in this form then it is necessary to randomize (scramble) the data before
transmission and to descramble it on reception.
5.2.3.1 CDMA in FH Systems
Sharing the wideband channel between multiple FH systems is possible and can
be considered a form of CDMA. With two or more systems hopping over the
same bandwidth collisions do occur. When there is a collision data is corrupted
and lost.
In an FFH system (say 10-100 hops per bit) corrupted chips will have little effect
on user data. However, in an SFH system user data will be lost and higher layer
error recoveries will be needed. One way of avoiding the problem in the SFH
environment is to arrange the hopping patterns so that each system uses a
different
set of channels so that collisions cannot occur.
5.2.4 DSSS and SFH Systems Compared
There is some discussion in the industry over which system of spread spectrum
operation is the most cost effective. The technology is not at all mature yet and
researchers are still trying to settle the matter but there are some early
indications.
1. In a paper presented to the IEEE, Chen and Wu (1992) report a performance
comparison between the two systems. The study uses two kinds of
mathematical channel models and studied two speeds of operation. Systems
were compared
without
equalization or error correction techniques being
applied.
Their conclusion was that at speeds of 1 Mbps the SFH system was superior
to DSSS in almost every respect and significantly so in most. At speeds of
10 Mbps their conclusion is the opposite. That is, DSSS is better, again
under simulated conditions.
As manufacturers bring their systems to market, experience will show the
difference.
2. An assessment of manufacturing cost shows that SFH “should” cost less to
manufacture and operate at lower power than DSSS. (This all depends on
the system design.)
It should be noted that there are many ways to implement either system.
For example, you can have a DSSS system which uses only a very short
pseudo-random sequence. This saves significant cost in the adapter but
limits the potential for CDMA operation and removes much of the security
advantage.
3. An SFH system can easily avoid local sources of strong narrowband
interference. All it needs to do is to modify the hopping pattern to avoid the
particular frequency band. The ISM bands have many uses and sources of
narrowband interference are relatively common. While, in general, a
narrowband interferer will not bother DSSS, a strong local interferer (such as
a nearby microwave system) will. An SFH system can detect and avoid the
frequency bands involved.
4. There is a great variation in the ability of RF-LAN equipment available in the
market today to reject spurious interference. The laws of physics set the
limit of what can be achieved; the design and engineering of the equipment
will determine what is actually achieved. The choice of components involved
will have a strong influence on the ultimate outcome. It is possible to build a
Chapter 5. Radio Communication in LANs 105
Get An Introduction to Wireless Technology, Second Edition now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.