LIVESTOCK AGROTERRORISM AND THE POTENTIAL PUBLIC HEALTH RISK
WILLIAM D. HUESTON
Center for Animal Health and Food Safety and National Center for Food Protection and Defense, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
STEPHAN SINGLETON
Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
1 INTRODUCTION
“Agroterrorism” evokes images of sick and dying animals, forlorn farmers, and burning cow carcasses. The public health risks associated with agroterrorism are typically described as the spillover human illness associated with agroterrorism agents that are zoonoses (diseases shared by domestic animals or wildlife and humans), such as anthrax or cattle brucellosis, the human form of which is undulant fever. However, public health is more than simply the illness and death directly caused by infectious diseases. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as “a state of complete physical, mental, and social well being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” [1]. The potential public health risks of livestock agroterrorism must be evaluated in this broader context.
Agroterrorism is the intentional use of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosive weapon or device against the nation's agricultural industries with the goal of generating fear, causing economic losses, and/or undermining social stability [2]. Livestock agriculture presents a comparatively easy target for intentional disease introduction. The widespread ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access