BIOSURVEILLANCE TRADECRAFT
JAMES M. WILSON AND CRAIG KIEBLER
Georgetown University Medical Center, Argus Research Operations Center, Imaging Science and Information Systems Center, Washington, D.C.
RONALD A. WALTERS
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, D.C.
JOHN DAVIES-COLE
Center for Policy, Planning and Epidemiology, DC Department of Health, Washington, D.C.
1 INTRODUCTION
The term “biosurveillance” is not currently associated with a universally accepted definition [1]. For the purposes of this article, we consider the definition of biosurveillance to be the detection and tracking of biological events that represent a deviation of what is considered normal endemic baseline. A “biological event” refers to disease events affecting humans, animals, and/or plants; here we focus primarily on biological events affecting humans or animals. The prospect of rapid detection of socially disruptive biological events that are triggered through natural, accidental, or intentional mechanisms is of interest not only to the public health community but to the agricultural, law enforcement, intelligence, and homeland security communities as well.
From a public health perspective, biosurveillance must embrace grounded public health surveillance methodology as well as near-real-time situational awareness (i.e. event detection). The public health community has traditionally focused on health-related information such as patient care, disease reporting, and diagnostic information. ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access