On Bhaskar’s argument for an essentialemancipatory impulse in social science

Hugh Lacey

Let a belief P, which has some object O, have a source (causal explanation) S. I am going to contend that if we possess: (i) adequate grounds for supposing P to be false; and (ii) adequate grounds for supposing that S co-explains P, then we may, and must, pass immediately to (iii) a negative evaluation of S (CP [i.e., ceteris paribus]); and (iv) a positive evaluation of action rationally directed at the removal of S (CP).

(Bhaskar, 1986, p. 177)

If one is in the possession of a theory that explains why false consciousness is necessary, then one can pass immediately, without the addition of any extraneous value judgment, ...

Get Critical Realism now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.