20
EXTERNALITIES IN A
SECOND-BEST ENVIRONMENT
THE SECOND-BEST ALLOCATION OF SAMUELSONIAN
NONEXCLUSIVE GOODS
Relationships Between First-Best and Second-Best Allocations
Concluding Comment
THE COASE THEOREM, BARGAINING, AND
PRIVATE INFORMATION
Bargaining Set Stability and the Coase Theorem
Private Information
Concluding Comment
We saw in Chapters 6±8 that Wrst-best models of externalities dichotom-
ize in two important respects for policy purposes. One is that the government
can pursue appropriate tax or expenditure policies to restore pareto optim-
ality in the presence of externalities without regard to distributional consider-
ations. All distributional issues are embodied in the interpersonal equity
conditions, which can be satisWed by an appropriate set of lump-sum taxes
and transfers. The other is that externalities arising within a subset of all
goods and factor markets can be corrected independently of behavior in the
other markets, in the sense that the perfectly competitive allocations in these
markets remain pareto optimal. These two properties greatly facilitate policy
design when correcting for externalities.
Unfortunately, neither of these dichotomies holds in a second-best
environment. As a consequence, even the simplest externalities may require
highly complex forms of government intervention, so complex in fact that it
is entirely implausible to expect governments to achieve them. To illustrate
this fundamental point, we will consider the example of providing a Samuel-
sonian nonexclusive consumption good in a many-person economy
made second best because the government does not have the ability to
tax and transfer lump sum to achieve the Wrst-best interpersonal equity
conditions.
659659
Get Public Finance, 2nd Edition now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.