## Sudden death

To compute the probability of winning in a sudden death overtime, the important statistic is not goals per game, but time until the first goal. The assumption that goal-scoring is a Poisson process implies that the time between goals is exponentially distributed.

Given `lam`, we can compute the time between goals like this:

```lam = 3.4
time_dist = thinkbayes.MakeExponentialPmf(lam, high=2, n=101)```

`high` is the upper bound of the distribution. In this case I chose 2, because the probability of going more than two games without scoring is small. `n` is the number of values in the Pmf.

If we know `lam` exactly, that’s all there is to it. But we don’t; instead we have a posterior distribution of possible values. So as we did with the distribution of goals, we make a meta-Pmf and compute a mixture of Pmfs.

```def MakeGoalTimePmf(suite):
metapmf = thinkbayes.Pmf()

for lam, prob in suite.Items():
pmf = thinkbayes.MakeExponentialPmf(lam, high=2, n=2001)
metapmf.Set(pmf, prob)

mix = thinkbayes.MakeMixture(metapmf)
return mix```

Figure 7-3 shows the resulting distributions. For time values less than one period (one third of a game), the Bruins are more likely to score. The time until the Canucks score is more likely to be longer.

I set the number of values, `n`, fairly high in order to minimize the number of ties, since it is not possible for ...

Get Think Bayes now with O’Reilly online learning.

O’Reilly members experience live online training, plus books, videos, and digital content from 200+ publishers.