Errata

MCITP Self-Paced Training Kit (Exam 70-647): Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator

Errata for MCITP Self-Paced Training Kit (Exam 70-647): Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator

The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released.

The following errata were submitted by our customers and have not yet been approved or disproved by the author or editor. They solely represent the opinion of the customer.

Color Key: Serious technical mistake Minor technical mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update

Version Location Description Submitted by Date submitted
Other Digital Version 74-75
Chapter 1, Lesson 2, Practice, Exerscise 3

Correct prefix on scope setup should be fec0:0:0:fffe:: not fec0::fffe.

Results of incorrect input is seen on Figure 1-23, then resulting prefix seen as fec0:: instead of fec0:0:0:fffe::

Anonymous  Jul 02, 2011 
PDF Page 113
Figure 2-11

Figure 2-11 is a ring replication topology, not a full mesh replication topology.

Chun-Yeung Ng  Nov 21, 2011 
PDF Page 113
1st paragraph

The full mesh replication topology on page 113 is a ring topology, not a full mesh one!

Marko Calasan  Mar 08, 2012 
PDF Page 130
Canada

Chap 2 Exercise 3 Question 5

Missing answer.

Because the infrastructure master role, RID master role, and PDC emulator role are domain-level roles, and the mexico.blueyonderairlines.com domain is in the Mexico site these roles will reside on a server in the Mexico site.

Frederick Poirier  Jul 06, 2012 
Printed, PDF Page 262
first paragraph 5th bullet

At the fifth bullet is specified
Windows XP SP2 with two 802.1x enforcement clients.

Is this correct shouldn't this be windows XP SP3, because SP3 isnt mentioned at all in this paragraph, especialy because on page 264 is stated:
The only two supported authentication protocols for 802.1x enforcement included in Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows Server 2008 are the PEAP types,
PEAP-TLS and PEAP-MSCHAPv2.

Matt Janssen  Nov 23, 2012 
Printed, PDF Page 353
Figure 7.8

In the tekst above figure 7-8 is stated :
By configuring software to be removed if the policy falls out of scope, as show in Figure 7-8, .....
Figure 7-8 however shows that the application want be removed when the policy falls out of scope. To make it happen there should be a checkmark in front of "Uninstall this application when it falls out of management.

Matt Janssen  Dec 03, 2012 
Printed, PDF Page 372
First bullet point

Integrated Development Environment (IDE) should be changed to:
Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE)

An integrated development environment (IDE) is a software application that provides comprehensive facilities to computer programmers for software development. An IDE normally consists of a source code editor, build automation tools, and a debugger.

Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE) is a standard electronic interface used between a computer motherboard's data paths or bus and the computer's disk storage devices.

Scott Kearney  Jun 30, 2012 
Printed, PDF Page 390
last line in 3rd paragrafh

In the last line of paragraph 3 is stated Silos are discussed later in this chapter.
The silos are mentioned a couple of times after this but are
never discussed.
So please add a explanation about silos.

Matt Janssen  Dec 21, 2012 
PDF Page 391
Figure 8-5

The Client Computer on the right should be a Remote Desktop Client since the Server computer with Microsoft Application Virtualization for RDS is the App-V client already, right??

Anonymous  Jul 01, 2011 
Printed, PDF Page 420
EXERCISE 1 Planning for a Data Sharing Solution

In exercise 1 the next questions are asked but never answered in this book. Why not?

In this exercise, you make decisions about the data sharing solutions for the various projects
in a manner based on the requirements given.
1. At a minimum, which solution or solutions should you implement to meet the stated
requirements for the Boston project?
2. Assuming that the design goals of making files available locally are met, how can you
automatically redirect users to files in the opposite branch when the local server is
unavailable?
3. At a minimum, which solution or solutions should you implement to meet the stated
requirements for the San Jose project?
4. At a minimum, which solution or solutions should you implement to meet the stated
requirements for the London project?
5. At a minimum, which solution or solutions should you implement to meet the stated
requirements for the Bangalore project?

Matt Janssen  Jan 04, 2013