Chapter 7. Creating Complex Datatypes
We have seen how to create simple datatypes that can be applied to attributes or simple type elements. It’s now time to learn how complex types can be created.
Simple Versus Complex Types
Before we start diving into complex types, I would like to reiterate the fundamental difference between simple and complex types. The simple datatypes that we saw in the previous chapters describe the content of a text node or an attribute value. They are completely independent of the other nodes and, therefore, independent of the markup. The same datatype system can be used to describe the content of any format, even if it is not XML but an RDBMS (Relational DataBase Management System), CSV (Comma Separated Values), or a fixed-sized text format.
The complex types discussed in this chapter (and, more specifically,
the complex content models) are, on the contrary, a description of
the markup structure. They use simple datatypes to describe their
leaf element nodes and attribute values, but have no other links with
simple datatypes. Keep this in mind, especially when we study the
derivation methods for complex datatypes. Even though the names (and
elements) are sometimes the same as those we’ve seen
for simple datatypes, their meaning, usage, and content models are
different. When we discuss the xs:restriction
element, for instance, you will see that this element has a different meaning and content model for simple types than it does for complex types. (In fact, ...
Get XML Schema now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.