where

$eq1708.jpg$

The occurrence of the double sign in the preceding expressions makes evident that the transformation from (10.9) to (10.26) is not unique (Nikiforov and Uvarov 1988); the specific choice may eventually be suggested by the problem at hand.

10.3.2.1.2.2.1 Plane Waves, Parabolic Waves, and Gaussian Beams  If τ′(ξ) = 0, which for the specific form of τ(ξ) amounts to τ(ξ) = 0 as well, and hence to the relations a2 + 2c = 0 and ab + d = 0 for the various coefficients, Equation (10.26) reduces to the normal form

$eq1709.jpg$

yielding $eq1710.jpg$. Indeed, it can readily be seen that, under the aforementioned relations for the coefficients, Equation (10.9) ultimately yields the ...

Get Mathematical Optics now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience live online training, plus books, videos, and digital content from nearly 200 publishers.