Chapter 2What Is a Failing Enterprise System? Is It Management's Fault?
The term “failing” is not only about a sluggish performance. Nor is it only about an implementation defect that prevents a system from providing services to subscribed consumers. Simply put, a system that does not meet business or technical requirements is a failing one. From an enterprise perspective, a product that does not offer solutions to potential problems is doomed to fizzle.
There are good enough reasons for management to define a system as an ineffective or failing entity. But how should this be determined? Cutting the losses is not a bad thing to do if executives believe that a product is defective and unable to deliver services. Such a valuation, however, should not only be based upon the symptoms of failure. The assessment should encompass a number of perspectives, some of which may offer indications as to why an implementation flopped. These multiview findings would provide a strong justification for halting operations and support of a product in production.
The art of system failure analysis is indeed intricate and consuming. As discussed, a wide range of reasons may contribute to a disappointing system performance or improper functionality. A full product life cycle then would provide multiple perspectives to help understanding the contributing factors of system mishap. By correcting the faults in a product life cycle process, future system failures could be avoided.
Now, consider some life ...
Get Incremental Software Architecture now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.