Private Equity
I am on a board of a $2 billion foundation and last year at the fall meeting the investment adviser proposed that we gradually move from a 12% allocation in private equity (PE) to a 30% position. The fund was as high as 28% in PE in 2006 with a net return of over 20%, and the adviser then strongly recommended cutting the position in half. The board agreed, and the adviser implemented by actually selling the positions in a number of the funds at a premium. Thus the board was receptive to this new allocation but a number of us wondered if 30% in an illiquid asset wasn’t too high. It was pointed out that in 2008 and 2009 endowments and pension funds with high PE allocations suffered painful liquidity crises. I offered to do some work. Here is my report.
December 2, 2011
I have talked with a number of people about private equity (PE) most of whom are friends to a greater or lesser degree and all of whom are serious, professional investors responsible for other people’s money. I told them I was trying to refine my view of PE as an asset class for the next 5 to 10 years in the context of the appropriate asset allocations for a $2 billion fund that was an active, multi-asset investor with a long horizon, real return, growth objective. I did tell them that the fund had an annual payout requirement. I was not more specific than that.
What did they think, I asked, of PE in ...
Get Diary of a Hedgehog: Biggs' Final Words on the Markets now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.