263
9
Adiabatic Flow in a Duct with Friction
Introduction
In the discussion of ow through ducts given up to this point, it was assumed, in almost
all cases, that the effects of viscosity were negligible. This is often an adequate assump-
tion when dealing with ow through nozzles or short ducts. For long ducts, however, the
effects of viscosity, i.e., the effects of uid friction at the walls, can in fact be dominant.
This is illustrated in Figure 9.1, which shows typical Mach number and pressure varia-
tions in a constant area duct with and without friction. In incompressible ow through a
duct of constant cross-sectional area, the friction only affects the pressure, which drops
in the direction of ow. The velocity in such a situation remains constant along the duct.
In compressible ow, however, friction effects all of the ow variables, i.e., the changes in
pressure cause changes in density, which lead to changes in velocity.
In some cases, the effects of viscosity may be negligible over part of the ow but then be
very important in other parts of the ow. This is illustrated in Figure 9.2.
In this chapter, consideration will be given to the effects of viscosity on steady gas ows
through ducts under such conditions that compressibility effects are important. In the
analyses given in this chapter it will be assumed that the ow is adiabatic, i.e., that the duct
is well insulated (a discussion of the effects of friction in the presence of heat exchange is
given in the next chapter). Attention will, in this chapter, mainly be restricted to ow in a
constant area duct although a brief discussion of the effects of area change will be given at
the end of this chapter.
Flow in a Constant Area Duct
Attention will here be given to the effects of wall friction on adiabatic ow through a duct
whose cross-sectional area does not change. This type of ow, i.e., compressible adiabatic
ow in a constant area duct with frictional effects, is known as “Fanno” ow.
Consider the momentum balance for the small portion of the duct shown in Figure 9.3.
Since steady ow is being considered, this gives
Netpressure forceForce duetowallshear stre− sss
Mass flow rate Velocity outVelocityin=×−