1Non-centralized Architecture
The blockchain and the distributed registry technology allow us to solve the problem of certification of the transaction chain, without using a centralized system, to a trusted third party.
The term “decentralized”, frequently used to refer to the blockchain or its applications, does not seem entirely appropriate to refer to the blockchain architecture. Indeed, decentralization is a movement from the center to subentities. In political science, for example, decentralization is a process by which entities, generally local, are given their own powers previously held by a central power, unlike deconcentration, a process by which the central power delegates powers at the local level to its representatives.
The blockchain architecture is not decentralized; it is part ab initio of parallel centralized or partially decentralized models, so the terms “distributed” or “non-centralized” seem more appropriate. The term “non-centralized” was preferred for this book because it explicitly marks an alternative to a centralized model and avoids a debate that has no place in this book between decentralized and distributed systems.
This typology, which is very frequently used not only on blogs [EAG 17] but also in books on the blockchain [RAV 16], is generally associated with a diagram that presents the difference between centralization, decentralization, and distribution, based on a book by Paul Baran on distributed systems [BAR 62].
Figure 1.1. Paul Baran’s distributed ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access