Insurance requirements in project ﬁnance are demanding, and as a result insur-
ance costs are high, but this tends to be a neglected area of project development.
This can lead to an underestimation of project costs because all required insur-
ances have not been taken into account or to the ﬁnancing being held up because
the insurances required by the lenders are not in place. At an early stage of the
project’s development, therefore, the Sponsors need to appoint an insurance bro-
ker with speciﬁc experience both in insurance for project ﬁnance in general, and
in insuring major projects in the country concerned, to advise on and eventually
place the insurance program.
The broker also plays an important role in communicating information about
the project to the insurance company. This is important because insurance is an
uberrimæ ﬁdei (“of the utmost good faith”) contract; if any material information
is not disclosed to the insurer there is no obligation to pay under the policy (cf.
comments on non-vitiation cover in §7.6.4). The broker must therefore work with
the Project Company and the Sponsors to ensure that this does not happen.
Brokers are often paid a percentage of the insurance premiums, but this is ob-
viously not an incentive to keep premiums down, and it is preferable to negotiate
a ﬁxed fee for their work.
The insurance is arranged in two phases: ﬁrst, the insurance covering the whole
of the construction period of the project (including start-up and testing), and sec-
ond, annual renewal of insurances when the project is in operation. It should be
noted that the operating phase insurances (other than perhaps the ﬁrst year) can-
not be arranged or their premiums ﬁxed in advance (cf. §8.10.1).
In addition, normal insurances required by law, such as employer’s liability, ve-
hicle insurances, etc., have to be taken out by the Project Company or the EPC
Contractor, as appropriate.
In construction contracts that are not being project-ﬁnanced, it is common for
the contractor to arrange the main insurances for the construction phase of the
project and to include this as part of the contract price. This is logical, because
under a standard construction contract the contractor is at risk of loss from insur-
able events: if part of the project is destroyed in a ﬁre, the contractor is required to
replace it, whether it is insured or not.
However, contractor-arranged insurance is not always suitable in project
ﬁnance for several reasons:
• As will be seen, lenders require Delay in Start-Up insurance, which cannot
easily be obtained by the EPC Contractor, who is not at risk of loss in this
§7.6 Insurance 127