Write Database-Agnostic Code

In developing ADO.NET, Microsoft set out to create a new data access architecture that would be more flexible, better performing, and more easily extensible than its previous COM-based OLE DB and ADO architectures. They did this by creating a model where every data source must supply its own data provider: a set of managed classes that allow you to connect to a particular data source (e.g., SQL Server, Oracle), execute commands, and retrieve data. In order to ensure that these providers are consistent, each implements a standard set of interfaces. However, this approach creates major challenges for developers who want to write provider-agnostic code—for example, a basic database routine that can be used equally well with the SQL Server provider or the Oracle provider. Usually, you use provider-agnostic code because you aren't sure what type of database the final version of an application will use, or because you anticipate the need to migrate to a different database in the future.

Note

Want a way to write database code that isn't bound to a specific data source? This challenge becomes a whole lot easier in . NET 2.0.

.NET 2.0 takes major steps to facilitate generic database coding by introducing a new factory model. (A factory model is a pattern where one class has the exclusive responsibility for creating instances of other classes.) In this model, you can use a database provider factory to build the ADO.NET connections, commands, and many other types ...

Get Visual Basic 2005: A Developer's Notebook now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.