July 2013
Intermediate to advanced
170 pages
4h 7m
English
Content preview from Enterprise Data Workflows with CascadingBecome an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
O’Reilly covers everything we've got, with content to help us build a world-class technology community, upgrade the capabilities and competencies of our teams, and improve overall team performance as well as their engagement.I wanted to learn C and C++, but it didn't click for me until I picked up an O'Reilly book. When I went on the O’Reilly platform, I was astonished to find all the books there, plus live events and sandboxes so you could play around with the technology.I’ve been on the O’Reilly platform for more than eight years. I use a couple of learning platforms, but I'm on O'Reilly more than anybody else. When you're there, you start learning. I'm never disappointed.I'm always learning. So when I got on to O'Reilly, I was like a kid in a candy store. There are playlists. There are answers. There's on-demand training. It's worth its weight in gold, in terms of what it allows me to do.
Chapter 5. Cascalog—A Clojure DSL for Cascading
Why Use Cascalog?
Sometimes the tools we select change the way we approach a problem. As the proverb goes, if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And sometimes our tools, over time, actually interfere with the process of solving a problem.
For most of the past three decades, SQL has been synonymous with database work. A couple of generations of programmers have grown up with relational databases as the de facto standard. Consider that while “NoSQL” has become quite a popular theme, most vendors in the Big Data space have been rushing (circa 2013Q1) to graft SQL features onto their frameworks.
Looking back four decades to the origins of the relational model—in the 1970 paper by Edgar Codd, “A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks”—the point was about relational models and not so much about databases and tables and structured queries. Codd himself detested SQL. The relational model was formally specified as a declarative “data sublanguage” (i.e., to be used within some other host language) based on first-order predicate logic. SQL is not that. In comparison, it forces programmers to focus largely on control flow issues and the structure of tables—to a much greater extent than the relational model intended. SQL’s semantics are also disjoint from the programming languages in which it gets used: Java, C++, Ruby, PHP, etc. For that matter, the term “relational” no longer even appears in the SQL-92 specifications. ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access
More than 5,000 organizations count on O’Reilly
O’Reilly covers everything we've got, with content to help us build a world-class technology community, upgrade the capabilities and competencies of our teams, and improve overall team performance as well as their engagement.Julian F.
I wanted to learn C and C++, but it didn't click for me until I picked up an O'Reilly book. When I went on the O’Reilly platform, I was astonished to find all the books there, plus live events and sandboxes so you could play around with the technology.Addison B.
I’ve been on the O’Reilly platform for more than eight years. I use a couple of learning platforms, but I'm on O'Reilly more than anybody else. When you're there, you start learning. I'm never disappointed.Amir M.
I'm always learning. So when I got on to O'Reilly, I was like a kid in a candy store. There are playlists. There are answers. There's on-demand training. It's worth its weight in gold, in terms of what it allows me to do.