Sybase Adaptive Server SQL Statements
As we saw in the previous section, there is significant overlap in the type support offered by Sybase and SQL Server. This section compares the SQL dialects of Sybase to SQL Server. In most cases, the SQL Server statements described in Chapter 3 apply to Sybase as well. This section outlines those statements that are different between the two platforms.
In Table A-2, the SQL commands are listed along with notes containing the differences between SQL Server and Sybase. While most of the statements have identical syntax and meaning, for those statements that contain large differences, the syntax for Sybase is listed with notes on how the statements differ.
|
Command |
Notes |
|
ALTER PROCEDURE |
Sybase does not support the ENCRYPTION keyword or replication through the FOR REPLICATION keywords. |
|
ALTER TABLE |
Sybase does not support the ROWGUIDCOL keyword or the CHECK and NOCHECK keywords for enabling constraints. ALTER TABLE |
|
ALTER TRIGGER |
Sybase has no equivalent to the ALTER TRIGGER statement in SQL Server. For equivalent functionality, drop the existing trigger with a DROP TRIGGER statement and recreate it with the CREATE |
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access