Chapter 5Redundancy Resolution via QP Approach and Unification

5.1 Introduction

A redundant manipulator is defined when more degrees of freedom (DOF) are available than the minimum number of DOF required to execute a given end-effector primary task [61, 62]. Our human arm, elephant trunk, and snake are also such redundant systems [63, 64]. Compared to non-redundant manipulators, the redundant manipulator naturally has wider operational space and extra degrees to meet more functional constraints, such as the online avoidance of joint physical limits [36] and environmental obstacles [65, 66]. One of the most fundamental issues in operating the redundant manipulators is the redundancy-resolution problem. That is, given the Cartesian velocity/acceleration trajectories of the end-effector, we are required to generate the corresponding joint velocity, acceleration, and/or torque trajectories in real time [61].

Redundancy resolution for optimizing the joint torques is one most important part of redundancy-resolution problems, which is aimed at making a more effective utilization of input power from actuators by exploiting the extra DOF in redundant manipulators. Similar to the velocity-level redundancy resolution, most researchers use the pseudoinverse-type solution for the torque-minimizing redundancy resolution of manipulators. In particular, initial formulation for local torque minimization was presented in the mid 1980s by Hollerback and Suh [67]. They designed several schemes ...

Get Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.