Errata
The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released.
The following errata were submitted by our customers and have not yet been approved or disproved by the author or editor. They solely represent the opinion of the customer.
Color Key: Serious technical mistake Minor technical mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update
Version | Location | Description | Submitted by | Date submitted |
---|---|---|---|---|
Printed | Page Page 5 The first paragraph that starts on that page |
This paragraph ends with the ISBN for The New Hacker’s Dictionary. After the end of that number, there’s a space followed by a period. There shouldn’t be a space. There should just be a period. |
Jason Yundt | Dec 20, 2023 |
Printed | Page Page 28 The first line |
There’s an extra parenthesis and quotation mark around the FSF’s Web address. The full parenthetical (which starts on the previous page) should read “(Richard Stallman, the author of Emacs and founder of the Free Software Foundation, insert-URL-here)”. |
Jason Yundt | Dec 21, 2023 |
Printed | Page 1 throughout the book |
All links to tuxedo.org need to change to catb.org; they are broken. |
Anonymous | |
Other Digital Version | 1 throughout the book |
All links to tuxedo.org need to change to catb.org; they are broken. |
Anonymous | Jul 16, 2008 |
Printed | Page 72 The reference to endnote 1 at page 72 is really pointing to the text of |
endnote 3. |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 74 The reference to endnote 2 at page 74 is really pointing to the text of |
endnote 4. |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 78 The reference to endnote 3 at page 78 is really pointing to the text of |
endnote 1. |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 78 The reference to endnote 4 at page 78 is really pointing to the text of |
endnote 2. |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 80 The superscripted reference to endnote 5 on page 80 actually refers to |
the bibliography for this chapter (second item: Principia Discordia). |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 82 The non-superscripted reference to endnote 5 at page 82 seems to be correct. |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 83 While the reference to endnote 6 at page 83 seems to be correct, there |
is a superscript 1 on the third line of the endnote itself. It is |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 83, 91 The references to notes 7 (page 83) & 8 (page 91) match the notes. |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 92 The non-superscripted reference to endnote 9 on page 92 seems correct |
(but should perhaps be a superscript). |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 94 The superscripted reference to endnote 9 at page 94 should be numbered 10. |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 94 The reference to endnote 10 at page 94 should be numbered 11. |
[ESR: A minor typo. The referencing link for this note on your website |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 107 The reference to endnote 11 at page 107 should be numbered 12. |
The reference to endnote 12 actually refers to the bibliography for this |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 120 The superscripted reference to endnote 1 at page 120 is really pointing |
to the text of endnote 4. |
Anonymous | |
Printed | Page 120, 121 The references to notes 2 & 3 (pages 120 & 121) match the notes. |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 127 The non-superscripted reference to endnote 1 at page 127 is correct. |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 134 The reference to endnote 4 at page 134 is really pointing to the text of |
endnote 5. |
Anonymous | |
Mobi | Page 134 text |
Current Copy |
Anonymous | Dec 07, 2020 |
Printed | Page 184 2nd full paragraph |
Wrong date for Windows Refund Day.. |
Anonymous |