Data Deconvolutions 493
to material parameters such as occupation numbers, carrier density, and molecular
orientation. In this chapter we discuss a selection of fs experimental techniques,
many of them originally developed for ps and ns spectroscopy.
The obvious temporal limitation of the pump–probe technique is the duration
of the pump and probe. The medium preparation should be completed before
the material can be probed. If the physics of the interaction is well understood,
a theoretical modeling (deconvolution) can provide some interpretation of data
corresponding to partial temporal overlap of pump and probe.
A compromise often must be sought between spectral and temporal resolution.
Either the probe or the pump pulse has to select a specific spectral feature. To
excite the desired transition, rather than an adjacent one, the excitation spectrum
(i.e., the pulse spectral width ω
p
, augmented by the Rabi frequency κE or
power broadening of the transition, if needed) should not exceed the separation
between lines . The spectral resolution imposes therefore a limit to the temporal
resolution, because the pulse duration should not be less than τ
p
≈ 1/( + κE).
10.2. DATA DECONVOLUTIONS
In most fs time-resolved experiments, a signal S(τ
d
) is measured as a function
of position or delay τ
d
of a reference probe pulse of intensity I
ref
(t). We will
consider the large class of measurements where the measured quantity is propor-
tional to the product of a gating function I
g
times the physical quantity f (t)to
be analyzed. The gate I
g
(t) is a direct function of the reference intensity I
ref
(t).
Because—as pointed out in the previous chapter—the detection electronics has
no fs resolution, the measured signal will be the time integral:
S(τ
d
) =
∞
−∞
I
g
(t − τ
d
)f (t)dt. (10.1)
Deconvolution procedures should thus be applied to retrieve the physical quan-
tity f (t) from the measurement S(τ
d
). A typical example is a measurement of
time resolved fluorescence by upconversion. As detailed in Section 10.7, the
detected upconversion radiation results from mixing the signal (fluorescence)
and the reference pulse in a nonlinear crystal. Therefore, in that particular case,
the gate function is the reference pulse itself I
g
(t) = I
ref
(t). It is often assumed
that the gating function in the correlation product [Eq. (10.1)] is much shorter
than the fastest transient of the signal and thus can be approximated by a δ func-
tion. With that simplifying assumption, the signal is directly proportional to the
physical parameter to be measured: S(τ
d
) ∝ f (τ
d
). There are, however, fast
events—such as the rise of fluorescence—for which this simplifying assumption
is not valid. The exact temporal dependence f (τ
d
) can be extracted from the data
Get Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena, 2nd Edition now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.