11Assurance by Design for Cyber‐physical Data‐driven Systems
Satish Chikkagoudar1, Samrat Chatterjee2, Ramesh Bharadwaj1, Auroop Ganguly3, Sastry Kompella1, and Darlene Thorsen2
1Information Technology Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA
2Data Sciences & Machine Intelligence Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
3Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
Currently, Cyber‐Physical Data‐Driven Systems (CPDDS) employ machine learning for the classification, data fusion, and control of our nation's infrastructure, such as the power grid, transportation networks (e.g. fuel distribution, air traffic control), and DoD long‐duration collaborative autonomous platforms including unmanned underwater, ground, surface, space, and aerial systems. Many CPDDSs are system‐of‐systems that should be designed to communicate over disadvantaged networks. It is important to assure that the CPDDSs are resilient against physical and cyber threats by design. Additionally, their design should tolerate misclassification errors resulting from natural and/or adversarial distribution shifts within their data driven components. The all‐domain nature of the problem of assuring the design of CPDDSs requires a multi‐disciplinary perspective as outlined in this chapter.
11.1 Introduction
U.S. critical infrastructure systems increasingly rely on process automation enabled by the seamless integration of information ...
Get IoT for Defense and National Security now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.