Open Sources 2.0	
by Chris DiBona, Mark Stone, Danese Cooper

The unconfirmed error reports are from readers.  They have not yet been 
approved or disproved by the author or editor and represent solely the
opinion of the reader.

Here's a key to the markup:
        [page-number]: serious technical mistake
        {page-number}: minor technical mistake
        <page-number>: important language/formatting problem
        (page-number): language change or minor formatting problem
        ?page-number?: reader question or request for clarification

This page was updated March 26, 2007.


UNCONFIRMED  errors and comments from readers:

 
{28}  1st paragraph after the 2 sample codes;
In the sample code, there are 2 lines changed, the "for" statement line
and the "printf" line. However, right after the second sample we read:

"The system would not that only one line had changed ...."

it should be:

"The system would not that only two lines had changed ...."

Another option is to change the sample to in fact change just 1 line of code.


[29]  1st paragraph, 4th line;
Subversion is *NOT* an Apache project
We read:

"any authentication scheme that Apache does (Subversion is an Apache project), which
...."

It should be:

"any authentication scheme that Apache does, which ...."

Or it's posible Chris tried to say that Subversions take advantage or uses Apache APR
project. In any case please clarify the statement, because saying that Subversion is
an Apache project might be interpreted that Subversion belongs to Apache, which is
not true.