REFLECTIONS ON THE HAIG±SIMONS CRITERION IN
PRACTICE: THE FEDERAL PERSONAL INCOME TAX
Despite its appeal to many public-sector economists, the Haig±Simons
income measure has not fared well in the United States. Only the federal
and state personal income taxes pay so much as lip service to the Haig±
Simons criterion. State governments rely heavily on sales taxes and local
governments rely primarily on the property taxes, neither of which is valid
according to the Haig±Simons criterion.
State sales taxes may appear to be consistent with the view that con-
sumption is the ideal tax base. In practice, however, sales taxes are far
removed from an ideal consumption tax. Sales taxes often exclude broad
classes of expenditures from taxation, they usually tax all included items at
one Wxed rate, and they are levied on businesses. What expenditures tax
proponents have in mind is a tax levied on individuals exactly as the federal
income tax is, except that it would exclude saving from the tax base. A
graduated rate schedule could easily be applied to individual expenditures,
removing the stigma from sales taxes that they may be regressive.
19
The federal personal income tax is the single largest tax in the United
States. Of all the broad-based taxes, it comes closest to the Haig±Simons
income measure as its tax base, but not really all that close. Recall that,
according to the Haig±Simons criterion, the federal income tax base should
include personal income and capital gains on assets held from the beginning
of the tax year, without regard to the sources or uses of income. The only
permitted deductions from Haig±Simons income are legitimate business
expenses, meaning expenses required to earn the income. The actual tax
base falls far short of the Haig±Simons ideal, both the personal income and
capital gains components.
Personal Income
Taxable income is only about half of personal income. The main discrep-
ancies between taxable income and personal fall into three categories: exemp-
tions, exclusions, and deductions.
An exemption is income that is recognized as taxable income by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) but is simply not taxed. The main example
is the personal exemption given to the taxpayer and all the taxpayer's depen-
dents. The exemption was $2800 per person in 2000, and it is adjusted each
year for increases in the consumer price index (CPI).
Exclusions are sources of income that are counted as personal income by
the U.S. Department of Commerce in the National Income and Product
19
This stigma may be more myth than reality. See the discussion in Chapter 17 on the
incidence (burden) of the sales tax.
362 REFLECTIONS ON THE HAIG±SIMONS CRITERION IN PRACTICE

Get Public Finance, 2nd Edition now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.