211
3
Methods for
Petroleum Processing
Based on Radiation-
Thermal Cracking
3.1 RADIATION METHODS FOR HIGH-VISCOUS
OIL AND BITUMEN PROCESSING
Very shortly after the discovery of radiation-thermal cracking (RTC) of hydrocar-
bons, Topchiev et al. (1959) discussed the prospects of its commercial applications.
Most of the successful technological approaches to oil radiation processing (RP)
developed later were based on this phenomenon.
Comberg (1988) developed a method for the extraction of liquid hydrocarbon
products from fossil resources such as oil shales, tar sands, heavy oil, and coals.
The method comprised the mixing of a donor solvent and the exposure of the
mixture to gamma irradiation. The donor solvent supplied hydrogen for combi-
nation with molecules whose bonds were broken by the irradiation process. The
synergetic effect of hydrogen donors and ionizing irradiation was demonstrated in
the following examples.
Two 50 g samples of granulated oil shale were each mixed with 50 cm
3
n-heptane
designed to serve as a hydrogen donor solvent. One sample was subjected to 1 MGy
Co-60 irradiation. No protective cover was used; the sample was exposed to air.
Irradiation was carried out for 6 days at the temperature of 40°C and at atmospheric
pressure. The solvent was then drained into open beakers of known weight and
evaporated at 80°C. The yields were measured by reweighing the beakers.
The solvent-only run (without irradiation) yielded 0.1 g of a dull, thin, hard
plastic-like material coated rmly and nonuniformly distributed over the bottom and
the walls of the container. The shale irradiated in solvent yielded 0.75 g of a brown
liquid of moderate viscosity, which owed slowly, like honey, at room temperature.
The same shale samples were then each mixed with fresh 50 cm
3
supplies of solvent,
and the process including irradiation repeated.
The control sample produced no additional measurable yield while the irradi-
ated sample produced an additional 0.3 g of a lighter less viscous liquid. The total
yield from the irradiated sample was 1.05 g, 10 times the solvent-only (control)
production. The elemental analysis had demonstrated increase in the H/C ratio and
212 Petroleum Radiation Processing
considerable decrease in the nitrogen and sulfur contents as a result of shale RP
(Table 3.1). Together with the higher yield of relatively light fraction, the irradiated
samples were characterised by higher clarity and low ash content.
The next series of irradiation experiments was conducted with the medium
volatile bituminous coal (atomic H/C = 0.57). Four samples consisting of 9 g each of
coal were mixed with 9 mL of the donor solvent, tetrahydrofuran. One sample was
exposed to 1 MGy of Co-60 radiation at ambient temperature and pressure, a second
was exposed to 2 MGy, and the last two retained as control.
After irradiation, the donor solvent was removed by evaporation at about 125°C.
The remaining solid was then processed with pyridine; the control samples received
the same treatment without irradiation. The extracted material was freed of pyri-
dine at 130°C and then analyzed for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. The results are
represented in Table 3.2.
The primary effect of the radiation was the increased yield of pyridine-soluble
hydrocarbons. A higher H/C ratio and reduced nitrogen content demonstrated
increased hydrogen transfer from the donor solvent. It was proposed to use the
method developed for kerogen extraction and shale oil upgrading.
The advantage of the method is an opportunity of feedstock processing at ambi-
ent temperature and pressure. However, low-rate radiolysis reactions involved in the
process result in very high irradiation doses, low yields of the target product, and
TABLE 3.1
Elemental Contents of Shale and Products
of Its Processing
Control Sample (Material Scrapped
from the Wall of the Beaker)
First
Irradiation
Second
Irradiation
H/C 1.72 1.99 1.99
N, % 0.31 0.08 0.033
S, % 6.1 1.78 0.39
Source: Comberg, H.J., Extraction and liquefaction of fossil fuels using
gamma irradiation and solvents, US Patent 4,772,379, 1988.
TABLE 3.2
Effect of Radiation Processing on Coal
Elemental Contents
Dose, MGy C H N H/C Yield, g
1 78.01 7.01 1.55 1.08 0.22
Control 84.88 6.92 2.88 0.98 0.07
2 76.6 7.45 1.25 1.17 0.45
Control 81.1 5.98 2.53 0.88 0.08
Get Petroleum Radiation Processing now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.