Chapter 8. Events and the Message Bus
So far we’ve spent a lot of time and energy on a simple problem that we could easily have solved with Django. You might be asking if the increased testability and expressiveness are really worth all the effort.
In practice, though, we find that it’s not the obvious features that make a mess of our codebases: it’s the goop around the edge. It’s reporting, and permissions, and workflows that touch a zillion objects.
Our example will be a typical notification requirement: when we can’t allocate an order because we’re out of stock, we should alert the buying team. They’ll go and fix the problem by buying more stock, and all will be well.
For a first version, our product owner says we can just send the alert by email.
Let’s see how our architecture holds up when we need to plug in some of the mundane stuff that makes up so much of our systems.
We’ll start by doing the simplest, most expeditious thing, and talk about why it’s exactly this kind of decision that leads us to the Big Ball of Mud.
Then we’ll show how to use the Domain Events pattern to separate side effects from our use cases, and how to use a simple Message Bus pattern for triggering behavior based on those events. We’ll show a few options for creating those events and how to pass them to the message bus, and finally we’ll show how the Unit of Work pattern can be modified to connect the two together elegantly, as previewed in Figure 8-1.
Get Architecture Patterns with Python now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.