Frequently, crashes are followed with a message like “ID 02.” “ID” is an abbreviation for idiosyncrasy and the number that follows indicates how many more months of testing the product should have had.
Many XSLT scripts you write will be so-called one-offs that transform well-defined input. Here testing does little more than execute the transformation against the input and inspect the output. However, even in this simple case, how do you best deal with a stylesheet that does not do what you expect? Usually, simple inspection of the code reveals the offending lines. However, debugging by code inspection is often not effective for developers new to XSLT—including those who are seasoned in manipulating XML in more procedural languages. This chapter demonstrates basic debugging techniques that offer quicker solutions to common coding mistakes and enhance your understanding of XSLT.
Many examples in this book emphasize the creation of reusable XSLT. Authors of reusable code must subject that code to more rigorous testing. By definition, reusable code is often deployed in contexts of which the author cannot have full knowledge. You should ensure that the code performs as advertised for typical inputs and boundary conditions. Reusable code should also behave predictably in the face of illegal inputs.
Developers are more likely to test when it is easy. Interpreted languages such as XSLT are typically easier to test because there is no compile ...