13Effects of Incentives in Smartphone Data Collection
Georg‐Christoph Haas1,2, Frauke Kreuter1,2,3, Florian Keusch2,3, Mark Trappmann1,4, and Sebastian Bähr1
1Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany
2Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
3Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Germany
4University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
13.1 Introduction
Smartphone sensor data enable researchers to analyze phenomena that cannot be investigated with survey data alone (e.g. Sugie 2018). However, smartphone data may include very sensitive information, e.g. on geolocation or app usage, which users may perceive as too private to share with researchers. To date, very little research has systematically examined participation in studies that collect passive smartphone sensor data. To our knowledge, no study so far has examined whether the knowledge about the effectiveness of incentives in surveys also holds for smartphone sensor data collection. Common incentive amounts and incentive schemes traditionally used in surveys may not be sufficient to motivate participation in a study that collects data passively from smartphones, given that individuals may perceive sensor data as more valuable than survey data. However, since participation in passive data collection requires less effort from participants, burden (measured in time spent on data collection) is much reduced compared to regular surveys. Therefore, ...
Get Big Data Meets Survey Science now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.