Attributes of Scorecard Systems
To better understand why scorecard systems are being adopted, how they are being used, and why the benefits achieved vary, participants in the online surveys were asked to select those features that they thought a scorecard system should have and to identify those attributes that their scorecard systems currently have. Exhibit 2.1 provides a list of scorecard system options and the percentage of Scorecard Adopters of the SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) survey who viewed the feature as desirable.
Feature | Percentage of Respondents Who View Feature as Desirable |
---|---|
Actions and objectives supported by measures or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) | 85 |
Many types of measures (leading, lagging, financial, nonfinancial, mixed) | 82 |
KPI/Measure reports | 82 |
Ability to graph measure data over time (to see trends) | 78 |
Scorecards for different levels of the organization | 78 |
Accountability for actions/initiatives | 75 |
Cause and effect map‐link strategic objectives to actions (or like words) | 72 |
Feedback/status on objectives, actions/initiatives, and measures | 72 |
Ability to communicate vision and strategy to employees | 72 |
Ability to link the reward system to the targets and results | 70 |
KPIs/Measures that roll up to aggregate measures | 65 |
Vision | 63 |
Mission | 62 |
Ability to calculate relationships between measures (e.g., correlation analysis) | 58 |
Framework for reporting (groupings or perspectives to report results) | 57 |
Multiple targets for KPIs/Measures ... |
Get Scorecard Best Practices now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.