When the human resources
department is truly support-
ing the enterprise instead of
just filing and smiling, it
becomes the host of human
capital.
END-TO-END HUMAN CAPITAL VALUE REPORTS 149
modity without which nothing happens. I deliberately use
the word lead to emphasize that human capital manage-
ment is not the sole responsi-
bility of the human resources
department. It is everyone’s
job from top to bottom in the
organization. Human capital
investment is optimized only
when all parties from the
board of directors to first-line
supervisors and the employees themselves play a role.
Staff departments such as information services, finance,
or human resources presumably develop systems, design
processes, and offer services aimed at supporting corporate
goals. It would be absurd and wasteful for them to do other-
wise. However, in all my years in and around staff groups, I
have often found it difficult to locate the connections. Most
often, it is a case of a general enterprise goal and a general
staff response devoid of direct, verifiable, point-to-point
links. This is okay if you want average returns on your staff
investments. That is what probability theory predicts—
general response and average results. In our case, we are
building direct, visible links all the way up and down the
pathway from the enterprise level to the human resources–
led response and back up again. With direct links, it is possi-
ble to assess results in explicit terms and thereby make
improvements that yield above-average results.
Three Ex am ple s
Let’s look at three examples of specific pathways between
enterprise goals and human capital management. The cases
I’ve chosen are important issues for any commercial en-
deavor. They are also points on which government and edu-