
256
K. Htiper et al.
10 5
10 0
o 10-5
"1o
o
~e" 10 "1~
10 "15
10 .20
1
9 ~ .,~...
..........
SCJ Norm sc """,,' ' "~i"~i~)'
~' """
"..
....... SORTCJ
Norm sd x
~,. "..
. ..
\ ~ ..
"'..
~
",-
SORTCJ
Norm sc
~ "..
":
~ ".
i i i i i
2 3 4 5 6 7
sweeps
Figure 1" Reduction of the off-diagonal norms
sd
and
sc
vs. sweeps for SCJ and SORTCJ.
10 5
10 0
o 10 .5
E
=o,
~1= 0.10
O 1
10 "15
10 "2o
SORTCJ-CT
',,, ~ -SORTCJ
I \
" 'o
' 'o '
5 1 15 2 25
sweeps
30
Figure 2: Reduction of the cross terms, i.e.
sc,
vs. sweeps for SORTCJ and SORTCJ-CT.