CHAPTER 15Rebalancing


In Chapter 2, we showed how to identify an efficient asset mix given assumptions about the expected returns, standard deviations, and correlations of asset classes. In Chapter 8, we introduced full‐scale optimization as a method to construct efficient portfolios when the assumptions necessary for mean‐variance analysis do not hold. Regardless of which method investors use to form portfolios, the portfolios become suboptimal almost immediately after implementation. Why? Price changes are not uniform across asset classes, so the portfolio weights drift away from the optimal targets over time. If there were no transaction costs, investors could trade daily, or even more often, to maintain the optimal weights. In practice, investors face a trade‐off: They must balance the transaction cost of restoring the optimal weights against the utility cost of remaining suboptimal.

Most investors employ simple heuristics to manage this trade‐off. Some implement calendar‐based rebalancing policies, in which they rebalance each month, quarter, or year. Others impose tolerance bands in which they rebalance when the exposure to any asset class drifts more than two percentage points from its target, for example. These approaches are better than not rebalancing at all. But they are arbitrary. Is total cost minimized by tolerance bands of one percentage point or two percentage points? Should equity asset classes have wider bands than fixed‐income asset classes? Should ...

Get A Practitioner's Guide to Asset Allocation now with O’Reilly online learning.

O’Reilly members experience live online training, plus books, videos, and digital content from 200+ publishers.