Chapter 4An Obsession with Process over Outcomes
The operation was a complete success. Unfortunately, the patient died …
In a previous life, I was consulting to a financial services firm in the UK and one of the first tasks I was asked to do was to assess the efficacy of the Programme Management Office (PMO). The Head of the PMO duly sent me a ream of documentation covering a range of projects and so, with a cold towel applied to my forehead and a bottomless cup of coffee, I began to plough through them.
Much to my surprise, the documentation was brilliant. The Project Summary documents were clear and concise. Just scanning them, I knew precisely what each project was setting out to achieve, why, the forecast costs, the expected benefits, the project success measures, who was accountable for what, the key implementation risks … each one was perfect. The Project Initiation Documents (PIDs) took it to another level of detail with Gantt charts, critical path analysis, stakeholder analysis, governance framework, project dependencies, a detailed timeline outlining every meeting and milestone and a sound communications plan. Why on earth did the executive team want me to look into this? It was all flawless.
I then met with the PMO Head, expecting this to be the shortest engagement in the history of consulting. She was a formidable lady; the sort of highly competent, take-no-prisoners deliverer that companies need to throw at seemingly intractable problem areas. A lesser person ...
Get The Change Catalyst now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.