VMware Cookbook

Errata for VMware Cookbook

Submit your own errata for this product.


The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".

The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.

Color Key: Serious Technical Mistake Minor Technical Mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update



Version Location Description Submitted By Date Submitted Date Corrected
Printed
Page 37
1st Paragraph

1st line on page 37 says : "Our first volume's datastore HBA has a device ID of 33." Should this not be device ID of 38? As Figure 2-1 on page 36 and last sentence on page 36 show vmhba38:C0:T0:L0.

Note from the Author or Editor:
Please change the first sentence on Page 37 From: Our first volume’s datastore HBA has a device ID of 33 To: Our first volume’s datastore HBA has a device ID of 38

Ike Nwosa  Aug 08, 2012  Dec 14, 2012
Other Digital Version
87
Figure

The Figure 2-11 and 2-12 are not the right one. The are Windows one, not the vCenter one.

Note from the Author or Editor:
New images for Figures 2-11, 2-12 and 2-13 have been sent to Adam Zaremba.

Eric Felder  Aug 16, 2012  Dec 14, 2012
PDF, ePub
Page 123
Figures from page 123 to 127.

From Figure 4-5 to 4-11, those figures do not refer to the correct information from the text content. Figure 4-5 and 4-6 are the same, and Figure 4-7 to 4.-11 are the same.

Note from the Author or Editor:
New figures for 4-5, 4-7, 4-8, 4-9 and 4-10 have been sent to Adam Zaremba for updating.

Anonymous  Sep 01, 2012  Dec 14, 2012
Printed
Page 165
Paragraph 2

Paragraph 2 page 165 - Managing Virtual Switches. "Again using the -l option to verify the changes, you will notice..." this goes onto say "...network portgroup has been added under vSwitch5." There is no vSwitch5 on the page. The page only refers to a vSwitch1. Therefore should the Paragraph not refer to vSwitch1 and not vSwitch5. This is rather confusing. Please clarify. Thanks.

Note from the Author or Editor:
On page 165 please change the following paragraph: FROM: "Again using the -l option to verify the changes, you will notice that the backup network portgroup has been added under vSwitch5 but that it has not yet been assigned to an uplink:" TO: Again using the -l option to verify the changes, you will notice that the backup network portgroup has been added under vSwitch1 but that it has not yet been assigned to an uplink:

Ike Nwosa  Aug 30, 2012  Dec 14, 2012