e = 2 is not a permissible exponent in RSA, as the mapping Ee is not one-to-one. The ambiguity in decipherment might be resolved by using a standard format for the plaintext x. It is unlikely, but not proved that only one of the (four) square roots would be in the standard format.
Hugh Williams  found a very clever way around this difficulty. He transforms the plaintext x into E1[x] where E1 is an invertible mapping with inverse D1. For primes with appropriate restrictions, there exist transformations E2 and D2 that correspond to encipherment and encipherment such that
The Jacobi symbol J(p/q) when q is a prime is defined by
J(p/q) can be extended for q not being a prime.
Proposition 12.8: (Properties of the Jacobi Symbol):
12.8a If p1 = p2 (modulo q), then J(p1/q) = J(p2/q);
12.8b J(p1p2/q) = J(p1/q)J(p2/q);
12.8c J(p/q1q2) = J(p/q2)J(p/q2);
12.8d if p, q are odd; and
12.8e If q is a prime, then .
Proposition 12.9: If p, q are primes such that 3 = p (modulo 4) = q (modulo 4) and J(x/pq) = 1, then
Proof: Using Proposition 12.8c and the hypothesis ...