June 2019
Intermediate to advanced
384 pages
11h 27m
English
| Figure 1.1 | Core prognostic frameworks in a PHM system. Source: based on IEEE (2017). |
| Figure 1.2 | Framework diagram for a PHM system. Source: based on CAVE3 (2015). |
| Figure 1.3 | Graph of the exponential CDF with λ = 3. |
| Figure 1.4 | Graph of the Weibull CDF with β = 1.2 and η = 5. |
| Figure 1.5 | Graph of the exponential PDF with λ = 3. |
| Figure 1.6 | Graphs of gamma PDFs. |
| Figure 1.7 | Graphs of Weibull PDFs. |
| Figure 1.8 | Failure rates of Weibull variables. |
| Figure 1.9 | Failure rates of gamma variables. |
| Figure 1.10 | Failure rate of the standard normal variable. |
| Figure 1.11 | Failure rate of the lognormal variable with μ = 0 and σ = 1. |
| Figure 1.12 | Logistic failure rate with μ = 0 and σ = 1. |
| Figure 1.13 | Gumbel failure rate. |
| Figure 1.14 | Log‐logistic failure rate with μ = 0. |
| Figure 1.15 | Integration domain. |
| Figure 1.16 | High‐level block diagram of a PHM system. |
| Figure 1.17 | A framework for CBM for PHM. Source: after CAVE3 (2015). |
| Figure 1.18 | Taxonomy of prognostic approaches. |
| Figure 1.19 | Example of an FFP signature – a curvilinear (convex), noisy characteristic curve. |
| Figure 1.20 | Ideal DPS transfer curve superimposed on an FFP signature. |
| Figure 1.21 | Ideal DPS, degradation threshold, and functional failure. |
| Figure 1.22 | Normalized and transformed FFP and DPS transformed into FFS. |
| Figure 1.23 | Ideal FFS – transfer curve for CBD. |
| Figure 1.24 | Variability in DPS transfer curves. |
| Figure 1.25 | FFS transforms of the DPS plots shown in Figure 1.23. |
| Figure 1.26 | FFS and prognostic ... |