With Safari, you learn the way you learn best. Get unlimited access to videos, live online training, learning paths, books, tutorials, and more.

No credit card required

Answers for Exercises

Chapter 4

4.1. (v). 4.2. (iii). 4.3. Data are normally distributed. 4.4. The probability plot and Shapiro–Wilk test both indicate that the data are normal. 4.5. No. The RLs are probably too low to make a difference either way.

Chapter 5

5.1. (d). 5.2. (a). 5. 3. (iii). 5.4. (A) Year 6 PCB data are normally distributed. Year 1 PCB data also are somewhat normal, but the probability plot shows deviations from a linear pattern in the upper and lower tails (i.e., the presence of large and small values); (B) The quantile–quantile plot suggests that the two data populations have roughly similar distributions, but the Year 1 PCB values are higher than the Year 6 values, while the side-by-side box plots show that the mean and median PCB for Year 1are larger than for Year 6; (C) The double quantile plot shows that the Year 1 PCBs are higher than the Year 6 values, for both the center and the tail portions of the distributions; (D) There is a downward trend in the PCB concentrations.

Chapter 6

6.1. (v). 6.2. (a). 6.3. (d). 6.4. Original data are right-skewed, with outliers, while the log-transformed data are normal (meaning the data are lognormally distributed), with no outliers. (A) Mean; (B) For the original data, the 25% trimmed mean of 16.6 is approximately equal to the median of 16; (C) The logarithms are normally distributed and the outliers “disappear.” 6.5. The normal distribution fits the data better than the lognormal, but the reported value of 3.37 for ...

With Safari, you learn the way you learn best. Get unlimited access to videos, live online training, learning paths, books, interactive tutorials, and more.

No credit card required