Observations on Coder Types
As a wrap-up to this chapter, I’d like to offer some observations on how Skill Metrics might apply for different types of coders. Not to stereotype or draw too broad of strokes, but at certain stages of development, coders are more likely to demonstrate certain strengths and weaknesses. You may choose to watch certain metrics more closely depending on the experience level and obligations of certain coders.
Architects
Coders designated as “architects” are usually the more experienced members of the team. Their assignments may differ from other coders, with a higher percentage of complex tasks, including design tasks. They may also be expected to spend more time guiding and assisting other team members, to ensure that the software is well-designed and high-quality.
The following Skill Metrics can be particularly relevant for architects:
- Power
It is likely that architects will have a higher Power rating than many other coders, since they will probably have a higher percentage of more complex tasks. It would not be surprising for an architect to average lower Utility, since having a high number of complex tasks typically means fewer tasks as well. - Assists
Architects are often sought out for help by other members of the team, and should also be proactively guiding, mentoring, or otherwise helping team members, so you would expect architects to have a higher number of Assists than most coders. - Range
An architect will likely need to be involved with many areas of the ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access