CHAPTER 3Performance Comparisons to Other Asset Classes
Little has changed with respect to basic asset‐allocation theory over the past 50 years, since Harry Markovitz introduced portfolio optimization based upon asset return, risk, and correlation. In practice, however, there are many more asset class choices available to investors today, and new asset classes like direct lending are only successful to the extent that they have differentiating investment features compared to other asset classes. A high current yield is the most obvious differentiating feature, but for institutional investors this is not enough to warrant consideration. Direct loans must also demonstrate attractive return and risk characteristics that justify their inclusion into a diversified portfolio of assets. This chapter provides a comparative analysis of return and risk across the major asset classes that direct loans would compete with for inclusion into a diversified portfolio.
Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 compare direct lending performance, measured by the Cliffwater Direct Lending Index (CDLI), with other private and publicly traded asset classes.
EXHIBIT 3.1 Asset class return and risk, September 2004 to December 2017.
| Return | Risk | Return/Risk Ratio | Max Draw Down | Correlations | |||||||||||||
| Russell 3000 | ML T‐bills | Bloom Barc 3–5 yr Tsy | Bloom Barc Aggr | S&P/LSTA | Bloom Barc HY | NCREIF NPI | CDLI | CA US Private Equity | |||||||||
| Russell 3000 | 9.3% | 15.1% | 0.61 | −46% | 1.00 | −0.10 | −0.54 | −0.26 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.24 | 0.68 | 0.76 | ||||
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access