This implies [4.9], since convergence in probability implies subsequence a.e. convergence (Chung, 1974, Theorem 4.2.3).
Using Lemma 4.4, we next argue that on B∩F, player 1 believes that player 2 is eventually ignoring her history while best responding to . In the following lemma, ε2 is from [4.6]. The set is the set of player 2 t-period histories such that player 2 ignores the next τ signals ...