191
15
Comparative
Productivity Efficiency
for Global Telecoms
Greater efciency of an enterprise is the equivalent of being more competitive in
the market and more protable. It is interesting to study the differences between the
Forbes Global 2000 rankings of leading companies
*
and the productivity efciency
ratings for leading global telecom operators. This chapter is the rst attempt to com-
pare the operating performances of global telecom operators in the Forbes Global
2000 rankings with the CCR ratings, particularly EBITDA margins, ROA levels,
total asset turnover, and net prot ratios.
In recent years, telecommunication industries have encountered erce competi-
tion, the bursting dot.com bubble, 3G high auction license pricing, and rapid overseas
development. In response to pressures from technical changes and market compe-
tition, telecom operators have worked hard to cut costs to maintain their bottom
lines (net incomes). The data envelopment approach (DEA) can combine multiple
output and input variables to assess an enterprise’s operating performance. One of
the incentives for the current study is to understand which geographical areas exhibit
better productivity efciency.
This is the rst study to compare relative performance efciencies of the leading
telecom operators by combining the three methods of traditional radical DEA mea-
sure, the Andersen and Petersen (A&P) efciency measure, and the new DEA mea-
sure. Critical research focusing on the productivity efciencies of telecom operators
has attracted the attention of academicians, policy regulators, and decision makers
the world over.
Several studies have applied DEA methodologies to solve practical problems
in the telecom industry. Saunders et al. (1995) discuss some questions about the
economics of telecommunications, arranging them around such themes as whether
the economic value of the benets derived from investments in telecommunications
can be demonstrated and quantied and which segments of the population derive
these benets. Majumdar (1995) investigates the impact of the adoption of new
switching technology on the performances of rms in the United States, telecom-
munications industry by computing both input-conserving and output-augmenting
measures of performance.
*
On March 25, 2004, Forbes issued a comprehensive rating of the world’s biggest and most powerful
companies during year 2003 measured by a composite ranking of sales, prots, assets, and market
value. The rating spanned 51 countries and 27 industries (http://www.forbes.com).
Get Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.