31
2
The Need for Causal, Explanatory
Models in Risk Assessment
2.1 Introduction
The aim of this chapter is to show that we can address some of the core
limitations of the traditional statistical approaches exposed in Chapter 1
by introducing causal explanations into the modeling process. The causal
models are examples of Bayesian Networks (BNs).
Although we will not formally dene BNs until Chapter 5 (because
such a denition requires an understanding of Bayesian probability that
we explain in Chapter 4), our intention here is to provide a avor of their
power and exibility in handling a range of risk-assessment problems.
In Section 2.2 we use the automobile crash example from Chapter 1
to explain the need for and structure of a causal BN. In Section 2.3 we
explain why popular methods of risk assessment (such as risk registers
and heat maps) are insufcient to properly handle risk assessment. We
describe the causal approach to risk assessment in Section 2.4, showing
how it overcomes the limitations of the popular methods.
2.2 Are You More Likely to Die in an
Automobile Crash When the Weather
Is Good Compared to Bad?
We saw in Chapter 1, Section 1.4 some data on fatal automobile accidents.
The fewest fatal crashes occur when the weather is at its worst and the high-
ways are at their most dangerous. Using the data alone and applying the
standard statistical regression techniques to that data we ended up with the
simple regression model shown in Figure2.1.
But there is a grave danger of confusing prediction with risk assess-
ment. For risk assessment and management the regression model is use-
less, because it provides no explanatory power at all. In fact, from a risk
perspective this model would provide irrational, and potentially danger-
ous, information. It would suggest that if you want to minimize your
chances of dying in an automobile crash you should do your driving
when the highways are at their most dangerous, in winter.
Visit www.bayesianrisk.com for your free Bayesian network software and models in
this chapter
We discuss a simplied view of
risk assessment and do not cover
decision and utility theory except
in passing and to make the point
that such theory is not enough
without coherent models of the
problem situation. Most other
books try to present decision the-
ory and risk all at once and in a
very mathematical way; this can
be rather overwhelming.

Get Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.