It is interesting to note that, at that time, his methodology was not to assess theories in
their entirety, but theories in different parts of the evidence-space. In this respect it is
useful to quote Camerer’s conclusions: “The important empirical question is whether
any theory that generalizes EU can explain the violations. The results of our test and
other recent tests are decidedly mixed: Each theory can account for some of the viola-
tions, but not all.” This was at a time when his list of generalizations of SEU consisted
of Weighted Utility, Implicit Expected Utility, “The Fanning-out Hypothesis”, Lottery-
Dependent Utility ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month, and much more.