Chapter 10Validating That Threats Are Addressed

You've been hard at work to address your threats, first by simply fixing them, and then by assessing risks around them. But are your efforts working? It is important that you test the fixes, and have confidence that anything previously identified has been addressed.

Good testers have a lot in common with good threat modelers: Both focus on how stuff is going to break, and work on preventing it. Working closely with your testers can have surprisingly positive payoff for threat modeling proponents, a synergy explored in more detail in Chapter 17, “Bringing Threat Modeling to Your Organization.”

A brief note on terminology: In this chapter, the term testing is used to refer to a key functional task that “quality assurance” performs: the creation and management of tests. This chapter focuses only on the subset of testing that intersects with threat modeling. As shown in Figure 10.1, threat-model-driven testing can overlap heavily with security testing, but the degree of overlap will vary across organizations. Some organizations have reliability testing specialists. They need to understand the issues you find when looking for denial-of-service threats. Others might manage repudiation as part of customer readiness. Your security testers might also use fuzzing, look for SQL injection, or create and manage tests that are not driven by threat modeling.

Figure 10.1 Different types of testing

This chapter will teach you about testing ...

Get Threat Modeling: Designing for Security now with O’Reilly online learning.

O’Reilly members experience live online training, plus books, videos, and digital content from 200+ publishers.