Hack #52. Communicate in E-Prime
Eliminate the verb "to be" from your communication to become less dogmatic. Easy to learn, hard to master.
Although almost anyone can speak dogmatically without using the verb "to be" and also speak calmly and rationally with it, many people have found that eliminating "to be" from their speech and writing makes it easier to communicate flexibly and nondogmatically.1
Alfred Korzybski, the founder of the discipline of general semantics, thought that the verb "to be" could lead to confused thought, confused action, and even fascism. Because so much of fascism consists of vilification of the enemy, and because so much of vilification of the enemy consists of calling them subhuman, identifying them with the forces of evil, and so on, fascists might find it hard to write propaganda without "to be."
Korzybski considered the use of "to be" as an auxiliary verb ("I am going next door") fairly innocuous, as well as several other uses. He primarily objected to two uses of the verb "to be," which he called identity and predication.
An example of identity:
- Identity
"That is a spaceship!" (Implication: call out the National Guard! Get the White House on Line 1!)
- E-Prime alternative
"That certainly looks like a spaceship to me." (Implication: it merits further investigation. What does it look like to you?)
An example of predication:
- Predication
"Fred is disgusting." (Implication: ostracize him!)
- E-Prime alternative
"I don't like Fred; I find him disgusting." (Implication: ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access