7 Tensors, Hyperplanes, Near Reflections, Constants (η,τ,K)
In Chapter 3, we presented a counterexample showing that with , the case > in Theorem 2.2 (part(1)) provides a barrier to the existence of the extension there. Moving forward, we now wish to study geometries on the finite set which remove such a barrier. Indeed, we have already made an optimistic guess for the following geometry on the set . Roughly, put: we remove degenerative cases as outlined below.
- The diameter of the set is not too large.
- The points of the set cannot be too close to each other.
- The points of the set are ...
Get Near Extensions and Alignment of Data in R(superscript)n now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.