May 2007
Intermediate to advanced
232 pages
5h 4m
English
Once you’ve determined your side and the other’s tactical orientation, you can assess the tactics that they are likely to use (see Table 12.8). Consider the history with the other party, or even the experience of initiating this negotiation. Are they easy or difficult to deal with on issues such as scheduling and sharing information? If they are likely to use adversarial zone tactics, determine what win-win zone tactics you might use. Consult Chapters 8 and 9 for additional guidance.
| Stage | Win-Win Zone Tactics | Adversarial Zone Tactics |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | ||
| Set the climate and agenda | Agenda | Missing man maneuver |
| Common interests | Deadline pressure | |
| Establish the process | Disclosure | Personal attacks |
| State and respond to opening positions | Authority limits | Rules |
| Team seating | Good guy/Bad guy | |
| Columbo | Red herring | |
| Objective criteria | Poor mouthing | |
| Saying no | Crunch time | |
| Walk-Away | Nonnegotiable demands | |
| Exploring | ||
| Distinguish between wants and needs | Create empathy | Bluffing/Lying |
| Expand the pie | Cherry-picking | |
| Identify alternative currencies/options | Scaling | Divide and conquer |
| Testing questions | End run | |
| Match currencies to needs | Brainstorming | Funny money |
| Bundling | Split the difference | |
| What if . . .? | Surprises | |
| Balancing the scales | Take it or leave it | |
| Concessions | Threats | |
| Patience/Persistence | ||
| Soak time | ||
| Warn, don’t threaten | ||
| Zeroing in | ||
| Closing | ||
| Summarize the agreement and contract | Caucus | Authority escalation |
| Change of pace | Deadlock | |
| Communicate and implement | Closing the deal | Fait accompli |
| Mark up ... |
Read now
Unlock full access