something here but stiffling e-commerce in this manner can (and will) only hurt Amazon itself. I had a nice packet of books lined up to order but I think the extra weeks waiting for my local bookstore are worth it now.
 
Richard Ammerlaan

March 1st, 2000 10:27 PM
 
I will never buy from Amazon again unless and until they renouce these bogus patents.
 
John Foderaro

March 1st, 2000 10:27 PM
 
Thomas Leibold

March 1st, 2000 10:30 PM
 
C'mon, guys. You've been the poster child for Web success. Don't go getting greedy now. I'm one of the customers who helped get you where you are. I avoid Barnes & Noble because I abhorred their lack of scruples when they decided that they wanted to replace you as the biggest bookstore on the Web. Now you are abusing your power, your medium, and your customers. Don't you understand that any of us on this list could circumvent your nuisance patents in a few minutes if pushed too hard?
 
Terry Ramey

March 1st, 2000 10:31 PM
 
Yannis Labrou

March 1st, 2000 10:32 PM
 
Over a month ago, when i first learned about amazon's ridiculous patents and trademark obscenities, i immediately boycotted amazon.com. As a regular customer of amazon, i am furious. We have seen the enemy and the enemy is amazon.com. For the sake of all that's holy, patenting something that is not your invention is appaling, and illegal. Netscape invented cookies with the explicit and implied use of "One click" anything. It was invented to give a persistent state to a stateless protocol: HTTP. That the US patent office failed to identify this scares me, but amazon's insidious and destructive attempts to ENFORCE the patent offend the very foundation of the Internet: collaboration. Shall we remember well the irony in chapter 11 of the amazon.com story...
 
jonathan ferguson

March 1st, 2000 10:32 PM
 
Joel Schroeder

March 1st, 2000 10:34 PM
 
Evan Franklin

March 1st, 2000 10:35 PM
 
Rod Curling-Hope

March 1st, 2000 10:36 PM
 
There is very little intellectual about either the associates program (haven't kick backs been a part of business since money began changeing hands) or one click shopping (we have been able to do it on computers at retail stores since the 80s) that granting intellectual property rights is ludicrous. The only thing more ludicrous is to try to enforce them.

I have severed all ties and stopped pursuing an associates position via my website with amazon.com. They were by book seller of choice and I will no longer shop there. I urge anyone who values the freedom and open source nature of the internet to follow suit.
 
Shawn O'Fallon

March 1st, 2000 10:38 PM
 
While I enjoy the Amazon.com site, and will likely continue to purchase items from them, I don't like these patents. Please reconsider, Amazon.

-Brian Danielson, Tigard, OR
 
Brian Danielson

March 1st, 2000 10:42 PM
 
Andrew Keynes

March 1st, 2000 10:43 PM
 
The affiliates patent is essentially a patent on using URL parameters to pass information from one web site to another. In essence it is patenting a portion of the HTML design specification. That is absurd on the face of it.

It hardly matters as to the reason for the passed information. The fact that the information is a database record key, or equivalent, is not a new invention. Who can patent a particular type of information being passed? Equally absurd.

To say that using a database key to access a database of business partners who deserve a commission on sales is so old an idea it has cobwebs. Is doing something on the Internet that is identical to what is done on a huge number of private networks or through the mail a new invention? Since the only new idea here is the Internet, Amazon has, in essence, succeeded in patenting the Internet.

Clearly it may be time for a massive restraint of trade lawsuit, or whatever fits when one company tries to prevent other companies from using existing technologies. It is equally clear that any attempt on the part of Amazon.com to use this patent will backfire in ways I can hardly wait to see.

However, it is just as clear that this patent must be attacked immediately and not permitted to stand. This sets extremely bad precedent. In essence, Amazon.com has succeeded in patenting old, unpatented software inventions that are new only because the medium, the Internet, is new.
 
Al Baker

March 1st, 2000 10:44 PM
 
The by-product of your patent(one-click)will ultimately deny your customers(or will at least minimize the use of) technology that makes internet related business much less complicated and time consuming. As an internet business, is it wise to anger/alienate your target consumers?
 
Chris Downs

March 1st, 2000 10:44 PM
 
I'll take my money elsewhere.
 
Ari

March 1st, 2000 10:44 PM
 
Until these patents are reversed, I intend to do whatever I can to stop people from shopping at Amazon. How quickly you went from being a bookstore to a cancer.
 
Bob Whitmore

March 1st, 2000 10:45 PM
 
I will not buy from Amazon until such time as they reconsider thier draconian policies.
 
Allen Bolderoff

March 1st, 2000 10:48 PM
 
As a professional programmer I am appalled that Amazon.com would even dream of patenting such a trivial piece of computer functionality. How the Patent Office can allow this to happen is just another piece of the moral decay in Washington.

While I have not been an avid Amazon shopper, this guarantees that I will avoid their site in the future.

Isn't there a real lawyer who can fight this?
 
Robert Stokesbary

March 1st, 2000 10:49 PM
 
It is outrageous for the patent office to allow patents on software.
 
Duane T Williams

March 1st, 2000 10:51 PM
 
Stop this nonsense Amazon! I was once a faithful customer, purchasing on average 5 books a month from your site. I still use your site, only to read the other customers reviews of books and recommendations, but other than that, I've stopped purchasing anything from your site.
 
Ming Nghiem

March 1st, 2000 10:54 PM
 
Jeff Bezos,
Dear sir, I have a vested interest in the e-commerce/business entrepreneurial arena . Please take these public concerns to heart so that others like myself will not be constrained by your over-zealous need to protect the bottom line!
 
Richard Christiansen

March 1st, 2000 10:55 PM
 
Eric Thompson

March 1st, 2000 10:55 PM
 
Dan King

March 1st, 2000 10:58 PM
 
The Internet is Public Domain...End of sentence.
 
Brendan Reid

March 1st, 2000 10:58 PM
 
No! This 1-Click Patent is insane.
 
Klaus Muth

March 1st, 2000 10:58 PM
 
Justin DiNardo

March 1st, 2000 10:58 PM
 
Nick Richter

March 1st, 2000 10:59 PM
 
Donna M. Jaggard

March 1st, 2000 11:01 PM
 
Geoffrey M. Herteg

March 1st, 2000 11:02 PM
 
Jeff, I'm waiting to order a pile of books from Amazon once you have renounced this foolishness.
Get out of the courts and back to doing what you
do best -- selling books!
 
George Moody

March 1st, 2000 11:02 PM
 
Suneel Jhangiani

March 1st, 2000 11:03 PM
 
All the arguments have been made. My family will no longer be doing business with your company until you abort this plagerisum of others work to hurt your competitiors. We have enjoyed doing business with your company but will no longer buy products from you till this type of action ceases.

Thank you.
 
David Jones

March 1st, 2000 11:03 PM
 
Jeff Bezos - your actions screem, "limited pie". The harder you try to hang on, the faster you crush the life out. Your success was built upon the dream - the creation. Your actions are from fear - the termination....
 
Chris Sltten

March 1st, 2000 11:04 PM
 
Brandy Sargent

March 1st, 2000 11:06 PM
 
Viva Penguinistas !
Boycott Amazon.
 
Mike Reys

March 1st, 2000 11:08 PM
 
Stop it. K'?! Enough said.
 
Kevin A. Gutteron

March 1st, 2000 11:08 PM
 
Kenneth Hong

March 1st, 2000 11:08 PM
 
I will not buy from you any longer until you stop this nonsense.
 
Reinhard Engel

March 1st, 2000 11:09 PM
 
My wife and I have spent more then $2000 with Amazon. No more. We will use Amazon to look up books (ie: use their bandwidth) but we will purchase from competitors.

So Amazon, not only will you lose revenue, you will lose money on bandwidth. This choice of yours will not only lose revenue (to the tune of more then $2K per year from us alone) but I'll bet I can cost you money to the tune of > $2K in wasted time and bandwidth over the next year.

Not only that but I am going to talk to all of our friends who use Amazon and get them to do the same. Want to bet it will cost you more like $50K per year in lost business and actual bandwidth costs?

Stop the bullshit, I'll supply prior art from web sites I have worked on if need be.
 
David Mandala

March 1st, 2000 11:11 PM
 
I refuse to purchase anything from Amazon, and actively encourage my friends and acquantances to do the same. When Amazon wakes up from their delusions, I will consider doing otherwise.
 
Jeremy McDermond

March 1st, 2000 11:12 PM
 
Lorenz Hochmair

March 1st, 2000 11:12 PM
 
Danielle Davis

March 1st, 2000 11:12 PM
 
Jason Miller

March 1st, 2000 11:12 PM
 
Stacey Redick

March 1st, 2000 11:14 PM
 
I am boycotting amazon, and encouraging everyone I know to do so as well, we spend a large amount of money per year at your company, and you have now lost that
 
Lachlan Smith

March 1st, 2000 11:15 PM
 
Unsure about how the computing community responds to attempts to usurp ownership of technology? Read your history books on ARC by SEA and their fight with Phil Katz and ZIP.

Your best bet is to fire the lawyers in your Intellectual Property department, blame this fiasco on them and release your patents into the public domain.

Failure to do so will undoubtedly cause irreparable damage to your brand which is really the basis for your success. It is a shame to spend so much money building it just to see it diluted so quickly.
 
Chris Weaver

March 1st, 2000 11:16 PM
 
Gerry Zimmerman

March 1st, 2000 11:18 PM
 
think. grow up.

 
terry jones

March 1st, 2000 11:19 PM
 
Henrik Flensborg

March 1st, 2000 11:19 PM
 
Eric-Jon Waugh

March 1st, 2000 11:22 PM
 
Kim Dalsgaard Rasmussen

March 1st, 2000 11:22 PM
 
The Internet made Amazon what it is today. How sadly short-sighted to try and throttle the very idea that underpins your success
 
Joseph D'Cruz

March 1st, 2000 11:22 PM
 
I'm really glad Amazon wasn't there when the car was developed, patenting the break pedal is just the thing they'd do.
 
Chen Shapira

March 1st, 2000 11:23 PM
 
Ralph Pryor

March 1st, 2000 11:24 PM
 
Patents kill the open environment that is the internet. Without that open environment anyone using these patents will loose it's customers. Software patents are not "a good thing to do".
 
Paul de Weerd

March 1st, 2000 11:25 PM
 
I like Amazon.com services, but I oppose an idea to patent technology developed for non-commercial purposes and being used worldwide.

Ivan
 
Ivan Yukov

March 1st, 2000 11:27 PM
 
Jeff Morris

March 1st, 2000 11:27 PM
 
I normally spend $200-$300 per quarter on books for college. These books have helped me learn one thing, and that is that Galileo already discovered that the sun did not revolve around earth, but that the earth revolves around the sun. Stop being so self-centered! A LOT of my friends have shopped Amazon for their books, but not anymore. Where would you be now, if someone else started doing what you are currently doing when you first started Amazon? Money is VERY lonely company when all your friends realize what you really stand for.

"Absolute power corrupts absolutely"
 
Courtney Shrock

March 1st, 2000 11:27 PM
 
Rachel K. So

March 1st, 2000 11:29 PM
 
Amazon's behavior is very disappointing.
 
Y.Shlafman

March 1st, 2000 11:32 PM
 
Andreas Piendl

March 1st, 2000 11:32 PM
 
I'm struggling to work out how they think they can end up in front doing something like this. It would have cost $$$ to get the patent in the first place, more $$$ to use it against rivals, and probably 10 times those amounts put together in lost business. And for what? So people have to enter their credit card numbers every time they purchase at B&N? I'll bet the people are defecting to Amazon in droves
 
Sam Johnston

March 1st, 2000 11:33 PM
 
Chris Kirchner

March 1st, 2000 11:37 PM
 
I will not remember the name amazon, if I need a book until you remember what your roots are.
 
Maik Schmidt

March 1st, 2000 11:40 PM
 
Teemu Huovila

March 1st, 2000 11:40 PM
 
Eric Baudais

March 1st, 2000 11:42 PM
 
Gregory P. Stitt

March 1st, 2000 11:43 PM
 
Christ van Willegen

March 1st, 2000 11:43 PM
 
Justin Simms

March 1st, 2000 11:48 PM
 
Jeff. I dare you to enforce the patent. If you do, it's going to bite you in the ass. In the process you will alienate many of your customers, investors AND affiliates. You can probably imagine what that would do to your stock price.
 
Lucas Jans

March 1st, 2000 11:49 PM
 
Christopher Anderson

March 1st, 2000 11:50 PM
 
Zvonimir Hlousek

March 1st, 2000 11:50 PM
 
Danny Hoffman

March 1st, 2000 11:51 PM
 
When the flames begin enmasse, watch you pocketstrings. When they start sounding sane hold on to your pants.

 
Stuart Hillman

March 1st, 2000 11:51 PM
 
I now shop somewhere else first, then shop somewhere somewhere else second, and then finally somewhere somewhere somewhere else. I only use Amazon for information purposes.
 
John Baker

March 1st, 2000 11:52 PM
 
Emil Eifrem

March 1st, 2000 11:53 PM
 
This is disgustingly antisocial behaviour. I will not buy from Amazon.
 
Martin Pool

March 1st, 2000 11:53 PM
 
Tsk, Tsk, Is this the only way you can get your company into the black?
 
Ross N. Houck

March 1st, 2000 11:55 PM
 
Ann Barcomb

March 1st, 2000 11:59 PM
 
please withdraw your silly patent !
 
Hilton De Meillon

March 2nd, 2000 12:00 AM
 
A. Kasenov

March 2nd, 2000 12:01 AM
 
HoYin Au

March 2nd, 2000 12:01 AM
 
I completely agree with you: Such Patent are inacceptable and should not be accepted because it does not help the e-commerce business.
 
David Screve

March 2nd, 2000 12:02 AM
 
jens persson

March 2nd, 2000 12:03 AM
 
Linda Moore

March 2nd, 2000 12:03 AM
 
Ronald Prague

March 2nd, 2000 12:05 AM
 
Greed is everywhere, don't you (Amazon) have enough already.

Our World is a small place, there is not enough for everyone without sharing.

Money is your GOD!

So I guess we will just have to starve to death as most are already, due to the greed of big business.

Greed is a poison!
 
Graham McCallum

March 2nd, 2000 12:06 AM
 
You should reconsider.
You're going to reap just what you sow.

I suppose you wouldn't hesitate to try to copyright a book by an anonymous author?

Typical, vicarious, retail middleman mentality.
Produce nothing, and just try to find weasel ways to profit from the work of others.

I've patented a method for extension of the middle finger in an upward attitude.
Allow me to demonstrate.
 
RMHanson

March 2nd, 2000 12:07 AM
 
Bruce Timberlake

March 2nd, 2000 12:08 AM
 
Amazon! You're my ex-online-bookstore until you guys drop the patents enforcement!

 
Jay Biler

March 2nd, 2000 12:08 AM
 
Matthias Krehl

March 2nd, 2000 12:09 AM
 
Lloyd Gilbert

March 2nd, 2000 12:09 AM
 
Ramin Miraftabi

March 2nd, 2000 12:09 AM
 
Consumers respond to making things easier and better. You have done this. Preventing further innovation by your competitors, however, will create a negative atmosphere that is anything but easy to surmount. Give customers a break. Give them a choice as to which One-Click service to use. I am certian most would use yours.
 
Ben Curtis

March 2nd, 2000 12:10 AM
 
David L. Freeman

March 2nd, 2000 12:10 AM
 
Demis Plomp

March 2nd, 2000 12:10 AM
 
Holger Steudle

March 2nd, 2000 12:12 AM
 
Charles Todd

March 2nd, 2000 12:12 AM
 
Roel K. Brand

March 2nd, 2000 12:14 AM
 
I agree wholeheartedly with the letter above, and urge Amazon to desist from trying to patent their "innovation" - if it is granted, it will only serve to hurt the Internet community.
 
Haniotakis Vangelis

March 2nd, 2000 12:15 AM
 
Nik Bulter

March 2nd, 2000 12:15 AM
 
Arjen Laarhoven

March 2nd, 2000 12:17 AM
 
I used to shop at Amazon if I needed something. I will check Barnes&Noble and other shops first now, before I'll order from you again.
 
R.P.J. van der Krogt

March 2nd, 2000 12:18 AM
 
My reaction to Amazon.com's patent was to drive to the bookstore today. Surprise! The cost of the books+tax was less than at Amazon.com+shipping. Reading one of the books now!
 
BM Ahmad

March 2nd, 2000 12:18 AM
 
Tobias Rundström

March 2nd, 2000 12:19 AM
 
Edward Swatschek

March 2nd, 2000 12:19 AM
 
Alright Amazon bite the hand that feeds you .
Way to go. Me nor anyone I know and that they know will ever buy a book through you greedy, lawsuit happy fools again.
Thanks
 
Warren D. Cowley

March 2nd, 2000 12:19 AM
 
Jeff Hildebrand

March 2nd, 2000 12:20 AM
 
I will not use amazon as long as this patent silliness continues. There are more than enough online bookstores without this outrageous behaviour!
 
Elak, Rolf

March 2nd, 2000 12:21 AM
 
Filip Ruymen

March 2nd, 2000 12:21 AM
 
Dirk Hohndel

March 2nd, 2000 12:22 AM
 
Yung Trinh

March 2nd, 2000 12:22 AM
 
Andreas Zisowsky

March 2nd, 2000 12:23 AM
 
I've already pushed Amazon UK to the bottom of my list for UK suppliers.

This action of yours with patents has led me to push Amazon US further down the list of US suppliers.

Only your good postage alternatives keep you from descending right to the depths.
 
Mike Walsh (Helsinki)

March 2nd, 2000 12:24 AM
 
Amazon is one of the most arrogant organizations currently using the web. Their prices are no longer the cheapest available on the Internet and this indicates their desire to gain a monopoly position regarding the merchandizing of their products.

Shame on you - Amazon.
 
John A Meech

March 2nd, 2000 12:24 AM
 
I would have to say that this ranks up there with Al Gore's claim to be the father of the internet. have a nice day.
 
Martin Garcia

March 2nd, 2000 12:25 AM
 
Sebastien Effinier

March 2nd, 2000 12:26 AM
 
It seems a pity that Amazon, with such good customer service and clean navigation, should stoop to such low tactics and attempt to throttle online business. My future business will be with FatBrain, or I'll just get off my butt and walk to the local Waterstones or Foyles, now they've started stocking Cisco Press books.
 
Joel Rowbottom

March 2nd, 2000 12:27 AM
 
Come on, Amazon. This is worse than the y2k "fix" patent. You already have the top ecommerce site on the net, are you really that scared that you will lose market share if you dont put your competitors out of business? Are you willing to hurt the industry the way microsoft has? Are you planning on turning your back on the people that helped create you and bully everyone around that poses the slightest threat to you? 1-click shopping and associate programs are both really good ideas, but they are hardly orginal or worthy of a patent. Why not forget about the patents and rather support the industry?

For now I will shop elsewhere. I am selling off my Amazon stock.
 
Tara

March 2nd, 2000 12:28 AM
 
Stephan Schiessling

March 2nd, 2000 12:30 AM
 
****** GROW UP!!! ******
Really, a patent on a cookie? Who do you guys think you are anyways? Sometimes I wonder why businesses have to be told to share, just like little children fighting over exclusive rights to a new toy. It's time for you to go through puberty and graduate into adulthood. GROW UP!!!
 
Trey Merrell

March 2nd, 2000 12:30 AM
 
David Kane-Parry

March 2nd, 2000 12:30 AM
 
Amazon is not only pissing in the well, they're trying to fence the well site and sell their piss by the bottle: @deprecated amazon.com
 
Patrick Römer

March 2nd, 2000 12:31 AM
 
My friends and I now all spend considerable effort to avoid using amazon.com in protest of these patents. And I continue to urge everyone to do the same!
 
Geoff Broadwell

March 2nd, 2000 12:31 AM
 
david cowperthwaite

March 2nd, 2000 12:31 AM
 
whatever happened to the "freedom of the 'net?"
 
Steven Hertert

March 2nd, 2000 12:32 AM
 
Shame on You Amazon
 
John Lavin

March 2nd, 2000 12:33 AM
 
If these patents for business concepts and business models continue to be awarded. The US government will just be creating more Monopolies.
 
Max Clark

March 2nd, 2000 12:33 AM
 
Pontus Lidman

March 2nd, 2000 12:34 AM
 
Rick Noble

March 2nd, 2000 12:34 AM
 
Gregory F. Woodruff

March 2nd, 2000 12:35 AM
 
As an IT professional, this kind of backwards blocking of technological advancement is nauseating. The techniques used for Amazon.com's 1-click and affiliates program has been available for years before Amazon tried to steal them.
 
Ross Lieberman

March 2nd, 2000 12:35 AM
 
I have left them for a competitor, and I'm happy I did. I hope O'reily can afford to be brave enough and boycot them as a publisher house too. I'm sure enough customers will also be moved by this, maybe also other publishers with some care left for things other than money.
 
Ira Abramov

March 2nd, 2000 12:36 AM
 
At least Microsoft are self-sustained bullies, as opposed to using the "call my mother" government system to bully competetors. I think that although the customer boycott is the current news item, with all the Web topics going through the government right now, wait until they realize you not only made your company look bad, but you dragged them unknowingly into bad public relations. If anyone should be upset with you, it is your own programmers and designers, whose innovation and work origninally made you the best e-commerce site on the net. Now, because of your misabuse of patents, you have essentialy destroyed their work, as it is no longer valid due to your actions.
 
Chris Beveridge

March 2nd, 2000 12:37 AM
 
Chris Phillips

March 2nd, 2000 12:38 AM
 
I have been a long time Amazon customer and until this patent issue came up, Amazon was the main online book seller I ordered from. Now it is the only one I won't order from. I hope that they can wake up and see their mis-use of software patents.
 
Hans Johnsson

March 2nd, 2000 12:39 AM
 
Dan Dunkin

March 2nd, 2000 12:39 AM
 
I cancelled my order of /Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity [Paperback] By: Jakob Nielsen/ at amazon.com, and got it for $5 less at B&N with a books.com discount.
 
Jeandré du Toit

March 2nd, 2000 12:39 AM
 
Hey Mr. Jeff what's next, patent the use a credit card??. Have you ever heard about the Open source Movement . The Web(and the e-commerce)will be growing with, without and even over your patents.
 
anonymous

March 2nd, 2000 12:41 AM
 
I was a satisfied customer of Amazon, but since I learned that they're using their (bogus) patent agressively, I've turned to other, less agressive, bookstores.
 
Anders Larsen

March 2nd, 2000 12:42 AM
 
The ultimate marketing coup: patenting a marketing concept! Surely, Mr Bezos, you and the patent office must have better things to do.
 
Peter Bonney

March 2nd, 2000 12:42 AM
 
It seems every internet CEO is bandying around such slogans as 'consumer empowerment' but how do you help consumers by restricting the web with patents.
 
Hardip Dehal

March 2nd, 2000 12:43 AM
 
Stas Bekman

March 2nd, 2000 12:47 AM
 
Patenting anything that is already in use, just to further your own business efforts - at the expense of the general community, will at some point bounce back on you. Oh wait. It IS bouncing back on you.

I for one, will not buy any products from amazon.com while this ridiculous thing is occuring. It's as bad as patenting the human genome.
 
david fraser

March 2nd, 2000 12:47 AM
 
Jeremy A. Thiel

March 2nd, 2000 12:47 AM
 
I have made purchases from Amazon previously, but I have not and will not give you my custom while you continue with these ridiculous patents.
 
Glen Harris

March 2nd, 2000 12:48 AM
 
Before this patent controversy arose, I was a very satisfied customer of Amazon.com. Now I refuse to do business with them. In fact, I still haven't used the $40 gift certificate I got for Christmas. (I just wish there were some way to get that $40 away from these techno-bullies without actually buying anything more from them. It really burns me to think that they already have my money, and I can't get it back from them.) SHAME!
 
John Diedrichs

March 2nd, 2000 12:49 AM
 
Costis Angelis

March 2nd, 2000 12:49 AM
 
Zappa: don't you eat that yellow snow.
 
Rick Richardson

March 2nd, 2000 12:50 AM
 
John Gilbertson

March 2nd, 2000 12:50 AM
 
Terry Glass

March 2nd, 2000 12:51 AM
 
Thomas Molander

March 2nd, 2000 12:52 AM
 
Christopher Hall

March 2nd, 2000 12:52 AM
 
Martin Bonner

March 2nd, 2000 12:54 AM
 
Alan Schmitt

March 2nd, 2000 12:54 AM
 
Perhaps an action similar to "etoy" war could be useful!!!.
 
Artur Silveira da Cunha

March 2nd, 2000 12:55 AM
 
Sheryl Hope Shay

March 2nd, 2000 12:56 AM
 
Alex Cureton-Griffiths

March 2nd, 2000 12:56 AM
 
Alex Cureton-Griffiths

March 2nd, 2000 12:56 AM
 
Johan Gislén

March 2nd, 2000 12:57 AM
 
I already cancelled my amazon customer account and I am not planning to buy anything there anymore.
 
Jean Christophe Helary

March 2nd, 2000 12:58 AM
 
Getting a patent is one thing.
Enforcing is another. A company that makes no money is going to have a hard time coming up with
money for retainers. I am going to watch the stock fall.

 
Kim Westre

March 2nd, 2000 12:59 AM
 
Just drop it and play by the rules - you know that it is a silly patent, and look how many costumers you are loosing because of it!
 
Joergen Ramskov

March 2nd, 2000 1:01 AM
 
Again a patent authority proves their lack of
knowledge. And I will never buy anything from
Amazon again (of course). And I will inform
everyone I know why the shouldn't buy from
Amazon.
 
Henrik Holmström

March 2nd, 2000 1:02 AM
 
Dang this page took a long time to load... a bad sign maybe? (for amazon)
 
Gareth Evans

March 2nd, 2000 1:04 AM
 
I too have purchased books from Amazon, but no longer. Not until they give up such a childish patent. The idea of trying to prevent another company such as myself from using a simple program to make the web an easier place to shop is CHILDISH. Sorry, the idea to make things easier to shop is not an original idea!! I have already been working on such a system and continue to do so.
 
Darin Bialy

March 2nd, 2000 1:04 AM
 
Fulko van Westrenen

March 2nd, 2000 1:05 AM
 
Jonas Linde

March 2nd, 2000 1:06 AM
 
There is no need for it.
 
Mark L. Breen

March 2nd, 2000 1:07 AM
 
Xavier Duthilleul

March 2nd, 2000 1:07 AM
 
Michael Olander

March 2nd, 2000 1:08 AM
 
Dirk Peter van der Werf

March 2nd, 2000 1:08 AM
 
François Tremblay

March 2nd, 2000 1:09 AM
 
I had thought that Amazon was perhaps the one company that clearly understood e-business. With an easy to use web site and absolutely excellent customer service, Amazon WAS my first destination when I wanted any product Amazon carries.

However, with this crazy patenting and patent enforcement, they begin to show the same monopolistic tendencies of Microsoft.

Amazon! Win the game through your excellent service, marketing and web site. Not through patents (accepted by patent-clerks with an obvious lack of technology understanding) and legal moves! Otherwise you will win the battle but lose the war.
 
Akiva Marks

March 2nd, 2000 1:10 AM
 
Thomas Walter

March 2nd, 2000 1:12 AM
 
All together to unite against Amazon and to stay free.
 
Bernard Eychenne

March 2nd, 2000 1:13 AM
 
Bye Bye Amazon. One more lost customer.

Ben.
 
Ben Ritchie

March 2nd, 2000 1:13 AM
 
I will use another online bookseller while this patent is upheld
 
lorna r mcneill

March 2nd, 2000 1:16 AM
 
Lee Shakespeare

March 2nd, 2000 1:16 AM
 
Anders Weijnitz

March 2nd, 2000 1:16 AM
 
Mikko Hänninen

March 2nd, 2000 1:16 AM
 
Gustav Brock

March 2nd, 2000 1:16 AM
 
Gabrielle Allen

March 2nd, 2000 1:17 AM
 
Julien GABEL

March 2nd, 2000 1:17 AM
 
Bye-bye Amazon.
 
Stefan Bergstrand

March 2nd, 2000 1:17 AM
 
Amazon has a useful search engine. That's all.
 
Paul Cymbala

March 2nd, 2000 1:18 AM
 
Michael Snyder

March 2nd, 2000 1:20 AM
 
You are using my patented system of packets and frames to send your cookies. I demand a percentage for every cookie you have ever sent. What a load of rubbish. Who wants to patent the internet next? I won't be buying from you any more.
 
Matt Swanson

March 2nd, 2000 1:22 AM
 
Dear Amazon,
This well is dry.
-- Amazon well humor and analogies are Copyright Eric Sybesma (c)2000
 
Eric Sybesma

March 2nd, 2000 1:22 AM
 
Richard Kunze

March 2nd, 2000 1:23 AM
 
Boycott Amazon!
 
Chris Williams

March 2nd, 2000 1:23 AM
 
One more amazon customer bites the dust.
 
Ernest Souhrada

March 2nd, 2000 1:24 AM
 
David Barlow

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 AM
 
I have always looked at Amazon.com as a pioneer
in its field. But so was Microsoft once.

I use Microsoft products when I must because there
is no alternative (once or twice every year).

In the case of Amazon.com there will always be
alternatives and I will use them instead.
 
Torbjörn Gard

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 AM
 
The concept of a patent on one-click ordering is utterly ridiculous. The patent process was instituted to protect the investment of time and money made by inventors from being commercially eroded. The investment required to invent one-click ordering was negligible, and Amazon.com should not be permitted to take unfair market advantage from that invention.
 
Oliver Crow

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 AM
 
Johan Eriksson

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 AM
 
Alex Cantlay

March 2nd, 2000 1:26 AM
 
Max Goncharenko

March 2nd, 2000 1:26 AM
 
Anton V. Boyarshinov, Obninsk -

March 2nd, 2000 1:27 AM
 
Ronald van der Lee

March 2nd, 2000 1:27 AM
 
Well I personally consider any software patent to be bad, and believe they should never have been issued. However the Amazon patent takes the cake as it is ridiculous, since cookies were around before, and this was their obvious use, and so the patent should be shot down as being without merit. (If they put the technology into the browsers, then they would have a stronger case, but as it is they do not have anything.) This should be challenged, and it will be revoked in due time. In the meanwhile boycott Amazon. I personally made at least 4 trips to local Borders to buy books I would have otherwise ordered on-line. So as long as we all do that they will see the errors of their way, and either release the patent into public domain, or suffer the consequences.
 
Martin Lebl

March 2nd, 2000 1:28 AM
 
Bart-Jan Vrielink

March 2nd, 2000 1:32 AM
 
I spent >100 UKP at amazon.co.uk yesterday, but then I didn't know about this. Next time I'll think twice and may go to bol.com or one of the others instead.
 
Martin Ebourne

March 2nd, 2000 1:32 AM
 
Tsk, tsk... this is childish of Amazon. Don't they have better things to do? Perhaps they should consider tasks other than the 'patent infringement merry-go-round'.
 
J. Beck

March 2nd, 2000 1:32 AM
 
Constantin Blagov

March 2nd, 2000 1:32 AM
 
I have been a longtime and faithful customer of Amazon.com, but no more!
 
Matt Hill

March 2nd, 2000 1:33 AM
 
From what I understand Amazon is trying to patent
the use of 'cookies' in a roundabout way in order
to gain a monopoly - why should they?

Does this mean someone can patent hair dyes? - exactly is sounds rediculous.

DOWN WITH AMAZON.
 
Mike Ramshaw

March 2nd, 2000 1:34 AM
 
Working in e-commerce we all benefit from the harvested exchange of ideas and innovations from all over the world. In the end businesses will succeed because they offer the customer an honest and sincere service that they trust and support. I am a great admirer and regular customer of Amazon but I see their current actions as neither honest nor sincere.
 
Diane Clark

March 2nd, 2000 1:34 AM
 
Steven A Schultz

March 2nd, 2000 1:35 AM
 
the next step will be:
Put a patend on a book?
Put a patend on "hello world"?
get real , get a life.

The text of your one-click patend is is to broad to be real. Have you ever heard of prior art?
You would have more success, if you would sell your "one-click" program (script) to interested parties., without having a controversial patend on it.
Sorry i stay with barnes & nobles.
 
Rudy Ketterer

March 2nd, 2000 1:37 AM
 
Hannah Pettifer

March 2nd, 2000 1:39 AM
 
Tone Marie Berg

March 2nd, 2000 1:39 AM
 
I agree entirely with Tim's comments. The granting of this patent is against all common sense.
I have been a customer of Amazons in the past and although they do provide a valuable service to the world community this sort of action will undoubtedly make me think twice before I use them again. There are after all alternatives !! and Amazon would do well to ponder on this.
 
Max N Clark

March 2nd, 2000 1:40 AM
 
Olof Ekedahl

March 2nd, 2000 1:42 AM
 
Vern Gerein

March 2nd, 2000 1:43 AM
 
Floris Kraak

March 2nd, 2000 1:44 AM
 
I agree fully with Tim O'Reilly and Amazon has just lost another customer. Don't strangle the market that gave you a successful bussiness with your patents.
 
Bryony Sigworth

March 2nd, 2000 1:44 AM
 
Signed
 
Per Lundberg

March 2nd, 2000 1:47 AM
 
Rostyslav Hermanyuk

March 2nd, 2000 1:48 AM
 
Ben J Boyle

March 2nd, 2000 1:48 AM
 
Time to move to another online bookstore, I guess.
 
Simon Geard

March 2nd, 2000 1:49 AM
 
I used to buy around $500 worth of books a year from Amazon.com. I have moved 100% of this business elsewhere. I will not use Amazon.com until there is a clear statement from the company indicating that it will stop trying to enforce its ridiculous and absurd patents on 1-click ordering and affiliate programs.
 
Tom Scott

March 2nd, 2000 1:50 AM
 
Paul Maskelyne

March 2nd, 2000 1:51 AM
 
Lennart Steinke

March 2nd, 2000 1:51 AM
 
Ama$on: stop this costly madness. you are a pig.
 
George Orwell

March 2nd, 2000 1:51 AM
 
Ben Short

March 2nd, 2000 1:52 AM
 
christos zissopoulos

March 2nd, 2000 1:53 AM
 
Adam Valkin

March 2nd, 2000 1:54 AM
 
Christopher S Martin

March 2nd, 2000 1:54 AM
 
What was the other site's name, wasn't it barnesandnobles.com?
 
Tobias Vancura

March 2nd, 2000 1:55 AM
 
Gerbrand van der Zouw

March 2nd, 2000 1:56 AM
 
Hey, I'm from Singapore, and this concerns me!
I say, we all boycott Amazon!

At the rate this is going, the PTO might as well
grant me a patent on Internetting from Singapore!!!
 
Chee Wee

March 2nd, 2000 2:01 AM
 
Bryan J. Abshier

March 2nd, 2000 2:01 AM
 
No more orders from me or the dozens of friends and colleagues who ask my advice on e-commerce. The most common questions are 'Whom do you buy from?' and 'Whom do you trust?'. Guess what? I've changed my standard response since Amazon initiated this ignorant, venal application, driven only by mindless greed.
Are they book-sellers, or book-makers?
 
Marcus GS Millar

March 2nd, 2000 2:01 AM
 
As a long-term expat in Japan, I've relied on Amazon for years. No longer, until this nonsense is stopped. Fatbrain, Powell's, or the other biggies will get my book business, DVD Express my movie business, and CDNow my music business.

And I'll be making that recommendation to the 200+ expats I work and play with, here.
 
Ben Madison

March 2nd, 2000 2:01 AM
 
Dave Braddick

March 2nd, 2000 2:02 AM
 
Tobias Klausmann

March 2nd, 2000 2:03 AM
 
Looks like I'll need to find a new source for my steady diet of nutshell books...wonder if its too late to return my ufie literature.
 
Patrick Brannan

March 2nd, 2000 2:03 AM
 
Obik Anti

March 2nd, 2000 2:03 AM
 
I think Amazon.com is like other companies that are making money. They just want to make more and more and don't pay attention to the environment and to the custumers claims.

If no one would stop buying at amazon.com for a week, but I mean no one, well maybe they'll think up twice before "patenting" the web ;)
 
Sébastien GALINA

March 2nd, 2000 2:03 AM
 
Frank J. Iacovino

March 2nd, 2000 2:04 AM
 
Matti Lehtinen

March 2nd, 2000 2:05 AM
 
Brian Alston

March 2nd, 2000 2:07 AM
 
What you're hurts you customers more than your competitors. I'll be back only when the stupidness ends.
 
Denis Hennessy

March 2nd, 2000 2:09 AM
 
So much for the $300+ of stuff I piled in my shopping cart.
 
Andrew Walters

March 2nd, 2000 2:09 AM
 
Donal Stewart

March 2nd, 2000 2:11 AM
 
Scott Rochford

March 2nd, 2000 2:19 AM
 
It's Borders for me!
 
Mr. Jackie Smith

March 2nd, 2000 2:19 AM
 
JAMES KLINGER

March 2nd, 2000 2:22 AM
 
Amazon.com wants to what? Oh thats ok, I use Quixtar.com anyways, they are so much more successful amazon is *trying* to market through Quixtar. HAHA I doubt the upstanding guys at Quixtar will deal with such untrustworthy folks, not to mention the fact that they pay you money back at Quixtar, something that amazon never thought of. Thats ok, they'd try to patent it if they had...
 
Matthew Olson

March 2nd, 2000 2:23 AM
 
Ricardo Gandara

March 2nd, 2000 2:23 AM
 
Helge Kreutzmann

March 2nd, 2000 2:23 AM
 
This idea is so blindingly obvious that a child could have thought of it and attempting to enforce the patent will have a stifling affect on eCommerce.
 
Ray Bellis

March 2nd, 2000 2:24 AM
 
Buuu!
 
Clas

March 2nd, 2000 2:24 AM
 
Buuu!
 
Clas

March 2nd, 2000 2:25 AM
 
Yet anouther reason why I won't buy from amazon.
 
Robin Forbes

March 2nd, 2000 2:28 AM
 
Dan Manell

March 2nd, 2000 2:29 AM
 
Stephan Bartels

March 2nd, 2000 2:29 AM
 
I used to be an Amazon affiliate. I now renounce Amazon for its malicious business tactics.
 
Michael P. Foster

March 2nd, 2000 2:29 AM
 
Hayley Buery

March 2nd, 2000 2:31 AM
 
Terje Malmedal

March 2nd, 2000 2:32 AM
 
I've been a customer of Amazon for quite some time. While I agree that this single click technology improves usability of the interface,
I strongly disagree on the attempt of patenting
technology and processes that were well-known
before Amazon and the Internet. I'll discontinue
my use of Amazon.com as long as this patent is not withdrawn, and use another bookorder service
instead. Given the fact that Amazon does not make profit so far and a boycott won't improve this situation, you should seriously consider not to stomp on customers' demands further, as you might end up as the most prominent Internet shop to get bankrupt because of greed.
 
Holger Veit

March 2nd, 2000 2:32 AM
 
Vadim Belman

March 2nd, 2000 2:33 AM
 
Mattias Hermansson

March 2nd, 2000 2:34 AM
 
I am now looking for another site for my book supplies.
 
Michael Tran

March 2nd, 2000 2:35 AM
 
Tim's right. Strong-arm tactics just turn people off. What if someone had patented the "one push door opening" system? Look, no handle to turn!

Try http://www.bookpool.com/
 
Leigh Anthony

March 2nd, 2000 2:36 AM
 
Is Amazon owned by Microsoft, or have they just been taking lessons from them?
 
Lucrezia

March 2nd, 2000 2:40 AM
 
Barbara Weidman

March 2nd, 2000 2:40 AM
 
We're strongly against software patents.

See www.freepatents.org for our position on
that matter.
 
Stefane Fermigier

March 2nd, 2000 2:40 AM
 
greg harris

March 2nd, 2000 2:42 AM
 
Powers that be at Amazon, please take note:

Computer users of the world are getting tired of monopolistic powers that try to crush competitors by "innovation."

Take a survey and find out how much of the computer users of the world hate Microsoft's business tactics and what they would like to do with a company like that. Then ask yourself: "Do we want to be loved this much too?"

To quote the Matrix: "One of these lives has a future. The other one does not."

Think things through.
 
Thomas Docking

March 2nd, 2000 2:45 AM
 
Dimitri Gaspard

March 2nd, 2000 2:45 AM
 
Simon Kristensen

March 2nd, 2000 2:47 AM
 
After reading RMS' announcement, I was in doubt if I should continue buying O'reilly books from Amazon. There service is quicker than ordering a book at a bookstore. And most bookstores don't have all the O'reilly books. O'reilly has become my first choice on technical subjects, because of their excellent quality.
Amazon makes buying these books a lot easier. But doing things in a more Microsoft manner, makes my skin crawl.
I am still in doubt on what to do!


 
Aschwin van der Woude

March 2nd, 2000 2:47 AM
 
I will no longer purchase any products from Amazon.com as long as this suppression of freedom is in force.
 
Ron Brockelman

March 2nd, 2000 2:49 AM
 
James McBoyle

March 2nd, 2000 2:51 AM
 
Jaron Frenk

March 2nd, 2000 2:51 AM
 
Craig Gormley

March 2nd, 2000 2:51 AM
 
Angela Mowat

March 2nd, 2000 2:53 AM
 
Christian Folini

March 2nd, 2000 2:53 AM
 
Alex Pawlitschko

March 2nd, 2000 2:53 AM
 
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
ams$on
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
 
Susan Grimes

March 2nd, 2000 2:55 AM
 
Callum Wright

March 2nd, 2000 2:55 AM
 
I couldn't have said it better myself.
 
Pete Doherty

March 2nd, 2000 2:57 AM
 
Thomas May

March 2nd, 2000 2:57 AM
 
There's plenty of alternative online book stores to choose from - I'll check out some of the others.
 
Richard Payne

March 2nd, 2000 2:58 AM
 
I used to believe that Amazon was one of the innovators on the Internet. I see now that they are more interested in snuffing out competition than innovating. You have lost my support, my business, and my recommendation. I am sure that Barnes and Noble, Borders, Chapter 11, etc. will welcome my business.
 
Richard Biever

March 2nd, 2000 3:02 AM
 
Mark Kuschnir

March 2nd, 2000 3:04 AM
 
I agree with Tim completely on this issue. I feel so strongly about it that I am a mouse click away from deciding not to continue as a Amazon customer until the matter is resolved.

Signed,
Nguyen T. Ho
(long time Amazon customer, admirer)
 
Nguyen Trong Ho

March 2nd, 2000 3:06 AM
 
I will newer buy another book at Amazon - that's final! Than I would prefer to pay some eXtra to somebody who is honnest!
 
Martin Nielsen

March 2nd, 2000 3:06 AM
 
One-Click is a nice feature and a good marketing technique but it is _not_ a tecknical innovation. Reasons for this is well covered in Mr O'Reillys letter.
I will not buy any more products from Amazon.com until You have withdrawn the patent on One-Click.
 
Henrik Hamelius

March 2nd, 2000 3:10 AM
 
I've been doing this kind of thing on Web sites for years, so I can't understand how the patent was granted in the first place!
 
Peter Bance

March 2nd, 2000 3:10 AM
 
Word.
 
Fredrik Carlén

March 2nd, 2000 3:11 AM
 
I use to shop exclusively at Amazon.com, now
I will take my business to Barnes & Noble instead.
Pity really, I used to enjoy Amazon, but this
patent thing is just too stupid.
 
Espen Randen

March 2nd, 2000 3:14 AM
 
Amazon...you just lost another sale. I recently bought four books ($112.00 worth) from Barnes and Noble. Jeff Bezos...are you listening?
Greed and stupidity--displayed by your recent actions re: patents--do not a successful business make. Get a grip and knock off the nonsense!
 
R.G.Crum

March 2nd, 2000 3:14 AM
 
Johan Norrman

March 2nd, 2000 3:15 AM
 
T.Oltmanns

March 2nd, 2000 3:17 AM
 
John Winters

March 2nd, 2000 3:20 AM
 
What next? Patenting a mouse click to confirm an electronic transaction?
How a patent on things commonly in use for so long on the 'net (before Amazon used them) was granted is beyind me.
I will place no new orders with amazon (com or uk) until you stop trying to stifle E-commerce with your ludicrous patents.
 
David Challender

March 2nd, 2000 3:22 AM
 
For a few years I had been a happy customer of Amazon. But they need to realize they are doing something despicable. Each of us only needs to convince very few people not to buy from Amazon.
 
Akos Szalkai

March 2nd, 2000 3:26 AM
 
D. Scott Barninger

March 2nd, 2000 3:27 AM
 
Joel Gerhold

March 2nd, 2000 3:27 AM
 
Toby Boardman

March 2nd, 2000 3:27 AM
 
I am not as angry as many of the other signers of this letter, but I do understand their feelings. I have been purchasing most of my books and Music CD's from Amazon.com for the last several years.

I am disappointed that the Patent Office granted your one-click patent because it does not seem to meet all three of the requirements required for the granting of patents. To be patentable, an invention must be useful (I grant that one), new, and non-obvious to someone skilled in the art. I believe it may fail to meet the second, and certainly fails to meet the third of these requirements.

I can understand your wish to obtain patents on your work so you need not defend yourself against harassing lawsuits by others, and I can accept that in these litigeous times, but I think you should give out free licenses (even to competitors) to these techniques. I do not mean that you should necessarily distribute your program code under the GPL (though that would be a nice thing to do), but I recommend you seriously consider publishing the fact that these patents have been obtained for defensive purposes and that you will not prosecute others who use them.
 
Jean-David Beyer

March 2nd, 2000 3:28 AM
 
David Byers

March 2nd, 2000 3:31 AM
 
Lynne Attwood

March 2nd, 2000 3:31 AM
 
I am a former cutomer of Amazon.com. I will remain "former" as long as Amazon.com continues to enforce the patent on One-Click, and continues to apply for and receive patents on processes that have been in use on the Web prior to receiving the patent. I am well aware that US courts have upheld AMazon.com's patent and the enforcement thereof. However, I am not a judge, nor am I "the court"; I am a consumer, and as such, I count for more. My money will NOT be supporting Amazon.com until they cease these business-stifling activities.
 
Robert A. James

March 2nd, 2000 3:33 AM
 
Colin Scott

March 2nd, 2000 3:34 AM
 
Edwin Brady

March 2nd, 2000 3:35 AM
 
Patrick Birch

March 2nd, 2000 3:35 AM
 
Former Amazon customer
 
Larry Hatt

March 2nd, 2000 3:41 AM
 
I've read the patent abstract but I can't
understand what makes this patentable (I'm not
a lawyer.) If supermarkets implement this one
day, will they have to pay Amazon for 'thinking' of it?
 
Alex Kurucz

March 2nd, 2000 3:41 AM
 
Lionel MOULAS

March 2nd, 2000 3:43 AM
 
So much for integrity. Maybe I can get a patent on tag.
 
Wayne Booth

March 2nd, 2000 3:46 AM
 
Rob Little

March 2nd, 2000 3:46 AM
 
Warren Hughes

March 2nd, 2000 3:48 AM
 
Anders Tiden

March 2nd, 2000 3:48 AM
 
Maurice Kelly

March 2nd, 2000 3:48 AM
 
Amazon are doing theselves no favours at all in the long run with this effort.
 
Mathias Disney

March 2nd, 2000 3:48 AM
 
Brandon Ferguson

March 2nd, 2000 3:50 AM
 
Jan Simonsen

March 2nd, 2000 3:50 AM
 
Ook Nederlandse klanten pikken dit niet.
 
Han Holl

March 2nd, 2000 3:50 AM
 
Colin McNally

March 2nd, 2000 3:51 AM
 
USPTO must step up to the job of assessing prior art. Their performance in the One Click, Referrals, and Y2K Windowing cases illustrates a complete lack of competence in their understanding of contemporary computer science.
 
Bruce B. Bottomley

March 2nd, 2000 3:53 AM
 
Linnea Edlund

March 2nd, 2000 3:53 AM
 
Ban Amazon
 
Atul Yadav

March 2nd, 2000 3:53 AM
 
Chris Day

March 2nd, 2000 3:54 AM
 
this kind of thing puts me off shopping on line
don`t want to go to the big suppliers, they are all patented up, don`t want to go to the smaller (more dodgy) firms either.
 
Will Palmer

March 2nd, 2000 3:55 AM
 
I have cancelled my Amazon account and encourage others to do likewise. This is how we are repayed for not frequenting our local bookstores.
 
Mark Crane

March 2nd, 2000 3:55 AM
 
Never buy a book online until you have checked out www.bestbookbuys.com !
 
Barry Mullan

March 2nd, 2000 3:55 AM
 
i'll boycott amazon 'til they give up...
 
Guillaume Criloux

March 2nd, 2000 3:55 AM
 
I agree
 
Liam

March 2nd, 2000 3:56 AM
 
How ?
 
Jonathan Embury

March 2nd, 2000 3:57 AM
 
The only way the web and e-commerce can grow is when e-commerce can be done in the most simple way possible. Just like one time the formation of markets and the start trade routes gave a boost to the economy of ancient societies. So too will the web benefit from those processes that make it the most easy to use. Keeping the process proprietary will not improve the efficiency of the process.
 
Rudolf van der Berg

March 2nd, 2000 3:57 AM
 
chris Wills

March 2nd, 2000 3:58 AM
 
I've been an satisfied Amazon customer for nearly 3 years, and followed your progress long before that. I've enjoyed your convenience, your service, and your innovation. But I'm saddened that you'd use legal ruses to squat on obvious (yes, it is obvious) innovation, and strain the growth and exchange of ideas on the Web on which we depend. I hope you'll reconsider your enforcement of the one-click patent. I did not shop at your site this past holiday season, and will not until you do.
 
Jack Bennetto

March 2nd, 2000 3:59 AM
 
Jeff Largent

March 2nd, 2000 4:00 AM
 
Ian Arch

March 2nd, 2000 4:01 AM
 
Amazon will not receive one additional dollar on the large amounts i spend in books until they stop this patenting thing.
 
Enrique Bengoechea

March 2nd, 2000 4:01 AM
 
David Warnock

March 2nd, 2000 4:02 AM
 

Unfortunate choice, Amazon. Your actions only attempt to stifle development of e-commerce.

I have a $50 gift certificate from the holidays. I will use this certificate shortly, if for no other reason than to deny you that amount becoming an excess income for you. Afterwards, you'll get no further orders from me.

That is an unfortunate loss for you. As a computer professional, the majority of reference books on my bookshelf were ordered from you. Now, I'll go elsewhere for these purchases.

Game over. You lose.
 
A. Reichert

March 2nd, 2000 4:02 AM
 
Philip Clark

March 2nd, 2000 4:03 AM
 
Riccardo "rastamon" Carracoi

March 2nd, 2000 4:11 AM
 
I see this is as a very unfortunate development
and one which will ensure that I will take
my custom elsewhere. Never forget that we have a choice.
 
Andy Gibb

March 2nd, 2000 4:11 AM
 
i thought about using you for a while, but then you go and pull this crap. guess i have to take my money somewhere else.
 
Klaus Kristensen

March 2nd, 2000 4:12 AM
 
Michael Merriman

March 2nd, 2000 4:13 AM
 
Art Pope

March 2nd, 2000 4:16 AM
 
Another customer lost!, until you cease this stupidity, then maybe I will return, but probably not
 
Jonathon McManus

March 2nd, 2000 4:18 AM
 
William Cleveland

March 2nd, 2000 4:18 AM
 
Robert Chetham

March 2nd, 2000 4:18 AM
 
i agree
 
poekie

March 2nd, 2000 4:21 AM
 
Come on, Amazon, you can't be serious. Stop making a laughing stock of yourself.
 
Richard L. Bos

March 2nd, 2000 4:22 AM
 
Lars Kyndi Laursen

March 2nd, 2000 4:23 AM
 
If Amazon's terrible customer service and incompetent fraud department weren't bad enough already..
 
Brian Snodgrass

March 2nd, 2000 4:24 AM
 
Up until this patent mess, I ordered my books from Amazon exclusively. Now, I'll use anyone BUT Amazon.
 
Michael Owen

March 2nd, 2000 4:27 AM
 
Ralf Hildebrandt

March 2nd, 2000 4:27 AM
 
It all smacks of a misguided protectionism and greed
 
Darren Oduka

March 2nd, 2000 4:28 AM
 
Michel Kern

March 2nd, 2000 4:29 AM
 
Christopher Batten

March 2nd, 2000 4:29 AM
 
The idea of patenting something that has been on the net for some years now is both ridiculous and frustrating. Now to tax your customers for a "service" you provide and market as something that makes your site unique is wrong. Many of us hope that you at Amazon.com will realize that those of us in the public will not stand for this and will spread the word across the world. Fortunately, you can't tax us to use our own connections as we boycott your site.
 
Trevor O.

March 2nd, 2000 4:30 AM
 
The web is for all - not the profiteering antics of the few.
 
Andrew Sharp

March 2nd, 2000 4:30 AM
 
harald

March 2nd, 2000 4:31 AM
 
Al Gore invented the Internet, Amazon patented it.
 
Manfredi Bargioni

March 2nd, 2000 4:31 AM
 
Nuff said already. No more one-click books and CD's for me!
 
Okke van 't Verlaat

March 2nd, 2000 4:32 AM
 
I used to purchase from Amazon, but based on this foolishness, I'll be taking my business elsewhere. Trademark the name One-Click if you must. If I recall correctly, there was an "affiliate" program by somewhere else before Amazon, so patenting it shouldn't have happened.
 
Duncan Hill

March 2nd, 2000 4:34 AM
 
Nuno Nunes

March 2nd, 2000 4:34 AM
 
Stig Are M. Botterli

March 2nd, 2000 4:35 AM
 
Don't stifle competition. I have noticed you only sued Barns and Noble, why not all the other thousdands of companys that are using one-click shopping? Duh, too much prior art.
 
Dan Guisinger

March 2nd, 2000 4:35 AM
 
I support this movement and all attempts to thwart senseless software patenting.
 
Sean M. Paus

March 2nd, 2000 4:37 AM
 
It is obvious that BIG is not BIG enough. Mr. Bezos is initiating "king of the hill" mentality, and threatens to choke the medium that got him there. Shouldn't a "man of the year" who has been wildly successful, share "his" ideas and methods with the soceity and vehicle that assisted in his rise to the top? What ever happened to the mentality "for the good of the whole"? It was replaced by the "protect thyself."


 
John Cameron

March 2nd, 2000 4:38 AM
 
Brian Almeida

March 2nd, 2000 4:38 AM
 
Don't hinder the development of the net by being small-minded. companies keep their customers by offering quality of service and value for money.
 
Steve Blunden

March 2nd, 2000 4:38 AM
 
alison kershaw

March 2nd, 2000 4:40 AM
 
In attempting to prevent anyone else from making use of this feature, you are rendering them more vulnerable to the hacking of their personal information, thus they become that much more of a target for cyber-criminals. The one-click feature is more secure for us to do business with, and if you want to prevent me from doing business isn the most secure manner possible, I simply won't do business with you.

 
Steven Cox

March 2nd, 2000 4:43 AM
 
SERGEY MUKHAYEV

March 2nd, 2000 4:43 AM
 
Robert Sadler

March 2nd, 2000 4:46 AM
 
eric Farris

March 2nd, 2000 4:46 AM
 
It's not surprising Jeff Bezos was Time Man of the Year -- after all, so were Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini! (Really!)
 
John Connor

March 2nd, 2000 4:48 AM
 
Bad for the Web. What a shame -- I too am an early Amazon adopter and big fan. Now deeply disappointed; unhappily support the boycott.
 
Brian Cooper

March 2nd, 2000 4:49 AM
 
Pete Jordan

March 2nd, 2000 4:49 AM
 
I urge everyone to protest this ludicrous behaviour by boycotting Amazon.Com until they come to their senses.
 
Peter Luichinger

March 2nd, 2000 4:49 AM
 
I will boycott Amazon and also encourage others to do so!
 
Raffael Stocker

March 2nd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
Simply Foolish, to try to press this patent, is not going to add value to your business. Nor is letting other people do business the way the web was intended. Give up and let people make the choice on how they want to shop.
 
James Barnes

March 2nd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
John Donigan

March 2nd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
I will not buy from Amazon because of this patent. I will not so much as visit their web site. I will actively encourage others to boycott Amazon.com.

STOP THIS STUPID PATENT NONSENSE NOW!!
 
Ed Centanni

March 2nd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
Grahame Budd

March 2nd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
Jean-Baptiste FREHAUT

March 2nd, 2000 4:53 AM
 
I have placed my last two orders with BOL because of the amazon behaviour
 
Seamus Keane

March 2nd, 2000 4:54 AM
 
I have made purchases from Amazon in the past, but I will make my purchases elsewhere due to this issue.
 
Debra L. Reid

March 2nd, 2000 4:55 AM
 
I won't be buying from you any more. If you want to patent something create something unique not based on existing technology in common use. Why don't you try this concentrate on giving the best price ,selection and service.
 
John Daniel

March 2nd, 2000 4:57 AM
 
Is this the sort of publicity you want A..z.n ?
Come on, play the game.

n.b. Amazon has been removed ufn.
 
Michael Culverhouse

March 2nd, 2000 4:57 AM
 
Vit Rudovich

March 2nd, 2000 4:57 AM
 
I'm young and trying to make my own way in e-business. How can I not resent anything that threatens to criminalize my own efforts to innovate? If legalistic prevarication of this kind wants to pass itself off as an honest claim to property, shouldn't Amazon perform it's own boycott, namely against selling any resources that might aid both budding and experienced programmers in writing their own scripts? This sounds ridiculous for a reason: Amazon would have to go this far to avoid hypocrisy. One-click shopping is not Velcro^TM; if their claim sticks it will only be through force and not reason.
 
Anthony Fields

March 2nd, 2000 4:58 AM
 
I am a loyal Amazon customer. But patenting one-click is a joke. My beginning programming students could think of that. I intend to buy from other sources until this policy is abandoned.
 
Gary Randolph

March 2nd, 2000 4:58 AM
 
If I make future purchases from Amazon, it will be tainted with a bad feeling that I'm somehow endorsing their actions in this patent issue. Why in the world would any company want to create that feeling in their customers? Getting around this patent is easy - other sites just need to add a second "click" before the order process is complete. Thus Amazon doesn't restrict their ability to compete against them, and we as customers end up paying the price in terms of extra layers of windows that we must wade through to get an order accomplished. A lose-lose situation if you ask me.
 
Paul McKee

March 2nd, 2000 4:59 AM
 
I am shutting down my affiliate site right now.
 
Joshua Goldberg

March 2nd, 2000 5:00 AM
 
Paul Comeau

March 2nd, 2000 5:05 AM
 
You've lost my business as a result of your ridiculous software patent policy.
 
Joel Schneider

March 2nd, 2000 5:06 AM
 
Stig Sjöberg

March 2nd, 2000 5:06 AM
 
And the government hassels Microsoft for "unfair business practices". What a rip-off! Do I see a boycott of Amazon on the horizon?
 
David Harrison

March 2nd, 2000 5:06 AM
 
Richard Gold

March 2nd, 2000 5:07 AM
 
David C. Papageorge

March 2nd, 2000 5:07 AM
 
Mike Ekholm

March 2nd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
Jeff.

Is Amazon.com a river of hidden piranhas? If yes, it is time to:
1. Move my custom elsewhere
2. Patent Dozens of obvious things on the Net and grant rights to everyone except Amazon.com. I can already think of a couple of them - less obvious than 1-click-@@$*!&


 
Manmohan Jain

March 2nd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
Antoine Hulin

March 2nd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
I enjoy using Amazon for much of my on-line buying, but I find your strategy of acquiring patents to ward off competition to be repugnant. It is a betrayal of the promise of e-commerce, and if your only source of competitiveness comes from these patents, then your company is doomed. They're relatively OBVIOUS innovations to on-line buying, and as such, should not enjoy a patent protection. Show real leadership and stop defending the indefensible.

Until you chang your ways, I can not, in good conscience, buy from your site.
 
Michael duVigneaud

March 2nd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
John Kingsley

March 2nd, 2000 5:11 AM
 
I had considered purchasing several book and recommending puchases from Amazon.com to my company. I have since decided against this.
 
Thomas DuVally

March 2nd, 2000 5:11 AM
 
Kath Cullen

March 2nd, 2000 5:11 AM
 
Bring out the patent lawyers. How about somone copyrighting "Single-click" shopping for public use? I'm sure you could legally argue that Single-click is not the same as "One-click." This just goes to show how truly screwed the patent system is.
 
B. Hill

March 2nd, 2000 5:11 AM
 
It is a shame that a company such as Amazon can patent or shall I say, steal public ideas. This only hurts every company trying to do business on the web. I would hate to see the web turn from a free, fun and open environment, to a legal quagmire.
 
Clifford Peaslee

March 2nd, 2000 5:13 AM
 
Amazon is to blaim for taking advantage of the clueless US Patent Office - the real problem rest on their doorstep!
 
Edward Russell

March 2nd, 2000 5:13 AM
 
A. Chris Nichols

March 2nd, 2000 5:13 AM
 
The U.S. patents system is broken. Amazon is taking advantage of this fact at the expense of the Internet community as a whole. As long as Amazon is following this line of reasoning, I will boycott its business. Perhaps *Boycott Amazon* could be patented under the current, confused patents system. *Boycott Amazon* now.
 
Richard Storey

March 2nd, 2000 5:14 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, at one time I was a frequent Amazon customer. However, this silly patent has turned me, as well as many others, away. One-Click ordering is a good idea, but why patent it? The patent is only going to hinder other technological advances, and the technology patented is already in use elsewhere! Is squashing the competition so important that you must let the U.S. government do it for you, rather than simply offering superior service?
 
David Shea

March 2nd, 2000 5:14 AM
 
Gunnar Fodnesbergene

March 2nd, 2000 5:16 AM
 
Bing Ho

March 2nd, 2000 5:17 AM
 
Gregory A. Owens

March 2nd, 2000 5:18 AM
 
Hail conqueror, Bill the Second! If you come to your senses and reverse your recent predatory actions in regard to your questionably obtained patents, then may you continue to prosper as a net-friendly and net-responsible business.

If, however, you continue your anti-net behavior, patenting the obvious and the previously invented, while still expecting me to store YOUR cookies on MY hard drive, then may the piranhas of your own limitless greed and more net-worhty competitors strip amazon.com to the financial bone.
 
Brent Thompson

March 2nd, 2000 5:19 AM
 
Kevin Houchens

March 2nd, 2000 5:19 AM
 
Well said, Tim. Well said.
 
Ken Kennedy

March 2nd, 2000 5:19 AM
 
Over the last few years I have bought lots of books from Amazon, and I have been especially happy with their ability to locate out of print books. But as a software developer I feel very strongly against software patents since in my opinion they will severly limit independent software development.

So from now and until Amazon stops using software patents offensively, I will not buy anything from Amazon.
 
Mats Löfkvist

March 2nd, 2000 5:20 AM
 
Kenneth J. Conrade

March 2nd, 2000 5:20 AM
 
David Bick

March 2nd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
I will boycott Amazon and other websites that I find out to have filed likewise patents.
 
Kees Beerepoot

March 2nd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
Greg Crockart

March 2nd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
good job!
 
mikeskup

March 2nd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
I agree with all points in Mr O'Reilly's letter and will refrain from using Amazon.com's services in the future until claims to these silly patents are withdrawn.
 
Petri I Taimisto

March 2nd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
All of my online business transactions will certainly exclude Amazon.com. I also urge people to send email to NPR.org as NPR is a large supported of Amazon.com.
 
donald martin

March 2nd, 2000 5:23 AM
 
Get a clue Jeff ...
 
Patrick Balint

March 2nd, 2000 5:23 AM
 
Edwin Angeli

March 2nd, 2000 5:24 AM
 
Don't let greed cripple the net.
 
Leighton Smith

March 2nd, 2000 5:24 AM
 
Amazon is helping to destroy one of the last "freedom zones." Because of their lack of community support I am boycotting Amazon.
 
Jason Jones

March 2nd, 2000 5:25 AM
 
Jody Franklin

March 2nd, 2000 5:25 AM
 
I avoid Amazon.com due both to their obnoxious patents and their insistence on spamming non-customers without permission.
 
Jay Levitt

March 2nd, 2000 5:27 AM
 
Dick Streefland

March 2nd, 2000 5:27 AM
 
Pedro Abreu

March 2nd, 2000 5:29 AM
 
Amazon makes enough money being themselves, why the patents on the obvious?
 
Bryan Davis

March 2nd, 2000 5:29 AM
 
Fabricio Chalub

March 2nd, 2000 5:30 AM
 
Germany
 
Kay Marquardt

March 2nd, 2000 5:31 AM
 
Allowing a patent on an otherwise ubiquitous and previously developed technology (cookies) is clearly an attempt to lay claim to someone else's work.
 
Tom Kennedy

March 2nd, 2000 5:31 AM
 
Desiree Tuvell

March 2nd, 2000 5:31 AM
 
Well, I used to use Amazon for almost all of my book needs, but I guess I'll just go to Borders, and encourage all of my friends to do the same.
 
Matt Ungaro

March 2nd, 2000 5:32 AM
 
I am boycotting Amazon.com and am informing my friends why. Mr. O'Reilly's letter echoes many of my thoughts.
 
Jim Menard

March 2nd, 2000 5:33 AM
 
Mike Peoples

March 2nd, 2000 5:33 AM
 
Henry Schaffer

March 2nd, 2000 5:33 AM
 
Where do you want to go today?
How about Barnes and Noble.
 
Michael K. Moran (West U, TX)

March 2nd, 2000 5:33 AM
 
James Daily

March 2nd, 2000 5:34 AM
 
Jacques Williams

March 2nd, 2000 5:35 AM
 
John Eisenschmidt

March 2nd, 2000 5:35 AM
 
And here I thought etoys vs. etoy was bad. I had a number of books sitting on my amazon.com wish list waiting for me to buy them. Now I'll just have to go somewhere else for my products.
 
Alexander Cherry

March 2nd, 2000 5:35 AM
 
Eric Powell

March 2nd, 2000 5:35 AM
 
One click? If this permitted graphics, I'd give you one finger! 0 not my clicking finger either.

You missed the mark in a big way. I could see the one-click shopping presented as a service mark, but not as a patented invention.

Mark Alley
 
Mark Alley

March 2nd, 2000 5:35 AM
 
I have been using Amazon.com for years, and have been so thrilled with the service that I often cite it as a model company in terms of customer service and innovative ways of doing business. Therefore, the news that Amazon.com is now pushing for frivolous patents as a way of staying competitive was a huge disappointment to me.
If you want to stay competitive, keep up the good service and creativity, and drop the frivolous patents. Dependency on enforcing frivolous patents- rather than true innovation and customer service- as a competitive business model is the surest way to suck all the innovation out of your company, leaving those same patents as the ONLY thing that is keeping you competitive. In the meantime, your use of those patents will have driven upset and alienated customers away from your site and into the arms of bn.com and fatbrain.com. In a field of very competitive pricing, Amazon has created the closest thing to brand loyalty there is. I know many people who will buy from Amazon before anywhere else unless there is vast price difference between products. Don't blow that loyalty by being stupid. How fast do you want to go out of business?
 
Tiffany Taylor

March 2nd, 2000 5:36 AM
 
mike shaw

March 2nd, 2000 5:36 AM
 
anonymous

March 2nd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
Patrick Heck

March 2nd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
Milt Rebmann

March 2nd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
Robert Warren Vawter III

March 2nd, 2000 5:38 AM
 
Greedy, selfish, and short-sighted.
 
Jim Smith

March 2nd, 2000 5:38 AM
 
The offensive (in both senses of the word) use of the patents held by Amazon.com only serves to stifle innovation and alienate Amazon from the very customers who helped the company get off the ground. It is unlikely that the patents will be upheld in court, and also unlikely that those other web sites served papers by your lawyers will be found in violation of your patent in any case (You can't patent the idea of 1-click, only the implementation details. There are numerous ways of implementing this, of which Amazon has patented one.) There is nothing to be gained and a great deal to be lost by pursuing this course, and a great deal to be gained and nothing to be lost by reversing the stance of Amazon.com and scoring this a public relations victory. If Amazon.com were to reverse its stance, and embrace the web as an environment of cooperation rather than cut-throat competition, it would be the best and most profitable course both for the web as a whole and for Amazon.com in particular. Please retract your agressive and competitive use of your software patents.
 
Bob Slaughter

March 2nd, 2000 5:39 AM
 
C'mon Amazon. Wake up. Rmember the old proverb about not doing something where you live? Well, all you're doing is driving my business to Borders and Barnes & Noble.
 
Rick Clemens

March 2nd, 2000 5:40 AM
 

Amazon should stick to what its good at: selling books. think of how you can sell books better and forget the rest.

dont bite the hands that feeds you.
 
Fabio Mont Alegre

March 2nd, 2000 5:41 AM
 
In the past I've been a *BIG* customer of Amazon, but I won't buy another book from the place until this patent issue has been dropped.

Patents are designed to reward ingenuity, not stifle progress.

 
Emlyn Everitt

March 2nd, 2000 5:41 AM
 
adam beecher

March 2nd, 2000 5:41 AM
 
As an Internet user since 1986, I was deeply saddened by the commercialization of the Internet which began in earnest around 1993-94. I also realized that the Internet was much more a resource for the wealthy and would never reach critical mass without "public funding" through business...because governments would not fund the necessary infrastructure improvements without also legislating big-brotherism. I was hoping that business would take the higher ground and compete openly and fairly while acknowledging that more Internet users and innovative businesses would better the system for everyone. Obviously, Amazon has realized that their current business practices suck and they haven't yet made a profit (due mostly to their higher prices than anything else...a condition which would have already driven a mom-and-pop bookstore out of business long ago). It is sad that they now pursue corporate profits not by competing fairly with others in their industry, but by taxing their competitors using a patent which was granted by an obviously Internet-illiterate agent. It's just one more example of why my business has never and will never go to the Amazon.com's, Barnes and Nobles, and Microsoft's...but instead to smaller and yet still more competitive local stores, open source operating systems like Free/OpenBSD, and discount (e)-booksellers like Bookpool.com
 
John-David Childs

March 2nd, 2000 5:42 AM
 
No comment!
 
Karl Pradene

March 2nd, 2000 5:42 AM
 
All of the books I have ever bought online I have bought from Amazon : as of today I will be ordering exclusively from other sources. Until Amazon give up this ludicrous patent claim, they can expect no more business from myself.
 
Vincent Cunniffe

March 2nd, 2000 5:42 AM
 
As long as you abuse the patent system by enforcing your claims to stifle both your competitors and all innovation in internet commerce, I will take my purchases directly to those competitors you wish to stifle. Barnes & Noble here I come.
 
Douglas Stuart

March 2nd, 2000 5:43 AM
 
Benedikt Kiessling

March 2nd, 2000 5:43 AM
 
Jeffrey Thompson

March 2nd, 2000 5:44 AM
 
If you wish to use up my hard disk then ask me first. Stop trying to crush competition through dirty tactics. If your can't handle the competition get out the fire. If your service is good the customers will stay. It really is in your benifit to allow competition, because it will help you to improve your service.
 
Paul Graydon

March 2nd, 2000 5:45 AM
 
Jonathan Amato

March 2nd, 2000 5:45 AM
 
Amazon how could you! This goes against the spirit and the purpose of the Internet.
 
Catherine Bassett

March 2nd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
This is just to register my support for Tim's argument. I shall be shopping elsewhere (indeed I bought Learning Perl very recently from another online bookshop - ace book, cheers Tim!) until the patent is withdrawn, or Amazon issue a statement to the effct that they will not be enforcing it.
 
Steffan Davies

March 2nd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
Amazon can go take a running jump. Fatbrain is a calling...
 
Matt Turvey

March 2nd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
Greg Glass

March 2nd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
Amazon can go take a running jump.

I'm using Fatbrain from now onwards.
 
Matt Turvey

March 2nd, 2000 5:48 AM
 
Matthew Miller

March 2nd, 2000 5:48 AM
 
Harold Dyson

March 2nd, 2000 5:49 AM
 
Nathan Lunt

March 2nd, 2000 5:49 AM
 
James Newby

March 2nd, 2000 5:49 AM
 
I used the Amazon site *once*, to buy a CD I found tricky to locate elsewhere. That was before the whole Dumb Patents issue blew up, yet I still feel bad for doing it.

I've now settled into the habit of redirecting people to http://www.noamazon.com - an anti-Amazon site containing a plethora of alternatives, such as the Barnes & Noble site.

Amazon must be made to see how their actions are doing harm. If that means hitting them in the profit margin, so be it.
 
Liam Hesse

March 2nd, 2000 5:49 AM
 
Ron Gredvig

March 2nd, 2000 5:50 AM
 
Jeffrey Jones

March 2nd, 2000 5:50 AM
 


Amazon needs to realize that LEGAL actions are not necessarily ETHICAL actions. Although there is absolutely nothing legally wrong with what they have done, they have left a bad taste in the mouths of many Internet shoppers. Not a good thing to do in such a competitive market.

Maybe someone should have consulted their marketing execs, instead of their lawyers. :)

Thumbs up to Jeff and O'Reilly for drawing attention to the issue.
 
Zach Pennington

March 2nd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
Andrew McCruden

March 2nd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
Rabid Vanyamba

March 2nd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
Mark T. Johns

March 2nd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
Ravi Chhatpar

March 2nd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
William S. Barnes

March 2nd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
Amazon is great, and it would be bad if they went down just because of that patents... hope they change their mind and do The Right Thing (tm).
 
Florin Boariu

March 2nd, 2000 5:52 AM
 
Jeff,

I was disturbed to learn recently that your company did recieve a patent for a trivial application of cookies you refer to as 1-click shopping. I am even more disturbed to learn you are attempting to enforce this pattent. As a former purchaser of books from Amazon.com and a developer of intranet/internet applications I am more than a little concerned that companies such as yours could possibly hamper business development on the web with this tendency towards the land grab style of pantenting. For this reason, I am advising all my friends to boycot Amazon.com until such time as this issue is resolved.
 
Evan L. Carew

March 2nd, 2000 5:52 AM
 
Jeff Barrows

March 2nd, 2000 5:53 AM
 
Amazon has lost my business and my respect.
 
Sandra Gillians

March 2nd, 2000 5:54 AM
 
Leif Möhr

March 2nd, 2000 5:54 AM
 
Daniel Judd

March 2nd, 2000 5:55 AM
 
I really have a problem with this one-click patent business. Understandably, the U.S. office bears some culpability in the matter. After all they awarded the ridicules patent. Still, applying for and attempting to enforce such a patent, is pretty low.
 
Philip McNamara

March 2nd, 2000 5:55 AM
 
Whatever short-term gain you think Amazon will gain from this is a drop in the bucket compared to the longer term damage to your reputation and customer goodwill.
 
William F. Bartelt III

March 2nd, 2000 5:56 AM
 
Robert D. Klein

March 2nd, 2000 5:57 AM
 
If Amazon do this, then maybe we should charge them for every byte stored in the amazon cookies on other Harddrivers.
 
Antony Iadarola

March 2nd, 2000 5:57 AM
 
Dean Giersch

March 2nd, 2000 5:57 AM
 
I've purchased several books from Amazon but have opted for other e-tailers in the last few months because of this issue. Get a grip, Amazon.
 
Jeremy Derr

March 2nd, 2000 5:59 AM
 
Tony S. Tosi

March 2nd, 2000 5:59 AM
 
I am in complete agreement with Mr. O'reilly's letter to Amazon regarding their patent. One-click anything is not new. In fact, this was the guiding principle for the GUI presentation. It was sad to hear of the courts decision and Amazon's insistance that this development was and intevative process. I have bought many books from Amazon, but, at least for the time being, I will switch to another mail-order company. This is my small protest against this type of reasoning.
 
John Spence

March 2nd, 2000 6:01 AM
 
I'd bought several books from Amazon over the last year, both personally and for my office. As I'm spending more and more online, it looks as though I'll probably make B&N my online bookstore as well as my traditional one.

Sorry Amazon, thought ya might be the one, but I was wrong.
 
clif

March 2nd, 2000 6:03 AM
 
Web-patents should never have been allowed. And those who took advantage of them have shown that they have no bussiness ethics. Don't lawyers and bussinessmen still have to take Ethics classes? Or is that just to show them how to avoid Ethics?
 
Steven Paavola

March 2nd, 2000 6:04 AM
 
Avarice and greed are rampant. This is just an example.
 
J. Kitzmiller

March 2nd, 2000 6:05 AM
 
Jeff Young

March 2nd, 2000 6:05 AM
 
Here - Here!
 
J.W. Smith

March 2nd, 2000 6:05 AM
 
Unbelievable!
 
Paula Wright

March 2nd, 2000 6:06 AM
 
Charles Schwieters

March 2nd, 2000 6:07 AM
 
Amazon.com will not get my business.
 
Chris Possessky

March 2nd, 2000 6:07 AM
 


Err.... Rather... Thumbs up to ORA - Not Jeff.

(Cut-and-paste editing makes for mistakes.) :)
 
Zach Pennington

March 2nd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, when I saw you during an interview on TV, you struck me as a bit odd. Now I see that is no longer the case. You're not odd; you're insane, especially if you think that people are going to sit by idly while you continue to -- as Mr. O' Reilly has so delicately put it -- "piss in the well".
 
Gary Parnes

March 2nd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
Support independent bookstores!
 
Simon T. Oldham

March 2nd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
I have worked in the engineering sector in patents, and have helped with the patenting of several brilliant innovations in power electronics. We then invested significant amounts in developing these inventions and bringing them to market, manufacturing the items which we had patented. One of these inventions in particular had me awestruck in its brilliance, with the sort of lateral thinking you see very few times in you lifetime, and is the only patent I have ever seen filed where the search report cited the prior art as "none".

In contrast, the one-click patent can easily be dismissed as lacking a clear inventive step, and is also little different to much prior art. Given the palpable invalidity of this patent, Amazon's actions in trying to enforce it can only be interpreted as a party with lots of money using that might to intimidate smaller companies which don't have the money to contest it. There is clearly a duty on the US patent office to examine patent applications properly, and they have failed in that duty. But for Amazon to put their big bucks behind this failure in the process and use it to intimidate other companies is nothing short of institutionalised abuse.

Adopting these sorts of methods disgraces Amazon, and puts them other companies that abuse their customers and the marketplace. I don't deal with such companies.
 
Dunstan Vavasour

March 2nd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
Fred Palumbo

March 2nd, 2000 6:09 AM
 
Did somebody say "Amazon.com"? I don't think so...
 
Stephen Negus

March 2nd, 2000 6:09 AM
 
My 1-click bye bye to Amazon.com .
 
Karl Zhang

March 2nd, 2000 6:12 AM
 
This action is yet another reason to supprt your local independent book seller.
 
Alisa K Hylton

March 2nd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Juliana Sant'Anna

March 2nd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Unbelievable! I am joining the boycott and will make the same recommendation to my friends and co-workers. I especially like the Supreme Court quote submitted by Mahlon Hollway on 2/29. I typically sign my email with my "bearded man" smiley which I have used for several years. Maybe I should patent that?

:-{>
 
Kurt Koller

March 2nd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Rolf Heckemann

March 2nd, 2000 6:14 AM
 
Richard Kemp

March 2nd, 2000 6:14 AM
 
Amazon - you build your business on open standards with open tools. And now you're trying to close them. Shame on you.

I can't believe I ever thought you were cool.
 
Matthew Christensen

March 2nd, 2000 6:14 AM
 
I understand much of the infrastructure at Amazon runs on Linux, Perl, and other OpenSoftware tools. To use these for commercial purposes is common and generally accepted, but to then create at patent around a process created with them is absurd.
 
Daniel Talbot

March 2nd, 2000 6:14 AM
 
On the new economy ship, Amazon has a chance to be the Capitan, I hope you do not decide to be the anchor.

Thank You.
 
J.D. Ashcraft

March 2nd, 2000 6:15 AM
 
New patent:
Special movement of the finger used to one-click order on amazon.com. Down and up. US Patent 5,345,345.
 
Florian Wegscheider

March 2nd, 2000 6:15 AM
 
Brenton Milne

March 2nd, 2000 6:15 AM
 
Laurent de la Vaissiere

March 2nd, 2000 6:16 AM
 
The order method you are trying to patent dates back to "cookies" which have been around for years. Both Amazon and Barnes&Noble have used the same principle that neither company has discovered. This lawsuit is quite ludicrous as is your attempt to patent something that has been around longer than you have.
 
Alla Barsky

March 2nd, 2000 6:18 AM
 
James T. Rosso

March 2nd, 2000 6:19 AM
 
Michael S. Baker

March 2nd, 2000 6:20 AM
 
David A. Fair

March 2nd, 2000 6:20 AM
 
Konrad Bloor

March 2nd, 2000 6:21 AM
 
Just wanted to say I agree wholeheartedly with your viewpoint. Sadly we can't really afford to boycott Amazon due to the service they provide, but frankly if they consist it appropriate to persist in their course of action, I only hope a serious competitor rises up and takes away their market. Shame.
 
Steve Wilkinson

March 2nd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
Casper Sorensen

March 2nd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
I'm not ordering anything from amazon.com anymore.
 
Michael Pope

March 2nd, 2000 6:23 AM
 
Due to your ridiculous business practices, you have lost me as a client.
 
Michel Gallant

March 2nd, 2000 6:23 AM
 
Joao Carlos Ferreira Barbosa

March 2nd, 2000 6:24 AM
 
Mr. Bezos:

Be aware that your Orwellian efforts to choke off your competition will fail. If I, a Internet Developer, choose to build a site that uses your unlawfully patented technology and you choose to take legal action against me... YOU WILL FAIL. Sure the courts may side with you initially, However... look at the effect the court of public opinion has had in the near past.. Look at the Etoy.com Vrs Etoys.com.. In that case the existing website came out on top.. Don't be afraid of more ecommerce on the web, be afraid of Walmart.com selling books!
 
Karl Yets

March 2nd, 2000 6:24 AM
 
As a developer, I will not support any company that seeks to burden the Internet with frivolous, ridiculous claims like these. From now on, I shall take my business to Barnes & Noble, and encourage others to do so as well.
 
Scott Powell

March 2nd, 2000 6:24 AM
 
Watch Nabisco patent chocolate chip cookies next.
 
David Lary

March 2nd, 2000 6:25 AM
 
Morgan Wajda-Levie

March 2nd, 2000 6:26 AM
 
I have used Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk many, many times and are quite pleased with the service in general.

For example, a book I bought from them five days ago. It was about £45 in a meat-space bookstore (Waterstones), while it was £33.59
from Amazon.co.uk (actually, £36.04 delivered to my doorstep). How convenient!
(The suggested retail price for the book is £41.99, which puts an expensive question mark on Waterstones...)

But if they are going to continue down the road they have chosen (patent their competitors out, rather than out-price and/or out-serve them), I feel strongly that I have to put my foot down and look for other (on-line!) book sellers.

Rgds,
Fridrik
 
Fridrik Asmundsson

March 2nd, 2000 6:26 AM
 
One more voice in the Amazon boycott, I suppose. I've ordered from Amazon extensively in the past, but now I'm turning my business over to Powell's.
 
Susan Marie Groppi

March 2nd, 2000 6:28 AM
 
Julian Corcuera

March 2nd, 2000 6:28 AM
 
It has been said "knowledge is freedom," so knowledge should be free.
 
Zardon Roger

March 2nd, 2000 6:29 AM
 
Nicole Saunders

March 2nd, 2000 6:30 AM
 
Gerard Gualberto

March 2nd, 2000 6:30 AM
 
All links and searchboxes to Amazon.com have been removed from all of the sites I maintain (approx. 20K hits/day total) and will remain that way until Amazon officially changes their policy.
 
Vince Vielhaber

March 2nd, 2000 6:30 AM
 
Troy Johnson

March 2nd, 2000 6:32 AM
 
Josh Simon

March 2nd, 2000 6:33 AM
 
Remember that women are techies too! I can guarantee you that my hard-earned pennies will not go into your coffers as long as you continue with this patent nonsense.
 
Shannon E.H. Sobota

March 2nd, 2000 6:33 AM
 
Bad Amazon... Bad. No cookie for you.
 
Bill Gates

March 2nd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
Nicole M. Moreau

March 2nd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
I can understand that Amazon is looking for new ways to finally make a profit. Bashing people over the head with lawyers for using something you misappropriated to begin with is not the way to go about this.

I have purchased from Amazon before, but unlike a lot of others here, I can't claim to be a regular customer. However, the potential cost to all of us for this frivolous patent is high enough to send my $0.02 somewhere else as well.

Until you come back to your senses, goodbye Amazon.
 
Sven Coenye

March 2nd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
Cyril CLARISSE

March 2nd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
Geez, Where will the rich and greedy stop - The fact that you combine technologies and processes that have been developed and implemented by other people or companies and patent them, smells alot like a lie or just cheating. If some person or committee, locked in a cube at the Patent office thought that Amazon has a valid claim - please fire him or the committee and get some new procedure in the Patent office- Again this smell like the Powers that be are getting dupe or paid off but the rich and greedy - Not to say I wouldn't have tried myself - But it is time that Amazon bow out and let the internet do what it does best : Provide (us) geek with the tools to take over the World:-)
With this - I will no longer buy from Amazon dot Bozos -

Thanks and Good Night!
 
Steve Tune

March 2nd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
Ernie Starchuk

March 2nd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
don't kill e commerce just as its starting to take off.
 
Mikey Sultz

March 2nd, 2000 6:35 AM
 
Amazon - how sleazy can you get?
 
Dave Lugo

March 2nd, 2000 6:35 AM
 
I recommend http://www.fatbrain.com or http://www.bookpool.com for technical books.
 
James Snow

March 2nd, 2000 6:36 AM
 
Amazon's actions are unethical and an example of business practice out of control to the detriment of technology and our society.
 
John Baxter

March 2nd, 2000 6:36 AM
 
I don't really order from Amazon any longer. Not really because of this. I like bookstores more and Borders is right down the street. Stil, I was going to look for some less common books/DVDs, but I think I'll skip Amazon because of this...

 
Charles Soto

March 2nd, 2000 6:36 AM
 
Anne Senft

March 2nd, 2000 6:38 AM
 
The people in charge at Amazon.com should wake up and realize that their purpose in life is to sell products. The way any company sells products is to have the best value at the best price. I don't buy something from a store because someone opened the door for me, and any educated purchaser will likely tell you the same thing.

I do not intend to purchase from Amazon.com until the lawsuit trying to defend this spurious patent is dropped.
 
Rick Greene

March 2nd, 2000 6:38 AM
 
I have been a customer of Amazon.com in the past, and I really enjoyed the site. However, in light of these business practices, I will no longer be doing business with them, unless they change their practices.
 
Rebecca Ames

March 2nd, 2000 6:39 AM
 
I fully support the boycott of Amazon.

Thank you,
Brian Boyd
 
Brian Boyd

March 2nd, 2000 6:39 AM
 
Johnie Stafford

March 2nd, 2000 6:40 AM
 
Charles Gagnon

March 2nd, 2000 6:41 AM
 
I am in shock that a company whose entire business
is based on open standards would patent a technique that is and has been in use for so long. Maintaining state is fundamental to web programming. In the past I have told my customers that they 'can find it on amazon' - never again. Now I will tell my customers to 'stay away from amazon'. Any links from my site to yours have been removed.

YOU ARE THREATENING MY LIVELYHOOD AND I WILL NEVER TRUST YOU AGAIN.
 
Jim Massey

March 2nd, 2000 6:42 AM
 
Kevin Beauchamp, CEO, SPIRE COMM

March 2nd, 2000 6:42 AM
 
As a patent holder of some of the first software patents ever granted, I am both dismayed and angry at the abuse of the patent process. The abuse appears to be by BOTH Amazon.com and the United States Patent Office. Having spent years proving the uniqueness of my own patents, I find it extraordinary that Amazon.com has been granted patents on such mundane, obvious and non-unique functions. It appears that ANY function that is further enabled by the Internet becomes fodder for the patent mill. Mr. Bezos is within his rights to obtain patent protection on a true innovation but this is an obvious abuse and not worth of the Time "Man of the Year." It would make Mr. Bezos a hero if he were to immediately assign both his new patents to a non-profit organization and place them in the public domain. That would retain his right to BE innovative when and if Amazon.com deserves it, but it admits that the two new patents were granted by overzealous examiners and should not be enforced.
 
John Small

March 2nd, 2000 6:43 AM
 
Eric Laabs

March 2nd, 2000 6:43 AM
 
This is a stupid as patenting the term www or .com. It's a slam against everyone trying to improve our nations economy via the web.
 
ken howell

March 2nd, 2000 6:43 AM
 
Now that the "1-click" and "affiliate" patents have been secured, Amazon should turn them over to a non-partisan organization to assure that they'll be available for all to use.
 
Paul MacIntosh

March 2nd, 2000 6:43 AM
 
Bob Parks

March 2nd, 2000 6:44 AM
 
hugo e alvarez

March 2nd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
Rachel Hackworth

March 2nd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
Let the Internet fly free!
 
Jeff Brown

March 2nd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
I think it's a great idea. Maybe you can get a patent on reading too!
 
Frank Golding

March 2nd, 2000 6:45 AM
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am quite disgusted by the predatory nature
of the patent process. I think the USPTO should
be held accountable for the many "marketing"
patents that they quite foolishly grant. If
there is an innovation in technology, allow a
patent. If it is no more than a slight tweak
on that-which-has-come-before (in this case,
it's not even that) allow the trademark to
exist for marketing purposes. Do not allow
a patent. Shame on Amazon, but more so to
the USPTO.gov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAji+fmUACgkQMLaY1VegcYEnhgCfdaWuH9IZNAzH7OI//vXSHijX
emAAnjZDVqFFTsj8jXiYlQL2n3PpPC7K
=Heds
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Graham G. Bignell

March 2nd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
That you were issued a patent for using Cookies for exactly what cookies were designed for is similar to me being issued a patent on your phone number simply because I thought to dial it. You are just using Cookies for the exact reason they were designed.

You benefit from the work of the original developers that thought of Cookies. Your developers undoubtedly put in a good amount of work to set up your system using that technology, let other companies do the same.

While I have probably only spent 100USD or so at amazon, I can assure you that I will not be spending any more until you stop attempting to enforce this absurd patent. To my friends I will recommend other sites to get books and CDs - oh yeah, your marketers probably forgot to tell upper-management - there are alternatives to A.C on the web.

Stop biting the hand that feeds you.
 
David Basener

March 2nd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
Salvatore Mancini

March 2nd, 2000 6:46 AM
 
A friend of mine said to me:
"A patent upon THE IDEA is preposterous.
It would be like patenting the idea
of a credit card or making an order
over the telephone."
 
Jason Kraley

March 2nd, 2000 6:46 AM
 
I had just registered to become an Amazon affiliate for a site I'm building the day before I read of the patent filing. This causes me to wonder if I'm making a bad moral decision and should reconsider. I would like to think of Amazon as a company that upholds an ethic with which I would not be ashamed to align myself.
 
Chris Estes

March 2nd, 2000 6:47 AM
 
At least we dont have to worry about this current issue with the OTHER book retailers out there...
 
Marc Ouimette

March 2nd, 2000 6:47 AM
 
Darrell Hyde

March 2nd, 2000 6:48 AM
 
And maybe if we're lucky, the patent office will invest in some technical savvy of its own.
 
James Kiley

March 2nd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
What Amazon did is wrong. Plain wrong.
 
Tom Blauvelt

March 2nd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
http://www.nieuw.nl
http://www.2dehands.nl
 
Michiel van Deursen

March 2nd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
Antoons Gilles

March 2nd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
I don't think I need to explain why this is a
Bad Move. It ain't only idealistic, geekish,
Nettish to disagree with Amazon and their patents.
If an explanation would be needed then I give
up on the world.
 
Albert Siersema

March 2nd, 2000 6:50 AM
 
I've placed 14 orders with Amazon since 4/97. I will purchase from Amazon's competitor's until they stop this utter nonsense.
 
Curt Coulter

March 2nd, 2000 6:50 AM
 
Hey Amazon, just imagine if someone had trademarked the online "shopping cart" and put you in a senseless bind like you're trying to do now to other merchants. This way of thinking isn't what got you to where you are today! Let's continue to share the technologies and idioms and leave the lawyers to make their money elsewhere.
 
Jerry Mooth

March 2nd, 2000 6:50 AM
 
Brian Toltzman

March 2nd, 2000 6:50 AM
 
Dave Seiden

March 2nd, 2000 6:50 AM
 
"Pissing in the well" was being polite. Greed is certainly something that is scalable: you can make it as big as you want.

http://acronymania.editthispage.com/
http://noamazon.com/
 
Dennis Moser

March 2nd, 2000 6:50 AM
 
Over the last three years, I've done nearly $900 of business with Amazon.com, but I'm not going to support them any more if they keep this patenting crap up.
 
John P. Pietrzak

March 2nd, 2000 6:51 AM
 
Stop the insanity Amazon! It appears you use your bogus patent only against your competitors. Why don't you file suit against the U.S. Government sites that use cookies in the ordering process! You know they would nullify the patent.

Count me in the boycott!

 
Barry Jackson

March 2nd, 2000 6:51 AM
 
John Kramer

March 2nd, 2000 6:52 AM
 
We are an extremely technically literate independent school, with hundreds of students all wired to the gills and a largely electronic curriculum. Many of our book purchases have been done through Amazon.com in the past. However, I have officially recommended (and my recommendation has been approved) that our school do no purchasing from Amazon.com as long as these practices are in place. I will be recommending this to my compatriots in the National Association of Independent Schools as well.
 
Eric Alfred Burns

March 2nd, 2000 6:52 AM
 
I hope Amazon to reconsider his purpose and cooperate more with Internet development and not to try to stop new e-commerce ways.
 
Juan Camilo Mayama

March 2nd, 2000 6:52 AM
 
Scott Franko

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
Henry Blassingame

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
Vincent Creusillet

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
David Christensen

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
John C. Lyden

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
Not only will I effect a personal boycott of Amazon.com, but at my small e-commerce store, I am soon implementing a so-called "One-click shopping" model, begun prior to any knowledge of this travesty. Will you condescend to crush it also?
 
Jeffrey T. Beekman

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
Don Werve

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
This is not the only patent applied for by Amazon.com for obvious and commonly used processes. There is also a patent applied for which basically describes taking the result of an executed stored procedure and passing that result to another stored procedure to be exectued. This is such a common procedure that not only should a patent not be granted, Amazon.com should be investigated and subsequently sued for abuse of process.

In the meantime I have written to Amazon.com with my own letter of protest and stopped purchasing products from their site.
 
William J. Bean

March 2nd, 2000 6:54 AM
 
The web is "free" domain - and as such the technology to make e-commerce easier for people to use should be as well. I do not agree with Amazon patenting the 1-Click method, as that destroys other companies hopes at good, easy to use e-commerce.

Do not destroy how other companies are looking to make their service easier for their customers to shop with them. 1-Click is a good idea, but not in the sense that you want it all to yourself. That's rediculous.
 
Lilliane M. Coldwell

March 2nd, 2000 6:54 AM
 
Klaus Brand

March 2nd, 2000 6:55 AM
 
Alan Morey

March 2nd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
The sad thing is that our investors, having seen the stupidity the USPTO will stamp as "novel", is now in the process of writing an equally brainless patent that will undoubtedly be granted. The whole thing sickens me.

I'll be stopping by opamp.com for my future technical book needs, that's for sure.
 
Robert McMillin

March 2nd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
I used to like Amazon but I will no longer shop there and will tell everyone I know not to shop there. The patents they have recieved are a joke. They are abusing the patent system and should have their patents revoked.
 
Eric Snyder

March 2nd, 2000 6:57 AM
 
Bill Faust

March 2nd, 2000 6:57 AM
 
Carl W. Eyler

March 2nd, 2000 6:57 AM
 
The patenting of technology is good to protect some intellectual property, but when it's taken too far, it only hurts other companies' right to innovate.
 
Mark Whiteford

March 2nd, 2000 6:57 AM
 
Amazon, what are you doing? Trying to be like microsoft? I'm taking my business elsewhere!
 
Mike Hastings

March 2nd, 2000 6:58 AM
 
Austin Morgan

March 2nd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
This is ridiculous. The government should have never allowed a patent on such a basic principle - especially one already in use by so many businesses. Amazon.com has finally overstepped their boundries.
 
Michael Lederman

March 2nd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
As a web developer, I just want to know who owns the patent for online form submissions, and querying a database because I must owe them a lot of money. Isn't this the same thing as 1-click?
 
Josh Wasserman

March 2nd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
Adrienne Hockman

March 2nd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
If amazon.com insists on enforcing its patents I will cancel my membership with its affiliate program and switch to using a competitors affiliate program.
 
Bruce Pennypacker

March 2nd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
I have already stopped purchasing from your site, which is a shame since it is probably the best place to buy books and music on the web. However, places like Powell's and Borders will now be receiving my business exclusively.

 
Denise Hewitt

March 2nd, 2000 7:00 AM
 
I think Mr. Bezos is a good guy, hopefully this is just the lawyers talking, and he will take control of the situation. I realize that Business is Business, but please Mr. Bezos, don't participate in this greedy, land-grabbing mentality. This long time Amazon customer will not stand for it.
 
Ray Haley, Jr.

March 2nd, 2000 7:00 AM
 
Even though I prefer Amazon, I will be ordering my books from B&N and FatBrain until this patent issue is resolved. This is an embarrassment to you and a detriment to the web.
 
Carl Chada

March 2nd, 2000 7:01 AM
 
Ed Macke

March 2nd, 2000 7:01 AM
 
I find the current idea of software patents to be
absurd. There are very very very few computer implementations that should get a 20 year monopoly since that is a geological age in computing. Maybe a 1 year monopoly would be much more apt to protect the rights of an inventor and allow the free market to not be stifled.

If I were to come up with something that I felt
was patentable.. I might do it. However the license for using it would be that you had to write your implementation via the GPL. I figure that would cause more than enough people to try
and turn over the law right then.

Stephen Smoogen
 
Stephen Smoogen

March 2nd, 2000 7:01 AM
 
Edward Bordas

March 2nd, 2000 7:02 AM
 
Matthew Gray

March 2nd, 2000 7:04 AM
 
...And from now on, the tag is the sole property of Amazon, as well as the word "book", and the whole concept of web shopping.
 
Kevin Davis

March 2nd, 2000 7:04 AM
 
Pits! I just made my first Amazon order last week and it was very convenient. But I can't in good conscience support with my purchases a company that poisons the 'gift community' I value so much. Powells, anyone?
 
Jonathan Shapiro

March 2nd, 2000 7:06 AM
 
Much as I prefer Amazon, I and my department will not purchase anything from them until this is satisfactorily resolved.
 
Mark Dinsmore

March 2nd, 2000 7:06 AM
 
Gareth Williams

March 2nd, 2000 7:06 AM
 
Fabrice Huet

March 2nd, 2000 7:07 AM
 
Amazon, there is nothing available from your site that is not available from a rival at an equal price, EXCEPT GOODWILL. You have lost this with me.
 
Jerry Dreiss

March 2nd, 2000 7:07 AM
 
As long as Amazon attempts to squash internet development with these ludicrous patents--clearly invalidated by prior art--I cannot in good conscience buy from them.
 
Andy Baird

March 2nd, 2000 7:07 AM
 
Brett Sanger

March 2nd, 2000 7:07 AM
 
Enforcing these patents is an insult to everybody who knows just a little bit about how the net works.
 
Matthias Worch

March 2nd, 2000 7:08 AM
 
Tim says it all. Stop this nonsense. It's wrong and you will lose in the end anyway. I'm a big fan (and customer) of amazon.com, but now I'll have to go look at the alternatives, starting with barnesandnoble.com. I don't like them, either, but how else can I get you to listen, Jeff? But I promise I'll come back if you put your thinking cap back on and realize that 1-click ordering and the associates program are NOT patentable knowledge.
 
Leland Woodbury

March 2nd, 2000 7:08 AM
 
Comrade Bezos,
please learn from history's many lessons.
 
Martin Naroznik

March 2nd, 2000 7:08 AM
 
While I have ordered items from Amazon in the past, I will no longer do so and I will encourage others to also discontinue business with Amazon until this issue is resolved.
 
Kim Hanfelt

March 2nd, 2000 7:09 AM
 
Hugo Leonardo Wolff de Souza

March 2nd, 2000 7:09 AM
 
Chris Shaffer

March 2nd, 2000 7:10 AM
 
I find Amazon.com's patenting of such obvious concepts more than appalling, I find it chilling. As a web professional, it gives me serious pause whenever I think about producing a website that might be percieved as competing with Amazon--thus inviting lawsuit, using Amazon's broad patents as a tool to drive the site out of business rather than competeing with my site on a fair and competitive basis.
 
Packy Anderson

March 2nd, 2000 7:10 AM
 
I agree with Tim O'Reilly's article asking Amazon.com to drop their patents of obvious web development parocesses. To enforce such a patent will create an angry backlach against Amazon and that type of predatory pracetice.

Stephen Zayko
Database and Web Developer
 
Stephen R. Zayko

March 2nd, 2000 7:12 AM
 
Dr Michael D. Addlesee

March 2nd, 2000 7:13 AM
 
D. Randall Spydell

March 2nd, 2000 7:14 AM
 
No more amaz0n purchases - I'll be going to www.fatbrain.com until this matter is dropped by amazon. Open source, guys! This is the path to true innovation.
 
Thomas Atlas

March 2nd, 2000 7:14 AM
 
Mr. Bezos,

This silly nonsense of patenting software has got to stop. Please, reconsider your actions and re-join the internet communinity as the leader we all know you can be.
 
Simon Mac Donald

March 2nd, 2000 7:15 AM
 
Tim Fulton

March 2nd, 2000 7:16 AM
 
Jennifer Harwood

March 2nd, 2000 7:17 AM
 
Talk about opening a way for the government to get it's paws into the web. Patenting anything written for the web goes against the entire community. Say goodbye Amazon we won't take it. Hope you enjoyed you're existance and have a good explaination for the share holders.
 
Joe Rochette

March 2nd, 2000 7:17 AM
 
This patent should never have been issued, as the idea that 1-click ordering is an innovation is absurd. It is a marketing scheme, and Amazon should not have abused the obvious error on the part of the Patent office. Until Amazon announces that "1-click ordering" is back in the public domain (that is, that Amazon will hold the patent only to keep other firms from having it and suing them), I won't do business with Amazon.

Thank you, Tim, for going out on a limb with this letter. I'll still buy many a book from your publishing house - just not through Amazon.
 
Jay Bryant

March 2nd, 2000 7:17 AM
 
Tammy Ezer

March 2nd, 2000 7:17 AM
 
Nick Melnick

March 2nd, 2000 7:18 AM
 
Ottavio Rizzo

March 2nd, 2000 7:18 AM
 
I have been an occasional customer to Amazon over
the past couple of years. However, with the
introduction of the 1-Click patent, I'm afraid I
will have to take my business elsewhere. Please
re-evaluate your position on these ridiculous
patents!
 
Dave Morgan

March 2nd, 2000 7:18 AM
 
I won't order from Amazon until you stop this nonsense.
 
David Orme

March 2nd, 2000 7:19 AM
 
The convenience of shopping online at Amazon
isn't worth supporting such slimy business practices. Luckily other companies have comparable services now; and it will be good for them to get all the extra business from this perfectly avoidable fiasco.

It's a a dangerous thing to alienate computer professionals who don't often have time for conventional shopping. I can almost hear the bookmarks to Amazon being deleted right now...
 
Pamela Ambrose

March 2nd, 2000 7:19 AM
 
Kevin Lynch

March 2nd, 2000 7:20 AM
 
I agree with Tim. The use of such a patent is greedy, short-sighted, and fraudulent.
 
Christopher C. Powell

March 2nd, 2000 7:20 AM
 
Bryan Scrivener

March 2nd, 2000 7:20 AM
 
Greg Merrill

March 2nd, 2000 7:21 AM
 
I disagree with the enforcement of the patent on the idea behind 1-click shopping. This is basic information ("cookies") that people have been using openly on the web for years. This patent (Ill-granted in my opinion) is akin to the people that copyrighted domain names for the express purpose of holding hostage those legitimate businesses that they addressed. (Granted, one is a patent, one is a copyright, but they both govern the licensing of intellectual product). While I have considered buying textbooks and other items from Amazon, as long as they do not release the patent (What is to prevent them from enforcing in the future?), I will not patronize their site.

 
John W. Paitel

March 2nd, 2000 7:21 AM
 
I haven't bought anything at Amazon since the "1-click" patent. This doesn't help the cause.
 
David Renteria

March 2nd, 2000 7:22 AM
 
First off as many can see, the public questions how could such an obvious technology already used in the public domain be given a patent right. I am no patent expert, but given enough evidence that indeed this technology was freely used one year before Amazon's patent application, would thus, give arguments to reverse the decision.

The next issue with most of the public is our outrage of Amazon's actions. It has always been my belief, if you don't like something, then don't buy it.
 
Kjersten Winters

March 2nd, 2000 7:22 AM
 
I have spend thousands of dollars on merchandise through the Amazon web site. I will not spend another DIME there, until your company drops it's ridiculous attempt at monopolizing technology that obviously pre-dates your patent application. I expect more from an Internet pioneer like Amazon. It will be inconvenient for me to shop elsewhere, but you leave me little choice.
 
Ben Tilford

March 2nd, 2000 7:23 AM
 
Lea Thompson

March 2nd, 2000 7:24 AM
 
One click ordering was in the public domain well before Amazon applied for this patent.
 
Steven E. Hughes

March 2nd, 2000 7:25 AM
 
Let's be honest, Jeff. If someone had come up to me and said "can we do a one-click buying system?", I would have said yes immediately. You didn't invent the light bulb, you didn't come up with something entirely new. All you did was manage to patent an obvious idea before everyone else. You have lost my business.
 
Andrew Brogdon

March 2nd, 2000 7:25 AM
 
Dan Janz

March 2nd, 2000 7:25 AM
 
I believe the whole notion of granting patents for software in any form is misplaced.
 
Richard Pearse

March 2nd, 2000 7:26 AM
 
Mattias V. Bertelsen

March 2nd, 2000 7:26 AM
 
I used to be a satisfied Amazon customer buying books and DVD for a couple of hundred dollars each month and I also used to recommend Amazon among my friends and collegues. Then in December I got aware that Amazon had turned to the evil side when trying to patent such obvious things as the 1-click cookie implementation and now it's become even worse with the affiliate patent.

I wrote to Amazon and said that I will be happy to become their customer again some day after they stop this issue of patenting obvious ideas and recommended them to tell about the withdrawal of their claim on their portal page, which would be a goodwill for them.

Of course I'm disappointed with Amazon which first looked like a good company, but the fault is of course also a system, which lets you patent ideas and patterns, even the most obvious ones. In case somebody wants to read the 411 patent document in detail I've put it on my web server.
http://cox.bacon.su.se/misc/patent/US05960411.pdf

To fight the dangerous idea of allowing software, pattern and idea patents also in Europe please check
http://swpat.ffii.org/indexen.html
and join the mailing list at
http://liberte.aful.org/mailman/listinfo/patents

Roland Orre
 
Roland Orre

March 2nd, 2000 7:26 AM
 
John Ray

March 2nd, 2000 7:28 AM
 
amazon.com? umm.. i dont know what that is, but i like signing stuff. and stuff.
 
Joel Nystrom

March 2nd, 2000 7:28 AM
 
The practice of defensive patents has been long practiced. Witness, for example, Microsoft's patent on style sheets, despite at least three decades of prior art in that particular field. However, using the One-Click patent in an offensive fashion is just that: offensive. As if Amazon invented the concept of storing user preferences and making shopping more convenient. It is my hope that the good folks at Amazon will see fit to cease this sort of action, rein in the legal department, and get back to selling goods and services. Why litigate when you can (as we've seen time and again) innovate?
 
Eric Meyer

March 2nd, 2000 7:29 AM
 
Sarah Manwell

March 2nd, 2000 7:29 AM
 
Stop commercialising our Net! Business is okay,
but the internet was not created for bringing
out monopolists!
 
Sven Schubert

March 2nd, 2000 7:30 AM
 
Your patents are absurd, and your enforcement of them is reprehensible.

A side note to our American neighbors: will somebody in the U.S. PLEASE do something about your patent office. The damage that they are doing to this burgeoning industry will take years to undo.
 
John Taylor

March 2nd, 2000 7:30 AM
 
I am a senior software developer and WAS a frequent Amazon customer. I buy lots of expensive tech books. I love 1-click ordering too. However, until you stop enforcing your ridiculus patents I will be shopping at Barnes & Noble, and I'm going to tell everyone I know to do the same.
 
Ted Stockwell

March 2nd, 2000 7:31 AM
 
Josh Babcock

March 2nd, 2000 7:31 AM
 
Michael Perrin

March 2nd, 2000 7:31 AM
 
Moira Stone

March 2nd, 2000 7:31 AM
 
I'm very disappointed in Amazon for the action they have taken concerning this patent. I won't be using Amazon UK and I'll reccommend my friends and colleagues also avoid it. It's a real shame this has happened.
 
Andy Bianchi

March 2nd, 2000 7:32 AM
 
As a user of Amazon.com from the beginning, I urge you to re-consider all ramifications of these patents.
 
Alexa

March 2nd, 2000 7:32 AM
 
hurry, it's not too late to patent on-line book reviews!
 
mARK bLOORE

March 2nd, 2000 7:32 AM
 
This patent is fully shit
 
Bill Gates

March 2nd, 2000 7:32 AM
 
I just bought a book from fatbrain instead of amazon. The only reason I won't buy from Amazon is because of the patents and their willingness to use them.
 
Sean Cavanaugh

March 2nd, 2000 7:33 AM
 
William Beegle

March 2nd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
Enough of this patent madness!
 
Jeff McWhirter

March 2nd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
it's simply ludicrous or rather ridiculous to see this absolutely asinine attempt to prevent competitors.perhaps anybody who has done anything like putting together a router can claim a patent on routing and charge bezos(should that change to bozo?).the past week has seen an attempt by fox and honda to remove their fans websites.i am astounded that these oberbureaucracies havent learned anything from examples.the people on the net use it for precisely what it was intended-- communicating with anyone anywhere.


there is only one thing you cant trod on people--- they can thing and --change your balance sheet completely.



ps:incidently the "inventor" of internet hasnt taken any "series" of "initiatives" on this issue.why?why?why?
 
Mohit Khariwal

March 2nd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
As a former faithful Amazon customer *and* Amazon Associate(wouldn't a TM look silly here?), I can't say how disgusted I am.
 
Melissa Lanning

March 2nd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
Geoffrey Mitchell

March 2nd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
Bryan Dougherty

March 2nd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
Software is too squishy to hold a patent.
 
Winslow Williams

March 2nd, 2000 7:35 AM
 
I'm not sure which is worse; believing that this is a deliberate abuse on your part of a patent system that has fallen terribly behind technology... or the idea that someone at Amazon actually feels that this idea is truly innovative.

Either way you've lost my business for good.
 
Chris Whitmore

March 2nd, 2000 7:35 AM
 
You won't get another cent from me, or from
anyone I can influence, until you reverse your
position on this issue.
 
Andy Warner

March 2nd, 2000 7:35 AM
 
David Ulansey

March 2nd, 2000 7:36 AM
 
Mr. Bezos,

I run a non profit that works with kids, and we are starting a program where kids will run a community website. We are hoping that many people and companies with technical know-how will help us as we move along with the the new technologies for our site. How can I have all of these kids look up to you as an example of excellence, and honesty?

You need to seriously reconsider your actions, because the message is going out to not only your existing customer base now, but it will affect this younger generation coming up.

I am in a collaborative environment with other kids programs, and they will also listen, and boycott your business. We are talking about thousands just in my area alone!

Do the "RIGHT THING"!
 
Michael Moonbird

March 2nd, 2000 7:36 AM
 
Lance Beauchamp

March 2nd, 2000 7:37 AM
 
Paul Wing

March 2nd, 2000 7:37 AM
 
I will shop at Third Place Books and Elliot Bay.
 
Ron Hebron

March 2nd, 2000 7:37 AM
 
Nick Wagner

March 2nd, 2000 7:38 AM
 
Kevin Cundiff

March 2nd, 2000 7:38 AM
 
My only comment is that I hope Amazon realizes how short-sighted and self-destructive their behavior is. Many people rave on Amazon's ability to provide products quickly and with little hassle. It is a rarity. I hope that they stop this, so that they regain their loyal customers.
 
Lya Ana Batlle

March 2nd, 2000 7:38 AM
 
Software patents are not "bad" per se. It is the abuse of the patent system that is detrimental; and clearly, this abuse is what we should identify as the "real and actual" problem here. I've examined, litigated & prosecuted; and I believe that filing & issuing patents that may be obvious are not "bad" per se either. The real abuse here is the attempt to enforce a patent that is too close to that obvious/invalid line. It deters competition & it wastes the courts' and the parties' time & money. So don't hound the PTO or owners of "~invalid" patents, hound the lamerz who try to enforce them. These are the real bad guys here; and now, Amazon qualifies. Hopefully they'll wake up & effectuate some damage control.
 
George F. Wallace. Esq.

March 2nd, 2000 7:38 AM
 
John Pettit

March 2nd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
I would estimate my spending on books to be well in excess of $300 per month. I used to consider Amazon.com to be a good place to shop for difficult to find books. I no longer consider Amazon.com to be a viable choice. I will no longer take my busness there and will encourage others to do the same until Amazon.com changes its current patenting practices.
 
David Mestel

March 2nd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
Software patents are not "bad" per se. It is the abuse of the patent system that is detrimental; and clearly, this abuse is what we should identify as the "real and actual" problem here. I've examined, litigated & prosecuted; and I believe that filing & issuing patents that may be obvious are not "bad" per se either. The real abuse here is the attempt to enforce a patent that is too close to that obvious/invalid line. It deters competition & it wastes the courts' and the parties' time & money. So don't hound the PTO or owners of "~invalid" patents, hound the lamerz who try to enforce them. These are the real bad guys here; and now, Amazon qualifies. Hopefully they'll wake up & effectuate some damage control.
 
George F. Wallace. Esq.

March 2nd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
Seeking these kinds of patents don't benefit the customer and only encourage me to shop elsewhere.
 
Mark Carrel

March 2nd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
John F. Gibson

March 2nd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
Amazon, the new Microsoft ?
 
Pascal Robert

March 2nd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
Michael LeRoux

March 2nd, 2000 7:40 AM
 
Gee, another corporate greed head trying to push others out of the boat. Who does this remind us of? Screw Amazon and their chicken shit patent. They got rich on technology that someone else (American taxpayers) paid for and now they want to steal the ball and go home. I'll step right up and piss in Amazon's well.
 
Ed Dotson

March 2nd, 2000 7:42 AM
 
Eske Christiansen

March 2nd, 2000 7:42 AM
 
The patent is clearly obvious to anyone in the field and should not have been granted. Having been granted, Amazon should demonstrate moral leadership commensurate with its dominant size in the market, or risk being branded a heartless, ant-social organization, only concerned with profits. This can best be done by abandoning the patent, or at a minimum not enforcing it. While I prefer Amazon's service, I am seriously considering boycott until Amazon shapes up.
 
Stu Derby

March 2nd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
To steal the efforts of hundreds of individuals attempting to make these internet improvements is dishonest and pitiful.
That YOU somehow feel that it is within your right to claim these community efforts as your OWN ideas- without giving credit where it is due brands you as small, and someone who is a greedy manipulator of facts.
Your own ideas bear merit- do not take merit that others have earned.
 
Renee Caldwell

March 2nd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
SANFORD W. FRENCH IV

March 2nd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
tc lewis

March 2nd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
Sam Belden

March 2nd, 2000 7:44 AM
 
The spirit of competition and the general respect of the customer have both been diminished by this.
 
Greg Klebart

March 2nd, 2000 7:44 AM
 
I will never purchase another product from Amazon. Check your records, I have bought quite a bit up to this point. You'll cave. You're weak.
 
Bert Bullough

March 2nd, 2000 7:45 AM
 
Amazon.com, the Wal-Mart of the web...
See y'all at FatBrain.
 
Chris Elmquist

March 2nd, 2000 7:45 AM
 
Considering the current patent craze, Jeff Bezos and Amazon might consider patenting the mouse. Sarcasm aside, I urge Amazon not to pursue lawsuits against competitors for using the mouse. As a Web developer for the last five years, I am concerned about such ethics and intentions and feel strongly that such behavior will only lead to further proprietary mentality, which runs counter to the open nature of the Web.
 
Kurt Nimmo

March 2nd, 2000 7:46 AM
 
Johannes Hubert

March 2nd, 2000 7:47 AM
 
You're wrong Mr. Bezos... Just flat wrong to do this. I'll be shopping elsewhere, thank you.
 
Don Riney

March 2nd, 2000 7:47 AM
 
Mark Brehob

March 2nd, 2000 7:48 AM
 
It is truly a shame that Amazon, one of the leaders in Internet commerce, feels the need to engage in negative, destructive business practices. I will not be doing business with them while they persist in this foolishness.
 
John A. Maxwell

March 2nd, 2000 7:48 AM
 
Information should be free. Not patented for money!!!
 
Oscar Taracena

March 2nd, 2000 7:48 AM
 
Matt Cummings

March 2nd, 2000 7:49 AM
 
I will no longer do ANY business with Amazon and give all my business to B&N. This patent of the "one click" is a total joke.
 
Pete Lucuk

March 2nd, 2000 7:49 AM
 
I stoped shopping at amazon a month or two ago.
 
Michael Deal

March 2nd, 2000 7:49 AM
 
Greg Kondrasuk

March 2nd, 2000 7:50 AM
 
Rich Sutter

March 2nd, 2000 7:52 AM
 
Attempting to patent a basic methodology of using the WWW interface is unconscionable. I shall not do business with amazon.com and will encourage others to boycott them until they cease this ludicrous behavior.
 
Joe Hartley

March 2nd, 2000 7:52 AM
 
Patents such as this are designed to allow their owners to stay on top without having to be innovative!
 
George Lowe

March 2nd, 2000 7:52 AM
 
Shame on Amazon.
 
Paul Pyryemybida

March 2nd, 2000 7:52 AM
 
e-mail already sent to Amazon.com. Pending orders cancelled. I liked the site, and was a frequent cutomer. I'll go back if they change their mind.
>K
 
Keith Woeltje

March 2nd, 2000 7:53 AM
 
I am not against software patents. I have two. I read the one-click patent and find it obvious and extemely broad. For example the patent covers this scenerio:

User enters name and shipping information. A new page is displayed with a list of items. Next to each item is a button that has hardcoded into it an assigned customer id and product id. User presses a button. Customer id and product id are sent to the server. The server looks up the ids and processes the order.

So a cookie is not even needed to satisfy the patent!

The fact that the customer does not explicitly identify themself is not a part of the original claim. It is included as an additional claim.
 
Dale Frye

March 2nd, 2000 7:55 AM
 
This is morally wrong and I'm sure they know it. I feel pity for a company that thinks that they need to act this way as it reveals that they don't believe in the quality of their own company. Sad, sad.
And I'm pretty sure that this will do them more harm than good.
I think I won't buy a book at Amazon in the near future as I'm sure there will be many other bookseller that believe in themselves and use their energy in constructive improvements of their services instead of destructive lawsuits.
 
Steffen Evers

March 2nd, 2000 7:55 AM
 
Although I've been purchasing my technical books from fatbrain.com for some time now, the majority of my non-technical book purchases (and those of my wife and other family members) have been made at amazon.com. Until now.

Big mistake, Jeff.
 
John Merz

March 2nd, 2000 7:55 AM
 
I am going to patent the process of clicking the mouse. Of course, if someone hasn’t gotten to it already.
 
Kevin McCarthy

March 2nd, 2000 7:55 AM
 
As a "net-savvy" user who regularly makes purchases online through various companies (and who has, in fact, used Amazon.com in the past), I feel I must state than until Amazon.com becomes a good citizen of the online community, I will no longer do business with them.
 
Sean C. Nichols

March 2nd, 2000 7:56 AM
 
I totally agree with this patent as everything under the sun should be patented!
 
Eddy D. Ventose

March 2nd, 2000 7:56 AM
 
Stop that madness!
 
Maciej Miasik

March 2nd, 2000 7:56 AM
 
This is highly disappointing. I buy most of my books from Amazon.com (unless I need the browse-and-drink-coffee experience of a real book store), however, learning about these sleazy and underhanded moves have sickened me, and I will no longer purchase _anything_ from Amazon.com, until and unless this course of action is stopped. This is an abuse of what the patent system in this country is intended to be. Having worked in intellectual property most of my adult life, I am well used to unethical tactics by lawyers, creators, publishers, corporations and other business entities...still, I am left a little tarnished, a little saddened today, to learn that a company that I _thought_ shared many of my own concerns about the world, and much of my moral philosophy, aspires to be just another Gatesian 'Evil Empire.' Jeff, you don't need to use your Big Shoe to squash your competitors - you'll definitely hurt your customers, too. You really just need to continue doing what you were doing, which was being the best at providing books and great service. Until you remember that, you've lost my business.
 
Amy Guskin

March 2nd, 2000 7:57 AM
 
I'm strongly in favour of the boycotte!
Since its beginning, I've ordered several books for about $200 - which would go to Amazon otherwise. What's more, I'd hardly come back again, even if they change their stupid mind in the future. They must do something _really_ outstanding to compensate for the huge damage they've been doing to the spirit of Internet with the software patents.
 
Evgeny Stambulchik

March 2nd, 2000 7:57 AM
 
Nicholas Ivy

March 2nd, 2000 7:58 AM
 
Timothy A. gregory

March 2nd, 2000 8:00 AM
 

One-click is not anybodys propery !
 
Ulf Holmlund

March 2nd, 2000 8:00 AM
 
Tim O'Reilly's excellent letter needs no elaboration. A truly open internet is best for everyone, including Amazon.
 
Michael Portuesi

March 2nd, 2000 8:00 AM
 
Rob Barney

March 2nd, 2000 8:01 AM
 
Well, off to borders...
 
Alex Nuttycombe

March 2nd, 2000 8:01 AM
 
I couldn't believe Amazon.com would seriously copyright this "1-click" technique. It's similiar to web browser "favorites" in Microsoft's and Netscape's browser's - in the sense that a link points to a page somewhere inside a web server.

I'm advising my relations on both sides of the continents not to buy from Amazon.com. The Buy.com, Bn.com and Borders.com online shops will more than make up for the loss of Amazon.com. If Amazon wants to operate in this outrageous fashion, they can do it without MY or my relations money. I'm not contributing towards this absolute farce.

This arrogant attitude to restricting how businesses operate eCommerce sites is underhand. This basically means that "ease of buying" only applies to customers who want items on Amazon.com, what if the customer wants an item NOT supplied by Amazon.com?

I applaude O'Reilly for taking a stand on this, I've never personally bought an O'Reilly book but might give them a try as Amazon.com is definitely OUT.

Regards.
 
Adrian Nielsen

March 2nd, 2000 8:02 AM
 
I am very disappointed in Amazon.com's recent actions related to enforcing the patent on One-Click ordering. In the past, I have been all too happy to buy from Amazon.com, as I wanted to show support for Internet businesses. Now I will take that support to a more deserving company.
 
Matt Brooks

March 2nd, 2000 8:03 AM
 
Marko Poutiainen

March 2nd, 2000 8:03 AM
 
Goodbye Amazon, hello Fatbrain and hello OpAmp technical books (opamp.com)! Sorry to see that the lawyers are running the outfit - what's next, suing Brazil for the use of the word Amazon?
 
Leigh Smith

March 2nd, 2000 8:04 AM
 
Ironic in my eyes is that Amazon (and other e-commerce companices) only exists because the core technologies of the Internet are _not_ patented/trademarked/whatever (at least not that I know of). It was their free availability which has made the Internet popular, and e-commerce a viable business proposition.
 
Lars Duening

March 2nd, 2000 8:04 AM
 
I fully support this patition against Amazon.com.
 
Liza Magill

March 2nd, 2000 8:04 AM
 
Broad "patents", if the term really deserves to be used, of this nature, incorporating little true original expression of art, do nothing but increase fees for lawyers and provide some additional licensing revenue from those who prefer to knuckle under rather than put additional cash into some attorney's pocket.
 
David B. Sawyer

March 2nd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
Gerhard Poul

March 2nd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
Amazon is not trying to patent an idea with the One-Click shopping cart. Amazon is trying to patent a 'No-Brainer'.
Thanks for adding Value (Not!)
 
David K Hambright

March 2nd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
chase beck

March 2nd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
There's plenty of business for everyone out there with out the need for such anti-competative behavior. Since you feel you can't compete on a level playing field, I'll be shopping at one of your numererous competitors from now on. If you manage to wrest control of amazon.com from it's lawyers, I'll reconsider. Maybe.
 
Scott Melchionda

March 2nd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
This is selfish, shortsighted and greedy. Not admirable traits. I'll buy from somewhere else. I don't want any cookies from Amazon.
 
Beth Williams

March 2nd, 2000 8:06 AM
 
I'm ordering a book TODAY and I'm getting it from www.barnesandnoble.com because of this.
 
William J. Dodd

March 2nd, 2000 8:06 AM
 
Chris Simonton

March 2nd, 2000 8:06 AM
 
Way to go, boss! I helped to implement a one-click ordering system at O'Reilly four years ago. Not only is this patent a stupid idea, but there's plenty of prior art out there!

 
Erik Ray

March 2nd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
The internet is a fast growing and inovating business, don't slow it down.
 
David Deslauriers

March 2nd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
Gregory Elkins

March 2nd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
I was a loyal Amazon Customer, but I will not purchase anything from Amazon again until you drop these ridiculous patent claims.
 
Charles Burch

March 2nd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
"One-click shopping" should have been filed as a trademark, not a patent. Your inability or unwillingness to recognize the difference between the two concepts will only serve to strengthen opposition to your company and its policies.
 
Larry Adams

March 2nd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
Pissing in the well, indeed! I've been an Amazon customer for years and I'm sorry to see you making such a wrong-headed turn. The future of the web is being decided right now...and Open Source is better in the long run for everyone. The web belongs to us all.
 
Karen Felker

March 2nd, 2000 8:08 AM
 
Brian T. Glenn

March 2nd, 2000 8:08 AM
 
I will not buy from Amazon until these "patents" are withdrawn.
 
Erick Waldchen

March 2nd, 2000 8:10 AM
 
How much open technology has Jeff Bezos and Amazon used to make their billions. Now they are trying to burn bridges they didn't invent to stop other from succeeding.
They obviously did not invent affiliate programs or the concept commissions. I believe the best way to fight this is a Class Action lawsuit of mammoth preportions against false patent claims and their harm to others.
 
Robert Hays

March 2nd, 2000 8:10 AM
 
J.P. Stewart

March 2nd, 2000 8:10 AM
 
I urge you to have the vision for your own future and the moral dedication to not use the ignorance of the government against the marketplace (your potential customers).
 
Kurt Frenter

March 2nd, 2000 8:11 AM
 
amy r. dawson

March 2nd, 2000 8:12 AM
 
Matt Peppin

March 2nd, 2000 8:12 AM
 
It's time to stop your disaster on the web.
 
wilfrid vlaeminck

March 2nd, 2000 8:13 AM
 
I will not be shopping Amazon until this practice has ended.

Why not just patent "selling books on the internet" and get it over with?

 
Dan Martin

March 2nd, 2000 8:13 AM
 
Stephen Peacock

March 2nd, 2000 8:13 AM
 
Competition is the father of innovation. Holding back comettition by attempting to monopolize on what is clearly preexisting commonly used techniques makes you an undesireeable merchant. As a consumer it makes me wonder if you just don't have the self assurance in the quality of your services to compete on a level playing field.
 
Kambiz Aghaiepour

March 2nd, 2000 8:14 AM
 
Hey, I was using online transaction in 1996 on my web server, maybe i should sue Amazon for doing the same...
 
Frederic Hurtubise

March 2nd, 2000 8:14 AM
 
I'm holding Amazon's coffee cup in my hand right now. I used to be a very good customer of theirs.
I guess next year I'll receive a gadget from Fatbrain, instead.
 
Francesco Paparella

March 2nd, 2000 8:14 AM
 
It's hard to believe that someone who claims to be so in tune with technology is trying to thwart innovation...the very same inovation that made his site possible in the first place. For that, I have no reservations whatsoever in signing this petition.
 
James Chambers

March 2nd, 2000 8:15 AM
 
Kyle Schmitt

March 2nd, 2000 8:16 AM
 
Richard B Dietz

March 2nd, 2000 8:17 AM
 
Give this boycott some teeth ...
Americans: www.borders.com
Canadians: www.chapters.ca

 
Michael Flynn

March 2nd, 2000 8:18 AM
 
I've been buying all my books elsewhere since
I heard of your successful patenting of a business model.
 
Rachel Hubbard

March 2nd, 2000 8:19 AM
 
Teresa L. Gregory

March 2nd, 2000 8:19 AM
 
Frankly, I'm ashamed of you! Attempting to punish competitors by patenting something that has been used for years in e-commerce. I will no longer use Amazon.com for my book or CD purchases any longer.
 
John W. Campbell

March 2nd, 2000 8:20 AM
 
Barnes & Noble just got a new customer.
 
Natalie Sims

March 2nd, 2000 8:20 AM
 
Geoff Barrett

March 2nd, 2000 8:21 AM
 
Oh my, my, my, my. Now look what you've gone and done! You used to be my single source for books, CDs and DVDs.
 
Christopher C Tweedy

March 2nd, 2000 8:22 AM
 
I like Amazon, the way they offer and deliver a service. It would sadden me to have to bar access to amazon*.* on the firewall - but I will have to. My businesses depend on web innovation as much as anyone elses, but we've had enough computer tax abuse from monopolies not to see another one trying to spring up. Don't. // P //
 
Peter Houppermans

March 2nd, 2000 8:22 AM
 
I have been a loyal Amazon customer since last Holiday season and would like to continue to be an Amazon customer in the future. I have had great experiences with both the availability of products and the dedication to customer support at Amazon which is why I have been a loyal customer. These are the reasons that I choose to work with a company not exclusive technical toys or features.

BUT for as long as Amazon continues to abuse the patent system and otherwise acts in a manner I consider unethical, anti-competitive and faintly Machiavellian I will take my business elsewhere.
 
A. J. Walp

March 2nd, 2000 8:22 AM
 
This is ridiculous. One-Click ordering is such a completely obvious application of cookies that one shudders at the ignorance of the patent office (Perhaps we should be mailing this letter, or another like it, to them). Remember that Amazon has profited by the previously open development of web technology; you would not have been able to implement 1-click if an odious patent were placed on the invention of cookies.
 
Eiki Martinson

March 2nd, 2000 8:23 AM
 
If the only way you can make your corporation profitable is to patent ideas that others created, you will never see a single penny from me ever again. Barnes and Noble .com as well as the bevy of other online bookstores will run you into the ground dear. See you in the .com hasbeen bucket soon along with DoubleClick. Ta Ta.
 
adam tanner

March 2nd, 2000 8:23 AM
 
I strongly disaprove of Amazon's actions. They have offended our community.
 
Kirk Fort

March 2nd, 2000 8:24 AM
 
Weatherby Mayfield

March 2nd, 2000 8:24 AM
 
I've been a long-time Amazon customer (probably about a thousand dollars worth of books over the last few years) and have, in the past, recommended Amazon to friends. I've always gotten superior customer service from them, but I will be ordering my books from B&N, O'Reilly, Fatbrain, anyone but Amazon until they stop this nonsense.
 
Donna Monaghan

March 2nd, 2000 8:24 AM
 
Kay Mosko

March 2nd, 2000 8:26 AM
 
I personally find this use of the patent system irresponsible and potentially damaging to the accepted use of internet commerce. I have decided not to use Amazon's services until Amazon retracts this patent, and others similar to it, and apologizes for this anti-competitive behavior.
 
Tom Honermann

March 2nd, 2000 8:26 AM
 
David Dubin

March 2nd, 2000 8:26 AM
 
Sophie Schaaf

March 2nd, 2000 8:26 AM
 
just a bit of dignity... it's simply what cookies were designed for!
 
Fabrizio Capolini

March 2nd, 2000 8:26 AM
 
Patrick M Brennan, Arlington MA

March 2nd, 2000 8:27 AM
 
Alison MacLellan

March 2nd, 2000 8:28 AM
 
The internet and the web were born of freedom. Software patents will strangle innovation and reduce the internet and the web to just another proprietary failure.

When you share with others, they are more likely to share with you. When you are selfish, you are more likely to be ostracized.
 
Scott Reimert

March 2nd, 2000 8:28 AM
 
I protest Amazon's patent. What a farking joke.
 
Heather D. Boothe

March 2nd, 2000 8:29 AM
 
I am a member of the Amazon.com Associates program. While you may have the best associates prograp, it is a method of business, and therefor not patentable. You're too smart a company to pull a Microsoft.
 
Margoleath Berman

March 2nd, 2000 8:29 AM
 
Ry4an Brase

March 2nd, 2000 8:29 AM
 
Hey Mr. Bezos,, could you patent homework so I don't have to do it any more?
 
jeff

March 2nd, 2000 8:29 AM
 
Looks like this might not have been your brightest business decision! Count me among those who will take my business to FatBrain and recommend my co-workers do the same.
 
Pat Edie

March 2nd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Nethanel

March 2nd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Ren Leaflight

March 2nd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Very dissapointing move.
 
B. Puttick

March 2nd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Jason Bott

March 2nd, 2000 8:31 AM
 
Bobby Russ

March 2nd, 2000 8:32 AM
 
Stop abusing the systems.
 
Don Harper

March 2nd, 2000 8:32 AM
 
I agree 100% with your position Tim. When will the PTO wake up & employ examiners with anything approaching Computing/Internet sophistication?
 
P.M. Lister

March 2nd, 2000 8:33 AM
 
Joanne Gallo

March 2nd, 2000 8:33 AM
 
No clicks for Amazon till you stop this patent absurdity.
 
Peter O'Day

March 2nd, 2000 8:33 AM
 
You're quickly running out of customers...
 
Aaron S. Kurland

March 2nd, 2000 8:34 AM
 
1-click-ordering is too abvious to implement. If it can be patent, I am afraid someone may already patent the hello.c program.
 
Yung Tin Ho

March 2nd, 2000 8:35 AM
 
The patent office needs a good kick up the proverbial, as do the law courts who seem to have forgotten the purpose of patents.
 
Kevin F. Quinn

March 2nd, 2000 8:35 AM
 
Blair Reamy

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
I am now boycotting Amazon.com until these patents are rescinded.
 
David Parker

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
Barry Martin

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
Not much to say that hasn't already been said. Like many, I've spent hundreds or thousands each year at Amazon.com for the last several years, and now all of that business will go elsewhere. I cannot support this kind of activity.
 
Paul V. Patanella

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
I used to be quite the supporter of Amazon.com and would always go there in search of technical books. However, this stupid patent has made me realize that I should take my business elsewhere.
 
Luis Arruda

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
I have been an Amazon customer in the past, but shall henceforth shop exclusively from other merchants. I am absolutely opposed to your enforcement of the 1-click patent.
May your business losses mount till you get with it.

Boo...
 
Kanakatti M. Subramanya

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
I have used Amazon for my new library in USA...
Good bye, Amazon!
 
Anton Karpov

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
Mark O'Brien

March 2nd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
Chaitanya Laxminarayan

March 2nd, 2000 8:37 AM
 
ubaldo pizzoli

March 2nd, 2000 8:37 AM
 
Erik Michaels-Ober

March 2nd, 2000 8:37 AM
 
Software patents such as this are blatently
antithetical to the spirit of the internet. It
is called the World Wide Web for a reason. It
belongs to the world not to an individual
company. Until this patent has been renounced
I shall be very reluctant to do business with
Amazon.com again. Other, more open and less
predatory companies exist serving the same
functions.
 
David Baldwin

March 2nd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
I have closed my Amazon account, which is not such a loud statement of protest since I only ordered from them once. After I discovered that buy.com is always cheaper, and in some cases significantly cheaper, I started using them exclusively anyway. The score so far: Buy 15, Amazon 1.
 
Jim Cain

March 2nd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
business ethics and amazon apparently do not go well together. the worst thing that if nothing will be done, this could start a huge wave of ridiculous patents.. what a shame.
 
anton

March 2nd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
Gene Cyr

March 2nd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
I truely believe that Amazon intentionally patents these ideas for the intent of supressing the ability of other companies to compete and innovate. Many have claimed that Amazon does this on a defensive basis, so that others may not do unto them what they are now doing to B&N and other companies.

However what they misunderstand is that Amazon could have much more easily defended themselves and help encouraged innovation by merely publishing these ideas in any publication, including their own web site, which would have prevented other companies from patenting those ideas on which their business depends. Once an idea/innovation/implementation has been published, it may not be patented. Be certain that I will be encouraging all of my fellow developers to publish any and all ideas they have to prevent further abuses of this sort.

Amazon has lost my business, quite likely permanently. I'll not support a business who uses underhanded tactics of this sort.

 
Kevin Carter

March 2nd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
Bruce Orcutt

March 2nd, 2000 8:39 AM
 
How does a company with good intentions can turn sour and sacrifice everything to greed? Just ask Amazon.com.
They had to find a product to justify the price of their shares. Well they found one: patents.
 
Martin Chesnay

March 2nd, 2000 8:39 AM
 
I wholeheartedly agree with the Open Letter to Jeff Bezos. As to prior art - I was using 1 click shopping at dozens of computer shopping sites long before Amazon filed the patent. What will he patent next - calculating shipping online?
 
Mike Pinter, Sr.

March 2nd, 2000 8:39 AM
 
Please reconsider your practices. They will ultimately hurt all ebusiness on the web. The 'technology' you're patenting are widespread and obvious methods. Anyone with and database design experience would come up with the same/similar design to streamline the checkout/purchase process for 'registered' customers. It's better to compete on business merits than in the courtroom. You're already so big/successful, it's unrealistic to think you need this 'hammer' to protect yourself from your competitors.
 
Thomas Leahey

March 2nd, 2000 8:40 AM
 
Patent this: Quality of products and customer satisfaction corelates with the number of choices the customer has. Our innovative MUCHO BUSTR(sm) [MUltiple CHOice BUsiness STRategy] technology is based on a breakthrough concept of *** more than one *** product/service supplier competing for customers' attention in a common marketplace. Instead of relying on benevolent, internally-driven, osmotic innovation, a competitor is forced to outperform rivals by rapidly and repeatedly introducing better features and/or lower price. Join the MUCHO BUSTR(sm) today!!!
 
Sid Paral

March 2nd, 2000 8:41 AM
 
Please stop this lawsuit so that I can continue to purchase books from your site. Darn it! I have a saved book list that I was waiting to purchase until I got my bonus, so please hurry up as it's now burning a hole in my pocket and I may have to go somewhere else and pay more!
 
Lara Ullman

March 2nd, 2000 8:41 AM
 
Trent Stevens

March 2nd, 2000 8:41 AM
 
David Ruskin

March 2nd, 2000 8:42 AM
 
Now Amazon becomes a reference center for me. I will continue to use it to look up titles, read reviews and suck resources, but I WILL NOT buy anything from them until this matter is dropped.
 
Mark Belnap

March 2nd, 2000 8:42 AM
 
Nadia Ursacki

March 2nd, 2000 8:43 AM
 
Brian Thompson

March 2nd, 2000 8:44 AM
 
Henric Andersson

March 2nd, 2000 8:45 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, I fully support your right to make money in the business world; however, by pursuing this patent on an idea neither you nor your company actually invented, you are disdainfully slapping the face of the open community that made your business possible. Cease and desist your unconscionable hubris, and make your money the old fashioned way, in the marketplace, not through licenses and litigation that threaten the very medium that gave your company its birth.

Speaking both personally, and as a representative of my institution, you will receive no business from me, until this nonsensical farce is laid to rest.
 
Michael J. Fromberger

March 2nd, 2000 8:46 AM
 
It seems that we will just have to let "Bezos the Buffoon" learn the hard way. A 70's style protest with double aught internet twist.
 
David Mitchell

March 2nd, 2000 8:46 AM
 
Simon Damberger

March 2nd, 2000 8:47 AM
 
Cheap move on the part of an otherwise highly respectable company.
 
Chris Valdez

March 2nd, 2000 8:47 AM
 
Lost my business.
 
C.S.Dishman

March 2nd, 2000 8:48 AM
 
Currently boycotting Amazon.
 
Kevin Donnelly

March 2nd, 2000 8:49 AM
 
I am currently boycotting Amazon due to their misapplication of (questionable) software patents. I will continue this until I feel confident that they will respect the community that built them.

This is all a terrible shame since I have enjoyed their services so much in the past, but my local bookstores are happy to have my business back, I'm sure.
 
Jonathan Lupa

March 2nd, 2000 8:52 AM
 
Bruce Ferrell

March 2nd, 2000 8:53 AM
 
Jose' L. Garcia

March 2nd, 2000 8:53 AM
 
as long as this goes on, i won't buy anything from amazon (there are others too)!
 
Michael Joncic

March 2nd, 2000 8:53 AM
 
Gerhard Fiedler

March 2nd, 2000 8:54 AM
 
Ryan Coulter

March 2nd, 2000 8:54 AM
 
I am no longer ordering from amazon, and have removed amazon affiliate links from all of my sites, I will continue to advise others to boycott Amazon until they release these patents into the public domain.
 
Jason Kohles

March 2nd, 2000 8:54 AM
 
Patrick Stevens

March 2nd, 2000 8:55 AM
 
I believe capitalism works. I believe amazon.com business model works. But as a customer and investor I have to condone this type of strategy, for it can lead to predatory tactics.

 
Josef Enrico Martinez

March 2nd, 2000 8:56 AM
 
What Amazon has done is theft, capitalizing on the Patent Office's inability to keep up with the pace of this industry. The public is not stupid though, and is already pronouncing the sentence upon this company.

Goodbye Amazon,
 
Rivaldo DoEspiritosanto

March 2nd, 2000 8:56 AM
 
I order books and cd's at Amazon.com all the time, and I think it is a great company with great service! However, please don't become Microsoft-like and stiffle competition and innovation by filing patents on technologies that should be open for all to use. In the end, I think the negative publicity you will get out of this will lead to less sales, rather than more. And that was not what you intended, was it?
 
Peter Jacobsen

March 2nd, 2000 8:57 AM
 
Boycotting Amazon and Spreading this information around is the best course of action.
 
Sanjeev Narang

March 2nd, 2000 8:59 AM
 
Ehren Wilson

March 2nd, 2000 8:59 AM
 
As a customer who has dealt with Amazon several times in the past, buying books and gift certificates, I now find myself in the position of having to advise all the people I have told to use Amazon to change their vendor.
Very bad PR Amazon, trying to take ownership of the basic of Internet technologies.

Finally, understand something Amazon. If you decide to take on the Internet community, you WILL lose. Just ask the RAAA. They don't stand a chance. Neither do you. It's like David going after Goliath, except Goliath is so big, the sling can't reach, and Goliath has a huge brain, and moves at lightning speed when prodded.

 
NewSurak

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
These patents clearly are unhealthy to the net
community. I am joining the boycott and will
actively encourage others to do so. Patenting of
trivial programming techniques is a violation of
the human spirit of innovation upon which Amazon
owes it's success. In filing these patents
Amazon.com proves that it does not understand nor
deserve our business.
 
John Bohumil

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
Stephen M. Crafts

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
Mark Wuest

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
Katrina Durkin

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
Tim hit this one on the nose. The patented technologies are an entirely obvious evolution of the current state of computing and should be struck down as invalid.

 
Nathan Wray

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
Albert Nurick

March 2nd, 2000 9:01 AM
 
I agree fully with the sentiments expressed in this open letter. I will watch carefully if Amazon attempts to use their patent of a simple and obvious technique to inhibit e-commerce by other firms. The beauty of it is... it's such a simple process that it can't even be "reverse engineered". I can't believe they could get a patent on the idea... perhaps a trade-mark on the phrase "1-Click Ordering" but not a patent. Hmm, maybe I could get a patent on putting hard covers on books!
 
Paul Meissner

March 2nd, 2000 9:01 AM
 
This is one of the worst violations of the open nature of the internet I've seen to date. I am a web developer, and it sickens me to think that I'll have to pay Amazon every time I implement one-click ordering or affiliate programs.
I agree with Tim and am no longer going to shop at amazon until they give up their patent. I'll be shopping at Fatbrain from now on.
 
Clay Roach

March 2nd, 2000 9:01 AM
 
Grow up, Jeff, and learn to play with the other kids. These marbles aren't yours to take.
 
Liza Q. Wirtz

March 2nd, 2000 9:01 AM
 
why can amazon monopolize if microsoft can't
 
jake pennell

March 2nd, 2000 9:02 AM
 
Ken McKinlay

March 2nd, 2000 9:02 AM
 
Daniel Peron

March 2nd, 2000 9:03 AM
 
I discontinued my affiliates program with Amazon.com because of their disturbing "Buying Circles" program. Now I feel I must join my voice with the thousands of others calling for a boycott of Amazon.com altogether. I simply don't approve of the way they do business.
 
Diane S. Sawyer

March 2nd, 2000 9:03 AM
 
Padmarao Appalaneni

March 2nd, 2000 9:04 AM
 
Sam Huffman

March 2nd, 2000 9:05 AM
 
The fact that you were able to obtain a patent on such a trivial process, (which you did not even invent) is mind boggling.

Your fortune was built on the generosity of truly noble educators and scientist who created the internet.

 
John Burden

March 2nd, 2000 9:05 AM
 
I respect and admire Jeff Bezos and Amazon.com, but until they stop attempting to patent obvious Web methods for doing business I will be buying books from Barnes and Noble, music from CDNow, electronics gear from eTown, etc. I fully believe in protecting intellectual property, but Amazon's recent patents are absurd and threaten to stifle not only innovation but the ease of doing business on the Web for consumers.
 
David Macdonald

March 2nd, 2000 9:05 AM
 
www.powells.com

 
Ryan Thomas

March 2nd, 2000 9:06 AM
 

Amazon has certainly lost my business due to their asinine actions in trying to enforce their 1 Click patent. But, more importantly, we have to ensure that the Patent Office becomes more educated in todays technology, so that patent officers may be able to respond to future patent claims like this in a more appropriate manner; laughing at the patent filer to their face, comes to mind. This way we -the consumers- won't have to deal with this stupidness.
 
Katy C Dixon

March 2nd, 2000 9:06 AM
 
Call your local congressman!
 
Thomas W. Moore

March 2nd, 2000 9:06 AM
 
Wallace R. Turnbull

March 2nd, 2000 9:07 AM
 
I will not buy from Amazon.
 
Kevin Colussi

March 2nd, 2000 9:07 AM
 
I've taken my business elsewhere, and I've encouraged my friends, family and co-workers to do the same. Get out of the way, Bezos, you're messing up my Internet.
 
Mike Carvalho

March 2nd, 2000 9:08 AM
 
Another Amazon customer buying elsewhere..
 
Mike Breach

March 2nd, 2000 9:09 AM
 
Thank goodness for Tim O'Reilly's voice of reason in this landscape of Internet madness. I, too, have been a faithful Amazon customer, but their recent behavior is alarming. They should know that being a superstore doesn't matter on the internet; the cost of switching to fatbrain/cdnow/etc is zero. Good will is a major factor in retaining customers.
 
Jack Humphrey

March 2nd, 2000 9:09 AM
 
Mangala Sadhu Sangeet Singh Khal

March 2nd, 2000 9:11 AM
 
Logan Weast

March 2nd, 2000 9:11 AM
 
As a consequence to this patent issues, I have decided to discontinue my purchases at amazon.de (even if it may be a "different" company and the patents are definitely not valid in Germany).

Amazon - if you honestly think about this patents you have to admit to yourself that they are absolutely dumb and maybe against everything the inventors of the patent-concept wanted to do.

Patents like this are a very good argument against patenting itself - if more people get some like these we will have to pay license fees for every mouseclick five years from now :(

 
Sven Weimann

March 2nd, 2000 9:12 AM
 
We, at the office, had a very good chuckle at your foolish patent as we browsed over to FatBrain.com and spent our monthly $1000 on books at that site.
Bye Bye 'Zon.
 
Brendan Barry

March 2nd, 2000 9:14 AM
 
Josh Stender

March 2nd, 2000 9:14 AM
 
More disturbing than the possibility of Amazon pursuing aggressive offense application of their patents is the simple fact that they were granted in the first place. With gross incompetence on the part of the Patent office in deciding to grant technology patents of this sort, those who use the net will be forced to wage constant battle with those organizations that attempt to leverage that incompetence for their own benefit. Perhaps organizations like nowebpatents should be preemptively registering patents and releasing them into the public domain. Unfortunately, I don't have the legal knowledge to evaluate the possible legal difficulties with that pursuit.
 
Keith Wellman

March 2nd, 2000 9:15 AM
 
Jeff Bezos you are about to get well and truly stuffed by the same people's internet that you have thus far been able to exploit to your advantage.The same power platform that allowed you to build is now moving to slowly strangle your business unless immediate withdrawal of these patents on public property is forthcoming.For my part in this campaign unless I see a rapid change of heart by Amazon.com I will ensure that Tim's open letter gets the maximum circulation possible within United Kingdom Higher Education establishments and every book-buying acadedmic member of staff.
 
Dennis Pass

March 2nd, 2000 9:15 AM
 
I must simply say that establishing any type of limitation on the Internet should be against your better judgement.

Certainly we are on the Internet to perform commerce, and commerce certainly can mean competition, but let's have healthy competition. Competition keeps us honest and hardworking!

If your intention is to use this patent to enforce "healthy competition" then I applaud your efforts, but if it is to become aggressive, then I will join the rank and file to protest your actions.
 
Ken Hylton

March 2nd, 2000 9:17 AM
 
Chris Petersen

March 2nd, 2000 9:18 AM
 
Steve Catapano

March 2nd, 2000 9:18 AM
 
I will no longer buy from Amazon due to this action.
 
Bill Enos

March 2nd, 2000 9:18 AM
 
These patents (1-click/affiliate program) are entriely bogus and I personally will never spend a single dime to help Amazon.com until they drop these and any other foolish patents.
 
Jonathan Hukari

March 2nd, 2000 9:19 AM
 
Before the 1-click patent I bought items from your site on a weekly basis. Amazon's site pattern is one of the best I've seen. Since I heard of this patent, I haven't touched your site. I've also been telling all my collegues, friends, and relations about this and asking them to avoid your store. Before these patents, you were winning on features and performance. Now however, all my business is going to Barnes and Nobel until yet get rid of these patents!!
 
John

March 2nd, 2000 9:20 AM
 
Do we really need another Microsoft?
 
James Masters

March 2nd, 2000 9:20 AM
 
I was once a loyal Amazon user but have stopped using Amazon since the patent issues came to light. Instead, I have made my purchases from Barnes and Noble and other alternative sites. I have also been disgusted by the privacy policies of both Amazon and Barnes and Noble and have sought more enlightened alternatives.
 
Mark A. Martin

March 2nd, 2000 9:20 AM
 
Pure GREED! Reprehensible.
 
Ron Strom

March 2nd, 2000 9:21 AM
 
ben morris

March 2nd, 2000 9:21 AM
 
This is an amazingly assinine move. It's stunning that Amazon would try to portray their ordering system as something worthy of a patent. There is no innovation, nothing new, and nothing all that special about their website. This also reflects just how bad the government is about granting patents. Patent clerks simply do not have the technical background necessary to evaluate a patent claim and be able to reject all of these stupid patents for everyday (IT) items.
 
David Figueroa

March 2nd, 2000 9:21 AM
 
Geoffrey Wayne

March 2nd, 2000 9:22 AM
 
I will never by another item from these filthy, greedy thieves at Amazon.com, unless they completely return to civilized behavior.
 
Shmuel Tomer

March 2nd, 2000 9:23 AM
 
To me, the issue is very simple.

The patent should never have been granted. First of all, it is a patent on an idea, which is absolutely prohibited by our patent system and totally opposed to its goals.

Second of all, the idea it patents is obvious -- not just obvious, but absolutely implicit in the "cookies" technology of which Amazon's "1-Click" system is only a trivial implementation. It would be as if someone else invented shoes, and Amazon patented the concept of putting feet into them.

In short, this was never Amazon's property to patent. Every day that they enforce that patent is another day that they are profiting off what doesn't belong to them.

Is this the kind of company that consumers want to entrust with their credit-card numbers over the Net?

I don't think so.
 
Joseph Crowley

March 2nd, 2000 9:23 AM
 
Perhaps if we all contribute a penny or three we can buy the patent office a clue.
 
Jim Robinson

March 2nd, 2000 9:24 AM
 
Both patents issued to Amazon should be invalidated because the concepts are (1) not invented by Amazon, (2) obvious, (3) covered by prior art, and most importantly (4) historically (and properly) not patentable. The recent change in patent policy to allow the patenting of general software methods and business methods is assinine. The policy should be reversed immediately and all patents allowed under it summarily abolished.
 
Max Bell

March 2nd, 2000 9:24 AM
 
Alon Brown

March 2nd, 2000 9:24 AM
 
Stop, the madness!!!
 
Landry Butler

March 2nd, 2000 9:25 AM
 
Amazon surely doesn't need to resort to these tricks to close out its competitors?
 
John Baynton

March 2nd, 2000 9:25 AM
 
No more bogus patents.
 
Ahmon Dancy

March 2nd, 2000 9:26 AM
 
Erik Johansen

March 2nd, 2000 9:27 AM
 
David K. Shepherd

March 2nd, 2000 9:27 AM
 
Affiliate marketing is simply a Web-enabled version of the age-old practice of word-of-mouth advertising. A patent on that? Absurd! I just became a loyal barnesandnoble.com customer.
 
William H. Hobbs, vp, NetContent

March 2nd, 2000 9:28 AM
 
John Rosendahl

March 2nd, 2000 9:29 AM
 
James Blondin

March 2nd, 2000 9:29 AM
 
I will no longer purchase anything from Amazon. Ever.
 
Jason Nichols

March 2nd, 2000 9:29 AM
 
Getting a little greedy are we Amazon? This patent nonsense will not help you in any way. I've decided not to buy from Amazon until they renounce their patents-(5,960,411 & 6,029,141) and will encourage others to do the same.
 
Jeff Wolkenhauer

March 2nd, 2000 9:30 AM
 
Shawn Anderson

March 2nd, 2000 9:30 AM
 
I'm continaully amazed at the need for companies to stiffle competition in order to be better at their business model. Microsoft did this and now they are going to pay the price. The intention of all of this open-source technology is to make the internet OPEN, which is what we all ultimately want. I will always use Amazon as a last resort when ordering until they release the source to "One-Clunk Ordering" under the GNU Public License. Good luck Amazon, you're gonna need it!!!
 
Michael Jenkins

March 2nd, 2000 9:30 AM
 
No more shopping at amazon for me until they back off these obvious patents. They never should have been granted. Someone needs to give the USPTO a kick in the pants.

On the Affiliate Marketing patent...so sorry, but PORNO sites had tons of PRIOR ART on that concept long before Jeff Bezos "invented" it. Greedy mofo.
 
Jason Burns

March 2nd, 2000 9:31 AM
 
In the past I have ordered from Amazon.com exclusively. Due to their current action, I will not patron them with my business again.
 
Craig Sheppard

March 2nd, 2000 9:31 AM
 
1-click ordering is no different than providing account numbers to customers by conventional means (such as a catalog mailing label) and asking the customer for it when ordering by phone. Amazon did NOT invent this (and did not invent cookies). Amazon is deliberately taking advantage of the U.S. Patent Office's practice of erring on the side of protection. This amounts to the THEFT of intellectual property in the public domain. Very sad that Amazon would stoop to this level in competing for market share rather than continue the great job they WERE doing satisfying customers. I WAS a happy customer, but will no longer do any business with Amazon.
 
Dale Sundstrom

March 2nd, 2000 9:31 AM
 
John Siracusa

March 2nd, 2000 9:31 AM
 
John Siracusa

March 2nd, 2000 9:32 AM
 
Jonathan Bona

March 2nd, 2000 9:32 AM
 
I have been a long time Amazon customer and until this patent issue came up, Amazon was the only online book seller I ordered from. Now it is the only one I won't order from.
 
Shawn Cornelius

March 2nd, 2000 9:32 AM
 
Ethan McCargar

March 2nd, 2000 9:32 AM
 
Matthew Hyclak

March 2nd, 2000 9:33 AM
 
No, I'm not boycotting you anymore. I'll just *never* purchase anything from your web site.

 
Martin Miller

March 2nd, 2000 9:34 AM
 
Ben Liberman

March 2nd, 2000 9:34 AM
 
Go Tim!!!
 
Bob Lee

March 2nd, 2000 9:34 AM
 
This must stop.

 
Mark Thompson

March 2nd, 2000 9:35 AM
 
Amazon you are pushing the current law system to far. You have lost me as a customer and I will now shop at Barns & Nobles.
 
Thomas Earl Warren

March 2nd, 2000 9:35 AM
 
Why in the world would you try to ruin something that so many have donated much time & skill to develop? Can't Amazon.com partner in the effort? Does everything have to be targeted at skinning others for a buck?
 
Don Brown

March 2nd, 2000 9:36 AM
 
As a programmer, I understand the feeling when someone copies or steals your programs. But at the same time, you are suing over an idea, not the actual implementation. Are these companies stealing your code and using it on their sites? No. They're using a very simple idea using cookies, nothing more. I will boycott Amazon until this situation is resolved.
 
Bryan Inagaki

March 2nd, 2000 9:37 AM
 
Michel Galle

March 2nd, 2000 9:37 AM
 
I like Amazon's service and find them to be most effective in terms of applying technology to e-commerce - for example, they just sent me (a frequent customer) an unsolicated birthday gift certificate for 50$!

Unfortunately, I find that I have to join the boycott (and not use the gift certificate), as I find the situation with the 1-click patent (and the associates patent, as well) to be a reprehensible abuse of the patent office.

In the meantime, I will be using the services of http://www.fatbrain.com , http://www.thinkgeek.com , and others.
 
Jon Obuchowski

March 2nd, 2000 9:38 AM
 
Joe Moorman

March 2nd, 2000 9:39 AM
 
I figured I had better hurry and sign before they patented use of the textbox-button combo...
 
Scott D. Barker

March 2nd, 2000 9:39 AM
 
Just because.
 
Dave Kingston

March 2nd, 2000 9:39 AM
 
It would be hard to improve upon the points so eloquently presented by Tim O'Reilly. Suffice it to say that I am in complete agreement with him, and that I view Amazon as a leech, capitalizing on the true innovations of others and adding precious little value of their own.

Wherever possible, I am taking my business elsewhere, notably www.fatbrain.com and www.bn.com, and will continue to do so until Amazon takes another, more community-oriented centered stance. I also buy a fair number of non-book products such as toys and tools - I am taking that business elsewhere, too.

I have also removed all the "Amazon Associates" links from my site. That's unfortunate for Amazon - about 2/3 of the new hits to our site were from searches hitting our libarary.
Presently, I'll switch the links over to another vendor.
 
Reinhardt Quelle

March 2nd, 2000 9:39 AM
 
Jeff - didn't you just get castigated for giving away demographic info on your customers? Here's your second major mistake. I find it laughable that you've stooped to one of the establishment's oldest tricks: copyrighting/patenting something that you neither invented nor were the first to put into practical use. Your treacherous use of patents on an OPEN STANDARD is antithetical to the spirit of the web. It is rivaled in infamy only bythose individuals who now patent the rights to individual DNA sequences in the hopes that some researcher 10 years down the road will find a medical use for them. I think it's only fitting that consumers hit you where it hurts -- your wallet.
 
anonymous

March 2nd, 2000 9:40 AM
 
Jeff - didn't you just get castigated for giving away demographic info on your customers? Here's your second major mistake. I find it laughable that you've stooped to one of the establishment's oldest tricks: copyrighting/patenting something that you neither invented nor were the first to put into practical use. Your treacherous use of patents on an OPEN STANDARD is antithetical to the spirit of the web. It is rivaled in infamy only bythose individuals who now patent the rights to individual DNA sequences in the hopes that some researcher 10 years down the road will find a medical use for them. I think it's only fitting that consumers hit you where it hurts -- your wallet.
 
Javaun Moradi, Atlanta, GA

March 2nd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
I'm simply stopping buying from Amazon. It's easy enough to get what I want from other places.

 
Martin Elster

March 2nd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
I have bought many books over the last few years amounting to several hundred, if not a thousand dollars from Amazon.com.

However, I will not buy another book, magazine, movie or ANYTHING from them unless they cease and desist in their innovation stifling practices.
 
Marc D Smith

March 2nd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
Byron Sturtevant

March 2nd, 2000 9:42 AM
 
Let a million Web businesses bloom, not another Microsoft.
 
Thomas McDonald

March 2nd, 2000 9:43 AM
 
Please help keep the Internet growing. We don't need to pay Amazon for an idea that is as basic as the checkstand aisle at any store in the world.
 
Adam Bray-Ali

March 2nd, 2000 9:44 AM
 
Andre Robatino

March 2nd, 2000 9:44 AM
 
I believe your action is extremely shortsighted and very detrimental to the continued growth of ecommerce. I had been looking forward to spending my entire income tax refund on my woodworking hobby with equipment from your "Tool Crib of the North" affiliate - no more. And forget the $100 or $200 a month I average on computer books.

You had better hope that no one on Wall Street puts 2 and 2 together. This move smacks of desperation and you know how nervous the market can be.
 
Steve Cross

March 2nd, 2000 9:44 AM
 
There is little left to say after reading so many of the other comments, but I can say that this is an opportunity, both for the public and for Amazon itself to truly use internet speed and correct a mistake that was surely made in part due to the overwhelming change this new environment dwells in. This free medium is in essence the hand that feeds; tampering with it in this manner is a way of biting it!
 
Arturo de Alba

March 2nd, 2000 9:45 AM
 

 
Shyam Kamadolli

March 2nd, 2000 9:45 AM
 
This is the same attitude that Bill G has me,me,me. Since the new Mr.Me wants to control the affiliate e-world, I have desided to ...DROP.... Amazon as an affiliate from 800 plus store mall. If all Amazons affiliates joined my the boycot it would seriously slow down Amazons traffic and revenue. This would probally affect Amazon's share price in a negative manner.
 
Laurence Bartle

March 2nd, 2000 9:46 AM
 
Vincèn Pujol

March 2nd, 2000 9:47 AM
 
Pamela J. Templin

March 2nd, 2000 9:47 AM
 
Shame on you Amazon! Consider me an ex-patron!
I cannot believe that you want to close-off the internet!!! There are pioneers on the web attempting to make this medium open for all so that we can have a place to exchange ideas and yes shop conveniently and efficiently. You are doing this for no other reason but to line your pockets by making the web exclusive and not inclusive.
Innovation and ideas nurture growth and success–not greed and dictatorship.
 
Ray Eleid

March 2nd, 2000 9:48 AM
 
Kavita B. Patel

March 2nd, 2000 9:48 AM
 
Bad Amazon! No more business for you!
 
Katherine Pitta

March 2nd, 2000 9:48 AM
 
As a lawyer, web developer and regular customer, I sincerely urge you to set a good example, not a bad one, in this critical area. The accelerating trend in claiming questionable Internet-related and software patents has enormous implications for the ability to innovate and for the wider community to share in the fruits of innovation. Please lead in the right direction and do so decisively.
 
LaVern A. Pritchard

March 2nd, 2000 9:49 AM
 
Intellectual property rights are important but
surely the '1-click' concept is nothing new. It
was just a question of who would be arrogant
enough to claim it as their own. Amazon, step
forward!
 
Hugo Rabson

March 2nd, 2000 9:49 AM
 
Philip C. Pilgrim

March 2nd, 2000 9:49 AM
 
Barnes & Noble (bn.com) gets my business until amazon.com gives up on these frivolous patents.
 
Ray Clouse

March 2nd, 2000 9:50 AM
 
Arto Rantala

March 2nd, 2000 9:51 AM
 
Ironically, I had just done a comparison of major online retailers, and had chosen Amazon based on service alone, despite an occasional higher price. Now they have lost me as a customer because of their insecurity about competing on that basis.
 
Parker Bennett

March 2nd, 2000 9:51 AM
 
Brian Ruth

March 2nd, 2000 9:51 AM
 
If your 'patent' is a previously used method, it cannot be enforced anyway since it is no patent. I consider the attempt to enforce such 'patent' as bad business method and will avoid to do business with such people.
 
Lembit Soobik

March 2nd, 2000 9:52 AM
 
Ashwin Baskaran

March 2nd, 2000 9:52 AM
 
Mark Powell

March 2nd, 2000 9:53 AM
 
I will continue to boycot Amazon.com, and to urge anyone I know with the intention of buying books, cd's, and other items avaliable on amazon to boycot amazon as well, untill this patent issue is well and truly resoloved.
 
Drew Sawyer

March 2nd, 2000 9:53 AM
 
Talk about killing the hen with the golden legs.

Besides the unbelievable incompetence of the USPTO and the stupidity of representatives that would vote for allowing patents over business processes (the US being the ONLY country in the world applying something that counterproductive), Amazon needs to be reminded that competition is healthy.
 
Renaud Pierre

March 2nd, 2000 9:54 AM
 
I have until now been a satisfied Amazon customer. I will, however, be boycotting Amazon.com and any site associated with it until this patent matter has been publicly resolved. Amazon's totalitarian approach is disgraceful, and is in complete opposition to the economic and intellectual freedom the web has come to symbolize.
 
Andrew Friz

March 2nd, 2000 9:55 AM
 
Rory dela Paz

March 2nd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
I must say, I considered carefully before signing this letter. Unlike many of the people who have signed, I am not anti-property. I am a capitalist in the original(and today, radical) sense of the term. However, regardless of your take on patents in general, this patent doesn't even meet the legal criteria for validity, and while a patent examiner might be fooled, a court probably won't be. You will incur legal fees, you will lose customers, your competitors will gain many of those customers, and in the end, your patent will be thrown out by a court. I do not ask anyone to sacrifice himself for the sake of anyone else, nor will I ever sacrifice myself. This isn't about sacrifice. This is about your own best interest. Give up on these patents - because it is the right thing for YOU.
 
John J. Adelsberger III

March 2nd, 2000 9:56 AM
 

Happy to say that I have never ordered from Amazon and do not plan to start, especially now. Small, independent bookstores are an endangered species thanks to Amazonian corruption.
 
Jessica Moore

March 2nd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
Aaron Petry

March 2nd, 2000 9:57 AM
 
Alexandre Roger

March 2nd, 2000 9:57 AM
 
Like many others, I'm taking my book-buying business elsewhere. MY employers rely on commonly available web technologies in many cases not dissimilar to these, and I refuse to condone these patents by dealing with Amazon.
 
Mike Whitaker

March 2nd, 2000 9:57 AM
 
I've written to Jeff Bezos about my concern for this matter, and yet all I got was a stock reply. Perhaps this will get them to listen a little more closely.
 
Matthew Burns

March 2nd, 2000 9:57 AM
 
In the world of e-commerce, where customer loyalty is such a fleeting thing, Amazon are doing themselves a great disservice with these frivilous patents. Behold how easy it is for myself and other like-minded individuals to refrain from shopping at Amazon. For a company that came so far on the wave of innovation that spawned the web, they seem to have forgotten how they got there and instead let the corporate lawyers take over. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to fatbrain.com.
 
Colin Jacobs

March 2nd, 2000 9:57 AM
 
It really is too bad that Amazon has stooped this low. They already had good market share and name recognition. Now their name will be recognized for something else than quality - unfairness. I too, will use Barnes and Noble or other vendors for products and services that Amazon sells until Amazon sees the light.
 
Rick Montgomery

March 2nd, 2000 9:58 AM
 
Jeremy Gude

March 2nd, 2000 9:58 AM
 
What?! Man of the Year wasn't enough for you?
 
Jerrod M. Bishop

March 2nd, 2000 9:59 AM
 
You can't patent shopping on the internet. It seems dumb that an option that saves people time while shopping, became patented. Either someone at the patent office let it slip, or they were somehow persuaded by Amazon to let it go through. Either way, Amazon might become the 800-pound gorilla much like Microsoft did, and we'll see Amazon go on trial next. AMerica is supposed to be a free market. Any person can make a business and compete. There should be no monopoly, but it sounds like Amazon is trying to be anti-American. Let's hope they learn their ways.
 
David Marcantonio

March 2nd, 2000 9:59 AM
 
I firmly believe in the open source concept - this issue flys in the face of this idea. Therefore I will vote with my feet and shop elsewhere until this issue is favorably resolved.
 
Bob Rinker

March 2nd, 2000 10:01 AM
 
I just heard what is going on, and I won't be shopping here anymore till you right it. Thats about $200 a month you have just lost.
 
Kerri Paul

March 2nd, 2000 10:01 AM
 
Simon Bonnick

March 2nd, 2000 10:02 AM
 
Adam Berger

March 2nd, 2000 10:02 AM
 
Edson Pereira

March 2nd, 2000 10:03 AM
 
I have been an avid purchaser at amazon.com for over 2 years now. However I feel that the patents which amazon has been trying to get and more importantly enforce are the lowest form business ethics, especially considering the fact that amazon would not exist were it not for those pioneering programmers who released thier ideas and code for the betterment of the net...not their pockets.
 
Alexander King

March 2nd, 2000 10:03 AM
 
Michael Muehlenberg

March 2nd, 2000 10:03 AM
 
Giant corporations may get to flex their muscles in the business world - but the consumer is still their ultimate boss.

As such, I will never buy from Amazon. Also, I will do my best to persuade my friends, aquaintances and anyone who will listen to boycott Amazon for as long as this patent nonsense goes on.

www.chapters.ca
www.indigo.ca
www.fatbrain.com
www.bn.com

 
Ron Harwood

March 2nd, 2000 10:04 AM
 
Gie van Roosbroeck

March 2nd, 2000 10:04 AM
 
Passing off someone else's work as your own is called plagiarism and is grounds for expulsion from any higher education institution in the world. This act violates three basic concepts upon which our country was founded: duty, honor, and integrity. Should we indemnify companies but punish individuals? Would you be where you are today without the work of countless others? Can you legitemately rationalize your actions as you ruthlessly steamroll over the very people who helped you get to where you are today?
 
Adam Gordon

March 2nd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
Christopher Muehlenberg

March 2nd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
I was a huge proponent of Amazon.com, but no longer. Until this idiocy ends, not only do I no longer recommend Amazon.com to people, I now encourage everyone who asks me about books on the 'net to boycott Amazon.com as I have.
 
Paul Sanders

March 2nd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
I think we should be directing more of our ire at the office which issued this patent, rather than Amazon. Otherwise we are going to have to continue to fight similar fights, on into the indefinite future.

That said, I too will be encouraging my friends to boycott Amazon.
 
James Treleaven

March 2nd, 2000 10:06 AM
 
Dear Jeff,

Unprofitable business model. Unprofitable attitude. Which came first?

BTW - Jeff which side of the look and feel debate were you on? Microsoft or Apple....

As the customer, I am reserving my right to fire you by taking my $$ elsewhere.

 
M Rosenberg

March 2nd, 2000 10:07 AM
 
Charles Cazabon

March 2nd, 2000 10:07 AM
 
Richard J Akerman

March 2nd, 2000 10:07 AM
 
Gordon Tisher

March 2nd, 2000 10:08 AM
 
Bad Jeff, bad. Innovation good. Corporate fear-mongering bad!!!! Learn to play nice with the other multi-nationals, more importantly the little guys.
 
Chris Murray

March 2nd, 2000 10:08 AM
 
Michael Fessler

March 2nd, 2000 10:08 AM
 
Having spent well over 3K last year at Amazon, as well as being a stockholder, I will find it hard, but not impossible to break my Amazon habit. I'm sure my local book and music stores will be happy to have my business again...it seems that convenience is the enemy after all!
 
H Hirzel

March 2nd, 2000 10:08 AM
 
My company has used affiliate tracking technology prior to Amazon filing for their patent in 1997.
The Lang Co. http://makura.com/lang/accessgel.html
 
Gary Lang

March 2nd, 2000 10:08 AM
 
It's an insult to true innovators when patents
like these are issued. I wholeheartedly join
the boycott, and will not make further purchases
from Amazon.
 
Jim Russell

March 2nd, 2000 10:09 AM
 
Brett Haydon

March 2nd, 2000 10:09 AM
 
Servaas Goossens

March 2nd, 2000 10:09 AM
 
Jason Downs

March 2nd, 2000 10:09 AM
 
Lee Smallbone

March 2nd, 2000 10:09 AM
 
Geoff Termorshuizen

March 2nd, 2000 10:09 AM
 
George A. Roberts IV

March 2nd, 2000 10:10 AM
 
Disgusting. Aggressive tactics such as these will not win the war for the hearts and minds of netizens. May I remind you of the case Grolier's brought up to patent the concept of multimedia. Until you abandon such practices, I shall be taking my business elsewhere. Good day, sir.
 
G Chung Ngai Moy

March 2nd, 2000 10:10 AM
 
President
Alternate Realities Publications
Studio Webworlds Web Design & Hosting

I find it ridiculous that Amazon.com has been granted patents on the creation of mere links which were pioneered by the first web browsers, and Multi-Level Marketing, as pioneered by the infamous Amway.
 
Dana Jorgensen

March 2nd, 2000 10:13 AM
 
Just another former Amazon customer
 
David Crook

March 2nd, 2000 10:13 AM
 
David Secrest

March 2nd, 2000 10:13 AM
 
Stephen A. Fuqua

March 2nd, 2000 10:14 AM
 
Harri Sylvander

March 2nd, 2000 10:15 AM
 
Amazon customer no more!
 
Kazimierz Olbinski

March 2nd, 2000 10:15 AM
 
Moriah Lewis

March 2nd, 2000 10:16 AM
 
Moriah Lewis

March 2nd, 2000 10:16 AM
 
I am seriously considering removing the Amazon.com associate links on the websites I run because of this patent crap.
 
Daniel Evanko

March 2nd, 2000 10:17 AM
 
Noah Sutherland

March 2nd, 2000 10:17 AM
 
Bruce Schneider

March 2nd, 2000 10:18 AM
 
Never mind my POV as a technologist, which are eloquently expressed by others here - as a consumer this certainly drives me to other vendors for the products and services provided by Amazon, and to recommend the same for others.
 
Jeff Savit

March 2nd, 2000 10:20 AM
 
Will we never be rid of these cursed "legal suits", who hover like birds of prey above the Internet in hopes of finding yet another way to ramp-up their billable hours. And how about the totally inept US Government Patent Office . . . they are mostly the ones to blame. "If you build a patent, they will come!" And in this case the "they" are the lawyers.


 
Paul Patrick Robinson

March 2nd, 2000 10:21 AM
 
Amazon lost one more customer.
 
robert warren

March 2nd, 2000 10:23 AM
 
Peter Komisar

March 2nd, 2000 10:23 AM
 
Jerry R

March 2nd, 2000 10:23 AM
 
Charles G. Hopkins

March 2nd, 2000 10:23 AM
 
Barnes & Noble (.com) and the other booksellers are starting to look better to me every day.
 
Scott P

March 2nd, 2000 10:24 AM
 
I'm afraid someone will patent me soon--oh crap, they've already started doing that, sequence by sequence. Just another company taking advantage of a crippled and overworked patent agency, so what? It's clearly unfair business practices, but Congress doesn't know how to apply yesterday's solutions to the new problems created by the technology revolution, nor does it affect their paycheck. However, this isn't about Congress--if you were responsive to the fundamental requirements of free enterprise and free speech these patents would not exist. Like to patent the html code for my web page??? It's up for grabs. America demands more lawsuits!!!
 
SiRuS

March 2nd, 2000 10:24 AM
 
The spirit of the internet is cooperation. Yes it is assumed that business' will compete on the web based on product, price, and or differentiation. E business' should not set patent rights on basic technology thus eliminating competition to use this technology while presenting their products.
 
Dan Hurley

March 2nd, 2000 10:24 AM
 
Continuing to boycott!
 
Joshua Chalifour

March 2nd, 2000 10:25 AM
 
I am a former Amazon.com customer
and writer of the occasional book review.
I buy books for work, pleasure, and gifts.
Your loss, Amazon.
softpro.com and barnesandnoble.com
and oreilly.com, here I come.
 
Mary-Anne Wolf

March 2nd, 2000 10:25 AM
 
Konrad Summers

March 2nd, 2000 10:25 AM
 
Mikhael Schlossman

March 2nd, 2000 10:26 AM
 
Amanda Owens

March 2nd, 2000 10:26 AM
 
Boy you f-ed up big time now!
Hello fatbrain!
 
Richard S.

March 2nd, 2000 10:26 AM
 
Let's keep technology open to creativity instead of blind greed.

 
Rob Callicotte, Jr.

March 2nd, 2000 10:26 AM
 
Marc Wiltse

March 2nd, 2000 10:27 AM
 
I think it is utterly preposterous that Amazon even attempted to attain a patent of such an obvious use of cookies. What's more preposterous, however, is that the patent office approved the application.
 
Alex Yacoub

March 2nd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
This type of behaviour is absolutely ridiculous and appalling! I read someone else's comments on this where they asked if this meant that Amazon could claim a patent on the concept of hyperlinks because of the "Affiliate" patent.

Is it just me, or is that as silly an idea as it sounds?
 
Leland Jory

March 2nd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
Jeffrey Shergalis

March 2nd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
Bill Bishop

March 2nd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
Brian Aljian

March 2nd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
Shame on you amazon! Will never buy again. Will always advice against buying from thiefs. Had your chance, blew it bigtime.
 
roderick

March 2nd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
What amazon.com has done here is inexcusable, and clearly shows their "true colors" as an organization.
 
Todd Threadgill

March 2nd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
My husband and I spend a large sum of money yearly on books. Not a penny will be spent at Amazon.com.
 
Deborah Palmer

March 2nd, 2000 10:29 AM
 
Kurt Kendall

March 2nd, 2000 10:30 AM
 
I switched to fatbrain because of this, and guess what - they've got better deals anyway ...
 
Honza Jirousek

March 2nd, 2000 10:32 AM
 
Amazon is trying to patent that?!?! OMG!
Talk about Microsoft trying to scr@# people on the net.......Humph!

I would like to patent the color green. Has anyone done that yet?
 
Dave Atwater

March 2nd, 2000 10:32 AM
 
Jill Borofka

March 2nd, 2000 10:34 AM
 
Jason Jasmin

March 2nd, 2000 10:35 AM
 
Nick Poolos

March 2nd, 2000 10:36 AM
 
Steve

March 2nd, 2000 10:36 AM
 
Peter Ibbotson

March 2nd, 2000 10:38 AM
 
Gil Murray

March 2nd, 2000 10:38 AM
 
mark

March 2nd, 2000 10:39 AM
 
Perhaps Amazon should consider filing a patent application for the entire Internet? I guess it wasn't really Al Gore after all.
 
Sean Nataro

March 2nd, 2000 10:39 AM
 
James C Hilley

March 2nd, 2000 10:40 AM
 
You can not patent what is not yours.
 
Josh Maher

March 2nd, 2000 10:40 AM
 
I thought Amazon really understood what the web was all about. How disappointing!
 
Tina Gongsakdi

March 2nd, 2000 10:41 AM
 
David Rolfe

March 2nd, 2000 10:41 AM
 
I used to do over $500 in business with Amazon a year. With this Patent abuse they've lost my money.
 
Lloyd I Freese Jr

March 2nd, 2000 10:41 AM
 
Mike Schlueter

March 2nd, 2000 10:41 AM
 
Jeff McAdams

March 2nd, 2000 10:42 AM
 
I will join in boycotting Amazon.
 
Kelly Larsen

March 2nd, 2000 10:43 AM
 
Andy Ciordia

March 2nd, 2000 10:43 AM
 
This should not be patented ... it's more of a business methodology than a technology.
 
Edward Kaull

March 2nd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
Dear Amazon,

I too must add my voice to the growing chorus urging you to stop this use of patents as offensive weapons against your competitors.

-- Bob Jakuc
 
Bob Jakuc

March 2nd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
The 'Net recognizes censorship as damage, and routes around it. It also recognizes patents for prior art as theft, and boycotts it. Bezos, you're about to corner the market on zero-clicks.
 
Mark Job

March 2nd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
Matthew England

March 2nd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
Even though I have previously puchased several hundered dollars worth of merchandise from Amazon, I am now boycotting them and will buy nothing further.
 
Derek Bastille

March 2nd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
Eric Marcoullier

March 2nd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
Jessica Sabell

March 2nd, 2000 10:45 AM
 
Christine Kimball

March 2nd, 2000 10:46 AM
 
Erin Quinlan

March 2nd, 2000 10:46 AM
 
Mark M. Brown

March 2nd, 2000 10:46 AM
 
Jeff Sorbo

March 2nd, 2000 10:47 AM
 
Ajesh Bhargava

March 2nd, 2000 10:47 AM
 
Andreas C. Kabel (Mountain View,

March 2nd, 2000 10:48 AM
 
i have bought many books from amazon.com. beginning today i will join the boycott until amazon.com clarifies its intentions for the use of this patent.
 
robert dunn-ballinger

March 2nd, 2000 10:48 AM
 
J. Colin Cox

March 2nd, 2000 10:48 AM
 
It's amazing how shortsighted companies can become in pursuit of an extra dollar. That extra dollar certainly isn't going to be coming from me. Furthermore, my colleagues working and studying in the field of computer science with me agree that no one wants to contribute their talents to a company who seeks to strangle our right to use these very common, very essential concepts. Unless you want to lose your money AND your shot at finding qualified people to keep your enterprise going, I suggest you get your act together and act in the interest of the Internet.
 
Cheryl Platz

March 2nd, 2000 10:48 AM
 
Hey guys, I buy a lot of Amazon books. Amazon needs to get it's policies in line with what it's buyers need/want.
 
Marsden

March 2nd, 2000 10:49 AM
 
Don Sytsma

March 2nd, 2000 10:49 AM
 
Sid Stafford

March 2nd, 2000 10:49 AM
 
Alan Weber

March 2nd, 2000 10:49 AM
 
Make no mistake: These patents won't hold up in court. Nonetheless, the very act of attempting to enforce them is disgraceful. It's like trying to patent air. I will not only take my business elsewhere; I won't visit the amazon site at all and will ask others to join the boycott as well.
 
Brian Greene

March 2nd, 2000 10:50 AM
 
I've been using Amazon exclusively for ordering books and CD's over the web - they get no more of my business until they stop this antisocial behavior.
 
Will O'Donovan

March 2nd, 2000 10:51 AM
 
John Tonge

March 2nd, 2000 10:51 AM
 
Marketing and legal are two different things. Haven't we learned this from Microsoft yet?
 
Kris Kirby

March 2nd, 2000 10:52 AM
 
Jay Gallivan

March 2nd, 2000 10:52 AM
 
Amazon.com - you are wrong! From now on I refuse to buy anything in your site. B&N is my choice! Besides, I can always go to their brick&mortar store and feel a book in my hand before(!) I buy it.
 
Alexander Seliutin

March 2nd, 2000 10:52 AM
 
The intelligence of this patent ranks up there with the patent originally given for Multimedia CD-ROMs, after it had been done for years. It will be overturned. However, in the process, Amazon.com has now lost a customer, before and after their patent is overturned.
 
Tony Bossaller

March 2nd, 2000 10:52 AM
 
Join the boycott of Amazon and use http://www.noamazon.com and/or http://www.addall.com the discounts are better and the stores listed are not trying to patent and litigate their way to market share.
 
Christopher Gait

March 2nd, 2000 10:53 AM
 
Brian Roundhill

March 2nd, 2000 10:53 AM
 
bla
 
a

March 2nd, 2000 10:53 AM
 
Mark Hawes

March 2nd, 2000 10:57 AM
 
Russell Jensen

March 2nd, 2000 10:58 AM
 
This is a blatent attempt to close down the Internet, and lock down e-commerce to some petty patent.
 
Rich Swier

March 2nd, 2000 10:58 AM
 
Businesses need to learn that what makes good business sense does not and should not work when it comes to the infrastructure of the Internet. Use the Net to do business, but don't be creeps about using the Net, OK?
 
Christopher J. Pinard

March 2nd, 2000 10:59 AM
 
Juan Diaz-Naveas

March 2nd, 2000 11:00 AM
 
George Kuch

March 2nd, 2000 11:00 AM
 
paulo m zimme

March 2nd, 2000 11:00 AM
 
I will never buy anything from Amazon again unless they stop trying to enforce these patents.
 
David Hanssen

March 2nd, 2000 11:01 AM
 
caleb reed

March 2nd, 2000 11:01 AM
 
Anna Tetiyevsky

March 2nd, 2000 11:01 AM
 
We need to re-think the patent process in the United States of America. Checks and Balances need to be established to prevent large corporations from abusing the system of the antiquated Patent Office. I have written to Amazon to request that my account be deleted and my personal information removed from their database. I will shop elsewhere from now on. Join the Boycott today!

http://www.noWebpatents.com
 
Kendall Dawson

March 2nd, 2000 11:03 AM
 
the 1-click trick is mundane and an associated patent would be absurd.
 
Braxton

March 2nd, 2000 11:03 AM
 
Your company got rich from freely exchanged technology, now you want to own it! I'm amazed at your greed, will not purchase from Amazon, and will urge my business and personal associates to support this boycot.

--Mark D. Holland
webmaster@jingles.com
 
Mark D. Holland

March 2nd, 2000 11:03 AM
 
Cyndi Smith

March 2nd, 2000 11:04 AM
 
Thanks to PoorRichard.com for alerting me to this important issue...
 
Michael E. Fitzpatrick

March 2nd, 2000 11:04 AM
 
I will not be buying anything more from Amazon.
 
Robert Miller

March 2nd, 2000 11:05 AM
 
Nicholas Amaral

March 2nd, 2000 11:06 AM
 
I won't even discuss why the patents should not have been granted. That, to me, is just a no-brainer. But it seems very strange that a company which was made possible by the Web would then attempt to hijack core Web technologies and business methods. Shame!

I cannot buy from Amazon any longer. I'm a Web developer, and to do so would be to contribute to the coffers of a corporation which is actively attempting to injure both myself and my clients.
 
Greg Metcalfe

March 2nd, 2000 11:06 AM
 
Andrew Dilley

March 2nd, 2000 11:07 AM
 
What Amazon has done is tantamount to patenting a deli counter and cash register, and then trying to force other delicatessens to change the way they operate. Such general patents should never be issued, and certainly not in an area as dynamic and innovative as the web.
 
Matthew Levy

March 2nd, 2000 11:07 AM
 
As an Internet developer, I am appalled that Amazon is enforcing patents on basic building blocks of commercial sites. Amazon's actions can only slow the growth of other innovative companies trying to provide service over this medium.

Shame on Amazon.com for their business practices.
 
Jonathan Fritz

March 2nd, 2000 11:07 AM
 
Michael Sacket

March 2nd, 2000 11:08 AM
 
I stopped buying from them as soon as this started and have not purchased a thing from them since. And I will not. They better understand they have competitors whose prices are just as reasonable. If they try and get heavy handed they can watch their business sink. Believe it or not it is the people that make this country and to many companies feel they dictate policy for the public and can do what they damn well please. THEY ARE WRONG.
 
Shaun Knopf

March 2nd, 2000 11:08 AM
 
Chris Malme

March 2nd, 2000 11:08 AM
 
Chris Robertson

March 2nd, 2000 11:08 AM
 
Francesco Zuliani

March 2nd, 2000 11:08 AM
 
If you can patent the 1-Click, maybe I should patent the hyper link.
 
Jeremy Sacket

March 2nd, 2000 11:09 AM
 
It's hard to say it better than Tim has.
 
Devin Ben-Hur

March 2nd, 2000 11:09 AM
 
Why take a step backwards?
 
sno

March 2nd, 2000 11:09 AM
 
Christopher Marquis

March 2nd, 2000 11:11 AM
 
I also think the "One Click" patent is a bad idea.

I spend a lot of money at Amazon and am now wondering if I should support this with my purchases.
HS
 
Hardi Stutes

March 2nd, 2000 11:12 AM
 
Darryl Baker

March 2nd, 2000 11:13 AM
 
I am another former amazon customer who is boycotting until the patent is recalled.
 
Alex Krowitz

March 2nd, 2000 11:14 AM
 
FATBRAIN!
 
John Restrepo

March 2nd, 2000 11:14 AM
 
Thinking Amazon.com to be pro-innovation and pro-technology, I have been a satisfied and frequent Amazon customer for some time. No more. They've shown their hand and revealed themselves to be petty and unethical, willing to stifle internet commerce as a whole for their own profits.

I'm all for capitalism, but this is wrong, and I'm deeply disappointed by this action. Amazon has made it clear that they have no regard for the internet community, and with every dollar I spend at BN.com and Fatbrain I'll be showing that, for my family and friends at least, the feeling is very much mutual.

Good luck trying to recover from this PR boondoggle, Mr. Bezos.

Mr. O'Reilly- you and your "associates" are doing wonderful work. Keep it up! You guys are the best!
 
Eric Krastel

March 2nd, 2000 11:15 AM
 
The granting of such patents by the US Patent Office is clear and evident proof that those reviewing such patent applications do not have the technical knowledge to be making judgments on the Internet related patent applications delivered into their hands. The fact that there are individuals and groups that feel compelled to exploit the US Patent office's inability to make informed decesions on such issues is not surprising given the attitude of some of the new "robber barons", but their tactics cannot derail Internet progress.
 
Charles C Caro

March 2nd, 2000 11:16 AM
 
Dave Rathnow

March 2nd, 2000 11:17 AM
 
You can also write to Amazon directly at feedback@amazon.com, as I have done.
 
John Myers

March 2nd, 2000 11:17 AM
 
Come on Amazon. I've been a customer for a long time, and while I haven't been participating in any boycott, I do find myself purchasing my books elsewhere these days.

You are a bellwether for ecommerce, and I'm opposed to the example you are setting in filing and enforcing your patents. I hope you come to your senses and do the right thing.
 
Craig Oshima

March 2nd, 2000 11:17 AM
 
I fully agree with Tim O'Reilly's comments and despise the greediness of Amazon's move. I have ordered books from Amazon in the past but will use Barnes and Noble until Amazon desists from their foolishness. Yes, boycott.
 
Grant Sperry

March 2nd, 2000 11:17 AM
 
Micah R. Condon

March 2nd, 2000 11:17 AM
 
Mr. Bezos and Amazon.com should abandon this offensive pursuit of patents on ecommerce business practice for several reasons. First, a closer review of these patents will reveal that they do not satisfy requisite elements, as well as the first-to-invent rule. The company's survival of a motion for preliminary injunction against B&N.com does not mean it will survive a substantive challenge to its patents in trial. Second, in a larger perspective, this practice is detrimental to the future of ecommerce and the advancement of the internet as a whole. Permitting monopolization of obvious, non-novel business methods will stifle the growth of this still-sprouting industry at the expense of all involved, including Amazon.com. Third, the company should halt further bad publicity and customer relations stemming from its current actions. In a cost-benefit analysis viewpoint, there is less to gain from preventing competitors from using the same processes, and a lot more to lose with lost revenues, irreplaceable consumer trust, and increasing public distaste. For all the reasons above, it will be to Amazon.com's benefit to proceed with these new-found intellectual property rights cautiously.
 
Andrew Hwang

March 2nd, 2000 11:18 AM
 
I am relatively new to the IT world (2 years) but O'Reilly books are the only ones I own. My proposition is that Tim should make a book called "Amazon In A Nutshell" or "Jeff Bezos In A Nutshell" and have all these comments make up the entire book. As far as soliciting Amazon for business, I've bought a handful of things from them. But after this, I guess I'll just have to go to the Barnes & Noble right across the street from me. Human interaction isn't all that bad.
 
Michael D. Smith

March 2nd, 2000 11:19 AM
 
How ridiculous can Amazon get!!!
 
Joe Sheremeto

March 2nd, 2000 11:19 AM
 
Until Amazon corrects its behaviour I will not purchase anything through them and encouraging everyone I know to boycott them as well.
 
Esko Woudenberg

March 2nd, 2000 11:20 AM
 
Why that ...!!
With ideas like this Amazon can wipe out electronic commerce ! How are online shops supposed to work now: they hire a hacker to trace the customer via hostname, call him, and then make the deal?
Why wont AltaVista just patent searching, Yahoo ffa, Borland programming, AOL surfing or Microsoft breathing ? These would be some great ideas.
And anyway: i dont think, that the Amazon guys are starving, they cant pay for gas, and they're working on C64's. How comes their huuge profit isn't enough ?
 
Attila Nagyidai

March 2nd, 2000 11:21 AM
 
James Bumgarner

March 2nd, 2000 11:22 AM
 
Dennis Crall

March 2nd, 2000 11:24 AM
 
Barnesandnoble.com here I come!
 
Eric Berg

March 2nd, 2000 11:25 AM
 
Betty Couvertier

March 2nd, 2000 11:25 AM
 
Jeff Schmidt

March 2nd, 2000 11:25 AM
 
www.bn.com has gotten some business they otherwise wouldn't have had, and they will get some more.
 
Carl Forde

March 2nd, 2000 11:25 AM
 
Ken D'Ambrosio

March 2nd, 2000 11:25 AM
 
Come on, Mr. Bezos. Do you REALLY want to eat the golden goose? Are you SO AFRAID of Barnes & Noble that you don't think you can compete with them without this kind of legal nonsense? Well, for me, that's a self-fulfilling fear -- this tactic will send me right into your competitors' arms. Please, stop this before it goes too far -- and that means stop it RIGHT NOW.
 
Don Wolford

March 2nd, 2000 11:26 AM
 
David Flanagan

March 2nd, 2000 11:26 AM
 
May the world slap you upside the head just for being such an arrogant fool.
 
David Kidder

March 2nd, 2000 11:26 AM
 
Hans Deragon

March 2nd, 2000 11:26 AM
 
Matt Gibson

March 2nd, 2000 11:27 AM
 
Taking something that was not even your own idea, patenting it, and then chasing down people that might pose some competition to you is utterly irresponsible. As someone who was a customer, You will not have to worry about making another penny from me, I will not support your practices anymore than I would a thief. Indirectly that is what you are. You steal a simple idea that has been used on many e-shopping sites all over the world, add a few things to it, and call it a whole new patentable idea? The patent office is obviously clueless to have even allowed something of this manner to pass through. Does Amazon.com wish to be grouped into companies with predatory practices similar to Microsoft? If so, be forwarned: That path may seem bright, but I believe in the long run, you will find it pushes more people away and does you more harm than it could ever do good. I am one of those people you have pushed away. This type of practice should never happen. Even if you have the ability to do so.

Buddy Ellis
 
Joseph O. Ellis III

March 2nd, 2000 11:27 AM
 
Tim Trautmann

March 2nd, 2000 11:28 AM
 
Life, kid, suck the box...yeah, Bruce Lee.
 
ryan woerth

March 2nd, 2000 11:28 AM
 

I purchase products on the web every day. Im taking my business elsewhere. www.noamazon.com!
 
Mark Cohen

March 2nd, 2000 11:29 AM
 
Yvette Soler

March 2nd, 2000 11:29 AM
 
Roy Waldspurger

March 2nd, 2000 11:29 AM
 
If amazon.com insists on this ridiculous behaviour, I will end my affiliate association. I have no interest in supporting any agency that does not embrace the open nature of the net. I would call for a boycott of all customers, and a boycott of small publishers from using amazon.com as a distributor. While it might hurt in the short run, in the long run it is better that Amazon go out of business than continue on path with such obvious and dire consequences.
 
Stephan Anstey

March 2nd, 2000 11:30 AM
 
Michael Cash

March 2nd, 2000 11:30 AM
 
Ewan Tempero

March 2nd, 2000 11:31 AM
 
Jeff, you don't know me, but I know and detest your type. With absolutely no consideration for the medium which allowed your business to thrive you now seek total control over it. I am new to the net and will now look elsewhere, avoiding your service as the plague that it is. ABANDON THIS BUSINESS PHILOSOPHY.
 
Greg Langdon

March 2nd, 2000 11:32 AM
 
Jason R. Briggs

March 2nd, 2000 11:33 AM
 
Jim Kirby

March 2nd, 2000 11:33 AM
 
Mike Heim

March 2nd, 2000 11:33 AM
 
how was this patent EVER issued???

ridiculous!
 
Josh Paluch

March 2nd, 2000 11:33 AM
 
Mariana Alvaro

March 2nd, 2000 11:33 AM
 
This is ridiculous. 'Nuff said.
 
Matthew Titmus

March 2nd, 2000 11:34 AM
 
Don't be a bully, Amazon.com!
 
Lisa Robson

March 2nd, 2000 11:34 AM
 
Thanks for taking action, Tim.
 
Alex Dunne

March 2nd, 2000 11:34 AM
 
Gyodi Reid

March 2nd, 2000 11:34 AM
 
Since Amazon has started enforcing patent 5,960,411 I have boycotted their business and will continue as well as encourage others to do the same.
 
David Wells

March 2nd, 2000 11:34 AM
 
We also mark our protest to the patent app for
The so-called "Internet-based customer
referral system" allows "associate" Web
sites to market products for a second
merchant Web site in return for a
commission. This type of program is widely used and has been common to all internet firms as a way of making an added income off of their sites.
Please do not grant this patent.
 
sandra figueroa

March 2nd, 2000 11:35 AM
 
Dennis Good

March 2nd, 2000 11:35 AM
 
Amazon's oportunistic patent not only unfairly threatens its competition, it also poses a serious threat to the tens of thousands of people like me who work in the ecommerce business... the same people who buy technical books on the subject from Amazon. Bezos doesn't appear to understand that the metaphorical well he's pissing in (to use Tim O'Reilly's analogy) is the same well from which he also drinks.
 
Steve Manes

March 2nd, 2000 11:35 AM
 
By enforcing ludicrous patents you are only limiting the web's effectiveness, and consequently your own. I suppose that by trying to make web business possible only for yourself, you will end up with no competition? There are too many other consumer options. Amazon.com will no longer be on my list of vendors (for any products) until you stop attempting to enforce such dimwitted patents.
 
Martin Pokorny

March 2nd, 2000 11:36 AM
 
Dave Lalonde

March 2nd, 2000 11:37 AM
 
Not only am I boycotting Amazon, I'm going to dump all my shares next time they pop above 75 (if they ever do...).
 
Liam Finley

March 2nd, 2000 11:38 AM
 
Dan Shellman

March 2nd, 2000 11:39 AM
 
Martin Burke

March 2nd, 2000 11:40 AM
 
Your recent activities in the area of the 1-Click patent issue sadden me. Amazon.com has been a great pioneer in web commerce. I sincerely hope Amazon can assume a more "for the greater good" position on this issue. I would be more inclined to deal with Amazon rather than Barnes and Noble if I felt that Amazon was more in tune with promoting ecommerce rather than shackling it.

 
Dick Henrichon

March 2nd, 2000 11:40 AM
 
I, too, will boycott Amazon as long as its patents continue to adversely affect the development of the Internet economy.
 
Joseph M. Murphy

March 2nd, 2000 11:40 AM
 
Before this fiasco, I purchased several hundred dollars of books from Amazon in a year. This year my business will go to their competitors. I will continue to boycott them and encourage others to do the same until:

1. Amazon stops attempting to charge other e-commerce sites for the use of supposed "1-click" and "affiliate program" systems.

2. Amazon stops filing for frivolous patents, that is, they stop wasting my tax dollars by swamping the USPTO and the courts with junk like this.

-=Ivan
 
C. Ivan Cooper

March 2nd, 2000 11:40 AM
 
Bad move, Bezos...
 
Brooke Schreier

March 2nd, 2000 11:42 AM
 
Hear! Hear!
 
Bruce Kleinschmidt

March 2nd, 2000 11:42 AM
 
The love of money is the root of all evil...and Jeff Bezos LOOOOVES money. A paradigm shift is in the works...from the companies who knew they could get away with anything, to those who will soon realize that they depend on the goodwill of other companies and individuals to allow their company to exist.
 
Greg Webster

March 2nd, 2000 11:42 AM
 
Clayton Chase

March 2nd, 2000 11:44 AM
 
Michael Gorman

March 2nd, 2000 11:44 AM
 
- if Amazon does not change their strategy and recant these current ridiculous "patent infringement claims" they will unfortunately find that they have won a small battle at the expense of losing the war
- Amazon is not David, the "little guy", anymore so no one will view these claims empathetically. Quite the opposite actually.
 
Bob Pridding

March 2nd, 2000 11:45 AM
 
Amazon has consistently earned my business by QoS and responsiveness. It would be the ultimate in stupidity to lose it because of an unenforceable and frivoless patent that won't improve your business in any significant way. Please do what is right and don't go any furthur than protecting your own practices from squatters on the technology who attempt to do what we fear most and try to profit from such patents.
 
Robert E Bruce

March 2nd, 2000 11:46 AM
 
The "one click" is a falacy, as prior to being able to receive an order something for the first time, credit details, address and other details have to be supplied, it is not possible to order something with "one click" unless you have previously been on the site and supplied the required details. Perhaps the "inventor" of cookies should file a patent and insist that Amazon refrains from using them.
 
Roger Win

March 2nd, 2000 11:48 AM
 
Brian Singleton

March 2nd, 2000 11:48 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, my family and I will no longer use your service because of your reckless attempt to stifle innovation on the web. Please reconsider your actions and drop enforcement of the "1-Click" patent.
 
Christopher Feller

March 2nd, 2000 11:49 AM
 
Matt Miller

March 2nd, 2000 11:50 AM
 
I am amazed that a patent examiner could be duped into
granting a patent on somehting so obvious. And indeed, to
something which had been done so many times before! ..
Identifying clients by means of cookies is not new, neither is
something Amazon invented, thousands of sites have been
uniquely identifying their returning visitors for many years,
its waht Netscape invented cookies for. get real, you are
going to lose this one.....
 
Robin Szemeti

March 2nd, 2000 11:50 AM
 
I thoroughly endorse the above sentiments. Another form of protest, a petition that trys to calculate the dollars that Amazon is losing, is available at: http://www.nowebpatents.com/
 
Jeff Cogshall

March 2nd, 2000 11:51 AM
 
FREEEEDOM!
 
Andy Gagne

March 2nd, 2000 11:51 AM
 
Christian Cosas

March 2nd, 2000 11:53 AM
 
Amazon used to be a company that won over customers by providing better service, and hence better value than its competition. It's recent patent actions indicate that it now seeks to lock in customers by abusing the patent system to eliminate competition. Trying to prevent others from providing convenient service directly hurts the customer, and will be reflected in clients' attitudes towards Amazon.

It's incredibly sad to see Amazon change from a forward-looking company to such a short-sighted company. I urge them to reverse their position on the patents. I will not be purchasing from them until they do so, and will urge colleagues to do the same.
 
mukesh agrawal

March 2nd, 2000 11:53 AM
 
John F. Trudeau

March 2nd, 2000 11:53 AM
 
Les Bessant

March 2nd, 2000 11:54 AM
 
Shame on you Amazon.com. I will continue my boycott until you get over yourselves!
 
Vincent M. Hanchon

March 2nd, 2000 11:54 AM
 
Congratulations, Jeff!
You've made yourself look a shortsighted, grasping fool.
Is it your ambition to be regarded as a second-rate Bill Gates wannabe?
 
James Fleming

March 2nd, 2000 11:54 AM
 
Chris Newman

March 2nd, 2000 11:55 AM
 
Michael Garrahan

March 2nd, 2000 11:55 AM
 
Michelle L. Reagin

March 2nd, 2000 11:55 AM
 
Nirad Sprads

March 2nd, 2000 11:55 AM
 
Affiliate programs have existed since the dawn of consumerism. I can't believe the patent was granted. And 1-click ordering is an obvious feature implemented with existing technology. Come on, Amazon! Win your customers with great service, not with legal loopholes.
 
Jeff Pedigo

March 2nd, 2000 11:55 AM
 
Steven Roberts

March 2nd, 2000 11:56 AM
 
One click is just marketing....

Come on guys, get on with life... Do you expect the rest of the world to do it in two clicks, or just half a click?? Duh..
 
Marcus Laubli

March 2nd, 2000 11:57 AM
 
Since the actions against B & N . . .
 
Matthew J. Probst

March 2nd, 2000 11:58 AM
 
Until you withdraw your 1-click patent application, I will place no more orders with Amazon.
 
Gerald Brown

March 2nd, 2000 11:58 AM
 
I am seriously thinking about placing a Patent on using you finger to click the mouse. Same degree of ridiculous thought.


From now on you will all have to use your elbows.

 
Dave Williams

March 2nd, 2000 11:59 AM
 
Mark Xenakes

March 2nd, 2000 12:01 PM
 
J. Emler Jr.

March 2nd, 2000 12:02 PM
 
The patenting of obvious technology, borne of the very nature of the web itself, is culture vulturism at its worst. You might as well grant a patent on speech or oxygen.
 
Jack Golan

March 2nd, 2000 12:02 PM
 
Tom Hanna

March 2nd, 2000 12:03 PM
 
Manni Wood

March 2nd, 2000 12:04 PM
 
Arthur Sarkisyants

March 2nd, 2000 12:04 PM
 
Omar Zelaya

March 2nd, 2000 12:05 PM
 
In a global economy businesses must learn to coexist in a balance between competitiveness and fairness. Amazon has displayed flagrant disrespect for that concept and should be publically derided for it.
 
J P Mclaughlin

March 2nd, 2000 12:05 PM
 
In considering the existence of this patent, I'm not certain which attribute it highlights more strongly: the stupidity and shortsightedness of someone who would seek such a patent, or the greed of that same party. The Patent Office, being a "machine" that does what it is told, is a witless dupe in this charade. Bezos and Amazon should know better.

These comments apply to the Associates patent as well. It's simply moronic to seek a patent for such a thing. Is the wheelbarrow next?
 
Ian King

March 2nd, 2000 12:06 PM
 
Darren Wai-Loon Chan

March 2nd, 2000 12:06 PM
 
This is the side-effect (or the effect ) of commercialization of Internet. Someone in Amazon must have realized that their entire business is based on set of freely available tools and techniques and must have started loosing sleep over the low barrier to entry in the online retailing world. Hence this scrammbling to get patents for "innovations" done at Amazon "lab"
 
Rakesh Saha

March 2nd, 2000 12:07 PM
 
Benjamin Salter

March 2nd, 2000 12:08 PM
 
Elvis Elch

March 2nd, 2000 12:08 PM
 
Forget experts, any web programmer whose ever used a cookie would consider this to be obvious. Another shining example of the Patent Office's lack of understanding of modern technology.
 
Ed Hand

March 2nd, 2000 12:08 PM
 
John Beimler

March 2nd, 2000 12:08 PM
 
Doug Wyatt

March 2nd, 2000 12:09 PM
 
Rick Thomas

March 2nd, 2000 12:10 PM
 
Don't screw with the hand the feeds you.
 
Joshua Leonard

March 2nd, 2000 12:10 PM
 
Jeff.. be successful in business through innovation, not through sly trickery!
 
Mike Sidler

March 2nd, 2000 12:11 PM
 
Jeff, if we continue down this path I will be forced to make license my patents on the air you breathe. Now, neither one of us wants that to happen do we!

Perhaps it would be more appropriate to spend that money on patent lawyers and research on something productive like actual R&D in the computer science field so you can actually earn your patents for something new, innovative, and dazzling without such stifling prior art.

All of you should be ashamed of yourselves, almost as much as those fine folks at the Patent office.

 
Christopher L. Filkins

March 2nd, 2000 12:11 PM
 
I have joined the FSF's boycott of Amazon.
I will not buy anything else from you until
you abandon your lawsuit against Barnes and Noble.

I'm also working with my customers to
help them drop out of your affiliate
program and join other affiliate programs.
 
Mark-Jason Dominus

March 2nd, 2000 12:12 PM
 
Robert Fox

March 2nd, 2000 12:12 PM
 
L. Huff

March 2nd, 2000 12:13 PM
 
As a long-term Amazon.com customer I have found your Internet business to be of great service. However, your actions in patenting certain processes are much more suspect. Until you clearly respond to the many valid concerns and criticisms around these issues, and use your industry leadership position to encourage innovation and competition (not strangle it), you can be certain that I will not remain a customer; in fact you have pushed me far enough to become an activist for raising the level of visibility around your myopic manipulations of Internet technologies.

The net community enabled your business, but it can and will squash your small-minded machinations. I suggest that as you consider your responses and options you place a high priority on both customer and industry response to this matter or you may find yourself a mere footnote in Internet history.
 
Mihai Manoliu

March 2nd, 2000 12:13 PM
 
I have joined the FSF's boycott of Amazon.
I will not buy anything else from you until
you abandon your lawsuit against Barnes and Noble.

I'm also working with my customers to
help them drop out of your affiliate
program and join other affiliate programs.
 
Mark-Jason Dominus

March 2nd, 2000 12:13 PM
 
Robbie Visscher

March 2nd, 2000 12:13 PM
 
I've ordered a lot from Amazon in the past. I'll cease to do so until enforcement of this patent is halted. Just because the Patent Office was stupid enough to grant this patent doesn't mean that Amazon should have applied for it.
 
Dave Clapper

March 2nd, 2000 12:13 PM
 
It's an abuse - it must be stopped now.
 
Lindsay Williams

March 2nd, 2000 12:13 PM
 
Renee Avery

March 2nd, 2000 12:14 PM
 
I originally, when the boycott was proposed, took the position that the fault really lay with the Patent Office, and that one shouldn't fault Amazon for taking advantage of the Office's incompetence.

After reading the open letter to Jeff Bezos, I am having second thoughts; if we wait for the Patent Office to gain competence, or for the courts to negate their incompetent actions, it may be a very long wait indeed. Unless Amazon sees themselves at some very significant risk if they don't enforce this scurrilous patent, I strongly urge them to drop the whole matter.
 
Herbert Kanner

March 2nd, 2000 12:14 PM
 
1. I have ordered from Amazon several times in the past.

2. I have never ordered from any other on-line bookseller.

3. I have never used 1-click to place an order at Amazon.

Of the above 3 observations, the only one that won't change is #3.

Hey, Amazon! How's the ROI on your legal dept.?
 
pDale Campbell

March 2nd, 2000 12:15 PM
 
Cam Keeley

March 2nd, 2000 12:16 PM
 
Gil

March 2nd, 2000 12:17 PM
 
WH Smith here we come . . .
 
Kevin Leeson

March 2nd, 2000 12:17 PM
 
Fraser MacGillivray

March 2nd, 2000 12:17 PM
 
Amazon? Shit!
 
Zoltan Budai

March 2nd, 2000 12:20 PM
 
I am disappointed that Amazon who has really made strides to provide value-add in a web-based environment would resort to such a slimy tactic as this patent. Amazon has competed well on a fair platform. Why resort to this?

I agree with all the points that Tim made and feel that I will need to withdraw my support as an otherwise happy customer.

 
Barbara Tallent

March 2nd, 2000 12:20 PM
 
Robert Fox

March 2nd, 2000 12:21 PM
 
Sounds like a typical MicroSHAFT tactic to me...
 
Robert Martin

March 2nd, 2000 12:21 PM
 
I've shopped at amazon.com in the past, and would shop again in the future. Indeed, I was planning on making a purchase in excess of $200 US today-- but I'm putting that on standby until amazon.com proves to be the sort of company I originally thought it was.
 
Coleman Poorman

March 2nd, 2000 12:22 PM
 
I used to buy books and DVDs from www.amazon.com and www.amazon.co.uk.
I will not buy from Amazon again, unless they choose to drop the patent and make one-click free again.

Janus Nielsen, Denmark
 
Janus Nielsen

March 2nd, 2000 12:23 PM
 
The intternet's got a lot of potential. Don't ruin it for everyone.
 
Tom Wall

March 2nd, 2000 12:23 PM
 
To Jeff Bezos and all other decision-makers at Amazon:

I understand that profits are important, but you make yourselves look silly by using the law as a bludgeon to batter your competition. Especially when your claim is based on a patent that never should have been granted, because of existing prior art.

I am boycotting you, and encouraging others to do the same.

Have A Nice Day.

----Ron Swartzendruber
 
Ron Swartzendruber

March 2nd, 2000 12:23 PM
 
I would like to patent the wheel ;)
 
Brian Kaney

March 2nd, 2000 12:23 PM
 
Mark Maslakowski

March 2nd, 2000 12:24 PM
 
Brett Jones

March 2nd, 2000 12:25 PM
 
Stephen Moore

March 2nd, 2000 12:25 PM
 
Patents are okay, but you cannot patent something that is simply common sense.
 
Michael Kalus

March 2nd, 2000 12:25 PM
 
I am disappointed that the management of amazon.com has seen fit to go out of their way to interrupt the growth and spirit of the internet.
 
Dan Edwards

March 2nd, 2000 12:25 PM
 
Well said, Tim.
 
Anthony R. Thompson

March 2nd, 2000 12:26 PM
 
john edstrom

March 2nd, 2000 12:26 PM
 
Maybe you should patten the new process you discovered. Convincing your consumers to run to the copetition.
It worked like a charm. I have forwarded this to all my friends family and associates to ban your site.
I would like to extend a heartfelt CONGRATS ON THE PATTENT.
see you at bn.com


dan
sell,sell,sell.
 
dan phillips

March 2nd, 2000 12:26 PM
 
www.fatbrain.com - enough said.
 
Jeff Neighbors

March 2nd, 2000 12:27 PM
 
William E. Bishop

March 2nd, 2000 12:27 PM
 
Hi, Jeff. Bad move. One less customer.
 
Jim Adams

March 2nd, 2000 12:27 PM
 
If this patent stands up in court, it will only be a matter of time before Maxtor, Western Digital, Quantum, Samsung, Seagate, Fujitsu, and other such hard drive manufacturers start suing you (Amazon) for storing your "patented" product on their product without their express written consent. See the ludicrous nature? Drop it while you can, Amazon.
 
Wes Keck

March 2nd, 2000 12:27 PM
 
Julia Henson

March 2nd, 2000 12:28 PM
 
Olivier Chanteloup

March 2nd, 2000 12:28 PM
 
I once was a big fan telling friends to use this site very often. Now I will not buy anything in Amazon, and I will tell my friends not to use this site.
 
Don Batsford

March 2nd, 2000 12:28 PM
 
Amazon,
Don't resort to foolishness to try to gain competitive advantage. Trying to patent "1-click" ordering is in the same league with trying to patent F1 as the Help key. Say goodbye to some of your customer base until you give this one up.
 
Wayne Abbott

March 2nd, 2000 12:28 PM
 
Josh Dahmes

March 2nd, 2000 12:28 PM
 
Shame on the U.S. patent office for granting this nonsense in the first place. Shame on Amazon for applying. This as a bad as aggressively patenting the keyboard, mouse, and monitor.
I will no longer shop at Amazon, and will actively promote a boycott of their business.
 
Ryan Sasser

March 2nd, 2000 12:29 PM
 
Joe Meadors

March 2nd, 2000 12:30 PM
 
Andrew Kupser

March 2nd, 2000 12:30 PM
 
If this patent stands up in court, it will only be a matter of time before Maxtor, Western Digital, Quantum, Samsung, Seagate, Fujitsu, and other such hard drive manufacturers start suing you (Amazon) for storing your "patented" product on their product without their express written consent. See the ludicrous nature? Drop it while you can, Amazon.
 
Wes Keck

March 2nd, 2000 12:31 PM
 
Amazon.com has been a site that I often order from. I am boycotting the site now -- what they've done is wrong. It's like trying to get a patent on the alphabet or better yet, how a scentence is formed. Amazon.com got lucky in that the patent office had NO idea what it was granting a patent for. What will they do next, grant a patent on "spamming"?
 
Angela Harris

March 2nd, 2000 12:31 PM
 
I considered Amazon a nice friendly happy place and thing. One-Click ordering should never have been patented. I will now look elsewhere for my online shopping.
 
Robert Gauthier

March 2nd, 2000 12:32 PM
 
Jeff, why?
Aren´t your billions enough?
Do you want everyorne else's money?

Let´s boycott Amazon!
 
Fax Christ

March 2nd, 2000 12:32 PM
 
David Tosi

March 2nd, 2000 12:32 PM
 
Jeff, you've made a mistake. Now it is time to correct your error.

We will refrain from purchasing anything from your website until this happens. Check your records. We have spent a whole bunch of money with you.

Greg Cryns
Yvonne Cryns
 
Greg Cryns

March 2nd, 2000 12:32 PM
 
Ronald Kuetemeier

March 2nd, 2000 12:32 PM
 
To Jeff & Amazon,

2 words. Grow up!
 
Andrés Becerra

March 2nd, 2000 12:33 PM
 
Scott Ganyo

March 2nd, 2000 12:35 PM
 
Allison Bocksruker

March 2nd, 2000 12:35 PM
 
The growth of web commerce depends on intelligent use of resources. If the only way your company can differentiate itself is to use leagalities to hoard technologies, it deserves to fail.
 
Stephen Schaeffer

March 2nd, 2000 12:36 PM
 
Amazon.com not only already enjoy brand recognition, but also offers reliable and good service that most of its customers recognize. You [Amazon.com] don't need to resort to legal underhandedness or potentially abusive practices to ensure revenues...
 
juris galang

March 2nd, 2000 12:36 PM
 
Hannah Chervitz

March 2nd, 2000 12:38 PM
 
From the beginning I have been a faithful and frequent customer of Amazon.com, ordering books and other merchandise two to three times a month. I will no longer order from Amazon until this ridiculous patent issue is resolved to my satisfaction. There are PLENTY of other etailers I can(and will) order from.
 
Chris Cunningham

March 2nd, 2000 12:38 PM
 
What's next? A patent on charging money for books? Come on Amazon, get real. Until then I'm shopping at fatbrain.com
 
Christopher Cosentino

March 2nd, 2000 12:39 PM
 
Ansel Rognlie

March 2nd, 2000 12:39 PM
 
It is unconscionalble under any circumstances to inhibit the flow of ideas and the application of ideas to a common business process. I am an Amazon customer and enjoy the site but I will no longer purchase there until these issues are resolved.
 
Dave Faul

March 2nd, 2000 12:41 PM
 
Stop the big machine from killing more. Your greed is all consuming. You are a cancer on this industry.
 
Robert Segedy

March 2nd, 2000 12:42 PM
 
Michael Buckbee

March 2nd, 2000 12:43 PM
 
Jeff Heinen

March 2nd, 2000 12:44 PM
 
All reference to Amazon has now been deleted from our site!
 
Dan Dycke

March 2nd, 2000 12:44 PM
 
Martin Emerson

March 2nd, 2000 12:44 PM
 
I have been a regular customer of Amazon.com for over 2 years now and I think that these patents are just a way for amazon to enforce a stranglehold on the ecommerce market. The patent on the affiliate program is what troubled me the most, this basically will allow amazon to restrict other ecommerce sites from engaging in normal business practices and this is something that will only slow the current ecommerce boom.
 
Michael Alchus

March 2nd, 2000 12:44 PM
 
I have chosen to stop ordering anything from Amazon, and will continue to do so for as long as this issue exists. If this is settled in any way other than Amazon unilaterally dropping the lawsuit, then I will *never* order from Amazon again. Even in the case of Amazon dropping the lawsuit, it'll probably take me a while before I'll consider going back. There are many other online retailers that deserve my money much more.
 
Nolan Johnson

March 2nd, 2000 12:44 PM
 
Denise Olliffe

March 2nd, 2000 12:45 PM
 
Jim Jacobus

March 2nd, 2000 12:46 PM
 
I will not purchase from Amazon until they renouce this patent silliness, and I will encourage others to do the same.
 
Gianpaolo Baglione

March 2nd, 2000 12:46 PM
 
sad.... now I have to remove all of my Affiliates program from 5 of my website that I maintain.
 
bill glenney

March 2nd, 2000 12:46 PM
 
How many ridiculous patents we have to suffer until they are outlaw forever?
 
Tino Rodriguez

March 2nd, 2000 12:46 PM
 
There are lots of other bookstores to buy from, most of them are cheaper than Amazon.com anyway. I will not buy from Amazon.com anymore!
 
Nils Winkler

March 2nd, 2000 12:47 PM
 
As a netizen, I believe Amazon's attempt to stifle competition via the patenting of "cookies" is absurd and will only earn them the scorn of the internet community.

As a consumer, I find Amazon's quest to become a monopoly not only in books, but in myriad of other consumer goods, disturbing. Mega-corporations, virtual or not, just serve to limit our choices and stifle new ideas for one purpose--- personal and corporate greed.

This patent issue only furthers my resolve to never, ever buy from Amazon again. In fact, Amazon's smarmy tactics ought to be a wake-up call for all us--support your local independent booksellers and retailers as much as possible. Who knows, maybe a friend or relative's job security depends upon it.






 
Kathleen Nolan

March 2nd, 2000 12:48 PM
 
Mr Bezos,

I am very disappointed in Amazon.com. You attempt to smother the innovative environment that gave YOU the opportunity to become so successful.

The "intellectual property" argument cannot justify your futile attempt to bully your competitors and therefore stifle the marvelous innovation we have seen as a result of the Internet. Actions like these will only result in a loss of potential revenue for Amazon.com.

Never bite the hand that feeds you Mr. Bezos!

In light of these shameful business tactics, I can no longer continue to purchase products through Amazon.com and will continue my boycott until these shameful, unethical and predatory tactics are stopped.

One thing is for sure - regardless of the innovation brought about by technology, it will always be the consumers who drive the success of a company.

I hope the backlash against Amazon.com is quite severe.

Jeffrey C. Williams





 
Jeffrey C. Williams

March 2nd, 2000 12:49 PM
 
Craig Stewart

March 2nd, 2000 12:49 PM
 
David Rigsby

March 2nd, 2000 12:49 PM
 
Jeff, I think what you're doing is fantastic... by your actions with this patent you are generously giving up millions of your previously well-deserved customers to your competitors. Very generous of you, and I will be happy to participate by shopping elsewhere, and will enthusiastically encourage my friends and associates to do the same. By the way, please cancel my current order.
 
Mara Bernard

March 2nd, 2000 12:49 PM
 
I refuse to enter your website or those that affiliate with you in solidarity with an internet that is friendly, free, and non-predatory.
 
George Shea

March 2nd, 2000 12:50 PM
 
Tim O'reilly is right. My question is, how do we challenge these patents? Can these things be overturned in a court case? Perhaps the open source community can rise to its own defense and fight the bastards in court. I'll put my money where my mouth is and make a contribution to a defense fund if needed.
 
Jim Barnes

March 2nd, 2000 12:50 PM
 
Jeff, I think what you're doing is fantastic... by your actions with this patent you are generously giving up millions of your previously well-deserved customers to your competitors. Very generous of you, and I will be happy to participate by shopping elsewhere, and will enthusiastically encourage my friends and associates to do the same. By the way, please cancel my current order.
 
Mara Bernard

March 2nd, 2000 12:51 PM
 
The Internet is about the exchange of ideas and has made Amazon a household name. Amazon get smart and don't bite the hand that feeds you.
 
Paul Schwager

March 2nd, 2000 12:51 PM
 
Chris Cunniffe

March 2nd, 2000 12:51 PM
 
Carey Kloss

March 2nd, 2000 12:51 PM
 
It is rediculous to patent an obvious, simple, well established methodology such as one click ordering
 
John Thorhauer

March 2nd, 2000 12:52 PM
 
Another non-Amazon customer has been created.

Thanks Jeff B.
 
Kelly Amsbry

March 2nd, 2000 12:52 PM
 
Richard Randall

March 2nd, 2000 12:52 PM
 
Amazon is out of step with the software community, and so is the Patent Office.
 
Stephen Bourne

March 2nd, 2000 12:53 PM
 
Clif Bauer

March 2nd, 2000 12:54 PM
 
Eric H. Anderson

March 2nd, 2000 12:55 PM
 
I have purchased from Amazon in the past, but I will not do so in the future. I understand your desire to make money, but must it be at the expense of technological innovation?
 
Stephen Jenkins

March 2nd, 2000 12:55 PM
 
If your company patents stuff that wasn't really thought up by anyone at your company, why should anyone expect you to be honest or helpful in other matters? I will be taking my business to an organization which does not claim others' ideas as its own.
 
Suzanne M. Saunders

March 2nd, 2000 12:55 PM
 
Hey Jeff, nice job in screwing up so badly. We knew it was simply a matter of time. Your're a greedy bastard and one day your comeupance will come. We're waiting, it will be sweet. And to all those loyal customers of the chains and of B&N take this time to ponder on the death of all the great independents who were systematically destroyed by Mr Bezos and Company. A sad state of affairs, eh? I want to encourage all of these buyers to do the right thing: Take the time to find an independent bookstore on the web and give them your business. Trust me, you'll see a huge difference in service and knowledge. At an independent bookstore you are much more than just a series of numbers, you are a human being who likes books. Spend your money where it will make a difference, not at a faceless greedy e-site. Take a stand. Americans stand up for your freedom of choice. Act now.
 
The entire staff at McIntyre's F

March 2nd, 2000 12:56 PM
 
I have been a regular user of Amazon for some time and will no longer do business with them until they rescind this policy. I will also encourage everyone I know to refrain from doing business with them until they change this policy.
 
Robert Daverin

March 2nd, 2000 12:56 PM
 
Mark Warburton

March 2nd, 2000 12:56 PM
 
Bhavin V. Choksi

March 2nd, 2000 12:56 PM
 
It's high time someone made a stand against
inappropriate application of 'intellectual
property' rights.
 
Randy Groves

March 2nd, 2000 12:57 PM
 
A firm supporter of Barnes & Noble now.
 
Hunter Ware

March 2nd, 2000 12:57 PM
 
I have spent hundreds of dollars at Amazon.com on CDs and books, but I am now shopping at competitors instead. I believe that Amazon trying to enforce their ludicrous 1-click patent is harmful, and hypocritical, as they have copied many features from other sites such as CDNow.
 
Scott Peter

March 2nd, 2000 12:57 PM
 
We are an Amazon partner and think that trying to patent one-clink ordering is a crappy way to do business. If enough people organize (look at the etoy vs. etoys thing) hopefully they will stop. Amazon has done very well and gotten a lot of advantages from being an innovator - it would be a shame if they tried to colonize the good ideas on the web. There are already too many lawyers trying to assert intellectual property rights - the balance is way off.
 
richard

March 2nd, 2000 12:57 PM
 
The issue of the PTO granting these patents shouldn't be so much a knock against the PTO, but a knock against the litigious nature of our society.

If you can't compete on level ground, then maybe you should go out of business. Intelligent business should be your goal, rather than strong-arming your competition into spending ridiculous amounts of money on defending their right to use public domain technologies and generic (albeit sometimes innovative) business concepts.
 
Jei Gaither

March 2nd, 2000 12:57 PM
 
Patents are against progress. Amazon holds patents on items that are a necessity to a good web store. Therefore, Amazon is against progress. I'm certainly not going to buy from a company that is against progress...
 
Matthew Schlegel

March 2nd, 2000 12:58 PM
 
Don't let short-sightedness and greed cripple the internet. This technology is already transforming the way we think and behave. See how much it's changed in the last 2 years? Imagine what it'll be like in 10? This is my kids' future you're talking about.
 
James Rolfe

March 2nd, 2000 12:59 PM
 
amazon will never see another penny of my business. i was an early adopter and an enthusiastic customer until this 1-click nonsense came up. now i used fatbrain.com and borders.com for all my book purchases. i now actively inform my friends and family of amazon's dispicable practices and point them to other vendors.
 
Hal Eisen

March 2nd, 2000 12:59 PM
 
Bill Schaninger

March 2nd, 2000 1:00 PM
 
Andrew Sivula

March 2nd, 2000 1:00 PM
 
Wake up Amazon!
Don't you big (read: rich) companies realize by now that if they keep us happy, we'll keep you happy too?
 
Stephen D

March 2nd, 2000 1:00 PM
 
I will hereafter actively enforce people to avoid Amazon
 
Ingemar Lindgren

March 2nd, 2000 1:00 PM
 
Bill Pomeroy

March 2nd, 2000 1:02 PM
 
Cherri Zaske

March 2nd, 2000 1:02 PM
 
sundar subramanian

March 2nd, 2000 1:03 PM
 
It is rediculous what Amazon is doing, patenting the affiliates program...This to me sounds like a company having a patent on the use of a sales force to sell their goods. It is a process that would have evolved and simply because they were the first to do it, does not mean they should be able to patent it, just like the first company to use a sales force to sell their goods should not and did not patent that process.
 
Owen O'Keeffe

March 2nd, 2000 1:03 PM
 
Matthew K. Bixby

March 2nd, 2000 1:03 PM
 
It's all been said ... but I'll say it again:

Amazon.com (among others) is being extremely selfish, self-centered and short-sighted. Not to mention arrogant. They are trying to do to everyone else what that brick & mortar company of the same name tried to do to them.

Stop.
 
Alan Young

March 2nd, 2000 1:04 PM
 
I am in strong opposition to such technology patents as the 'one click' patent granted to Amazon.com. Until Amazon clearly states their intentions on such patents, I will not use their services. I will not recommend them, and I will advise associates and friends to sign this letter and not give Amazon.com their business.
 
Quinn Stone

March 2nd, 2000 1:04 PM
 
I have notified Amazon that I will not use their site until they reverse their misguided attempts to patent obvious web technology. I have bought from Amazon for several years and have frequently used their auction site to sell items.
 
Frederick R. Hanhisalo

March 2nd, 2000 1:04 PM
 
Thank you, Tim, for showing leadership with this initiative. Business method patents have to go. Obvious methods of any sort do not merit patents.
 
Ron Feigenblatt

March 2nd, 2000 1:04 PM
 
Your mis-use of the patent system has led to my decision to refrain from purchasing from Amazon.com in the future.
 
Nicholas Silberstein

March 2nd, 2000 1:04 PM
 
John DeGood

March 2nd, 2000 1:05 PM
 
Douglas Gregor

March 2nd, 2000 1:05 PM
 
Zia Munshi

March 2nd, 2000 1:05 PM
 
Aaron Spence

March 2nd, 2000 1:05 PM
 
Sounds like bad PR to me!
 
Jan Pospichal

March 2nd, 2000 1:06 PM
 
Not another penny to Amazon until they cease this ridiculous behavior!
 
John Arbaugh

March 2nd, 2000 1:06 PM
 
Jon Miller

March 2nd, 2000 1:07 PM
 
I joined the original boycott called for by Richard Stallman. I now buy all my books elsewhere (and I buy a LOT of books!) SHAME ON BEZOS - he's the anti-Tim Burners Lee.
 
Paul Rostick

March 2nd, 2000 1:08 PM
 
Michael Walters

March 2nd, 2000 1:08 PM
 
I laughed out loud when I saw the 1-click patent granted to Amazon. I stopped laughing when I saw Amazon legally attacking bn.com. This is common sense... 1-click ordering. I wondered if they were going to patent using cookies on the Internet altogether.

Then comes the next foolish patent... talk about prior art! thousands of companies have been doing affiliate programs for years... Who is this dweeb at the US Patent office? Have they ever used the web? Do they have a clue? Clearly not, as granting these patents indicate.

Maybe I can get a patent on transportation via wheeled vehicles... Wait... Maybe the question above was not so retorical after all. Who is this dweeb at the US Patent office? I need to talk with him.
 
Joe Spencer

March 2nd, 2000 1:08 PM
 
As an Internet technologist, I not only find Amazon's behavior insulting to everyone, but also frightening. Their brazen patent fraud and their wherewithal to deceive the legal system is a wake up call. Please inform your friends and business associates of Amazon's illegal activity and encourage them to take a stand.
 
Mike Hoysak

March 2nd, 2000 1:09 PM
 
I've made purchases from Amazon in the past, that trend will stop imediately.
 
Dan Schulmeister

March 2nd, 2000 1:10 PM
 
I don't care to have businesses attempting to lock me into dealing with them. I'll be taking my business elsewhere and encouraging others to do the same.
 
Seth W. Klein

March 2nd, 2000 1:11 PM
 
Jaideep Baphna

March 2nd, 2000 1:11 PM
 
C. Sean Peacock

March 2nd, 2000 1:12 PM
 
dEAR DR. MR. BEZOS;

WHY YOU NOT GIVE AWAY YOUR WORK FREE?

I am sorry about you. Boykot Oreilly books with the ugly animals (and the ones on the covers, too)

SMAPDI
 
SMAPDI

March 2nd, 2000 1:12 PM
 
charlie schmidt

March 2nd, 2000 1:12 PM
 
Jason Blankenship

March 2nd, 2000 1:12 PM
 
barned and noble and fatbrain get my business now (even if it takes more than 1 click).
 
Rick Spaller

March 2nd, 2000 1:12 PM
 
This patent will do nothing but hurt inovation on the web. The damage has been done but I am and mank other will not buy your products until you drop the patents.
 
Bryan Helmkamp

March 2nd, 2000 1:12 PM
 
Channing Limbaugh

March 2nd, 2000 1:13 PM
 
Gerebitz Andras

March 2nd, 2000 1:14 PM
 
This patent on 1-click is ridiculous! It is like Microsoft's crap only worse.
 
Sean Wilhelm

March 2nd, 2000 1:14 PM
 
I've already been directly in contact with Aamazon.com regarding this, and have been boycotting them since the b&n suit was made public.

Amazon's site was(is) very nice. Their prices are not the best, but the service is good. They can obviously compete on merrit. Instead they prefer to compete on the basis of who has the most money to blow on legal fees. I refuse to suppor this because it hurts everyone involved except the lawyers. Hell, it even hurst those who are not yet online consumers.

I've been activly converting others to the cause. My (conservative) estimate is that I've redirected somewhere in the neiborhood of $25000 of my and other's money to fatbrain.com and other online book retailers. At this point, given that I'm getting used to fatbrain's site and assuming that they continue to improve it, I'm not even sure I'll go back if amazon gets a clue.
 
Greg Jandl

March 2nd, 2000 1:14 PM
 
Robert H. Waldo III

March 2nd, 2000 1:17 PM
 
Shame on you Bezos!!!
 
David Jackson

March 2nd, 2000 1:17 PM
 
Guy Cavet

March 2nd, 2000 1:17 PM
 
Tell you what, just BOYCOTT Amazon. Don't buy their books till this patent issue is cleared up.If they can hurt growth, then they will feel the effects of what they caused.

Don't forget, YOU the consummer, are the actual employer. If YOU don't buy, no business stays in business no matter how large and they certainly won't be able to pay those hired employees who work to serve your needs and/or desires.

Flex your muscles.
Robert Dilorio
rdilorio@us.ibm.com
 
robert diIorio

March 2nd, 2000 1:17 PM
 
Amazing that the Patent Office cooperates in this foolishness.
 
Wayne Fulton

March 2nd, 2000 1:18 PM
 
Katrina Ottosen

March 2nd, 2000 1:18 PM
 
I guess I should follow the news more. I just heard of this outrage by Amazon. I am a frequent customer (8 orders totaling $605 this year, 28 orders last year). I think it's time to give B&N, Borders, and FatBrain my business. Using patents as a way to restrain trade is immoral, if not illegal. I won't go back to Amazon until they start behaving.
 
David N. Smith

March 2nd, 2000 1:18 PM
 
I used to look to Amazon first for all of my book needs. I've since stopped this practice. I've stopped buying from Amazon at all.

I know that business is a cutthroat world. I know that corporations need to look at the bottom line. But can't someone take the high road just once?
 
Everett Kropf

March 2nd, 2000 1:18 PM
 
David G. Cheney

March 2nd, 2000 1:19 PM
 
Ditto for patenting Affiliate Programs, too.
It's like patenting MLM... or banner ads.
 
Kris Michaud

March 2nd, 2000 1:19 PM
 
Brent Fisher

March 2nd, 2000 1:19 PM
 
Ditto for patenting Affiliate Programs, too.
It's like patenting MLM... or banner ads.
 
Kris Michaud

March 2nd, 2000 1:19 PM
 
Ditto for patenting Affiliate Programs, too.
It's like patenting MLM... or banner ads.
 
Kris Michaud

March 2nd, 2000 1:19 PM
 
Ditto for patenting Affiliate Programs, too.
It's like patenting MLM... or banner ads.
 
Kris Michaud

March 2nd, 2000 1:20 PM
 
I've ordered books from Amazon in the past, but I'm boycotting them and their affiliates until they realize that software patents are not the correct way to erect barriers to competition. Some hints: Perhaps if your website actually worked and people could actually find what they're looking for, then the 25% of your visitors that currently throw up their hands and give up in frustration might actually stick around and BUY something. Then you wouldn't need to sic lawyers on every other .com company for using the prior art only you had the audacity to consider filing a patent for, would you?
 
El Howard

March 2nd, 2000 1:20 PM
 
I totally agree with the article, it's outregeous what amazo is trying to pull. It's against the free spirit of the development world.
 
Nguyen Van Kim

March 2nd, 2000 1:23 PM
 
Matt Masson

March 2nd, 2000 1:23 PM
 
I have been an Amazon only customer until now, I will not be using them and will encourage others to boycot them as well.
 
Kristian Goree

March 2nd, 2000 1:24 PM
 
Erik Arneson

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 PM
 
Craig Silverman

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 PM
 
This is rediculous, we need more tech savvy people in the patent office! No more Amazon for me thank you, bookpool.com baby
 
Greg

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 PM
 
I find this patent to be nothing short of microsoft'esque monopolism. The lack of appreciation and total disregaurd this act shows for the people who got you where you are (the inovators of the tech you supposedly invented) makes me phisically ill.
You have lost my business. Forever.
 
Scott Prince

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 PM
 
Restricting others from using proper technology which is not a result of hard labor is not what you would expect from a decend company.
I mind you doing that much, that I have decided not to utilize your on-line service until I find that I am doing business with a company with standards for their conduct.
Fortunatly there are other channels that provide the kind of service we have gotten accustomed to at your site.
Sorry about this action, but it is of importance to take measures on these cases.
Yours Thomas Jørgensen.
 
Thomas Jørgensen

March 2nd, 2000 1:25 PM
 
Ronald F. Lens

March 2nd, 2000 1:26 PM
 
I will never by from amazon.com again. There are plenty of other places to give my money to.
 
Jeff Smith

March 2nd, 2000 1:26 PM
 
Jeff,

Are you STUPID? You had a loyal customer in me, now I need to reconsider. I can see that there are other choices out there, and I will be shopping else where until I read that you have dropped these two patents.

I was taught that it is unkind to take advantage of someone because of a mental disability. I don't know if the clerk at the patent office has a mental disability, but he absolutely had a technology disability. Shame on you for taking advantage of someone's disability.

FatBrain... here I come... I have been averaging over $200 per month in recent months... by the way, FatBrain, do you have an affiliate program?
 
Gordon Clarke

March 2nd, 2000 1:27 PM
 
To register my protest over Amazon's actions. I have also cancelled my Amazon account - I asked Amazon to delete my account and profile, which they did.
 
Shahram Javey

March 2nd, 2000 1:27 PM
 
Mark Amerman

March 2nd, 2000 1:27 PM
 
kevin T Nixon Jr

March 2nd, 2000 1:28 PM
 
I am a loyal customer of Amazon.com. All of the books I've bought on the net have been from Amazon over the past few years, and I appreciate their efficiency.

When the 1-Click patent was issued, I was rather surprised as this is a particularly obvious idea.

When the Affiliates patent was issued, I was stunned.

I used to think of Amazon.com as a pioneer in e-commerce, a renegade, an underdog, winning the war over the established brick-n-mortar bookstores.

Now the underdog wants to place shackles on everyone else by using the legal system as a lever to prevent others from using obvious methods of doing business on the net. That's not the Amazon.com I remember.

The net has its own rules, and those rules are openness and freedom. Try to restrict that freedom at your own peril.

I am withdrawing my support for Amazon.com; you may close my account. I can no longer purchase from you knowing that I am supporting this thievery.

In the future I will purchase my books and CDs from Borders or B&N online.

s.




 
Scott S. Goodwin

March 2nd, 2000 1:28 PM
 
Gregory Stoll

March 2nd, 2000 1:28 PM
 
Your recent act of patenting the "One-Click" technology was ill-advised. Given the openness of source technologies on the Internet, and the prior availability of one-click technologies on other e-commerce portals, you have made an agressive, anti-competitive choice in seeking to acquire the "One-Click" patent in the first place.
Your best move at this point would be to provide a statement that the patent of this "technology" will not be used in any anti-competitive or bullying manner. Furthermore, you would be well advised to terminate the person(s) responsible for this rediculous idea.
Given your recent actions, I have decided to cease the recommendation of Amazon.com as a vendor to my clients as well as to discontinue any ordering of media through Amazon.com.
 
David W. Hall III

March 2nd, 2000 1:29 PM
 
Scott McNulty

March 2nd, 2000 1:29 PM
 
Bob Zoller

March 2nd, 2000 1:29 PM
 
Serge Egelman

March 2nd, 2000 1:30 PM
 
Attempts to patent techniques used on the web to support e-commerce are short-sighted and will ultimately be the death-knell of the web. For example, what's stopping some company from obtaining a patent on the use of hyperlinks? If Amazon can get a patent on the affiliate program concept, this is not beyond the realm of possibility. Can you imagine what would happen to the web if every website that used a link had to a company like Amazon.com?

This trend must stop now, and we are the only ones who can stop it. There are a couple of things we all can do:

1. apply pressure on Amazon to stop this behaviour, by boycotting their site.

2. apply pressure on the U.S. gov't and/or U.S. Patent Office to disallow this blatant misuse of the patent system.
 
Bruce Head

March 2nd, 2000 1:30 PM
 
Blake R. Swopes

March 2nd, 2000 1:31 PM
 
Since the extreme dumbing-down of mass-market retailing personnel, I counted on Amazon to have the books I was looking for and to deliver them on time. I looked forward to shopping on Amazon because I could always find what I needed and I always knew I would get it as promised.

Now that Mr. Bezos is suffering from the same megalomania that previously plagued Bill Gates, I cannot trust that my favorite Internet merchant has its wits about it with this patent garbage. And so I must once again darken the doorstep of my nearest B&N store and suffer the blank stares of the know-nothing staff, along with poorly stocked shelves and extremely rude patrons, rather than help finance one man's imperialistic tendencies.

Thanks a lot, Jeff. May you get what you deserve.
 
Jenny Berger

March 2nd, 2000 1:31 PM
 
Yannick Koehler

March 2nd, 2000 1:31 PM
 
Should I apply for a patent on Internet-based customer lingual system also known as letter ? or
Internet-based customer mathematic system know as
number ? or Internet-based customer mathematic calculation system as multiplication...
 
Alain Castonguay

March 2nd, 2000 1:32 PM
 
It's a shame that Amazon.com's lawyers seem to be the company's true CEO. I've been an Amazon.com affiliate for years, but can no longer say that without some embarrassment.
 
Gary Will

March 2nd, 2000 1:33 PM
 
Chris Taggart

March 2nd, 2000 1:34 PM
 
Patrick Belknap

March 2nd, 2000 1:35 PM
 
I agree with your statement Mr. O'Reilly. Future innovation is at Risk if Amazon takes this precedence.
 
Seyla Seng

March 2nd, 2000 1:36 PM
 
I was never a real big fan of Amazon and now I can see why. I think Jeff Bezos is letting the magazine covers and Time "Man of the Year" stuff go to his head. Watch the amazon stock price. They lost money again this year. I doubt if they will ever make a profit. My last few words go out to the US Patent office: Where are your heads? I wonder who's getting the big payoff here?
 
Jacob Carroll

March 2nd, 2000 1:36 PM
 
I have stopped purchasing through Amazon due to this short-sighted and patently perverse attempt at controlling it's competition.
 
Matthias E. Giwer

March 2nd, 2000 1:36 PM
 
This is an important issue!
 
Diarmaid O'Reilly

March 2nd, 2000 1:39 PM
 
Amazon.com just lost 1 more click!
 
Hermann Hesse

March 2nd, 2000 1:39 PM
 
I think the amazon is a magnifigant thing and should be treated like a fellow man
 
Dan Little

March 2nd, 2000 1:40 PM
 
Jack Hattaway

March 2nd, 2000 1:40 PM
 
I wouldn't shop Amazon anyway, as I prefer to order from the local bookstore (supporting the local economy), but now that this rediculous shit is going on, I definitely will not order from Amazon at all. In addition, I have removed all links to Amazon from my links site (http://www.blj8.com/my-urls/).
 
Brian L. Johnson

March 2nd, 2000 1:40 PM
 
Ana A. Mourao

March 2nd, 2000 1:41 PM
 
It is a shame that a savvy Internet businessman such as yourself is attempting to treat such normal methods of Internet business as his own.

Rather than wasting time taking advantage of overworked patent officials, you should be investing time into making your business better.

Until you learn that lesson, I & my company will no longer be using your site to shop.

Keep the Internet unrestricted for both you and your competition, or you will continue to face public relation SNAFUs and public backlash.

Sincerely,
Jeff M. Coon
Dallas, TX
 
Jeff M. Coon

March 2nd, 2000 1:41 PM
 
I entirely support this effort to stop Amazon.com from patenting technology that is not specific to them.

I will joing the boycott, refusing to purchase ANY books from them until they drop the patients related to click through technology that everyone uses.

 
John Durrett

March 2nd, 2000 1:41 PM
 
Alicia Curran

March 2nd, 2000 1:41 PM
 
Christopher B. Wright

March 2nd, 2000 1:42 PM
 
Matt Kaufman

March 2nd, 2000 1:43 PM
 
Damjan Georgievski

March 2nd, 2000 1:43 PM
 
Sean Carley

March 2nd, 2000 1:43 PM
 
Rebecca Heft

March 2nd, 2000 1:43 PM
 
Albert Jong

March 2nd, 2000 1:44 PM
 
The same reason I hate Microsoft and their monopolies, I now add Amazon. I will no longer purchase anything from them, and I have/will tell other's the same. Until they get past the dollar signs and head out of orifice, I might buy some, awful big might at that.
 
Richard Paul

March 2nd, 2000 1:44 PM
 
Dave Lennon

March 2nd, 2000 1:45 PM
 
Karl Gruel

March 2nd, 2000 1:46 PM
 
What a waste of energy...
 
George Bourozikas

March 2nd, 2000 1:46 PM
 
I'm not as eloquent on this subject as Tim O'Reilly. But you should ask yourselves whether it is worth this loss of goodwill from amongst your best customers to hold on to a patent for a couple of years.
 
Andrew Brown

March 2nd, 2000 1:48 PM
 
Those who read this, will hear my voice:
"Stop Stupid (Software) Patents"
 
Geert Stappers

March 2nd, 2000 1:50 PM
 
The path you have chosen to riches denigrates the culture that has made you what you are today.
As an Internet Services Developer for 7+ years, I have created very similar applications, as the ones you are attempting to patent. Some of these applications were created long before Amazon.com implemented them.
I agree with the letter on all points and will also boycott Amazon.com until you have a change of heart and policy.
 
Cynthia Rossbach

March 2nd, 2000 1:50 PM
 
It is inconceivable to believe that a company has tha ability to patent technology widely used on the internet for many years.
Now is the time to review patent and trademark procedures, It has to be clear that internet technology is driven by rapid collaborative ingenuity that can not be held off
by someone claiming its invention. The information age is built on the premise of sharing information.
 
Marco Garciaguirre

March 2nd, 2000 1:50 PM
 
Jeff - your actions regarding the patent are hard to comprehend. Back in (early) 1997, a number of persons I worked with considered an idea such as one-click to be a trivial "cookie" implementation hardly worth our time...not something to be patented! What is next - patenting the use of the word "Amazon?" or how about the letter "A"...

Until now, your organization was my vendor of 1st choice for online book sales - now you are last on the list - unless I decide to boycott you completely. The order I sent today may be my last.

I remain optimistic that you will do the right thing, and reverse your recent error.
 
Rob H

March 2nd, 2000 1:51 PM
 
Ric Shepard

March 2nd, 2000 1:51 PM
 
Jack Avenevoli

March 2nd, 2000 1:53 PM
 
cmon let mot be another microsoft
 
brian haynes

March 2nd, 2000 1:53 PM
 
So much for BIG being better!
 
Joseph Young

March 2nd, 2000 1:54 PM
 
Bruce A. Johnson

March 2nd, 2000 1:54 PM
 
Dana Nau

March 2nd, 2000 1:54 PM
 
I'm an Internet Developer and the idea that someone can patent such a common practice seems unlawful. What's next, they patent hyper-text links.

The way I see it, if someone copied thier code to allow this, then it would be illeagel. But if a few lines of the code differs from what they have, then it is a different entity, and therfore can not be patented.

Amazon.com is obviously grasping for straws here. Thier competitors are stealing thier market faster then they can create new ones. The governemnt should be ashamed they allowed such a patent to go through. The patent is just advancing Amazon.com closer to an online merchant monopoly.

But that's just my opinion. So what happens if a site located in another country uses the "one-click" gimic. Our government doesn't have the right to inflict our laws on another country. So I guess an easy way around this would be to establish a server in another country. Businesses will be forced to take thier companies to foreign countries. Yeah, that sounds like it'll really help out the economy. Leave it to the government and a monopoly to screw everyone over, including themselves.
 
Adam Wayne Lehman

March 2nd, 2000 1:54 PM
 
As a Amazon customer for several years, I have stopped shopping at Amazon.com. As a software developer myself, 1-click is a rudimentary idea, and to deny this to other sites is a abomination.
 
Herb Dyer

March 2nd, 2000 1:56 PM
 
No! Bad Amazon!
 
Andy Forest

March 2nd, 2000 1:57 PM
 
My firm has used the Amazon site many times over. I cannot however continue to use, include in our site promotions, nor recommend to any of our clients, Amazons services. Uh oh Amazon, you just lost $$! We will boycott all services rendered by Amazon on their web site. Since you (Amazon)obviously take bad legal advise, I would like to offer you my legal services as well, I'm sure I can come up with something else stupid you will buy! Since Amazon has started offensively enforcing patent 5,960,411, I makes the world very aware of what kind of people are at the helm of this "company". Keep up the good job of showing us all a good example of a bad example! We can all learn from the fools in the world.
 
Mike Phillips

March 2nd, 2000 1:57 PM
 
A disgraceful error by the Patent Office!
 
Erik WEssman

March 2nd, 2000 1:58 PM
 
I am currently an Amazon customer, but I will cease to be one if Amazon does not obtain a recision of the injunction against Barnes and Noble's version of "one-click ordering", or if Amazon continues to press claims on broad patents to processes that are perfectly obvious to the average idiot web developer.
 
Bruce A. Johnson

March 2nd, 2000 1:59 PM
 
Paul Lohse

March 2nd, 2000 1:59 PM
 
Your patenting of obvious techniques is a poor attempt to monopolize the open Internet which has allowed your business to exist and succeed. My wife and I have ceased to purchase books and other products from Amazon, and will not visit your site again until you renounce these patents.
 
Douglas Frick

March 2nd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
As past (and may I add satisfied) customer of Amazon, I'll never make another purchase from them unless this nonsense is stopped. Remember 'eToy.com'. Well, hell hath no furry like the web community scorned.
 
Paul McLellan

March 2nd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
Robert A. Salzman Jr.

March 2nd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
Two words : BOYCOTT AMAZON !
 
GUIEZE Jérôme

March 2nd, 2000 2:01 PM
 
Nate Haugo

March 2nd, 2000 2:01 PM
 
Try inovation, not domination.
 
Rana Ian

March 2nd, 2000 2:02 PM
 
It is important to maintain a balanced attitude toward your competitors in a free open-market online economy. To agressively seek patents on commonly used e-commerce features runs contrary to the purpose of the internet. Most internet users would rather be free to choose where they shop online and not be forced into shopping at one site only, just because that particular e-commerce site has patented all the available e-commerce features so necessary to a pleasant shopping experience. That this is not the only patent that Amazon has recently been awarded is also not a "good thing"! They have also patented their affiliate reward system. The same type of system that is widely used by other affiliate program coordinating companies and by other e-commerce sites using their own in-house software or in conjunction with the companies offering various versions of affiliate referral tracking.
 
S. Bonet

March 2nd, 2000 2:02 PM
 
Try innovation, not domination.
 
Rana Ian

March 2nd, 2000 2:03 PM
 
I used to buy all my books and dvds from Amazon, because of this patent fiasco, I will no longer even look at the site.
 
Nelson Alonso

March 2nd, 2000 2:03 PM
 
Leonard A. Dole.

March 2nd, 2000 2:03 PM
 
Mary Wior

March 2nd, 2000 2:04 PM
 
I have much new respect for Tim O'Reilly for being
so brave and trying to protect competition and innovation on the web. I won't be buying anything from Amazon until they stop this practice.
 
Damon Haley

March 2nd, 2000 2:05 PM
 
Is Amazon looking to be the Micro$oft of the e-tailing universe?

Just when it looked like things like open source software and the level playing field brought about by the internet would re-engender business success through ideals like good customer service and value for money, we find that, once again, business domination will come down to those who have the best lawyers and the deepest pockets.

Perhaps I'm naive, and watch too much TV, but I find the "Star Trek - Next Generation" ethos to be very powerful - people no longer work for money, but rather seek personal improvement through the acquisition of knowledge and understanding (they're not the same...), and then share that knowledge freely with the community to improve the lot of everyone.

Almost like the (original) Linux community really (c;

If people like Mr Bezos continue to try to succeed in life through the ownership of ideas, this ideal will never happen.

Shame.
 
Colin Wilson

March 2nd, 2000 2:06 PM
 
Brian Lakeman

March 2nd, 2000 2:06 PM
 
Amazon,
you will stop this madness, or you will not last as an online retailer.
 
Scott Bradford

March 2nd, 2000 2:06 PM
 
The particular success of Amazon.com may have something to do with Jeff Bezos' leadership and innovation. However, underlying that success (if you can call a multi-million dollar losing business venture a success) and every other ecommerce poster company on the Web is the network based on open standards and -real- freedom of innovation. Amazon's attempts at patenting 1-click buying and referral programs would effectively freeze the development of ecommerce industries at their January 1, 2000 mark--except, of course, for Amazon.

It's a false hope the Bezos is clinging to. He seems to believe that by putting a proprietar stamp on these 'innovations'--neither of which are original to Amazon--he can ensure Amazon's success while denying a leg up to the competition. Nothing could be further from the truth. While his efforts must and certainly will be stopped, the truth is that the same kinds of people who came up with these revolutionary, if obvious, ideas, will come up with even better ways of doing business. And they sure as hell won't let Amazon in on the new 'secrets'.

Sooner or later the bubble around Amazon will have to burst. Eventually major stockholders will realize that they own a company worth negative several million dollars. Evenutally they will also realize that Bezos' attempts to freeze out the competition will only, in fact, lock Amazon in it's money-sucking, profit-evading state for the forseeable future. We can only hope that this day comes to pass in time to save Jeff Bezos' soul. Before he moves to Redmond.
 
Christopher Luebcke

March 2nd, 2000 2:06 PM
 
I agree with Tim O'Reilly's assessment of Amazon's patents and will not buy from Amazon until Amazon stops using these heavy-handed tactics to sabotage competition.
 
Charles Kerr

March 2nd, 2000 2:07 PM
 
You have lost a good customer
 
Glenn Berry

March 2nd, 2000 2:07 PM
 
I agree with Tim O'Reilly's assessment of Amazon's patents and will not buy from Amazon until they stop using these heavy-handed tactics to sabotage competition.
 
Charles Kerr

March 2nd, 2000 2:07 PM
 
John Ballantyne

March 2nd, 2000 2:08 PM
 
I will buy no more products from Amazon because of their misuse of patents.
 
Ted Dustman

March 2nd, 2000 2:08 PM
 
Don't make me have to boycott Amazon. Stop the nonsensical patents now.
 
Marina Streznewski

March 2nd, 2000 2:08 PM
 
please dont halt the net
 
James Maes

March 2nd, 2000 2:08 PM
 
We are removing all links to Amazon from our web pages.
 
Jeff Bauer

March 2nd, 2000 2:09 PM
 
I didn't find anything on the patent server about a method for starting fires by rubbing two sticks together. Look out, cavepeople; I'm going to spend thousands of hours researching this method, and then I'm going to patent it. Next I'm heading for your fire circles to sue your butts!
 
Margaret Chesler

March 2nd, 2000 2:10 PM
 
Mr Bezos,

I must say that I am impressed by the growth of your organization and the value to customers of your business model. I am extremely distressed, however, by the granting of this patent. Whether or not you considered your original application a gratuitous lark, I cannot say. I do know, however, that your request could only have been approved by an overworked and possibly incompetent patent clerk.

Allowing 'soft' patents as these is dubious public policy. Enforcing them will stifle innovation. I therefore must ask you to refrain from doing so, as the future of an entire industry can be affected by this power that the government has unwisely granted to you.

If you choose otherwise, Barnes & Noble will have all my business, and I will encourage others to send their business there as well. I can't put it any more bluntly.

Thanks for the time.

James Hasik
Atlanta, Georgia
 
James Hasik

March 2nd, 2000 2:10 PM
 
You've lost my business Amazon. I once owned a small retail /manufacturing furniture business and had competitors come from 90 miles away and ask the vendors to cut me off so they would have a monopoly-some did, most did not. I have since gone back to my true profession, which is teaching. I am teaching computer classes at 2 community colleges and for a computer retailer.Rest assured they will get a lesson on this-I am tired of being stepped on by people who have more money than they will ever need. I told my class earlier this week that it was foolish to beleive there was any true competitive pricing in the world and you have proved once again that money talks and vulgarly.
 
Donna Muse

March 2nd, 2000 2:11 PM
 
Biting the hand that feeds you...
 
Theodore Ruegsegger

March 2nd, 2000 2:11 PM
 
Biting the hand that feeds you...
 
Theodore Ruegsegger

March 2nd, 2000 2:12 PM
 
Last year I personally spent approximately GBP350
on products from your US and UK web sites.

I also was responsible for spending much, much
more than that amount through the companies I
have worked for.

No More!

Until you stop trying to prevent other web sites from the simple and obvious *application* of someone else's invention I shall not spend any more money with your company.

By all means, feel free to trademark the phrase "1-Click" in the context of ordering products from a website. But please do not abuse the freely available inventions of others.

On a related note. I will be removing my associate links from all my web sites.

Mike Little.
 
Mike Little

March 2nd, 2000 2:13 PM
 
Bad Amazon!! Bad! Bad!!
 
Jay Benson

March 2nd, 2000 2:14 PM
 
Cliff Cunnington

March 2nd, 2000 2:14 PM
 
I just hope other people do as me and bojcot Amazon. Amazon did lose one customer the day they got their one mouse click patent granted. Now I feel that it's time to start work in promotion of a bojcott against Amazon. Maybe it's time to look over the work of patent and registration what they are doing ? Should it be so easily to get a patent of something this rudamentry and widely used thing and on so loose basis ?
 
Eje Gustafsson

March 2nd, 2000 2:14 PM
 
David Fifield

March 2nd, 2000 2:15 PM
 
I am happy to join this boycott and urge others to continue and add to the protest.
 
Larry Wm Scott

March 2nd, 2000 2:17 PM
 
I, too, have joined the FSF's boycott of Amazon.com
 
paulv@cinternet.net

March 2nd, 2000 2:17 PM
 
Ben Sprague-Klepzig

March 2nd, 2000 2:18 PM
 
I have used amazon.com in the past for purchases, and would like to in the future. Unfortunately, I have lost trust in amazon.com due to the one-click and affiliate patents they have tried to pursue. This indicates to me a lack of integrity as a company. I believe that the enforcement of these patents would both be unfair to other companies and consumers, and would be harmful to internet business as a whole.

I will not use amazon.com again unless they are willing to show integrity, and not claim credit for concepts that they did not 'invent'. I will not recommend amazon.com, and will try my best to convince others not to use amazon.com either unless they drop these patents.
 
Lance Larsen

March 2nd, 2000 2:18 PM
 
Brian D. Lloyd

March 2nd, 2000 2:19 PM
 
I have used Amazon.com as my primary provider of books, almost exclusiveley.

But, not any more, until they change their ways. It is too bad that such a fine retailer in so many other respects has decided to offend and abuse thier customers, the internet, and the public, by behaviour which is counter to the whole notion of openness, which has characterized the internet from its inception.

-- Jim Roberts
 
Jim Roberts

March 2nd, 2000 2:19 PM
 
I will personally boycott amazon.com.
 
Christopher Billings

March 2nd, 2000 2:20 PM
 
Roy Borglund

March 2nd, 2000 2:21 PM
 

I would urge everyone to use another site such as fatbrain or bookpool.
 
Douglas E. Washington

March 2nd, 2000 2:21 PM
 
M C. Geers

March 2nd, 2000 2:22 PM
 
Its a big world, there is plenty for every one, and what goes around comes around
 
Bill Schultz

March 2nd, 2000 2:22 PM
 
Come Jeff, fair go. I may not buy much from Amazon, but I won't be buying any more untill this patent is dropped.

Regards

Julian Bordas
 
Julian Bordas

March 2nd, 2000 2:23 PM
 
Amazon is setting a bad precedence for e-commerce and the web with their patents. They should relinquish them or choose not to enforce them.
 
Tony Bridson

March 2nd, 2000 2:23 PM
 
Perrin Rowland

March 2nd, 2000 2:23 PM
 
Michael J. Sikorsky

March 2nd, 2000 2:23 PM
 
You should have your customers' best interests in mind, not your bank account's.
 
Owain Davies

March 2nd, 2000 2:25 PM
 
Just because something is legal does not make it right. Even if Amazon's use of the patent system seems to comply with laws much older than the technology, I hope that they will come to understand the harm they are doing to the online community.
 
Jason Bleazard

March 2nd, 2000 2:25 PM
 

I regret to say that I've been a steady customer of Amazon until now, but I was horrified when I read what their lawyers have been up to. Public pressure seems the only way to rein them in. Until then, it's noamazon.com for me.
 
Andy South

March 2nd, 2000 2:25 PM
 
My business will go elsewhere.
 
Wes McRae

March 2nd, 2000 2:25 PM
 
I have ceased to buy from Amazon and will continue to (not) do so this foolishness is sorted out. I estimate that I have spent about 500$ (CAD)
elsewhere, that is, not at Amazon.com.
 
Bruce Hollebone

March 2nd, 2000 2:26 PM
 
Amazon will loose on the internet.
 
Laca

March 2nd, 2000 2:27 PM
 
Bryce Allen

March 2nd, 2000 2:27 PM
 
Creighton Kagey

March 2nd, 2000 2:27 PM
 
From the XOR patent to this. The patent office keeps repeating history. Amazon, if you had come out immediately and stated that this was for defensive purposes and that you would never enforce this patent then you would have not already have lost my business. But since you have already sued one of your competitors over an equally bogus patent then I have to assume your intentions are motivated by greed. Fatbrain and B&N will receive all of my business in the future.
 
Ryan S. Hanlon

March 2nd, 2000 2:29 PM
 
Tim Ramsey

March 2nd, 2000 2:30 PM
 
Amazon.com has brought Bezos great success with that success has now brought greed which has created ignorance in the control of competitive business. As long as Bezos and amazon feel that they have been so innovative enough to patent everything then they will slowly dissappear back to amazon who? Ill continue my business with fatbrain.com or bn.com.
 
Scott H. MacFarland

March 2nd, 2000 2:31 PM
 
W.T. Lane

March 2nd, 2000 2:33 PM
 
It is like paying people to put up billboards on their 'site'!

I'm sorry but words fail me. I pity the fact that you have to put up with the lack of intelligence of the people running the US patent office.

Please get back to your roots, rebellious, innovative and stop the madness that reigns supreme.
 
Friso Dijstelbergen

March 2nd, 2000 2:34 PM
 
I will never purchase anything from Amazon.com again until they stop their unfair business practices. This recent development, like the standard day to day business practices of Microsoft, show the consumers of the world that if a company gets too big, it can wield its power and its deep pockets to control a market. We must not let this happen. Once entrenched, this patent will be used to squeeze out any competition, large or small, which is ultimately bad for the consumer.
 
Robert Drake

March 2nd, 2000 2:35 PM
 
Tom DeGraff

March 2nd, 2000 2:35 PM
 
Offensive use of these patents puts you in company with Al Gore and his ludicrous claim of having "invented" the internet. Mr. Gore, by his very nature, can't help making himself visibly foolish on a regular basis. You folks at Amazon, however have done some remarkable and intelligent things toward makin e-commerce a reality, and I sincerely believe you can and must do better than this.
 
Jay Loveless

March 2nd, 2000 2:36 PM
 

If Bezos can patent the one-click, can he patent the double-click as well?

BOYCOTT amazon, Fat Brain rules!
 
John Miller

March 2nd, 2000 2:37 PM
 
Arthur Cain

March 2nd, 2000 2:37 PM
 
This is a ridiculous patent that should never have been issued.
 
David Bredenberg

March 2nd, 2000 2:37 PM
 
Jim Raney

March 2nd, 2000 2:38 PM
 
Unlike some of the others who posted here, I will reserve judgement on whether or not to abandon Amazon. I am an optimist, and I like to believe that people (and companies) work towards the best results for the most people.

I truly hope and believe that Amazon is a smart company, who knows that it is in their best interest not to offend their own customers. I hope that they will justify my faith, and give me a reason to shop with them again.
 
George Macoukji

March 2nd, 2000 2:38 PM
 
We all know the phrase "a rising tide lifts all boats". Amazon grew because public confidence in and access to commerce on the web grew. Damage other ecom sites and you eventually hurt yourself as well.

Nerds like me buy a lot of big expensive programming books. But not from Amazon. Not unless they drop this nonsense.
 
Elizabeth Warner

March 2nd, 2000 2:39 PM
 
Amazon had been our household's first stop when looking for books and music. No longer. If the other 8000+ people here have been spending as much as we have a month there, you *will* see a difference!
 
Steven Cochran

March 2nd, 2000 2:40 PM
 
I will no longer buy anything from amazon.com.. Furthermore I will encourage everybody that will listen to follow my lead and not buy from Amazon as well.
 
Z Moore

March 2nd, 2000 2:41 PM
 
I was about to order some books through Amazon for the first time. However I will not now buy from Amazon because of this patent.
 
peter fagan

March 2nd, 2000 2:41 PM
 
The internet should remain open. What happens when the coin is turned and you are the one being choked because of a practice you initiated? Everyone (including those who "invent" a process) stands to benefit by working on bettering the current technology instead of stifling its growth and development. Down with the ignorant patents. I'll shop at FatBrain or B&N until this stops.
 
JC Avena

March 2nd, 2000 2:42 PM
 
Amazon seems to be throwing away with both hands everything that made it a breath of fresh air in the business world -- in favor of becoming the Microsoft of e-commerce: arrogant, bullying, hostile to any ideas or innovations it can't own.
 
Casey Leichter

March 2nd, 2000 2:44 PM
 
I run a nice, robust B2B site. Like most of us I spend a fair amount of money on tech books. I see no reason to spend money with a company who one day may sue me on a bogus patent claim.

Note: I have contacted my congress person concerning this patent.
 
Mike Barrington

March 2nd, 2000 2:44 PM
 
I have purchased quite a few products from Amazon in the past. I will continue my business elsewhere until I hear that they've come to their senses. Even if I have to use 2 clicks instead of one.
 
Mark Shindler

March 2nd, 2000 2:45 PM
 
Ian Bennett

March 2nd, 2000 2:45 PM
 
Jay R. Gindin

March 2nd, 2000 2:46 PM
 
Dear Amazon:

Your actions against Barnes and Noble regarding the one-click ordering patent are very short-sighted. Just remember that the stock market is the final judge and jury as to whether what you are doing is right or not. If you plan to keep using your stock as your own private currency for expanding the empire, you can't afford to do anything that will devalue that currency. Keep the big picture in mind and let up a little on these silly, short-term gains; you may just be mortgaging your future.

Regards,

John Strosnider
 
John Strosnider

March 2nd, 2000 2:48 PM
 
Karl Keyton

March 2nd, 2000 2:48 PM
 
Maureen Franz

March 2nd, 2000 2:49 PM
 
Aleksey Linetskiy

March 2nd, 2000 2:49 PM
 
owen mathewson

March 2nd, 2000 2:50 PM
 
Riaan Booysen

March 2nd, 2000 2:51 PM
 
This is absurd. Maybe I should get a patent on the process of writing any set of instructions that would be performed on a computer. Then anyone who wanted to program ANYTHING would have to get my permission.

 
David A McInnis

March 2nd, 2000 2:51 PM
 
R. Alfred Mayer

March 2nd, 2000 2:51 PM
 
Weak. Really weak. I will no longer shop at Amazon.
 
Colin Ingarfield

March 2nd, 2000 2:52 PM
 
Jonas Luster

March 2nd, 2000 2:52 PM
 
Just today I was looking to buy a book ,"Professional Apache" (Peter Wainwright / Paperback / Wrox Press, Inc. / October 1999) Amazon price $39.99, I had fully planned on purchasing this book from Amazon, untill shortly before I placed my order a friend/co-worker informed me of this recient patent by Amazon, after hering of this outragious claim I have decided not to purchase this book from Amazon, and have purchased it from BarnsAndNoble (same price, just without the bullshit).

Im sure this pattent was designed to help your business Amazon, but the way I see it, your loosing money.
 
Robert J. Connell

March 2nd, 2000 2:53 PM
 
If someone would have asked me 1 week ago for the best place to buy books I would not have hesitated to point them to Amazon.
This 'one-click' idea is basically 'network marketing'. I don't think this should be patentable.
I have given Amazon all my business in the past and will boycott them until something positive is done regarding their patent. I will find a replacement for my needs and will strongly recommend that people I know and work with do not buy from Amazon.

Thank you Mr. Oreilly for taking my defense on this issue.
 
Mike Esler

March 2nd, 2000 2:54 PM
 
Paul Stephanouk

March 2nd, 2000 2:54 PM
 
Your not doing this improve yourself, but to hinder others. What your doing is wrong!
 
Ed

March 2nd, 2000 2:55 PM
 
This is ludicrous. How can the US Patent office even grant a patent on this?
 
Sean Price

March 2nd, 2000 2:55 PM
 
Linna Yamazaki

March 2nd, 2000 2:55 PM
 
We will not link to Amazon nor participate in the affiliate program until the patent is revoked. Referrals have existed for years in business, and both one-click and affiliate programs are merely the amplification of existing art through obvious technical means.
 
William E. Rushman

March 2nd, 2000 2:56 PM
 
Adam L Wolf

March 2nd, 2000 2:56 PM
 
Software patents are intrinsically destructive.
Companies like Amazon are built on the Internet
and therefore on open software. Patenting
threatens innovation and the Internet itself and
is not even in the interests of the patenter.
I have today cancelled my Amazon account.
 
Mark Summerfield

March 2nd, 2000 2:57 PM
 
Matt Lyerla

March 2nd, 2000 2:57 PM
 
Todd M Kuipers

March 2nd, 2000 2:59 PM
 
I think i'll patent the use of the word fuck. that way i can make money hand over fist whenever somebody attempts to describe your gross incompetence in regards to what the internet is all about.
 
Jed Baker

March 2nd, 2000 2:59 PM
 
Lost one potentional customer.
 
Thomas Nilsson

March 2nd, 2000 3:00 PM
 
Steeling candy when their pockets are full. Amazon, is the competition so hot that you have no other means to compete other than tilt the tables?
 
F. J. McCauley

March 2nd, 2000 3:00 PM
 
I am boycoting Amazon.com until they come to their greedy senses.
 
Trey Mitchell

March 2nd, 2000 3:01 PM
 
The general ineptitude of the reviewers in the patent office is the key that allows travesties such as this. But the companies that file for these broad and trivial patents need to feel the effects of their greed and their abuse of the patent system. To that end, I am also joining the boycott against Amazon.com.

For all of you out there who also feel that the patent system is being abused, _Please write your legislative representatives asking for reform in the patent office, particularly to ensure that competent and qualified patent reviewers are hired and trained, and existing state of the art is _Properly reviewed with the help of industry experts.

We need judicial penalties, legislative intervention, executive reform, and consumer actions together to halt this abuse.
 
Eric Newquist

March 2nd, 2000 3:02 PM
 
michael sherman

March 2nd, 2000 3:02 PM
 
I agree with 'ya totally tim, Those jerks are pissn' in the well!
 
sary-poo

March 2nd, 2000 3:02 PM
 
Amazon did not create the idea of cookie placement on client computers, and should not be allowed to patent the concept

R. A. Brant
Navair/Navairwest NT/Exchange Admin
 
Richard Brant

March 2nd, 2000 3:03 PM
 
I will no longer buy from Amazon, and urge everyone else I know to do likewise.
 
Michael Browning

March 2nd, 2000 3:03 PM
 
Yup,

Enforcement of this nuisance patent would be enough to drop Amazon off of my 'buy' list of vendors.
 
Howard Marantz

March 2nd, 2000 3:03 PM
 
The internet you are using to sell your products was developed by open standards. Now play fair and continue the tradition.
 
Andrew Ferguson

March 2nd, 2000 3:05 PM
 
Jeffrey Thomson

March 2nd, 2000 3:07 PM
 
As the editor and chief of an internet university forum and newsletter, I plan to educate my entire campus fully on this development, and organize a boycott. I am a firm believer in the freedom of information and technological information, and patenting ideas you stole is WRONG
 
James Stratton-Crawley

March 2nd, 2000 3:08 PM
 
Beware. When the Hunt brothers tried to corner the silver market, inventors came to the public's rescue. Paul Pilzner's writes about this phenenom extensively as the recourse and result of human nature. If you do enforce, this patent, consumers will rise to the underdog's defense and buy buy buy.

I understand the need to position your company against your exisiting and future competition using this "technology." What must be made clear to your customer base is that Amazon.Com will never enforce it. And if they ever do they will announce their intentions publicly and be willing to take the consequences

-Daniel McDermott

 
Daniel McDermott

March 2nd, 2000 3:08 PM
 
Joseph Corrigan

March 2nd, 2000 3:10 PM
 
I just can't believe that the patent office will patent "public domain" technology. It' like trying to patent the pencil and paper. This is an abomination of justice and Amazon should be struck out. this is worse than Microsoft trying to pur netscape out of business. At least Bill tried making better technolgy not harrassing them with we own the rights to the word "browser"
 
Glenn Bolton

March 2nd, 2000 3:10 PM
 
I don't agree at all with your patent. You didn't event this technology. Just because you were the first person to think of patenting this, doesn't mean you should. I will purchase no more books from Amazon.com unless you remove your patents.
 
Stephanie Blair

March 2nd, 2000 3:10 PM
 
The real problem here is the patent office obviously. I need to fill one out for the "Home Page" concept
 
Derek Kaczmarczyk

March 2nd, 2000 3:10 PM
 
Quite a pathetic show of greed, also a note to the creator of this, it would be wise to have the post at the begining of the page, I'm on a fast connection, if not I probably wouldn't of waited for the bottom..
 
Robert Lloyd

March 2nd, 2000 3:11 PM
 
I, for one, will not do business with Amazon again until they commit never to enforce these patents. In the meantime, I'll do my shopping at B&N and fatbrain.com.
 
Bob Steigerwald

March 2nd, 2000 3:11 PM
 
Is the Patent office run by a bunch of Morons?
 
Kasu Sista

March 2nd, 2000 3:11 PM
 
This sort of heavy handed use of patent law does a great disservice to the internet community. By trying to patent such basic concepts as "1-click shopping" Amazon is behaving much like Microsoft has been accused of behaving. I hope Amazon considers, however, that it has a long way to go before it has the market share and profits on Microsoft to back it's own proprietary technology against competitors. In an e-business, consumers care very little about how many clicks it takes to shop and much more about good prices, prompt delivery, availability, security and many other issues. My advice is to stop wasting resources on patenting cookies and scripts and put that time, money and energy towards what e-consumers actually want from your business. Do this soon, before you chase your customers over to Chapters, Indigo or Barnes and Noble.
 
Mark S. Hayden

March 2nd, 2000 3:12 PM
 
I'm against amazons attmept to regulate internet technolgy.
 
Alex Doroshko

March 2nd, 2000 3:13 PM
 
Paul Harrison

March 2nd, 2000 3:14 PM
 
Lindsey Dubb

March 2nd, 2000 3:15 PM
 
Mr. Bezos,

I work in e-business and have been a faithful Amazon customer for a long time, and I am shocked by your recent action against Barnes & Noble.

Your attempt to patent the use of cookies, as if it was technically new, is nearly as unethical, and might have effects nearly as bad, as Microsoft's infamous "embrace, extend, exterminate" policy. As a long-time information technology professional, I despise the unscrupulous exploitation of technology in the service of naked greed, particularly when the technology in question was invented by other people.

I will not shop at Amazon until your policy has not only changed, but has been disavowed, with an apology. I will so inform all my friends and I will urge them to boycott you as well.
 
David Clement

March 2nd, 2000 3:16 PM
 
I will not purchase any more books from Amazon until the attack is withdrawn. (I have in the past, spent a lot of money there). Sorry Amazon, but there has to be ethics in business.
 
John Stephenson

March 2nd, 2000 3:16 PM
 
No way, Amazon. I teach Beginning Internet to a couple of hundred of adults per year, and have always spoken highly of Amazon. No more. Give it up. You won't get my business or, likely, that of any of my students.
 
Arnold Pulda

March 2nd, 2000 3:17 PM
 
Although the real problem is a Patent Office
apparently run by refugees from the 18th
century, polite behavior has great value in
its own right. Just because you CAN do something
to your momentary advantage does not mean you
MUST do it. For all Amazon's gigantism, it has
still been preferable to the clueless
rapaciousness of Barnes & Noble. You're
throwing that away, Mr. Bezos. Is it worth it,
really?
 
Brad Bulger

March 2nd, 2000 3:19 PM
 
I have been boycotting Amazon since the B&N Lawsuit was filed, and am urging all other Creative, Inc. Employees in my facility to do the same.
 
Joe Grisso

March 2nd, 2000 3:20 PM
 
Lee Fisher

March 2nd, 2000 3:20 PM
 
Carlos Palma

March 2nd, 2000 3:21 PM
 
Using these methods to gain market share is pointless as net consumers can readily learn about these kind of practices I for one will not buy from amazon until such time as it holds to competing farily in the marketplace
 
Robert Brklje

March 2nd, 2000 3:22 PM
 
Using these methods to gain market share is pointless as net consumers can readily learn about these kind of practices I for one will not buy from amazon until such time as it holds to competing fairly in the marketplace
 
Robert Brklje

March 2nd, 2000 3:22 PM
 
Matthew Gibbins

March 2nd, 2000 3:23 PM
 
I am a web developer. In the past I have implemented features that are basically similar to the "One-Click" process that has now been patented by amazon.com. This is ridiculous!

Unfortunately, as a tiny independent company I could not afford to pay even one day of litigation against amazon.com. Therefore I will have to decide: do I make use of prior code that I have implemented in at least 3 websites prior to this date or do I take the risk of being sued...

Unfortunately, I have people that depend on me (employees, their families and last but not least - my own family) therefore I have to be prudent and play chicken on the business level...

Somehow this reminds me of the big (really big) bully who used to frequent my childhood playground...

He now operates a supermarket and he doesn't see a dime of my money, neither will amazon.com...

Let's all say NO to the new big bully!
 
Eliezer Navarsky

March 2nd, 2000 3:23 PM
 
Ben Cabrera

March 2nd, 2000 3:23 PM
 
I think we should be concerned about Amazon but we should be even more concerned about the brain-dead people at the Patents Office who grant patents about stuff they do not understand.

 
Adham Shaaban

March 2nd, 2000 3:24 PM
 
My family will never purchase another product form amazon.com until they rescind their "1-click" patent. The patent office and judicial system are being swindled by fast talking technical B.S., they need to be better informed. But it is companies like Amazon.com that are trying to monopolize on an open internet by placing a patent on information they place on my computer. What good is your patent if nobody accepted internet "cookies"? I prefer my cookies dunked in a glass of cold milk, (I wonder if I can patent that?) and not controlled by big business mongrels.
 
Bob Nulph

March 2nd, 2000 3:24 PM
 
Jan van der Reis

March 2nd, 2000 3:24 PM
 
I will order nothing from your site, until you
drop this absurd tactic.

I am also writing my congresswoman, informing her
of my absolute opposition to your tactic.

Stephen B. Flynn
10224 South Portal Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
 
Stephen Flynn

March 2nd, 2000 3:25 PM
 
Ridiculous! No!
 
Bonnie Booysen

March 2nd, 2000 3:25 PM
 
Even though this is as I understand it soley a US patent at present, I agree wholeheartedly with the principle of this protest. No further books will be purchased by my company from the UK arm of Amazon until this matter is resolved. Of course I will be happy to continue to use the Amazon site as a convenient free guide to the books available, I just won't buy from there!
Dave Sparkes - Computron Limited, UK
 
Dave Sparkes

March 2nd, 2000 3:26 PM
 
What this all really seems to boil down to is this: Amazon hopes to be a monster version of Wallmart, controlling pricing and limiting shoppers choices...a "category killer" in an every widening circle of product categories (i.e. toys, hardware, gifts and more to come). If they inforce these two patents (one-click shopping and affiliate partnership selling) then new and old online shopping sites will be reduced to giving less-than perfect service and not be able to introduce themselves to the online buying public in a timely manner. It is SO convenient to go back and shop on a site that you bought from previously and know that all you have to do is hit "yes" and it is done. I, for one, do not want to have one business control my shopping choices. I do not want to lessen the chances that more new companies offering inovative products and services will be daunted by the potential cost of lawsuits filed by wealthy and powerful Amazon.com. Diversity is great...and a whole lot less BORING! The online world holds so much promise for everyone...let's all work to keep it that way!
 
Cece Parker

March 2nd, 2000 3:27 PM
 
I used to be a regular Amazon customer, but I no longer am because of this issue. Should Amazon change its ways I would resume doing business with them.
 
Steve Mattan

March 2nd, 2000 3:28 PM
 
After learning of the "one-click" patent, I realized that one of my worst nightmares was coming true ... abuse and blatent attempt at manipulation of the very foundations of the web and its underlying freedoms. As a veteran programmer and web developer, I can say that the "one-click" technique is nothing new. That Amazon.com has chosen to exploit this technique as an exclusive right is, in my opinion, an infringement of my freedoms and of my clients, in areas of e-commerce and other areas of web development. If anything, the granting of such a patent should be illegal, and enforcement should prove to be as equal or greater a crime.
 
Shawn Coppock

March 2nd, 2000 3:28 PM
 
Brian Seppanen

March 2nd, 2000 3:28 PM
 
Dave Citak

March 2nd, 2000 3:29 PM
 
Gene Dinkey

March 2nd, 2000 3:29 PM
 
Robert Landrito

March 2nd, 2000 3:29 PM
 
It may have been a good idea on paper Jeff....
 
Graham Gemmell

March 2nd, 2000 3:30 PM
 
Very offended by patents on 1-click ordering and associate programs. Have ordered from amazon since 1996 but now will deal with powells.com online or local BN stores exclusively until you change your offensive software patent positions.

-Dan
 
Dan Freedman

March 2nd, 2000 3:30 PM
 
While I am a regular customer at Amazon.com, I view your business tactics as part of your relationship with me. I will go elsewhere with my business if Amazon seeks to enforce patents for an obvious practice such as this.
 
Daniel Schmelzer

March 2nd, 2000 3:30 PM
 
After reading about the patents you have secured, I find that my positive image of you has plummeted, probably never to ascend until you forgo your monopolistic ways. Just sign me a former customer.
 
Jim Selig

March 2nd, 2000 3:31 PM
 
Plain and simple--you cannot own everything. Your world will collapse of its own weight and debt because you are so overextended. You don't need the ill will of "the people" on top of that.
 
Harriet Seltzer

March 2nd, 2000 3:32 PM
 
I'm against amazons attmept to regulate internet technology.
 
Alex Doroshko

March 2nd, 2000 3:33 PM
 
We should be sending all these comments to the patent office, which is embarssing itsself with the granting of such silly pattents. But, until the patent office figures out what its doing, the best we can do is to avoid companies that take advantage of this lack of concern and understanding on the govt's part.
 
Lewis Oliver

March 2nd, 2000 3:34 PM
 
Personally, I feel Tim's reticence to join fully in the suggested boycott of Amazon.com to be admirable, in so much as Amazon.com HAS created a great thing. However, the proposed boycott is one of the few tools that those of us without the finacial resources of Amazon.com have to battle these specious patents.
 
Norman L. Moore, Jr.

March 2nd, 2000 3:35 PM
 
I will not buy another book from Amazon until
this is resolved.
 
Sanjay Sheth

March 2nd, 2000 3:37 PM
 
I have no polite response.
 
Peter M. Shea

March 2nd, 2000 3:39 PM
 
Tomas T. Peiser, CET

March 2nd, 2000 3:39 PM
 
To Amazon.com:

I feel insulted that you use the free services of the web and claim them as your own.

Arthur Wendover
 
Arthur Wendover

March 2nd, 2000 3:39 PM
 
Lydia Ash

March 2nd, 2000 3:40 PM
 
I am through doing business with Amazon and will encourage eveyone I know to do the same.
 
Liz Donaldson

March 2nd, 2000 3:40 PM
 
louise butler

March 2nd, 2000 3:42 PM
 
Trying to grab a patent for something like one-click ordering would be like Magellen trying to patent the Pacific Ocean.
 
Wendy Nystrom

March 2nd, 2000 3:42 PM
 
Travis Richardson

March 2nd, 2000 3:43 PM
 
I'm going to be blunt. What evey kinda crack these people at amazon are on, they should sell on thier site, cuase it really good stuff.
 
James Brasil

March 2nd, 2000 3:44 PM
 
Brad Emmons

March 2nd, 2000 3:46 PM
 
I cancelled my Amazon account shortly after RMS called for the boycott.. it's like a patent on breathing. C'mon Bezos! Give up the greed!
 
Steve Wainstead

March 2nd, 2000 3:46 PM
 
Your actions violate the standards of fairness and fair play.
 
Cindy Ann Beattie

March 2nd, 2000 3:47 PM
 
I was one of the first to signup as an affiliate of Amazon.com, which is to say I have been part of this program for years. I'm pulling all referances to Amazon.com from my site tonight. I don't want my clients thinking that I support your tactics.
 
Dave Hawkins

March 2nd, 2000 3:47 PM
 
Fletcher Sandbeck

March 2nd, 2000 3:47 PM
 
As Commissioner of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office, I am sad that a very wealthy
company such as Amazon has taken advantage of the
known patent examination limitations that the US Patent and Trademark Office suffers under. In
an era where our organization's ability to find
prior art to properly determine the statutory tests of novelty and obviousness is less than optimal, we would prefer to see companies such as Amazon assuming more responsibilities (beyond statutory requirements) to locate such prior art and submit it for consideration by our examiners. I urge all companies and lawyers, not just Amazon, to help make the system work better so that patents are indeed "checks in the bank" and not "licenses to sue".

 
Q. Todd Dickinson

March 2nd, 2000 3:48 PM
 
Bryan Zarnett

March 2nd, 2000 3:50 PM
 
Yes, I was wrong, I was so wrong. I appologize if this patent frenzy of ours sent the wrong message to our dear customers.
Jeff
 
Jeff Bezos

March 2nd, 2000 3:51 PM
 
Bad move!
 
Lou Pietz

March 2nd, 2000 3:53 PM
 
Eric Chapman

March 2nd, 2000 3:53 PM
 
You will lose my business until you elect not to enforce these ridiculous patents.
 
Rob Bryant

March 2nd, 2000 3:54 PM
 
Seattle, WA
 
melissa roberts

March 2nd, 2000 3:54 PM
 
Amazon's great service made me a regular customer, but I cannot allow this issue to go unprotested. Please reconsider.
 
Matthew Labarge

March 2nd, 2000 3:55 PM
 
Robert Mills

March 2nd, 2000 3:55 PM
 
Earl Pickett

March 2nd, 2000 3:56 PM
 
I will never buy anything from Amazon again.
I'm very sorry to say this, because it's a
great resource.

However, Bezos has repeatedly demostrated both
his greed and his contempt for the online
community that has made him insanely wealthy.
He has used up his credit with me forever. Even
if he releases his patents to the public domain,
it is only fair payment for his use of a common
resource that was free for the taking when he
found it.

He had his chance, made his pile, and burned his
bridges.
 
Dave Moore

March 2nd, 2000 3:57 PM
 
Björn Johansson

March 2nd, 2000 3:57 PM
 
I was once an enthusiastic Amazon customer. Amazon's own records show I spent $275.65 at Amazon prior to their abuses of the patent system, and $0.00 since then. I will continue to boycott Amazon, and will urge others to join in the boycott, until Amazon transfers its patents on obvious software implementations of business practices to a public trust to ensure that the patents may not be employed to stifle the technological development of the net.
 
Ted McManus

March 2nd, 2000 3:57 PM
 
It wasn't Amazon.com that came up with the use of cookies and they didn't invent the "affiliate program" either. The fact that there is a patent on this is absurd. The fact that Amazon.com has the rights to this patent is even more absurd.
 
Chris Holland

March 2nd, 2000 3:58 PM
 
Fatbrain is an EXCELLENT online bookstore.
 
Joel Black

March 2nd, 2000 3:58 PM
 
I object! Stop the madness!
O'Reilly Rocks!
 
Timberwolf

March 2nd, 2000 3:59 PM
 
Mr. Bezos talks about customer acquisition and customer retention all the time. This patent business has caused me to sample several Amazon comptitors, and I doubt if I will ever bother with Amazon again.

paul
 
Paul S.

March 2nd, 2000 3:59 PM
 
I wish I had read this letter three days earlier, you would not have been given my order,
 
GRAHAM ENGLISH

March 2nd, 2000 4:01 PM
 
Anti competitive antics, such as those presently being exhibited by Bezos and Amazon.com can only hurt the web community in the long run. Governmental agencies need to take into account those ideas which should be proprietary and those which are common sense. Ideas, such as those which Amazon is patenting, are common sense and any competent programming team can duplicate the process - and have. I am not so sure that Amazon.com is the first to have put this latest idea on the net and there seems to have been no research into this. The fault is as much the United States Patent Office as it is Amazon.com's for allowing this egregious behavior. Their patents are probably going to cause great disruptions in e-commerce over the next couple of years as the courts discover the Internet commerce ramifications of this anti-competitive behavior.
 
Charles H. Tupper

March 2nd, 2000 4:01 PM
 
It's sad to see businesses that rely on the internet be this clueless and callous towards it. Buy.com and Barnes and Noble here I come.
 
James Owens

March 2nd, 2000 4:02 PM
 
Kitt Hodsden

March 2nd, 2000 4:03 PM
 
With technologies such as HTML being public domain, how can you think of trying to patent something so trivial?
 
Bobby Orr

March 2nd, 2000 4:03 PM
 
Raman Wahi

March 2nd, 2000 4:03 PM
 
Bridget Dwyer

March 2nd, 2000 4:05 PM
 
Mike Freedman

March 2nd, 2000 4:05 PM
 
Nathaniel Landau

March 2nd, 2000 4:05 PM
 
Bleh. You disgust me.
 
Rafael Kaufmann

March 2nd, 2000 4:05 PM
 
I will not purchase from Amazon.com until they publicly announce their intention not to enforce this or any other such patent.
 
Gary Calvin

March 2nd, 2000 4:06 PM
 
Michael Moreno

March 2nd, 2000 4:07 PM
 
Embarrassing ... that's the word that first springs to mind. But since Amazon has some experience with patents, perhaps I can ask you a question. I was thinking of applying for a patent on a process I came up with. This process involves the combination of various organic ingredients into an edible compound. I have dubbed this process "cooking" and hope to patent it as soon as possible. Any advice you might have would be appreciated.
 
Michael Beck

March 2nd, 2000 4:07 PM
 
Simon Vining

March 2nd, 2000 4:10 PM
 
They sure know how to kill the goose that lays the golden egg.
 
Stan Treanor

March 2nd, 2000 4:11 PM
 
Remember this,
The customer always, ALWAYS win.
 
Jae Lee

March 2nd, 2000 4:12 PM
 
Chris Lott

March 2nd, 2000 4:12 PM
 
I see how it works, you sell books for less than they're worth, lose buttloads of investor money, and say that you'll make a profit in a few years.. After you've patented everything you can get your hands on, and license the patents to your competitors..
 
Brian Schulteis

March 2nd, 2000 4:13 PM
 
I have a lot of influence with my freinds where
computers are conserned, and I will advise them
to avoid Amazon.com untill this is resolved.
If our government keeps taking away our freedom
with such ludecrist laws I will be forced to
find another country to move to.
 
Russell E. Mayfield

March 2nd, 2000 4:15 PM
 
1-I just bought another $100 of books at Amazon and am beginning to doubt whether I want should continue to do business with a poor corporate citizen.

There is no technology behind "1-Click Ordering" that has not been used by many other people; this is no more unique than offering a "37-day money-back guarantee" when everyone offers 30 days. Litigating using patents of this poor quality is as disreputable as domain-name squatting.
 
Jeremy Silver

March 2nd, 2000 4:15 PM
 
Tony Pasqualoni

March 2nd, 2000 4:16 PM
 
Karl Swan

March 2nd, 2000 4:17 PM
 
Greedy Idiots. You're fired. Later!
 
Tom Wilson

March 2nd, 2000 4:17 PM
 
I understand the intention of Amazon.com.
They wish to secure the rights to "1-Click" ordering. However.....
A) the technology and software utilized is NOT
theirs.
B) the idea behind the concept was NOT begun by
Amazon.com.
c) vague patents such as this tend to force
customer boycotts and petitions.

Amazon.com...

Most effective corporations have marketing
strategists that are supposed to clue you in on
what might happen if you start doing stupid
things like this.

You should listen to yours next time you come up
with such a moronic idea, if you still have a
customer base to poll.

 
Chris Citty

March 2nd, 2000 4:18 PM
 
I was one of those individuals who choose not to buy from Barnes & Noble's WWW site when they opened up their WWW with a frivolous lawsuit against Amazon. Now it looks like Amazon is afraid of losing its dominance and is engaging in the same tactic of frivolous lawsuits and even more frivolous and illegitimate patent claims.

Amazon, I was a loyal customer, but I will now no longer make any purchases from Amazon. I instead will choose another avenue for my purchases of books and videos and encourage everyone I can to do the same. After all, Amazon doesn't offer any deal you can not get a Barnes & Noble (www.bn.com) or Borders (www.borders.com).
 
Juan Cabanela

March 2nd, 2000 4:18 PM
 
I object to the patenting of an application of someone else's ideas (the cookie) that have been used for years. It will not be hard ot switch to Barnes and Noble or Borders. I have used all three and it won't be much of an impact on me or my friends here at school to boycott Amazon.

Good luck getting your reputation back.
 
Andrew Hill

March 2nd, 2000 4:19 PM
 
Just when you think you've found your online bookstore of choice...
 
Scott Barrow

March 2nd, 2000 4:20 PM
 
Katrina Chapma

March 2nd, 2000 4:21 PM
 
Gilbert Nguyen

March 2nd, 2000 4:21 PM
 
John Fix

March 2nd, 2000 4:22 PM
 
You guys are out of your minds if you think you're going to take over the internet with these kind of patents.
 
Mark Warrick

March 2nd, 2000 4:23 PM
 
David Webster

March 2nd, 2000 4:23 PM
 
Maxim Tulyuk

March 2nd, 2000 4:24 PM
 
I used Amazon extensively over the holiday season for gift purchases. I will not be buying from them again until they stop this nonsense.
 
Amy Riha

March 2nd, 2000 4:25 PM
 
Thue Janus Kristensen

March 2nd, 2000 4:27 PM
 
Austin Mills

March 2nd, 2000 4:28 PM
 
Mommy?
MOMMY?
WHERE'S my MOMMY?
 
Mark

March 2nd, 2000 4:28 PM
 
Ed Mooring

March 2nd, 2000 4:29 PM
 
Dear Priceline.com,

Your next.
 
J Lee

March 2nd, 2000 4:29 PM
 
David P. Lentini

March 2nd, 2000 4:30 PM
 
David Newman

March 2nd, 2000 4:31 PM
 
Steven Chen

March 2nd, 2000 4:32 PM
 
I've been shopping at other competitors' sites since I heard about this ridiculous patent issue. I find them equally fast and reliable; maybe, even better. Try'em.

Amazon.com will get a good lesson from its 'conscious' customers if they keep pursuing this nonsense.
 
B. Bora Bali

March 2nd, 2000 4:33 PM
 
Lawrence Calmus

March 2nd, 2000 4:34 PM
 
As a proponent of the advancement of technologies, and this one being a completely obvious idea that is already in place in a variety of other sites, I believe it is wrong for Amazon to even attempt to coin this as being their own inventive and creative idea, or that it should be kept proprietary in any way.

These are natural concepts that anyone would be coming up with to make their sites better, and by attempting to take complete ownership of such concepts, you're only harming the consumer, and certainly your reputation as a responsible organization.

The idea that the one-click ordering concept(and the latest patent granted regarding referring people to purchase advertised items sold on other sites for a commission) is absolutely, positively absurd. Amazon, this is (for lack of any better or more accurate term) stupid.
 
Anthony Coppoletta

March 2nd, 2000 4:35 PM
 
Mike Nimer

March 2nd, 2000 4:35 PM
 
Why?
 
Seth Harkavy

March 2nd, 2000 4:37 PM
 
I've stopped ordering from Amazon. So does my
company. So far thats about $200 in would-be
orders lost to Amazon from myself.
I could probably cause
at least $2000 in lost orders to Amazon this
year directly and possibly $8000 or more indirectly.
 
Joe Desbonnet

March 2nd, 2000 4:38 PM
 
As a webmaster who has made money from Amazon.com's affliate program, I am joining in the boycott and all links to amazon.com from my portal are removed until Amazon comes to its senses.
 
Ernie Booth

March 2nd, 2000 4:38 PM
 
This patent is a blatant example of monopolisation and greed. A leopard can't change its spots... so I won't be buying anything from Amazon at all. I will recommend to my friends and colleagues to do likewise. The folks at Amazon would also do well to remember that bad news travels like lightning on the WWW.
 
William Waters

March 2nd, 2000 4:40 PM
 
David Radnell

March 2nd, 2000 4:40 PM
 
Peter Rizzuto

March 2nd, 2000 4:42 PM
 
jd

March 2nd, 2000 4:44 PM
 
Brian Keron

March 2nd, 2000 4:44 PM
 
Is this the technique Amazon will use to become profitable? At least your site has good book reviews, as that is all I will use it for and take my purchases elswhere. It may not be much, but there's 8000 people on this list who will likely do the same.
 
Mike Hakanson

March 2nd, 2000 4:45 PM
 
Linh Nguyen

March 2nd, 2000 4:45 PM
 
Robert Kopp III

March 2nd, 2000 4:46 PM
 
I am also an active Amazon customer and will cease to patronize their site until they back off patents 5,960,411 and 6,029,141. Boo! Hiss!
 
Mohan Embar

March 2nd, 2000 4:46 PM
 
You wanted to be too smart? The more smart you want to be the more you'll lose. Indeed, you have NO chance to win even a case with such a ridiculous patent. From the other hand it's an extraordinary damage to your business. The reason? While others will boycott you till you stop that bad practice, me personally will boycott you FOREVER. No more orders to you guys... I own my personal patent number 0,0,0,1 which claims my rights to hate somebody (isn't it the only language you understand?)
 
Ig Roy

March 2nd, 2000 4:47 PM
 
I totally deplore the use by Amazon and others of this technique. It has obvuously reached the point where greed outweighs common sense and the rights of consumers. If Amazon keeps this up then I will be forced to go elsewhere.

Enough is enough I say!!!
 
Wolf Ragnarson

March 2nd, 2000 4:47 PM
 
Brougham Baker

March 2nd, 2000 4:48 PM
 
Gunther Winkelmans

March 2nd, 2000 4:48 PM
 
Chris Audley

March 2nd, 2000 4:48 PM
 
Jef Pfeiffer

March 2nd, 2000 4:49 PM
 
I am strongly opposed to Amazon using their new
One Click Patent. I belong to Several Writers groups and the thought that a writers book could
be on a website that stoops this low is incorrigible!
 
Ken Renaud

March 2nd, 2000 4:49 PM
 
Amazon didn't invent these commonly used practices nor did they invent the technology to make them. The one word I want to hear when someone mentions Amazon.com is BOYCOTT!

This reminds me of the etoy boycott where the big corporation trys to cleverly screw the little guy.

Amazon is not in the technology business and should stay out of it. The technology the used in Amazons site is used by sites all over the world.

 
Virgil Viall

March 2nd, 2000 4:50 PM
 
Frank J. Knight

March 2nd, 2000 4:50 PM
 
Derek Morr

March 2nd, 2000 4:51 PM
 
I, too, find your attempt to sequester basic Internet functionality for your own exclusive use abhorrent and will no longer use your service.
 
Fergus Reilly PhD

March 2nd, 2000 4:51 PM
 
Why is it that revolutions mostly end up as dictatorships?
 
Marjolein Towler

March 2nd, 2000 4:51 PM
 
Magnus Lassus

March 2nd, 2000 4:51 PM
 
Come on Mr. Bezos. You know very well there isn't one shred of real innovation in what you've done here. Quit poisoning the waters for everyone else trying to do business. This is not going to regain your lost market share. Grow up.
 
Jeff Botari

March 2nd, 2000 4:52 PM
 
PK Murphy

March 2nd, 2000 4:52 PM
 
Jonas Oxgaard

March 2nd, 2000 4:53 PM
 
Patenting and consequently suing to inhibit your competitors is a pathetic way to maintain market share. It is a clear sign of a faltering business model. Perhaps this legal move truly shows Amazon's value as a company: smoke and mirrors.
 
Steve Irwin

March 2nd, 2000 4:54 PM
 
What is the difference between this process and that of buying domain names for the purpose of turning a profit.
This violates the 'spirit' of the web for the almighty dollar. Will we have to mount a boycott to get their attention?
 
Kirk Oakes

March 2nd, 2000 4:54 PM
 
Carl Shapiro

March 2nd, 2000 4:54 PM
 
Ryan O'Boyle

March 2nd, 2000 4:54 PM
 
I have stopped going to Amazon.com after the
boycott call from RMS. I have stopped referring
Amazon.com to friends/family. I have removed
Amazon.com from my bookmark file.
 
Raghavendra Bhat

March 2nd, 2000 4:55 PM
 
What unbelievable gall.
 
Thomas P Schaaf

March 2nd, 2000 4:55 PM
 
I longer tought Amazon.com was THE model to follow for doing business on the web.
Such action no longer inspire respect. I am deeply disappointed.

Francois Lane
MicroSon.com
 
Francois Lane

March 2nd, 2000 4:55 PM
 
I am now a former Amazon Customer. I will become a customer again when this problem is resolved. A company like this must learn that just because something is legal to do, it is not neccessarily the right thing to do. Amazon has crossed the line, they have refused to listen to the public, and they will now suffer the consequences.
 
David Breitigam

March 2nd, 2000 4:56 PM
 
Too bad. Amazon used to be a terrific place to shop. I guess I'll be shopping at www.wordsworth.com until Amazon gives up this patent folly. Perhaps I'll like shopping there better anyway.
 
Charles Durst

March 2nd, 2000 4:56 PM
 
Mr. Jeff Bezos and Amazon Management:

You are making a fundamental mistake that historically has failed to work. Resorting to legal “trickery” will not achieve your intended goal. It never does. You will inevitably end up spending far more on lawyers than you would on true innovation. I urge you to reconsider before it is too late. Your patents will not hold up, and you know it. You may buy some time against your competitors, but the ill will you reap will offset any advantage you hope to gain. As a CTO of a dot.com myself, I know that it can be hard to resist the pressures of lawyers, venture vultures, and other unscrupulous types. Nonetheless, the decisions you make now will define your legacy; make them carefully. Do not believe them: it is not all about the money.
 
Randolph L. Harrison

March 2nd, 2000 4:57 PM
 
conrad g. welling

March 2nd, 2000 4:59 PM
 
I think patents are important to encourage and reward innovation but these Amazon claims undermine the process and seek to exploit the ignorance of those administering the process. Ultimately they may prove a costly waste of time in court but before then the are a dangerous threat to smaller internet companies, which is ofcourse the intention of Amazon. With the real barriers to entry for ecommerce so low (no bricks and mortar investment required) companies like Amazon seek to erect artificial intellectual property barriers. Let's recognize this for what it is, an attempt to block fair competition. The DOJ should be investigating these tactics.
 
Angus Dorbie

March 2nd, 2000 4:59 PM
 
Mr. Bezos,

Before you read this, go check how much I have ordered from Amazon in the last year.
Ok, now that we both know who I am, let me say that I consider this patent, and the attempts at enforcing it, to be shameful. It is bad enough to attempt to obtain a patent on something that is so trivially obvious. To be then granted such a patent indicates serious problems with the patent process, which is, of course, not your (ie, Amazon's) fault.
But to then go ahead and attempt to enforce your 'ownership' of this idea is contemptible.
Please desist. If you (ie, Amazon) do not, I _Will find somewhere else to buy e-books (Barnes and Noble? (shudder)).

Sincerely,
Gary D Stephens
 
Gary Stephens

March 2nd, 2000 5:01 PM
 
Delvin Shrout

March 2nd, 2000 5:01 PM
 
Adam MacBeth

March 2nd, 2000 5:02 PM
 
What will Amazon try to do... come after every web site that has ad banners? In effect all advertising falls into the category of affiliate programs!
 
Michael A. Johnson

March 2nd, 2000 5:03 PM
 
simon

March 2nd, 2000 5:03 PM
 
Marleen Adelman

March 2nd, 2000 5:03 PM
 
Stephanie Springer

March 2nd, 2000 5:06 PM
 
I'm sure that these patents are over-broad. Most (if not all) have prior art. Not only will you loose business over this, but you will also (ultimately) loose the patents.
 
Stephen Samuel

March 2nd, 2000 5:07 PM
 
Christine Bieniek

March 2nd, 2000 5:08 PM
 
I have already avoided doing business with you because of the predatory attitude displayed by your patent filing to the tune of a several hundred dollors. Multiply that number by the number of signatures here and you're talking serious lost income.
 
Thomas J. Culliton

March 2nd, 2000 5:09 PM
 
I've bought from both BN and Amazon, and in my opinion, the service has been quicker and better from Amazon. In light of these restricting actions taken by Amazon, I will no longer be a customer until they make a statement of intentions. These patents appear to me to be overly broad and work against online growth of internet commerce. These patents may help your business grow in the short run, but in the long run, you're losing customers and their trust.
 
Sid Wiesner

March 2nd, 2000 5:09 PM
 
You can write a small "ecommerce" script using a cookie in about 7 lines of code.

Cookies are implemented on nearly every e-commerce site. Your patenting an idea. Taking advantage of a clueless patent office, when all you have the rights too is a copyright.

What if McDonalds had patented "Fast Food."
McDonalds is still the number one fast food restaurant... you will stil end up the number one e-commerce company.

Please Drop The Case... its a bad marketing move.
 
Paul Rodrigues

March 2nd, 2000 5:10 PM
 
As webmaster of LinuxStart.Com, a high traffic search engine for Linux information, I am boycotting Amazon and will encourage my visitors to so as well, until this patent is revoked.
 
Garry Dolley

March 2nd, 2000 5:12 PM
 
The patents granted to Amazon would stand no chance whatsoever in the United Kingdom or Europe. This clearly puts U.S. companies (potentially) at a commericial disadvantage. What is wrong with with the US Patent Office? There is clearly 'no inventive step.' No invention at all in fact, and prior-art everywhere. Does Jeff Bezos want a patent for typing his bootlaces?

The granting of '1 Click' and the 'affiliate technology' patents are an embarrassment to Amazom, and a greater embarrassment for America.
Eddie Gill
Design Consultant to Video Games Industry
Leeds
United Kingdom
 
Eddie Gill

March 2nd, 2000 5:15 PM
 
I have stopped purchasing from Amazon at the urging of Richard Stallman, and I would request others do the same - JB
 
Jack Baruth

March 2nd, 2000 5:15 PM
 
I agree with the letter.
 
Nadean Shavor

March 2nd, 2000 5:16 PM
 
Andrej Marjan

March 2nd, 2000 5:21 PM
 
John Short

March 2nd, 2000 5:21 PM
 
I have emailed amazon previously about my concern over this issue (internet patents).

I have been purchasing from other booksellers while the patents are pursued.



 
Stephen Hancock

March 2nd, 2000 5:24 PM
 
I've boycotted Microsoft for their business practices, and I'll boycott Amazon until they come to their senses. The customer is always right!
 
Schuyler D. Erle

March 2nd, 2000 5:29 PM
 
I buy about $USD2500 on books, CDs, and DVDs and associated stuff every year. Most of my friends and my brother are in the same sort of league, some who buy rare and hard to get stuff in Australia and are (were) active Amazon customers. I'll be encouraging them not to buy stuff through Amazon, and Amazon will not be getting a single cent of my money until they stop this childish patent business.

 
Andrew van der Stock

March 2nd, 2000 5:30 PM
 
The only thing that you'll get out of this is lost sales and a bad reputation. You'll have but a piece of paper to hold in remembrance of the company you once "had". It will only be a short while from now, as is evidenced from these letters to you, that you will cease to be....simple! If this is your hopes for a future....you've just sunk it! I used to run an affiliate site spouting Buy from Amazon, but now I can only say Bye bye Amazon....
 
Brian Cornwell

March 2nd, 2000 5:33 PM
 
I order all my books and CDs from Amazon, and I love one-click, but patenting technology based on cookies? Please!?! You are quickly loosing the respect and support of the geeks who are among your best customers!
 
B. Porter

March 2nd, 2000 5:34 PM
 
David Gifford

March 2nd, 2000 5:35 PM
 
This issue demonstrates the bankruptcy of Amamzon's business model. Now Bezos is grabbing for anything he can; apparently books are not enough to sustain the company. Too bad that a man associated with bookselling seems to have learned so little from the literary arts.
 
Adam Fox

March 2nd, 2000 5:37 PM
 
Peter Sorotokin

March 2nd, 2000 5:38 PM
 
Clearly an abuse of the patent system. Shame on you, Amazon!
 
LY , Poh

March 2nd, 2000 5:38 PM
 
Please come to your senses, Jeff!!
 
Steve Kennedy

March 2nd, 2000 5:38 PM
 
Kasey Johns

March 2nd, 2000 5:39 PM
 
It seems that Amazon.com is trying to satisfy some urge to tell the world that they have developed some innovative technologies and processes and thus are a "technology" company. Which is a joke in this case. It is a shame that such trivial pursuits can be even given the status of "invention" by the US Patent Office.
 
Sanjeev Srivastava

March 2nd, 2000 5:40 PM
 
Fatbrain and Barnes & Noble, here I come
 
Stephen Smith

March 2nd, 2000 5:40 PM
 
My wife and I have enjoyed ordering from Amazon in the past but that will cease. I will never order from Amazon again, regardless of whether or not they drop this frivolous patent. It's acts like these that just make me shake my head in bewilderment... So long, Amazon.
 
Jody Holmes

March 2nd, 2000 5:42 PM
 
I do agree with the letter
 
sudhir kaloth

March 2nd, 2000 5:43 PM
 
Patents such as these hinder the growth of electronic industry, not help it.

I am sad that Amazon, a company I have previously
had great respect for, should walk that road.

I have spent many thousands of dollars on O'Reilly books. I will buy nothing from Amazon
until this patent issue is resolved.
 
Nick Urbanik

March 2nd, 2000 5:43 PM
 
Look up my account. See how much you will give up each year.

 
James

March 2nd, 2000 5:46 PM
 
Timothy B. Brown

March 2nd, 2000 5:46 PM
 
Asa Gage

March 2nd, 2000 5:47 PM
 
I agree with your comments 100%!!
 
mamata

March 2nd, 2000 5:50 PM
 
There is nothing worthy of a patent in "one click ordering" Copyright maybe. Trademark definitely. Amazon, get your act together, focus on making a profit, and doing the best for your customers. I am in boycott mode.
 
Peter Macaulay

March 2nd, 2000 5:50 PM
 
I am in complete agreement with Tim that this
patent covers nothing but an obvious use of
cookies and hence should never have been granted.

I'm a longtime amazon.com customer -- one who
rarely fails to order a couple of books per week.
I really don't want to have to switch to another
online book and CD store, especially when this
action is recommended by RMS -- someone I almost
never agree with -- but if this patent fight
continues and this patent is found to be valid I
feel I won't have any choice but to stop using
amazon.com.
 
Ned Freed

March 2nd, 2000 5:50 PM
 
Michael Ricketts

March 2nd, 2000 5:51 PM
 
I have sent an official protest to my friends in the patent office.
 
John Dvorak

March 2nd, 2000 5:53 PM
 
Jeremy Buchanan

March 2nd, 2000 5:54 PM
 
Eric Fontenot

March 2nd, 2000 5:54 PM
 
Lawrence O'Donnell

March 2nd, 2000 5:55 PM
 
I've been a user of Amazon's services for a long time. I have an Amazon hot drink glass, more bookmarks and notepads than I could use in my lifetime....and will continue to use your services, but I have to agree that this attempt to patent this portion of your excellent service is unreasonable. Why not just register it as a trademark and hang your little "tm" off the end of the service? I also agree that you should take the high ground, withdraw the patent application, and take up O'Reilly on their publicity offer.
 
Dan O. Clark

March 2nd, 2000 5:56 PM
 
The internet was founded to keep communication and information flowing at all times, what amazon is doing prevents that. These patents and snuffing out inovations in e-comerce. This must be stoped.
 
Daniel Randolph

March 2nd, 2000 5:57 PM
 
Ouch ...maybe you should use "www.ubergreedy.com" for your web page, no?
 
Patrick D Moon

March 2nd, 2000 5:57 PM
 
I've been a loyal Amazon customer and supporter for quite a while but that will change immediately unless Amazon turns away from it's recent dark-side activities.
 
Amy Towery

March 2nd, 2000 6:01 PM
 
I have to aggree, patenting something that is already in wide use is wrong. The long term results of everyone trying to do the same thing would be terrible. Until I hear that you will no longer enforce the patent, I or anyone I know will not buy or even visit your site, and I will convince others to stay away.
 
Greg Davis

March 2nd, 2000 6:01 PM
 
If Amazon chooses to enforce this ridiculous patent, I will have no choice but to boycott their site and encourage others to do the same.

 
Tony J. Fader

March 2nd, 2000 6:01 PM
 
I will NOT purchase from amazon.com until they come to their senses. This is a ridiculous use of patent law. There are plenty of other places to buy books, cds and dvds.
 
christopher fury

March 2nd, 2000 6:01 PM
 
As long as Amazon is pursuing this absurd patent claim I will not be buying from them. And I have canceled a potential online commerce participation which I had been considering. I do not want to do business with an entity which would attempt to gain an unfair business advantage through manipulation of the doddering, senile US Patent Office.
 
TK Major

March 2nd, 2000 6:02 PM
 
I have sent Amazon an email and will ordering from bn from now on.
 
Michael Wallace

March 2nd, 2000 6:02 PM
 
Hugh Blemings

March 2nd, 2000 6:03 PM
 
Kelly Brown

March 2nd, 2000 6:03 PM
 
It is a shame that the patent system and the courts have become instruments that those with power and money can leverage to maintain their interests and thwart competition. I have boycotted Amazon since first hearing about this issue. During Christmas, I purchased mostly books as gifts. Had it not been for the boycott, Amazon would have gotten my business. Because of their unacceptable practices, they didn't. And until they change course, they won't.
 
Peter Boerboom

March 2nd, 2000 6:03 PM
 
If Amazon chooses to enforce this ridiculous patent, I will have no choice but to boycott their site and encourage others to do the same.

 
Tony J. Fader

March 2nd, 2000 6:04 PM
 
Pat Slevin

March 2nd, 2000 6:05 PM
 
Charles Wilson

March 2nd, 2000 6:07 PM
 
I'm clicked off!
 
Drew Olewnick

March 2nd, 2000 6:08 PM
 
If anyone wants to raise more protests, I have reserved the name BanAmazon.com and would love to give administrative privaleges to the cause.

Amazon must suffer a consumer loss for violoting netiquette like this.
 
Paul Berry

March 2nd, 2000 6:09 PM
 
Christopher A. Romp

March 2nd, 2000 6:10 PM
 
There are a number of (relatively hard to find) books I currently want which I had been planning to buy from Amazon. I will not now be using them until they drop their current software patenting policy.
 
James Hollingshead

March 2nd, 2000 6:10 PM
 
I have joined the Amazon boycott.
 
Bryan Larsen

March 2nd, 2000 6:13 PM
 
Amen to what Tim said - Short sighted is the key thing here, and stalling and even stopping innovation because of patents, already visible in so many arenas, fields, and avenues, will surely happen to the Web if Amazon's tactics continue, or are propogated by other "big eBiz" corporations.
 
Mark Prince

March 2nd, 2000 6:13 PM
 
You lost my business. Get with the program!
 
Corinne Sutter-Brown

March 2nd, 2000 6:15 PM
 

This type of defensive posturing will only hurt the online community, but if you feel you must take this action, then release the patent to the world for free use.

~Sean
 
Sean

March 2nd, 2000 6:15 PM
 
Senthil Rajamanickam

March 2nd, 2000 6:17 PM
 
Sarah Huffman

March 2nd, 2000 6:18 PM
 
The US Patent and Trademark office should never have granted a patent to Amazon.com for such an obvious idea as using a cookie to track a customer. Furthermore, Amazon.com should never have filed the application. It's time for consumers to vote for fair and free competition and refuse to support those vendors who won't compete on the basis of value and customer service. Amazon.com has lost my business at this point.
 
Andrew Merkle

March 2nd, 2000 6:19 PM
 
Not making enough money selling books? You will be making even less with greedy lawyers and unprofessional tactics like that. When do we get to prosecute the lawyers and plaintiffs for wasting taxpayer money by clogging up the court system?

Money talks - economic boycott.

Thank you Tim O'Reilly.
 
Joe Hoffman

March 2nd, 2000 6:20 PM
 
As a long standing Amazon customer, I find Amazon's patent decisions regretable and will be seriously looking at moving my business to one of it's rivals - most probably the "victim" of the one-click patent, Barnes and Noble.
 
Tim Makinson

March 2nd, 2000 6:20 PM
 
I'm a long-time Amazon customer AND a long-time Amazon Associate. I will cease buying from Amazon and close my online Associates bookstore unless the company disavows these absurd patents.
 
Dave Kalman

March 2nd, 2000 6:21 PM
 
This is the type of behavior that falls under the heading of "Killing the Golden Goose"! More and more the very things that make the Internet what it is, is being ruined by just these type of cynical, self-serving and basically, in this case, illegitimate power grabs.

Personally, I have purchased from Amazon in the past and have had a very good experience doing so. However, in light of this I will seek my books at Barnes and Noble or Borders first -- before I steer my business to Amazon!
 
Sylvia Barnes

March 2nd, 2000 6:21 PM
 
Richard Turenne

March 2nd, 2000 6:21 PM
 
I will not buy any new books from Amazon until
Amazon stops stealing ...
 
Qinghe Sun

March 2nd, 2000 6:22 PM
 
Goodbye Amazon.
 
Tracy Williams

March 2nd, 2000 6:25 PM
 
Sara Adrienne Elder

March 2nd, 2000 6:26 PM
 
The anarchy of the web is directly responsible for its greatest strengths. Large corporations and their proprietary bullying will break the back of the web, and ruin what could have been one of the greatest social and intellectual revolutions in the history of mankind.

I'll be buying my books offline.
 
Darren Abrecht

March 2nd, 2000 6:28 PM
 
Ross Brattain

March 2nd, 2000 6:29 PM
 
Ben calvert

March 2nd, 2000 6:31 PM
 
wuzzz a customer...
 
ivan lim

March 2nd, 2000 6:31 PM
 
Dear Mr Bozos,
Sorry, but no more Amazon business from me, till you stop you stupid patenting, that too of basic things.
Why dont you go ahead and also patent whole of E-Commerse ??? That way you will be the only one who can sell "anything" on the web.
have fun, and some more loss..
Ciao.
 
Rohit

March 2nd, 2000 6:33 PM
 
As a person who has spend hundreds of dollars on Amazon.com, I am appalled at this behavior. If Amazon.com continues on this track, I will shop with my feet and move on to another site.
 
Luqman Mahmud

March 2nd, 2000 6:33 PM
 
I've been boycotting Amazon for several weeks, purchasing from Barnes & Noble whenever possible.
 
Mark Block

March 2nd, 2000 6:35 PM
 
Rafael Rodriguez Aquino

March 2nd, 2000 6:36 PM
 
Rod Cardwell

March 2nd, 2000 6:38 PM
 
David Filiatrault

March 2nd, 2000 6:38 PM
 
Alexandra Mysakova

March 2nd, 2000 6:38 PM
 
Think! Think! Think!
 
Li-fan Chen

March 2nd, 2000 6:40 PM
 
Goodbye Amazon; Hello Barnes and Nobel!
 
Sean D'Esposito

March 2nd, 2000 6:40 PM
 
Andreas Knab

March 2nd, 2000 6:40 PM
 
Last Friday, I decided to finally buy a digital camera. I went to Amazon by reflex and ordered a thousand-dollar camera. After significant reflection, I cancelled my order and opted for an Amazon competetor.
 
Erik Robson

March 2nd, 2000 6:42 PM
 
a former Amazon.com customer.
 
proclus realm

March 2nd, 2000 6:42 PM
 
Ridiculous
 
Joe Beltran

March 2nd, 2000 6:42 PM
 
Patent or not, our voice will be heard. I will never order from Amazon again.
 
Scott E. Jorgensen

March 2nd, 2000 6:42 PM
 
Amazon just fell in love with B Gate$
= having two people piss you off equally saves
energy.
ps. this patent bull will help your competitors.
Think etoys or are you brain dead?
 
M Parkstrom

March 2nd, 2000 6:42 PM
 
The one click patent is totally absurd. What's
"new" with that? Nothing.
I will make sure that I won't buy anything
at amazon or any of their partners as long
as amazon is insisting on enforcing royalties
for that patent.
Regards,
Joerg Kaduk
 
Joerg Kaduk

March 2nd, 2000 6:44 PM
 
Hey Jeff, how about a patent on the english language. Oh and then there's the obvious follow-up patent on communication through spoken word. No better still, something you're company knows a great deal about - the art of not turning a profit! You seem to be pretty good at losing money. Why not patent that? And guess what? You're going to get even better at that, since I'm sure that many people will NOT buy from Amazon.com! In fact here are a few alternatives....

http://www.chapters.ca/ (great books at the low CDN exchange rate)
http://www.indigo.ca/ (more CDN exchange rate value)

Oh, and then there are your U.S. counterparts, B&N and the rest. Plus all those small stores that would, most likely, love to pick up your lost customers.

Stupid moves Jeff - make a smart one!
 
Karl Sanderson

March 2nd, 2000 6:44 PM
 
Bad idea, amazon, I've already purchased about 5 items on other sites due to this decision.
 
In Deego

March 2nd, 2000 6:46 PM
 
I will no longer buy from amazon.com and I will also strongly recommend Barnes and Noble to the 1000+ computer users frequently seek my advice through my work as a consultant and ISP owner. In fact, I believe that we will give bn.com a FREE link on our front page.

WAKE UP AMAZON!

 
Tim Barkley

March 2nd, 2000 6:48 PM
 
I've bought thousands of dollars worth of books from Amazon in the past. My business now goes elsewhere.
 
Andrew Maizels

March 2nd, 2000 6:49 PM
 
Saikat DebRoy

March 2nd, 2000 6:52 PM
 
Please stop the bar on innovation! The Internet is an open medium and such attempts at patenting obvious technologies and techniques will only serve to limit the growth of Internet applications and e-commerce sites. I'm an Amazon.com customer myself and love your site, but this latest round of patents frowns on the usual Amazon.com way of embracing open standards and Internet techniques.
 
Dave Notik

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 PM
 
Tim, your letter is excellent. I fully agree with your position and I support the boycott of Amazon.

I _was_ Amazon's customer. Since this time I will not buy anything more from Amazon regardless their further behavior.

Best regards,
Igor.
 
Igor Komir

March 2nd, 2000 6:53 PM
 
Jeff,

Your use of the patent system is short-sighted.
It will stifle the growth of e-commerce, but
only for so long, until someone inevitably
finds a way around it.
Wouldn't you rather have 10% of a 1 trillion
dollar industry than 50% of a 1 billion
dollar industry?
I regret to say that while you pursue this
ill-advised path, I will not patronise
Amazon.com.
 
Ken Yap

March 2nd, 2000 6:54 PM
 
I find this "patent" to be a chilling threat to common sense, and will no longer use Amazon if they attempt to attempt to enforce this "patent" against other sites. Just because something is out in the public domain, and you attempt to claim it because you thought of it first, doesn't make it right.
"Leadership is doing the right thing when no one is looking".
 
Dan Boughton

March 2nd, 2000 6:55 PM
 
Richard

March 2nd, 2000 6:58 PM
 
In order to retain rights to a patent, one must defend the patent against all who dare abuse it, or the patent becomes null and void (so I am told). So ... I make issue that Amazon must file suit against Network Solutions for use of their one-click affiliate program.

Of course, then Network Solutions could drop all of Amazons IP addresses in protest.

If Amazon doesn't like that alternative, then the patent becomes null and void.
 
Jon M Bell

March 2nd, 2000 6:58 PM
 
A long time customer, I do not care to deal with a company that stifles competition using legal trickery and dubiously granted patents. Goodbye, Amazon.
 
Jared Faulkner

March 2nd, 2000 6:59 PM
 
Kirk Barrett

March 2nd, 2000 7:00 PM
 
You should note how repugnant these weak patents are to a large group of users -not just the Open Source community but most of the "internet elite" technologicaly savvy users. This group comprises a large portion of your market and influences an even larger group.

I do not believe it is in your business interest to enforce these patents.
 
Trevor Crosse

March 2nd, 2000 7:01 PM
 
Have you heard of Compton's New Media? You might want to look the case up, Mr. Bezos. They tried to patent certain concepts in multi-media similar to the way you are trying to patent concepts in E-commerce.
 
Paul W. Shuster

March 2nd, 2000 7:01 PM
 
Lance Tost

March 2nd, 2000 7:03 PM
 
Alan Hampson

March 2nd, 2000 7:06 PM
 
I have always lived by the theory that if you do a job well, the client will tell a friend. Do a job poorly and the client will tell 10 friends. I suspect the word is getting around quickly about the arrogance of Amazon.Com. This move is going to haunt you and if not changed, eventually bury you.
 
Gary Letchford

March 2nd, 2000 7:06 PM
 
James Grace

March 2nd, 2000 7:06 PM
 
Julio Aguilar

March 2nd, 2000 7:06 PM
 
Karen Tost

March 2nd, 2000 7:07 PM
 
How can anyone be permitted to patent internet standards?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
 
Jason Harris

March 2nd, 2000 7:09 PM
 
Hi Jeff...

I suppose you would feel not good if some one patented the WWW and that you have to pay every time someone downloads a page from your site. Well your patents do something very similar ... thay are not conducive for growth.

I am a "Veteran" Amazon customer and love shopping at your site. It will just be great if you don't enforce those patents, then as customers we will have such great service as yours from other vendors too.

thanking in anticipation, Prakash
 
Prakash Manglanathan

March 2nd, 2000 7:09 PM
 
I knew I should have patented the start button.
Doh!
 
Wendell Sandwith

March 2nd, 2000 7:09 PM
 
I agree with O'Reilly's stand on Amazon's patent
issue and request that Amazon stop their lawsuit.
I have been an Amazon customer in the past but
will join the boycott to not purchase any Amazon
products.

Sincerely,

M. Wong

 
Mona Wong

March 2nd, 2000 7:11 PM
 
Aaron Lehmann

March 2nd, 2000 7:12 PM
 
Peter Fletcher

March 2nd, 2000 7:13 PM
 
Gary Imhoff

March 2nd, 2000 7:15 PM
 
Forget B&N! Shop Powell's!
 
Alison Kent

March 2nd, 2000 7:15 PM
 
What an insane idea!
 
George Duggan

March 2nd, 2000 7:16 PM
 
Your patent may be legal, but it is immoral.
 
Edward Hoo

March 2nd, 2000 7:16 PM
 
Bill Simpson-Young

March 2nd, 2000 7:16 PM
 
All the more reason to shop at your friendly neighborhood local independent bookstore!
 
Allan Hollander

March 2nd, 2000 7:18 PM
 
I had admired the clean-cut image of Amazon as the little guy making it big. Now it seems you are trying to morph into just another money-grubbing bad neighbor. Plz explain your actions, perhaps their is a reasonable explanation.
 
Joseph Brooks

March 2nd, 2000 7:19 PM
 
Vassil Peytchev

March 2nd, 2000 7:21 PM
 
Dorothea Salo

March 2nd, 2000 7:23 PM
 
Way to go Tim!

 
Eric Garneau

March 2nd, 2000 7:24 PM
 
Just say no.
 
Michael Davis

March 2nd, 2000 7:25 PM
 
I will not do any business with Amazon.com until this patent issue is resolved. Patents like the 2 in question serve only to stiffle creativity. These concepts existed long before Amazon filed a patent for them. The U.S. patent office should not have issued the patent in the first place!
 
Peter Traeg

March 2nd, 2000 7:26 PM
 
Hank Brain

March 2nd, 2000 7:26 PM
 
When in the course of human events, It becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, The seperate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of Natures God entitle them to the seperation...
We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, That they are endowed by their creator with certain unalieable rights, That among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness...
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed!

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance!
 
James Fuller

March 2nd, 2000 7:26 PM
 
Brian Suetta

March 2nd, 2000 7:28 PM
 
Kristin Lewis

March 2nd, 2000 7:29 PM
 
keep it sane keep it simple, thanks
 
Paul Smith

March 2nd, 2000 7:29 PM
 
Down with the System!
 
Shawn Allen

March 2nd, 2000 7:30 PM
 
David Naffziger

March 2nd, 2000 7:30 PM
 
I will purchase my O'reilly books at Barnes and Nobel until I hear better news...
 
Bill Burge

March 2nd, 2000 7:32 PM
 
Daniel Downey, MD FACS

March 2nd, 2000 7:32 PM
 
To Mr.Bezos
From your die-hard fan

I have been die-hard fan of your service. It is not because of your One stop shopping thing, nor of your affiliate program, but because of your excellent service for individual customers.

Please stop your attenpt to own EC before all of your customers will go away.

Kiyoto Miyazaki
 
Kiyoto Miyazaki

March 2nd, 2000 7:35 PM
 
David Lindrum

March 2nd, 2000 7:37 PM
 
I will encourage everyone I know not to buy anything from Amazon.com
 
Clint Gilbert

March 2nd, 2000 7:37 PM
 

This patent is a gross display of greed and hunger for control of an industry. There is fierce competition and severe abuse of the system.
 
C. James Radcliff

March 2nd, 2000 7:40 PM
 
Tim Dean

March 2nd, 2000 7:41 PM
 
I have purchased from Amazon in the past, and, will again when they change their ways.
 
Brian A. Doherty

March 2nd, 2000 7:47 PM
 
Jacqui McDonald

March 2nd, 2000 7:50 PM
 
Dana Carson

March 2nd, 2000 7:51 PM
 
Cory Doctorow

March 2nd, 2000 7:53 PM
 
Hmmm...and I thought that Bezos was a sharp business man...now, I see how first impressions can be wrong! What an idiot!!!
 
Jim Sutton

March 2nd, 2000 7:54 PM
 
Nate Lee

March 2nd, 2000 7:54 PM
 
Boniface Lau

March 2nd, 2000 7:57 PM
 
We here at Internetshows.com, Inc. believe clearly that the utilization of patent pending technology is a risk. Those who do so face harsh consequences when the applicant is granted the applied-for patent.

We ourselves utilize a patented font matrix that informs our Internetshows viewers of the particular page of the show they are viewing.

But that design patent is clearly much different than the benefits to the entire industry which Amazon patents have and can continue to provide e-commerce progress.

For Amazon to enforce their patents is their right but at what cost to themselves and the industry? Maybe Amazon should consider the positive benefits of shared technology which have put PC computers and Microsoft software far ahead of Apple.

This has been the fate of Apple despite the fact that their Macs are far better and faster that PCs.

J.L. Allyn, President
Internetshows.com, Inc.
1801 Avenue of the Stars, 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067 1(888)797-4697
http://www.internetshows.com, jlallyn@internetshows.com

 
J.L. Allyn

March 2nd, 2000 7:59 PM
 
C'mon Jeff; These frivilous patents are a black eye to the internet community which is the source of all of your good fortune. Do you actually beleive the "techniques" employed by your developers just miraculously came to them after they signed on with Amazon? Did the evoloution of technology and standard programming practices have no influence on them? It is equivalent to being granted a patent on "taking a whiz" and then suing every living sole who uses your technique without permission. Your company's greed is something I hope the public takes note of.
 
Robert Candelmo

March 2nd, 2000 7:59 PM
 
What's next, a patent for black text on a white background?
 
Danny Adkins

March 2nd, 2000 8:00 PM
 
I have been a loyal Amazon.com customer. In fact I have never ordered a book from any other on line bookseller. The only way that I will remain a Amazon.com customer is if Amazon dedicates patent 6,029,141 and the other unfortunate patents to the public domain.
 
Jim Tinkler

March 2nd, 2000 8:02 PM
 
I received a very thoughtful gift at Christmas time from Amazon.com for being a "valued customer." I will not purchase any further merchandise from Amazon.com until you drop your frivolous and unjust lawsuits regarding One-Click Ordering and Affiliate Programs. I will spend my online dollars instead at Barnes & Noble and other direct competitors. I will urge my friends and coworkers to do the same.
 
Timothy J. Wilmering

March 2nd, 2000 8:02 PM
 
Paul Swift

March 2nd, 2000 8:02 PM
 
Do the right thing, Jeff.
 
Shaun Grannis

March 2nd, 2000 8:04 PM
 
Maybe Ralph has it right.www.amazon.sucks
 
Bruce Pedigo

March 2nd, 2000 8:05 PM
 
Sue Smith

March 2nd, 2000 8:10 PM
 
Grace Burkins

March 2nd, 2000 8:13 PM
 
Tim,
Your recent patent takes advantage of a common technology which many companies now use. Your patent is a greedy attempt to control something which isn't totally your's. You are hurting your good name by this threat to commerce. John lundgren
 
john lundgren

March 2nd, 2000 8:14 PM
 
Your actions regarding other companies using affiliate program technology and one-click ordering is outrageous. I hope it backfires on you. I for one will boycott all amazon sites. I plan to ask friends, families, and associates to do the same. I plan to post to all forums where I am a member. I will ask others to do the same.

You haven't made it past out of the red yet. So now you must attempt to cripple your opponents with ruthless actions that could destroy the very industry of which you are a part? Remember this truth: what you sow, you shall reap.

 
Christine Williams

March 2nd, 2000 8:16 PM
 
I switched my site affiliation from Amazon to another online bookseller who is not trying to abuse the PTO process to gain petents to obvious methods.
 
Yiorgos Theodoropoulos

March 2nd, 2000 8:21 PM
 
Amazon is clearly the best e-commerce site on the web today. They built a solid reputation on excellent customer service and delivery. I'm often shocked at how good they are.

That said, I've placed my last order with them. One of the beautiful things about commerce on the web is that there is always another outlet. I'll wade through poor customer service and the like, but the next Amazon is out there.

Bezos was Time Man of the Year. He's starting to look like he has the desire to be the next big technology monopolist. Don't get too big a head Jeff. The web gave you the opportunity to become what you are. It can take it away too.

John

And watch out Doubleclick....you are next.
 
John Rodney

March 2nd, 2000 8:22 PM
 
Jeff Cech

March 2nd, 2000 8:22 PM
 
Just one more reason to shop online, but make purchases in person. When I find O'Reilly's
HTML bookshelve cd, if/when it comes out. I'll
drive over to Barnes and Noble.
 
Wenzel, G. L.

March 2nd, 2000 8:23 PM
 
Rosemary Lee

March 2nd, 2000 8:25 PM
 
Jeff Russell

March 2nd, 2000 8:27 PM
 
An inappropriate use of the patent system.
 
Justin Yung

March 2nd, 2000 8:28 PM
 
Dave Bachmann

March 2nd, 2000 8:28 PM
 
What's your well water taste like these days?
 
Nicolas Baltazar

March 2nd, 2000 8:32 PM
 
Duh!
 
Mike Reynolds

March 2nd, 2000 8:35 PM
 
Matthew Bader

March 2nd, 2000 8:37 PM
 
Eric E. Fronheiser

March 2nd, 2000 8:41 PM
 
I will buy products from others that don't use
lawyers to enforce bogus patents. Of course, your
spam had already convinced me you were not
a company I wanted to do business with...
 
Bill Moseley

March 2nd, 2000 8:42 PM
 
I am a very typical and to this point loyal Amazon customer. I think many of us understand your ambivalence on this issue, Jeff.

I encourage you to use some of your billions to establish a state of the art INTERNET INSTITUTE OF LAW FOUNDATION that could study and create revolutionary legal concepts particular to internet uniqueness. Sort of like what needs to be done with legal concepts surrounding the human genome, cloning, splicing, etc.

Privacy, encryption, patents, interstate and international cooperation, etc.

It would be a public relations COUP.

This of course would have to be separate from Amazons own law department.
 
Dave Trippel

March 2nd, 2000 8:42 PM
 
I'm currently a customer, but fast becoming a disillusioned one. Does size have to come with an absense of generousity.?
 
Phil Fluet

March 2nd, 2000 8:43 PM
 
I would like to warn Amazon that we will be challenging the patent in Federal court.
As of Jun. 1996, we held a provisional patent on affiliate programs 60/053,178
We have been selling our product, iCash since Jun. 1996, and were the first company known to sell such software. We also have held a copyright on our code since Jul.1997, so we have alot of proof of its existance and creation dates. If anything, we have the legal rights to this. Second, this type of technology has been in use since 1994 in the adult internet industry, so there is no way that amazon can claim they invented it. The adult industry is currently ralleying to file a class action suit against amazon.!

Chris Ihlenfeld
Digital Concepts
 
Chris Ihlenfeld

March 2nd, 2000 8:44 PM
 
Howard Liu

March 2nd, 2000 8:45 PM
 
Brian Kelly

March 2nd, 2000 8:45 PM
 
I'm going to patent a business technique that helps secure trust among individuals. I'm calling it, The Handshake(TM). After that, I'm going to patent an important dental hygiene methodology that I'm calling Brushing My Teeth(TM).
 
Ron Little

March 2nd, 2000 8:46 PM
 
Amazon you morons go away
 
Bill Gates

March 2nd, 2000 8:46 PM
 
I guess I can only sum up my response in 3 words:
Lawyers Get Richer!!!

(God I hope Amazon doesn't win this one, now that would be a very sad day, to say the least!)
 
James Hooper

March 2nd, 2000 8:47 PM
 
It is very interesting how amazon can patent something they didnt invent. Affiliate and click programs have been around on the net since 1993, well before amazon showed up.
I think its a cheap deceatful way of trying to gain the advantage on their competitors...reminds me of the dirty grungy theif named bill gates...guess they know each other!
 
Sue Amazon

March 2nd, 2000 8:47 PM
 
I run a small ISP and have links to many popular sites on my front page (formerly including Amazon.com) Bye Bye Amazon
 
Eric Joe

March 2nd, 2000 8:48 PM
 
As a Linux user and devotee of Open Source (though I have no problem with commercial software and buy it if needed) your patent on a technology that is not even an Amazon innovation is unacceptable. The Internet was born free and any attempt by anyone to hinder something as basic as ease of navigation is intolerable to me. Amazon has been removed from my browser lists. You now join Proctor & Gamble, Time (AOL business practices suck), Gillette and others on my boycott list. Some companies I've boycotted for decades. Are you one?
 
Kevin Mangeri

March 2nd, 2000 8:49 PM
 
Go ahead - bite the hand that feeds you.
The food ceases.....now.
 
Tony Herman

March 2nd, 2000 8:49 PM
 
This makes me not like Jeff Bezos and Amazon. This guy is no hero, just another hope to be monopolist. Sad to say, in this fight, I think big money greed will win out again.
 
James Taylor

March 2nd, 2000 8:49 PM
 
As a Linux user and devotee of Open Source (though I have no problem with commercial software and buy it if needed) your patent on a technology that is not even an Amazon innovation is unacceptable. The Internet was born free and any attempt by anyone to hinder something as basic as ease of navigation is intolerable to me. Amazon has been removed from my browser lists. You now join Proctor & Gamble, Time (AOL business practices suck), Gillette and others on my boycott list. Some companies I've boycotted for decades. Will you be one?
 
Kevin Mangeri

March 2nd, 2000 8:51 PM
 
Please do not purchase from companies associated with Walker Digital (Priceline.com) and Amazon.com. In addition, I ask all businesses currently in business partnerships with these companies to cease. Both companies are taking actions that the creators of the patent system were afraid of--hoarding patents on simple, non-creative processes. The current focus--the software/business processes which the average database/Web developer can easily create. Our Internet itself is a much more patentable and innovative system, which the original creators knew would not grow to the popularity it has today if they had patented it. Patents on simple, basic processes such as those being patented by these companies will corrupt the foundation of our Internet. A reverse auction? A reverse-reverse-inverse auction? Checking-out with a single click, duh. Let's call it 1-Click and patent it. Affiliate programs, duh. I seriously question the management of these corporations as these patents are so obvious that they can only hurt the reputation of the companies that applied for them--not improve their revenues. They were much better off using intelligent marketing then illegitimate patent protection. If these companies were considered over-valued with these patents in place--imagine how over-valued they are now--no more patents and questionable management. Even if these illegitimate patents mistakenly stand up in the courtroom, the ultimate success or failure of the patent is in its ability to earn profits for the company. Well, these companies will see no additional revenue from the pockets of this consumer/Web developer while they engage in such laughable activities. In the end, the Web is won by the power of consumer choice. Amazon.com can try to patent the 1-Click check-out, but bn.com and fatbrain.com are only 1-Click away in my browser. So I will 1-Click to these sites to spend my money--not only on a book, but for the future and integrity of our Internet.
 
Paul D. Millington

March 2nd, 2000 8:52 PM
 
This is a really prime example of dot-com madness. How absurd to patent something this common.
 
DeAnne DeWitt-Rowton

March 2nd, 2000 8:54 PM
 
I've been shopping with Amazon since its earliest days. I dare say I will not spend another dime of money with them until or unless they change their ridiculous patent policies. Being that I and my employees have purchased a great deal of expensive technical works via Amazon in the past, I'm guessing that the loss of our business will be greatly appreciated by Borders and FatBrain.

Todd South, CEO
NevadaPages Internet Services
 
Todd South

March 2nd, 2000 8:54 PM
 
I have been a Barnes & Noble customer for long and I still remain so. Because your service is lousy. Now I have one more reason not to buy from you.
 
Nathan Arun

March 2nd, 2000 8:56 PM
 

Listen to what people want: can the patents. Or gamble on winning the ensuing PR war.
 
Michael Hirota

March 2nd, 2000 8:56 PM
 
In light of patent 5,960,411, I have decreed that all books and/or documentation purchased from Amazon.com will be non-expensable back to the company. Purchases will only be made through non-inane patent carrying companies.
 
Peter J. Rzeminski II

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 PM
 
THOUGH love repine, and reason chafe,
There came a voice without reply,—
"'Tis man's perdition to be safe,
When for the truth he ought to die."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Albert Liu

March 2nd, 2000 9:00 PM
 
I am still a loyal Amazon customer. :-(....
 
Michael Wang

March 2nd, 2000 9:02 PM
 
The good thing about Amazon Com's greed, and the greed of other companies seeking patents, is that their gull will be their downfall. What we're experiencing here is the attempted fencing off of the Net's open range. The difference is our cattle are people and the overall improvement of everyone's lifestyle. We can live without Amazon Com, but not with these patents.
 
Monty Keeling

March 2nd, 2000 9:04 PM
 
I've enjoyed using Amazon in the past; it's my favorite place to look for books. But I haven't purchased anything there since I heard about the 1-Click patent, and I will continue to purchase elsewhere until Amazon changes its strategy.
 
Erin Jensen

March 2nd, 2000 9:06 PM
 
I don't like your patent approach. I don't even like your online ordering approach. The latter may make me a minority but I haven't ordered from you in over two years just because you track me. I don't mind a few extra keystrokes to place an order and I don't think you are capable of divining a single clue as to what my range of interests are at any point in time. I strongly object to such treatment and you lose my business. I don't care about "one click" ordering and it is certainly not patentable.
 
Bob Perdriau

March 2nd, 2000 9:07 PM
 
Scott Polohonki

March 2nd, 2000 9:08 PM
 
I have personally never ordered anything from Amazon.com, but I have noticed some titles which are hard to come by in my town and have given some thought as to ordering from Amazon. But in all consciousness I now find I am disgusted by the way Amazon is trying to corner the market on the one click ordering, when I know they are not the first ones to have used it. In this way I feel the people of Amazon are being selfish and petty....and they need to grow up.
 
Christina Night

March 2nd, 2000 9:08 PM
 
Michael Lindner

March 2nd, 2000 9:09 PM
 
Early on I was a devoted Amazon customer. Amazon seemed to be the company everyone looked to as they got there early on and faught to make it. Many people in the tech community supported them from very early on. Since the one-click fiasco started I have avoided making any purchases through Amazon, and will continue to do this until they give up this rediculous attempt to patent ideas that clearly should not be patented.
 
David Royer

March 2nd, 2000 9:12 PM
 
J. D. Bradshaw, zoology grad. st

March 2nd, 2000 9:13 PM
 
Daniel Dulitz

March 2nd, 2000 9:13 PM
 
Time to stop Amazon's short sighted greed in this matter.
 
Matthew Johnson

March 2nd, 2000 9:14 PM
 
'Silly thought, to patent longstanding past practice ... the US Patent Office should get an Internet connection....
 
Ken Watson

March 2nd, 2000 9:14 PM
 
I have no words vile enough to describe this.
 
Rachel Miller

March 2nd, 2000 9:14 PM
 
I really, really, really like the utility and scope of Amazon's site. However, It is easy enough for me to stop purchasing there due to this nonsense. Understand, Amazon?
 
Stephen P. Burgess

March 2nd, 2000 9:15 PM
 
As a new distributor of Amazon, I am watching this to determine if I will continue my association with the company.
 
Stephen Collins

March 2nd, 2000 9:16 PM
 
The actions you are taking imperil the net's economy while it is still in a developmental state
 
Bill Larson

March 2nd, 2000 9:19 PM
 
Dean Mills

March 2nd, 2000 9:24 PM
 
Why is the patent office so easy?
 
William Meigs

March 2nd, 2000 9:25 PM
 
Free the world, and stop patenting what should rightfuly be free. If this goes on then people like amazon.com will patent, holding the steering wheel, then while driving a car and everyone must pay royalty to them.
 
Anushankar

March 2nd, 2000 9:32 PM
 
The real culprit here is the U.S. Patent Office.
 
Carl Mueller

March 2nd, 2000 9:36 PM
 
Joe Rossi

March 2nd, 2000 9:38 PM
 
I will no longer buy books from Amazon.com.

 
Paul J. Chambers

March 2nd, 2000 9:39 PM
 
Amanda Lawson

March 2nd, 2000 9:39 PM
 
Justin A. Longworth

March 2nd, 2000 9:46 PM
 
This patent was awarded out of ignorance. The PTO needs to be fixed!
 
Peter Greene

March 2nd, 2000 9:47 PM
 
John Owen

March 2nd, 2000 9:47 PM
 
Mari Knoblauch

March 2nd, 2000 9:50 PM
 
I'm buying my books anywhere except Amazon. Maybe even my local bookstore!!
 
Donna Jones - webdesigner

March 2nd, 2000 9:54 PM
 
Cease and desist.
'Til then we'll resist.
 
Desiree Thomas

March 2nd, 2000 9:56 PM
 
I was too late to cancel an order I made today :-) Oh well, I'll just consider that my last one with Amazon, and I emailed them of the fact. What a shame, I thought the service was good. Oh well, their loss. At todays count, over 8000 potential customers lost. Amazon, wake up! You have only yourselves to blame.
 
B. Sheehan

March 2nd, 2000 9:57 PM
 
Frederick Czajka

March 2nd, 2000 9:57 PM
 
Rhoda Newman

March 2nd, 2000 9:58 PM
 
I will gladly click multiple times in order to help preserve the freedom that is the Internet and the WWW. Neither myself, nor my family members, shall be visiting Amazon.com unless and until this silly Microsoftian patent business is eradicated. Spend your time and energy and money doing what you do, selling books and having lots of info on books, rather than attempting to patent a basic ingredient of the WWW.
 
Anthony M. Carson

March 2nd, 2000 9:59 PM
 
Ben Bleything

March 2nd, 2000 10:00 PM
 
Every one of you folks who have posted comments have shopped at amazon.com at one point or another. If I read enough of the comments, I get the general feeling people have had about enough and have decided not to shop there anymore. That's fine but did anyone know that you just can't leave amazon.com? In fact, try writing customer service about how to leave their one-click. You'll get a polite canned message back that tells you how to disable their one-click (oops - that's one-click tm). But write back again telling that you didn't want to diable it but actually wanted them to remove and destroy your information and they'll tell you even more politely where to go. Yes, folks. Amazon.com also wants to keep all of your vital information and won't give up your credit number! How else could they claim to the analysts that they have a staggering 16 million customers? Amazon motel - customers go in but they don't come out! Wait until the privacy advocates get ahold of this one (any of you out there?) - can you imagine not being able to cancel your account at a department store or even a bank? Heads would roll. Go ahead. Try it. Write them and ask them to cancel and delete your one-click information. The one place the WTO protesters SHOULD have hit in Seattle was amazon. They have permanently lost my business. They will also be left holding the proverbial bag when the next big thing comes along and obsoletes their technology AND they've lost half their pissed-off former customers.
 
R. Lee

March 2nd, 2000 10:03 PM
 
While I am stopping short of a boycott right now, I have suspended purchases from Amazon until I get a better sense of how you folks are going to jump on this issue. I don't like the way you are going right now-the way of Microsoft and proprietary "standards" which stifle the market. I thought better of your judgement-prove me right.

 
Thomas A. Amoroso, MD

March 2nd, 2000 10:07 PM
 
Jennifer Rubis

March 2nd, 2000 10:08 PM
 
This a very disappointing action on the part of Amazon. Just remember: Amazon is not the only on-line bookstore. Many of us will go through the extra effort to enter in our purchasing information to avoid doing business with an organization that is unreasonable.
 
Lori Murray

March 2nd, 2000 10:11 PM
 
As one who appreciates the awesome power of the Internet, and as a long-time investor in the business of Amazon.com, I oppose the 'ownership' by any entity of all common and obvious solutions to a problem. What's next, the patenting of walking?
 
David E. Cullen-Vidal

March 2nd, 2000 10:12 PM
 
I never have ordered much from Amazon, but I know now, I'll be taking what business I do transact on-line elsewhere. Single-click, huh? Maybe Apple should come after Amazon, after all, Macs have had single click work for years before 97.
 
Wendell L. Peninger

March 2nd, 2000 10:13 PM
 
Brian Warn

March 2nd, 2000 10:13 PM
 
Patenting such obvious technology that anyone with an average knowledge of web programming can develop is downright ridiculous. On top of that, you file a suit against B&N? God, you really do suck, Amazon. You've gone from being pioneers to being just a place full of lawyers.

For your atrocious deeds, I shall *never* order ANYTHING from your store, even if it costs less. Take THAT!

 
Madhu Menon

March 2nd, 2000 10:15 PM
 
Jeff Bezos once said he was more terrified of his own customers than any competetive threat.

Wait'll news of this gets around. He ain't seen nothing yet!
 
Gautam Srikanth

March 2nd, 2000 10:16 PM
 
This is sadly reminiscent of Gateway's attempt to stop TUCOWS from using Fresian cows! Remember the storm that kicked up?

Sadly I too will now boycott Amazon. Hello http://www.dymocks.com.au

Peter Tilbrook (ICQ: 666275)
Internet Applications Developer
SafetyWeb Internet Solutions
 
Peter Tilbrook

March 2nd, 2000 10:19 PM
 
These patents are ridiculous. I'll browse your site and buy my books elsewhere.
 
Greg Haselmann

March 2nd, 2000 10:27 PM
 
Daniel Kelley

March 2nd, 2000 10:29 PM
 
1+1 = 2. No wait. I can't say add those numbers since addition by method of combination is a proprietary process.
 
D Pentecost

March 2nd, 2000 10:30 PM
 
John Foster

March 2nd, 2000 10:31 PM
 
While I have purchased several books from Amazon over the past 18 months, I will likely not be purchasing any more unless Amazon stops this nonsensical behaviour (i.e. enforcing bogus patents that should never have been granted).

Furthermore I will ask/tell a friend to boycott Amazon, and they will ask/tell a friend, ... in fact that is how I heard about this petition.
 
Dave Ings

March 2nd, 2000 10:31 PM
 
The lightbulb was a great invention. A patent was well deserved! Notice that no one ever patented the process of screwing in the lightbulb!

Great Ideas for Patents:
1. The process of screwing in a lightbulb.
2. The process of placing cash inside a cash register.
3. The process of dialing a phone.
4. The process of pushing a button to buy something.
etc..

Obviously, this is ridiculous. Stop the insanity!
Amazon, do not bite the hand that feeds YOU!
 
Scott Becker

March 2nd, 2000 10:32 PM
 
What else do I need to say? All these ridiculous patents are slowing down innovation and creating a big market for lawyers.
 
Nghia Lam

March 2nd, 2000 10:35 PM
 
Snake Oil coming!
 
Kevin Cullis

March 2nd, 2000 10:41 PM
 
My company is fueled primarily by revenue gained from over 300 affiliate programs.
The money that my company gains from one, will go into marketing another "newer
site", or the old guard "amazon.com". It is upsetting to me to think that Amazon
would want to stop others from succeeding with Affiliate programs as it has. Amazon
would not be where it is today without its affiliates. For Amazon to try to patent a
process that is called "commissions" in the off-line world, is upsetting. What will they
patent next, the ability to sell books online, hey Amazon didn't think of that first
either, but I'm not sure if that matters anymore. I think I'll stop writing this letter and
go patent brushing your teeth, or that whole idea of "pumping your gas" with the hose.

Richard Lewis
 
Richard Anthony Lewis

March 2nd, 2000 10:42 PM
 
The patenting of obvious ideas is a legal assault on the progress of human intelligence. Amazon is
claiming ownership of everyone's creativity. No wonder our legal system is bogged down. Amazon should lose the right to *ever* sue *anyone*.
 
Arlin Anderson

March 2nd, 2000 10:45 PM
 
Rod Taylor

March 2nd, 2000 10:50 PM
 
Eric Berendsen

March 2nd, 2000 10:51 PM
 
NOTICE...NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE
I've decided to Patent the use of written word exchanged between individuals through the means of electronic transmission Know as the Internet..This exchange of written words Shall be called email or Electronic Mail..But will also include the exchange of messages or bulletin and forums or any other electronic means in which individuals may send the written word..
I will license the use of such Email on Per character basis..ie. per letter or number or symbol or Byte of electronic code.
Henceforth all email messages or other electronic messages MUST be routed thru MY web-site for approval before they can be transmitted or forwarded to the recipient..No Email will be forwarded without prior payment to MYWEBSITE.COM

Anyone who fails to comply with the Legality of this Patent Will be forced to pay Treble Costs
And will be Horsewhipped at Dawn


YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED



(This is how ridiculous Amazon's Patents Are)
WAKE UP AMAZON
 
DisGruntled Web User

March 2nd, 2000 10:57 PM
 
Randy Murray

March 2nd, 2000 10:58 PM
 
Amazone.com being the first and largest of its kind fears competition. Soon, every bookshop on the corner will sell books on the net, adding to the decay of sites like Amazon.com.

It it fear for their inevitable future loss of dominancy that Amazon.com leads her way of acting and thinking.

This kind of patenting has to stop NOW for all the obvious reasons.
 
Fred J.M. Slot

March 2nd, 2000 10:59 PM
 
Brett Knowles

March 2nd, 2000 11:01 PM
 
The idea of patenting technology that has been used widely for a period of time by other people, is completely obsurd. My High School website has been using this technology before you patented it. Maybe Microsoft is entitled to patent the idea of an operating system. I know, how about I patent the use of pop-up window advertising, I guess people wouldn't complain then.
 
Stephen M. Peterson

March 2nd, 2000 11:03 PM
 
Jordi Montserrat

March 2nd, 2000 11:03 PM
 
bernhard borges

March 2nd, 2000 11:05 PM
 
I would never ever buy anything from Amazon site
again.
 
Anurag Srivastava

March 2nd, 2000 11:10 PM
 
Ford Pedersen

March 2nd, 2000 11:12 PM
 
History repeats itself....

'nuf said...

Cor
 
Cor Gest jr

March 2nd, 2000 11:16 PM
 
Andre le Roux

March 2nd, 2000 11:17 PM
 
The only reason companies get away with such patents is the relative youth of the comptuters and the internet, and the fact that there are very few computer-lawers. Trying to enforce such patents is detrimental not only to the computer industry at large, but to customers, reducing their choice and forcing them away from e-comerce. Ultimately even the patent holder will sufer for their arrogance.
 
Ian Walters

March 2nd, 2000 11:26 PM
 
This is right up there with the Unisys shenanigans, fellas and gals. While it pains me to prefer brick-and-mortar businesses gone online over the first retailer born and bred in the medium, I will not touch any of your services until this foolishness stops. Regardless of any misuse of the decrepit U.S Patent system (which is bad enough, in and of itself), I would not entrust my continued business to a retailer that rests on its laurels and patents, rather then continuing to innovate. Continued invention and reinvention has shown itself to be the only reliable indicator of viability for an online business thus far, even more so than good customer service (something that more and more retailers are realizing is crucial in an area where the travel time to their competitors is a hell of a lot closer to the speed of light than to the speed limit).
 
Dave Solbes

March 2nd, 2000 11:30 PM
 
I will continue to boycott Amazon.com both personally and as a buyer of technology books for our company until Amazon pledges not to enforce this scurrilous "patent".
 
Hal Helms

March 2nd, 2000 11:31 PM
 
I started my boycot of Amazon.com on the day you filed your infringement complaint, back in September, and will continue my boycot until you will stop using these patents on business processes and without proper research of prior art, or all such faulty patents are repealed. I will complain to the EU. trade comissioners that such patents are in violation of the WTO treaty, as forming a non-tariff barrier of the US market for European companies, and that the right answer of the EU is not to emulate such foolish patent legislation and practices, but to no longer accept any priority date for a US patent, until the situation is remedied.

Jeroen Hellingman
 
Jeroen Hellingman

March 2nd, 2000 11:32 PM
 
Rory Donnelly

March 2nd, 2000 11:32 PM
 
Alex Fong

March 2nd, 2000 11:34 PM
 
Roger D'Errico

March 2nd, 2000 11:38 PM
 
I'm sorry to say that I have to boycott an otherwise great website, where I and the company I work for previously have bought almost all our technical litterature from.
 
Sten Nordström

March 2nd, 2000 11:38 PM
 

Dear Mr Bezos,

I trust that you will listen to your
constituents.

They are, to say the least, extremely
displeased with you.

As a business man, I hardly need to
point out where this is going to hurt you.

Unfortunately for you, I am also a
business man.

I am the principal director of one of the
largest private help desk companies in
Australia.

We support vendor products world wide.

We provide service to the business and
technical clientele of the vendor, as well
as their customers.

We have personally recommended you for
technical, management and accounting
material to many hundreds of people.

They have spent many thousands, not
including the value of their referrals.

They are located all over the planet.

You may consider this service forfeit.

They will all be personally notified of
your abhorrent actions and be redirected
elsewhere.

I would personally advise you against taking
on the international community, both via the
internet and at law.

You will find the international community are
more than willing to take you on and not cease
until satisfied.

I trust your stock and stake holders
understand the consequences of your
actions.

Christopher Thompson
National Computer Helpdesk
The Australian Helpdesk Company.


 
Christopher Thompson

March 2nd, 2000 11:39 PM
 
Steve Baylis

March 2nd, 2000 11:41 PM
 
i refuse to buy from companies with this attitude.
 
tony den haan

March 2nd, 2000 11:41 PM
 
Richard Chamberlain

March 2nd, 2000 11:47 PM
 
Did you give permission to Amazon.com to sell the private information baked into their "cookies"?

Well, the following is a direct paste from Amazon's site...

"We do not sell, trade, or rent your personal information to others. We may choose to do so in the future with trustworthy third parties, but you can tell us not to."

Dear Amazon.com. Please do not sell my email address, or my telephone number... oh, and for future reference (never know what new patent may be coming)... Please do not steal my car, kick my dog, talk to my children, park in my space, walk on my grass, or sleep with my wife.

Sheesh, I hope I thought of everything?
 
Terry Brownell

March 2nd, 2000 11:54 PM
 
Amazon doesn't work well with others, doesn't know how to share, interrupts while others are talking, poor study habits, needs improvement, below average, needs to respect other peoples space, poor manors, rude, selfish, unfriendly, etc.

Recommend Redo Kindergarten.
 
Jason Shupe

March 2nd, 2000 11:54 PM
 
Brian Spitznagle

March 2nd, 2000 11:58 PM
 
Mike Brittain

March 2nd, 2000 11:59 PM
 
Frank Larsen

March 3rd, 2000 12:01 AM
 
Andrei Woinaroski

March 3rd, 2000 12:01 AM
 
I cannot stand for abuse of the patent system, and will not support, and will actively work to destroy, any company that abuses it.
 
Tom Burdick

March 3rd, 2000 12:04 AM
 
Max Meloni

March 3rd, 2000 12:08 AM
 
Stop this patent nonsence. It is killing the web - the very hand that feeds you!
 
Michael Bernth

March 3rd, 2000 12:08 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, to me your actions suggest that you no longer believe that Amazon can prosper via open competition (versus gun-backed monopoly). Investors beware!
 
Terry Reedy

March 3rd, 2000 12:11 AM
 
I've already sent you a letter separately. I'd really rather not be boycotting you.

 
Cheryl Giblert

March 3rd, 2000 12:11 AM
 
patrick

March 3rd, 2000 12:11 AM
 
Michiel Terpstra

March 3rd, 2000 12:12 AM
 
I will not purchase from Amazon again.
 
David Galvan

March 3rd, 2000 12:15 AM
 
Dare Talvitie

March 3rd, 2000 12:18 AM
 
Alex Machado

March 3rd, 2000 12:21 AM
 
The first affiliate programs were not run by Amazon, but rather, by Adult web sites. This is back in 95, well before Amazon's patent application.
 
Andrew Prendergast

March 3rd, 2000 12:24 AM
 
What next - hyperlinks (C)

As an amazon associate I earn a nice bit of pocket money from amazon but I would like to continue doing this from other companies aswell.

 
Andy Bird

March 3rd, 2000 12:24 AM
 
Again an example of the fact that an every-day-common-sense method can be patended. It seems as if everything that is more advanced then paper-and-pencil can be patended, and thereby one can prohibit others to use it. I'm glad nobody ever patend (let's rephrase: forced sole use by them) of the ballpoint pen.
 
Heremans David

March 3rd, 2000 12:27 AM
 
Bertrand Lorentz

March 3rd, 2000 12:30 AM
 
Larry Rank

March 3rd, 2000 12:31 AM
 
Ilya Shadrin

March 3rd, 2000 12:34 AM
 
Kerry Buckley

March 3rd, 2000 12:37 AM
 
Owen Smigelski

March 3rd, 2000 12:37 AM
 
Kjell Ove Vuttudal

March 3rd, 2000 12:41 AM
 
I have been an Amazon customer in the past, but no longer. I'm satisfied that there are enough competitors available with equivalent services and selection. Once I leave Amazon behind, I don't forsee any need to return. Amazon's behavior is truly unsettling.
 
Peter G. B. Araujo

March 3rd, 2000 12:50 AM
 
Paul Knierim

March 3rd, 2000 12:53 AM
 
Amazon has made the subject of ecommerce into a joke in too many ways. Already one of the most successful businesses on the Net, this attempt to curtail innovation and "own" commonly used technology is disgusting.
I strongly support the rescinding of this patent and hope that someone in the bureaucracy of the patent offices realizes that this is like patenting the "art of breathing."

Paul Donley/s
 
Paul Donley

March 3rd, 2000 12:56 AM
 
Amazon won't get any more of my money until they drop this stupid pretension to "innovation". I am not sure if they'll get any of my money after that either....
 
Srikanth B

March 3rd, 2000 12:57 AM
 
Heartfully agree with Tim.
 
Alexey Vekshin

March 3rd, 2000 12:59 AM
 
Shay Levinovsky

March 3rd, 2000 1:01 AM
 
If Amazon makes offensive use if its patents, my business will go to its "victims". Bezos - wise up. "Goodwill" is priceless in e-commerce because it is SO easy to go elsewhere. Don't blow all the goodwill that you've accumulated so far.
 
Brian Hird

March 3rd, 2000 1:03 AM
 
Jonah Burke

March 3rd, 2000 1:03 AM
 
Marc Hoeppner

March 3rd, 2000 1:05 AM
 
Sten Thaning

March 3rd, 2000 1:07 AM
 
Bill Clinton

March 3rd, 2000 1:09 AM
 
This practice of amazon stinks!
 
Sven Dinse

March 3rd, 2000 1:09 AM
 
I thought Amazon 'got' what the Internet was all about. Sadly not.
 
Sam Carr

March 3rd, 2000 1:10 AM
 
Derek Sheppler

March 3rd, 2000 1:10 AM
 
Jelle van Willigen

March 3rd, 2000 1:13 AM
 
Sebastian Luhr

March 3rd, 2000 1:14 AM
 
Being in India, I have never ordered through the web, but these patents are really stupid. I think the only real solution to this problem is to restrain the Patent Office from issuing software patents until they place an upper limit on patents awarded in an year and the upper limit should be less than 10 ;-).

Till then we can peacefully assume Jeff to be the next devil incarnate, after Bill ofcourse ;-).
 
Anand Srivastava

March 3rd, 2000 1:14 AM
 
Gord McLeod

March 3rd, 2000 1:15 AM
 
Five days, 8532 (mostly unique and annotated)
signatures.

I agree with what has been said by the vast
majority of those above and can guarantee that
amazon.com will not get my money or my
recommendation until they cease this unethical
and anti-competitive enforcement of patents of
that which is and should remain in the public
domain.

 
Michael O'Leary

March 3rd, 2000 1:19 AM
 
Piers Whitney

March 3rd, 2000 1:20 AM
 
Phil Britton

March 3rd, 2000 1:20 AM
 
I could understand that they may want to patent some software which means everyone having open source is a security threat. However this is nothing like that and just restricting the growth of people being able to buy quickly from sites they visit regularly.
 
Suzie Miller

March 3rd, 2000 1:20 AM
 
Paul Engel/ Continental Investor

March 3rd, 2000 1:22 AM
 
Amazon has built its business on fundamental technology given free by its inventors all over the world. I personally spent over US$1,000 with amazon.co.uk last year. I won't spend another cent while amazon take this approach.
 
Alan Hunter

March 3rd, 2000 1:22 AM
 
So long as Amazon continues this foolish practice, they can count on loosing my business.
 
James Franklin

March 3rd, 2000 1:23 AM
 
Eric Festinger

March 3rd, 2000 1:23 AM
 
I'm surprised that it was entertained by the patent office in the first place. I'm inclined to think the patent folk have as much to answer for as Amazon do, if not more. Ignorance isn't an excuse - particularly in light of the fact that the patents office is supposed to be the arbiter of what constitutes substantive technological advance. Both Amazon and the Patents people are making public fools of themselves.
 
Ewan McDonell

March 3rd, 2000 1:24 AM
 
As a developer of professional web sites, I am disgusted in the fact that you would stop other developers of using such an obvious technique. It is not original and it is not art for that matter. GET REAL BEZOS! You can join my hate list with Microcrap and the rest of Gates investments. Anything that Amazon is partnering with is also on my boycott list. Until the day comes that you publically make good on this, you have lost my business.
 
Preston Hall

March 3rd, 2000 1:25 AM
 
It used to take only one click for readers to jump to Amazon from my site. It will again when I'm sure that I'm not infringing Amazon's patents.
 
Michael Bolton

March 3rd, 2000 1:26 AM
 
Its a big company, I don't expect anything more.
God I'm cynical.
 
Mark Johnson

March 3rd, 2000 1:29 AM
 
Ciprian Cosma

March 3rd, 2000 1:29 AM
 
Adrian Stevenson

March 3rd, 2000 1:30 AM
 
This is as boneheaded a move as New Coke was. They got smart and stopped before it did to much damage. Will you do the same Amazon?
 
Chris Ross

March 3rd, 2000 1:32 AM
 
A long-time customer and Amazon Associate.
 
Jan Sepstrup

March 3rd, 2000 1:33 AM
 
Charlie Kryszewski

March 3rd, 2000 1:34 AM
 
Martin G. Rowland

March 3rd, 2000 1:34 AM
 
At this point and time I hhave already decided to and stopped doing business with Amazon due to certain practices of theirs that bothered me.

So I can't take that step. However, I do encourage everyone I know to take their business somewhere else (http://www.powells.com for example, an independently owned online book retailer). People listen to me. I'm a tech professional in Seattle and they pay attention when I say "this isn't a good company".

However, if Amazon were to take the step and stop patenting the obvious and rescind this patent, I would be willing to give them another chance and give them my business.
 
Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush

March 3rd, 2000 1:34 AM
 
Julien Mudry

March 3rd, 2000 1:35 AM
 
Such patents are simply non-sense. We are arriving in cases where every common thing is patented. Why not try to have a real innovation by sharing ideas instead of closing them ?

I support the boycott to amazon, and I invite everyone to do so.
 
Yves Rougy

March 3rd, 2000 1:35 AM
 
Robert Ramsay

March 3rd, 2000 1:38 AM
 
Svein Kåre Gunnarson

March 3rd, 2000 1:39 AM
 
Adam Gutcheon

March 3rd, 2000 1:40 AM
 
As of today (when I first encountered this ridiculous abuse of the patent system) I and everyone I work with will no longer be using Amazon.com.
 
raven gray

March 3rd, 2000 1:40 AM
 
Paul S. Russell

March 3rd, 2000 1:41 AM
 
Felix O'Connor

March 3rd, 2000 1:42 AM
 
Simon Brown

March 3rd, 2000 1:43 AM
 
Jonathan Cobley

March 3rd, 2000 1:44 AM
 
Richard Folwell

March 3rd, 2000 1:48 AM
 
Just give me a single example in which your patent improves anything for the Internet (which you live of, remeber).
 
Milan Mikic

March 3rd, 2000 1:52 AM
 
Patent-and-sue is no model to build a lasting business on. If this is really all about get-in-quick-then-sue, then I find that quite disgusting.

Locking up these things whether by legal means or monopoly means is not what the internet is about. Open standards and open competition on quality of service and price are much better.
 
Fraser Speirs

March 3rd, 2000 1:52 AM
 
I admire Amazon.com, do a significant percentage of my book shopping there, and hope that you will soon issue a clarification of your position so that I might in good conscience shop with the company again.
 
Robert M. Eversz

March 3rd, 2000 1:53 AM
 
Ronald Jaramillo

March 3rd, 2000 1:53 AM
 
toralf ohme

March 3rd, 2000 1:54 AM
 
Amazon your patent is old news. !!!!
 
Hans Rosloot

March 3rd, 2000 1:55 AM
 
Frank Nordberg

March 3rd, 2000 1:57 AM
 
Never another red cent from my pocket into Bezos'.
 
Alex Duncan

March 3rd, 2000 2:01 AM
 
I find it disappointing that Amazon has resorted to these methods to stay on top. I am currently in the process of removing all 'affiliate' links that we offer through our 20 web sites and will be happy to explain my reasons to the owners of the numerous web sites that we run for others should they be interested.
 
Mathew Bennett

March 3rd, 2000 2:05 AM
 

Amazon, I ordered my last book from you last week & let me assure you it will be my last book period, unless you drop your crazy patenting.

I like the web the way it is, ownership of a community resource breeds contempt.

I.
 
Ivan O'Grady

March 3rd, 2000 2:08 AM
 
Boycot Amazon
 
Hugo Pereira

March 3rd, 2000 2:08 AM
 
Christoph Schuette

March 3rd, 2000 2:16 AM
 
The open letter sums it up well.

Like patenting genetic sequences, you will stifle and restrict development, which you too will suffer from. I oppose this and suggest an appeal against the issuing of this patent.
 
Brett Cupitt

March 3rd, 2000 2:17 AM
 
Sven Scheurer

March 3rd, 2000 2:18 AM
 
Go Tim! Go!
 
Emmanuel Viale

March 3rd, 2000 2:21 AM
 
Ali Knapp

March 3rd, 2000 2:22 AM
 
David Josselyn

March 3rd, 2000 2:23 AM
 
One of the definitions in my Oxford English dictionary has patent as "obvious". I think that just about sums up the "technology" being used...

For the good of us all, please do not try to enforce this ludicrous and destructive patent.
 
Liam DelaHunty

March 3rd, 2000 2:24 AM
 
I also feel that I can no longer purchase items from Amazon.com nor in good faith recommend that others do so. The actions of Amazon in pursuing and enforcing these patents shows a lack of respect for the open idea environment of the internet that allowed them to be so successful in the first place.
 
Michael Akers

March 3rd, 2000 2:25 AM
 
Svein Olav Nyberg

March 3rd, 2000 2:26 AM
 
Kerry Dye

March 3rd, 2000 2:26 AM
 
I am an Amazon customer, but will consider moving away from them, for their practices are an insult.
I develop web sites myself, and although I am nowhere near achieving Amazon's success (he he) it is insulting that they tell me their one-click ordering is such a great technology it warrants a patent.
Insulting! And hence let's boycott them until they respect us!
 
Camille Semaan

March 3rd, 2000 2:30 AM
 
Let the internet grow in all directions.
 
Michael Wiekierak

March 3rd, 2000 2:30 AM
 
Your Greed , will be your downfall. As a Kiwi, we strongly believe in inovation and competiveness, however you cannot win if you loose your integrety! .. I will not buy from Amazon , while they continue to profit from the great and selfless goodwill freely given by the open source community.
 
Warren Sanders

March 3rd, 2000 2:32 AM
 
Perhaps the U.S. Patent Office should also be addressed for this problem!
 
Rita R. Smith

March 3rd, 2000 2:34 AM
 
I don't have any good comments, except that I don't like it at all.
 
Robert Oedegaard

March 3rd, 2000 2:35 AM
 
Thomas Oldervoll

March 3rd, 2000 2:36 AM
 
Mark Wilkinson

March 3rd, 2000 2:38 AM
 
Jonas Hammarberg

March 3rd, 2000 2:38 AM
 
I'm sure that Jeff Bezon and Amazon have a story to tell about how the 1-Click and Affiliate patents are "different," that the issues are "complex," that this is a "business" issue and we shouldn't "overreact." Sometimes BS is just BS.

Here's some food for thought. Amazon.com has 37 GIF images on their homepage right now. Do you think they're paying Compuserve a licensing fee for their use of the GIF patent? How do you think Jeff Bezos would react if Compuserve suddently *did* try to charge Amazon.com for using GIFs? Thirty-seven files times millions of pageviews per day = a lot of licensing fees...

 
Jonathan Bellack

March 3rd, 2000 2:43 AM
 
Ned Brickley

March 3rd, 2000 2:47 AM
 
The many comments above sums it up , so here is another protest from a freedom loving country "Down-under" , we also like our freedom to do business and commerce to remain that way Jeff , is there any laws in the USA to prevent monopolies being created and , we have some fairly tough laws here in Australia against Restrictive Trade practices.
 
Robert Lynch

March 3rd, 2000 2:50 AM
 
The idea of a button, no matter clicks it requires to operate it, is an absurd case for a patent.
 
Joe Sparks

March 3rd, 2000 2:50 AM
 
I agree entirely with this interpretation of the issue. There is no need whatsoever for these patents to be filed and it will be very damanging to all concerned if it is allowed to continue any further. Imagine if there was a patent on TCP/IP, that would be as bad for the growth of the Internet as this would be for the development of ecommerce.
 
Craig Wallace

March 3rd, 2000 2:53 AM
 
Eric Morrell

March 3rd, 2000 2:54 AM
 
I have purchased books and CD-ROMs from Amazon for quite some time now. But no more. At least not until you publicly apologize for trying to exploit this ridiculous patent. I am absolutely sure the courts will void your effort to pirate one of the fundamental values of the Internet.

I have been following your projections of future profitability with great interest - and support. I sincerely believe you are now taking the wrong path to try and achieve this. I do believe you will fail if you continue. It takes a big man to admit he's made a mistake. I encourage you to do so.
 
Bob Jenks

March 3rd, 2000 2:55 AM
 
Mike Raynham

March 3rd, 2000 2:56 AM
 
Sad that Amazon can behave in such a way - this is just silly, and Bezos lost my respect.
 
Ulf Larsen

March 3rd, 2000 2:57 AM
 
Polly Kidd

March 3rd, 2000 2:57 AM
 
Anytime I want a review of a book on a language I haven't learned yet like perl or assembly I always go to Amazon.So far I've never bought anything there yet ( Thank God) and now I never will. I'll look for reviews and make future purchases elsewhere. Jeff your a butthead.
 
Michael Brandon

March 3rd, 2000 2:58 AM
 
Michael Tjeertes

March 3rd, 2000 2:59 AM
 
well said Tim.
 
Richard Rodger

March 3rd, 2000 3:00 AM
 
I just added the site to my filtered sites list. My dad often shops there but from now on i'm encouraging him to use Barnes and Noble.

Stuff you Amazon.
 
Mark Robinson

March 3rd, 2000 3:02 AM
 
The world is slowly getting more and more Douglas Adams-esque: this patent is very much in the same spirit as the chap who patents a staircase...
 
Karl-Koenig Koenigsson

March 3rd, 2000 3:02 AM
 
I have, for the last 3 years, been a frequent buyer of books in Amazon. These latest acts by Amazon of trying to choke Amazon's competion using dubious means will only drive me and my friends & family away from your site.
 
Yochai Cohen

March 3rd, 2000 3:04 AM
 
G. von Gerard

March 3rd, 2000 3:10 AM
 
Haakon Bratsberg

March 3rd, 2000 3:12 AM
 
Please stop filing for foolish proposals.
You will be in trouble when you come upon
a REALLY good idea.

 
P. Minovic

March 3rd, 2000 3:13 AM
 
Keep it free!
 
Dr. Arnim Decker

March 3rd, 2000 3:14 AM
 
anonymous

March 3rd, 2000 3:15 AM
 
Well, said. Open your eyes Amazon!
 
Scott MacDonald

March 3rd, 2000 3:16 AM
 
I am taking my business to Fatbrain.
 
Roger Evans

March 3rd, 2000 3:17 AM
 
The poeple running the patent office are in dire need of a dose of common sense.
 
Paul Anderson

March 3rd, 2000 3:18 AM
 
I have bought from both Amazon and Barnes and Nobel. My reasons for using Amazon have nothing to do with trivial things such as one click shopping (in fact I never use it!). I have always been impressed by the level of customer service and satisfaction I have received from Amazon.com. I am signing this open letter in protest trying to stifle web growth through the use of silly patents.

Until Amazon issues a formal letter of apology and stops such behavior I am going to take my business and the business of my company elsewhere. I suggest everyone everyone I know that they should do the same and give them the reasons to back it up.

So I urge you Amazon to stop this madness before it ruins a great web commerce site.
 
Kevin Welch

March 3rd, 2000 3:18 AM
 
"1-Click" patent? "Associates" patent? Come on Jeff, who ya fooling? I think Amazon.com's got a great website, but get real on trying to make money on the side with "patents". I read both of them at ibm.patent.com. How about I make my own whereby I submit via a secured document credit card and billing information which is then transmitted to the company's server and my order is processed, charged to my credit card and then shipped to me? I'll only charge you 0.1% of all dollar transactions which use this method? Agree?
 
Peter McIntyre

March 3rd, 2000 3:18 AM
 
Best Alternative Booksite: www.Fatbrain.com
Best Alternative CD : www.CDNow.com

Amazon.com, Doubleclick, and Priceline.com has declared war on creativity.
 
Ho Lee

March 3rd, 2000 3:20 AM
 
Jan Miczaika

March 3rd, 2000 3:22 AM
 
Why wouldn't I be surprised to hear that Amazon managed to get a patent for inventing the fire or the wheel? Are we going nuts?
 
Thanos Massias

March 3rd, 2000 3:23 AM
 
Greed!
That's what appears to be at work here.
It's destructive, it's toxic and, sadly,
it can be contagious. What have you wrought?
 
Barbara Bode

March 3rd, 2000 3:24 AM
 
Microsoft tried to cripple Java with a unique implementation. Now you are trying to cripple an open technology for no reason than profit.

I am sorry Jeff - but you are totally wrong on this. You have gone from being a much-admired person in my book to 'just another salesman'.

The link to your book shop is being removed from our company website in protest at your companie's actions; to be reinstated only when you come to your senses on this.

Peter Rowley (UK)
 
Peter R Rowley

March 3rd, 2000 3:27 AM
 
Matthew Bosworth

March 3rd, 2000 3:28 AM
 
Erle R. Granger II

March 3rd, 2000 3:30 AM
 
Esteban Manchado

March 3rd, 2000 3:32 AM
 
Amazon, stop this nonsense now. You have already lost all my business forever. Check with Fatbrain or BN, I spend at least $300 a month on books and I am still young with an ever growing income. Amazon will never get a penny of my money. I will of course window shop there before I go make my purchases elsewhere, I will enjoying visiting and knowing that I will not spend a penny there.

Furthermore, US Patent Office, you stop this nonsense now.

"Clicking" an icon, text or graphic on the internet needs to remain the digital equivalent of opening a door. The door design can be patented, but the act of opening it and passing through cannot. Patent icons, text and graphics, but don't our virtual movement.

Thank you,
Michael L. Deane

 
Michael L. Deane

March 3rd, 2000 3:32 AM
 
Harry Goldstein

March 3rd, 2000 3:32 AM
 
Your good will is worth far more than what you could ever earn with this patent
 
Michael Angier

March 3rd, 2000 3:38 AM
 
I have stopped using Amazon's service and am constantly evangelizing each of my acquaintences to do so. Once a great supporter and advocate of your service, I will now continue to market against it as long as Amazon continues to attempt to protect its legal, but morally wrong, patents on blatantly obvious and previously extant techniques.
 
David Wiley

March 3rd, 2000 3:39 AM
 
Mark Cunningham

March 3rd, 2000 3:39 AM
 
Since hearing about these patents I have stopped using Amazon.com.
 
Dave MacCallum

March 3rd, 2000 3:40 AM
 
niall little

March 3rd, 2000 3:42 AM
 
Another Micro$oft in the making!
 
John Stephenson

March 3rd, 2000 3:43 AM
 
I have been a customer of yours from almost the begining. I am disappointed at your attempt to stamp on you legitimate competion, in addition to inconveniencing customers at other book selling sites. Please give this patent application a second look and ask yourself if it's something that you really have to do.
 
Jon Threlkeld

March 3rd, 2000 3:44 AM
 
Setting aside the dubious sense in allowing software patents in the first place (given that patents should not be simply patents for ideas, but implementations of those ideas), the propensity for the US patent office to seemingly allow patents for already available technology on a first-come first-served basis is doing real damage to the software industry, IMHO.
 
Jim Finnis

March 3rd, 2000 3:45 AM
 
Clear prior art; where do the Patent Office keep their brains and Amazon their sense.
 
Derek Robinson

March 3rd, 2000 3:50 AM
 
Our local UK community site has been an Amazon.co.uk affiliate for some time.

With this move by Amazon to restrict or charge for use of technology which is common practice and helps many smaller sites to generate revenue, we will be removing all links to Amazon from our site.

We will be finding alternative resources for our 500+ visitors per day.

It worries me that similar moves will be made with UK patents now a precident has been set in the US.
 
Jenny

March 3rd, 2000 3:51 AM
 

 
Lawrence Lessig

March 3rd, 2000 3:52 AM
 
Christof Chen

March 3rd, 2000 3:53 AM
 
Dave Roberts

March 3rd, 2000 3:57 AM
 
I regularly bought off Amazon but I'm afraid these actions has moved me onto other sites, quit with the patents guys until you actually invent something.
 
Steve Jones

March 3rd, 2000 3:59 AM
 
Very disappointing. There are so many other resources for buying books over the net that Amazon should really pay attention to their corporate reputation. Amazon just lost a customer.
 
Ben Craigo

March 3rd, 2000 4:07 AM
 
Katherine Carlson

March 3rd, 2000 4:07 AM
 
Joy Keeping

March 3rd, 2000 4:08 AM
 
I strongly disagree with the attempt to patent ideas like the "one click" patent Amazon has recently obtained. This is not a new and original idea, but just a use of pre-existing technologies and techniques. As a webmaster and a user of open source software, I have seen the web grow enormously from the earliest Lynx and Mosaic browsers, aided greatly by various open source technologies such as Apache, Sendmail, Bind and now Lynx, and I am deeply disturbed to see Amazon trying to reverse this trend.
A rising tide will lift all boats, and Amazon seems to be trying to stem the tide, or channel it in their direction, and I for one am not happy with this course.
On a personal note, I am going to be ordering my books online from other companies, at least until Amazon has changed their course in this and other patent matters.
 
Francis W. Cole III

March 3rd, 2000 4:11 AM
 
Ivo Noorhoff

March 3rd, 2000 4:15 AM
 
I will no longer buy products from Amazon. Hogshead Publishing will no longer supply its products to Amazon.
 
James Wallis, Director, Hogshead

March 3rd, 2000 4:16 AM
 
This patent is absurd
 
Alexander Polzin

March 3rd, 2000 4:17 AM
 
Todd Milligan

March 3rd, 2000 4:18 AM
 
Steven Enlow

March 3rd, 2000 4:18 AM
 
as time has gone by, i have become more and more disenchanted with amazon. what was (only a year ago!) an impressive and useful bookseller has grown monstrously large, clumsy, and bizarre, a beast with fins and feathers and hooves, seeling everything everwhere. i can only imagine what the future holds--a microsoft-style monster with total control of e-commerce if such patents are upheld.

jeff! nothing earns enemies on the web faster than hubris. just like bill gates--YOU STARTED IN A GARAGE! you don't need to rule the world to prove anything. we were impressed--but when you steal our cookies too, we will fight you.

i don't much like barnes and noble, but i'll shop there now.
 
parrish baker

March 3rd, 2000 4:21 AM
 
I totally agree with the abusrdity of this patent. Why patent something so obviously not a new invention or system? You're going to end up like Microsoft.
 
Hilary Gay

March 3rd, 2000 4:21 AM
 
Until amazon stops this nonsense I will not buy a thing from their website.
 
Roland Ruth

March 3rd, 2000 4:21 AM
 
Matthew Hansen

March 3rd, 2000 4:21 AM
 
Benjamin Hanzelmann

March 3rd, 2000 4:21 AM
 
I will no longer shop at Amazon until they see the error of their ways...
 
Francis Pacheco

March 3rd, 2000 4:22 AM
 
did I hear someone say Microsoft?

Bezos must be taking lessons from Gates.

 
Steven Austin

March 3rd, 2000 4:22 AM
 
I was once a faithful Amazon customer until the predatory behavior got to the point it can stifle e-commerce initiatives. This is a "bad thing" and I will now take my business to other on-line vendors and brick and motar stores.
 
Jon Huff

March 3rd, 2000 4:24 AM
 
Rachel Pevtzow

March 3rd, 2000 4:25 AM
 
Hallgrimur Jonsson

March 3rd, 2000 4:25 AM
 
Patents represent innovation.
 
Mark Lennox

March 3rd, 2000 4:27 AM
 
Amazon's records will show that I am a regular customer, but not anymore.... not until Amazon stops trying to claim and enforce undeserved patents.
 
Gerri Nickle

March 3rd, 2000 4:27 AM
 
Fabrizio Ermini

March 3rd, 2000 4:27 AM
 
Mindless greed is loosed upon Amazon.com.. Kill it now!
 
Charles Munn

March 3rd, 2000 4:28 AM
 
This patent should never have been granted and should not be enforced. Tim has already said it better. I will not buy from Amazon until enforcement of this patent is discontinued and have advised others to shop elsewhere as well.
 
Steve Bowman

March 3rd, 2000 4:29 AM
 
When you've got nothing to sell and you don't make any money, have to do something to float the stock.
 
Barry Johnson

March 3rd, 2000 4:29 AM
 
This patent is a terrible joke for web developers, and a bad business pratice to general public. It is like Apple Computers tries to file a patent for using mouse clicks in computer programs, so that no programmers can write programs use mouse clicks, and the end users can only use their mice with programs from Apple Computer.

I am a repeated customer to Amazon.com, and I respect the greate effort that Amazon.com has done to promote and realize the convenient way of buying books and other stuff on the internet. But if Amazon.com refuses to correct this error, I will stop buying from Amazon.com, and call everyone that I know to do so.

Please reconsider this patent issue.

Allan Chen
 
Allan Chen

March 3rd, 2000 4:30 AM
 
Keith Paton

March 3rd, 2000 4:30 AM
 
Michael P. Geraghty

March 3rd, 2000 4:30 AM
 
Stephen Gillis

March 3rd, 2000 4:31 AM
 
I am of the opinion that Amazon should seriously consider suspending these patents to allow continued innovation of online commerce. I will hereby stop purchasing books from Amazon until I hear that this is so.
 
Matt Bland

March 3rd, 2000 4:32 AM
 
Mike Jarvis

March 3rd, 2000 4:32 AM
 
I was a regular customer of Amazon; no longer. Xerox Parc's use of a mouse predates your patent by many years, one click or double. I have been one-clicking for many years; I have made my living as a programmer since 1963. I do not think so kindly as others; I do not believe you are just protecting yourself, I believe you are greedy beyond belief, and have chosen to further your goals by outright thievery of intellectual property belonging to others. Maybe I should file for a patent on 'the bird'! It would amount to the same thing.
 
Robert C. Dye

March 3rd, 2000 4:33 AM
 
Dave Seidel

March 3rd, 2000 4:34 AM
 
To bad you didn't learn anything ftm Microsoft mistakes.
 
Calin Alexandrescu

March 3rd, 2000 4:34 AM
 
Fintan Costello

March 3rd, 2000 4:35 AM
 
Innovation can only be achieved in an open ended society. Competition is a necessary evil in a capitalistic society, but hurting the consumer by forcing limited choices will only serve to alienate the people you are trying to keep.
 
Tony Panariello

March 3rd, 2000 4:35 AM
 
Brian Ensink

March 3rd, 2000 4:36 AM
 
Trond Andresen, Norway

March 3rd, 2000 4:37 AM
 
Martha Shafer-Thyen

March 3rd, 2000 4:39 AM
 
Amazon
Why did you have to go and spoil a very good reputation by being greedy?
 
Andrew Mason

March 3rd, 2000 4:39 AM
 
Alphabet Street & other rival book/CD sellers suddenly look more attractive. Typical money-grabbing nonsense by small-minded people.
 
Aidan

March 3rd, 2000 4:40 AM
 
Jacquie Withers

March 3rd, 2000 4:41 AM
 
Anne McKay

March 3rd, 2000 4:41 AM
 
Please don't do this.
 
Ellen Taliaferro

March 3rd, 2000 4:42 AM
 
I have exclusively purchased my online books from Amazon for years. Now I will buy from B&N and others and NEVER again from amazon. Wake up and smell the paper pulp Mr. Bezo.
 
Thena Kuntz

March 3rd, 2000 4:43 AM
 
Kristine Howard

March 3rd, 2000 4:43 AM
 
I'm not sure how much the $1241 I've spent at Amazon.com over the past two years matters but it is the last money I expect to spend there until the patent issue is resolved in a way that satisfies me.
 
Raymond Nichols

March 3rd, 2000 4:44 AM
 
I hereby submit my strongest objections to this development.
 
CJM

March 3rd, 2000 4:46 AM
 
I think Jeff Bezos continuing to steer the course he is on with the patents is a mis-step for Amazon.

I believe, along with many others, that the 1-click patent will ultimately be found invalid and that Amazon will have gained nothing and lost a lot of good will and admiration.

I also believe that most Amazon customers have no knowledge of the issue and would not care if they knew about it.
 
An ASP Programmer

March 3rd, 2000 4:46 AM
 
I have bought many a book and CD from Amazon and respect the business that they are in. However, such a blatant effort to monopolise with a patent that should never have been granted, and would never have been granted had the patent office any idea about what it is, sours things greatly.
I urge Amazon to rethink for the internets sake.
I have used this feature many times in scripts that I have written, am I now infringing the patent. This is a very worrying affair indeed.
 
Richard Livsey

March 3rd, 2000 4:47 AM
 
I order on Amazon, but I was upsate when whey pattended the one click button (I don't use it).

I don't understand how they could paten the affiliate program.

I hop they will change were mind. Jeff Bezos is clever and he want a better world, not only a better world just for himself.

I found the www.noamazon.com web site very nice.
 
Igor Schlumberger

March 3rd, 2000 4:47 AM
 
No more Amazon purchases from here.
 
Phil Orrell

March 3rd, 2000 4:48 AM
 
Stefan Sveen

March 3rd, 2000 4:49 AM
 
Gordon Hoffstein

March 3rd, 2000 4:50 AM
 
Mal Ross

March 3rd, 2000 4:50 AM
 
Amazon are great. Their patent enforcement strategy sucks though :-)

 
Jason Handby

March 3rd, 2000 4:50 AM
 
Yet another name to add to the long list. Until now I would not have dreamed of going anywhere but Amazon.com for book purchases, and I made about $500 worth in '99. Sadly, I now feel forced into looking elsewhere, and asking my friends to do the same. This was not a good business decision - be big enough to openly and candidly admit it. Please.
 
James Shaw

March 3rd, 2000 4:51 AM
 
PLease Jeff stop it
benjamin
ps is this just a bit of email grabbing?
 
benjamin chilcott

March 3rd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
Mary Ginder

March 3rd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
Tim Mustill

March 3rd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
I have also sent email directly to Amazon in response to their automated advertisement system making my position clear. If Amazon drops this lawsuit and freely licenses these frivolous patents, I will committ to purchasing my next hundred books from Amazon.com. Until then, I will purchase nothing from them.
 
Howard C. Shaw III

March 3rd, 2000 4:52 AM
 
Matt Keleher

March 3rd, 2000 4:53 AM
 
I order on Amazon, but I was upsate when whey pattended the one click button (I don't use it).

I don't understand how they could paten the affiliate program.

I hop they will change were mind. Jeff Bezos is clever and he want a better world, not only a better world just for himself.

I found the www.noamazon.com web site very nice.
 
Igor Schlumberger

March 3rd, 2000 4:53 AM
 
I was a frequent Amzon customer - this move has sent me elsewhere.
 
Steph Richardson

March 3rd, 2000 4:54 AM
 
Sallie Szymczyk

March 3rd, 2000 4:54 AM
 
I have been an avid and loyal Amazon customer since the on-line service began. Living as I do in a rural environment, Amazon was my source for books for myslef, my family, my friends, my businesses and my church in the amount of hundreds of dollars a year. While this fact and amount may be trivial to the "bottom line" at Amazon, it is not trivial to me. I, like the others on this list and hopefully others not on it will be voting with me feet, dollars and keyboard against what I can only see as an abuse of ignorance. The fact that the patent office does not understand the technology involved is not an excuse for those that do to take an unearned reward by creating a patent that is as illegitimate as a patent on a icon for a book, or, more to the point, a trash can.

Amazon was once a company run in a way that was at one with the technological community. It is sad to see the lawyers have taken over, one more time.

 
Ryugen C. Fisher

March 3rd, 2000 4:54 AM
 
George Anderson

March 3rd, 2000 4:55 AM
 
Please don't force me away from your service like this...
 
Jardine Barrington-Cook

March 3rd, 2000 4:55 AM
 
Richard Quance

March 3rd, 2000 4:55 AM
 
come on amazon. prove us wrong.
 
anthony webster

March 3rd, 2000 4:56 AM
 
Ivos Piacentini

March 3rd, 2000 4:58 AM
 
After the publishing of buyers practices, the patent of one click button seems to fit well with the Amazon image which sucks. Amazon is a prime Microsoft procurment candidate as their business practices fit nicely , and I WILL NOT BE buying from Amazon!
 
Bryan T

March 3rd, 2000 4:58 AM
 
You didn't need to do this.
 
Paul Vanukoff

March 3rd, 2000 4:58 AM
 
Mark Seven Smith

March 3rd, 2000 4:58 AM
 
davis mcpherson

March 3rd, 2000 4:59 AM
 
Does size inherently corrupt organsiations, even Net companies? We're about to find out... fingers crossed.
 
Max Christian

March 3rd, 2000 4:59 AM
 
Gordon Hope

March 3rd, 2000 5:00 AM
 
I totally agree with Tim O'Reilly's point of view. 1-Click Ordering is not a new invention, just smart use of existing technology. Stop it, Amazon, or I will have to order my books elsewhere!
 
Bas de Valk

March 3rd, 2000 5:02 AM
 
Stuff like this only holds back innovation.
Trademark the name - don't patent the obvious and widely used techniques.
 
Paul Ruane

March 3rd, 2000 5:02 AM
 
boycot them
 
Diederik Smets

March 3rd, 2000 5:03 AM
 
I have had nothing but excellent service from Amazon in the past, but I will no longer be using their business because of their obvious disregard for the intellectual property of others. I will also be encouraging others that I help introduce to the world of on-line commerce to avoid Amazon until such time as this issue is resolved.
 
Ryan Smith

March 3rd, 2000 5:03 AM
 
Tracy Hedberg

March 3rd, 2000 5:03 AM
 
Daniel Svennberg

March 3rd, 2000 5:03 AM
 
As a web developer I am highly disappointed in the attempt to restrict use of technologies that if they hadn't been free in the beginning you never would have existed.
 
Michael E. Lee

March 3rd, 2000 5:04 AM
 
I just filed a patent for opening the home fridge :) So stay away from this device or you'll hear from my lawyer.
 
Ofer Weintraub

March 3rd, 2000 5:05 AM
 
I've been a very satisfied customer of Amazon's for over a year. However, after reading the patent registration for myself, I can no longer in good conscience support them. The 1-click and associates patents are sad abuses of the patent system.
 
David Greenbaum

March 3rd, 2000 5:07 AM
 
James Rahfeldt

March 3rd, 2000 5:07 AM
 
I've been using Amazon for most of my online publication purchases since your first year of operation. I'm sure Barnes and Noble will appreciate my business.

Stop traveling down the Microsoft path. It worked for them because they manipulated users and their partners. That scenario is failing as will yours. Can't you see that the market must remain open to support growth for all, including Amazon? Don't be short sited, or your success will be short lived. Learn from others' mistakes and be a leader, not a loser.
 
Richard Law

March 3rd, 2000 5:08 AM
 
Christopher Bove

March 3rd, 2000 5:08 AM
 
I wonder if Amazon enjoy being compared with Microsoft...must be...Amazon suig my dirkie!
 
Rika Grobbelaar

March 3rd, 2000 5:08 AM
 
Aaron Swartz

March 3rd, 2000 5:09 AM
 
Randy Dillon

March 3rd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
Timothy Phelps

March 3rd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
Damn but this is already a long list. Amazon, that should tell you something.
 
Ramon Scott

March 3rd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
Please think long term on this and not just the short term. Creativity is what makes the web an exciting place to be, don't be the first to take this freedom away. I enjoy using Amazon, but would think twice if this comes to fruition.
 
Rick Stotler

March 3rd, 2000 5:10 AM
 
If these patents are enforced I, for one, shall NEVER use Amazon again, and I have purchased around $1000 worth of books from them in the past year. I shall be recommending friends and colleagues do the same.
 
Charles Roper

March 3rd, 2000 5:12 AM
 
Nicola Wharmby

March 3rd, 2000 5:13 AM
 
the inside tip of my left nostril burns at the thought of it ... got to ... scRaatch it
 
stickman

March 3rd, 2000 5:13 AM
 
Keesjan van Bunningen

March 3rd, 2000 5:14 AM
 
This patent is ridiculous.
 
Alexander Presber

March 3rd, 2000 5:14 AM
 
Amazon will fall on its own sword, and deservedly so. It will also lose revenue. I will be recommending that my clients discontinue their affiliate schemes with amazon.

"He who goes to law takes a wolf by the ears."
 
David Petherick, Scotland

March 3rd, 2000 5:15 AM
 
I love you Amazon, but this has gone too far. As good as your service is, I think I'll stay away and bring my business elsewhere until this matter is resolved. I hope you make the right decision.
 
Felix R Flauta Jr

March 3rd, 2000 5:15 AM
 
Boycott Amazon.com - find books at the following sites, and in many cases, PAY LESS!
http://www.abebooks.com
http://www.addall.com
http://www.bibliofind.com
http://www.bibliophile.net
http://www.bookavenue.com
http://www.bookfinder.com
http://www.bookopoly.com
http://www.digibib.com
http://www.gbmbooks.com
http://www.usedbooks.com
http://www.yourbooks.com
 
Kenenth Samson

March 3rd, 2000 5:15 AM
 
Beth Zonderman

March 3rd, 2000 5:16 AM
 
I'm hardly involved in the publishing industry, nor any industry at all. I am a freshman in college, who's only boughten a few books from Amazon. Yet, I am concerned about your patents, and angry too. I think that this itself you should be concerned about. Your customers don't have to be anymore than slightly informed to figure out what these patents mean, and to object to them. This should definitely concern you.
 
April Lyall

March 3rd, 2000 5:17 AM
 
Simon Kinahan

March 3rd, 2000 5:17 AM
 
Benjamin Falloon

March 3rd, 2000 5:17 AM
 
I suppose we would next hear about a patent which requires you to pay a fee to click your mouse
 
Ramesh Naidu

March 3rd, 2000 5:18 AM
 
Richard E. Dexter

March 3rd, 2000 5:18 AM
 
This is really a problem with the Patent Office. Amazon is just following the direction its Wall Street owners and trying to monopolize online market activity. Just like every other capitalist. The Patent Office should be staffed with knowledgeable people. Where is Einstein when you need him?
 
Gary Patterson

March 3rd, 2000 5:19 AM
 
I am appaled at the extent of Amazon's bravado in creating an afront to the free market economy from which it spawned. My web page bookstore which I opened in belief that I am a part of the same economy will be shut down... I will take it off the web and in its place will create a reference to this letter. Amazon the giant will become Amazon the ghost insofar as I am concerned, until such time as this entire patent business has been terminated. I have used 1-click. I enjoy it's simple expediency. I cannot imagine that use of such a tool by competitors would be prohibited unless Amazon were paid for the permission to use this logic. Ditto for the Associates patent. It looks as though someone in the corporate legal staff at Amazon has Jeff's ear - and this person's office must be closer than the cash register and closer than the newsroom where mail such as this is being screened before it reaches Mr. Bezos's desk.
 
John B. Moss

March 3rd, 2000 5:20 AM
 
This patent should not have been issued. Amazon has the expertise to develop a workable e-commerce site, has done so, and through that knows that the patent is ludicrous. That they choose to look at their immediate opportunity for gain and ignore this makes me very angry as a developer. It would be like 7-11 patenting and enforcing the convenience store model, and suing anything remotely resembling themselves.
 
Douglas Munsinger

March 3rd, 2000 5:20 AM
 
I am boycotting Amazon and all of their affiliates.
 
Robert Weeks

March 3rd, 2000 5:20 AM
 
How about patenting the concept of selling online... you'd really cash in Mr. Bezos! These patents are an outrage. Boycott Amazon.
 
Andy Brown

March 3rd, 2000 5:20 AM
 
Amazon who? There are so many other ways to purchase products that considering such an arrogant organization.
 
M A Nelson

March 3rd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
Jeff Boison

March 3rd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
Eric Quigley

March 3rd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
Larry Leszczynski

March 3rd, 2000 5:21 AM
 
Amazon shall see my signature but they will not see my business.
 
Timur Snoke

March 3rd, 2000 5:22 AM
 
I have long been a faithful Amazon customer. So faithful, in fact, that I have never even given the Barnes & Nobles or FatBrain sites enough of a thought to visit them. I'll be checking them out later today.
If I were B&N I believe I'd budget donations to Amazon to ensure they continue to abuse the patent process. It would surely be the best marketing dollars ever spent.
 
David Zimmerman

March 3rd, 2000 5:22 AM
 
"One click shopping" is hardly a revolutionary idea in e-commerce. I seriously doubt that it was even first conceived at Amazon. Who do you think you are? Apple? I've never liked Barnes and Noble, primarily because their computer book section at their physical location typically has books horribly mis-categorized. I've been avoiding them even online because of the irritation I've experience by searching for titles at their physical locations. Well, I'm now a Barnes and Noble customer until your abandon your enforcement of this ridiculous patent. In fact, I'm going to turn on my active desktop and stick a great big "One click to shop at Barnes and Noble" button on it right now. Now, that's convenient!
 
Chris Ward

March 3rd, 2000 5:23 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, your attempt to patent a technique that is of such common knowledge is a blow in the face of all who hold the Internet as a means for free exchange and innovation. If all big corporations followed your example, we will quickly find that innovation and creativity on the Internet is gone. I am saddened to report that I will not be using your site again until this issue is resolved.
 
Luis Navarro

March 3rd, 2000 5:23 AM
 
Fabio Serra

March 3rd, 2000 5:24 AM
 
Philadelphia, PA
 
K Neely

March 3rd, 2000 5:24 AM
 
Until Amazon drops this patent, I'll shop elsewhere, there are many alternatives.
 
colin williams

March 3rd, 2000 5:24 AM
 
Goldie Freeman

March 3rd, 2000 5:25 AM
 
Steven L. Fitzgerald

March 3rd, 2000 5:25 AM
 
Sad.
 
Marc Desjardins

March 3rd, 2000 5:25 AM
 
Jeremy Layne Weathers

March 3rd, 2000 5:26 AM
 
Rest assured, I will never use Amazon.com as long as they seek spurious patents such as this. These actions will come back to harm them, but they damage the future of electronic commerce in general.
 
Mike Eovino

March 3rd, 2000 5:26 AM
 
Eileen Talamantez, ETBOOKS

March 3rd, 2000 5:26 AM
 
Robert L. Kegebein III

March 3rd, 2000 5:27 AM
 
Ben Miller

March 3rd, 2000 5:27 AM
 
Christopher Duke

March 3rd, 2000 5:27 AM
 
Your patent is wrong. You already have control of the market there is no need to resort to cheap tricks. I will no longer shop with you. I will also tell all my Levenger buddies not to shop with until you revoke your patent.
 
Stephen Higgins

March 3rd, 2000 5:27 AM
 

As a web programmer since 1992 when the web wasn't even realized by almost anyone but us tek-heads that came from the BBS world, I seriously think you (Amazon) should retract your request for any patents that are pending. I also believe you should rescind (if it's at all possible) the current patents that you might have acquired. The web is an open market - for all - to develop, discover, and enjoy. Use of the failing governmental patent system to turn on the consumers that created you, is a poor Microsoft move, if I've ever seen one. You should be ashamed of your actions.

God forbid we quit killing each other in the marketplace for a bigger piece of the pie all the time, and just build something that everyone can use and enjoy for a long time to come. Seems that money is worth more than happiness. I pity your executives.

Amazon executives are the lowest of scum. Maybe Lawyers aren't as bad as we thought?
 
Kevin Ferlin

March 3rd, 2000 5:30 AM
 
Carrie Ritch

March 3rd, 2000 5:30 AM
 
Luc Peerdeman

March 3rd, 2000 5:31 AM
 
Damien Neva

March 3rd, 2000 5:32 AM
 
So unfortunate that we have arrived here so quickly. How long until we learn?
 
Tripp Fenderson

March 3rd, 2000 5:32 AM
 
Steve Vibert

March 3rd, 2000 5:33 AM
 
I find it frustrating the Amazon is so intent on patenting these technologies. This is a very dangerous trend that is completely contrary to the open nature of the Internet. I firmly against this. Your company's position in this matter will impact my buying decisions going forward.
 
Jay L

March 3rd, 2000 5:33 AM
 
My first Internet purchase was from Amazon.com. It was a frightening and educational experience for me. I am a small business owner myself and will be involved in e-commerce in the coming months. It saddens me to see a force as powerful as Amazon.com attempting to stifle the growth of a tool as useful as the Internet. I've bought a lot from Amazon.com and hope to buy more; but not until this foolishnes ceases. You have many well informed customers who will not tolerate this sort of behavior. You have many under informed customers who are heavily influenced by those of us in the know. Don't think you can keep riding on the wave of neophytes constantly growing on the Web, they're learning too. I hope this is not a sign of some sort of company wide attitude change. You're marketing has always presented you as a forward thinking, consumer friendly establishment; this 1-click patent fiasco is already stirring a ripple of "big company paranoia." Don't become another unscrupulous corporate monster reluctantly tolerated by a community that reluctantly deals with you only they have to.
 
Tom Gartman

March 3rd, 2000 5:33 AM
 
I agree with Tim's response to the Amazon 1-click patent.
 
Malcolm Russell

March 3rd, 2000 5:35 AM
 
I just got through cancelling an order I had placed with Amazon. I will instead give my business to its rivals. I am deeply disappointed in the ethics of Jeff Bezos. I had really thought he was made of better stuff. Just because the Patents Office is such a mess is no excuse for obtaining these fraudulent patents, and certainly not for suing their competetion with them.
 
Jasper Johal

March 3rd, 2000 5:36 AM
 
Jeff Longland

March 3rd, 2000 5:36 AM
 
I bought a few books from Amazon.com some time age, but after hearing about the company's crass and mean-minded attempts to squash all competitors (particularly a fine, small bookstore called Amazon Books), I have ceased buying anything from Amazon.com. I advise all of my colleagues to refrain from patronizing this business, too, and explain my reasons. I will refer them to this "Open Letter" website.
 
Stephanie Judy

March 3rd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
This is a poor choice from a company that has utilized the efforts of many to build an empire.
 
Mark Kyes

March 3rd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
Andi Luke

March 3rd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
Drew D. Saur

March 3rd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
Do we really want to allow another monopoly to develop in our technology?

Use or lose your local eBookshop! Try www.bookshop.co.uk in Britain!
 
Mike Taylor

March 3rd, 2000 5:37 AM
 
I am an Amazon customer but I don't have to be one.
 
James Klecha

March 3rd, 2000 5:38 AM
 
Eric Rosenfield

March 3rd, 2000 5:38 AM
 
Peter Shapiro

March 3rd, 2000 5:38 AM
 
Greg Bryant

March 3rd, 2000 5:39 AM
 
Amazon has become a new media monster. This patent
is indicative of it's despotic mind set. From what I've read recently it treats many of it's employees with the same disdain as it treats the community which made it successful.
 
Matt Steane

March 3rd, 2000 5:41 AM
 
Mala Mital

March 3rd, 2000 5:41 AM
 
Nathan Griffiths

March 3rd, 2000 5:42 AM
 
Frederique Krupa

March 3rd, 2000 5:42 AM
 
Jeff,
Time's Man of the Year. Your 15 minutes are up, stop grandstanding, get off the stage or we'll knock you off. I'm joining FatBrain's affiliate program and I hope they fight you all the way!!
TRH
 
Tony Harper

March 3rd, 2000 5:42 AM
 
Tord Lindberg

March 3rd, 2000 5:42 AM
 
Mr. Mark Van de Walle

March 3rd, 2000 5:43 AM
 
You do what you like Jeff. Man of the Year or not, have you actually made a profit?
 
StewartN

March 3rd, 2000 5:43 AM
 
Like many others I am a long time customer and supporter of Amazon.com. I have lost track of the number of positive letters that I have written to Amazon extolling their great product and service organization.

But I am also a supporter of Open Source. You are building on a massive amount of work done by others and calling it your own. A painter that comes up with a new color using existing paints, can't patent paint. You were given, the paint, the canvas, and hell even the light. Be proud of what you have accomplished and stop there.

You have thrived on the internet, now you are taking a first step in killing that which fed and nurtured you.

Please rethink your position.
 
Charles J. Horni

March 3rd, 2000 5:43 AM
 
I used to be a big customer of Amazon.com - part of my job is ordering books for an 800 person company. Now, I believe I will turn to other online vendors unless some sort of reasonable solution can be made.
 
Ted Hekman

March 3rd, 2000 5:43 AM
 
Cosimo Vagarini

March 3rd, 2000 5:43 AM
 
It will be hard for me to boycott Amazon, since I really enjoy shopping there (no matter how badly you screwed up my holiday orders!) but I cannot concieve of how Amazon was even given this patent in the first place.
 
Tom Steves

March 3rd, 2000 5:44 AM
 
Ned M Andre

March 3rd, 2000 5:44 AM
 
You are a great company; this is a bad idea. Be Nice, and don't do it...
 
Paul Bradforth

March 3rd, 2000 5:44 AM
 
Amazon sux!
 
Gordon Worley

March 3rd, 2000 5:45 AM
 
Your position and efforts are just nonsense.
 
Charles H. Peterson, Jr.

March 3rd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
shame on you, Amazon.this is a cheap money-grubbing land-grab patent, and reflects poorly on you. i am joining the thousands fo other people boycotting your company, and i will urge all my friends, co-workers, and associates to do the same.
 
Sam Cowan

March 3rd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
If it looks like microsoft don't do business with it!
 
Keith Smith

March 3rd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
I can see how Amazon would want to build on their brand by seeming innovative in B:C e-commerce (which clearly they are) and want to perhaps consult for other retailers on the web and sell them solution models(??). But patenting the use of a cookie to hold what is a essentially a single key for a database table seems preposterous. They can do all of this without the use of the patent and call it anything they want...
 
Mike Murphy

March 3rd, 2000 5:46 AM
 
No more Amazon books for awhile. Fatbrain...
 
Joshua Millsapps

March 3rd, 2000 5:47 AM
 
Russ Barrett

March 3rd, 2000 5:47 AM
 
Amazon's lost my business.
 
Cathy Crosman

March 3rd, 2000 5:47 AM
 
I have extensively used and will continue to use Amazon.com. Nevertheless, I am opposed to a patent for 1-click.
 
Mark Hoy

March 3rd, 2000 5:47 AM
 
Drew Downard

March 3rd, 2000 5:47 AM
 
As creative director for MarketLink Corporation, a strategic web business development company, I agree with Tim Oreilly's open letter. I find the business strategy of patenting a commonly used technique appalling. This strategy could only be justified if Amazon.com's specific referral technique required some sort of proprietary technology - which it doesn't. The fact that they have done what thousands of other web businesses have done since the introduction of cookies, and have claimed it as their own will only stifle innovation and possibly attract the wrath of mischievous web enthusiasts that have recently crippled some e-commerce sites.
 
Randy Horton

March 3rd, 2000 5:48 AM
 
I wish I could do more than just stop buying from Amazon, but I'm certainly not sending another cent in their direction.
 
Dan Ray

March 3rd, 2000 5:49 AM
 
I too *was* a customer of amazon.com..until this.
As a systems administrator, developer, web developer and systems consultant, I too more than
realize the ill effect this has on the internet
community and possibilities of future development
as a whole. I can only imagine that given this
behavior, Amazon might one day go so far as to
try to patent code that *my* company has created.
What a thought. Amazon..wake up! Why do you desire
to throw roadblocks in the face of those who
helped you become who you are? You don't need to
patent things like this given your success.
I (nor my family and friends) will be buying from
Amazon until this stupidity is revoked. I will
likely make certain that anyone else I know..
clients and the like..hear about this. My guess is
that they too will stop doing business with you.
It's a shame to see a company as great as Amazon
deface themselves with such behavior.
 
Pat Winn

March 3rd, 2000 5:49 AM
 
In the past year, I have purchased six( 6 ) books from Amazon.com Their subjects have been in the fields of observational astronomy, and design and programming for the internet. ( java & xml )

As a result of your attempt to swindle a patent on an already established technology ( cookies ), I am sufficiently unimpressed with Amazon.com's land-grabbing menatlity that I will not likely purchase another item from amazon.com in the future.

Also, on websites that I design, which I do professionally, I will no longer use any of Amazon.com associate programs for my client's sites.

Sincerely,
John Hembling.
 
John Hembling

March 3rd, 2000 5:49 AM
 
I have an easy buy process in my solutions too, always have done. Can we say prior art?
 
Ben Mitchell

March 3rd, 2000 5:50 AM
 
Þórarinn Stefánsson

March 3rd, 2000 5:50 AM
 
I have no idea why you want to irritate so many of your customers and turn yourselves into the Microsoft of on-line sales. Your patent is ridiculous and if all you want to do is to alienate your customers, there are much better ways to do so.
 
babette turner-underwood

March 3rd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
I'm amazed that Amazon would pursue such an issue since technology is a core foundation and lifeline of the company. As a software developer myself I contribute to the message being sent that Amazon has bitten the hand the feeds it, and now it should realize the consequences…No Amazon.com!

 
Robert Schumann

March 3rd, 2000 5:51 AM
 
I am joining the list.
 
Philip Burnham

March 3rd, 2000 5:52 AM
 
Stefan Boresch

March 3rd, 2000 5:52 AM
 
People- it is up to us! We have the power to boycott and I say let's do it!
 
Martin W. Siddons, Jr.

March 3rd, 2000 5:53 AM
 
Alexander J. Winner

March 3rd, 2000 5:53 AM
 
I will not use Amazon until they desist from obtaining this patent.
 
Kevin Hoffmann

March 3rd, 2000 5:53 AM
 
Niall Murphy

March 3rd, 2000 5:54 AM
 
Goodbye Amazon, Hello Bookpool.
 
David Leaver

March 3rd, 2000 5:55 AM
 
Andres Garcia

March 3rd, 2000 5:55 AM
 
Erecting barriers is lawyers trick not an innovators tool. We feel betrayed.
 
Kevin Gulstene

March 3rd, 2000 5:55 AM
 
Dobrica Pavlinusic

March 3rd, 2000 5:55 AM
 
Haemish Graham

March 3rd, 2000 5:56 AM
 
Ruth Wright

March 3rd, 2000 5:56 AM
 
I too have been a long-time, faithful Amazon customer, but I do not wish to support aggressive patent abuse. I will not order from Amazon again until the patent issue has been resolved.
 
Andy Huhn

March 3rd, 2000 5:57 AM
 
I operate a web design and development family of portals (DallasWebBuilders.com) which enjoys an average of 11,000 hits per day. In light of Mr. Bezos' refusal to acknowledge the concern that Amazon.com's illegitmate patent on 1-click processes has created in the eCommerce community, I have decided to immediately stop using Amazon.com as an affiliate on the family of web design and development portals.

It's a shame that folks like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates seem to forget so quickly that it is a free and fair marketplace which gave them the environment to use their talents to build such successful companies. Our actions may be just a drop in the bucket, but we all must do what we can to insure that the big guys compete honestly and fairly.

 
Giovanni Gallucci

March 3rd, 2000 5:57 AM
 
You should not be taking these actions. I agree wholeheartedly with Tim O'Reilly's thoughts. I am a regular customer too.
 
Jay Fogarty

March 3rd, 2000 5:57 AM
 

In my opinion, patenting the 1-click ordering
is absurd. I like Amazon, and the 1-click ordering is indeed a great tool of convenience, but hardly revolutionary; it's been done before.

I think that Amazon's trying to hog the rights to the Associates program and the 1-click ordering
is a slap in the face to everyone, competitors and customers alike. It's an affront to anyone with the intelligence to realize what the intent behind it is. All together now...does everyone remember Amazon's "we'll give your book a recommendation if you pay us" fiasco? Such selfish activities belong on a kindergarten playground, not a mature, professional arena.

Amazon's patents remind me of the children who will not share their toys...seems they always end up playing by themselves, while the rest of the kids leave them behind.
 
Neal Tvaroha

March 3rd, 2000 5:57 AM
 
I'm mildly shocked that a company would continue to defend a patent that is so obviously not their innovation, and one they obtained free thanks to the "common domain" nature of open source technology, and one that has been so instrumental in their success. Amazon.com is biting the hand that fed it in its infancy.

It would be like me filing for copyright protection of the song "Happy Birthday," except that the song is not responsible for any success on my part as a songwriter.

I'm not going to "boycott" Amazon.com- I won't try to make some statement. I'm just not going to purchase anything from them, ever. I've decided I just don't like them. And that's the real price they've paid.
 
Mark J. Ohland

March 3rd, 2000 5:58 AM
 
Hey guys, there is many other bookstores out there - click them out...
 
Kris De Decker

March 3rd, 2000 5:58 AM
 
Our company has ordered many books from Amazon, but we will be sending our business to ther sites until Amazon admits the error of their ways.

Hello Jeff... The web is a FREE medium.
 
William Jones

March 3rd, 2000 5:58 AM
 
America Online angered me with busy signals several years ago, and I will never go back to them. I have bought from you, but you are angering me with this patent nonsense. It is an insult to real innovation. Fatbrain.com and Barnes and Nobles will thank you for their new customer - me.
 
Brian Jacobs

March 3rd, 2000 5:58 AM
 
This is a bad idea, folks ... please give it up now!
 
Ron Luther

March 3rd, 2000 5:58 AM
 
Joey Reid

March 3rd, 2000 5:58 AM
 
One click ordering should be considered "prior art", and the patent should never have been granted. I'll give vocal and expert witness support to any action fighting it.
 
Ross Hamilton

March 3rd, 2000 5:59 AM
 
http://www.indigo.ca/ and http://www.chapters.ca/ are a couple of others.
 
Paul Chvostek

March 3rd, 2000 5:59 AM
 
I think pursuing these patents insults the intelligence of your users. We are not Neanderthals wowed by a magician; in this case, we are impressed not by your illusory claims of innovation and uniqueness, but by your blue-ribbon implementations. In other words, perfect what you've got: destroying others will only make you look petty and without confidence in your own excellence.
 
Chellee Boese

March 3rd, 2000 6:00 AM
 
Todd Mokros

March 3rd, 2000 6:01 AM
 
The Internet is first and foremost a forum for the exchange of ideas and information. How disappointing, Mr. Bezos, that you take advantage of open source technology and try to make it your own.
 
Christopher Belford

March 3rd, 2000 6:01 AM
 
Iain Loasby

March 3rd, 2000 6:01 AM
 
Can Amazon make a real dollar profit without stealing from the work of other developers? Am selling my stock.
 
c douglass

March 3rd, 2000 6:01 AM
 
That patent has to be one of the most ridiculous moves of all time.
 
Jim Perry

March 3rd, 2000 6:02 AM
 
Jeff Belcher (Coventry, England)

March 3rd, 2000 6:02 AM
 
I have to agree with Richard Sullivan on this. Boycott and hit em in the pocketbook
 
annie stage

March 3rd, 2000 6:02 AM
 
Bad Amazon, go to your room.
 
Paymon Yau

March 3rd, 2000 6:03 AM
 
Todd Rutecki

March 3rd, 2000 6:03 AM
 
Sad, but I won't be shopping at amazon in the future. You prob have me as jage@indy.net in the system, or jtjohnso@indygov.org.

It's well worth 3 extra bucks at the local bookstore to NOT support you're patent crap.

Thanks for trying to ruin it for all of us who benifit from the open Internet.

Cookies! Bah, that's so weak. Patent something real, invent something better...


Jeremiah
 
Jeremiah Johnson

March 3rd, 2000 6:03 AM
 
Steve Fulmer

March 3rd, 2000 6:04 AM
 
As an antiquarian bookseller, I have only had positive experiences dealing with Amazon (as opposed to Barnes and Noble). Therefore I am very disapponted to hear about Amazon's actions re patents.

Boycott Amazon.com - find books at the following sites, and in many cases,
PAY LESS!
http://www.abebooks.com
http://www.addall.com
http://www.bibliofind.com
http://www.bibliophile.net
http://www.bookavenue.com
http://www.bookfinder.com
http://www.bookopoly.com
http://www.digibib.com
http://www.gbmbooks.com
http://www.usedbooks.com
http://www.yourbooks.com

 
Dey Gosse

March 3rd, 2000 6:04 AM
 
Jeff,

It really is true that the reason OReilly books sell so well on Amazon is that you have big time support from the Internet early adopters. I find myself ordering from Amazon rather than BN because of a kind of loyalty that identifies with your pioneering efforts, which I admire greatly.

Even though I am CEO of a software company, and I expect to have my software protected by legal means, I have to say that Tim O'Reilly's description of 1Click as a 'land-grab' is a pretty accurate encapsulation of my own feelings about it. I don't object to your getting a patent, a trademark, or a copyright, for work that you have earned.

But using the obsolete patent office to help with a transparently unfair grab is pretty offensive behavior.

Since Tim's advisory note didn't seem to get through to you, I'm going to let you know that until you decide to withdraw your unfair patent, we will be purchasing from www.bn.com. I never thought that I'd be on Richard Stallman's side of anything, but here I am.

You really need to reconsider your position on this. We are only one small company, www.wrightsoft.com, but our opinion matters to us. I would much rather that you focus your energies on how to make it easy for me to have my customers order what they need from Amazon while they're using our software, than restricting growth by unfair means.

Bill Wright


 
Bill Wright

March 3rd, 2000 6:04 AM
 
This is ridiculous! I was considering becoming an affiliate of Amazon - and I KNOW I won't now! As soon as I feel ready - I want to start an affiliate program of my own - And I should be able to without fearing what Amazon might do...
STOP THIS!
 
Ronnie Moehrke

March 3rd, 2000 6:04 AM
 
I have a website, quite successful, that functions as an "associate" of amazon.com. I'm really unhappy that Amazon has decided to take advantage of the US Patent Office and their, obvious, ignorance to patent this program (concept).

The chances are the courts will never uphold these patents and, yet, Amazon will cost the business world large sums of money to pursue this in the courts.

Jeff, re-join the world!
 
James Clay

March 3rd, 2000 6:04 AM
 
Emily Bloss

March 3rd, 2000 6:05 AM
 
Thank goodness for Chapters.
http://www.chapters.ca
 
Abdel Abdullah

March 3rd, 2000 6:05 AM
 
Daniel Ervin

March 3rd, 2000 6:05 AM
 
Will Morris

March 3rd, 2000 6:06 AM
 
Sarcasm: I have just filed a patent for a method of breathing where air is drawn through either the nasal or oral cavity, passing the vocal cords and into the lungs of the breather. I intend to enforce this patent on the lawyers of Amazon.com, and the loony or loonies that came up with the idea of the "1 click" patent in the first place.
 
Lee Cao

March 3rd, 2000 6:06 AM
 
As the stockmarkets start to react to the Piracy of Amazon perhaps Jeff will rue the day he started his Megalomania.
Amazon does not stand up as a proper investment by any standard at all. Its built on future dreams, these dreams cannot be realised without the support of us.
Look how people react to the 'Slash and Burn' of the orginal Amazon. All the rain of Seattle wont douse the flames of retribution that will be unleashed on Amazon 2.
 
Roger Phillips

March 3rd, 2000 6:07 AM
 
I agree with the comments suggesting that the abuse is larger than Amazon and that the fault lies in the current structure of the patent system but I had previously thought that Amazon was more forward thinking. If Larry Wall had the mindset that Jeff Bezos apparently does, ecommerce would still be a dream. Thanks to Tim for taking positions like this and enabling a community to speak.
 
Ron Nau

March 3rd, 2000 6:07 AM
 
Robyn Laniel

March 3rd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
I have enjoyued buying from Amazon in the past, and I hope they'll come to their senses so I can do so again in the future.
 
Diane Donaldson

March 3rd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
David Tipple

March 3rd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
Chris Pelsor

March 3rd, 2000 6:08 AM
 
You've just lost my business.
 
gail cox

March 3rd, 2000 6:09 AM
 
Jeff,
I've bought yours books and even written a few reviews for your site. I point people your way every day... until now. Get with the program! The web was wide open when you started. At least leave it that way before your gone. Don't fence us in!
 
Phillip Hammond

March 3rd, 2000 6:09 AM
 
It would appear that one could patent the alphabet. I doubt there have been any patent claims to the letter "E" but it is a highly
useful and I would highly suggest someone get
the rights to it as it is used daily for all
branches of e-commerce (sometimes more than
once in the same word - imagine the royalties!

Have a nice day!
 
Joe Gilligan

March 3rd, 2000 6:09 AM
 
I fully agree with the letter!!!
 
Donald T.M. Anderson Jr.

March 3rd, 2000 6:09 AM
 
In the past, I have always used Amazon to explain how a new company can win in the Internet space against an established brand by getting there first and building an enthusiastic customer following. I guess now I can use you as an example of how quickly one incredibly stupid decision can reverse all of it. Please change your mind on this issue. It is still not too late.
 
Bryant Patten

March 3rd, 2000 6:10 AM
 
Show some leadership on this issue!
 
Robin K Deyoe

March 3rd, 2000 6:11 AM
 
Brian D. Shapiro, Sr. Systems Pr

March 3rd, 2000 6:12 AM
 
One-click shopping is a great idea. It allows for
greater security on the web as customers do not
have to constantly re-enter their credit-card
information. Unfortunately, Mr Bezos, you don't
own this idea. And the potential for this to
benefit people far outweighs whatever profits you
might earn. Amazon may sell anything under the sun, but Amazon might not sell say, Dell computers. If I were a Dell customer, I would demand that Dell put in this "one-click" technology to use, for my peace of mind. Unfortunately, becuase of your actions, Mr Bezos,
other innocent e-companies, not necessarily your competitors, cannnot offer this.

Please think about the community, rather than your own bottom-line. If you do, sometimes, the bottom-line will take care of itself. But if you don't, the converse might well happen!
 
Shang Shan Chong

March 3rd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Damn, a patent for cookie technology, what a great idea... I think Ill go and patent the URL idea. Or how about the "?"... yeah, from now on, no one can use the "?", its my idea, I came up with it, got that? Oh hey, I just used it...

Fuck you Amazon.
 
James Coyle

March 3rd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Well, I haven't been a customer of Amazon for long. I have enjoyed excellent service and would have liked to make further purchases through the company.
However, it looks like being a short lived affair. I am saddened by this somewhat cynical move. Register the '1 Click' slogan if you will, but drop this rediculous patent for heaven's sake.
I would urge you to consider that open source is likely to change the face of microsoft in the long run, and they're just a little bit bigger than you are. Wise up.
 
Brett Wiltshire

March 3rd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Today I'm just a name on a list, but tomorrow I another dollar that won't go to Amazon...
 
tamas perlaky

March 3rd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, should you happen to read this, let me simply state that I have had nothing but positive experiences ordering from Amazon, but it disturbs and saddens me to learn that Amazon feels that it must resort to strong-arm, bullying tactics to secure its market position. While such tactics may win the "battle," the "war" will most likely be won by the competitor who offers the market the best product, service, and value. Using its patents offensively distracts Amazon from the task of continuing to improve upon these elements of its business, and I urge you to reconsider the precedents you have (and will) set for the technology industry and the lasting effects they are likely to have on Amazon's market position.
 
A.M. Gildersleeve

March 3rd, 2000 6:13 AM
 
Christopher Fulbright

March 3rd, 2000 6:14 AM
 
Don't get high on your own supply Jeff. You're lucky that the internet helped you build your Dream, don't beg the question and just let the internet evolve as it should.

If you attempt to stifle such basic creativity as one-click ordering and affiliate programs, you'll have mass mutiny on your hands by thousands of your affiliates. And, the customers today aren't stupid. Barnes and Noble is only one click away!
(Maybe I'll go there right now...)

Thanks,

Paul Bauer
www.dreamsalive.com
 
Paul Bauer

March 3rd, 2000 6:14 AM
 
Derek Rainwater

March 3rd, 2000 6:15 AM
 
I think Amazon has stopped too far short of what they could have done. They should patent all shopping done on-line and limit all retail internet purchases to their site alone. After all, blatantly copying Amazon.com's brilliantly unique innovations is the only reason anyone else has had any success on the internet at all. Shame on everyone else that uses hyper text to do business.
 
James Bayer

March 3rd, 2000 6:15 AM
 
I disagree entirely with Amazon's approach/strategy with this patent. As an IT professional in the B2B world, I am consistently reminded of this type of philosophy and it distresses me greatly that it has infected an internet pioneer. It is worse than any virus maliciously inflicted upon the net. I will not purchase any item on Amazon until I see a different direction.
 
Nick Reichenbach

March 3rd, 2000 6:15 AM
 
This is clearly what happens when ordinarily honest and reasonable businessmen listen too much to their staff weasels (lawyers). Until and unless Amazon backs off of this unfair and ultimately illegal practice, I too will no longer be a customer.
 
Rick Vera-Burgos

March 3rd, 2000 6:15 AM
 
Yeah! Amazon learns to use cookies and think they're the only ones. With that kind of awareness, no wonder they have yet to turn a profit...
 
Eric Souza

March 3rd, 2000 6:16 AM
 
Good company. Bad idea.
 
Brian Hoffman

March 3rd, 2000 6:16 AM
 
Ariane Reid

March 3rd, 2000 6:16 AM
 
Adam Trowbridge

March 3rd, 2000 6:17 AM
 
We at DendWrite.com were debating whether to become an Amazon or Barnes&Noble affiliate. Both had given pretty good service, but Amazon's abuse of the patent system made our decision quite clear: we're now B&N.com affiliates and encourage our friends & associates to boycott Amazon and consider buying from B&N.com, whether or not they go through our site.
 
Michael Stillman

March 3rd, 2000 6:17 AM
 
I fully agree that both the 1-click ordering and the affiliate marketing patents are ungrounded. Both of these methods are well known techniques that have been with us for quite some time (before Amazon).

Business tricks like this are shameful. I have cancelled all my outstanding orders with Amazon and advised my friends and my 4000 employee company to do the same until this unscrupulous behavior is withdrawn.

I have always liked Amazon and will be happy to rejoin once this 'mistake' is corrected. Until then I wonder how Amazon is going to afford all the hundreds of legal battles with 60% to 80% of all web-based busiensses once most of their customer base has boycotted them :-)
 
Philip Schmidt

March 3rd, 2000 6:18 AM
 
I'm really sorry to do this, because amazon was always very nice, convenient, fast, everything -- their customer service was *fantastic*, and I love their post-its :-) Often, my orders arrived the day after I placed them, even with standard shipping. Using cdnow.com and bn.com, that is unfortunately not the case.

In the past, I would never have used a non-amazon site just because of how good amazon had been. I didn't shop at amazon because of 1-click shopping (I never even used it), but because they gave me good prices and fantastic service.

Stop the stupid patents! If you drop them, you'll win anyway because you're a better company! If you don't drop them, you may not lose immediately, but you'll certainly piss off a lot of people.
 
David Charlton

March 3rd, 2000 6:18 AM
 
Barnes & Noble gets all my book business from now on, unless they, too, succumb to greed and stupidity in which case it's back to the local book store for me.
 
James Gerrish

March 3rd, 2000 6:18 AM
 
Tim, great letter. As an Amazon Associate, a software engineer and fan of open source software, I will not buy from Amazon until they stop taking advantage of the patent office's inability to understand open source software and the internet. I would urge all other Associates to also close up shop and go elsewhere.
 
Bill Mikkelsen

March 3rd, 2000 6:18 AM
 
Erik Morton

March 3rd, 2000 6:19 AM
 
Ruth Rinehart

March 3rd, 2000 6:20 AM
 
Amazon.com could save face by rescinding their action with the explanation that the patent was applied for in 1997 - ancient history in Internet time. As an act of goodwill to the Internet community, they should avoid pursuing this matter further. As a result of Amazon's action, I will be using the services of B&N until this frivolous enforcement attempt is dropped.
 
David Verschoore

March 3rd, 2000 6:20 AM
 
You are just a reminder of what is bad about the system of economics we share. Grab all you can and let the rest be dammed.
 
Robert Ward

March 3rd, 2000 6:21 AM
 
I am an Amazon's client from the first day and still buy many books from Amazon. The reason I was one of the first is that I have been using computers, programming, building hardware, etc.. from the early days of computing. It's people like me, I believe, that have created and maintained the succes of Amazon on the web. What Amazon is now doing is, if not really inmoral, at least repulsive to many of us. Should Amazon go ahead to enforce this patent (and others like this) I'll seriously consider stopping my custom to Amazon. Bezos succeded because he was innovative, innovation comes from enthousiastic and dedicated people: don't kill innovation Jeff!
 
Oscar Estevez

March 3rd, 2000 6:21 AM
 
The filing for patents for these ideas is plain stupid. Many sites already have similar features and the notion that Amazon was the originator of these features is speculative. While I am a frequent buyer on Amazon, I will be switching to bn.com until Amazon drops the frivolous pursuit of patents for the 1-click and Associates features. In the past I have shopped on both sites, but used Amazon mainly out of loyalty. With the filing of these patents, Amazon has lost my loyalty.
 
Sean O'Brien

March 3rd, 2000 6:21 AM
 
Software and business patents are good to stop progress.
 
Matthias Bruestle

March 3rd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
Kathryn Leak

March 3rd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
I am sorry to see a innovative buisness like Amazon.com to become just another greedy ginat tyrant want-a-be with no sense of honor and graditude towards other unselfish innovators of the web.
 
Sigurjon Sveinsson

March 3rd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
Trying to make Bill Gates jealous HE didn't think to steal this first?
 
Richard Niolon, Ph.D.

March 3rd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
Neil Turner

March 3rd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
The spirit of the internet, knowledge sharing, and that was it original purpose, that any attempt by any one company (or person) to dominate any area of the net technologically or otherwise is a grave mis-use of the 20th centuries greatest invention.
 
Brian Vos

March 3rd, 2000 6:22 AM
 
As a stockholder in Amazon.com, I say "Stop the Madness"!
 
David Edwards

March 3rd, 2000 6:23 AM
 
Justin Greene

March 3rd, 2000 6:24 AM
 
Barry Mitchell

March 3rd, 2000 6:25 AM
 
it's funny how expensive greed can become.
 
Bob Parrish

March 3rd, 2000 6:25 AM
 
Nick Mathewson

March 3rd, 2000 6:25 AM
 
Mitchell Surface

March 3rd, 2000 6:26 AM
 
Kenneth R. Klebart

March 3rd, 2000 6:26 AM
 
Brian Drum

March 3rd, 2000 6:26 AM
 
It is sad to see the potential of the 'net sacrificed to the short sightedness of a few individuals. It is equally sad to see the potential of an innovative and successful marketplace competitor threatened so much by the decisions of individuals who are misplaced within their corporate structure. I believe we should try to identify those individuals within the Amazon.com corporate structure who are truly responsible for these short sighted and unwise decisions. It would be a service to Amazon as well as to the rest of the community if pressure could be brought to bear on the actual source of the problem.
 
David McGuire

March 3rd, 2000 6:27 AM
 
tripp millican

March 3rd, 2000 6:27 AM
 
Your patent is ludicrous. I will no longer do business with amazon.
 
Marshal Simmons

March 3rd, 2000 6:28 AM
 
karl berry

March 3rd, 2000 6:28 AM
 
I was a happy Amazon.com customer. Now I am not.
I am using it still for it's good search engine... and then go elsewhere.


Try to wake up.
 
Florin Iucha

March 3rd, 2000 6:28 AM
 
Peter Arien

March 3rd, 2000 6:29 AM
 
Andrew Labarge

March 3rd, 2000 6:29 AM
 
Matthew Palmer

March 3rd, 2000 6:29 AM
 
Michael Breneman

March 3rd, 2000 6:29 AM
 
Bezos has shown the type of business behavior that requires me to take my business anywhere else.
 
Mark Conan McMackin

March 3rd, 2000 6:29 AM
 
I agree with Tim. This is the first step in stifling the growth potential of the Web. I also urge Amazon.com to drop the patent.
 
Gary Krajci

March 3rd, 2000 6:30 AM
 
Christopher Cole

March 3rd, 2000 6:30 AM
 
Amazon customer until the patent started being enforced. After then, I've taken my business elsewhere.
 
Matthew Myers

March 3rd, 2000 6:30 AM
 
Harold Sinclair

March 3rd, 2000 6:31 AM
 
I too had been a satisfied Amazon customer, but I see this as another attempt at corporate "ownership" of the web. I would cancel my account, but they don't seem to allow it! (While we're at it, let's keep a close eye on aol/tw.)
 
David A. Beardsley

March 3rd, 2000 6:31 AM
 
Chad Dinerman

March 3rd, 2000 6:31 AM
 
Darryl Peck

March 3rd, 2000 6:31 AM
 
Rob Mack

March 3rd, 2000 6:32 AM
 
Trying to limit competition this way does not promote Amazon's credibility as an internet citizen.
 
Jose Batista

March 3rd, 2000 6:32 AM
 
From an innovator and pioneer of the internet, who I used to love shopping at, to a bottom feeder who simply patents non-original ideas that are widely in use. You people didn't even invent the affiliate program! Never again will I shop at Amazon.
 
Jason Dostal

March 3rd, 2000 6:32 AM
 
Sarah M. Reidy

March 3rd, 2000 6:32 AM
 
Former Amazon Customer
 
Jonathan R. Golding

March 3rd, 2000 6:33 AM
 
Tim Glen

March 3rd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
I, too, will not purchase anything from Amazon until they change their position on these patents. The patents will only hinder e-commerce.
 
Eric Barker

March 3rd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
This patent will not be defendable. The application is "obvious" and would be easily thought of by anyone using the web. It would be analagous to someone patenting, "Press 1 on your telephone to place your order." Protecting intellectual property is a difficult issue that is rife with judgement calls. I think the Patent Office missed on this one.
 
Dean Dodson

March 3rd, 2000 6:34 AM
 
I think it is a shame, that a company who has found great success by enjoying and exploiting the fruits of other's labor, feels the need to not only request but to enforce a patent on technology that they had not invented.

"invent: To produce of contrive (something previously unknown) by the use of ingenuity or imagination." --from Webster's II New College Dictionary

It appears that the only "ingenuity or imagination" used was in finding a way to "work the patent system."

Mr. Bezos, please reconsider your position.
:::
 
Frank Edward Baker

March 3rd, 2000 6:36 AM
 
I am going to remove the associate's links on my websites until Amazon decides to play fair with the net community.
 
Belinda Burnore

March 3rd, 2000 6:36 AM
 
Jason A. Kerpelman

March 3rd, 2000 6:36 AM
 
I will not purchase anything from Amazon, nor will I visit their website for any purpose until they agree to drop these patents.
 
Josh Gohlke

March 3rd, 2000 6:36 AM
 
I signed this with one click!
 
Sean Michael Wentzell

March 3rd, 2000 6:37 AM
 
A. Dallas (Austin, TX)

March 3rd, 2000 6:37 AM
 
J Morrissey

March 3rd, 2000 6:37 AM
 
Jeffrey Carlton

March 3rd, 2000 6:38 AM
 
As a computer professional I have been watching the "intellectual property patents" with some interest for a while, and the recent grabs by Amazon just simply leave me aghast. Does such greed and stupidity actually exist in the world??? Amazing. Talk about sawing off the branch on which you are sitting...
 
Ruben Mannstaedt

March 3rd, 2000 6:38 AM
 
Sean Daly

March 3rd, 2000 6:39 AM
 
It is interesting to see how ultimate greed can show up in a business one had respect for. Amazon.com has no sense of integrity. It is stealing technology that someone else made and many others used before Amazon existed as a company. My whole family will not purchase from Amazon.com until it shows it has integrity. I will actively voice this situation to all my acquaintances and friends. Until now it was my
business of choice when I purchased on the internet.
 
Natacha Sochat, MD

March 3rd, 2000 6:40 AM
 
Linda Wishman

March 3rd, 2000 6:41 AM
 
Craig Saila

March 3rd, 2000 6:41 AM
 
Count one more person who is boycotting your site and recommending others boycott it as well. Many friends, neighbors, and associates refer to me as 'my friend who helps me with my computer'. I now recommend they NOT do business with you nor purchase your stock. We are the age and income brackets that made you... and we are now switching to your competition.
 
N. Hermanson

March 3rd, 2000 6:41 AM
 
I am deeply shocked. In my opininon you are giving the Internet community a big blow on the nose and eventually shooting yourself in the foot, which is regrettable, considering the great things Amazon.com has done TO the Internet community. (You probably have the brains to guess why?)

I am even more shocked that the US patent office doesn't have more computer knowledge.

If you want to be fair, call them an tell them that they have made a mistake, they should have someone with proper knowledge have a look at your application and reconsider. :-)

Until then I shall not make use of your web site, thank you.

Seriously, It is very sad to see how short sighted Mr. Mammon is.
 
Bodvar Bjorgvinsson

March 3rd, 2000 6:41 AM
 
Amazon can kiss my business goodbye! The last thing we need is another abusive company like Microsoft.
 
Brian D. Goodwin

March 3rd, 2000 6:42 AM
 
Let's say someone put a patent on a document such as the US Constitution and was enforced worldwide. Would that dictate, that only the US could declair laws of freedom? C'mon lets share information, not hold it greedily for the sole purpose of making Amazon the only one who can write code... If the code involved is indeed as common as is stated in the letter, then someone could mistakenly run against the patent. Also, if it contains knowlege that has previously been developed, then to hell with the patent in the first place!!

John W.
SysAdmin
 
John M. Wolfe

March 3rd, 2000 6:42 AM
 
Good site! Good Service! Good Heavens! Let it lie, Amazon, let it lie!
 
Lee Harris

March 3rd, 2000 6:42 AM
 
Maceo Marquez

March 3rd, 2000 6:42 AM
 
Way to go Amazon.... perhaps you would like us to surrender the entire HTML language to you while you are at it. BE REALISTIC FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!
 
Al Kahler

March 3rd, 2000 6:43 AM
 
It is sad when a profitable online business like Amazon.com keeps to themselves the very innovation that got them to where they are today. Just another ugly example of open source-sprung capitalism.
 
Nicholas Tse

March 3rd, 2000 6:44 AM
 
I support this open letter to Jeff Bezos 100% and will boycott Amazon until they drop this ridiculous pursuit of a patent on something so trivial. It is a complete disrespect for "open-source" and is a spiteful reprise to the same internet that has put them on the planet. While Jeff Bezos may only see this letter as 10,000 of millions and millions of potential customers, rest assured that these 10,000 will certainly educate those around them about this issue and let the "dominoe effect" fall where it may.
 
Jeff Briggs

March 3rd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
Lisa Gagnon

March 3rd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
In response to your 1-Click Patent efforts, I'll be taking my business to Fatbrain, Barnes&Noble, and any other online bookseller, until you stop this ludicrous and shamelessly greedy stunt. I've been a customer from your earliest days, and have stuck by you even as I became nervous at the increasing WalMartization of Amazon.com. This is the last straw though, and you can count on me to take my business elsewhere and tell all my friends to do the same.
 
Matt Spiegler

March 3rd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
Jose A. Diaz

March 3rd, 2000 6:45 AM
 
Rupert Wainwright

March 3rd, 2000 6:46 AM
 
Ellen Childress

March 3rd, 2000 6:46 AM
 
Another reason to shop indepentdent (non-chain)book sellers.
 
Jack Hawk

March 3rd, 2000 6:47 AM
 
I am telling everyone I know about this. You will not have the business of my colleagues, friends and family until you change your tactics. Don't make the same mistake Microsoft did.
 
Emory Baird

March 3rd, 2000 6:47 AM
 
Sarah Kuehnle

March 3rd, 2000 6:47 AM
 
I have ordered from Amazon before, and was very pleased with the convenience of the service. I was planning to use it again, but unless Amazon backs off the patent, I will join the boycott.
 
Tihamer Toth-Fejel

March 3rd, 2000 6:47 AM
 
jason sutter

March 3rd, 2000 6:47 AM
 
Jeremy Pinnix

March 3rd, 2000 6:48 AM
 
T. M. Hawley

March 3rd, 2000 6:48 AM
 
I have often thought that amazon was a great place to do business,Get competative pricing,and quality service. It is truly a sad state of affairs that you would try to put a stop to being in competion what are you worried about? I am a business person as well and you just lost any of my future business.
 
Joe Montelongo

March 3rd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
For shame, Amazon.com. For a company which subsists by sharing information (books!), you have some pretty unpleasant policies.
 
Mike Pelletier

March 3rd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
Mark Kunzmann

March 3rd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
Maybe one of the web pioneers will patent something that will cause Amazon and others to pay up or shut down.

The good news (for attorneys) is that the legal profession will continue to prosper with web litigation that will certainly thrive.
 
Dave Mansfield

March 3rd, 2000 6:49 AM
 
Greg Case

March 3rd, 2000 6:51 AM
 
Jeff, I have to say that you are true pioneers. So many things in our past, which began as noble ventures, have been squashed like a bug because someone wanted to step in and take over. We did it to the native Americans when we came over from Great Britain. Now, you have begun something that, if allowed to pass uncontested, will most likely result in destroying the one place where people truly feel free -- the internet. If your frivolous patents are allowed to stand, you will be opening Pandora's box, and will be responsible for the internet's open standards being slammed shut.
 
Michael Glass

March 3rd, 2000 6:51 AM
 
From now on I will not deal with Amazon in any way, shape, or form. Your greed, Mr. Jeff, is ubeliveable!
 
Ed Price

March 3rd, 2000 6:52 AM
 
The patents filed for and obtained by Amazon reflect an amazing lack of internet and computer savey on the part of the U.S. Patent office.
Cangressional and Senatorial pressures should also be brought to focus on this issue as they have the power to effect change.
I would urge Amazon to release these patents into the public domain immediately. After all, I find it amazing that they have the gall to patent a concept! And folks, should Netscape choose and cookies are part of the 1click patent, I suspect that they could have the patent revoked for tech. infringement. After all... it sure wasn't Amazon that came up with cookie!
 
Kate Reust

March 3rd, 2000 6:52 AM
 
When Amazon first went into business, I was an enthusiastic customer. As traditional booksellers like Barnes & Noble moved onto the Internet, Amazon continued to be my online bookstore of preference. But when I learned some time ago of your bogus 1-Click patent, I decided to stop doing business with you for as long as that patent stands. Your latest associates patent has only reinforced my decision.

You are conducting business in a realm where all the work has already been done for you, often by people giving away their innovations for free. You did not invent the HTTP protocol, GUI interfaces, the World Wide Web, or cookies. You are hardly the first to sell products, or to keep customers' credit cards on file. Combining all of these into a business system is a trivial innovation, and I'm even skeptical of your being the first to do that. You are stealing the work of others, claiming it as your own, and using it as a weapon to beat others down. That is wrong. Your customers know it is wrong, and your business will suffer for it.

 
Peter F. Dubuque

March 3rd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
What more can be said?
 
James A. Redfield

March 3rd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
Jeff, I'm a customer, an admirer, and a web developer. What you're doing is foolish and only temporarily self-serving. Consider Mercedes-Benz. They invented anti-lock brakes, petented them, and encouraged other manufactureres to use the technology. If you do the same you'll come out a winner in this scenario. I won't support a company that would erode the open-source foundations upon which my business rests, however. You've lost my business till you come to your senses.
 
Nils Menten

March 3rd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
Bad move Amazon. You lost me as a customer.
 
Wayne Down

March 3rd, 2000 6:53 AM
 
I feel that the things that made the web so powerful need to remain available for all to use so that it may continue growing. Amazon isn't helping grow the web but it could help stagnate at least part of the web.
 
John Champion

March 3rd, 2000 6:54 AM
 
Brian Paulson

March 3rd, 2000 6:54 AM
 
I greatly admire the company, not the act.
 
S. Seth Hickel

March 3rd, 2000 6:55 AM
 
It seems ridiculous that an online retailer as large and powerful as Amazon would have to resort to such pettiness. Have the fortitude to be successful by running a better business, not by misusing the judicial system to protect yourself against future threats.
 
John Gorrilla

March 3rd, 2000 6:55 AM
 
As an investor, I view this move by Amazon as a sign that Amazon *never* sees profitability from it core business and instead is attempting to sponge off other e-commerce sites and sites that have affiliate programs in order to turn a profit at no cost.

I am a registered affiliate for Amazon, but I refuse to link to Amazon anymore because of its overbearing affiliate program policy... In fact, I would go so far as to say that Amazon's program is completely unlike any other affiliate program because all other programs serve the dual purpose of being rebate programs for the affiliates themselves.

By the way, Amazon...
I have linked to Amazon.com protest pages from my site, which gets a couple thousand page views a day... http://www.youmightbe.com

Enjoy the upper-hand while the uninformed are still in the majority. It won't be that way for long.
 
Thomas Powell

March 3rd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
Mitch Mitchell

March 3rd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
simon gurney

March 3rd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
Pascal Coupet

March 3rd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
While I understand the need to protect unique ideas, it seems this patent has gone too far. My knowledge of HTML, JavaScript, site design, and internet savvy in general is due to the open source environment of the WWW. I can't imagine what the internet would be like had "view source" not been a common browser option. Many brilliant minds may have never been exposed to what would eventually become their careers. And this is only thinking in terms of the past 5 years - what if there had been no sharing of "invention" prior to then!
 
AA Allen

March 3rd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
As a writer, my books (Random House and Prentice Hall) are sold by Amazon, but that doesn't keep me from saying that this stinks.

Jerry Day
 
Jerry day

March 3rd, 2000 6:56 AM
 
I have stopped shopping at Amazon.com because of their actions. I urge others to do so.
 
Tom Jenkins

March 3rd, 2000 6:57 AM
 
Megan Crossman

March 3rd, 2000 6:57 AM
 
In the Media, Amazon is a success... the school is still out on their business model and this will not win any new points when they begin to get challenged in court.

www.1america.com is preparing to organize online e-commerce sites to immediately challenge this failure on the part of the US patent office.
 
Marshall Heller

March 3rd, 2000 6:58 AM
 
Igor Sorokin

March 3rd, 2000 6:58 AM
 
Gilles Desjardins

March 3rd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
As an early Amazon customer and a avid perl user (a.k.a. O'Reilly reader), this is out right offensive. Friends and I have bought many books since the early days of Amaozon existence, it (the patent) will make buying a more difficult proposition. Don't enforce it, just forget thatyou ever even applied for it. Don't make us all regret being customers.
 
John Hayes

March 3rd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
Wow, almost 10,000 petitioners. Getting the hint yet Amazon?
 
Andy MacNamara

March 3rd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
I agree that the service offered is top, but I am strongly against this patent.

I have ordered books from Amazon before. Until they change their mind about this, they will no longer have my custom. That's a promise.

If other like-minded people do the same -- and stick to their guns -- Amazon WILL GET HURT.

Finally, perhaps its worth noting that upsetting people with technical savvy can be very bad for your health. I refer to the denial of service attacks. Anyone with a web-stressing tool can record a script and leave it running over night. Or bombard you with messages.

CHANGE YOUR MINDS NOW

It's Waterstones for me from now on ...
 
Ian Lloyd

March 3rd, 2000 6:59 AM
 
You reap what you so.
 
Eric Smith

March 3rd, 2000 7:00 AM
 
John Leonard

March 3rd, 2000 7:00 AM
 
Jeff - I was an ardent supporter of Amazon.com and still support the innovative way you've used technology (developed by others) to further customer service. As President of another company doing it's own incredibly small bit to expand the envelope of online customer service techniques -- we're much smaller than your company of course, but also intent on producing quality jobs and quality customer service -- I am, for now, a customer of BarnesandNoble.com. At least one of our clients is larger than you, but the vast majority of our dotcom clients are much, much smaller than Amazon. Whereas the larger companies can take you on in court, and likely will soon succeed against you, these smaller companies can never hope to bring up a case against your ridiculous patents. Do you really want to put all of these small businesses out of business? or do you prefer to focus on providing quality customer service in an efficient manner and thrive in that way? Please don't forget that the government also uses cookies in their procurement ordering and buying, and they're the first providers (& financial investors) of much of the technology the American public and you are now thriving on.
 
Connie S. Mazur

March 3rd, 2000 7:00 AM
 
A new "Bill Gates"?!.
 
Igor Sorokin

March 3rd, 2000 7:01 AM
 
I am totally against what Amazon is doing and sincerely hope they reconsider their actions. I find it sad that a company that has profited so fantastically from the open community created by the Internet now wants to limit others access to those same benefits. Shame on you.
 
Kathy Becker

March 3rd, 2000 7:02 AM
 
Don't be so greedy, Jeff!
 
Judy Cheske

March 3rd, 2000 7:02 AM
 
Chanan Braunstein

March 3rd, 2000 7:02 AM
 
Ashley Brown

March 3rd, 2000 7:02 AM
 
Daniel Michaud

March 3rd, 2000 7:03 AM
 
You were doing so well by being the good company with the better sense of community on the web. Too bad! This might be just the kind of opportunity B&N was looking for. I know it made me visit their site for the first time ever, and I have been ordering from you for over 2 years now. (Turns out their site is pretty good!)
 
Nathan Jones

March 3rd, 2000 7:04 AM
 
Even though I'm a stock holder I can't abide this kind of money grabbing nonsense.

I find bamm.com more attractive and cheaper every day.
 
Les Hall

March 3rd, 2000 7:05 AM
 
Jarek Wieczorek

March 3rd, 2000 7:06 AM
 
Paul Retherford

March 3rd, 2000 7:06 AM
 
Phil Dye

March 3rd, 2000 7:07 AM
 
As one who works in the e-Commerce industry, I feel that Amazon.com has tried to unfairly take control of what used to be (and with the exception of Amazon.com) still is a fabulous marketing tool, the Internet. Their attempts at enforcing their new patent are ludicrous at best. Because it's dark in a room, I turn on light. Should I register that as a patent and then proceed to enforce that action on others who may do the same? No. And neither should Amazon.
 
Ethan Wooster

March 3rd, 2000 7:07 AM
 
I agree
 
David Barrington

March 3rd, 2000 7:07 AM
 
I've been using Amazon.com exclusively for ordering books and CDs online, but I don't want to support this kind of Microsoft, big-bully tactics. I'll start shopping elsewhere now. I agree with Tim. Mr. Bezos needs to admit his mistake and retract his stance.
 
J.F. Flowers

March 3rd, 2000 7:08 AM
 
I have no problem with Amazon seeking patents wherever possible on its innovations. However, this is a case in which the patent was granted for work that was not unique or innovative. While this is good competitive move, it is a horrible pr one. I like many others, will choose to take my business elsewhere if Amazon continues to try enforcing this patent.
 
James Lewin

March 3rd, 2000 7:08 AM
 
Give us our money back !!!
Don't make us pay for what you had for free, Uncle Scrooge !!!
 
Olivier Monachon

March 3rd, 2000 7:08 AM
 
Christina Leclerc

March 3rd, 2000 7:08 AM
 
I will never buy anything from Amazon.
 
Mark Kaczmarczyk

March 3rd, 2000 7:09 AM
 
Amazon has just done themselves in for my business. I own multiple internet businesses and am abhorred by the monopolistic tactics of Amazon.com. My business will now be done with Barnes & Noble. I urge others to join in and boycott Amazon. We are supposed to nurture the Internet and make it grow together. Amazons move is clearly a power play to become a dictator. All cookies from Amazon have forever been removed from all my machines and never will they be allowed to return.
 
Scott Mitchell

March 3rd, 2000 7:09 AM
 
Jeff Bezos,

I have always admired your pioneering ways in e-commerce. But this act of ultimate cyber-hubris cannot go unpunished. I cannot in good conscience continue to purchase items from Amazon as long as this outrage continues...
 
Mark Lisanti

March 3rd, 2000 7:10 AM
 
MIKE HINTON

March 3rd, 2000 7:10 AM
 
I have spent about $2000 at amazon.com. It is very easily my favorite website, but I will reluctantly withdraw my future business there until they stop enforcing their patents.
 
Tim Crews

March 3rd, 2000 7:10 AM
 
To your cookies I say be gone amazon!
 
Mark Patten

March 3rd, 2000 7:10 AM
 
Frivolous, petulant and boneheaded.
 
Lawrence A. Westhaver

March 3rd, 2000 7:11 AM
 
What's next, a patent on HTML?
 
Tom Busch

March 3rd, 2000 7:12 AM
 
William Barrett

March 3rd, 2000 7:12 AM
 
I have stock in Amazon.com. I think Amazon.com is a well managed, innovative company. I think it has many worthy competitive advantages. I DON'T THINK the 1-click shopping method is one of them. This is a basic technological feature that has no right to be patented. Amazon should do the right thing and let it go.
 
Charles Bent

March 3rd, 2000 7:13 AM
 
Chris Curtis

March 3rd, 2000 7:13 AM
 
Patents without merit, specially for a common knowledge technology, will impair continued development of the Internet! Everybody will be hurt by such actions and in the end even Amazon will have to pay!
 
Antonio E. Senior

March 3rd, 2000 7:13 AM
 
Anyone who succeeds in patenting the obvious, and more to the point, already established, use of an existing technology is not protecting their intellectual property. They have just succeeded in finding a patent lawyer who clearly doesn't understand the technology well enough.

Surely in any legal action resulting from this patent, documentation about cookies can be cited as prior art, thus invalidating the patent. And as all the common examples on cookies demonstrate a shopping cart, it's hardly even a novel approach. Wow - you store the credit card number as well. Big deal.

This patent has got to be the latest in a long line of utterly stupid patents, right up there with the XOR cursor patent. Grow up, and start inventing technologies that nobody else _has_ thought of.

As a result of this action, I certainly intend not to use Amazon until they relinquish their patent.
 
Ranulf Doswell

March 3rd, 2000 7:13 AM
 
1LessClick from me.
 
heidi hiteshue

March 3rd, 2000 7:14 AM
 
I was an Amazon customer. Since the patent 5,960,411 I have boycotted their business and will continue as well as actively encourage others to do the same. Until they stop stifling the industry with this patent. The US Patent office is making mistakes - you know it and so do the rest of us. Don't strangle the rest of us.

 
Greg Buckwalter

March 3rd, 2000 7:14 AM
 
I will be purchasing books from Fatbrain or BN until you change this policy.

It is essential that ideas like this that are prior art not be accepted by the Patent Office.
 
Colin Gilboy

March 3rd, 2000 7:15 AM
 
Bad move, Amazon.
 
Tony Owens

March 3rd, 2000 7:15 AM
 
next thing you know, they will patent selling books on the internet.
How Absurb !!!!!
No amazon for me, ever.
 
Patrick Fredrich

March 3rd, 2000 7:16 AM
 
As a long time Amazon.com customer, have bought thousand dollars worth of books, I am very disapointed by the patent-enforcing matter in question. While I don´t support the boicot practice, I too agree that the 1-click patent, for instance, holds up technological advances and what some would consider stealing obivous technology, and "open" technology that was already in use.
 
Luis R.A. Garcia

March 3rd, 2000 7:16 AM
 
While I find it convenient to shop at Amazon.com, I haven't found anythind at your site that I can't get elsewhere, and I have sometimes found 1-click ordering invconvenient. I suggest you wake up and smell the coffee.
 
Karri Benedict

March 3rd, 2000 7:16 AM
 
Phillip A. Martin

March 3rd, 2000 7:16 AM
 
Shocked, that is the only way I can describe my reaction! Not shocked that Amazon would apply for a patent on either their 1-click method or their Associates program for defensive purposes, but shocked that the patent office would grant either and shocked that Amazon used either of them offensively.

Hmmm, I wonder if I could get a patent for a web-based interface to pay commissions to my sales force?
 
Kenn R. Fagans

March 3rd, 2000 7:17 AM
 
Crummy idea for a patent but a great marketing move if you make. Most of us just sit around with other people's ideas and never do anything. Jeff, you are the kind of person who makes America the best country to live in. Trying to patent the innovative use of cookies is goofy, but you have probably helped build the basic market for books which every bookseller here signing has benefited from.
 
David Kesterson

March 3rd, 2000 7:17 AM
 
Tim O'Reilly is right when he says, all of the smart people don't work for you. The ideas you've patented are no more "unique inventions" than the Internet is a field for propriatary claim-staking, or patents are weapons in the battle of greed. I'm boycotting Amazon until the lawsuits are dropped and these patents are withdrawn. -GLC (another Web Developer)
 
Gina Leigh Cicotello

March 3rd, 2000 7:17 AM
 
greedy greedy never gets! don't you have enough.
 
carlos hicks

March 3rd, 2000 7:18 AM
 
Maja-Lisa Thomson

March 3rd, 2000 7:19 AM
 
Kristjan Bjorn Thordarson

March 3rd, 2000 7:19 AM
 
Elizabeth Lawley

March 3rd, 2000 7:19 AM
 
I believe Amazon will leave a bad taste in the mouths of many and will ultimately loose business from thier unscrupulous abuse of the patent system.
 
Mark Hircock

March 3rd, 2000 7:20 AM
 
I've spent quite a lot of money at Amazon the past couple of years. No more. Until you quit trying to enforce these ridiculous patents I'll use other internet book sellers (fatbrain, borders, powell's and so on).
 
Larry Barber

March 3rd, 2000 7:20 AM
 
Heck, we could all turn off our cookies and prevent Amazon from using 1-Click at all!

Thank you Tim for helping the open source community thrive.
 
Brian Allemana

March 3rd, 2000 7:20 AM
 
I will not purchase another item from Amazon, until they cease the practice of patenting software technology and release patents like the "one-click purchasing" patent. Amazon should know that they aren't the only game in town and that they're not even the best game in town anymore.
 
Paul "Bo" Peaslee

March 3rd, 2000 7:20 AM
 
Amazon's greed led me to switch to barnes and noble, where the shipping costs the same but packages arrive sooner.
 
Christine Hughes

March 3rd, 2000 7:22 AM
 
As a software developer, I'm APPALLED at the idea of software patents... I don't care HOW much time you took to write those "One-click" shopping scripts, that's what copyrights are for!
 
Ryan Waddell

March 3rd, 2000 7:22 AM
 
Mr. Bezos,
By reconsidering you'll get a lot more than just "1 click".
 
Marina Windevoxhel

March 3rd, 2000 7:23 AM
 
Laura Tanis

March 3rd, 2000 7:23 AM
 
Steve Thornton

March 3rd, 2000 7:23 AM
 
Luis R. Lebron

March 3rd, 2000 7:24 AM
 
Laurent Pelecq

March 3rd, 2000 7:25 AM
 
Remember when there where two major online booksellers? Barnes & Noble and hummm who was the other one?
 
Sean Roche

March 3rd, 2000 7:25 AM
 
Nick Willson

March 3rd, 2000 7:25 AM
 
Christina R Wodtke

March 3rd, 2000 7:26 AM
 
What a pity!
 
Maria Castro

March 3rd, 2000 7:26 AM
 
This patent should never have been granted.
 
Eric B.

March 3rd, 2000 7:27 AM
 
Don Sutherland

March 3rd, 2000 7:27 AM
 
K McClintock

March 3rd, 2000 7:27 AM
 
I've never been an Amazon.com "fan" since Day One -- nothing personal, I just didn't like buying from them. I've spent more time looking at the books on the shelves in real stores and prefer the ability to thumb thru anyways... Plus, those of us that *do* work on the Web/'net need a breath of fresh air now and then anyways. I think what Amazon.com is doing and trying to do is deplorable and needs to be stopped. It certainly is a shame when GREED takes over and common sense and decency have to take a back seat.

-_- D.
 
Dayn Riegel

March 3rd, 2000 7:27 AM
 
Jane Chakravorty

March 3rd, 2000 7:27 AM
 
Clay Claiborne

March 3rd, 2000 7:29 AM
 
Leslie Fitch

March 3rd, 2000 7:30 AM
 
Douglas Sparling

March 3rd, 2000 7:30 AM
 
Michael Butcher

March 3rd, 2000 7:30 AM
 
Tracy Leffler

March 3rd, 2000 7:30 AM
 
Steve Maxey

March 3rd, 2000 7:30 AM
 
Harsono Wirjoprawiro

March 3rd, 2000 7:31 AM
 
I would remind you -- just what was it that killed DIVX? It was the same kind of grassroots reaction that you're engendering here. That'll make a nice tombstone: "Amazon.com - the 2nd DIVX."
 
Nathan Shumate

March 3rd, 2000 7:31 AM
 
Best advertising Barnes and Noble could get!
 
David Earl

March 3rd, 2000 7:32 AM
 
Bad, bad idea, Amazon. What's next, trying to patent the air we breathe? And the Associates patent has made me decide not to place an Amazon Associates link on my websites as I develop them. I will also try to persuade my friends who do have links to drop them and try bestbookbuys.com for an alternate resource for buying books and music.
 
Don Kinney

March 3rd, 2000 7:32 AM
 
Fundamentally, Amazon.com is a good company and provides a valuable services. The potential enforcement of its latest patents, however, will only stifle the growth of e-commerce and business to business relationships. If Amazon stands on its patents and moves to broadly enforce them, the transaction costs in selling to customers and businesses will only increase. As costs increase, businesses and consumers may be less inclined to support e-commerce activites.

Finally, Amazon is on the verge of facing a huge backlash from all the professional individuals creating the virtual world of e-commerce. If the company alienates these professionals, that ill will is certainly going to be passed on to customers and businesses.
 
Michael F. Polk

March 3rd, 2000 7:33 AM
 
anonymous

March 3rd, 2000 7:33 AM
 
I've been an Amazon customer from the beginning, but I can't in good conscience support a company that openly goes against philosophies that attracted me to them in the first place.
 
Eric Hutson

March 3rd, 2000 7:33 AM
 
Amazon is finally making the final step needed to acheive their goal (Wal-mart of the web). Instead of focusing on new ideas to offer, they cut down those around them.
 
Clint Howarth

March 3rd, 2000 7:33 AM
 
I'll no longer buy from Amazon until it stops its high-handed ways.
 
dale sprouse

March 3rd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
From the time I first heard about this I've become more and more annoyed. The more I think about it the less I like your behavior. If you don't stop this foolishness you will do real harm. I will not buy from Amazon until you end this patent business.
 
David Lawrence

March 3rd, 2000 7:34 AM
 
Barbara Messing

March 3rd, 2000 7:35 AM
 
Zimran Ahmed

March 3rd, 2000 7:35 AM
 
Ryan Cook

March 3rd, 2000 7:37 AM
 
Paul Nicholls

March 3rd, 2000 7:37 AM
 
Chris Freas

March 3rd, 2000 7:38 AM
 
I will do no further business with Amazon.com until they stop this insanity. Furthermore, I will advise all my friends, colleagues and relatives to the same.
 
Scott Greiner

March 3rd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
Isn't the the Internet about, connection, freedom, the ability to make educated decisions, the ability to have access to all knowledge and opinion. Amazon.com's patent desicion show they are no better then the most cut-throat corrupt business practice that seeks to always get the advantage instead of upholding the ideals of its industry. Internet users have the choice, and I no longer choose you!
 
Matthew McBride

March 3rd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
Stop patenting things you didn't invent.
 
Andrea Goethals

March 3rd, 2000 7:39 AM
 
Quick math:

As of now about 9200 people signed this letter.
They all WERE Amazon customers.
They all purchased about 6 (or more) items a year
The average order price was $20 (or more).

9200x6x$20=$1,104,000.00 !!!
And growing !!!!

This is a very expensive patent, isn't it ?

If reason will not convince you Amazon, maybe money will !


 
Sophie Fredrich

March 3rd, 2000 7:40 AM
 
Jennifer Nealon Garone

March 3rd, 2000 7:40 AM
 
Silly Amazon!
 
Brian Wooley

March 3rd, 2000 7:41 AM
 
Frivilous patents must be stopped. This is just another example of a patent being granted that was built upon other peoples ideas and hard work. Please reconsider your position on this issue.
 
Mark A. Carter

March 3rd, 2000 7:41 AM
 
The great thing about the World Wide Web is it's raw equality. The web does not discriminate against sex, race, color, religion, certain education, etc. When we start to put up barriers to competition, the web becomes another realm of the haves and have-nots. When that happens, discrimination isn't far behind. Keep the web free!
 
Casey Dylan

March 3rd, 2000 7:41 AM
 
Alecia Ramsay

March 3rd, 2000 7:41 AM
 
Bryan Gillespie

March 3rd, 2000 7:42 AM
 
Please, remember the internet has given you the business you have. What has attracted people to the internet is not just the wealth of information, but the free flow of ideas. Don't forget where it came from, because if we do, we ruin it for everyone involved.

Think about it... remember the Internet is what WE make it, and I certainly don't want it to be just like the business/corporate world already is. We as a society have one of the most influential tools ever. We can use it for real change, or we can do things as they have always been done, with greedy, cutthroat manuvers like yours. I for one would like to see things change, wouldnt you?
 
Brad Robbins

March 3rd, 2000 7:42 AM
 
Dear Jeff Bezos,

After reading Time Magazine's portrait of you and your company, I looked upon you as a great innovator and leader of the technology revolution.

Now, after hearing of your abuse of an obviously outdated patent office, I look upon your company with disgust and disdain - you are not a leader, you're a swine.
 
Jesse Heap

March 3rd, 2000 7:42 AM
 
Jean Hedren

March 3rd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
Until amazon complies, I will advise all my clients not to do business with them. This is info-highway robbery at it's worst.
 
Chester Daniels

March 3rd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
Patrick King

March 3rd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
Why don´t we all sue Amazon for invasion of our pricacy; i.e. filling our computers with cookies without prior consent?
Why do american companies always think, that it´s OK to patent other peoples inventions etc.?
 
Jan Andersen

March 3rd, 2000 7:43 AM
 
Brandon Franklin

March 3rd, 2000 7:44 AM
 
I used to love Amazon.
 
David Comdico

March 3rd, 2000 7:44 AM
 
Amazon has been very good about listening to their customers in the past. Everyone should voice his/her concerns directly to Amazon.
 
Timothy Lang

March 3rd, 2000 7:45 AM
 
These frivolous patents are an embarrassment to Amazon and an insult to the loyal customers who have helped build this business. I will boycott Amazon, and encourage others to do so, until such time as they reconsider their actions.
 
John H. Dixon, Jr

March 3rd, 2000 7:45 AM
 
Hey, Amazon.. i have been using 'one click...' i mean cookies for a couple of years maybe i should have patented my 'one click' store last year.
 
Phil

March 3rd, 2000 7:46 AM
 
This blatent attempt to take advantage of the US patent system at the expense of all other internet users and developers is disgusting. It's a shame becasue I really used to enjoy shopping at Amazon, but greed is not attractive.
 
Christine J. Marcinkiewicz

March 3rd, 2000 7:46 AM
 
I bought *all* of my holiday gifts at Amazon
several years back. I bought quite a few college
textbooks there. I recommended them to people as
the place to shop for books online. But I can't condone their business practices, so I have taken my business to other online booksellers. Bad move, Amazon. Way to keep your long-time, loyal customers.
 
Bridget Kromhout

March 3rd, 2000 7:47 AM
 
As a website technical developer, I am appalled that Amazon would so blatantly abuse your powers like this. Your customer service is your best seller, your will win the #1 spot with that, and be honorable. You dont' need the patent. Also,
how dare you use *my* disk space to store your cookies and then have the gall to say that others can't. Be honorable, drop the patent, allow the web to continue to grow with its innovations, and win with your product, not devisive tactics.
 
Jen Hall

March 3rd, 2000 7:47 AM
 
I am appalled by Amazon's actions. I have been a loyal Amazon customer almost from the beginning - and I buy quite a lot of books. But I don't think that I will buy from Amazon in the future.
 
Steve Carroll

March 3rd, 2000 7:47 AM
 
Mathew Corthell

March 3rd, 2000 7:48 AM
 
Comments on the whole thing from one of the founding programmers at Amazon.com: www.op.net/~pbd/amazon-1click.html

Worth reading
 
Hans Löfving

March 3rd, 2000 7:49 AM
 
Reconsidering what has been an unwavering loyalty to Amazon...
 
Tania Schlatter

March 3rd, 2000 7:49 AM
 
Shawn Clarke

March 3rd, 2000 7:50 AM
 
I think I'll return to buying books from my local neighborhood book store.
 
George Tucker

March 3rd, 2000 7:50 AM
 
I will not buy anything from Amazon as long as a farce of a 'patent' is being enforced by Amazon. Additionally I shall instruct that all mutual funds and other stock funds divest from Amazon and related stocks.
 
Glenn Host

March 3rd, 2000 7:50 AM
 
Mr. Bezos,
I am regular customer of Amazon.Com. But I won't be buying anything now from you until you stop this abuse of patents. I fully support Tim !!!
 
Unmesh Laddha

March 3rd, 2000 7:51 AM
 
Kenneth D. Weinert

March 3rd, 2000 7:52 AM
 
James LewisMoss

March 3rd, 2000 7:52 AM
 
Ramon Woo

March 3rd, 2000 7:53 AM
 
Here we go again....
As a develeper I must say I'm getting pretty sick of this sort of thing.

Perspective: What they have patented amounts to nothing more than a fairly typical e-commerce / online solution that my contempories and I make a living rolling out for these sorts of "visionary pioneers"...

Stop and think just how quickly the whole thing would dry up if the developers (you know - the people who plan - design - and implement these sorts of technologies) started becoming as greedy as their clients.

Well, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth - and I'm pleased to see that already 10,000+ others agree.

Well done Amazon, a fine lesson on how to lose a substancial portion of your customer base.

Oh, and just think about who you've really alientated with this patent when you start falling behind the technology game with your competitors... who will no doubt have less trouble than yourself getting good developers to extend their services...


 
Nos Doughty

March 3rd, 2000 7:53 AM
 
With nearly 10,000 people stating that they will no longer frequent Amazon.com, do you think that you have offended enough people yet?

Granted, the majority of people that have signed this "petition/protest" are techies. Have you considered that those techies tend to influence those people with lesser computer skills? Because I have been offended I will recommend to my friends, family and co-workers to avoid shopping on your site.

Continuing on this path can only spell the demise of your company.
 
Jeff Conover

March 3rd, 2000 7:53 AM
 
I am horrified that Amazon's patent application received any serious consideration at ALL, let alone approval.

At MOST, I believe that Amazon might have been justified in applying for a *copyright* on "one-click-ordering*. Even that, however, would likely not have been grantet, as the phrase is simply a generic description of a simple process.

A few days ago, I'd started a personal order with amazon for several hundred dollars worth of books. Needless to say, I will NOT be proceeding with the order, and will deal instead with one of Amazons competitors. As I also have some influence on corporate spending, I'll be making my views known in that area as well.
 
Craig Whitlaw

March 3rd, 2000 7:55 AM
 
The patent will be hard to uphold - I believe there are 1000s of cases of prior-art prior to 1997. Our company started doing exactly this type of thing with production internet systems in February 1997 (earlier in development / testing and playing). Of course we have continued to use cookies more and more.
Michael May
@solucion.com
 
Michael May

March 3rd, 2000 7:55 AM
 
Andrew McKenzie

March 3rd, 2000 7:55 AM
 
I will boycott Amazon.com so long as the 1-Click patent is enforced, and I will spread the news to everyone I know as quickly as possible.
 
Jim Mallmann

March 3rd, 2000 7:56 AM
 
Ceri Williams

March 3rd, 2000 7:56 AM
 
I refuse to continue to order from Amazon until they [Amazon] decides to play fair :)
 
Peter Elsner

March 3rd, 2000 7:56 AM
 
Mario Ripol

March 3rd, 2000 7:57 AM
 
Such 'land'grabbing won't just affect amazon.com but also amazon.*, don't underestimate the power of bad press.

fatbrain have gained an Irish customer, at least temporarily.
 
Jerh. O'Connor

March 3rd, 2000 7:57 AM
 
I'm a stockholder of Amazon and a customer. I also personally work on my own site that uses this so called "Patentable" Affiliate technology. At work, I wrote an Affiliate application that does the very thing that Amazon just patented. Seeing this, disgusts me. This does not promote the growth of the internet. All I can say is that I will sell me stock and will no longer shop at Amazon.com
 
Marvin Park

March 3rd, 2000 7:58 AM
 
What a shame. Buy from Fatbrain instead.
 
Peter Marino

March 3rd, 2000 7:58 AM
 
My customer experience with Amazon.com has been excellent. It is truly unfortunate that your priorities have become misplaced, and that you value stifling innovation in an open environment that has benefited you and your stock holders tremendously. I have purchased hundreds of dollars worth of books from you in the past. I did so because your company set and exceeded my expectations in every aspect of the online shopping experience.

The 1-click device is a valuable tool in making shopping easy and attractive for customers of amazon. To patent the application of a previous innovation is a slap in the face of those of us who contribute to the standards behind the very tools that provide amazon with a platform for your great success. What would be your position if those in IETF had patented their technology and forced you to pay for access to smtp, ldap, snmp, etc. You wouldn't have a business!

Wise up Amazon.com! You are loosing a huge customer base, and threatening your own business needlessly. I refuse to purchase from you until there is a change of position on this patent enforcement issue. I must go and remove all my information from your databases now and click-once some where else until you stop "pissing in the well".

Thanks for your attention.
 
Debi Jones

March 3rd, 2000 7:59 AM
 
I have countless O'Reilly & Associates books. Some purchaced at Amazon.com. No more. I'll go to a retail store before buying another one at Amazon.

What next? A patent on Login and Password?

 
Gary L. Burnore

March 3rd, 2000 8:00 AM
 
Victor Castro

March 3rd, 2000 8:00 AM
 
I won't be buying anything from Amazon until this stops. To be honest I'm just as happy walking over to my local bookstore.
 
Kurt Krumme

March 3rd, 2000 8:00 AM
 
Thomas Abraham

March 3rd, 2000 8:00 AM
 
ya know, i buy somewhere between $150-250 worth of books each month... i have resisted the idea of buying from amazon because i feel strongly that neighborhoods need to support neighborhood bookstores if we want to keep them. but i have ordered occasionally from amazon, also. i've been waffling.

i'm also a web developer, and ya know, this kinda puts a nail in the amazon.coffin for me.
 
ryan stuart

March 3rd, 2000 8:00 AM
 
Remi Olsen

March 3rd, 2000 8:01 AM
 
David Gunther

March 3rd, 2000 8:02 AM
 
Andrew Tuttle

March 3rd, 2000 8:02 AM
 
Glenn Hunt

March 3rd, 2000 8:03 AM
 
Linda Kalb

March 3rd, 2000 8:04 AM
 
Alice Toth

March 3rd, 2000 8:04 AM
 
Jennifer E. O'Neal

March 3rd, 2000 8:04 AM
 
When Thomas Edison invented the light bulb, no one questioned his right to a patent. Why? Because it was the first working electric light bulb. Amazon is not the first site to use cookies to keep track of customers. And that's what it comes down to. Of course I will not buy from Amazon until they back away from this patent mess. The only possible positive outcome of all this is if they put that patent in the public domain.
 
Kevin Hebert

March 3rd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
Needless patents like these serve no other purpose than to unfairly complicate and hinder e-commerce everywhere on the web. Is that something Amazon is truly striving for? Is that something our courts, legislature, and citizens desire?
 
Scott W. Yancey

March 3rd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
Dear Mr. Bezos,

Though I am sure you won't be, you should be ashamed. The fact that someone at the Patent office failed to properly do his homework is no excuse for you enforcing a patent that stifles competition. Until you reverse this policy none of the 3 companies I own and am involved with will use Amazon.com as a point of purchase for anything.
 
Robert Rosenwald

March 3rd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
Amazon has been well-known as slime for some time. Aside from this patent issue, you've got the whole monitoring and cookie bit, the mistreatment of their warehouse employees, and the recent lawsuit against a bookstore that called itself Amazon for 20 years before the website existed, in which Amazon.com's lawyers spent an inordinate amount of time trying to establish the sexual orientation of the defendants. I actively boycott them and have long urged everyone I know to avoid them at all costs. SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL BOOKSTORE!!!
 
dave abston

March 3rd, 2000 8:05 AM
 
Please Mr. Bezos. It would be a shame for Amazon to end up being forever mentioned in the same breath as Compton's (remember that debacle?) as yet another example of abusing the patent process.
 
Marlin D. May

March 3rd, 2000 8:06 AM
 
Amazon has lost another customer until this
madness is past. Furthermore, I will add
links to this and other anti-patent sites on
as many web sites as I control. (3)

Finally, I am drinking coffee from
an Amazon coffee mug as I type this. I will
retire this mug until you wake up.
 
Lewis Wolfgang

March 3rd, 2000 8:06 AM
 
Your attempts to obtain the patents in question are cheap, shallow and greedy? I won't be buying anything from Amazon until you give up. There are plenty of other online book retailers out there.
 
Glenn Taylor

March 3rd, 2000 8:06 AM
 
Both one-click ordering and affiliate programs should not be the exclusive priviledge of anyone. I believe this violates the principles of free enterprise. You may have rights to your specific configuration of one-click ordering, but not the entire concept. Claiming affiliate advertising as personal property is like one newspaper claiming classified ads as their exclusive right. Get serious. Leave affiliate advertising alone.
 
Randy S.Hutchins

March 3rd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
All I can say is, "How DARE you ?". You are taking advantage of all of us with your pettiness when we are the reason you even exist! You can be sure that neither I nor anyone I am aquainted with will be doing any shopping on your site! Not now and not EVER (at least as far as I am concerned). If you are capable of this, you obviously cannot be trusted. The world could do without organizations like you. I will be doing ALL of my book shopping at Chapters.ca from now on! Their book prices are MUCH cheaper anyways (especially considering the exchange rate for the U.S. dollar)!
 
Anita E. Konczi

March 3rd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
Ridiculous software patents like these are one of the many Things That Are Wrong with today's software industry. How about trying to compete with a better product instead of lawyers?
 
Chris Herborth

March 3rd, 2000 8:07 AM
 
Steve Scherbinski

March 3rd, 2000 8:08 AM
 
This is just another outrageous example of how the Internet is being closed off by greedy corporate forces.
 
George Baker

March 3rd, 2000 8:08 AM
 
Jonathan B. Ellis

March 3rd, 2000 8:08 AM
 
I, as an internet development professional, despise this sort of blatent greed. If this trend continues all web technologies will be stifled because of the fear of possible litigation. I think I will patent showing the current date on my website. Then no one, from the NYtimes to the Whte House, will be able to show their users the current date. Seems as logical as Amazon's moves.
 
Kent Taylor

March 3rd, 2000 8:09 AM
 
tomorrow I gonna get a patent on my 2-way-breathing -- and any human being that wants to live further on has to pay me for my great retrovation.
 
mac mueller

March 3rd, 2000 8:09 AM
 
Wesley Goggan

March 3rd, 2000 8:10 AM
 
I am boycotting Amazon and encourage others to do so until you drop this patent application.
 
Joe Edwards

March 3rd, 2000 8:11 AM
 
David Hollenshead

March 3rd, 2000 8:11 AM
 
Greed is it's own punishment.
 
Micah Goldstein

March 3rd, 2000 8:12 AM
 
Count on me to boycott Amazon for this type of greed!
 
Alec Smith

March 3rd, 2000 8:12 AM
 
Amazon.com was a little guy once too. If somebody had patented cookies, they wouldn't be the big guy they are today.

 
Greg Alioto

March 3rd, 2000 8:14 AM
 
Patenting obvious technologies only serves to fetter innovation. In this case it's a whole industry that may suffer, if Amazon's example propagates.
 
Paul Hertz

March 3rd, 2000 8:14 AM
 
how in the world could a broad patent like this be issued?!? absurd. even more absurd is enforcing it. use it to lure people into buying stock, or some such rubbish, but stopping others from such an obvious 'innovation'?
 
thomas settle

March 3rd, 2000 8:14 AM
 
1 word: Ridiculous. What's next, patenting the color "red"???
 
Jeff Oiler

March 3rd, 2000 8:14 AM
 
Cj Walker

March 3rd, 2000 8:15 AM
 
Sean Oakley

March 3rd, 2000 8:16 AM
 
I have bought many books and other items through Amazon.com. I will not continue to do so until amazon has ceased this lunacy.
 
Jim Mogle

March 3rd, 2000 8:16 AM
 
Barak Hill

March 3rd, 2000 8:18 AM
 
Paul McDonald

March 3rd, 2000 8:18 AM
 
Your company's livelihood has been dependent on the work of others. Respect this fact by helping th selfless efforts of the past influence the future.
 
Sanjit Singh Bakshi

March 3rd, 2000 8:19 AM
 
I'll stop shopping at Amazon from now on
 
François Charoy

March 3rd, 2000 8:20 AM
 
I'm not a volume purchaser of books from Amazon, but for now Amazon has lost my business. Multiply that by the number of signatures here.
 
John Acheson

March 3rd, 2000 8:21 AM
 
Charles Powers

March 3rd, 2000 8:21 AM
 
Pat Fisher

March 3rd, 2000 8:21 AM
 
Your claim that one-click ordering is your company's original idea is as absurd as a rooster's claim that it brings the sunrise. Shame on Amazon for trying such a childish stunt.
 
Barrington King

March 3rd, 2000 8:22 AM
 
What's going on with the Patent Office? Are they merely extremely stupid or are they in collusion with Amazon?

Maybe they should issue a patent to Al Gore for inventing the Internet as long as they're issuing spurious patents. That's about as logical as issuing the one to Amazon for "inventing" one click ordering.

Maybe they should issue a patent to someone for inventing money while they're at it. You know someone invented money--and it probably wasn't the United States Government. I actually think they should issue a patent for currency to Amazon, also. That way no one could use currency except with Amazon's permission.

I think I'll apply for a patent for the programming "Hello World" exercise. Then I'll go sue the author of every computer book for infringing on my patent.

All I can say is that I won't be buying from Amazon.com anymore--I think I'll start supporting their rival, BarnesandNoble.com, from now on.

Obviously government doesn't work very well--let your vote be heard the only way that it can be anymore--with your pocketbook. It's time to boycott companies with unscrupulous business practices.

--Scott Fisher
 
Scott Fisher

March 3rd, 2000 8:23 AM
 
Virginia Hicks

March 3rd, 2000 8:24 AM
 
If Amazon gets away with this, the web as we now know it is over. Simple ideas will become patented, and we can say goodbye to people making homepages, new start-up businesses etc. because whatever they try to do will be patented. It truly is an insult to the great work of Tim Berners-Lee and others and cannot be tolerated.
 
Aleks Wukovich

March 3rd, 2000 8:24 AM
 
One-click shopping? Affiliate programs? These are all obvious extensions of existing techniques and the patents awarded only shows the stupidity of of the PTO and the greed of Amazon. I believe Amazon's pursuits of these patents to be simply ill-advised attempts at scaring off competition. Amazon should be ashamed.
 
Marty Schmid

March 3rd, 2000 8:24 AM
 
I think this is the most absurd patent. Patents are meant to protect the interests of the company filing the patent. This "1-Click" patent does everything but that. I, for one, will not be buying any books from Amazon in the near future
 
Rishi Khan

March 3rd, 2000 8:25 AM
 
Catherine Johnson

March 3rd, 2000 8:26 AM
 
Brad Ackerman

March 3rd, 2000 8:26 AM
 
Anything I add would already have been said.... but that is sort of the point isn't it...
 
Sean McCarthy

March 3rd, 2000 8:27 AM
 
You can depend on far fewer affiliates to manage also, me for one. Sure glad I sold my amazon stock!
 
P.K. Avritt

March 3rd, 2000 8:28 AM
 
As a historian of technology and economics I know that patent law is the most useful extension of natural property rights ever devised. However, it's net overall value is based on the trade off between the net present value of the innovation on a non-exclusive basis and the net present value of the innovation on an exclusive basis for the responsible party against the cost of development of the innovation. Our legal system uses the standard of "obvious to one skilled in the art" as a proxy for the cost of development. Whether or not this particular legal artifice is in fact met, it is pretty clear that the present value on an exclusive basis to Amazon is very large, but that on a non-exclusive basis it's still far larger than necessary to cover the fairly minimal associated development costs. Therefor this is not the type of innovation which should be protected by a patent.
 
Jeffery B. Cross

March 3rd, 2000 8:28 AM
 
... no more orders for now, Amazon!
 
Frank short

March 3rd, 2000 8:29 AM
 
Elinor Karlsson

March 3rd, 2000 8:29 AM
 
Kevin Worcester

March 3rd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Besides the above you lie about shipping orders all in one package-you ship them in as many packages as possible. Count me out. Rein in your greed!
 
Janie Johnston

March 3rd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Simply disappointet!
My future orders will be placed somewhere else - even though I have to DOUBLE-CLICK!
I will encourage all my students over the comming decade (approx. 10.000) here at Copenhagen University to shop somewhere else.

 
Henrik Lund

March 3rd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Sonia Iron Cloud

March 3rd, 2000 8:30 AM
 
Thank you Tim for trying to stop the madness. The whole thing is ridiculous and i have no idea how Amazon go even this far.
 
Dennis Scanland

March 3rd, 2000 8:31 AM
 
Most software patents are trivial and obvious to most programmers, however, the patent office needs to hire competent programmers to reject these. I think I'll apply for the "Submit" button patent, I think it's available!
 
Ulrich "1-click" Sondermann

March 3rd, 2000 8:32 AM
 
I spend several hundred dollars per year at Amazon. I use to buy all the books for our technical staff at Amazon. I even like the one-click ordering, but the idea of patenting the use of a cookie (which has prior art since the beginning of the web) is insane. I will use B & N until you give up this stupid patent.
 
Greg Brouelette

March 3rd, 2000 8:32 AM
 
Remember everyone, the alternative to Amazon doesn't have to be Borders or B&N -- think about a LOCAL bookstore owned by LOCAL resident. You might have to special order what you want and pay a few dollars extra, but the money will (mostly) remain in your community -- providing jobs and taxes that will directly benefit YOU!
 
Eric

March 3rd, 2000 8:32 AM
 
I will never again buy at Amazon.com. I do not support companies whose business practices stall innovation.
 
Christopher J Hicks

March 3rd, 2000 8:33 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, because of Amazon's frivolous patent filings, other web stores have earned my business. Also, don't count on any more referals from my web site. You don't "Invent" the obviou re.:U.S. Supreme Court, Atlantic Works vs. Brady, 1882. You have contributed to my research on both more friendly policies and on lower prices. Thank you.
 
phil bottin

March 3rd, 2000 8:34 AM
 
I haven't purchased from Amazon, but have referred many people there, including family members who were cautious about ordering online, but I'll refrain from doing so in the future. I have gone online and written many reviews, thereby encouraging other to buy this book or that, and I'll refrain from doing so as well as not ordering anything I would have, until Amazon changes their policy.
 
Greg Dunn

March 3rd, 2000 8:34 AM
 
Dan Tyler

March 3rd, 2000 8:34 AM
 
Former Customer
 
Kyle Messineo

March 3rd, 2000 8:35 AM
 
As a web developer, I want to emphasize that a patent on this technique is akin to patenting oxygen. If the Patent Office was tech-savvy, this never would have been approved. Please abandon your ill-gotten patent!
 
Eric Miller

March 3rd, 2000 8:35 AM
 
Nicholas Ketter

March 3rd, 2000 8:35 AM
 
I will boycot Amazon
 
Tord Ingolf Reistad

March 3rd, 2000 8:36 AM
 
Bye bye Amazon, it's patently obvious why.
 
Rohan Charitra

March 3rd, 2000 8:37 AM
 
This situation is exactly the kind of corporate B.S. that is not only going to force me to boycott Amazon, but the World Wide Web itself. True innovation and progress on the Web has already been slowed and tainted by ever-increasing corporate and commercial interests. Unfortunately, this trend shows no signs of reversing itself. Amazon has the opportunity to abandon this frivolity and set an important precedent for the future. Instead they have decided to forsake the communities that helped make them what they are. What a pity...
 
Brad Kamradt

March 3rd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
Mr. O'Reilly's statements go to the heart of this matter, i.e. should companies be able to patent technology which itself is an incremental development of previously developed technologies?

I believe that amazon.com is shooting themselves in the foot with such tactics.
 
Brian Prunty

March 3rd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
If you check your records on my email address you will find that I have been an excellent customer over the years. I am disturbed by your short-sighted actions. I am of the hope that you will listen to the concerns of the Web Community and consider the long-term consequences of trying to corner this technology.
 
Roberta Louise Wolff

March 3rd, 2000 8:38 AM
 
it's too bad. I liked amazon.
 
Megan Winget

March 3rd, 2000 8:39 AM
 
Wake up, Jeff! You are biting the hand that feeds you.
 
Eric Hazen

March 3rd, 2000 8:39 AM
 
Linda and Ricardo Rivera

March 3rd, 2000 8:40 AM
 
I want to thank Tim O'Reilly for speaking out on this matter, and for providing an opportunity for others to register their support. I emailed Amazon.com with my concerns about the patent suit against Barnes and Noble some time ago, expressing many of the same views as Tim has in his letter. My main (only slightly facetious,) argument was that such technology as one click shopping, rather than being the sole property of one business, should be a mandatory feature of all e-business sites. Imagine a lawsuit to prevent competing businesses from using cash registers! If Amazon's only claim to advantage over Barnes and Noble (or Bob's Online Bait Shop, for that matter,)is one click ordering, they are not long for this world in any event, and they are hurting everyone by their position with regard to this technology implementation.
 
Andrew Heffron

March 3rd, 2000 8:40 AM
 
Tracy Kreider

March 3rd, 2000 8:40 AM
 
I am worried, not only about the abuse of patents but also about the continued loss of all democratic institutions. Are we facing a thousand-year mercantile reich? If so, the patent issue is one of the tools being used to put it in place.
 
Charles L. Hethcoat III

March 3rd, 2000 8:41 AM
 
I will look for other places to purchase before I look to Amazon.com
Byron
 
byron lippe

March 3rd, 2000 8:42 AM
 
Alex Saunders

March 3rd, 2000 8:42 AM
 
S.D.Fortas

March 3rd, 2000 8:43 AM
 
Looks like Amazon has already lost about 9,500 customers....Make it 9,501...Open Standards will propel this industry and will be looked upon as the computer age in the future. Close-mindedness and GREED can be our only downfall to this great time in history.
 
Glenn

March 3rd, 2000 8:43 AM
 
I will not buy from Amazon again.
 
George W. Chacko

March 3rd, 2000 8:44 AM
 
I have never shopped at Amazon.com, but I look forward to shopping there someday soon. However, I will not shop at Amazon.com until a statement of intent is issued by Amazon.com that shows that they will not enforce their patent on 1-Click ordering or any other patent on basic internet tricks.
 
Brian Schallhammer

March 3rd, 2000 8:44 AM
 
Mike Schmelder

March 3rd, 2000 8:44 AM
 
Craig Treptow

March 3rd, 2000 8:45 AM
 
Andrew Diseker

March 3rd, 2000 8:45 AM
 
Amazon is acting like another Microsoft - who was crushed and scolded. The beauty of the web is that programmers get excited about what they have designed and written for the rest of us to use and share.claiming ownership of someone else's efforts is called theft, period. I will no longer be using Amazon to buy books or gifts - just another small customer totally digusted by Amazon's greed - I guess greed has no limits and no excuses. Well fine, you'll soon discover that the public doesn't like bullies.
 
Donnasue Jacobi

March 3rd, 2000 8:45 AM
 
One more very disturbed customer has gone the way of the wind. I will, of course, encourage everyone I know to stop buying from Amazon until until it gives up this riduculus patent buisness.
 
Nathan Bartel

March 3rd, 2000 8:46 AM
 
Keep the web free and open space! Until you abandon pursuit of these actions, I'll be ordering all my books from Barnes & Noble.
 
Kath Heytink

March 3rd, 2000 8:46 AM
 
Distasteful, short-sighted and ungrateful actions on the part of Amazon.
 
Bruce Brososky

March 3rd, 2000 8:46 AM
 
Lucy Cooper

March 3rd, 2000 8:47 AM
 
I have purchased from Amazon in the past and found that your prices beat out all others by a large margin. You don't need to resort to these tactics to lead the way. I WILL NOT purchase anything else until these patents are dropped.
 
T.J. Langford

March 3rd, 2000 8:48 AM
 
Abhijit Khale

March 3rd, 2000 8:48 AM
 
Vicki Birchfield

March 3rd, 2000 8:49 AM
 
Steven Bass

March 3rd, 2000 8:49 AM
 
David G. Hill

March 3rd, 2000 8:50 AM
 
Any attempt to 'limit' the functionality of the web as a whole should be viewed as an attempt to control or to monopolize an industry.
I will NOT purchase from Amazon.com until these patents are dropped.

Go to BN.com (same prices most of the time)!!!
 
David Sebranek

March 3rd, 2000 8:50 AM
 
I've been a long time technology implementor and manager and also started using Amazon for all my book purchases within 6 months of your opening (remember the time when JeffB had an article on the cover of WSJ, left column about why anyone would leave NY for..aghast...Seattle?). BUT..given the issues Amazon had summer of '99 with sales of book lists by domain and of the patents, I have not purchased any more material from Amazon. While you may be bringing in the Target/Kmart customer market, you've lost this early adopter and former ardent fan..
Peter Borocz
 
Peter Borocz

March 3rd, 2000 8:50 AM
 
I sincerely hope that the tide of public opinion is enough to make Amazon alter its position. With the net, we have a chance to avoid making some of the same mistakes we have made in the past in our use of valuable common resources. By sharing the fruits of their expertise, a lot of people have made amazing contributions to this effort. The danger is that a few big players who just "don't get it" can start the kind of spiral of selfishness we've seen over and over since the days when we were grazing animals on the village "commons." If Amazon continues to push for this patent, the best we can do is to avoid following such a shoddy example of net citizenship.
 
Janesse Leung

March 3rd, 2000 8:51 AM
 
sherece taffe

March 3rd, 2000 8:51 AM
 
I will not be purchasing anything from your company until this policy has changed and your company has publically stated that it will allow the patent to lapse.
 
Don O'Beirne

March 3rd, 2000 8:52 AM
 
dena larsen

March 3rd, 2000 8:52 AM
 
Guido van Rooij

March 3rd, 2000 8:52 AM
 
Elyse Boucher

March 3rd, 2000 8:52 AM
 
Alan Cooper

March 3rd, 2000 8:52 AM
 
crooks!
 
pat neff

March 3rd, 2000 8:52 AM
 
Erika Barcott

March 3rd, 2000 8:54 AM
 
Amazon's actions are deplorable. I have removed
my Amazon affiliate banner and linked to the
Boycott Amazon website on my stevemorrow.com
homepage.
 
Steve Morrow

March 3rd, 2000 8:54 AM
 
I purchased a lot of books through Amazon.com, no more. I do not associated with thieves of intellectual property, particularly when the owner is the community at large.
 
Manuel I. Martin

March 3rd, 2000 8:55 AM
 
Your selfish "land grab" is, in fact, theft from others that have given freely to the development of the web.



I will not use your services, and I will encourage others to boycott as well, as long as you persist with your unjust position.
 
Larry Bowman

March 3rd, 2000 8:56 AM
 
Jim Savage

March 3rd, 2000 8:56 AM
 
Jeff Branc

March 3rd, 2000 8:56 AM
 
Until you stop this nonsense you can forget
about any more business from me.
 
David Watkins

March 3rd, 2000 8:56 AM
 
If Bill Gates did this, the Justice Dept. would be all over him like white on rice.
 
William Rieger

March 3rd, 2000 8:57 AM
 
I was a customer of Amazon.com, but I will take my business elsewhere unless they give up this idiotic patent. Barnes and Noble seem to be just about as good.
 
Aidan Dysart

March 3rd, 2000 8:58 AM
 
I was once a fan of Amazon. Well, if not a fan at least a very curious onlooker. Business has always been interesting to me and the thought that a company can be successful while not making money was quite interesting. On that point alone I used to shop at Amazon. However, the "technology" used by Amazon was around before Amazon existed. Patenting something in such common use to screw with competitors is arrogance on the same level of Micro$oft. Microsoft doesn't get my business and if the silly patents don't stop, neither will Amazon.
 
Matt Tanner

March 3rd, 2000 8:59 AM
 
You just lost this customer.
 
Suzanne Gillis

March 3rd, 2000 8:59 AM
 
I and everyone that I know will be taking my business elsewhere. Your Associate patent is even more absurd than your 1-click
 
m. fields

March 3rd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
Whoever approved this pattent needs to get access to the internet before making another decision.
 
Gary Davis

March 3rd, 2000 9:00 AM
 
You cant (or shouldnt) patent old intellectual property!
 
Stephen Henderson

March 3rd, 2000 9:01 AM
 
Mr. Bezos:

I was (WAS!) a loyal amazon.com customer for several years. No longer. I have and will continue to patronize other on-line booksellers (FatBrain.com, bookpool.com, and yes, bn.com) as long as your foolishly and stubbornly persist in defending the 1-click patent. As a computer professional deeply immersed in the world of the Internet, I rely very heavily on trade books to continue to enhance my skillset, and spend between $1200 and $1500 per year on computer related titles alone. And I also love to read on other topics.

I am not simply boycotting, but I have vocally encouraged my friends, family and associates to do likewise. You seem to miss the point that it is very easy for a consumer to take their business to another online merchant. This is not traditional retail, where changing stores may mean a significant cost in terms of the convenience of travelling to the new merchant's location. This is the web, and you are but one of thousands of possible places that I can spend my money. But you are also one where I will elect not to do so.

You effectively created a category on the web, but you did not create anything that justifies this patent.

Regards,
Doug Selph
 
Doug Selph

March 3rd, 2000 9:01 AM
 
Tobey Wheelock

March 3rd, 2000 9:02 AM
 
Theo Scripps

March 3rd, 2000 9:03 AM
 
Bob Philbrook

March 3rd, 2000 9:03 AM
 
For the same reason that I boycott Microsoft, and Starbucks, I will now add Amazon.com.
 
Matt Knowles

March 3rd, 2000 9:03 AM
 
I guess the money/ego thing has finally gone to Mr. Bezos' head. Too bad for us consumers.
 
Loren Stone

March 3rd, 2000 9:04 AM
 
Walter Belgers

March 3rd, 2000 9:04 AM
 
Chris Nuccitelli

March 3rd, 2000 9:05 AM
 
Don't be a greedy putz - one priceline on the net is enough!
 
Derick Bulkley

March 3rd, 2000 9:06 AM
 
William Browne

March 3rd, 2000 9:07 AM
 
Patenting the application of a cookie is not big and it's not clever. It's also nothing new. It is however a slap in the face to web developers everywhere. The very people who sang your praises to the masses and put you where you are today. They are also the last people you want to piss off - Remember what happened to etoys.
 
John Dalziel

March 3rd, 2000 9:07 AM
 
This whole patent idea is getting out of hand. I have bought numerous books and movies from Amazon in the past, but will now find other avenues for purchase. This patent is just as bad as their "Affiliate program" patent. Maybe they should try to patent UPS next...
 
Michael Yurchak

March 3rd, 2000 9:07 AM
 
Janie Bridgeman

March 3rd, 2000 9:08 AM
 
Graeme Ruppel

March 3rd, 2000 9:08 AM
 
Sveta Klimova

March 3rd, 2000 9:09 AM
 
I'm a software developer who had done just fine thank you without patents. If I don't need them in this industry, why do you?

mine, mine, mine,... sounds to me like toddler philosophy :)
 
Donna Weyer

March 3rd, 2000 9:10 AM
 
It is a shame when literature is being limited by the needs of profit. Mr. Bezos seems to be the anti-Gutenberg of our time with his attempt at retraction of the printed word.
 
Philippe Rosse

March 3rd, 2000 9:10 AM
 
Back in 1995 when I first started designing my site, I was excited to feature such innovative as affiliate programs with Amazon.com on my site. Over the years, I have become more and more discouraged, encouraging more and more buyers to buy from independent bookstores. The last book I have listed as a book to order from Amazon is a German language book that is difficult to find anywhere else. Maybe it's time I dropped that last, lingering association with Amazon.com. Amazon.com's predatory tactics are, at best, disappointing.
 
Pam Keesey

March 3rd, 2000 9:11 AM
 
I have not been to SEARS since 1989 because they pissed me off. I will NEVER use your site as long as you try to enforce this. How many saftey patents has VOLVO never enforced for the good of the masses? Of course, theirs are unique and not obvious like "links and cookies" on the internet
 
Scott Conner

March 3rd, 2000 9:11 AM
 
I will no longer use Amazon.com for my purchases unless the patent initiative is dropped. I will also recommend that others do not. The whole thing is ridiculous - it's a travesty of the patent system both on the Patent Office's and Amazon's part.
 
Craig H. Moore, Ph.D.

March 3rd, 2000 9:11 AM
 
I am amazed that Amazon will actually try to get absurd patents to protect a weak business. I think they should concentrate on proper execution. I used to buy books from them earlier, considering they were the pioneers but I have switched to bn.com since the issue of the 1-click patent.

 
Ibrahim Syedmahaboob

March 3rd, 2000 9:12 AM
 
As a one-click user AND an associate of Amazon, I'm appalled - here's hoping Book Sense comes on-line soon, so I can call myself a *former* one-click user and associate.
 
Karen Wilson

March 3rd, 2000 9:12 AM
 
Steve Myers

March 3rd, 2000 9:12 AM
 
G. Brysn Fessenden

March 3rd, 2000 9:13 AM
 
Well said, Tim!
 
Kevin Oakes

March 3rd, 2000 9:13 AM
 
That any company/entity would attempt to patent a technology so obviously generic is sad at it’s least and despicable in it’s extreme. This approach to progressive thought will surely have a negative impact on technology, and perhaps personal freedom in the long run. That reminds me, everyone out there better stop using my “Cursive Writing Style, TM”.
 
Aaron Hachez

March 3rd, 2000 9:15 AM
 
Kathleen Smith

March 3rd, 2000 9:15 AM
 
Allan McLellan

March 3rd, 2000 9:15 AM
 
Marc Shannon

March 3rd, 2000 9:17 AM
 
I'm not sure why people are so surprised about amazon.com's business practices. Hogging questionable patents is only a piece of it. They've engaged in predatory marketing practices since day one. They've sold goods below cost (letting their shareholders make up the difference) to drive competitors out of business. They've sold spots on their "bestseller" or "featured books" lists to publishers who wanted to flak their titles. They've spammed. They've hijacked the search engines so that no matter what you are looking for, you get directed to their site (yes, even if you're looking for a different bookstore). Heck, they even stole their name ("amazon") from an existing bookstore and then gay-bashed that bookstore's owners when they tried to protect their name.

If you really want to teach amazon.com a lesson, don't just sign this petition. Take your business to a knowledgeable independent bookstore (or CD shop, or video shop, or pet store, or vitamin seller, etc., etc.).
 
Deacon Maccubbin

March 3rd, 2000 9:17 AM
 
Matthew Silbert

March 3rd, 2000 9:17 AM
 
It's innovation, creativity, and customer service that bring people to your business and your site. This patent business is just one big slap in the face to those who enabled your success in the first place. Any business that doesn't appreciate those who contributed to its foundation can't possibly appreciate its customers. You've sent us all a signal that, at least, those who've signed here have received loud and clear. Our business goes where its value and meaning in an exploding economic sector is understood and appreciated, and that's clearly not Amazon.com.
 
Carol Spencer

March 3rd, 2000 9:17 AM
 
Amazon's motive's are obviously driven by 100% greed.
 
Brian Luft

March 3rd, 2000 9:18 AM
 
I agree with the arguments of this letter. This is an anti-competitive use patents. It is trivial to the Nth degree.
 
Julian Brown

March 3rd, 2000 9:18 AM
 
Abigail Larsen

March 3rd, 2000 9:18 AM
 
Daniel Ransom

March 3rd, 2000 9:19 AM
 
How in the world did Amazon find somebody in the patent office stupid enough to actually grant them the patents in the first place?
 
S

March 3rd, 2000 9:19 AM
 
Charles K. Edmondson

March 3rd, 2000 9:20 AM
 
Open source is revolutionizing software development and the internet. This patent attempt is both pathetic and frightening. As far as I'm concerned Amazon.com would not be on-line if it was not for the efforts of everyone involved in building the web. I will not buy from Amazon.com anymore now or ever again - I refuse to support this kind of narrow-minded selfishness.
 
Ania D.

March 3rd, 2000 9:20 AM
 
I've been a loyal enough Amazon purchaser to be on their preferred customer list. No more...not until Jeff stops imitating Bill.
 
Gayle Kerley

March 3rd, 2000 9:20 AM
 
It's just a damn shame, Jeff. The dark side is powerful, and attractive. But it's filled with hate, for your compatriots and yourself. And with the weight and influence that you have, that's not a metaphysical issue--the future of the web is at stake.
 
Matthew Hunt

March 3rd, 2000 9:22 AM
 
Adam Shepard

March 3rd, 2000 9:22 AM
 
Michael Dymund

March 3rd, 2000 9:23 AM
 
patents are dangerous things in the software industry...
 
Donna Weyer

March 3rd, 2000 9:23 AM
 
Robert Jagger

March 3rd, 2000 9:23 AM
 
Barry Nordby

March 3rd, 2000 9:23 AM
 
I have bought several items from Amazon.com, but in view of these patents, I will have to go to buy.com or bookpool.com from now on.
 
Robert Lehmann

March 3rd, 2000 9:24 AM
 
Aaron Krol

March 3rd, 2000 9:24 AM
 
One-Trick foolery.
 
Michael Calvello

March 3rd, 2000 9:24 AM
 
Elissa Tognozzi

March 3rd, 2000 9:25 AM
 
As much as I love doing business with Amazon I feel that what you are doing in this area is wrong for everyone involved. The internet is not and should not owned by anyone. Your attempts to stifle competition in this manner is a direct threat to the future of an open internet and the net economy. Please back off on this, an open anouncment that you are granting open use of the ideas in your pattents would instantly solidify Amazons leadership position.

 
Dennis Grannen

March 3rd, 2000 9:25 AM
 
I completely agree with Tim O'Reilly's assessment of Amazon's patent. It is an abuse of the patent system, and an obvious attempt to shut out competitors by claiming that a simple and obvious technique is somehow a unique invention. It's as absurd as patenting the 'check-out' line at a grocery store. Hopefully Amazon will have the good faith to abandon this patent and compete using it's real strengths: excellent customer service, great selection, prompt delivery, and ease-of-use. Amazon: do the right thing.
 
Dave McFarland

March 3rd, 2000 9:26 AM
 
T. M. Del Beccaro

March 3rd, 2000 9:26 AM
 
David Solan

March 3rd, 2000 9:27 AM
 
The letter and that of Mr O'Reilly speak out far more eloquently than I could on this issue, which I wholeheartedly agree with and support. To this end I will not be using Amazon.co.uk or Amazon.com for any book orders.
 
Michael Salmon

March 3rd, 2000 9:27 AM
 
Jeff - Its obvious from all the response that you are making a big marketing mistake. You realise that only a small % of people that are disappointed with a company actually respond to them. With over 9000 on this letter - you are closer to losing 100,000 to 150,000 customers - most of them "loyal" customers. (and I'm sure this will continue to grow as others hear about it) I shopped at Amazon because of "service" and selection - not because of some silly 1-click system. Notice the word "shopped" - I was just going to order 5 books until hearing about this. I'll now be going to your competitors.
 
Bruce Jenkins

March 3rd, 2000 9:28 AM
 
bill burns

March 3rd, 2000 9:29 AM
 
Steven Funk

March 3rd, 2000 9:29 AM
 
Stop the madness.
 
Chris Peterson

March 3rd, 2000 9:30 AM
 
The incompetence of the patent office in granting
such an obviously invalid patent does not mitigate
the deplorable ethics that Amazon has shown in
abusing the clearly broken patent process.
 
Larry Weaver

March 3rd, 2000 9:30 AM
 
Gregory M. Pomerantz

March 3rd, 2000 9:31 AM
 
Catherine Brunel

March 3rd, 2000 9:31 AM
 
I will not order anything from Amazon until the
patent application is withdrawn.
 
Andrew Gram

March 3rd, 2000 9:32 AM
 
Steve Pielocik

March 3rd, 2000 9:34 AM
 
It's incredible that these guys are so myopic.
 
Paul Corsi

March 3rd, 2000 9:34 AM
 
I protest this ridiculous abuse of the patent system. I will not be ordering from Amazon.com until I find this situation rectified. I will order from Barnes and Noble or from Borders or some other book store.

Amazon is convenient, but I am not surrendering to these patent theives.
 
Paul Thompson

March 3rd, 2000 9:34 AM
 
madeline brane

March 3rd, 2000 9:34 AM
 
Kylee Peterson

March 3rd, 2000 9:35 AM
 
Dear Jeff (and others):

I am disappointed, but not surprised, at your hypocritical patent suit. This disgusting maneuver around absurd patents simply puts you in the same camp as the other megalomaniacs who are afraid of real competition. They, like you, think that the only way they can 'win' is by using sleazy tactics and rolling over the innovators whose energies are focused on creating rather than controlling. Echoing many others above, you are off my screen, Jeff.

Most people don't realize that they can buy books off the net easily and often at lower prices than you offer.

For those who don't know that, try these book search services:

http://www.bookfinder.com
http://www.abebooks.com
http://www.addall.com
http://www.bibliofind.com
http://www.bibliophile.net
http://www.bookavenue.com
http://www.bookopoly.com
http://www.digibib.com
http://www.gbmbooks.com
http://www.usedbooks.com
http://www.yourbooks.com
 
Stilson Snow

March 3rd, 2000 9:35 AM
 
one more reason to give your business to booksellers who are actually interested in books, independent bookstores.
 
jennifer ashley

March 3rd, 2000 9:35 AM
 
You truly should be ashamed of yourself for attempting to use the patent process this way. Your patent is thoroughly indefensible on any number of grounds to anyone with the slightest understanding of the issues. Most indefensible of all is your eagerness to employ the patent office's gross ignorance to launch an attack on your customers and colleagues. Shame on you. I'll be going now - to fatbrain and Barnes & Noble, but not Amazon.
 
Dag Gano

March 3rd, 2000 9:36 AM
 
Hughla J. McDowell

March 3rd, 2000 9:36 AM
 
Kathy Wilson

March 3rd, 2000 9:36 AM
 
You've done many things so well, why go down this destructive path now?
 
R Jensen

March 3rd, 2000 9:37 AM
 
Joe Francia

March 3rd, 2000 9:37 AM
 
I will continue to use Amazon.com for browsing and reviews of books. I will then use www.bestbookbuys.com to find the lowest price (which is never amazon.com anyway)
 
Stephen Girouard

March 3rd, 2000 9:40 AM
 
Often times management and legal teams are so blinded by protecting their investment, that they turn a blind eye to their most valuable asset; their customers… Your actions only server to hurt your customers in the long run.
 
Mark Schneider

March 3rd, 2000 9:40 AM
 
TERRY STERKEL

March 3rd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
Adrian Donlan

March 3rd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
Erik Lounsbury

March 3rd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
You service was great, but your patents are not.

I'll stick to Barnes & Noble and Borders for now.
 
Lee A. Webber

March 3rd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
Jeff Byrd

March 3rd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
Until Amazon finds a way to play nice, I will no longer purchase items from them and in the next week I will be removing links to them from my company's web sites. The internet is too young to start this sort of thing and I feel that Amazon is trying to lock out competition on the internet and that is a bad thing for everyone. Amazon is beginning to stink of microsoft type tactics and frankly it should upset people that the US Patent office is issuing patents for things they don't seem to understand.
 
William Graybill II

March 3rd, 2000 9:41 AM
 
Max Reiner

March 3rd, 2000 9:42 AM
 
1-Click-Signed
 
Randall Edmunds

March 3rd, 2000 9:42 AM
 
Having spent quite a bit of money at Amazon.com (I have a photo book fetish) I will be taking my business elsewhere until these patent issues are resolved in the favor of the Internet community.
 
Brooks D. Ayola

March 3rd, 2000 9:44 AM
 
I will boycott Amazon.com until they withdraw their attempts to enforce their patents on one-click shopping and associate web sites.
 
Gregg Williams

March 3rd, 2000 9:44 AM
 
Jack Clang

March 3rd, 2000 9:44 AM
 
I concur with Tim O'Reilly's comments on the patenting of the one-click mechanism. (In fact I actually used it for a while at Amazon.com then stopped as the increase shipping costs proved to mount up too high.) When possible and/or feasible I prefer to patronize indepedendent bookstores. (I refuse to patronize the chains, especially Barnes and Noble and Borders because of the manner in which they have deliberately set out to destroy and drive existing independent bookstores out of business as well as the censorship-like effect that they are having on the publishing industry today-- i.e. causing many mid-list authors to be dropped--an effect which I don't think Amazon.com participates in directly at this point.) Since unfortunately the only independent bookstore remaining near me is a mystery bookstore I will continue to make non-mystery-related purchases from Amazon.com despite the present brouhaha. Yet I call upon you, Jeff Bezos, to reconsider your patenting of the one-click process but only if it can be done in such a manner that no one else can step in and patent the process. The process should remain a part of free internet enterprise.
 
Louis H. Silverstein

March 3rd, 2000 9:44 AM
 
These patents are frivolous, trivial and absurd.
 
Ray Doeksen

March 3rd, 2000 9:46 AM
 
Blair McDougall

March 3rd, 2000 9:46 AM
 
I will not purchase anything through Amazon.com and will convince people around me to do the same until Amazon.com stops this stupidity.

 
Craig Knox

March 3rd, 2000 9:46 AM
 
Paul Smith

March 3rd, 2000 9:46 AM
 
I think this is terrible and I will not shop at your site until clarification is forth coming. I also buy media material for my company and will avoid using your site from there too. Please come clean as you are hurting every one with these travial claims.
 
Jeffrey W. Hill

March 3rd, 2000 9:46 AM
 
Willie Alire

March 3rd, 2000 9:46 AM
 
Open-source coding is the life-blood of the internet. Patenting simple procedures to me smacks of a company desparate for something to call their own in an increasingly competitive marketplace, and does not endear them to me.
 
Dr. Ian Silvester

March 3rd, 2000 9:47 AM
 
Heather Haindel

March 3rd, 2000 9:48 AM
 
Jonathan Ard

March 3rd, 2000 9:48 AM
 
Why don't you try patenting the use of butter knives to spread peanut butter.
 
Mark DeYoung

March 3rd, 2000 9:48 AM
 
I've made a conscious decision *not* to shop at Amazon anymore since the first time I've heard about Amazon patenting their "1-click technology".

Instead I've shopped at their rival online bookstores instead.
 
Laurie Landry

March 3rd, 2000 9:49 AM
 
Christopher D. Holst

March 3rd, 2000 9:49 AM
 
From the All-American boy next-door to the neighborhood bully. Thanks for the cup, but I'll take my hundreds elsewhere while this ridiculousness lasts. I guess I'll finally have to try B&N and Borders sites.
 
Mark Swaisgood

March 3rd, 2000 9:50 AM
 
Amelia Ayer

March 3rd, 2000 9:50 AM
 
Jill McClellan

March 3rd, 2000 9:51 AM
 
kerstin mikalbrown

March 3rd, 2000 9:52 AM
 
An avid reader with a large appetite, I fell in love with Amazon when it first came out. After this sort of behavior though, I can't in good conscience support their absurd efforts to patent the obvious and attempt to litigate their way out of competition. Having made this decision some time ago, Amazon has lost out on about $500 worth of my patronage in the last few months. Here's to hoping it wasn't worth it for them...
 
Franklin Moody

March 3rd, 2000 9:52 AM
 
This is an abysmal misuse of patent law.
 
Patrick O'Brien

March 3rd, 2000 9:53 AM
 
Russ Mann

March 3rd, 2000 9:53 AM
 
Please don't embark on a possibly self-defeating journey. You run the risk of starting a dangerous trend which could jeopardize the openess of the web, thereby jeopardizing our livelihoods as web professionals.
 
Wayne Suiter

March 3rd, 2000 9:53 AM
 
I agree with the comment I saw about "pissing in the well." But it goes farther than that. Why should we, in the telecommunications arena, support a fellow who tries to block us all out. You remind me of the businesses in California that tried to get a court injunction against Costco, saying it hurt their businesses. What ever happened to good old fashioned American ingenuity, know-how and fair competition? Is it really that important to you to corner the entire market? Think about it.
 
Susan E. Cook

March 3rd, 2000 9:54 AM
 
Leisa Narkisnky

March 3rd, 2000 9:54 AM
 
Miranda Pearce

March 3rd, 2000 9:55 AM
 
Betsy Goldberg

March 3rd, 2000 9:55 AM
 
Jeremy Knudsen

March 3rd, 2000 9:55 AM
 
I would not buy from Amazon unless this patent suit is dropped.
 
David Sears

March 3rd, 2000 9:55 AM
 
Barnes & Noble - here we come!
 
Jason Benjamin

March 3rd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
greedy bastards!
 
Jaisen Mathai

March 3rd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
Charles Shopsin

March 3rd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
As a merchant who has been on the 'net for 3 years now, I both understand Amazon's position, and disagree with it.

The internet is a marvelous place for experimentation and innovation. It is the best example of how customer service and good information can make a retailer successful. By greedily limiting technology for other retailers, Amazon is exhibiting fear and a monopolistic attitude. Isn't it better to draw customers because they really like the service and information?

The 'net is an accumulation of good ideas put together in unique ways. To then patent those good ideas ultimately diminishes the quality of the work that follows.

It's too bad that Jeff Bezos can't see his way to making Amazon great by doing good for a wider community.
 
Ellen Barnard

March 3rd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
Hugh D. Hyatt

March 3rd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
I will not purchase from Amazon unless and until
they abandon both the absurd "one-click" patent
*and* the "affiliates" 'patent'.

 
Tom Biggs

March 3rd, 2000 9:56 AM
 
Patents have no place in the innovative Internet world. Share the wealth of ideas!
 
Jonathan Monsma

March 3rd, 2000 9:57 AM
 
Even though the patent office was obviously mistaken in granting this patent, that does not excuse the conduct of Amazon in utilizing it in the way they have. Amazon does not seem to have high regard for the needs of their potential customers so I see no reason to shop there or invest in the company until such time as I see evidence to the contrary.
 
Stacy Behrens

March 3rd, 2000 9:58 AM
 
Amazon, you were doing so well - we thought you weren't like the others (Microsoft) but you got too big for yourself. This goes against what the internet is all about.

Well, I'm off to Borders....
 
Leanne Smith

March 3rd, 2000 9:58 AM
 
You have got to be kidding! How could you, in good conscience, even apply for such a patent? Get real!
 
Ed Goyette

March 3rd, 2000 9:58 AM
 
I will not buy anything at all from Amazon until these ridiculous patents stop, and I will urge my company not to either. Resorting to litigation as a means to keep market share deserves no respect, much less patronage, from anyone.
 
Don Draper

March 3rd, 2000 9:59 AM
 
Michael Whitehead

March 3rd, 2000 9:59 AM
 
I have had nothing but good experiences with Amazon. It is always the first location for my searches. It is disheartening to find out that they would attempt something as disloyal to their customers as this. Until the matter has been resolved Amazon will not even be an option for future purchases.
 
Rob Gehrig

March 3rd, 2000 9:59 AM
 
There is the kind of thing we've come to expect from MicroSoft. Amazon was supposed to be a new breed.
 
Douglas Rowe

March 3rd, 2000 10:01 AM
 
Play fair jeffy-boy. Nobody likes a nitpicky cheater.
 
mike sullivan

March 3rd, 2000 10:01 AM
 
I will buy about $50 worth of books today.
I will not be purchasing them at Amazon. Amazon has an easy-to-use website for buying books, but
I refuse to shop there while they continue with their current policies regarding patents.
 
Philip Hunt

March 3rd, 2000 10:01 AM
 
I would like to point out that vendors like i-bill.com used such a system before amazon.com even existed and that many of these patent may in fact constitute a deliberate copyright infringement on the part of Amazon.com

 
Hugh Chapman

March 3rd, 2000 10:02 AM
 
There are other online stores. If it takes one more click to send my business their way whilst at the same time registering my disbelief and disgust at your utterly untenable position on this "invention", it is a small price to pay - and can't we all use some mouse clicking exercise anyway?

G
 
Gavin Cowie

March 3rd, 2000 10:02 AM
 
Jeff Cook

March 3rd, 2000 10:02 AM
 
This is really unfortunate. Chapters ahoy.
 
Gwynn Kirk

March 3rd, 2000 10:03 AM
 
Darren Clark

March 3rd, 2000 10:03 AM
 
K. Eric Harper

March 3rd, 2000 10:04 AM
 
Tas Dienes

March 3rd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
John Huynh

March 3rd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
James Burd

March 3rd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
Troy Evans

March 3rd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
Jonathan Robadue

March 3rd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
I've been in the software industry for over 20 years and watched the innovation and expansion of ideas get strangled by the "legal" arm of some companies via patents that should never have been granted since the idea was widely in use earlier. I supported Amazon early on and continued to refer users to this "innovative" site. I will no longer until I see Jeff return to the roots of his success and understand that service and creativity is what built his success, not attorneys and bogus patents.
 
Robert Schloss

March 3rd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
I have been a steady customer of Amazon for a long time, and have sent quite a bit of business to them through referal. Last week, I made a $50 order to B&N, the first of many I'm sure, and the reason the order went there rather than to Amazon was this patent business. Until Bezos & Co. get their heads out of their own posterior darkness, I'll patronize their competitors, and I'll likewise spread the word to those I can influence. I would rather stick with Amazon, because I've enjoyed my experiences up till now...but I won't support them if this is the kind of thing they stand for.
 
Tim Byrd

March 3rd, 2000 10:05 AM
 
Rex Lam

March 3rd, 2000 10:06 AM
 
Dave Aten

March 3rd, 2000 10:06 AM
 
Skeets Norquist

March 3rd, 2000 10:06 AM
 
Roland Thalmann

March 3rd, 2000 10:06 AM
 
Little brother always seems to grow up into you know who - BIG BROTHER..... Give this one up guys or Amazon will surely suffer the consequences. I will not use your service again, and will continue to urge my associates to do the same, until you stop trying to be the next feared behemoth of proprietary theft. As Tim and others have said, the internet and the technology that powers most of it is for all of us, not just the 8th graders who come steal the ball from the 2nd graders. Thanks
 
Brendan Coots - Internet Marketi

March 3rd, 2000 10:06 AM
 
Darlene G. Spangler

March 3rd, 2000 10:07 AM
 
I've always ordered my online books through Amazon. This has now stopped until they drop the patents and act like integrous, ethical, fair web denizens.
 
Nicole Byrd

March 3rd, 2000 10:08 AM
 

actions against cyber-squatting may prove in coming decades to be as destructive as anti-terrorist responses have been in recent decades. --will burre
 
will l. burre

March 3rd, 2000 10:08 AM
 
I will cease doing business with Amazon.com until they renege this patent. I have done business with them in the past, and I am sorry to lose them as a vendor over this.
 
Keith Lamont

March 3rd, 2000 10:08 AM
 
Tim Hannon

March 3rd, 2000 10:09 AM
 
I have ordered many books & CDs from Amazon. I have liked them and supported them as a site, and eschewed B&N. But their actions make me wish I'd never done business with them. I consider obvious s.w. and business process patents to be the height of stupidity, arrogance, bankrupt integrity & intelligence, and, in my eyes, a criminal offense. Shame on you Amazon, and shame on the idiots at the U.S. Patent Office that have been bungling s.w. patents and business process patents for at least a decade! The Patent Office should just admit they don't know a damn thing and close their own doors...they've certainly learned nothing useful in the last decade.
 
Jason A. Kulas

March 3rd, 2000 10:10 AM
 
Planning to patent air next?
 
Julia Henry

March 3rd, 2000 10:10 AM
 
Susan Garland

March 3rd, 2000 10:11 AM
 
Mike Sanders

March 3rd, 2000 10:11 AM
 
You make me sick.
 
Andrew Placek

March 3rd, 2000 10:11 AM
 
I've been using Amazon for years - through all of the time when they couldn't get their act together to offer on-line reporting - and I've referred them quite a few sales.

I even stuck with them, even though I couldn't buy through my own links. But with this affiliate patent, I will no longer support their business. I feel that this patent could potentially damage the thriving affiliate world, and I'm going to hit them where it hurts - right in the wallet!

Though it will be a hassle, I will be removing all of my Amazon links from the following sites:

http://www.babylounge.com/ http://www.entrepreneurmom.com/ http://www.pregnancy-birth-baby-parenting.com/
http://www.mommyrx.com/ http://www.velocitynyc.com/ http://www.orioleparkatcamdenyards.com/
http://www.newyorkyankeesbaseballclub.com/ http://www.affiliatesolutionprovider.com/ http://www.springsteen2000.com/
http://www.ticketinlet.com/

Onward and upward to Barnes & Noble!
 
Shawn Collins

March 3rd, 2000 10:11 AM
 
Eivind G. Nilssen

March 3rd, 2000 10:12 AM
 
I WAS a Amazon.com customer until this happened. I have now started buying ALL my books from Borders and FatBrain.com

THINK GEEK!!

 
Randy Cain

March 3rd, 2000 10:13 AM
 
I heartly agree with Tim O'Reilly's comments. Amazon provides a great service, but it is based on technology that was developed by others and distributed freely. Amazon's attempt at enforcing the 1-click patent can't hold up - and definitely should not, since it is not an "invention" but a combination of other people's inventions. I urge you, Amazon, to drop the patent enforcement and acknowledge your error. I'm a steady Amazon customer, but this action makes me question my loyalty to Amazon. There are a lot of other places to shop on the Web these days - heed your customer base!
 
Anne Russell

March 3rd, 2000 10:13 AM
 
Mr. Bezos,

How convenient that you think you can use my computer to store cookies or my Web site to advertise for you, but that no one else may do the same. The ill will you will bring upon yourselves with attempts to procure what most Web experts believe are un-earned patents is not worth it. I have been an Amazon customer and participated in your affiliate program in the past. However, since learning of your unfounded campaign against Amazon bookstore in Minnesota, which clearly existed prior to your venture, and now this patent foolishness, the evidence is mounting that you are a MicroSoft Wann-be. Got news for ya, people don't look up to thieves or pretenders. Think about it.
 
Jan Hogle

March 3rd, 2000 10:14 AM
 
Good idea! Perhaps you could patent using eye-balls to view web pages too.

I won't shop at your store.
 
Graham Day

March 3rd, 2000 10:14 AM
 
Since amazon disagrees with the net community on this issue why support them? Barnes & Noble here I come. Maybe amazon's accountants will have a word with their lawyers...
 
Chris Bennet

March 3rd, 2000 10:14 AM
 
Carol Kelly

March 3rd, 2000 10:15 AM
 
I will take my custom elsewhere until you get with the program!
 
Robin Lambourne

March 3rd, 2000 10:15 AM
 
What can I say that hasn't already been said? Patenting a trivial idea like 'one-click ordering' is sheer foolishness. I no longer purchase from Amazon.
 
Aaron Pace

March 3rd, 2000 10:16 AM
 
Amazon has lost another customer.
 
Kit Mellem

March 3rd, 2000 10:16 AM
 
I will vote with my dollars, and amazon will not receive any of them.
 
Brad Bierman

March 3rd, 2000 10:17 AM
 
These frivolous patents are a serious impediment to the progress of the Web. Do the right thing now, or be forced to make reparations later.
 
Ed Cayce

March 3rd, 2000 10:17 AM
 
I've just made my last purchase at Amazon, and I'm on my way to cancel that now.

I also run a number of office/personal web proxies, I've hardcoded them to go to Fatbrain instead of Amazon to keep us honest.

Love that.
 
David Bullock

March 3rd, 2000 10:17 AM
 
Will no longer trade at Amazon until they recind the patent.
 
Tim Dean

March 3rd, 2000 10:18 AM
 
These do not even classify as software patents... they are marketing slogans and ideas, taken way out of hand and blown far out of proportion. I used to be a big customer of Amazon... now I will not even consider them.
 
Joseph Gosselin

March 3rd, 2000 10:19 AM
 
David Wagner

March 3rd, 2000 10:19 AM
 
Amen, brother!
 
Mike Smithson

March 3rd, 2000 10:20 AM
 
As an ISP and local bookstore company with a link
to Amazon on our bookstore page,we are highly disappointed with Amazon. We will remove Amazon's link and describe Amazon's tactics in this month's newsletter issue to our dialup, webhosting and dedicated connection subscribers.
 
phil walker

March 3rd, 2000 10:20 AM
 
Alain Goettelmann

March 3rd, 2000 10:21 AM
 
Next question on "Who Wants to be A Millionaire": All of these people think they invented the web, but which of them actually did?

a) Al Gore
b) Tim Berners-Lee
c) amazon.com

give it up, guys, you're shooting yourselves in the foot -- look at all the people who simply don't like you now!
 
Dustin Kline

March 3rd, 2000 10:21 AM
 
I chose to be an amazon.com affiliate because I liked their policy better than other options I had investigated with other booksellers. I have to agree with Tim O'Rielly on this matter of the one-click patent however. If amazon.com chooses to continue this narrow minded dead end, I will be obligated to seek out other affiliates, as no one will wish to make purchases through my site for anything from amazon.com. What is worse, my site may get a black eye as well by being affiliated with amazon.com.
Like Tim, I respect the many things that amazon.com has to offer my visitors. I sincerely hope they change their course, but if they do not, I will not allow myself or my site to ride this ship into the rocks if that is Jeff Bezos choice.
Eddie of feoamante.com
 
Edward McMullen Jr.

March 3rd, 2000 10:22 AM
 
Dylan bGreene

March 3rd, 2000 10:22 AM
 
The attempt to limit the use of the Internet by a restrictive patent only encourages me to avoid Amazon.com. In my book purchases, which are primarily for older books, I have not found Amazon able to meet the prices offered by independent book sellers. If the attitude of Amazon is to attempt to monopolize internet commerce, I can be counted on to vigorously oppose and to boycott all Amazon efforts.
Edward Beechert
 
e.beechert

March 3rd, 2000 10:22 AM
 
Maura Dykstra

March 3rd, 2000 10:22 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, please re-think your position.
 
Brian Wilson

March 3rd, 2000 10:23 AM
 
Agree. But the patent fury goes beyond Amazon.com. How about Priceline vs. Expedia?
 
Nart Wielaard

March 3rd, 2000 10:23 AM
 
Arun Giddu

March 3rd, 2000 10:24 AM
 
amazon dreht jetzt durch ?
 
franz metz

March 3rd, 2000 10:25 AM
 
holly phan

March 3rd, 2000 10:27 AM
 
Guy Consitt

March 3rd, 2000 10:28 AM
 
Arek Mazur

March 3rd, 2000 10:29 AM
 
Greg Burnison

March 3rd, 2000 10:29 AM
 
I don't have much to add to Mr. O'Reilly's comments -- they vocalize my feelings much better than I could. I will simply add that Amazon will not get a penny more of my money while they continue such egregious business practices. I can't in good conscience support a company that abuses technology, the patent office and the web community for their own profit. And I will by lobbying every Amazon customer I know to boycott the company.
 
Linda Barth

March 3rd, 2000 10:29 AM
 
Cameron Dawson

March 3rd, 2000 10:30 AM
 
shame on amazon, shame, shame, shame.......
 
Edward Loyola

March 3rd, 2000 10:30 AM
 
Although I like your site and way of doing business, its distressing to see that apparently you are behaving like another Microsoft. I won't use your site, and recommend others don't as well unless you take a different position. Let's play fair.
 
Francis Upton

March 3rd, 2000 10:30 AM
 
For some time now I have been purchasing all of my books online, until recently those orders all went to amazon (dozens of books this year alone). From here on out I will be using other vendors to make my orders.

Amongst my family and friends, I am the computer literate one, the one who has lead them to the internet, and more importantly the one who has lead them to amazon. I am now actively discouraging people from buying from amazon.

Please, see the error of your ways.
 
Sharon French

March 3rd, 2000 10:31 AM
 
I'm also expressing my displeasure with my lack of patronage.
 
Matt Boone

March 3rd, 2000 10:31 AM
 
To Jeff Bezos:

The 'technology' that you are attempting to patent is more suited as an exercise for a first year CS major. If the implications of what you are attempting to do were not so scary, this would be a laughable as the claim that Al Gore invented the internet!!

I will be boycotting your company and I am advising everyone that I know to do the same unless you drop these ridiculous patent applications.

John Byrne
 
John Byrne

March 3rd, 2000 10:32 AM
 
Amazon.com no longer receives my business. Their suit of B&N shows exactly what kind of company they are.
 
Adrian T Kuepker

March 3rd, 2000 10:33 AM
 
Casey Paul Scott

March 3rd, 2000 10:33 AM
 
Now that I am aware of Amazon's misuse of the patent process, I am boycotting Amazon. As an ISP, we constantly purchase technical books, about 100 per year, and I have just instructed my staff to place our company book purchases elsewhere.
 
Macy Hallock

March 3rd, 2000 10:34 AM
 
I disagree with many of the ways our society claims intellectual property. Specifically the 1-Click patent is fairly obvious and ridiculous to claim as your own. I am confident that this patent will not hold up in time.
 
Marty Haught

March 3rd, 2000 10:34 AM
 
Josh Siegel

March 3rd, 2000 10:34 AM
 
On my site Servlets.com I used to earn $500 a quarter in referrals to Amazon selling my book (published by O'Reilly coincidentally). Now
next to the Amazon link I have information about the patent dispute, with advice to buy from BookPool or some other company until Amazon realizes their mistake. It'll cost me money in the short term, but in the long term we need to protect the Web from ridiculous patents.
 
Jason Hunter

March 3rd, 2000 10:34 AM
 
I just tried scrolling through all these names and comments just to see the scope of the numbers of people who will no longer be your customers. Now I'm adding my name to the list. If you want to join the ranks with the ilk of those like Microsoft who are just out to make a buck, be my guest. But for me the Amazon.com river is polluted and damned now and I'll no longer swim in it. You chose that river as a symbol of a free flowing commerce...now you're building a damn to stop it?!! Keep 1-Click and watch your damn divert your free flowing river to others more willing and able to handle the flow. It's a shame you're using 20th century business strategies in the 21st century. One thing people really respect these days is anyone or any business who can admit its mistakes, take responsiblity and correct them. Can you do it? Will you do it? We'll be watching!
 
Marika Ray

March 3rd, 2000 10:36 AM
 
Love your site, your selection, your custom service. Too bad I can't say the same about your business ethics. Goodbye, Jeff. Hello, Barnes & Noble.
 
Edward A. Cohen

March 3rd, 2000 10:36 AM
 
Bethel Spooner

March 3rd, 2000 10:36 AM
 
Until Amazon ceases these ridiculous software patent filings, it will be FatBrain.com that will get all my (and my employer's) business.
 
Lee Ballard

March 3rd, 2000 10:37 AM
 
I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!
 
Malcolm Lawrence

March 3rd, 2000 10:38 AM
 
Paul Irvine

March 3rd, 2000 10:39 AM
 
Larry Wagar

March 3rd, 2000 10:40 AM
 
Mike Cole

March 3rd, 2000 10:40 AM
 
I definately would have to say that I am not going to purchase any more books from amazon.com if they keep up this silly notion of 1 click ordering and afiliates being there original idea. Back off the patent lawsuits. As a consumer and internet user, I dont plan on using amazon.com
 
Shawn Hriman

March 3rd, 2000 10:40 AM
 
amazon.com
You did not create the browser; you did not create cookie's; you did not create SSL; you did not create the mouse; and most importantly, you did not create the one click ordering. If a plumbing company had patented the handle on a toilet and used that patent in the same manner against there competitors, we would all still have outhouses in our backyard. Donate your patent to a free source organization for the good of the internet. Until then, I am flushing my amazon account and you will receive no profits(or losses in your case) from me.
 
Erik C. Eid

March 3rd, 2000 10:42 AM
 
I have all positive things to say about my past experiences as an Amazon customer. However, I am sad to learn that part of Amazon's business practices is based upon a fundamentally wrong premise as described in the above open letter by Tim O'Reilly. I now add my name to this list of signatures as a disappointed Amazon customer.
 
R.A. Wilson

March 3rd, 2000 10:42 AM
 
I will be boycotting Amazon
 
trevor cooper

March 3rd, 2000 10:42 AM
 
Alan Green

March 3rd, 2000 10:43 AM
 
JT Utley, current amazon associate.
 
JT Utley

March 3rd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
Web commerce cannot thrive if it's leaders adopt the Gates-Ballmer business model. This is clearly the Microsoft method of implementing a particular technology in a specific way and then claiming exclusive rights to the entire technology.
Mr. Bezos' financial backers would be well-advised to pressure Amazon to avoid alienating it's customer base if they wish to ever see a return on their substantial investments.
 
Bill Moser

March 3rd, 2000 10:44 AM
 
Let's start an open process "Internet community against Amazon.com"!
I'll not use Amazon.com more!




 
Serge Vinnik, PhD

March 3rd, 2000 10:45 AM
 
It goes against the spirit of innovation (and ultimately hurts all of mankind) to try to patent ideas that are both pervasive and merely an extention of age old offline practices to a new technological platform
 
Scott Stolzman

March 3rd, 2000 10:46 AM
 
Christopher Swingley

March 3rd, 2000 10:47 AM
 
I am a computer science student who buys all of my textbooks online as do most of the students at my school. Amazon WAS our main source on the Internet for buying these textbooks. I am now spreading the news about your 1-click patent and am encouraging students to buy their books elsewhere (VarsityBooks.com, BigWords.com, etc).
 
Rashel Shattuck

March 3rd, 2000 10:48 AM
 
For Amazon to seek and win this patent is very discouraging, but hardly suprising considering the nature of Amazon; an Internet giant whose presence on the web serves only for their own financial gain.

The Internet has been a fantastic medium for freely sharing that so valuable of assets: information. Occasionally some big, obnoxious company like Amazon stomps through with no goal except to make a buck... and that's fine, so long as they do not stand in the way of the Internet's potential. But now they have this patent, and I wish them nothing but utter financial failure should they wield this new weapon.

Alan Bellows
bellows@enol.com
 
Alan Bellows

March 3rd, 2000 10:48 AM
 
I firmly agree with all of the points of the petition, and as a result of this, I will no longer make use of any goods or services made available to me by amazon.com, until such time as the situation is rectified, and I will encourage others to boycott amazon as well.
 
Joseph R. Childrose

March 3rd, 2000 10:48 AM
 
I firmly agree with all of the points of the petition, and as a result of this, I will no longer make use of any goods or services made available to me by amazon.com, until such time as the situation is rectified, and I will encourage others to boycott amazon as well.
 
Joseph R. Childrose

March 3rd, 2000 10:49 AM
 
It only takes 1-Click to order and 1-Patent to cause thousands to never order again.
 
Jim Moss

March 3rd, 2000 10:50 AM
 
Alex diNorcia

March 3rd, 2000 10:51 AM
 
Carri Abrahms

March 3rd, 2000 10:51 AM
 
I wholeheartedly agree with the sentiments expressed in your letter.
 
Lyell E. Petersen

March 3rd, 2000 10:51 AM
 
While I have nothing new to add to the extensive comments made thus far, I too will be taking my business elsewhere until this farce has stopped.
 
Brad Mehrtens

March 3rd, 2000 10:52 AM
 
Gearl Brace

March 3rd, 2000 10:52 AM
 
Phil Earnhardt

March 3rd, 2000 10:53 AM
 
The web is not like the playground at school... finders do not become keepers. www.fatbrain.com is looking better and better every day.
 
Elliot G.

March 3rd, 2000 10:55 AM
 
Larry Tucker

March 3rd, 2000 10:55 AM
 
I agree whole heartedly with Tim O'Reilly's letter.
 
Robert Falconer

March 3rd, 2000 10:56 AM
 
Jennifer Francisco

March 3rd, 2000 10:56 AM
 
I have been a Amazon.com customer for some time now, and have been pleased with ther service. Indeed, Amazon.com was my first stop in the world of e-commerce. I am extremely disappointed with your company's actions of late. Specifically the patenting of 1-click shopping and the Associates program. There is nothing new in these ideas or in your application of them. Enforcement of these patents can only serve to hinder further innovation and will be ultimately destructive both to e-commerce and to the online community as a whole.

It is unfortunate that, at a time when much of the computer industry is realizing the advantages of openness and cooperation (the open source movement being a prime example), Amazon.com seems to be moving in exactly the opposite direction.
 
Greg Pendergast

March 3rd, 2000 10:56 AM
 
Esther Sukhra

March 3rd, 2000 10:57 AM
 
I've also been a loyal and frequent customer. At first glance I dismissed this issue as trivial. Until I witnessed this amazing reaction. The people on this list are your best customers, and you have violated the principles that attracted them to the WWW in the first place. Give up on the patent idea, set a precedent in opening up the web, and we will return for your products and service.
 
Jim Howe

March 3rd, 2000 10:59 AM
 
How could I support anyone who'd dam(n) the flow of ideas which is the source of my excitement for the digital world?
 
Jesse Burkett

March 3rd, 2000 10:59 AM
 
As a publisher involved in e-commerce, I (and many many others) look to Amazon.com as a leader and innovator in the field, whose success has been well deserved. You are setting a bad example with this frivolous patent, much as Wizards of the Coast did in a similar patent they obtained on the basic mechanics of collectible card games. They reaped only a mountain of bad press by their actions, and you are doing the same.

It is one thing to protect a legitimate piece of original technology. It is another to use the "holes" in current patent law to attempt to grab an exclusive hold on a method of doing busienss that is a slight variant of open standards technology that was in existence long before your current use of it. The latter is what seems to be happening here.

It's a mistake. Your company is frankly too fine and successful a firm to require such action. Please continue to set a great example of customer service and fair play by reversing this decision. I urge you to reconsider.
 
Guy McLimore / MicroTactix Games

March 3rd, 2000 11:01 AM
 
I have been a Amazon.com customer for some time now, and have been pleased with ther service. Indeed, Amazon.com was my first stop in the world of e-commerce. I am extremely disappointed with your company's actions of late. Specifically the patenting of 1-click shopping and the Associates program. There is nothing new in these ideas or in your application of them. Enforcement of these patents can only serve to hinder further innovation and will be ultimately destructive both to e-commerce and to the online community as a whole.

It is unfortunate that, at a time when much of the computer industry is realizing the advantages of openness and cooperation (the open source movement being a prime example), Amazon.com seems to be moving in exactly the opposite direction.
For all of these reasons, I conclude that Amazon.com no longer deserves my patronage and I will be taking my business elsewhere.
 
Greg Pendergast

March 3rd, 2000 11:01 AM
 
As a customer of both Amazon and B&N, I think that Amazon has a good chance at winning the competative game without resorting to the legal tactics that outrage most technocally oriented customers.

Please drop these bizzare patent suits.
 
John MCCain

March 3rd, 2000 11:02 AM
 
Stop the madness.
 
Ryan McKim

March 3rd, 2000 11:03 AM
 
Ditto
 
Tom Yerex

March 3rd, 2000 11:03 AM
 
I was a loyal Amazon customer until the patent of 1-Click. Barnes & Noble gets all of my business now.
 
Patricia Green

March 3rd, 2000 11:04 AM
 
Tim O'Reilly (and I'm sure many others) have said it best, but I simply cannot see how Amazon expect to get away with this. I have been an Amazon customer (and a big O'Reilly customer) from almost day one, and I'm deeply troubled by these patents and Amazons apparent disregard of the ill-feeling that's growing amongst its customer base. Pressure works. The combined voices of thousands of users can and does make a difference, look at the whole etoy.com farce.
 
Chris Shrigley

March 3rd, 2000 11:04 AM
 
Michael Zammit

March 3rd, 2000 11:05 AM
 
I am fully supporting the boycott of Amazon.com and am actively encouraging others to do so as well.
 
Kenneth Hughes

March 3rd, 2000 11:05 AM
 
March 3, 2000 -
Good for you Tim for having the guts to bite the hand that feeds you! As an author, Amazon feeds me too, but I'm hereby putting them on notice that I don't care for their bullying.
Technology isn't the only area in which I have a beef with them over their tactics. Right before Christmas they sent a letter to small publishers telling them that if they didn't give Amazon a larger discount their books would be listed as "available in six weeks". Those authors and publishers who caved in to the extortion and granted Amazon a bigger discount would have their books listed on the Amazon site as "ships immediately".
My publisher didn't cave in, and so my book was not listed as "ships immediately". In fact however, Amazon usually stocks my book at their warehouses and CAN ship immediately. Even if it is not in stock at the warehouse, Amazon gets the book for the customer, from the publisher, usually within about 3 days. Unfortunately, this little fact (which could help Amazon sell my book) is not made known to the public... presumably because the publisher won't give Amazon a bigger discount.
So good for you, Tim! I agree with you completely! Go get em!
 
Beverley Laumann

March 3rd, 2000 11:05 AM
 
Kishore

March 3rd, 2000 11:12 AM
 
As an avid book buyer and computer user I have used Amazon many times before. As a web developer I protest their "patent" and will not use their service again until they agree to forget it. Patents like these threaten myself and other small businesses. This patent also threatens the further development of the web.

I learned of this patent through the Webmonkey newsletter. I'm sending email to all of my freinds and associates regarding this issue and urging them to sign the letter, stop using Amazon, and to email Amazon itself to let them know this won't be tolerated.
 
Greg Fredette

March 3rd, 2000 11:12 AM
 
Remember Henry Ford and the Selden patent. You are Selden and you're going to get your arse whooped by some modern Henry.
 
Jared Kibele

March 3rd, 2000 11:12 AM
 
I am not a regular shooper at Amazon, but I heard a lot about it. What all I see here is a diffrent versoin of the opinion I had. Please Amazon dont try build laws that spoils atmosphere.

 
Mano

March 3rd, 2000 11:13 AM
 
Mr. Bezos, you already had my loyalty as a customer. Now, I'll have to put up with inferior service elsewhere because I can't in good conscience support a company that displays such blatantly arrogant, greedy, and predatory business practices. It's time for the technology that put Amazon where it is today to teach you a lesson. I predict that this viral boycott will grow and grow until it hits you where it counts: volume shortfalls that vastly exceed any potential lawsuit damages received. Perhaps then you will wake up and smell the stench and decide to clean it up. For the record, I feel just as strongly about your Affiliate Marketing patent as well.
 
Geoffrey Zimmerman

March 3rd, 2000 11:14 AM
 
I've been an Amazon user since '97, but this ridiculousness will keep me off their site for the forseeable future.
 
Jeffrey Quinn

March 3rd, 2000 11:14 AM
 
please don't choke the web.
 
bill french

March 3rd, 2000 11:15 AM
 
Thank you again Microsoft for
stifling technological progress.
Did I say Microsoft? I meant Amazon.
Oh well, what's the difference?
 
C. Taylor

March 3rd, 2000 11:15 AM
 
I will not spend another cent on Amazon.com until they withdraw their suit.
 
Raphael Crawford-Marks

March 3rd, 2000 11:16 AM
 
Brian M Schaefer

March 3rd, 2000 11:18 AM
 
MArketing ideas are not what patents are about, and if you have to use patents to defend your marketing ideas, you should realize that the marketing game is one that everytime you create an idea, it only lasts a little while, and like other things, you need to keep breaking new ground.
 
Audrey Watson

March 3rd, 2000 11:19 AM
 
Laura Bergstrom

March 3rd, 2000 11:19 AM
 
Jeff, this obtaining this patent is tantamount to spitting in the wind. Bad move.
 
J.D. Hansen

March 3rd, 2000 11:19 AM
 
The growth of any business should be based on its ability to 'do its thing' BETTER than its competition (ie; Amazon's outstanding customer service and reputation), not in being the only one who CAN do it. Everyone benefits from healthy competition. This is very unhealthy. You have poisoned the 'open technology' community.

I've always feared that sooner or later one player would spoil it for the rest of us. I am very disappointed Amazon, it certainly shouldn't have been you.

You have lost my business, and the business of everyone that respects my opinion.
 
Jay Raney

March 3rd, 2000 11:22 AM
 
Charles Lovelady

March 3rd, 2000 11:26 AM
 
Just another stupid marketing/executive decision. No tech in his right mind would file such a ridiculous patent for something he didn't invent or inovate.

Time to turn back to regular bookshop's. You suck amazon.com.
 
Pedro Corte-Real

March 3rd, 2000 11:27 AM
 
I wonder if the woman who first requested an affliates program from you ever got paid for her genius - or is she another unsung person in history who's idea became gold for someone else?
 
Mary K. Greer

March 3rd, 2000 11:28 AM
 
Mitch Norcross

March 3rd, 2000 11:29 AM
 
I have been a regular customer of Amazon.com, but now I am going to take my business elsewhere.
 
Roy P. Eltham

March 3rd, 2000 11:29 AM
 
Mr. Bezos:

I find your use of patent law in the two case specifically mentioned above unfortunate. Rather than casting yourself and your company in the role of entrepreneur, innovator, and friendly to the web community as a whole, you have now taken a seat right behind Mr. Gates et al on the "e-commerce at all costs" bus. The web is about innovation and improving on ideas put forth by others, not using patent law as a club to beat everyone else into submission. While there's plenty of room for e-commerce and everyone who wants to make a buck by legitimate means using the web, there also must be equal room for the countless innovators who have made it what it is today- most of them unpaid. Do you _know_ what an RFC is? It's the ongoing dialog of contribution and creativity that is the fabric of the
World Wide Web. It's innovators asking others for their ideas. It's the synergy that makes the web possible. And if we keep going in the direction you suggest, a direction entirely counter to the idea and spirit of the RFC and the Web, the Web will soon be a completely different beast, one I may not care to use. I now regret my recent purchases from Amazon.com and will switch to Borders or direct purchases.
 
Tom Peters

March 3rd, 2000 11:29 AM
 
Mr. Bezos-

Ultimately, this is a public policy issue that won't get dealt with until after the elections--if ever, but right now you could do the right thing and reserve your use of bogus patent weaponry for purely _defensive_ purposes. I am disappointed to see that you have chosen instead to use your patent weaponry for offensive purposes. You're already rich. Now, that you've done that, why don't you try to stand for something good, instead of becoming a little richer through legal chicanery that just encourges others to use the same type of legal chicanery?
 
Charles Cowens

March 3rd, 2000 11:30 AM
 
Mike Alberts

March 3rd, 2000 11:30 AM
 
I personally will definitely boycott Amazon.com until this patent is lifted. This is definitely a case of abuse of patent rights. Your decision to patent such a trivial use of already existing technology will only become the laughing stock of the entire Internet development community. For you to believe otherwise is simply ludicrous. We'll have something to joke about in our cubicles for weeks, dude. Patenting a cookie function, how incredibly arrogant and toxic to the Internet's legacy of open standards. This is like putting a virus in the belly of the World Wide Web.
 
Victor McManus

March 3rd, 2000 11:30 AM
 
Ditto ... I agree with ALL of you. SHARE and play nice.
 
Nicole Baker

March 3rd, 2000 11:30 AM
 
Carma Allen

March 3rd, 2000 11:32 AM
 
Shame, more money = more greed. Amazon could have done the Sun way, but chose Micro$oft method. I hope South America doesn't loose the river, when Amazon sues them.
Thanks, User-Friendly for informing us at a cost to you. (another from Canada )
 
Alan Hill

March 3rd, 2000 11:32 AM
 
I will not buy from Amazon.com because of this patent.
 
mathew child

March 3rd, 2000 11:32 AM
 
Gretchen McArthur

March 3rd, 2000 11:32 AM
 
I'm boycotting Amazon over patents.
 
Richard Uhtenwoldt

March 3rd, 2000 11:33 AM
 
I will not buy from Amazon until this issue is resolved. I will advise many others who respect my opinion to do the same. This is a shame, because besides this patent problem I far prefer dealing with Amazon's site to that of their competitors.
 
Miles Nordin

March 3rd, 2000 11:33 AM
 
Tim's reasoned and honest letter identifies the primary issues and warns of very real consequences, both for the Web in general and for Amazon in particular.

These patents represent good ideas but not inventions. Amazon's excesses in claiming ownership of common-sense developments make the company look like a selfish and destructive player.

I don't care whether there is a boycott or not. I won't buy from Amazon until they take on a constructive and cooperative role in the development of the Internet.
 
Daniel Elbaum

March 3rd, 2000 11:34 AM
 
This patent can only serve to have a negative on the whole E-business industry as a whole
 
Rachel Lenkowski

March 3rd, 2000 11:34 AM
 
I too have chosen to no longer use Amazon.com, as a direct result of these recent patent affairs.
 
Nicholas K. Gracilla

March 3rd, 2000 11:35 AM
 
You're misuse of the patent system is inexcusable. As a former customer, I promise I will not continue business and encourage others to use your competitors as well. I will not return my business to you until you not only stop these tactics but attempt to make amends for the damage you have done.
 
Dan Pinal

March 3rd, 2000 11:35 AM
 
Robert Herman

March 3rd, 2000 11:37 AM
 
Tom Loredo

March 3rd, 2000 11:39 AM
 
Darren Smith

March 3rd, 2000 11:39 AM
 
It's all about Greed and Control, not what's best for all.

The patent office is in trouble and it's about time the government did something about it.
 
Bob Marconi

March 3rd, 2000 11:39 AM
 
If you cannot provide value for the customer without patenting silly things like "one-click", then you need to rethink your entire business.
 
D Clyde Williamson

March 3rd, 2000 11:40 AM
 
Eric Ridgley

March 3rd, 2000 11:40 AM
 
These patents have got to be the most moronic idea i've heard in a while. As a programmer i know how trivial the 1-click purchasing is, and the affiliates program is just a basic business process. What's next, patents for hyperlinks??
 
Peter Funke

March 3rd, 2000 11:41 AM
 
Just stop it Amazon. You're making a mistake that is going to bite us all in the ass.
 
Jason DeFillippo

March 3rd, 2000 11:41 AM
 
I find Amazon's behaviour unacceptable. There was prior art. So, Amazon has no right to enforce that patent. Until they stop trying to enforce it, I will boycott Amazon. There are many other good bookstores on the internet. (I love having the freedom to choose)
 
Jonas Jochum

March 3rd, 2000 11:42 AM
 
Please reconsider your position. My many friends and associates who trust my opinion on technology issues may never regain trust in your company if this goes on for long. I have no idea how many friends they have, or how much damage they will cause to your brand, but be warned, it could be very significant.

For now, you may consider me another lost customer (churn, baby, churn).
 
Mike Slack

March 3rd, 2000 11:42 AM
 
Your mom 'n pop garage business becoming a billion dollar business sent a powerful message to WE THE PEOPLE, who've doubted for years that we still live in a nation where dreams can come true. Your GREED has obliterated that original message. MONEY has empowered you! You're now just another insurmountable block, which deminished or eliminates the possibilities or other "dreamers."
I will use even greater enthusiasm, than used to encourage dozens of family and friends to utilize your services, to discourage further business with you!
Stuffing your rancid,invasive cookies into our personal systems, against our will and personal rights, will be stopped by WE THE PEOPLE--The cookie monsters!
 
Julie Laros

March 3rd, 2000 11:42 AM
 
Michael Randall

March 3rd, 2000 11:42 AM
 
The web has come to symbolize freedom...freedom of ideas, freedom from prejuduces, freedom to be yourself...Amazon seemed to me to be a leader in that fight for freedom, freedom from the outrageous prices charged by some land-locked stores, and freedom to find the book, movie, or cd you are looking for, even if it's not something that the corner store will carry.

These patents go against that whole concept of freedom. They are a sell-out, rat dirty business trick. Maybe you have enough business right now to be able to ignore such statements..but remember, what goes around comes around.

Please drop these ugly patent suits, and go back to being what you were...a leader in ethical online e-commerce, an example not just in how much money you made but in how you ran your business.

Thank you.
 
Pauline Williamson

March 3rd, 2000 11:44 AM
 
My wife and I are voracious book-buyers. We will not be shopping at Amazon while Amazon continues to file for and assert frivolous software patents.
 
Ian Crosby

March 3rd, 2000 11:44 AM
 
William D Lee

March 3rd, 2000 11:45 AM
 
Mike Schmidt

March 3rd, 2000 11:45 AM
 
Your petty war with Barnes and Nobles over the
years have done nothing to make either side
look good in the online market place. This
patent is completely insane. My only hope
is that maybe it is such a weak patent and
have gotten so much press that the US government
will decide to rehaul the whole software
patent process.
 
Billy Barron

March 3rd, 2000 11:47 AM
 
Andrea Dubois

March 3rd, 2000 11:47 AM
 
As someone who's written about and observed the the immense transformations in the book and publishing industries over the past 10 years, I can sadly say that Amazon's attempt to corner the market on internet technology is just one of many examples of the dubious tactics employed by corporate booksellers to stifle and snuff out competition. As companies like Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Borders try to consolidate the production and sale of books into fewer and fewer hands, the result is a quiet and insidious limiting of diversity of art and thought. Amazon's pursuit of patents is frighteningly similar to Barnes & Noble's attempts a year ago to purchase the book wholesale company Ingram in an effort to put the squeeze on the thousands of independent booksellers who compete with them. Competition is healthy and increases the vibrancy of our culture. It is because of antics like those pursued by Amazon that I will continue buy from local and independent bookstores.
 
Andrew Engelson

March 3rd, 2000 11:47 AM
 
Thomas Patterson

March 3rd, 2000 11:47 AM
 
Let's just hope Amazon isn't starting to follow Microsoft's business model.
 
Norm Elmore

March 3rd, 2000 11:48 AM
 
I've been a faithful Amazonian for 2 years and have purchased many, many books and CDs. I have just sent a 'feedback' email to Amazon and deleted all my Amazon email alerts and subscriptions. I will not buy a single item from Amazon until this madness stops.
 
Ken Buch

March 3rd, 2000 11:48 AM
 
While you might be able to register the name "One Click Shopping", I don't believe that the feature should be owned by any one company. (Despite the patent office disagreeing with me) The feature has been around for a long time. It would be like saying only Coka Cola can sell soft drinks, and that there can only be one flavor. I really don't understand the point of your patent. Do you think people will flock to your store because you are the only one with One Click Shopping? Well, add me to the list of one that won't be.
 
Frank Wolfe

March 3rd, 2000 11:49 AM
 
Amazon.com. The web's answer to Microsoft? Let's hope not.
 
Michael Romero

March 3rd, 2000 11:49 AM
 
I will no longer buy from amazon.com. I am very angry at amazon.com, and at the U.S. patent office for its irresponsible ignorance regarding the technology for which it is issuing undeserved patents.
 
Steve Doonan

March 3rd, 2000 11:50 AM
 
Tomasz Szymanski

March 3rd, 2000 11:50 AM
 
Down with monopolizing software practice!
 
Darren Shaw

March 3rd, 2000 11:50 AM
 
Jennifer Johnston

March 3rd, 2000 11:51 AM
 
I have been a satisfied customer of Amazon for quite some time, but as a software developer I am offended by Amazon's trivial patent application and their Microsoft-like business tactics. I will, therefore, boycott Amazon.com until such time as Amazon publicly apologizes for their behavior, drops their pursuit of this and any other such patents, and lives up to these words with obvious actions. Until such time, I will do my online shopping with Amazon's competitors such as Fatbrain, Barnes and Noble, and Buy.com.
 
Chris Todd

March 3rd, 2000 11:52 AM
 
Richard H Clancey

March 3rd, 2000 11:53 AM
 
I speak as both an Open Source Advocate and a Political Populist. I respectfully ask that you do not patent programming idea's that are not novel and non-obvious. Also, please do not solicite the US Government to take preference for large companies over small developers. This is doing more harm then good. Middle-class America is not going to tolerate being screwed while watching Politicians and Public Company CEO's getting rich at our expense. You should be paying attention to this.

I will research and react accordingly, such that if I determine that buying O'Reilly books from Amazon.com causes Amazon to lose money - then I will buy my O'Reilly books from Amazon. If indeed you profit from these sales, I'll buy them elsewhere - unless and until you change to tactics of fairness in development of Web technologies.

Regards,
-geo
 
George Lester

March 3rd, 2000 11:54 AM
 
Your site has been the first place for me to look online for books and music. I've had nothing but good experiences ordering online with you. But, alas, no more. I will no longer even browse your site as long as you enforce your ill begotten booty of patents. You are no more entitled to those patents than if you went to a bank teller to deposit a $20 check and instead, the teller credited your account with $200. That mistake would at least be discovered at the end of the day, unlike the mistake of granting you those patents. Do the right thing, release those patents into the public domain.
 
Paul Stevens

March 3rd, 2000 11:56 AM
 
Hear hear!
 
Bradford Smith

March 3rd, 2000 11:58 AM
 
Someone should've patented the "Cookie" idea!
 
Joel Chen

March 3rd, 2000 11:58 AM
 
Matthew Kanaracus

March 3rd, 2000 11:58 AM
 
It's not a huge surprise that the outfit that's managed to burn through $350 million-plus of other peoples money wants to patent other peoples innovation.
 
John Heasly

March 3rd, 2000 11:59 AM
 
yeah! I've been stealing amazon.com's ideas and using them on my own sites for years! how dare they try to keep me honest! These patents are a blow to plagiarizers erverywhere!
 
vaughan aldrich

March 3rd, 2000 11:59 AM
 
M Hutchinson

March 3rd, 2000 12:00 PM
 
When the news of this suit was first announced I had thought that there must have been some sort of error on the part of the announcer. Why? I would have thought that a thriving firm like amazon.com would not have had the time to engage in litigation, regardless of the merits of the suit.

I think it is extremely unfortunate that you are letting your legal counselors position your firm in like company as Microsoft in lashing out against and attempting to suppress competition.

Paradoxically, I believe that you will discover that many of your previously loyal customers will "vote with their dollars" and purchase from the competitor (barnesandnoble.com I believe) you are litigating against!

Do yourself and your image a favour - drop the suit and keep you customers. Your firm provides great customer service - that is what really gives you an edge.
 
Stephen E Kearns

March 3rd, 2000 12:01 PM
 
Emily Gray

March 3rd, 2000 12:02 PM
 
Use of patents to squash innovate and creative models of ecommerce is not productive, especially if it involves the patenting of technologies that are widely used on the web. Shame on you Amazon!!
 
R. Derrick Mickle

March 3rd, 2000 12:07 PM
 
Kyle Rames

March 3rd, 2000 12:07 PM
 
Amazon, you have lost my business and that of my company. You have blinded yourself to what the
web was founded on for the sake of profit.
 
Brett Walsh

March 3rd, 2000 12:07 PM
 
I have previously been a satisfied customer and associate of Amazon.com, but I am afraid I can no longer in good concience use your services (or recommend them to others, as I used to do) if you turly feel justified in using unethical, short-sighted tactics to turn a dollar. It's a new age, Mr. Bezos - ownership and force are "looking out for number one" are no longer the way we prosper. Get with the new program, or get left behind in the dust.
 
Kimberly E. Beall

March 3rd, 2000 12:10 PM
 
Timothy Roloff

March 3rd, 2000 12:10 PM
 
Give me a break. These are features that are a natural way of doing things with the technology available. This is like saying "I am patenting the use of a tissue to blow my nose on."

I thing this is anti-competition and even as scary as the crap microsoft is pulling. Screw you guys. I will not deal with a company like this.

- Charles Kline

 
charles kline

March 3rd, 2000 12:10 PM
 
It shouldn't be news to anyone that the American patent office doesn't know anything about computer technology. Just look at IBM's patent on establishing a byte order in a networked data connection. Its like patenting the technology to add 1 and 1.

This type of ridiculosity has been going on for at least 40 years; Amazon is only the latest perpetrator. But the US Patent Office is the enabler; it is to them that this protest should be sent.

As far as one-click buying goes; wasn't that invented in soda-machines?
 
Bret D Weinraub

March 3rd, 2000 12:10 PM
 
B. Cummiskey

March 3rd, 2000 12:11 PM
 
Amazon slaps all Internet developers in the face, without whose free exchange of work and ideas there would be no riches, no Amazon, and no patent to fight over. There are plenty of other places to blow one's cash.
 
Aaron Weiss

March 3rd, 2000 12:13 PM
 
I am boycotting amazon.com and have encouraged my family to do so.
 
Eric Anholt

March 3rd, 2000 12:15 PM
 
I used to buy things from Amazon that I could not find on Chapters.ca, but now I will just do without. I am disgusted at the steps Amazon has taken.
 
Scott Lawrence

March 3rd, 2000 12:17 PM
 
Tom Nugent

March 3rd, 2000 12:18 PM
 
Amazon's business creedo: If you can't turn a profit selling product, then sue somebody to help make your bottom line.
 
Jeff Koch

March 3rd, 2000 12:22 PM
 
As manager of development, I have directed no further purchases from Amazon.com from within our organization until they abandon their claim to this technology.
 
Eric Kuyper

March 3rd, 2000 12:22 PM
 
Shawn Manley

March 3rd, 2000 12:23 PM
 
F D Yocum

March 3rd, 2000 12:24 PM
 
You seemed like an okay guy in the early days, Bezos. What greed can do!
 
Gary Blakeslee

March 3rd, 2000 12:25 PM
 
As a web designer and programmer, I have a clear interest in keeping the Web's open technologies open. I strongly oppose Amazon's attempt to patent such a basic and obvious use of cookies. This isn't an invention - its a trivial application of existing technology.
 
Shawn Grunberger

March 3rd, 2000 12:26 PM
 
I'm starting a dot com and thought the one click idea too obvious to NOT include. Now I wonder...

In any case bn.com still serves my needs
 
jean moreau

March 3rd, 2000 12:27 PM
 
These patents are frivolous and are anti-competitive. They do not "protect" intellectual property as they have become defacto standard tools in an e-commerce world.
 
Sam Lewis

March 3rd, 2000 12:27 PM
 
$200 more for non-amazon purchases
 
Paul Kulchenko

March 3rd, 2000 12:28 PM
 
Michael DeVarennes

March 3rd, 2000 12:28 PM
 
Pamela Patterson

March 3rd, 2000 12:30 PM
 
Scott Christensen

March 3rd, 2000 12:32 PM
 
Randy Burt

March 3rd, 2000 12:32 PM
 
It's bullshit to patent such elementary, language-like, communication-fundamental little gimmicks.
Besides, it will not work because every webdesigner is allready using them. .........and will.

 
Cor Knops (Associate of Amazon..

March 3rd, 2000 12:33 PM
 
I am telling everyone to boycott Amazon because of this ridiculous patent. I guess I'll two click over to bn.com.
 
Mike McCune

March 3rd, 2000 12:34 PM
 
I am an avid reader (I buy 15-20 books a month), and I support Richard Stallman's boycott and will not give my business to Amazon until this issue is resolved. I prefer to shop at independent, community-based bookstores anyway. I suggest Powell's Books, which is far and away my favorite.

"Pissing in the well"...what a perfect way to describe it, Tim. Amazon, your customers do NOT approve.
 
D.J. Swanson

March 3rd, 2000 12:35 PM
 
I am not shopping at Amazon any more because this is an abusive act towards the consumer (US). It really makes me angry at Amazon.
 
Mary Broussard

March 3rd, 2000 12:35 PM
 
I stopped using Amazon when I heard about this, and I purchased as much as $100 in books/etc per month from them. Here I was, purchasing materials about open source and free software from a company who did not support it. I own stock in Amazon; I'm pondering selling it.

Come on, who is the genius who thought of one-click? Isn't that one of the most basic aspects of web programming? We use one click every day to get from one link to another, are you going to sue everyone? One click buying is no great invention (ie, it won't work if you don't use cookies).

Wake Up Amazon.
 
Joshua Denmark

March 3rd, 2000 12:37 PM
 
joke.amazon.com
 
Brandon L. Golm

March 3rd, 2000 12:38 PM
 
Sharon MacKenzie

March 3rd, 2000 12:40 PM
 
I am opposed to the patenting of processes which are common practice or 'prior art' and I object strongly to amazon.com using the courts to try to uphold a patent which should never have been issued in the first place.
 
Keith Miller

March 3rd, 2000 12:40 PM
 
Paul Showalter

March 3rd, 2000 12:40 PM
 
Andrew Woodall

March 3rd, 2000 12:41 PM
 
Kelly Cochrane

March 3rd, 2000 12:41 PM
 
If you continue with this stifeling process you will lose this customer.
 
Jeff Terwilliger

March 3rd, 2000 12:41 PM
 
If you try to win by cheating, Jeff, nobody will want to play with you :(
 
Mark Bracewell

March 3rd, 2000 12:42 PM
 
This seems like case of ignorant thinking mixed with rampant arrogance. If one learns only one thing from Microsoft it is that a little bad pr goes a long way. You can be the biggest player out there, but step on enough people and they will start looking for ways to knock you down. Amazon is still only a 250 pound gorilla and maybe a little of my business to bn.com might teach this young company a lesson before it becomes another 900 pound annoyance.
 
Viet Do

March 3rd, 2000 12:43 PM
 
George W Bush

March 3rd, 2000 12:43 PM
 
Why are we all screaming at Amazon and vowing our support for Barnes & Noble? I see them as equal evils - right now Amazon has taken the spotlight, but do we really see B&N as the only alternative?
 
anonymous

March 3rd, 2000 12:46 PM
 
I will not be making any purchases with Amazon until this matter of patent abuse is sorted.
 
James Matthews

March 3rd, 2000 12:46 PM
 
Chuck Hacala

March 3rd, 2000 12:48 PM
 
Lawrence Halff

March 3rd, 2000 12:50 PM
 
Jeremy Green

March 3rd, 2000 12:51 PM
 
There's a certain amount of "biting the hand that feeds you" in this move, isn't there?

I mean, would Amazon even exist (would the Web as we know it today exist at all) if early pioneers of the World Wide Web had used this type of strategy?

Mr. Bezos, you are a pioneer in the world of ecommerce, but your company is not an innovator of technology or processes. Now that you have your "patent", why not make it public domain and put this issue to rest?
 
David Wood

March 3rd, 2000 12:51 PM
 
As one Jeff to another- come on, man! Dangerous precedent, and it makes you look greedy, like Microsoft.

I'm older than you- suppose I'd patented my name??!! Who would you be then?? Amazon is too good to need this kind of legal sleight of hand. Keep blazing the way with integrity!
 
Jeff Viehmeyer

March 3rd, 2000 12:52 PM
 
Clarrie Higham

March 3rd, 2000 12:52 PM
 
I will no longer buy anything from amazon.
 
Dominik Toepfer

March 3rd, 2000 12:53 PM
 
Patents are a bad idea in software, period. Please stop the insanity. Compete on service and reliability.

Damn the man.
 
jeff wyonch

March 3rd, 2000 12:53 PM
 
Bart Bernhardt

March 3rd, 2000 12:54 PM
 
ooopps...i just removed their cookies from my machine! and cleared their database of my account info.
 
D. Decker

March 3rd, 2000 12:54 PM
 
I'm truly sorry to see this, but I will abstain from purchasing anything from Amazon.com, nor will I recommend it to anybody else, until this foolish "patent" claim is dropped.
 
Tom Raymond

March 3rd, 2000 12:55 PM
 
They're just panicked cause they haven't figured out how to spend less to acquire customers.
 
David S. Gray

March 3rd, 2000 12:55 PM
 
I once did enjoy your services, but ever since I heard about your 1-click patent, I have stopped shopping at your site. You provide good services otherwise, but please, do not try to inhibit innovation. Innovation is good for everyone, especially when it is open.
 
Keith Kyzivat

March 3rd, 2000 12:57 PM
 
I have been a long-time customer of Amazon, even
though I have used other shops more lately.
Amazon's selection is massive and not comparable
to anyone's elses. I remember how guilty I used
to feel when I was looking at Amazon's book
reviews and then buying the book from Fatbrain
or somewhere else. Well, no more. As long as
Amazon is cannibalizing the fruits of open
source development with their patents, I have
every right to use every service they offer
and not pay a dime. In other words, I, too,
am voting with my money.

 
Sami Itkonen

March 3rd, 2000 12:57 PM
 
Martin Alexander

March 3rd, 2000 12:59 PM
 
www.noamazon.com
 
Josiah Hagen

March 3rd, 2000 1:00 PM
 
chris

March 3rd, 2000 1:00 PM
 
Deidra Morrison

March 3rd, 2000 1:00 PM
 
Don't stifle innovation with anti-competitive practices in an industry in its infancy. Don't kill the golden goose for us all.

Boycott Amazon for all purchases until a public notice about the non-enforcement of these patents is posted.
 
Dave Sanders

March 3rd, 2000 1:01 PM
 
Michael Hoffman

March 3rd, 2000 1:01 PM
 
Amazon will not get any more of my business until this nonsense is over. Get a life, Mr. Bezos!
 
Angie Altfillisch

March 3rd, 2000 1:02 PM
 
The strong backlash against Amazon.Com from the techie community is unlikely to get Amazon's attention because it won't much affect its revenues or stock market position.
The only way to force a rogue company to change its ways is through the bottom line. Happily, Amazon's profit picture is terrible and the company's cosmic market cap exists only because of speculative greed. Should the shine tarnish, let's say because of consumer backlash, Amazon might be a bit more responsive.
 
Louis Bertrand

March 3rd, 2000 1:03 PM
 
Amazon will never get another penny from me or my friends. I hope they get sued from the pig that patented e-commerce. Kudos for O'Reilly!
 
Jim Gorczyca

March 3rd, 2000 1:03 PM
 
Amazon.com can now be placed in the Microsoft camp of being a "barrier to innovation." Tactics like these may reap you short term gains, but in the long run not only will you hurt consumers, but you will undermine your own business as well.
 
Lucas Rockwell

March 3rd, 2000 1:04 PM
 
Such patents on work based on prior art and obviousness show two things... 1) the U.S. Patent system is inherently broken 2) corporate greed manifests itself wherever it can take root.
 
Steven Collins

March 3rd, 2000 1:06 PM
 
I was surfing for specific information and ran across this Amazon.com patent article. A am appalled that not only did Amazon applied for these patents but that it was granted! I have shopped at Amazon.com in the past, and have pointed many customers and professionals to shop there as well. However, I view this maneuver as jeopardizing the growth of the net and will act accordingly with my (as well as my referrals) future purchasing power until this is cleared up.
 
James Sharp

March 3rd, 2000 1:06 PM
 
Patenting your own lack of innovation is your marketing department's way of saying you've run out of ideas. Time to move aside and make way for some real development.
 
Ralf Fletcher

March 3rd, 2000 1:07 PM
 
I have stopped purchasing from Amazon as a result
of the patent and I will continue to use other
vendors until Amazon makes a formal and public
announcement which forswears enforcement of this
ludicrous patent.
 
Reece Hart

March 3rd, 2000 1:07 PM
 
I actually sent a letter to Amazon. (Paraphrased) "If I create an e-commerce ordering system for my website that uses cookies to get the job done with one mouse click, will I be violating your patent?"

Naturally they replied with some lawyer-ease about not being able to comment on an active lawsuit.

 
Matt Savino

March 3rd, 2000 1:08 PM
 
Jak Mang

March 3rd, 2000 1:11 PM
 
I was a happy Amazon customer, I will no longer purchase anything there unless this situation is rectified.
 
Jean Detheux

March 3rd, 2000 1:12 PM
 
Just say no to Amazon!!
 
Patrick Osborne

March 3rd, 2000 1:13 PM
 
AMAZON IS OUT OF CONTROL!
 
Richard Morris

March 3rd, 2000 1:13 PM
 
Jason Murray

March 3rd, 2000 1:14 PM
 
Joanna Dinsmore

March 3rd, 2000 1:14 PM
 
Randall H. Shinn

March 3rd, 2000 1:14 PM
 
BOYCOTT AMAZON!!!
 
Joe Gaspar

March 3rd, 2000 1:15 PM
 
Sadly, Amazon.com is off my list of
preferred retailers until they learn
to play fair.
 
Kiki Dee

March 3rd, 2000 1:15 PM
 
This is really hard to believe…Amazon was granted a patent on a technology that I have been using for my client sites for years!! I can hardly start to express how outraged I am… In the past I purchased many technical books through Amazon, but I think in regards to this new light they shed upon me a light bulb went off…. I am definitely done supporting them any further. I guess it is back to my local bookstore or better yet, Barnes and Noble online *grin* Maybe I ought to Patent the word “book” or “sign up for our newsletter!”
Needless to say that we also use many affiliate programs, wonder what will happen there….’nuff said!
 
Sabine Myers

March 3rd, 2000 1:18 PM
 
Bryce Thornton

March 3rd, 2000 1:18 PM
 
Ronald Velner

March 3rd, 2000 1:19 PM
 
James E. Leinweber

March 3rd, 2000 1:20 PM
 
Lisa Kesterson

March 3rd, 2000 1:20 PM
 
The patent system for software needs review. NY senator Charles Schumer was making some such noises. We need to encourage this.
 
Arun Gupta

March 3rd, 2000 1:23 PM
 
You have made a sad, sad choice.
 
Linus Boman

March 3rd, 2000 1:24 PM
 
What's next - a patent on fresh air?
Amazon are taking the piss.
 
Steve Pullinger

March 3rd, 2000 1:25 PM
 
I have been a customer of Amazon, however there are enough alternatives until they pull their heads out! Why don't we just start patenting math algorithms, then we can charge all educational facilities for using them.
 
Craig Berbling

March 3rd, 2000 1:26 PM
 
Michael Roberts

March 3rd, 2000 1:27 PM
 
Tom Potts

March 3rd, 2000 1:28 PM
 
I have purchaded probably close to $300 worth of books from Amazon since December. This may not be much to them, but they won't get any more of my money. Now I need to get rid of their cookie! Also, Yahoo has a much better auction.
 
Randy Johnson

March 3rd, 2000 1:28 PM
 
I have known the power of an affiliate program (via internet marketing experts) long before Amazon started one... how did Amazon ever receive the patent for it? The harder you squeeze the harder the resistance...
 
John Butler

March 3rd, 2000 1:32 PM
 
I've been a customer at Amazon for a number of years now, because they provide a terrific service. However, they aren't the only game in town, and their recent actions concerning these ridiculous patents has led me to favor other sites like Fatbrain.com and Borders.com for book purchasing.
 
Anthony Intintoli

March 3rd, 2000 1:32 PM
 
Affiliate programs were not invented by Amazon and should not be banned from other sites - My own website has to be put on hold until the courts decide that Amazon has no right to stop me from making some extra cash. I will certainly continue to boycott Amazon !
 
Gregg Knudsen

March 3rd, 2000 1:33 PM
 
Claus Zimmermann

March 3rd, 2000 1:33 PM
 
The Net that has so enriched Bezos wouldn't exist if the people who truly created it had spent their time beating each other over the head with patent lawyers. Shame, shame! Amazon has proven itself to be no friend to the bookselling and book-buying community (by refusing to resist censorship attempts); they're obviously no friend to the Net itself either.
 
Angela Gunn

March 3rd, 2000 1:35 PM
 
Allowing Amazon to claim their 'invention' is fine with me. Preventing others from using it is immature. I promise to never buy something from Amazon until they release this patent. Afterall, they are not the only site online that offers the products and services they do.
 
Jeff ten Bosch

March 3rd, 2000 1:35 PM
 
Marimba

March 3rd, 2000 1:36 PM
 
Sandy Antunes

March 3rd, 2000 1:37 PM
 
How saddened I am that Amazon (one of my favorite places on the net to order from) would do this. Greed is never becoming and that seems to be what this is about. I guess its time for me to find a new place to order my books from. Barnes & Noble here I come!
 
Lucinda Miracle-Lewis

March 3rd, 2000 1:37 PM
 
Amazon: Quite bogus !!
Are you going to patent use of the color Red next ?

No more Amazon.com for me;
I guess I'll have to use B & N . . .
 
Jay Riddell

March 3rd, 2000 1:37 PM
 
In the past year I have spent well over one thousand dollars on books at amazon.com. At one point and time amazon automatically activated one click ordering. I immediately disabled it. You are by far the best book store on the net as far as completeness, ease of use, and price. It really urks my chains when companies like this have to try to implement crap like this. It feels like all your trying to do is squeeze every last penny you can out of people. I want to do business with a company that appreciates me, and my business, and not one that insults me with stupid sales pitches. I would shop your sight with and without one click ordering. It is stupid to patent an idea so broad. Its like trying to patent the wheel. Another point is that this feature does not draw more customers, nor does it help to keep the customers you already have. It is a nice perk for people that want to use it, but most could care less. You have huge sales and yet you still can't turn a profit. Stop wasting your time with frivolous patents, cut costs, focus on your core business's and treat your customers with appreciation, respect and good will, and they will do the same for you. Act mean hearted, ill willed, and like money grubbers and your customers will flock to your competitors in droves regardless of how many hair brained buzz words and patents your marketing department can pump out. E-commerce has changed many things in business, but at the same time there are many time tested practices in business that have always worked and held true. Get your head out of the E-clouds, and remember the golden rule.
P.S. Things better change or else I will feel justified in paying more somewhere else. You tend to find that customers morals are not something you can always ignore.
 
Brett Heitman

March 3rd, 2000 1:37 PM
 
I will not use the Amazon.com website untill they stop there current buisness practices in regards to patents
 
Charles Zuhlke

March 3rd, 2000 1:37 PM
 
What a shame, we thought you were on our side...
 
Douglas Hardman

March 3rd, 2000 1:37 PM
 
Jack Beslanwitch

March 3rd, 2000 1:38 PM
 
Marijka Hambrecht

March 3rd, 2000 1:38 PM
 
Catherine Hampton

March 3rd, 2000 1:39 PM
 
I am an Amazon customer
 
Robert Lee Foster

March 3rd, 2000 1:42 PM
 
John Wynen

March 3rd, 2000 1:43 PM
 
Gunnar Sigurdsson

March 3rd, 2000 1:43 PM
 
Quick-pay gas pumps are not patented..
Likewise should Quick-pay e-commerce sites..
Anyone can think of one-click shopping..

Therefore, the idea of one click should not be patented..

But, I do grant you that the implementation of the design (non-obvious algorithms) and such should be patentable..
 
Jason Simas

March 3rd, 2000 1:43 PM
 
Alejandro Lynch

March 3rd, 2000 1:45 PM
 
Kim Greist

March 3rd, 2000 1:46 PM
 
Tim Rowles

March 3rd, 2000 1:48 PM
 
Michael P. Barnes

March 3rd, 2000 1:48 PM
 
PER-GUNNAR MARTINSSON

March 3rd, 2000 1:48 PM
 
Paul Murphy

March 3rd, 2000 1:48 PM
 
I cannot put it better than Tim did -- patents restricting techniques that streamline electronic commerce actively harm the growth of the industry.
 
Joseph D. McMahon

March 3rd, 2000 1:49 PM
 
I have now become a BOL affiliate rather than Amazon due to the manner in which Amazon choose to conduct their buisness
 
Clive Jones

March 3rd, 2000 1:50 PM
 
Up yours Bezos
 
Chandler Kane

March 3rd, 2000 1:51 PM
 
Brad Freer

March 3rd, 2000 1:51 PM
 
Charles B DePue III

March 3rd, 2000 1:53 PM
 
My disgust with Amazon has reached an all-time high.

I will use your site from now on to search for books/music/videos/your dignity/your self-repect/your clue/your understanding of how much you fucked yourself--
and then I will promptly open a new window and purchase my book form borders or barnes&noble-
companies whose sole goals seem to be providing me with books at a fair price- not ripping of the public while frantically swaying on the shoulders of giants.
 
Torin Hill

March 3rd, 2000 1:55 PM
 
Andrew J Ward

March 3rd, 2000 1:55 PM
 
Bad conduct on your part Amazon. Such will cost you as this continues to be made known. I personally will be sure to forward this information to my little list of Friends in my address book. If others do the same, do you realize how fast this negitive PR will build against you for your petty actions? Back off before you shoot your selves in the other foot as well!
Sonny Edmonds
http://members.xoom.com/SonnyEdmonds/
 
Sonny Edmonds

March 3rd, 2000 1:56 PM
 
I have been a regular customer of Amazon since its inception, but these ridiculous patent claims have made me reconsider. I'll be buying from local independent booksellers now.
 
Fred Sampson

March 3rd, 2000 1:57 PM
 
Oh Amazon people,

This is wrong. You know it is wrong. I can't imagine attempting a patent on this ever passed the straight-face test internally - do you think this would pass by unnoticed in today's day and age? Come come now...
 
Dan Hutchings

March 3rd, 2000 1:58 PM
 
You must stop filing patents which basically steal technology which others have generously given the internet community in the interest of innovation. I will never purchase another item from you, rather I will go to www.bookpool.com
 
Jason Whitman

March 3rd, 2000 1:58 PM
 
Richard G Guadagno

March 3rd, 2000 1:59 PM
 
Unbelievable! I will boycott their site and tell others to do the same. They need to hire Al Gore so they can patent the internet.
 
Randy M. Asher

March 3rd, 2000 1:59 PM
 
sean lally

March 3rd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
Phil Stoneman

March 3rd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
They're just a bookstore. How arrogant. I will absolutely not utilize the services or products of any company which so underhandedly attempts to restrict the open market our country tries to maintain, and that the internet has promoted so fully. That Amazon.com can even exist is greatly the product of a set of ideals they obviously seem to clash with. How ironic that they are taking moves they think will enhance their competitive edge, when it just might be their economic downfall. It seems to me to signal they feel they cannot be appropriately competitive based upon their own merits. Goodbye; another business will fill your shoes.
 
Thomas R. Hand

March 3rd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
Scott Silvers

March 3rd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
Such a trivial and spoiling patent application is not new, but Amazon have, as Tim has said, built on open standards that contain all the elemts used in this patent.

It is deeply saddening. I think I will stick to using BOL and John Smiths for books as long as you pursue this foolishness

cds
 
Colin D. Speirs

March 3rd, 2000 2:00 PM
 
keala hagmann

March 3rd, 2000 2:01 PM
 
I was one of the very first Amazon.com customers, and still frequent the "store". It's too bad an awesome company such as Amazon.com has to go off and do such a stupid thing. Hopefully they [Amazon] will back off this patent before I have to categorize them with Circuit City, whom I boycotted for DIVX.
 
John Everson

March 3rd, 2000 2:04 PM
 
Tim, you're a saint. You're reasonableness has inspired me to think of Jeff and the rest of the crew at amazon as less than thieves. How about calling a summit on the order of your Open Source Summit a few years back? I think an event like this would create a lot of media attention and goodwill towards amazon, if they do the right thing.

Thanks for speaking out for us! O'Reilly rules!
 
Thomas Petersen

March 3rd, 2000 2:04 PM
 
Jeremy Osner

March 3rd, 2000 2:05 PM
 
I am an Amazon customer (I just order another item less then 15 minutes ago in fact) and am disturbed by where patents and actions of this type may lead. My business does and will go to those who lead by innovation and value, not to those who try to dominate by litigious means. Keep my web/e-commerce experience free of the practices plaguing ‘conventional’ business or loose me as a customer.
 
William F. Barber

March 3rd, 2000 2:05 PM
 
another customer lost...
 
Adam Stern

March 3rd, 2000 2:05 PM
 
asdfasdfasdfa
 
asdfasdf

March 3rd, 2000 2:08 PM
 
asdfasdfasdfa
 
asdfasdf

March 3rd, 2000 2:08 PM
 
Robert Clegg

March 3rd, 2000 2:09 PM
 
I have been a long time Amazon customer and until this patent issue came up, Amazon was the only online book seller I ordered from. Now it is the only one I won't order from. I hope that they can wake up and see their mis-use of software patents
 
David Chapman

March 3rd, 2000 2:09 PM
 
I have purchased items from amazon.com in the past. Until this farce is stopped, I will buy else where. You have made Barnes and Noble very wealthy with this action.

 
dan smith

March 3rd, 2000 2:10 PM
 
I purchase a lot of products on the web, and until this situation I bought a lot from amazon. This will no longer occur. Barnessandnoble.com is now the main recipient of my dollars.

Please, do the right thing and stop this ridiculousness.
 
Sean L Rowan

March 3rd, 2000 2:10 PM
 
As a professional software developer, I find these types of patents ridiculous and stifling toward innovation. Amazon.com has gone too far. I won't mind purchasing items elsewhere
-- former amazon.com customer
 
Jim Carter

March 3rd, 2000 2:12 PM
 
Lawrence La Raia

March 3rd, 2000 2:13 PM
 
Why shouldn't I drive over to Barnes and Noble and save postage?
 
Barbara Uhrig

March 3rd, 2000 2:14 PM
 
This is like Gap patenting the process of placing merchandise in a bag at the check out counter. Come on Amazon, grow up.
 
Seth Brewer

March 3rd, 2000 2:15 PM
 
Jameus Hutchens

March 3rd, 2000 2:16 PM
 
Alexander Noble

March 3rd, 2000 2:16 PM
 
Peter Tutini

March 3rd, 2000 2:17 PM
 
The greed and stupidity of Amazon should be expected yet suprises me nonetheless. I thought stupid games like this ended in kindergarden. I suppose I was mistaken.
 
Eric Boucher

March 3rd, 2000 2:19 PM
 
The Amazon patents for 1-click, Associates, etc., are ridiculous! There is some trivial coding that
many people have done for years prior to the patent. I'll never shop at Amazon unless they correct their mistake.
 
John Timm

March 3rd, 2000 2:19 PM
 
After reviewing the issues with Amazon's One-Click patent, I have decided to not purchase any item or click on any banner related to Amazon or to promote Amazon in anyway.

O'Reilly's, Barnes and Nobles, Borders, and Buy.Com here I come.

Man of the Year (for greed)!!!


 
Chris Sanchez

March 3rd, 2000 2:20 PM
 
I have been a heavy Amazon.com shopper (look me up), but I will switch to Barnes and Noble or Borders in protest if you pursue this silly patent. Patent law is becoming a joke; don't add to the madness.
 
George Grenley

March 3rd, 2000 2:23 PM
 
you've got to be kidding, Jeff! give it a rest!
 
Chuck Haddaway

March 3rd, 2000 2:23 PM
 
Paul V. Piescik

March 3rd, 2000 2:26 PM
 
David H. Penn

March 3rd, 2000 2:27 PM
 
I will not purchase from Amazon.com as long as they continue this policy.
 
Tom Philippi

March 3rd, 2000 2:27 PM
 
Terry Overton

March 3rd, 2000 2:30 PM
 
Gerald Vrooman

March 3rd, 2000 2:31 PM
 
marcia friedman

March 3rd, 2000 2:31 PM
 
harold goldstein

March 3rd, 2000 2:32 PM
 
Marco Bruchmann

March 3rd, 2000 2:34 PM
 
This is your Internet. Don't let the big men take it away from you.
 
Jeremy Rhoten

March 3rd, 2000 2:35 PM
 
I am also contacting ToolCrib of the North and cutting my ties to that business until this Patent is dropped.
 
Brian Glasgow

March 3rd, 2000 2:35 PM
 
Mike Zeoli

March 3rd, 2000 2:36 PM
 
Albert Eisenstone

March 3rd, 2000 2:36 PM
 
I just received a book I bought from AMAZON yesterday. Today someone forwarded me this e-mail about all this crap they are doing with the patents. What a load of crap. How ignorant is Bozo to think that amazon alone came up with cookie technology. Whatever!! That was my final purchase until the issue is dropped. Even at that, I may just never buy from amazon again because this was such a greedy and selfish move. Rest assured that I will be forwarding the boycott news to all of my friends and will discourage anyone from buying from amazon! It's back to brick and mortar for me!!!
 
Gabriela Toepfer

March 3rd, 2000 2:36 PM
 
Barron Shaw

March 3rd, 2000 2:36 PM
 
Sejal Kamani

March 3rd, 2000 2:40 PM
 
Owen M. Smith

March 3rd, 2000 2:40 PM
 
As an Amazon.com customer I appreciate the obvious use of cookies which allows the convenience of 1-click ordering. As an author, I resent any practice which would seek to limit other retailers from implementing the same conveniences.
 
Jeffrey Dean

March 3rd, 2000 2:40 PM
 
I see no good reason for filing these patents, I feel these will hurt Amazon in the long run rather than help them.
 
Chris Connolly

March 3rd, 2000 2:42 PM
 
I was on the point of making my first purchase from Amazon when this story came to light; suffice to say that I did not make that purchase, and nor do I intend to make any other purchases from Amazon while they continue to hold patents for obvious software techniques.

Recently I heard a news-clip where Amazon responded claiming that the patends were justified because they had spent a great deal of time and effort in producing the product.

If the executive at Amazon truly believe that it took their analysts thousands of hours to come up with the basic ideas underpinning their patents (as opposed to spending thousands of hours coding their implementation), then they should sack them as completely incompetent -- any analyst worth their salt would have deduced an equivalent system with maybe a few hours thought, certainly not enough true innovation to warrant any sort of patent protection.

The appropriate protection that Amazon should be seeking is *copyright* (which they already have by default), rather than *patent*; until they surrender these patents I will not be making any purchases from them, and furthermore will be recommending to all my contacts that they do likewise.

This is of course not restricted to Amazon; I will take the same approach to any business which adopts a similarly litigious approach.
 
Martin D Kealey

March 3rd, 2000 2:44 PM
 
My first impression was that of disgust, when I read about these patents. So now I WON'T buy anything from Amazon - there are competitors who are just as good & I can make all my purchases through them. Byebye Amazon.. you greedy b*stards.
 
John Enevoldsen

March 3rd, 2000 2:45 PM
 
Mr Bezos, please order one of your available books on business ethics...and read it.
 
Steve Hobmann

March 3rd, 2000 2:49 PM
 
Kobus Jooste

March 3rd, 2000 2:50 PM
 
Jaosn Sanborn

March 3rd, 2000 2:50 PM
 
Chris Mervin

March 3rd, 2000 2:51 PM
 
I wholeheartedly agree with Tim and Richard.
Don
 
Don Engelhaupt

March 3rd, 2000 2:52 PM
 
Nathan Walrath

March 3rd, 2000 2:53 PM
 
Arve Hetland

March 3rd, 2000 2:55 PM
 
I am horrified that Amazon are trying to hinder the growth of the net by patenting software that is not really theirs. I will no longer use Amazon, until the patent is withdrawn.
 
mick upton

March 3rd, 2000 2:55 PM
 
Alex Zarenin

March 3rd, 2000 2:56 PM
 
Peter Roman

March 3rd, 2000 2:58 PM
 
Amazon,

I am shocked by your blatant disrespect for the roots from which you have come. As a web developer who has built e-ecommerce sites (for companies larger than yours) I have often thought about patenting or releasing some of functionality as a product. However, if I did that, and my collegues did that, then we'd be doing the web a disservice. For one, we are disrespecting our heritage. Secondly, we are creating a world where open thought becomes a mute point and web innovations will be done on the lawyer level and not on the web level. We work with and use the web because we don't want to deal with restrictions and silly patents and an industry that is based on basck-stabbing and blood-sucking. Please do not turn it into that industry.

Consider yourself boycotted.

 
Michael Oltman

March 3rd, 2000 2:58 PM
 
Mr. O'Reilly,

Great job! I will continue to buy your books, but not from Amazon.com.

Regards,
Marc
 
Marc Cobery

March 3rd, 2000 3:04 PM
 
please do not impede progress with your quality site, you may not understand true communism.

thanks-john
 
john kalister

March 3rd, 2000 3:04 PM
 
I will not use and will urge my friends not to use Amazon.com until the business becomes more "ecommerce-friendly" and quits trying to make a buck off the backs of those who came before.
 
Timothy G. Lang

March 3rd, 2000 3:05 PM
 
I've been boycotting Amazon since I first read about them getting an injunction against Barnes & Noble, over the One-Click ordering.
 
Kevin Doblosky

March 3rd, 2000 3:06 PM
 
Joe Marshall

March 3rd, 2000 3:07 PM
 
The question should not be "How do we fix this?" but "How did this happen?" It is just insane that Amazon would be awarded a patent for technology that has been around for so long and is in such widespead use.
 
Morgan Leigh

March 3rd, 2000 3:08 PM
 
Jeff...your actions are outrageous. How dare you who have benefited so much from the internet try to stifle the opportunity for others. I for one will never purchase ANYTHING from Amazon.com or any company associated with Amazon.com until such time as your patents are willingly given up.
 
Bruno Amicci

March 3rd, 2000 3:09 PM
 
I have long been a supporter of Amazon. I am saddened that Mr. Bezos has decided in favor of legal wrangling over marketing savvy to win the market. I guess it's time to check out Barnes & Noble...
 
Mark Phillips

March 3rd, 2000 3:09 PM
 
If the patent office is going to be stupid, it is our duty as consumers voting with our dollars to challenge unethical and immoral business practices. I believe that giving away patents that will hamper innovation is an immoral practice and it has to be stopped through a boycott.
Because of that I hereby announce that I will not buy anything from Amazon again until they publicly announce that they will not enforce their patents, or give them up completely. I buy a lot of books both for business and personal reasons, and I have started building a large DVD collection, and not a penny of the thousands of dollars I spend yearly is going to go to Amazon until they clarify this situation.
It's your call Jeff.
 
Francisco Gutierrez

March 3rd, 2000 3:11 PM
 
I will begin boycotting Amazon.com right away. Tonite I wil buy books elsewhere. Amazon has lost another customer and gained another voice to help spread the word against its outrages business practices.
 
David McCandlish

March 3rd, 2000 3:14 PM
 
don't build fences in the sky
 
carolee young

March 3rd, 2000 3:15 PM
 
Frank Febbraro

March 3rd, 2000 3:16 PM
 
Jamie A. Johns

March 3rd, 2000 3:17 PM
 
I'm very disappointed in amazon.
 
Jacki Forbes

March 3rd, 2000 3:19 PM
 
Paul Hubbard

March 3rd, 2000 3:20 PM
 
Patents such as this one only serve to stifle the very innovation that made such technology possible. Please consider if Amazon would even exist if the ideas that created the world wide web had been patented by their creators. And theirs was truely a new creation.
 
Alex Nelson

March 3rd, 2000 3:21 PM
 
Without a free exchange of information, the internet will turn into little more than yet another channel for advertising and pushy salesmen. I'm getting far too much of that already. Anybody who tries to chain the net with patents can wave byebye to any business from me. Fortunately, Amazon has plenty of competitors by now - and one of them just got a new customer.
 
Janne Torklep

March 3rd, 2000 3:21 PM
 
I'm surprised your company hasn't tried to patent the concept of a 'bookstore'.

You know, a place where people can peruse titles and exchange money for a book you have on hand.

You are certainly in a good position to apply for such a patent, as your web site states that you are the largest one on the planet. And since your people have spent many hours developing your online presence, then naturally you have a vested interest in protecting your efforts, yes?

So why not apply for a patent for 'A Method of Interchange between an Interested Party and a Purveyor of the Written Word'?

It's silly, that's why.

A person can't own an idea any more than they can 'own' sunshine. You don't pay people to develop an idea; they're paid to develop an implementation. And you certainly have the right to defend your hard-earned implementation against copy-cats. But the idea?

Once an Idea takes shape, it needs to be shared or it's lost. We write it down, work it out, but eventually, you've got to TELL somebody. 'Bounce it off' them. See if they have another perspective, another way of looking at the problem. Now the idea is in their head, swimming about, relating to everything they've ever seen before.

Now, do you really presume to own something swimming about in someone else's head?

Trying to patent a concept can only restrict the process of coming up with more ideas. How can I go on thinking if certain thoughts are 'forbidden' since they're not 'mine'? How do you expect to enforce such a ridiculous restriction?

I think Amazon's motives have been made exceeding clear by their actions. You've come up with a way to finess a very bad time for your biggest competitor by some clever legal wording. But please, consider the consequences everyone else must face. Setting this kind of precedent just to knife a competitor in the back will only lead to alot more knives being drawn. Is your bottom line so vastly important that you'd risk endangering the very medium to which you owe your existence?

Open Source. Give away the code, sell the service, EVERYBODY WINS.
 
Rob Flickenger

March 3rd, 2000 3:22 PM
 
Rod Wilkinson

March 3rd, 2000 3:22 PM
 
You invented one-click ordering and Al Gore invented tthe internet. Come to think of it, I suppose I invented peanut butter sandwhiches.

Stupidity is always rewarded--even in the Amazon. I think we ought to take you out behind the "Barn." So what if it takes me two clicks.
 
Mike Weaver

March 3rd, 2000 3:24 PM
 
Tom Link

March 3rd, 2000 3:27 PM
 
I have a site which is an Amazon Affiliate and I have bought a lot of product from the. That is history now until the patetnt is given up.
 
Allan Foster

March 3rd, 2000 3:27 PM
 
Well, I was considering to buy something from Amazon for the convenience. Now I will not and I will look for other sources. It's a shame the way greed takes over people and corporations. Even if Amazon changes its mind about the patents, I will only use them as a last resort. Sorry folks. You will have to do something really big to make it up to this community.
 
Steven Morris

March 3rd, 2000 3:28 PM
 
Daniel Selders

March 3rd, 2000 3:31 PM
 
Amazon...bleah...
 
Heath David

March 3rd, 2000 3:31 PM
 
Amazon's patents like all patents, have at their heart, an intent of blocking everybody else from availing of some useful or beneficial idea without paying royalties. The whole design of this system is so anal that its harm to society exceeds the benefits. The US Congress should rectify this problem before further harm is done, by shortening patent periods, weakening the holders remedies, strengthining the users' rights and tightening up the sloppy and arbitrary granting of patents.

This system is so retro that it puts *all of us* in dehumanizing roles, bickering with each other. Life will be better after the system is fixed.

TOdd Boyle CPA Kirkland WA
 
Todd Boyle

March 3rd, 2000 3:31 PM
 
I willno longer buy there.... and I certainly hope he accepts this invitation...
http://affiliateforce.com/amazon/
 
Mandy Botha

March 3rd, 2000 3:33 PM
 
It's not really Amazon.com's fault, I guess. If the patent office hadn't been daft enough to grant the patent in the first place this problem wouldn't be occurring. Please look at the example of MicroSoft to see what happens to a company which spends an awful lot of money trying to protect its position by preventing others from offering a potentially innovative service.
 
Daniel Farnan

March 3rd, 2000 3:34 PM
 
Peter Belding

March 3rd, 2000 3:34 PM
 
Mike DeGraw-Bertsch

March 3rd, 2000 3:35 PM
 
Jens Aarup

March 3rd, 2000 3:36 PM
 
Here here!!
 
Pat Cruz

March 3rd, 2000 3:37 PM
 
Howard Butler

March 3rd, 2000 3:38 PM
 
Tim Patton

March 3rd, 2000 3:39 PM
 
Issa R. Breibish

March 3rd, 2000 3:41 PM
 
Cameron Kelly

March 3rd, 2000 3:49 PM
 
This patent shows Amazon to have little regard for
its customers and for those who developed and gave away the underlying internet technologies. The patent itself is an obvious and intended application of cookies that it will never stand. I DO agree with RMS that Amazon should not be supported by our business.
 
David Fenyes

March 3rd, 2000 4:24 PM
 
People who have become bilionaires (or even lowly millionaires) from the work of the free-software movement such as Tim Berners-Lee, should give back to the global network instead of trying to hoard cyberspace for their personal enrichment. I will support the Amazon boycott. Losing the goodwill of the techies is not good policy.
 
John Counts


O'Reilly Home | O'Reilly Bookstores | How to Order | O'Reilly Contacts
International | About O'Reilly | Affiliated Companies

© 2000, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.