
Chapter 3
Using Systematic Reviews in
Software Engineering
3.1 Systematic reviews . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . .. 32
3.2 Mapping studies . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . 34
3.3 Meta-analysis . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . ... 37
We conduct secondary studies in order to answer a variety of research ques-
tions, so it is not surprising that we need to adapt the way that such a study
is organised according to the question being addressed. Some reviews seek to
answer questions about software